| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LHB | 22 | 11 | 276 | 174 | 158.6 | 25.1 | 19 | 21 | 77.9 Scout Score 77.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production92.540% Impact94.427% Versatility73.715% Shot quality16.76% Trajectory27.812% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.86×[0, 23, 64] | 92.5 Production 92.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.55× parp94.435% True Avg1.92× parp94.430% Balls / boundary3.08p94.417.5% Balls / dismissal24.67p83.317.5% | 16.7 Shot Quality 16.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation64.8% Control · Build59% Phase-weighted control63.3% | 94.4 Impact 94.4 = WPA percentile · total +45.8 WPA · Powerplay+63.4 WPA · Consolidation-17.6 | 73.7 Versatility 73.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp94.426.7% vs Spin SRp94.426.7% Accel into Consp5020% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 2 | RHB | 24 | 11 | 294 | 200 | 147 | 26.7 | 27 | 11 | 66.1 Scout Score 66.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production66.940% Impact83.327% Versatility74.415% Shot quality83.36% Trajectory5.612% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.64×[0, 6, 11] | 66.9 Production 66.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.1× parp83.335% True Avg1× parp61.130% Balls / boundary4.95p72.217.5% Balls / dismissal18.17p38.917.5% | 83.3 Shot Quality 83.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation79.6% Control · Build75.6% Phase-weighted control78.4% | 83.3 Impact 83.3 = WPA percentile · total +27.4 WPA · Powerplay+7.9 WPA · Consolidation+19.5 | 74.4 Versatility 74.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp83.326.7% vs Spin SRp83.326.7% Accel into Consp83.320% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 3 | RHB | 27 | 11 | 260 | 195 | 133.3 | 23.6 | 26 | 15 | 58.7 Scout Score 58.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production61.740% Impact72.227% Versatility63.315% Shot quality506% Trajectory16.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.83×[27, 31, 23] | 61.7 Production 61.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp61.135% True Avg1× parp5030% Balls / boundary4.73p83.317.5% Balls / dismissal20.29p61.117.5% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.1% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control70.3% | 72.2 Impact 72.2 = WPA percentile · total +2.4 WPA · Powerplay+3 WPA · Consolidation-0.6 | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp72.226.7% vs Spin SRp61.126.7% Accel into Consp72.220% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 4 | RHB | 30 | 8 | 163 | 136 | 119.9 | 23.3 | 16 | 5 | 55.4 Scout Score 55.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production43.340% Impact61.127% Versatility48.515% Shot quality72.26% Trajectory83.312% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.12×[65, 23, 14] | 43.3 Production 43.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.07× parp72.235% True Avg0.81× parp27.830% Balls / boundary5.45p38.917.5% Balls / dismissal15p16.717.5% | 72.2 Shot Quality 72.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72.4% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control73.4% | 61.1 Impact 61.1 = WPA percentile · total -5.8 WPA · Powerplay-0.1 WPA · Consolidation-5.7 | 48.5 Versatility 48.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp38.926.7% vs Spin SRp27.826.7% Accel into Consp27.820% Pressure entryp94.426.7% | |
| 5 | RHB | 23 | 3 | 53 | 45 | 117.8 | 17.7 | 6 | 2 | 49.3 Scout Score 49.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production48.640% Impact5027% Versatility44.815% Shot quality27.86% Trajectory66.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[21, 27, 5] | 48.6 Production 48.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp5035% True Avg0.66× parp38.930% Balls / boundary4.83p61.117.5% Balls / dismissal14.5p5017.5% | 27.8 Shot Quality 27.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation64.3% Control · Build50% Phase-weighted control63.3% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total -8.3 WPA · Powerplay-8.3 WPA · Consolidation+0.1 | 44.8 Versatility 44.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5026.7% vs Spin SRp38.926.7% Accel into Consp38.920% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | 22 | 2 | 38 | 32 | 118.8 | 19 | 1 | 3 | 48.7 Scout Score 48.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production48.940% Impact38.927% Versatility46.315% Shot quality61.16% Trajectory66.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[33, 5] | 48.9 Production 48.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.8× parp38.935% True Avg1.01× parp72.230% Balls / boundary8.33p5.617.5% Balls / dismissal25p72.217.5% | 61.1 Shot Quality 61.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted control71.4% | 38.9 Impact 38.9 = WPA percentile · total -15.9 WPA · Powerplay-14.6 WPA · Consolidation-1.3 | 46.3 Versatility 46.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp27.826.7% vs Spin SRp5026.7% Accel into Consp61.120% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 7 | RHB | 22 | 10 | 197 | 145 | 135.9 | 21.9 | 12 | 15 | 47.9 Scout Score 47.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production46.440% Impact27.827% Versatility67.815% Shot quality5.66% Trajectory94.412% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.2×[5, 29, 18] | 46.4 Production 46.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.77× parp5.635% True Avg2.52× parp83.330% Balls / boundary6.5p16.717.5% Balls / dismissal65p94.417.5% | 5.6 Shot Quality 5.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation51.4% Control · Build67.7% Phase-weighted control56.4% | 27.8 Impact 27.8 = WPA percentile · total -26.1 WPA · Powerplay-29.7 WPA · Consolidation+3.6 | 67.8 Versatility 67.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp61.126.7% vs Spin SRp72.226.7% Accel into Consp94.420% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 8 | LHB | 21 | 10 | 206 | 185 | 111.4 | 22.9 | 18 | 8 | 25.4 Scout Score 25.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production28.340% Impact16.727% Versatility8.515% Shot quality38.96% Trajectory5012% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[50, 4, 2] | 28.3 Production 28.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.84× parp27.835% True Avg0.63× parp16.730% Balls / boundary5p5017.5% Balls / dismissal15p27.817.5% | 38.9 Shot Quality 38.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70.3% Control · Build64.4% Phase-weighted control68.4% | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = WPA percentile · total -45 WPA · Powerplay-20.8 WPA · Consolidation-24.1 | 8.5 Versatility 8.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5.626.7% vs Spin SRp16.726.7% Accel into Consp5.620% Pressure entryp5.626.7% | |
| 9 | RHB | 21 | 10 | 112 | 107 | 104.7 | 11.2 | 14 | 3 | 20.6 Scout Score 20.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production13.340% Impact5.627% Versatility22.615% Shot quality94.46% Trajectory38.912% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.89×[23, 2, 4] | 13.3 Production 13.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.84× parp16.735% True Avg0.45× parp5.630% Balls / boundary5.65p27.817.5% Balls / dismissal10.67p5.617.5% | 94.4 Shot Quality 94.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.8% Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted control81.8% | 5.6 Impact 5.6 = WPA percentile · total -45.5 WPA · Powerplay-42.7 WPA · Consolidation-2.9 | 22.6 Versatility 22.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp16.726.7% vs Spin SRp5.626.7% Accel into Consp16.720% Pressure entryp5026.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 29 | 11 | 473 | 199 | 237.7 | 47.3 | 33 | 45 | 92.7 Scout Score 92.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production97.428% Impact97.427% Versatility91.627% Shot quality71.18% Trajectory86.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[54, 53, 34] | 97.4 Production 97.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.8× parp97.442.9% True Avg3.32× parp97.432.1% Balls / boundary2.77p97.425% | 71.1 Shot Quality 71.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build86.5% Phase-weighted control81.5% | 97.4 Impact 97.4 = WPA percentile · total +105.8 WPA · Consolidation+21.4 WPA · Build+84.4 | 91.6 Versatility 91.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep86.544.4% vs LA-orthodox25bp91.7 vs Leg-spin15bp93.8 vs Short ball10bp62.5 Spin hittingp94.229.6% Off-spin14bp94.4 LA-orthodox32bp90.6 Leg-spin21bp97.1 Chinaman31bp95.8 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p97.414.8% Reach deathp97.411.1% | |
| 2 | LHB | — | 11 | 437 | 295 | 148.1 | 54.6 | 28 | 32 | 76.8 Scout Score 76.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production84.228% Impact92.127% Versatility76.127% Shot quality28.98% Trajectory55.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.98×[9, 44, 28] | 84.2 Production 84.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.12× parp81.642.9% True Avg1.78× parp81.632.1% Balls / boundary5.32p92.125% | 28.9 Shot Quality 28.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75.6% Control · Build72% Phase-weighted control73.6% | 92.1 Impact 92.1 = WPA percentile · total +76.7 WPA · Consolidation+34.4 WPA · Build+42.2 | 76.1 Versatility 76.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep8344.4% vs Off-spin51bp78.6 vs Chinaman23bp92.9 vs Short ball7b7b <min Spin hittingp65.629.6% Off-spin67bp50 LA-orthodox13bp96.9 Leg-spin68bp67.6 Chinaman23bp87.5 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p76.314.8% Reach deathp76.311.1% | |
| 3 | LHB | 20 | 10 | 302 | 183 | 165 | 50.3 | 21 | 18 | 74 Scout Score 74 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production85.528% Impact86.827% Versatility62.127% Shot quality86.88% Trajectory28.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.83×[18, 40, 1] | 85.5 Production 85.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.15× parp86.842.9% True Avg2.24× parp86.832.1% Balls / boundary6p81.625% | 86.8 Shot Quality 86.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86.5% Control · Build80.2% Phase-weighted control81.9% | 86.8 Impact 86.8 = WPA percentile · total +43 WPA · Consolidation-2.1 WPA · Build+45.2 | 62.1 Versatility 62.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep47.444.4% vs Off-spin20bp64.3 vs Chinaman18bp50 vs Short ball11bp12.5 Spin hittingp6329.6% Off-spin24bp72.2 LA-orthodox19bp59.4 Leg-spin20bp55.9 Chinaman18bp62.5 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p81.614.8% Reach deathp92.111.1% | |
| 4 | LHB | 26 | 10 | 283 | 202 | 140.1 | 31.4 | 19 | 16 | 71.5 Scout Score 71.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production71.128% Impact81.627% Versatility63.527% Shot quality92.18% Trajectory5010% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.93×[37, 32, 14] | 71.1 Production 71.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.07× parp65.842.9% True Avg1.45× parp65.832.1% Balls / boundary6.19p86.825% | 92.1 Shot Quality 92.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation77.2% Control · Build86.4% Phase-weighted control82% | 81.6 Impact 81.6 = WPA percentile · total +24.7 WPA · Consolidation-4.5 WPA · Build+29.1 | 63.5 Versatility 63.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep58.244.4% vs Off-spin50bp50 vs Chinaman20bp78.6 vs Short ball6b6b <min Spin hittingp54.529.6% Off-spin54bp33.3 LA-orthodox31bp65.6 Leg-spin42bp61.8 Chinaman20bp79.2 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p92.114.8% Reach deathp71.111.1% | |
| 5 | RHB | 24 | 10 | 158 | 109 | 145 | 26.3 | 9 | 11 | 68 Scout Score 68 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production72.728% Impact76.327% Versatility4827% Shot quality60.58% Trajectory92.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.21×[7, 7, 49] | 72.7 Production 72.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.13× parp71.142.9% True Avg2.34× parp76.332.1% Balls / boundary6.08p71.125% | 60.5 Shot Quality 60.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.6% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control79.5% | 76.3 Impact 76.3 = WPA percentile · total +8.7 WPA · Consolidation+7.3 WPA · Build+1.5 | 48 Versatility 48 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep38.344.4% vs LA-orthodox14bp75 vs Leg-spin16bp6.2 vs Short ball6b6b <min Spin hittingp58.329.6% Off-spin14bp83.3 LA-orthodox21bp71.9 Leg-spin20bp26.5 Chinaman4b4b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p55.314.8% Reach deathp5011.1% | |
| 6 | RHB | — | 5 | 54 | 35 | 154.3 | 13.5 | 6 | 2 | 66.5 Scout Score 66.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production57.128% Impact65.827% Versatility76.527% Shot quality55.38% Trajectory76.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[11, 39, 2] | 57.1 Production 57.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.21× parp60.542.9% True Avg0.64× parp5032.1% Balls / boundary4.67p60.525% | 55.3 Shot Quality 55.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build68.4% Phase-weighted control78.6% | 65.8 Impact 65.8 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+2.7 WPA · Build-2.6 | 76.5 Versatility 76.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep81.244.4% vs LA-orthodox8b8b <min vs Leg-spin10bp81.2 vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp91.229.6% Off-spin1b1b <min LA-orthodox8b8b <min Leg-spin10bp91.2 Chinaman9b9b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p60.514.8% Reach deathp39.511.1% | |
| 7 | RHB | 26 | 8 | 210 | 114 | 184.2 | 30 | 21 | 14 | 64.4 Scout Score 64.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production7828% Impact55.327% Versatility78.127% Shot quality65.88% Trajectory13.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.67×[10, 11, 51] | 78 Production 78 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.52× parp92.142.9% True Avg1.57× parp60.532.1% Balls / boundary3.44p76.325% | 65.8 Shot Quality 65.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation77.3% Control · Build81.8% Phase-weighted control80% | 55.3 Impact 55.3 = WPA percentile · total -2.8 WPA · Consolidation-11.1 WPA · Build+8.2 | 78.1 Versatility 78.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep71.644.4% vs LA-orthodox12bp58.3 vs Leg-spin8b8b <min vs Short ball10bp87.5 Spin hittingp80.329.6% Off-spin4b4b <min LA-orthodox27bp78.1 Leg-spin12bp85.3 Chinaman8b8b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p86.814.8% Reach deathp86.811.1% | |
| 8 | RHB | — | 3 | 70 | 62 | 112.9 | 23.3 | 4 | 3 | 54.9 Scout Score 54.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production44.528% Impact60.527% Versatility47.827% Shot quality78.98% Trajectory68.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[29, 19, 22] | 44.5 Production 44.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.82× parp39.542.9% True Avg1.27× parp55.332.1% Balls / boundary11p39.525% | 78.9 Shot Quality 78.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation85.7% Control · Build79.4% Phase-weighted control81.8% | 60.5 Impact 60.5 = WPA percentile · total -2 WPA · Consolidation-4.1 WPA · Build+2.1 | 47.8 Versatility 47.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep62.544.4% vs LA-orthodox6b6b <min vs Leg-spin16bp62.5 vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp44.429.6% Off-spin7b7b <min LA-orthodox11bp15.6 Leg-spin16bp76.5 Chinaman13bp29.2 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p13.214.8% Reach deathp44.711.1% | |
| 9 | RHB | 23 | 6 | 57 | 39 | 146.2 | 9.5 | 4 | 5 | 54.6 Scout Score 54.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production54.128% Impact71.127% Versatility65.827% Shot quality7.98% Trajectory18.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.68×[6, 1, 8] | 54.1 Production 54.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.43× parp76.342.9% True Avg0.45× parp23.732.1% Balls / boundary3.67p55.325% | 7.9 Shot Quality 7.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation55.6% Control · Build50% Phase-weighted control54.5% | 71.1 Impact 71.1 = WPA percentile · total +5.9 WPA · Consolidation+14.1 WPA · Build-8.1 | 65.8 Versatility 65.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep62.544.4% vs LA-orthodox5b5b <min vs Leg-spin12bp62.5 vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp80.729.6% Off-spin1b1b <min LA-orthodox14bp84.4 Leg-spin12bp76.5 Chinaman2b2b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p5014.8% Reach deathp60.511.1% | |
| 10 | LHB | — | 7 | 90 | 73 | 123.3 | 12.9 | 5 | 6 | 50.4 Scout Score 50.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production44.428% Impact28.927% Versatility68.127% Shot quality44.78% Trajectory81.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[16, 26, 1] | 44.4 Production 44.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1× parp55.342.9% True Avg0.56× parp13.232.1% Balls / boundary6.67p65.825% | 44.7 Shot Quality 44.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70.4% Control · Build81.8% Phase-weighted control76.7% | 28.9 Impact 28.9 = WPA percentile · total -30.4 WPA · Consolidation-22.7 WPA · Build-7.7 | 68.1 Versatility 68.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep77.344.4% vs Off-spin16bp92.9 vs Chinaman19bp64.3 vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp66.129.6% Off-spin18bp61.1 LA-orthodox7b7b <min Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman19bp70.8 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p34.214.8% Reach deathp81.611.1% | |
| 11 | LHB | 35 | 10 | 185 | 175 | 105.7 | 30.8 | 18 | 2 | 39.5 Scout Score 39.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production34.828% Impact39.527% Versatility27.327% Shot quality97.48% Trajectory39.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.86×[13, 23, 6] | 34.8 Production 34.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.74× parp7.942.9% True Avg1.91× parp71.132.1% Balls / boundary11.5p34.225% | 97.4 Shot Quality 97.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation64.3% Control · Build87.2% Phase-weighted control83.7% | 39.5 Impact 39.5 = WPA percentile · total -28.3 WPA · Consolidation-9.8 WPA · Build-18.5 | 27.3 Versatility 27.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep35.744.4% vs Off-spin17bp35.7 vs Chinaman14bp35.7 vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp21.229.6% Off-spin23bp5.6 LA-orthodox26bp21.9 Leg-spin12bp14.7 Chinaman17bp45.8 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p28.914.8% Reach deathp7.911.1% | |
| 12 | RHB | 22 | 10 | 123 | 136 | 90.4 | 15.4 | 11 | 1 | 35.8 Scout Score 35.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production27.628% Impact34.227% Versatility23.627% Shot quality34.28% Trajectory97.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.21×[9, 21, 5] | 27.6 Production 27.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.76× parp28.942.9% True Avg0.57× parp28.932.1% Balls / boundary13.2p23.725% | 34.2 Shot Quality 34.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73% Control · Build79.3% Phase-weighted control75.8% | 34.2 Impact 34.2 = WPA percentile · total -29.5 WPA · Consolidation-41.3 WPA · Build+11.7 | 23.6 Versatility 23.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep18.844.4% vs LA-orthodox9b9b <min vs Leg-spin18bp18.8 vs Short ball6b6b <min Spin hittingp2829.6% Off-spin7b7b <min LA-orthodox31bp28.1 Leg-spin22bp8.8 Chinaman16bp54.2 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p44.714.8% Reach deathp2.611.1% | |
| 13 | RHB | 33 | 10 | 106 | 75 | 141.3 | 10.6 | 11 | 7 | 35.8 Scout Score 35.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production25.228% Impact44.727% Versatility49.127% Shot quality39.58% Trajectory2.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.51×[0, 7, 1] | 25.2 Production 25.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.56× parp34.242.9% True Avg0.22× parp18.432.1% Balls / boundary21p18.425% | 39.5 Shot Quality 39.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control76.2% | 44.7 Impact 44.7 = WPA percentile · total -17.8 WPA · Consolidation-8.4 WPA · Build-9.4 | 49.1 Versatility 49.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox8b8b <min vs Leg-spin3b3b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp46.929.6% Off-spin5b5b <min LA-orthodox20bp46.9 Leg-spin6b6b <min Chinaman6b6b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p65.814.8% Reach deathp28.911.1% | |
| 14 | RHB | 34 | 9 | 96 | 87 | 110.3 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 35 Scout Score 35 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production46.628% Impact18.427% Versatility44.627% Shot quality18.48% Trajectory34.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.85×[13, 0, 1] | 46.6 Production 46.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.92× parp5042.9% True Avg0.69× parp39.532.1% Balls / boundary8.38p5025% | 18.4 Shot Quality 18.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation69% Control · Build68.4% Phase-weighted control68.7% | 18.4 Impact 18.4 = WPA percentile · total -39.4 WPA · Consolidation-33.8 WPA · Build-5.6 | 44.6 Versatility 44.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep43.344.4% vs LA-orthodox10bp41.7 vs Leg-spin35bp43.8 vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp45.229.6% Off-spin2b2b <min LA-orthodox12bp37.5 Leg-spin38bp50 Chinaman12bp37.5 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p71.114.8% Reach deathp13.211.1% | |
| 15 | RHB | 20 | 5 | 54 | 58 | 93.1 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 32.5 Scout Score 32.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production36.828% Impact5027% Versatility28.527% Shot quality2.68% Trajectory7.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.66×[2, 12, 7] | 36.8 Production 36.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.61× parp44.742.9% True Avg0.22× parp44.732.1% Balls / boundary26p13.225% | 2.6 Shot Quality 2.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation28.6% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control46.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total -6.2 WPA · Consolidation-7.6 WPA · Build+1.5 | 28.5 Versatility 28.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox0b0b <min vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp2.929.6% Off-spin7b7b <min LA-orthodox6b6b <min Leg-spin12bp2.9 Chinaman6b6b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p18.414.8% Reach deathp23.711.1% | |
| 16 | RHB | 32 | 3 | 29 | 36 | 80.6 | 9.7 | 2 | 1 | 29.3 Scout Score 29.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production28.428% Impact23.727% Versatility26.227% Shot quality13.28% Trajectory68.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[26, 0, 3] | 28.4 Production 28.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.63× parp23.742.9% True Avg0.42× parp34.232.1% Balls / boundary11.67p28.925% | 13.2 Shot Quality 13.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72.7% Control · Build58.3% Phase-weighted control62.9% | 23.7 Impact 23.7 = WPA percentile · total -33.8 WPA · Consolidation-20.6 WPA · Build-13.2 | 26.2 Versatility 26.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep18.344.4% vs LA-orthodox13bp8.3 vs Leg-spin10bp31.2 vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp18.429.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox13bp3.1 Leg-spin10bp38.2 Chinaman4b4b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p39.514.8% Reach deathp60.511.1% | |
| 17 | LHB | 27 | 9 | 242 | 216 | 112 | 40.3 | 19 | 8 | 26 Scout Score 26 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production46.428% Impact2.627% Versatility22.127% Shot quality508% Trajectory23.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.71×[17, 20, 17] | 46.4 Production 46.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.79× parp13.242.9% True Avg2.49× parp92.132.1% Balls / boundary11.13p44.725% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build77.6% Phase-weighted control78.4% | 2.6 Impact 2.6 = WPA percentile · total -65.2 WPA · Consolidation-83.4 WPA · Build+18.2 | 22.1 Versatility 22.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep19.344.4% vs Off-spin33bp21.4 vs Chinaman22bp7.1 vs Short ball11bp37.5 Spin hittingp34.929.6% Off-spin37bp33.3 LA-orthodox32bp53.1 Leg-spin36bp32.4 Chinaman24bp16.7 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p7.914.8% Reach deathp18.411.1% | |
| 18 | LHB | 20 | 11 | 162 | 144 | 112.5 | 16.2 | 8 | 7 | 21.8 Scout Score 21.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production12.428% Impact7.927% Versatility19.927% Shot quality78.98% Trajectory44.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[3, 30, 1] | 12.4 Production 12.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.74× parp18.442.9% True Avg0.53× parp7.932.1% Balls / boundary22p7.925% | 78.9 Shot Quality 78.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.8% Control · Build81.8% Phase-weighted control81.8% | 7.9 Impact 7.9 = WPA percentile · total -47.2 WPA · Consolidation-28.7 WPA · Build-18.6 | 19.9 Versatility 19.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep12.644.4% vs Off-spin21bp7.1 vs Chinaman13bp21.4 vs Short ball6b6b <min Spin hittingp23.629.6% Off-spin30bp16.7 LA-orthodox12bp37.5 Leg-spin20bp44.1 Chinaman19bp4.2 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p23.714.8% Reach deathp34.211.1% | |
| 19 | RHB | 17 | 7 | 69 | 95 | 72.6 | 9.9 | 6 | 1 | 18.3 Scout Score 18.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production2.628% Impact13.227% Versatility22.527% Shot quality23.78% Trajectory60.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.98×[9, 0, 16] | 2.6 Production 2.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.47× parp2.642.9% True Avg0.28× parp2.632.1% Balls / boundary53p2.625% | 23.7 Shot Quality 23.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70.7% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control69.8% | 13.2 Impact 13.2 = WPA percentile · total -43.9 WPA · Consolidation-36.8 WPA · Build-7.1 | 22.5 Versatility 22.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep2544.4% vs LA-orthodox11bp25 vs Leg-spin9b9b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp14.529.6% Off-spin9b9b <min LA-orthodox20bp9.4 Leg-spin10bp20.6 Chinaman20bp16.7 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2.614.8% Reach deathp60.511.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 34 | 9 | 133 | 87 | 152.9 | 44.3 | 11 | 8 | 72.1 Scout Score 72.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production77.440% Impact79.425% Versatility4918% Shot quality14.74% Trajectory91.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.26×[7, 22, 0] | 77.4 Production 77.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.29× parp91.232.5% Balls / boundary2.88p91.220% Balls / six8.17p67.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 14.7 Shot Quality 14.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build60.6% Phase-weighted control63.2% | 79.4 Impact 79.4 = WPA percentile · total +25.5 WPA · Death+25.5 | 49 Versatility 49 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker6b6b <min vs Slower ball11bp50 vs Spin (death)p91.216.7% Reach buildp14.722.2% | |
| 2 | LHB | 34 | 10 | 254 | 153 | 166 | 36.3 | 12 | 24 | 71.7 Scout Score 71.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production9040% Impact61.825% Versatility59.218% Shot quality20.64% Trajectory67.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.06×[67, 6, 29] | 90 Production 90 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.35× parp97.132.5% Balls / boundary2.86p97.120% Balls / six4p97.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 20.6 Shot Quality 20.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation58.3% Control · Build64% Phase-weighted control63.2% | 61.8 Impact 61.8 = WPA percentile · total +0.7 WPA · Death+0.7 | 59.2 Versatility 59.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker9b9b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p73.516.7% Reach buildp73.522.2% | |
| 3 | LHB | 26 | 11 | 198 | 121 | 163.6 | 22 | 14 | 16 | 68.5 Scout Score 68.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production81.940% Impact91.225% Versatility50.218% Shot quality504% Trajectory14.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.87×[0, 37, 7] | 81.9 Production 81.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.18× parp85.332.5% Balls / boundary3.5p85.320% Balls / six5.6p91.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.3% Control · Build68.9% Phase-weighted control70% | 91.2 Impact 91.2 = WPA percentile · total +31.9 WPA · Death+31.9 | 50.2 Versatility 50.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p11.816.7% Reach buildp79.422.2% | |
| 4 | LHB | 29 | 10 | 236 | 139 | 169.8 | 39.3 | 18 | 15 | 66.8 Scout Score 66.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production6540% Impact97.125% Versatility62.118% Shot quality67.64% Trajectory20.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.87×[6, 26, 2] | 65 Production 65 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.09× parp55.932.5% Balls / boundary3.83p67.620% Balls / six7.67p79.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 67.6 Shot Quality 67.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Build75.9% Phase-weighted control75.3% | 97.1 Impact 97.1 = WPA percentile · total +50.1 WPA · Death+50.1 | 62.1 Versatility 62.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker4b4b <min vs Slower ball9b9b <min vs Spin (death)p67.616.7% Reach buildp91.222.2% | |
| 5 | LHB | 27 | 10 | 221 | 157 | 140.8 | 27.6 | 23 | 9 | 66.6 Scout Score 66.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production69.340% Impact85.325% Versatility60.518% Shot quality61.84% Trajectory32.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.96×[22, 14, 34] | 69.3 Production 69.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.24× parp67.632.5% Balls / boundary2.82p79.420% Balls / six6.2p73.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 61.8 Shot Quality 61.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70.4% Control · Build79.3% Phase-weighted control75% | 85.3 Impact 85.3 = WPA percentile · total +26.7 WPA · Death+26.7 | 60.5 Versatility 60.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker4b4b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p97.116.7% Reach buildp61.822.2% | |
| 6 | RHB | 25 | 4 | 78 | 49 | 159.2 | 39 | 6 | 3 | 57.2 Scout Score 57.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production56.940% Impact73.525% Versatility5118% Shot quality85.34% Trajectory26.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[30, 10, 20] | 56.9 Production 56.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.22× parp61.832.5% Balls / boundary3.62p55.920% Balls / six9.67p55.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 85.3 Shot Quality 85.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control80% | 73.5 Impact 73.5 = WPA percentile · total +8.3 WPA · Death+8.3 | 51 Versatility 51 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker4b4b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p79.416.7% Reach buildp32.422.2% | |
| 7 | LHB | 20 | 2 | 42 | 29 | 144.8 | 42 | 3 | 3 | 56.7 Scout Score 56.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production52.640% Impact67.625% Versatility42.518% Shot quality97.14% Trajectory55.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[23, 19] | 52.6 Production 52.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp5032.5% Balls / boundary4.2p44.120% Balls / six7p61.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 97.1 Shot Quality 97.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build87.5% Phase-weighted control87.5% | 67.6 Impact 67.6 = WPA percentile · total +7 WPA · Death+7 | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p20.616.7% Reach buildp38.222.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | 19 | 9 | 194 | 119 | 163 | 48.5 | 12 | 12 | 55.2 Scout Score 55.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production75.740% Impact26.525% Versatility52.918% Shot quality55.94% Trajectory5013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[33, 51, 6] | 75.7 Production 75.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.15× parp79.432.5% Balls / boundary4.27p73.520% Balls / six7.11p85.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 55.9 Shot Quality 55.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation90.9% Control · Build70.5% Phase-weighted control74.5% | 26.5 Impact 26.5 = WPA percentile · total -11.7 WPA · Death-11.7 | 52.9 Versatility 52.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker4b4b <min vs Slower ball8b8b <min vs Spin (death)p44.116.7% Reach buildp67.622.2% | |
| 9 | RHB | 31 | 9 | 234 | 139 | 168.3 | 26 | 9 | 22 | 52 Scout Score 52 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production33.840% Impact55.925% Versatility61.418% Shot quality79.44% Trajectory79.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.12×[11, 51, 38] | 33.8 Production 33.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap38.232.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap26.520% Balls / sixn/ap26.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 79.4 Shot Quality 79.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.5% Control · Build81.9% Phase-weighted control79.9% | 55.9 Impact 55.9 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 61.4 Versatility 61.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p55.916.7% Reach buildp97.122.2% | |
| 10 | RHB | 30 | 9 | 146 | 112 | 130.4 | 20.9 | 12 | 7 | 48.8 Scout Score 48.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production6040% Impact20.625% Versatility37.118% Shot quality8.84% Trajectory97.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.94×[11, 1, 41] | 60 Production 60 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.24× parp73.532.5% Balls / boundary3.2p61.820% Balls / six10.67p5032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 8.8 Shot Quality 8.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation37.5% Control · Build63.9% Phase-weighted control61.2% | 20.6 Impact 20.6 = WPA percentile · total -13.7 WPA · Death-13.7 | 37.1 Versatility 37.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p11.816.7% Reach buildp20.622.2% | |
| 11 | RHB | 31 | 7 | 74 | 49 | 151 | 10.6 | 2 | 8 | 45.6 Scout Score 45.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production30.740% Impact5025% Versatility63.718% Shot quality32.44% Trajectory61.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[29, 6, 0] | 30.7 Production 30.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.7× parp14.732.5% Balls / boundary6.67p20.620% Balls / six10p44.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 32.4 Shot Quality 32.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build65.5% Phase-weighted control65.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total -4.9 WPA · Death-4.9 | 63.7 Versatility 63.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p85.316.7% Reach buildp85.322.2% | |
| 12 | RHB | 24 | 8 | 78 | 66 | 118.2 | 11.1 | 5 | 4 | 41.3 Scout Score 41.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production26.640% Impact44.125% Versatility41.818% Shot quality26.54% Trajectory85.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.18×[8, 17, 24] | 26.6 Production 26.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.79× parp26.532.5% Balls / boundary6p38.220% Balls / six18p8.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 26.5 Shot Quality 26.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build63.3% Phase-weighted control63.3% | 44.1 Impact 44.1 = WPA percentile · total -7.6 WPA · Death-7.6 | 41.8 Versatility 41.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p32.416.7% Reach buildp26.522.2% | |
| 13 | RHB | 25 | 4 | 29 | 39 | 74.4 | 7.2 | 2 | 1 | 38.8 Scout Score 38.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production26.540% Impact38.225% Versatility41.818% Shot quality38.24% Trajectory73.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.07×[0, 9, 18] | 26.5 Production 26.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.55× parp20.632.5% Balls / boundary11p8.820% Balls / six11p32.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 38.2 Shot Quality 38.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control67.9% | 38.2 Impact 38.2 = WPA percentile · total -8.7 WPA · Death-8.7 | 41.8 Versatility 41.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p55.916.7% Reach buildp8.822.2% | |
| 14 | RHB | 28 | 8 | 70 | 56 | 125 | 11.7 | 5 | 4 | 33.6 Scout Score 33.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production38.540% Impact32.425% Versatility37.618% Shot quality73.54% Trajectory2.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.85×[2, 4, 12] | 38.5 Production 38.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.93× parp44.132.5% Balls / boundary4p5020% Balls / six14p20.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 73.5 Shot Quality 73.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.5% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control78.6% | 32.4 Impact 32.4 = WPA percentile · total -10.8 WPA · Death-10.8 | 37.6 Versatility 37.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p38.216.7% Reach buildp2.922.2% | |
| 15 | RHB | 25 | 4 | 19 | 24 | 79.2 | 9.5 | 1 | 0 | 29.2 Scout Score 29.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production36.940% Impact2.925% Versatility49.718% Shot quality91.24% Trajectory8.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.86×[1, 1, 11] | 36.9 Production 36.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.3× parp32.432.5% Balls / boundary4p32.420% Balls / six4p38.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 91.2 Shot Quality 91.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.5% Control · Build85.7% Phase-weighted control86.7% | 2.9 Impact 2.9 = WPA percentile · total -69.5 WPA · Death-69.5 | 49.7 Versatility 49.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p55.916.7% Reach buildp44.122.2% | |
| 16 | RHB | 27 | 8 | 44 | 47 | 93.6 | 5.5 | 3 | 2 | 25.1 Scout Score 25.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production18.140% Impact14.725% Versatility46.118% Shot quality2.94% Trajectory44.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[1, 0, 9] | 18.1 Production 18.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.37× parp8.832.5% Balls / boundary10p14.720% Balls / six20p14.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 2.9 Shot Quality 2.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation62.5% Control · Build60% Phase-weighted control60.6% | 14.7 Impact 14.7 = WPA percentile · total -14 WPA · Death-14 | 46.1 Versatility 46.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p26.516.7% Reach buildp5022.2% | |
| 17 | LHB | 25 | 6 | 77 | 67 | 114.9 | 15.4 | 6 | 1 | 20.8 Scout Score 20.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production1040% Impact8.825% Versatility43.518% Shot quality44.14% Trajectory38.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[25, 11, 13] | 10 Production 10 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.5× parp2.932.5% Balls / boundary29p2.920% Balls / six58p2.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 44.1 Shot Quality 44.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build68.4% Phase-weighted control68.4% | 8.8 Impact 8.8 = WPA percentile · total -14.8 WPA · Death-14.8 | 43.5 Versatility 43.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball6b6b <min vs Spin (death)p2.916.7% Reach buildp55.922.2% |
Aman Khan
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 29
92.7
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 473 · Balls 199 · SR 237.7 · Avg 47.3 · 4s 33 · 6s 45
92.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production97.428%27.3
Impact *97.427%26.3
Versatility91.627%24.7
Shot quality71.18%5.7
Trajectory86.810%8.7
Scout Score92.7
97.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR229.21.8×130bp97.442.9%
True Avg74.53.32×4wp97.432.1%
Balls / boundary2.8—130bp97.425%
97.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +105.8
WPA · Consolidation+21.4
WPA · Build+84.4
91.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p86.544.4%
vs LA-orthodox172 SR25bp91.7
vs Leg-spin287 SR15bp93.8
vs Short ball250 SR10bp62.5
Spin hitting———p94.229.6%
Off-spin293 SR14bp94.4
LA-orthodox197 SR32bp90.6
Leg-spin281 SR21bp97.1
Chinaman229 SR31bp95.8
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)209.3 SR1.42×43bp97.414.8%
Reach death300 SR1.83×19bp97.411.1%
71.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build86.5%
Phase-weighted control81.5% → p71.1
86.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[54, 53, 34]
Innings11
Pugazhendi Akash
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 22
77.9
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 276 · Balls 174 · SR 158.6 · Avg 25.1 · 4s 19 · 6s 21
77.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production92.540%37.0
Impact *94.427%25.5
Versatility73.715%11.1
Shot quality16.76%1.0
Trajectory27.812%3.3
Scout Score77.9
92.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2001.55×74bp94.435%
True Avg49.31.92×3wp94.430%
Balls / boundary3.1—74bp94.417.5%
Balls / dismissal24.7—3wp83.317.5%
94.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +45.8
WPA · Powerplay+63.4
WPA · Consolidation-17.6
73.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR148.2 SR1.02×83bp94.426.7%
vs Spin SR168.1 SR1.36×91bp94.426.7%
Accel into Cons120.4 SR—54bp5020%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
16.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation64.8%
Control · Build59%
Phase-weighted control63.3% → p16.7
27.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.86×
Recent scores[0, 23, 64]
Innings11
Ritik Sharma
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB
76.8
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 437 · Balls 295 · SR 148.1 · Avg 54.6 · 4s 28 · 6s 32
76.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production84.228%23.6
Impact *92.127%24.9
Versatility76.127%20.5
Shot quality28.98%2.3
Trajectory55.310%5.5
Scout Score76.8
84.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR142.11.12×197bp81.642.9%
True Avg401.78×7wp81.632.1%
Balls / boundary5.3—197bp92.125%
92.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +76.7
WPA · Consolidation+34.4
WPA · Build+42.2
76.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p8344.4%
vs Off-spin125 SR51bp78.6
vs Chinaman191 SR23bp92.9
vs Short ball43 SR7b7b <min
Spin hitting———p65.629.6%
Off-spin119 SR67bp50
LA-orthodox262 SR13bp96.9
Leg-spin112 SR68bp67.6
Chinaman191 SR23bp87.5
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)164.8 SR1.12×54bp76.314.8%
Reach death213.3 SR1.3×15bp76.311.1%
28.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75.6%
Control · Build72%
Phase-weighted control73.6% → p28.9
55.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.98×
Recent scores[9, 44, 28]
Innings11
Prithvi Rajan Khanna
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 20
74
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 302 · Balls 183 · SR 165 · Avg 50.3 · 4s 21 · 6s 18
74OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production85.528%23.9
Impact *86.827%23.4
Versatility62.127%16.8
Shot quality86.88%6.9
Trajectory28.910%2.9
Scout Score74
85.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR145.71.15×138bp86.842.9%
True Avg50.22.24×4wp86.832.1%
Balls / boundary6—138bp81.625%
86.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +43
WPA · Consolidation-2.1
WPA · Build+45.2
62.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p47.444.4%
vs Off-spin110 SR20bp64.3
vs Chinaman117 SR18bp50
vs Short ball100 SR11bp12.5
Spin hitting———p6329.6%
Off-spin129 SR24bp72.2
LA-orthodox147 SR19bp59.4
Leg-spin105 SR20bp55.9
Chinaman117 SR18bp62.5
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)175.4 SR1.19×65bp81.614.8%
Reach death241.5 SR1.47×41bp92.111.1%
86.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86.5%
Control · Build80.2%
Phase-weighted control81.9% → p86.8
28.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.83×
Recent scores[18, 40, 1]
Innings10
Sahil Sanjiv Dutta
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 34
72.1
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 133 · Balls 87 · SR 152.9 · Avg 44.3 · 4s 11 · 6s 8
72.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production77.440%31.0
Impact *79.425%19.9
Versatility4918%8.8
Shot quality14.74%0.6
Trajectory91.213%11.9
Scout Score72.1
77.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR212.21.29×49bp91.232.5%
Balls / boundary2.9—49bp91.220%
Balls / six8.2—49bp67.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
79.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +25.5
WPA · Death+25.5
49VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker67 SR6b6b <min
vs Slower ball145 SR11bp50
vs Spin (death)250 SR1.6×8bp91.216.7%
Reach build87.9 SR0.64×33bp14.722.2%
14.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build60.6%
Phase-weighted control63.2% → p14.7
91.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.26×
Recent scores[7, 22, 0]
Innings9
Sagar Trivedi
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 34
71.7
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 254 · Balls 153 · SR 166 · Avg 36.3 · 4s 12 · 6s 24
71.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production9040%36.0
Impact *61.825%15.4
Versatility59.218%10.7
Shot quality20.64%0.8
Trajectory67.613%8.8
Scout Score71.7
90ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR221.71.35×60bp97.132.5%
Balls / boundary2.9—60bp97.120%
Balls / six4—60bp97.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
61.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0.7
WPA · Death+0.7
59.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker122 SR9b9b <min
vs Slower ball400 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)173.7 SR1.11×19bp73.516.7%
Reach build142.7 SR1.03×75bp73.522.2%
20.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation58.3%
Control · Build64%
Phase-weighted control63.2% → p20.6
67.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.06×
Recent scores[67, 6, 29]
Innings10
Aman Khan
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 26
71.5
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 283 · Balls 202 · SR 140.1 · Avg 31.4 · 4s 19 · 6s 16
71.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production71.128%19.9
Impact *81.627%22.0
Versatility63.527%17.1
Shot quality92.18%7.4
Trajectory5010%5.0
Scout Score71.5
71.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR136.51.07×167bp65.842.9%
True Avg32.61.45×7wp65.832.1%
Balls / boundary6.2—167bp86.825%
81.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +24.7
WPA · Consolidation-4.5
WPA · Build+29.1
63.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p58.244.4%
vs Off-spin102 SR50bp50
vs Chinaman150 SR20bp78.6
vs Short ball250 SR6b6b <min
Spin hitting———p54.529.6%
Off-spin100 SR54bp33.3
LA-orthodox148 SR31bp65.6
Leg-spin107 SR42bp61.8
Chinaman150 SR20bp79.2
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)221.4 SR1.5×28bp92.114.8%
Reach death204.5 SR1.25×22bp71.111.1%
92.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation77.2%
Control · Build86.4%
Phase-weighted control82% → p92.1
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.93×
Recent scores[37, 32, 14]
Innings10
Achal Singla
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 26
68.5
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 198 · Balls 121 · SR 163.6 · Avg 22 · 4s 14 · 6s 16
68.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production81.940%32.8
Impact *91.225%22.8
Versatility50.218%9.0
Shot quality504%2.0
Trajectory14.713%1.9
Scout Score68.5
81.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR194.61.18×56bp85.332.5%
Balls / boundary3.5—56bp85.320%
Balls / six5.6—56bp91.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
91.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +31.9
WPA · Death+31.9
50.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker50 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball114 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)85.7 SR0.55×7bp11.816.7%
Reach build155.6 SR1.13×45bp79.422.2%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.3%
Control · Build68.9%
Phase-weighted control70% → p50
14.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.87×
Recent scores[0, 37, 7]
Innings11
Karan Kannan
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 24
68
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 158 · Balls 109 · SR 145 · Avg 26.3 · 4s 9 · 6s 11
68OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production72.728%20.4
Impact *76.327%20.6
Versatility4827%13.0
Shot quality60.58%4.8
Trajectory92.110%9.2
Scout Score68
72.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR143.81.13×73bp71.142.9%
True Avg52.52.34×2wp76.332.1%
Balls / boundary6.1—73bp71.125%
76.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +8.7
WPA · Consolidation+7.3
WPA · Build+1.5
48VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p38.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox157 SR14bp75
vs Leg-spin44 SR16bp6.2
vs Short ball250 SR6b6b <min
Spin hitting———p58.329.6%
Off-spin236 SR14bp83.3
LA-orthodox162 SR21bp71.9
Leg-spin75 SR20bp26.5
Chinaman125 SR4b4b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)152 SR1.03×25bp55.314.8%
Reach death187.5 SR1.14×16bp5011.1%
60.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.6%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control79.5% → p60.5
92.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.21×
Recent scores[7, 7, 49]
Innings10
Shrikaran A
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 29
66.8
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 236 · Balls 139 · SR 169.8 · Avg 39.3 · 4s 18 · 6s 15
66.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production6540%26.0
Impact *97.125%24.3
Versatility62.118%11.2
Shot quality67.64%2.7
Trajectory20.613%2.7
Scout Score66.8
65ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR178.31.09×46bp55.932.5%
Balls / boundary3.8—46bp67.620%
Balls / six7.7—46bp79.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
97.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +50.1
WPA · Death+50.1
62.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker50 SR4b4b <min
vs Slower ball133 SR9b9b <min
vs Spin (death)190.9 SR1.22×11bp67.616.7%
Reach build169.6 SR1.23×79bp91.222.2%
67.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Build75.9%
Phase-weighted control75.3% → p67.6
20.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.87×
Recent scores[6, 26, 2]
Innings10
Sidak Singh
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 27
66.6
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 221 · Balls 157 · SR 140.8 · Avg 27.6 · 4s 23 · 6s 9
66.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production69.340%27.7
Impact *85.325%21.3
Versatility60.518%10.9
Shot quality61.84%2.5
Trajectory32.413%4.2
Scout Score66.6
69.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR203.21.24×31bp67.632.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—31bp79.420%
Balls / six6.2—31bp73.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
85.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +26.7
WPA · Death+26.7
60.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker150 SR4b4b <min
vs Slower ball50 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)287.5 SR1.84×16bp97.116.7%
Reach build137.9 SR1×58bp61.822.2%
61.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70.4%
Control · Build79.3%
Phase-weighted control75% → p61.8
32.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.96×
Recent scores[22, 14, 34]
Innings10
Avish Gautam
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB
66.5
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 54 · Balls 35 · SR 154.3 · Avg 13.5 · 4s 6 · 6s 2
66.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production57.128%16.0
Impact *65.827%17.8
Versatility76.527%20.7
Shot quality55.38%4.4
Trajectory76.310%7.6
Scout Score66.5
57.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR153.61.21×28bp60.542.9%
True Avg14.30.64×3wp5032.1%
Balls / boundary4.7—28bp60.525%
65.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+2.7
WPA · Build-2.6
76.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p81.244.4%
vs LA-orthodox88 SR8b8b <min
vs Leg-spin270 SR10bp81.2
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p91.229.6%
Off-spin100 SR1b1b <min
LA-orthodox88 SR8b8b <min
Leg-spin270 SR10bp91.2
Chinaman89 SR9b9b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)——0bp60.514.8%
Reach death183.3 SR1.12×6bp39.511.1%
55.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build68.4%
Phase-weighted control78.6% → p55.3
76.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[11, 39, 2]
Innings5
Gautam Dileep Shastry
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 24
66.1
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 294 · Balls 200 · SR 147 · Avg 26.7 · 4s 27 · 6s 11
66.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production66.940%26.8
Impact *83.327%22.5
Versatility74.415%11.2
Shot quality83.36%5.0
Trajectory5.612%0.7
Scout Score66.1
66.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR142.21.1×109bp83.335%
True Avg25.81×6wp61.130%
Balls / boundary5—109bp72.217.5%
Balls / dismissal18.2—6wp38.917.5%
83.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +27.4
WPA · Powerplay+7.9
WPA · Consolidation+19.5
74.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR136.7 SR0.94×109bp83.326.7%
vs Spin SR159.3 SR1.29×91bp83.326.7%
Accel into Cons149 SR—49bp83.320%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
83.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation79.6%
Control · Build75.6%
Phase-weighted control78.4% → p83.3
5.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.64×
Recent scores[0, 6, 11]
Innings11
Parameeswaran S
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 26
64.4
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 210 · Balls 114 · SR 184.2 · Avg 30 · 4s 21 · 6s 14
64.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production7828%21.8
Impact *55.327%14.9
Versatility78.127%21.1
Shot quality65.88%5.3
Trajectory13.210%1.3
Scout Score64.4
78ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR192.71.52×55bp92.142.9%
True Avg35.31.57×3wp60.532.1%
Balls / boundary3.4—55bp76.325%
55.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -2.8
WPA · Consolidation-11.1
WPA · Build+8.2
78.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p71.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox150 SR12bp58.3
vs Leg-spin150 SR8b8b <min
vs Short ball280 SR10bp87.5
Spin hitting———p80.329.6%
Off-spin475 SR4b4b <min
LA-orthodox167 SR27bp78.1
Leg-spin167 SR12bp85.3
Chinaman88 SR8b8b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)204.8 SR1.39×21bp86.814.8%
Reach death230 SR1.4×10bp86.811.1%
65.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation77.3%
Control · Build81.8%
Phase-weighted control80% → p65.8
13.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.67×
Recent scores[10, 11, 51]
Innings8
Vedant Bhardwaj
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 27
58.7
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 260 · Balls 195 · SR 133.3 · Avg 23.6 · 4s 26 · 6s 15
58.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production61.740%24.7
Impact *72.227%19.5
Versatility63.315%9.5
Shot quality506%3.0
Trajectory16.712%2.0
Scout Score58.7
61.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR127.50.99×142bp61.135%
True Avg25.91×7wp5030%
Balls / boundary4.7—142bp83.317.5%
Balls / dismissal20.3—7wp61.117.5%
72.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2.4
WPA · Powerplay+3
WPA · Consolidation-0.6
63.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR131.6 SR0.91×114bp72.226.7%
vs Spin SR135.8 SR1.1×81bp61.126.7%
Accel into Cons150 SR—38bp72.220%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.1%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control70.3% → p50
16.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.83×
Recent scores[27, 31, 23]
Innings11
Harsh Vaishav
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 25
57.2
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 78 · Balls 49 · SR 159.2 · Avg 39 · 4s 6 · 6s 3
57.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production56.940%22.8
Impact *73.525%18.4
Versatility5118%9.2
Shot quality85.34%3.4
Trajectory26.513%3.4
Scout Score57.2
56.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2001.22×29bp61.832.5%
Balls / boundary3.6—29bp55.920%
Balls / six9.7—29bp55.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
73.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +8.3
WPA · Death+8.3
51VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR4b4b <min
vs Slower ball120 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)233.3 SR1.49×6bp79.416.7%
Reach build100 SR0.72×20bp32.422.2%
85.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control80% → p85.3
26.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[30, 10, 20]
Innings4
Samar Khan
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 20
56.7
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 42 · Balls 29 · SR 144.8 · Avg 42 · 4s 3 · 6s 3
56.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production52.640%21.0
Impact *67.625%16.9
Versatility42.518%7.7
Shot quality97.14%3.9
Trajectory55.913%7.3
Scout Score56.7
52.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR161.90.99×21bp5032.5%
Balls / boundary4.2—21bp44.120%
Balls / six7—21bp61.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
67.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +7
WPA · Death+7
42.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker33 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)83.3 SR0.53×6bp20.616.7%
Reach build100 SR0.72×8bp38.222.2%
97.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build87.5%
Phase-weighted control87.5% → p97.1
55.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[23, 19]
Innings2
Saurav Candha
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 30
55.4
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 163 · Balls 136 · SR 119.9 · Avg 23.3 · 4s 16 · 6s 5
55.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production43.340%17.3
Impact *61.127%16.5
Versatility48.515%7.3
Shot quality72.26%4.3
Trajectory83.312%10.0
Scout Score55.4
43.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR138.31.07×60bp72.235%
True Avg20.80.81×4wp27.830%
Balls / boundary5.5—60bp38.917.5%
Balls / dismissal15—4wp16.717.5%
61.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5.8
WPA · Powerplay-0.1
WPA · Consolidation-5.7
48.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR122.2 SR0.84×72bp38.926.7%
vs Spin SR117.2 SR0.95×64bp27.826.7%
Accel into Cons103.4 SR—29bp27.820%
Pressure entry100 SR0.77×26bp94.426.7%
72.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72.4%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control73.4% → p72.2
83.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.12×
Recent scores[65, 23, 14]
Innings8
Shiva Subash N
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 19
55.2
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 194 · Balls 119 · SR 163 · Avg 48.5 · 4s 12 · 6s 12
55.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production75.740%30.3
Impact *26.525%6.6
Versatility52.918%9.5
Shot quality55.94%2.2
Trajectory5013%6.5
Scout Score55.2
75.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR189.11.15×64bp79.432.5%
Balls / boundary4.3—64bp73.520%
Balls / six7.1—64bp85.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
26.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -11.7
WPA · Death-11.7
52.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker25 SR4b4b <min
vs Slower ball138 SR8b8b <min
vs Spin (death)133.3 SR0.85×12bp44.116.7%
Reach build143.2 SR1.04×44bp67.622.2%
55.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation90.9%
Control · Build70.5%
Phase-weighted control74.5% → p55.9
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[33, 51, 6]
Innings9
Somraj Bishnoi
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
54.9
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 70 · Balls 62 · SR 112.9 · Avg 23.3 · 4s 4 · 6s 3
54.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production44.528%12.5
Impact *60.527%16.3
Versatility47.827%12.9
Shot quality78.98%6.3
Trajectory68.410%6.8
Scout Score54.9
44.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR103.60.82×55bp39.542.9%
True Avg28.51.27×2wp55.332.1%
Balls / boundary11—55bp39.525%
60.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -2
WPA · Consolidation-4.1
WPA · Build+2.1
47.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p62.544.4%
vs LA-orthodox83 SR6b6b <min
vs Leg-spin125 SR16bp62.5
vs Short ball200 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p44.429.6%
Off-spin143 SR7b7b <min
LA-orthodox73 SR11bp15.6
Leg-spin125 SR16bp76.5
Chinaman77 SR13bp29.2
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)100 SR0.68×10bp13.214.8%
Reach death185.7 SR1.13×7bp44.711.1%
78.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation85.7%
Control · Build79.4%
Phase-weighted control81.8% → p78.9
68.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[29, 19, 22]
Innings3
Bharat Rawat
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 23
54.6
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 57 · Balls 39 · SR 146.2 · Avg 9.5 · 4s 4 · 6s 5
54.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production54.128%15.1
Impact *71.127%19.2
Versatility65.827%17.8
Shot quality7.98%0.6
Trajectory18.410%1.8
Scout Score54.6
54.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR181.81.43×22bp76.342.9%
True Avg100.45×4wp23.732.1%
Balls / boundary3.7—22bp55.325%
71.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +5.9
WPA · Consolidation+14.1
WPA · Build-8.1
65.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p62.544.4%
vs LA-orthodox380 SR5b5b <min
vs Leg-spin125 SR12bp62.5
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p80.729.6%
Off-spin100 SR1b1b <min
LA-orthodox179 SR14bp84.4
Leg-spin125 SR12bp76.5
Chinaman50 SR2b2b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)133.3 SR0.9×3bp5014.8%
Reach death——0bp60.511.1%
7.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation55.6%
Control · Build50%
Phase-weighted control54.5% → p7.9
18.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.68×
Recent scores[6, 1, 8]
Innings6
Krishna Pandey
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 31
52
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 234 · Balls 139 · SR 168.3 · Avg 26 · 4s 9 · 6s 22
52OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production33.840%13.5
Impact *55.925%14.0
Versatility61.418%11.1
Shot quality79.44%3.2
Trajectory79.413%10.3
Scout Score52
33.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp38.232.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp26.520%
Balls / six——0bp26.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
55.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
61.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp55.916.7%
Reach build201 SR1.46×105bp97.122.2%
79.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.5%
Control · Build81.9%
Phase-weighted control79.9% → p79.4
79.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.12×
Recent scores[11, 51, 38]
Innings9
Rahul Tomar
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB
50.4
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 90 · Balls 73 · SR 123.3 · Avg 12.9 · 4s 5 · 6s 6
50.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production44.428%12.4
Impact *28.927%7.8
Versatility68.127%18.4
Shot quality44.78%3.6
Trajectory81.610%8.2
Scout Score50.4
44.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR126.71×60bp55.342.9%
True Avg12.70.56×6wp13.232.1%
Balls / boundary6.7—60bp65.825%
28.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -30.4
WPA · Consolidation-22.7
WPA · Build-7.7
68.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p77.344.4%
vs Off-spin131 SR16bp92.9
vs Chinaman121 SR19bp64.3
vs Short ball100 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p66.129.6%
Off-spin128 SR18bp61.1
LA-orthodox29 SR7b7b <min
Leg-spin267 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman121 SR19bp70.8
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)142.1 SR0.96×19bp34.214.8%
Reach death260 SR1.58×5bp81.611.1%
44.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70.4%
Control · Build81.8%
Phase-weighted control76.7% → p44.7
81.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[16, 26, 1]
Innings7
Vikas Sikarwar
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 23
49.3
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 53 · Balls 45 · SR 117.8 · Avg 17.7 · 4s 6 · 6s 2
49.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production48.640%19.4
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility44.815%6.7
Shot quality27.86%1.7
Trajectory66.712%8.0
Scout Score49.3
48.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR117.20.91×29bp5035%
True Avg170.66×2wp38.930%
Balls / boundary4.8—29bp61.117.5%
Balls / dismissal14.5—2wp5017.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -8.3
WPA · Powerplay-8.3
WPA · Consolidation+0.1
44.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR119 SR0.82×21bp5026.7%
vs Spin SR116.7 SR0.94×24bp38.926.7%
Accel into Cons92.9 SR—14bp38.920%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
27.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation64.3%
Control · Build50%
Phase-weighted control63.3% → p27.8
66.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[21, 27, 5]
Innings3
Irfan Ul Haq
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 30
48.8
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 146 · Balls 112 · SR 130.4 · Avg 20.9 · 4s 12 · 6s 7
48.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production6040%24.0
Impact *20.625%5.2
Versatility37.118%6.7
Shot quality8.84%0.4
Trajectory97.113%12.6
Scout Score48.8
60ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR203.11.24×32bp73.532.5%
Balls / boundary3.2—32bp61.820%
Balls / six10.7—32bp5032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
20.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -13.7
WPA · Death-13.7
37.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker50 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball275 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)85.7 SR0.55×7bp11.816.7%
Reach build106.9 SR0.77×72bp20.622.2%
8.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation37.5%
Control · Build63.9%
Phase-weighted control61.2% → p8.8
97.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.94×
Recent scores[11, 1, 41]
Innings9
Bysani Dhruv Kumar Reddy
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 22
48.7
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 38 · Balls 32 · SR 118.8 · Avg 19 · 4s 1 · 6s 3
48.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production48.940%19.6
Impact *38.927%10.5
Versatility46.315%6.9
Shot quality61.16%3.7
Trajectory66.712%8.0
Scout Score48.7
48.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1040.8×25bp38.935%
True Avg261.01×1wp72.230%
Balls / boundary8.3—25bp5.617.5%
Balls / dismissal25—1wp72.217.5%
38.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -15.9
WPA · Powerplay-14.6
WPA · Consolidation-1.3
46.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR115 SR0.79×20bp27.826.7%
vs Spin SR125 SR1.01×12bp5026.7%
Accel into Cons171.4 SR—7bp61.120%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
61.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted control71.4% → p61.1
66.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[33, 5]
Innings2
Pravin R
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 22
47.9
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 197 · Balls 145 · SR 135.9 · Avg 21.9 · 4s 12 · 6s 15
47.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production46.440%18.6
Impact *27.827%7.5
Versatility67.815%10.2
Shot quality5.66%0.3
Trajectory94.412%11.3
Scout Score47.9
46.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.77×65bp5.635%
True Avg652.52×1wp83.330%
Balls / boundary6.5—65bp16.717.5%
Balls / dismissal65—1wp94.417.5%
27.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -26.1
WPA · Powerplay-29.7
WPA · Consolidation+3.6
67.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR132.4 SR0.91×74bp61.126.7%
vs Spin SR139.4 SR1.13×71bp72.226.7%
Accel into Cons171.4 SR—35bp94.420%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
5.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation51.4%
Control · Build67.7%
Phase-weighted control56.4% → p5.6
94.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.2×
Recent scores[5, 29, 18]
Innings10
Nadeem Khan
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 31
45.6
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 74 · Balls 49 · SR 151 · Avg 10.6 · 4s 2 · 6s 8
45.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production30.740%12.3
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility63.718%11.5
Shot quality32.44%1.3
Trajectory61.813%8.0
Scout Score45.6
30.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1150.7×20bp14.732.5%
Balls / boundary6.7—20bp20.620%
Balls / six10—20bp44.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.9
WPA · Death-4.9
63.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker133 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)260 SR1.66×5bp85.316.7%
Reach build175.9 SR1.27×29bp85.322.2%
32.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build65.5%
Phase-weighted control65.5% → p32.4
61.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[29, 6, 0]
Innings7
Adil Ayub Tunda
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 24
41.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 78 · Balls 66 · SR 118.2 · Avg 11.1 · 4s 5 · 6s 4
41.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production26.640%10.6
Impact *44.125%11.0
Versatility41.818%7.5
Shot quality26.54%1.1
Trajectory85.313%11.1
Scout Score41.3
26.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR130.60.79×36bp26.532.5%
Balls / boundary6—36bp38.220%
Balls / six18—36bp8.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
44.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -7.6
WPA · Death-7.6
41.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball157 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)116.7 SR0.74×6bp32.416.7%
Reach build103.3 SR0.75×30bp26.522.2%
26.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build63.3%
Phase-weighted control63.3% → p26.5
85.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.18×
Recent scores[8, 17, 24]
Innings8
Ankit Sharma
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 35
39.5
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 185 · Balls 175 · SR 105.7 · Avg 30.8 · 4s 18 · 6s 2
39.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production34.828%9.7
Impact *39.527%10.7
Versatility27.327%7.4
Shot quality97.48%7.8
Trajectory39.510%4.0
Scout Score39.5
34.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR93.50.74×92bp7.942.9%
True Avg431.91×2wp71.132.1%
Balls / boundary11.5—92bp34.225%
39.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -28.3
WPA · Consolidation-9.8
WPA · Build-18.5
27.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p35.744.4%
vs Off-spin100 SR17bp35.7
vs Chinaman86 SR14bp35.7
vs Short ball100 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p21.229.6%
Off-spin87 SR23bp5.6
LA-orthodox73 SR26bp21.9
Leg-spin58 SR12bp14.7
Chinaman106 SR17bp45.8
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)134.8 SR0.91×23bp28.914.8%
Reach death141 SR0.86×61bp7.911.1%
97.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation64.3%
Control · Build87.2%
Phase-weighted control83.7% → p97.4
39.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.86×
Recent scores[13, 23, 6]
Innings10
Shushruth V S
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 25
38.8
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 29 · Balls 39 · SR 74.4 · Avg 7.2 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
38.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production26.540%10.6
Impact *38.225%9.6
Versatility41.818%7.5
Shot quality38.24%1.5
Trajectory73.513%9.6
Scout Score38.8
26.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR90.90.55×11bp20.632.5%
Balls / boundary11—11bp8.820%
Balls / six11—11bp32.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
38.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -8.7
WPA · Death-8.7
41.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp55.916.7%
Reach build75 SR0.54×24bp8.822.2%
38.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control67.9% → p38.2
73.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.07×
Recent scores[0, 9, 18]
Innings4
Nitin Pranav V
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 22
35.8
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 123 · Balls 136 · SR 90.4 · Avg 15.4 · 4s 11 · 6s 1
35.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production27.628%7.7
Impact *34.227%9.2
Versatility23.627%6.4
Shot quality34.28%2.7
Trajectory97.410%9.7
Scout Score35.8
27.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR970.76×66bp28.942.9%
True Avg12.80.57×5wp28.932.1%
Balls / boundary13.2—66bp23.725%
34.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -29.5
WPA · Consolidation-41.3
WPA · Build+11.7
23.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p18.844.4%
vs LA-orthodox67 SR9b9b <min
vs Leg-spin50 SR18bp18.8
vs Short ball150 SR6b6b <min
Spin hitting———p2829.6%
Off-spin71 SR7b7b <min
LA-orthodox90 SR31bp28.1
Leg-spin45 SR22bp8.8
Chinaman112 SR16bp54.2
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)147.1 SR1×17bp44.714.8%
Reach death115.6 SR0.7×32bp2.611.1%
34.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73%
Control · Build79.3%
Phase-weighted control75.8% → p34.2
97.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.21×
Recent scores[9, 21, 5]
Innings10
Vikneshwaran Marimuthu
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 33
35.8
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 106 · Balls 75 · SR 141.3 · Avg 10.6 · 4s 11 · 6s 7
35.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production25.228%7.1
Impact *44.727%12.1
Versatility49.127%13.3
Shot quality39.58%3.2
Trajectory2.610%0.3
Scout Score35.8
25.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR71.40.56×21bp34.242.9%
True Avg50.22×3wp18.432.1%
Balls / boundary21—21bp18.425%
44.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -17.8
WPA · Consolidation-8.4
WPA · Build-9.4
49.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox50 SR8b8b <min
vs Leg-spin33 SR3b3b <min
vs Short ball250 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p46.929.6%
Off-spin80 SR5b5b <min
LA-orthodox115 SR20bp46.9
Leg-spin33 SR6b6b <min
Chinaman200 SR6b6b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)250 SR1.7×2bp65.814.8%
Reach death133.3 SR0.81×6bp28.911.1%
39.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control76.2% → p39.5
2.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.51×
Recent scores[0, 7, 1]
Innings10
Premraj Rajavelu
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 34
35
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 96 · Balls 87 · SR 110.3 · Avg 12 · 4s 5 · 6s 5
35OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production46.628%13.0
Impact *18.427%5.0
Versatility44.627%12.0
Shot quality18.48%1.5
Trajectory34.210%3.4
Scout Score35
46.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR116.40.92×67bp5042.9%
True Avg15.60.69×5wp39.532.1%
Balls / boundary8.4—67bp5025%
18.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -39.4
WPA · Consolidation-33.8
WPA · Build-5.6
44.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p43.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox90 SR10bp41.7
vs Leg-spin106 SR35bp43.8
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p45.229.6%
Off-spin100 SR2b2b <min
LA-orthodox92 SR12bp37.5
Leg-spin103 SR38bp50
Chinaman83 SR12bp37.5
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)190 SR1.29×10bp71.114.8%
Reach death106.2 SR0.65×16bp13.211.1%
18.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation69%
Control · Build68.4%
Phase-weighted control68.7% → p18.4
34.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.85×
Recent scores[13, 0, 1]
Innings9
Satish Jangir
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 28
33.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 70 · Balls 56 · SR 125 · Avg 11.7 · 4s 5 · 6s 4
33.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production38.540%15.4
Impact *32.425%8.1
Versatility37.618%6.8
Shot quality73.54%2.9
Trajectory2.913%0.4
Scout Score33.6
38.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR153.60.93×28bp44.132.5%
Balls / boundary4—28bp5020%
Balls / six14—28bp20.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
32.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -10.8
WPA · Death-10.8
37.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker50 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball180 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)00×1bp38.216.7%
Reach build65 SR0.47×20bp2.922.2%
73.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.5%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control78.6% → p73.5
2.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.85×
Recent scores[2, 4, 12]
Innings8
Kushwanth Silora
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 20
32.5
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 54 · Balls 58 · SR 93.1 · Avg 18 · 4s 3 · 6s 3
32.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production36.828%10.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility28.527%7.7
Shot quality2.68%0.2
Trajectory7.910%0.8
Scout Score32.5
36.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR76.90.61×13bp44.742.9%
True Avg50.22×2wp44.732.1%
Balls / boundary——13bp13.225%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -6.2
WPA · Consolidation-7.6
WPA · Build+1.5
28.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox—0b0b <min
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p2.929.6%
Off-spin229 SR7b7b <min
LA-orthodox133 SR6b6b <min
Leg-spin33 SR12bp2.9
Chinaman83 SR6b6b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)50 SR0.34×4bp18.414.8%
Reach death160 SR0.97×15bp23.711.1%
2.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation28.6%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control46.2% → p2.6
7.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.66×
Recent scores[2, 12, 7]
Innings5
Arun Chaprana
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 32
29.3
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 29 · Balls 36 · SR 80.6 · Avg 9.7 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
29.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production28.428%8.0
Impact *23.727%6.4
Versatility26.227%7.1
Shot quality13.28%1.1
Trajectory68.410%6.8
Scout Score29.3
28.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR800.63×35bp23.742.9%
True Avg9.30.42×3wp34.232.1%
Balls / boundary11.7—35bp28.925%
23.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -33.8
WPA · Consolidation-20.6
WPA · Build-13.2
26.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p18.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox62 SR13bp8.3
vs Leg-spin80 SR10bp31.2
vs Short ball33 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p18.429.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox62 SR13bp3.1
Leg-spin80 SR10bp38.2
Chinaman25 SR4b4b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)137.5 SR0.93×8bp39.514.8%
Reach death——0bp60.511.1%
13.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72.7%
Control · Build58.3%
Phase-weighted control62.9% → p13.2
68.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[26, 0, 3]
Innings3
Thanneru Vamsi Krishna
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 25
29.2
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 19 · Balls 24 · SR 79.2 · Avg 9.5 · 4s 1 · 6s 0
29.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production36.940%14.8
Impact *2.925%0.7
Versatility49.718%8.9
Shot quality91.24%3.6
Trajectory8.813%1.1
Scout Score29.2
36.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR500.3×2bp32.432.5%
Balls / boundary——2bp32.420%
Balls / six——2bp38.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
2.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -69.5
WPA · Death-69.5
49.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp55.916.7%
Reach build100 SR0.72×7bp44.122.2%
91.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.5%
Control · Build85.7%
Phase-weighted control86.7% → p91.2
8.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.86×
Recent scores[1, 1, 11]
Innings4
Sanaboyina Tarun
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 27
26
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 242 · Balls 216 · SR 112 · Avg 40.3 · 4s 19 · 6s 8
26OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production46.428%13.0
Impact *2.627%0.7
Versatility22.127%6.0
Shot quality508%4.0
Trajectory23.710%2.4
Scout Score26
46.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR100.60.79×167bp13.242.9%
True Avg562.49×3wp92.132.1%
Balls / boundary11.1—167bp44.725%
2.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -65.2
WPA · Consolidation-83.4
WPA · Build+18.2
22.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p19.344.4%
vs Off-spin94 SR33bp21.4
vs Chinaman64 SR22bp7.1
vs Short ball118 SR11bp37.5
Spin hitting———p34.929.6%
Off-spin100 SR37bp33.3
LA-orthodox131 SR32bp53.1
Leg-spin78 SR36bp32.4
Chinaman75 SR24bp16.7
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)132.1 SR0.9×56bp7.914.8%
Reach death161.1 SR0.98×36bp18.411.1%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build77.6%
Phase-weighted control78.4% → p50
23.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.71×
Recent scores[17, 20, 17]
Innings9
N Dharshan Rajagopal
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 21
25.4
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 206 · Balls 185 · SR 111.4 · Avg 22.9 · 4s 18 · 6s 8
25.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production28.340%11.3
Impact *16.727%4.5
Versatility8.515%1.3
Shot quality38.96%2.3
Trajectory5012%6.0
Scout Score25.4
28.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR108.90.84×45bp27.835%
True Avg16.30.63×3wp16.730%
Balls / boundary5—45bp5017.5%
Balls / dismissal15—3wp27.817.5%
16.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -45
WPA · Powerplay-20.8
WPA · Consolidation-24.1
8.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR108.5 SR0.75×71bp5.626.7%
vs Spin SR113.2 SR0.91×114bp16.726.7%
Accel into Cons92.2 SR—64bp5.620%
Pressure entry60 SR0.46×15bp5.626.7%
38.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70.3%
Control · Build64.4%
Phase-weighted control68.4% → p38.9
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[50, 4, 2]
Innings10
Pavan Shankar
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 27
25.1
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 44 · Balls 47 · SR 93.6 · Avg 5.5 · 4s 3 · 6s 2
25.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production18.140%7.2
Impact *14.725%3.7
Versatility46.118%8.3
Shot quality2.94%0.1
Trajectory44.113%5.7
Scout Score25.1
18.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR600.37×10bp8.832.5%
Balls / boundary10—10bp14.720%
Balls / six——10bp14.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
14.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -14
WPA · Death-14
46.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)33.3 SR0.21×3bp26.516.7%
Reach build120 SR0.87×25bp5022.2%
2.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation62.5%
Control · Build60%
Phase-weighted control60.6% → p2.9
44.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[1, 0, 9]
Innings8
Ragavan Ramamoorthy
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 20
21.8
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 162 · Balls 144 · SR 112.5 · Avg 16.2 · 4s 8 · 6s 7
21.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production12.428%3.5
Impact *7.927%2.1
Versatility19.927%5.4
Shot quality78.98%6.3
Trajectory44.710%4.5
Scout Score21.8
12.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR94.30.74×88bp18.442.9%
True Avg11.90.53×7wp7.932.1%
Balls / boundary22—88bp7.925%
7.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -47.2
WPA · Consolidation-28.7
WPA · Build-18.6
19.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p12.644.4%
vs Off-spin76 SR21bp7.1
vs Chinaman77 SR13bp21.4
vs Short ball67 SR6b6b <min
Spin hitting———p23.629.6%
Off-spin93 SR30bp16.7
LA-orthodox92 SR12bp37.5
Leg-spin85 SR20bp44.1
Chinaman74 SR19bp4.2
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)130 SR0.88×20bp23.714.8%
Reach death185.2 SR1.13×27bp34.211.1%
78.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.8%
Control · Build81.8%
Phase-weighted control81.8% → p78.9
44.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[3, 30, 1]
Innings11
Raghav Goyal
Finisher · pos 8 · LHB · age 25
20.8
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 77 · Balls 67 · SR 114.9 · Avg 15.4 · 4s 6 · 6s 1
20.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production1040%4.0
Impact *8.825%2.2
Versatility43.518%7.8
Shot quality44.14%1.8
Trajectory38.213%5.0
Scout Score20.8
10ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR82.80.5×29bp2.932.5%
Balls / boundary29—29bp2.920%
Balls / six——29bp2.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
8.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -14.8
WPA · Death-14.8
43.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball117 SR6b6b <min
vs Spin (death)81.2 SR0.52×16bp2.916.7%
Reach build139.5 SR1.01×38bp55.922.2%
44.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build68.4%
Phase-weighted control68.4% → p44.1
38.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[25, 11, 13]
Innings6
Jashwanth Shreeram R
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 21
20.6
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 112 · Balls 107 · SR 104.7 · Avg 11.2 · 4s 14 · 6s 3
20.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production13.340%5.3
Impact *5.627%1.5
Versatility22.615%3.4
Shot quality94.46%5.7
Trajectory38.912%4.7
Scout Score20.6
13.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR108.30.84×96bp16.735%
True Avg11.60.45×9wp5.630%
Balls / boundary5.6—96bp27.817.5%
Balls / dismissal10.7—9wp5.617.5%
5.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -45.5
WPA · Powerplay-42.7
WPA · Consolidation-2.9
22.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR116.3 SR0.8×86bp16.726.7%
vs Spin SR57.1 SR0.46×21bp5.626.7%
Accel into Cons72.7 SR—11bp16.720%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
94.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.8%
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted control81.8% → p94.4
38.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.89×
Recent scores[23, 2, 4]
Innings10
P Shailesh Vaithianathan
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 17
18.3
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 69 · Balls 95 · SR 72.6 · Avg 9.9 · 4s 6 · 6s 1
18.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production2.628%0.7
Impact *13.227%3.6
Versatility22.527%6.1
Shot quality23.78%1.9
Trajectory60.510%6.0
Scout Score18.3
2.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR60.40.47×53bp2.642.9%
True Avg6.40.28×5wp2.632.1%
Balls / boundary53—53bp2.625%
13.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -43.9
WPA · Consolidation-36.8
WPA · Build-7.1
22.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p2544.4%
vs LA-orthodox64 SR11bp25
vs Leg-spin67 SR9b9b <min
vs Short ball125 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p14.529.6%
Off-spin67 SR9b9b <min
LA-orthodox65 SR20bp9.4
Leg-spin70 SR10bp20.6
Chinaman75 SR20bp16.7
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)73.3 SR0.5×15bp2.614.8%
Reach death——0bp60.511.1%
23.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70.7%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control69.8% → p23.7
60.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.98×
Recent scores[9, 0, 16]
Innings7
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leg-spin | — | 43.0 | 19 | 237 | 5.51 | 90.2 Scout Score 90.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay91.520.9% Middle91.767.4% Death79.411.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p80.80.86× | 89.8 Bowling Production 89.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 3.78 econp96.620.9% Middle12w · 5.97 econp8867.4% Death2w · 6 econp87.811.6% | 92 Quality 92 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay35%p81.2 False-shot · Middle38%p95.3 | 94.5 Impact 94.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +43.6p96.220.9% MiddleWPA +76.7p99.167.4% DeathWPA +5.2p64.611.6% | 87.9 Versatility 87.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp85.820.9% Middlep92.567.4% Deathp65.611.6% | |
| 2 | LA pace | — | 11.0 | 7 | 97 | 8.82 | 73.7 Scout Score 73.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay73.790.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p84.20.86× | 58.1 Bowling Production 58.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 8.3 econp58.190.9% | 98.8 Quality 98.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay48%p98.8 | 83.8 Impact 83.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +24.2p83.890.9% | 58.1 Versatility 58.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp58.190.9% | |
| 3 | Leg-spin | — | 7.0 | 3 | 48 | 6.86 | 70.2 Scout Score 70.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle70.271.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 67.2 Bowling Production 67.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 6.8 econp67.271.4% | 97.2 Quality 97.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle57%p97.2 | 68.9 Impact 68.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +12p68.971.4% | 62.3 Versatility 62.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep62.371.4% | |
| 4 | Leg-spin | 29 | 15.5 | 7 | 123 | 7.77 | 70.1 Scout Score 70.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle84.656.8% Death50.943.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p85.80.84× | 69.4 Bowling Production 69.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 5.89 econp89.456.8% Death2w · 10.24 econp43.243.2% | 70.8 Quality 70.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle32%p70.8 | 72.5 Impact 72.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +42.5p87.756.8% DeathWPA +1.9p52.443.2% | 65.3 Versatility 65.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep79.256.8% Deathp46.943.2% | |
| 5 | Leg-spin | — | 11.0 | 5 | 78 | 7.09 | 69.4 Scout Score 69.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay52.818.2% Middle73.181.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p69.20.99× | 73.1 Bowling Production 73.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8.5 econp52.418.2% Middle4w · 6.78 econp77.681.8% | 56.8 Quality 56.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p53.8 False-shot · Middle28%p57.5 | 71.4 Impact 71.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +3.2p48.818.2% MiddleWPA +19.3p76.481.8% | 69.5 Versatility 69.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp46.818.2% Middlep74.581.8% | |
| 6 | Leg-spin | 21 | 7.0 | 6 | 52 | 7.43 | 68.3 Scout Score 68.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle68.3100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 78 Bowling Production 78 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle6w · 7.43 econp78100% | 89.6 Quality 89.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle38%p89.6 | 53.8 Impact 53.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +5.1p53.8100% | 52.8 Versatility 52.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep52.8100% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 39.0 | 15 | 236 | 6.05 | 68 Scout Score 68 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay41.720.5% Middle73.859% Death77.520.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p7.51.23× | 69.9 Bowling Production 69.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8 econp45.520.5% Middle7w · 5.04 econp70.859% Death6w · 7 econp91.820.5% | 71.1 Quality 71.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p61.2 False-shot · Middle30%p74.5 | 79.3 Impact 79.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.6p38.820.5% MiddleWPA +54.6p93.459% DeathWPA +19.4p79.320.5% | 81.7 Versatility 81.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.820.5% Middlep97.259% Deathp78.120.5% | |
| 8 | Off-spin | 24 | 25.0 | 10 | 174 | 6.96 | 67.7 Scout Score 67.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay48.48% Middle84.872% Death14.120% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p29.21.08× | 72.2 Bowling Production 72.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8 econp54.38% Middle8w · 5.39 econp89.572% Death1w · 12.2 econp17.120% | 82.6 Quality 82.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p53.8 False-shot · Middle32%p85.8 | 72.1 Impact 72.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -0.3p41.28% MiddleWPA +55.1p95.372% DeathWPA -83.8p1.220% | 73.9 Versatility 73.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp568% Middlep93.472% Deathp10.920% | |
| 9 | LA pace | 29 | 39.1 | 18 | 296 | 7.56 | 65.8 Scout Score 65.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay6651.1% Middle48.510.2% Death70.138.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p22.51.13× | 70.3 Bowling Production 70.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 7.05 econp66.551.1% Middle3w · 9 econp59.710.2% Death10w · 7.85 econp7838.7% | 46.4 Quality 46.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p43.8 False-shot · Middle29%p59.4 | 87.9 Impact 87.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +44.8p98.851.1% MiddleWPA -0.4p38.710.2% DeathWPA +31p86.638.7% | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp52.851.1% Middlep41.510.2% Deathp55.138.7% | |
| 10 | LA pace | 34 | 10.0 | 4 | 71 | 7.1 | 65.6 Scout Score 65.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay66.470% Death6320% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 64.3 Bowling Production 64.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 6.71 econp63.370% Death2w · 8 econp67.720% | 88.8 Quality 88.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay40%p88.8 | 66.4 Impact 66.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +11.7p66.270% DeathWPA +6.2p67.120% | 54.8 Versatility 54.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp56.870% Deathp48.120% | |
| 11 | Chinaman | 25 | 43.0 | 14 | 341 | 7.93 | 63.6 Scout Score 63.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay34.111.6% Middle7281.4% Death14.87% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p4.21.26× | 67.8 Bowling Production 67.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.4 econp41.411.6% Middle12w · 7.17 econp76.381.4% Death0w · 14.33 econp12.67% | 67.4 Quality 67.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p31.2 False-shot · Middle30%p72.6 | 79.3 Impact 79.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -4.6p33.811.6% MiddleWPA +49.5p91.581.4% DeathWPA -20.9p13.47% | 68.2 Versatility 68.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp41.811.6% Middlep73.681.4% Deathp507% | |
| 12 | Off-spin | 22 | 19.0 | 7 | 144 | 7.58 | 62.2 Scout Score 62.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay58.710.5% Middle63.578.9% Death56.110.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p82.50.86× | 55.6 Bowling Production 55.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 5.5 econp63.410.5% Middle5w · 7.87 econp53.278.9% Death1w · 7.5 econp66.110.5% | 52.1 Quality 52.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p53.8 False-shot · Middle27%p51.9 | 74.3 Impact 74.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0.2p43.810.5% MiddleWPA +35.1p85.878.9% DeathWPA -18.5p18.310.5% | 51.7 Versatility 51.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp64.810.5% Middlep48.178.9% Deathp65.610.5% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 34 | 23.0 | 7 | 189 | 8.22 | 61.9 Scout Score 61.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay57.160.9% Death69.539.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p75.80.95× | 61.6 Bowling Production 61.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 8.57 econp55.260.9% Death2w · 7.67 econp71.539.1% | 93.8 Quality 93.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay40%p93.8 | 46.4 Impact 46.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -4.4p36.260.9% DeathWPA +3.8p62.239.1% | 55.9 Versatility 55.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp46.860.9% Deathp70.139.1% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 23 | 17.1 | 12 | 137 | 7.98 | 61.8 Scout Score 61.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay57.940.8% Middle68.835% Death58.124.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p40.81.01× | 70.9 Bowling Production 70.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 6.71 econp83.340.8% Middle5w · 8.17 econp69.335% Death2w · 9.84 econp52.424.3% | 60.8 Quality 60.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p58.8 False-shot · Middle31%p63.2 | 60.4 Impact 60.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -10p21.240.8% MiddleWPA +44.7p89.635% DeathWPA +29.1p84.124.3% | 61.4 Versatility 61.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp76.540.8% Middlep54.235% Deathp46.424.3% | |
| 15 | Leg-spin | 29 | 39.0 | 7 | 281 | 7.21 | 61.4 Scout Score 61.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle60.592.3% Death78.25.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p94.20.81× | 56.4 Bowling Production 56.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle6w · 6.89 econp55.192.3% Death1w · 5.5 econp79.55.1% | 6.6 Quality 6.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p6.6 | 80 Impact 80 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +21p80.292.3% DeathWPA +9.9p76.85.1% | 74.1 Versatility 74.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep75.592.3% Deathp505.1% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 29 | 18.0 | 6 | 137 | 7.61 | 61.2 Scout Score 61.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay67.672.2% Death44.427.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p87.50.83× | 58.8 Bowling Production 58.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 6.69 econp64.772.2% Death3w · 10 econp43.527.8% | 78.8 Quality 78.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p78.8 | 50.7 Impact 50.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +8.6p61.272.2% DeathWPA -16.1p23.227.8% | 56.2 Versatility 56.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp59.272.2% Deathp48.127.8% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 24 | 38.0 | 15 | 322 | 8.47 | 61.1 Scout Score 61.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay79.250% Middle66.77.9% Death38.442.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p92.50.82× | 54.5 Bowling Production 54.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 7.26 econp70.350% Middle1w · 7 econp58.27.9% Death8w · 10.19 econp3542.1% | 83.4 Quality 83.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p83.8 False-shot · Middle44%p81.1 | 51.2 Impact 51.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +28.8p88.850% MiddleWPA +11.2p677.9% DeathWPA -42.4p3.742.1% | 65 Versatility 65 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp67.250% Middlep53.87.9% Deathp64.342.1% | |
| 18 | RA pace | — | 35.0 | 9 | 294 | 8.4 | 60.9 Scout Score 60.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay73.251.4% Middle72.717.1% Death34.331.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p74.20.96× | 44 Bowling Production 44 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 7.39 econp56.951.4% Middle2w · 5.83 econp69.817.1% Death2w · 11.45 econp8.931.4% | 96.9 Quality 96.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay41%p96.2 False-shot · Middle61%p99.1 | 77.8 Impact 77.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +40p93.851.4% MiddleWPA +10p63.217.1% DeathWPA +3.6p59.831.4% | 47.5 Versatility 47.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp44.551.4% Middlep67.917.1% Deathp41.231.4% | |
| 19 | Off-spin | 28 | 29.4 | 10 | 220 | 7.42 | 60.1 Scout Score 60.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay5413.5% Middle6062.9% Death63.823.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p37.51.03× | 66.5 Bowling Production 66.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 5.5 econp70.513.5% Middle6w · 7.39 econp6462.9% Death3w · 8.57 econp70.823.6% | 23.6 Quality 23.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p23.8 False-shot · Middle20%p23.6 | 76.7 Impact 76.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +3.3p51.213.5% MiddleWPA +32.1p8462.9% DeathWPA +7.2p7223.6% | 53.8 Versatility 53.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp60.813.5% Middlep61.362.9% Deathp29.723.6% | |
| 20 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 20.0 | 6 | 137 | 6.85 | 59.7 Scout Score 59.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay60.350% Middle57.335% Death63.215% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p17.51.15× | 73.8 Bowling Production 73.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 6.6 econp76.450% Middle3w · 7.29 econp71.335% Death0w · 6.67 econp71.115% | 27.1 Quality 27.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay20%p13.8 False-shot · Middle24%p46.2 | 69.9 Impact 69.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +22.5p78.850% MiddleWPA +6p57.535% DeathWPA +6.7p69.515% | 60.3 Versatility 60.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp61.850% Middlep59.435% Deathp57.815% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 22 | 29.2 | 15 | 247 | 8.42 | 58 Scout Score 58 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay76.140.9% Middle65.413.6% Death39.545.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p90.80.82× | 52.9 Bowling Production 52.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 6.92 econp69.540.9% Middle1w · 6.5 econp5913.6% Death10w · 10.35 econp36.245.5% | 71.8 Quality 71.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p73.8 False-shot · Middle33%p66 | 57.8 Impact 57.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +30.1p91.240.9% MiddleWPA +10.8p65.113.6% DeathWPA -14.3p25.645.5% | 43.5 Versatility 43.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4940.9% Middlep64.213.6% Deathp32.545.5% | |
| 22 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 37.0 | 14 | 279 | 7.54 | 57.5 Scout Score 57.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay64.427% Middle56.164.9% Death44.98.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p34.21.04× | 73.7 Bowling Production 73.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 7 econp79.927% Middle9w · 7.54 econp74.264.9% Death1w · 9.33 econp49.18.1% | 11.3 Quality 11.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p36.2 False-shot · Middle18%p0.9 | 70.3 Impact 70.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +16.6p73.827% MiddleWPA +17.6p72.664.9% DeathWPA -3.6p40.28.1% | 51.6 Versatility 51.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp52.527% Middlep51.964.9% Deathp46.98.1% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 34 | 37.0 | 14 | 310 | 8.38 | 54.9 Scout Score 54.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay56.854.1% Middle53.75.4% Death52.640.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p15.81.16× | 51.5 Bowling Production 51.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 7.1 econp58.854.1% Middle1w · 7 econp59.55.4% Death9w · 10.27 econp40.740.5% | 75.5 Quality 75.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay32%p76.2 False-shot · Middle42%p68.9 | 72.5 Impact 72.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +5.7p58.854.1% MiddleWPA +1.3p505.4% DeathWPA +50.6p93.940.5% | 54.1 Versatility 54.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp55.854.1% Middlep55.75.4% Deathp51.640.5% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 21 | 38.0 | 14 | 326 | 8.58 | 54.7 Scout Score 54.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay60.747.4% Middle55.926.3% Death42.726.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p9.21.21× | 52.6 Bowling Production 52.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 8.22 econp54.947.4% Middle4w · 8.1 econp5926.3% Death4w · 9.7 econp41.926.3% | 90 Quality 90 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay37%p91.2 False-shot · Middle35%p87.7 | 61.6 Impact 61.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +16.2p71.247.4% MiddleWPA +5.5p55.726.3% DeathWPA +1.8p5026.3% | 56 Versatility 56 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp59.547.4% Middlep45.326.3% Deathp60.326.3% | |
| 25 | Leg-spin | 34 | 19.1 | 9 | 156 | 8.14 | 54.5 Scout Score 54.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle4767.8% Death70.532.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p27.51.09× | 62.1 Bowling Production 62.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 8.69 econp48.767.8% Death4w · 6.97 econp90.332.2% | 40.6 Quality 40.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle23%p40.6 | 56.1 Impact 56.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +8.1p61.367.8% DeathWPA -0.1p45.132.2% | 49.4 Versatility 49.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep35.867.8% Deathp78.132.2% | |
| 26 | Chinaman | 17 | 39.0 | 13 | 276 | 7.08 | 53.2 Scout Score 53.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle4987.2% Death81.912.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p39.21.01× | 65.8 Bowling Production 65.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle11w · 7.35 econp62.487.2% Death2w · 5.2 econp88.912.8% | 76.4 Quality 76.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle30%p76.4 | 12.2 Impact 12.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -52.4p0.987.2% DeathWPA +39p8912.8% | 79.5 Versatility 79.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep80.287.2% Deathp7512.8% | |
| 27 | Leg-spin | 27 | 30.1 | 8 | 215 | 7.13 | 53.1 Scout Score 53.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay25.836.5% Middle69.660.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p5.81.24× | 62.1 Bowling Production 62.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.82 econp34.136.5% Middle7w · 7.05 econp7960.2% | 27.9 Quality 27.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p3.8 False-shot · Middle24%p42.5 | 71.4 Impact 71.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -6.4p28.836.5% MiddleWPA +71.8p97.260.2% | 58.1 Versatility 58.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp38.836.5% Middlep69.860.2% | |
| 28 | Off-spin | 30 | 15.0 | 5 | 114 | 7.6 | 52 Scout Score 52 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle42.773.3% Death86.220% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p89.20.83× | 49.8 Bowling Production 49.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 8.27 econp39.373.3% Death2w · 4.33 econp88.320% | 12.3 Quality 12.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle18%p12.3 | 53.8 Impact 53.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0.5p46.273.3% DeathWPA +26.7p81.720% | 53 Versatility 53 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep45.373.3% Deathp81.220% | |
| 29 | SLA orthodox | 18 | 17.3 | 9 | 158 | 9.03 | 50.5 Scout Score 50.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay41.940% Middle50.141.9% Death70.818.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p14.21.17× | 49.9 Bowling Production 49.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.29 econp44.540% Middle5w · 11.05 econp45.141.9% Death3w · 8.21 econp7318.1% | 45.4 Quality 45.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p28.8 False-shot · Middle30%p61.3 | 69 Impact 69 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +5p53.840% MiddleWPA +13.8p70.841.9% DeathWPA +86p98.818.1% | 44.5 Versatility 44.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp46.840% Middlep38.741.9% Deathp53.118.1% | |
| 30 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 2 | 41 | 8.2 | 49.8 Scout Score 49.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay19.440% Middle70.160% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 57.3 Bowling Production 57.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 14 econp16.540% Middle2w · 4.33 econp84.660% | 25.6 Quality 25.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay0%p8.8 False-shot · Middle17%p36.8 | 49.2 Impact 49.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13.1p11.240% MiddleWPA +18.9p74.560% | 55.4 Versatility 55.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp33.940% Middlep69.860% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 29 | 19.0 | 11 | 181 | 9.53 | 49.1 Scout Score 49.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle48.152.6% Death50.247.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p79.20.89× | 53.5 Bowling Production 53.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle6w · 9.1 econp51.252.6% Death5w · 10 econp56.147.4% | 93.4 Quality 93.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle37%p93.4 | 21.4 Impact 21.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -32.6p6.652.6% DeathWPA -4.4p37.847.4% | 36.1 Versatility 36.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep42.552.6% Deathp2947.4% | |
| 32 | Off-spin | 28 | 9.0 | 2 | 78 | 8.67 | 46.6 Scout Score 46.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle46.688.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p24.21.12× | 50.4 Bowling Production 50.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 7.5 econp50.488.9% | 27.4 Quality 27.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle19%p27.4 | 59.4 Impact 59.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +7p59.488.9% | 50.9 Versatility 50.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep50.988.9% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 21 | 18.5 | 6 | 164 | 8.71 | 44.8 Scout Score 44.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay54.258.4% Middle45.615.9% Death22.925.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p10.81.18× | 39.7 Bowling Production 39.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.27 econp43.658.4% Middle1w · 9 econp42.615.9% Death4w · 11.79 econp28.925.7% | 69.4 Quality 69.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay32%p66.2 False-shot · Middle44%p81.1 | 53.8 Impact 53.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +20.2p76.258.4% MiddleWPA +0p44.315.9% DeathWPA -26.1p8.525.7% | 51.8 Versatility 51.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp60.658.4% Middlep42.515.9% Deathp37.725.7% | |
| 34 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 31.0 | 8 | 253 | 8.16 | 44.3 Scout Score 44.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.735.5% Middle33.941.9% Death39.522.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p19.21.15× | 51.7 Bowling Production 51.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 7.36 econp73.835.5% Middle2w · 8.08 econp34.541.9% Death1w · 9.57 econp48.822.6% | 16.7 Quality 16.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay20%p6.2 False-shot · Middle20%p25.5 | 52.9 Impact 52.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +24.2p86.235.5% MiddleWPA -2p36.841.9% DeathWPA -6.7p30.522.6% | 47.9 Versatility 47.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp55.235.5% Middlep49.141.9% Deathp34.422.6% | |
| 35 | RA pace | 30 | 39.0 | 16 | 354 | 9.08 | 44.2 Scout Score 44.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay38.348.7% Middle64.620.5% Death4030.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p72.50.97× | 45.8 Bowling Production 45.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 8.74 econp44.948.7% Middle4w · 8.25 econp6420.5% Death5w · 10.17 econp3530.8% | 44.9 Quality 44.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p41.2 False-shot · Middle27%p53.8 | 27.7 Impact 27.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -28.1p6.248.7% MiddleWPA +19.7p78.320.5% DeathWPA -8.4p2830.8% | 54.4 Versatility 54.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp61.548.7% Middlep44.320.5% Deathp49.930.8% | |
| 36 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 12.0 | 5 | 102 | 8.5 | 42.9 Scout Score 42.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay41.966.7% Middle44.833.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p2.51.27× | 45 Bowling Production 45 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.38 econp35.166.7% Middle3w · 8.75 econp64.933.3% | 29.5 Quality 29.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay19%p11.2 False-shot · Middle33%p66 | 59.5 Impact 59.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +22.6p81.266.7% MiddleWPA -18.3p1633.3% | 48.2 Versatility 48.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp47.566.7% Middlep49.533.3% | |
| 37 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 3 | 59 | 9.83 | 42.1 Scout Score 42.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle42.183.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 48.5 Bowling Production 48.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 8.6 econp48.583.3% | 17 Quality 17 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle13%p17 | 42.5 Impact 42.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -0.1p42.583.3% | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep42.583.3% | |
| 38 | LA pace | 20 | 9.0 | 3 | 102 | 11.33 | 42 Scout Score 42 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay24.344.4% Middle51.922.2% Death5933.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p77.50.91× | 32.7 Bowling Production 32.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 15.75 econp4.944.4% Middle0w · 6.5 econp45.122.2% Death3w · 8.67 econp61.433.3% | 63.5 Quality 63.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay38%p71.2 False-shot · Middle25%p48.1 | 32.3 Impact 32.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -28.6p3.844.4% MiddleWPA +3p51.922.2% DeathWPA +2.9p57.333.3% | 38.8 Versatility 38.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp29.444.4% Middlep56.622.2% Deathp39.433.3% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 31 | 6.0 | 1 | 53 | 8.83 | 41.3 Scout Score 41.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay47.566.7% Middle28.833.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 38.6 Bowling Production 38.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.75 econp48.266.7% Middle0w · 11 econp19.333.3% | 22.8 Quality 22.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p23.8 False-shot · Middle0%p20.8 | 48.5 Impact 48.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +5.2p56.266.7% MiddleWPA -8p3333.3% | 46.3 Versatility 46.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp50.166.7% Middlep38.733.3% | |
| 40 | Off-spin | 22 | 9.0 | 1 | 80 | 8.89 | 40.4 Scout Score 40.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle31.766.7% Death66.822.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 41.2 Bowling Production 41.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 8.5 econp31.766.7% Death0w · 6.5 econp69.722.2% | 33 Quality 33 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle19%p33 | 33.5 Impact 33.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -13.2p19.866.7% DeathWPA +8.4p74.422.2% | 37.4 Versatility 37.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep35.866.7% Deathp42.222.2% | |
| 41 | LA pace | 26 | 26.4 | 6 | 245 | 9.19 | 39.7 Scout Score 39.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay44.671.2% Middle227.5% Death29.521.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p12.51.17× | 40.1 Bowling Production 40.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 8.32 econp46.271.2% Middle0w · 12 econp16.87.5% Death0w · 11.12 econp27.621.2% | 16.6 Quality 16.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p16.2 False-shot · Middle0%p20.8 | 55.7 Impact 55.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +13.5p68.871.2% MiddleWPA -8.1p31.17.5% DeathWPA -17.8p20.721.2% | 49.9 Versatility 49.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4871.2% Middlep29.27.5% Deathp63.821.2% | |
| 42 | Off-spin | 20 | 8.0 | 0 | 68 | 8.5 | 39.7 Scout Score 39.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle39.7100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p97.50.79× | 26.2 Bowling Production 26.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 8.5 econp26.2100% | 14.2 Quality 14.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p14.2 | 48.1 Impact 48.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +1.2p48.1100% | 49.1 Versatility 49.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep49.1100% | |
| 43 | RA pace | 26 | 23.1 | 8 | 251 | 10.83 | 37.7 Scout Score 37.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay29.412.9% Middle31.525.9% Death42.161.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p35.81.04× | 19.9 Bowling Production 19.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 9.67 econp23.812.9% Middle2w · 10.33 econp27.525.9% Death6w · 11.29 econp15.961.2% | 63.5 Quality 63.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p33.8 False-shot · Middle36%p78.3 | 63.2 Impact 63.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -5.2p31.212.9% MiddleWPA -19.9p12.325.9% DeathWPA +42.1p91.561.2% | 39.9 Versatility 39.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp32.512.9% Middlep22.625.9% Deathp48.761.2% | |
| 44 | SLA orthodox | 35 | 22.2 | 6 | 196 | 8.78 | 37.7 Scout Score 37.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay24.462.7% Middle63.732.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p99.20.56× | 31.4 Bowling Production 31.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.36 econp19.762.7% Middle4w · 9.21 econp54.232.1% | 19.7 Quality 19.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p1.2 False-shot · Middle28%p55.7 | 36.9 Impact 36.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13.1p13.862.7% MiddleWPA +23p82.132.1% | 33 Versatility 33 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp31.562.7% Middlep35.832.1% | |
| 45 | RA pace | 31 | 16.0 | 6 | 136 | 8.5 | 37.5 Scout Score 37.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle35.587.5% Death51.912.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p30.81.06× | 44.6 Bowling Production 44.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 8.36 econp4287.5% Death2w · 9.5 econp62.812.5% | 34.9 Quality 34.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle23%p34.9 | 27.5 Impact 27.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -9.9p23.687.5% DeathWPA +2.7p54.912.5% | 42.4 Versatility 42.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep44.387.5% Deathp2912.5% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 33 | 5.0 | 0 | 45 | 9 | 37.2 Scout Score 37.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.280% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 16.6 Bowling Production 16.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 9 econp16.680% | 63.8 Quality 63.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p63.8 | 46.2 Impact 46.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +1.5p46.280% | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp33.580% | |
| 47 | LA pace | 31 | 11.0 | 3 | 122 | 11.09 | 36.6 Scout Score 36.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay38.745.5% Middle29.327.3% Death40.227.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 35 Bowling Production 35 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 11.4 econp46.245.5% Middle0w · 9.33 econp2427.3% Death0w · 12.33 econp27.227.3% | 28.2 Quality 28.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p38.8 False-shot · Middle6%p10.4 | 30 Impact 30 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -9.9p23.845.5% MiddleWPA -5.5p34.927.3% DeathWPA -4.8p35.427.3% | 47.5 Versatility 47.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp3545.5% Middlep37.327.3% Deathp78.727.3% | |
| 48 | Off-spin | 20 | 7.0 | 2 | 75 | 10.71 | 35.9 Scout Score 35.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay24.328.6% Middle39.742.9% Death4228.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 33 Bowling Production 33 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11.5 econp1928.6% Middle1w · 10 econp37.642.9% Death1w · 11 econp4028.6% | 25 Quality 25 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p18.8 False-shot · Middle11%p29.2 | 36.3 Impact 36.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -10.8p18.828.6% MiddleWPA -0.2p40.642.9% DeathWPA +0p47.628.6% | 35.8 Versatility 35.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp37.228.6% Middlep45.342.9% Deathp20.328.6% | |
| 49 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 7.0 | 2 | 73 | 10.43 | 34.7 Scout Score 34.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle34.785.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 36.8 Bowling Production 36.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 9.17 econp36.885.7% | 44.3 Quality 44.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle22%p44.3 | 14.2 Impact 14.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -19.4p14.285.7% | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep42.585.7% | |
| 50 | RA pace | 32 | 9.0 | 2 | 100 | 11.11 | 34.1 Scout Score 34.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay42.844.4% Middle3922.2% Death19.133.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 32.5 Bowling Production 32.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.5 econp57.244.4% Middle0w · 10 econp2222.2% Death0w · 15.33 econp6.533.3% | 46.4 Quality 46.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p23.8 False-shot · Middle58%p91.5 | 21.4 Impact 21.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -7.8p26.244.4% MiddleWPA -8.9p27.422.2% DeathWPA -25.5p1133.3% | 45.8 Versatility 45.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp5044.4% Middlep39.222.2% Deathp44.633.3% | |
| 51 | LA pace | 27 | 25.1 | 6 | 269 | 10.69 | 32.8 Scout Score 32.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay33.831.8% Middle29.631.8% Death34.636.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p95.80.81× | 14.7 Bowling Production 14.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10.62 econp18.531.8% Middle0w · 9.75 econp8.131.8% Death4w · 11.56 econp17.136.4% | 76.4 Quality 76.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p68.8 False-shot · Middle35%p84 | 18.7 Impact 18.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -11.5p16.231.8% MiddleWPA -35.4p4.731.8% DeathWPA -4.8p32.936.4% | 32.6 Versatility 32.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp2531.8% Middlep26.431.8% Deathp44.636.4% | |
| 52 | RA pace | 19 | 25.2 | 7 | 259 | 10.22 | 31.2 Scout Score 31.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle22.882.9% Death71.817.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p70.80.99× | 22.7 Bowling Production 22.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle6w · 10.48 econp14.382.9% Death1w · 9 econp63.417.1% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle26%p50 | 23.5 Impact 23.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -32.4p8.582.9% DeathWPA +78.2p96.317.1% | 14.7 Versatility 14.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep5.782.9% Deathp58.617.1% | |
| 53 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 6.2 | 1 | 64 | 10.11 | 30.4 Scout Score 30.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle30.494.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 30.3 Bowling Production 30.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 8.67 econp30.394.7% | 8.5 Quality 8.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle14%p8.5 | 29.2 Impact 29.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -8.9p29.294.7% | 40.6 Versatility 40.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep40.694.7% | |
| 54 | Leg-spin | 21 | 4.0 | 1 | 48 | 12 | 27.3 Scout Score 27.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle27.3100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 20.1 Bowling Production 20.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 12 econp20.1100% | 31.1 Quality 31.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p31.1 | 25.5 Impact 25.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -9.5p25.5100% | 26.4 Versatility 26.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep26.4100% | |
| 55 | RA pace | 18 | 15.0 | 6 | 177 | 11.8 | 26.3 Scout Score 26.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay34.266.7% Death10.533.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p0.81.29× | 35.3 Bowling Production 35.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 9.1 econp50.566.7% Death1w · 17.2 econp5.133.3% | 48.8 Quality 48.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p48.8 | 7.9 Impact 7.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -20.8p8.866.7% DeathWPA -29.1p6.133.3% | 49.5 Versatility 49.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp52.866.7% Deathp42.933.3% | |
| 56 | RA pace | 31 | 12.3 | 3 | 133 | 10.64 | 26.2 Scout Score 26.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay60.916% Middle18.572% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p32.51.04× | 27.8 Bowling Production 27.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 4 econp57.616% Middle3w · 11.89 econp21.172% | 47.3 Quality 47.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay50%p86.2 False-shot · Middle22%p38.7 | 13.9 Impact 13.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +10.2p63.816% MiddleWPA -40.8p2.872% | 14.9 Versatility 14.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp56.416% Middlep5.772% | |
| 57 | Off-spin | 23 | 5.0 | 1 | 48 | 9.6 | 25.9 Scout Score 25.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle25.9100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p67.50.99× | 21.4 Bowling Production 21.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9.6 econp21.4100% | 17 Quality 17 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle13%p17 | 21.7 Impact 21.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -12.9p21.7100% | 25.5 Versatility 25.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep25.5100% | |
| 58 | Chinaman | 19 | 29.0 | 3 | 250 | 8.62 | 25.8 Scout Score 25.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle24.686.2% Death35.710.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p20.81.14× | 36.7 Bowling Production 36.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 8.08 econp3586.2% Death0w · 10.33 econp51.110.3% | 4.7 Quality 4.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle20%p4.7 | 11 Impact 11 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -31.9p10.486.2% DeathWPA -19.3p15.910.3% | 45.3 Versatility 45.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep49.186.2% Deathp14.110.3% | |
| 59 | RA pace | 22 | 13.2 | 3 | 135 | 10.12 | 24 Scout Score 24 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay20.182.5% Death42.317.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p25.81.1× | 21 Bowling Production 21 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10 econp17.282.5% Death1w · 10.71 econp3917.5% | 46.2 Quality 46.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p46.2 | 8.5 Impact 8.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -28.9p1.282.5% DeathWPA -2.2p42.717.5% | 42.4 Versatility 42.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp37.582.5% Deathp65.517.5% | |
| 60 | RA pace | 25 | 4.0 | 0 | 41 | 10.25 | 18.5 Scout Score 18.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle18.5100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.21× | 12.3 Bowling Production 12.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 10.25 econp12.3100% | 2.8 Quality 2.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle4%p2.8 | 17.9 Impact 17.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -17.1p17.9100% | 29.2 Versatility 29.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep29.2100% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leg-spin | — | 9.0 | 5 | 34 | 3.78 | 96.6 Phase Production 96.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.466× parp98.836.8% Wicket rate0.56/ovp93.842.1% Boundary %7%p98.821.1% | 81.2 Quality 81.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 96.2 Impact 96.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+43.6 | 85.8 Versatility 85.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.830% Econ vs LHBp68.830% Wkt vs RHBp91.220% Wkt vs LHBp86.220% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 23 | 7.0 | 5 | 47 | 6.71 | 83.3 Phase Production 83.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.828× parp72.536.8% Wicket rate0.71/ovp98.842.1% Boundary %17%p71.221.1% | 58.8 Quality 58.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 21.2 Impact 21.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10 | 76.5 Versatility 76.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp61.230% Econ vs LHBp66.230% Wkt vs RHBp93.820% Wkt vs LHBp97.520% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 10.0 | 4 | 70 | 7 | 79.9 Phase Production 79.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.863× parp76.236.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp81.242.1% Boundary %15%p83.821.1% | 36.2 Quality 36.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 73.8 Impact 73.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+16.6 | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp93.830% Econ vs LHBp21.230% Wkt vs RHBp83.820% Wkt vs LHBp6.220% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 10.0 | 3 | 66 | 6.6 | 76.4 Phase Production 76.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.814× parp93.836.8% Wicket rate0.30/ovp53.842.1% Boundary %13%p91.221.1% | 13.8 Quality 13.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 78.8 Impact 78.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+22.5 | 61.8 Versatility 61.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp78.830% Econ vs LHBp71.230% Wkt vs RHBp61.220% Wkt vs LHBp22.520% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 11.0 | 5 | 81 | 7.36 | 73.8 Phase Production 73.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.908× parp63.836.8% Wicket rate0.46/ovp86.242.1% Boundary %18%p66.221.1% | 6.2 Quality 6.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 86.2 Impact 86.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+24.2 | 55.2 Versatility 55.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp73.830% Econ vs LHBp23.830% Wkt vs RHBp86.220% Wkt vs LHBp43.820% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | 28 | 4.0 | 1 | 22 | 5.5 | 70.5 Phase Production 70.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.678× parp86.236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp4542.1% Boundary %4%p93.821.1% | 23.8 Quality 23.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 51.2 Impact 51.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.3 | 60.8 Versatility 60.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp58.830% Econ vs LHBp91.230% Wkt vs RHBp66.220% Wkt vs LHBp12.520% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 24 | 19.0 | 6 | 138 | 7.26 | 70.3 Phase Production 70.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.896× parp78.836.8% Wicket rate0.32/ovp57.542.1% Boundary %18%p81.221.1% | 83.8 Quality 83.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 88.8 Impact 88.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+28.8 | 67.2 Versatility 67.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp63.830% Econ vs LHBp73.830% Wkt vs RHBp46.220% Wkt vs LHBp83.820% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 22 | 12.0 | 4 | 83 | 6.92 | 69.5 Phase Production 69.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.853× parp83.836.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp61.242.1% Boundary %19%p61.221.1% | 73.8 Quality 73.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 91.2 Impact 91.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+30.1 | 49 Versatility 49 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.230% Econ vs LHBp13.830% Wkt vs RHBp78.820% Wkt vs LHBp1.220% | |
| 9 | LA pace | 29 | 20.0 | 5 | 141 | 7.05 | 66.5 Phase Production 66.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.869× parp91.236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp33.842.1% Boundary %16%p88.821.1% | 43.8 Quality 43.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 98.8 Impact 98.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+44.8 | 52.8 Versatility 52.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.230% Econ vs LHBp53.830% Wkt vs RHBp31.220% Wkt vs LHBp22.520% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 29 | 13.0 | 3 | 87 | 6.69 | 64.7 Phase Production 64.7 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.825× parp96.236.8% Wicket rate0.23/ovp31.242.1% Boundary %18%p76.221.1% | 78.8 Quality 78.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 61.2 Impact 61.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.6 | 59.2 Versatility 59.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.230% Econ vs LHBp78.830% Wkt vs RHBp33.820% Wkt vs LHBp22.520% | |
| 11 | Off-spin | 22 | 2.0 | 1 | 11 | 5.5 | 63.4 Phase Production 63.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.678× parp61.236.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp68.842.1% Boundary %17%p56.221.1% | 53.8 Quality 53.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 43.8 Impact 43.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.2 | 64.8 Versatility 64.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.230% Econ vs LHBp81.230% Wkt vs RHBp51.220% Wkt vs LHBp88.820% | |
| 12 | LA pace | 34 | 7.0 | 2 | 47 | 6.71 | 63.3 Phase Production 63.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.828× parp72.536.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp51.242.1% Boundary %17%p71.221.1% | 88.8 Quality 88.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 66.2 Impact 66.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.7 | 56.8 Versatility 56.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.230% Econ vs LHBp56.230% Wkt vs RHBp53.820% Wkt vs LHBp38.820% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 34 | 20.0 | 4 | 142 | 7.1 | 58.8 Phase Production 58.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.876× parp88.836.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp13.842.1% Boundary %13%p96.221.1% | 76.2 Quality 76.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 58.8 Impact 58.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.7 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp91.230% Econ vs LHBp36.230% Wkt vs RHBp6.220% Wkt vs LHBp81.220% | |
| 14 | LA pace | — | 10.0 | 6 | 83 | 8.3 | 58.1 Phase Production 58.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.024× parp41.236.8% Wicket rate0.60/ovp96.242.1% Boundary %25%p11.221.1% | 98.8 Quality 98.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %48% | 83.8 Impact 83.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+24.2 | 58.1 Versatility 58.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp18.830% Econ vs LHBp8530% Wkt vs RHBp98.820% Wkt vs LHBp36.220% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 31 | 2.0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 57.6 Phase Production 57.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.493× parp81.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp26.242.1% Boundary %8%p78.821.1% | 86.2 Quality 86.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %50% | 63.8 Impact 63.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.2 | 56.4 Versatility 56.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp83.830% Econ vs LHBp42.530% Wkt vs RHBp22.520% Wkt vs LHBp7020% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 32 | 4.0 | 2 | 34 | 8.5 | 57.2 Phase Production 57.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.048× parp33.836.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp83.842.1% Boundary %21%p4521.1% | 23.8 Quality 23.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 26.2 Impact 26.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.8 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp66.230% Econ vs LHBp11.230% Wkt vs RHBp81.220% Wkt vs LHBp52.520% | |
| 17 | RA pace | — | 18.0 | 5 | 133 | 7.39 | 56.9 Phase Production 56.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.911× parp68.836.8% Wicket rate0.28/ovp48.842.1% Boundary %20%p52.521.1% | 96.2 Quality 96.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %41% | 93.8 Impact 93.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+40 | 44.5 Versatility 44.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp88.830% Econ vs LHBp18.830% Wkt vs RHBp48.820% Wkt vs LHBp12.520% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 34 | 14.0 | 5 | 120 | 8.57 | 55.2 Phase Production 55.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.057× parp26.236.8% Wicket rate0.36/ovp76.242.1% Boundary %19%p63.821.1% | 93.8 Quality 93.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 36.2 Impact 36.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.4 | 46.8 Versatility 46.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp31.230% Econ vs LHBp26.230% Wkt vs RHBp68.820% Wkt vs LHBp78.820% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 21 | 18.0 | 6 | 148 | 8.22 | 54.9 Phase Production 54.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.014× parp46.236.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp63.842.1% Boundary %20%p52.521.1% | 91.2 Quality 91.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %37% | 71.2 Impact 71.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+16.2 | 59.5 Versatility 59.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6.230% Econ vs LHBp98.830% Wkt vs RHBp63.820% Wkt vs LHBp76.220% | |
| 20 | Off-spin | 24 | 2.0 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 54.3 Phase Production 54.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.987× parp48.836.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp68.842.1% Boundary %25%p3521.1% | 53.8 Quality 53.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 41.2 Impact 41.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.3 | 56 Versatility 56 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp26.230% Econ vs LHBp76.230% Wkt vs RHBp28.820% Wkt vs LHBp97.520% | |
| 21 | Leg-spin | — | 2.0 | 1 | 17 | 8.5 | 52.4 Phase Production 52.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.048× parp43.836.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp68.842.1% Boundary %25%p3521.1% | 53.8 Quality 53.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 48.8 Impact 48.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.2 | 46.8 Versatility 46.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp38.830% Econ vs LHBp31.230% Wkt vs RHBp76.220% Wkt vs LHBp52.520% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 18 | 10.0 | 5 | 91 | 9.1 | 50.5 Phase Production 50.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.122× parp16.236.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp91.242.1% Boundary %23%p28.821.1% | 48.8 Quality 48.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 8.8 Impact 8.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-20.8 | 52.8 Versatility 52.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp16.230% Econ vs LHBp58.830% Wkt vs RHBp88.820% Wkt vs LHBp62.520% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 31 | 4.0 | 1 | 31 | 7.75 | 48.2 Phase Production 48.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.956× parp53.836.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp4542.1% Boundary %21%p4521.1% | 23.8 Quality 23.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 56.2 Impact 56.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.2 | 50.1 Versatility 50.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp48.830% Econ vs LHBp42.530% Wkt vs RHBp43.820% Wkt vs LHBp7020% | |
| 24 | LA pace | 26 | 19.0 | 6 | 158 | 8.32 | 46.2 Phase Production 46.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.025× parp36.236.8% Wicket rate0.32/ovp57.542.1% Boundary %21%p41.221.1% | 16.2 Quality 16.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 68.8 Impact 68.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+13.5 | 48 Versatility 48 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp13.830% Econ vs LHBp96.230% Wkt vs RHBp71.220% Wkt vs LHBp3.820% | |
| 25 | LA pace | 31 | 5.0 | 3 | 57 | 11.4 | 46.2 Phase Production 46.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.406× parp6.236.8% Wicket rate0.60/ovp88.842.1% Boundary %23%p31.221.1% | 38.8 Quality 38.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 23.8 Impact 23.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.9 | 35 Versatility 35 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.830% Econ vs LHBp8.830% Wkt vs RHBp96.220% Wkt vs LHBp22.520% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 8.0 | 2 | 64 | 8 | 45.5 Phase Production 45.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.987× parp51.236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp38.842.1% Boundary %21%p48.821.1% | 61.2 Quality 61.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 38.8 Impact 38.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.6 | 40.8 Versatility 40.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp43.830% Econ vs LHBp31.230% Wkt vs RHBp38.820% Wkt vs LHBp52.520% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 30 | 19.0 | 7 | 166 | 8.74 | 44.9 Phase Production 44.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.077× parp21.236.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp78.842.1% Boundary %24%p18.821.1% | 41.2 Quality 41.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 6.2 Impact 6.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-28.1 | 61.5 Versatility 61.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp11.230% Econ vs LHBp93.830% Wkt vs RHBp58.820% Wkt vs LHBp91.220% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | 18 | 7.0 | 1 | 51 | 7.29 | 44.5 Phase Production 44.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.898× parp58.836.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp18.842.1% Boundary %17%p71.221.1% | 28.8 Quality 28.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 53.8 Impact 53.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5 | 46.8 Versatility 46.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp56.230% Econ vs LHBp48.830% Wkt vs RHBp13.820% Wkt vs LHBp62.520% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 21 | 11.0 | 1 | 80 | 7.27 | 43.6 Phase Production 43.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.897× parp66.236.8% Wicket rate0.09/ovp2.542.1% Boundary %15%p86.221.1% | 66.2 Quality 66.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 76.2 Impact 76.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+20.2 | 60.6 Versatility 60.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.830% Econ vs LHBp8530% Wkt vs RHBp1.220% Wkt vs LHBp93.820% | |
| 30 | Chinaman | 25 | 5.0 | 2 | 47 | 9.4 | 41.4 Phase Production 41.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.159× parp18.836.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp73.842.1% Boundary %27%p16.221.1% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 33.8 Impact 33.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.6 | 41.8 Versatility 41.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp23.830% Econ vs LHBp31.230% Wkt vs RHBp73.820% Wkt vs LHBp52.520% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 8.0 | 2 | 67 | 8.38 | 35.1 Phase Production 35.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.033× parp38.836.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp38.842.1% Boundary %25%p21.221.1% | 11.2 Quality 11.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 81.2 Impact 81.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+22.6 | 47.5 Versatility 47.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp33.830% Econ vs LHBp61.230% Wkt vs RHBp36.220% Wkt vs LHBp58.820% | |
| 32 | Leg-spin | 27 | 11.0 | 1 | 86 | 7.82 | 34.1 Phase Production 34.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.964× parp56.236.8% Wicket rate0.09/ovp2.542.1% Boundary %20%p58.821.1% | 3.8 Quality 3.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 28.8 Impact 28.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.4 | 38.8 Versatility 38.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.230% Econ vs LHBp51.230% Wkt vs RHBp3.820% Wkt vs LHBp43.820% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 26 | 3.0 | 0 | 29 | 9.67 | 23.8 Phase Production 23.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.192× parp23.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp16.242.1% Boundary %22%p38.821.1% | 33.8 Quality 33.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 31.2 Impact 31.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.2 | 32.5 Versatility 32.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp51.230% Econ vs LHBp16.230% Wkt vs RHBp17.520% Wkt vs LHBp43.820% | |
| 34 | SLA orthodox | 35 | 14.0 | 2 | 117 | 8.36 | 19.7 Phase Production 19.7 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.031× parp31.236.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp6.242.1% Boundary %24%p26.221.1% | 1.2 Quality 1.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 13.8 Impact 13.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.1 | 31.5 Versatility 31.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp76.230% Econ vs LHBp1.230% Wkt vs RHBp8.820% Wkt vs LHBp32.520% | |
| 35 | Off-spin | 20 | 2.0 | 0 | 23 | 11.5 | 19 Phase Production 19 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.418× parp13.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp26.242.1% Boundary %33%p13.821.1% | 18.8 Quality 18.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 18.8 Impact 18.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.8 | 37.2 Versatility 37.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp68.830% Econ vs LHBp6.230% Wkt vs RHBp41.220% Wkt vs LHBp32.520% | |
| 36 | LA pace | 27 | 8.0 | 2 | 85 | 10.62 | 18.5 Phase Production 18.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.31× parp3.836.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp38.842.1% Boundary %29%p3.821.1% | 68.8 Quality 68.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 16.2 Impact 16.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.5 | 25 Versatility 25 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp36.230% Econ vs LHBp3.830% Wkt vs RHBp56.220% Wkt vs LHBp8.820% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 22 | 11.0 | 2 | 110 | 10 | 17.2 Phase Production 17.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.233× parp8.836.8% Wicket rate0.18/ovp21.242.1% Boundary %24%p23.821.1% | 46.2 Quality 46.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 1.2 Impact 1.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-28.9 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.830% Econ vs LHBp88.830% Wkt vs RHBp26.220% Wkt vs LHBp22.520% | |
| 38 | RA pace | 33 | 4.0 | 0 | 36 | 9 | 16.6 Phase Production 16.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.11× parp28.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1042.1% Boundary %29%p8.821.1% | 63.8 Quality 63.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 46.2 Impact 46.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.5 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp21.230% Econ vs LHBp63.830% Wkt vs RHBp17.520% Wkt vs LHBp22.520% | |
| 39 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 28 | 14 | 16.5 Phase Production 16.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.726× parp11.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp26.242.1% Boundary %42%p6.221.1% | 8.8 Quality 8.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 11.2 Impact 11.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.1 | 33.9 Versatility 33.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8.830% Econ vs LHBp42.530% Wkt vs RHBp22.520% Wkt vs LHBp7020% | |
| 40 | LA pace | 20 | 4.0 | 0 | 63 | 15.75 | 4.9 Phase Production 4.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.942× parp1.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1042.1% Boundary %50%p1.221.1% | 71.2 Quality 71.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 3.8 Impact 3.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-28.6 | 29.4 Versatility 29.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.230% Econ vs LHBp42.530% Wkt vs RHBp11.220% Wkt vs LHBp7020% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Off-spin | 24 | 18.0 | 8 | 97 | 5.39 | 89.5 Phase Production 89.5 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.69× parp97.244.1% Wicket rate0.44/ovp80.244.1% Boundary %8%p95.311.8% | 85.8 Quality 85.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 95.3 Impact 95.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+55.1 | 93.4 Versatility 93.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp87.750% Econ vs LHBp99.150% | |
| 2 | Leg-spin | 29 | 9.0 | 5 | 53 | 5.89 | 89.4 Phase Production 89.4 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.754× parp91.544.1% Wicket rate0.56/ovp87.744.1% Boundary %11%p87.711.8% | 70.8 Quality 70.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 87.7 Impact 87.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+42.5 | 79.2 Versatility 79.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp89.650% Econ vs LHBp68.950% | |
| 3 | Leg-spin | — | 29.0 | 12 | 173 | 5.97 | 88 Phase Production 88 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.764× parp95.344.1% Wicket rate0.41/ovp78.344.1% Boundary %8%p97.211.8% | 95.3 Quality 95.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 99.1 Impact 99.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+76.7 | 92.5 Versatility 92.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp97.250% Econ vs LHBp87.750% | |
| 4 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 2 | 13 | 4.33 | 84.6 Phase Production 84.6 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.555× parp85.844.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp8444.1% Boundary %6%p82.111.8% | 36.8 Quality 36.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 74.5 Impact 74.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+18.9 | 69.8 Versatility 69.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp55.750% Econ vs LHBp8450% | |
| 5 | Leg-spin | 27 | 18.1 | 7 | 128 | 7.05 | 79 Phase Production 79 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.902× parp8444.1% Wicket rate0.38/ovp72.644.1% Boundary %13%p8411.8% | 42.5 Quality 42.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 97.2 Impact 97.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+71.8 | 69.8 Versatility 69.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8450% Econ vs LHBp55.750% | |
| 6 | Leg-spin | 21 | 7.0 | 6 | 52 | 7.43 | 78 Phase Production 78 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.951× parp68.944.1% Wicket rate0.86/ovp99.144.1% Boundary %19%p3311.8% | 89.6 Quality 89.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 53.8 Impact 53.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.1 | 52.8 Versatility 52.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp80.250% Econ vs LHBp25.550% | |
| 7 | Leg-spin | — | 9.0 | 4 | 61 | 6.78 | 77.6 Phase Production 77.6 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.868× parp80.244.1% Wicket rate0.44/ovp76.444.1% Boundary %13%p72.611.8% | 57.5 Quality 57.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 76.4 Impact 76.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+19.3 | 74.5 Versatility 74.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp68.950% Econ vs LHBp80.250% | |
| 8 | Chinaman | 25 | 35.0 | 12 | 251 | 7.17 | 76.3 Phase Production 76.3 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.918× parp89.644.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp59.444.1% Boundary %13%p89.611.8% | 72.6 Quality 72.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 91.5 Impact 91.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+49.5 | 73.6 Versatility 73.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp93.450% Econ vs LHBp53.850% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 24.0 | 9 | 181 | 7.54 | 74.2 Phase Production 74.2 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.966× parp76.444.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp68.944.1% Boundary %13%p85.811.8% | 0.9 Quality 0.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 72.6 Impact 72.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+17.6 | 51.9 Versatility 51.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp95.350% Econ vs LHBp8.550% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 7.0 | 3 | 51 | 7.29 | 71.3 Phase Production 71.3 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.933× parp70.844.1% Wicket rate0.43/ovp74.544.1% Boundary %14%p61.311.8% | 46.2 Quality 46.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 57.5 Impact 57.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6 | 59.4 Versatility 59.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp59.450% Econ vs LHBp59.450% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 23.0 | 7 | 116 | 5.04 | 70.8 Phase Production 70.8 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.646× parp99.144.1% Wicket rate0.31/ovp34.944.1% Boundary %7%p99.111.8% | 74.5 Quality 74.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 93.4 Impact 93.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+54.6 | 97.2 Versatility 97.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp99.150% Econ vs LHBp95.350% | |
| 12 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 2 | 35 | 5.83 | 69.8 Phase Production 69.8 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.747× parp87.744.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp5044.1% Boundary %11%p76.411.8% | 99.1 Quality 99.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %61% | 63.2 Impact 63.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10 | 67.9 Versatility 67.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.850% Econ vs LHBp5050% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 23 | 6.0 | 5 | 49 | 8.17 | 69.3 Phase Production 69.3 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.046× parp51.944.1% Wicket rate0.83/ovp97.244.1% Boundary %19%p30.211.8% | 63.2 Quality 63.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 89.6 Impact 89.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+44.7 | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.250% Econ vs LHBp62.350% | |
| 14 | Leg-spin | — | 5.0 | 2 | 34 | 6.8 | 67.2 Phase Production 67.2 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.871× parp72.644.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp62.344.1% Boundary %13%p65.111.8% | 97.2 Quality 97.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %57% | 68.9 Impact 68.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+12 | 62.3 Versatility 62.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3350% Econ vs LHBp91.550% | |
| 15 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 4.0 | 3 | 35 | 8.75 | 64.9 Phase Production 64.9 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.12× parp38.744.1% Wicket rate0.75/ovp90.644.1% Boundary %12%p6711.8% | 66 Quality 66 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 16 Impact 16 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.3 | 49.5 Versatility 49.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp27.450% Econ vs LHBp71.750% | |
| 16 | Off-spin | 28 | 18.4 | 6 | 138 | 7.39 | 64 Phase Production 64 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.947× parp78.344.1% Wicket rate0.32/ovp42.544.1% Boundary %12%p91.511.8% | 23.6 Quality 23.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 84 Impact 84 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+32.1 | 61.3 Versatility 61.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp74.550% Econ vs LHBp48.150% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 30 | 8.0 | 4 | 66 | 8.25 | 64 Phase Production 64 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.056× parp5044.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp82.144.1% Boundary %17%p49.111.8% | 53.8 Quality 53.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 78.3 Impact 78.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+19.7 | 44.3 Versatility 44.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp78.350% Econ vs LHBp10.450% | |
| 18 | Chinaman | 17 | 34.0 | 11 | 250 | 7.35 | 62.4 Phase Production 62.4 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.942× parp82.144.1% Wicket rate0.32/ovp40.644.1% Boundary %15%p70.811.8% | 76.4 Quality 76.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 0.9 Impact 0.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-52.4 | 80.2 Versatility 80.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp70.850% Econ vs LHBp89.650% | |
| 19 | LA pace | 29 | 4.0 | 3 | 36 | 9 | 59.7 Phase Production 59.7 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.152× parp3344.1% Wicket rate0.75/ovp90.644.1% Boundary %17%p44.311.8% | 59.4 Quality 59.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 38.7 Impact 38.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.4 | 41.5 Versatility 41.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp63.250% Econ vs LHBp19.850% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 34 | 2.0 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 59.5 Phase Production 59.5 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.896× parp59.444.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp65.144.1% Boundary %17%p38.711.8% | 68.9 Quality 68.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.3 | 55.7 Versatility 55.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.650% Econ vs LHBp71.750% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 22 | 4.0 | 1 | 26 | 6.5 | 59 Phase Production 59 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.832× parp74.544.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp37.744.1% Boundary %8%p80.211.8% | 66 Quality 66 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 65.1 Impact 65.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.8 | 64.2 Versatility 64.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp61.350% Econ vs LHBp6750% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 21 | 10.0 | 4 | 81 | 8.1 | 59 Phase Production 59 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.037× parp53.844.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp70.844.1% Boundary %18%p34.911.8% | 87.7 Quality 87.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 55.7 Impact 55.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.5 | 45.3 Versatility 45.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp76.450% Econ vs LHBp14.250% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 24 | 3.0 | 1 | 21 | 7 | 58.2 Phase Production 58.2 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.896× parp65.144.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp55.744.1% Boundary %17%p41.511.8% | 81.1 Quality 81.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %44% | 67 Impact 67 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.2 | 53.8 Versatility 53.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp21.750% Econ vs LHBp85.850% | |
| 24 | Leg-spin | 29 | 36.0 | 6 | 248 | 6.89 | 55.1 Phase Production 55.1 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.882× parp93.444.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp6.644.1% Boundary %12%p93.411.8% | 6.6 Quality 6.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 80.2 Impact 80.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+21 | 75.5 Versatility 75.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.850% Econ vs LHBp97.250% | |
| 25 | SLA orthodox | 35 | 7.1 | 4 | 66 | 9.21 | 54.2 Phase Production 54.2 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.179× parp21.744.1% Wicket rate0.56/ovp85.844.1% Boundary %16%p57.511.8% | 55.7 Quality 55.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 82.1 Impact 82.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+23 | 35.8 Versatility 35.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.250% Econ vs LHBp57.550% | |
| 26 | Off-spin | 22 | 15.0 | 5 | 118 | 7.87 | 53.2 Phase Production 53.2 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.007× parp61.344.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp44.344.1% Boundary %17%p55.711.8% | 51.9 Quality 51.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 85.8 Impact 85.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+35.1 | 48.1 Versatility 48.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp72.650% Econ vs LHBp23.650% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 29 | 10.0 | 6 | 91 | 9.1 | 51.2 Phase Production 51.2 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.165× parp19.844.1% Wicket rate0.60/ovp93.444.1% Boundary %22%p10.411.8% | 93.4 Quality 93.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %37% | 6.6 Impact 6.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-32.6 | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2.850% Econ vs LHBp82.150% | |
| 28 | Off-spin | 28 | 8.0 | 2 | 60 | 7.5 | 50.4 Phase Production 50.4 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.96× parp6744.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp27.444.1% Boundary %12%p74.511.8% | 27.4 Quality 27.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 59.4 Impact 59.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7 | 50.9 Versatility 50.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5050% Econ vs LHBp51.950% | |
| 29 | Leg-spin | 34 | 13.0 | 5 | 113 | 8.69 | 48.7 Phase Production 48.7 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.113× parp29.244.1% Wicket rate0.38/ovp6744.1% Boundary %17%p52.811.8% | 40.6 Quality 40.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 61.3 Impact 61.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.1 | 35.8 Versatility 35.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp44.350% Econ vs LHBp27.450% | |
| 30 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 2 | 43 | 8.6 | 48.5 Phase Production 48.5 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.101× parp40.644.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp62.344.1% Boundary %20%p26.411.8% | 17 Quality 17 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 42.5 Impact 42.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.1 | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp42.550% Econ vs LHBp42.550% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | 18 | 7.2 | 5 | 81 | 11.05 | 45.1 Phase Production 45.1 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.414× parp4.744.1% Wicket rate0.68/ovp95.344.1% Boundary %23%p8.511.8% | 61.3 Quality 61.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 70.8 Impact 70.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+13.8 | 38.7 Versatility 38.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp0.950% Econ vs LHBp76.450% | |
| 32 | LA pace | 20 | 2.0 | 0 | 13 | 6.5 | 45.1 Phase Production 45.1 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.832× parp63.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.844.1% Boundary %8%p68.911.8% | 48.1 Quality 48.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 51.9 Impact 51.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3 | 56.6 Versatility 56.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6750% Econ vs LHBp46.250% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 21 | 3.0 | 1 | 27 | 9 | 42.6 Phase Production 42.6 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.152× parp34.944.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp55.744.1% Boundary %22%p22.611.8% | 81.1 Quality 81.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %44% | 44.3 Impact 44.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp48.150% Econ vs LHBp36.850% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 31 | 14.0 | 4 | 117 | 8.36 | 42 Phase Production 42 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.07× parp46.244.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp3344.1% Boundary %16%p59.411.8% | 34.9 Quality 34.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 23.6 Impact 23.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.9 | 44.3 Versatility 44.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp57.550% Econ vs LHBp31.150% | |
| 35 | Off-spin | 30 | 11.0 | 3 | 91 | 8.27 | 39.3 Phase Production 39.3 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.059× parp48.144.1% Wicket rate0.27/ovp31.144.1% Boundary %18%p36.811.8% | 12.3 Quality 12.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 46.2 Impact 46.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.5 | 45.3 Versatility 45.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp25.550% Econ vs LHBp65.150% | |
| 36 | Off-spin | 20 | 3.0 | 1 | 30 | 10 | 37.6 Phase Production 37.6 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.28× parp23.644.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp55.744.1% Boundary %22%p22.611.8% | 29.2 Quality 29.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 40.6 Impact 40.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.2 | 45.3 Versatility 45.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp12.350% Econ vs LHBp78.350% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 6.0 | 2 | 55 | 9.17 | 36.8 Phase Production 36.8 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.174× parp25.544.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp5044.1% Boundary %19%p30.211.8% | 44.3 Quality 44.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 14.2 Impact 14.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.4 | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp82.150% Econ vs LHBp2.850% | |
| 38 | Chinaman | 19 | 25.0 | 3 | 202 | 8.08 | 35 Phase Production 35 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.035× parp57.544.1% Wicket rate0.12/ovp0.944.1% Boundary %14%p78.311.8% | 4.7 Quality 4.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 10.4 Impact 10.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-31.9 | 49.1 Versatility 49.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp23.650% Econ vs LHBp74.550% | |
| 39 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 13.0 | 2 | 105 | 8.08 | 34.5 Phase Production 34.5 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.034× parp55.744.1% Wicket rate0.16/ovp8.544.1% Boundary %17%p52.811.8% | 25.5 Quality 25.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 36.8 Impact 36.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2 | 49.1 Versatility 49.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp91.550% Econ vs LHBp6.650% | |
| 40 | Off-spin | 22 | 6.0 | 1 | 51 | 8.5 | 31.7 Phase Production 31.7 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.088× parp44.344.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp15.144.1% Boundary %17%p46.211.8% | 33 Quality 33 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 19.8 Impact 19.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.2 | 35.8 Versatility 35.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp31.150% Econ vs LHBp40.650% | |
| 41 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 6.0 | 1 | 52 | 8.67 | 30.3 Phase Production 30.3 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.11× parp36.844.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp15.144.1% Boundary %14%p63.211.8% | 8.5 Quality 8.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 29.2 Impact 29.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.9 | 40.6 Versatility 40.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp51.950% Econ vs LHBp29.250% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 26 | 6.0 | 2 | 62 | 10.33 | 27.5 Phase Production 27.5 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.323× parp8.544.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp5044.1% Boundary %22%p14.211.8% | 78.3 Quality 78.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 12.3 Impact 12.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.9 | 22.6 Versatility 22.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp29.250% Econ vs LHBp1650% | |
| 43 | Off-spin | 20 | 8.0 | 0 | 68 | 8.5 | 26.2 Phase Production 26.2 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.088× parp42.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.844.1% Boundary %17%p49.111.8% | 14.2 Quality 14.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 48.1 Impact 48.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.2 | 49.1 Versatility 49.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4.750% Econ vs LHBp93.450% | |
| 44 | LA pace | 31 | 3.0 | 0 | 28 | 9.33 | 24 Phase Production 24 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.195× parp31.144.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp12.344.1% Boundary %17%p41.511.8% | 10.4 Quality 10.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %6% | 34.9 Impact 34.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.5 | 37.3 Versatility 37.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.650% Econ vs LHBp34.950% | |
| 45 | RA pace | 32 | 2.0 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 22 Phase Production 22 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.28× parp27.444.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.844.1% Boundary %33%p6.611.8% | 91.5 Quality 91.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %58% | 27.4 Impact 27.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.9 | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1650% Econ vs LHBp62.350% | |
| 46 | Off-spin | 23 | 5.0 | 1 | 48 | 9.6 | 21.4 Phase Production 21.4 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.229× parp1644.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp25.544.1% Boundary %20%p26.411.8% | 17 Quality 17 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 21.7 Impact 21.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.9 | 25.5 Versatility 25.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp17.950% Econ vs LHBp3350% | |
| 47 | RA pace | 31 | 9.0 | 3 | 107 | 11.89 | 21.1 Phase Production 21.1 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.522× parp0.944.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp46.244.1% Boundary %26%p2.811.8% | 38.7 Quality 38.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 2.8 Impact 2.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-40.8 | 5.7 Versatility 5.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6.650% Econ vs LHBp4.750% | |
| 48 | Leg-spin | 21 | 4.0 | 1 | 48 | 12 | 20.1 Phase Production 20.1 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.537× parp6.644.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp37.744.1% Boundary %29%p4.711.8% | 31.1 Quality 31.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 25.5 Impact 25.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.5 | 26.4 Versatility 26.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8.550% Econ vs LHBp44.350% | |
| 49 | RA pace | 31 | 2.0 | 0 | 22 | 11 | 19.3 Phase Production 19.3 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.409× parp17.944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.844.1% Boundary %25%p18.911.8% | 20.8 Quality 20.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 33 Impact 33 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8 | 38.7 Versatility 38.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp65.150% Econ vs LHBp12.350% | |
| 50 | LA pace | 26 | 2.0 | 0 | 24 | 12 | 16.8 Phase Production 16.8 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.537× parp12.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.844.1% Boundary %25%p18.911.8% | 20.8 Quality 20.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 31.1 Impact 31.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.1 | 29.2 Versatility 29.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp19.850% Econ vs LHBp38.750% | |
| 51 | RA pace | 19 | 21.0 | 6 | 220 | 10.48 | 14.3 Phase Production 14.3 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.341× parp2.844.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp29.244.1% Boundary %24%p0.911.8% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 8.5 Impact 8.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-32.4 | 5.7 Versatility 5.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.450% Econ vs LHBp0.950% | |
| 52 | RA pace | 25 | 4.0 | 0 | 41 | 10.25 | 12.3 Phase Production 12.3 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.312× parp14.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp10.444.1% Boundary %25%p12.311.8% | 2.8 Quality 2.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %4% | 17.9 Impact 17.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.1 | 29.2 Versatility 29.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp36.850% Econ vs LHBp21.750% | |
| 53 | LA pace | 27 | 8.0 | 0 | 78 | 9.75 | 8.1 Phase Production 8.1 vs all bowlers · n=53 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.248× parp10.444.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.844.1% Boundary %21%p1611.8% | 84 Quality 84 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 4.7 Impact 4.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-35.4 | 26.4 Versatility 26.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp34.950% Econ vs LHBp17.950% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 8.0 | 6 | 56 | 7 | 91.8 Phase Production 91.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.702× parp91.543.6% Boundary %12%p91.541.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp93.914.5% | — | 79.3 Impact 79.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+19.4 | 78.1 Versatility 78.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep78.1100% | |
| 2 | Leg-spin | 34 | 6.1 | 4 | 43 | 6.97 | 90.3 Phase Production 90.3 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.7× parp86.643.6% Boundary %8%p98.841.8% Wicket rate0.65/ovp76.814.5% | — | 45.1 Impact 45.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.1 | 78.1 Versatility 78.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep78.1100% | |
| 3 | Chinaman | 17 | 5.0 | 2 | 26 | 5.2 | 88.9 Phase Production 88.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.522× parp98.843.6% Boundary %7%p95.141.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp41.514.5% | — | 89 Impact 89 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+39 | 75 Versatility 75 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep75100% | |
| 4 | Off-spin | 30 | 3.0 | 2 | 13 | 4.33 | 88.3 Phase Production 88.3 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.435× parp93.943.6% Boundary %6%p8941.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp69.514.5% | — | 81.7 Impact 81.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+26.7 | 81.2 Versatility 81.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep81.2100% | |
| 5 | Leg-spin | — | 5.0 | 2 | 30 | 6 | 87.8 Phase Production 87.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.602× parp96.343.6% Boundary %7%p95.141.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp41.514.5% | — | 64.6 Impact 64.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.2 | 65.6 Versatility 65.6 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep65.6100% | |
| 6 | Leg-spin | 29 | 2.0 | 1 | 11 | 5.5 | 79.5 Phase Production 79.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.552× parp79.343.6% Boundary %0%p86.641.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp59.814.5% | — | 76.8 Impact 76.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.9 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 7 | LA pace | 29 | 15.1 | 10 | 119 | 7.85 | 78 Phase Production 78 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.787× parp8950% Wicket rate0.66/ovp96.316.7% Boundary %20%p52.433.3% | — | 86.6 Impact 86.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+31 | 55.1 Versatility 55.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep71.740% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 8 | SLA orthodox | 18 | 3.1 | 3 | 26 | 8.21 | 73 Phase Production 73 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.824× parp69.543.6% Boundary %16%p7241.8% Wicket rate0.95/ovp86.614.5% | — | 98.8 Impact 98.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+86 | 53.1 Versatility 53.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep53.1100% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 34 | 9.0 | 2 | 69 | 7.67 | 71.5 Phase Production 71.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.769× parp84.150% Wicket rate0.22/ovp8.516.7% Boundary %15%p84.133.3% | — | 62.2 Impact 62.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.8 | 70.1 Versatility 70.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep76.140% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp89.126.7% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 3.0 | 0 | 20 | 6.67 | 71.1 Phase Production 71.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.669× parp81.743.6% Boundary %11%p79.341.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp15.914.5% | — | 69.5 Impact 69.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.7 | 57.8 Versatility 57.8 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep57.8100% | |
| 11 | Off-spin | 28 | 7.0 | 3 | 60 | 8.57 | 70.8 Phase Production 70.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.86× parp74.443.6% Boundary %17%p74.441.8% Wicket rate0.43/ovp5014.5% | — | 72 Impact 72 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7.2 | 29.7 Versatility 29.7 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep29.7100% | |
| 12 | Off-spin | 22 | 2.0 | 0 | 13 | 6.5 | 69.7 Phase Production 69.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.652× parp76.843.6% Boundary %8%p76.841.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2814.5% | — | 74.4 Impact 74.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.4 | 42.2 Versatility 42.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep42.2100% | |
| 13 | LA pace | 34 | 2.0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 67.7 Phase Production 67.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.803× parp67.150% Wicket rate1.00/ovp80.516.7% Boundary %17%p62.233.3% | — | 67.1 Impact 67.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.2 | 48.1 Versatility 48.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep54.340% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 14 | Off-spin | 22 | 2.0 | 1 | 15 | 7.5 | 66.1 Phase Production 66.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.753× parp7243.6% Boundary %17%p62.241.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp59.814.5% | — | 18.3 Impact 18.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.5 | 65.6 Versatility 65.6 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep65.6100% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 19 | 4.2 | 1 | 39 | 9 | 63.4 Phase Production 63.4 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.903× parp62.250% Wicket rate0.23/ovp30.516.7% Boundary %12%p81.733.3% | — | 96.3 Impact 96.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+78.2 | 58.6 Versatility 58.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep80.440% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 31 | 2.0 | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 62.8 Phase Production 62.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.953× parp57.350% Wicket rate1.00/ovp80.516.7% Boundary %17%p62.233.3% | — | 54.9 Impact 54.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.7 | 29 Versatility 29 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6.540% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 17 | LA pace | 20 | 3.0 | 3 | 26 | 8.67 | 61.4 Phase Production 61.4 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.87× parp64.650% Wicket rate1.00/ovp8916.7% Boundary %22%p42.733.3% | — | 57.3 Impact 57.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.9 | 39.4 Versatility 39.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep32.640% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 29 | 9.0 | 5 | 90 | 10 | 56.1 Phase Production 56.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.003× parp42.750% Wicket rate0.56/ovp74.416.7% Boundary %18%p67.133.3% | — | 37.8 Impact 37.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.4 | 29 Versatility 29 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6.540% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 23 | 4.1 | 2 | 41 | 9.84 | 52.4 Phase Production 52.4 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.987× parp5050% Wicket rate0.48/ovp64.616.7% Boundary %20%p5033.3% | — | 84.1 Impact 84.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+29.1 | 46.4 Versatility 46.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep5040% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 20 | Chinaman | 19 | 3.0 | 0 | 31 | 10.33 | 51.1 Phase Production 51.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.037× parp45.143.6% Boundary %17%p69.541.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp15.914.5% | — | 15.9 Impact 15.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.3 | 14.1 Versatility 14.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep14.1100% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 3.0 | 1 | 28 | 9.33 | 49.1 Phase Production 49.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.936× parp59.843.6% Boundary %22%p42.741.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp35.414.5% | — | 40.2 Impact 40.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.6 | 46.9 Versatility 46.9 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep46.9100% | |
| 22 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 7.0 | 1 | 67 | 9.57 | 48.8 Phase Production 48.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.96× parp54.943.6% Boundary %19%p57.341.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp6.114.5% | — | 30.5 Impact 30.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.7 | 34.4 Versatility 34.4 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep34.4100% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 29 | 5.0 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 43.5 Phase Production 43.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.003× parp47.650% Wicket rate0.60/ovp7216.7% Boundary %27%p23.233.3% | — | 23.2 Impact 23.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16.1 | 48.1 Versatility 48.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep23.940% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp84.826.7% | |
| 24 | Leg-spin | 29 | 6.5 | 2 | 70 | 10.24 | 43.2 Phase Production 43.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.028× parp35.443.6% Boundary %20%p54.941.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp32.914.5% | — | 52.4 Impact 52.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.9 | 46.9 Versatility 46.9 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep46.9100% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 21 | 10.0 | 4 | 97 | 9.7 | 41.9 Phase Production 41.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.973× parp52.450% Wicket rate0.40/ovp37.816.7% Boundary %23%p2833.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.8 | 60.3 Versatility 60.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep84.840% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 34 | 15.0 | 9 | 154 | 10.27 | 40.7 Phase Production 40.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.03× parp2850% Wicket rate0.60/ovp84.116.7% Boundary %21%p37.833.3% | — | 93.9 Impact 93.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+50.6 | 51.6 Versatility 51.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6340% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 27 | Off-spin | 20 | 2.0 | 1 | 22 | 11 | 40 Phase Production 40 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.104× parp37.843.6% Boundary %25%p35.441.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp59.814.5% | — | 47.6 Impact 47.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 20.3 Versatility 20.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep20.3100% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 22 | 2.2 | 1 | 25 | 10.71 | 39 Phase Production 39 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.075× parp40.250% Wicket rate0.43/ovp52.416.7% Boundary %29%p30.533.3% | — | 42.7 Impact 42.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.2 | 65.5 Versatility 65.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep97.840% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 22 | 13.2 | 10 | 138 | 10.35 | 36.2 Phase Production 36.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.038× parp25.650% Wicket rate0.75/ovp98.816.7% Boundary %25%p20.733.3% | — | 25.6 Impact 25.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.3 | 32.5 Versatility 32.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.240% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 24 | 16.0 | 8 | 163 | 10.19 | 35 Phase Production 35 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.022× parp30.550% Wicket rate0.50/ovp67.116.7% Boundary %23%p25.633.3% | — | 3.7 Impact 3.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-42.4 | 64.3 Versatility 64.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep67.440% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp80.426.7% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 30 | 12.0 | 5 | 122 | 10.17 | 35 Phase Production 35 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.02× parp32.950% Wicket rate0.41/ovp45.116.7% Boundary %22%p32.933.3% | — | 28 Impact 28 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.4 | 49.9 Versatility 49.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep58.740% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 21 | 4.5 | 4 | 57 | 11.79 | 28.9 Phase Production 28.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.183× parp18.350% Wicket rate0.83/ovp91.516.7% Boundary %31%p13.433.3% | — | 8.5 Impact 8.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-26.1 | 37.7 Versatility 37.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep28.340% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 33 | LA pace | 26 | 5.4 | 0 | 63 | 11.12 | 27.6 Phase Production 27.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.116× parp23.250% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.216.7% Boundary %21%p47.633.3% | — | 20.7 Impact 20.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.8 | 63.8 Versatility 63.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep93.540% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 34 | LA pace | 31 | 3.0 | 0 | 37 | 12.33 | 27.2 Phase Production 27.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.237× parp20.750% Wicket rate0.00/ovp15.916.7% Boundary %22%p42.733.3% | — | 35.4 Impact 35.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.8 | 78.7 Versatility 78.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep89.140% Slower ballp97.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 35 | Off-spin | 24 | 5.0 | 1 | 61 | 12.2 | 17.1 Phase Production 17.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.224× parp15.943.6% Boundary %30%p15.941.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp24.414.5% | — | 1.2 Impact 1.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-83.8 | 10.9 Versatility 10.9 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep10.9100% | |
| 36 | LA pace | 27 | 9.1 | 4 | 106 | 11.56 | 17.1 Phase Production 17.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.16× parp13.450% Wicket rate0.44/ovp54.916.7% Boundary %29%p3.733.3% | — | 32.9 Impact 32.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.8 | 44.6 Versatility 44.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep45.740% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 26 | 14.1 | 6 | 160 | 11.29 | 15.9 Phase Production 15.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.133× parp8.550% Wicket rate0.43/ovp47.616.7% Boundary %26%p1133.3% | — | 91.5 Impact 91.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+42.1 | 48.7 Versatility 48.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep19.640% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp93.526.7% | |
| 38 | Chinaman | 25 | 3.0 | 0 | 43 | 14.33 | 12.6 Phase Production 12.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.438× parp6.143.6% Boundary %33%p18.341.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp15.914.5% | — | 13.4 Impact 13.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-20.9 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 39 | RA pace | — | 11.0 | 2 | 126 | 11.45 | 8.9 Phase Production 8.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.149× parp1150% Wicket rate0.18/ovp3.716.7% Boundary %27%p8.533.3% | — | 59.8 Impact 59.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.6 | 41.2 Versatility 41.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep3740% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 32 | 3.0 | 0 | 46 | 15.33 | 6.5 Phase Production 6.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.539× parp3.750% Wicket rate0.00/ovp15.916.7% Boundary %39%p6.133.3% | — | 11 Impact 11 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-25.5 | 44.6 Versatility 44.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6.540% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp97.826.7% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 18 | 5.0 | 1 | 86 | 17.2 | 5.1 Phase Production 5.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.726× parp1.250% Wicket rate0.20/ovp24.416.7% Boundary %43%p1.233.3% | — | 6.1 Impact 6.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-29.1 | 42.9 Versatility 42.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep41.340% Slower ballp47.833.3% Slow bouncerp39.126.7% |
Alim Shaikhlal Shaikh
Bowler · Leg-spin
90.2
Scout Score
Overs 43.0 · Wkts 19 · Runs 237 · Econ 5.51
90.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay91.520.9%19.1
Middle91.767.4%61.8
Death79.411.6%9.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p80.80.86×
Scout Score90.2
91.5Powerplay20.9% of overs · 5w · 3.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp96.638%
Impactp96.227%
Qualityp81.215%
Versatilityp85.810%
Trajectoryp80.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.466× par54bp98.836.8%
Wicket rate0.56/ov54bp93.842.1%
Boundary %7%54bp98.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.352× par40bp98.830%
Econ vs LHB0.788× par14bp68.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.60/ov40bp91.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.43/ov14bp86.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +43.6 · induced false-shot 35%
91.7Middle67.4% of overs · 12w · 5.97 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp8838%
Impactp99.125%
Qualityp95.315%
Versatilityp92.512%
Trajectoryp80.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.764× par174bp95.344.1%
Wicket rate0.41/ov174bp78.344.1%
Boundary %8%174bp97.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.712× par103bp97.250%
Econ vs LHB0.842× par71bp87.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +76.7 · induced false-shot 38%
79.4Death11.6% of overs · 2w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp87.855%
Impactp64.625%
Versatilityp65.68%
Trajectoryp80.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.602× par30bp96.343.6%
Boundary %7%30bp95.141.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp41.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.517bp65.6100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.2
Prakash Kumar
Bowler · LA pace
73.7
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 97 · Econ 8.82
73.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay73.790.9%67.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p84.20.86×
Scout Score73.7
73.7Powerplay90.9% of overs · 6w · 8.3 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.138%
Impactp83.827%
Qualityp98.815%
Versatilityp58.110%
Trajectoryp84.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.024× par60bp41.236.8%
Wicket rate0.60/ov60bp96.242.1%
Boundary %25%60bp11.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.104× par53bp18.830%
Econ vs LHB0.42× par7bp8530%
Wkt vs RHB0.68/ov53bp98.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp36.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +24.2 · induced false-shot 48%
Jishan Adil
Bowler · Leg-spin
70.2
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 48 · Econ 6.86
70.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle70.271.4%50.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score70.2
70.2Middle71.4% of overs · 2w · 6.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.238%
Impactp68.925%
Qualityp97.215%
Versatilityp62.312%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.871× par30bp72.644.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp62.344.1%
Boundary %13%30bp65.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.216× par16bp3350%
Econ vs LHB0.455× par14bp91.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +12 · induced false-shot 57%
Shrikaran A
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 29
70.1
Scout Score
Overs 15.5 · Wkts 7 · Runs 123 · Econ 7.77
70.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle84.656.8%48.1
Death50.943.2%22.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p85.80.84×
Scout Score70.1
84.6Middle56.8% of overs · 5w · 5.89 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp89.438%
Impactp87.725%
Qualityp70.815%
Versatilityp79.212%
Trajectoryp85.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.754× par54bp91.544.1%
Wicket rate0.56/ov54bp87.744.1%
Boundary %11%54bp87.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.748× par42bp89.650%
Econ vs LHB0.73× par12bp68.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +42.5 · induced false-shot 32%
50.9Death43.2% of overs · 2w · 10.24 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.255%
Impactp52.425%
Versatilityp46.98%
Trajectoryp85.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.028× par41bp35.443.6%
Boundary %20%41bp54.941.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov41bp32.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.824bp46.9100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.9
Avish Gautam
Bowler · Leg-spin
69.4
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 78 · Econ 7.09
69.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay52.818.2%9.6
Middle73.181.8%59.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p69.20.99×
Scout Score69.4
52.8Powerplay18.2% of overs · 1w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.438%
Impactp48.827%
Qualityp53.815%
Versatilityp46.810%
Trajectoryp69.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.048× par12bp43.836.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp68.842.1%
Boundary %25%12bp3521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.988× par9bp38.830%
Econ vs LHB1.226× par3bp31.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.67/ov9bp76.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp52.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.2 · induced false-shot 33%
73.1Middle81.8% of overs · 4w · 6.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp77.638%
Impactp76.425%
Qualityp57.515%
Versatilityp74.512%
Trajectoryp69.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.868× par54bp80.244.1%
Wicket rate0.44/ov54bp76.444.1%
Boundary %13%54bp72.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.923× par30bp68.950%
Econ vs LHB0.797× par24bp80.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +19.3 · induced false-shot 28%
Shobhit Shaudhary
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 21
68.3
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 52 · Econ 7.43
68.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle68.3100%68.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score68.3
68.3Middle100% of overs · 6w · 7.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp7838%
Impactp53.825%
Qualityp89.615%
Versatilityp52.812%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.951× par42bp68.944.1%
Wicket rate0.86/ov42bp99.144.1%
Boundary %19%42bp3311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.827× par38bp80.250%
Econ vs LHB1.992× par4bp25.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.1 · induced false-shot 38%
Sidak Singh
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
68
Scout Score
Overs 39.0 · Wkts 15 · Runs 236 · Econ 6.05
68OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay41.720.5%8.5
Middle73.859%43.5
Death77.520.5%15.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p7.51.23×
Scout Score68
41.7Powerplay20.5% of overs · 2w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.538%
Impactp38.827%
Qualityp61.215%
Versatilityp40.810%
Trajectoryp7.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.987× par48bp51.236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp38.842.1%
Boundary %21%48bp48.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.971× par45bp43.830%
Econ vs LHB1.226× par3bp31.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.26/ov45bp38.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp52.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.6 · induced false-shot 31%
73.8Middle59% of overs · 7w · 5.04 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.838%
Impactp93.425%
Qualityp74.515%
Versatilityp97.212%
Trajectoryp7.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.646× par138bp99.144.1%
Wicket rate0.31/ov138bp34.944.1%
Boundary %7%138bp99.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.617× par74bp99.150%
Econ vs LHB0.685× par64bp95.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +54.6 · induced false-shot 30%
77.5Death20.5% of overs · 6w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp91.855%
Impactp79.325%
Versatilityp78.18%
Trajectoryp7.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.702× par48bp91.543.6%
Boundary %12%48bp91.541.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov48bp93.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7237bp78.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +19.4
Karan Kannan
Bowler · Off-spin · age 24
67.7
Scout Score
Overs 25.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 174 · Econ 6.96
67.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay48.48%3.9
Middle84.872%61.1
Death14.120%2.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p29.21.08×
Scout Score67.7
48.4Powerplay8% of overs · 1w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.338%
Impactp41.227%
Qualityp53.815%
Versatilityp5610%
Trajectoryp29.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.987× par12bp48.836.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp68.842.1%
Boundary %25%12bp3521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.389× par8bp26.230%
Econ vs LHB0.184× par4bp76.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov8bp28.820%
Wkt vs LHB1.50/ov4bp97.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.3 · induced false-shot 33%
84.8Middle72% of overs · 8w · 5.39 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp89.538%
Impactp95.325%
Qualityp85.815%
Versatilityp93.412%
Trajectoryp29.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.69× par108bp97.244.1%
Wicket rate0.44/ov108bp80.244.1%
Boundary %8%108bp95.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.826× par58bp87.750%
Econ vs LHB0.526× par50bp99.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +55.1 · induced false-shot 32%
14.1Death20% of overs · 1w · 12.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp17.155%
Impactp1.225%
Versatilityp10.98%
Trajectoryp29.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.224× par30bp15.943.6%
Boundary %30%30bp15.941.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp24.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.3413bp10.9100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -83.8
Pranay Singh
Bowler · LA pace · age 29
65.8
Scout Score
Overs 39.1 · Wkts 18 · Runs 296 · Econ 7.56
65.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay6651.1%33.7
Middle48.510.2%4.9
Death70.138.7%27.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p22.51.13×
Scout Score65.8
66Powerplay51.1% of overs · 5w · 7.05 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.538%
Impactp98.827%
Qualityp43.815%
Versatilityp52.810%
Trajectoryp22.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.869× par120bp91.236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov120bp33.842.1%
Boundary %16%120bp88.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.863× par109bp86.230%
Econ vs LHB0.936× par11bp53.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.28/ov109bp31.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp22.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +44.8 · induced false-shot 28%
48.5Middle10.2% of overs · 3w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.738%
Impactp38.725%
Qualityp59.415%
Versatilityp41.512%
Trajectoryp22.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.152× par24bp3344.1%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp90.644.1%
Boundary %17%24bp44.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.823× par10bp63.250%
Econ vs LHB1.423× par14bp19.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.4 · induced false-shot 29%
70.1Death38.7% of overs · 10w · 7.85 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp7848%
Impactp86.625%
Versatilityp55.115%
Trajectoryp22.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.787× par91bp8950%
Wicket rate0.66/ov91bp96.316.7%
Boundary %20%91bp52.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate14%91bp71.740%
Slower ball091bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer091bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +31
Ravi Yadav
Bowler · LA pace · age 34
65.6
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 71 · Econ 7.1
65.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay66.470%46.5
Death6320%12.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score65.6
66.4Powerplay70% of overs · 2w · 6.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.338%
Impactp66.227%
Qualityp88.815%
Versatilityp56.810%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.828× par42bp72.536.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp51.242.1%
Boundary %17%42bp71.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.823× par36bp71.230%
Econ vs LHB0.858× par6bp56.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov36bp53.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov6bp38.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.7 · induced false-shot 40%
63Death20% of overs · 2w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.748%
Impactp67.125%
Versatilityp48.115%
Trajectoryp54.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.803× par12bp67.150%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp80.516.7%
Boundary %17%12bp62.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%12bp54.340%
Slower ball012bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer012bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.2
Raghav Goyal
Bowler · Chinaman · age 25
63.6
Scout Score
Overs 43.0 · Wkts 14 · Runs 341 · Econ 7.93
63.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay34.111.6%4.0
Middle7281.4%58.6
Death14.87%1.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p4.21.26×
Scout Score63.6
34.1Powerplay11.6% of overs · 2w · 9.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.438%
Impactp33.827%
Qualityp31.215%
Versatilityp41.810%
Trajectoryp4.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.159× par30bp18.836.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp73.842.1%
Boundary %27%30bp16.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.152× par27bp23.830%
Econ vs LHB1.226× par3bp31.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.44/ov27bp73.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp52.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.6 · induced false-shot 23%
72Middle81.4% of overs · 12w · 7.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.338%
Impactp91.525%
Qualityp72.615%
Versatilityp73.612%
Trajectoryp4.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.918× par210bp89.644.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov210bp59.444.1%
Boundary %13%210bp89.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.89× par137bp93.450%
Econ vs LHB0.961× par73bp53.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +49.5 · induced false-shot 30%
14.8Death7% of overs · 0w · 14.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp12.655%
Impactp13.425%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp4.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.438× par18bp6.143.6%
Boundary %33%18bp18.341.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp15.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -20.9
Pugazhendi Akash
Bowler · Off-spin · age 22
62.2
Scout Score
Overs 19.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 144 · Econ 7.58
62.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay58.710.5%6.2
Middle63.578.9%50.1
Death56.110.5%5.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p82.50.86×
Scout Score62.2
58.7Powerplay10.5% of overs · 1w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.438%
Impactp43.827%
Qualityp53.815%
Versatilityp64.810%
Trajectoryp82.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.678× par12bp61.236.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp68.842.1%
Boundary %17%12bp56.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB—0bp41.230%
Econ vs LHB0.674× par12bp81.230%
Wkt vs RHB—0bp51.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.50/ov12bp88.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.2 · induced false-shot 33%
63.5Middle78.9% of overs · 5w · 7.87 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.238%
Impactp85.825%
Qualityp51.915%
Versatilityp48.112%
Trajectoryp82.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.007× par90bp61.344.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov90bp44.344.1%
Boundary %17%90bp55.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.845× par31bp72.650%
Econ vs LHB1.121× par59bp23.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +35.1 · induced false-shot 27%
56.1Death10.5% of overs · 1w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.155%
Impactp18.325%
Versatilityp65.68%
Trajectoryp82.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.753× par12bp7243.6%
Boundary %17%12bp62.241.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp59.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.777bp65.6100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.5
Gaurav Yadav
Bowler · RA pace · age 34
61.9
Scout Score
Overs 23.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 189 · Econ 8.22
61.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay57.160.9%34.8
Death69.539.1%27.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p75.80.95×
Scout Score61.9
57.1Powerplay60.9% of overs · 5w · 8.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.238%
Impactp36.227%
Qualityp93.815%
Versatilityp46.810%
Trajectoryp75.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.057× par84bp26.236.8%
Wicket rate0.36/ov84bp76.242.1%
Boundary %19%84bp63.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.048× par65bp31.230%
Econ vs LHB1.084× par19bp26.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov65bp68.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.32/ov19bp78.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.4 · induced false-shot 40%
69.5Death39.1% of overs · 2w · 7.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.548%
Impactp62.225%
Versatilityp70.115%
Trajectoryp75.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.769× par54bp84.150%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp8.516.7%
Boundary %15%54bp84.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate15%54bp76.140%
Slower ball054bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer15.74154bp89.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.8
Aditya Singh Chauhan
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
61.8
Scout Score
Overs 17.1 · Wkts 12 · Runs 137 · Econ 7.98
61.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay57.940.8%23.6
Middle68.835%24.1
Death58.124.3%14.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p40.81.01×
Scout Score61.8
57.9Powerplay40.8% of overs · 5w · 6.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.338%
Impactp21.227%
Qualityp58.815%
Versatilityp76.510%
Trajectoryp40.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.828× par42bp72.536.8%
Wicket rate0.71/ov42bp98.842.1%
Boundary %17%42bp71.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.877× par38bp61.230%
Econ vs LHB0.368× par4bp66.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.63/ov38bp93.820%
Wkt vs LHB1.50/ov4bp97.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10 · induced false-shot 31%
68.8Middle35% of overs · 5w · 8.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.338%
Impactp89.625%
Qualityp63.215%
Versatilityp54.212%
Trajectoryp40.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.046× par36bp51.944.1%
Wicket rate0.83/ov36bp97.244.1%
Boundary %19%36bp30.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.089× par33bp46.250%
Econ vs LHB0.266× par3bp62.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +44.7 · induced false-shot 31%
58.1Death24.3% of overs · 2w · 9.84 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.448%
Impactp84.125%
Versatilityp46.415%
Trajectoryp40.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.987× par25bp5050%
Wicket rate0.48/ov25bp64.616.7%
Boundary %20%25bp5033.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%25bp5040%
Slower ball025bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer025bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +29.1
Pradeep Jakar
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 29
61.4
Scout Score
Overs 39.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 281 · Econ 7.21
61.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle60.592.3%55.8
Death78.25.1%4.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p94.20.81×
Scout Score61.4
60.5Middle92.3% of overs · 6w · 6.89 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.138%
Impactp80.225%
Qualityp6.615%
Versatilityp75.512%
Trajectoryp94.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.882× par216bp93.444.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov216bp6.644.1%
Boundary %12%216bp93.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.052× par111bp53.850%
Econ vs LHB0.698× par105bp97.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +21 · induced false-shot 21%
78.2Death5.1% of overs · 1w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.555%
Impactp76.825%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp94.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.552× par12bp79.343.6%
Boundary %0%12bp86.641.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp59.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.9
Pankaj Yadav
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
61.2
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 137 · Econ 7.61
61.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay67.672.2%48.8
Death44.427.8%12.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p87.50.83×
Scout Score61.2
67.6Powerplay72.2% of overs · 3w · 6.69 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.738%
Impactp61.227%
Qualityp78.815%
Versatilityp59.210%
Trajectoryp87.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.825× par78bp96.236.8%
Wicket rate0.23/ov78bp31.242.1%
Boundary %18%78bp76.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.851× par67bp81.230%
Econ vs LHB0.669× par11bp78.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.27/ov67bp33.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp22.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.6 · induced false-shot 33%
44.4Death27.8% of overs · 3w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.548%
Impactp23.225%
Versatilityp48.115%
Trajectoryp87.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.003× par30bp47.650%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp7216.7%
Boundary %27%30bp23.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%30bp23.940%
Slower ball030bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer1530bp84.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16.1
Adil Ayub Tunda
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
61.1
Scout Score
Overs 38.0 · Wkts 15 · Runs 322 · Econ 8.47
61.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay79.250%39.6
Middle66.77.9%5.3
Death38.442.1%16.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p92.50.82×
Scout Score61.1
79.2Powerplay50% of overs · 6w · 7.26 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.338%
Impactp88.827%
Qualityp83.815%
Versatilityp67.210%
Trajectoryp92.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.896× par114bp78.836.8%
Wicket rate0.32/ov114bp57.542.1%
Boundary %18%114bp81.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.913× par99bp63.830%
Econ vs LHB0.785× par15bp73.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.31/ov99bp46.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp83.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +28.8 · induced false-shot 33%
66.7Middle7.9% of overs · 1w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.238%
Impactp6725%
Qualityp81.115%
Versatilityp53.812%
Trajectoryp92.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.896× par18bp65.144.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp55.744.1%
Boundary %17%18bp41.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.604× par7bp21.750%
Econ vs LHB0.435× par11bp85.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.2 · induced false-shot 44%
38.4Death42.1% of overs · 8w · 10.19 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp3548%
Impactp3.725%
Versatilityp64.315%
Trajectoryp92.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.022× par96bp30.550%
Wicket rate0.50/ov96bp67.116.7%
Boundary %23%96bp25.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate12%96bp67.440%
Slower ball096bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer7.81296bp80.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -42.4
Tahir Bhat
Bowler · RA pace
60.9
Scout Score
Overs 35.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 294 · Econ 8.4
60.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay73.251.4%37.6
Middle72.717.1%12.4
Death34.331.4%10.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p74.20.96×
Scout Score60.9
73.2Powerplay51.4% of overs · 5w · 7.39 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.938%
Impactp93.827%
Qualityp96.215%
Versatilityp44.510%
Trajectoryp74.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.911× par108bp68.836.8%
Wicket rate0.28/ov108bp48.842.1%
Boundary %20%108bp52.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.856× par96bp88.830%
Econ vs LHB1.349× par12bp18.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.31/ov96bp48.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov12bp12.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +40 · induced false-shot 41%
72.7Middle17.1% of overs · 2w · 5.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.838%
Impactp63.225%
Qualityp99.115%
Versatilityp67.912%
Trajectoryp74.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.747× par36bp87.744.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp5044.1%
Boundary %11%36bp76.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.551× par19bp85.850%
Econ vs LHB0.984× par17bp5050%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10 · induced false-shot 61%
34.3Death31.4% of overs · 2w · 11.45 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp8.948%
Impactp59.825%
Versatilityp41.215%
Trajectoryp74.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.149× par66bp1150%
Wicket rate0.18/ov66bp3.716.7%
Boundary %27%66bp8.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%66bp3740%
Slower ball066bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer066bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.6
Satish Jangir
Bowler · Off-spin · age 28
60.1
Scout Score
Overs 29.4 · Wkts 10 · Runs 220 · Econ 7.42
60.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay5413.5%7.3
Middle6062.9%37.7
Death63.823.6%15.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p37.51.03×
Scout Score60.1
54Powerplay13.5% of overs · 1w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.538%
Impactp51.227%
Qualityp23.815%
Versatilityp60.810%
Trajectoryp37.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.678× par24bp86.236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp4542.1%
Boundary %4%24bp93.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.741× par12bp58.830%
Econ vs LHB0.613× par12bp91.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.50/ov12bp66.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov12bp12.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.3 · induced false-shot 21%
60Middle62.9% of overs · 6w · 7.39 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp6438%
Impactp8425%
Qualityp23.615%
Versatilityp61.312%
Trajectoryp37.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.947× par112bp78.344.1%
Wicket rate0.32/ov112bp42.544.1%
Boundary %12%112bp91.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.904× par53bp74.550%
Econ vs LHB0.999× par59bp48.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +32.1 · induced false-shot 20%
63.8Death23.6% of overs · 3w · 8.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.855%
Impactp7225%
Versatilityp29.78%
Trajectoryp37.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.86× par42bp74.443.6%
Boundary %17%42bp74.441.8%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp5014.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.8324bp29.7100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7.2
Sandeep Paswan
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 19
59.7
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 137 · Econ 6.85
59.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay60.350%30.1
Middle57.335%20.1
Death63.215%9.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p17.51.15×
Scout Score59.7
60.3Powerplay50% of overs · 3w · 6.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.438%
Impactp78.827%
Qualityp13.815%
Versatilityp61.810%
Trajectoryp17.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.814× par60bp93.836.8%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp53.842.1%
Boundary %13%60bp91.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.831× par49bp78.830%
Econ vs LHB0.736× par11bp71.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov49bp61.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp22.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +22.5 · induced false-shot 20%
57.3Middle35% of overs · 3w · 7.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.338%
Impactp57.525%
Qualityp46.215%
Versatilityp59.412%
Trajectoryp17.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.933× par42bp70.844.1%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp74.544.1%
Boundary %14%42bp61.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.973× par30bp59.450%
Econ vs LHB0.797× par12bp59.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6 · induced false-shot 24%
63.2Death15% of overs · 0w · 6.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.155%
Impactp69.525%
Versatilityp57.88%
Trajectoryp17.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.669× par18bp81.743.6%
Boundary %11%18bp79.341.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp15.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.212bp57.8100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.7
Anugrah Latwal
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
58
Scout Score
Overs 29.2 · Wkts 15 · Runs 247 · Econ 8.42
58OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay76.140.9%31.1
Middle65.413.6%8.9
Death39.545.5%18.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p90.80.82×
Scout Score58
76.1Powerplay40.9% of overs · 4w · 6.92 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.538%
Impactp91.227%
Qualityp73.815%
Versatilityp4910%
Trajectoryp90.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.853× par72bp83.836.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp61.242.1%
Boundary %19%72bp61.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.7× par55bp96.230%
Econ vs LHB1.341× par17bp13.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.44/ov55bp78.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov17bp1.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +30.1 · induced false-shot 33%
65.4Middle13.6% of overs · 1w · 6.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp5938%
Impactp65.125%
Qualityp6615%
Versatilityp64.212%
Trajectoryp90.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.832× par24bp74.544.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp37.744.1%
Boundary %8%24bp80.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.898× par15bp61.350%
Econ vs LHB0.708× par9bp6750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.8 · induced false-shot 33%
39.5Death45.5% of overs · 10w · 10.35 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.248%
Impactp25.625%
Versatilityp32.515%
Trajectoryp90.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.038× par80bp25.650%
Wicket rate0.75/ov80bp98.816.7%
Boundary %25%80bp20.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate1%80bp15.240%
Slower ball080bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer080bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.3
Naman Sharma
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 21
57.5
Scout Score
Overs 37.0 · Wkts 14 · Runs 279 · Econ 7.54
57.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay64.427%17.4
Middle56.164.9%36.4
Death44.98.1%3.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p34.21.04×
Scout Score57.5
64.4Powerplay27% of overs · 4w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.938%
Impactp73.827%
Qualityp36.215%
Versatilityp52.510%
Trajectoryp34.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.863× par60bp76.236.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov60bp81.242.1%
Boundary %15%60bp83.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.757× par46bp93.830%
Econ vs LHB1.209× par14bp21.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.52/ov46bp83.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov14bp6.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +16.6 · induced false-shot 27%
56.1Middle64.9% of overs · 9w · 7.54 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.238%
Impactp72.625%
Qualityp0.915%
Versatilityp51.912%
Trajectoryp34.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.966× par144bp76.444.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov144bp68.944.1%
Boundary %13%144bp85.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.71× par79bp95.350%
Econ vs LHB1.299× par65bp8.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +17.6 · induced false-shot 18%
44.9Death8.1% of overs · 1w · 9.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.155%
Impactp40.225%
Versatilityp46.98%
Trajectoryp34.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.936× par18bp59.843.6%
Boundary %22%18bp42.741.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp35.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.8313bp46.9100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.6
Sagar Trivedi
Bowler · RA pace · age 34
54.9
Scout Score
Overs 37.0 · Wkts 14 · Runs 310 · Econ 8.38
54.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay56.854.1%30.7
Middle53.75.4%2.9
Death52.640.5%21.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p15.81.16×
Scout Score54.9
56.8Powerplay54.1% of overs · 4w · 7.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.838%
Impactp58.827%
Qualityp76.215%
Versatilityp55.810%
Trajectoryp15.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.876× par120bp88.836.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov120bp13.842.1%
Boundary %13%120bp96.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.849× par103bp91.230%
Econ vs LHB1.039× par17bp36.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.17/ov103bp6.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.35/ov17bp81.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.7 · induced false-shot 32%
53.7Middle5.4% of overs · 1w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp68.915%
Versatilityp55.712%
Trajectoryp15.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.896× par12bp59.444.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp65.144.1%
Boundary %17%12bp38.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.216× par8bp39.650%
Econ vs LHB0.199× par4bp71.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.3 · induced false-shot 42%
52.6Death40.5% of overs · 9w · 10.27 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.748%
Impactp93.925%
Versatilityp51.615%
Trajectoryp15.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.03× par90bp2850%
Wicket rate0.60/ov90bp84.116.7%
Boundary %21%90bp37.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate11%90bp6340%
Slower ball090bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer090bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +50.6
Rahul Rajeev
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
54.7
Scout Score
Overs 38.0 · Wkts 14 · Runs 326 · Econ 8.58
54.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay60.747.4%28.8
Middle55.926.3%14.7
Death42.726.3%11.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p9.21.21×
Scout Score54.7
60.7Powerplay47.4% of overs · 6w · 8.22 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.938%
Impactp71.227%
Qualityp91.215%
Versatilityp59.510%
Trajectoryp9.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.014× par108bp46.236.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov108bp63.842.1%
Boundary %20%108bp52.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.19× par84bp6.230%
Econ vs LHB0.398× par24bp98.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.36/ov84bp63.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.25/ov24bp76.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +16.2 · induced false-shot 37%
55.9Middle26.3% of overs · 4w · 8.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp5938%
Impactp55.725%
Qualityp87.715%
Versatilityp45.312%
Trajectoryp9.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.037× par60bp53.844.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov60bp70.844.1%
Boundary %18%60bp34.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.798× par30bp76.450%
Econ vs LHB1.301× par30bp14.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.5 · induced false-shot 35%
42.7Death26.3% of overs · 4w · 9.7 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.948%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp60.315%
Trajectoryp9.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.973× par60bp52.450%
Wicket rate0.40/ov60bp37.816.7%
Boundary %23%60bp2833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate18%60bp84.840%
Slower ball060bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer060bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.8
Sahil Sanjiv Dutta
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 34
54.5
Scout Score
Overs 19.1 · Wkts 9 · Runs 156 · Econ 8.14
54.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle4767.8%31.9
Death70.532.2%22.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p27.51.09×
Scout Score54.5
47Middle67.8% of overs · 5w · 8.69 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.738%
Impactp61.325%
Qualityp40.615%
Versatilityp35.812%
Trajectoryp27.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.113× par78bp29.244.1%
Wicket rate0.38/ov78bp6744.1%
Boundary %17%78bp52.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.112× par37bp44.350%
Econ vs LHB1.127× par41bp27.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.1 · induced false-shot 23%
70.5Death32.2% of overs · 4w · 6.97 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp90.355%
Impactp45.125%
Versatilityp78.18%
Trajectoryp27.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.7× par37bp86.643.6%
Boundary %8%37bp98.841.8%
Wicket rate0.65/ov37bp76.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.627bp78.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.1
Badal Rawat
Bowler · Chinaman · age 17
53.2
Scout Score
Overs 39.0 · Wkts 13 · Runs 276 · Econ 7.08
53.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle4987.2%42.7
Death81.912.8%10.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p39.21.01×
Scout Score53.2
49Middle87.2% of overs · 11w · 7.35 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.438%
Impactp0.925%
Qualityp76.415%
Versatilityp80.212%
Trajectoryp39.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.942× par204bp82.144.1%
Wicket rate0.32/ov204bp40.644.1%
Boundary %15%204bp70.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.982× par138bp70.850%
Econ vs LHB0.833× par66bp89.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -52.4 · induced false-shot 30%
81.9Death12.8% of overs · 2w · 5.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp88.955%
Impactp8925%
Versatilityp758%
Trajectoryp39.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.522× par30bp98.843.6%
Boundary %7%30bp95.141.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp41.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.4512bp75100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +39
Pavan Shankar
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 27
53.1
Scout Score
Overs 30.1 · Wkts 8 · Runs 215 · Econ 7.13
53.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay25.836.5%9.4
Middle69.660.2%41.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p5.81.24×
Scout Score53.1
25.8Powerplay36.5% of overs · 1w · 7.82 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.138%
Impactp28.827%
Qualityp3.815%
Versatilityp38.810%
Trajectoryp5.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.964× par66bp56.236.8%
Wicket rate0.09/ov66bp2.542.1%
Boundary %20%66bp58.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.971× par61bp46.230%
Econ vs LHB0.883× par5bp51.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.10/ov61bp3.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp43.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.4 · induced false-shot 17%
69.6Middle60.2% of overs · 7w · 7.05 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp7938%
Impactp97.225%
Qualityp42.515%
Versatilityp69.812%
Trajectoryp5.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.902× par109bp8444.1%
Wicket rate0.38/ov109bp72.644.1%
Boundary %13%109bp8411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.884× par83bp8450%
Econ vs LHB0.919× par26bp55.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +71.8 · induced false-shot 24%
Bharat Sharma
Bowler · Off-spin · age 30
52
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 114 · Econ 7.6
52OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle42.773.3%31.3
Death86.220%17.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p89.20.83×
Scout Score52
42.7Middle73.3% of overs · 3w · 8.27 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.338%
Impactp46.225%
Qualityp12.315%
Versatilityp45.312%
Trajectoryp89.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.059× par66bp48.144.1%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp31.144.1%
Boundary %18%66bp36.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.211× par34bp25.550%
Econ vs LHB0.896× par32bp65.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.5 · induced false-shot 18%
86.2Death20% of overs · 2w · 4.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp88.355%
Impactp81.725%
Versatilityp81.28%
Trajectoryp89.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.435× par18bp93.943.6%
Boundary %6%18bp8941.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp69.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.279bp81.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +26.7
Haaris Maraica
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 18
50.5
Scout Score
Overs 17.3 · Wkts 9 · Runs 158 · Econ 9.03
50.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay41.940%16.8
Middle50.141.9%21.0
Death70.818.1%12.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p14.21.17×
Scout Score50.5
41.9Powerplay40% of overs · 1w · 7.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.538%
Impactp53.827%
Qualityp28.815%
Versatilityp46.810%
Trajectoryp14.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.898× par42bp58.836.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp18.842.1%
Boundary %17%42bp71.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.903× par41bp56.230%
Econ vs LHB0.736× par1bp48.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.14/ov41bp13.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov1bp62.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5 · induced false-shot 24%
50.1Middle41.9% of overs · 5w · 11.05 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.138%
Impactp70.825%
Qualityp61.315%
Versatilityp38.712%
Trajectoryp14.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.414× par44bp4.744.1%
Wicket rate0.68/ov44bp95.344.1%
Boundary %23%44bp8.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.633× par33bp0.950%
Econ vs LHB0.652× par11bp76.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +13.8 · induced false-shot 30%
70.8Death18.1% of overs · 3w · 8.21 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp7355%
Impactp98.825%
Versatilityp53.18%
Trajectoryp14.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.824× par19bp69.543.6%
Boundary %16%19bp7241.8%
Wicket rate0.95/ov19bp86.614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.0213bp53.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +86
Piyush Sain
Bowler · RA pace
49.8
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 41 · Econ 8.2
49.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay19.440%7.8
Middle70.160%42.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score49.8
19.4Powerplay40% of overs · 0w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp16.538%
Impactp11.227%
Qualityp8.815%
Versatilityp33.910%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.726× par12bp11.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp26.242.1%
Boundary %42%12bp6.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.728× par12bp8.830%
Econ vs LHB—0bp42.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp22.520%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp7020%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.1 · induced false-shot 0%
70.1Middle60% of overs · 2w · 4.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.638%
Impactp74.525%
Qualityp36.815%
Versatilityp69.812%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.555× par18bp85.844.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp8444.1%
Boundary %6%18bp82.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.499× par3bp55.750%
Econ vs LHB0.584× par15bp8450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +18.9 · induced false-shot 17%
Aman Khan
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
49.1
Scout Score
Overs 19.0 · Wkts 11 · Runs 181 · Econ 9.53
49.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle48.152.6%25.3
Death50.247.4%23.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p79.20.89×
Scout Score49.1
48.1Middle52.6% of overs · 6w · 9.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.238%
Impactp6.625%
Qualityp93.415%
Versatilityp42.512%
Trajectoryp79.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.165× par60bp19.844.1%
Wicket rate0.60/ov60bp93.444.1%
Boundary %22%60bp10.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.473× par32bp2.850%
Econ vs LHB0.797× par28bp82.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -32.6 · induced false-shot 37%
50.2Death47.4% of overs · 5w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.148%
Impactp37.825%
Versatilityp2915%
Trajectoryp79.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.003× par54bp42.750%
Wicket rate0.56/ov54bp74.416.7%
Boundary %18%54bp67.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%54bp6.540%
Slower ball054bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer054bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.4
Omar Patni
Bowler · Off-spin · age 28
46.6
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 78 · Econ 8.67
46.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle46.688.9%41.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p24.21.12×
Scout Score46.6
46.6Middle88.9% of overs · 2w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.438%
Impactp59.425%
Qualityp27.415%
Versatilityp50.912%
Trajectoryp24.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.96× par48bp6744.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp27.444.1%
Boundary %12%48bp74.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.973× par10bp5050%
Econ vs LHB0.986× par38bp51.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7 · induced false-shot 19%
Tejveer Kumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
44.8
Scout Score
Overs 18.5 · Wkts 6 · Runs 164 · Econ 8.71
44.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay54.258.4%31.7
Middle45.615.9%7.3
Death22.925.7%5.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p10.81.18×
Scout Score44.8
54.2Powerplay58.4% of overs · 1w · 7.27 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.638%
Impactp76.227%
Qualityp66.215%
Versatilityp60.610%
Trajectoryp10.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.897× par66bp66.236.8%
Wicket rate0.09/ov66bp2.542.1%
Boundary %15%66bp86.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.954× par59bp53.830%
Econ vs LHB0.42× par7bp8530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov59bp1.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.86/ov7bp93.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +20.2 · induced false-shot 32%
45.6Middle15.9% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.638%
Impactp44.325%
Qualityp81.115%
Versatilityp42.512%
Trajectoryp10.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.152× par18bp34.944.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp55.744.1%
Boundary %22%18bp22.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.089× par11bp48.150%
Econ vs LHB1.252× par7bp36.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 44%
22.9Death25.7% of overs · 4w · 11.79 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.948%
Impactp8.525%
Versatilityp37.715%
Trajectoryp10.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.183× par29bp18.350%
Wicket rate0.83/ov29bp91.516.7%
Boundary %31%29bp13.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%29bp28.340%
Slower ball029bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer029bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -26.1
R Nithiyananda
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 21
44.3
Scout Score
Overs 31.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 253 · Econ 8.16
44.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.735.5%21.2
Middle33.941.9%14.2
Death39.522.6%8.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p19.21.15×
Scout Score44.3
59.7Powerplay35.5% of overs · 5w · 7.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.838%
Impactp86.227%
Qualityp6.215%
Versatilityp55.210%
Trajectoryp19.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.908× par66bp63.836.8%
Wicket rate0.46/ov66bp86.242.1%
Boundary %18%66bp66.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.862× par61bp73.830%
Econ vs LHB1.471× par5bp23.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.49/ov61bp86.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp43.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +24.2 · induced false-shot 20%
33.9Middle41.9% of overs · 2w · 8.08 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.538%
Impactp36.825%
Qualityp25.515%
Versatilityp49.112%
Trajectoryp19.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.034× par78bp55.744.1%
Wicket rate0.16/ov78bp8.544.1%
Boundary %17%78bp52.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.811× par60bp91.550%
Econ vs LHB1.771× par18bp6.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2 · induced false-shot 20%
39.5Death22.6% of overs · 1w · 9.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.855%
Impactp30.525%
Versatilityp34.48%
Trajectoryp19.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.96× par42bp54.943.6%
Boundary %19%42bp57.341.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp6.114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.9928bp34.4100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.7
Irfan Ul Haq
Bowler · RA pace · age 30
44.2
Scout Score
Overs 39.0 · Wkts 16 · Runs 354 · Econ 9.08
44.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay38.348.7%18.7
Middle64.620.5%13.2
Death4030.8%12.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p72.50.97×
Scout Score44.2
38.3Powerplay48.7% of overs · 7w · 8.74 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.938%
Impactp6.227%
Qualityp41.215%
Versatilityp61.510%
Trajectoryp72.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.077× par114bp21.236.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov114bp78.842.1%
Boundary %24%114bp18.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.151× par103bp11.230%
Econ vs LHB0.401× par11bp93.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.35/ov103bp58.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.55/ov11bp91.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -28.1 · induced false-shot 28%
64.6Middle20.5% of overs · 4w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp6438%
Impactp78.325%
Qualityp53.815%
Versatilityp44.312%
Trajectoryp72.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.056× par48bp5044.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov48bp82.144.1%
Boundary %17%48bp49.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.748× par25bp78.350%
Econ vs LHB1.42× par23bp10.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +19.7 · induced false-shot 27%
40Death30.8% of overs · 5w · 10.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp3548%
Impactp2825%
Versatilityp49.915%
Trajectoryp72.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.02× par72bp32.950%
Wicket rate0.41/ov72bp45.116.7%
Boundary %22%72bp32.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%72bp58.740%
Slower ball072bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer072bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.4
Dev Narayan Ved
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 26
42.9
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 102 · Econ 8.5
42.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay41.966.7%27.9
Middle44.833.3%14.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p2.51.27×
Scout Score42.9
41.9Powerplay66.7% of overs · 2w · 8.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.138%
Impactp81.227%
Qualityp11.215%
Versatilityp47.510%
Trajectoryp2.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.033× par48bp38.836.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp38.842.1%
Boundary %25%48bp21.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.063× par46bp33.830%
Econ vs LHB0.368× par2bp61.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.26/ov46bp36.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov2bp58.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +22.6 · induced false-shot 19%
44.8Middle33.3% of overs · 3w · 8.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.938%
Impactp1625%
Qualityp6615%
Versatilityp49.512%
Trajectoryp2.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.12× par24bp38.744.1%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp90.644.1%
Boundary %12%24bp6711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.272× par20bp27.450%
Econ vs LHB0.199× par4bp71.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.3 · induced false-shot 33%
Somraj Bishnoi
Bowler · RA pace
42.1
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 59 · Econ 9.83
42.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle42.183.3%35.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score42.1
42.1Middle83.3% of overs · 2w · 8.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.538%
Impactp42.525%
Qualityp1715%
Versatilityp42.512%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.101× par30bp40.644.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp62.344.1%
Boundary %20%30bp26.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.147× par15bp42.550%
Econ vs LHB1.062× par15bp42.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.1 · induced false-shot 13%
Samar Khan
Bowler · LA pace · age 20
42
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 102 · Econ 11.33
42OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay24.344.4%10.8
Middle51.922.2%11.5
Death5933.3%19.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p77.50.91×
Scout Score42
24.3Powerplay44.4% of overs · 0w · 15.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp4.938%
Impactp3.827%
Qualityp71.215%
Versatilityp29.410%
Trajectoryp77.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.942× par24bp1.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp1042.1%
Boundary %50%24bp1.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.944× par24bp1.230%
Econ vs LHB—0bp42.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov24bp11.220%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp7020%
Impact · Quality — WPA -28.6 · induced false-shot 38%
51.9Middle22.2% of overs · 0w · 6.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.138%
Impactp51.925%
Qualityp48.115%
Versatilityp56.612%
Trajectoryp77.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.832× par12bp63.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp20.844.1%
Boundary %8%12bp68.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.748× par8bp6750%
Econ vs LHB0.996× par4bp46.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3 · induced false-shot 25%
59Death33.3% of overs · 3w · 8.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.448%
Impactp57.325%
Versatilityp39.415%
Trajectoryp77.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.87× par18bp64.650%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp8916.7%
Boundary %22%18bp42.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%18bp32.640%
Slower ball018bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer018bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.9
Bhupender Chauhan
Bowler · RA pace · age 31
41.3
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 53 · Econ 8.83
41.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay47.566.7%31.7
Middle28.833.3%9.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score41.3
47.5Powerplay66.7% of overs · 1w · 7.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.238%
Impactp56.227%
Qualityp23.815%
Versatilityp50.110%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.956× par24bp53.836.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp4542.1%
Boundary %21%24bp4521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.957× par24bp48.830%
Econ vs LHB—0bp42.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.25/ov24bp43.820%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp7020%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.2 · induced false-shot 21%
28.8Middle33.3% of overs · 0w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.338%
Impactp3325%
Qualityp20.815%
Versatilityp38.712%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.409× par12bp17.944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp20.844.1%
Boundary %25%12bp18.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.599× par5bp65.150%
Econ vs LHB2.049× par7bp12.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8 · induced false-shot 0%
Vikas Kumar Gupta
Bowler · Off-spin · age 22
40.4
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 80 · Econ 8.89
40.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle31.766.7%21.1
Death66.822.2%14.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score40.4
31.7Middle66.7% of overs · 1w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp31.738%
Impactp19.825%
Qualityp3315%
Versatilityp35.812%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.088× par36bp44.344.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp15.144.1%
Boundary %17%36bp46.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.39× par7bp31.150%
Econ vs LHB1.044× par29bp40.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.2 · induced false-shot 19%
66.8Death22.2% of overs · 0w · 6.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.755%
Impactp74.425%
Versatilityp42.28%
Trajectoryp54.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.652× par12bp76.843.6%
Boundary %8%12bp76.841.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp2814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.6512bp42.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.4
Jasoliya Senilkumar
Bowler · LA pace · age 26
39.7
Scout Score
Overs 26.4 · Wkts 6 · Runs 245 · Econ 9.19
39.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay44.671.2%31.8
Middle227.5%1.6
Death29.521.2%6.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p12.51.17×
Scout Score39.7
44.6Powerplay71.2% of overs · 6w · 8.32 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.238%
Impactp68.827%
Qualityp16.215%
Versatilityp4810%
Trajectoryp12.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.025× par114bp36.236.8%
Wicket rate0.32/ov114bp57.542.1%
Boundary %21%114bp41.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.134× par98bp13.830%
Econ vs LHB0.368× par16bp96.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov98bp71.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov16bp3.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +13.5 · induced false-shot 23%
22Middle7.5% of overs · 0w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp16.838%
Impactp31.125%
Qualityp20.815%
Versatilityp29.212%
Trajectoryp12.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.537× par12bp12.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp20.844.1%
Boundary %25%12bp18.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.59× par8bp19.850%
Econ vs LHB1.394× par4bp38.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.1 · induced false-shot 0%
29.5Death21.2% of overs · 0w · 11.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.648%
Impactp20.725%
Versatilityp63.815%
Trajectoryp12.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.116× par34bp23.250%
Wicket rate0.00/ov34bp1.216.7%
Boundary %21%34bp47.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate26%34bp93.540%
Slower ball034bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer034bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.8
Kevin Raj A
Bowler · Off-spin · age 20
39.7
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 68 · Econ 8.5
39.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle39.7100%39.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p97.50.79×
Scout Score39.7
39.7Middle100% of overs · 0w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.238%
Impactp48.125%
Qualityp14.215%
Versatilityp49.112%
Trajectoryp97.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.088× par48bp42.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov48bp3.844.1%
Boundary %17%48bp49.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.524× par27bp4.750%
Econ vs LHB0.493× par21bp93.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.2 · induced false-shot 17%
Achal Singla
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
37.7
Scout Score
Overs 23.1 · Wkts 8 · Runs 251 · Econ 10.83
37.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay29.412.9%3.8
Middle31.525.9%8.2
Death42.161.2%25.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p35.81.04×
Scout Score37.7
29.4Powerplay12.9% of overs · 0w · 9.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp23.838%
Impactp31.227%
Qualityp33.815%
Versatilityp32.510%
Trajectoryp35.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.192× par18bp23.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp16.242.1%
Boundary %22%18bp38.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.912× par13bp51.230%
Econ vs LHB1.913× par5bp16.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov13bp17.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp43.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.2 · induced false-shot 22%
31.5Middle25.9% of overs · 2w · 10.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.538%
Impactp12.325%
Qualityp78.315%
Versatilityp22.612%
Trajectoryp35.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.323× par36bp8.544.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp5044.1%
Boundary %22%36bp14.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.247× par18bp29.250%
Econ vs LHB1.417× par18bp1650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.9 · induced false-shot 36%
42.1Death61.2% of overs · 6w · 11.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp15.948%
Impactp91.525%
Versatilityp48.715%
Trajectoryp35.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.133× par85bp8.550%
Wicket rate0.43/ov85bp47.616.7%
Boundary %26%85bp1133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%85bp19.640%
Slower ball085bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer3085bp93.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +42.1
Ankit Sharma
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 35
37.7
Scout Score
Overs 22.2 · Wkts 6 · Runs 196 · Econ 8.78
37.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay24.462.7%15.3
Middle63.732.1%20.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p99.20.56×
Scout Score37.7
24.4Powerplay62.7% of overs · 2w · 8.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.738%
Impactp13.827%
Qualityp1.215%
Versatilityp31.510%
Trajectoryp99.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.031× par84bp31.236.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov84bp6.242.1%
Boundary %24%84bp26.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.867× par76bp76.230%
Econ vs LHB2.575× par8bp1.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.16/ov76bp8.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp32.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.1 · induced false-shot 17%
63.7Middle32.1% of overs · 4w · 9.21 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.238%
Impactp82.125%
Qualityp55.715%
Versatilityp35.812%
Trajectoryp99.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.179× par43bp21.744.1%
Wicket rate0.56/ov43bp85.844.1%
Boundary %16%43bp57.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.297× par30bp14.250%
Econ vs LHB0.858× par13bp57.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +23 · induced false-shot 28%
Krishna Pandey
Bowler · RA pace · age 31
37.5
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 136 · Econ 8.5
37.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle35.587.5%31.1
Death51.912.5%6.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p30.81.06×
Scout Score37.5
35.5Middle87.5% of overs · 4w · 8.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp4238%
Impactp23.625%
Qualityp34.915%
Versatilityp44.312%
Trajectoryp30.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.07× par84bp46.244.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov84bp3344.1%
Boundary %16%84bp59.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.026× par62bp57.550%
Econ vs LHB1.159× par22bp31.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.9 · induced false-shot 23%
51.9Death12.5% of overs · 2w · 9.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.848%
Impactp54.925%
Versatilityp2915%
Trajectoryp30.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.953× par12bp57.350%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp80.516.7%
Boundary %17%12bp62.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp6.540%
Slower ball012bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer012bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.7
Saurabh Yadav
Bowler · RA pace · age 33
37.2
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 45 · Econ 9
37.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.280%29.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score37.2
37.2Powerplay80% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp16.638%
Impactp46.227%
Qualityp63.815%
Versatilityp33.510%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.11× par24bp28.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp1042.1%
Boundary %29%24bp8.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.31× par13bp21.230%
Econ vs LHB0.869× par11bp63.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov13bp17.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp22.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.5 · induced false-shot 33%
Parth Vaghani
Bowler · LA pace · age 31
36.6
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 122 · Econ 11.09
36.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay38.745.5%17.6
Middle29.327.3%8.0
Death40.227.3%11.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score36.6
38.7Powerplay45.5% of overs · 3w · 11.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.238%
Impactp23.827%
Qualityp38.815%
Versatilityp3510%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.406× par30bp6.236.8%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp88.842.1%
Boundary %23%30bp31.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.169× par19bp28.830%
Econ vs LHB1.806× par11bp8.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.95/ov19bp96.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp22.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.9 · induced false-shot 27%
29.3Middle27.3% of overs · 0w · 9.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp2438%
Impactp34.925%
Qualityp10.415%
Versatilityp37.312%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.195× par18bp31.144.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp12.344.1%
Boundary %17%18bp41.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.216× par8bp39.650%
Econ vs LHB1.195× par10bp34.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.5 · induced false-shot 6%
40.2Death27.3% of overs · 0w · 12.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.248%
Impactp35.425%
Versatilityp78.715%
Trajectoryp54.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.237× par18bp20.750%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp15.916.7%
Boundary %22%18bp42.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate22%18bp89.140%
Slower ball13.88918bp97.833.3%
Slow bouncer018bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.8
Arun Sarwan
Bowler · Off-spin · age 20
35.9
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 75 · Econ 10.71
35.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay24.328.6%6.9
Middle39.742.9%17.0
Death4228.6%12.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score35.9
24.3Powerplay28.6% of overs · 0w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp1938%
Impactp18.827%
Qualityp18.815%
Versatilityp37.210%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.418× par12bp13.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp26.242.1%
Boundary %33%12bp13.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0× par4bp68.830%
Econ vs LHB2.115× par8bp6.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov4bp41.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp32.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.8 · induced false-shot 8%
39.7Middle42.9% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.638%
Impactp40.625%
Qualityp29.215%
Versatilityp45.312%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.28× par18bp23.644.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp55.744.1%
Boundary %22%18bp22.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.769× par11bp12.350%
Econ vs LHB0.455× par7bp78.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.2 · induced false-shot 11%
42Death28.6% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp4055%
Impactp47.625%
Versatilityp20.38%
Trajectoryp54.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.104× par12bp37.843.6%
Boundary %25%12bp35.441.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp59.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage16bp20.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Vignesh K
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 32
34.7
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 73 · Econ 10.43
34.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle34.785.7%29.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score34.7
34.7Middle85.7% of overs · 2w · 9.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.838%
Impactp14.225%
Qualityp44.315%
Versatilityp42.512%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.174× par36bp25.544.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp5044.1%
Boundary %19%36bp30.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.528× par17bp82.150%
Econ vs LHB1.803× par19bp2.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.4 · induced false-shot 22%
Arun Chaprana
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
34.1
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 100 · Econ 11.11
34.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay42.844.4%19.0
Middle3922.2%8.7
Death19.133.3%6.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score34.1
42.8Powerplay44.4% of overs · 2w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.238%
Impactp26.227%
Qualityp23.815%
Versatilityp5010%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.048× par24bp33.836.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp83.842.1%
Boundary %21%24bp4521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.811× par21bp66.230%
Econ vs LHB2.697× par3bp11.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.57/ov21bp81.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp52.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.8 · induced false-shot 21%
39Middle22.2% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp2238%
Impactp27.425%
Qualityp91.515%
Versatilityp39.212%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.28× par12bp27.444.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp20.844.1%
Boundary %33%12bp6.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.58× par9bp1650%
Econ vs LHB0.266× par3bp62.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.9 · induced false-shot 58%
19.1Death33.3% of overs · 0w · 15.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp6.548%
Impactp1125%
Versatilityp44.615%
Trajectoryp54.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.539× par18bp3.750%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp15.916.7%
Boundary %39%18bp6.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%18bp6.540%
Slower ball018bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer58.33318bp97.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -25.5
Vijai Raja
Bowler · LA pace · age 27
32.8
Scout Score
Overs 25.1 · Wkts 6 · Runs 269 · Econ 10.69
32.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay33.831.8%10.7
Middle29.631.8%9.4
Death34.636.4%12.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p95.80.81×
Scout Score32.8
33.8Powerplay31.8% of overs · 2w · 10.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp18.538%
Impactp16.227%
Qualityp68.815%
Versatilityp2510%
Trajectoryp95.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.31× par48bp3.836.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp38.842.1%
Boundary %29%48bp3.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.079× par35bp36.230%
Econ vs LHB1.924× par13bp3.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov35bp56.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov13bp8.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.5 · induced false-shot 33%
29.6Middle31.8% of overs · 0w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp8.138%
Impactp4.725%
Qualityp8415%
Versatilityp26.412%
Trajectoryp95.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.248× par48bp10.444.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov48bp3.844.1%
Boundary %21%48bp1611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.161× par29bp34.950%
Econ vs LHB1.384× par19bp17.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -35.4 · induced false-shot 35%
34.6Death36.4% of overs · 4w · 11.56 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp17.148%
Impactp32.925%
Versatilityp44.615%
Trajectoryp95.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.16× par55bp13.450%
Wicket rate0.44/ov55bp54.916.7%
Boundary %29%55bp3.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%55bp45.740%
Slower ball055bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer055bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.8
Shiva Subash N
Bowler · RA pace · age 19
31.2
Scout Score
Overs 25.2 · Wkts 7 · Runs 259 · Econ 10.22
31.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle22.882.9%18.9
Death71.817.1%12.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p70.80.99×
Scout Score31.2
22.8Middle82.9% of overs · 6w · 10.48 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp14.338%
Impactp8.525%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp5.712%
Trajectoryp70.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.341× par126bp2.844.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov126bp29.244.1%
Boundary %24%126bp0.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.313× par53bp10.450%
Econ vs LHB1.386× par73bp0.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -32.4 · induced false-shot 26%
71.8Death17.1% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.448%
Impactp96.325%
Versatilityp58.615%
Trajectoryp70.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.903× par26bp62.250%
Wicket rate0.23/ov26bp30.516.7%
Boundary %12%26bp81.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate15%26bp80.440%
Slower ball026bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer026bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +78.2
Shishir Hr
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 23
30.4
Scout Score
Overs 6.2 · Wkts 1 · Runs 64 · Econ 10.11
30.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle30.494.7%28.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score30.4
30.4Middle94.7% of overs · 1w · 8.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.338%
Impactp29.225%
Qualityp8.515%
Versatilityp40.612%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.11× par36bp36.844.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp15.144.1%
Boundary %14%36bp63.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.02× par22bp51.950%
Econ vs LHB1.252× par14bp29.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.9 · induced false-shot 14%
Ayush M
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 21
27.3
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 48 · Econ 12
27.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle27.3100%27.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score27.3
27.3Middle100% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.138%
Impactp25.525%
Qualityp31.115%
Versatilityp26.412%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.537× par24bp6.644.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp37.744.1%
Boundary %29%24bp4.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.497× par24bp8.550%
Econ vs LHB—0bp44.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.5 · induced false-shot 17%
Srujan Sankappa Sinhasan
Bowler · RA pace · age 18
26.3
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 177 · Econ 11.8
26.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay34.266.7%22.8
Death10.533.3%3.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p0.81.29×
Scout Score26.3
34.2Powerplay66.7% of overs · 5w · 9.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.538%
Impactp8.827%
Qualityp48.815%
Versatilityp52.810%
Trajectoryp0.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.122× par60bp16.236.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov60bp91.242.1%
Boundary %23%60bp28.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.142× par59bp16.230%
Econ vs LHB0× par1bp58.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.51/ov59bp88.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov1bp62.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -20.8 · induced false-shot 30%
10.5Death33.3% of overs · 1w · 17.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp5.148%
Impactp6.125%
Versatilityp42.915%
Trajectoryp0.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.726× par30bp1.250%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp24.416.7%
Boundary %43%30bp1.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%30bp41.340%
Slower ball030bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer030bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -29.1
Gopal Thivagar
Bowler · RA pace · age 31
26.2
Scout Score
Overs 12.3 · Wkts 3 · Runs 133 · Econ 10.64
26.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay60.916%9.7
Middle18.572%13.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p32.51.04×
Scout Score26.2
60.9Powerplay16% of overs · 0w · 4 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.638%
Impactp63.827%
Qualityp86.215%
Versatilityp56.410%
Trajectoryp32.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.493× par12bp81.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp26.242.1%
Boundary %8%12bp78.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.494× par12bp83.830%
Econ vs LHB—0bp42.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp22.520%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp7020%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.2 · induced false-shot 50%
18.5Middle72% of overs · 3w · 11.89 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.138%
Impactp2.825%
Qualityp38.715%
Versatilityp5.712%
Trajectoryp32.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.522× par54bp0.944.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp46.244.1%
Boundary %26%54bp2.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.427× par32bp6.650%
Econ vs LHB1.666× par22bp4.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -40.8 · induced false-shot 22%
Neyan Kangayan
Bowler · Off-spin · age 23
25.9
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 48 · Econ 9.6
25.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle25.9100%25.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p67.50.99×
Scout Score25.9
25.9Middle100% of overs · 1w · 9.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.438%
Impactp21.725%
Qualityp1715%
Versatilityp25.512%
Trajectoryp67.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.229× par30bp1644.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp25.544.1%
Boundary %20%30bp26.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.746× par6bp17.950%
Econ vs LHB1.129× par24bp3350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.9 · induced false-shot 13%
Satvik Deswal
Bowler · Chinaman · age 19
25.8
Scout Score
Overs 29.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 250 · Econ 8.62
25.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle24.686.2%21.2
Death35.710.3%3.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p20.81.14×
Scout Score25.8
24.6Middle86.2% of overs · 3w · 8.08 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp3538%
Impactp10.425%
Qualityp4.715%
Versatilityp49.112%
Trajectoryp20.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.035× par150bp57.544.1%
Wicket rate0.12/ov150bp0.944.1%
Boundary %14%150bp78.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.163× par74bp23.650%
Econ vs LHB0.912× par76bp74.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -31.9 · induced false-shot 20%
35.7Death10.3% of overs · 0w · 10.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.155%
Impactp15.925%
Versatilityp14.18%
Trajectoryp20.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.037× par18bp45.143.6%
Boundary %17%18bp69.541.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp15.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.037bp14.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.3
Nitin Pranav V
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
24
Scout Score
Overs 13.2 · Wkts 3 · Runs 135 · Econ 10.12
24OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay20.182.5%16.6
Death42.317.5%7.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p25.81.1×
Scout Score24
20.1Powerplay82.5% of overs · 2w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp17.238%
Impactp1.227%
Qualityp46.215%
Versatilityp37.510%
Trajectoryp25.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.233× par66bp8.836.8%
Wicket rate0.18/ov66bp21.242.1%
Boundary %24%66bp23.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.36× par55bp3.830%
Econ vs LHB0.602× par11bp88.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.22/ov55bp26.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp22.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -28.9 · induced false-shot 29%
42.3Death17.5% of overs · 1w · 10.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp3948%
Impactp42.725%
Versatilityp65.515%
Trajectoryp25.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.075× par14bp40.250%
Wicket rate0.43/ov14bp52.416.7%
Boundary %29%14bp30.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate29%14bp97.840%
Slower ball014bp47.833.3%
Slow bouncer014bp39.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.2
T Prathapraj
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
18.5
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 41 · Econ 10.25
18.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle18.5100%18.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.21×
Scout Score18.5
18.5Middle100% of overs · 0w · 10.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=53
Componentpctweight
Productionp12.338%
Impactp17.925%
Qualityp2.815%
Versatilityp29.212%
Trajectoryp54.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.312× par24bp14.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp10.444.1%
Boundary %25%24bp12.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.185× par12bp36.850%
Econ vs LHB1.461× par12bp21.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.1 · induced false-shot 4%