| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | — | 8 | 345 | 178 | 193.8 | 43.1 | 33 | 21 | 67.6 Scout Score 67.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production84.840% Impact5027% Versatility69.415% Shot quality456% Trajectory59.112% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.96×[7, 62, 26] | 84.8 Production 84.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.24× parp77.335% True Avg2.13× parp86.430% Balls / boundary3.03p95.517.5% Balls / dismissal30.33p86.417.5% | 45 Shot Quality 45 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.8% Control · Build63.4% Phase-weighted control79.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 69.4 Versatility 69.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp68.226.7% vs Spin SRp77.326.7% Accel into Consp68.220% Pressure entryp63.626.7% | |
| 2 | RHB | 24 | 7 | 265 | 124 | 213.7 | 37.9 | 14 | 23 | 64.6 Scout Score 64.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production78.940% Impact5027% Versatility77.915% Shot quality856% Trajectory22.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.91×[20, 0, 50] | 78.9 Production 78.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.35× parp86.435% True Avg2.05× parp77.330% Balls / boundary3.33p68.217.5% Balls / dismissal26.67p77.317.5% | 85 Shot Quality 85 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation92.1% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control90.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 77.9 Versatility 77.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp77.326.7% vs Spin SRp86.426.7% Accel into Consp86.420% Pressure entryp63.626.7% | |
| 3 | RHB | 28 | 4 | 77 | 31 | 248.4 | 19.2 | 6 | 7 | 59.1 Scout Score 59.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production63.240% Impact5027% Versatility64.515% Shot quality56% Trajectory86.412% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.15×[45, 1, 11] | 63.2 Production 63.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.69× parp95.535% True Avg0.89× parp40.930% Balls / boundary2.15p77.317.5% Balls / dismissal9.33p22.717.5% | 5 Shot Quality 5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation33.3% Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted control33.3% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 64.5 Versatility 64.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp86.426.7% vs Spin SRp68.226.7% Accel into Consp31.820% Pressure entryp63.626.7% | |
| 4 | RHB | 33 | 10 | 459 | 270 | 170 | 76.5 | 50 | 18 | 58.4 Scout Score 58.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production81.140% Impact5027% Versatility28.215% Shot quality556% Trajectory40.912% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[5, 60, 90] | 81.1 Production 81.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.19× parp59.135% True Avg2.73× parp95.530% Balls / boundary3p86.417.5% Balls / dismissal40.5p95.517.5% | 55 Shot Quality 55 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation85.3% Control · Build80.2% Phase-weighted control83.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 28.2 Versatility 28.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5026.7% vs Spin SRp31.826.7% Accel into Consp13.620% Pressure entryp13.626.7% | |
| 5 | RHB | 22 | 9 | 330 | 174 | 189.7 | 41.2 | 23 | 26 | 58 Scout Score 58 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production54.340% Impact5027% Versatility45.815% Shot quality756% Trajectory95.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.45×[64, 46, 19] | 54.3 Production 54.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.08× parp5035% True Avg1.25× parp59.130% Balls / boundary3.64p5017.5% Balls / dismissal20.4p59.117.5% | 75 Shot Quality 75 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation89.5% Control · Build87.5% Phase-weighted control89% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 45.8 Versatility 45.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp59.126.7% vs Spin SRp5026.7% Accel into Consp77.320% Pressure entryp4.526.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | 20 | 4 | 70 | 32 | 218.8 | 17.5 | 6 | 6 | 50.8 Scout Score 50.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production40.740% Impact5027% Versatility58.515% Shot quality506% Trajectory77.312% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[14, 10, 19] | 40.7 Production 40.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.36× parp68.235% True Avg0.62× parp13.630% Balls / boundary2.67p59.117.5% Balls / dismissal8p13.617.5% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted controln/a | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 58.5 Versatility 58.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp95.526.7% vs Spin SRp22.726.7% Accel into Consp5020% Pressure entryp63.626.7% | |
| 7 | RHB | 19 | 7 | 223 | 117 | 190.6 | 31.9 | 17 | 18 | 47.5 Scout Score 47.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production53.940% Impact5027% Versatility73.615% Shot quality156% Trajectory4.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.83×[28, 5, 21] | 53.9 Production 53.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.04× parp40.935% True Avg1.28× parp68.230% Balls / boundary3.42p40.917.5% Balls / dismissal21.67p68.217.5% | 15 Shot Quality 15 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75.6% Control · Build63.6% Phase-weighted control74.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 73.6 Versatility 73.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp13.626.7% vs Spin SRp95.526.7% Accel into Consp95.520% Pressure entryp95.526.7% | |
| 8 | RHB | — | 2 | 67 | 47 | 142.6 | 33.5 | 5 | 4 | 38.8 Scout Score 38.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production30.940% Impact5027% Versatility21.515% Shot quality256% Trajectory68.212% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[57, 10] | 30.9 Production 30.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.66× parp13.635% True Avgn/ap5030% Balls / boundary7.5p13.617.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap5017.5% | 25 Shot Quality 25 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Build83.3% Phase-weighted control76.1% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 21.5 Versatility 21.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp40.926.7% vs Spin SRp13.626.7% Accel into Consp4.520% Pressure entryp22.726.7% | |
| 9 | RHB | 22 | 9 | 236 | 149 | 158.4 | 33.7 | 23 | 13 | 38.4 Scout Score 38.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production25.940% Impact5027% Versatility33.615% Shot quality956% Trajectory31.812% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.93×[10, 44, 9] | 25.9 Production 25.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.94× parp22.735% True Avg0.76× parp22.730% Balls / boundary3.74p31.817.5% Balls / dismissal14.2p31.817.5% | 95 Shot Quality 95 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation92.9% Control · Build91.2% Phase-weighted control92.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 33.6 Versatility 33.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp4.526.7% vs Spin SRp59.126.7% Accel into Consp40.920% Pressure entryp31.826.7% | |
| 10 | RHB | 19 | 4 | 53 | 49 | 108.2 | 17.7 | 4 | 2 | 35 Scout Score 35 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production19.140% Impact5027% Versatility38.515% Shot quality356% Trajectory5012% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.95×[7, 0, 38] | 19.1 Production 19.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.31× parp4.535% True Avg0.25× parp31.830% Balls / boundary14p4.517.5% Balls / dismissal14p40.917.5% | 35 Shot Quality 35 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.5% Control · Build68.2% Phase-weighted control76.3% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp31.826.7% vs Spin SRp4.526.7% Accel into Consp59.120% Pressure entryp63.626.7% | |
| 11 | LHB | 26 | 7 | 117 | 75 | 156 | 16.7 | 8 | 9 | 31.7 Scout Score 31.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production17.340% Impact5027% Versatility38.515% Shot quality656% Trajectory13.612% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.86×[11, 6, 14] | 17.3 Production 17.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp31.835% True Avg0.49× parp4.530% Balls / boundary3.71p22.717.5% Balls / dismissal8.67p4.517.5% | 65 Shot Quality 65 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.8% Control · Build91.7% Phase-weighted control85.3% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp22.726.7% vs Spin SRp40.926.7% Accel into Consp22.720% Pressure entryp63.626.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 21 | 10 | 314 | 193 | 162.7 | 39.2 | 28 | 19 | 76 Scout Score 76 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production95.728% Impact5027% Versatility86.527% Shot quality65.88% Trajectory71.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[109, 17, 1] | 95.7 Production 95.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.27× parp97.442.9% True Avg2.03× parp92.132.1% Balls / boundary3.88p97.425% | 65.8 Shot Quality 65.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.1% Control · Build80.4% Phase-weighted control83.9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 86.5 Versatility 86.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep82.644.4% vs LA-orthodox37bp85 vs Leg-spin5b5b <min vs Short ball12bp75 Spin hittingp97.229.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox43bp97.2 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p92.114.8% Reach deathp65.811.1% | |
| 2 | LHB | 26 | 8 | 276 | 153 | 180.4 | 46 | 16 | 22 | 65.4 Scout Score 65.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production59.828% Impact5027% Versatility79.527% Shot quality508% Trajectory97.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.28×[16, 8, 73] | 59.8 Production 59.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.97× parp60.542.9% True Avg1.04× parp5032.1% Balls / boundary6.5p71.125% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.4% Control · Build77.4% Phase-weighted control79.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 79.5 Versatility 79.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7544.4% vs Off-spin25bp75 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball6b6b <min Spin hittingp75.929.6% Off-spin29bp77.3 LA-orthodox44bp75 Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p86.814.8% Reach deathp97.411.1% | |
| 3 | RHB | 22 | 8 | 236 | 151 | 156.3 | 47.2 | 15 | 14 | 63.4 Scout Score 63.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production65.228% Impact5027% Versatility56.327% Shot quality97.48% Trajectory86.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.13×[62, 28, 37] | 65.2 Production 65.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.93× parp5042.9% True Avg5.09× parp97.432.1% Balls / boundary7.57p5025% | 97.4 Shot Quality 97.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation93.3% Control · Build88.2% Phase-weighted control89.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 56.3 Versatility 56.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep56.444.4% vs LA-orthodox27bp25 vs Leg-spin24bp91.7 vs Short ball7b7b <min Spin hittingp39.829.6% Off-spin14bp86.4 LA-orthodox31bp8.3 Leg-spin32bp50 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p65.814.8% Reach deathp86.811.1% | |
| 4 | RHB | 23 | 6 | 203 | 146 | 139 | 40.6 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 Scout Score 58.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production84.228% Impact5027% Versatility46.127% Shot quality60.58% Trajectory39.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.95×[7, 3, 67] | 84.2 Production 84.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.05× parp81.642.9% True Avg1.46× parp81.632.1% Balls / boundary5.4p92.125% | 60.5 Shot Quality 60.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.5% Control · Build76.9% Phase-weighted control82.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 46.1 Versatility 46.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep41.144.4% vs LA-orthodox40bp55 vs Leg-spin10bp8.3 vs Short ball14bp25 Spin hittingp40.229.6% Off-spin11bp50 LA-orthodox47bp25 Leg-spin19bp72.2 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p97.414.8% Reach deathp13.211.1% | |
| 5 | RHB | 29 | 7 | 150 | 98 | 153.1 | 21.4 | 14 | 7 | 58.1 Scout Score 58.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production73.928% Impact5027% Versatility76.927% Shot quality28.98% Trajectory7.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.7×[12, 17, 0] | 73.9 Production 73.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.16× parp92.142.9% True Avg1× parp39.532.1% Balls / boundary4.47p86.825% | 28.9 Shot Quality 28.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build71.9% Phase-weighted control76.1% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 76.9 Versatility 76.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep87.944.4% vs LA-orthodox29bp95 vs Leg-spin16bp75 vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp80.629.6% Off-spin7b7b <min LA-orthodox30bp91.7 Leg-spin17bp61.1 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p60.514.8% Reach deathp44.711.1% | |
| 6 | RHB | 27 | 5 | 137 | 78 | 175.6 | 27.4 | 3 | 14 | 54.7 Scout Score 54.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production78.828% Impact5027% Versatility41.727% Shot quality81.68% Trajectory13.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.78×[15, 28, 19] | 78.8 Production 78.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.17× parp86.842.9% True Avg1.11× parp65.832.1% Balls / boundary5p81.625% | 81.6 Shot Quality 81.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.8% Control · Build88.5% Phase-weighted control85.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 41.7 Versatility 41.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep544.4% vs LA-orthodox23bp5 vs Leg-spin8b8b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp63.929.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox32bp63.9 Leg-spin8b8b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p81.614.8% Reach deathp76.311.1% | |
| 7 | RHB | 20 | 7 | 119 | 88 | 135.2 | 17 | 6 | 9 | 52.4 Scout Score 52.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production38.328% Impact5027% Versatility6127% Shot quality71.18% Trajectory60.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[9, 45, 10] | 38.3 Production 38.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.8× parp34.242.9% True Avg0.93× parp55.332.1% Balls / boundary11.25p23.725% | 71.1 Shot Quality 71.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Build90.3% Phase-weighted control84.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 61 Versatility 61 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7544.4% vs LA-orthodox23bp75 vs Leg-spin6b6b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp69.429.6% Off-spin9b9b <min LA-orthodox23bp69.4 Leg-spin6b6b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2.614.8% Reach deathp60.511.1% | |
| 8 | RHB | 32 | 6 | 154 | 63 | 244.4 | 30.8 | 13 | 14 | 52.3 Scout Score 52.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production47.628% Impact5027% Versatility69.327% Shot quality2.68% Trajectory65.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.06×[11, 56, 37] | 47.6 Production 47.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.12× parp71.142.9% True Avg0.35× parp18.432.1% Balls / boundary4.5p44.725% | 2.6 Shot Quality 2.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72.7% Control · Build57.1% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 69.3 Versatility 69.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox7b7b <min vs Leg-spin2b2b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp86.129.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox19bp86.1 Leg-spin2b2b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p76.314.8% Reach deathp92.111.1% | |
| 9 | LHB | 22 | 5 | 53 | 46 | 115.2 | 10.6 | 4 | 2 | 50.9 Scout Score 50.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production56.428% Impact5027% Versatility49.527% Shot quality7.98% Trajectory76.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[23, 29, 0] | 56.4 Production 56.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.02× parp65.842.9% True Avg0.9× parp44.732.1% Balls / boundary5.67p55.325% | 7.9 Shot Quality 7.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72% Control · Build55.6% Phase-weighted control67.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 49.5 Versatility 49.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin2b2b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp58.329.6% Off-spin2b2b <min LA-orthodox11bp58.3 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p5014.8% Reach deathp23.711.1% | |
| 10 | RHB | 28 | 9 | 163 | 108 | 150.9 | 27.2 | 15 | 7 | 50.6 Scout Score 50.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production66.228% Impact5027% Versatility40.527% Shot quality92.18% Trajectory2.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.7×[8, 4, 25] | 66.2 Production 66.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.92× parp44.742.9% True Avg1.79× parp86.832.1% Balls / boundary5.77p76.325% | 92.1 Shot Quality 92.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation77.3% Control · Build92.5% Phase-weighted control88% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 40.5 Versatility 40.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep1544.4% vs LA-orthodox19bp15 vs Leg-spin4b4b <min vs Short ball8b8b <min Spin hittingp48.129.6% Off-spin27bp59.1 LA-orthodox19bp2.8 Leg-spin16bp83.3 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p71.114.8% Reach deathp81.611.1% | |
| 11 | RHB | — | 4 | 70 | 49 | 142.9 | 35 | 1 | 6 | 50.6 Scout Score 50.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production70.728% Impact5027% Versatility37.627% Shot quality23.78% Trajectory52.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[57, 4, 9] | 70.7 Production 70.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.05× parp76.342.9% True Avg1.11× parp71.132.1% Balls / boundary5.86p60.525% | 23.7 Shot Quality 23.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation69.2% Control · Build78.6% Phase-weighted control75.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 37.6 Versatility 37.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep34.144.4% vs LA-orthodox10bp35 vs Leg-spin12bp33.3 vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp52.529.6% Off-spin19bp95.5 LA-orthodox10bp13.9 Leg-spin12bp16.7 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p13.214.8% Reach deathp44.711.1% | |
| 12 | LHB | 24 | 6 | 133 | 125 | 106.4 | 22.2 | 11 | 4 | 46 Scout Score 46 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production40.428% Impact5027% Versatility18.727% Shot quality86.88% Trajectory92.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.16×[59, 8, 1] | 40.4 Production 40.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.82× parp28.942.9% True Avg1.05× parp60.532.1% Balls / boundary8.22p34.225% | 86.8 Shot Quality 86.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86.2% Control · Build86.7% Phase-weighted control86.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 18.7 Versatility 18.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep8.344.4% vs Off-spin22bp8.3 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp37.729.6% Off-spin29bp4.5 LA-orthodox22bp80.6 Leg-spin17bp38.9 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p23.714.8% Reach deathp2.611.1% | |
| 13 | RHB | 32 | 5 | 116 | 93 | 124.7 | 29 | 9 | 4 | 45.8 Scout Score 45.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production44.528% Impact5027% Versatility5127% Shot quality39.58% Trajectory28.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.87×[11, 18, 23] | 44.5 Production 44.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.94× parp55.342.9% True Avg0.76× parp34.232.1% Balls / boundary7.83p39.525% | 39.5 Shot Quality 39.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.8% Control · Build72% Phase-weighted control76.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 51 Versatility 51 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep58.344.4% vs LA-orthodox9b9b <min vs Leg-spin13bp58.3 vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp40.329.6% Off-spin11bp68.2 LA-orthodox35bp36.1 Leg-spin13bp27.8 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p55.314.8% Reach deathp44.711.1% | |
| 14 | RHB | 26 | 6 | 99 | 78 | 126.9 | 16.5 | 4 | 8 | 44 Scout Score 44 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production35.928% Impact5027% Versatility41.727% Shot quality13.28% Trajectory81.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.13×[16, 25, 32] | 35.9 Production 35.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.88× parp39.542.9% True Avg0.59× parp7.932.1% Balls / boundary6.5p65.825% | 13.2 Shot Quality 13.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.6% Control · Build70.3% Phase-weighted control71.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 41.7 Versatility 41.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep53.844.4% vs LA-orthodox22bp65 vs Leg-spin12bp33.3 vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp20.829.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox22bp30.6 Leg-spin14bp5.6 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p44.714.8% Reach deathp44.711.1% | |
| 15 | LHB | — | 7 | 158 | 115 | 137.4 | 22.6 | 7 | 12 | 42.1 Scout Score 42.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production2528% Impact5027% Versatility54.127% Shot quality44.78% Trajectory34.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.87×[8, 14, 14] | 25 Production 25 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.82× parp23.742.9% True Avg0.72× parp23.732.1% Balls / boundary8.5p28.925% | 44.7 Shot Quality 44.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.3% Control · Build78.7% Phase-weighted control77.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 54.1 Versatility 54.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep58.344.4% vs Off-spin30bp58.3 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp48.629.6% Off-spin33bp31.8 LA-orthodox33bp41.7 Leg-spin17bp94.4 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p39.514.8% Reach deathp71.111.1% | |
| 16 | LHB | 19 | 2 | 36 | 44 | 81.8 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 40.9 Scout Score 40.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production32.328% Impact5027% Versatility32.127% Shot quality55.38% Trajectory52.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[11, 25] | 32.3 Production 32.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.63× parp10.542.9% True Avg1.11× parp76.332.1% Balls / boundary17p13.225% | 55.3 Shot Quality 55.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation90.9% Control · Build78.3% Phase-weighted control82.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 32.1 Versatility 32.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep41.744.4% vs Off-spin17bp41.7 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp33.829.6% Off-spin17bp22.7 LA-orthodox14bp47.2 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p18.414.8% Reach deathp7.911.1% | |
| 17 | LHB | 26 | 9 | 92 | 78 | 117.9 | 10.2 | 9 | 1 | 40.5 Scout Score 40.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production14.128% Impact5027% Versatility53.927% Shot quality76.38% Trajectory23.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.85×[5, 1, 5] | 14.1 Production 14.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.72× parp18.442.9% True Avg0.45× parp13.232.1% Balls / boundary16p7.925% | 76.3 Shot Quality 76.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84% Control · Build87% Phase-weighted control85.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 53.9 Versatility 53.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep91.744.4% vs Off-spin13bp91.7 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp29.729.6% Off-spin21bp40.9 LA-orthodox23bp19.4 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p7.914.8% Reach deathp28.911.1% | |
| 18 | RHB | 34 | 7 | 56 | 68 | 82.4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 31.9 Scout Score 31.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production628% Impact5027% Versatility44.927% Shot quality34.28% Trajectory18.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.8×[8, 4, 9] | 6 Production 6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.63× parp10.542.9% True Avg0.28× parp2.632.1% Balls / boundary34p2.625% | 34.2 Shot Quality 34.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.1% Control · Build87.5% Phase-weighted control76.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 44.9 Versatility 44.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep4544.4% vs LA-orthodox19bp45 vs Leg-spin5b5b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp52.829.6% Off-spin5b5b <min LA-orthodox26bp52.8 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p28.914.8% Reach deathp44.711.1% | |
| 19 | LHB | 19 | 4 | 45 | 48 | 93.8 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 29.7 Scout Score 29.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production1528% Impact5027% Versatility22.327% Shot quality18.48% Trajectory44.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[7, 16, 3] | 15 Production 15 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.57× parp2.642.9% True Avg0.57× parp28.932.1% Balls / boundary13p18.425% | 18.4 Shot Quality 18.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86.7% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control74.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 22.3 Versatility 22.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep2544.4% vs Off-spin21bp25 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp13.629.6% Off-spin21bp13.6 LA-orthodox5b5b <min Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p34.214.8% Reach deathp18.411.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 22 | 7 | 258 | 107 | 241.1 | 86 | 11 | 29 | 67.6 Scout Score 67.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production90.440% Impact5025% Versatility64.918% Shot quality76.34% Trajectory32.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.95×[48, 35, 56] | 90.4 Production 90.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.46× parp97.532.5% Balls / boundary2.11p97.520% Balls / six3.35p97.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 76.3 Shot Quality 76.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build82.2% Phase-weighted control84% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 64.9 Versatility 64.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker6b6b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p82.516.7% Reach buildp92.522.2% | |
| 2 | RHB | 34 | 7 | 167 | 83 | 201.2 | 41.8 | 5 | 17 | 66.5 Scout Score 66.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production83.540% Impact5025% Versatility46.918% Shot quality18.44% Trajectory87.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.07×[19, 24, 24] | 83.5 Production 83.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.39× parp87.532.5% Balls / boundary2.5p87.520% Balls / six3.18p92.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 18.4 Shot Quality 18.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation55.6% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control64.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 46.9 Versatility 46.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p1516.7% Reach buildp62.522.2% | |
| 3 | RHB | 31 | 6 | 87 | 51 | 170.6 | 14.5 | 5 | 7 | 62.9 Scout Score 62.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production68.540% Impact5025% Versatility51.418% Shot quality92.14% Trajectory77.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[7, 37, 16] | 68.5 Production 68.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.41× parp72.532.5% Balls / boundary2.2p77.520% Balls / six3.67p67.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 92.1 Shot Quality 92.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build88.9% Phase-weighted control88.9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 51.4 Versatility 51.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp52.522.2% | |
| 4 | RHB | 31 | 7 | 218 | 121 | 180.2 | 43.6 | 13 | 17 | 61.2 Scout Score 61.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production7640% Impact5025% Versatility63.518% Shot quality97.44% Trajectory22.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.85×[8, 35, 3] | 76 Production 76 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.23× parp82.532.5% Balls / boundary2.46p82.520% Balls / six5.33p77.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 97.4 Shot Quality 97.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build90.7% Phase-weighted control91% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 63.5 Versatility 63.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker5b5b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p87.516.7% Reach buildp82.522.2% | |
| 5 | RHB | 23 | 7 | 152 | 80 | 190 | 30.4 | 11 | 10 | 60 Scout Score 60 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production84.540% Impact5025% Versatility47.518% Shot quality71.14% Trajectory17.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.84×[6, 8, 21] | 84.5 Production 84.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.6× parp92.532.5% Balls / boundary1.93p92.520% Balls / six3.62p87.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 71.1 Shot Quality 71.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control80.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 47.5 Versatility 47.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p2516.7% Reach buildp57.522.2% | |
| 6 | RHB | 30 | 3 | 43 | 21 | 204.8 | 21.5 | 2 | 5 | 58.7 Scout Score 58.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.540% Impact5025% Versatility50.318% Shot quality504% Trajectory62.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[19, 6, 18] | 67.5 Production 67.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.06× parp57.532.5% Balls / boundary3p72.520% Balls / six4.2p82.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted controln/a | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 50.3 Versatility 50.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp47.522.2% | |
| 7 | LHB | 30 | 4 | 26 | 21 | 123.8 | 8.7 | 1 | 2 | 57.7 Scout Score 57.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production57.440% Impact5025% Versatility51.818% Shot quality5.34% Trajectory97.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.11×[7, 2, 17] | 57.4 Production 57.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.76× parp67.532.5% Balls / boundary1.67p62.520% Balls / six2.5p47.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 5.3 Shot Quality 5.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build60% Phase-weighted control62.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 51.8 Versatility 51.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p97.516.7% Reach buildp22.522.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | 23 | 6 | 86 | 55 | 156.4 | 17.2 | 1 | 8 | 53.2 Scout Score 53.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.240% Impact5025% Versatility52.918% Shot quality86.84% Trajectory92.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.08×[10, 32, 7] | 39.2 Production 39.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.89× parp17.532.5% Balls / boundary5p12.520% Balls / six6p72.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 86.8 Shot Quality 86.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build87% Phase-weighted control88% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 52.9 Versatility 52.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p77.516.7% Reach buildp42.522.2% | |
| 9 | RHB | 20 | 6 | 98 | 42 | 233.3 | 24.5 | 3 | 11 | 52.3 Scout Score 52.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production64.540% Impact5025% Versatility61.418% Shot quality65.84% Trajectory2.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.43×[7, 5, 2] | 64.5 Production 64.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.55× parp77.532.5% Balls / boundary2.67p57.520% Balls / six2.67p62.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 65.8 Shot Quality 65.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build78.3% Phase-weighted control78.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 61.4 Versatility 61.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp97.522.2% | |
| 10 | LHB | 29 | 4 | 34 | 26 | 130.8 | 11.3 | 2 | 2 | 49.7 Scout Score 49.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production38.440% Impact5025% Versatility48.118% Shot quality60.54% Trajectory82.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.04×[9, 12, 9] | 38.4 Production 38.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.82× parp32.532.5% Balls / boundary4p32.520% Balls / six6p42.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 60.5 Shot Quality 60.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build78.6% Phase-weighted control78.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 48.1 Versatility 48.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp37.522.2% | |
| 11 | RHB | 36 | 3 | 40 | 34 | 117.6 | 40 | 4 | 1 | 49.4 Scout Score 49.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production47.240% Impact5025% Versatility42.518% Shot quality55.34% Trajectory62.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[12, 27, 1] | 47.2 Production 47.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.09× parp62.532.5% Balls / boundary3p52.520% Balls / six9p27.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 55.3 Shot Quality 55.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build76% Phase-weighted control76% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp12.522.2% | |
| 12 | RHB | — | 3 | 33 | 32 | 103.1 | 16.5 | 3 | 2 | 46.6 Scout Score 46.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4240% Impact5025% Versatility43.618% Shot quality34.24% Trajectory62.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[0, 30, 3] | 42 Production 42 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0× parp47.532.5% Balls / boundary2p42.520% Balls / six2p32.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 34.2 Shot Quality 34.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 43.6 Versatility 43.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp17.522.2% | |
| 13 | RHB | 27 | 3 | 76 | 49 | 155.1 | 25.3 | 8 | 2 | 45.9 Scout Score 45.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production35.340% Impact5025% Versatility5118% Shot quality504% Trajectory62.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[37, 36, 3] | 35.3 Production 35.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1× parp52.532.5% Balls / boundary4p37.520% Balls / six16p1032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build76% Phase-weighted control75.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 51 Versatility 51 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p32.516.7% Reach buildp67.522.2% | |
| 14 | LHB | 33 | 7 | 125 | 70 | 178.6 | 25 | 8 | 11 | 44.7 Scout Score 44.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4740% Impact5025% Versatility56.918% Shot quality39.54% Trajectory12.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.77×[11, 1, 14] | 47 Production 47 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.96× parp42.532.5% Balls / boundary3.33p67.520% Balls / six7.5p37.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 39.5 Shot Quality 39.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.8% Control · Build65.5% Phase-weighted control70% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 56.9 Versatility 56.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp77.522.2% | |
| 15 | RHB | 31 | 7 | 107 | 96 | 111.5 | 17.8 | 6 | 6 | 43.5 Scout Score 43.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4340% Impact5025% Versatility32.418% Shot quality44.74% Trajectory47.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[21, 1, 8] | 43 Production 43 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp27.532.5% Balls / boundary3.71p47.520% Balls / six6.5p52.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 44.7 Shot Quality 44.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.2% Control · Build72.7% Phase-weighted control73.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 32.4 Versatility 32.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p7.516.7% Reach buildp2.522.2% | |
| 16 | LHB | 24 | 7 | 114 | 56 | 203.6 | 28.5 | 6 | 11 | 39.4 Scout Score 39.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production27.640% Impact5025% Versatility65.418% Shot quality13.24% Trajectory27.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[12, 0, 9] | 27.6 Production 27.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp22.532.5% Balls / boundary4.5p27.520% Balls / six9p22.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 13.2 Shot Quality 13.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build62.2% Phase-weighted control63.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 65.4 Versatility 65.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p92.516.7% Reach buildp87.522.2% | |
| 17 | RHB | 27 | 4 | 52 | 39 | 133.3 | 26 | 2 | 5 | 38.2 Scout Score 38.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production34.840% Impact5025% Versatility37.118% Shot quality5.34% Trajectory37.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.96×[11, 26, 8] | 34.8 Production 34.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.78× parp12.532.5% Balls / boundary4.43p22.520% Balls / six6.2p57.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 5.3 Shot Quality 5.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build62.5% Phase-weighted control62.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 37.1 Versatility 37.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p2.516.7% Reach buildp27.522.2% | |
| 18 | RHB | 30 | 5 | 27 | 30 | 90 | 6.8 | 1 | 2 | 37 Scout Score 37 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production28.940% Impact5025% Versatility34.718% Shot quality28.94% Trajectory42.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[0, 16, 1] | 28.9 Production 28.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp37.532.5% Balls / boundary5p17.520% Balls / six10p17.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 28.9 Shot Quality 28.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation63.6% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control65% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 34.7 Versatility 34.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p1516.7% Reach buildp7.522.2% | |
| 19 | RHB | — | 4 | 32 | 44 | 72.7 | 10.7 | 3 | 0 | 34 Scout Score 34 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production12.240% Impact5025% Versatility41.918% Shot quality23.74% Trajectory62.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[11, 4, 9] | 12.2 Production 12.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.6× parp7.532.5% Balls / boundary9p7.520% Balls / six36p2.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 23.7 Shot Quality 23.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build60% Phase-weighted control64.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 41.9 Versatility 41.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p2516.7% Reach buildp32.522.2% | |
| 20 | RHB | 20 | 5 | 53 | 40 | 132.5 | 17.7 | 2 | 3 | 31.6 Scout Score 31.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production12.140% Impact5025% Versatility55.818% Shot quality81.64% Trajectory7.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.73×[22, 3, 3] | 12.1 Production 12.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.52× parp2.532.5% Balls / boundary16p2.520% Balls / six16p1032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 81.6 Shot Quality 81.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build87.5% Phase-weighted control87.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp72.522.2% |
Aditya Ahuja
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 21
76
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 314 · Balls 193 · SR 162.7 · Avg 39.2 · 4s 28 · 6s 19
76OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production95.728%26.8
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility86.527%23.4
Shot quality65.88%5.3
Trajectory71.110%7.1
Scout Score76
95.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR182.81.27×93bp97.442.9%
True Avg56.72.03×3wp92.132.1%
Balls / boundary3.9—93bp97.425%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
86.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p82.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox186 SR37bp85
vs Leg-spin20 SR5b5b <min
vs Short ball333 SR12bp75
Spin hitting———p97.229.6%
Off-spin100 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox198 SR43bp97.2
Leg-spin20 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)200 SR1.25×39bp92.114.8%
Reach death194.4 SR1×18bp65.811.1%
65.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.1%
Control · Build80.4%
Phase-weighted control83.9% → p65.8
71.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[109, 17, 1]
Innings10
Vedants Jajoo
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
67.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 345 · Balls 178 · SR 193.8 · Avg 43.1 · 4s 33 · 6s 21
67.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production84.840%33.9
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility69.415%10.4
Shot quality456%2.7
Trajectory59.112%7.1
Scout Score67.6
84.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR198.91.24×91bp77.335%
True Avg60.32.13×3wp86.430%
Balls / boundary3—91bp95.517.5%
Balls / dismissal30.3—3wp86.417.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
69.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR195.6 SR1.15×91bp68.226.7%
vs Spin SR192 SR1.36×87bp77.326.7%
Accel into Cons212.2 SR—41bp68.220%
Pressure entry——0bp63.626.7%
45Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.8%
Control · Build63.4%
Phase-weighted control79.7% → p45
59.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.96×
Recent scores[7, 62, 26]
Innings8
Varun Bisht
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 22
67.6
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 258 · Balls 107 · SR 241.1 · Avg 86 · 4s 11 · 6s 29
67.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production90.440%36.2
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility64.918%11.7
Shot quality76.34%3.1
Trajectory32.513%4.2
Scout Score67.6
90.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR282.51.46×57bp97.532.5%
Balls / boundary2.1—57bp97.520%
Balls / six3.4—57bp97.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
64.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR6b6b <min
vs Slower ball600 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)170 SR1.01×10bp82.516.7%
Reach build213.3 SR1.45×45bp92.522.2%
76.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build82.2%
Phase-weighted control84% → p76.3
32.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.95×
Recent scores[48, 35, 56]
Innings7
Apoorv Wankhade
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 34
66.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 167 · Balls 83 · SR 201.2 · Avg 41.8 · 4s 5 · 6s 17
66.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production83.540%33.4
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility46.918%8.4
Shot quality18.44%0.7
Trajectory87.513%11.4
Scout Score66.5
83.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR268.61.39×35bp87.532.5%
Balls / boundary2.5—35bp87.520%
Balls / six3.2—35bp92.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
46.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)66.7 SR0.4×3bp1516.7%
Reach build138.5 SR0.94×39bp62.522.2%
18.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation55.6%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control64.6% → p18.4
87.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.07×
Recent scores[19, 24, 24]
Innings7
Yash Kadam
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 26
65.4
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 276 · Balls 153 · SR 180.4 · Avg 46 · 4s 16 · 6s 22
65.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production59.828%16.7
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility79.527%21.5
Shot quality508%4.0
Trajectory97.410%9.7
Scout Score65.4
59.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR139.40.97×104bp60.542.9%
True Avg291.04×5wp5032.1%
Balls / boundary6.5—104bp71.125%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
79.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7544.4%
vs Off-spin96 SR25bp75
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball133 SR6b6b <min
Spin hitting———p75.929.6%
Off-spin159 SR29bp77.3
LA-orthodox143 SR44bp75
Leg-spin67 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)175 SR1.09×40bp86.814.8%
Reach death341.7 SR1.76×24bp97.411.1%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.4%
Control · Build77.4%
Phase-weighted control79.8% → p50
97.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.28×
Recent scores[16, 8, 73]
Innings8
Satyam Bhoyar
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 24
64.6
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 265 · Balls 124 · SR 213.7 · Avg 37.9 · 4s 14 · 6s 23
64.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production78.940%31.6
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility77.915%11.7
Shot quality856%5.1
Trajectory22.712%2.7
Scout Score64.6
78.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR217.51.35×80bp86.435%
True Avg582.05×3wp77.330%
Balls / boundary3.3—80bp68.217.5%
Balls / dismissal26.7—3wp77.317.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
77.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR203.8 SR1.2×78bp77.326.7%
vs Spin SR230.4 SR1.64×46bp86.426.7%
Accel into Cons234.2 SR—38bp86.420%
Pressure entry——0bp63.626.7%
85Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation92.1%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control90.2% → p85
22.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.91×
Recent scores[20, 0, 50]
Innings7
Jagjot Sasan
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 22
63.4
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 236 · Balls 151 · SR 156.3 · Avg 47.2 · 4s 15 · 6s 14
63.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production65.228%18.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility56.327%15.2
Shot quality97.48%7.8
Trajectory86.810%8.7
Scout Score63.4
65.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1340.93×106bp5042.9%
True Avg1425.09×1wp97.432.1%
Balls / boundary7.6—106bp5025%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
56.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p56.444.4%
vs LA-orthodox81 SR27bp25
vs Leg-spin150 SR24bp91.7
vs Short ball214 SR7b7b <min
Spin hitting———p39.829.6%
Off-spin171 SR14bp86.4
LA-orthodox87 SR31bp8.3
Leg-spin128 SR32bp50
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)154.1 SR0.96×37bp65.814.8%
Reach death221.4 SR1.14×42bp86.811.1%
97.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation93.3%
Control · Build88.2%
Phase-weighted control89.6% → p97.4
86.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.13×
Recent scores[62, 28, 37]
Innings8
Raghunath Ramaswamy Sanjay
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 31
62.9
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 87 · Balls 51 · SR 170.6 · Avg 14.5 · 4s 5 · 6s 7
62.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production68.540%27.4
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility51.418%9.3
Shot quality92.14%3.7
Trajectory77.513%10.1
Scout Score62.9
68.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR272.71.41×11bp72.532.5%
Balls / boundary2.2—11bp77.520%
Balls / six3.7—11bp67.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
51.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build127.8 SR0.87×18bp52.522.2%
92.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build88.9%
Phase-weighted control88.9% → p92.1
77.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[7, 37, 16]
Innings6
Shubham Dubey
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 31
61.2
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 218 · Balls 121 · SR 180.2 · Avg 43.6 · 4s 13 · 6s 17
61.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production7640%30.4
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility63.518%11.4
Shot quality97.44%3.9
Trajectory22.513%2.9
Scout Score61.2
76ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR237.51.23×32bp82.532.5%
Balls / boundary2.5—32bp82.520%
Balls / six5.3—32bp77.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
63.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker180 SR5b5b <min
vs Slower ball350 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)266.7 SR1.59×3bp87.516.7%
Reach build164 SR1.12×86bp82.522.2%
97.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build90.7%
Phase-weighted control91% → p97.4
22.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.85×
Recent scores[8, 35, 3]
Innings7
Abhishek Agrawal
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 23
60
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 152 · Balls 80 · SR 190 · Avg 30.4 · 4s 11 · 6s 10
60OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production84.540%33.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility47.518%8.6
Shot quality71.14%2.8
Trajectory17.513%2.3
Scout Score60
84.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR310.31.6×29bp92.532.5%
Balls / boundary1.9—29bp92.520%
Balls / six3.6—29bp87.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
47.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.59×3bp2516.7%
Reach build139.3 SR0.95×28bp57.522.2%
71.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control80.4% → p71.1
17.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.84×
Recent scores[6, 8, 21]
Innings7
Updesh Rajput
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 28
59.1
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 77 · Balls 31 · SR 248.4 · Avg 19.2 · 4s 6 · 6s 7
59.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production63.240%25.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility64.515%9.7
Shot quality56%0.3
Trajectory86.412%10.4
Scout Score59.1
63.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR271.41.69×28bp95.535%
True Avg25.30.89×3wp40.930%
Balls / boundary2.2—28bp77.317.5%
Balls / dismissal9.3—3wp22.717.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
64.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR250 SR1.47×18bp86.426.7%
vs Spin SR246.2 SR1.75×13bp68.226.7%
Accel into Cons33.3 SR—3bp31.820%
Pressure entry——0bp63.626.7%
5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation33.3%
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted control33.3% → p5
86.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.15×
Recent scores[45, 1, 11]
Innings4
Lalit Yadav
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 30
58.7
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 43 · Balls 21 · SR 204.8 · Avg 21.5 · 4s 2 · 6s 5
58.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.540%27.0
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility50.318%9.1
Shot quality504%2.0
Trajectory62.513%8.1
Scout Score58.7
67.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR204.81.06×21bp57.532.5%
Balls / boundary3—21bp72.520%
Balls / six4.2—21bp82.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
50.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build——0bp47.522.2%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted controln/a → p50
62.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[19, 6, 18]
Innings3
Ravikumar Samarth
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 33
58.4
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 459 · Balls 270 · SR 170 · Avg 76.5 · 4s 50 · 6s 18
58.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production81.140%32.4
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility28.215%4.2
Shot quality556%3.3
Trajectory40.912%4.9
Scout Score58.4
81.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR191.41.19×81bp59.135%
True Avg77.52.73×2wp95.530%
Balls / boundary3—81bp86.417.5%
Balls / dismissal40.5—2wp95.517.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
28.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR184.7 SR1.08×137bp5026.7%
vs Spin SR154.9 SR1.1×133bp31.826.7%
Accel into Cons150.7 SR—75bp13.620%
Pressure entry159.8 SR0.99×97bp13.626.7%
55Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation85.3%
Control · Build80.2%
Phase-weighted control83.5% → p55
40.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[5, 60, 90]
Innings10
Manan Agrawal
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 23
58.3
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 203 · Balls 146 · SR 139 · Avg 40.6 · 4s 14 · 6s 10
58.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production84.228%23.6
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility46.127%12.4
Shot quality60.58%4.8
Trajectory39.510%4.0
Scout Score58.3
84.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR150.91.05×108bp81.642.9%
True Avg40.81.46×4wp81.632.1%
Balls / boundary5.4—108bp92.125%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
46.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p41.144.4%
vs LA-orthodox95 SR40bp55
vs Leg-spin100 SR10bp8.3
vs Short ball193 SR14bp25
Spin hitting———p40.229.6%
Off-spin136 SR11bp50
LA-orthodox94 SR47bp25
Leg-spin142 SR19bp72.2
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)210.9 SR1.32×46bp97.414.8%
Reach death141.7 SR0.73×12bp13.211.1%
60.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.5%
Control · Build76.9%
Phase-weighted control82.4% → p60.5
39.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.95×
Recent scores[7, 3, 67]
Innings6
Siddhesh Wath
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 29
58.1
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 150 · Balls 98 · SR 153.1 · Avg 21.4 · 4s 14 · 6s 7
58.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production73.928%20.7
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility76.927%20.8
Shot quality28.98%2.3
Trajectory7.910%0.8
Scout Score58.1
73.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR167.21.16×67bp92.142.9%
True Avg281×4wp39.532.1%
Balls / boundary4.5—67bp86.825%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
76.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p87.944.4%
vs LA-orthodox193 SR29bp95
vs Leg-spin144 SR16bp75
vs Short ball260 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p80.629.6%
Off-spin143 SR7b7b <min
LA-orthodox187 SR30bp91.7
Leg-spin135 SR17bp61.1
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)164.3 SR1.02×14bp60.514.8%
Reach death——0bp44.711.1%
28.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build71.9%
Phase-weighted control76.1% → p28.9
7.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.7×
Recent scores[12, 17, 0]
Innings7
Rohit Binkar
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 22
58
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 330 · Balls 174 · SR 189.7 · Avg 41.2 · 4s 23 · 6s 26
58OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production54.340%21.7
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility45.815%6.9
Shot quality756%4.5
Trajectory95.512%11.5
Scout Score58
54.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR173.51.08×102bp5035%
True Avg35.41.25×5wp59.130%
Balls / boundary3.6—102bp5017.5%
Balls / dismissal20.4—5wp59.117.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
45.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR189.3 SR1.11×122bp59.126.7%
vs Spin SR190.4 SR1.35×52bp5026.7%
Accel into Cons223.7 SR—38bp77.320%
Pressure entry147.2 SR0.91×36bp4.526.7%
75Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation89.5%
Control · Build87.5%
Phase-weighted control89% → p75
95.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.45×
Recent scores[64, 46, 19]
Innings9
Hrushikesh Pawar
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 30
57.7
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 26 · Balls 21 · SR 123.8 · Avg 8.7 · 4s 1 · 6s 2
57.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production57.440%23.0
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility51.818%9.3
Shot quality5.34%0.2
Trajectory97.513%12.7
Scout Score57.7
57.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR3401.76×5bp67.532.5%
Balls / boundary1.7—5bp62.520%
Balls / six2.5—5bp47.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
51.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)425 SR2.53×4bp97.516.7%
Reach build70 SR0.48×10bp22.522.2%
5.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build60%
Phase-weighted control62.5% → p5.3
97.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.11×
Recent scores[7, 2, 17]
Innings4
Darshan Nalkande
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 27
54.7
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 137 · Balls 78 · SR 175.6 · Avg 27.4 · 4s 3 · 6s 14
54.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production78.828%22.1
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility41.727%11.3
Shot quality81.68%6.5
Trajectory13.210%1.3
Scout Score54.7
78.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR169.11.17×55bp86.842.9%
True Avg311.11×3wp65.832.1%
Balls / boundary5—55bp81.625%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
41.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p544.4%
vs LA-orthodox65 SR23bp5
vs Leg-spin350 SR8b8b <min
vs Short ball200 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p63.929.6%
Off-spin250 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox109 SR32bp63.9
Leg-spin350 SR8b8b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)194.4 SR1.21×18bp81.614.8%
Reach death280 SR1.45×5bp76.311.1%
81.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.8%
Control · Build88.5%
Phase-weighted control85.5% → p81.6
13.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.78×
Recent scores[15, 28, 19]
Innings5
Tejas Soni
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 23
53.2
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 86 · Balls 55 · SR 156.4 · Avg 17.2 · 4s 1 · 6s 8
53.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.240%15.7
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility52.918%9.5
Shot quality86.84%3.5
Trajectory92.513%12.0
Scout Score53.2
39.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR173.30.89×30bp17.532.5%
Balls / boundary5—30bp12.520%
Balls / six6—30bp72.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
52.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball67 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)166.7 SR0.99×6bp77.516.7%
Reach build121.7 SR0.83×23bp42.522.2%
86.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build87%
Phase-weighted control88% → p86.8
92.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.08×
Recent scores[10, 32, 7]
Innings6
Vedant Dighade
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 20
52.4
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 119 · Balls 88 · SR 135.2 · Avg 17 · 4s 6 · 6s 9
52.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production38.328%10.7
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility6127%16.5
Shot quality71.18%5.7
Trajectory60.510%6.0
Scout Score52.4
38.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR115.60.8×45bp34.242.9%
True Avg260.93×2wp55.332.1%
Balls / boundary11.2—45bp23.725%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
61VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7544.4%
vs LA-orthodox113 SR23bp75
vs Leg-spin83 SR6b6b <min
vs Short ball100 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p69.429.6%
Off-spin211 SR9b9b <min
LA-orthodox113 SR23bp69.4
Leg-spin83 SR6b6b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)100 SR0.62×14bp2.614.8%
Reach death200 SR1.03×10bp60.511.1%
71.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Build90.3%
Phase-weighted control84.4% → p71.1
60.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[9, 45, 10]
Innings7
Jitesh Sharma
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 32
52.3
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 154 · Balls 63 · SR 244.4 · Avg 30.8 · 4s 13 · 6s 14
52.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production47.628%13.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility69.327%18.7
Shot quality2.68%0.2
Trajectory65.810%6.6
Scout Score52.3
47.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR161.11.12×18bp71.142.9%
True Avg9.70.35×3wp18.432.1%
Balls / boundary4.5—18bp44.725%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
69.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox57 SR7b7b <min
vs Leg-spin300 SR2b2b <min
vs Short ball50 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p86.129.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox184 SR19bp86.1
Leg-spin300 SR2b2b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)211.1 SR1.32×9bp76.314.8%
Reach death360 SR1.86×10bp92.111.1%
2.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72.7%
Control · Build57.1%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p2.6
65.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.06×
Recent scores[11, 56, 37]
Innings6
Shreyash Padole
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 20
52.3
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 98 · Balls 42 · SR 233.3 · Avg 24.5 · 4s 3 · 6s 11
52.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production64.540%25.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility61.418%11.1
Shot quality65.84%2.6
Trajectory2.513%0.3
Scout Score52.3
64.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR3001.55×8bp77.532.5%
Balls / boundary2.7—8bp57.520%
Balls / six2.7—8bp62.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
61.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball600 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build269.6 SR1.84×23bp97.522.2%
65.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build78.3%
Phase-weighted control78.8% → p65.8
2.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.43×
Recent scores[7, 5, 2]
Innings6
Ashit Singh
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 22
50.9
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 53 · Balls 46 · SR 115.2 · Avg 10.6 · 4s 4 · 6s 2
50.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production56.428%15.8
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility49.527%13.4
Shot quality7.98%0.6
Trajectory76.310%7.6
Scout Score50.9
56.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR147.11.02×34bp65.842.9%
True Avg250.9×2wp44.732.1%
Balls / boundary5.7—34bp55.325%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
49.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin100 SR2b2b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball140 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p58.329.6%
Off-spin100 SR2b2b <min
LA-orthodox109 SR11bp58.3
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)150 SR0.94×24bp5014.8%
Reach death50 SR0.26×2bp23.711.1%
7.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72%
Control · Build55.6%
Phase-weighted control67.6% → p7.9
76.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[23, 29, 0]
Innings5
Tushar Suryavanshi
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 20
50.8
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 70 · Balls 32 · SR 218.8 · Avg 17.5 · 4s 6 · 6s 6
50.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production40.740%16.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility58.515%8.8
Shot quality506%3.0
Trajectory77.312%9.3
Scout Score50.8
40.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR218.81.36×32bp68.235%
True Avg17.50.62×4wp13.630%
Balls / boundary2.7—32bp59.117.5%
Balls / dismissal8—4wp13.617.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
58.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR246.4 SR1.45×28bp95.526.7%
vs Spin SR25 SR0.18×4bp22.726.7%
Accel into Cons——0bp5020%
Pressure entry——0bp63.626.7%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted controln/a → p50
77.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[14, 10, 19]
Innings4
Kshitiz Dahiya
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 28
50.6
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 163 · Balls 108 · SR 150.9 · Avg 27.2 · 4s 15 · 6s 7
50.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production66.228%18.5
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility40.527%10.9
Shot quality92.18%7.4
Trajectory2.610%0.3
Scout Score50.6
66.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR133.30.92×75bp44.742.9%
True Avg501.79×2wp86.832.1%
Balls / boundary5.8—75bp76.325%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
40.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p1544.4%
vs LA-orthodox79 SR19bp15
vs Leg-spin150 SR4b4b <min
vs Short ball175 SR8b8b <min
Spin hitting———p48.129.6%
Off-spin144 SR27bp59.1
LA-orthodox79 SR19bp2.8
Leg-spin150 SR16bp83.3
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)176.2 SR1.1×21bp71.114.8%
Reach death214.8 SR1.11×27bp81.611.1%
92.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation77.3%
Control · Build92.5%
Phase-weighted control88% → p92.1
2.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.7×
Recent scores[8, 4, 25]
Innings9
Siddhant Muley
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
50.6
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 70 · Balls 49 · SR 142.9 · Avg 35 · 4s 1 · 6s 6
50.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production70.728%19.8
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility37.627%10.2
Shot quality23.78%1.9
Trajectory52.610%5.3
Scout Score50.6
70.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR151.21.05×41bp76.342.9%
True Avg311.11×2wp71.132.1%
Balls / boundary5.9—41bp60.525%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
37.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p34.144.4%
vs LA-orthodox90 SR10bp35
vs Leg-spin108 SR12bp33.3
vs Short ball100 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p52.529.6%
Off-spin226 SR19bp95.5
LA-orthodox90 SR10bp13.9
Leg-spin108 SR12bp16.7
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)33.3 SR0.21×3bp13.214.8%
Reach death——0bp44.711.1%
23.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation69.2%
Control · Build78.6%
Phase-weighted control75.6% → p23.7
52.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[57, 4, 9]
Innings3
Sooraj Rai
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 29
49.7
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 34 · Balls 26 · SR 130.8 · Avg 11.3 · 4s 2 · 6s 2
49.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production38.440%15.4
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility48.118%8.7
Shot quality60.54%2.4
Trajectory82.513%10.7
Scout Score49.7
38.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR158.30.82×12bp32.532.5%
Balls / boundary4—12bp32.520%
Balls / six6—12bp42.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
48.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build107.1 SR0.73×14bp37.522.2%
60.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build78.6%
Phase-weighted control78.6% → p60.5
82.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.04×
Recent scores[9, 12, 9]
Innings4
Aditya Sarwate
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 36
49.4
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 40 · Balls 34 · SR 117.6 · Avg 40 · 4s 4 · 6s 1
49.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production47.240%18.9
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility42.518%7.7
Shot quality55.34%2.2
Trajectory62.513%8.1
Scout Score49.4
47.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR211.11.09×9bp62.532.5%
Balls / boundary3—9bp52.520%
Balls / six9—9bp27.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
42.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball50 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build84 SR0.57×25bp12.522.2%
55.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build76%
Phase-weighted control76% → p55.3
62.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[12, 27, 1]
Innings3
Tushar Kadu
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 19
47.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 223 · Balls 117 · SR 190.6 · Avg 31.9 · 4s 17 · 6s 18
47.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production53.940%21.6
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility73.615%11.0
Shot quality156%0.9
Trajectory4.512%0.5
Scout Score47.5
53.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR167.71.04×65bp40.935%
True Avg36.31.28×3wp68.230%
Balls / boundary3.4—65bp40.917.5%
Balls / dismissal21.7—3wp68.217.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
73.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR158.1 SR0.93×74bp13.626.7%
vs Spin SR246.5 SR1.75×43bp95.526.7%
Accel into Cons239 SR—41bp95.520%
Pressure entry210 SR1.3×10bp95.526.7%
15Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75.6%
Control · Build63.6%
Phase-weighted control74.2% → p15
4.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.83×
Recent scores[28, 5, 21]
Innings7
Sabbamitta Gavai
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB
46.6
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 33 · Balls 32 · SR 103.1 · Avg 16.5 · 4s 3 · 6s 2
46.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4240%16.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility43.618%7.8
Shot quality34.24%1.4
Trajectory62.513%8.1
Scout Score46.6
42ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR00×1bp47.532.5%
Balls / boundary——1bp42.520%
Balls / six——1bp32.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
43.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build33.3 SR0.23×9bp17.522.2%
34.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p34.2
62.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[0, 30, 3]
Innings3
Aryam Meshram
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 24
46
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 133 · Balls 125 · SR 106.4 · Avg 22.2 · 4s 11 · 6s 4
46OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production40.428%11.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility18.727%5.0
Shot quality86.88%6.9
Trajectory92.110%9.2
Scout Score46
40.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR118.90.82×74bp28.942.9%
True Avg29.31.05×3wp60.532.1%
Balls / boundary8.2—74bp34.225%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
18.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p8.344.4%
vs Off-spin73 SR22bp8.3
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball300 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p37.729.6%
Off-spin72 SR29bp4.5
LA-orthodox145 SR22bp80.6
Leg-spin118 SR17bp38.9
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)133.3 SR0.83×18bp23.714.8%
Reach death113.3 SR0.59×15bp2.611.1%
86.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86.2%
Control · Build86.7%
Phase-weighted control86.5% → p86.8
92.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.16×
Recent scores[59, 8, 1]
Innings6
Pushpak Gujar
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 27
45.9
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 76 · Balls 49 · SR 155.1 · Avg 25.3 · 4s 8 · 6s 2
45.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production35.340%14.1
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility5118%9.2
Shot quality504%2.0
Trajectory62.513%8.1
Scout Score45.9
35.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR193.81×16bp52.532.5%
Balls / boundary4—16bp37.520%
Balls / six16—16bp1032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
51VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball180 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.59×1bp32.516.7%
Reach build144 SR0.98×25bp67.522.2%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build76%
Phase-weighted control75.8% → p50
62.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[37, 36, 3]
Innings3
Akshay Wadkar
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 32
45.8
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 116 · Balls 93 · SR 124.7 · Avg 29 · 4s 9 · 6s 4
45.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production44.528%12.5
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility5127%13.8
Shot quality39.58%3.2
Trajectory28.910%2.9
Scout Score45.8
44.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR136.20.94×47bp55.342.9%
True Avg21.30.76×3wp34.232.1%
Balls / boundary7.8—47bp39.525%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
51VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p58.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox89 SR9b9b <min
vs Leg-spin115 SR13bp58.3
vs Short ball175 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p40.329.6%
Off-spin155 SR11bp68.2
LA-orthodox103 SR35bp36.1
Leg-spin115 SR13bp27.8
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)157.9 SR0.98×19bp55.314.8%
Reach death——0bp44.711.1%
39.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.8%
Control · Build72%
Phase-weighted control76.6% → p39.5
28.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.87×
Recent scores[11, 18, 23]
Innings5
Akshay Karnewar
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 33
44.7
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 125 · Balls 70 · SR 178.6 · Avg 25 · 4s 8 · 6s 11
44.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4740%18.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility56.918%10.2
Shot quality39.54%1.6
Trajectory12.513%1.6
Scout Score44.7
47ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR186.70.96×30bp42.532.5%
Balls / boundary3.3—30bp67.520%
Balls / six7.5—30bp37.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
56.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball275 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build200 SR1.36×29bp77.522.2%
39.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.8%
Control · Build65.5%
Phase-weighted control70% → p39.5
12.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.77×
Recent scores[11, 1, 14]
Innings7
Shantanu Rajput
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 26
44
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 99 · Balls 78 · SR 126.9 · Avg 16.5 · 4s 4 · 6s 8
44OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production35.928%10.1
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility41.727%11.3
Shot quality13.28%1.1
Trajectory81.610%8.2
Scout Score44
35.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR126.90.88×78bp39.542.9%
True Avg16.50.59×6wp7.932.1%
Balls / boundary6.5—78bp65.825%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
41.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p53.844.4%
vs LA-orthodox100 SR22bp65
vs Leg-spin108 SR12bp33.3
vs Short ball50 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p20.829.6%
Off-spin188 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox100 SR22bp30.6
Leg-spin93 SR14bp5.6
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)144.1 SR0.9×34bp44.714.8%
Reach death——0bp44.711.1%
13.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.6%
Control · Build70.3%
Phase-weighted control71.8% → p13.2
81.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.13×
Recent scores[16, 25, 32]
Innings6
Vaibhav Chandekar
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 31
43.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 107 · Balls 96 · SR 111.5 · Avg 17.8 · 4s 6 · 6s 6
43.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4340%17.2
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility32.418%5.8
Shot quality44.74%1.8
Trajectory47.513%6.2
Scout Score43.5
43ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR176.90.91×26bp27.532.5%
Balls / boundary3.7—26bp47.520%
Balls / six6.5—26bp52.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
32.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)33.3 SR0.2×3bp7.516.7%
Reach build72.7 SR0.5×44bp2.522.2%
44.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.2%
Control · Build72.7%
Phase-weighted control73.8% → p44.7
47.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[21, 1, 8]
Innings7
Kartik Rathod
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB
42.1
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 158 · Balls 115 · SR 137.4 · Avg 22.6 · 4s 7 · 6s 12
42.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production2528%7.0
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility54.127%14.6
Shot quality44.78%3.6
Trajectory34.210%3.4
Scout Score42.1
25ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR118.80.82×85bp23.742.9%
True Avg20.20.72×5wp23.732.1%
Balls / boundary8.5—85bp28.925%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
54.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p58.344.4%
vs Off-spin90 SR30bp58.3
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p48.629.6%
Off-spin97 SR33bp31.8
LA-orthodox106 SR33bp41.7
Leg-spin153 SR17bp94.4
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)140 SR0.87×10bp39.514.8%
Reach death237.5 SR1.23×8bp71.111.1%
44.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.3%
Control · Build78.7%
Phase-weighted control77.6% → p44.7
34.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.87×
Recent scores[8, 14, 14]
Innings7
Addhyan Rauthan
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 19
40.9
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 36 · Balls 44 · SR 81.8 · Avg 18 · 4s 1 · 6s 1
40.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production32.328%9.0
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility32.127%8.7
Shot quality55.38%4.4
Trajectory52.610%5.3
Scout Score40.9
32.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR91.20.63×34bp10.542.9%
True Avg311.11×1wp76.332.1%
Balls / boundary17—34bp13.225%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
32.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p41.744.4%
vs Off-spin82 SR17bp41.7
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p33.829.6%
Off-spin82 SR17bp22.7
LA-orthodox107 SR14bp47.2
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)66.7 SR0.42×3bp18.414.8%
Reach death60 SR0.31×5bp7.911.1%
55.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation90.9%
Control · Build78.3%
Phase-weighted control82.4% → p55.3
52.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[11, 25]
Innings2
Yash Rathod
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 26
40.5
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 92 · Balls 78 · SR 117.9 · Avg 10.2 · 4s 9 · 6s 1
40.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production14.128%3.9
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility53.927%14.6
Shot quality76.38%6.1
Trajectory23.710%2.4
Scout Score40.5
14.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR104.20.72×48bp18.442.9%
True Avg12.50.45×4wp13.232.1%
Balls / boundary16—48bp7.925%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
53.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p91.744.4%
vs Off-spin138 SR13bp91.7
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball50 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p29.729.6%
Off-spin119 SR21bp40.9
LA-orthodox91 SR23bp19.4
Leg-spin100 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)85.7 SR0.53×7bp7.914.8%
Reach death00×1bp28.911.1%
76.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84%
Control · Build87%
Phase-weighted control85.4% → p76.3
23.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.85×
Recent scores[5, 1, 5]
Innings9
Shivam Deshmukh
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 24
39.4
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 114 · Balls 56 · SR 203.6 · Avg 28.5 · 4s 6 · 6s 11
39.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production27.640%11.0
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility65.418%11.8
Shot quality13.24%0.5
Trajectory27.513%3.6
Scout Score39.4
27.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR161.10.83×18bp22.532.5%
Balls / boundary4.5—18bp27.520%
Balls / six9—18bp22.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
65.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)260 SR1.55×5bp92.516.7%
Reach build213.5 SR1.45×37bp87.522.2%
13.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build62.2%
Phase-weighted control63.2% → p13.2
27.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[12, 0, 9]
Innings7
Akshay G Agarwal
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
38.8
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 67 · Balls 47 · SR 142.6 · Avg 33.5 · 4s 5 · 6s 4
38.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production30.940%12.4
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility21.515%3.2
Shot quality256%1.5
Trajectory68.212%8.2
Scout Score38.8
30.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR106.70.66×15bp13.635%
True Avg——0wp5030%
Balls / boundary7.5—15bp13.617.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp5017.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
21.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR170.6 SR1×34bp40.926.7%
vs Spin SR69.2 SR0.49×13bp13.626.7%
Accel into Cons71.4 SR—14bp4.520%
Pressure entry158.3 SR0.98×36bp22.726.7%
25Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Build83.3%
Phase-weighted control76.1% → p25
68.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[57, 10]
Innings2
Danish Malewar
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 22
38.4
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 236 · Balls 149 · SR 158.4 · Avg 33.7 · 4s 23 · 6s 13
38.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production25.940%10.4
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility33.615%5.0
Shot quality956%5.7
Trajectory31.812%3.8
Scout Score38.4
25.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR150.70.94×71bp22.735%
True Avg21.40.76×5wp22.730%
Balls / boundary3.7—71bp31.817.5%
Balls / dismissal14.2—5wp31.817.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
33.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR128.4 SR0.75×74bp4.526.7%
vs Spin SR188 SR1.34×75bp59.126.7%
Accel into Cons157.1 SR—42bp40.920%
Pressure entry150 SR0.93×6bp31.826.7%
95Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation92.9%
Control · Build91.2%
Phase-weighted control92.4% → p95
31.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.93×
Recent scores[10, 44, 9]
Innings9
Shanmesh Deshmukh
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 27
38.2
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 52 · Balls 39 · SR 133.3 · Avg 26 · 4s 2 · 6s 5
38.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production34.840%13.9
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility37.118%6.7
Shot quality5.34%0.2
Trajectory37.513%4.9
Scout Score38.2
34.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR151.60.78×31bp12.532.5%
Balls / boundary4.4—31bp22.520%
Balls / six6.2—31bp57.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
37.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)20 SR0.12×5bp2.516.7%
Reach build62.5 SR0.43×8bp27.522.2%
5.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build62.5%
Phase-weighted control62.5% → p5.3
37.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.96×
Recent scores[11, 26, 8]
Innings4
Akash Kombe
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 30
37
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 27 · Balls 30 · SR 90 · Avg 6.8 · 4s 1 · 6s 2
37OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production28.940%11.6
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility34.718%6.2
Shot quality28.94%1.2
Trajectory42.513%5.5
Scout Score37
28.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1600.83×10bp37.532.5%
Balls / boundary5—10bp17.520%
Balls / six10—10bp17.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
34.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)66.7 SR0.4×3bp1516.7%
Reach build11.1 SR0.08×9bp7.522.2%
28.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation63.6%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control65% → p28.9
42.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[0, 16, 1]
Innings5
Iknoor Singh
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 19
35
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 53 · Balls 49 · SR 108.2 · Avg 17.7 · 4s 4 · 6s 2
35OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production19.140%7.6
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility38.515%5.8
Shot quality356%2.1
Trajectory5012%6.0
Scout Score35
19.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR500.31×14bp4.535%
True Avg70.25×1wp31.830%
Balls / boundary14—14bp4.517.5%
Balls / dismissal14—1wp40.917.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
38.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR131.2 SR0.77×16bp31.826.7%
vs Spin SR97 SR0.69×33bp4.526.7%
Accel into Cons187.5 SR—8bp59.120%
Pressure entry——0bp63.626.7%
35Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.5%
Control · Build68.2%
Phase-weighted control76.3% → p35
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.95×
Recent scores[7, 0, 38]
Innings4
Gaurav Dhoble
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB
34
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 32 · Balls 44 · SR 72.7 · Avg 10.7 · 4s 3 · 6s 0
34OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production12.240%4.9
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility41.918%7.5
Shot quality23.74%0.9
Trajectory62.513%8.1
Scout Score34
12.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR116.70.6×18bp7.532.5%
Balls / boundary9—18bp7.520%
Balls / six——18bp2.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
41.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker200 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.59×3bp2516.7%
Reach build40 SR0.27×5bp32.522.2%
23.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build60%
Phase-weighted control64.7% → p23.7
62.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[11, 4, 9]
Innings4
Dhruv Shorey
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 34
31.9
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 56 · Balls 68 · SR 82.4 · Avg 8 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
31.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production628%1.7
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility44.927%12.1
Shot quality34.28%2.7
Trajectory18.410%1.8
Scout Score31.9
6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR91.20.63×34bp10.542.9%
True Avg7.80.28×4wp2.632.1%
Balls / boundary34—34bp2.625%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
44.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p4544.4%
vs LA-orthodox95 SR19bp45
vs Leg-spin60 SR5b5b <min
vs Short ball200 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p52.829.6%
Off-spin80 SR5b5b <min
LA-orthodox108 SR26bp52.8
Leg-spin60 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)116.7 SR0.73×6bp28.914.8%
Reach death——0bp44.711.1%
34.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.1%
Control · Build87.5%
Phase-weighted control76.5% → p34.2
18.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.8×
Recent scores[8, 4, 9]
Innings7
Adhyan Daga
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 26
31.7
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 117 · Balls 75 · SR 156 · Avg 16.7 · 4s 8 · 6s 9
31.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production17.340%6.9
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility38.515%5.8
Shot quality656%3.9
Trajectory13.612%1.6
Scout Score31.7
17.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR159.60.99×52bp31.835%
True Avg13.80.49×6wp4.530%
Balls / boundary3.7—52bp22.717.5%
Balls / dismissal8.7—6wp4.517.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
38.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR152.9 SR0.9×51bp22.726.7%
vs Spin SR162.5 SR1.16×24bp40.926.7%
Accel into Cons118.2 SR—11bp22.720%
Pressure entry——0bp63.626.7%
65Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.8%
Control · Build91.7%
Phase-weighted control85.3% → p65
13.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.86×
Recent scores[11, 6, 14]
Innings7
Shree Choudhary
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 20
31.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 53 · Balls 40 · SR 132.5 · Avg 17.7 · 4s 2 · 6s 3
31.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production12.140%4.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility55.818%10.0
Shot quality81.64%3.3
Trajectory7.513%1.0
Scout Score31.6
12.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.52×16bp2.532.5%
Balls / boundary16—16bp2.520%
Balls / six16—16bp1032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
55.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball33 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build154.2 SR1.05×24bp72.522.2%
81.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build87.5%
Phase-weighted control87.5% → p81.6
7.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.73×
Recent scores[22, 3, 3]
Innings5
Kunal Nagar
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 19
29.7
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 45 · Balls 48 · SR 93.8 · Avg 15 · 4s 3 · 6s 2
29.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production1528%4.2
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility22.327%6.0
Shot quality18.48%1.5
Trajectory44.710%4.5
Scout Score29.7
15ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR82.10.57×39bp2.642.9%
True Avg160.57×2wp28.932.1%
Balls / boundary13—39bp18.425%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
22.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p2544.4%
vs Off-spin76 SR21bp25
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball160 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p13.629.6%
Off-spin76 SR21bp13.6
LA-orthodox40 SR5b5b <min
Leg-spin80 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)125 SR0.78×8bp34.214.8%
Reach death144.4 SR0.75×9bp18.411.1%
18.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86.7%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control74.4% → p18.4
44.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[7, 16, 3]
Innings4
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LA pace | 28 | 31.0 | 9 | 250 | 8.06 | 70.5 Scout Score 70.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay70.854.8% Middle54.96.5% Death72.738.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p85.60.9× | 79.8 Bowling Production 79.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 8.24 econp79.454.8% Middle0w · 7.5 econp43.76.5% Death4w · 7.92 econp86.238.7% | 76.7 Quality 76.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p77 False-shot · Middle33%p74.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5054.8% MiddleWPA +0p506.5% DeathWPA +0p5038.7% | 63.6 Versatility 63.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp7054.8% Middlep50.56.5% Deathp56.738.7% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 25.5 | 10 | 183 | 7.08 | 69.4 Scout Score 69.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay60.27.7% Middle70.292.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p990.7× | 88.9 Bowling Production 88.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 6 econp73.57.7% Middle9w · 7.17 econp90.292.3% | 31.3 Quality 31.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p10.8 False-shot · Middle20%p33 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p507.7% MiddleWPA +0p5092.3% | 71.4 Versatility 71.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp72.37.7% Middlep71.392.3% | |
| 3 | Off-spin | 25 | 14.0 | 4 | 82 | 5.86 | 68.5 Scout Score 68.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle68.378.6% Death69.814.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p93.30.78× | 82.7 Bowling Production 82.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 6.73 econp83.978.6% Death0w · 1.5 econp76.514.3% | 26.6 Quality 26.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle18%p26.6 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5078.6% DeathWPA +0p5014.3% | 82.4 Versatility 82.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep88.378.6% Deathp5014.3% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 27.1 | 9 | 225 | 8.28 | 68.4 Scout Score 68.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay29.67.4% Middle71.788.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p20.21.13× | 84.4 Bowling Production 84.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 21 econp11.57.4% Middle9w · 6.88 econp90.588.3% | 74.9 Quality 74.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p41.9 False-shot · Middle25%p77.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p507.4% MiddleWPA +0p5088.3% | 88.1 Versatility 88.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp34.57.4% Middlep92.688.3% | |
| 5 | Leg-spin | — | 27.0 | 8 | 185 | 6.85 | 66.8 Scout Score 66.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle67.777.2% Death63.522.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p29.81.09× | 77.8 Bowling Production 77.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle6w · 6.43 econp78.577.2% Death2w · 8.27 econp75.322.8% | 79.8 Quality 79.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle26%p79.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5077.2% DeathWPA +0p5022.8% | 84.4 Versatility 84.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep87.277.2% Deathp7522.8% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | 26 | 27.0 | 14 | 186 | 6.89 | 65.9 Scout Score 65.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay53.129.6% Middle73.255.6% Death64.314.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p31.71.06× | 83.8 Bowling Production 83.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.88 econp58.329.6% Middle10w · 5.93 econp98.455.6% Death2w · 6.5 econp8014.8% | 57.4 Quality 57.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p55.4 False-shot · Middle22%p58.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5029.6% MiddleWPA +0p5055.6% DeathWPA +0p5014.8% | 77.9 Versatility 77.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp60.329.6% Middlep94.755.6% Deathp5014.8% | |
| 7 | Off-spin | — | 4.0 | 2 | 22 | 5.5 | 65.6 Scout Score 65.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle65.6100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50n/a | 82.5 Bowling Production 82.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 5.5 econp82.5100% | 53.2 Quality 53.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p53.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p50100% | 73.4 Versatility 73.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep73.4100% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 19 | 10.0 | 7 | 85 | 8.5 | 65 Scout Score 65 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle6590% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p89.40.81× | 65.2 Bowling Production 65.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 9.33 econp65.290% | 88.3 Quality 88.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle32%p88.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5090% | 45.7 Versatility 45.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep45.790% | |
| 9 | LA pace | 21 | 5.3 | 2 | 54 | 9.82 | 64.7 Scout Score 64.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay64.754.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 77.5 Bowling Production 77.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 4.33 econp77.554.5% | 63.5 Quality 63.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p63.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5054.5% | 68.9 Versatility 68.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp68.954.5% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 26 | 29.0 | 11 | 276 | 9.52 | 60.9 Scout Score 60.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay70.362.1% Middle54.117.2% Death38.220.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p27.91.09× | 71.8 Bowling Production 71.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 8.33 econp89.862.1% Middle2w · 10 econp52.417.2% Death2w · 12.67 econp3420.7% | 84.1 Quality 84.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p82.4 False-shot · Middle37%p90.4 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5062.1% MiddleWPA +0p5017.2% DeathWPA +0p5020.7% | 62.6 Versatility 62.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp75.162.1% Middlep44.717.2% Deathp4020.7% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 24 | 23.5 | 8 | 254 | 10.66 | 60.4 Scout Score 60.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay68.450.3% Middle51.68.4% Death52.541.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p79.80.96× | 58.6 Bowling Production 58.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 10.25 econp70.550.3% Middle0w · 8.5 econp41.98.4% Death3w · 11.59 econp47.441.3% | 93.8 Quality 93.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay38%p98.6 False-shot · Middle25%p64.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5050.3% MiddleWPA +0p508.4% DeathWPA +0p5041.3% | 51.6 Versatility 51.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp5350.3% Middlep45.78.4% Deathp51.141.3% | |
| 12 | Off-spin | — | 10.5 | 4 | 99 | 9.14 | 60.3 Scout Score 60.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle60.390.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p39.41.01× | 78.3 Bowling Production 78.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 8.14 econp78.390.8% | 35.1 Quality 35.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle19%p35.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5090.8% | 73.4 Versatility 73.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep73.490.8% | |
| 13 | RA pace | — | 17.0 | 4 | 154 | 9.06 | 59.8 Scout Score 59.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle6288.2% Death43.411.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p95.20.77× | 55.7 Bowling Production 55.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 8.53 econp59.188.2% Death0w · 13 econp30.111.8% | 69.1 Quality 69.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle23%p69.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5088.2% DeathWPA +0p5011.8% | 56.5 Versatility 56.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep59.688.2% Deathp33.311.8% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 17.0 | 4 | 158 | 9.29 | 59.6 Scout Score 59.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay42.429.4% Middle66.770.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p97.10.77× | 52.8 Bowling Production 52.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 10.2 econp30.529.4% Middle4w · 8.92 econp62.170.6% | 66.9 Quality 66.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay20%p25.7 False-shot · Middle28%p84 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5029.4% MiddleWPA +0p5070.6% | 59.8 Versatility 59.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp37.329.4% Middlep69.170.6% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 27 | 30.2 | 20 | 319 | 10.52 | 59.1 Scout Score 59.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay55.849.5% Middle72.419.8% Death55.930.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p740.97× | 59.8 Bowling Production 59.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 11.27 econp52.649.5% Middle5w · 6.83 econp87.919.8% Death8w · 11.68 econp53.230.8% | 67.7 Quality 67.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p66.2 False-shot · Middle25%p71.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5049.5% MiddleWPA +0p5019.8% DeathWPA +0p5030.8% | 57.1 Versatility 57.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp5049.5% Middlep70.219.8% Deathp6030.8% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 26 | 4.0 | 2 | 36 | 9 | 59 Scout Score 59 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay6450% Middle5450% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50n/a | 61.2 Bowling Production 61.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.5 econp71.550% Middle1w · 10.5 econp50.850% | 80.8 Quality 80.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay42%p79.7 False-shot · Middle42%p81.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5050% MiddleWPA +0p5050% | 52.4 Versatility 52.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp64.350% Middlep40.450% | |
| 17 | Leg-spin | 27 | 34.4 | 9 | 296 | 8.54 | 57.8 Scout Score 57.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle54.669.2% Death6530.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p33.71.02× | 67.3 Bowling Production 67.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle6w · 8.42 econp61.869.2% Death3w · 8.81 econp79.730.8% | 41.5 Quality 41.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle20%p41.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5069.2% DeathWPA +0p5030.8% | 70.2 Versatility 70.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep75.569.2% Deathp58.330.8% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 23 | 26.0 | 12 | 277 | 10.65 | 57.5 Scout Score 57.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay55.730.8% Middle51.923.1% Death61.446.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p72.10.99× | 57.5 Bowling Production 57.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 11.88 econp50.130.8% Middle2w · 9.17 econp54.723.1% Death4w · 10.58 econp63.846.2% | 54.5 Quality 54.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p73 False-shot · Middle17%p29.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5030.8% MiddleWPA +0p5023.1% DeathWPA +0p5046.2% | 58.3 Versatility 58.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp49.730.8% Middlep57.423.1% Deathp64.446.2% | |
| 19 | RA pace | — | 15.5 | 4 | 158 | 9.98 | 56.8 Scout Score 56.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay49.631.6% Middle66.737.9% Death52.130.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p87.50.87× | 49.2 Bowling Production 49.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9.8 econp4531.6% Middle2w · 8.5 econp60.837.9% Death1w · 12 econp39.130.5% | 71.8 Quality 71.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p39.2 False-shot · Middle42%p98.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5031.6% MiddleWPA +0p5037.9% DeathWPA +0p5030.5% | 58.5 Versatility 58.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp43.231.6% Middlep62.837.9% Deathp68.930.5% | |
| 20 | Off-spin | — | 15.0 | 7 | 144 | 9.6 | 54.5 Scout Score 54.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay33.513.3% Middle57.886.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p77.90.97× | 69.7 Bowling Production 69.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 14 econp18.713.3% Middle7w · 8.92 econp77.586.7% | 11.6 Quality 11.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p10.8 False-shot · Middle14%p11.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5013.3% MiddleWPA +0p5086.7% | 49.8 Versatility 49.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp34.313.3% Middlep52.186.7% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 38 | 28.0 | 11 | 290 | 10.36 | 54.5 Scout Score 54.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay64.460.7% Middle45.57.1% Death3832.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p261.09× | 57.1 Bowling Production 57.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 8.59 econp74.260.7% Middle1w · 13.5 econp39.17.1% Death5w · 13 econp28.832.1% | 86.4 Quality 86.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p87.8 False-shot · Middle33%p74.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5060.7% MiddleWPA +0p507.1% DeathWPA +0p5032.1% | 62.8 Versatility 62.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp69.260.7% Middlep36.27.1% Deathp56.732.1% | |
| 22 | Off-spin | 22 | 5.0 | 0 | 50 | 10 | 53.7 Scout Score 53.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle53.780% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 51 Bowling Production 51 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 6.25 econp5180% | 53.2 Quality 53.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p53.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5080% | 70.2 Versatility 70.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep70.280% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 28 | 20.4 | 9 | 196 | 9.48 | 53.4 Scout Score 53.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay38.429% Middle63.833.9% Death55.637.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p14.41.16× | 63.8 Bowling Production 63.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 11.83 econp40.829% Middle3w · 8.43 econp7233.9% Death4w · 8.61 econp74.437.1% | 60.4 Quality 60.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay19%p20.3 False-shot · Middle38%p94.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5029% MiddleWPA +0p5033.9% DeathWPA +0p5037.1% | 51.7 Versatility 51.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp49.229% Middlep69.133.9% Deathp37.837.1% | |
| 24 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 32.0 | 12 | 299 | 9.34 | 52 Scout Score 52 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay56.228.1% Middle50.368.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p81.70.94× | 63.3 Bowling Production 63.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 10.44 econp66.928.1% Middle7w · 9.14 econp61.868.8% | 5.9 Quality 5.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay20%p17.6 False-shot · Middle8%p1.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5028.1% MiddleWPA +0p5068.8% | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp64.628.1% Middlep5068.8% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 24 | 18.0 | 3 | 194 | 10.78 | 50.7 Scout Score 50.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay55.844.4% Middle4127.8% Death52.527.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p83.70.9× | 37.3 Bowling Production 37.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.62 econp46.244.4% Middle0w · 12.2 econp8.427.8% Death1w · 11.2 econp51.927.8% | 82.2 Quality 82.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p73 False-shot · Middle43%p96.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5044.4% MiddleWPA +0p5027.8% DeathWPA +0p5027.8% | 38.9 Versatility 38.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp54.144.4% Middlep20.227.8% Deathp33.327.8% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 28.0 | 5 | 206 | 7.36 | 49 Scout Score 49 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay65.425% Middle43.267.9% Death46.47.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p37.51.01× | 59.6 Bowling Production 59.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 5.71 econp79.325% Middle3w · 7.42 econp53.667.9% Death0w · 12.5 econp48.67.1% | 20.9 Quality 20.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p68.9 False-shot · Middle10%p3.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5025% MiddleWPA +0p5067.9% DeathWPA +0p507.1% | 56.4 Versatility 56.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp77.325% Middlep51.167.9% Deathp33.37.1% | |
| 27 | Leg-spin | — | 14.0 | 6 | 115 | 8.21 | 48.8 Scout Score 48.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle42.478.6% Death72.221.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p6.71.24× | 55.7 Bowling Production 55.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 9.82 econp45.478.6% Death3w · 2.33 econp93.721.4% | 43.6 Quality 43.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle20%p43.6 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5078.6% DeathWPA +0p5021.4% | 55.6 Versatility 55.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep45.778.6% Deathp91.721.4% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 27 | 23.5 | 9 | 282 | 11.83 | 48.6 Scout Score 48.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay50.954.5% Middle4116.8% Death48.528.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p91.30.79× | 41.4 Bowling Production 41.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 10.85 econp50.354.5% Middle1w · 12.25 econp27.216.8% Death3w · 13.46 econp32.728.7% | 34.9 Quality 34.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p33.8 False-shot · Middle17%p38.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5054.5% MiddleWPA +0p5016.8% DeathWPA +0p5028.7% | 45 Versatility 45 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp41.454.5% Middlep27.716.8% Deathp62.228.7% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 20 | 22.0 | 9 | 244 | 11.09 | 48.2 Scout Score 48.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay45.636.4% Middle57.631.8% Death41.831.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p70.20.99× | 40 Bowling Production 40 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.75 econp44.236.4% Middle2w · 9.57 econp46.431.8% Death5w · 14.14 econp28.831.8% | 55.5 Quality 55.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p23 False-shot · Middle36%p92.6 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5036.4% MiddleWPA +0p5031.8% DeathWPA +0p5031.8% | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp48.636.4% Middlep54.831.8% Deathp46.731.8% | |
| 30 | Off-spin | 22 | 13.3 | 3 | 121 | 8.96 | 47.7 Scout Score 47.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle48.777.8% Death44.322.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p16.31.15× | 61.9 Bowling Production 61.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 8.1 econp6577.8% Death0w · 12 econp51.222.2% | 9.6 Quality 9.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle13%p9.6 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5077.8% DeathWPA +0p5022.2% | 59.2 Versatility 59.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep70.277.8% Deathp20.822.2% | |
| 31 | LA pace | 26 | 22.5 | 10 | 251 | 10.99 | 47.6 Scout Score 47.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay54.352.6% Middle29.125.5% Death52.921.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p4.81.25× | 51.1 Bowling Production 51.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 11.17 econp60.852.6% Middle1w · 12.86 econp15.125.5% Death2w · 8.4 econp69.921.9% | 77.1 Quality 77.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay32%p85.1 False-shot · Middle23%p60.6 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5052.6% MiddleWPA +0p5025.5% DeathWPA +0p5021.9% | 35.4 Versatility 35.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp44.652.6% Middlep10.625.5% Deathp42.221.9% | |
| 32 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 5.0 | 2 | 56 | 11.2 | 46 Scout Score 46 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay49.440% Middle43.760% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 44.5 Bowling Production 44.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10 econp54.340% Middle1w · 12 econp3860% | 45.2 Quality 45.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p28.4 False-shot · Middle22%p56.4 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5040% MiddleWPA +0p5060% | 37 Versatility 37 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp56.640% Middlep23.960% | |
| 33 | Off-spin | 31 | 19.4 | 8 | 198 | 10.07 | 45.6 Scout Score 45.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.620.3% Middle48.435.6% Death36.844.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p8.71.22× | 56.6 Bowling Production 56.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 6.75 econp81.320.3% Middle2w · 8.57 econp63.935.6% Death4w · 12.81 econp39.344.1% | 29.8 Quality 29.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p48.6 False-shot · Middle14%p19.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5020.3% MiddleWPA +0p5035.6% DeathWPA +0p5044.1% | 46.9 Versatility 46.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp7020.3% Middlep6635.6% Deathp20.844.1% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 20 | 30.0 | 11 | 350 | 11.67 | 45.5 Scout Score 45.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay57.953.3% Middle4013.3% Death27.833.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p12.51.18× | 43.3 Bowling Production 43.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 9.81 econp63.753.3% Middle0w · 9 econp36.513.3% Death5w · 15.7 econp13.533.3% | 80.1 Quality 80.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p90.5 False-shot · Middle17%p38.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5053.3% MiddleWPA +0p5013.3% DeathWPA +0p5033.3% | 52.6 Versatility 52.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp54.353.3% Middlep55.313.3% Deathp48.933.3% | |
| 35 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 9.0 | 2 | 91 | 10.11 | 45.4 Scout Score 45.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay50.144.4% Middle41.555.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 41.6 Bowling Production 41.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9.5 econp49.744.4% Middle1w · 10.6 econp35.155.6% | 48.2 Quality 48.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p48.6 False-shot · Middle20%p47.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5044.4% MiddleWPA +0p5055.6% | 37.1 Versatility 37.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp50.844.4% Middlep26.155.6% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 26 | 7.0 | 2 | 68 | 9.71 | 45.1 Scout Score 45.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle45.185.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 43 Bowling Production 43 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9.17 econp4385.7% | 29.8 Quality 29.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p29.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5085.7% | 53.2 Versatility 53.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep53.285.7% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 15.0 | 3 | 137 | 9.13 | 45 Scout Score 45 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay60.446.7% Middle31.553.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p68.31× | 46.3 Bowling Production 46.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 7.43 econp80.646.7% Middle0w · 10.62 econp16.353.3% | 9.8 Quality 9.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay19%p14.9 False-shot · Middle8%p5.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5046.7% MiddleWPA +0p5053.3% | 56.8 Versatility 56.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp71.946.7% Middlep43.653.3% | |
| 38 | RA pace | 30 | 19.5 | 8 | 223 | 11.24 | 44.5 Scout Score 44.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay53.450.4% Death35.449.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p35.61.02× | 42.6 Bowling Production 42.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.8 econp59.850.4% Death6w · 13.73 econp2549.6% | 58.1 Quality 58.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p58.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5050.4% DeathWPA +0p5049.6% | 46.8 Versatility 46.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp49.250.4% Deathp44.449.6% | |
| 39 | LA pace | 29 | 7.0 | 1 | 73 | 10.43 | 44.3 Scout Score 44.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay53.957.1% Middle31.542.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 40.5 Bowling Production 40.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9 econp57.157.1% Middle0w · 12.33 econp18.342.9% | 38.3 Quality 38.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p48.6 False-shot · Middle11%p24.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5057.1% MiddleWPA +0p5042.9% | 45.4 Versatility 45.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp60.757.1% Middlep2542.9% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 32 | 28.1 | 12 | 320 | 11.36 | 42.8 Scout Score 42.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay44.839.1% Middle34.928.4% Death47.332.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p2.91.28× | 40 Bowling Production 40 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 11.36 econp34.239.1% Middle2w · 10.75 econp30.728.4% Death7w · 11.89 econp55.132.5% | 75 Quality 75 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay36%p93.2 False-shot · Middle21%p50 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5039.1% MiddleWPA +0p5028.4% DeathWPA +0p5032.5% | 40 Versatility 40 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.339.1% Middlep24.528.4% Deathp53.332.5% | |
| 41 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 8.0 | 1 | 68 | 8.5 | 42.6 Scout Score 42.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle42.687.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 40.1 Bowling Production 40.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9.14 econp40.187.5% | 19.1 Quality 19.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle14%p19.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5087.5% | 55.3 Versatility 55.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep55.387.5% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 23 | 5.5 | 3 | 98 | 16.8 | 42.1 Scout Score 42.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle50.251.4% Death33.548.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 31.9 Bowling Production 31.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 14.33 econp43.351.4% Death1w · 19.41 econp19.948.6% | 86.2 Quality 86.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle39%p86.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5051.4% DeathWPA +0p5048.6% | 28.8 Versatility 28.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep24.551.4% Deathp33.348.6% | |
| 43 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 5.0 | 2 | 66 | 13.2 | 40.3 Scout Score 40.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay33.940% Middle44.560% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 38.9 Bowling Production 38.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 12.5 econp28.240% Middle2w · 13.67 econp4660% | 28.5 Quality 28.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay0%p2.7 False-shot · Middle17%p45.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5040% MiddleWPA +0p5060% | 27.2 Versatility 27.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.240% Middlep19.160% | |
| 44 | RA pace | 21 | 5.0 | 1 | 73 | 14.6 | 39.2 Scout Score 39.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay39.280% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 9.9 Bowling Production 9.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 13.75 econp9.980% | 95.9 Quality 95.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay50%p95.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5080% | 21.9 Versatility 21.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp21.980% | |
| 45 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 0 | 46 | 9.2 | 38.7 Scout Score 38.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle38.7100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p11.34× | 28.5 Bowling Production 28.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 9.2 econp28.5100% | 62.8 Quality 62.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle23%p62.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p50100% | 48.4 Versatility 48.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep48.4100% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 33 | 27.1 | 5 | 307 | 11.3 | 38 Scout Score 38 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay41.869.9% Death29.130.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p241.1× | 26.9 Bowling Production 26.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 10.05 econp35.269.9% Death2w · 14.2 econp7.730.1% | 60.8 Quality 60.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p60.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5069.9% DeathWPA +0p5030.1% | 44 Versatility 44 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp34.369.9% Deathp66.730.1% | |
| 47 | RA pace | 26 | 5.0 | 1 | 81 | 16.2 | 37.6 Scout Score 37.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.680% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 22.1 Bowling Production 22.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 16.5 econp22.180% | 48.6 Quality 48.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p48.6 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5080% | 30.3 Versatility 30.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp30.380% | |
| 48 | Leg-spin | 24 | 5.0 | 1 | 60 | 12 | 36.3 Scout Score 36.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle36.380% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 33.4 Bowling Production 33.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 11.5 econp33.480% | 16 Quality 16 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle8%p16 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5080% | 28.2 Versatility 28.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep28.280% | |
| 49 | Off-spin | 20 | 5.0 | 1 | 57 | 11.4 | 34.2 Scout Score 34.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle34.2100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 25.8 Bowling Production 25.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 11.4 econp25.8100% | 22.3 Quality 22.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle13%p22.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p50100% | 26.6 Versatility 26.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep26.6100% | |
| 50 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 7.0 | 0 | 91 | 13 | 32.7 Scout Score 32.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle32.785.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p760.97× | 19 Bowling Production 19 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 10.83 econp1985.7% | 7.4 Quality 7.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle6%p7.4 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5085.7% | 35.1 Versatility 35.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep35.185.7% | |
| 51 | RA pace | 21 | 19.3 | 3 | 227 | 11.64 | 31.4 Scout Score 31.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay34.151.3% Middle28.343.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p18.31.14× | 24.1 Bowling Production 24.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10.5 econp37.551.3% Middle1w · 12.71 econp8.443.6% | 34.5 Quality 34.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay18%p6.8 False-shot · Middle24%p67 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5051.3% MiddleWPA +0p5043.6% | 21.6 Versatility 21.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp34.651.3% Middlep6.443.6% | |
| 52 | RA pace | 21 | 12.3 | 4 | 142 | 11.36 | 28 Scout Score 28 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay31.716% Middle27.272% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p22.11.12× | 20.5 Bowling Production 20.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11 econp30.216% Middle2w · 12.11 econp18.472% | 11.8 Quality 11.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay0%p2.7 False-shot · Middle13%p13.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5016% MiddleWPA +0p5072% | 30.5 Versatility 30.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp41.116% Middlep28.272% | |
| 53 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 0 | 77 | 19.25 | 27.9 Scout Score 27.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay27.975% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p53.81× | 4.8 Bowling Production 4.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 22.33 econp4.875% | 36.5 Quality 36.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p36.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5075% | 17 Versatility 17 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp1775% | |
| 54 | RA pace | 27 | 9.0 | 1 | 120 | 13.33 | 24.6 Scout Score 24.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay24.677.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p10.61.2× | 10 Bowling Production 10 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 14.57 econp1077.8% | 31.1 Quality 31.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p31.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5077.8% | 15.9 Versatility 15.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp15.977.8% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 26 | 18.0 | 7 | 150 | 8.33 | 89.8 Phase Production 89.8 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.822× parp93.236.8% Wicket rate0.39/ovp85.142.1% Boundary %20%p93.221.1% | 82.4 Quality 82.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 75.1 Versatility 75.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp74.330% Econ vs LHBp98.630% Wkt vs RHBp82.420% Wkt vs LHBp33.820% | |
| 2 | Off-spin | 31 | 4.0 | 2 | 27 | 6.75 | 81.3 Phase Production 81.3 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.666× parp82.436.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp82.442.1% Boundary %17%p7721.1% | 48.6 Quality 48.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 70 Versatility 70 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp60.830% Econ vs LHBp90.530% Wkt vs RHBp35.120% Wkt vs LHBp87.820% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 7.0 | 3 | 52 | 7.43 | 80.6 Phase Production 80.6 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.733× parp85.136.8% Wicket rate0.43/ovp79.742.1% Boundary %21%p74.321.1% | 14.9 Quality 14.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 71.9 Versatility 71.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp93.230% Econ vs LHBp79.730% Wkt vs RHBp1.420% Wkt vs LHBp98.620% | |
| 4 | LA pace | 28 | 17.0 | 5 | 140 | 8.24 | 79.4 Phase Production 79.4 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.812× parp95.936.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp56.842.1% Boundary %20%p95.921.1% | 77 Quality 77 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 70 Versatility 70 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp87.830% Econ vs LHBp93.230% Wkt vs RHBp66.220% Wkt vs LHBp12.220% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 7.0 | 2 | 40 | 5.71 | 79.3 Phase Production 79.3 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.564× parp98.636.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp52.742.1% Boundary %12%p98.621.1% | 68.9 Quality 68.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 77.3 Versatility 77.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.630% Econ vs LHBp82.430% Wkt vs RHBp58.120% Wkt vs LHBp56.820% | |
| 6 | LA pace | 21 | 3.0 | 1 | 13 | 4.33 | 77.5 Phase Production 77.5 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.428× parp90.536.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp60.842.1% Boundary %11%p87.821.1% | 63.5 Quality 63.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 68.9 Versatility 68.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp95.930% Econ vs LHBp63.530% Wkt vs RHBp14.920% Wkt vs LHBp90.520% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 38 | 17.0 | 5 | 146 | 8.59 | 74.2 Phase Production 74.2 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.847× parp87.836.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp56.842.1% Boundary %22%p85.121.1% | 87.8 Quality 87.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 69.2 Versatility 69.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp79.730% Econ vs LHBp87.830% Wkt vs RHBp90.520% Wkt vs LHBp4.120% | |
| 8 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 2.0 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 73.5 Phase Production 73.5 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.592× parp74.336.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp68.942.1% Boundary %8%p81.121.1% | 10.8 Quality 10.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 72.3 Versatility 72.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7730% Econ vs LHBp70.330% Wkt vs RHBp7720% Wkt vs LHBp63.520% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 26 | 2.0 | 1 | 15 | 7.5 | 71.5 Phase Production 71.5 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.74× parp68.936.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp68.942.1% Boundary %8%p81.121.1% | 79.7 Quality 79.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 64.3 Versatility 64.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp55.430% Econ vs LHBp74.330% Wkt vs RHBp41.920% Wkt vs LHBp85.120% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 24 | 12.0 | 5 | 123 | 10.25 | 70.5 Phase Production 70.5 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.011× parp5036.8% Wicket rate0.41/ovp87.842.1% Boundary %24%p71.621.1% | 98.6 Quality 98.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 53 Versatility 53 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.630% Econ vs LHBp14.930% Wkt vs RHBp55.420% Wkt vs LHBp79.720% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 9.0 | 4 | 94 | 10.44 | 66.9 Phase Production 66.9 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.03× parp41.936.8% Wicket rate0.44/ovp90.542.1% Boundary %24%p63.521.1% | 17.6 Quality 17.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 64.6 Versatility 64.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.230% Econ vs LHBp66.230% Wkt vs RHBp68.920% Wkt vs LHBp95.920% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 20 | 16.0 | 6 | 157 | 9.81 | 63.7 Phase Production 63.7 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.968× parp71.636.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp74.342.1% Boundary %28%p28.421.1% | 90.5 Quality 90.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 54.3 Versatility 54.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp58.130% Econ vs LHBp58.130% Wkt vs RHBp95.920% Wkt vs LHBp1.420% | |
| 13 | LA pace | 26 | 12.0 | 7 | 134 | 11.17 | 60.8 Phase Production 60.8 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.102× parp28.436.8% Wicket rate0.58/ovp95.942.1% Boundary %26%p47.321.1% | 85.1 Quality 85.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 44.6 Versatility 44.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp25.730% Econ vs LHBp25.730% Wkt vs RHBp93.220% Wkt vs LHBp52.720% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 30 | 10.0 | 2 | 88 | 8.8 | 59.8 Phase Production 59.8 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.868× parp79.736.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp2742.1% Boundary %20%p90.521.1% | 58.1 Quality 58.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 49.2 Versatility 49.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp90.530% Econ vs LHBp33.830% Wkt vs RHBp31.120% Wkt vs LHBp28.420% | |
| 15 | Off-spin | 26 | 8.0 | 2 | 71 | 8.88 | 58.3 Phase Production 58.3 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.876× parp7736.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp36.542.1% Boundary %23%p68.921.1% | 55.4 Quality 55.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 60.3 Versatility 60.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp82.430% Econ vs LHBp60.830% Wkt vs RHBp4.120% Wkt vs LHBp82.420% | |
| 16 | LA pace | 29 | 4.0 | 1 | 36 | 9 | 57.1 Phase Production 57.1 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.888× parp66.236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp44.642.1% Boundary %21%p66.221.1% | 48.6 Quality 48.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 60.7 Versatility 60.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp63.530% Econ vs LHBp70.330% Wkt vs RHBp9.520% Wkt vs LHBp93.220% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 2.0 | 1 | 20 | 10 | 54.3 Phase Production 54.3 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.987× parp44.636.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp68.942.1% Boundary %25%p41.921.1% | 28.4 Quality 28.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 56.6 Versatility 56.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp44.630% Econ vs LHBp45.930% Wkt vs RHBp71.620% Wkt vs LHBp75.720% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 27 | 15.0 | 7 | 169 | 11.27 | 52.6 Phase Production 52.6 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.112× parp2336.8% Wicket rate0.47/ovp93.242.1% Boundary %31%p2321.1% | 66.2 Quality 66.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp12.230% Econ vs LHBp5030% Wkt vs RHBp87.820% Wkt vs LHBp68.920% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 27 | 13.0 | 5 | 141 | 10.85 | 50.3 Phase Production 50.3 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.07× parp33.836.8% Wicket rate0.38/ovp7742.1% Boundary %28%p25.721.1% | 33.8 Quality 33.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 41.4 Versatility 41.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp31.130% Econ vs LHBp36.530% Wkt vs RHBp85.120% Wkt vs LHBp20.320% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 23 | 8.0 | 6 | 95 | 11.88 | 50.1 Phase Production 50.1 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.172× parp14.936.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp98.642.1% Boundary %35%p14.921.1% | 73 Quality 73 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 49.7 Versatility 49.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp68.930% Econ vs LHBp1.430% Wkt vs RHBp98.620% Wkt vs LHBp44.620% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 4.0 | 1 | 38 | 9.5 | 49.7 Phase Production 49.7 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.937× parp55.436.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp44.642.1% Boundary %25%p5021.1% | 48.6 Quality 48.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50.8 Versatility 50.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp47.330% Econ vs LHBp55.430% Wkt vs RHBp63.520% Wkt vs LHBp36.520% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 24 | 8.0 | 2 | 77 | 9.62 | 46.2 Phase Production 46.2 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.95× parp63.536.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp36.542.1% Boundary %27%p35.121.1% | 73 Quality 73 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 54.1 Versatility 54.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp17.630% Econ vs LHBp95.930% Wkt vs RHBp39.220% Wkt vs LHBp60.820% | |
| 23 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 1 | 49 | 9.8 | 45 Phase Production 45 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.967× parp52.736.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp31.142.1% Boundary %23%p59.521.1% | 39.2 Quality 39.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 43.2 Versatility 43.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp52.730% Econ vs LHBp39.230% Wkt vs RHBp52.720% Wkt vs LHBp25.720% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 20 | 8.0 | 2 | 78 | 9.75 | 44.2 Phase Production 44.2 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.962× parp58.136.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp36.542.1% Boundary %27%p35.121.1% | 23 Quality 23 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 48.6 Versatility 48.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.130% Econ vs LHBp17.630% Wkt vs RHBp79.720% Wkt vs LHBp9.520% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 28 | 6.0 | 2 | 71 | 11.83 | 40.8 Phase Production 40.8 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.167× parp20.336.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp63.542.1% Boundary %28%p31.121.1% | 20.3 Quality 20.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 49.2 Versatility 49.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2330% Econ vs LHBp52.730% Wkt vs RHBp60.820% Wkt vs LHBp71.620% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 21 | 10.0 | 2 | 105 | 10.5 | 37.5 Phase Production 37.5 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.036× parp39.236.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp2742.1% Boundary %25%p55.421.1% | 6.8 Quality 6.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.930% Econ vs LHBp28.430% Wkt vs RHBp17.620% Wkt vs LHBp5020% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 33 | 19.0 | 3 | 191 | 10.05 | 35.2 Phase Production 35.2 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.992× parp60.836.8% Wicket rate0.16/ovp4.142.1% Boundary %26%p52.721.1% | 60.8 Quality 60.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 34.3 Versatility 34.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.430% Econ vs LHBp7730% Wkt vs RHBp6.820% Wkt vs LHBp6.820% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 32 | 11.0 | 3 | 125 | 11.36 | 34.2 Phase Production 34.2 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.121× parp25.736.8% Wicket rate0.27/ovp5042.1% Boundary %32%p17.621.1% | 93.2 Quality 93.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 40.3 Versatility 40.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp66.230% Econ vs LHBp6.830% Wkt vs RHBp74.320% Wkt vs LHBp17.620% | |
| 29 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 5.0 | 0 | 51 | 10.2 | 30.5 Phase Production 30.5 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.006× parp47.336.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.442.1% Boundary %23%p59.521.1% | 25.7 Quality 25.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 37.3 Versatility 37.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.930% Econ vs LHBp85.130% Wkt vs RHBp21.620% Wkt vs LHBp14.920% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 21 | 2.0 | 0 | 22 | 11 | 30.2 Phase Production 30.2 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.085× parp36.536.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.942.1% Boundary %25%p41.921.1% | 2.7 Quality 2.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 41.1 Versatility 41.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp33.830% Econ vs LHBp41.930% Wkt vs RHBp44.620% Wkt vs LHBp47.320% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 2.0 | 0 | 25 | 12.5 | 28.2 Phase Production 28.2 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.233× parp31.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.942.1% Boundary %25%p41.921.1% | 2.7 Quality 2.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp36.530% Econ vs LHBp31.130% Wkt vs RHBp28.420% Wkt vs LHBp66.220% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 26 | 4.0 | 1 | 66 | 16.5 | 22.1 Phase Production 22.1 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.628× parp6.836.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp44.642.1% Boundary %54%p4.121.1% | 48.6 Quality 48.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 30.3 Versatility 30.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6.830% Econ vs LHBp2330% Wkt vs RHBp5020% Wkt vs LHBp56.820% | |
| 33 | Off-spin | — | 2.0 | 0 | 28 | 14 | 18.7 Phase Production 18.7 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.381× parp17.636.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.942.1% Boundary %42%p20.321.1% | 10.8 Quality 10.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 34.3 Versatility 34.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5030% Econ vs LHBp12.230% Wkt vs RHBp47.320% Wkt vs LHBp31.120% | |
| 34 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 2.0 | 0 | 42 | 21 | 11.5 Phase Production 11.5 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy2.072× parp4.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.942.1% Boundary %67%p9.521.1% | 41.9 Quality 41.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 34.5 Versatility 34.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4.130% Econ vs LHBp45.930% Wkt vs RHBp21.620% Wkt vs LHBp75.720% | |
| 35 | RA pace | 27 | 7.0 | 1 | 102 | 14.57 | 10 Phase Production 10 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.438× parp9.536.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp12.242.1% Boundary %43%p6.821.1% | 31.1 Quality 31.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 15.9 Versatility 15.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9.530% Econ vs LHBp9.530% Wkt vs RHBp12.220% Wkt vs LHBp39.220% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 21 | 4.0 | 0 | 55 | 13.75 | 9.9 Phase Production 9.9 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.357× parp12.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp6.842.1% Boundary %42%p12.221.1% | 95.9 Quality 95.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %50% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 21.9 Versatility 21.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp20.330% Econ vs LHBp20.330% Wkt vs RHBp25.720% Wkt vs LHBp2320% | |
| 37 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 0 | 67 | 22.33 | 4.8 Phase Production 4.8 vs all bowlers · n=37 KPIvaluepctshare True economy2.203× parp1.436.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp9.542.1% Boundary %61%p1.421.1% | 36.5 Quality 36.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 17 Versatility 17 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.430% Econ vs LHBp4.130% Wkt vs RHBp35.120% Wkt vs LHBp41.920% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Off-spin | 26 | 15.0 | 10 | 89 | 5.93 | 98.4 Phase Production 98.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.662× parp98.944.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp98.944.1% Boundary %9%p94.711.8% | 58.5 Quality 58.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 94.7 Versatility 94.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp90.450% Econ vs LHBp98.950% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 24.0 | 9 | 165 | 6.88 | 90.5 Phase Production 90.5 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.767× parp94.744.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp8444.1% Boundary %10%p98.911.8% | 77.7 Quality 77.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 92.6 Versatility 92.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp92.650% Econ vs LHBp92.650% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 23.5 | 9 | 171 | 7.17 | 90.2 Phase Production 90.2 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.8× parp92.644.1% Wicket rate0.38/ovp86.244.1% Boundary %10%p96.811.8% | 33 Quality 33 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 71.3 Versatility 71.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp94.750% Econ vs LHBp47.950% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 27 | 6.0 | 5 | 41 | 6.83 | 87.9 Phase Production 87.9 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.762× parp8444.1% Wicket rate0.83/ovp96.844.1% Boundary %14%p69.111.8% | 71.3 Quality 71.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 70.2 Versatility 70.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp88.350% Econ vs LHBp52.150% | |
| 5 | Off-spin | 25 | 11.0 | 4 | 74 | 6.73 | 83.9 Phase Production 83.9 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.75× parp90.444.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp75.544.1% Boundary %9%p90.411.8% | 26.6 Quality 26.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 88.3 Versatility 88.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.250% Econ vs LHBp90.450% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | — | 4.0 | 2 | 22 | 5.5 | 82.5 Phase Production 82.5 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.613× parp86.244.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp79.844.1% Boundary %8%p78.711.8% | 53.2 Quality 53.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 73.4 Versatility 73.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.950% Econ vs LHBp64.950% | |
| 7 | Leg-spin | — | 20.5 | 6 | 134 | 6.43 | 78.5 Phase Production 78.5 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.717× parp96.844.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp56.444.1% Boundary %11%p92.611.8% | 79.8 Quality 79.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 87.2 Versatility 87.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.950% Econ vs LHBp75.550% | |
| 8 | Off-spin | — | 9.5 | 4 | 80 | 8.14 | 78.3 Phase Production 78.3 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.907× parp75.544.1% Wicket rate0.41/ovp81.944.1% Boundary %14%p75.511.8% | 35.1 Quality 35.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 73.4 Versatility 73.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp69.150% Econ vs LHBp77.750% | |
| 9 | Off-spin | — | 13.0 | 7 | 116 | 8.92 | 77.5 Phase Production 77.5 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.995× parp64.944.1% Wicket rate0.54/ovp94.744.1% Boundary %18%p60.611.8% | 11.7 Quality 11.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 52.1 Versatility 52.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7.450% Econ vs LHBp96.850% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 28 | 7.0 | 3 | 59 | 8.43 | 72 Phase Production 72 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.94× parp71.344.1% Wicket rate0.43/ovp77.744.1% Boundary %19%p53.211.8% | 94.7 Quality 94.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 69.1 Versatility 69.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5050% Econ vs LHBp88.350% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 19 | 9.0 | 5 | 84 | 9.33 | 65.2 Phase Production 65.2 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp43.644.1% Wicket rate0.56/ovp92.644.1% Boundary %20%p43.611.8% | 88.3 Quality 88.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 45.7 Versatility 45.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp73.450% Econ vs LHBp18.150% | |
| 12 | Off-spin | 22 | 10.3 | 3 | 85 | 8.1 | 65 Phase Production 65 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.903× parp77.744.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp5044.1% Boundary %14%p73.411.8% | 9.6 Quality 9.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 70.2 Versatility 70.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp45.750% Econ vs LHBp94.750% | |
| 13 | Off-spin | 31 | 7.0 | 2 | 60 | 8.57 | 63.9 Phase Production 63.9 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.956× parp69.144.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp53.244.1% Boundary %12%p8411.8% | 19.1 Quality 19.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 66 Versatility 66 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp58.550% Econ vs LHBp73.450% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 12.0 | 4 | 107 | 8.92 | 62.1 Phase Production 62.1 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.994× parp62.844.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp6744.1% Boundary %21%p41.511.8% | 84 Quality 84 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 69.1 Versatility 69.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp52.150% Econ vs LHBp86.250% | |
| 15 | Leg-spin | 27 | 24.0 | 6 | 202 | 8.42 | 61.8 Phase Production 61.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.939× parp79.844.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp37.244.1% Boundary %14%p86.211.8% | 41.5 Quality 41.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 75.5 Versatility 75.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8450% Econ vs LHBp6750% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 22.0 | 7 | 201 | 9.14 | 61.8 Phase Production 61.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.019× parp58.544.1% Wicket rate0.32/ovp64.944.1% Boundary %17%p62.811.8% | 1.1 Quality 1.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp75.550% Econ vs LHBp24.550% | |
| 17 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 2 | 51 | 8.5 | 60.8 Phase Production 60.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.948× parp6744.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp61.744.1% Boundary %22%p3411.8% | 98.9 Quality 98.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 62.8 Versatility 62.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.550% Econ vs LHBp8450% | |
| 18 | RA pace | — | 15.0 | 4 | 128 | 8.53 | 59.1 Phase Production 59.1 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.952× parp73.444.1% Wicket rate0.26/ovp41.544.1% Boundary %16%p71.311.8% | 69.1 Quality 69.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 59.6 Versatility 59.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp79.850% Econ vs LHBp39.450% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 23 | 6.0 | 2 | 55 | 9.17 | 54.7 Phase Production 54.7 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.022× parp48.944.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp61.744.1% Boundary %19%p5011.8% | 29.8 Quality 29.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 57.4 Versatility 57.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp35.150% Econ vs LHBp79.850% | |
| 20 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 19.0 | 3 | 141 | 7.42 | 53.6 Phase Production 53.6 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.828× parp88.344.1% Wicket rate0.16/ovp9.644.1% Boundary %12%p88.311.8% | 3.2 Quality 3.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %10% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 51.1 Versatility 51.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.850% Econ vs LHBp5.350% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 26 | 5.0 | 2 | 50 | 10 | 52.4 Phase Production 52.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.115× parp37.244.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp73.444.1% Boundary %23%p30.911.8% | 90.4 Quality 90.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %37% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 44.7 Versatility 44.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp43.650% Econ vs LHBp45.750% | |
| 22 | Off-spin | 22 | 4.0 | 0 | 25 | 6.25 | 51 Phase Production 51 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.697× parp81.944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp12.844.1% Boundary %8%p78.711.8% | 53.2 Quality 53.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 70.2 Versatility 70.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp77.750% Econ vs LHBp62.850% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 26 | 2.0 | 1 | 21 | 10.5 | 50.8 Phase Production 50.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.171× parp35.144.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp70.244.1% Boundary %25%p37.211.8% | 81.9 Quality 81.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 40.4 Versatility 40.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp64.950% Econ vs LHBp1650% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 20 | 7.0 | 2 | 67 | 9.57 | 46.4 Phase Production 46.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.067× parp41.544.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp53.244.1% Boundary %21%p39.411.8% | 92.6 Quality 92.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 54.8 Versatility 54.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp54.350% Econ vs LHBp55.350% | |
| 25 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 3.0 | 2 | 41 | 13.67 | 46 Phase Production 46 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.524× parp9.644.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp89.444.1% Boundary %28%p20.211.8% | 45.7 Quality 45.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 19.1 Versatility 19.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp30.950% Econ vs LHBp7.450% | |
| 26 | Leg-spin | — | 11.0 | 3 | 108 | 9.82 | 45.4 Phase Production 45.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.095× parp39.444.1% Wicket rate0.27/ovp47.944.1% Boundary %18%p58.511.8% | 43.6 Quality 43.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 45.7 Versatility 45.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3350% Econ vs LHBp58.550% | |
| 27 | LA pace | 28 | 2.0 | 0 | 15 | 7.5 | 43.7 Phase Production 43.7 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.836× parp60.644.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp23.444.1% Boundary %17%p56.411.8% | 74.5 Quality 74.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50.5 Versatility 50.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6750% Econ vs LHBp3450% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 23 | 3.0 | 2 | 43 | 14.33 | 43.3 Phase Production 43.3 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.598× parp7.444.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp89.444.1% Boundary %39%p5.311.8% | 86.2 Quality 86.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %39% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 24.5 Versatility 24.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp47.950% Econ vs LHBp1.150% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 26 | 6.0 | 1 | 55 | 9.17 | 43 Phase Production 43 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.022× parp48.944.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp26.644.1% Boundary %11%p81.911.8% | 29.8 Quality 29.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 53.2 Versatility 53.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp37.250% Econ vs LHBp69.150% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 24 | 2.0 | 0 | 17 | 8.5 | 41.9 Phase Production 41.9 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.948× parp54.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp23.444.1% Boundary %8%p64.911.8% | 64.9 Quality 64.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 45.7 Versatility 45.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.350% Econ vs LHBp20.250% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 7.0 | 1 | 64 | 9.14 | 40.1 Phase Production 40.1 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.02× parp56.444.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp20.244.1% Boundary %19%p53.211.8% | 19.1 Quality 19.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 55.3 Versatility 55.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.450% Econ vs LHBp71.350% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 38 | 2.0 | 1 | 27 | 13.5 | 39.1 Phase Production 39.1 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.505× parp1644.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp70.244.1% Boundary %42%p9.611.8% | 74.5 Quality 74.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 36.2 Versatility 36.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp11.750% Econ vs LHBp60.650% | |
| 33 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 3.0 | 1 | 36 | 12 | 38 Phase Production 38 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.338× parp22.344.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp58.544.1% Boundary %28%p20.211.8% | 56.4 Quality 56.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 23.9 Versatility 23.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp25.550% Econ vs LHBp22.350% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 20 | 4.0 | 0 | 36 | 9 | 36.5 Phase Production 36.5 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.004× parp52.144.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp12.844.1% Boundary %12%p6711.8% | 38.3 Quality 38.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 55.3 Versatility 55.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp60.650% Econ vs LHBp5050% | |
| 35 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 5.0 | 1 | 53 | 10.6 | 35.1 Phase Production 35.1 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.182× parp3344.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp3444.1% Boundary %20%p46.811.8% | 47.9 Quality 47.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 26.1 Versatility 26.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp25.550% Econ vs LHBp26.650% | |
| 36 | Leg-spin | 24 | 4.0 | 1 | 46 | 11.5 | 33.4 Phase Production 33.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.282× parp24.544.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp44.744.1% Boundary %25%p24.511.8% | 16 Quality 16 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 28.2 Versatility 28.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp22.350% Econ vs LHBp3450% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 32 | 8.0 | 2 | 86 | 10.75 | 30.7 Phase Production 30.7 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.199× parp26.644.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp39.444.1% Boundary %25%p13.811.8% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 24.5 Versatility 24.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp20.250% Econ vs LHBp28.750% | |
| 38 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 0 | 46 | 9.2 | 28.5 Phase Production 28.5 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.026× parp45.744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp6.444.1% Boundary %20%p46.811.8% | 62.8 Quality 62.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 48.4 Versatility 48.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp62.850% Econ vs LHBp3450% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 1 | 49 | 12.25 | 27.2 Phase Production 27.2 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.366× parp13.844.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp44.744.1% Boundary %29%p11.711.8% | 38.3 Quality 38.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 27.7 Versatility 27.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp13.850% Econ vs LHBp41.550% | |
| 40 | Off-spin | 20 | 5.0 | 1 | 57 | 11.4 | 25.8 Phase Production 25.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.271× parp20.244.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp3444.1% Boundary %27%p1611.8% | 22.3 Quality 22.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 26.6 Versatility 26.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9.650% Econ vs LHBp43.650% | |
| 41 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 6.0 | 0 | 65 | 10.83 | 19 Phase Production 19 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.208× parp30.944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.244.1% Boundary %22%p3411.8% | 7.4 Quality 7.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 35.1 Versatility 35.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp56.450% Econ vs LHBp13.850% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 21 | 9.0 | 2 | 109 | 12.11 | 18.4 Phase Production 18.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.351× parp3.244.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp30.944.1% Boundary %22%p28.711.8% | 13.8 Quality 13.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 28.2 Versatility 28.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.150% Econ vs LHBp55.350% | |
| 43 | LA pace | 29 | 3.0 | 0 | 37 | 12.33 | 18.3 Phase Production 18.3 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.375× parp18.144.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.144.1% Boundary %28%p20.211.8% | 24.5 Quality 24.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 25 Versatility 25 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1650% Econ vs LHBp3450% | |
| 44 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 8.0 | 0 | 85 | 10.62 | 16.3 Phase Production 16.3 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.185× parp28.744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.144.1% Boundary %23%p26.611.8% | 5.3 Quality 5.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 43.6 Versatility 43.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5.350% Econ vs LHBp81.950% | |
| 45 | LA pace | 26 | 5.5 | 1 | 75 | 12.86 | 15.1 Phase Production 15.1 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.434× parp5.344.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp28.744.1% Boundary %34%p1.111.8% | 60.6 Quality 60.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 10.6 Versatility 10.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp18.150% Econ vs LHBp3.250% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 24 | 5.0 | 0 | 61 | 12.2 | 8.4 Phase Production 8.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.36× parp11.744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp6.444.1% Boundary %33%p3.211.8% | 96.8 Quality 96.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %43% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 20.2 Versatility 20.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.750% Econ vs LHBp11.750% | |
| 47 | RA pace | 21 | 8.3 | 1 | 108 | 12.71 | 8.4 Phase Production 8.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.417× parp1.144.1% Wicket rate0.12/ovp1644.1% Boundary %28%p7.411.8% | 67 Quality 67 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 6.4 Versatility 6.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.250% Econ vs LHBp9.650% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leg-spin | — | 3.0 | 3 | 7 | 2.33 | 93.7 Phase Production 93.7 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.203× parp98.143.6% Boundary %0%p90.441.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp90.414.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 91.7 Versatility 91.7 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep91.7100% | |
| 2 | LA pace | 28 | 12.0 | 4 | 95 | 7.92 | 86.2 Phase Production 86.2 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.688× parp94.250% Wicket rate0.34/ovp38.516.7% Boundary %14%p98.133.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 56.7 Versatility 56.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep66.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 3 | Off-spin | 26 | 4.0 | 2 | 26 | 6.5 | 80 Phase Production 80 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.565× parp86.543.6% Boundary %12%p78.841.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp63.514.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 4 | Leg-spin | 27 | 10.4 | 3 | 94 | 8.81 | 79.7 Phase Production 79.7 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.766× parp82.743.6% Boundary %14%p94.241.8% Wicket rate0.28/ovp28.814.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 58.3 Versatility 58.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep58.3100% | |
| 5 | Off-spin | 25 | 2.0 | 0 | 3 | 1.5 | 76.5 Phase Production 76.5 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.13× parp90.443.6% Boundary %0%p82.741.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp17.314.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 6 | Leg-spin | — | 6.1 | 2 | 51 | 8.27 | 75.3 Phase Production 75.3 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.719× parp7543.6% Boundary %14%p86.541.8% Wicket rate0.32/ovp44.214.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 75 Versatility 75 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep75100% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 28 | 7.4 | 4 | 66 | 8.61 | 74.4 Phase Production 74.4 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.748× parp78.850% Wicket rate0.52/ovp7516.7% Boundary %22%p67.333.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 37.8 Versatility 37.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep19.440% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 8 | LA pace | 26 | 5.0 | 2 | 42 | 8.4 | 69.9 Phase Production 69.9 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.73× parp71.250% Wicket rate0.40/ovp55.816.7% Boundary %20%p7533.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 42.2 Versatility 42.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep30.640% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 23 | 12.0 | 4 | 127 | 10.58 | 63.8 Phase Production 63.8 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.92× parp67.350% Wicket rate0.34/ovp38.516.7% Boundary %22%p71.233.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 64.4 Versatility 64.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep86.140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 32 | 9.1 | 7 | 109 | 11.89 | 55.1 Phase Production 55.1 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.033× parp36.550% Wicket rate0.76/ovp94.216.7% Boundary %24%p63.533.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 53.3 Versatility 53.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep58.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 27 | 9.2 | 8 | 109 | 11.68 | 53.2 Phase Production 53.2 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.015× parp44.250% Wicket rate0.86/ovp98.116.7% Boundary %27%p44.233.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep7540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 24 | 5.0 | 1 | 56 | 11.2 | 51.9 Phase Production 51.9 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.973× parp63.550% Wicket rate0.20/ovp9.616.7% Boundary %23%p55.833.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 33.3 Versatility 33.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep8.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 13 | Off-spin | 22 | 3.0 | 0 | 36 | 12 | 51.2 Phase Production 51.2 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.043× parp59.643.6% Boundary %22%p59.641.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.914.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 20.8 Versatility 20.8 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep20.8100% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 2.0 | 0 | 25 | 12.5 | 48.6 Phase Production 48.6 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.086× parp55.843.6% Boundary %25%p51.941.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp17.314.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 33.3 Versatility 33.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep33.3100% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 24 | 9.5 | 3 | 114 | 11.59 | 47.4 Phase Production 47.4 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.007× parp51.950% Wicket rate0.31/ovp32.716.7% Boundary %25%p48.133.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 51.1 Versatility 51.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep52.840% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 16 | Off-spin | 31 | 8.4 | 4 | 111 | 12.81 | 39.3 Phase Production 39.3 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.113× parp28.843.6% Boundary %27%p40.441.8% Wicket rate0.46/ovp67.314.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 20.8 Versatility 20.8 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep20.8100% | |
| 17 | RA pace | — | 4.5 | 1 | 58 | 12 | 39.1 Phase Production 39.1 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.043× parp48.150% Wicket rate0.20/ovp2516.7% Boundary %31%p32.733.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 68.9 Versatility 68.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep97.240% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 26 | 6.0 | 2 | 76 | 12.67 | 34 Phase Production 34 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.101× parp32.750% Wicket rate0.34/ovp48.116.7% Boundary %31%p28.833.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 40 Versatility 40 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep2540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 27 | 6.5 | 3 | 92 | 13.46 | 32.7 Phase Production 32.7 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.17× parp21.250% Wicket rate0.44/ovp59.616.7% Boundary %29%p36.533.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 62.2 Versatility 62.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep80.640% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 20 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 26 | 13 | 30.1 Phase Production 30.1 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.129× parp40.450% Wicket rate0.00/ovp17.316.7% Boundary %42%p21.233.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 33.3 Versatility 33.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep8.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 38 | 9.0 | 5 | 117 | 13 | 28.8 Phase Production 28.8 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.129× parp2550% Wicket rate0.56/ovp78.816.7% Boundary %37%p9.633.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 56.7 Versatility 56.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep66.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 20 | 7.0 | 5 | 99 | 14.14 | 28.8 Phase Production 28.8 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.229× parp17.350% Wicket rate0.71/ovp86.516.7% Boundary %33%p17.333.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 46.7 Versatility 46.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep41.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 30 | 9.5 | 6 | 135 | 13.73 | 25 Phase Production 25 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.193× parp13.550% Wicket rate0.61/ovp82.716.7% Boundary %32%p13.533.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 44.4 Versatility 44.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep36.140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 23 | 2.5 | 1 | 55 | 19.41 | 19.9 Phase Production 19.9 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.687× parp5.850% Wicket rate0.35/ovp51.916.7% Boundary %35%p2533.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 33.3 Versatility 33.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep8.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 20 | 10.0 | 5 | 157 | 15.7 | 13.5 Phase Production 13.5 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.364× parp1.950% Wicket rate0.50/ovp71.216.7% Boundary %42%p1.933.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 48.9 Versatility 48.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep47.240% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 33 | 8.1 | 2 | 116 | 14.2 | 7.7 Phase Production 7.7 vs all bowlers · n=26 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.234× parp9.650% Wicket rate0.25/ovp5.816.7% Boundary %43%p5.833.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 66.7 Versatility 66.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep91.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% |
Saurabh Dubey
Bowler · LA pace · age 28
70.5
Scout Score
Overs 31.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 250 · Econ 8.06
70.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay70.854.8%38.8
Middle54.96.5%3.6
Death72.738.7%28.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p85.60.9×
Scout Score70.5
70.8Powerplay54.8% of overs · 5w · 8.24 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.438%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp7715%
Versatilityp7010%
Trajectoryp85.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.812× par102bp95.936.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov102bp56.842.1%
Boundary %20%102bp95.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.828× par55bp87.830%
Econ vs LHB0.805× par47bp93.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.33/ov55bp66.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.26/ov47bp12.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
54.9Middle6.5% of overs · 0w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.738%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp74.515%
Versatilityp50.512%
Trajectoryp85.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.836× par12bp60.644.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp23.444.1%
Boundary %17%12bp56.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.805× par12bp6750%
Econ vs LHB—0bp3450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
72.7Death38.7% of overs · 4w · 7.92 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp86.248%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp56.715%
Trajectoryp85.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.688× par72bp94.250%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp38.516.7%
Boundary %14%72bp98.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%72bp66.740%
Slower ball072bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer072bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Parth Rekhade
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
69.4
Scout Score
Overs 25.5 · Wkts 10 · Runs 183 · Econ 7.08
69.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay60.27.7%4.6
Middle70.292.3%64.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p990.7×
Scout Score69.4
60.2Powerplay7.7% of overs · 1w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp10.815%
Versatilityp72.310%
Trajectoryp9910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.592× par12bp74.336.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp68.942.1%
Boundary %8%12bp81.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.576× par9bp7730%
Econ vs LHB0.62× par3bp70.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.67/ov9bp7720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp63.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 8%
70.2Middle92.3% of overs · 9w · 7.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp90.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp3315%
Versatilityp71.312%
Trajectoryp9910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.8× par143bp92.644.1%
Wicket rate0.38/ov143bp86.244.1%
Boundary %10%143bp96.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.681× par88bp94.750%
Econ vs LHB1.033× par55bp47.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
Mandar Mahalle
Bowler · Off-spin · age 25
68.5
Scout Score
Overs 14.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 82 · Econ 5.86
68.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle68.378.6%53.7
Death69.814.3%10.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p93.30.78×
Scout Score68.5
68.3Middle78.6% of overs · 4w · 6.73 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp26.615%
Versatilityp88.312%
Trajectoryp93.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.75× par66bp90.444.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov66bp75.544.1%
Boundary %9%66bp90.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.765× par32bp86.250%
Econ vs LHB0.771× par34bp90.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 18%
69.8Death14.3% of overs · 0w · 1.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.555%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp93.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.13× par12bp90.443.6%
Boundary %0%12bp82.741.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp17.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Shreyash Padole
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 20
68.4
Scout Score
Overs 27.1 · Wkts 9 · Runs 225 · Econ 8.28
68.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay29.67.4%2.2
Middle71.788.3%63.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p20.21.13×
Scout Score68.4
29.6Powerplay7.4% of overs · 0w · 21 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp11.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp41.915%
Versatilityp34.510%
Trajectoryp20.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy2.072× par12bp4.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp18.942.1%
Boundary %67%12bp9.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB2.017× par12bp4.130%
Econ vs LHB—0bp45.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp21.620%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp75.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
71.7Middle88.3% of overs · 9w · 6.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp90.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp77.715%
Versatilityp92.612%
Trajectoryp20.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.767× par144bp94.744.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov144bp8444.1%
Boundary %10%144bp98.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.754× par94bp92.650%
Econ vs LHB0.801× par50bp92.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
Gurdeep Singh Sodhi
Bowler · Leg-spin
66.8
Scout Score
Overs 27.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 185 · Econ 6.85
66.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle67.777.2%52.3
Death63.522.8%14.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p29.81.09×
Scout Score66.8
67.7Middle77.2% of overs · 6w · 6.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp78.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp79.815%
Versatilityp87.212%
Trajectoryp29.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.717× par125bp96.844.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov125bp56.444.1%
Boundary %11%125bp92.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.582× par73bp98.950%
Econ vs LHB0.952× par52bp75.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 26%
63.5Death22.8% of overs · 2w · 8.27 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.355%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp758%
Trajectoryp29.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.719× par37bp7543.6%
Boundary %14%37bp86.541.8%
Wicket rate0.32/ov37bp44.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.6528bp75100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Yash Kadam
Bowler · Off-spin · age 26
65.9
Scout Score
Overs 27.0 · Wkts 14 · Runs 186 · Econ 6.89
65.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay53.129.6%15.7
Middle73.255.6%40.7
Death64.314.8%9.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p31.71.06×
Scout Score65.9
53.1Powerplay29.6% of overs · 2w · 8.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp55.415%
Versatilityp60.310%
Trajectoryp31.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.876× par48bp7736.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp36.542.1%
Boundary %23%48bp68.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.836× par31bp82.430%
Econ vs LHB0.949× par17bp60.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov31bp4.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.71/ov17bp82.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
73.2Middle55.6% of overs · 10w · 5.93 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp98.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp58.515%
Versatilityp94.712%
Trajectoryp31.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.662× par90bp98.944.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov90bp98.944.1%
Boundary %9%90bp94.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.729× par53bp90.450%
Econ vs LHB0.571× par37bp98.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
64.3Death14.8% of overs · 2w · 6.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp8055%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp31.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.565× par24bp86.543.6%
Boundary %12%24bp78.841.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp63.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Jasvindarsingh Tak
Bowler · Off-spin
65.6
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 22 · Econ 5.5
65.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle65.6100%65.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50n/a
Scout Score65.6
65.6Middle100% of overs · 2w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp53.215%
Versatilityp73.412%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.613× par24bp86.244.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp79.844.1%
Boundary %8%24bp78.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.322× par10bp81.950%
Econ vs LHB0.884× par14bp64.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 21%
Addhyan Rauthan
Bowler · RA pace · age 19
65
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 85 · Econ 8.5
65OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle6590%58.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p89.40.81×
Scout Score65
65Middle90% of overs · 5w · 9.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp88.315%
Versatilityp45.712%
Trajectoryp89.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par54bp43.644.1%
Wicket rate0.56/ov54bp92.644.1%
Boundary %20%54bp43.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.92× par35bp73.450%
Econ vs LHB1.303× par19bp18.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 32%
Sanyog Shyam Bhagwat
Bowler · LA pace · age 21
64.7
Scout Score
Overs 5.3 · Wkts 2 · Runs 54 · Econ 9.82
64.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay64.754.5%35.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score64.7
64.7Powerplay54.5% of overs · 1w · 4.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp77.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp63.515%
Versatilityp68.910%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.428× par18bp90.536.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp60.842.1%
Boundary %11%18bp87.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.329× par14bp95.930%
Econ vs LHB0.775× par4bp63.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov14bp14.920%
Wkt vs LHB1.50/ov4bp90.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
Nachiket Bhute
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
60.9
Scout Score
Overs 29.0 · Wkts 11 · Runs 276 · Econ 9.52
60.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay70.362.1%43.7
Middle54.117.2%9.3
Death38.220.7%7.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p27.91.09×
Scout Score60.9
70.3Powerplay62.1% of overs · 7w · 8.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp89.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp82.415%
Versatilityp75.110%
Trajectoryp27.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.822× par108bp93.236.8%
Wicket rate0.39/ov108bp85.142.1%
Boundary %20%108bp93.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.925× par71bp74.330%
Econ vs LHB0.604× par37bp98.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.42/ov71bp82.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.32/ov37bp33.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 29%
54.1Middle17.2% of overs · 2w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp90.415%
Versatilityp44.712%
Trajectoryp27.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.115× par30bp37.244.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp73.444.1%
Boundary %23%30bp30.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.115× par26bp43.650%
Econ vs LHB0.91× par4bp45.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 37%
38.2Death20.7% of overs · 2w · 12.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp3448%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp4015%
Trajectoryp27.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.101× par36bp32.750%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp48.116.7%
Boundary %31%36bp28.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%36bp2540%
Slower ball036bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer036bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Praful Hinge
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
60.4
Scout Score
Overs 23.5 · Wkts 8 · Runs 254 · Econ 10.66
60.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay68.450.3%34.4
Middle51.68.4%4.3
Death52.541.3%21.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p79.80.96×
Scout Score60.4
68.4Powerplay50.3% of overs · 5w · 10.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp98.615%
Versatilityp5310%
Trajectoryp79.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.011× par72bp5036.8%
Wicket rate0.41/ov72bp87.842.1%
Boundary %24%72bp71.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.901× par39bp71.630%
Econ vs LHB1.165× par33bp14.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.31/ov39bp55.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.55/ov33bp79.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 38%
51.6Middle8.4% of overs · 0w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp64.915%
Versatilityp45.712%
Trajectoryp79.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.948× par12bp54.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp23.444.1%
Boundary %8%12bp64.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.644× par9bp71.350%
Econ vs LHB1.942× par3bp20.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
52.5Death41.3% of overs · 3w · 11.59 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.448%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp51.115%
Trajectoryp79.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.007× par59bp51.950%
Wicket rate0.31/ov59bp32.716.7%
Boundary %25%59bp48.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%59bp52.840%
Slower ball059bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer059bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Gaurav Dhoble
Bowler · Off-spin
60.3
Scout Score
Overs 10.5 · Wkts 4 · Runs 99 · Econ 9.14
60.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle60.390.8%54.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p39.41.01×
Scout Score60.3
60.3Middle90.8% of overs · 4w · 8.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp78.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp35.115%
Versatilityp73.412%
Trajectoryp39.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.907× par59bp75.544.1%
Wicket rate0.41/ov59bp81.944.1%
Boundary %14%59bp75.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.94× par37bp69.150%
Econ vs LHB0.861× par22bp77.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 19%
Rajveer Jolly
Bowler · RA pace
59.8
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 154 · Econ 9.06
59.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle6288.2%54.7
Death43.411.8%5.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p95.20.77×
Scout Score59.8
62Middle88.2% of overs · 4w · 8.53 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp69.115%
Versatilityp59.612%
Trajectoryp95.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.952× par90bp73.444.1%
Wicket rate0.26/ov90bp41.544.1%
Boundary %16%90bp71.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.909× par68bp79.850%
Econ vs LHB1.059× par22bp39.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 23%
43.4Death11.8% of overs · 0w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.148%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp33.315%
Trajectoryp95.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.129× par12bp40.450%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp17.316.7%
Boundary %42%12bp21.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp8.340%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Kunal Nagar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 19
59.6
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 158 · Econ 9.29
59.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay42.429.4%12.5
Middle66.770.6%47.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p97.10.77×
Scout Score59.6
42.4Powerplay29.4% of overs · 0w · 10.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp25.715%
Versatilityp37.310%
Trajectoryp97.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.006× par30bp47.336.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp1.442.1%
Boundary %23%30bp59.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.392× par12bp14.930%
Econ vs LHB0.758× par18bp85.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp21.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov18bp14.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
66.7Middle70.6% of overs · 4w · 8.92 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp8415%
Versatilityp69.112%
Trajectoryp97.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.994× par72bp62.844.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp6744.1%
Boundary %21%72bp41.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.073× par45bp52.150%
Econ vs LHB0.863× par27bp86.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
Aditya Thakare
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
59.1
Scout Score
Overs 30.2 · Wkts 20 · Runs 319 · Econ 10.52
59.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay55.849.5%27.6
Middle72.419.8%14.3
Death55.930.8%17.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p740.97×
Scout Score59.1
55.8Powerplay49.5% of overs · 7w · 11.27 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp66.215%
Versatilityp5010%
Trajectoryp7410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.112× par90bp2336.8%
Wicket rate0.47/ov90bp93.242.1%
Boundary %31%90bp2321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.144× par65bp12.230%
Econ vs LHB0.992× par25bp5030%
Wkt vs RHB0.46/ov65bp87.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.48/ov25bp68.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 27%
72.4Middle19.8% of overs · 5w · 6.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp87.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp71.315%
Versatilityp70.212%
Trajectoryp7410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.762× par36bp8444.1%
Wicket rate0.83/ov36bp96.844.1%
Boundary %14%36bp69.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.713× par28bp88.350%
Econ vs LHB0.91× par8bp52.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
55.9Death30.8% of overs · 8w · 11.68 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.248%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp6015%
Trajectoryp7412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.015× par56bp44.250%
Wicket rate0.86/ov56bp98.116.7%
Boundary %27%56bp44.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%56bp7540%
Slower ball056bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer056bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Avinash Jadhav
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
59
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 36 · Econ 9
59OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay6450%32.0
Middle5450%27.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50n/a
Scout Score59
64Powerplay50% of overs · 1w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp79.715%
Versatilityp64.310%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.74× par12bp68.936.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp68.942.1%
Boundary %8%12bp81.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.768× par6bp55.430%
Econ vs LHB0.724× par6bp74.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov6bp41.920%
Wkt vs LHB1.00/ov6bp85.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 42%
54Middle50% of overs · 1w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp81.915%
Versatilityp40.412%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.171× par12bp35.144.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp70.244.1%
Boundary %25%12bp37.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.724× par8bp64.950%
Econ vs LHB2.185× par4bp1650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 42%
Pushpak Gujar
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 27
57.8
Scout Score
Overs 34.4 · Wkts 9 · Runs 296 · Econ 8.54
57.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle54.669.2%37.8
Death6530.8%20.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p33.71.02×
Scout Score57.8
54.6Middle69.2% of overs · 6w · 8.42 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp41.515%
Versatilityp75.512%
Trajectoryp33.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.939× par144bp79.844.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov144bp37.244.1%
Boundary %14%144bp86.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.921× par114bp8450%
Econ vs LHB0.947× par30bp6750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
65Death30.8% of overs · 3w · 8.81 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.755%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp58.38%
Trajectoryp33.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.766× par64bp82.743.6%
Boundary %14%64bp94.241.8%
Wicket rate0.28/ov64bp28.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7452bp58.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Tejas Soni
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
57.5
Scout Score
Overs 26.0 · Wkts 12 · Runs 277 · Econ 10.65
57.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay55.730.8%17.2
Middle51.923.1%12.0
Death61.446.2%28.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p72.10.99×
Scout Score57.5
55.7Powerplay30.8% of overs · 6w · 11.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp7315%
Versatilityp49.710%
Trajectoryp72.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.172× par48bp14.936.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov48bp98.642.1%
Boundary %35%48bp14.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.896× par27bp68.930%
Econ vs LHB1.566× par21bp1.430%
Wkt vs RHB1.11/ov27bp98.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.29/ov21bp44.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 29%
51.9Middle23.1% of overs · 2w · 9.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.738%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp29.815%
Versatilityp57.412%
Trajectoryp72.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.022× par36bp48.944.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp61.744.1%
Boundary %19%36bp5011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.139× par26bp35.150%
Econ vs LHB0.655× par10bp79.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
61.4Death46.2% of overs · 4w · 10.58 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.848%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp64.415%
Trajectoryp72.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.92× par72bp67.350%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp38.516.7%
Boundary %22%72bp71.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%72bp86.140%
Slower ball072bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer072bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Abhishek Gupta
Bowler · RA pace
56.8
Scout Score
Overs 15.5 · Wkts 4 · Runs 158 · Econ 9.98
56.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay49.631.6%15.7
Middle66.737.9%25.3
Death52.130.5%15.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p87.50.87×
Scout Score56.8
49.6Powerplay31.6% of overs · 1w · 9.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp4538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp39.215%
Versatilityp43.210%
Trajectoryp87.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.967× par30bp52.736.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp31.142.1%
Boundary %23%30bp59.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.928× par18bp52.730%
Econ vs LHB1.034× par12bp39.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov18bp52.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov12bp25.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 23%
66.7Middle37.9% of overs · 2w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp98.915%
Versatilityp62.812%
Trajectoryp87.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.948× par36bp6744.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp61.744.1%
Boundary %22%36bp3411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.136× par17bp41.550%
Econ vs LHB0.805× par19bp8450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 42%
52.1Death30.5% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.148%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp68.915%
Trajectoryp87.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.043× par29bp48.150%
Wicket rate0.20/ov29bp2516.7%
Boundary %31%29bp32.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%29bp97.240%
Slower ball029bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer029bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Siddhant Muley
Bowler · Off-spin
54.5
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 144 · Econ 9.6
54.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay33.513.3%4.5
Middle57.886.7%50.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p77.90.97×
Scout Score54.5
33.5Powerplay13.3% of overs · 0w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp18.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp10.815%
Versatilityp34.310%
Trajectoryp77.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.381× par12bp17.636.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp18.942.1%
Boundary %42%12bp20.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0× par1bp5030%
Econ vs LHB1.579× par11bp12.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov1bp47.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp31.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 8%
57.8Middle86.7% of overs · 7w · 8.92 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp77.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp11.715%
Versatilityp52.112%
Trajectoryp77.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.995× par78bp64.944.1%
Wicket rate0.54/ov78bp94.744.1%
Boundary %18%78bp60.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.336× par40bp7.450%
Econ vs LHB0.632× par38bp96.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 14%
Umesh Yadav
Bowler · RA pace · age 38
54.5
Scout Score
Overs 28.0 · Wkts 11 · Runs 290 · Econ 10.36
54.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay64.460.7%39.1
Middle45.57.1%3.2
Death3832.1%12.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p261.09×
Scout Score54.5
64.4Powerplay60.7% of overs · 5w · 8.59 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.238%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp87.815%
Versatilityp69.210%
Trajectoryp2610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.847× par102bp87.836.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov102bp56.842.1%
Boundary %22%102bp85.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.884× par43bp79.730%
Econ vs LHB0.841× par59bp87.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.56/ov43bp90.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.10/ov59bp4.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 31%
45.5Middle7.1% of overs · 1w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp74.515%
Versatilityp36.212%
Trajectoryp2610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.505× par12bp1644.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp70.244.1%
Boundary %42%12bp9.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB2.024× par7bp11.750%
Econ vs LHB0.728× par5bp60.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
38Death32.1% of overs · 5w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.848%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp56.715%
Trajectoryp2612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.129× par54bp2550%
Wicket rate0.56/ov54bp78.816.7%
Boundary %37%54bp9.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%54bp66.740%
Slower ball054bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer054bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Jagjot Sasan
Bowler · Off-spin · age 22
53.7
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 50 · Econ 10
53.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle53.780%43.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score53.7
53.7Middle80% of overs · 0w · 6.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp5138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp53.215%
Versatilityp70.212%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.697× par24bp81.944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp12.844.1%
Boundary %8%24bp78.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.644× par15bp77.750%
Econ vs LHB0.809× par9bp62.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 21%
Kshitiz Dahiya
Bowler · RA pace · age 28
53.4
Scout Score
Overs 20.4 · Wkts 9 · Runs 196 · Econ 9.48
53.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay38.429%11.1
Middle63.833.9%21.6
Death55.637.1%20.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p14.41.16×
Scout Score53.4
38.4Powerplay29% of overs · 2w · 11.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp20.315%
Versatilityp49.210%
Trajectoryp14.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.167× par36bp20.336.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp63.542.1%
Boundary %28%36bp31.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.152× par35bp2330%
Econ vs LHB0.62× par1bp52.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov35bp60.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov1bp71.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 19%
63.8Middle33.9% of overs · 3w · 8.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp7238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp94.715%
Versatilityp69.112%
Trajectoryp14.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.94× par42bp71.344.1%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp77.744.1%
Boundary %19%42bp53.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.095× par30bp5050%
Econ vs LHB0.486× par12bp88.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 38%
55.6Death37.1% of overs · 4w · 8.61 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.448%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp37.815%
Trajectoryp14.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.748× par46bp78.850%
Wicket rate0.52/ov46bp7516.7%
Boundary %22%46bp67.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%46bp19.440%
Slower ball046bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer046bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Kaustubh Salve
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
52
Scout Score
Overs 32.0 · Wkts 12 · Runs 299 · Econ 9.34
52OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay56.228.1%15.8
Middle50.368.8%34.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p81.70.94×
Scout Score52
56.2Powerplay28.1% of overs · 4w · 10.44 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.938%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp17.615%
Versatilityp64.610%
Trajectoryp81.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.03× par54bp41.936.8%
Wicket rate0.44/ov54bp90.542.1%
Boundary %24%54bp63.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.022× par53bp39.230%
Econ vs LHB0× par1bp66.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov53bp68.920%
Wkt vs LHB6.00/ov1bp95.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
50.3Middle68.8% of overs · 7w · 9.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp1.115%
Versatilityp5012%
Trajectoryp81.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.019× par132bp58.544.1%
Wicket rate0.32/ov132bp64.944.1%
Boundary %17%132bp62.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.975× par113bp75.550%
Econ vs LHB1.15× par19bp24.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 8%
Rahul Dongarwar
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
50.7
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 194 · Econ 10.78
50.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay55.844.4%24.8
Middle4127.8%11.4
Death52.527.8%14.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p83.70.9×
Scout Score50.7
55.8Powerplay44.4% of overs · 2w · 9.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.238%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp7315%
Versatilityp54.110%
Trajectoryp83.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.95× par48bp63.536.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp36.542.1%
Boundary %27%48bp35.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.187× par33bp17.630%
Econ vs LHB0.372× par15bp95.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.18/ov33bp39.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp60.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 29%
41Middle27.8% of overs · 0w · 12.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp8.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp96.815%
Versatilityp20.212%
Trajectoryp83.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.36× par30bp11.744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp6.444.1%
Boundary %33%30bp3.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.2× par22bp28.750%
Econ vs LHB1.821× par8bp11.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 43%
52.5Death27.8% of overs · 1w · 11.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.948%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp33.315%
Trajectoryp83.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.973× par30bp63.550%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp9.616.7%
Boundary %23%30bp55.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%30bp8.340%
Slower ball030bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer030bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Aditya Sarwate
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 36
49
Scout Score
Overs 28.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 206 · Econ 7.36
49OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay65.425%16.4
Middle43.267.9%29.3
Death46.47.1%3.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p37.51.01×
Scout Score49
65.4Powerplay25% of overs · 2w · 5.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp68.915%
Versatilityp77.310%
Trajectoryp37.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.564× par42bp98.636.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp52.742.1%
Boundary %12%42bp98.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.591× par38bp98.630%
Econ vs LHB0.155× par4bp82.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.32/ov38bp58.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp56.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 29%
43.2Middle67.9% of overs · 3w · 7.42 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp3.215%
Versatilityp51.112%
Trajectoryp37.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.828× par114bp88.344.1%
Wicket rate0.16/ov114bp9.644.1%
Boundary %12%114bp88.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.636× par83bp96.850%
Econ vs LHB1.386× par31bp5.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 10%
46.4Death7.1% of overs · 0w · 12.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.655%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp33.38%
Trajectoryp37.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.086× par12bp55.843.6%
Boundary %25%12bp51.941.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp17.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.0912bp33.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Mandar Ghodmare
Bowler · Leg-spin
48.8
Scout Score
Overs 14.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 115 · Econ 8.21
48.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle42.478.6%33.3
Death72.221.4%15.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p6.71.24×
Scout Score48.8
42.4Middle78.6% of overs · 3w · 9.82 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp43.615%
Versatilityp45.712%
Trajectoryp6.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.095× par66bp39.444.1%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp47.944.1%
Boundary %18%66bp58.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.115× par52bp3350%
Econ vs LHB0.936× par14bp58.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
72.2Death21.4% of overs · 3w · 2.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp93.755%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp91.78%
Trajectoryp6.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.203× par18bp98.143.6%
Boundary %0%18bp90.441.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp90.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.218bp91.7100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Darshan Nalkande
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
48.6
Scout Score
Overs 23.5 · Wkts 9 · Runs 282 · Econ 11.83
48.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay50.954.5%27.7
Middle4116.8%6.9
Death48.528.7%13.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p91.30.79×
Scout Score48.6
50.9Powerplay54.5% of overs · 5w · 10.85 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp33.815%
Versatilityp41.410%
Trajectoryp91.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.07× par78bp33.836.8%
Wicket rate0.38/ov78bp7742.1%
Boundary %28%78bp25.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.085× par51bp31.130%
Econ vs LHB1.034× par27bp36.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.47/ov51bp85.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.22/ov27bp20.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 23%
41Middle16.8% of overs · 1w · 12.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp38.315%
Versatilityp27.712%
Trajectoryp91.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.366× par24bp13.844.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp44.744.1%
Boundary %29%24bp11.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.546× par15bp13.850%
Econ vs LHB1.052× par9bp41.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
48.5Death28.7% of overs · 3w · 13.46 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.748%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp62.215%
Trajectoryp91.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.17× par41bp21.250%
Wicket rate0.44/ov41bp59.616.7%
Boundary %29%41bp36.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%41bp80.640%
Slower ball041bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer041bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Kunal Kungwani
Bowler · RA pace · age 20
48.2
Scout Score
Overs 22.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 244 · Econ 11.09
48.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay45.636.4%16.6
Middle57.631.8%18.3
Death41.831.8%13.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p70.20.99×
Scout Score48.2
45.6Powerplay36.4% of overs · 2w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.238%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp2315%
Versatilityp48.610%
Trajectoryp70.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.962× par48bp58.136.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp36.542.1%
Boundary %27%48bp35.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.761× par25bp85.130%
Econ vs LHB1.214× par23bp17.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.48/ov25bp79.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov23bp9.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 21%
57.6Middle31.8% of overs · 2w · 9.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp92.615%
Versatilityp54.812%
Trajectoryp70.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.067× par42bp41.544.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp53.244.1%
Boundary %21%42bp39.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.063× par40bp54.350%
Econ vs LHB0.364× par2bp55.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 36%
41.8Death31.8% of overs · 5w · 14.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.848%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp46.715%
Trajectoryp70.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.229× par42bp17.350%
Wicket rate0.71/ov42bp86.516.7%
Boundary %33%42bp17.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%42bp41.740%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer042bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Varun Bisht
Bowler · Off-spin · age 22
47.7
Scout Score
Overs 13.3 · Wkts 3 · Runs 121 · Econ 8.96
47.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle48.777.8%37.9
Death44.322.2%9.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p16.31.15×
Scout Score47.7
48.7Middle77.8% of overs · 3w · 8.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp6538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp9.615%
Versatilityp70.212%
Trajectoryp16.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.903× par63bp77.744.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov63bp5044.1%
Boundary %14%63bp73.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.107× par32bp45.750%
Econ vs LHB0.705× par31bp94.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 13%
44.3Death22.2% of overs · 0w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.255%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp20.88%
Trajectoryp16.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.043× par18bp59.643.6%
Boundary %22%18bp59.641.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp1.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.226bp20.8100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Dipesh Parwani
Bowler · LA pace · age 26
47.6
Scout Score
Overs 22.5 · Wkts 10 · Runs 251 · Econ 10.99
47.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay54.352.6%28.6
Middle29.125.5%7.4
Death52.921.9%11.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p4.81.25×
Scout Score47.6
54.3Powerplay52.6% of overs · 7w · 11.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp85.115%
Versatilityp44.610%
Trajectoryp4.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.102× par72bp28.436.8%
Wicket rate0.58/ov72bp95.942.1%
Boundary %26%72bp47.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.11× par41bp25.730%
Econ vs LHB1.101× par31bp25.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.73/ov41bp93.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.39/ov31bp52.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 32%
29.1Middle25.5% of overs · 1w · 12.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp15.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp60.615%
Versatilityp10.612%
Trajectoryp4.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.434× par35bp5.344.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov35bp28.744.1%
Boundary %34%35bp1.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.387× par13bp18.150%
Econ vs LHB1.556× par22bp3.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 23%
52.9Death21.9% of overs · 2w · 8.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.948%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp42.215%
Trajectoryp4.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.73× par30bp71.250%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp55.816.7%
Boundary %20%30bp7533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%30bp30.640%
Slower ball030bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer030bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Sahil Sheikh
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 23
46
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 56 · Econ 11.2
46OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay49.440%19.8
Middle43.760%26.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score46
49.4Powerplay40% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp28.415%
Versatilityp56.610%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.987× par12bp44.636.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp68.942.1%
Boundary %25%12bp41.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.96× par12bp44.630%
Econ vs LHB—0bp45.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.50/ov12bp71.620%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp75.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
43.7Middle60% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp3838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp56.415%
Versatilityp23.912%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.338× par18bp22.344.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp58.544.1%
Boundary %28%18bp20.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.288× par13bp25.550%
Econ vs LHB1.457× par5bp22.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
Raghunath Ramaswamy Sanjay
Bowler · Off-spin · age 31
45.6
Scout Score
Overs 19.4 · Wkts 8 · Runs 198 · Econ 10.07
45.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.620.3%12.1
Middle48.435.6%17.2
Death36.844.1%16.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p8.71.22×
Scout Score45.6
59.6Powerplay20.3% of overs · 2w · 6.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp48.615%
Versatilityp7010%
Trajectoryp8.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.666× par24bp82.436.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp82.442.1%
Boundary %17%24bp7721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.832× par9bp60.830%
Econ vs LHB0.579× par15bp90.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov9bp35.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.80/ov15bp87.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
48.4Middle35.6% of overs · 2w · 8.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp19.115%
Versatilityp6612%
Trajectoryp8.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.956× par42bp69.144.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp53.244.1%
Boundary %12%42bp8411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.026× par27bp58.550%
Econ vs LHB0.825× par15bp73.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 14%
36.8Death44.1% of overs · 4w · 12.81 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.355%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp20.88%
Trajectoryp8.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.113× par52bp28.843.6%
Boundary %27%52bp40.441.8%
Wicket rate0.46/ov52bp67.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.229bp20.8100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Sanskar Chavate
Bowler · RA pace · age 20
45.5
Scout Score
Overs 30.0 · Wkts 11 · Runs 350 · Econ 11.67
45.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay57.953.3%30.9
Middle4013.3%5.3
Death27.833.3%9.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p12.51.18×
Scout Score45.5
57.9Powerplay53.3% of overs · 6w · 9.81 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp90.515%
Versatilityp54.310%
Trajectoryp12.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.968× par96bp71.636.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov96bp74.342.1%
Boundary %28%96bp28.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.971× par54bp58.130%
Econ vs LHB0.975× par42bp58.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.67/ov54bp95.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov42bp1.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
40Middle13.3% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp38.315%
Versatilityp55.312%
Trajectoryp12.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.004× par24bp52.144.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp12.844.1%
Boundary %12%24bp6711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.012× par21bp60.650%
Econ vs LHB0.728× par3bp5050%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
27.8Death33.3% of overs · 5w · 15.7 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp13.548%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp48.915%
Trajectoryp12.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.364× par60bp1.950%
Wicket rate0.50/ov60bp71.216.7%
Boundary %42%60bp1.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%60bp47.240%
Slower ball060bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer060bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Arya Durugkar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 19
45.4
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 91 · Econ 10.11
45.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay50.144.4%22.2
Middle41.555.6%23.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score45.4
50.1Powerplay44.4% of overs · 1w · 9.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp48.615%
Versatilityp50.810%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.937× par24bp55.436.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp44.642.1%
Boundary %25%24bp5021.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.947× par14bp47.330%
Econ vs LHB0.93× par10bp55.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.43/ov14bp63.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov10bp36.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
41.5Middle55.6% of overs · 1w · 10.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp47.915%
Versatilityp26.112%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.182× par30bp3344.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp3444.1%
Boundary %20%30bp46.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.288× par13bp25.550%
Econ vs LHB1.157× par17bp26.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
Adhyan Daga
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
45.1
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 68 · Econ 9.71
45.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle45.185.7%38.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score45.1
45.1Middle85.7% of overs · 1w · 9.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp4338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp29.815%
Versatilityp53.212%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.022× par36bp48.944.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp26.644.1%
Boundary %11%36bp81.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.142× par22bp37.250%
Econ vs LHB0.832× par14bp69.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
Hrushikesh Pawar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 30
45
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 137 · Econ 9.13
45OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay60.446.7%28.2
Middle31.553.3%16.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p68.31×
Scout Score45
60.4Powerplay46.7% of overs · 3w · 7.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp80.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp14.915%
Versatilityp71.910%
Trajectoryp68.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.733× par42bp85.136.8%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp79.742.1%
Boundary %21%42bp74.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.746× par34bp93.230%
Econ vs LHB0.62× par8bp79.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov34bp1.420%
Wkt vs LHB2.25/ov8bp98.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 19%
31.5Middle53.3% of overs · 0w · 10.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp16.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp5.315%
Versatilityp43.612%
Trajectoryp68.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.185× par48bp28.744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov48bp1.144.1%
Boundary %23%48bp26.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.455× par27bp5.350%
Econ vs LHB0.832× par21bp81.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 8%
Lalit Yadav
Bowler · RA pace · age 30
44.5
Scout Score
Overs 19.5 · Wkts 8 · Runs 223 · Econ 11.24
44.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay53.450.4%26.9
Death35.449.6%17.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p35.61.02×
Scout Score44.5
53.4Powerplay50.4% of overs · 2w · 8.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp58.115%
Versatilityp49.210%
Trajectoryp35.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.868× par60bp79.736.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp2742.1%
Boundary %20%60bp90.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.757× par35bp90.530%
Econ vs LHB1.042× par25bp33.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.17/ov35bp31.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.24/ov25bp28.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
35.4Death49.6% of overs · 6w · 13.73 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp2548%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp44.415%
Trajectoryp35.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.193× par59bp13.550%
Wicket rate0.61/ov59bp82.716.7%
Boundary %32%59bp13.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%59bp36.140%
Slower ball059bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer059bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Sooraj Rai
Bowler · LA pace · age 29
44.3
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 73 · Econ 10.43
44.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay53.957.1%30.8
Middle31.542.9%13.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score44.3
53.9Powerplay57.1% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp48.615%
Versatilityp60.710%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.888× par24bp66.236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp44.642.1%
Boundary %21%24bp66.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.905× par21bp63.530%
Econ vs LHB0.62× par3bp70.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov21bp9.520%
Wkt vs LHB2.00/ov3bp93.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
31.5Middle42.9% of overs · 0w · 12.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp18.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp24.515%
Versatilityp2512%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.375× par18bp18.144.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp18.144.1%
Boundary %28%18bp20.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.324× par18bp1650%
Econ vs LHB—0bp3450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 11%
Shubham Kapse
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
42.8
Scout Score
Overs 28.1 · Wkts 12 · Runs 320 · Econ 11.36
42.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay44.839.1%17.5
Middle34.928.4%9.9
Death47.332.5%15.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p2.91.28×
Scout Score42.8
44.8Powerplay39.1% of overs · 3w · 11.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.238%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp93.215%
Versatilityp40.310%
Trajectoryp2.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.121× par66bp25.736.8%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp5042.1%
Boundary %32%66bp17.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.942× par52bp66.230%
Econ vs LHB1.772× par14bp6.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.35/ov52bp74.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov14bp17.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 36%
34.9Middle28.4% of overs · 2w · 10.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.738%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp24.512%
Trajectoryp2.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.199× par48bp26.644.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp39.444.1%
Boundary %25%48bp13.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.189× par39bp20.250%
Econ vs LHB1.133× par9bp28.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 21%
47.3Death32.5% of overs · 7w · 11.89 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.148%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp53.315%
Trajectoryp2.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.033× par55bp36.550%
Wicket rate0.76/ov55bp94.216.7%
Boundary %24%55bp63.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%55bp58.340%
Slower ball055bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer055bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Ashit Singh
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
42.6
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 68 · Econ 8.5
42.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle42.687.5%37.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score42.6
42.6Middle87.5% of overs · 1w · 9.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp19.115%
Versatilityp55.312%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.02× par42bp56.444.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp20.244.1%
Boundary %19%42bp53.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.133× par25bp39.450%
Econ vs LHB0.857× par17bp71.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 14%
Manan Agrawal
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
42.1
Scout Score
Overs 5.5 · Wkts 3 · Runs 98 · Econ 16.8
42.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle50.251.4%25.8
Death33.548.6%16.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score42.1
50.2Middle51.4% of overs · 2w · 14.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp86.215%
Versatilityp24.512%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.598× par18bp7.444.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp89.444.1%
Boundary %39%18bp5.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.127× par12bp47.950%
Econ vs LHB2.671× par6bp1.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 39%
33.5Death48.6% of overs · 1w · 19.41 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.948%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp33.315%
Trajectoryp53.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.687× par17bp5.850%
Wicket rate0.35/ov17bp51.916.7%
Boundary %35%17bp2533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%17bp8.340%
Slower ball017bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer017bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Gaurav Farde
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 21
40.3
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 66 · Econ 13.2
40.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay33.940%13.6
Middle44.560%26.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score40.3
33.9Powerplay40% of overs · 0w · 12.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.238%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp2.715%
Versatilityp39.210%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.233× par12bp31.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp18.942.1%
Boundary %25%12bp41.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.095× par10bp36.530%
Econ vs LHB1.861× par2bp31.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov10bp28.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov2bp66.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 0%
44.5Middle60% of overs · 2w · 13.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp4638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp45.715%
Versatilityp19.112%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.524× par18bp9.644.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp89.444.1%
Boundary %28%18bp20.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.288× par9bp30.950%
Econ vs LHB1.861× par9bp7.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
Atharva Podutwar
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
39.2
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 73 · Econ 14.6
39.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay39.280%31.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score39.2
39.2Powerplay80% of overs · 0w · 13.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp9.938%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp95.915%
Versatilityp21.910%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.357× par24bp12.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp6.842.1%
Boundary %42%24bp12.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.414× par11bp20.330%
Econ vs LHB1.336× par13bp20.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov11bp25.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov13bp2320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 50%
Hardik Verma
Bowler · SLA orthodox
38.7
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 46 · Econ 9.2
38.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle38.7100%38.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p11.34×
Scout Score38.7
38.7Middle100% of overs · 0w · 9.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp62.815%
Versatilityp48.412%
Trajectoryp110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.026× par30bp45.744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp6.444.1%
Boundary %20%30bp46.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.987× par30bp62.850%
Econ vs LHB—0bp3450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 23%
Rajneesh Gurbani
Bowler · RA pace · age 33
38
Scout Score
Overs 27.1 · Wkts 5 · Runs 307 · Econ 11.3
38OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay41.869.9%29.2
Death29.130.1%8.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p241.1×
Scout Score38
41.8Powerplay69.9% of overs · 3w · 10.05 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.238%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp60.815%
Versatilityp34.310%
Trajectoryp2410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.992× par114bp60.836.8%
Wicket rate0.16/ov114bp4.142.1%
Boundary %26%114bp52.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.088× par54bp28.430%
Econ vs LHB0.92× par60bp7730%
Wkt vs RHB0.11/ov54bp6.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.20/ov60bp6.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
29.1Death30.1% of overs · 2w · 14.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=26
Componentpctweight
Productionp7.748%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp66.715%
Trajectoryp2412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.234× par49bp9.650%
Wicket rate0.25/ov49bp5.816.7%
Boundary %43%49bp5.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%49bp91.740%
Slower ball049bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer049bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Dushyant Tekan
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
37.6
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 81 · Econ 16.2
37.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.680%30.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score37.6
37.6Powerplay80% of overs · 1w · 16.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp48.615%
Versatilityp30.310%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.628× par24bp6.836.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp44.642.1%
Boundary %54%24bp4.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.585× par20bp6.830%
Econ vs LHB1.706× par4bp2330%
Wkt vs RHB0.30/ov20bp5020%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp56.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
Ankush Tammiwar
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 24
36.3
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 60 · Econ 12
36.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle36.380%29.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score36.3
36.3Middle80% of overs · 1w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp33.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp1615%
Versatilityp28.212%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.282× par24bp24.544.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp44.744.1%
Boundary %25%24bp24.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.234× par24bp22.350%
Econ vs LHB—0bp3450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 8%
Shree Choudhary
Bowler · Off-spin · age 20
34.2
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 57 · Econ 11.4
34.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle34.2100%34.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score34.2
34.2Middle100% of overs · 1w · 11.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp25.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp22.315%
Versatilityp26.612%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.271× par30bp20.244.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp3444.1%
Boundary %27%30bp1611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.803× par10bp9.650%
Econ vs LHB1.056× par20bp43.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 13%
Akshay Karnewar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 33
32.7
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 91 · Econ 13
32.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle32.785.7%28.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p760.97×
Scout Score32.7
32.7Middle85.7% of overs · 0w · 10.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp1938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp7.415%
Versatilityp35.112%
Trajectoryp7610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.208× par36bp30.944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp3.244.1%
Boundary %22%36bp3411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.051× par19bp56.450%
Econ vs LHB1.457× par17bp13.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 6%
Ananmay Jaiswal
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
31.4
Scout Score
Overs 19.3 · Wkts 3 · Runs 227 · Econ 11.64
31.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay34.151.3%17.5
Middle28.343.6%12.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p18.31.14×
Scout Score31.4
34.1Powerplay51.3% of overs · 2w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp6.815%
Versatilityp34.610%
Trajectoryp18.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.036× par60bp39.236.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp2742.1%
Boundary %25%60bp55.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.998× par41bp41.930%
Econ vs LHB1.11× par19bp28.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.14/ov41bp17.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.32/ov19bp5020%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 18%
28.3Middle43.6% of overs · 1w · 12.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp8.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp6715%
Versatilityp6.412%
Trajectoryp18.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.417× par51bp1.144.1%
Wicket rate0.12/ov51bp1644.1%
Boundary %28%51bp7.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.479× par27bp3.250%
Econ vs LHB1.396× par24bp9.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 24%
Rahul Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
28
Scout Score
Overs 12.3 · Wkts 4 · Runs 142 · Econ 11.36
28OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay31.716%5.1
Middle27.272%19.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p22.11.12×
Scout Score28
31.7Powerplay16% of overs · 0w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.238%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp2.715%
Versatilityp41.110%
Trajectoryp22.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.085× par12bp36.536.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp18.942.1%
Boundary %25%12bp41.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.296× par4bp33.830%
Econ vs LHB1.008× par8bp41.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov4bp44.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp47.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 0%
27.2Middle72% of overs · 2w · 12.11 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp18.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp13.815%
Versatilityp28.212%
Trajectoryp22.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.351× par54bp3.244.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp30.944.1%
Boundary %22%54bp28.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.338× par52bp1.150%
Econ vs LHB0.364× par2bp55.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 13%
Swapnil Singh
Bowler · RA pace
27.9
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 77 · Econ 19.25
27.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay27.975%20.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p53.81×
Scout Score27.9
27.9Powerplay75% of overs · 0w · 22.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp4.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp36.515%
Versatilityp1710%
Trajectoryp53.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy2.203× par18bp1.436.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp9.542.1%
Boundary %61%18bp1.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB2.305× par9bp1.430%
Econ vs LHB2.137× par9bp4.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov9bp35.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov9bp41.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
Shanmesh Deshmukh
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
24.6
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 120 · Econ 13.33
24.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay24.677.8%19.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p10.61.2×
Scout Score24.6
24.6Powerplay77.8% of overs · 1w · 14.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=37
Componentpctweight
Productionp1038%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp31.115%
Versatilityp15.910%
Trajectoryp10.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.438× par42bp9.536.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp12.242.1%
Boundary %43%42bp6.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.516× par19bp9.530%
Econ vs LHB1.402× par23bp9.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov19bp12.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.26/ov23bp39.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 21%