| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 21 | 8 | 241 | 136 | 177.2 | 34.4 | 26 | 11 | 74.4 Scout Score 74.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production63.240% Impact86.427% Versatility75.515% Shot quality68.26% Trajectory86.412% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[50, 0, 39] | 63.2 Production 63.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.17× parp86.435% True Avg0.98× parp40.930% Balls / boundary3.29p86.417.5% Balls / dismissal15.33p31.817.5% | 68.2 Shot Quality 68.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.2% Control · Build75.8% Phase-weighted control82.3% | 86.4 Impact 86.4 = WPA percentile · total +38.8 WPA · Powerplay+16.1 WPA · Consolidation+22.7 | 75.5 Versatility 75.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp86.426.7% vs Spin SRp86.426.7% Accel into Consp86.420% Pressure entryp45.526.7% | |
| 2 | LHB | 24 | 7 | 162 | 119 | 136.1 | 23.1 | 11 | 8 | 71.6 Scout Score 71.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production81.140% Impact77.327% Versatility29.415% Shot quality40.96% Trajectory95.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[36, 37, 0] | 81.1 Production 81.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.02× parp77.335% True Avg3× parp95.530% Balls / boundary4.91p59.117.5% Balls / dismissal54p86.417.5% | 40.9 Shot Quality 40.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.6% Control · Build83.3% Phase-weighted control77.7% | 77.3 Impact 77.3 = WPA percentile · total +6.9 WPA · Powerplay+10.5 WPA · Consolidation-3.7 | 29.4 Versatility 29.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp13.626.7% vs Spin SRp68.226.7% Accel into Consp31.820% Pressure entryp4.526.7% | |
| 3 | LHB | 19 | 11 | 310 | 165 | 187.9 | 31 | 32 | 16 | 70.7 Scout Score 70.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production5540% Impact95.527% Versatility82.115% Shot quality77.36% Trajectory5012% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[36, 44, 15] | 55 Production 55 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.44× parp95.535% True Avg0.57× parp13.630% Balls / boundary2.59p95.517.5% Balls / dismissal7.33p4.517.5% | 77.3 Shot Quality 77.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.5% Control · Build76% Phase-weighted control83.6% | 95.5 Impact 95.5 = WPA percentile · total +67.8 WPA · Powerplay+36.1 WPA · Consolidation+31.7 | 82.1 Versatility 82.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp95.526.7% vs Spin SRp95.526.7% Accel into Consp95.520% Pressure entryp45.526.7% | |
| 4 | RHB | 31 | 8 | 319 | 219 | 145.7 | 45.6 | 32 | 10 | 58.1 Scout Score 58.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production58.240% Impact68.227% Versatility38.515% Shot quality95.56% Trajectory40.912% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.83×[9, 50, 15] | 58.2 Production 58.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.87× parp5035% True Avg1.41× parp77.330% Balls / boundary5.67p31.817.5% Balls / dismissal29.75p68.217.5% | 95.5 Shot Quality 95.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation93.3% Control · Build91.1% Phase-weighted control92.6% | 68.2 Impact 68.2 = WPA percentile · total +3.3 WPA · Powerplay-5.4 WPA · Consolidation+8.7 | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5026.7% vs Spin SRp31.826.7% Accel into Consp22.720% Pressure entryp45.526.7% | |
| 5 | LHB | 18 | 10 | 350 | 217 | 161.3 | 43.8 | 30 | 19 | 46.5 Scout Score 46.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production6540% Impact4.527% Versatility61.515% Shot quality506% Trajectory59.112% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.93×[70, 0, 48] | 65 Production 65 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.94× parp59.135% True Avg1.42× parp68.230% Balls / boundary4.2p77.317.5% Balls / dismissal28p59.117.5% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76% Control · Build86.3% Phase-weighted control79.5% | 4.5 Impact 4.5 = WPA percentile · total -33.3 WPA · Powerplay-12.8 WPA · Consolidation-20.5 | 61.5 Versatility 61.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp77.326.7% vs Spin SRp77.326.7% Accel into Consp40.920% Pressure entryp45.526.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | 29 | 8 | 205 | 151 | 135.8 | 25.6 | 14 | 12 | 42.8 Scout Score 42.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production46.440% Impact5027% Versatility40.915% Shot quality31.86% Trajectory22.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.63×[27, 14, 1] | 46.4 Production 46.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.75× parp31.835% True Avg1.55× parp59.130% Balls / boundary6.33p22.717.5% Balls / dismissal38p77.317.5% | 31.8 Shot Quality 31.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75.6% Control · Build71% Phase-weighted control74.9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total -3.6 WPA · Powerplay-17.7 WPA · Consolidation+14.1 | 40.9 Versatility 40.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp40.926.7% vs Spin SRp22.726.7% Accel into Consp4.520% Pressure entryp86.426.7% | |
| 7 | RHB | 21 | 9 | 301 | 203 | 148.3 | 37.6 | 28 | 14 | 42.3 Scout Score 42.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production31.840% Impact59.127% Versatility41.515% Shot quality59.16% Trajectory31.812% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.65×[21, 5, 0] | 31.8 Production 31.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp22.735% True Avg0.93× parp31.830% Balls / boundary5.64p40.917.5% Balls / dismissal20.67p40.917.5% | 59.1 Shot Quality 59.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build78.6% Phase-weighted control82% | 59.1 Impact 59.1 = WPA percentile · total -0.2 WPA · Powerplay-6.1 WPA · Consolidation+5.9 | 41.5 Versatility 41.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp59.126.7% vs Spin SRp13.626.7% Accel into Consp5020% Pressure entryp45.526.7% | |
| 8 | LHB | 25 | 6 | 88 | 66 | 133.3 | 14.7 | 10 | 4 | 41.5 Scout Score 41.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4540% Impact31.827% Versatility43.315% Shot quality4.56% Trajectory68.212% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.95×[15, 25, 2] | 45 Production 45 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.96× parp68.235% True Avg0.5× parp22.730% Balls / boundary4p68.217.5% Balls / dismissal9.6p13.617.5% | 4.5 Shot Quality 4.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build61.1% Phase-weighted control61.1% | 31.8 Impact 31.8 = WPA percentile · total -17.9 WPA · Powerplay-17.9 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 43.3 Versatility 43.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp68.226.7% vs Spin SRp4.526.7% Accel into Consp59.120% Pressure entryp45.526.7% | |
| 9 | RHB | 24 | 8 | 199 | 152 | 130.9 | 28.4 | 11 | 15 | 40.2 Scout Score 40.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4540% Impact13.627% Versatility56.115% Shot quality13.66% Trajectory77.312% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[28, 30, 60] | 45 Production 45 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.7× parp4.535% True Avg2.46× parp86.430% Balls / boundary8.12p4.517.5% Balls / dismissal65p95.517.5% | 13.6 Shot Quality 13.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation67.9% Control · Build83.3% Phase-weighted control70% | 13.6 Impact 13.6 = WPA percentile · total -31.5 WPA · Powerplay-21.8 WPA · Consolidation-9.7 | 56.1 Versatility 56.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp22.726.7% vs Spin SRp40.926.7% Accel into Consp68.220% Pressure entryp95.526.7% | |
| 10 | RHB | 28 | 8 | 157 | 114 | 137.7 | 19.6 | 10 | 10 | 38 Scout Score 38 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production40.540% Impact40.927% Versatility51.815% Shot quality22.76% Trajectory13.612% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.62×[12, 6, 12] | 40.5 Production 40.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.85× parp40.935% True Avg1.11× parp5030% Balls / boundary6p13.617.5% Balls / dismissal24p5017.5% | 22.7 Shot Quality 22.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build40% Phase-weighted control72.1% | 40.9 Impact 40.9 = WPA percentile · total -14.1 WPA · Powerplay-19 WPA · Consolidation+4.9 | 51.8 Versatility 51.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp31.826.7% vs Spin SRp59.126.7% Accel into Consp77.320% Pressure entryp45.526.7% | |
| 11 | RHB | 28 | 8 | 144 | 123 | 117.1 | 18 | 15 | 5 | 23.8 Scout Score 23.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production18.940% Impact22.727% Versatility29.415% Shot quality86.46% Trajectory4.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.24×[1, 0, 1] | 18.9 Production 18.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.75× parp13.635% True Avg0.51× parp4.530% Balls / boundary5.43p5017.5% Balls / dismissal12.67p22.717.5% | 86.4 Shot Quality 86.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation91.3% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control86.4% | 22.7 Impact 22.7 = WPA percentile · total -20.9 WPA · Powerplay-14.3 WPA · Consolidation-6.6 | 29.4 Versatility 29.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp4.526.7% vs Spin SRp5026.7% Accel into Consp13.620% Pressure entryp45.526.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 29 | 11 | 281 | 176 | 159.7 | 28.1 | 21 | 19 | 80.7 Scout Score 80.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production91.328% Impact86.127% Versatility83.627% Shot quality508% Trajectory52.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.93×[1, 45, 9] | 91.3 Production 91.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.39× parp91.742.9% True Avg1.9× parp86.132.1% Balls / boundary3.71p97.225% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75.9% Control · Build78.3% Phase-weighted control76.9% | 86.1 Impact 86.1 = WPA percentile · total +29.8 WPA · Consolidation+7.1 WPA · Build+22.7 | 83.6 Versatility 83.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep94.444.4% vs LA-orthodox20bp95.5 vs Leg-spin14bp92.9 vs Short ball7b7b <min Spin hittingp88.929.6% Off-spin3b3b <min LA-orthodox55bp96.2 Leg-spin22bp70.8 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p80.614.8% Reach deathp30.611.1% | |
| 2 | LHB | 28 | 3 | 83 | 38 | 218.4 | 27.7 | 2 | 9 | 76 Scout Score 76 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production89.128% Impact97.227% Versatility52.727% Shot quality41.78% Trajectory72.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[32, 6, 45] | 89.1 Production 89.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.63× parp97.242.9% True Avg1.58× parp80.632.1% Balls / boundary3.36p86.125% | 41.7 Shot Quality 41.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Build76.7% Phase-weighted control75.7% | 97.2 Impact 97.2 = WPA percentile · total +67.9 WPA · Consolidation+1.3 WPA · Build+66.6 | 52.7 Versatility 52.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin6b6b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball7b7b <min Spin hittingp5029.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox4b4b <min Leg-spin6b6b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p97.214.8% Reach deathp11.111.1% | |
| 3 | RHB | 34 | 8 | 171 | 125 | 136.8 | 21.4 | 12 | 7 | 68.6 Scout Score 68.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production68.528% Impact80.627% Versatility49.427% Shot quality63.98% Trajectory91.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.2×[60, 47, 5] | 68.5 Production 68.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.02× parp63.942.9% True Avg1.39× parp69.432.1% Balls / boundary6.12p7525% | 63.9 Shot Quality 63.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation92.3% Control · Build75.4% Phase-weighted control81.7% | 80.6 Impact 80.6 = WPA percentile · total +12 WPA · Consolidation+4.7 WPA · Build+7.3 | 49.4 Versatility 49.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep47.744.4% vs LA-orthodox45bp31.8 vs Leg-spin27bp64.3 vs Short ball12bp70 Spin hittingp62.329.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox47bp42.3 Leg-spin28bp95.8 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p63.914.8% Reach deathp2.811.1% | |
| 4 | RHB | 24 | 8 | 189 | 129 | 146.5 | 31.5 | 13 | 12 | 68.3 Scout Score 68.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production7528% Impact91.727% Versatility49.127% Shot quality77.88% Trajectory30.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.86×[5, 24, 25] | 75 Production 75 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.08× parp86.142.9% True Avg1.02× parp47.232.1% Balls / boundary5.29p91.725% | 77.8 Shot Quality 77.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.7% Control · Build82.9% Phase-weighted control83.3% | 91.7 Impact 91.7 = WPA percentile · total +43.8 WPA · Consolidation-35.5 WPA · Build+79.2 | 49.1 Versatility 49.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep39.544.4% vs LA-orthodox28bp40.9 vs Leg-spin10bp35.7 vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp36.629.6% Off-spin19bp25 LA-orthodox47bp34.6 Leg-spin10bp54.2 Chinaman10bp50 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p91.714.8% Reach deathp63.911.1% | |
| 5 | RHB | 22 | 7 | 303 | 201 | 150.7 | 60.6 | 27 | 11 | 66.5 Scout Score 66.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production81.728% Impact41.727% Versatility7127% Shot quality91.78% Trajectory58.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.95×[62, 8, 0] | 81.7 Production 81.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.04× parp80.642.9% True Avg7.42× parp97.232.1% Balls / boundary6.8p63.925% | 91.7 Shot Quality 91.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.9% Control · Build91.2% Phase-weighted control90.4% | 41.7 Impact 41.7 = WPA percentile · total -6 WPA · Consolidation-6.5 WPA · Build+0.5 | 71 Versatility 71 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep80.344.4% vs LA-orthodox57bp77.3 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball18bp90 Spin hittingp50.229.6% Off-spin18bp15 LA-orthodox84bp57.7 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p69.414.8% Reach deathp91.711.1% | |
| 6 | RHB | 20 | 8 | 219 | 143 | 153.1 | 36.5 | 15 | 14 | 66.4 Scout Score 66.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production7928% Impact7527% Versatility6427% Shot quality258% Trajectory47.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.9×[16, 18, 61] | 79 Production 79 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.03× parp7542.9% True Avg2.3× parp91.732.1% Balls / boundary6.07p69.425% | 25 Shot Quality 25 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control70.6% | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile · total +10.5 WPA · Consolidation+2.6 WPA · Build+7.9 | 64 Versatility 64 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox24bp50 vs Leg-spin24bp50 vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp65.729.6% Off-spin19bp45 LA-orthodox30bp65.4 Leg-spin30bp79.2 Chinaman1b1b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p86.114.8% Reach deathp86.111.1% | |
| 7 | RHB | 20 | 7 | 95 | 78 | 121.8 | 15.8 | 5 | 6 | 58.5 Scout Score 58.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production52.428% Impact58.327% Versatility63.827% Shot quality13.98% Trajectory97.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.24×[34, 7, 12] | 52.4 Production 52.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.98× parp58.342.9% True Avg0.96× parp52.832.1% Balls / boundary7p41.725% | 13.9 Shot Quality 13.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation54.8% Control · Build76% Phase-weighted control64.3% | 58.3 Impact 58.3 = WPA percentile · total -2.5 WPA · Consolidation-13.5 WPA · Build+11.1 | 63.8 Versatility 63.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep86.444.4% vs LA-orthodox12bp86.4 vs Leg-spin9b9b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp52.229.6% Off-spin16bp65 LA-orthodox20bp73.1 Leg-spin13bp4.2 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p52.814.8% Reach deathp19.411.1% | |
| 8 | LHB | 28 | 9 | 186 | 130 | 143.1 | 20.7 | 25 | 3 | 53 Scout Score 53 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.528% Impact52.827% Versatility53.327% Shot quality58.38% Trajectory86.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[30, 58, 46] | 39.5 Production 39.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.9× parp41.742.9% True Avg0.64× parp30.632.1% Balls / boundary6.75p47.225% | 58.3 Shot Quality 58.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71% Control · Build87% Phase-weighted control77.8% | 52.8 Impact 52.8 = WPA percentile · total -4.5 WPA · Consolidation-16.9 WPA · Build+12.4 | 53.3 Versatility 53.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin5b5b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp66.929.6% Off-spin26bp75 LA-orthodox15bp80.8 Leg-spin20bp45.8 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p47.214.8% Reach deathp38.911.1% | |
| 9 | RHB | 26 | 7 | 136 | 80 | 170 | 27.2 | 3 | 14 | 49.2 Scout Score 49.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production56.328% Impact69.427% Versatility36.427% Shot quality508% Trajectory8.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.71×[14, 15, 1] | 56.3 Production 56.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.04× parp69.442.9% True Avg0.88× parp41.732.1% Balls / boundary6.5p52.825% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.5% Control · Build77.1% Phase-weighted control76.9% | 69.4 Impact 69.4 = WPA percentile · total +4.6 WPA · Consolidation-12.7 WPA · Build+17.3 | 36.4 Versatility 36.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep13.644.4% vs LA-orthodox22bp13.6 vs Leg-spin5b5b <min vs Short ball8b8b <min Spin hittingp56.129.6% Off-spin18bp95 LA-orthodox24bp26.9 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman2b2b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p19.414.8% Reach deathp97.211.1% | |
| 10 | RHB | — | 7 | 146 | 114 | 128.1 | 20.9 | 19 | 3 | 48.8 Scout Score 48.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production63.328% Impact36.127% Versatility34.627% Shot quality69.48% Trajectory63.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[46, 5, 0] | 63.3 Production 63.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.95× parp52.842.9% True Avg1.28× parp63.932.1% Balls / boundary5.5p80.625% | 69.4 Shot Quality 69.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.6% Control · Build82.1% Phase-weighted control81.8% | 36.1 Impact 36.1 = WPA percentile · total -7.7 WPA · Consolidation+12.4 WPA · Build-20.2 | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep26.644.4% vs LA-orthodox15bp59.1 vs Leg-spin27bp7.1 vs Short ball11bp30 Spin hittingp38.329.6% Off-spin7b7b <min LA-orthodox22bp50 Leg-spin28bp29.2 Chinaman3b3b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p58.314.8% Reach deathp2511.1% | |
| 11 | RHB | 27 | 2 | 48 | 43 | 111.6 | 48 | 5 | 0 | 47.9 Scout Score 47.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production32.628% Impact47.227% Versatility46.727% Shot quality77.88% Trajectory72.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[37, 11] | 32.6 Production 32.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.72× parp16.742.9% True Avgn/ap7532.1% Balls / boundary24p5.625% | 77.8 Shot Quality 77.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.9% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control83.3% | 47.2 Impact 47.2 = WPA percentile · total -5.7 WPA · Consolidation-1.4 WPA · Build-4.2 | 46.7 Versatility 46.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox9b9b <min vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp5029.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox9b9b <min Leg-spin4b4b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p36.114.8% Reach deathp38.911.1% | |
| 12 | RHB | 21 | 7 | 96 | 70 | 137.1 | 16 | 3 | 6 | 41.7 Scout Score 41.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production31.328% Impact19.427% Versatility68.627% Shot quality97.28% Trajectory13.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.81×[9, 12, 10] | 31.3 Production 31.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.94× parp47.242.9% True Avg0.59× parp19.432.1% Balls / boundary9.6p19.425% | 97.2 Shot Quality 97.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation93.3% Control · Build88.9% Phase-weighted control91.7% | 19.4 Impact 19.4 = WPA percentile · total -14.9 WPA · Consolidation-1.7 WPA · Build-13.2 | 68.6 Versatility 68.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep68.244.4% vs LA-orthodox24bp68.2 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball7b7b <min Spin hittingp88.529.6% Off-spin2b2b <min LA-orthodox37bp88.5 Leg-spin2b2b <min Chinaman6b6b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p41.714.8% Reach deathp52.811.1% | |
| 13 | LHB | 27 | 10 | 114 | 80 | 142.5 | 14.2 | 7 | 8 | 41.4 Scout Score 41.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production27.828% Impact63.927% Versatility42.927% Shot quality36.18% Trajectory19.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.85×[10, 0, 19] | 27.8 Production 27.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.85× parp2542.9% True Avg0.6× parp2532.1% Balls / boundary7.71p36.125% | 36.1 Shot Quality 36.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation55.6% Control · Build77.8% Phase-weighted control74.1% | 63.9 Impact 63.9 = WPA percentile · total -1.9 WPA · Consolidation-0.4 WPA · Build-1.5 | 42.9 Versatility 42.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin3b3b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp37.529.6% Off-spin7b7b <min LA-orthodox8b8b <min Leg-spin20bp37.5 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p8.314.8% Reach deathp7511.1% | |
| 14 | RHB | 26 | 4 | 46 | 35 | 131.4 | 23 | 1 | 3 | 36.6 Scout Score 36.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production27.328% Impact30.627% Versatility4627% Shot quality2.88% Trajectory80.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[17, 13, 8] | 27.3 Production 27.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.72× parp16.742.9% True Avg0.91× parp58.332.1% Balls / boundary24p5.625% | 2.8 Shot Quality 2.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build45.8% Phase-weighted control45.8% | 30.6 Impact 30.6 = WPA percentile · total -8.4 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build-8.4 | 46 Versatility 46 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox4b4b <min vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp5029.6% Off-spin4b4b <min LA-orthodox7b7b <min Leg-spin4b4b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2514.8% Reach deathp47.211.1% | |
| 15 | LHB | 24 | 8 | 93 | 69 | 134.8 | 11.6 | 3 | 8 | 33.3 Scout Score 33.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production27.628% Impact2527% Versatility62.827% Shot quality19.48% Trajectory2.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.67×[6, 12, 0] | 27.6 Production 27.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.89× parp36.142.9% True Avg0.57× parp13.932.1% Balls / boundary8.17p30.625% | 19.4 Shot Quality 19.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Build66% Phase-weighted control65.3% | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile · total -13.9 WPA · Consolidation-0.2 WPA · Build-13.7 | 62.8 Versatility 62.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7544.4% vs Off-spin11bp75 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp62.229.6% Off-spin20bp85 LA-orthodox5b5b <min Leg-spin11bp20.8 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p30.614.8% Reach deathp58.311.1% | |
| 16 | RHB | 27 | 11 | 209 | 178 | 117.4 | 19 | 20 | 5 | 30.5 Scout Score 30.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.328% Impact2.827% Versatility34.627% Shot quality86.18% Trajectory2510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.85×[8, 4, 8] | 39.3 Production 39.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp30.642.9% True Avg0.99× parp36.132.1% Balls / boundary6.89p58.325% | 86.1 Shot Quality 86.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.6% Control · Build83.1% Phase-weighted control83.9% | 2.8 Impact 2.8 = WPA percentile · total -30.9 WPA · Consolidation-33.3 WPA · Build+2.4 | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep31.544.4% vs LA-orthodox21bp22.7 vs Leg-spin20bp21.4 vs Short ball21bp50 Spin hittingp36.429.6% Off-spin18bp35 LA-orthodox35bp19.2 Leg-spin24bp62.5 Chinaman5b5b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p13.914.8% Reach deathp69.411.1% | |
| 17 | LHB | 29 | 8 | 105 | 77 | 136.4 | 17.5 | 8 | 7 | 20.4 Scout Score 20.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production10.128% Impact13.927% Versatility33.327% Shot quality8.38% Trajectory41.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.88×[0, 13, 11] | 10.1 Production 10.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.71× parp2.842.9% True Avg0.48× parp8.332.1% Balls / boundary8.5p2525% | 8.3 Shot Quality 8.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation62.5% Control · Build51.9% Phase-weighted control56.9% | 13.9 Impact 13.9 = WPA percentile · total -18.8 WPA · Consolidation-2.7 WPA · Build-16.1 | 33.3 Versatility 33.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep2544.4% vs Off-spin13bp25 vs Chinaman1b1b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp729.6% Off-spin15bp5 LA-orthodox11bp3.8 Leg-spin12bp12.5 Chinaman1b1b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p7514.8% Reach deathp80.611.1% | |
| 18 | RHB | 26 | 10 | 106 | 96 | 110.4 | 11.8 | 3 | 7 | 19.2 Scout Score 19.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production7.928% Impact8.327% Versatility32.327% Shot quality30.68% Trajectory36.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.86×[13, 7, 1] | 7.9 Production 7.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp8.342.9% True Avg0.46× parp2.832.1% Balls / boundary10.67p13.925% | 30.6 Shot Quality 30.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build76.5% Phase-weighted control71.9% | 8.3 Impact 8.3 = WPA percentile · total -23.7 WPA · Consolidation-12.4 WPA · Build-11.3 | 32.3 Versatility 32.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep33.144.4% vs LA-orthodox11bp4.5 vs Leg-spin13bp78.6 vs Short ball12bp10 Spin hittingp53.829.6% Off-spin16bp55 LA-orthodox14bp11.5 Leg-spin17bp87.5 Chinaman5b5b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2.814.8% Reach deathp11.111.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 25 | 9 | 224 | 113 | 198.2 | 44.8 | 13 | 20 | 82.5 Scout Score 82.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production87.840% Impact80.425% Versatility76.918% Shot quality45.74% Trajectory89.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.15×[53, 6, 21] | 87.8 Production 87.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.26× parp89.132.5% Balls / boundary2.81p97.820% Balls / six3.93p97.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 45.7 Shot Quality 45.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build74.4% Phase-weighted control74.4% | 80.4 Impact 80.4 = WPA percentile · total +37.9 WPA · Death+37.9 | 76.9 Versatility 76.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p92.961.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball19bp92.9 vs Spin (death)p2.216.7% Reach buildp89.122.2% | |
| 2 | LHB | 22 | 10 | 267 | 180 | 148.3 | 29.7 | 12 | 21 | 76.6 Scout Score 76.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production83.340% Impact84.825% Versatility67.718% Shot quality71.74% Trajectory54.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.96×[6, 26, 22] | 83.3 Production 83.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.21× parp84.832.5% Balls / boundary2.93p89.120% Balls / six3.38p93.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 71.7 Shot Quality 71.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72.2% Control · Build81.3% Phase-weighted control77.5% | 84.8 Impact 84.8 = WPA percentile · total +39.4 WPA · Death+39.4 | 67.7 Versatility 67.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p78.661.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball11bp78.6 vs Spin (death)p97.816.7% Reach buildp15.222.2% | |
| 3 | RHB | 26 | 6 | 103 | 53 | 194.3 | 25.8 | 3 | 11 | 67.3 Scout Score 67.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production74.140% Impact93.525% Versatility63.218% Shot quality23.94% Trajectory15.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.68×[1, 1, 23] | 74.1 Production 74.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.26× parp76.132.5% Balls / boundary3.14p71.720% Balls / six3.14p84.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 23.9 Shot Quality 23.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control67.7% | 93.5 Impact 93.5 = WPA percentile · total +52 WPA · Death+52 | 63.2 Versatility 63.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p65.216.7% Reach buildp97.822.2% | |
| 4 | RHB | 23 | 7 | 61 | 32 | 190.6 | 20.3 | 3 | 6 | 66.8 Scout Score 66.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production7340% Impact97.825% Versatility45.318% Shot quality19.64% Trajectory32.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.79×[14, 12, 1] | 73 Production 73 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.29× parp80.432.5% Balls / boundary2.78p80.420% Balls / six4.17p71.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 19.6 Shot Quality 19.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build57.1% Phase-weighted control57.1% | 97.8 Impact 97.8 = WPA percentile · total +61.5 WPA · Death+61.5 | 45.3 Versatility 45.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p73.916.7% Reach buildp10.922.2% | |
| 5 | RHB | 25 | 6 | 170 | 97 | 175.3 | 34 | 14 | 12 | 66.4 Scout Score 66.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production8140% Impact6325% Versatility53.418% Shot quality54.34% Trajectory5013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[0, 14, 37] | 81 Production 81 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.78× parp97.832.5% Balls / boundary2.11p84.820% Balls / six2.71p76.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 54.3 Shot Quality 54.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build73.3% Phase-weighted control76% | 63 Impact 63 = WPA percentile · total +25.6 WPA · Death+25.6 | 53.4 Versatility 53.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p93.516.7% Reach buildp32.622.2% | |
| 6 | RHB | 24 | 8 | 231 | 132 | 175 | 38.5 | 16 | 17 | 64.3 Scout Score 64.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production85.540% Impact54.325% Versatility55.818% Shot quality97.84% Trajectory19.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.69×[31, 6, 8] | 85.5 Production 85.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.32× parp93.532.5% Balls / boundary2.8p93.520% Balls / six4.31p89.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 97.8 Shot Quality 97.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build85.5% Phase-weighted control85.5% | 54.3 Impact 54.3 = WPA percentile · total +17.3 WPA · Death+17.3 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker5b5b <min vs Slower ball17bp50 vs Spin (death)p84.816.7% Reach buildp5022.2% | |
| 7 | LHB | 25 | 10 | 178 | 107 | 166.4 | 25.4 | 12 | 13 | 63.2 Scout Score 63.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production66.240% Impact67.425% Versatility24.818% Shot quality67.44% Trajectory97.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.17×[27, 10, 4] | 66.2 Production 66.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.08× parp58.732.5% Balls / boundary3.73p67.420% Balls / six6.22p80.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 67.4 Shot Quality 67.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.9% Control · Build83.3% Phase-weighted control77.1% | 67.4 Impact 67.4 = WPA percentile · total +31.3 WPA · Death+31.3 | 24.8 Versatility 24.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p7.161.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball17bp7.1 vs Spin (death)p15.216.7% Reach buildp80.422.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | 21 | 7 | 125 | 87 | 143.7 | 20.8 | 6 | 9 | 61 Scout Score 61 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production54.840% Impact58.725% Versatility47.318% Shot quality93.54% Trajectory93.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.16×[24, 44, 7] | 54.8 Production 54.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.14× parp6332.5% Balls / boundary4p45.720% Balls / six4p54.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 93.5 Shot Quality 93.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation92.3% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control85.2% | 58.7 Impact 58.7 = WPA percentile · total +21.8 WPA · Death+21.8 | 47.3 Versatility 47.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p28.316.7% Reach buildp54.322.2% | |
| 9 | LHB | 24 | 6 | 115 | 72 | 159.7 | 19.2 | 5 | 8 | 56.5 Scout Score 56.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production63.940% Impact5025% Versatility58.918% Shot quality76.14% Trajectory3713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.8×[19, 11, 26] | 63.9 Production 63.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.33× parp71.732.5% Balls / boundary3p6320% Balls / six3p6332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 76.1 Shot Quality 76.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control78.9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +10.3 WPA · Death+10.3 | 58.9 Versatility 58.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p80.416.7% Reach buildp67.422.2% | |
| 10 | RHB | 27 | 5 | 153 | 95 | 161.1 | 76.5 | 14 | 7 | 51.8 Scout Score 51.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production23.240% Impact89.125% Versatility46.618% Shot quality504% Trajectory76.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.08×[0, 35, 59] | 23.2 Production 23.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.9× parp15.232.5% Balls / boundary4p5020% Balls / six40p2.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build73.6% Phase-weighted control74.5% | 89.1 Impact 89.1 = WPA percentile · total +40.7 WPA · Death+40.7 | 46.6 Versatility 46.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p35.761.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball15bp35.7 vs Spin (death)p23.916.7% Reach buildp93.522.2% | |
| 11 | RHB | 19 | 8 | 177 | 125 | 141.6 | 25.3 | 12 | 12 | 50.2 Scout Score 50.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production53.240% Impact41.325% Versatility61.418% Shot quality41.34% Trajectory45.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.93×[61, 13, 0] | 53.2 Production 53.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.05× parp45.732.5% Balls / boundary3.62p58.720% Balls / six5.8p58.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 41.3 Shot Quality 41.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build74.3% Phase-weighted control72.9% | 41.3 Impact 41.3 = WPA percentile · total +8.1 WPA · Death+8.1 | 61.4 Versatility 61.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p64.361.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball13bp64.3 vs Spin (death)p19.616.7% Reach buildp84.822.2% | |
| 12 | LHB | 33 | 7 | 134 | 119 | 112.6 | 26.8 | 12 | 4 | 47.5 Scout Score 47.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production33.340% Impact71.725% Versatility46.618% Shot quality634% Trajectory41.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.93×[5, 33, 34] | 33.3 Production 33.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.89× parp32.632.5% Balls / boundary4.43p3720% Balls / six10.33p23.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 63 Shot Quality 63 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Build80.4% Phase-weighted control77% | 71.7 Impact 71.7 = WPA percentile · total +31.5 WPA · Death+31.5 | 46.6 Versatility 46.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p41.316.7% Reach buildp41.322.2% | |
| 13 | RHB | 31 | 10 | 111 | 64 | 173.4 | 13.9 | 9 | 9 | 46.9 Scout Score 46.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production55.240% Impact76.125% Versatility24.218% Shot quality15.24% Trajectory6.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.49×[7, 10, 0] | 55.2 Production 55.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.08× parp5032.5% Balls / boundary3.3p76.120% Balls / six6.6p5032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 15.2 Shot Quality 15.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation57.1% Control · Build55% Phase-weighted control55.6% | 76.1 Impact 76.1 = WPA percentile · total +35.4 WPA · Death+35.4 | 24.2 Versatility 24.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p21.461.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball16bp21.4 vs Spin (death)p34.816.7% Reach buildp23.922.2% | |
| 14 | RHB | 19 | 4 | 27 | 21 | 128.6 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 46.2 Scout Score 46.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production46.840% Impact45.725% Versatility42.618% Shot quality4.34% Trajectory6313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[5, 8, 14] | 46.8 Production 46.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.48× parp54.332.5% Balls / boundary3p41.320% Balls / six3p41.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 4.3 Shot Quality 4.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation33.3% Control · Build53.8% Phase-weighted control50% | 45.7 Impact 45.7 = WPA percentile · total +9.4 WPA · Death+9.4 | 42.6 Versatility 42.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p34.816.7% Reach buildp28.322.2% | |
| 15 | RHB | 25 | 8 | 60 | 31 | 193.5 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 45.8 Scout Score 45.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production62.240% Impact32.625% Versatility49.818% Shot quality4.34% Trajectory28.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.74×[4, 1, 15] | 62.2 Production 62.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.14× parp67.432.5% Balls / boundary3.5p54.320% Balls / six4.2p67.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 4.3 Shot Quality 4.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build50% Phase-weighted control50% | 32.6 Impact 32.6 = WPA percentile · total +2.7 WPA · Death+2.7 | 49.8 Versatility 49.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball6b6b <min vs Spin (death)p89.116.7% Reach buildp19.622.2% | |
| 16 | RHB | 24 | 6 | 153 | 119 | 128.6 | 30.6 | 12 | 4 | 40.9 Scout Score 40.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production30.740% Impact28.325% Versatility47.918% Shot quality89.14% Trajectory71.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.06×[8, 24, 39] | 30.7 Production 30.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp23.932.5% Balls / boundary5p23.920% Balls / six10p32.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 89.1 Shot Quality 89.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81% Control · Build84.4% Phase-weighted control83.7% | 28.3 Impact 28.3 = WPA percentile · total +0.8 WPA · Death+0.8 | 47.9 Versatility 47.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p8.716.7% Reach buildp71.722.2% | |
| 17 | RHB | 19 | 2 | 56 | 40 | 140 | 28 | 3 | 2 | 38.8 Scout Score 38.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production33.740% Impact19.625% Versatility48.918% Shot quality84.84% Trajectory6313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[11, 45] | 33.7 Production 33.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.44× parp3732.5% Balls / boundary10p10.920% Balls / six10p3732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 84.8 Shot Quality 84.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72.7% Control · Build87.5% Phase-weighted control82.9% | 19.6 Impact 19.6 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 48.9 Versatility 48.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p8.716.7% Reach buildp76.122.2% | |
| 18 | RHB | 33 | 4 | 35 | 38 | 92.1 | 11.7 | 0 | 3 | 36.4 Scout Score 36.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.740% Impact6.525% Versatility42.918% Shot quality10.94% Trajectory82.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[11, 7, 13] | 39.7 Production 39.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.86× parp41.332.5% Balls / boundary5.5p19.620% Balls / six5.5p45.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 10.9 Shot Quality 10.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation33.3% Control · Build54.2% Phase-weighted control51.9% | 6.5 Impact 6.5 = WPA percentile · total -5.8 WPA · Death-5.8 | 42.9 Versatility 42.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p65.216.7% Reach buildp6.522.2% | |
| 19 | RHB | 25 | 2 | 45 | 32 | 140.6 | 45 | 2 | 2 | 32.4 Scout Score 32.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production20.740% Impact15.225% Versatility49.418% Shot quality80.44% Trajectory6313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[21, 24] | 20.7 Production 20.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp19.632.5% Balls / boundary7.33p2.220% Balls / six11p19.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 80.4 Shot Quality 80.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control80% | 15.2 Impact 15.2 = WPA percentile · total -0.6 WPA · Death-0.6 | 49.4 Versatility 49.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball6b6b <min vs Spin (death)p52.216.7% Reach buildp45.722.2% | |
| 20 | RHB | 23 | 9 | 42 | 30 | 140 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 30.4 Scout Score 30.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production31.540% Impact10.925% Versatility53.318% Shot quality58.74% Trajectory23.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.71×[9, 0, 0] | 31.5 Production 31.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.46× parp28.332.5% Balls / boundary6p28.320% Balls / six12p28.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 58.7 Shot Quality 58.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control76.5% | 10.9 Impact 10.9 = WPA percentile · total -1.5 WPA · Death-1.5 | 53.3 Versatility 53.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p52.216.7% Reach buildp6322.2% | |
| 21 | LHB | 19 | 4 | 46 | 38 | 121.1 | 11.5 | 4 | 2 | 29 Scout Score 29 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production17.640% Impact2.225% Versatility52.318% Shot quality32.64% Trajectory82.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[30, 9, 7] | 17.6 Production 17.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.69× parp10.932.5% Balls / boundary6p15.220% Balls / six24p10.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 32.6 Shot Quality 32.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Build84.6% Phase-weighted control69.6% | 2.2 Impact 2.2 = WPA percentile · total -18.2 WPA · Death-18.2 | 52.3 Versatility 52.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball6b6b <min vs Spin (death)p52.216.7% Reach buildp58.722.2% | |
| 22 | RHB | 27 | 9 | 106 | 99 | 107.1 | 15.1 | 8 | 3 | 27.3 Scout Score 27.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production21.140% Impact3725% Versatility43.418% Shot quality374% Trajectory2.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.44×[1, 2, 6] | 21.1 Production 21.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp6.532.5% Balls / boundary4.57p32.620% Balls / six10.67p15.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 37 Shot Quality 37 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build68.9% Phase-weighted control70.3% | 37 Impact 37 = WPA percentile · total +7.2 WPA · Death+7.2 | 43.4 Versatility 43.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball9b9b <min vs Spin (death)p73.916.7% Reach buildp2.222.2% | |
| 23 | RHB | 33 | 8 | 44 | 37 | 118.9 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 21.7 Scout Score 21.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production11.640% Impact23.925% Versatility47.518% Shot quality28.34% Trajectory10.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.63×[1, 0, 5] | 11.6 Production 11.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.67× parp2.232.5% Balls / boundary7.5p6.520% Balls / six30p6.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 28.3 Shot Quality 28.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation0% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control68.2% | 23.9 Impact 23.9 = WPA percentile · total +0.2 WPA · Death+0.2 | 47.5 Versatility 47.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball6b6b <min vs Spin (death)p52.216.7% Reach buildp3722.2% |
Shaik Zaheer Abbas
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 25
82.5
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 224 · Balls 113 · SR 198.2 · Avg 44.8 · 4s 13 · 6s 20
82.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production87.840%35.1
Impact *80.425%20.1
Versatility76.918%13.8
Shot quality45.74%1.8
Trajectory89.113%11.6
Scout Score82.5
87.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR227.11.26×59bp89.132.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—59bp97.820%
Balls / six3.9—59bp97.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
80.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +37.9
WPA · Death+37.9
76.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p92.961.1%
vs Yorker33 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball247 SR19bp92.9
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.58×14bp2.216.7%
Reach build160.5 SR1.1×43bp89.122.2%
45.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build74.4%
Phase-weighted control74.4% → p45.7
89.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.15×
Recent scores[53, 6, 21]
Innings9
Ricky Bhui
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 29
80.7
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 281 · Balls 176 · SR 159.7 · Avg 28.1 · 4s 21 · 6s 19
80.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production91.328%25.6
Impact *86.127%23.2
Versatility83.627%22.6
Shot quality508%4.0
Trajectory52.810%5.3
Scout Score80.7
91.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR192.31.39×52bp91.742.9%
True Avg501.9×2wp86.132.1%
Balls / boundary3.7—52bp97.225%
86.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +29.8
WPA · Consolidation+7.1
WPA · Build+22.7
83.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p94.444.4%
vs LA-orthodox210 SR20bp95.5
vs Leg-spin200 SR14bp92.9
vs Short ball171 SR7b7b <min
Spin hitting———p88.929.6%
Off-spin200 SR3b3b <min
LA-orthodox165 SR55bp96.2
Leg-spin127 SR22bp70.8
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)166.7 SR1.11×18bp80.614.8%
Reach death166.7 SR0.92×9bp30.611.1%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75.9%
Control · Build78.3%
Phase-weighted control76.9% → p50
52.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.93×
Recent scores[1, 45, 9]
Innings11
S D N V Prasad
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 22
76.6
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 267 · Balls 180 · SR 148.3 · Avg 29.7 · 4s 12 · 6s 21
76.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production83.340%33.3
Impact *84.825%21.2
Versatility67.718%12.2
Shot quality71.74%2.9
Trajectory54.313%7.1
Scout Score76.6
83.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR218.21.21×44bp84.832.5%
Balls / boundary2.9—44bp89.120%
Balls / six3.4—44bp93.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
84.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +39.4
WPA · Death+39.4
67.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p78.661.1%
vs Yorker0 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball227 SR11bp78.6
vs Spin (death)342.9 SR1.98×14bp97.816.7%
Reach build118.7 SR0.82×75bp15.222.2%
71.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72.2%
Control · Build81.3%
Phase-weighted control77.5% → p71.7
54.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.96×
Recent scores[6, 26, 22]
Innings10
K V Kashyap Prakash
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 28
76
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 83 · Balls 38 · SR 218.4 · Avg 27.7 · 4s 2 · 6s 9
76OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production89.128%24.9
Impact *97.227%26.2
Versatility52.727%14.2
Shot quality41.78%3.3
Trajectory72.210%7.2
Scout Score76
89.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR224.31.63×37bp97.242.9%
True Avg41.51.58×2wp80.632.1%
Balls / boundary3.4—37bp86.125%
97.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +67.9
WPA · Consolidation+1.3
WPA · Build+66.6
52.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin183 SR6b6b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball314 SR7b7b <min
Spin hitting———p5029.6%
Off-spin183 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox75 SR4b4b <min
Leg-spin167 SR6b6b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)281 SR1.86×21bp97.214.8%
Reach death00×1bp11.111.1%
41.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Build76.7%
Phase-weighted control75.7% → p41.7
72.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[32, 6, 45]
Innings3
Thota Vigneswara Sai Sravan
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 21
74.4
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 241 · Balls 136 · SR 177.2 · Avg 34.4 · 4s 26 · 6s 11
74.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production63.240%25.3
Impact *86.427%23.3
Versatility75.515%11.3
Shot quality68.26%4.1
Trajectory86.412%10.4
Scout Score74.4
63.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR176.11.17×46bp86.435%
True Avg270.98×3wp40.930%
Balls / boundary3.3—46bp86.417.5%
Balls / dismissal15.3—3wp31.817.5%
86.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +38.8
WPA · Powerplay+16.1
WPA · Consolidation+22.7
75.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR193 SR1.2×57bp86.426.7%
vs Spin SR165.8 SR1.22×79bp86.426.7%
Accel into Cons177.2 SR—57bp86.420%
Pressure entry——0bp45.526.7%
68.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.2%
Control · Build75.8%
Phase-weighted control82.3% → p68.2
86.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[50, 0, 39]
Innings8
Maddila Harsha Vardhan
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 24
71.6
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 162 · Balls 119 · SR 136.1 · Avg 23.1 · 4s 11 · 6s 8
71.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production81.140%32.4
Impact *77.327%20.9
Versatility29.415%4.4
Shot quality40.96%2.5
Trajectory95.512%11.5
Scout Score71.6
81.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR153.71.02×54bp77.335%
True Avg833×1wp95.530%
Balls / boundary4.9—54bp59.117.5%
Balls / dismissal54—1wp86.417.5%
77.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +6.9
WPA · Powerplay+10.5
WPA · Consolidation-3.7
29.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR121.4 SR0.76×56bp13.626.7%
vs Spin SR149.2 SR1.1×63bp68.226.7%
Accel into Cons131.9 SR—47bp31.820%
Pressure entry00×1bp4.526.7%
40.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.6%
Control · Build83.3%
Phase-weighted control77.7% → p40.9
95.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[36, 37, 0]
Innings7
Kogatam Haneesh Veera Reddy
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 19
70.7
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 310 · Balls 165 · SR 187.9 · Avg 31 · 4s 32 · 6s 16
70.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production5540%22.0
Impact *95.527%25.8
Versatility82.115%12.3
Shot quality77.36%4.6
Trajectory5012%6.0
Scout Score70.7
55ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR215.91.44×44bp95.535%
True Avg15.80.57×6wp13.630%
Balls / boundary2.6—44bp95.517.5%
Balls / dismissal7.3—6wp4.517.5%
95.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +67.8
WPA · Powerplay+36.1
WPA · Consolidation+31.7
82.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR195.2 SR1.22×105bp95.526.7%
vs Spin SR175 SR1.29×60bp95.526.7%
Accel into Cons195.8 SR—48bp95.520%
Pressure entry——0bp45.526.7%
77.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.5%
Control · Build76%
Phase-weighted control83.6% → p77.3
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[36, 44, 15]
Innings11
Prasanth Kumar
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 34
68.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 171 · Balls 125 · SR 136.8 · Avg 21.4 · 4s 12 · 6s 7
68.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production68.528%19.2
Impact *80.627%21.8
Versatility49.427%13.3
Shot quality63.98%5.1
Trajectory91.710%9.2
Scout Score68.6
68.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR140.41.02×104bp63.942.9%
True Avg36.51.39×4wp69.432.1%
Balls / boundary6.1—104bp7525%
80.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +12
WPA · Consolidation+4.7
WPA · Build+7.3
49.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p47.744.4%
vs LA-orthodox113 SR45bp31.8
vs Leg-spin181 SR27bp64.3
vs Short ball150 SR12bp70
Spin hitting———p62.329.6%
Off-spin133 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox111 SR47bp42.3
Leg-spin175 SR28bp95.8
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)155.6 SR1.03×27bp63.914.8%
Reach death118.8 SR0.66×16bp2.811.1%
63.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation92.3%
Control · Build75.4%
Phase-weighted control81.7% → p63.9
91.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.2×
Recent scores[60, 47, 5]
Innings8
Mopada Ravikiran
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 24
68.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 189 · Balls 129 · SR 146.5 · Avg 31.5 · 4s 13 · 6s 12
68.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production7528%21.0
Impact *91.727%24.8
Versatility49.127%13.3
Shot quality77.88%6.2
Trajectory30.610%3.1
Scout Score68.3
75ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR148.91.08×90bp86.142.9%
True Avg26.81.02×5wp47.232.1%
Balls / boundary5.3—90bp91.725%
91.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +43.8
WPA · Consolidation-35.5
WPA · Build+79.2
49.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p39.544.4%
vs LA-orthodox114 SR28bp40.9
vs Leg-spin120 SR10bp35.7
vs Short ball160 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p36.629.6%
Off-spin126 SR19bp25
LA-orthodox106 SR47bp34.6
Leg-spin120 SR10bp54.2
Chinaman230 SR10bp50
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)179.2 SR1.19×24bp91.714.8%
Reach death188.9 SR1.05×9bp63.911.1%
77.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.7%
Control · Build82.9%
Phase-weighted control83.3% → p77.8
30.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.86×
Recent scores[5, 24, 25]
Innings8
Dheeraj Kumar
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 26
67.3
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 103 · Balls 53 · SR 194.3 · Avg 25.8 · 4s 3 · 6s 11
67.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production74.140%29.6
Impact *93.525%23.4
Versatility63.218%11.4
Shot quality23.94%1.0
Trajectory15.213%2.0
Scout Score67.3
74.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR227.31.26×22bp76.132.5%
Balls / boundary3.1—22bp71.720%
Balls / six3.1—22bp84.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
93.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +52
WPA · Death+52
63.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker133 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball175 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)233.3 SR1.35×3bp65.216.7%
Reach build204.2 SR1.41×24bp97.822.2%
23.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control67.7% → p23.9
15.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.68×
Recent scores[1, 1, 23]
Innings6
Gadde Samanvith
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 23
66.8
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 61 · Balls 32 · SR 190.6 · Avg 20.3 · 4s 3 · 6s 6
66.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production7340%29.2
Impact *97.825%24.4
Versatility45.318%8.2
Shot quality19.64%0.8
Trajectory32.613%4.2
Scout Score66.8
73ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2321.29×25bp80.432.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—25bp80.420%
Balls / six4.2—25bp71.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
97.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +61.5
WPA · Death+61.5
45.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball200 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)220 SR1.27×5bp73.916.7%
Reach build42.9 SR0.3×7bp10.922.2%
19.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build57.1%
Phase-weighted control57.1% → p19.6
32.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.79×
Recent scores[14, 12, 1]
Innings7
Garimella Sai Poorna Teja
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 22
66.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 303 · Balls 201 · SR 150.7 · Avg 60.6 · 4s 27 · 6s 11
66.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production81.728%22.9
Impact *41.727%11.3
Versatility7127%19.2
Shot quality91.78%7.3
Trajectory58.310%5.8
Scout Score66.5
81.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR143.41.04×136bp80.642.9%
True Avg1957.42×1wp97.232.1%
Balls / boundary6.8—136bp63.925%
41.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -6
WPA · Consolidation-6.5
WPA · Build+0.5
71VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p80.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox142 SR57bp77.3
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball178 SR18bp90
Spin hitting———p50.229.6%
Off-spin94 SR18bp15
LA-orthodox133 SR84bp57.7
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)153.8 SR1.02×65bp69.414.8%
Reach death235.7 SR1.31×14bp91.711.1%
91.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.9%
Control · Build91.2%
Phase-weighted control90.4% → p91.7
58.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.95×
Recent scores[62, 8, 0]
Innings7
Muvvala Yuvan
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 20
66.4
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 219 · Balls 143 · SR 153.1 · Avg 36.5 · 4s 15 · 6s 14
66.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production7928%22.1
Impact *7527%20.2
Versatility6427%17.3
Shot quality258%2.0
Trajectory47.210%4.7
Scout Score66.4
79ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR142.41.03×85bp7542.9%
True Avg60.52.3×2wp91.732.1%
Balls / boundary6.1—85bp69.425%
75Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +10.5
WPA · Consolidation+2.6
WPA · Build+7.9
64VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox121 SR24bp50
vs Leg-spin146 SR24bp50
vs Short ball280 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p65.729.6%
Off-spin132 SR19bp45
LA-orthodox143 SR30bp65.4
Leg-spin143 SR30bp79.2
Chinaman0 SR1b1b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)181.2 SR1.2×16bp86.114.8%
Reach death197.4 SR1.1×39bp86.111.1%
25Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control70.6% → p25
47.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.9×
Recent scores[16, 18, 61]
Innings8
Vamsi Krishna
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 25
66.4
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 170 · Balls 97 · SR 175.3 · Avg 34 · 4s 14 · 6s 12
66.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production8140%32.4
Impact *6325%15.8
Versatility53.418%9.6
Shot quality54.34%2.2
Trajectory5013%6.5
Scout Score66.4
81ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR321.11.78×19bp97.832.5%
Balls / boundary2.1—19bp84.820%
Balls / six2.7—19bp76.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
63Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +25.6
WPA · Death+25.6
53.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball275 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)300 SR1.73×10bp93.516.7%
Reach build113.3 SR0.78×15bp32.622.2%
54.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build73.3%
Phase-weighted control76% → p54.3
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[0, 14, 37]
Innings6
Mitta Lekhaz Reddy
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 24
64.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 231 · Balls 132 · SR 175 · Avg 38.5 · 4s 16 · 6s 17
64.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production85.540%34.2
Impact *54.325%13.6
Versatility55.818%10.0
Shot quality97.84%3.9
Trajectory19.613%2.5
Scout Score64.3
85.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR237.51.32×56bp93.532.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—56bp93.520%
Balls / six4.3—56bp89.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
54.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +17.3
WPA · Death+17.3
55.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR5b5b <min
vs Slower ball200 SR17bp50
vs Spin (death)227.3 SR1.31×11bp84.816.7%
Reach build128.9 SR0.89×76bp5022.2%
97.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build85.5%
Phase-weighted control85.5% → p97.8
19.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.69×
Recent scores[31, 6, 8]
Innings8
Marthala Dhanush
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 25
63.2
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 178 · Balls 107 · SR 166.4 · Avg 25.4 · 4s 12 · 6s 13
63.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production66.240%26.5
Impact *67.425%16.9
Versatility24.818%4.5
Shot quality67.44%2.7
Trajectory97.813%12.7
Scout Score63.2
66.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR194.61.08×56bp58.732.5%
Balls / boundary3.7—56bp67.420%
Balls / six6.2—56bp80.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
67.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +31.3
WPA · Death+31.3
24.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p7.161.1%
vs Yorker0 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball129 SR17bp7.1
vs Spin (death)33.3 SR0.19×3bp15.216.7%
Reach build183.3 SR1.26×12bp80.422.2%
67.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.9%
Control · Build83.3%
Phase-weighted control77.1% → p67.4
97.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.17×
Recent scores[27, 10, 4]
Innings10
Allareddi Sai Surya Teja Reddy
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 21
61
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 125 · Balls 87 · SR 143.7 · Avg 20.8 · 4s 6 · 6s 9
61OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production54.840%21.9
Impact *58.725%14.7
Versatility47.318%8.5
Shot quality93.54%3.7
Trajectory93.513%12.2
Scout Score61
54.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR206.21.14×16bp6332.5%
Balls / boundary4—16bp45.720%
Balls / six4—16bp54.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
58.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +21.8
WPA · Death+21.8
47.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball220 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)50 SR0.29×2bp28.316.7%
Reach build134.3 SR0.92×35bp54.322.2%
93.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation92.3%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control85.2% → p93.5
93.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.16×
Recent scores[24, 44, 7]
Innings7
T Varun Satwik
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 20
58.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 95 · Balls 78 · SR 121.8 · Avg 15.8 · 4s 5 · 6s 6
58.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production52.428%14.7
Impact *58.327%15.7
Versatility63.827%17.2
Shot quality13.98%1.1
Trajectory97.210%9.7
Scout Score58.5
52.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR135.70.98×56bp58.342.9%
True Avg25.30.96×3wp52.832.1%
Balls / boundary7—56bp41.725%
58.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -2.5
WPA · Consolidation-13.5
WPA · Build+11.1
63.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p86.444.4%
vs LA-orthodox167 SR12bp86.4
vs Leg-spin44 SR9b9b <min
vs Short ball75 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p52.229.6%
Off-spin150 SR16bp65
LA-orthodox145 SR20bp73.1
Leg-spin31 SR13bp4.2
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)147.8 SR0.98×23bp52.814.8%
Reach death100 SR0.55×1bp19.411.1%
13.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation54.8%
Control · Build76%
Phase-weighted control64.3% → p13.9
97.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.24×
Recent scores[34, 7, 12]
Innings7
Abhishek Reddy
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 31
58.1
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 319 · Balls 219 · SR 145.7 · Avg 45.6 · 4s 32 · 6s 10
58.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production58.240%23.3
Impact *68.227%18.4
Versatility38.515%5.8
Shot quality95.56%5.7
Trajectory40.912%4.9
Scout Score58.1
58.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR131.10.87×119bp5035%
True Avg391.41×4wp77.330%
Balls / boundary5.7—119bp31.817.5%
Balls / dismissal29.8—4wp68.217.5%
68.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +3.3
WPA · Powerplay-5.4
WPA · Consolidation+8.7
38.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR155 SR0.97×131bp5026.7%
vs Spin SR131.8 SR0.97×88bp31.826.7%
Accel into Cons126.7 SR—45bp22.720%
Pressure entry——0bp45.526.7%
95.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation93.3%
Control · Build91.1%
Phase-weighted control92.6% → p95.5
40.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.83×
Recent scores[9, 50, 15]
Innings8
Yadla Vasu
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 24
56.5
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 115 · Balls 72 · SR 159.7 · Avg 19.2 · 4s 5 · 6s 8
56.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production63.940%25.6
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility58.918%10.6
Shot quality76.14%3.0
Trajectory3713%4.8
Scout Score56.5
63.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2401.33×15bp71.732.5%
Balls / boundary3—15bp6320%
Balls / six3—15bp6332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +10.3
WPA · Death+10.3
58.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)300 SR1.73×4bp80.416.7%
Reach build140 SR0.96×50bp67.422.2%
76.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control78.9% → p76.1
37Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.8×
Recent scores[19, 11, 26]
Innings6
Karan Shinde
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 28
53
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 186 · Balls 130 · SR 143.1 · Avg 20.7 · 4s 25 · 6s 3
53OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.528%11.1
Impact *52.827%14.3
Versatility53.327%14.4
Shot quality58.38%4.7
Trajectory86.110%8.6
Scout Score53
39.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR124.10.9×54bp41.742.9%
True Avg16.80.64×4wp30.632.1%
Balls / boundary6.8—54bp47.225%
52.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.5
WPA · Consolidation-16.9
WPA · Build+12.4
53.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin100 SR5b5b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball0 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p66.929.6%
Off-spin158 SR26bp75
LA-orthodox147 SR15bp80.8
Leg-spin115 SR20bp45.8
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)146.2 SR0.97×26bp47.214.8%
Reach death——0bp38.911.1%
58.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71%
Control · Build87%
Phase-weighted control77.8% → p58.3
86.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[30, 58, 46]
Innings9
B Munish Varma
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 27
51.8
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 153 · Balls 95 · SR 161.1 · Avg 76.5 · 4s 14 · 6s 7
51.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production23.240%9.3
Impact *89.125%22.3
Versatility46.618%8.4
Shot quality504%2.0
Trajectory76.113%9.9
Scout Score51.8
23.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR162.50.9×40bp15.232.5%
Balls / boundary4—40bp5020%
Balls / six40—40bp2.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
89.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +40.7
WPA · Death+40.7
46.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p35.761.1%
vs Yorker67 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball173 SR15bp35.7
vs Spin (death)120 SR0.69×5bp23.916.7%
Reach build162.3 SR1.12×53bp93.522.2%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build73.6%
Phase-weighted control74.5% → p50
76.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.08×
Recent scores[0, 35, 59]
Innings5
Kancherla Anand Josiah
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 19
50.2
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 177 · Balls 125 · SR 141.6 · Avg 25.3 · 4s 12 · 6s 12
50.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production53.240%21.3
Impact *41.325%10.3
Versatility61.418%11.1
Shot quality41.34%1.7
Trajectory45.713%5.9
Scout Score50.2
53.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR189.71.05×29bp45.732.5%
Balls / boundary3.6—29bp58.720%
Balls / six5.8—29bp58.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
41.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +8.1
WPA · Death+8.1
61.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p64.361.1%
vs Yorker133 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball215 SR13bp64.3
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.58×5bp19.616.7%
Reach build144.3 SR0.99×70bp84.822.2%
41.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build74.3%
Phase-weighted control72.9% → p41.3
45.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.93×
Recent scores[61, 13, 0]
Innings8
Bendalam Satvi
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 26
49.2
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 136 · Balls 80 · SR 170 · Avg 27.2 · 4s 3 · 6s 14
49.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production56.328%15.8
Impact *69.427%18.7
Versatility36.427%9.8
Shot quality508%4.0
Trajectory8.310%0.8
Scout Score49.2
56.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR143.11.04×65bp69.442.9%
True Avg23.20.88×4wp41.732.1%
Balls / boundary6.5—65bp52.825%
69.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +4.6
WPA · Consolidation-12.7
WPA · Build+17.3
36.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p13.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox105 SR22bp13.6
vs Leg-spin280 SR5b5b <min
vs Short ball100 SR8b8b <min
Spin hitting———p56.129.6%
Off-spin256 SR18bp95
LA-orthodox104 SR24bp26.9
Leg-spin280 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman100 SR2b2b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)119 SR0.79×21bp19.414.8%
Reach death286.7 SR1.59×15bp97.211.1%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.5%
Control · Build77.1%
Phase-weighted control76.9% → p50
8.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.71×
Recent scores[14, 15, 1]
Innings7
Kaki Satya Surya Jayanth
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB
48.8
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 146 · Balls 114 · SR 128.1 · Avg 20.9 · 4s 19 · 6s 3
48.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production63.328%17.7
Impact *36.127%9.7
Versatility34.627%9.3
Shot quality69.48%5.6
Trajectory63.910%6.4
Scout Score48.8
63.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR131.20.95×77bp52.842.9%
True Avg33.71.28×3wp63.932.1%
Balls / boundary5.5—77bp80.625%
36.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -7.7
WPA · Consolidation+12.4
WPA · Build-20.2
34.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p26.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox140 SR15bp59.1
vs Leg-spin104 SR27bp7.1
vs Short ball118 SR11bp30
Spin hitting———p38.329.6%
Off-spin171 SR7b7b <min
LA-orthodox132 SR22bp50
Leg-spin104 SR28bp29.2
Chinaman100 SR3b3b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)153.6 SR1.02×28bp58.314.8%
Reach death150 SR0.83×4bp2511.1%
69.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.6%
Control · Build82.1%
Phase-weighted control81.8% → p69.4
63.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[46, 5, 0]
Innings7
Uppara Girinath
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 27
47.9
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 48 · Balls 43 · SR 111.6 · Avg 48 · 4s 5 · 6s 0
47.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production32.628%9.1
Impact *47.227%12.7
Versatility46.727%12.6
Shot quality77.88%6.2
Trajectory72.210%7.2
Scout Score47.9
32.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.72×24bp16.742.9%
True Avg——0wp7532.1%
Balls / boundary24—24bp5.625%
47.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5.7
WPA · Consolidation-1.4
WPA · Build-4.2
46.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox67 SR9b9b <min
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball200 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p5029.6%
Off-spin100 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox67 SR9b9b <min
Leg-spin125 SR4b4b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)120 SR0.8×10bp36.114.8%
Reach death——0bp38.911.1%
77.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.9%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control83.3% → p77.8
72.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[37, 11]
Innings2
Saurabh Kumar
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 33
47.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 134 · Balls 119 · SR 112.6 · Avg 26.8 · 4s 12 · 6s 4
47.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production33.340%13.3
Impact *71.725%17.9
Versatility46.618%8.4
Shot quality634%2.5
Trajectory41.313%5.4
Scout Score47.5
33.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR161.30.89×31bp32.632.5%
Balls / boundary4.4—31bp3720%
Balls / six10.3—31bp23.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
71.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +31.5
WPA · Death+31.5
46.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball171 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)170 SR0.98×10bp41.316.7%
Reach build123.9 SR0.85×46bp41.322.2%
63Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Build80.4%
Phase-weighted control77% → p63
41.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.93×
Recent scores[5, 33, 34]
Innings7
KV Sasikanth
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 31
46.9
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 111 · Balls 64 · SR 173.4 · Avg 13.9 · 4s 9 · 6s 9
46.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production55.240%22.1
Impact *76.125%19.0
Versatility24.218%4.4
Shot quality15.24%0.6
Trajectory6.513%0.8
Scout Score46.9
55.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR193.91.08×33bp5032.5%
Balls / boundary3.3—33bp76.120%
Balls / six6.6—33bp5032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
76.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +35.4
WPA · Death+35.4
24.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p21.461.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball162 SR16bp21.4
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.58×1bp34.816.7%
Reach build110 SR0.76×20bp23.922.2%
15.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation57.1%
Control · Build55%
Phase-weighted control55.6% → p15.2
6.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.49×
Recent scores[7, 10, 0]
Innings10
Seeram Venkata Rahul
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 18
46.5
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 350 · Balls 217 · SR 161.3 · Avg 43.8 · 4s 30 · 6s 19
46.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production6540%26.0
Impact *4.527%1.2
Versatility61.515%9.2
Shot quality506%3.0
Trajectory59.112%7.1
Scout Score46.5
65ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR140.50.94×84bp59.135%
True Avg39.31.42×3wp68.230%
Balls / boundary4.2—84bp77.317.5%
Balls / dismissal28—3wp59.117.5%
4.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -33.3
WPA · Powerplay-12.8
WPA · Consolidation-20.5
61.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR170 SR1.06×130bp77.326.7%
vs Spin SR148.3 SR1.09×87bp77.326.7%
Accel into Cons134 SR—50bp40.920%
Pressure entry——0bp45.526.7%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76%
Control · Build86.3%
Phase-weighted control79.5% → p50
59.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.93×
Recent scores[70, 0, 48]
Innings10
G Manvith Reddy
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 19
46.2
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 27 · Balls 21 · SR 128.6 · Avg 9 · 4s 1 · 6s 2
46.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production46.840%18.7
Impact *45.725%11.4
Versatility42.618%7.7
Shot quality4.34%0.2
Trajectory6313%8.2
Scout Score46.2
46.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR266.71.48×3bp54.332.5%
Balls / boundary3—3bp41.320%
Balls / six3—3bp41.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
45.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +9.4
WPA · Death+9.4
42.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.58×1bp34.816.7%
Reach build107.7 SR0.74×13bp28.322.2%
4.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation33.3%
Control · Build53.8%
Phase-weighted control50% → p4.3
63Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[5, 8, 14]
Innings4
Chennu Siddhardha
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 25
45.8
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 60 · Balls 31 · SR 193.5 · Avg 12 · 4s 3 · 6s 6
45.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production62.240%24.9
Impact *32.625%8.2
Versatility49.818%9.0
Shot quality4.34%0.2
Trajectory28.313%3.7
Scout Score45.8
62.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR204.81.14×21bp67.432.5%
Balls / boundary3.5—21bp54.320%
Balls / six4.2—21bp67.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
32.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2.7
WPA · Death+2.7
49.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball133 SR6b6b <min
vs Spin (death)314.3 SR1.81×7bp89.116.7%
Reach build50 SR0.34×4bp19.622.2%
4.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build50%
Phase-weighted control50% → p4.3
28.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.74×
Recent scores[4, 1, 15]
Innings8
Pinninti Tapaswi
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 29
42.8
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 205 · Balls 151 · SR 135.8 · Avg 25.6 · 4s 14 · 6s 12
42.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production46.440%18.6
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility40.915%6.1
Shot quality31.86%1.9
Trajectory22.712%2.7
Scout Score42.8
46.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR113.20.75×38bp31.835%
True Avg431.55×1wp59.130%
Balls / boundary6.3—38bp22.717.5%
Balls / dismissal38—1wp77.317.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.6
WPA · Powerplay-17.7
WPA · Consolidation+14.1
40.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR145.2 SR0.9×62bp40.926.7%
vs Spin SR129.2 SR0.95×89bp22.726.7%
Accel into Cons130.5 SR—82bp4.520%
Pressure entry123.2 SR0.82×56bp86.426.7%
31.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75.6%
Control · Build71%
Phase-weighted control74.9% → p31.8
22.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.63×
Recent scores[27, 14, 1]
Innings8
Munnangi Abhinav
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 21
42.3
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 301 · Balls 203 · SR 148.3 · Avg 37.6 · 4s 28 · 6s 14
42.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production31.840%12.7
Impact *59.127%16.0
Versatility41.515%6.2
Shot quality59.16%3.5
Trajectory31.812%3.8
Scout Score42.3
31.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR124.20.83×124bp22.735%
True Avg25.70.93×6wp31.830%
Balls / boundary5.6—124bp40.917.5%
Balls / dismissal20.7—6wp40.917.5%
59.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -0.2
WPA · Powerplay-6.1
WPA · Consolidation+5.9
41.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR164.7 SR1.03×116bp59.126.7%
vs Spin SR126.4 SR0.93×87bp13.626.7%
Accel into Cons144.4 SR—36bp5020%
Pressure entry——0bp45.526.7%
59.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build78.6%
Phase-weighted control82% → p59.1
31.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.65×
Recent scores[21, 5, 0]
Innings9
Y Teja Reddy
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 21
41.7
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 96 · Balls 70 · SR 137.1 · Avg 16 · 4s 3 · 6s 6
41.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production31.328%8.8
Impact *19.427%5.2
Versatility68.627%18.5
Shot quality97.28%7.8
Trajectory13.910%1.4
Scout Score41.7
31.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR129.20.94×48bp47.242.9%
True Avg15.50.59×4wp19.432.1%
Balls / boundary9.6—48bp19.425%
19.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -14.9
WPA · Consolidation-1.7
WPA · Build-13.2
68.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p68.244.4%
vs LA-orthodox142 SR24bp68.2
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball143 SR7b7b <min
Spin hitting———p88.529.6%
Off-spin100 SR2b2b <min
LA-orthodox151 SR37bp88.5
Leg-spin150 SR2b2b <min
Chinaman83 SR6b6b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)131.2 SR0.87×16bp41.714.8%
Reach death177.8 SR0.99×9bp52.811.1%
97.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation93.3%
Control · Build88.9%
Phase-weighted control91.7% → p97.2
13.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.81×
Recent scores[9, 12, 10]
Innings7
Ch Sai Sandeep Kumar
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 25
41.5
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 88 · Balls 66 · SR 133.3 · Avg 14.7 · 4s 10 · 6s 4
41.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4540%18.0
Impact *31.827%8.6
Versatility43.315%6.5
Shot quality4.56%0.3
Trajectory68.212%8.2
Scout Score41.5
45ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR143.80.96×48bp68.235%
True Avg13.80.5×5wp22.730%
Balls / boundary4—48bp68.217.5%
Balls / dismissal9.6—5wp13.617.5%
31.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -17.9
WPA · Powerplay-17.9
WPA · Consolidation+0
43.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR183.9 SR1.15×31bp68.226.7%
vs Spin SR88.6 SR0.65×35bp4.526.7%
Accel into Cons——0bp59.120%
Pressure entry——0bp45.526.7%
4.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build61.1%
Phase-weighted control61.1% → p4.5
68.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.95×
Recent scores[15, 25, 2]
Innings6
B Vinay Kumar
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 27
41.4
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 114 · Balls 80 · SR 142.5 · Avg 14.2 · 4s 7 · 6s 8
41.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production27.828%7.8
Impact *63.927%17.3
Versatility42.927%11.6
Shot quality36.18%2.9
Trajectory19.410%1.9
Scout Score41.4
27.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR116.70.85×54bp2542.9%
True Avg15.80.6×4wp2532.1%
Balls / boundary7.7—54bp36.125%
63.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -1.9
WPA · Consolidation-0.4
WPA · Build-1.5
42.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin167 SR3b3b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball0 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p37.529.6%
Off-spin243 SR7b7b <min
LA-orthodox100 SR8b8b <min
Leg-spin105 SR20bp37.5
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)120.8 SR0.8×24bp8.314.8%
Reach death196.2 SR1.09×26bp7511.1%
36.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation55.6%
Control · Build77.8%
Phase-weighted control74.1% → p36.1
19.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.85×
Recent scores[10, 0, 19]
Innings10
Tripurana Vijay
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 24
40.9
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 153 · Balls 119 · SR 128.6 · Avg 30.6 · 4s 12 · 6s 4
40.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production30.740%12.3
Impact *28.325%7.1
Versatility47.918%8.6
Shot quality89.14%3.6
Trajectory71.713%9.3
Scout Score40.9
30.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1500.83×20bp23.932.5%
Balls / boundary5—20bp23.920%
Balls / six10—20bp32.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
28.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0.8
WPA · Death+0.8
47.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball200 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)80 SR0.46×5bp8.716.7%
Reach build137.7 SR0.95×77bp71.722.2%
89.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81%
Control · Build84.4%
Phase-weighted control83.7% → p89.1
71.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.06×
Recent scores[8, 24, 39]
Innings6
Gutta Rohit
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 24
40.2
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 199 · Balls 152 · SR 130.9 · Avg 28.4 · 4s 11 · 6s 15
40.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4540%18.0
Impact *13.627%3.7
Versatility56.115%8.4
Shot quality13.66%0.8
Trajectory77.312%9.3
Scout Score40.2
45ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR104.60.7×65bp4.535%
True Avg682.46×1wp86.430%
Balls / boundary8.1—65bp4.517.5%
Balls / dismissal65—1wp95.517.5%
13.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -31.5
WPA · Powerplay-21.8
WPA · Consolidation-9.7
56.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR128.6 SR0.8×77bp22.726.7%
vs Spin SR133.3 SR0.98×75bp40.926.7%
Accel into Cons148.2 SR—56bp68.220%
Pressure entry161.8 SR1.08×34bp95.526.7%
13.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation67.9%
Control · Build83.3%
Phase-weighted control70% → p13.6
77.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[28, 30, 60]
Innings8
Jajula Vishnu Datta
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 19
38.8
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 56 · Balls 40 · SR 140 · Avg 28 · 4s 3 · 6s 2
38.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production33.740%13.5
Impact *19.625%4.9
Versatility48.918%8.8
Shot quality84.84%3.4
Trajectory6313%8.2
Scout Score38.8
33.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR800.44×5bp3732.5%
Balls / boundary——5bp10.920%
Balls / six——5bp3732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
19.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
48.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)80 SR0.46×5bp8.716.7%
Reach build154.2 SR1.06×24bp76.122.2%
84.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72.7%
Control · Build87.5%
Phase-weighted control82.9% → p84.8
63Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[11, 45]
Innings2
Dhruva Kumar Reddy
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 28
38
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 157 · Balls 114 · SR 137.7 · Avg 19.6 · 4s 10 · 6s 10
38OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production40.540%16.2
Impact *40.927%11.0
Versatility51.815%7.8
Shot quality22.76%1.4
Trajectory13.612%1.6
Scout Score38
40.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR127.80.85×72bp40.935%
True Avg30.71.11×3wp5030%
Balls / boundary6—72bp13.617.5%
Balls / dismissal24—3wp5017.5%
40.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -14.1
WPA · Powerplay-19
WPA · Consolidation+4.9
51.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR134.5 SR0.84×58bp31.826.7%
vs Spin SR141.1 SR1.04×56bp59.126.7%
Accel into Cons157.1 SR—28bp77.320%
Pressure entry——0bp45.526.7%
22.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build40%
Phase-weighted control72.1% → p22.7
13.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.62×
Recent scores[12, 6, 12]
Innings8
Pinninti Tejaswi
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 26
36.6
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 46 · Balls 35 · SR 131.4 · Avg 23 · 4s 1 · 6s 3
36.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production27.328%7.6
Impact *30.627%8.3
Versatility4627%12.4
Shot quality2.88%0.2
Trajectory80.610%8.1
Scout Score36.6
27.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.72×24bp16.742.9%
True Avg240.91×1wp58.332.1%
Balls / boundary24—24bp5.625%
30.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -8.4
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build-8.4
46VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox200 SR4b4b <min
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p5029.6%
Off-spin100 SR4b4b <min
LA-orthodox114 SR7b7b <min
Leg-spin50 SR4b4b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)100 SR0.66×11bp2514.8%
Reach death175 SR0.97×8bp47.211.1%
2.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build45.8%
Phase-weighted control45.8% → p2.8
80.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[17, 13, 8]
Innings4
Sirla Srinivas
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 33
36.4
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 35 · Balls 38 · SR 92.1 · Avg 11.7 · 4s 0 · 6s 3
36.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.740%15.9
Impact *6.525%1.6
Versatility42.918%7.7
Shot quality10.94%0.4
Trajectory82.613%10.7
Scout Score36.4
39.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR154.50.86×11bp41.332.5%
Balls / boundary5.5—11bp19.620%
Balls / six5.5—11bp45.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
6.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5.8
WPA · Death-5.8
42.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball129 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)233.3 SR1.35×3bp65.216.7%
Reach build70.8 SR0.49×24bp6.522.2%
10.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation33.3%
Control · Build54.2%
Phase-weighted control51.9% → p10.9
82.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[11, 7, 13]
Innings4
P Panduranga Raju
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 24
33.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 93 · Balls 69 · SR 134.8 · Avg 11.6 · 4s 3 · 6s 8
33.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production27.628%7.7
Impact *2527%6.8
Versatility62.827%17.0
Shot quality19.48%1.6
Trajectory2.810%0.3
Scout Score33.3
27.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR122.40.89×49bp36.142.9%
True Avg150.57×4wp13.932.1%
Balls / boundary8.2—49bp30.625%
25Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -13.9
WPA · Consolidation-0.2
WPA · Build-13.7
62.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7544.4%
vs Off-spin127 SR11bp75
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball67 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p62.229.6%
Off-spin175 SR20bp85
LA-orthodox140 SR5b5b <min
Leg-spin100 SR11bp20.8
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)127.3 SR0.84×22bp30.614.8%
Reach death173.7 SR0.96×19bp58.311.1%
19.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Build66%
Phase-weighted control65.3% → p19.4
2.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.67×
Recent scores[6, 12, 0]
Innings8
Andimani Teja
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 25
32.4
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 45 · Balls 32 · SR 140.6 · Avg 45 · 4s 2 · 6s 2
32.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production20.740%8.3
Impact *15.225%3.8
Versatility49.418%8.9
Shot quality80.44%3.2
Trajectory6313%8.2
Scout Score32.4
20.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1500.83×22bp19.632.5%
Balls / boundary7.3—22bp2.220%
Balls / six11—22bp19.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
15.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -0.6
WPA · Death-0.6
49.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball150 SR6b6b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.216.7%
Reach build120 SR0.83×10bp45.722.2%
80.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control80% → p80.4
63Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[21, 24]
Innings2
Maheep Kumar
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 27
30.5
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 209 · Balls 178 · SR 117.4 · Avg 19 · 4s 20 · 6s 5
30.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.328%11.0
Impact *2.827%0.8
Versatility34.627%9.3
Shot quality86.18%6.9
Trajectory2510%2.5
Scout Score30.5
39.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR125.80.91×124bp30.642.9%
True Avg260.99×6wp36.132.1%
Balls / boundary6.9—124bp58.325%
2.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -30.9
WPA · Consolidation-33.3
WPA · Build+2.4
34.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p31.544.4%
vs LA-orthodox110 SR21bp22.7
vs Leg-spin110 SR20bp21.4
vs Short ball143 SR21bp50
Spin hitting———p36.429.6%
Off-spin128 SR18bp35
LA-orthodox103 SR35bp19.2
Leg-spin121 SR24bp62.5
Chinaman60 SR5b5b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)134.4 SR0.89×61bp13.914.8%
Reach death192.3 SR1.07×13bp69.411.1%
86.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.6%
Control · Build83.1%
Phase-weighted control83.9% → p86.1
25Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.85×
Recent scores[8, 4, 8]
Innings11
P Roshan Pavan Kumar
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 23
30.4
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 42 · Balls 30 · SR 140 · Avg 7 · 4s 4 · 6s 3
30.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production31.540%12.6
Impact *10.925%2.7
Versatility53.318%9.6
Shot quality58.74%2.3
Trajectory23.913%3.1
Scout Score30.4
31.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR83.30.46×6bp28.332.5%
Balls / boundary6—6bp28.320%
Balls / six——6bp28.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
10.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -1.5
WPA · Death-1.5
53.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.216.7%
Reach build160 SR1.1×10bp6322.2%
58.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control76.5% → p58.7
23.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.71×
Recent scores[9, 0, 0]
Innings9
O Bhaswanth Krishna
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 19
29
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 46 · Balls 38 · SR 121.1 · Avg 11.5 · 4s 4 · 6s 2
29OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production17.640%7.0
Impact *2.225%0.6
Versatility52.318%9.4
Shot quality32.64%1.3
Trajectory82.613%10.7
Scout Score29
17.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1250.69×12bp10.932.5%
Balls / boundary6—12bp15.220%
Balls / six——12bp10.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
2.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -18.2
WPA · Death-18.2
52.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball133 SR6b6b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.216.7%
Reach build146.2 SR1.01×13bp58.722.2%
32.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Build84.6%
Phase-weighted control69.6% → p32.6
82.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[30, 9, 7]
Innings4
P Girinath Reddy
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 27
27.3
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 106 · Balls 99 · SR 107.1 · Avg 15.1 · 4s 8 · 6s 3
27.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production21.140%8.4
Impact *3725%9.2
Versatility43.418%7.8
Shot quality374%1.5
Trajectory2.213%0.3
Scout Score27.3
21.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1500.83×32bp6.532.5%
Balls / boundary4.6—32bp32.620%
Balls / six10.7—32bp15.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
37Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +7.2
WPA · Death+7.2
43.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker200 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball111 SR9b9b <min
vs Spin (death)220 SR1.27×5bp73.916.7%
Reach build86.9 SR0.6×61bp2.222.2%
37Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build68.9%
Phase-weighted control70.3% → p37
2.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.44×
Recent scores[1, 2, 6]
Innings9
CR Gnaneshwar
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 28
23.8
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 144 · Balls 123 · SR 117.1 · Avg 18 · 4s 15 · 6s 5
23.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production18.940%7.6
Impact *22.727%6.1
Versatility29.415%4.4
Shot quality86.46%5.2
Trajectory4.512%0.5
Scout Score23.8
18.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR111.80.75×76bp13.635%
True Avg14.20.51×6wp4.530%
Balls / boundary5.4—76bp5017.5%
Balls / dismissal12.7—6wp22.717.5%
22.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -20.9
WPA · Powerplay-14.3
WPA · Consolidation-6.6
29.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR95.3 SR0.59×64bp4.526.7%
vs Spin SR140.7 SR1.03×59bp5026.7%
Accel into Cons113 SR—23bp13.620%
Pressure entry——0bp45.526.7%
86.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation91.3%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control86.4% → p86.4
4.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.24×
Recent scores[1, 0, 1]
Innings8
Bandaru Ayyappa
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 33
21.7
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 44 · Balls 37 · SR 118.9 · Avg 11 · 4s 3 · 6s 2
21.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production11.640%4.6
Impact *23.925%6.0
Versatility47.518%8.6
Shot quality28.34%1.1
Trajectory10.913%1.4
Scout Score21.7
11.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1200.67×15bp2.232.5%
Balls / boundary7.5—15bp6.520%
Balls / six——15bp6.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
23.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0.2
WPA · Death+0.2
47.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball83 SR6b6b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.216.7%
Reach build119 SR0.82×21bp3722.2%
28.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation0%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control68.2% → p28.3
10.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.63×
Recent scores[1, 0, 5]
Innings8
Manish Golamaru
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 29
20.4
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 105 · Balls 77 · SR 136.4 · Avg 17.5 · 4s 8 · 6s 7
20.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production10.128%2.8
Impact *13.927%3.8
Versatility33.327%9.0
Shot quality8.38%0.7
Trajectory41.710%4.2
Scout Score20.4
10.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR980.71×51bp2.842.9%
True Avg12.50.48×4wp8.332.1%
Balls / boundary8.5—51bp2525%
13.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -18.8
WPA · Consolidation-2.7
WPA · Build-16.1
33.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p2544.4%
vs Off-spin85 SR13bp25
vs Chinaman100 SR1b1b <min
vs Short ball125 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p729.6%
Off-spin73 SR15bp5
LA-orthodox45 SR11bp3.8
Leg-spin92 SR12bp12.5
Chinaman100 SR1b1b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)169.2 SR1.12×13bp7514.8%
Reach death320 SR1.77×5bp80.611.1%
8.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation62.5%
Control · Build51.9%
Phase-weighted control56.9% → p8.3
41.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.88×
Recent scores[0, 13, 11]
Innings8
Pyla Avinash
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 26
19.2
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 106 · Balls 96 · SR 110.4 · Avg 11.8 · 4s 3 · 6s 7
19.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production7.928%2.2
Impact *8.327%2.2
Versatility32.327%8.7
Shot quality30.68%2.4
Trajectory36.110%3.6
Scout Score19.2
7.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR114.10.83×64bp8.342.9%
True Avg12.20.46×6wp2.832.1%
Balls / boundary10.7—64bp13.925%
8.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -23.7
WPA · Consolidation-12.4
WPA · Build-11.3
32.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p33.144.4%
vs LA-orthodox73 SR11bp4.5
vs Leg-spin185 SR13bp78.6
vs Short ball58 SR12bp10
Spin hitting———p53.829.6%
Off-spin138 SR16bp55
LA-orthodox64 SR14bp11.5
Leg-spin153 SR17bp87.5
Chinaman80 SR5b5b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)104.2 SR0.69×24bp2.814.8%
Reach death00×1bp11.111.1%
30.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build76.5%
Phase-weighted control71.9% → p30.6
36.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.86×
Recent scores[13, 7, 1]
Innings10
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 29.1 | 14 | 202 | 6.93 | 81.9 Scout Score 81.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay81.341.1% Middle84.545.1% Death75.613.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p68.20.99× | 86 Bowling Production 86 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 6.25 econp85.141.1% Middle6w · 7.06 econp89.145.1% Death4w · 8.5 econp78.413.7% | 72.3 Quality 72.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p56.2 False-shot · Middle29%p87 | 90.6 Impact 90.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +33.2p96.241.1% MiddleWPA +17.8p9145.1% DeathWPA +4.2p72.513.7% | 72.4 Versatility 72.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp77.241.1% Middlep66.545.1% Deathp77.313.7% | |
| 2 | Chinaman | 25 | 29.0 | 16 | 249 | 8.59 | 73.7 Scout Score 73.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle77.586.2% Death42.510.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p35.51.09× | 85.5 Bowling Production 85.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle12w · 7.68 econp91.286.2% Death3w · 12 econp37.810.3% | 57 Quality 57 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle24%p57 | 94.2 Impact 94.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +38p9986.2% DeathWPA -0.8p53.810.3% | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep5086.2% Deathp5010.3% | |
| 3 | RA pace | 25 | 7.0 | 4 | 52 | 7.43 | 70.4 Scout Score 70.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay7057.1% Death70.842.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p57.31× | 75.5 Bowling Production 75.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 7.5 econp75.557.1% Death2w · 7.33 econp75.642.9% | 63.8 Quality 63.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p63.8 | 78 Impact 78 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +8.8p73.857.1% DeathWPA +14.4p83.842.9% | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp61.257.1% Deathp44.742.9% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 28 | 18.0 | 5 | 137 | 7.61 | 69.1 Scout Score 69.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay74.777.8% Death43.116.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p86.40.85× | 77.7 Bowling Production 77.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 6.64 econp88.477.8% Death0w · 13.33 econp27.716.7% | 8.8 Quality 8.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p8.8 | 80.4 Impact 80.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +24.1p88.877.8% DeathWPA -10.9p41.216.7% | 70 Versatility 70 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp7277.8% Deathp60.916.7% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 22.2 | 10 | 152 | 6.81 | 67.1 Scout Score 67.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay8317.9% Middle59.367.2% Death83.414.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p700.95× | 70.5 Bowling Production 70.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 4.25 econp92.317.9% Middle4w · 7.8 econp61.367.2% Death2w · 5.4 econp85.514.9% | 25.3 Quality 25.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p41.2 False-shot · Middle20%p21 | 74.6 Impact 74.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +39.9p98.817.9% MiddleWPA +6p6567.2% DeathWPA +18p88.814.9% | 79.1 Versatility 79.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp81.217.9% Middlep8067.2% Deathp72.714.9% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | 21 | 13.0 | 6 | 116 | 8.92 | 65.6 Scout Score 65.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay38.923.1% Middle74.569.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p13.61.2× | 70.9 Bowling Production 70.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 8.67 econp40.323.1% Middle5w · 7.67 econp81.169.2% | 62.3 Quality 62.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay11%p21.2 False-shot · Middle28%p76 | 83.8 Impact 83.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +1.2p56.223.1% MiddleWPA +20.9p9369.2% | 57.6 Versatility 57.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp38.523.1% Middlep6469.2% | |
| 7 | LA pace | 24 | 31.4 | 16 | 278 | 8.78 | 63.7 Scout Score 63.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay56.763.2% Middle63.812.6% Death81.824.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p900.81× | 68.9 Bowling Production 68.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 9.4 econp64.163.2% Middle0w · 6.25 econp55.412.6% Death9w · 8.48 econp88.324.2% | 89 Quality 89 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p88.8 False-shot · Middle38%p90 | 36.5 Impact 36.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -15.2p21.263.2% MiddleWPA +0.1p5112.6% DeathWPA +2.1p68.824.2% | 53.5 Versatility 53.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4363.2% Middlep62.512.6% Deathp7624.2% | |
| 8 | Leg-spin | — | 29.0 | 12 | 252 | 8.69 | 63.5 Scout Score 63.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle6693.1% Death306.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p42.71.04× | 71 Bowling Production 71 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle11w · 8.3 econp73.993.1% Death1w · 14 econp31.86.9% | 25 Quality 25 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p25 | 81.9 Impact 81.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +14.6p8793.1% DeathWPA -39p13.86.9% | 66.8 Versatility 66.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep6893.1% Deathp506.9% | |
| 9 | Off-spin | 33 | 8.0 | 5 | 71 | 8.88 | 63.2 Scout Score 63.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay52.425% Middle67.137.5% Death66.537.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p57.31× | 69 Bowling Production 69 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10 econp60.225% Middle2w · 7 econp72.837.5% Death2w · 10 econp7137.5% | 39.6 Quality 39.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p37.5 False-shot · Middle17%p41 | 67.3 Impact 67.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -0.1p51.225% MiddleWPA +11.7p7937.5% DeathWPA +1.1p66.237.5% | 53.9 Versatility 53.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4325% Middlep6537.5% Deathp5037.5% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 33.0 | 10 | 263 | 7.97 | 62.1 Scout Score 62.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay68.951.5% Middle4839.4% Death84.89.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p88.20.82× | 62.2 Bowling Production 62.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 8.94 econp58.851.5% Middle2w · 6.92 econp61.939.4% Death3w · 7 econp82.59.1% | 38.7 Quality 38.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p53.8 False-shot · Middle19%p19 | 55.2 Impact 55.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +19.9p83.851.5% MiddleWPA -17.5p939.4% DeathWPA +33.8p93.89.1% | 77.4 Versatility 77.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp7151.5% Middlep8839.4% Deathp68.29.1% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 27 | 9.3 | 4 | 65 | 6.84 | 61.8 Scout Score 61.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.642.1% Middle63.457.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p37.31.09× | 71.7 Bowling Production 71.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 6 econp6642.1% Middle3w · 7.45 econp75.857.9% | 42.1 Quality 42.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay12%p18.8 False-shot · Middle24%p59 | 68.5 Impact 68.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +15.9p78.842.1% MiddleWPA +4.1p6157.9% | 60.9 Versatility 60.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp6742.1% Middlep56.557.9% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 37.0 | 8 | 297 | 8.03 | 61.8 Scout Score 61.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay61.737.8% Middle61.959.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p301.13× | 59 Bowling Production 59 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 8 econp66.437.8% Middle4w · 7.82 econp54.459.5% | 59.1 Quality 59.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p68.8 False-shot · Middle24%p53 | 75.3 Impact 75.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +6.6p66.237.8% MiddleWPA +12.4p8159.5% | 71.8 Versatility 71.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp52.837.8% Middlep8459.5% | |
| 13 | RA pace | — | 25.0 | 11 | 195 | 7.8 | 60.2 Scout Score 60.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle56.988% Death83.912% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p82.70.86× | 69.2 Bowling Production 69.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle7w · 8.36 econp65.588% Death4w · 3.67 econp96.512% | 1 Quality 1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle11%p1 | 69.9 Impact 69.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +6.4p6788% DeathWPA +21.2p91.212% | 54.1 Versatility 54.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep5788% Deathp32.412% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 2 | 50 | 12.5 | 59.7 Scout Score 59.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle59.750% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p57.31× | 53.8 Bowling Production 53.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 11 econp53.850% | 70 Quality 70 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle33%p70 | 73 Impact 73 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +9.8p7350% | 39.5 Versatility 39.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep39.550% | |
| 15 | Leg-spin | 21 | 38.5 | 14 | 304 | 7.83 | 59.4 Scout Score 59.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay75.115.5% Middle4543.8% Death6940.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p97.30.7× | 73.1 Bowling Production 73.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 5.33 econp92.215.5% Middle3w · 7.88 econp54.343.8% Death8w · 8.72 econp86.140.8% | 21.6 Quality 21.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay11%p6.2 False-shot · Middle21%p27 | 28.8 Impact 28.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +16.3p81.215.5% MiddleWPA -12.3p1543.8% DeathWPA -19p23.840.8% | 56.8 Versatility 56.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp74.415.5% Middlep5743.8% Deathp5040.8% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 28 | 19.4 | 5 | 196 | 9.97 | 57.8 Scout Score 57.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay5866.1% Death57.328.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p39.11.09× | 50 Bowling Production 50 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 9.46 econp48.266.1% Death1w · 10.76 econp54.228.8% | 98.8 Quality 98.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay38%p98.8 | 64.7 Impact 64.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +3.8p61.266.1% DeathWPA +4.2p72.528.8% | 48.1 Versatility 48.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp44.566.1% Deathp56.328.8% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 27 | 37.4 | 15 | 360 | 9.56 | 57.8 Scout Score 57.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.450.4% Middle60.710.6% Death54.838.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p99.10.67× | 54.7 Bowling Production 54.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 8.74 econp56.950.4% Middle0w · 7.75 econp41.510.6% Death10w · 11.11 econp55.438.9% | 78.6 Quality 78.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p76.2 False-shot · Middle38%p90 | 40.6 Impact 40.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -1.4p46.250.4% MiddleWPA +0.9p5710.6% DeathWPA -18.6p28.838.9% | 50.2 Versatility 50.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.850.4% Middlep60.510.6% Deathp60.938.9% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 25 | 13.4 | 5 | 138 | 10.1 | 57.6 Scout Score 57.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay49.229.3% Middle61.465.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p48.21.01× | 55.1 Bowling Production 55.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 12 econp30.229.3% Middle4w · 8.56 econp66.265.9% | 75.3 Quality 75.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p73.8 False-shot · Middle28%p76 | 60.5 Impact 60.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +4.2p63.829.3% MiddleWPA +2.5p5965.9% | 44.6 Versatility 44.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4629.3% Middlep4465.9% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 31 | 31.5 | 12 | 279 | 8.76 | 57.3 Scout Score 57.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle34.756.5% Death86.643.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p91.80.8× | 62.1 Bowling Production 62.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 9 econp39.456.5% Death8w · 8.46 econp91.743.5% | 39 Quality 39 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p39 | 44.6 Impact 44.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -25.2p356.5% DeathWPA +88.5p98.843.5% | 38.8 Versatility 38.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep3356.5% Deathp46.343.5% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 27 | 38.0 | 16 | 378 | 9.95 | 55.6 Scout Score 55.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay73.544.7% Middle47.515.8% Death38.539.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p11.81.26× | 61 Bowling Production 61 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 9.12 econp71.644.7% Middle3w · 9.83 econp47.115.8% Death6w · 10.93 econp54.639.5% | 92.2 Quality 92.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay32%p96.2 False-shot · Middle31%p81 | 50.7 Impact 50.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +31.7p91.244.7% MiddleWPA -0.6p4715.8% DeathWPA -71.2p6.239.5% | 57.5 Versatility 57.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp6044.7% Middlep3815.8% Deathp62.439.5% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 30.0 | 5 | 205 | 6.83 | 55.6 Scout Score 55.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay3740% Middle67.960% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p31.81.1× | 59.7 Bowling Production 59.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8.25 econp45.240% Middle4w · 5.89 econp69.460% | 20.3 Quality 20.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay18%p16.2 False-shot · Middle20%p23 | 72.7 Impact 72.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.6p36.240% MiddleWPA +32.1p9760% | 71.2 Versatility 71.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp44.540% Middlep8960% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 26 | 11.3 | 7 | 131 | 11.39 | 55.5 Scout Score 55.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay64.160.9% Middle49.417.4% Death36.121.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.41.01× | 52.2 Bowling Production 52.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 9.86 econp66.960.9% Middle1w · 12 econp37.417.4% Death1w · 15.2 econp22.921.7% | 80.7 Quality 80.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p83.8 False-shot · Middle33%p70 | 59.5 Impact 59.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +2.5p58.860.9% MiddleWPA +4.5p6317.4% DeathWPA -0.2p58.821.7% | 47.5 Versatility 47.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp56.260.9% Middlep35.517.4% Deathp32.421.7% | |
| 23 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 20.1 | 6 | 167 | 8.28 | 54.4 Scout Score 54.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay23.229.8% Middle68.665.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p84.50.85× | 56.7 Bowling Production 56.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.67 econp14.729.8% Middle4w · 6.99 econp75.965.3% | 9.1 Quality 9.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay14%p13.8 False-shot · Middle14%p7 | 61.9 Impact 61.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -21.2p11.229.8% MiddleWPA +14.3p8565.3% | 64.6 Versatility 64.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.629.8% Middlep75.565.3% | |
| 24 | Off-spin | 24 | 39.0 | 7 | 326 | 8.36 | 53.9 Scout Score 53.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay66.643.6% Middle4448.7% Death44.37.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p6.41.35× | 48.2 Bowling Production 48.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 8.18 econp5443.6% Middle1w · 8.05 econp42.748.7% Death2w · 11.33 econp49.87.7% | 46.9 Quality 46.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p93.8 False-shot · Middle15%p5 | 81.2 Impact 81.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +32.4p93.843.6% MiddleWPA +11.4p7548.7% DeathWPA -7.1p48.87.7% | 61.3 Versatility 61.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp60.243.6% Middlep6448.7% Deathp507.7% | |
| 25 | Off-spin | 24 | 6.0 | 2 | 54 | 9 | 53.7 Scout Score 53.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle53.7100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p57.31× | 54.4 Bowling Production 54.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 9 econp54.4100% | 67 Quality 67 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle28%p67 | 45 Impact 45 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -1.1p45100% | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep50100% | |
| 26 | Off-spin | 26 | 7.0 | 5 | 61 | 8.71 | 53.3 Scout Score 53.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle39.657.1% Death71.542.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p57.31× | 54.7 Bowling Production 54.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 10.25 econp34.857.1% Death4w · 6.67 econp81.242.9% | 32 Quality 32 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p32 | 55.3 Impact 55.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -0.1p4957.1% DeathWPA +0p63.842.9% | 38.6 Versatility 38.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep3057.1% Deathp5042.9% | |
| 27 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 20.1 | 8 | 182 | 9.02 | 52.4 Scout Score 52.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay23.639.7% Middle71.858.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p19.11.18× | 63.6 Bowling Production 63.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 11.25 econp30.939.7% Middle6w · 7.52 econp85.858.7% | 30.8 Quality 30.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay10%p3.8 False-shot · Middle22%p49 | 59.1 Impact 59.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13.8p23.839.7% MiddleWPA +13.2p8358.7% | 58.1 Versatility 58.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp30.239.7% Middlep7758.7% | |
| 28 | Leg-spin | 24 | 26.0 | 7 | 212 | 8.15 | 52.4 Scout Score 52.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay70.723.1% Middle46.673.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p93.60.75× | 45.3 Bowling Production 45.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 6.67 econp73.123.1% Middle4w · 8.84 econp36.573.1% | 44.5 Quality 44.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p23.8 False-shot · Middle23%p51 | 51.9 Impact 51.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +23.5p86.223.1% MiddleWPA -1.6p4173.1% | 51.1 Versatility 51.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp67.423.1% Middlep4673.1% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 33 | 32.0 | 15 | 342 | 10.69 | 50.3 Scout Score 50.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay43.921.9% Middle49.728.1% Death53.550% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p0.91.45× | 44.3 Bowling Production 44.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 11.71 econp29.321.9% Middle4w · 9.44 econp53.128.1% Death9w · 10.94 econp45.850% | 73 Quality 73 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay26%p58.8 False-shot · Middle30%p84 | 73.6 Impact 73.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +8.5p71.221.9% MiddleWPA +0.5p5328.1% DeathWPA +16.3p86.250% | 51.3 Versatility 51.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp46.221.9% Middlep3028.1% Deathp65.550% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 16 | 37.5 | 14 | 369 | 9.75 | 50.2 Scout Score 50.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay55.868.7% Middle37.831.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p15.51.2× | 56.2 Bowling Production 56.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay9w · 9.54 econp64.468.7% Middle5w · 10.23 econp38.231.3% | 36.7 Quality 36.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p33.8 False-shot · Middle21%p43 | 69.6 Impact 69.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +12.1p76.268.7% MiddleWPA +0.7p5531.3% | 32.4 Versatility 32.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp41.268.7% Middlep1331.3% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 33.0 | 13 | 301 | 9.12 | 49.7 Scout Score 49.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay30.448.5% Middle67.439.4% Death69.512.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p2.71.41× | 52.6 Bowling Production 52.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 11.06 econp26.248.5% Middle4w · 7 econp76.739.4% Death4w · 8.25 econp79.512.1% | 47.2 Quality 47.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay20%p26.2 False-shot · Middle27%p73 | 63.5 Impact 63.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -0.2p48.848.5% MiddleWPA +11.4p7739.4% DeathWPA +8.8p78.812.1% | 49.3 Versatility 49.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp30.848.5% Middlep6539.4% Deathp72.712.1% | |
| 32 | Off-spin | 25 | 31.0 | 8 | 263 | 8.48 | 49.4 Scout Score 49.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay54.625.8% Middle54.658.1% Death22.316.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p101.28× | 57.8 Bowling Production 57.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.62 econp52.625.8% Middle5w · 7.22 econp70.858.1% Death1w · 12.8 econp19.416.1% | 76.6 Quality 76.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p71.2 False-shot · Middle27%p79 | 33.1 Impact 33.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +8.5p68.825.8% MiddleWPA -12.1p1758.1% DeathWPA -14.3p33.816.1% | 66.4 Versatility 66.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp43.525.8% Middlep8858.1% Deathp2516.1% | |
| 33 | RA pace | — | 27.0 | 7 | 278 | 10.3 | 46.9 Scout Score 46.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.444.4% Middle64.140.7% Death3114.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p20.91.17× | 37.6 Bowling Production 37.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 10.75 econp27.644.4% Middle4w · 9.18 econp51.240.7% Death0w · 12 econp30.414.8% | 86.5 Quality 86.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p78.8 False-shot · Middle32%p95 | 55.7 Impact 55.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -11.6p26.244.4% MiddleWPA +28.1p9540.7% DeathWPA -13.4p36.214.8% | 42.2 Versatility 42.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp49.244.4% Middlep3840.7% Deathp32.414.8% | |
| 34 | RA pace | — | 19.0 | 8 | 209 | 11 | 45.5 Scout Score 45.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay4715.8% Middle31.647.4% Death62.836.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p44.51.02× | 30.3 Bowling Production 30.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 13.33 econp30.215.8% Middle1w · 9.89 econp12.447.4% Death6w · 11.43 econp53.336.8% | 83.3 Quality 83.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay39%p81.2 False-shot · Middle30%p84 | 58.6 Impact 58.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +1.1p53.815.8% MiddleWPA -3.8p3147.4% DeathWPA +61.1p96.236.8% | 34 Versatility 34 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp43.515.8% Middlep1747.4% Deathp51.736.8% | |
| 35 | LA pace | 23 | 20.2 | 9 | 233 | 11.46 | 45.2 Scout Score 45.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay38.829.5% Middle34.834.4% Death60.436.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p24.51.16× | 43.8 Bowling Production 43.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 12.17 econp30.329.5% Middle3w · 13 econp32.834.4% Death4w · 9.41 econp65.436.1% | 65.6 Quality 65.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p66.2 False-shot · Middle26%p65 | 39.7 Impact 39.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2p41.229.5% MiddleWPA -11.2p2134.4% DeathWPA -0.4p56.236.1% | 54.1 Versatility 54.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp3829.5% Middlep4134.4% Deathp79.936.1% | |
| 36 | Leg-spin | 23 | 16.0 | 4 | 145 | 9.06 | 44.5 Scout Score 44.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle44.887.5% Death42.412.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p71.80.95× | 46.4 Bowling Production 46.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 8.36 econp47.387.5% Death1w · 14 econp40.212.5% | 17 Quality 17 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle19%p17 | 42.5 Impact 42.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -1.3p4387.5% DeathWPA -11p38.812.5% | 49.1 Versatility 49.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep52.587.5% Deathp2512.5% | |
| 37 | Leg-spin | 23 | 10.0 | 3 | 97 | 9.7 | 44.5 Scout Score 44.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle44.5100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p77.30.9× | 40.6 Bowling Production 40.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 9.7 econp40.6100% | 47 Quality 47 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle22%p47 | 33 Impact 33 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -3.7p33100% | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep50100% | |
| 38 | RA pace | — | 9.0 | 3 | 106 | 11.78 | 43.4 Scout Score 43.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.744.4% Middle52.822.2% Death44.633.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p57.31× | 37.9 Bowling Production 37.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 12.5 econp25.644.4% Middle1w · 10.5 econp48.622.2% Death1w · 11.67 econp47.133.3% | 91.8 Quality 91.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay42%p91.2 False-shot · Middle50%p93 | 24.8 Impact 24.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -19.8p13.844.4% MiddleWPA -2.8p3722.2% DeathWPA -16.6p31.233.3% | 47.9 Versatility 47.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp48.844.4% Middlep4522.2% Deathp48.633.3% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 24 | 14.0 | 3 | 143 | 10.21 | 43 Scout Score 43 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay26.735.7% Middle20.728.6% Death77.235.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p80.90.86× | 39.1 Bowling Production 39.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11.8 econp13.935.7% Middle0w · 11.75 econp13.228.6% Death3w · 7.4 econp8535.7% | 41.3 Quality 41.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p48.8 False-shot · Middle17%p32 | 32.4 Impact 32.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -24p8.835.7% MiddleWPA -40p128.6% DeathWPA +14.1p81.235.7% | 34.3 Versatility 34.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.935.7% Middlep2128.6% Deathp42.435.7% | |
| 40 | LA pace | — | 20.0 | 7 | 200 | 10 | 42.7 Scout Score 42.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay41.810% Middle30.245% Death55.545% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p22.71.16× | 46.2 Bowling Production 46.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 12 econp53.110% Middle1w · 8.56 econp30.945% Death5w · 11 econp6045% | 51.8 Quality 51.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p37.5 False-shot · Middle24%p55 | 42.4 Impact 42.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -5p31.210% MiddleWPA -16.8p1145% DeathWPA +5.3p76.245% | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp5310% Middlep4345% Deathp32.445% | |
| 41 | LA pace | 22 | 30.0 | 10 | 338 | 11.27 | 41.8 Scout Score 41.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay56.243.3% Middle79.110% Death20.446.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p73.60.91× | 33.8 Bowling Production 33.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 10.23 econp56.443.3% Middle1w · 5.67 econp68.410% Death4w · 13.43 econp5.446.7% | 68.3 Quality 68.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay26%p61.2 False-shot · Middle50%p99 | 28.4 Impact 28.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -1.7p43.843.3% MiddleWPA +15p8910% DeathWPA -111.2p1.246.7% | 61.9 Versatility 61.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp6443.3% Middlep7210% Deathp57.846.7% | |
| 42 | LA pace | — | 21.0 | 9 | 243 | 11.57 | 38.5 Scout Score 38.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay20.128.6% Middle6242.9% Death21.628.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p40.91.06× | 30.9 Bowling Production 30.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11.5 econp1328.6% Middle7w · 9.56 econp5742.9% Death2w · 14.67 econp9.828.6% | 70.7 Quality 70.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay19%p31.2 False-shot · Middle33%p97 | 40.4 Impact 40.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -18.2p16.228.6% MiddleWPA +7p7142.9% DeathWPA -27.1p18.828.6% | 33.7 Versatility 33.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp2028.6% Middlep3342.9% Deathp48.628.6% | |
| 43 | RA pace | 29 | 15.0 | 3 | 153 | 10.2 | 37.9 Scout Score 37.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay41.920% Middle35.740% Death38.140% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p28.21.13× | 41.8 Bowling Production 41.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11 econp47.620% Middle0w · 8.67 econp29.640% Death2w · 11.33 econp5140% | 57.4 Quality 57.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p46.2 False-shot · Middle25%p63 | 24.9 Impact 24.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -4p33.820% MiddleWPA -4.5p2940% DeathWPA -37p16.240% | 42.9 Versatility 42.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp49.520% Middlep41.540% Deathp40.940% | |
| 44 | RA pace | — | 12.0 | 9 | 144 | 12 | 37.5 Scout Score 37.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay4566.7% Death22.533.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p33.61.09× | 49 Bowling Production 49 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 10.75 econp61.666.7% Death3w · 14.5 econp23.833.3% | 86.2 Quality 86.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p86.2 | 3.8 Impact 3.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -35.5p1.266.7% DeathWPA -56.3p8.833.3% | 43.5 Versatility 43.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4966.7% Deathp32.433.3% | |
| 45 | RA pace | 33 | 12.1 | 4 | 140 | 11.51 | 36.9 Scout Score 36.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle31.441.1% Death41.450.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p95.50.71× | 30.4 Bowling Production 30.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 10.4 econp25.241.1% Death3w · 12.32 econp34.650.7% | 15 Quality 15 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle13%p15 | 26.6 Impact 26.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5p2741.1% DeathWPA -18.8p26.250.7% | 37.2 Versatility 37.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep2741.1% Deathp45.550.7% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 23 | 17.4 | 3 | 179 | 10.13 | 36.2 Scout Score 36.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle34.973.6% Death39.726.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p4.51.35× | 26.7 Bowling Production 26.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 9.54 econp21.873.6% Death1w · 11.79 econp40.426.4% | 37 Quality 37 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle20%p37 | 63 Impact 63 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +6.5p6973.6% DeathWPA -8.6p46.226.4% | 35.1 Versatility 35.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep2873.6% Deathp54.726.4% | |
| 47 | RA pace | 29 | 24.4 | 4 | 267 | 10.82 | 35.9 Scout Score 35.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay38.844.6% Middle47.916.2% Death27.639.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p79.10.89× | 24.6 Bowling Production 24.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.55 econp32.444.6% Middle1w · 8 econp50.316.2% Death1w · 13.45 econp539.2% | 40.7 Quality 40.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p43.8 False-shot · Middle17%p32 | 26.8 Impact 26.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -5.2p28.844.6% MiddleWPA -3.1p3516.2% DeathWPA -23.7p21.239.2% | 56.1 Versatility 56.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp42.544.6% Middlep6116.2% Deathp69.639.2% | |
| 48 | RA pace | 26 | 6.0 | 2 | 56 | 9.33 | 35.6 Scout Score 35.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle35.666.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p57.31× | 39.7 Bowling Production 39.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 10 econp39.766.7% | 32 Quality 32 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p32 | 25 Impact 25 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -6.3p2566.7% | 31.5 Versatility 31.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep31.566.7% | |
| 49 | LA pace | 32 | 26.0 | 8 | 241 | 9.27 | 34 Scout Score 34 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay40.661.5% Death23.638.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p17.31.19× | 44.8 Bowling Production 44.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 7.5 econp56.161.5% Death5w · 12.1 econp26.738.5% | 11.2 Quality 11.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay18%p11.2 | 28.2 Impact 28.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.3p38.861.5% DeathWPA -54p11.238.5% | 48.2 Versatility 48.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp53.861.5% Deathp39.438.5% | |
| 50 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 29.0 | 8 | 258 | 8.9 | 32.6 Scout Score 32.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay33.641.4% Middle28.748.3% Death46.710.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p26.41.13× | 51.2 Bowling Production 51.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 9.17 econp64.441.4% Middle2w · 8.29 econp39.548.3% Death2w · 10.67 econp53.110.3% | 6.5 Quality 6.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p1.2 False-shot · Middle16%p11 | 13.4 Impact 13.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -25.8p6.241.4% MiddleWPA -13.5p1348.3% DeathWPA -9.1p43.810.3% | 48.5 Versatility 48.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp46.241.4% Middlep51.548.3% Deathp43.210.3% | |
| 51 | LA pace | 31 | 6.0 | 1 | 88 | 14.67 | 32.1 Scout Score 32.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay34.133.3% Middle41.933.3% Death20.433.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p57.31× | 26.1 Bowling Production 26.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 13.5 econp30.133.3% Middle0w · 10 econp38.833.3% Death1w · 20.5 econp9.633.3% | 48.1 Quality 48.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p51.2 False-shot · Middle17%p45 | 20.5 Impact 20.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -17.1p18.833.3% MiddleWPA -1.6p3933.3% DeathWPA -73.4p3.833.3% | 45.4 Versatility 45.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp41.933.3% Middlep4133.3% Deathp53.233.3% | |
| 52 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 10.0 | 2 | 116 | 11.6 | 31.8 Scout Score 31.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle28.160% Death39.130% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p66.40.99× | 30.2 Bowling Production 30.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 11 econp3260% Death0w · 12.33 econp26.530% | 13 Quality 13 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle14%p13 | 35.8 Impact 35.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -7.3p2360% DeathWPA +0p61.230% | 14 Versatility 14 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep1360% Deathp15.930% | |
| 53 | SLA orthodox | — | 11.0 | 1 | 104 | 9.45 | 27.1 Scout Score 27.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle27.190.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p75.50.91× | 25.5 Bowling Production 25.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9.1 econp25.590.9% | 9 Quality 9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle13%p9 | 7 Impact 7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -20.4p790.9% | 56 Versatility 56 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep5690.9% | |
| 54 | RA pace | 27 | 8.0 | 0 | 122 | 15.25 | 24.3 Scout Score 24.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay15.850% Middle33.925% Death31.625% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p57.31× | 12.3 Bowling Production 12.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 16.5 econp4.450% Middle0w · 11.5 econp2625% Death0w · 16.5 econp14.625% | 39.5 Quality 39.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p28.8 False-shot · Middle25%p61 | 19.4 Impact 19.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -35.2p3.850% MiddleWPA -11.3p1925% DeathWPA -0.8p51.225% | 32.8 Versatility 32.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp31.150% Middlep36.525% Deathp32.425% | |
| 55 | SLA orthodox | 29 | 12.4 | 2 | 115 | 9.08 | 8.8 Scout Score 8.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle8.886.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p8.21.32× | 8.8 Bowling Production 8.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 9.82 econp8.886.8% | 3 Quality 3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle11%p3 | 5 Impact 5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -21.8p586.8% | 24 Versatility 24 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep2486.8% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 4.0 | 4 | 17 | 4.25 | 92.3 Phase Production 92.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.452× parp91.236.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp96.242.1% Boundary %12%p86.221.1% | 41.2 Quality 41.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 98.8 Impact 98.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+39.9 | 81.2 Versatility 81.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.230% Econ vs LHBp93.830% Wkt vs RHBp98.820% Wkt vs LHBp37.520% | |
| 2 | Leg-spin | 21 | 6.0 | 3 | 32 | 5.33 | 92.2 Phase Production 92.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.567× parp93.836.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp91.242.1% Boundary %14%p91.221.1% | 6.2 Quality 6.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 81.2 Impact 81.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+16.3 | 74.4 Versatility 74.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp93.830% Econ vs LHBp5030% Wkt vs RHBp88.820% Wkt vs LHBp67.520% | |
| 3 | RA pace | 28 | 14.0 | 5 | 93 | 6.64 | 88.4 Phase Production 88.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.707× parp96.236.8% Wicket rate0.36/ovp76.242.1% Boundary %14%p98.821.1% | 8.8 Quality 8.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 88.8 Impact 88.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+24.1 | 72 Versatility 72 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.230% Econ vs LHBp78.830% Wkt vs RHBp83.820% Wkt vs LHBp13.820% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 12.0 | 4 | 75 | 6.25 | 85.1 Phase Production 85.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.665× parp98.836.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp67.542.1% Boundary %14%p96.221.1% | 56.2 Quality 56.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 96.2 Impact 96.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+33.2 | 77.2 Versatility 77.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.830% Econ vs LHBp81.230% Wkt vs RHBp56.220% Wkt vs LHBp6020% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 25 | 4.0 | 2 | 30 | 7.5 | 75.5 Phase Production 75.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.798× parp71.236.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp86.242.1% Boundary %21%p61.221.1% | 63.8 Quality 63.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 73.8 Impact 73.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.8 | 61.2 Versatility 61.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.230% Econ vs LHBp36.230% Wkt vs RHBp48.820% Wkt vs LHBp96.220% | |
| 6 | Leg-spin | 24 | 6.0 | 2 | 40 | 6.67 | 73.1 Phase Production 73.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.709× parp86.236.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp62.542.1% Boundary %19%p71.221.1% | 23.8 Quality 23.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 86.2 Impact 86.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+23.5 | 67.4 Versatility 67.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.230% Econ vs LHBp67.530% Wkt vs RHBp68.820% Wkt vs LHBp4520% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 27 | 17.0 | 7 | 155 | 9.12 | 71.6 Phase Production 71.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.97× parp63.836.8% Wicket rate0.41/ovp88.842.1% Boundary %24%p51.221.1% | 96.2 Quality 96.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 91.2 Impact 91.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+31.7 | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp43.830% Econ vs LHBp91.230% Wkt vs RHBp93.820% Wkt vs LHBp3.820% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 26 | 7.0 | 5 | 69 | 9.86 | 66.9 Phase Production 66.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.049× parp43.836.8% Wicket rate0.71/ovp93.842.1% Boundary %24%p53.821.1% | 83.8 Quality 83.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 58.8 Impact 58.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.5 | 56.2 Versatility 56.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.230% Econ vs LHBp31.230% Wkt vs RHBp91.220% Wkt vs LHBp81.220% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 14.0 | 4 | 112 | 8 | 66.4 Phase Production 66.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.851× parp83.836.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp43.842.1% Boundary %20%p81.221.1% | 68.8 Quality 68.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 66.2 Impact 66.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.6 | 52.8 Versatility 52.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp83.830% Econ vs LHBp38.830% Wkt vs RHBp66.220% Wkt vs LHBp13.820% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 1 | 24 | 6 | 66 Phase Production 66 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.638× parp81.236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp38.842.1% Boundary %8%p93.821.1% | 18.8 Quality 18.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 78.8 Impact 78.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15.9 | 67 Versatility 67 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp73.830% Econ vs LHBp88.830% Wkt vs RHBp58.820% Wkt vs LHBp32.520% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 16 | 26.0 | 9 | 248 | 9.54 | 64.4 Phase Production 64.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.015× parp51.236.8% Wicket rate0.35/ovp71.242.1% Boundary %22%p73.821.1% | 33.8 Quality 33.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 76.2 Impact 76.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+12.1 | 41.2 Versatility 41.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp48.830% Econ vs LHBp23.830% Wkt vs RHBp76.220% Wkt vs LHBp21.220% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 12.0 | 4 | 110 | 9.17 | 64.4 Phase Production 64.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.975× parp61.236.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp67.542.1% Boundary %22%p63.821.1% | 1.2 Quality 1.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 6.2 Impact 6.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-25.8 | 46.2 Versatility 46.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp68.830% Econ vs LHBp18.830% Wkt vs RHBp81.220% Wkt vs LHBp18.820% | |
| 13 | LA pace | 24 | 20.0 | 7 | 188 | 9.4 | 64.1 Phase Production 64.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1× parp56.236.8% Wicket rate0.35/ovp73.842.1% Boundary %24%p58.821.1% | 88.8 Quality 88.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 21.2 Impact 21.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.2 | 43 Versatility 43 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp58.830% Econ vs LHBp21.230% Wkt vs RHBp86.220% Wkt vs LHBp8.820% | |
| 14 | RA pace | — | 8.0 | 6 | 86 | 10.75 | 61.6 Phase Production 61.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.143× parp33.836.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp98.842.1% Boundary %27%p36.221.1% | 86.2 Quality 86.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 1.2 Impact 1.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-35.5 | 49 Versatility 49 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp63.830% Econ vs LHBp1.230% Wkt vs RHBp96.220% Wkt vs LHBp51.220% | |
| 15 | Off-spin | 33 | 2.0 | 1 | 20 | 10 | 60.2 Phase Production 60.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.064× parp46.236.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp8042.1% Boundary %25%p4521.1% | 37.5 Quality 37.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 51.2 Impact 51.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.1 | 43 Versatility 43 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.230% Econ vs LHBp26.230% Wkt vs RHBp46.220% Wkt vs LHBp6020% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 17.0 | 5 | 152 | 8.94 | 58.8 Phase Production 58.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.951× parp68.836.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp46.242.1% Boundary %22%p66.221.1% | 53.8 Quality 53.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 83.8 Impact 83.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+19.9 | 71 Versatility 71 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp56.230% Econ vs LHBp98.830% Wkt vs RHBp43.820% Wkt vs LHBp78.820% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 27 | 19.0 | 5 | 166 | 8.74 | 56.9 Phase Production 56.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.929× parp73.836.8% Wicket rate0.26/ovp28.842.1% Boundary %20%p83.821.1% | 76.2 Quality 76.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 46.2 Impact 46.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.4 | 39.8 Versatility 39.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp88.830% Econ vs LHBp3.830% Wkt vs RHBp31.220% Wkt vs LHBp28.820% | |
| 18 | LA pace | 22 | 13.0 | 5 | 133 | 10.23 | 56.4 Phase Production 56.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.088× parp38.836.8% Wicket rate0.38/ovp83.842.1% Boundary %27%p32.521.1% | 61.2 Quality 61.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 43.8 Impact 43.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.7 | 64 Versatility 64 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp36.230% Econ vs LHBp73.830% Wkt vs RHBp63.820% Wkt vs LHBp91.220% | |
| 19 | LA pace | 32 | 16.0 | 3 | 120 | 7.5 | 56.1 Phase Production 56.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.798× parp88.836.8% Wicket rate0.19/ovp11.242.1% Boundary %19%p88.821.1% | 11.2 Quality 11.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 38.8 Impact 38.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.3 | 53.8 Versatility 53.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp91.230% Econ vs LHBp61.230% Wkt vs RHBp26.220% Wkt vs LHBp13.820% | |
| 20 | Off-spin | 24 | 17.0 | 4 | 139 | 8.18 | 54 Phase Production 54 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.87× parp78.836.8% Wicket rate0.23/ovp21.242.1% Boundary %22%p76.221.1% | 93.8 Quality 93.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 93.8 Impact 93.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+32.4 | 60.2 Versatility 60.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp76.230% Econ vs LHBp71.230% Wkt vs RHBp78.820% Wkt vs LHBp1.220% | |
| 21 | LA pace | — | 2.0 | 1 | 24 | 12 | 53.1 Phase Production 53.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.276× parp36.236.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp8042.1% Boundary %33%p28.821.1% | 37.5 Quality 37.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 31.2 Impact 31.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5 | 53 Versatility 53 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp31.230% Econ vs LHBp58.830% Wkt vs RHBp73.820% Wkt vs LHBp56.220% | |
| 22 | Off-spin | 25 | 8.0 | 2 | 69 | 8.62 | 52.6 Phase Production 52.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.917× parp66.236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp32.542.1% Boundary %21%p68.821.1% | 71.2 Quality 71.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 68.8 Impact 68.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.5 | 43.5 Versatility 43.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp66.230% Econ vs LHBp33.830% Wkt vs RHBp61.220% Wkt vs LHBp6.220% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 28 | 13.0 | 4 | 123 | 9.46 | 48.2 Phase Production 48.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.006× parp53.836.8% Wicket rate0.31/ovp51.242.1% Boundary %27%p32.521.1% | 98.8 Quality 98.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 61.2 Impact 61.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.8 | 44.5 Versatility 44.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp61.230% Econ vs LHBp8.830% Wkt vs RHBp18.820% Wkt vs LHBp98.820% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 29 | 3.0 | 1 | 33 | 11 | 47.6 Phase Production 47.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.17× parp41.236.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp57.542.1% Boundary %28%p38.821.1% | 46.2 Quality 46.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 33.8 Impact 33.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4 | 49.5 Versatility 49.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.830% Econ vs LHBp63.830% Wkt vs RHBp71.220% Wkt vs LHBp37.520% | |
| 25 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 12.0 | 1 | 99 | 8.25 | 45.2 Phase Production 45.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.878× parp76.236.8% Wicket rate0.08/ovp1.242.1% Boundary %21%p78.821.1% | 16.2 Quality 16.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 36.2 Impact 36.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.6 | 44.5 Versatility 44.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp78.830% Econ vs LHBp41.230% Wkt vs RHBp1.220% Wkt vs LHBp41.220% | |
| 26 | Off-spin | 21 | 3.0 | 0 | 26 | 8.67 | 40.3 Phase Production 40.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.922× parp58.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp16.242.1% Boundary %22%p56.221.1% | 21.2 Quality 21.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 56.2 Impact 56.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.2 | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp51.230% Econ vs LHBp43.830% Wkt vs RHBp23.820% Wkt vs LHBp26.220% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 29 | 11.0 | 2 | 105 | 9.55 | 32.4 Phase Production 32.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.015× parp48.836.8% Wicket rate0.18/ovp13.842.1% Boundary %26%p41.221.1% | 43.8 Quality 43.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 28.8 Impact 28.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.2 | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.830% Econ vs LHBp28.830% Wkt vs RHBp3.820% Wkt vs LHBp8520% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 8.0 | 2 | 90 | 11.25 | 30.9 Phase Production 30.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.197× parp18.836.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp32.542.1% Boundary %25%p48.821.1% | 3.8 Quality 3.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %10% | 23.8 Impact 23.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.8 | 30.2 Versatility 30.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp33.830% Econ vs LHBp11.230% Wkt vs RHBp51.220% Wkt vs LHBp32.520% | |
| 29 | LA pace | 23 | 6.0 | 2 | 73 | 12.17 | 30.3 Phase Production 30.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.294× parp3.836.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp62.542.1% Boundary %33%p12.521.1% | 66.2 Quality 66.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 41.2 Impact 41.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2 | 38 Versatility 38 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp26.230% Econ vs LHBp16.230% Wkt vs RHBp41.220% Wkt vs LHBp8520% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 25 | 4.0 | 1 | 48 | 12 | 30.2 Phase Production 30.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.276× parp26.236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp38.842.1% Boundary %33%p2021.1% | 73.8 Quality 73.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 63.8 Impact 63.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.2 | 46 Versatility 46 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6.230% Econ vs LHBp86.230% Wkt vs RHBp16.220% Wkt vs LHBp7520% | |
| 31 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 1 | 40 | 13.33 | 30.2 Phase Production 30.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.418× parp11.236.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp57.542.1% Boundary %39%p8.821.1% | 81.2 Quality 81.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %39% | 53.8 Impact 53.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.1 | 43.5 Versatility 43.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp13.830% Econ vs LHBp56.230% Wkt vs RHBp21.220% Wkt vs LHBp91.220% | |
| 32 | LA pace | 31 | 2.0 | 0 | 27 | 13.5 | 30.1 Phase Production 30.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.436× parp28.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp23.842.1% Boundary %25%p4521.1% | 51.2 Quality 51.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 18.8 Impact 18.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.1 | 41.9 Versatility 41.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp16.230% Econ vs LHBp67.530% Wkt vs RHBp38.820% Wkt vs LHBp4520% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 33 | 7.0 | 2 | 82 | 11.71 | 29.3 Phase Production 29.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.246× parp8.836.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp48.842.1% Boundary %29%p26.221.1% | 58.8 Quality 58.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 71.2 Impact 71.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.5 | 46.2 Versatility 46.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.830% Econ vs LHBp76.230% Wkt vs RHBp36.220% Wkt vs LHBp7520% | |
| 34 | RA pace | — | 12.0 | 3 | 129 | 10.75 | 27.6 Phase Production 27.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.143× parp31.236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp26.242.1% Boundary %29%p23.821.1% | 78.8 Quality 78.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 26.2 Impact 26.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.6 | 49.2 Versatility 49.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp11.230% Econ vs LHBp96.230% Wkt vs RHBp33.820% Wkt vs LHBp51.220% | |
| 35 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 16.0 | 5 | 177 | 11.06 | 26.2 Phase Production 26.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.177× parp6.236.8% Wicket rate0.31/ovp53.842.1% Boundary %31%p6.221.1% | 26.2 Quality 26.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 48.8 Impact 48.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.2 | 30.8 Versatility 30.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp18.830% Econ vs LHBp13.830% Wkt vs RHBp53.820% Wkt vs LHBp51.220% | |
| 36 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 1 | 50 | 12.5 | 25.6 Phase Production 25.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.33× parp13.836.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp38.842.1% Boundary %33%p2021.1% | 91.2 Quality 91.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 13.8 Impact 13.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.8 | 48.8 Versatility 48.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8.830% Econ vs LHBp83.830% Wkt vs RHBp13.820% Wkt vs LHBp91.220% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 6.0 | 1 | 70 | 11.67 | 14.7 Phase Production 14.7 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.241× parp16.236.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp18.842.1% Boundary %36%p3.821.1% | 13.8 Quality 13.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 11.2 Impact 11.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.2 | 40.6 Versatility 40.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp21.230% Econ vs LHBp5030% Wkt vs RHBp28.820% Wkt vs LHBp67.520% | |
| 38 | RA pace | 24 | 5.0 | 0 | 59 | 11.8 | 13.9 Phase Production 13.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.255× parp21.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp6.242.1% Boundary %33%p16.221.1% | 48.8 Quality 48.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 8.8 Impact 8.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-24 | 36.9 Versatility 36.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp23.830% Econ vs LHBp5030% Wkt vs RHBp6.220% Wkt vs LHBp67.520% | |
| 39 | LA pace | — | 6.0 | 0 | 69 | 11.5 | 13 Phase Production 13 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.223× parp23.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.842.1% Boundary %33%p12.521.1% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 16.2 Impact 16.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.2 | 20 Versatility 20 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp38.830% Econ vs LHBp6.230% Wkt vs RHBp8.820% Wkt vs LHBp23.820% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 0 | 66 | 16.5 | 4.4 Phase Production 4.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.755× parp1.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp8.842.1% Boundary %50%p1.221.1% | 28.8 Quality 28.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 3.8 Impact 3.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-35.2 | 31.1 Versatility 31.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.230% Econ vs LHBp5030% Wkt vs RHBp11.220% Wkt vs LHBp67.520% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chinaman | 25 | 25.0 | 12 | 192 | 7.68 | 91.2 Phase Production 91.2 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.901× parp8744.1% Wicket rate0.48/ovp9744.1% Boundary %13%p8511.8% | 57 Quality 57 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 99 Impact 99 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+38 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9750% Econ vs LHBp350% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 13.1 | 6 | 93 | 7.06 | 89.1 Phase Production 89.1 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.828× parp8944.1% Wicket rate0.46/ovp8944.1% Boundary %11%p9011.8% | 87 Quality 87 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 91 Impact 91 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+17.8 | 66.5 Versatility 66.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9350% Econ vs LHBp4050% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 11.5 | 6 | 89 | 7.52 | 85.8 Phase Production 85.8 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.882× parp8344.1% Wicket rate0.51/ovp9344.1% Boundary %14%p6911.8% | 49 Quality 49 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 83 Impact 83 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+13.2 | 77 Versatility 77 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7950% Econ vs LHBp7550% | |
| 4 | Off-spin | 21 | 9.0 | 5 | 69 | 7.67 | 81.1 Phase Production 81.1 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.899× parp7344.1% Wicket rate0.56/ovp9544.1% Boundary %15%p5911.8% | 76 Quality 76 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 93 Impact 93 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+20.9 | 64 Versatility 64 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6350% Econ vs LHBp6550% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 13.0 | 4 | 91 | 7 | 76.7 Phase Production 76.7 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.821× parp9144.1% Wicket rate0.31/ovp5744.1% Boundary %9%p9711.8% | 73 Quality 73 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 77 Impact 77 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.4 | 65 Versatility 65 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9550% Econ vs LHBp3550% | |
| 6 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 13.1 | 4 | 92 | 6.99 | 75.9 Phase Production 75.9 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.819× parp9344.1% Wicket rate0.31/ovp5544.1% Boundary %11%p9011.8% | 7 Quality 7 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 85 Impact 85 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+14.3 | 75.5 Versatility 75.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9150% Econ vs LHBp6050% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 27 | 5.3 | 3 | 41 | 7.45 | 75.8 Phase Production 75.8 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.874× parp6944.1% Wicket rate0.55/ovp8544.1% Boundary %12%p6711.8% | 59 Quality 59 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 61 Impact 61 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.1 | 56.5 Versatility 56.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6750% Econ vs LHBp4650% | |
| 8 | Leg-spin | — | 27.0 | 11 | 224 | 8.3 | 73.9 Phase Production 73.9 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.973× parp6744.1% Wicket rate0.41/ovp8744.1% Boundary %16%p5111.8% | 25 Quality 25 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 87 Impact 87 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+14.6 | 68 Versatility 68 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5150% Econ vs LHBp8550% | |
| 9 | Off-spin | 33 | 3.0 | 2 | 21 | 7 | 72.8 Phase Production 72.8 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.821× parp6544.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp8344.1% Boundary %11%p6411.8% | 41 Quality 41 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 79 Impact 79 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.7 | 65 Versatility 65 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6150% Econ vs LHBp6950% | |
| 10 | Off-spin | 25 | 18.0 | 5 | 130 | 7.22 | 70.8 Phase Production 70.8 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.847× parp9544.1% Wicket rate0.28/ovp5144.1% Boundary %16%p5411.8% | 79 Quality 79 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 17 Impact 17 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.1 | 88 Versatility 88 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8750% Econ vs LHBp8950% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 18.0 | 4 | 106 | 5.89 | 69.4 Phase Production 69.4 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.691× parp9944.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp3244.1% Boundary %7%p9911.8% | 23 Quality 23 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 97 Impact 97 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+32.1 | 89 Versatility 89 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9950% Econ vs LHBp7950% | |
| 12 | LA pace | 22 | 3.0 | 1 | 17 | 5.67 | 68.4 Phase Production 68.4 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.664× parp7944.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp5944.1% Boundary %11%p6411.8% | 99 Quality 99 = false-shots induced False-shot %50% | 89 Impact 89 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15 | 72 Versatility 72 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7350% Econ vs LHBp7150% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 25 | 9.0 | 4 | 77 | 8.56 | 66.2 Phase Production 66.2 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.003× parp5244.1% Wicket rate0.44/ovp7844.1% Boundary %13%p7511.8% | 76 Quality 76 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 59 Impact 59 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.5 | 44 Versatility 44 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6550% Econ vs LHBp2350% | |
| 14 | RA pace | — | 22.0 | 7 | 184 | 8.36 | 65.5 Phase Production 65.5 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.981× parp6344.1% Wicket rate0.32/ovp6544.1% Boundary %14%p7711.8% | 1 Quality 1 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 67 Impact 67 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.4 | 57 Versatility 57 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7150% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 15 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 13.0 | 2 | 90 | 6.92 | 61.9 Phase Production 61.9 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.812× parp9744.1% Wicket rate0.16/ovp1844.1% Boundary %10%p9511.8% | 19 Quality 19 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 9 Impact 9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.5 | 88 Versatility 88 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8950% Econ vs LHBp8750% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 15.0 | 4 | 117 | 7.8 | 61.3 Phase Production 61.3 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.915× parp7744.1% Wicket rate0.26/ovp4344.1% Boundary %14%p7111.8% | 21 Quality 21 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 65 Impact 65 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6 | 80 Versatility 80 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6950% Econ vs LHBp9150% | |
| 17 | LA pace | — | 9.0 | 7 | 86 | 9.56 | 57 Phase Production 57 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.12× parp2744.1% Wicket rate0.78/ovp9944.1% Boundary %22%p1211.8% | 97 Quality 97 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 71 Impact 71 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7 | 33 Versatility 33 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2950% Econ vs LHBp3750% | |
| 18 | LA pace | 24 | 4.0 | 0 | 25 | 6.25 | 55.4 Phase Production 55.4 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.733× parp8144.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2344.1% Boundary %8%p8111.8% | 90 Quality 90 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 51 Impact 51 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.1 | 62.5 Versatility 62.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8550% Econ vs LHBp4050% | |
| 19 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 22.0 | 4 | 172 | 7.82 | 54.4 Phase Production 54.4 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.917× parp8544.1% Wicket rate0.18/ovp1544.1% Boundary %13%p8711.8% | 53 Quality 53 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 81 Impact 81 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+12.4 | 84 Versatility 84 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7550% Econ vs LHBp9350% | |
| 20 | Off-spin | 24 | 6.0 | 2 | 54 | 9 | 54.4 Phase Production 54.4 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.055× parp4544.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp6244.1% Boundary %14%p6111.8% | 67 Quality 67 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 45 Impact 45 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.1 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3750% Econ vs LHBp6350% | |
| 21 | Leg-spin | 21 | 17.0 | 3 | 134 | 7.88 | 54.3 Phase Production 54.3 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.924× parp7544.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp2744.1% Boundary %14%p7911.8% | 27 Quality 27 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 15 Impact 15 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.3 | 57 Versatility 57 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8350% Econ vs LHBp3150% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 53.8 Phase Production 53.8 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.29× parp2944.1% Wicket rate1.00/ovp9144.1% Boundary %33%p711.8% | 70 Quality 70 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 73 Impact 73 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.8 | 39.5 Versatility 39.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2350% Econ vs LHBp5650% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 33 | 9.0 | 4 | 85 | 9.44 | 53.1 Phase Production 53.1 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.107× parp3344.1% Wicket rate0.44/ovp7844.1% Boundary %18%p3511.8% | 84 Quality 84 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 53 Impact 53 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.5 | 30 Versatility 30 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5350% Econ vs LHBp750% | |
| 24 | RA pace | — | 11.0 | 4 | 101 | 9.18 | 51.2 Phase Production 51.2 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.077× parp3744.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp7144.1% Boundary %20%p3011.8% | 95 Quality 95 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 95 Impact 95 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+28.1 | 38 Versatility 38 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2550% Econ vs LHBp5150% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 29 | 4.0 | 1 | 32 | 8 | 50.3 Phase Production 50.3 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.938× parp5544.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp4744.1% Boundary %17%p4511.8% | 32 Quality 32 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 35 Impact 35 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.1 | 61 Versatility 61 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2750% Econ vs LHBp9550% | |
| 26 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 1 | 21 | 10.5 | 48.6 Phase Production 48.6 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.231× parp3544.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp6844.1% Boundary %25%p2711.8% | 93 Quality 93 = false-shots induced False-shot %50% | 37 Impact 37 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.8 | 45 Versatility 45 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp750% Econ vs LHBp8350% | |
| 27 | Leg-spin | 23 | 14.0 | 3 | 117 | 8.36 | 47.3 Phase Production 47.3 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.98× parp5744.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp3544.1% Boundary %16%p5711.8% | 17 Quality 17 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 43 Impact 43 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.3 | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5950% Econ vs LHBp4650% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 27 | 6.0 | 3 | 59 | 9.83 | 47.1 Phase Production 47.1 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.153× parp2544.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp8144.1% Boundary %25%p311.8% | 81 Quality 81 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 47 Impact 47 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.6 | 38 Versatility 38 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp950% Econ vs LHBp6750% | |
| 29 | Off-spin | 24 | 19.0 | 1 | 153 | 8.05 | 42.7 Phase Production 42.7 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.944× parp7144.1% Wicket rate0.05/ovp144.1% Boundary %11%p9311.8% | 5 Quality 5 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.4 | 64 Versatility 64 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5550% Econ vs LHBp7350% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 0 | 31 | 7.75 | 41.5 Phase Production 41.5 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.909× parp5944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2344.1% Boundary %17%p4511.8% | 90 Quality 90 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 57 Impact 57 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.9 | 60.5 Versatility 60.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4450% Econ vs LHBp7750% | |
| 31 | Leg-spin | 23 | 10.0 | 3 | 97 | 9.7 | 40.6 Phase Production 40.6 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.137× parp1744.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp5344.1% Boundary %12%p8311.8% | 47 Quality 47 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 33 Impact 33 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.7 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp350% Econ vs LHBp9750% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 26 | 4.0 | 1 | 40 | 10 | 39.7 Phase Production 39.7 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.173× parp3144.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp4744.1% Boundary %17%p4511.8% | 32 Quality 32 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.3 | 31.5 Versatility 31.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4450% Econ vs LHBp1950% | |
| 33 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 14.0 | 2 | 116 | 8.29 | 39.5 Phase Production 39.5 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.972× parp6144.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp944.1% Boundary %14%p7311.8% | 11 Quality 11 = false-shots induced False-shot %16% | 13 Impact 13 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.5 | 51.5 Versatility 51.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7750% Econ vs LHBp2650% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 31 | 18.0 | 4 | 162 | 9 | 39.4 Phase Production 39.4 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.055× parp4344.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp3244.1% Boundary %16%p5411.8% | 39 Quality 39 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 3 Impact 3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-25.2 | 33 Versatility 33 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4950% Econ vs LHBp1750% | |
| 35 | LA pace | 31 | 2.0 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 38.8 Phase Production 38.8 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.173× parp3944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3844.1% Boundary %17%p4111.8% | 45 Quality 45 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 39 Impact 39 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.6 | 41 Versatility 41 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3350% Econ vs LHBp4950% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 16 | 11.5 | 5 | 121 | 10.23 | 38.2 Phase Production 38.2 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.199× parp744.1% Wicket rate0.42/ovp7544.1% Boundary %21%p1711.8% | 43 Quality 43 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 55 Impact 55 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.7 | 13 Versatility 13 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp550% Econ vs LHBp2150% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 26 | 2.0 | 1 | 24 | 12 | 37.4 Phase Production 37.4 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.407× parp1544.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp6844.1% Boundary %33%p711.8% | 70 Quality 70 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 63 Impact 63 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.5 | 35.5 Versatility 35.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1150% Econ vs LHBp6050% | |
| 38 | Leg-spin | 24 | 19.0 | 4 | 168 | 8.84 | 36.5 Phase Production 36.5 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.037× parp4744.1% Wicket rate0.21/ovp2944.1% Boundary %19%p2511.8% | 51 Quality 51 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 41 Impact 41 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.6 | 46 Versatility 46 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3950% Econ vs LHBp5350% | |
| 39 | Off-spin | 26 | 4.0 | 1 | 41 | 10.25 | 34.8 Phase Production 34.8 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.202× parp2344.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp4744.1% Boundary %21%p3311.8% | 32 Quality 32 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 49 Impact 49 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.1 | 30 Versatility 30 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3150% Econ vs LHBp2950% | |
| 40 | LA pace | 23 | 7.0 | 3 | 91 | 13 | 32.8 Phase Production 32.8 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.524× parp144.1% Wicket rate0.43/ovp7344.1% Boundary %36%p111.8% | 65 Quality 65 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 21 Impact 21 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.2 | 41 Versatility 41 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp150% Econ vs LHBp8150% | |
| 41 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 6.0 | 2 | 66 | 11 | 32 Phase Production 32 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.29× parp544.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp6244.1% Boundary %22%p2111.8% | 13 Quality 13 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 23 Impact 23 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.3 | 13 Versatility 13 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1550% Econ vs LHBp1150% | |
| 42 | LA pace | — | 9.0 | 1 | 77 | 8.56 | 30.9 Phase Production 30.9 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.003× parp5244.1% Wicket rate0.11/ovp1244.1% Boundary %20%p2311.8% | 55 Quality 55 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 11 Impact 11 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16.8 | 43 Versatility 43 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8150% Econ vs LHBp550% | |
| 43 | RA pace | 29 | 6.0 | 0 | 52 | 8.67 | 29.6 Phase Production 29.6 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.016× parp4944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp544.1% Boundary %17%p4911.8% | 63 Quality 63 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 29 Impact 29 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.5 | 41.5 Versatility 41.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5750% Econ vs LHBp2650% | |
| 44 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 0 | 23 | 11.5 | 26 Phase Production 26 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.348× parp1944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3844.1% Boundary %33%p711.8% | 61 Quality 61 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 19 Impact 19 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.3 | 36.5 Versatility 36.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1750% Econ vs LHBp5650% | |
| 45 | SLA orthodox | — | 10.0 | 1 | 91 | 9.1 | 25.5 Phase Production 25.5 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.067× parp4144.1% Wicket rate0.10/ovp744.1% Boundary %18%p3711.8% | 9 Quality 9 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 7 Impact 7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-20.4 | 56 Versatility 56 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1350% Econ vs LHBp9950% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 33 | 5.0 | 1 | 52 | 10.4 | 25.2 Phase Production 25.2 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.219× parp1144.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp4144.1% Boundary %23%p1911.8% | 15 Quality 15 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 27 Impact 27 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5 | 27 Versatility 27 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2150% Econ vs LHBp3350% | |
| 47 | RA pace | 23 | 13.0 | 2 | 124 | 9.54 | 21.8 Phase Production 21.8 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.118× parp2144.1% Wicket rate0.16/ovp1844.1% Boundary %18%p3911.8% | 37 Quality 37 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 69 Impact 69 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.5 | 28 Versatility 28 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4750% Econ vs LHBp950% | |
| 48 | RA pace | 24 | 4.0 | 0 | 47 | 11.75 | 13.2 Phase Production 13.2 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.378× parp344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2344.1% Boundary %25%p1511.8% | 32 Quality 32 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 1 Impact 1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-40 | 21 Versatility 21 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4150% Econ vs LHBp150% | |
| 49 | RA pace | — | 9.0 | 1 | 89 | 9.89 | 12.4 Phase Production 12.4 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.16× parp1344.1% Wicket rate0.11/ovp1244.1% Boundary %22%p1211.8% | 84 Quality 84 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 31 Impact 31 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.8 | 17 Versatility 17 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1950% Econ vs LHBp1550% | |
| 50 | SLA orthodox | 29 | 11.0 | 0 | 108 | 9.82 | 8.8 Phase Production 8.8 vs all bowlers · n=50 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.151× parp944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp344.1% Boundary %20%p3011.8% | 3 Quality 3 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 5 Impact 5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.8 | 24 Versatility 24 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3550% Econ vs LHBp1350% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 4 | 11 | 3.67 | 96.5 Phase Production 96.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.338× parp98.850% Wicket rate1.33/ovp9516.7% Boundary %0%p93.833.3% | — | 91.2 Impact 91.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+21.2 | 32.4 Versatility 32.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.440% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 31 | 13.5 | 8 | 117 | 8.46 | 91.7 Phase Production 91.7 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.779× parp96.250% Wicket rate0.58/ovp63.816.7% Boundary %13%p98.833.3% | — | 98.8 Impact 98.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+88.5 | 46.3 Versatility 46.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.440% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp90.426.7% | |
| 3 | LA pace | 24 | 7.4 | 9 | 65 | 8.48 | 88.3 Phase Production 88.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.781× parp86.250% Wicket rate1.18/ovp98.816.7% Boundary %17%p86.233.3% | — | 68.8 Impact 68.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.1 | 76 Versatility 76 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep82.740% Slower ballp98.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 4 | Leg-spin | 21 | 15.5 | 8 | 138 | 8.72 | 86.1 Phase Production 86.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.803× parp93.843.6% Boundary %15%p96.241.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp33.814.5% | — | 23.8 Impact 23.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep50100% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 3.2 | 2 | 18 | 5.4 | 85.5 Phase Production 85.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.497× parp91.243.6% Boundary %10%p88.841.8% Wicket rate0.60/ovp58.814.5% | — | 88.8 Impact 88.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+18 | 72.7 Versatility 72.7 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep72.7100% | |
| 6 | RA pace | 24 | 5.0 | 3 | 37 | 7.4 | 85 Phase Production 85 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.682× parp88.850% Wicket rate0.60/ovp61.216.7% Boundary %13%p91.233.3% | — | 81.2 Impact 81.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+14.1 | 42.4 Versatility 42.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep40.440% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 3.0 | 3 | 21 | 7 | 82.5 Phase Production 82.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.645× parp81.243.6% Boundary %11%p83.841.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp82.514.5% | — | 93.8 Impact 93.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+33.8 | 68.2 Versatility 68.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep68.2100% | |
| 8 | Off-spin | 26 | 3.0 | 4 | 20 | 6.67 | 81.2 Phase Production 81.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.614× parp83.843.6% Boundary %17%p73.841.8% Wicket rate1.33/ovp9514.5% | — | 63.8 Impact 63.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 4.0 | 4 | 33 | 8.25 | 79.5 Phase Production 79.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.76× parp76.243.6% Boundary %17%p8041.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp87.514.5% | — | 78.8 Impact 78.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.8 | 72.7 Versatility 72.7 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep72.7100% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 4.0 | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 78.4 Phase Production 78.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.783× parp73.843.6% Boundary %17%p8041.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp87.514.5% | — | 72.5 Impact 72.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.2 | 77.3 Versatility 77.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep77.3100% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 25 | 3.0 | 2 | 22 | 7.33 | 75.6 Phase Production 75.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.675× parp78.850% Wicket rate0.67/ovp7016.7% Boundary %17%p73.833.3% | — | 83.8 Impact 83.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+14.4 | 44.7 Versatility 44.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.440% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp84.626.7% | |
| 12 | Off-spin | 33 | 3.0 | 2 | 30 | 10 | 71 Phase Production 71 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.921× parp68.843.6% Boundary %17%p73.841.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp7014.5% | — | 66.2 Impact 66.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.1 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep50100% | |
| 13 | LA pace | 23 | 7.2 | 4 | 69 | 9.41 | 65.4 Phase Production 65.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.867× parp71.250% Wicket rate0.55/ovp51.216.7% Boundary %23%p63.833.3% | — | 56.2 Impact 56.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.4 | 79.9 Versatility 79.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep94.240% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp98.126.7% | |
| 14 | LA pace | — | 9.0 | 5 | 99 | 11 | 60 Phase Production 60 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.013× parp56.250% Wicket rate0.56/ovp53.816.7% Boundary %22%p68.833.3% | — | 76.2 Impact 76.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.3 | 32.4 Versatility 32.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.440% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 27 | 14.4 | 10 | 163 | 11.11 | 55.4 Phase Production 55.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.024× parp53.850% Wicket rate0.68/ovp78.816.7% Boundary %26%p46.233.3% | — | 28.8 Impact 28.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.6 | 60.9 Versatility 60.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep86.540% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 27 | 15.0 | 6 | 164 | 10.93 | 54.6 Phase Production 54.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.007× parp61.250% Wicket rate0.40/ovp21.216.7% Boundary %24%p61.233.3% | — | 6.2 Impact 6.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-71.2 | 62.4 Versatility 62.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep90.440% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 28 | 5.4 | 1 | 61 | 10.76 | 54.2 Phase Production 54.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.991× parp66.250% Wicket rate0.17/ovp8.816.7% Boundary %24%p58.833.3% | — | 72.5 Impact 72.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.2 | 56.3 Versatility 56.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep7540% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 18 | RA pace | — | 7.0 | 6 | 80 | 11.43 | 53.3 Phase Production 53.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.053× parp43.850% Wicket rate0.86/ovp91.216.7% Boundary %26%p48.833.3% | — | 96.2 Impact 96.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+61.1 | 51.7 Versatility 51.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep63.540% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 19 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 3.0 | 2 | 32 | 10.67 | 53.1 Phase Production 53.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.982× parp58.843.6% Boundary %28%p41.241.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp7014.5% | — | 43.8 Impact 43.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.1 | 43.2 Versatility 43.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep43.2100% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 29 | 6.0 | 2 | 68 | 11.33 | 51 Phase Production 51 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.044× parp48.850% Wicket rate0.34/ovp27.516.7% Boundary %22%p66.233.3% | — | 16.2 Impact 16.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-37 | 40.9 Versatility 40.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep36.540% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 21 | Off-spin | 24 | 3.0 | 2 | 34 | 11.33 | 49.8 Phase Production 49.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.044× parp51.243.6% Boundary %28%p41.241.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp7014.5% | — | 48.8 Impact 48.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.1 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 22 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 1 | 35 | 11.67 | 47.1 Phase Production 47.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.074× parp46.250% Wicket rate0.34/ovp31.216.7% Boundary %22%p56.233.3% | — | 31.2 Impact 31.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16.6 | 48.6 Versatility 48.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep55.840% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 33 | 16.0 | 9 | 175 | 10.94 | 45.8 Phase Production 45.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.007× parp63.850% Wicket rate0.56/ovp56.216.7% Boundary %31%p13.833.3% | — | 86.2 Impact 86.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+16.3 | 65.5 Versatility 65.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep98.140% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 23 | 4.4 | 1 | 55 | 11.79 | 40.4 Phase Production 40.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.085× parp38.850% Wicket rate0.22/ovp18.816.7% Boundary %25%p53.833.3% | — | 46.2 Impact 46.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.6 | 54.7 Versatility 54.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep44.240% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp78.826.7% | |
| 25 | Leg-spin | 23 | 2.0 | 1 | 28 | 14 | 40.2 Phase Production 40.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.289× parp27.543.6% Boundary %25%p51.241.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp46.214.5% | — | 38.8 Impact 38.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11 | 25 Versatility 25 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep25100% | |
| 26 | Chinaman | 25 | 3.0 | 3 | 36 | 12 | 37.8 Phase Production 37.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.105× parp41.243.6% Boundary %39%p18.841.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp82.514.5% | — | 53.8 Impact 53.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.8 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 33 | 6.1 | 3 | 76 | 12.32 | 34.6 Phase Production 34.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.135× parp31.250% Wicket rate0.49/ovp41.216.7% Boundary %27%p36.233.3% | — | 26.2 Impact 26.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.8 | 45.5 Versatility 45.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep48.140% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 28 | Leg-spin | — | 2.0 | 1 | 28 | 14 | 31.8 Phase Production 31.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.289× parp27.543.6% Boundary %33%p31.241.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp46.214.5% | — | 13.8 Impact 13.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-39 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep50100% | |
| 29 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 0 | 48 | 12 | 30.4 Phase Production 30.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.105× parp36.250% Wicket rate0.00/ovp6.216.7% Boundary %29%p33.833.3% | — | 36.2 Impact 36.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.4 | 32.4 Versatility 32.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.440% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 28 | 3.0 | 0 | 40 | 13.33 | 27.7 Phase Production 27.7 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.228× parp23.850% Wicket rate0.00/ovp12.516.7% Boundary %28%p41.233.3% | — | 41.2 Impact 41.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.9 | 60.9 Versatility 60.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep55.840% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp84.626.7% | |
| 31 | LA pace | 32 | 10.0 | 5 | 121 | 12.1 | 26.7 Phase Production 26.7 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.114× parp21.250% Wicket rate0.50/ovp38.816.7% Boundary %28%p28.833.3% | — | 11.2 Impact 11.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-54 | 39.4 Versatility 39.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep32.740% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 32 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 3.0 | 0 | 37 | 12.33 | 26.5 Phase Production 26.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.136× parp33.843.6% Boundary %33%p23.841.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp12.514.5% | — | 61.2 Impact 61.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 15.9 Versatility 15.9 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep15.9100% | |
| 33 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 3 | 58 | 14.5 | 23.8 Phase Production 23.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.335× parp11.250% Wicket rate0.75/ovp76.216.7% Boundary %38%p16.233.3% | — | 8.8 Impact 8.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-56.3 | 32.4 Versatility 32.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.440% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 26 | 2.3 | 1 | 38 | 15.2 | 22.9 Phase Production 22.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.4× parp16.250% Wicket rate0.40/ovp36.216.7% Boundary %33%p26.233.3% | — | 58.8 Impact 58.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.2 | 32.4 Versatility 32.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.440% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 35 | Off-spin | 25 | 5.0 | 1 | 64 | 12.8 | 19.4 Phase Production 19.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.179× parp18.843.6% Boundary %33%p21.241.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp16.214.5% | — | 33.8 Impact 33.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.3 | 25 Versatility 25 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep25100% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 0 | 33 | 16.5 | 14.6 Phase Production 14.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.52× parp13.850% Wicket rate0.00/ovp23.816.7% Boundary %50%p11.233.3% | — | 51.2 Impact 51.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.8 | 32.4 Versatility 32.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.440% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 37 | LA pace | — | 6.0 | 2 | 88 | 14.67 | 9.8 Phase Production 9.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.351× parp6.250% Wicket rate0.34/ovp27.516.7% Boundary %39%p6.233.3% | — | 18.8 Impact 18.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-27.1 | 48.6 Versatility 48.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep55.840% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 38 | LA pace | 31 | 2.0 | 1 | 41 | 20.5 | 9.6 Phase Production 9.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.888× parp1.250% Wicket rate0.50/ovp46.216.7% Boundary %58%p3.833.3% | — | 3.8 Impact 3.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-73.4 | 53.2 Versatility 53.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep67.340% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 39 | LA pace | 22 | 14.0 | 4 | 188 | 13.43 | 5.4 Phase Production 5.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.237× parp3.850% Wicket rate0.29/ovp3.816.7% Boundary %33%p8.833.3% | — | 1.2 Impact 1.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-111.2 | 57.8 Versatility 57.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep78.840% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp38.526.7% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 29 | 9.4 | 1 | 130 | 13.45 | 5 Phase Production 5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.239× parp8.850% Wicket rate0.10/ovp1.216.7% Boundary %36%p1.233.3% | — | 21.2 Impact 21.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-23.7 | 69.6 Versatility 69.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep71.240% Slower ballp48.133.3% Slow bouncerp94.226.7% |
Siraparapu Ashish
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
81.9
Scout Score
Overs 29.1 · Wkts 14 · Runs 202 · Econ 6.93
81.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay81.341.1%33.4
Middle84.545.1%38.1
Death75.613.7%10.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p68.20.99×
Scout Score81.9
81.3Powerplay41.1% of overs · 4w · 6.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp85.138%
Impactp96.227%
Qualityp56.215%
Versatilityp77.210%
Trajectoryp68.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.665× par72bp98.836.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp67.542.1%
Boundary %14%72bp96.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.659× par61bp98.830%
Econ vs LHB0.695× par11bp81.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.29/ov61bp56.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.55/ov11bp6020%
Impact · Quality — WPA +33.2 · induced false-shot 25%
84.5Middle45.1% of overs · 6w · 7.06 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp89.138%
Impactp9125%
Qualityp8715%
Versatilityp66.512%
Trajectoryp68.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.828× par79bp8944.1%
Wicket rate0.46/ov79bp8944.1%
Boundary %11%79bp9011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.794× par72bp9350%
Econ vs LHB1.136× par7bp4050%
Impact · Quality — WPA +17.8 · induced false-shot 29%
75.6Death13.7% of overs · 4w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp78.455%
Impactp72.525%
Versatilityp77.38%
Trajectoryp68.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.783× par24bp73.843.6%
Boundary %17%24bp8041.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov24bp87.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.6118bp77.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.2
Thanneeru Bharath
Bowler · Chinaman · age 25
73.7
Scout Score
Overs 29.0 · Wkts 16 · Runs 249 · Econ 8.59
73.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle77.586.2%66.8
Death42.510.3%4.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p35.51.09×
Scout Score73.7
77.5Middle86.2% of overs · 12w · 7.68 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp91.238%
Impactp9925%
Qualityp5715%
Versatilityp5012%
Trajectoryp35.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.901× par150bp8744.1%
Wicket rate0.48/ov150bp9744.1%
Boundary %13%150bp8511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.81× par124bp9750%
Econ vs LHB1.335× par26bp350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +38 · induced false-shot 24%
42.5Death10.3% of overs · 3w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.855%
Impactp53.825%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp35.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.105× par18bp41.243.6%
Boundary %39%18bp18.841.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp82.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.8
Andimani Teja
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
70.4
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 52 · Econ 7.43
70.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay7057.1%40.0
Death70.842.9%30.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p57.31×
Scout Score70.4
70Powerplay57.1% of overs · 2w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.538%
Impactp73.827%
Qualityp63.815%
Versatilityp61.210%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.798× par24bp71.236.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp86.242.1%
Boundary %21%24bp61.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.755× par22bp71.230%
Econ vs LHB1.273× par2bp36.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.27/ov22bp48.820%
Wkt vs LHB3.00/ov2bp96.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.8 · induced false-shot 29%
70.8Death42.9% of overs · 2w · 7.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.648%
Impactp83.825%
Versatilityp44.715%
Trajectoryp57.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.675× par18bp78.850%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp7016.7%
Boundary %17%18bp73.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%18bp15.440%
Slower ball018bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer22.22218bp84.626.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +14.4
Kaldhi Ajay Kumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 28
69.1
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 137 · Econ 7.61
69.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay74.777.8%58.1
Death43.116.7%7.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p86.40.85×
Scout Score69.1
74.7Powerplay77.8% of overs · 5w · 6.64 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp88.438%
Impactp88.827%
Qualityp8.815%
Versatilityp7210%
Trajectoryp86.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.707× par84bp96.236.8%
Wicket rate0.36/ov84bp76.242.1%
Boundary %14%84bp98.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.708× par74bp96.230%
Econ vs LHB0.7× par10bp78.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.41/ov74bp83.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov10bp13.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +24.1 · induced false-shot 17%
43.1Death16.7% of overs · 0w · 13.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.748%
Impactp41.225%
Versatilityp60.915%
Trajectoryp86.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.228× par18bp23.850%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp12.516.7%
Boundary %28%18bp41.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%18bp55.840%
Slower ball018bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer22.22218bp84.626.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.9
Shaik Kamil
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
67.1
Scout Score
Overs 22.2 · Wkts 10 · Runs 152 · Econ 6.81
67.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay8317.9%14.9
Middle59.367.2%39.8
Death83.414.9%12.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p700.95×
Scout Score67.1
83Powerplay17.9% of overs · 4w · 4.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp92.338%
Impactp98.827%
Qualityp41.215%
Versatilityp81.210%
Trajectoryp7010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.452× par24bp91.236.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov24bp96.242.1%
Boundary %12%24bp86.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.511× par20bp86.230%
Econ vs LHB0.159× par4bp93.830%
Wkt vs RHB1.20/ov20bp98.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp37.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +39.9 · induced false-shot 21%
59.3Middle67.2% of overs · 4w · 7.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.338%
Impactp6525%
Qualityp2115%
Versatilityp8012%
Trajectoryp7010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.915× par90bp7744.1%
Wicket rate0.26/ov90bp4344.1%
Boundary %14%90bp7111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.969× par72bp6950%
Econ vs LHB0.683× par18bp9150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6 · induced false-shot 20%
83.4Death14.9% of overs · 2w · 5.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp85.555%
Impactp88.825%
Versatilityp72.78%
Trajectoryp7012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.497× par20bp91.243.6%
Boundary %10%20bp88.841.8%
Wicket rate0.60/ov20bp58.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.520bp72.7100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +18
Thota Vigneswara Sai Sravan
Bowler · Off-spin · age 21
65.6
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 116 · Econ 8.92
65.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay38.923.1%9.0
Middle74.569.2%51.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p13.61.2×
Scout Score65.6
38.9Powerplay23.1% of overs · 0w · 8.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.338%
Impactp56.227%
Qualityp21.215%
Versatilityp38.510%
Trajectoryp13.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.922× par18bp58.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp16.242.1%
Boundary %22%18bp56.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.905× par12bp51.230%
Econ vs LHB0.955× par6bp43.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp23.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov6bp26.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.2 · induced false-shot 11%
74.5Middle69.2% of overs · 5w · 7.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.138%
Impactp9325%
Qualityp7615%
Versatilityp6412%
Trajectoryp13.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.899× par54bp7344.1%
Wicket rate0.56/ov54bp9544.1%
Boundary %15%54bp5911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.919× par22bp6350%
Econ vs LHB0.904× par32bp6550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +20.9 · induced false-shot 28%
Chennupati Ravi Teja
Bowler · LA pace · age 24
63.7
Scout Score
Overs 31.4 · Wkts 16 · Runs 278 · Econ 8.78
63.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay56.763.2%35.8
Middle63.812.6%8.0
Death81.824.2%19.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p900.81×
Scout Score63.7
56.7Powerplay63.2% of overs · 7w · 9.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.138%
Impactp21.227%
Qualityp88.815%
Versatilityp4310%
Trajectoryp9010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1× par120bp56.236.8%
Wicket rate0.35/ov120bp73.842.1%
Boundary %24%120bp58.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.981× par108bp58.830%
Econ vs LHB1.167× par12bp21.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.39/ov108bp86.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov12bp8.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.2 · induced false-shot 30%
63.8Middle12.6% of overs · 0w · 6.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.438%
Impactp5125%
Qualityp9015%
Versatilityp62.512%
Trajectoryp9010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.733× par24bp8144.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp2344.1%
Boundary %8%24bp8111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.574× par17bp8550%
Econ vs LHB1.136× par7bp4050%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.1 · induced false-shot 38%
81.8Death24.2% of overs · 9w · 8.48 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp88.348%
Impactp68.825%
Versatilityp7615%
Trajectoryp9012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.781× par46bp86.250%
Wicket rate1.18/ov46bp98.816.7%
Boundary %17%46bp86.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate11%46bp82.740%
Slower ball5.43546bp98.133.3%
Slow bouncer046bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.1
Pardha Saradhi Gg
Bowler · Leg-spin
63.5
Scout Score
Overs 29.0 · Wkts 12 · Runs 252 · Econ 8.69
63.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle6693.1%61.4
Death306.9%2.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p42.71.04×
Scout Score63.5
66Middle93.1% of overs · 11w · 8.3 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.938%
Impactp8725%
Qualityp2515%
Versatilityp6812%
Trajectoryp42.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.973× par162bp6744.1%
Wicket rate0.41/ov162bp8744.1%
Boundary %16%162bp5111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.02× par121bp5150%
Econ vs LHB0.829× par41bp8550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +14.6 · induced false-shot 21%
30Death6.9% of overs · 1w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp31.855%
Impactp13.825%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp42.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.289× par12bp27.543.6%
Boundary %33%12bp31.241.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp46.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.26bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -39
Sirla Srinivas
Bowler · Off-spin · age 33
63.2
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 71 · Econ 8.88
63.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay52.425%13.1
Middle67.137.5%25.2
Death66.537.5%24.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p57.31×
Scout Score63.2
52.4Powerplay25% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.238%
Impactp51.227%
Qualityp37.515%
Versatilityp4310%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.064× par12bp46.236.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp8042.1%
Boundary %25%12bp4521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.639× par1bp46.230%
Econ vs LHB1.1× par11bp26.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov1bp46.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.55/ov11bp6020%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.1 · induced false-shot 17%
67.1Middle37.5% of overs · 2w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp72.838%
Impactp7925%
Qualityp4115%
Versatilityp6512%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.821× par18bp6544.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp8344.1%
Boundary %11%18bp6411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.883× par15bp6150%
Econ vs LHB0.482× par3bp6950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.7 · induced false-shot 17%
66.5Death37.5% of overs · 2w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp7155%
Impactp66.225%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp57.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.921× par18bp68.843.6%
Boundary %17%18bp73.841.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp7014.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.359bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.1
Lalith Mohan
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 36
62.1
Scout Score
Overs 33.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 263 · Econ 7.97
62.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay68.951.5%35.5
Middle4839.4%18.9
Death84.89.1%7.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p88.20.82×
Scout Score62.1
68.9Powerplay51.5% of overs · 5w · 8.94 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.838%
Impactp83.827%
Qualityp53.815%
Versatilityp7110%
Trajectoryp88.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.951× par102bp68.836.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov102bp46.242.1%
Boundary %22%102bp66.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.998× par96bp56.230%
Econ vs LHB0.212× par6bp98.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.25/ov96bp43.820%
Wkt vs LHB1.00/ov6bp78.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +19.9 · induced false-shot 24%
48Middle39.4% of overs · 2w · 6.92 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.938%
Impactp925%
Qualityp1915%
Versatilityp8812%
Trajectoryp88.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.812× par78bp9744.1%
Wicket rate0.16/ov78bp1844.1%
Boundary %10%78bp9511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.843× par72bp8950%
Econ vs LHB0.362× par6bp8750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.5 · induced false-shot 19%
84.8Death9.1% of overs · 3w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.555%
Impactp93.825%
Versatilityp68.28%
Trajectoryp88.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.645× par18bp81.243.6%
Boundary %11%18bp83.841.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp82.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7412bp68.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +33.8
B Munish Varma
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
61.8
Scout Score
Overs 9.3 · Wkts 4 · Runs 65 · Econ 6.84
61.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.642.1%25.1
Middle63.457.9%36.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p37.31.09×
Scout Score61.8
59.6Powerplay42.1% of overs · 1w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp6638%
Impactp78.827%
Qualityp18.815%
Versatilityp6710%
Trajectoryp37.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.638× par24bp81.236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp38.842.1%
Boundary %8%24bp93.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.706× par19bp73.830%
Econ vs LHB0.382× par5bp88.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.32/ov19bp58.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp32.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15.9 · induced false-shot 12%
63.4Middle57.9% of overs · 3w · 7.45 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.838%
Impactp6125%
Qualityp5915%
Versatilityp56.512%
Trajectoryp37.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.874× par33bp6944.1%
Wicket rate0.55/ov33bp8544.1%
Boundary %12%33bp6711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.697× par9bp6750%
Econ vs LHB0.964× par24bp4650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.1 · induced false-shot 24%
Uddaraju Ahitesh Varma
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 26
61.8
Scout Score
Overs 37.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 297 · Econ 8.03
61.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay61.737.8%23.3
Middle61.959.5%36.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p301.13×
Scout Score61.8
61.7Powerplay37.8% of overs · 4w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.438%
Impactp66.227%
Qualityp68.815%
Versatilityp52.810%
Trajectoryp3010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.851× par84bp83.836.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov84bp43.842.1%
Boundary %20%84bp81.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.837× par74bp83.830%
Econ vs LHB0.955× par10bp38.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.32/ov74bp66.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov10bp13.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.6 · induced false-shot 27%
61.9Middle59.5% of overs · 4w · 7.82 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.438%
Impactp8125%
Qualityp5315%
Versatilityp8412%
Trajectoryp3010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.917× par132bp8544.1%
Wicket rate0.18/ov132bp1544.1%
Boundary %13%132bp8711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.959× par104bp7550%
Econ vs LHB0.749× par28bp9350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +12.4 · induced false-shot 24%
Sai Charan Nidamanuri
Bowler · RA pace
60.2
Scout Score
Overs 25.0 · Wkts 11 · Runs 195 · Econ 7.8
60.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle56.988%50.1
Death83.912%10.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p82.70.86×
Scout Score60.2
56.9Middle88% of overs · 7w · 8.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.538%
Impactp6725%
Qualityp115%
Versatilityp5712%
Trajectoryp82.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.981× par132bp6344.1%
Wicket rate0.32/ov132bp6544.1%
Boundary %14%132bp7711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.973× par119bp7150%
Econ vs LHB1.001× par13bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.4 · induced false-shot 11%
83.9Death12% of overs · 4w · 3.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp96.548%
Impactp91.225%
Versatilityp32.415%
Trajectoryp82.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.338× par18bp98.850%
Wicket rate1.33/ov18bp9516.7%
Boundary %0%18bp93.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%18bp15.440%
Slower ball018bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer018bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +21.2
Yarragunta Pramod
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
59.7
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 50 · Econ 12.5
59.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle59.750%29.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p57.31×
Scout Score59.7
59.7Middle50% of overs · 2w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.838%
Impactp7325%
Qualityp7015%
Versatilityp39.512%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.29× par12bp2944.1%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp9144.1%
Boundary %33%12bp711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.278× par12bp2350%
Econ vs LHB—0bp5650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.8 · induced false-shot 33%
Bailapudi Yeswanth
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 21
59.4
Scout Score
Overs 38.5 · Wkts 14 · Runs 304 · Econ 7.83
59.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay75.115.5%11.6
Middle4543.8%19.7
Death6940.8%28.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p97.30.7×
Scout Score59.4
75.1Powerplay15.5% of overs · 3w · 5.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp92.238%
Impactp81.227%
Qualityp6.215%
Versatilityp74.410%
Trajectoryp97.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.567× par36bp93.836.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp91.242.1%
Boundary %14%36bp91.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.568× par36bp93.830%
Econ vs LHB—0bp5030%
Wkt vs RHB0.50/ov36bp88.820%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp67.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +16.3 · induced false-shot 11%
45Middle43.8% of overs · 3w · 7.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.338%
Impactp1525%
Qualityp2715%
Versatilityp5712%
Trajectoryp97.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.924× par102bp7544.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov102bp2744.1%
Boundary %14%102bp7911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.85× par55bp8350%
Econ vs LHB1.031× par47bp3150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.3 · induced false-shot 21%
69Death40.8% of overs · 8w · 8.72 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp86.155%
Impactp23.825%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp97.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.803× par95bp93.843.6%
Boundary %15%95bp96.241.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov95bp33.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.6461bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19
Harishankar Reddy
Bowler · RA pace · age 28
57.8
Scout Score
Overs 19.4 · Wkts 5 · Runs 196 · Econ 9.97
57.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay5866.1%38.3
Death57.328.8%16.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p39.11.09×
Scout Score57.8
58Powerplay66.1% of overs · 4w · 9.46 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.238%
Impactp61.227%
Qualityp98.815%
Versatilityp44.510%
Trajectoryp39.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.006× par78bp53.836.8%
Wicket rate0.31/ov78bp51.242.1%
Boundary %27%78bp32.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.953× par67bp61.230%
Econ vs LHB1.331× par11bp8.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.18/ov67bp18.820%
Wkt vs LHB1.09/ov11bp98.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.8 · induced false-shot 38%
57.3Death28.8% of overs · 1w · 10.76 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.248%
Impactp72.525%
Versatilityp56.315%
Trajectoryp39.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.991× par34bp66.250%
Wicket rate0.17/ov34bp8.816.7%
Boundary %24%34bp58.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate9%34bp7540%
Slower ball034bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer034bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.2
PV Satyanarayan Raju
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
57.8
Scout Score
Overs 37.4 · Wkts 15 · Runs 360 · Econ 9.56
57.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.450.4%29.9
Middle60.710.6%6.4
Death54.838.9%21.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p99.10.67×
Scout Score57.8
59.4Powerplay50.4% of overs · 5w · 8.74 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.938%
Impactp46.227%
Qualityp76.215%
Versatilityp39.810%
Trajectoryp99.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.929× par114bp73.836.8%
Wicket rate0.26/ov114bp28.842.1%
Boundary %20%114bp83.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.796× par85bp88.830%
Econ vs LHB1.317× par29bp3.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.21/ov85bp31.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.41/ov29bp28.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.4 · induced false-shot 28%
60.7Middle10.6% of overs · 0w · 7.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.538%
Impactp5725%
Qualityp9015%
Versatilityp60.512%
Trajectoryp99.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.909× par24bp5944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp2344.1%
Boundary %17%24bp4511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.069× par15bp4450%
Econ vs LHB0.643× par9bp7750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.9 · induced false-shot 38%
54.8Death38.9% of overs · 10w · 11.11 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.448%
Impactp28.825%
Versatilityp60.915%
Trajectoryp99.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.024× par88bp53.850%
Wicket rate0.68/ov88bp78.816.7%
Boundary %26%88bp46.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate12%88bp86.540%
Slower ball088bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer088bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.6
V Srikanth
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
57.6
Scout Score
Overs 13.4 · Wkts 5 · Runs 138 · Econ 10.1
57.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay49.229.3%14.4
Middle61.465.9%40.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p48.21.01×
Scout Score57.6
49.2Powerplay29.3% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.238%
Impactp63.827%
Qualityp73.815%
Versatilityp4610%
Trajectoryp48.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.276× par24bp26.236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp38.842.1%
Boundary %33%24bp2021.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.578× par17bp6.230%
Econ vs LHB0.546× par7bp86.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov17bp16.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.86/ov7bp7520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.2 · induced false-shot 33%
61.4Middle65.9% of overs · 4w · 8.56 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.238%
Impactp5925%
Qualityp7615%
Versatilityp4412%
Trajectoryp48.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.003× par54bp5244.1%
Wicket rate0.44/ov54bp7844.1%
Boundary %13%54bp7511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.93× par27bp6550%
Econ vs LHB1.098× par27bp2350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.5 · induced false-shot 28%
KV Sasikanth
Bowler · RA pace · age 31
57.3
Scout Score
Overs 31.5 · Wkts 12 · Runs 279 · Econ 8.76
57.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle34.756.5%19.6
Death86.643.5%37.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p91.80.8×
Scout Score57.3
34.7Middle56.5% of overs · 4w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.438%
Impactp325%
Qualityp3915%
Versatilityp3312%
Trajectoryp91.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.055× par108bp4344.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov108bp3244.1%
Boundary %16%108bp5411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.022× par86bp4950%
Econ vs LHB1.183× par22bp1750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -25.2 · induced false-shot 21%
86.6Death43.5% of overs · 8w · 8.46 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp91.748%
Impactp98.825%
Versatilityp46.315%
Trajectoryp91.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.779× par83bp96.250%
Wicket rate0.58/ov83bp63.816.7%
Boundary %13%83bp98.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%83bp15.440%
Slower ball083bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer24.09683bp90.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +88.5
P Girinath Reddy
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
55.6
Scout Score
Overs 38.0 · Wkts 16 · Runs 378 · Econ 9.95
55.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay73.544.7%32.9
Middle47.515.8%7.5
Death38.539.5%15.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p11.81.26×
Scout Score55.6
73.5Powerplay44.7% of overs · 7w · 9.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.638%
Impactp91.227%
Qualityp96.215%
Versatilityp6010%
Trajectoryp11.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.97× par102bp63.836.8%
Wicket rate0.41/ov102bp88.842.1%
Boundary %24%102bp51.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.064× par66bp43.830%
Econ vs LHB0.796× par36bp91.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.55/ov66bp93.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.17/ov36bp3.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +31.7 · induced false-shot 32%
47.5Middle15.8% of overs · 3w · 9.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.138%
Impactp4725%
Qualityp8115%
Versatilityp3812%
Trajectoryp11.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.153× par36bp2544.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp8144.1%
Boundary %25%36bp311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.232× par30bp950%
Econ vs LHB0.723× par6bp6750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.6 · induced false-shot 31%
38.5Death39.5% of overs · 6w · 10.93 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.648%
Impactp6.225%
Versatilityp62.415%
Trajectoryp11.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.007× par90bp61.250%
Wicket rate0.40/ov90bp21.216.7%
Boundary %24%90bp61.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate13%90bp90.440%
Slower ball090bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer090bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -71.2
Saurabh Kumar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 33
55.6
Scout Score
Overs 30.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 205 · Econ 6.83
55.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay3740%14.8
Middle67.960%40.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p31.81.1×
Scout Score55.6
37Powerplay40% of overs · 1w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.238%
Impactp36.227%
Qualityp16.215%
Versatilityp44.510%
Trajectoryp31.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.878× par72bp76.236.8%
Wicket rate0.08/ov72bp1.242.1%
Boundary %21%72bp78.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.87× par69bp78.830%
Econ vs LHB1.061× par3bp41.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.08/ov69bp1.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp41.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.6 · induced false-shot 18%
67.9Middle60% of overs · 4w · 5.89 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.438%
Impactp9725%
Qualityp2315%
Versatilityp8912%
Trajectoryp31.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.691× par108bp9944.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov108bp3244.1%
Boundary %7%108bp9911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.69× par98bp9950%
Econ vs LHB0.651× par10bp7950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +32.1 · induced false-shot 20%
Kavuri Saiteja
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
55.5
Scout Score
Overs 11.3 · Wkts 7 · Runs 131 · Econ 11.39
55.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay64.160.9%39.0
Middle49.417.4%8.6
Death36.121.7%7.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.41.01×
Scout Score55.5
64.1Powerplay60.9% of overs · 5w · 9.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.938%
Impactp58.827%
Qualityp83.815%
Versatilityp56.210%
Trajectoryp46.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.049× par42bp43.836.8%
Wicket rate0.71/ov42bp93.842.1%
Boundary %24%42bp53.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.081× par26bp41.230%
Econ vs LHB0.995× par16bp31.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.69/ov26bp91.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.75/ov16bp81.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.5 · induced false-shot 33%
49.4Middle17.4% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.438%
Impactp6325%
Qualityp7015%
Versatilityp35.512%
Trajectoryp46.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.407× par12bp1544.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp6844.1%
Boundary %33%12bp711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.458× par11bp1150%
Econ vs LHB0.723× par1bp6050%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.5 · induced false-shot 33%
36.1Death21.7% of overs · 1w · 15.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.948%
Impactp58.825%
Versatilityp32.415%
Trajectoryp46.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.4× par15bp16.250%
Wicket rate0.40/ov15bp36.216.7%
Boundary %33%15bp26.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%15bp15.440%
Slower ball015bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer015bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.2
Mallikarjuna
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 21
54.4
Scout Score
Overs 20.1 · Wkts 6 · Runs 167 · Econ 8.28
54.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay23.229.8%6.9
Middle68.665.3%44.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p84.50.85×
Scout Score54.4
23.2Powerplay29.8% of overs · 1w · 11.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp14.738%
Impactp11.227%
Qualityp13.815%
Versatilityp40.610%
Trajectoryp84.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.241× par36bp16.236.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp18.842.1%
Boundary %36%36bp3.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.242× par36bp21.230%
Econ vs LHB—0bp5030%
Wkt vs RHB0.17/ov36bp28.820%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp67.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.2 · induced false-shot 14%
68.6Middle65.3% of overs · 4w · 6.99 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.938%
Impactp8525%
Qualityp715%
Versatilityp75.512%
Trajectoryp84.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.819× par79bp9344.1%
Wicket rate0.31/ov79bp5544.1%
Boundary %11%79bp9011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.814× par78bp9150%
Econ vs LHB0.723× par1bp6050%
Impact · Quality — WPA +14.3 · induced false-shot 14%
Tripurana Vijay
Bowler · Off-spin · age 24
53.9
Scout Score
Overs 39.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 326 · Econ 8.36
53.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay66.643.6%29.0
Middle4448.7%21.4
Death44.37.7%3.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p6.41.35×
Scout Score53.9
66.6Powerplay43.6% of overs · 4w · 8.18 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp5438%
Impactp93.827%
Qualityp93.815%
Versatilityp60.210%
Trajectoryp6.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.87× par102bp78.836.8%
Wicket rate0.23/ov102bp21.242.1%
Boundary %22%102bp76.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.878× par64bp76.230%
Econ vs LHB0.854× par38bp71.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov64bp78.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov38bp1.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +32.4 · induced false-shot 31%
44Middle48.7% of overs · 1w · 8.05 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.738%
Impactp7525%
Qualityp515%
Versatilityp6412%
Trajectoryp6.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.944× par114bp7144.1%
Wicket rate0.05/ov114bp144.1%
Boundary %11%114bp9311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.004× par66bp5550%
Econ vs LHB0.874× par48bp7350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.4 · induced false-shot 15%
44.3Death7.7% of overs · 2w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.855%
Impactp48.825%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp6.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.044× par18bp51.243.6%
Boundary %28%18bp41.241.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp7014.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.1
Nimmala Himakar
Bowler · Off-spin · age 24
53.7
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 54 · Econ 9
53.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle53.7100%53.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p57.31×
Scout Score53.7
53.7Middle100% of overs · 2w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.438%
Impactp4525%
Qualityp6715%
Versatilityp5012%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.055× par36bp4544.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp6244.1%
Boundary %14%36bp6111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.09× par32bp3750%
Econ vs LHB0.723× par4bp6350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.1 · induced false-shot 28%
Yara Sandeep
Bowler · Off-spin · age 26
53.3
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 61 · Econ 8.71
53.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle39.657.1%22.6
Death71.542.9%30.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p57.31×
Scout Score53.3
39.6Middle57.1% of overs · 1w · 10.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.838%
Impactp4925%
Qualityp3215%
Versatilityp3012%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.202× par24bp2344.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp4744.1%
Boundary %21%24bp3311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.22× par12bp3150%
Econ vs LHB1.205× par12bp2950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.1 · induced false-shot 17%
71.5Death42.9% of overs · 4w · 6.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.255%
Impactp63.825%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp57.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.614× par18bp83.843.6%
Boundary %17%18bp73.841.8%
Wicket rate1.33/ov18bp9514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Midde Anjaneyulu
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
52.4
Scout Score
Overs 20.1 · Wkts 8 · Runs 182 · Econ 9.02
52.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay23.639.7%9.4
Middle71.858.7%42.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p19.11.18×
Scout Score52.4
23.6Powerplay39.7% of overs · 2w · 11.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.938%
Impactp23.827%
Qualityp3.815%
Versatilityp30.210%
Trajectoryp19.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.197× par48bp18.836.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp32.542.1%
Boundary %25%48bp48.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.143× par43bp33.830%
Econ vs LHB1.655× par5bp11.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.28/ov43bp51.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp32.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.8 · induced false-shot 10%
71.8Middle58.7% of overs · 6w · 7.52 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp85.838%
Impactp8325%
Qualityp4915%
Versatilityp7712%
Trajectoryp19.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.882× par71bp8344.1%
Wicket rate0.51/ov71bp9344.1%
Boundary %14%71bp6911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.91× par59bp7950%
Econ vs LHB0.723× par12bp7550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +13.2 · induced false-shot 22%
Mopada Ravikiran
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 24
52.4
Scout Score
Overs 26.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 212 · Econ 8.15
52.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay70.723.1%16.3
Middle46.673.1%34.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p93.60.75×
Scout Score52.4
70.7Powerplay23.1% of overs · 2w · 6.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.138%
Impactp86.227%
Qualityp23.815%
Versatilityp67.410%
Trajectoryp93.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.709× par36bp86.236.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp62.542.1%
Boundary %19%36bp71.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.732× par34bp81.230%
Econ vs LHB0.318× par2bp67.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.35/ov34bp68.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov2bp4520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +23.5 · induced false-shot 17%
46.6Middle73.1% of overs · 4w · 8.84 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.538%
Impactp4125%
Qualityp5115%
Versatilityp4612%
Trajectoryp93.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.037× par114bp4744.1%
Wicket rate0.21/ov114bp2944.1%
Boundary %19%114bp2511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.067× par83bp3950%
Econ vs LHB0.956× par31bp5350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.6 · induced false-shot 23%
Bandaru Ayyappa
Bowler · RA pace · age 33
50.3
Scout Score
Overs 32.0 · Wkts 15 · Runs 342 · Econ 10.69
50.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay43.921.9%9.6
Middle49.728.1%14.0
Death53.550%26.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p0.91.45×
Scout Score50.3
43.9Powerplay21.9% of overs · 2w · 11.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.338%
Impactp71.227%
Qualityp58.815%
Versatilityp46.210%
Trajectoryp0.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.246× par42bp8.836.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp48.842.1%
Boundary %29%42bp26.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.368× par35bp3.830%
Econ vs LHB0.637× par7bp76.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.17/ov35bp36.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.86/ov7bp7520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.5 · induced false-shot 26%
49.7Middle28.1% of overs · 4w · 9.44 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.138%
Impactp5325%
Qualityp8415%
Versatilityp3012%
Trajectoryp0.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.107× par54bp3344.1%
Wicket rate0.44/ov54bp7844.1%
Boundary %18%54bp3511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.994× par40bp5350%
Econ vs LHB1.446× par14bp750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.5 · induced false-shot 30%
53.5Death50% of overs · 9w · 10.94 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.848%
Impactp86.225%
Versatilityp65.515%
Trajectoryp0.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.007× par96bp63.850%
Wicket rate0.56/ov96bp56.216.7%
Boundary %31%96bp13.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate21%96bp98.140%
Slower ball096bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer096bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +16.3
Makki Toshith Yadav
Bowler · RA pace · age 16
50.2
Scout Score
Overs 37.5 · Wkts 14 · Runs 369 · Econ 9.75
50.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay55.868.7%38.3
Middle37.831.3%11.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p15.51.2×
Scout Score50.2
55.8Powerplay68.7% of overs · 9w · 9.54 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.438%
Impactp76.227%
Qualityp33.815%
Versatilityp41.210%
Trajectoryp15.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.015× par156bp51.236.8%
Wicket rate0.35/ov156bp71.242.1%
Boundary %22%156bp73.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.018× par123bp48.830%
Econ vs LHB1.003× par33bp23.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov123bp76.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.37/ov33bp21.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +12.1 · induced false-shot 22%
37.8Middle31.3% of overs · 5w · 10.23 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.238%
Impactp5525%
Qualityp4315%
Versatilityp1312%
Trajectoryp15.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.199× par71bp744.1%
Wicket rate0.42/ov71bp7544.1%
Boundary %21%71bp1711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.246× par47bp550%
Econ vs LHB1.115× par24bp2150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.7 · induced false-shot 21%
B Vinay Kumar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
49.7
Scout Score
Overs 33.0 · Wkts 13 · Runs 301 · Econ 9.12
49.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay30.448.5%14.7
Middle67.439.4%26.6
Death69.512.1%8.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p2.71.41×
Scout Score49.7
30.4Powerplay48.5% of overs · 5w · 11.06 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.238%
Impactp48.827%
Qualityp26.215%
Versatilityp30.810%
Trajectoryp2.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.177× par96bp6.236.8%
Wicket rate0.31/ov96bp53.842.1%
Boundary %31%96bp6.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.171× par84bp18.830%
Econ vs LHB1.22× par12bp13.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.29/ov84bp53.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.50/ov12bp51.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.2 · induced false-shot 20%
67.4Middle39.4% of overs · 4w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.738%
Impactp7725%
Qualityp7315%
Versatilityp6512%
Trajectoryp2.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.821× par78bp9144.1%
Wicket rate0.31/ov78bp5744.1%
Boundary %9%78bp9711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.734× par57bp9550%
Econ vs LHB1.067× par21bp3550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.4 · induced false-shot 27%
69.5Death12.1% of overs · 4w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.555%
Impactp78.825%
Versatilityp72.78%
Trajectoryp2.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.76× par24bp76.243.6%
Boundary %17%24bp8041.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov24bp87.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7923bp72.7100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.8
Chennu Siddhardha
Bowler · Off-spin · age 25
49.4
Scout Score
Overs 31.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 263 · Econ 8.48
49.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay54.625.8%14.1
Middle54.658.1%31.7
Death22.316.1%3.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p101.28×
Scout Score49.4
54.6Powerplay25.8% of overs · 2w · 8.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.638%
Impactp68.827%
Qualityp71.215%
Versatilityp43.510%
Trajectoryp1010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.917× par48bp66.236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp32.542.1%
Boundary %21%48bp68.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.894× par35bp66.230%
Econ vs LHB0.979× par13bp33.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov35bp61.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov13bp6.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.5 · induced false-shot 29%
54.6Middle58.1% of overs · 5w · 7.22 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.838%
Impactp1725%
Qualityp7915%
Versatilityp8812%
Trajectoryp1010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.847× par108bp9544.1%
Wicket rate0.28/ov108bp5144.1%
Boundary %16%108bp5411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.872× par88bp8750%
Econ vs LHB0.723× par20bp8950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.1 · induced false-shot 27%
22.3Death16.1% of overs · 1w · 12.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.455%
Impactp33.825%
Versatilityp258%
Trajectoryp1012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.179× par30bp18.843.6%
Boundary %33%30bp21.241.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp16.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.1610bp25100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.3
Gollapudi Yeswanth
Bowler · RA pace
46.9
Scout Score
Overs 27.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 278 · Econ 10.3
46.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.444.4%16.2
Middle64.140.7%26.1
Death3114.8%4.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p20.91.17×
Scout Score46.9
36.4Powerplay44.4% of overs · 3w · 10.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.638%
Impactp26.227%
Qualityp78.815%
Versatilityp49.210%
Trajectoryp20.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.143× par72bp31.236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov72bp26.242.1%
Boundary %29%72bp23.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.256× par60bp11.230%
Econ vs LHB0.584× par12bp96.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.20/ov60bp33.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.50/ov12bp51.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.6 · induced false-shot 29%
64.1Middle40.7% of overs · 4w · 9.18 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.238%
Impactp9525%
Qualityp9515%
Versatilityp3812%
Trajectoryp20.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.077× par66bp3744.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov66bp7144.1%
Boundary %20%66bp3011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.131× par45bp2550%
Econ vs LHB0.964× par21bp5150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +28.1 · induced false-shot 32%
31Death14.8% of overs · 0w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.448%
Impactp36.225%
Versatilityp32.415%
Trajectoryp20.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.105× par24bp36.250%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp6.216.7%
Boundary %29%24bp33.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%24bp15.440%
Slower ball024bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer024bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.4
K Pramod Kumar
Bowler · RA pace
45.5
Scout Score
Overs 19.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 209 · Econ 11
45.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay4715.8%7.4
Middle31.647.4%15.0
Death62.836.8%23.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p44.51.02×
Scout Score45.5
47Powerplay15.8% of overs · 1w · 13.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.238%
Impactp53.827%
Qualityp81.215%
Versatilityp43.510%
Trajectoryp44.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.418× par18bp11.236.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp57.542.1%
Boundary %39%18bp8.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.532× par15bp13.830%
Econ vs LHB0.849× par3bp56.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov15bp21.220%
Wkt vs LHB2.00/ov3bp91.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.1 · induced false-shot 39%
31.6Middle47.4% of overs · 1w · 9.89 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp12.438%
Impactp3125%
Qualityp8415%
Versatilityp1712%
Trajectoryp44.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.16× par54bp1344.1%
Wicket rate0.11/ov54bp1244.1%
Boundary %22%54bp1211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.229× par21bp1950%
Econ vs LHB1.139× par33bp1550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.8 · induced false-shot 30%
62.8Death36.8% of overs · 6w · 11.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.348%
Impactp96.225%
Versatilityp51.715%
Trajectoryp44.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.053× par42bp43.850%
Wicket rate0.86/ov42bp91.216.7%
Boundary %26%42bp48.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%42bp63.540%
Slower ball042bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer042bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +61.1
Madha Deepak
Bowler · LA pace · age 23
45.2
Scout Score
Overs 20.2 · Wkts 9 · Runs 233 · Econ 11.46
45.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay38.829.5%11.4
Middle34.834.4%12.0
Death60.436.1%21.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p24.51.16×
Scout Score45.2
38.8Powerplay29.5% of overs · 2w · 12.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.338%
Impactp41.227%
Qualityp66.215%
Versatilityp3810%
Trajectoryp24.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.294× par36bp3.836.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp62.542.1%
Boundary %33%36bp12.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.237× par32bp26.230%
Econ vs LHB1.751× par4bp16.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.19/ov32bp41.220%
Wkt vs LHB1.50/ov4bp8520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2 · induced false-shot 28%
34.8Middle34.4% of overs · 3w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.838%
Impactp2125%
Qualityp6515%
Versatilityp4112%
Trajectoryp24.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.524× par42bp144.1%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp7344.1%
Boundary %36%42bp111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.652× par38bp150%
Econ vs LHB0.181× par4bp8150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.2 · induced false-shot 26%
60.4Death36.1% of overs · 4w · 9.41 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.448%
Impactp56.225%
Versatilityp79.915%
Trajectoryp24.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.867× par44bp71.250%
Wicket rate0.55/ov44bp51.216.7%
Boundary %23%44bp63.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate18%44bp94.240%
Slower ball044bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer29.54544bp98.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.4
M Hemanth Reddy
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 23
44.5
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 145 · Econ 9.06
44.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle44.887.5%39.2
Death42.412.5%5.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p71.80.95×
Scout Score44.5
44.8Middle87.5% of overs · 3w · 8.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.338%
Impactp4325%
Qualityp1715%
Versatilityp52.512%
Trajectoryp71.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.98× par84bp5744.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov84bp3544.1%
Boundary %16%84bp5711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.988× par60bp5950%
Econ vs LHB0.964× par24bp4650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.3 · induced false-shot 19%
42.4Death12.5% of overs · 1w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.255%
Impactp38.825%
Versatilityp258%
Trajectoryp71.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.289× par12bp27.543.6%
Boundary %25%12bp51.241.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp46.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.2912bp25100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11
Thalachitla Deepu Bhargav
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 23
44.5
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 97 · Econ 9.7
44.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle44.5100%44.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p77.30.9×
Scout Score44.5
44.5Middle100% of overs · 3w · 9.7 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.638%
Impactp3325%
Qualityp4715%
Versatilityp5012%
Trajectoryp77.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.137× par60bp1744.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp5344.1%
Boundary %12%60bp8311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.315× par44bp350%
Econ vs LHB0.633× par16bp9750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.7 · induced false-shot 22%
CH Dilli Ganesh
Bowler · RA pace
43.4
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 106 · Econ 11.78
43.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.744.4%16.7
Middle52.822.2%11.7
Death44.633.3%14.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p57.31×
Scout Score43.4
37.7Powerplay44.4% of overs · 1w · 12.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp25.638%
Impactp13.827%
Qualityp91.215%
Versatilityp48.810%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.33× par24bp13.836.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp38.842.1%
Boundary %33%24bp2021.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.49× par21bp8.830%
Econ vs LHB0.212× par3bp83.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov21bp13.820%
Wkt vs LHB2.00/ov3bp91.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.8 · induced false-shot 42%
52.8Middle22.2% of overs · 1w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.638%
Impactp3725%
Qualityp9315%
Versatilityp4512%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.231× par12bp3544.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp6844.1%
Boundary %25%12bp2711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.893× par7bp750%
Econ vs LHB0.289× par5bp8350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.8 · induced false-shot 50%
44.6Death33.3% of overs · 1w · 11.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.148%
Impactp31.225%
Versatilityp48.615%
Trajectoryp57.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.074× par18bp46.250%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp31.216.7%
Boundary %22%18bp56.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%18bp55.840%
Slower ball018bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer018bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16.6
J Saketh Ram
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
43
Scout Score
Overs 14.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 143 · Econ 10.21
43OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay26.735.7%9.5
Middle20.728.6%5.9
Death77.235.7%27.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p80.90.86×
Scout Score43
26.7Powerplay35.7% of overs · 0w · 11.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp13.938%
Impactp8.827%
Qualityp48.815%
Versatilityp36.910%
Trajectoryp80.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.255× par30bp21.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp6.242.1%
Boundary %33%30bp16.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.256× par30bp23.830%
Econ vs LHB—0bp5030%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov30bp6.220%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp67.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -24 · induced false-shot 23%
20.7Middle28.6% of overs · 0w · 11.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp13.238%
Impactp125%
Qualityp3215%
Versatilityp2112%
Trajectoryp80.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.378× par24bp344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp2344.1%
Boundary %25%24bp1511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.104× par12bp4150%
Econ vs LHB1.687× par12bp150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -40 · induced false-shot 17%
77.2Death35.7% of overs · 3w · 7.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp8548%
Impactp81.225%
Versatilityp42.415%
Trajectoryp80.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.682× par30bp88.850%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp61.216.7%
Boundary %13%30bp91.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%30bp40.440%
Slower ball030bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer030bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +14.1
Sathivada Purushotham Ganesh
Bowler · LA pace
42.7
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 200 · Econ 10
42.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay41.810%4.2
Middle30.245%13.6
Death55.545%25.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p22.71.16×
Scout Score42.7
41.8Powerplay10% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.138%
Impactp31.227%
Qualityp37.515%
Versatilityp5310%
Trajectoryp22.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.276× par12bp36.236.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp8042.1%
Boundary %33%12bp28.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.335× par11bp31.230%
Econ vs LHB0.637× par1bp58.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.55/ov11bp73.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov1bp56.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5 · induced false-shot 17%
30.2Middle45% of overs · 1w · 8.56 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.938%
Impactp1125%
Qualityp5515%
Versatilityp4312%
Trajectoryp22.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.003× par54bp5244.1%
Wicket rate0.11/ov54bp1244.1%
Boundary %20%54bp2311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.86× par43bp8150%
Econ vs LHB1.578× par11bp550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16.8 · induced false-shot 24%
55.5Death45% of overs · 5w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp6048%
Impactp76.225%
Versatilityp32.415%
Trajectoryp22.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.013× par54bp56.250%
Wicket rate0.56/ov54bp53.816.7%
Boundary %22%54bp68.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%54bp15.440%
Slower ball054bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer054bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.3
G Sai Venkata Sumith
Bowler · LA pace · age 22
41.8
Scout Score
Overs 30.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 338 · Econ 11.27
41.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay56.243.3%24.3
Middle79.110%7.9
Death20.446.7%9.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p73.60.91×
Scout Score41.8
56.2Powerplay43.3% of overs · 5w · 10.23 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.438%
Impactp43.827%
Qualityp61.215%
Versatilityp6410%
Trajectoryp73.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.088× par78bp38.836.8%
Wicket rate0.38/ov78bp83.842.1%
Boundary %27%78bp32.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.115× par75bp36.230%
Econ vs LHB0.424× par3bp73.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.32/ov75bp63.820%
Wkt vs LHB2.00/ov3bp91.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.7 · induced false-shot 26%
79.1Middle10% of overs · 1w · 5.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp68.438%
Impactp8925%
Qualityp9915%
Versatilityp7212%
Trajectoryp73.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.664× par18bp7944.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp5944.1%
Boundary %11%18bp6411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.744× par15bp7350%
Econ vs LHB0.241× par3bp7150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15 · induced false-shot 50%
20.4Death46.7% of overs · 4w · 13.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp5.448%
Impactp1.225%
Versatilityp57.815%
Trajectoryp73.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.237× par84bp3.850%
Wicket rate0.29/ov84bp3.816.7%
Boundary %33%84bp8.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate11%84bp78.840%
Slower ball084bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer084bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -111.2
Varri Giri Prasad
Bowler · LA pace
38.5
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 243 · Econ 11.57
38.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay20.128.6%5.7
Middle6242.9%26.6
Death21.628.6%6.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p40.91.06×
Scout Score38.5
20.1Powerplay28.6% of overs · 0w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp1338%
Impactp16.227%
Qualityp31.215%
Versatilityp2010%
Trajectoryp40.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.223× par36bp23.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp3.842.1%
Boundary %33%36bp12.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.14× par28bp38.830%
Econ vs LHB1.512× par8bp6.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov28bp8.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp23.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.2 · induced false-shot 19%
62Middle42.9% of overs · 7w · 9.56 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp5738%
Impactp7125%
Qualityp9715%
Versatilityp3312%
Trajectoryp40.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.12× par54bp2744.1%
Wicket rate0.78/ov54bp9944.1%
Boundary %22%54bp1211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.116× par45bp2950%
Econ vs LHB1.125× par9bp3750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7 · induced false-shot 33%
21.6Death28.6% of overs · 2w · 14.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp9.848%
Impactp18.825%
Versatilityp48.615%
Trajectoryp40.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.351× par36bp6.250%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp27.516.7%
Boundary %39%36bp6.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%36bp55.840%
Slower ball036bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer036bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -27.1
Karthik Raman
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
37.9
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 153 · Econ 10.2
37.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay41.920%8.4
Middle35.740%14.3
Death38.140%15.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p28.21.13×
Scout Score37.9
41.9Powerplay20% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.638%
Impactp33.827%
Qualityp46.215%
Versatilityp49.510%
Trajectoryp28.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.17× par18bp41.236.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp57.542.1%
Boundary %28%18bp38.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.323× par14bp28.830%
Econ vs LHB0.637× par4bp63.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.43/ov14bp71.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp37.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4 · induced false-shot 22%
35.7Middle40% of overs · 0w · 8.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.638%
Impactp2925%
Qualityp6315%
Versatilityp41.512%
Trajectoryp28.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.016× par36bp4944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp544.1%
Boundary %17%36bp4911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.918× par19bp5750%
Econ vs LHB1.148× par17bp2650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.5 · induced false-shot 25%
38.1Death40% of overs · 2w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp5148%
Impactp16.225%
Versatilityp40.915%
Trajectoryp28.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.044× par36bp48.850%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp27.516.7%
Boundary %22%36bp66.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%36bp36.540%
Slower ball036bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer036bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -37
Pranav Reddy B
Bowler · RA pace
37.5
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 144 · Econ 12
37.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay4566.7%30.0
Death22.533.3%7.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p33.61.09×
Scout Score37.5
45Powerplay66.7% of overs · 6w · 10.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.638%
Impactp1.227%
Qualityp86.215%
Versatilityp4910%
Trajectoryp33.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.143× par48bp33.836.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov48bp98.842.1%
Boundary %27%48bp36.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.905× par36bp63.830%
Econ vs LHB1.857× par12bp1.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.83/ov36bp96.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.50/ov12bp51.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -35.5 · induced false-shot 33%
22.5Death33.3% of overs · 3w · 14.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp23.848%
Impactp8.825%
Versatilityp32.415%
Trajectoryp33.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.335× par24bp11.250%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp76.216.7%
Boundary %38%24bp16.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%24bp15.440%
Slower ball024bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer024bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -56.3
SK Kamaruddin
Bowler · RA pace · age 33
36.9
Scout Score
Overs 12.1 · Wkts 4 · Runs 140 · Econ 11.51
36.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle31.441.1%12.9
Death41.450.7%21.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p95.50.71×
Scout Score36.9
31.4Middle41.1% of overs · 1w · 10.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp25.238%
Impactp2725%
Qualityp1515%
Versatilityp2712%
Trajectoryp95.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.219× par30bp1144.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp4144.1%
Boundary %23%30bp1911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.191× par24bp2150%
Econ vs LHB1.326× par6bp3350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5 · induced false-shot 13%
41.4Death50.7% of overs · 3w · 12.32 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.648%
Impactp26.225%
Versatilityp45.515%
Trajectoryp95.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.135× par37bp31.250%
Wicket rate0.49/ov37bp41.216.7%
Boundary %27%37bp36.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%37bp48.140%
Slower ball037bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer037bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.8
Gadde Samanvith
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
36.2
Scout Score
Overs 17.4 · Wkts 3 · Runs 179 · Econ 10.13
36.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle34.973.6%25.7
Death39.726.4%10.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p4.51.35×
Scout Score36.2
34.9Middle73.6% of overs · 2w · 9.54 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.838%
Impactp6925%
Qualityp3715%
Versatilityp2812%
Trajectoryp4.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.118× par78bp2144.1%
Wicket rate0.16/ov78bp1844.1%
Boundary %18%78bp3911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.051× par67bp4750%
Econ vs LHB1.512× par11bp950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.5 · induced false-shot 20%
39.7Death26.4% of overs · 1w · 11.79 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.448%
Impactp46.225%
Versatilityp54.715%
Trajectoryp4.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.085× par28bp38.850%
Wicket rate0.22/ov28bp18.816.7%
Boundary %25%28bp53.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%28bp44.240%
Slower ball028bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer17.85728bp78.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.6
Kodavandla Sudharsian
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
35.9
Scout Score
Overs 24.4 · Wkts 4 · Runs 267 · Econ 10.82
35.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay38.844.6%17.3
Middle47.916.2%7.8
Death27.639.2%10.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p79.10.89×
Scout Score35.9
38.8Powerplay44.6% of overs · 2w · 9.55 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.438%
Impactp28.827%
Qualityp43.815%
Versatilityp42.510%
Trajectoryp79.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.015× par66bp48.836.8%
Wicket rate0.18/ov66bp13.842.1%
Boundary %26%66bp41.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.999× par62bp53.830%
Econ vs LHB1.273× par4bp28.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.10/ov62bp3.820%
Wkt vs LHB1.50/ov4bp8520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.2 · induced false-shot 23%
47.9Middle16.2% of overs · 1w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.338%
Impactp3525%
Qualityp3215%
Versatilityp6112%
Trajectoryp79.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.938× par24bp5544.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp4744.1%
Boundary %17%24bp4511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.19× par17bp2750%
Econ vs LHB0.31× par7bp9550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.1 · induced false-shot 17%
27.6Death39.2% of overs · 1w · 13.45 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp548%
Impactp21.225%
Versatilityp69.615%
Trajectoryp79.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.239× par58bp8.850%
Wicket rate0.10/ov58bp1.216.7%
Boundary %36%58bp1.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate9%58bp71.240%
Slower ball058bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer26.72458bp94.226.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -23.7
Yeddala Girish Kumar Reddy
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
35.6
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 56 · Econ 9.33
35.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle35.666.7%23.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p57.31×
Scout Score35.6
35.6Middle66.7% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.738%
Impactp2525%
Qualityp3215%
Versatilityp31.512%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.173× par24bp3144.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp4744.1%
Boundary %17%24bp4511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.069× par15bp4450%
Econ vs LHB1.366× par9bp1950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.3 · induced false-shot 17%
Cheepurapalli Stephen
Bowler · LA pace · age 32
34
Scout Score
Overs 26.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 241 · Econ 9.27
34OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay40.661.5%25.0
Death23.638.5%9.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p17.31.19×
Scout Score34
40.6Powerplay61.5% of overs · 3w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.138%
Impactp38.827%
Qualityp11.215%
Versatilityp53.810%
Trajectoryp17.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.798× par96bp88.836.8%
Wicket rate0.19/ov96bp11.242.1%
Boundary %19%96bp88.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.794× par86bp91.230%
Econ vs LHB0.828× par10bp61.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.21/ov86bp26.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov10bp13.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.3 · induced false-shot 18%
23.6Death38.5% of overs · 5w · 12.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.748%
Impactp11.225%
Versatilityp39.415%
Trajectoryp17.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.114× par60bp21.250%
Wicket rate0.50/ov60bp38.816.7%
Boundary %28%60bp28.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%60bp32.740%
Slower ball060bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer060bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -54
Yadla Vasu
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 24
32.6
Scout Score
Overs 29.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 258 · Econ 8.9
32.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay33.641.4%13.9
Middle28.748.3%13.9
Death46.710.3%4.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p26.41.13×
Scout Score32.6
33.6Powerplay41.4% of overs · 4w · 9.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.438%
Impactp6.227%
Qualityp1.215%
Versatilityp46.210%
Trajectoryp26.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.975× par72bp61.236.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp67.542.1%
Boundary %22%72bp63.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.932× par63bp68.830%
Econ vs LHB1.273× par9bp18.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.38/ov63bp81.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov9bp18.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -25.8 · induced false-shot 8%
28.7Middle48.3% of overs · 2w · 8.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.538%
Impactp1325%
Qualityp1115%
Versatilityp51.512%
Trajectoryp26.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.972× par84bp6144.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov84bp944.1%
Boundary %14%84bp7311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.926× par67bp7750%
Econ vs LHB1.148× par17bp2650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.5 · induced false-shot 16%
46.7Death10.3% of overs · 2w · 10.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.155%
Impactp43.825%
Versatilityp43.28%
Trajectoryp26.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.982× par18bp58.843.6%
Boundary %28%18bp41.241.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp7014.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.1112bp43.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.1
Ranjeet Darji
Bowler · LA pace · age 31
32.1
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 88 · Econ 14.67
32.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay34.133.3%11.4
Middle41.933.3%14.0
Death20.433.3%6.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p57.31×
Scout Score32.1
34.1Powerplay33.3% of overs · 0w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.138%
Impactp18.827%
Qualityp51.215%
Versatilityp41.910%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.436× par12bp28.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp23.842.1%
Boundary %25%12bp4521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.66× par10bp16.230%
Econ vs LHB0.318× par2bp67.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov10bp38.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov2bp4520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.1 · induced false-shot 25%
41.9Middle33.3% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.838%
Impactp3925%
Qualityp4515%
Versatilityp4112%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.173× par12bp3944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp3844.1%
Boundary %17%12bp4111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.295× par7bp3350%
Econ vs LHB1.012× par5bp4950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.6 · induced false-shot 17%
20.4Death33.3% of overs · 1w · 20.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp9.648%
Impactp3.825%
Versatilityp53.215%
Trajectoryp57.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.888× par12bp1.250%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp46.216.7%
Boundary %58%12bp3.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%12bp67.340%
Slower ball012bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -73.4
Pinninti Tejaswi
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 26
31.8
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 116 · Econ 11.6
31.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle28.160%16.9
Death39.130%11.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p66.40.99×
Scout Score31.8
28.1Middle60% of overs · 2w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp3238%
Impactp2325%
Qualityp1315%
Versatilityp1312%
Trajectoryp66.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.29× par36bp544.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp6244.1%
Boundary %22%36bp2111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.195× par28bp1550%
Econ vs LHB1.627× par8bp1150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.3 · induced false-shot 14%
39.1Death30% of overs · 0w · 12.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.555%
Impactp61.225%
Versatilityp15.98%
Trajectoryp66.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.136× par18bp33.843.6%
Boundary %33%18bp23.841.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp12.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.2416bp15.9100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Challarapu Siva
Bowler · SLA orthodox
27.1
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 104 · Econ 9.45
27.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle27.190.9%24.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p75.50.91×
Scout Score27.1
27.1Middle90.9% of overs · 1w · 9.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp25.538%
Impactp725%
Qualityp915%
Versatilityp5612%
Trajectoryp75.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.067× par60bp4144.1%
Wicket rate0.10/ov60bp744.1%
Boundary %18%60bp3711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.162× par54bp1350%
Econ vs LHB0.121× par6bp9950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -20.4 · induced false-shot 13%
Shambu Akhil
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
24.3
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 122 · Econ 15.25
24.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay15.850%7.9
Middle33.925%8.5
Death31.625%7.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p57.31×
Scout Score24.3
15.8Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 16.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp4.438%
Impactp3.827%
Qualityp28.815%
Versatilityp31.110%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.755× par24bp1.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp8.842.1%
Boundary %50%24bp1.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.756× par24bp1.230%
Econ vs LHB—0bp5030%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov24bp11.220%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp67.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -35.2 · induced false-shot 17%
33.9Middle25% of overs · 0w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp2638%
Impactp1925%
Qualityp6115%
Versatilityp36.512%
Trajectoryp57.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.348× par12bp1944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp3844.1%
Boundary %33%12bp711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.337× par12bp1750%
Econ vs LHB—0bp5650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.3 · induced false-shot 25%
31.6Death25% of overs · 0w · 16.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp14.648%
Impactp51.225%
Versatilityp32.415%
Trajectoryp57.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.52× par12bp13.850%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp23.816.7%
Boundary %50%12bp11.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp15.440%
Slower ball012bp48.133.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.8
Manish Golamaru
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 29
8.8
Scout Score
Overs 12.4 · Wkts 2 · Runs 115 · Econ 9.08
8.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle8.886.8%7.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p8.21.32×
Scout Score8.8
8.8Middle86.8% of overs · 0w · 9.82 econ · vs all bowlers n=50
Componentpctweight
Productionp8.838%
Impactp525%
Qualityp315%
Versatilityp2412%
Trajectoryp8.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.151× par66bp944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov66bp344.1%
Boundary %20%66bp3011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.081× par60bp3550%
Econ vs LHB1.808× par6bp1350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.8 · induced false-shot 11%