| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LHB | 23 | 5 | 174 | 100 | 174 | 34.8 | 20 | 9 | 77.5 Scout Score 77.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production95.540% Impact5027% Versatility93.615% Shot quality59.16% Trajectory68.212% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.01×[87, 32, 6] | 95.5 Production 95.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.28× parp95.535% True Avg1.64× parp95.530% Balls / boundary2.88p95.517.5% Balls / dismissal24.5p95.517.5% | 59.1 Shot Quality 59.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.6% Control · Build85.7% Phase-weighted control80.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 93.6 Versatility 93.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp95.526.7% vs Spin SRp95.526.7% Accel into Consp86.420% Pressure entryp95.526.7% | |
| 2 | RHB | 21 | 6 | 127 | 85 | 149.4 | 31.8 | 14 | 5 | 68.2 Scout Score 68.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production75.740% Impact5027% Versatility59.115% Shot quality86.46% Trajectory86.412% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[62, 0, 0] | 75.7 Production 75.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.1× parp86.435% True Avg0.8× parp77.330% Balls / boundary3.23p86.417.5% Balls / dismissal14p40.917.5% | 86.4 Shot Quality 86.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build94.7% Phase-weighted control86.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 59.1 Versatility 59.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp86.426.7% vs Spin SRp5026.7% Accel into Consp59.120% Pressure entryp40.926.7% | |
| 3 | LHB | — | 5 | 124 | 90 | 137.8 | 41.3 | 7 | 6 | 64.6 Scout Score 64.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production75.240% Impact5027% Versatility54.815% Shot quality22.76% Trajectory95.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[26, 17, 45] | 75.2 Production 75.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.04× parp68.235% True Avg1.36× parp86.430% Balls / boundary5p59.117.5% Balls / dismissal25p86.417.5% | 22.7 Shot Quality 22.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation65.2% Control · Build81.5% Phase-weighted control71.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 54.8 Versatility 54.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp4.526.7% vs Spin SRp86.426.7% Accel into Consp5020% Pressure entryp77.326.7% | |
| 4 | RHB | 20 | 5 | 242 | 172 | 140.7 | 48.4 | 20 | 12 | 56 Scout Score 56 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production69.240% Impact5027% Versatility42.715% Shot quality77.36% Trajectory31.812% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.87×[34, 56, 19] | 69.2 Production 69.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp77.335% True Avgn/ap63.630% Balls / boundary4.21p77.317.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap54.517.5% | 77.3 Shot Quality 77.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.6% Control · Build80.4% Phase-weighted control85.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 42.7 Versatility 42.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp40.926.7% vs Spin SRp68.226.7% Accel into Consp13.620% Pressure entryp40.926.7% | |
| 5 | RHB | 31 | 4 | 106 | 77 | 137.7 | 26.5 | 7 | 7 | 55.1 Scout Score 55.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production41.240% Impact5027% Versatility67.615% Shot quality95.56% Trajectory77.312% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[30, 61, 10] | 41.2 Production 41.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.71× parp22.735% True Avg0.66× parp5030% Balls / boundary6p36.417.5% Balls / dismissal18p68.217.5% | 95.5 Shot Quality 95.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation90.6% Control · Build88% Phase-weighted control89.9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 67.6 Versatility 67.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp31.826.7% vs Spin SRp77.326.7% Accel into Consp77.320% Pressure entryp86.426.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | — | 4 | 117 | 85 | 137.6 | 29.2 | 6 | 8 | 50.7 Scout Score 50.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production50.140% Impact5027% Versatility54.215% Shot quality506% Trajectory5012% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.93×[8, 32, 33] | 50.1 Production 50.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.88× parp5035% True Avgn/ap63.630% Balls / boundary6.43p22.717.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap54.517.5% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.8% Control · Build14.3% Phase-weighted control78.1% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5026.7% vs Spin SRp40.926.7% Accel into Consp95.520% Pressure entryp40.926.7% | |
| 7 | LHB | 32 | 5 | 80 | 63 | 127 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 38.2 Scout Score 38.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production34.840% Impact5027% Versatility33.615% Shot quality68.26% Trajectory13.612% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.83×[2, 7, 11] | 34.8 Production 34.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.96× parp59.135% True Avg0.44× parp4.530% Balls / boundary3.89p68.217.5% Balls / dismissal8.75p4.517.5% | 68.2 Shot Quality 68.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.6% Control · Build86.7% Phase-weighted control85.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 33.6 Versatility 33.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp59.126.7% vs Spin SRp22.726.7% Accel into Consp4.520% Pressure entryp40.926.7% | |
| 8 | RHB | 25 | 5 | 75 | 64 | 117.2 | 18.8 | 5 | 5 | 37.1 Scout Score 37.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production31.540% Impact5027% Versatility39.115% Shot quality4.56% Trajectory40.912% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.9×[13, 35, 10] | 31.5 Production 31.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.82× parp40.935% True Avg0.38× parp22.730% Balls / boundary6p36.417.5% Balls / dismissal9p22.717.5% | 4.5 Shot Quality 4.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation46.2% Control · Build59.3% Phase-weighted control52.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 39.1 Versatility 39.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp77.326.7% vs Spin SRp4.526.7% Accel into Consp31.820% Pressure entryp40.926.7% | |
| 9 | LHB | 26 | 6 | 104 | 70 | 148.6 | 26 | 6 | 7 | 36.2 Scout Score 36.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production28.640% Impact5027% Versatility58.515% Shot quality31.86% Trajectory4.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.61×[14, 13, 2] | 28.6 Production 28.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.82× parp31.835% True Avg0.58× parp31.830% Balls / boundary6.83p13.617.5% Balls / dismissal13.67p31.817.5% | 31.8 Shot Quality 31.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build73.3% Phase-weighted control74.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 58.5 Versatility 58.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp68.226.7% vs Spin SRp59.126.7% Accel into Consp68.220% Pressure entryp40.926.7% | |
| 10 | RHB | 32 | 3 | 37 | 45 | 82.2 | 12.3 | 2 | 1 | 34.6 Scout Score 34.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production28.240% Impact5027% Versatility1315% Shot quality13.66% Trajectory59.112% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[3, 27, 7] | 28.2 Production 28.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.47× parp4.535% True Avg0.49× parp40.930% Balls / boundary20p4.517.5% Balls / dismissal20p77.317.5% | 13.6 Shot Quality 13.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation69.2% Control · Build58.3% Phase-weighted control65.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 13 Versatility 13 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp13.626.7% vs Spin SRp13.626.7% Accel into Consp22.720% Pressure entryp4.526.7% | |
| 11 | LHB | 40 | 5 | 68 | 55 | 123.6 | 13.6 | 6 | 3 | 31.7 Scout Score 31.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production2040% Impact5027% Versatility33.615% Shot quality40.96% Trajectory22.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.87×[24, 6, 0] | 20 Production 20 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.67× parp13.635% True Avg0.3× parp13.630% Balls / boundary5.67p5017.5% Balls / dismissal8.5p13.617.5% | 40.9 Shot Quality 40.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81% Control · Build58.8% Phase-weighted control74.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 33.6 Versatility 33.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp22.726.7% vs Spin SRp31.826.7% Accel into Consp40.920% Pressure entryp40.926.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 35 | 5 | 163 | 93 | 175.3 | 40.8 | 21 | 6 | 76.4 Scout Score 76.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production82.228% Impact5027% Versatility86.927% Shot quality91.28% Trajectory91.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[48, 72, 20] | 82.2 Production 82.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.31× parp91.242.9% True Avg1.29× parp58.832.1% Balls / boundary4p97.125% | 91.2 Shot Quality 91.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation90% Control · Build78.1% Phase-weighted control84.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 86.9 Versatility 86.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep9544.4% vs LA-orthodox35bp95 vs Leg-spin8b8b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp8329.6% Off-spin19bp77.3 LA-orthodox48bp85.3 Leg-spin8b8b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p91.214.8% Reach deathp58.811.1% | |
| 2 | LHB | 23 | 5 | 173 | 95 | 182.1 | 57.7 | 7 | 16 | 71.8 Scout Score 71.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production91.828% Impact5027% Versatility76.927% Shot quality85.38% Trajectory5010% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.98×[49, 46, 5] | 91.8 Production 91.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.61× parp97.142.9% True Avg2.64× parp85.332.1% Balls / boundary3.75p91.225% | 85.3 Shot Quality 85.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation92.9% Control · Build78.3% Phase-weighted control81.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 76.9 Versatility 76.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep67.544.4% vs Off-spin20bp90 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball12bp30 Spin hittingp96.129.6% Off-spin25bp95.5 LA-orthodox15bp97.1 Leg-spin6b6b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p55.914.8% Reach deathp91.211.1% | |
| 3 | LHB | 24 | 6 | 181 | 118 | 153.4 | 30.2 | 10 | 12 | 69.3 Scout Score 69.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production87.228% Impact5027% Versatility6827% Shot quality55.98% Trajectory85.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.04×[55, 68, 12] | 87.2 Production 87.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.21× parp85.342.9% True Avg3.24× parp91.232.1% Balls / boundary5.44p85.325% | 55.9 Shot Quality 55.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72.5% Control · Build79.3% Phase-weighted control76.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 68 Versatility 68 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7044.4% vs Off-spin24bp70 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball11bp70 Spin hittingp63.729.6% Off-spin30bp59.1 LA-orthodox35bp67.6 Leg-spin7b7b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p61.814.8% Reach deathp79.411.1% | |
| 4 | RHB | 26 | 6 | 110 | 80 | 137.5 | 27.5 | 7 | 7 | 61.9 Scout Score 61.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production60.928% Impact5027% Versatility65.227% Shot quality508% Trajectory97.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.14×[18, 7, 0] | 60.9 Production 60.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.21× parp79.442.9% True Avg0.84× parp26.532.1% Balls / boundary5.1p73.525% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86.7% Control · Build72.2% Phase-weighted control76.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 65.2 Versatility 65.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep86.644.4% vs LA-orthodox22bp85 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball10bp90 Spin hittingp29.429.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox32bp29.4 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p97.114.8% Reach deathp32.411.1% | |
| 5 | RHB | 28 | 5 | 161 | 75 | 214.7 | 32.2 | 23 | 7 | 57.2 Scout Score 57.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production64.728% Impact5027% Versatility58.827% Shot quality73.58% Trajectory38.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[6, 31, 34] | 64.7 Production 64.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.17× parp67.642.9% True Avg1.21× parp67.632.1% Balls / boundary6.33p55.925% | 73.5 Shot Quality 73.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build42.9% Phase-weighted control78.9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 58.8 Versatility 58.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox5b5b <min vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp91.229.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox29bp91.2 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p20.614.8% Reach deathp58.811.1% | |
| 6 | RHB | 29 | 5 | 177 | 113 | 156.6 | 44.2 | 13 | 10 | 55.3 Scout Score 55.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production82.628% Impact5027% Versatility5227% Shot quality2.98% Trajectory44.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[34, 25, 69] | 82.6 Production 82.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.16× parp73.542.9% True Avg5.1× parp97.132.1% Balls / boundary5.79p79.425% | 2.9 Shot Quality 2.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation58.8% Control · Build76.6% Phase-weighted control69.1% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 52 Versatility 52 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep50.144.4% vs LA-orthodox39bp55 vs Leg-spin15bp37.5 vs Short ball9b9b <min Spin hittingp62.329.6% Off-spin10bp50 LA-orthodox56bp73.5 Leg-spin19bp35.7 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p73.514.8% Reach deathp2.911.1% | |
| 7 | RHB | 38 | 5 | 128 | 87 | 147.1 | 32 | 12 | 6 | 49.8 Scout Score 49.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production6728% Impact5027% Versatility61.327% Shot quality8.88% Trajectory2.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.63×[16, 1, 10] | 67 Production 67 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.04× parp61.842.9% True Avgn/ap73.532.1% Balls / boundary6p67.625% | 8.8 Shot Quality 8.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build72.2% Phase-weighted control69.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 61.3 Versatility 61.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7544.4% vs LA-orthodox18bp75 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball8b8b <min Spin hittingp61.829.6% Off-spin7b7b <min LA-orthodox43bp61.8 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p5014.8% Reach deathp20.611.1% | |
| 8 | RHB | 21 | 6 | 154 | 93 | 165.6 | 30.8 | 8 | 11 | 48 Scout Score 48 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production49.228% Impact5027% Versatility62.227% Shot quality38.28% Trajectory8.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.67×[11, 6, 12] | 49.2 Production 49.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.03× parp5042.9% True Avg0.98× parp38.232.1% Balls / boundary7p61.825% | 38.2 Shot Quality 38.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation55.6% Control · Build78.7% Phase-weighted control75.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 62.2 Versatility 62.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep6244.4% vs LA-orthodox28bp65 vs Leg-spin17bp87.5 vs Short ball10bp10 Spin hittingp64.529.6% Off-spin9b9b <min LA-orthodox32bp44.1 Leg-spin23bp92.9 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p32.414.8% Reach deathp97.111.1% | |
| 9 | RHB | 29 | 6 | 212 | 177 | 119.8 | 70.7 | 14 | 5 | 45.3 Scout Score 45.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production31.528% Impact5027% Versatility2727% Shot quality97.18% Trajectory79.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.02×[32, 62, 61] | 31.5 Production 31.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp8.842.9% True Avg2.47× parp79.432.1% Balls / boundary15.57p8.825% | 97.1 Shot Quality 97.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build92.6% Phase-weighted control86.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 27 Versatility 27 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep26.944.4% vs LA-orthodox63bp15 vs Leg-spin21bp62.5 vs Short ball6b6b <min Spin hittingp32.129.6% Off-spin23bp68.2 LA-orthodox90bp14.7 Leg-spin23bp64.3 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p8.814.8% Reach deathp38.211.1% | |
| 10 | LHB | 18 | 6 | 204 | 143 | 142.7 | 34 | 15 | 8 | 43.6 Scout Score 43.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production31.428% Impact5027% Versatility38.227% Shot quality67.68% Trajectory55.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[53, 45, 40] | 31.4 Production 31.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp20.642.9% True Avg1.29× parp58.832.1% Balls / boundary11.56p14.725% | 67.6 Shot Quality 67.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80.4% Control · Build75.5% Phase-weighted control77.9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 38.2 Versatility 38.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep20.844.4% vs Off-spin27bp10 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball10bp50 Spin hittingp43.529.6% Off-spin35bp22.7 LA-orthodox53bp50 Leg-spin11bp78.6 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p44.114.8% Reach deathp85.311.1% | |
| 11 | RHB | 34 | 7 | 107 | 86 | 124.4 | 15.3 | 14 | 2 | 41.8 Scout Score 41.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production42.628% Impact5027% Versatility45.227% Shot quality26.58% Trajectory20.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.9×[9, 5, 33] | 42.6 Production 42.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.95× parp44.142.9% True Avg0.8× parp44.132.1% Balls / boundary7.75p38.225% | 26.5 Shot Quality 26.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build68.4% Phase-weighted control74.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 45.2 Versatility 45.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep3544.4% vs LA-orthodox24bp35 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp38.229.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox37bp38.2 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p79.414.8% Reach deathp58.811.1% | |
| 12 | RHB | — | 5 | 93 | 73 | 127.4 | 18.6 | 1 | 8 | 41.2 Scout Score 41.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production46.828% Impact5027% Versatility37.627% Shot quality14.78% Trajectory32.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.93×[3, 0, 49] | 46.8 Production 46.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.03× parp55.942.9% True Avg0.89× parp32.432.1% Balls / boundary7.88p5025% | 14.7 Shot Quality 14.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control71.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 37.6 Versatility 37.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep4544.4% vs LA-orthodox34bp45 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp46.429.6% Off-spin17bp86.4 LA-orthodox40bp29.4 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p14.714.8% Reach deathp14.711.1% | |
| 13 | LHB | 24 | 3 | 47 | 43 | 109.3 | 15.7 | 3 | 2 | 40.9 Scout Score 40.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production3428% Impact5027% Versatility33.927% Shot quality20.68% Trajectory70.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[24, 7, 16] | 34 Production 34 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.94× parp38.242.9% True Avg0.66× parp20.632.1% Balls / boundary7.8p44.125% | 20.6 Shot Quality 20.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.5% Control · Build68.2% Phase-weighted control71.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 33.9 Versatility 33.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep3044.4% vs Off-spin19bp30 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp34.229.6% Off-spin22bp13.6 LA-orthodox10bp79.4 Leg-spin6b6b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p26.514.8% Reach deathp58.811.1% | |
| 14 | RHB | 22 | 3 | 56 | 56 | 100 | 18.7 | 3 | 3 | 39.2 Scout Score 39.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production27.528% Impact5027% Versatility16.927% Shot quality79.48% Trajectory70.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[20, 35, 1] | 27.5 Production 27.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.77× parp14.742.9% True Avg0.89× parp5032.1% Balls / boundary10.5p20.625% | 79.4 Shot Quality 79.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.8% Control · Build80.6% Phase-weighted control81% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 16.9 Versatility 16.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep544.4% vs LA-orthodox21bp5 vs Leg-spin7b7b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp3.429.6% Off-spin10bp4.5 LA-orthodox24bp2.9 Leg-spin7b7b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p85.314.8% Reach deathp8.811.1% | |
| 15 | LHB | 24 | 5 | 101 | 83 | 121.7 | 20.2 | 10 | 2 | 38.8 Scout Score 38.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production22.728% Impact5027% Versatility47.127% Shot quality44.18% Trajectory26.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.91×[14, 18, 28] | 22.7 Production 22.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.92× parp26.542.9% True Avg0.79× parp14.732.1% Balls / boundary9p26.525% | 44.1 Shot Quality 44.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86.2% Control · Build67.6% Phase-weighted control76.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 47.1 Versatility 47.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin19bp50 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp42.929.6% Off-spin24bp40.9 LA-orthodox27bp55.9 Leg-spin14bp21.4 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p38.214.8% Reach deathp58.811.1% | |
| 16 | RHB | 31 | 5 | 111 | 88 | 126.1 | 22.2 | 8 | 3 | 34.7 Scout Score 34.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production24.828% Impact5027% Versatility2927% Shot quality61.88% Trajectory14.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.79×[1, 26, 9] | 24.8 Production 24.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.94× parp32.442.9% True Avg0.75× parp8.832.1% Balls / boundary8.29p32.425% | 61.8 Shot Quality 61.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.9% Control · Build78.9% Phase-weighted control77.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 29 Versatility 29 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep2044.4% vs LA-orthodox24bp25 vs Leg-spin16bp12.5 vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp2429.6% Off-spin11bp31.8 LA-orthodox40bp8.8 Leg-spin20bp50 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p67.614.8% Reach deathp26.511.1% | |
| 17 | LHB | 32 | 4 | 46 | 59 | 78 | 11.5 | 3 | 0 | 32.1 Scout Score 32.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production2.928% Impact5027% Versatility33.527% Shot quality32.48% Trajectory61.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[14, 9, 12] | 2.9 Production 2.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.62× parp2.942.9% True Avg0.5× parp2.932.1% Balls / boundary19.67p2.925% | 32.4 Shot Quality 32.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.1% Control · Build70.4% Phase-weighted control74.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin8b8b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball7b7b <min Spin hittingp14.529.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox22bp20.6 Leg-spin18bp7.1 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2.914.8% Reach deathp58.811.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LHB | 31 | 7 | 126 | 67 | 188.1 | 31.5 | 2 | 13 | 65.5 Scout Score 65.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production89.440% Impact5025% Versatility66.818% Shot quality14.64% Trajectory35.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.91×[20, 0, 9] | 89.4 Production 89.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.33× parp93.832.5% Balls / boundary4.2p97.920% Balls / six4.67p97.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 14.6 Shot Quality 14.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build64% Phase-weighted control64% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 66.8 Versatility 66.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p97.916.7% Reach buildp89.622.2% | |
| 2 | RHB | 26 | 5 | 55 | 40 | 137.5 | 18.3 | 1 | 5 | 62.4 Scout Score 62.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production80.640% Impact5025% Versatility32.118% Shot quality6.24% Trajectory89.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.12×[3, 7, 44] | 80.6 Production 80.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.3× parp81.232.5% Balls / boundary4.17p81.220% Balls / six5p93.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 6.2 Shot Quality 6.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build53.3% Phase-weighted control53.3% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 32.1 Versatility 32.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p6.216.7% Reach buildp2.122.2% | |
| 3 | RHB | 23 | 5 | 152 | 84 | 181 | 50.7 | 22 | 4 | 59.7 Scout Score 59.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production71.740% Impact5025% Versatility61.518% Shot quality97.94% Trajectory27.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.89×[15, 6, 29] | 71.7 Production 71.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.89× parp97.932.5% Balls / boundary2p77.120% Balls / six10p52.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 97.9 Shot Quality 97.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation92.9% Control · Build90% Phase-weighted control91.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 61.5 Versatility 61.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p60.416.7% Reach buildp93.822.2% | |
| 4 | RHB | 39 | 6 | 65 | 40 | 162.5 | 21.7 | 1 | 6 | 59.1 Scout Score 59.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.540% Impact5025% Versatility58.218% Shot quality85.44% Trajectory43.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.98×[0, 20, 7] | 67.5 Production 67.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.13× parp64.632.5% Balls / boundary5.4p56.220% Balls / six6.75p85.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 85.4 Shot Quality 85.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build84.6% Phase-weighted control84.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 58.2 Versatility 58.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p85.416.7% Reach buildp60.422.2% | |
| 5 | LHB | 29 | 5 | 47 | 52 | 90.4 | 9.4 | 4 | 1 | 57.2 Scout Score 57.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production50.440% Impact5025% Versatility56.118% Shot quality43.84% Trajectory97.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.48×[2, 12, 6] | 50.4 Production 50.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.01× parp39.632.5% Balls / boundary4.5p52.120% Balls / six9p60.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 43.8 Shot Quality 43.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build76% Phase-weighted control76.9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 56.1 Versatility 56.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p89.616.7% Reach buildp47.922.2% | |
| 6 | LHB | 33 | 4 | 101 | 64 | 157.8 | 33.7 | 3 | 9 | 55.1 Scout Score 55.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production42.240% Impact5025% Versatility64.518% Shot quality89.64% Trajectory81.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[25, 45, 15] | 42.2 Production 42.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.96× parp22.932.5% Balls / boundary6.33p31.220% Balls / six9.5p64.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 89.6 Shot Quality 89.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build87.8% Phase-weighted control86.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 64.5 Versatility 64.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p72.916.7% Reach buildp97.922.2% | |
| 7 | RHB | 32 | 4 | 22 | 26 | 84.6 | 7.3 | 1 | 1 | 54.9 Scout Score 54.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production55.540% Impact5025% Versatility45.518% Shot quality22.94% Trajectory85.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[2, 6, 6] | 55.5 Production 55.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR3.9× parp72.932.5% Balls / boundary1p43.820% Balls / six1p47.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 22.9 Shot Quality 22.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build68.2% Phase-weighted control68% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 45.5 Versatility 45.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p81.216.7% Reach buildp6.222.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | 26 | 4 | 87 | 68 | 127.9 | 21.8 | 7 | 4 | 54.8 Scout Score 54.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.840% Impact5025% Versatility52.918% Shot quality81.24% Trajectory18.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.8×[13, 9, 28] | 67.8 Production 67.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.19× parp68.832.5% Balls / boundary4.25p64.620% Balls / six5.67p77.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 81.2 Shot Quality 81.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.2% Control · Build78.1% Phase-weighted control81.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 52.9 Versatility 52.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p47.916.7% Reach buildp64.622.2% | |
| 9 | RHB | 32 | 5 | 59 | 32 | 184.4 | 14.8 | 4 | 3 | 54.6 Scout Score 54.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production7640% Impact5025% Versatility53.118% Shot quality33.34% Trajectory6.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.69×[15, 2, 2] | 76 Production 76 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.41× parp89.632.5% Balls / boundary4p85.420% Balls / six8p68.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 33.3 Shot Quality 33.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control75% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 53.1 Versatility 53.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p77.116.7% Reach buildp43.822.2% | |
| 10 | LHB | 30 | 5 | 80 | 63 | 127 | 20 | 3 | 5 | 52.6 Scout Score 52.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production80.440% Impact5025% Versatility36.718% Shot quality27.14% Trajectory2.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.59×[6, 0, 18] | 80.4 Production 80.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.28× parp77.132.5% Balls / boundary3.86p93.820% Balls / six5.4p89.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 27.1 Shot Quality 27.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation85.7% Control · Build65% Phase-weighted control73.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 36.7 Versatility 36.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p22.916.7% Reach buildp10.422.2% | |
| 11 | RHB | 28 | 6 | 87 | 61 | 142.6 | 21.8 | 4 | 5 | 52.6 Scout Score 52.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production62.740% Impact5025% Versatility55.918% Shot quality77.14% Trajectory14.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.79×[14, 8, 12] | 62.7 Production 62.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.11× parp43.832.5% Balls / boundary5p72.920% Balls / six8p81.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 77.1 Shot Quality 77.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build81% Phase-weighted control81% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 55.9 Versatility 55.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p7561.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball10bp75 vs Spin (death)p18.816.7% Reach buildp31.222.2% | |
| 12 | RHB | 35 | 5 | 63 | 56 | 112.5 | 21 | 2 | 3 | 51.6 Scout Score 51.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production49.640% Impact5025% Versatility41.118% Shot quality60.44% Trajectory72.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.06×[22, 11, 23] | 49.6 Production 49.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.05× parp27.132.5% Balls / boundary5.75p47.920% Balls / six7.67p72.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 60.4 Shot Quality 60.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build78.8% Phase-weighted control78.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 41.1 Versatility 41.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p43.816.7% Reach buildp14.622.2% | |
| 13 | RHB | 27 | 6 | 121 | 71 | 170.4 | 60.5 | 8 | 5 | 50 Scout Score 50 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production64.740% Impact5025% Versatility33.718% Shot quality64.64% Trajectory22.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.82×[37, 13, 6] | 64.7 Production 64.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.26× parp85.432.5% Balls / boundary4.7p89.620% Balls / six11.75p35.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 64.6 Shot Quality 64.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build79.2% Phase-weighted control79.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 33.7 Versatility 33.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p2561.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball11bp25 vs Spin (death)p35.416.7% Reach buildp56.222.2% | |
| 14 | RHB | — | 5 | 37 | 40 | 92.5 | 9.2 | 3 | 2 | 48.3 Scout Score 48.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production40.140% Impact5025% Versatility44.618% Shot quality68.84% Trajectory68.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.04×[13, 6, 6] | 40.1 Production 40.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0× parp35.432.5% Balls / boundary2p37.520% Balls / six2p41.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 68.8 Shot Quality 68.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Build82.6% Phase-weighted control80% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 44.6 Versatility 44.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p31.216.7% Reach buildp39.622.2% | |
| 15 | RHB | 24 | 2 | 36 | 26 | 138.5 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 48.1 Scout Score 48.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.240% Impact5025% Versatility56.818% Shot quality72.94% Trajectory52.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[19, 17] | 39.2 Production 39.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap56.232.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap22.920% Balls / sixn/ap27.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 72.9 Shot Quality 72.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build80.8% Phase-weighted control80.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 56.8 Versatility 56.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p60.416.7% Reach buildp72.922.2% | |
| 16 | LHB | 22 | 4 | 64 | 68 | 94.1 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 46.9 Scout Score 46.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.240% Impact5025% Versatility45.718% Shot quality52.14% Trajectory64.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.01×[25, 36, 3] | 39.2 Production 39.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap56.232.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap22.920% Balls / sixn/ap27.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 52.1 Shot Quality 52.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.8% Control · Build50% Phase-weighted control77.1% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 45.7 Versatility 45.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p60.416.7% Reach buildp22.922.2% | |
| 17 | RHB | 31 | 4 | 75 | 46 | 163 | 75 | 5 | 4 | 45.5 Scout Score 45.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production33.440% Impact5025% Versatility53.118% Shot quality56.24% Trajectory60.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.01×[36, 2, 33] | 33.4 Production 33.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.07× parp31.232.5% Balls / boundary4.67p68.820% Balls / six28p6.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 56.2 Shot Quality 56.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build77.8% Phase-weighted control77.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 53.1 Versatility 53.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p27.116.7% Reach buildp81.222.2% | |
| 18 | RHB | 19 | 4 | 67 | 58 | 115.5 | 16.8 | 5 | 3 | 44.6 Scout Score 44.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.240% Impact5025% Versatility52.218% Shot quality47.94% Trajectory39.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.96×[1, 9, 43] | 39.2 Production 39.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap56.232.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap22.920% Balls / sixn/ap27.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 47.9 Shot Quality 47.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.2% Control · Build72.4% Phase-weighted control77.1% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 52.2 Versatility 52.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p60.416.7% Reach buildp52.122.2% | |
| 19 | RHB | — | 5 | 52 | 45 | 115.6 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 43.3 Scout Score 43.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production44.140% Impact5025% Versatility48.518% Shot quality10.44% Trajectory31.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.89×[2, 29, 1] | 44.1 Production 44.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.65× parp47.932.5% Balls / boundary2p37.520% Balls / six2p41.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 10.4 Shot Quality 10.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72% Control · Build37.5% Phase-weighted control63.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 48.5 Versatility 48.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p60.416.7% Reach buildp35.422.2% | |
| 20 | RHB | — | 3 | 38 | 33 | 115.2 | 38 | 1 | 2 | 43.3 Scout Score 43.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production34.840% Impact5025% Versatility52.218% Shot quality18.84% Trajectory52.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[4, 13, 21] | 34.8 Production 34.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.9× parp18.832.5% Balls / boundary7p14.620% Balls / six10.5p56.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 18.8 Shot Quality 18.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 52.2 Versatility 52.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker4b4b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p93.816.7% Reach buildp27.122.2% | |
| 21 | LHB | 37 | 5 | 28 | 28 | 100 | 9.3 | 4 | 0 | 41.3 Scout Score 41.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production2540% Impact5025% Versatility36.518% Shot quality2.14% Trajectory93.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.28×[0, 5, 18] | 25 Production 25 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.81× parp14.632.5% Balls / boundary5p60.420% Balls / six40p2.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 2.1 Shot Quality 2.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build37.5% Phase-weighted control37.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 36.5 Versatility 36.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p10.416.7% Reach buildp18.822.2% | |
| 22 | RHB | 27 | 6 | 99 | 95 | 104.2 | 24.8 | 5 | 4 | 37.2 Scout Score 37.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production1240% Impact5025% Versatility46.218% Shot quality39.64% Trajectory77.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.06×[36, 18, 28] | 12 Production 12 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.57× parp2.132.5% Balls / boundary25p2.120% Balls / six25p10.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 39.6 Shot Quality 39.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build75.9% Phase-weighted control75.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 46.2 Versatility 46.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p2.116.7% Reach buildp68.822.2% | |
| 23 | RHB | — | 2 | 32 | 27 | 118.5 | 32 | 2 | 2 | 36.9 Scout Score 36.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production16.440% Impact5025% Versatility54.318% Shot quality33.34% Trajectory52.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[28, 4] | 16.4 Production 16.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.52× parp6.232.5% Balls / boundary15p10.420% Balls / six30p14.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 33.3 Shot Quality 33.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control75% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 54.3 Versatility 54.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball6b6b <min vs Spin (death)p39.616.7% Reach buildp77.122.2% | |
| 24 | RHB | 30 | 5 | 28 | 21 | 133.3 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 34.2 Scout Score 34.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production18.240% Impact5025% Versatility5218% Shot quality93.84% Trajectory10.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.7×[11, 1, 2] | 18.2 Production 18.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.39× parp10.432.5% Balls / boundary20p6.220% Balls / six20p18.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 93.8 Shot Quality 93.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build90.9% Phase-weighted control90.9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 52 Versatility 52 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p14.616.7% Reach buildp85.422.2% |
Ayaz Ahmed
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 23
77.5
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 174 · Balls 100 · SR 174 · Avg 34.8 · 4s 20 · 6s 9
77.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production95.540%38.2
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility93.615%14.0
Shot quality59.16%3.5
Trajectory68.212%8.2
Scout Score77.5
95.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR191.81.28×49bp95.535%
True Avg471.64×2wp95.530%
Balls / boundary2.9—49bp95.517.5%
Balls / dismissal24.5—2wp95.517.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
93.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR186.5 SR1.21×37bp95.526.7%
vs Spin SR166.7 SR1.31×63bp95.526.7%
Accel into Cons150 SR—28bp86.420%
Pressure entry169 SR1.13×29bp95.526.7%
59.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.6%
Control · Build85.7%
Phase-weighted control80.5% → p59.1
68.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.01×
Recent scores[87, 32, 6]
Innings5
Suryakumar Yadav
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 35
76.4
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 163 · Balls 93 · SR 175.3 · Avg 40.8 · 4s 21 · 6s 6
76.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production82.228%23.0
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility86.927%23.5
Shot quality91.28%7.3
Trajectory91.210%9.1
Scout Score76.4
82.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR165.31.31×72bp91.242.9%
True Avg29.81.29×4wp58.832.1%
Balls / boundary4—72bp97.125%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
86.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p9544.4%
vs LA-orthodox160 SR35bp95
vs Leg-spin150 SR8b8b <min
vs Short ball133 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p8329.6%
Off-spin147 SR19bp77.3
LA-orthodox181 SR48bp85.3
Leg-spin150 SR8b8b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)230 SR1.64×10bp91.214.8%
Reach death——0bp58.811.1%
91.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation90%
Control · Build78.1%
Phase-weighted control84.7% → p91.2
91.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[48, 72, 20]
Innings5
Jay Jain
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 23
71.8
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 173 · Balls 95 · SR 182.1 · Avg 57.7 · 4s 7 · 6s 16
71.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production91.828%25.7
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility76.927%20.8
Shot quality85.38%6.8
Trajectory5010%5.0
Scout Score71.8
91.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR203.31.61×60bp97.142.9%
True Avg612.64×2wp85.332.1%
Balls / boundary3.8—60bp91.225%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
76.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p67.544.4%
vs Off-spin230 SR20bp90
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball108 SR12bp30
Spin hitting———p96.129.6%
Off-spin224 SR25bp95.5
LA-orthodox233 SR15bp97.1
Leg-spin167 SR6b6b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)162.5 SR1.16×24bp55.914.8%
Reach death209.1 SR1.36×22bp91.211.1%
85.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation92.9%
Control · Build78.3%
Phase-weighted control81.7% → p85.3
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.98×
Recent scores[49, 46, 5]
Innings5
Ajit Yadav
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 24
69.3
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 181 · Balls 118 · SR 153.4 · Avg 30.2 · 4s 10 · 6s 12
69.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production87.228%24.4
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility6827%18.4
Shot quality55.98%4.5
Trajectory85.310%8.5
Scout Score69.3
87.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR153.11.21×98bp85.342.9%
True Avg753.24×2wp91.232.1%
Balls / boundary5.4—98bp85.325%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
68VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7044.4%
vs Off-spin104 SR24bp70
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball155 SR11bp70
Spin hitting———p63.729.6%
Off-spin123 SR30bp59.1
LA-orthodox160 SR35bp67.6
Leg-spin229 SR7b7b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)161.3 SR1.15×31bp61.814.8%
Reach death163.2 SR1.06×19bp79.411.1%
55.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72.5%
Control · Build79.3%
Phase-weighted control76.5% → p55.9
85.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.04×
Recent scores[55, 68, 12]
Innings6
Musheer Khan
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 21
68.2
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 127 · Balls 85 · SR 149.4 · Avg 31.8 · 4s 14 · 6s 5
68.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production75.740%30.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility59.115%8.9
Shot quality86.46%5.2
Trajectory86.412%10.4
Scout Score68.2
75.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR164.31.1×42bp86.435%
True Avg230.8×3wp77.330%
Balls / boundary3.2—42bp86.417.5%
Balls / dismissal14—3wp40.917.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
59.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR176.7 SR1.14×30bp86.426.7%
vs Spin SR134.5 SR1.05×55bp5026.7%
Accel into Cons133.3 SR—24bp59.120%
Pressure entry——0bp40.926.7%
86.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build94.7%
Phase-weighted control86.6% → p86.4
86.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[62, 0, 0]
Innings6
Tushar Deshpande
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 31
65.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 126 · Balls 67 · SR 188.1 · Avg 31.5 · 4s 2 · 6s 13
65.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production89.440%35.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility66.818%12.0
Shot quality14.64%0.6
Trajectory35.413%4.6
Scout Score65.5
89.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR204.81.33×42bp93.832.5%
Balls / boundary4.2—42bp97.920%
Balls / six4.7—42bp97.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
66.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball200 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)241.7 SR1.62×12bp97.916.7%
Reach build160 SR1.22×25bp89.622.2%
14.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build64%
Phase-weighted control64% → p14.6
35.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.91×
Recent scores[20, 0, 9]
Innings7
Gautam Waghela
Top order · pos 3 · LHB
64.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 124 · Balls 90 · SR 137.8 · Avg 41.3 · 4s 7 · 6s 6
64.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production75.240%30.1
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility54.815%8.2
Shot quality22.76%1.4
Trajectory95.512%11.5
Scout Score64.6
75.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1561.04×25bp68.235%
True Avg391.36×1wp86.430%
Balls / boundary5—25bp59.117.5%
Balls / dismissal25—1wp86.417.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
54.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR85.2 SR0.55×27bp4.526.7%
vs Spin SR160.3 SR1.26×63bp86.426.7%
Accel into Cons130.4 SR—23bp5020%
Pressure entry141 SR0.94×39bp77.326.7%
22.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation65.2%
Control · Build81.5%
Phase-weighted control71.2% → p22.7
95.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[26, 17, 45]
Innings5
Sagar Chabria
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 26
62.4
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 55 · Balls 40 · SR 137.5 · Avg 18.3 · 4s 1 · 6s 5
62.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production80.640%32.2
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility32.118%5.8
Shot quality6.24%0.2
Trajectory89.613%11.6
Scout Score62.4
80.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2001.3×25bp81.232.5%
Balls / boundary4.2—25bp81.220%
Balls / six5—25bp93.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
32.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball200 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)57.1 SR0.38×7bp6.216.7%
Reach build33.3 SR0.25×15bp2.122.2%
6.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build53.3%
Phase-weighted control53.3% → p6.2
89.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.12×
Recent scores[3, 7, 44]
Innings5
Saksham Parashar
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 26
61.9
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 110 · Balls 80 · SR 137.5 · Avg 27.5 · 4s 7 · 6s 7
61.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production60.928%17.1
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility65.227%17.6
Shot quality508%4.0
Trajectory97.110%9.7
Scout Score61.9
60.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR152.91.21×51bp79.442.9%
True Avg19.50.84×4wp26.532.1%
Balls / boundary5.1—51bp73.525%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
65.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p86.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox141 SR22bp85
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball240 SR10bp90
Spin hitting———p29.429.6%
Off-spin67 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox112 SR32bp29.4
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)222.2 SR1.58×18bp97.114.8%
Reach death152.6 SR0.99×19bp32.411.1%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86.7%
Control · Build72.2%
Phase-weighted control76.5% → p50
97.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.14×
Recent scores[18, 7, 0]
Innings6
Shashwat Jagtap
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 23
59.7
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 152 · Balls 84 · SR 181 · Avg 50.7 · 4s 22 · 6s 4
59.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production71.740%28.7
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility61.518%11.1
Shot quality97.94%3.9
Trajectory27.113%3.5
Scout Score59.7
71.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2901.89×10bp97.932.5%
Balls / boundary2—10bp77.120%
Balls / six10—10bp52.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
61.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball233 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp60.416.7%
Reach build185 SR1.41×20bp93.822.2%
97.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation92.9%
Control · Build90%
Phase-weighted control91.2% → p97.9
27.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.89×
Recent scores[15, 6, 29]
Innings5
Rohan Raje
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 39
59.1
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 65 · Balls 40 · SR 162.5 · Avg 21.7 · 4s 1 · 6s 6
59.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.540%27.0
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility58.218%10.5
Shot quality85.44%3.4
Trajectory43.813%5.7
Scout Score59.1
67.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR174.11.13×27bp64.632.5%
Balls / boundary5.4—27bp56.220%
Balls / six6.8—27bp85.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
58.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball180 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)222.2 SR1.49×9bp85.416.7%
Reach build138.5 SR1.06×13bp60.422.2%
85.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build84.6%
Phase-weighted control84.6% → p85.4
43.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.98×
Recent scores[0, 20, 7]
Innings6
Sarfaraz Khan
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 28
57.2
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 161 · Balls 75 · SR 214.7 · Avg 32.2 · 4s 23 · 6s 7
57.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production64.728%18.1
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility58.827%15.9
Shot quality73.58%5.9
Trajectory38.210%3.8
Scout Score57.2
64.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR147.41.17×19bp67.642.9%
True Avg281.21×1wp67.632.1%
Balls / boundary6.3—19bp55.925%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
58.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox100 SR5b5b <min
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p91.229.6%
Off-spin250 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox221 SR29bp91.2
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)100 SR0.71×8bp20.614.8%
Reach death——0bp58.811.1%
73.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build42.9%
Phase-weighted control78.9% → p73.5
38.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[6, 31, 34]
Innings5
Shams Mulani
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 29
57.2
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 47 · Balls 52 · SR 90.4 · Avg 9.4 · 4s 4 · 6s 1
57.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production50.440%20.2
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility56.118%10.1
Shot quality43.84%1.8
Trajectory97.913%12.7
Scout Score57.2
50.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR155.61.01×9bp39.632.5%
Balls / boundary4.5—9bp52.120%
Balls / six9—9bp60.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
56.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)300 SR2.01×4bp89.616.7%
Reach build108 SR0.82×25bp47.922.2%
43.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build76%
Phase-weighted control76.9% → p43.8
97.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.48×
Recent scores[2, 12, 6]
Innings5
Nutan Goel
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 20
56
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 242 · Balls 172 · SR 140.7 · Avg 48.4 · 4s 20 · 6s 12
56OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production69.240%27.7
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility42.715%6.4
Shot quality77.36%4.6
Trajectory31.812%3.8
Scout Score56
69.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR147.50.99×59bp77.335%
True Avg——0wp63.630%
Balls / boundary4.2—59bp77.317.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp54.517.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
42.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR147.1 SR0.95×70bp40.926.7%
vs Spin SR136.3 SR1.07×102bp68.226.7%
Accel into Cons97.7 SR—44bp13.620%
Pressure entry——0bp40.926.7%
77.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.6%
Control · Build80.4%
Phase-weighted control85.6% → p77.3
31.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.87×
Recent scores[34, 56, 19]
Innings5
Sairaj Patil
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 29
55.3
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 177 · Balls 113 · SR 156.6 · Avg 44.2 · 4s 13 · 6s 10
55.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production82.628%23.1
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility5227%14.0
Shot quality2.98%0.2
Trajectory44.110%4.4
Scout Score55.3
82.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR145.71.16×81bp73.542.9%
True Avg1185.1×1wp97.132.1%
Balls / boundary5.8—81bp79.425%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
52VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p50.144.4%
vs LA-orthodox115 SR39bp55
vs Leg-spin120 SR15bp37.5
vs Short ball189 SR9b9b <min
Spin hitting———p62.329.6%
Off-spin120 SR10bp50
LA-orthodox170 SR56bp73.5
Leg-spin100 SR19bp35.7
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)184.6 SR1.32×13bp73.514.8%
Reach death66.7 SR0.43×6bp2.911.1%
2.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation58.8%
Control · Build76.6%
Phase-weighted control69.1% → p2.9
44.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[34, 25, 69]
Innings5
Shreyas Iyer
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 31
55.1
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 106 · Balls 77 · SR 137.7 · Avg 26.5 · 4s 7 · 6s 7
55.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production41.240%16.5
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility67.615%10.1
Shot quality95.56%5.7
Trajectory77.312%9.3
Scout Score55.1
41.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR105.60.71×18bp22.735%
True Avg190.66×1wp5030%
Balls / boundary6—18bp36.417.5%
Balls / dismissal18—1wp68.217.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
67.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR128.6 SR0.83×14bp31.826.7%
vs Spin SR139.7 SR1.1×63bp77.326.7%
Accel into Cons134.4 SR—32bp77.320%
Pressure entry154.3 SR1.03×46bp86.426.7%
95.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation90.6%
Control · Build88%
Phase-weighted control89.9% → p95.5
77.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[30, 61, 10]
Innings4
Shivam Dube
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 33
55.1
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 101 · Balls 64 · SR 157.8 · Avg 33.7 · 4s 3 · 6s 9
55.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production42.240%16.9
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility64.518%11.6
Shot quality89.64%3.6
Trajectory81.213%10.6
Scout Score55.1
42.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR147.40.96×19bp22.932.5%
Balls / boundary6.3—19bp31.220%
Balls / six9.5—19bp64.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
64.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)200 SR1.34×5bp72.916.7%
Reach build170.7 SR1.3×41bp97.922.2%
89.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build87.8%
Phase-weighted control86.7% → p89.6
81.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[25, 45, 15]
Innings4
Akash Parkar
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 32
54.9
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 22 · Balls 26 · SR 84.6 · Avg 7.3 · 4s 1 · 6s 1
54.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production55.540%22.2
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility45.518%8.2
Shot quality22.94%0.9
Trajectory85.413%11.1
Scout Score54.9
55.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR6003.9×1bp72.932.5%
Balls / boundary1—1bp43.820%
Balls / six1—1bp47.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
45.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)600 SR4.02×1bp81.216.7%
Reach build59.1 SR0.45×22bp6.222.2%
22.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build68.2%
Phase-weighted control68% → p22.9
85.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[2, 6, 6]
Innings4
Siddhant Singh
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 26
54.8
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 87 · Balls 68 · SR 127.9 · Avg 21.8 · 4s 7 · 6s 4
54.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.840%27.1
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility52.918%9.5
Shot quality81.24%3.2
Trajectory18.813%2.4
Scout Score54.8
67.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR182.41.19×17bp68.832.5%
Balls / boundary4.2—17bp64.620%
Balls / six5.7—17bp77.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
52.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball143 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.67×1bp47.916.7%
Reach build125 SR0.95×32bp64.622.2%
81.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.2%
Control · Build78.1%
Phase-weighted control81.6% → p81.2
18.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.8×
Recent scores[13, 9, 28]
Innings4
Vaibhav Mali
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 32
54.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 59 · Balls 32 · SR 184.4 · Avg 14.8 · 4s 4 · 6s 3
54.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production7640%30.4
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility53.118%9.6
Shot quality33.34%1.3
Trajectory6.213%0.8
Scout Score54.6
76ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR216.71.41×24bp89.632.5%
Balls / boundary4—24bp85.420%
Balls / six8—24bp68.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
53.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker200 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball350 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)200 SR1.34×9bp77.116.7%
Reach build87.5 SR0.67×8bp43.822.2%
33.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control75% → p33.3
6.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.69×
Recent scores[15, 2, 2]
Innings5
Dhrumil Matkar
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 30
52.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 80 · Balls 63 · SR 127 · Avg 20 · 4s 3 · 6s 5
52.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production80.440%32.2
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility36.718%6.6
Shot quality27.14%1.1
Trajectory2.113%0.3
Scout Score52.6
80.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR196.31.28×27bp77.132.5%
Balls / boundary3.9—27bp93.820%
Balls / six5.4—27bp89.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
36.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball400 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.67×5bp22.916.7%
Reach build60 SR0.46×20bp10.422.2%
27.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation85.7%
Control · Build65%
Phase-weighted control73.5% → p27.1
2.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.59×
Recent scores[6, 0, 18]
Innings5
Sourabh Singh
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 28
52.6
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 87 · Balls 61 · SR 142.6 · Avg 21.8 · 4s 4 · 6s 5
52.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production62.740%25.1
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility55.918%10.1
Shot quality77.14%3.1
Trajectory14.613%1.9
Scout Score52.6
62.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1701.11×40bp43.832.5%
Balls / boundary5—40bp72.920%
Balls / six8—40bp81.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
55.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p7561.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball180 SR10bp75
vs Spin (death)109.1 SR0.73×11bp18.816.7%
Reach build90.5 SR0.69×21bp31.222.2%
77.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build81%
Phase-weighted control81% → p77.1
14.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.79×
Recent scores[14, 8, 12]
Innings6
Gaurav Jathar
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 35
51.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 63 · Balls 56 · SR 112.5 · Avg 21 · 4s 2 · 6s 3
51.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production49.640%19.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility41.118%7.4
Shot quality60.44%2.4
Trajectory72.913%9.5
Scout Score51.6
49.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR160.91.05×23bp27.132.5%
Balls / boundary5.8—23bp47.920%
Balls / six7.7—23bp72.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
41.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball275 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)155.6 SR1.04×9bp43.816.7%
Reach build78.8 SR0.6×33bp14.622.2%
60.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build78.8%
Phase-weighted control78.8% → p60.4
72.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.06×
Recent scores[22, 11, 23]
Innings5
Anish Chaudhary
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
50.7
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 117 · Balls 85 · SR 137.6 · Avg 29.2 · 4s 6 · 6s 8
50.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production50.140%20.0
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility54.215%8.1
Shot quality506%3.0
Trajectory5012%6.0
Scout Score50.7
50.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR131.10.88×45bp5035%
True Avg——0wp63.630%
Balls / boundary6.4—45bp22.717.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp54.517.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
54.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR156 SR1.01×25bp5026.7%
vs Spin SR130 SR1.02×60bp40.926.7%
Accel into Cons166.7 SR—33bp95.520%
Pressure entry——0bp40.926.7%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.8%
Control · Build14.3%
Phase-weighted control78.1% → p50
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.93×
Recent scores[8, 32, 33]
Innings4
Tanush Kotian
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 27
50
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 121 · Balls 71 · SR 170.4 · Avg 60.5 · 4s 8 · 6s 5
50OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production64.740%25.9
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility33.718%6.1
Shot quality64.64%2.6
Trajectory22.913%3.0
Scout Score50
64.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR193.61.26×47bp85.432.5%
Balls / boundary4.7—47bp89.620%
Balls / six11.8—47bp35.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
33.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p2561.1%
vs Yorker50 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball173 SR11bp25
vs Spin (death)142.9 SR0.96×7bp35.416.7%
Reach build125 SR0.95×24bp56.222.2%
64.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build79.2%
Phase-weighted control79.2% → p64.6
22.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.82×
Recent scores[37, 13, 6]
Innings6
Aditya Tare
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 38
49.8
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 128 · Balls 87 · SR 147.1 · Avg 32 · 4s 12 · 6s 6
49.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production6728%18.8
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility61.327%16.6
Shot quality8.88%0.7
Trajectory2.910%0.3
Scout Score49.8
67ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR130.61.04×36bp61.842.9%
True Avg——0wp73.532.1%
Balls / boundary6—36bp67.625%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
61.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7544.4%
vs LA-orthodox133 SR18bp75
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball162 SR8b8b <min
Spin hitting———p61.829.6%
Off-spin100 SR7b7b <min
LA-orthodox151 SR43bp61.8
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)157.1 SR1.12×14bp5014.8%
Reach death114.3 SR0.74×7bp20.611.1%
8.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build72.2%
Phase-weighted control69.4% → p8.8
2.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.63×
Recent scores[16, 1, 10]
Innings5
Awais Khan
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB
48.3
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 37 · Balls 40 · SR 92.5 · Avg 9.2 · 4s 3 · 6s 2
48.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production40.140%16.0
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility44.618%8.0
Shot quality68.84%2.8
Trajectory68.813%8.9
Scout Score48.3
40.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR00×1bp35.432.5%
Balls / boundary——1bp37.520%
Balls / six——1bp41.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
44.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)00×1bp31.216.7%
Reach build100 SR0.76×23bp39.622.2%
68.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Build82.6%
Phase-weighted control80% → p68.8
68.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.04×
Recent scores[13, 6, 6]
Innings5
Harshal Jadhav
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 24
48.1
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 36 · Balls 26 · SR 138.5 · Avg 18 · 4s 3 · 6s 1
48.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.240%15.7
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility56.818%10.2
Shot quality72.94%2.9
Trajectory52.113%6.8
Scout Score48.1
39.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp56.232.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp22.920%
Balls / six——0bp27.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
56.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp60.416.7%
Reach build138.5 SR1.06×26bp72.922.2%
72.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build80.8%
Phase-weighted control80.8% → p72.9
52.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[19, 17]
Innings2
Ayush Vartak
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 21
48
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 154 · Balls 93 · SR 165.6 · Avg 30.8 · 4s 8 · 6s 11
48OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production49.228%13.8
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility62.227%16.8
Shot quality38.28%3.1
Trajectory8.810%0.9
Scout Score48
49.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1301.03×70bp5042.9%
True Avg22.80.98×4wp38.232.1%
Balls / boundary7—70bp61.825%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
62.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p6244.4%
vs LA-orthodox118 SR28bp65
vs Leg-spin153 SR17bp87.5
vs Short ball80 SR10bp10
Spin hitting———p64.529.6%
Off-spin144 SR9b9b <min
LA-orthodox116 SR32bp44.1
Leg-spin217 SR23bp92.9
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)123.1 SR0.88×13bp32.414.8%
Reach death273.9 SR1.78×23bp97.111.1%
38.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation55.6%
Control · Build78.7%
Phase-weighted control75.7% → p38.2
8.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.67×
Recent scores[11, 6, 12]
Innings6
Ayush Jethwa
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 22
46.9
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 64 · Balls 68 · SR 94.1 · Avg 16 · 4s 7 · 6s 1
46.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.240%15.7
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility45.718%8.2
Shot quality52.14%2.1
Trajectory64.613%8.4
Scout Score46.9
39.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp56.232.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp22.920%
Balls / six——0bp27.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
45.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp60.416.7%
Reach build33.3 SR0.25×6bp22.922.2%
52.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.8%
Control · Build50%
Phase-weighted control77.1% → p52.1
64.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.01×
Recent scores[25, 36, 3]
Innings4
Parikshit Valsangkar
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 31
45.5
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 75 · Balls 46 · SR 163 · Avg 75 · 4s 5 · 6s 4
45.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production33.440%13.4
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility53.118%9.6
Shot quality56.24%2.2
Trajectory60.413%7.9
Scout Score45.5
33.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR164.31.07×28bp31.232.5%
Balls / boundary4.7—28bp68.820%
Balls / six28—28bp6.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
53.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball150 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)125 SR0.84×8bp27.116.7%
Reach build161.1 SR1.23×18bp81.222.2%
56.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build77.8%
Phase-weighted control77.8% → p56.2
60.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.01×
Recent scores[36, 2, 33]
Innings4
Chinmay Sutar
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 29
45.3
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 212 · Balls 177 · SR 119.8 · Avg 70.7 · 4s 14 · 6s 5
45.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production31.528%8.8
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility2727%7.3
Shot quality97.18%7.8
Trajectory79.410%7.9
Scout Score45.3
31.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR104.60.83×109bp8.842.9%
True Avg572.47×2wp79.432.1%
Balls / boundary15.6—109bp8.825%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
27VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p26.944.4%
vs LA-orthodox94 SR63bp15
vs Leg-spin138 SR21bp62.5
vs Short ball67 SR6b6b <min
Spin hitting———p32.129.6%
Off-spin126 SR23bp68.2
LA-orthodox109 SR90bp14.7
Leg-spin135 SR23bp64.3
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)90 SR0.64×10bp8.814.8%
Reach death159.3 SR1.04×27bp38.211.1%
97.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build92.6%
Phase-weighted control86.2% → p97.1
79.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.02×
Recent scores[32, 62, 61]
Innings6
Harsh Aghav
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 19
44.6
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 67 · Balls 58 · SR 115.5 · Avg 16.8 · 4s 5 · 6s 3
44.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.240%15.7
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility52.218%9.4
Shot quality47.94%1.9
Trajectory39.613%5.1
Scout Score44.6
39.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp56.232.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp22.920%
Balls / six——0bp27.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
52.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp60.416.7%
Reach build120.7 SR0.92×29bp52.122.2%
47.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.2%
Control · Build72.4%
Phase-weighted control77.1% → p47.9
39.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.96×
Recent scores[1, 9, 43]
Innings4
Abhigyan Kundu
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 18
43.6
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 204 · Balls 143 · SR 142.7 · Avg 34 · 4s 15 · 6s 8
43.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production31.428%8.8
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility38.227%10.3
Shot quality67.68%5.4
Trajectory55.910%5.6
Scout Score43.6
31.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR114.40.91×104bp20.642.9%
True Avg29.81.29×4wp58.832.1%
Balls / boundary11.6—104bp14.725%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
38.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p20.844.4%
vs Off-spin74 SR27bp10
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball130 SR10bp50
Spin hitting———p43.529.6%
Off-spin94 SR35bp22.7
LA-orthodox134 SR53bp50
Leg-spin173 SR11bp78.6
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)146.4 SR1.04×28bp44.114.8%
Reach death300 SR1.95×4bp85.311.1%
67.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80.4%
Control · Build75.5%
Phase-weighted control77.9% → p67.6
55.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[53, 45, 40]
Innings6
Om Ramdas Bangar
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB
43.3
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 52 · Balls 45 · SR 115.6 · Avg 13 · 4s 9 · 6s 0
43.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production44.140%17.6
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility48.518%8.7
Shot quality10.44%0.4
Trajectory31.213%4.1
Scout Score43.3
44.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.65×1bp47.932.5%
Balls / boundary——1bp37.520%
Balls / six——1bp41.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
48.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp60.416.7%
Reach build75 SR0.57×8bp35.422.2%
10.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72%
Control · Build37.5%
Phase-weighted control63.6% → p10.4
31.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.89×
Recent scores[2, 29, 1]
Innings5
Rohit Pol
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB
43.3
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 38 · Balls 33 · SR 115.2 · Avg 38 · 4s 1 · 6s 2
43.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production34.840%13.9
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility52.218%9.4
Shot quality18.84%0.8
Trajectory52.113%6.8
Scout Score43.3
34.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR138.10.9×21bp18.832.5%
Balls / boundary7—21bp14.620%
Balls / six10.5—21bp56.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
52.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR4b4b <min
vs Slower ball80 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)280 SR1.87×5bp93.816.7%
Reach build75 SR0.57×12bp27.122.2%
18.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p18.8
52.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[4, 13, 21]
Innings3
Siddhesh Lad
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 34
41.8
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 107 · Balls 86 · SR 124.4 · Avg 15.3 · 4s 14 · 6s 2
41.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production42.628%11.9
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility45.227%12.2
Shot quality26.58%2.1
Trajectory20.610%2.1
Scout Score41.8
42.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR119.40.95×31bp44.142.9%
True Avg18.50.8×2wp44.132.1%
Balls / boundary7.8—31bp38.225%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
45.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p3544.4%
vs LA-orthodox104 SR24bp35
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p38.229.6%
Off-spin0 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox114 SR37bp38.2
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)240 SR1.71×5bp79.414.8%
Reach death——0bp58.811.1%
26.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build68.4%
Phase-weighted control74.2% → p26.5
20.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.9×
Recent scores[9, 5, 33]
Innings7
Vinayak Bhoir
Finisher · pos 8 · LHB · age 37
41.3
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 28 · Balls 28 · SR 100 · Avg 9.3 · 4s 4 · 6s 0
41.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production2540%10.0
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility36.518%6.6
Shot quality2.14%0.1
Trajectory93.813%12.2
Scout Score41.3
25ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1250.81×20bp14.632.5%
Balls / boundary5—20bp60.420%
Balls / six——20bp2.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
36.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball167 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)50 SR0.33×6bp10.416.7%
Reach build37.5 SR0.29×8bp18.822.2%
2.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build37.5%
Phase-weighted control37.5% → p2.1
93.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.28×
Recent scores[0, 5, 18]
Innings5
Om Keshkamat
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
41.2
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 93 · Balls 73 · SR 127.4 · Avg 18.6 · 4s 1 · 6s 8
41.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production46.828%13.1
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility37.627%10.2
Shot quality14.78%1.2
Trajectory32.410%3.2
Scout Score41.2
46.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR130.21.03×63bp55.942.9%
True Avg20.50.89×4wp32.432.1%
Balls / boundary7.9—63bp5025%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
37.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p4544.4%
vs LA-orthodox106 SR34bp45
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball175 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p46.429.6%
Off-spin171 SR17bp86.4
LA-orthodox112 SR40bp29.4
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)115.4 SR0.82×13bp14.714.8%
Reach death100 SR0.65×6bp14.711.1%
14.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control71.4% → p14.7
32.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.93×
Recent scores[3, 0, 49]
Innings5
Vinay Kunwar
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 24
40.9
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 47 · Balls 43 · SR 109.3 · Avg 15.7 · 4s 3 · 6s 2
40.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production3428%9.5
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility33.927%9.2
Shot quality20.68%1.6
Trajectory70.610%7.1
Scout Score40.9
34ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR117.90.94×39bp38.242.9%
True Avg15.30.66×3wp20.632.1%
Balls / boundary7.8—39bp44.125%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
33.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p3044.4%
vs Off-spin84 SR19bp30
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball67 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p34.229.6%
Off-spin77 SR22bp13.6
LA-orthodox170 SR10bp79.4
Leg-spin150 SR6b6b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)80 SR0.57×5bp26.514.8%
Reach death——0bp58.811.1%
20.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.5%
Control · Build68.2%
Phase-weighted control71.8% → p20.6
70.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[24, 7, 16]
Innings3
Arjun Dani
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 22
39.2
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 56 · Balls 56 · SR 100 · Avg 18.7 · 4s 3 · 6s 3
39.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production27.528%7.7
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility16.927%4.6
Shot quality79.48%6.4
Trajectory70.610%7.1
Scout Score39.2
27.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR97.60.77×42bp14.742.9%
True Avg20.50.89×2wp5032.1%
Balls / boundary10.5—42bp20.625%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
16.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p544.4%
vs LA-orthodox90 SR21bp5
vs Leg-spin43 SR7b7b <min
vs Short ball400 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p3.429.6%
Off-spin60 SR10bp4.5
LA-orthodox92 SR24bp2.9
Leg-spin43 SR7b7b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)260 SR1.85×5bp85.314.8%
Reach death115.4 SR0.75×13bp8.811.1%
79.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.8%
Control · Build80.6%
Phase-weighted control81% → p79.4
70.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[20, 35, 1]
Innings3
Pragnesh Durgesh Kanpillewar
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 24
38.8
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 101 · Balls 83 · SR 121.7 · Avg 20.2 · 4s 10 · 6s 2
38.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production22.728%6.4
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility47.127%12.7
Shot quality44.18%3.5
Trajectory26.510%2.6
Scout Score38.8
22.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR115.90.92×63bp26.542.9%
True Avg18.20.79×4wp14.732.1%
Balls / boundary9—63bp26.525%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
47.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin100 SR19bp50
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p42.929.6%
Off-spin117 SR24bp40.9
LA-orthodox144 SR27bp55.9
Leg-spin79 SR14bp21.4
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)120 SR0.86×5bp38.214.8%
Reach death——0bp58.811.1%
44.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86.2%
Control · Build67.6%
Phase-weighted control76.2% → p44.1
26.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.91×
Recent scores[14, 18, 28]
Innings5
Sachin Yadav
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 32
38.2
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 80 · Balls 63 · SR 127 · Avg 16 · 4s 8 · 6s 3
38.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production34.840%13.9
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility33.615%5.0
Shot quality68.26%4.1
Trajectory13.612%1.6
Scout Score38.2
34.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR142.90.96×35bp59.135%
True Avg12.50.44×4wp4.530%
Balls / boundary3.9—35bp68.217.5%
Balls / dismissal8.8—4wp4.517.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
33.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR156.2 SR1.01×32bp59.126.7%
vs Spin SR96.8 SR0.76×31bp22.726.7%
Accel into Cons61.5 SR—13bp4.520%
Pressure entry——0bp40.926.7%
68.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.6%
Control · Build86.7%
Phase-weighted control85.4% → p68.2
13.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.83×
Recent scores[2, 7, 11]
Innings5
Maxwell Swaminathan
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 27
37.2
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 99 · Balls 95 · SR 104.2 · Avg 24.8 · 4s 5 · 6s 4
37.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production1240%4.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility46.218%8.3
Shot quality39.64%1.6
Trajectory77.113%10.0
Scout Score37.2
12ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR880.57×25bp2.132.5%
Balls / boundary25—25bp2.120%
Balls / six25—25bp10.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
46.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball200 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)80 SR0.54×15bp2.116.7%
Reach build125.9 SR0.96×58bp68.822.2%
39.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build75.9%
Phase-weighted control75.7% → p39.6
77.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.06×
Recent scores[36, 18, 28]
Innings6
Varun Lavande
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 25
37.1
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 75 · Balls 64 · SR 117.2 · Avg 18.8 · 4s 5 · 6s 5
37.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production31.540%12.6
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility39.115%5.9
Shot quality4.56%0.3
Trajectory40.912%4.9
Scout Score37.1
31.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR122.20.82×18bp40.935%
True Avg110.38×2wp22.730%
Balls / boundary6—18bp36.417.5%
Balls / dismissal9—2wp22.717.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
39.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR176.2 SR1.14×21bp77.326.7%
vs Spin SR88.4 SR0.69×43bp4.526.7%
Accel into Cons92.3 SR—13bp31.820%
Pressure entry——0bp40.926.7%
4.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation46.2%
Control · Build59.3%
Phase-weighted control52.8% → p4.5
40.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.9×
Recent scores[13, 35, 10]
Innings5
Moin Ahmed
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB
36.9
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 32 · Balls 27 · SR 118.5 · Avg 32 · 4s 2 · 6s 2
36.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production16.440%6.6
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility54.318%9.8
Shot quality33.34%1.3
Trajectory52.113%6.8
Scout Score36.9
16.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR800.52×15bp6.232.5%
Balls / boundary15—15bp10.420%
Balls / six——15bp14.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
54.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball50 SR6b6b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.67×2bp39.616.7%
Reach build166.7 SR1.27×12bp77.122.2%
33.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control75% → p33.3
52.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[28, 4]
Innings2
Arjun Tendulkar
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 26
36.2
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 104 · Balls 70 · SR 148.6 · Avg 26 · 4s 6 · 6s 7
36.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production28.640%11.4
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility58.515%8.8
Shot quality31.86%1.9
Trajectory4.512%0.5
Scout Score36.2
28.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1220.82×41bp31.835%
True Avg16.70.58×3wp31.830%
Balls / boundary6.8—41bp13.617.5%
Balls / dismissal13.7—3wp31.817.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
58.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR171.4 SR1.11×21bp68.226.7%
vs Spin SR138.8 SR1.09×49bp59.126.7%
Accel into Cons150 SR—12bp68.220%
Pressure entry——0bp40.926.7%
31.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build73.3%
Phase-weighted control74.4% → p31.8
4.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.61×
Recent scores[14, 13, 2]
Innings6
Prasad Pawar
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 31
34.7
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 111 · Balls 88 · SR 126.1 · Avg 22.2 · 4s 8 · 6s 3
34.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production24.828%6.9
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility2927%7.8
Shot quality61.88%4.9
Trajectory14.710%1.5
Scout Score34.7
24.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1190.94×58bp32.442.9%
True Avg17.20.75×4wp8.832.1%
Balls / boundary8.3—58bp32.425%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
29VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p2044.4%
vs LA-orthodox96 SR24bp25
vs Leg-spin119 SR16bp12.5
vs Short ball500 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p2429.6%
Off-spin100 SR11bp31.8
LA-orthodox100 SR40bp8.8
Leg-spin110 SR20bp50
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)181.8 SR1.3×11bp67.614.8%
Reach death133.3 SR0.87×9bp26.511.1%
61.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.9%
Control · Build78.9%
Phase-weighted control77.6% → p61.8
14.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.79×
Recent scores[1, 26, 9]
Innings5
Eknath Kerkar
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 32
34.6
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 37 · Balls 45 · SR 82.2 · Avg 12.3 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
34.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production28.240%11.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility1315%1.9
Shot quality13.66%0.8
Trajectory59.112%7.1
Scout Score34.6
28.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR700.47×20bp4.535%
True Avg140.49×1wp40.930%
Balls / boundary20—20bp4.517.5%
Balls / dismissal20—1wp77.317.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
13VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR50 SR0.32×6bp13.626.7%
vs Spin SR87.2 SR0.68×39bp13.626.7%
Accel into Cons84.6 SR—13bp22.720%
Pressure entry70 SR0.47×10bp4.526.7%
13.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation69.2%
Control · Build58.3%
Phase-weighted control65.8% → p13.6
59.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[3, 27, 7]
Innings3
Makarand Patil
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 30
34.2
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 28 · Balls 21 · SR 133.3 · Avg 7 · 4s 1 · 6s 2
34.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production18.240%7.3
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility5218%9.4
Shot quality93.84%3.8
Trajectory10.413%1.4
Scout Score34.2
18.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR600.39×10bp10.432.5%
Balls / boundary——10bp6.220%
Balls / six——10bp18.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
52VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)40 SR0.27×5bp14.616.7%
Reach build200 SR1.53×11bp85.422.2%
93.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build90.9%
Phase-weighted control90.9% → p93.8
10.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.7×
Recent scores[11, 1, 2]
Innings5
Sagar Mishra
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 32
32.1
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 46 · Balls 59 · SR 78 · Avg 11.5 · 4s 3 · 6s 0
32.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production2.928%0.8
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility33.527%9.0
Shot quality32.48%2.6
Trajectory61.810%6.2
Scout Score32.1
2.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR780.62×59bp2.942.9%
True Avg11.50.5×4wp2.932.1%
Balls / boundary19.7—59bp2.925%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
33.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin62 SR8b8b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball29 SR7b7b <min
Spin hitting———p14.529.6%
Off-spin62 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox109 SR22bp20.6
Leg-spin72 SR18bp7.1
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)36.4 SR0.26×11bp2.914.8%
Reach death——0bp58.811.1%
32.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.1%
Control · Build70.4%
Phase-weighted control74.6% → p32.4
61.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[14, 9, 12]
Innings4
Parag Khanapurkar
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 40
31.7
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 68 · Balls 55 · SR 123.6 · Avg 13.6 · 4s 6 · 6s 3
31.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production2040%8.0
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility33.615%5.0
Shot quality40.96%2.5
Trajectory22.712%2.7
Scout Score31.7
20ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.67×17bp13.635%
True Avg8.50.3×2wp13.630%
Balls / boundary5.7—17bp5017.5%
Balls / dismissal8.5—2wp13.617.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
33.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR116.7 SR0.76×18bp22.726.7%
vs Spin SR127 SR1×37bp31.826.7%
Accel into Cons128.6 SR—21bp40.920%
Pressure entry——0bp40.926.7%
40.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81%
Control · Build58.8%
Phase-weighted control74.6% → p40.9
22.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.87×
Recent scores[24, 6, 0]
Innings5
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 27 | 12.5 | 10 | 76 | 5.92 | 73.4 Scout Score 73.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay79.162.3% Middle66.315.6% Death62.222.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p82.50.91× | 83.5 Bowling Production 83.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 5.38 econp92.862.3% Middle2w · 5.5 econp74.515.6% Death4w · 7.76 econp63.822.1% | 85.1 Quality 85.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay40%p89.8 False-shot · Middle33%p66.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5062.3% MiddleWPA +0p5015.6% DeathWPA +0p5022.1% | 76.5 Versatility 76.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp85.962.3% Middlep60.615.6% Deathp61.222.1% | |
| 2 | Off-spin | 23 | 9.0 | 7 | 48 | 5.33 | 71.3 Scout Score 71.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle70.266.7% Death73.433.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 86.1 Bowling Production 86.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 6 econp82.966.7% Death4w · 4 econp92.433.3% | 88.5 Quality 88.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle33%p88.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5066.7% DeathWPA +0p5033.3% | 60.3 Versatility 60.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep65.466.7% Deathp5033.3% | |
| 3 | Off-spin | 17 | 15.0 | 9 | 95 | 6.33 | 67.4 Scout Score 67.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay67.526.7% Middle64.646.7% Death72.426.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p84.20.89× | 79.8 Bowling Production 79.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 6 econp7626.7% Middle3w · 6.14 econp82.146.7% Death4w · 7 econp79.726.7% | 38.3 Quality 38.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p64.8 False-shot · Middle17%p23.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5026.7% MiddleWPA +0p5046.7% DeathWPA +0p5026.7% | 73.5 Versatility 73.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp69.326.7% Middlep7546.7% Deathp7526.7% | |
| 4 | Off-spin | 33 | 7.0 | 5 | 56 | 8 | 67 Scout Score 67 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle6785.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 81.3 Bowling Production 81.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 6.5 econp81.385.7% | 72.1 Quality 72.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle28%p72.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5085.7% | 64.4 Versatility 64.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep64.485.7% | |
| 5 | LA pace | 26 | 21.0 | 7 | 167 | 7.95 | 66 Scout Score 66 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay68.652.4% Middle42.59.5% Death68.238.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p85.80.89× | 74.1 Bowling Production 74.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 7.45 econp80.352.4% Middle0w · 10 econp26.99.5% Death3w · 8.12 econp77.238.1% | 59.4 Quality 59.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p60.2 False-shot · Middle25%p54.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5052.4% MiddleWPA +0p509.5% DeathWPA +0p5038.1% | 60.2 Versatility 60.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp69.852.4% Middlep259.5% Deathp55.838.1% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | — | 5.0 | 2 | 33 | 6.6 | 63.1 Scout Score 63.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle63.180% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 65.8 Bowling Production 65.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 6.75 econp65.880% | 92.3 Quality 92.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle38%p92.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5080% | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep55.880% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 25 | 20.0 | 7 | 159 | 7.95 | 62 Scout Score 62 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay6325% Middle71.340% Death50.635% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p79.20.94× | 65.4 Bowling Production 65.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.2 econp65.825% Middle3w · 5.75 econp84.640% Death2w · 10.29 econp43.135% | 65 Quality 65 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay37%p75 False-shot · Middle25%p58.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5025% MiddleWPA +0p5040% DeathWPA +0p5035% | 64.8 Versatility 64.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp53.225% Middlep82.740% Deathp52.735% | |
| 8 | Off-spin | 26 | 8.0 | 3 | 60 | 7.5 | 61.4 Scout Score 61.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle66.275% Death46.725% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 66.5 Bowling Production 66.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 6.33 econp7475% Death1w · 11 econp43.825% | 88.5 Quality 88.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle33%p88.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5075% DeathWPA +0p5025% | 57.9 Versatility 57.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep60.675% Deathp5025% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 31 | 25.0 | 12 | 165 | 6.6 | 60.2 Scout Score 60.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay43.944% Middle75.524% Death71.232% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p7.51.17× | 76.7 Bowling Production 76.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 7.55 econp49.944% Middle5w · 4.83 econp97.824% Death7w · 6.62 econp97.632% | 59.2 Quality 59.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p37.5 False-shot · Middle42%p99 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5044% MiddleWPA +0p5024% DeathWPA +0p5032% | 66 Versatility 66 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp5044% Middlep85.624% Deathp73.332% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 22.0 | 7 | 177 | 8.05 | 60 Scout Score 60 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay50.331.8% Middle68.859.1% Death36.19.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p75.80.97× | 64.2 Bowling Production 64.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.57 econp58.331.8% Middle4w · 6.69 econp73.959.1% Death1w · 15 econp21.49.1% | 55.9 Quality 55.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p8 False-shot · Middle28%p81.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5031.8% MiddleWPA +0p5059.1% DeathWPA +0p509.1% | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp58.931.8% Middlep70.259.1% Deathp34.49.1% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 19.1 | 6 | 160 | 8.35 | 59.9 Scout Score 59.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay46.620.9% Middle63.773% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p99.20.67× | 59.1 Bowling Production 59.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 13.25 econp28.920.9% Middle5w · 7.36 econp67.773% | 59 Quality 59 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p53.4 False-shot · Middle25%p60.6 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5020.9% MiddleWPA +0p5073% | 51.2 Versatility 51.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4220.9% Middlep53.873% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | 31 | 26.0 | 10 | 149 | 5.73 | 59.9 Scout Score 59.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay61.453.8% Middle55.938.5% Death69.57.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p17.51.09× | 81.7 Bowling Production 81.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 5.93 econp94.153.8% Middle2w · 6 econp63.438.5% Death2w · 3 econp86.17.7% | 38.2 Quality 38.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p28.4 False-shot · Middle23%p51.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5053.8% MiddleWPA +0p5038.5% DeathWPA +0p507.7% | 71.9 Versatility 71.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp61.853.8% Middlep81.738.5% Deathp93.87.7% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 39 | 7.0 | 3 | 64 | 9.14 | 58.7 Scout Score 58.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle57.957.1% Death60.428.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p69.20.98× | 56.5 Bowling Production 56.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 9 econp52.257.1% Death1w · 5 econp6528.6% | 97.1 Quality 97.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle42%p97.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5057.1% DeathWPA +0p5028.6% | 41 Versatility 41 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep33.757.1% Deathp55.828.6% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 10.0 | 3 | 73 | 7.3 | 57 Scout Score 57 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay56.920% Middle5770% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p74.20.97× | 64 Bowling Production 64 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10 econp52.520% Middle2w · 6.57 econp67.370% | 33.9 Quality 33.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay42%p71.6 False-shot · Middle17%p23.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5020% MiddleWPA +0p5070% | 63.8 Versatility 63.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp53.420% Middlep66.870% | |
| 15 | Off-spin | 31 | 6.0 | 1 | 35 | 5.83 | 56.2 Scout Score 56.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle56.283.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 57.2 Bowling Production 57.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 6.6 econp57.283.3% | 62.5 Quality 62.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle27%p62.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5083.3% | 63 Versatility 63 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep6383.3% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 13.2 | 3 | 104 | 7.8 | 56 Scout Score 56 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay52.745% Middle59.345% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p94.20.82× | 56.4 Bowling Production 56.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.5 econp52.845% Middle1w · 6.17 econp60.145% | 31.8 Quality 31.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p26.1 False-shot · Middle19%p37.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5045% MiddleWPA +0p5045% | 66.1 Versatility 66.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp58.245% Middlep7445% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | 29 | 22.5 | 10 | 170 | 7.45 | 55.2 Scout Score 55.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay67.643.8% Middle45.639.4% Death45.516.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p2.51.24× | 74.1 Bowling Production 74.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 6.7 econp94.443.8% Middle2w · 6.78 econp60.839.4% Death2w · 10.96 econp5216.8% | 44.2 Quality 44.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay32%p69.3 False-shot · Middle17%p16.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5043.8% MiddleWPA +0p5039.4% DeathWPA +0p5016.8% | 65.6 Versatility 65.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp75.543.8% Middlep60.639.4% Deathp51.616.8% | |
| 18 | Leg-spin | 26 | 12.0 | 6 | 81 | 6.75 | 54.8 Scout Score 54.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle54.891.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p29.21.02× | 74.2 Bowling Production 74.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 6.91 econp74.291.7% | 20.2 Quality 20.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle18%p20.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5091.7% | 68.3 Versatility 68.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep68.391.7% | |
| 19 | Off-spin | 34 | 20.0 | 10 | 148 | 7.4 | 54.4 Scout Score 54.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay73.135% Middle44.365% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p15.81.1× | 67.5 Bowling Production 67.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 5.71 econp96.735% Middle5w · 8.31 econp51.865% | 55.3 Quality 55.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay43%p92 False-shot · Middle20%p35.6 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5035% MiddleWPA +0p5065% | 54.3 Versatility 54.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp74.835% Middlep43.365% | |
| 20 | Off-spin | 18 | 13.0 | 4 | 102 | 7.85 | 54.2 Scout Score 54.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay43.130.8% Middle58.246.2% Death61.223.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p72.50.98× | 57.3 Bowling Production 57.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 7.75 econp38.530.8% Middle3w · 7.5 econp67.646.2% Death1w · 8.67 econp61.623.1% | 35.1 Quality 35.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p17 False-shot · Middle22%p47.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5030.8% MiddleWPA +0p5046.2% DeathWPA +0p5023.1% | 55.3 Versatility 55.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp51.630.8% Middlep47.146.2% Deathp76.623.1% | |
| 21 | Leg-spin | 19 | 19.1 | 3 | 140 | 7.3 | 54.2 Scout Score 54.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle51.683.5% Death67.616.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p89.20.87× | 38 Bowling Production 38 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 7.5 econp30.783.5% Death1w · 6.32 econp74.716.5% | 77.9 Quality 77.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle27%p77.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5083.5% DeathWPA +0p5016.5% | 54.3 Versatility 54.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep56.783.5% Deathp42.216.5% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 32 | 14.2 | 4 | 111 | 7.74 | 53.1 Scout Score 53.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay42.927.9% Middle42.427.9% Death66.444.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p34.21.01× | 60.3 Bowling Production 60.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10 econp4327.9% Middle0w · 7 econp35.227.9% Death3w · 6.79 econp8744.2% | 39.2 Quality 39.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p35.2 False-shot · Middle21%p43.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5027.9% MiddleWPA +0p5027.9% DeathWPA +0p5044.2% | 50.9 Versatility 50.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp43.227.9% Middlep54.827.9% Deathp53.344.2% | |
| 23 | LA pace | 28 | 9.3 | 6 | 101 | 10.63 | 52.2 Scout Score 52.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay43.752.6% Death61.747.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 46.3 Bowling Production 46.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 13.4 econp21.852.6% Death5w · 7.56 econp73.647.4% | 94.3 Quality 94.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay47%p94.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5052.6% DeathWPA +0p5047.4% | 38.7 Versatility 38.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp26.652.6% Deathp52.147.4% | |
| 24 | LA pace | 29 | 24.5 | 10 | 228 | 9.18 | 52.1 Scout Score 52.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay5452.3% Middle34.78.1% Death53.139.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p19.21.08× | 59.1 Bowling Production 59.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 9.08 econp59.652.3% Middle0w · 10.5 econp28.18.1% Death6w · 9.05 econp64.639.6% | 63.6 Quality 63.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p67 False-shot · Middle17%p41.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5052.3% MiddleWPA +0p508.1% DeathWPA +0p5039.6% | 52.1 Versatility 52.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp58.452.3% Middlep28.48.1% Deathp48.539.6% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 23 | 15.3 | 7 | 140 | 9.03 | 51.5 Scout Score 51.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay61.745.2% Middle53.623.7% Death3531.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p0.81.36× | 55.1 Bowling Production 55.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 7.71 econp71.145.2% Middle3w · 8.73 econp56.423.7% Death1w · 11.17 econp30.931.2% | 97.6 Quality 97.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay48%p98.9 False-shot · Middle41%p95.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5045.2% MiddleWPA +0p5023.7% DeathWPA +0p5031.2% | 54.6 Versatility 54.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp6345.2% Middlep44.223.7% Deathp50.331.2% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 18.0 | 8 | 152 | 8.44 | 50.1 Scout Score 50.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay61.227.8% Middle50.355.6% Death30.716.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p22.51.05× | 56.4 Bowling Production 56.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 7.4 econp65.627.8% Middle6w · 7.9 econp61.255.6% Death0w · 12 econp24.916.7% | 63.8 Quality 63.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay40%p87.5 False-shot · Middle23%p51.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5027.8% MiddleWPA +0p5055.6% DeathWPA +0p5016.7% | 45.1 Versatility 45.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp74.327.8% Middlep37.555.6% Deathp21.916.7% | |
| 27 | Leg-spin | — | 18.0 | 5 | 122 | 6.78 | 49.8 Scout Score 49.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle48.283.3% Death61.511.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p4.21.22× | 63.3 Bowling Production 63.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 6.47 econp61.583.3% Death2w · 4.5 econp77.311.1% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle18%p12.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5083.3% DeathWPA +0p5011.1% | 82.6 Versatility 82.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep83.783.3% Deathp7511.1% | |
| 28 | Off-spin | 27 | 25.0 | 8 | 209 | 8.36 | 49.5 Scout Score 49.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay75.324% Middle39.664% Death50.312% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p90.80.86× | 46.8 Bowling Production 46.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 6.5 econp82.824% Middle5w · 8.75 econp33.964% Death0w · 10 econp43.212% | 28.5 Quality 28.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay47%p96.6 False-shot · Middle14%p2.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5024% MiddleWPA +0p5064% DeathWPA +0p5012% | 46.1 Versatility 46.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp67.324% Middlep39.464% Deathp39.112% | |
| 29 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 22.2 | 5 | 181 | 8.1 | 49.4 Scout Score 49.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.626.9% Middle63.553.7% Death2719.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p9.21.14× | 56.1 Bowling Production 56.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8.67 econp4526.9% Middle3w · 6.58 econp74.853.7% Death1w · 11.54 econp19.519.4% | 59 Quality 59 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay14%p5.7 False-shot · Middle29%p85.6 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5026.9% MiddleWPA +0p5053.7% DeathWPA +0p5019.4% | 59.7 Versatility 59.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp52.326.9% Middlep73.153.7% Deathp32.819.4% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 34 | 7.0 | 3 | 67 | 9.57 | 49.2 Scout Score 49.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay32.628.6% Middle57.557.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 44 Bowling Production 44 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 14 econp20.628.6% Middle2w · 7.75 econp55.757.1% | 68 Quality 68 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p19.3 False-shot · Middle38%p92.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5028.6% MiddleWPA +0p5057.1% | 38.4 Versatility 38.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp32.528.6% Middlep41.357.1% | |
| 31 | Leg-spin | 31 | 16.4 | 4 | 156 | 9.36 | 47.9 Scout Score 47.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay57.318% Middle49.666% Death30.616% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p95.80.8× | 35.6 Bowling Production 35.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8 econp54.218% Middle2w · 7.45 econp3766% Death1w · 18.75 econp8.716% | 49.2 Quality 49.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p50 False-shot · Middle23%p49 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5018% MiddleWPA +0p5066% DeathWPA +0p5016% | 48.3 Versatility 48.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp60.718% Middlep5166% Deathp23.416% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 33 | 21.2 | 9 | 175 | 8.2 | 47 Scout Score 47 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay64.723.4% Middle55.232.8% Death31.443.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p5.81.2× | 49.5 Bowling Production 49.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 5.8 econp87.923.4% Middle1w · 6.14 econp54.932.8% Death5w · 11.04 econp24.843.8% | 80.1 Quality 80.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay37%p75 False-shot · Middle31%p83.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5023.4% MiddleWPA +0p5032.8% DeathWPA +0p5043.8% | 56 Versatility 56 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp59.823.4% Middlep72.132.8% Deathp41.843.8% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 33 | 12.0 | 3 | 121 | 10.08 | 46.8 Scout Score 46.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay46.891.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p70.80.98× | 31 Bowling Production 31 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10.36 econp3191.7% | 83 Quality 83 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay35%p83 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5091.7% | 20.2 Versatility 20.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp20.291.7% | |
| 34 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 22.0 | 9 | 171 | 7.77 | 46.6 Scout Score 46.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay58.327.3% Middle40.759.1% Death48.313.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p14.21.11× | 57.1 Bowling Production 57.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 7.33 econp76.727.3% Middle3w · 7.38 econp48.859.1% Death3w · 10.33 econp53.813.6% | 27.2 Quality 27.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p46.6 False-shot · Middle18%p18.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5027.3% MiddleWPA +0p5059.1% DeathWPA +0p5013.6% | 54.8 Versatility 54.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp72.727.3% Middlep46.259.1% Deathp56.213.6% | |
| 35 | SLA orthodox | 35 | 19.3 | 5 | 168 | 8.62 | 45.6 Scout Score 45.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.741% Middle52.751.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p97.50.72× | 35 Bowling Production 35 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.88 econp10.141% Middle2w · 6.8 econp54.951.3% | 21.4 Quality 21.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p39.8 False-shot · Middle13%p6.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5041% MiddleWPA +0p5051.3% | 55.9 Versatility 55.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.841% Middlep71.251.3% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 26 | 4.3 | 1 | 50 | 11.11 | 45.2 Scout Score 45.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Death45.255.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 46.5 Bowling Production 46.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Death0w · 10.4 econp46.555.6% | — | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy DeathWPA +0p5055.6% | 28.5 Versatility 28.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Deathp28.555.6% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 17.0 | 5 | 133 | 7.82 | 44.6 Scout Score 44.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.147.1% Middle37.129.4% Death69.123.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p27.51.02× | 51.9 Bowling Production 51.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8 econp42.547.1% Middle1w · 8.8 econp38.529.4% Death3w · 6.25 econp87.623.5% | 6.2 Quality 6.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay12%p1.1 False-shot · Middle13%p14.4 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5047.1% MiddleWPA +0p5029.4% DeathWPA +0p5023.5% | 49 Versatility 49 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp45.747.1% Middlep42.329.4% Deathp64.123.5% | |
| 38 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 15.5 | 5 | 144 | 9.09 | 44.6 Scout Score 44.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay52.112.6% Middle4474.7% Death40.712.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p80.80.92× | 45.7 Bowling Production 45.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.5 econp49.112.6% Middle4w · 8.03 econp47.674.7% Death0w · 13 econp31.112.6% | 13.7 Quality 13.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p43.2 False-shot · Middle17%p8.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5012.6% MiddleWPA +0p5074.7% DeathWPA +0p5012.6% | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp53.512.6% Middlep33.774.7% Deathp17.212.6% | |
| 39 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 11.0 | 3 | 79 | 7.18 | 44.6 Scout Score 44.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle44.690.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p10.81.14× | 39.4 Bowling Production 39.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 7.5 econp39.490.9% | 74 Quality 74 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle27%p74 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5090.9% | 40.9 Versatility 40.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep40.990.9% | |
| 40 | SLA orthodox | 37 | 12.0 | 4 | 109 | 9.08 | 44.5 Scout Score 44.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay38.541.7% Middle49.550% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 51.4 Bowling Production 51.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.6 econp3741.7% Middle2w · 7 econp63.450% | 11.5 Quality 11.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p12.5 False-shot · Middle14%p10.6 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5041.7% MiddleWPA +0p5050% | 46.6 Versatility 46.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.241.7% Middlep51.950% | |
| 41 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 19.0 | 6 | 159 | 8.37 | 44.5 Scout Score 44.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay64.131.6% Middle2952.6% Death56.715.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p12.51.12× | 44.6 Bowling Production 44.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 7.33 econp80.531.6% Middle2w · 9.3 econp1552.6% Death1w · 7.33 econp71.515.8% | 50.5 Quality 50.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay36%p78.4 False-shot · Middle20%p33.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5031.6% MiddleWPA +0p5052.6% DeathWPA +0p5015.8% | 48.6 Versatility 48.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp70.531.6% Middlep37.552.6% Deathp42.215.8% | |
| 42 | LA pace | 27 | 8.0 | 3 | 93 | 11.62 | 44.4 Scout Score 44.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay45.637.5% Middle44.637.5% Death42.325% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 34.1 Bowling Production 34.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 12.33 econp38.937.5% Middle1w · 10 econp33.537.5% Death1w · 13 econp27.825% | 63 Quality 63 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p50 False-shot · Middle33%p76 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5037.5% MiddleWPA +0p5037.5% DeathWPA +0p5025% | 44.1 Versatility 44.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp47.437.5% Middlep2437.5% Deathp69.125% | |
| 43 | RA pace | 33 | 18.5 | 8 | 203 | 10.78 | 44.1 Scout Score 44.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay40.563.7% Middle35.910.6% Death56.525.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p25.81.03× | 50.2 Bowling Production 50.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 11.92 econp47.363.7% Middle0w · 12 econp20.510.6% Death2w · 7.45 econp69.525.7% | 18.2 Quality 18.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p10.2 False-shot · Middle33%p66.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5063.7% MiddleWPA +0p5010.6% DeathWPA +0p5025.7% | 46.9 Versatility 46.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp49.163.7% Middlep2610.6% Deathp50.325.7% | |
| 44 | RA pace | — | 9.0 | 2 | 107 | 11.89 | 44 Scout Score 44 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay4966.7% Middle2922.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p32.51.01× | 43.1 Bowling Production 43.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.83 econp51.166.7% Middle0w · 13 econp18.822.2% | 49.6 Quality 49.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p56.8 False-shot · Middle8%p27.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5066.7% MiddleWPA +0p5022.2% | 36.1 Versatility 36.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp42.766.7% Middlep16.322.2% | |
| 45 | RA pace | 34 | 8.0 | 2 | 86 | 10.75 | 43.8 Scout Score 43.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay43.875% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p67.50.99× | 29.2 Bowling Production 29.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.5 econp29.275% | 56.8 Quality 56.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p56.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5075% | 39.5 Versatility 39.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.575% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 35 | 18.0 | 9 | 180 | 10 | 43.2 Scout Score 43.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay42.533.3% Middle48.322.2% Death41.244.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p20.81.05× | 44.7 Bowling Production 44.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 11.5 econp47.133.3% Middle0w · 6.5 econp42.822.2% Death6w · 10.62 econp43.944.4% | 47.9 Quality 47.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p33 False-shot · Middle29%p70.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5033.3% MiddleWPA +0p5022.2% DeathWPA +0p5044.4% | 41.4 Versatility 41.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.533.3% Middlep57.722.2% Deathp33.944.4% | |
| 47 | LA pace | 33 | 16.0 | 5 | 199 | 12.44 | 43.1 Scout Score 43.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay44.856.2% Middle59.812.5% Death33.331.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p87.50.88× | 20.1 Bowling Production 20.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 11.56 econp20.556.2% Middle2w · 7.5 econp61.212.5% Death1w · 16 econp2.831.2% | 78.1 Quality 78.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay35%p80.7 False-shot · Middle33%p66.3 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5056.2% MiddleWPA +0p5012.5% DeathWPA +0p5031.2% | 38.9 Versatility 38.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp26.456.2% Middlep44.212.5% Deathp59.431.2% | |
| 48 | Off-spin | 34 | 4.0 | 0 | 30 | 7.5 | 43.1 Scout Score 43.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle43.1100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 29.3 Bowling Production 29.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 7.5 econp29.3100% | 56.7 Quality 56.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle25%p56.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p50100% | 49 Versatility 49 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep49100% | |
| 49 | RA pace | 32 | 9.1 | 5 | 109 | 11.89 | 42.5 Scout Score 42.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay48.232.7% Death39.256.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 27 Bowling Production 27 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 10 econp33.632.7% Death4w · 13.16 econp23.256.4% | 85.2 Quality 85.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay44%p85.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5032.7% DeathWPA +0p5056.4% | 54.9 Versatility 54.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.932.7% Deathp6356.4% | |
| 50 | RA pace | 29 | 12.0 | 5 | 131 | 10.92 | 42.2 Scout Score 42.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay40.541.7% Middle44.533.3% Death42.125% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p77.50.97× | 34.5 Bowling Production 34.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.2 econp32.641.7% Middle1w · 8.5 econp41.233.3% Death3w · 13.67 econp28.725% | 26.7 Quality 26.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay20%p22.7 False-shot · Middle17%p31.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5041.7% MiddleWPA +0p5033.3% DeathWPA +0p5025% | 35.8 Versatility 35.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp34.141.7% Middlep31.733.3% Deathp43.925% | |
| 51 | Off-spin | 27 | 13.0 | 1 | 127 | 9.77 | 41.8 Scout Score 41.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle38.176.9% Death60.215.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p92.50.84× | 13.5 Bowling Production 13.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 10.4 econp4.476.9% Death0w · 7 econp59.215.4% | 79.8 Quality 79.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle28%p79.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5076.9% DeathWPA +0p5015.4% | 27.6 Versatility 27.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep23.176.9% Deathp5015.4% | |
| 52 | SLA orthodox | 37 | 18.0 | 3 | 127 | 7.06 | 41.1 Scout Score 41.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay49.427.8% Middle37.666.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p24.21.03× | 40.1 Bowling Production 40.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 6.4 econp63.527.8% Middle1w · 7.5 econp30.366.7% | 34.5 Quality 34.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay20%p22.7 False-shot · Middle21%p39.4 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5027.8% MiddleWPA +0p5066.7% | 48.4 Versatility 48.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp59.527.8% Middlep43.866.7% | |
| 53 | SLA orthodox | 39 | 9.0 | 2 | 80 | 8.89 | 37.8 Scout Score 37.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle37.8100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 27.8 Bowling Production 27.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 8.89 econp27.8100% | 45.2 Quality 45.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle22%p45.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p50100% | 24 Versatility 24 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep24100% | |
| 54 | RA pace | 32 | 7.0 | 1 | 84 | 12 | 37.4 Scout Score 37.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay34.342.9% Death40.442.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 25.6 Bowling Production 25.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 12.67 econp19.442.9% Death1w · 12.33 econp31.742.9% | 30.7 Quality 30.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p30.7 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5042.9% DeathWPA +0p5042.9% | 40.8 Versatility 40.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp37.742.9% Deathp43.942.9% | |
| 55 | RA pace | 30 | 7.0 | 2 | 90 | 12.86 | 35.7 Scout Score 35.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay32.542.9% Death3857.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 26.2 Bowling Production 26.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 13.33 econp24.342.9% Death2w · 12.5 econp27.657.1% | 14.8 Quality 14.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay11%p14.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5042.9% DeathWPA +0p5057.1% | 34.2 Versatility 34.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp24.842.9% Deathp41.257.1% | |
| 56 | RA pace | 29 | 5.0 | 1 | 75 | 15 | 34.8 Scout Score 34.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.240% Death32.440% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 20.6 Bowling Production 20.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 15 econp21.440% Death1w · 15.5 econp19.940% | 43.2 Quality 43.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p43.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5040% DeathWPA +0p5040% | 34.4 Versatility 34.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.240% Deathp28.540% | |
| 57 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 7.0 | 1 | 54 | 7.71 | 34.7 Scout Score 34.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle34.785.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 28.2 Bowling Production 28.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 7.5 econp28.285.7% | 4.8 Quality 4.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle8%p4.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5085.7% | 47.1 Versatility 47.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep47.185.7% | |
| 58 | LA pace | 33 | 7.0 | 0 | 98 | 14 | 33.1 Scout Score 33.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay33.342.9% Middle36.828.6% Death29.228.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 15.9 Bowling Production 15.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 15.33 econp8.742.9% Middle0w · 10 econp29.428.6% Death0w · 16 econp13.228.6% | 48.7 Quality 48.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p62.5 False-shot · Middle8%p27.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5042.9% MiddleWPA +0p5028.6% DeathWPA +0p5028.6% | 26.1 Versatility 26.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp20.342.9% Middlep32.228.6% Deathp28.528.6% | |
| 59 | Leg-spin | — | 8.3 | 0 | 71 | 8.35 | 32.8 Scout Score 32.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle22.870.6% Death56.829.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p30.81.02× | 27.4 Bowling Production 27.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 9 econp11.370.6% Death0w · 6.8 econp65.929.4% | 1 Quality 1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle6%p1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5070.6% DeathWPA +0p5029.4% | 32.4 Versatility 32.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep23.170.6% Deathp54.729.4% | |
| 60 | RA pace | 24 | 8.0 | 0 | 114 | 14.25 | 29.7 Scout Score 29.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay21.650% Middle30.325% Death45.425% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50.81× | 14.7 Bowling Production 14.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 15.5 econp2.650% Middle0w · 14 econp1825% Death0w · 12 econp35.625% | 11.6 Quality 11.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay4%p3.4 False-shot · Middle8%p27.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5050% MiddleWPA +0p5025% DeathWPA +0p5025% | 27.3 Versatility 27.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp14.950% Middlep14.425% Deathp64.825% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Off-spin | 34 | 7.0 | 5 | 40 | 5.71 | 96.7 Phase Production 96.7 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.615× parp94.336.8% Wicket rate0.71/ovp98.942.1% Boundary %10%p96.621.1% | 92 Quality 92 = false-shots induced False-shot %43% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 74.8 Versatility 74.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp87.530% Econ vs LHBp87.530% Wkt vs RHBp98.920% Wkt vs LHBp12.520% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 29 | 10.0 | 6 | 67 | 6.7 | 94.4 Phase Production 94.4 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.721× parp9236.8% Wicket rate0.60/ovp96.642.1% Boundary %13%p94.321.1% | 69.3 Quality 69.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 75.5 Versatility 75.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.630% Econ vs LHBp37.530% Wkt vs RHBp94.320% Wkt vs LHBp81.820% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 31 | 14.0 | 6 | 83 | 5.93 | 94.1 Phase Production 94.1 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.638× parp98.936.8% Wicket rate0.43/ovp87.542.1% Boundary %14%p98.921.1% | 28.4 Quality 28.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 61.8 Versatility 61.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.930% Econ vs LHBp5.730% Wkt vs RHBp62.520% Wkt vs LHBp89.820% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 27 | 8.0 | 4 | 43 | 5.38 | 92.8 Phase Production 92.8 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.578× parp96.636.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp89.842.1% Boundary %15%p9221.1% | 89.8 Quality 89.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 85.9 Versatility 85.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9230% Econ vs LHBp94.330% Wkt vs RHBp85.220% Wkt vs LHBp64.820% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 33 | 5.0 | 3 | 29 | 5.8 | 87.9 Phase Production 87.9 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.624× parp89.836.8% Wicket rate0.60/ovp9242.1% Boundary %17%p76.121.1% | 75 Quality 75 = false-shots induced False-shot %37% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 59.8 Versatility 59.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp94.330% Econ vs LHBp26.130% Wkt vs RHBp96.620% Wkt vs LHBp21.620% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | 27 | 6.0 | 3 | 39 | 6.5 | 82.8 Phase Production 82.8 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.699× parp85.236.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.842.1% Boundary %17%p80.721.1% | 96.6 Quality 96.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %47% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 67.3 Versatility 67.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.830% Econ vs LHBp96.630% Wkt vs RHBp37.520% Wkt vs LHBp94.320% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 6.0 | 3 | 44 | 7.33 | 80.5 Phase Production 80.5 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.789× parp7536.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.842.1% Boundary %14%p87.521.1% | 78.4 Quality 78.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 70.5 Versatility 70.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp76.130% Econ vs LHBp8330% Wkt vs RHBp9220% Wkt vs LHBp21.620% | |
| 8 | LA pace | 26 | 11.0 | 4 | 82 | 7.45 | 80.3 Phase Production 80.3 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.802× parp87.536.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp71.642.1% Boundary %18%p85.221.1% | 60.2 Quality 60.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 69.8 Versatility 69.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp62.530% Econ vs LHBp98.930% Wkt vs RHBp820% Wkt vs LHBp98.920% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 6.0 | 3 | 44 | 7.33 | 76.7 Phase Production 76.7 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.789× parp7536.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.842.1% Boundary %19%p69.321.1% | 46.6 Quality 46.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 72.7 Versatility 72.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp55.730% Econ vs LHBp89.830% Wkt vs RHBp71.620% Wkt vs LHBp73.920% | |
| 10 | Off-spin | 17 | 4.0 | 2 | 24 | 6 | 76 Phase Production 76 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.646× parp78.436.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp76.142.1% Boundary %17%p71.621.1% | 64.8 Quality 64.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 69.3 Versatility 69.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp80.730% Econ vs LHBp76.130% Wkt vs RHBp89.820% Wkt vs LHBp21.620% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 23 | 7.0 | 3 | 54 | 7.71 | 71.1 Phase Production 71.1 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.83× parp71.636.8% Wicket rate0.43/ovp73.942.1% Boundary %21%p64.821.1% | 98.9 Quality 98.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %48% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 63 Versatility 63 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.230% Econ vs LHBp39.830% Wkt vs RHBp69.320% Wkt vs LHBp5820% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 25 | 5.0 | 2 | 41 | 8.2 | 65.8 Phase Production 65.8 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.882× parp62.536.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp68.242.1% Boundary %20%p6721.1% | 75 Quality 75 = false-shots induced False-shot %37% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 53.2 Versatility 53.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp69.330% Econ vs LHBp44.330% Wkt vs RHBp80.720% Wkt vs LHBp14.820% | |
| 13 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 5.0 | 2 | 37 | 7.4 | 65.6 Phase Production 65.6 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.796× parp6736.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp68.242.1% Boundary %23%p5821.1% | 87.5 Quality 87.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 74.3 Versatility 74.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp73.930% Econ vs LHBp80.730% Wkt vs RHBp47.720% Wkt vs LHBp9220% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 37 | 5.0 | 1 | 32 | 6.4 | 63.5 Phase Production 63.5 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.689× parp80.736.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp38.642.1% Boundary %13%p8321.1% | 22.7 Quality 22.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 59.5 Versatility 59.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp89.830% Econ vs LHBp46.630% Wkt vs RHBp47.720% Wkt vs LHBp45.520% | |
| 15 | LA pace | 29 | 13.0 | 4 | 118 | 9.08 | 59.6 Phase Production 59.6 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.977× parp53.436.8% Wicket rate0.31/ovp55.742.1% Boundary %20%p78.421.1% | 67 Quality 67 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 58.4 Versatility 58.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp48.930% Econ vs LHBp85.230% Wkt vs RHBp5820% Wkt vs LHBp3320% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 7.0 | 2 | 60 | 8.57 | 58.3 Phase Production 58.3 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.922× parp60.236.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp48.942.1% Boundary %19%p73.921.1% | 8 Quality 8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 58.9 Versatility 58.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6730% Econ vs LHBp5830% Wkt vs RHBp21.620% Wkt vs LHBp85.220% | |
| 17 | Leg-spin | 31 | 3.0 | 1 | 24 | 8 | 54.2 Phase Production 54.2 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.861× parp55.736.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp52.342.1% Boundary %22%p55.721.1% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 60.7 Versatility 60.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp64.830% Econ vs LHBp51.130% Wkt vs RHBp60.220% Wkt vs LHBp69.320% | |
| 18 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 6.0 | 2 | 57 | 9.5 | 52.8 Phase Production 52.8 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.022× parp51.136.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp59.142.1% Boundary %28%p43.221.1% | 26.1 Quality 26.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 58.2 Versatility 58.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp44.330% Econ vs LHBp69.330% Wkt vs RHBp44.320% Wkt vs LHBp76.120% | |
| 19 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 2.0 | 1 | 20 | 10 | 52.5 Phase Production 52.5 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.076× parp48.936.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp63.642.1% Boundary %33%p36.421.1% | 71.6 Quality 71.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 53.4 Versatility 53.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp30.730% Econ vs LHBp71.630% Wkt vs RHBp76.120% Wkt vs LHBp37.520% | |
| 20 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 2 | 59 | 9.83 | 51.1 Phase Production 51.1 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.058× parp46.636.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp59.142.1% Boundary %28%p43.221.1% | 56.8 Quality 56.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 42.7 Versatility 42.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.430% Econ vs LHBp28.430% Wkt vs RHBp64.820% Wkt vs LHBp26.120% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 31 | 11.0 | 0 | 83 | 7.55 | 49.9 Phase Production 49.9 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.812× parp8336.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.142.1% Boundary %17%p89.821.1% | 37.5 Quality 37.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.630% Econ vs LHBp9230% Wkt vs RHBp1.120% Wkt vs LHBp3.420% | |
| 22 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 2.0 | 1 | 23 | 11.5 | 49.1 Phase Production 49.1 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.237× parp39.836.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp63.642.1% Boundary %33%p36.421.1% | 43.2 Quality 43.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 53.5 Versatility 53.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp26.130% Econ vs LHBp65.930% Wkt vs RHBp6720% Wkt vs LHBp62.520% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 33 | 12.0 | 6 | 143 | 11.92 | 47.3 Phase Production 47.3 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.282× parp5.736.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp94.342.1% Boundary %31%p26.121.1% | 10.2 Quality 10.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 49.1 Versatility 49.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.130% Econ vs LHBp55.730% Wkt vs RHBp78.420% Wkt vs LHBp81.820% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 35 | 6.0 | 3 | 69 | 11.5 | 47.1 Phase Production 47.1 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.237× parp23.936.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.842.1% Boundary %33%p18.221.1% | 33 Quality 33 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 40.5 Versatility 40.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp21.630% Econ vs LHBp19.330% Wkt vs RHBp8320% Wkt vs LHBp5820% | |
| 25 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 6.0 | 1 | 52 | 8.67 | 45 Phase Production 45 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.933× parp5836.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp29.542.1% Boundary %25%p53.421.1% | 5.7 Quality 5.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 52.3 Versatility 52.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp60.230% Econ vs LHBp60.230% Wkt vs RHBp35.220% Wkt vs LHBp45.520% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 32 | 4.0 | 1 | 40 | 10 | 43 Phase Production 43 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.076× parp4236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp45.542.1% Boundary %29%p39.821.1% | 35.2 Quality 35.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 43.2 Versatility 43.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.630% Econ vs LHBp35.230% Wkt vs RHBp87.520% Wkt vs LHBp5.720% | |
| 27 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 8.0 | 1 | 64 | 8 | 42.5 Phase Production 42.5 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.861× parp69.336.8% Wicket rate0.13/ovp9.142.1% Boundary %23%p62.521.1% | 1.1 Quality 1.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 45.7 Versatility 45.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8330% Econ vs LHBp4230% Wkt vs RHBp30.720% Wkt vs LHBp10.220% | |
| 28 | LA pace | 27 | 3.0 | 1 | 37 | 12.33 | 38.9 Phase Production 38.9 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.327× parp28.436.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp52.342.1% Boundary %33%p30.721.1% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 47.4 Versatility 47.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.830% Econ vs LHBp65.930% Wkt vs RHBp19.320% Wkt vs LHBp96.620% | |
| 29 | Off-spin | 18 | 4.0 | 0 | 31 | 7.75 | 38.5 Phase Production 38.5 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.834× parp64.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp4.542.1% Boundary %21%p60.221.1% | 17 Quality 17 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 51.6 Versatility 51.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp51.130% Econ vs LHBp78.430% Wkt vs RHBp55.720% Wkt vs LHBp820% | |
| 30 | SLA orthodox | 37 | 5.0 | 1 | 53 | 10.6 | 37 Phase Production 37 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.141× parp37.536.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp38.642.1% Boundary %30%p3321.1% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 40.2 Versatility 40.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4230% Econ vs LHBp3330% Wkt vs RHBp10.220% Wkt vs LHBp78.420% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 32 | 3.0 | 0 | 30 | 10 | 33.6 Phase Production 33.6 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.076× parp44.336.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp15.942.1% Boundary %28%p5021.1% | 85.2 Quality 85.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %44% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 40.9 Versatility 40.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5830% Econ vs LHBp30.730% Wkt vs RHBp26.120% Wkt vs LHBp45.520% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 29 | 5.0 | 1 | 56 | 11.2 | 32.6 Phase Production 32.6 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.205× parp30.736.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp38.642.1% Boundary %33%p23.921.1% | 22.7 Quality 22.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp35.230% Econ vs LHBp23.930% Wkt vs RHBp52.320% Wkt vs LHBp29.520% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 33 | 11.0 | 2 | 114 | 10.36 | 31 Phase Production 31 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.115× parp3336.8% Wicket rate0.18/ovp21.642.1% Boundary %27%p46.621.1% | 83 Quality 83 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 20.2 Versatility 20.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp37.530% Econ vs LHBp14.830% Wkt vs RHBp5.720% Wkt vs LHBp1720% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 34 | 6.0 | 1 | 63 | 10.5 | 29.2 Phase Production 29.2 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.13× parp35.236.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp29.542.1% Boundary %33%p18.221.1% | 56.8 Quality 56.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 39.5 Versatility 39.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp78.430% Econ vs LHBp3.430% Wkt vs RHBp73.920% Wkt vs LHBp1.120% | |
| 35 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 4.0 | 1 | 53 | 13.25 | 28.9 Phase Production 28.9 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.426× parp10.236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp45.542.1% Boundary %33%p28.421.1% | 53.4 Quality 53.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 42 Versatility 42 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp830% Econ vs LHBp51.130% Wkt vs RHBp52.320% Wkt vs LHBp69.320% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 30 | 3.0 | 0 | 40 | 13.33 | 24.3 Phase Production 24.3 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.435× parp19.336.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp15.942.1% Boundary %28%p5021.1% | 14.8 Quality 14.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 24.8 Versatility 24.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp23.930% Econ vs LHBp1730% Wkt vs RHBp3320% Wkt vs LHBp29.520% | |
| 37 | LA pace | 28 | 5.0 | 1 | 67 | 13.4 | 21.8 Phase Production 21.8 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.442× parp836.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp38.642.1% Boundary %37%p12.521.1% | 94.3 Quality 94.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %47% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 26.6 Versatility 26.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3330% Econ vs LHBp1.130% Wkt vs RHBp23.920% Wkt vs LHBp5820% | |
| 38 | RA pace | 29 | 2.0 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 21.4 Phase Production 21.4 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.614× parp1736.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2542.1% Boundary %42%p21.621.1% | 43.2 Quality 43.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 40.2 Versatility 40.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.230% Econ vs LHBp62.530% Wkt vs RHBp39.820% Wkt vs LHBp52.320% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 34 | 2.0 | 0 | 28 | 14 | 20.6 Phase Production 20.6 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.506× parp21.636.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2542.1% Boundary %50%p10.221.1% | 19.3 Quality 19.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 32.5 Versatility 32.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.430% Econ vs LHBp21.630% Wkt vs RHBp4220% Wkt vs LHBp45.520% | |
| 40 | LA pace | 33 | 9.0 | 2 | 104 | 11.56 | 20.5 Phase Production 20.5 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.243× parp14.836.8% Wicket rate0.22/ovp3342.1% Boundary %35%p5.721.1% | 80.7 Quality 80.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 26.4 Versatility 26.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp19.330% Econ vs LHBp830% Wkt vs RHBp3.420% Wkt vs LHBp87.520% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 32 | 3.0 | 0 | 38 | 12.67 | 19.4 Phase Production 19.4 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.363× parp26.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp15.942.1% Boundary %39%p14.821.1% | 30.7 Quality 30.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 37.7 Versatility 37.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1730% Econ vs LHBp51.130% Wkt vs RHBp1720% Wkt vs LHBp69.320% | |
| 42 | SLA orthodox | 35 | 8.0 | 1 | 95 | 11.88 | 10.1 Phase Production 10.1 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.278× parp12.536.8% Wicket rate0.13/ovp9.142.1% Boundary %35%p821.1% | 39.8 Quality 39.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 36.8 Versatility 36.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5.730% Econ vs LHBp73.930% Wkt vs RHBp12.520% Wkt vs LHBp52.320% | |
| 43 | LA pace | 33 | 3.0 | 0 | 46 | 15.33 | 8.7 Phase Production 8.7 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.65× parp3.436.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp15.942.1% Boundary %50%p3.421.1% | 62.5 Quality 62.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 20.3 Versatility 20.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp12.530% Econ vs LHBp11.430% Wkt vs RHBp28.420% Wkt vs LHBp37.520% | |
| 44 | RA pace | 24 | 4.0 | 0 | 62 | 15.5 | 2.6 Phase Production 2.6 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.668× parp1.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp4.542.1% Boundary %54%p1.121.1% | 3.4 Quality 3.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 14.9 Versatility 14.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.430% Econ vs LHBp11.430% Wkt vs RHBp14.820% Wkt vs LHBp37.520% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 31 | 6.0 | 5 | 29 | 4.83 | 97.8 Phase Production 97.8 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.628× parp9944.1% Wicket rate0.83/ovp98.144.1% Boundary %6%p92.311.8% | 99 Quality 99 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 85.6 Versatility 85.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp77.950% Econ vs LHBp93.350% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 25 | 8.0 | 3 | 46 | 5.75 | 84.6 Phase Production 84.6 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.747× parp95.244.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp70.244.1% Boundary %6%p9911.8% | 58.7 Quality 58.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 82.7 Versatility 82.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp66.350% Econ vs LHBp9950% | |
| 3 | Off-spin | 23 | 6.0 | 3 | 36 | 6 | 82.9 Phase Production 82.9 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.78× parp85.644.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp86.544.1% Boundary %11%p59.611.8% | 88.5 Quality 88.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 65.4 Versatility 65.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp93.350% Econ vs LHBp37.550% | |
| 4 | Off-spin | 17 | 7.0 | 3 | 43 | 6.14 | 82.1 Phase Production 82.1 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.798× parp88.544.1% Wicket rate0.43/ovp77.944.1% Boundary %10%p7411.8% | 23.1 Quality 23.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 75 Versatility 75 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp58.750% Econ vs LHBp91.350% | |
| 5 | Off-spin | 33 | 6.0 | 5 | 39 | 6.5 | 81.3 Phase Production 81.3 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.845× parp70.244.1% Wicket rate0.83/ovp98.144.1% Boundary %11%p59.611.8% | 72.1 Quality 72.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 64.4 Versatility 64.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5150% Econ vs LHBp77.950% | |
| 6 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 12.0 | 3 | 79 | 6.58 | 74.8 Phase Production 74.8 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.856× parp91.344.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp52.944.1% Boundary %8%p95.211.8% | 85.6 Quality 85.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 73.1 Versatility 73.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp91.350% Econ vs LHBp54.850% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 74.5 Phase Production 74.5 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.715× parp64.444.1% Wicket rate1.00/ovp90.444.1% Boundary %8%p52.911.8% | 66.3 Quality 66.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 60.6 Versatility 60.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp62.550% Econ vs LHBp58.750% | |
| 8 | Leg-spin | 26 | 11.0 | 4 | 76 | 6.91 | 74.2 Phase Production 74.2 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.898× parp72.144.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp72.144.1% Boundary %9%p89.411.8% | 20.2 Quality 20.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 68.3 Versatility 68.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp47.150% Econ vs LHBp89.450% | |
| 9 | Off-spin | 26 | 6.0 | 2 | 38 | 6.33 | 74 Phase Production 74 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.823× parp79.844.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp65.444.1% Boundary %8%p84.611.8% | 88.5 Quality 88.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 60.6 Versatility 60.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2450% Econ vs LHBp97.150% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 13.0 | 4 | 87 | 6.69 | 73.9 Phase Production 73.9 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.87× parp83.744.1% Wicket rate0.31/ovp60.644.1% Boundary %10%p87.511.8% | 81.7 Quality 81.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 70.2 Versatility 70.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp79.850% Econ vs LHBp60.650% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 14.0 | 5 | 103 | 7.36 | 67.7 Phase Production 67.7 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.956× parp58.744.1% Wicket rate0.36/ovp7444.1% Boundary %11%p77.911.8% | 60.6 Quality 60.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 53.8 Versatility 53.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9950% Econ vs LHBp8.750% | |
| 12 | Off-spin | 18 | 6.0 | 3 | 45 | 7.5 | 67.6 Phase Production 67.6 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.975× parp44.244.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp86.544.1% Boundary %8%p84.611.8% | 47.1 Quality 47.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 47.1 Versatility 47.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp31.750% Econ vs LHBp62.550% | |
| 13 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 7.0 | 2 | 46 | 6.57 | 67.3 Phase Production 67.3 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.854× parp7644.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp56.744.1% Boundary %10%p7411.8% | 23.1 Quality 23.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 66.8 Versatility 66.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp68.350% Econ vs LHBp65.450% | |
| 14 | Off-spin | — | 4.0 | 2 | 27 | 6.75 | 65.8 Phase Production 65.8 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.877× parp60.644.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.744.1% Boundary %17%p2611.8% | 92.3 Quality 92.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp29.850% Econ vs LHBp81.750% | |
| 15 | SLA orthodox | 31 | 10.0 | 2 | 60 | 6 | 63.4 Phase Production 63.4 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.78× parp97.144.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp2544.1% Boundary %10%p80.811.8% | 51.9 Quality 51.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 81.7 Versatility 81.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp95.250% Econ vs LHBp68.350% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 37 | 6.0 | 2 | 42 | 7 | 63.4 Phase Production 63.4 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.91× parp62.544.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp65.444.1% Boundary %11%p59.611.8% | 10.6 Quality 10.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 51.9 Versatility 51.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp87.550% Econ vs LHBp16.350% | |
| 17 | Leg-spin | — | 15.0 | 3 | 97 | 6.47 | 61.5 Phase Production 61.5 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.84× parp93.344.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp20.244.1% Boundary %9%p97.111.8% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 83.7 Versatility 83.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp97.150% Econ vs LHBp70.250% | |
| 18 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 10.0 | 6 | 79 | 7.9 | 61.2 Phase Production 61.2 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.027× parp35.644.1% Wicket rate0.60/ovp95.244.1% Boundary %15%p29.811.8% | 51.9 Quality 51.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp35.650% Econ vs LHBp39.450% | |
| 19 | LA pace | 33 | 2.0 | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 61.2 Phase Production 61.2 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.975× parp39.444.1% Wicket rate1.00/ovp90.444.1% Boundary %17%p33.711.8% | 66.3 Quality 66.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 44.2 Versatility 44.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp37.550% Econ vs LHBp5150% | |
| 20 | SLA orthodox | 29 | 9.0 | 2 | 61 | 6.78 | 60.8 Phase Production 60.8 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.881× parp7444.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp46.244.1% Boundary %11%p66.311.8% | 16.3 Quality 16.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 60.6 Versatility 60.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp89.450% Econ vs LHBp31.750% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 6.0 | 1 | 37 | 6.17 | 60.1 Phase Production 60.1 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.801× parp81.744.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp29.844.1% Boundary %6%p92.311.8% | 37.5 Quality 37.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 74 Versatility 74 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp64.450% Econ vs LHBp83.750% | |
| 22 | Off-spin | 31 | 5.0 | 1 | 33 | 6.6 | 57.2 Phase Production 57.2 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.858× parp68.344.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp5044.1% Boundary %13%p42.311.8% | 62.5 Quality 62.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 63 Versatility 63 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp60.650% Econ vs LHBp65.450% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 23 | 3.4 | 3 | 32 | 8.73 | 56.4 Phase Production 56.4 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.134× parp29.844.1% Wicket rate0.82/ovp93.344.1% Boundary %18%p18.311.8% | 95.2 Quality 95.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %41% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 44.2 Versatility 44.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.650% Econ vs LHBp2.950% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 34 | 4.0 | 2 | 31 | 7.75 | 55.7 Phase Production 55.7 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.007× parp37.544.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.744.1% Boundary %17%p2611.8% | 92.3 Quality 92.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 41.3 Versatility 41.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp52.950% Econ vs LHBp29.850% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 33 | 7.0 | 1 | 43 | 6.14 | 54.9 Phase Production 54.9 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.798× parp88.544.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp16.344.1% Boundary %10%p7411.8% | 83.7 Quality 83.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 72.1 Versatility 72.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4950% Econ vs LHBp95.250% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | 35 | 10.0 | 2 | 68 | 6.8 | 54.9 Phase Production 54.9 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.884× parp77.944.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp2544.1% Boundary %10%p80.811.8% | 6.7 Quality 6.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 71.2 Versatility 71.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp54.850% Econ vs LHBp87.550% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 39 | 4.0 | 2 | 36 | 9 | 52.2 Phase Production 52.2 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.17× parp2444.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.744.1% Boundary %12%p47.111.8% | 97.1 Quality 97.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 33.7 Versatility 33.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp20.250% Econ vs LHBp47.150% | |
| 28 | Off-spin | 34 | 13.0 | 5 | 108 | 8.31 | 51.8 Phase Production 51.8 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.08× parp27.944.1% Wicket rate0.38/ovp7644.1% Boundary %13%p5111.8% | 35.6 Quality 35.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 43.3 Versatility 43.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6.750% Econ vs LHBp79.850% | |
| 29 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 13.0 | 3 | 96 | 7.38 | 48.8 Phase Production 48.8 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.96× parp56.744.1% Wicket rate0.23/ovp43.344.1% Boundary %14%p39.411.8% | 18.3 Quality 18.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 46.2 Versatility 46.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.750% Econ vs LHBp10.650% | |
| 30 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 11.5 | 4 | 95 | 8.03 | 47.6 Phase Production 47.6 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.043× parp33.744.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp68.344.1% Boundary %16%p22.111.8% | 8.7 Quality 8.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 33.7 Versatility 33.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp33.750% Econ vs LHBp33.750% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 35 | 4.0 | 0 | 26 | 6.5 | 42.8 Phase Production 42.8 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.845× parp66.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp12.544.1% Boundary %8%p68.311.8% | 70.2 Quality 70.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 57.7 Versatility 57.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.450% Econ vs LHBp7650% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 29 | 4.0 | 1 | 34 | 8.5 | 41.2 Phase Production 41.2 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.105× parp31.744.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp54.844.1% Boundary %17%p2611.8% | 31.7 Quality 31.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 31.7 Versatility 31.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.350% Econ vs LHBp22.150% | |
| 33 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 10.0 | 2 | 75 | 7.5 | 39.4 Phase Production 39.4 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.975× parp47.144.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp2544.1% Boundary %12%p64.411.8% | 74 Quality 74 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 40.9 Versatility 40.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7550% Econ vs LHBp6.750% | |
| 34 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 5.0 | 1 | 44 | 8.8 | 38.5 Phase Production 38.5 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.144× parp2644.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp5044.1% Boundary %13%p42.311.8% | 14.4 Quality 14.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 42.3 Versatility 42.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp83.750% Econ vs LHBp150% | |
| 35 | Leg-spin | 31 | 11.0 | 2 | 82 | 7.45 | 37 Phase Production 37 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.969× parp5144.1% Wicket rate0.18/ovp18.344.1% Boundary %12%p54.811.8% | 49 Quality 49 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 51 Versatility 51 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp45.250% Econ vs LHBp56.750% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 32 | 4.0 | 0 | 28 | 7 | 35.2 Phase Production 35.2 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.91× parp54.844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp12.544.1% Boundary %12%p47.111.8% | 43.3 Quality 43.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 54.8 Versatility 54.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp56.750% Econ vs LHBp52.950% | |
| 37 | Off-spin | 27 | 16.0 | 5 | 140 | 8.75 | 33.9 Phase Production 33.9 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.137× parp10.644.1% Wicket rate0.31/ovp62.544.1% Boundary %17%p14.411.8% | 2.9 Quality 2.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 39.4 Versatility 39.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4.850% Econ vs LHBp7450% | |
| 38 | LA pace | 27 | 3.0 | 1 | 30 | 10 | 33.5 Phase Production 33.5 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.3× parp14.444.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp58.744.1% Boundary %22%p10.611.8% | 76 Quality 76 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 24 Versatility 24 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp12.550% Econ vs LHBp35.650% | |
| 39 | Leg-spin | 19 | 16.0 | 2 | 120 | 7.5 | 30.7 Phase Production 30.7 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.975× parp52.944.1% Wicket rate0.13/ovp6.744.1% Boundary %15%p37.511.8% | 77.9 Quality 77.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 56.7 Versatility 56.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp27.950% Econ vs LHBp85.650% | |
| 40 | SLA orthodox | 37 | 12.0 | 1 | 90 | 7.5 | 30.3 Phase Production 30.3 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.975× parp4944.1% Wicket rate0.08/ovp144.1% Boundary %11%p70.211.8% | 39.4 Quality 39.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 43.8 Versatility 43.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7550% Econ vs LHBp12.550% | |
| 41 | LA pace | 33 | 2.0 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 29.4 Phase Production 29.4 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.3× parp21.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp36.544.1% Boundary %17%p33.711.8% | 27.9 Quality 27.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 32.2 Versatility 32.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp15.450% Econ vs LHBp4950% | |
| 42 | Off-spin | 34 | 4.0 | 0 | 30 | 7.5 | 29.3 Phase Production 29.3 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.975× parp41.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp12.544.1% Boundary %12%p47.111.8% | 56.7 Quality 56.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 49 Versatility 49 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp72.150% Econ vs LHBp2650% | |
| 43 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 6.0 | 0 | 45 | 7.5 | 28.2 Phase Production 28.2 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.975× parp44.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.844.1% Boundary %11%p59.611.8% | 4.8 Quality 4.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 47.1 Versatility 47.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp70.250% Econ vs LHBp2450% | |
| 44 | LA pace | 29 | 2.0 | 0 | 21 | 10.5 | 28.1 Phase Production 28.1 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.365× parp18.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp36.544.1% Boundary %17%p33.711.8% | 41.3 Quality 41.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 28.4 Versatility 28.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp15.450% Econ vs LHBp41.350% | |
| 45 | SLA orthodox | 39 | 9.0 | 2 | 80 | 8.89 | 27.8 Phase Production 27.8 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.155× parp12.544.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp46.244.1% Boundary %17%p16.311.8% | 45.2 Quality 45.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 24 Versatility 24 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp43.350% Econ vs LHBp4.850% | |
| 46 | LA pace | 26 | 2.0 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 26.9 Phase Production 26.9 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.3× parp21.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp36.544.1% Boundary %25%p12.511.8% | 54.8 Quality 54.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 25 Versatility 25 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp22.150% Econ vs LHBp27.950% | |
| 47 | RA pace | 33 | 2.0 | 0 | 24 | 12 | 20.5 Phase Production 20.5 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.56× parp8.744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp36.544.1% Boundary %33%p4.811.8% | 66.3 Quality 66.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 26 Versatility 26 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8.750% Econ vs LHBp43.350% | |
| 48 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 26 | 13 | 18.8 Phase Production 18.8 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.69× parp4.844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp36.544.1% Boundary %33%p4.811.8% | 27.9 Quality 27.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 16.3 Versatility 16.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp18.350% Econ vs LHBp14.450% | |
| 49 | RA pace | 24 | 2.0 | 0 | 28 | 14 | 18 Phase Production 18 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.82× parp2.944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp36.544.1% Boundary %33%p4.811.8% | 27.9 Quality 27.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 14.4 Versatility 14.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.650% Econ vs LHBp18.350% | |
| 50 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 10.0 | 2 | 93 | 9.3 | 15 Phase Production 15 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.209× parp6.744.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp2544.1% Boundary %18%p8.711.8% | 33.7 Quality 33.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2.950% Econ vs LHBp72.150% | |
| 51 | Leg-spin | — | 6.0 | 0 | 54 | 9 | 11.3 Phase Production 11.3 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.17× parp16.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.844.1% Boundary %17%p20.211.8% | 1 Quality 1 = false-shots induced False-shot %6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 23.1 Versatility 23.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2650% Econ vs LHBp20.250% | |
| 52 | Off-spin | 27 | 10.0 | 1 | 104 | 10.4 | 4.4 Phase Production 4.4 vs all bowlers · n=52 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.352× parp144.1% Wicket rate0.10/ovp8.744.1% Boundary %22%p111.8% | 79.8 Quality 79.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 23.1 Versatility 23.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp150% Econ vs LHBp45.250% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 31 | 8.0 | 7 | 53 | 6.62 | 97.6 Phase Production 97.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.686× parp98.850% Wicket rate0.88/ovp91.516.7% Boundary %8%p98.833.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 73.3 Versatility 73.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep88.640% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp79.526.7% | |
| 2 | Off-spin | 23 | 3.0 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 92.4 Phase Production 92.4 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.414× parp96.343.6% Boundary %6%p87.841.8% Wicket rate1.33/ovp93.914.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 4.0 | 3 | 25 | 6.25 | 87.6 Phase Production 87.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.647× parp8943.6% Boundary %8%p91.541.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp7214.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 64.1 Versatility 64.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep64.1100% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 32 | 6.2 | 3 | 43 | 6.79 | 87 Phase Production 87 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.703× parp93.950% Wicket rate0.47/ovp47.616.7% Boundary %10%p96.333.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 53.3 Versatility 53.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep29.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp93.226.7% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 31 | 2.0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 86.1 Phase Production 86.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.311× parp91.543.6% Boundary %0%p84.141.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp75.614.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 93.8 Versatility 93.8 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep93.8100% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | 17 | 4.0 | 4 | 28 | 7 | 79.7 Phase Production 79.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.725× parp79.343.6% Boundary %12%p76.841.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp8914.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 75 Versatility 75 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep75100% | |
| 7 | Leg-spin | — | 2.0 | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 77.3 Phase Production 77.3 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.466× parp86.643.6% Boundary %8%p68.341.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp75.614.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 75 Versatility 75 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep75100% | |
| 8 | LA pace | 26 | 8.0 | 3 | 65 | 8.12 | 77.2 Phase Production 77.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.841× parp81.750% Wicket rate0.37/ovp30.516.7% Boundary %12%p93.933.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep7540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 9 | Leg-spin | 19 | 3.1 | 1 | 20 | 6.32 | 74.7 Phase Production 74.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.654× parp84.143.6% Boundary %10%p79.341.8% Wicket rate0.32/ovp32.914.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 42.2 Versatility 42.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep42.2100% | |
| 10 | LA pace | 28 | 4.3 | 5 | 34 | 7.56 | 73.6 Phase Production 73.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.782× parp7250% Wicket rate1.11/ovp96.316.7% Boundary %15%p64.633.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 52.1 Versatility 52.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep65.940% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 3.0 | 1 | 22 | 7.33 | 71.5 Phase Production 71.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.759× parp67.143.6% Boundary %6%p87.841.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp37.814.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 42.2 Versatility 42.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep42.2100% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 33 | 4.5 | 2 | 36 | 7.45 | 69.5 Phase Production 69.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.771× parp76.850% Wicket rate0.41/ovp42.716.7% Boundary %14%p7233.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50.3 Versatility 50.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep34.140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp7526.7% | |
| 13 | Leg-spin | — | 2.3 | 0 | 17 | 6.8 | 65.9 Phase Production 65.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.704× parp69.543.6% Boundary %7%p81.741.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp9.814.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 54.7 Versatility 54.7 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep54.7100% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 39 | 2.0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 65 Phase Production 65 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.518× parp74.450% Wicket rate0.50/ovp57.316.7% Boundary %17%p54.933.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep7540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 15 | LA pace | 29 | 9.5 | 6 | 89 | 9.05 | 64.6 Phase Production 64.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.937× parp64.650% Wicket rate0.61/ovp69.516.7% Boundary %17%p62.233.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 48.5 Versatility 48.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep56.840% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 27 | 2.5 | 4 | 22 | 7.76 | 63.8 Phase Production 63.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.804× parp59.850% Wicket rate1.41/ovp98.816.7% Boundary %18%p52.433.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 61.2 Versatility 61.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep52.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp88.626.7% | |
| 17 | Off-spin | 18 | 3.0 | 1 | 26 | 8.67 | 61.6 Phase Production 61.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.897× parp57.343.6% Boundary %11%p74.441.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp37.814.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 76.6 Versatility 76.6 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep76.6100% | |
| 18 | Off-spin | 27 | 2.0 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 59.2 Phase Production 59.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.725× parp62.243.6% Boundary %8%p68.341.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp24.414.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 19 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 3.0 | 3 | 31 | 10.33 | 53.8 Phase Production 53.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.07× parp52.443.6% Boundary %22%p45.141.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp82.914.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 56.2 Versatility 56.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep56.2100% | |
| 20 | SLA orthodox | 29 | 3.5 | 2 | 42 | 10.96 | 52 Phase Production 52 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.134× parp42.743.6% Boundary %17%p57.341.8% Wicket rate0.52/ovp64.614.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 51.6 Versatility 51.6 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep51.6100% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 26 | 2.3 | 0 | 26 | 10.4 | 46.5 Phase Production 46.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.077× parp5050% Wicket rate0.00/ovp9.816.7% Boundary %13%p59.833.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 28.5 Versatility 28.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6.840% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 35 | 8.0 | 6 | 85 | 10.62 | 43.9 Phase Production 43.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.1× parp40.250% Wicket rate0.75/ovp86.616.7% Boundary %23%p2833.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 33.9 Versatility 33.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep20.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 23 | Off-spin | 26 | 2.0 | 1 | 22 | 11 | 43.8 Phase Production 43.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.139× parp45.143.6% Boundary %25%p37.841.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp57.314.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 24 | Off-spin | 27 | 3.0 | 0 | 30 | 10 | 43.2 Phase Production 43.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.035× parp54.943.6% Boundary %22%p45.141.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2.414.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 39.1 Versatility 39.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep39.1100% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 25 | 7.0 | 2 | 72 | 10.29 | 43.1 Phase Production 43.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.065× parp47.650% Wicket rate0.29/ovp15.916.7% Boundary %19%p5033.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 52.7 Versatility 52.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep2540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp97.726.7% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 24 | 2.0 | 0 | 24 | 12 | 35.6 Phase Production 35.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.243× parp37.850% Wicket rate0.00/ovp24.416.7% Boundary %25%p37.833.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 64.8 Versatility 64.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep97.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 32 | 3.0 | 1 | 37 | 12.33 | 31.7 Phase Production 31.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.277× parp20.750% Wicket rate0.34/ovp37.816.7% Boundary %22%p45.133.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 43.9 Versatility 43.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep45.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 2.0 | 0 | 26 | 13 | 31.1 Phase Production 31.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.346× parp26.843.6% Boundary %25%p37.841.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp24.414.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 17.2 Versatility 17.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep17.2100% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 23 | 4.5 | 1 | 54 | 11.17 | 30.9 Phase Production 30.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.157× parp35.450% Wicket rate0.20/ovp13.416.7% Boundary %24%p32.933.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50.3 Versatility 50.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep61.440% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 29 | 3.0 | 3 | 41 | 13.67 | 28.7 Phase Production 28.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.415× parp13.450% Wicket rate1.00/ovp82.916.7% Boundary %28%p24.433.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 43.9 Versatility 43.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep45.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 31 | LA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 1 | 26 | 13 | 27.8 Phase Production 27.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.346× parp26.850% Wicket rate0.50/ovp57.316.7% Boundary %33%p14.633.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 69.1 Versatility 69.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep7540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp84.126.7% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 30 | 4.0 | 2 | 50 | 12.5 | 27.6 Phase Production 27.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.294× parp18.350% Wicket rate0.50/ovp5016.7% Boundary %25%p30.533.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 41.2 Versatility 41.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep38.640% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 33 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 3.0 | 0 | 36 | 12 | 24.9 Phase Production 24.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.243× parp32.943.6% Boundary %28%p24.441.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2.414.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 21.9 Versatility 21.9 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep21.9100% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 33 | 9.2 | 5 | 103 | 11.04 | 24.8 Phase Production 24.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.143× parp23.250% Wicket rate0.53/ovp67.116.7% Boundary %25%p6.133.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 41.8 Versatility 41.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.940% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp70.526.7% | |
| 35 | RA pace | 32 | 5.1 | 4 | 68 | 13.16 | 23.2 Phase Production 23.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.363× parp6.150% Wicket rate0.77/ovp79.316.7% Boundary %26%p20.733.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 63 Versatility 63 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep93.240% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 36 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 2.0 | 1 | 30 | 15 | 21.4 Phase Production 21.4 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.553× parp15.943.6% Boundary %33%p14.641.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp57.314.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 34.4 Versatility 34.4 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep34.4100% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 29 | 2.0 | 1 | 31 | 15.5 | 19.9 Phase Production 19.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.605× parp1150% Wicket rate0.50/ovp57.316.7% Boundary %33%p14.633.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 28.5 Versatility 28.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6.840% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 38 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 4.2 | 1 | 50 | 11.54 | 19.5 Phase Production 19.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.195× parp30.543.6% Boundary %27%p8.541.8% Wicket rate0.23/ovp18.314.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 32.8 Versatility 32.8 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep32.8100% | |
| 39 | LA pace | 33 | 2.0 | 0 | 32 | 16 | 13.2 Phase Production 13.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.657× parp8.550% Wicket rate0.00/ovp24.416.7% Boundary %33%p14.633.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 28.5 Versatility 28.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6.840% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% | |
| 40 | Leg-spin | 31 | 2.4 | 1 | 50 | 18.75 | 8.7 Phase Production 8.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.941× parp3.743.6% Boundary %44%p1.241.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp45.114.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 23.4 Versatility 23.4 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep23.4100% | |
| 41 | LA pace | 33 | 5.0 | 1 | 80 | 16 | 2.8 Phase Production 2.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.657× parp1.250% Wicket rate0.20/ovp6.116.7% Boundary %33%p3.733.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 59.4 Versatility 59.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep84.140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp34.126.7% |
Sylvester Dsouza
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
73.4
Scout Score
Overs 12.5 · Wkts 10 · Runs 76 · Econ 5.92
73.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay79.162.3%49.3
Middle66.315.6%10.3
Death62.222.1%13.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p82.50.91×
Scout Score73.4
79.1Powerplay62.3% of overs · 4w · 5.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp92.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp89.815%
Versatilityp85.910%
Trajectoryp82.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.578× par48bp96.636.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov48bp89.842.1%
Boundary %15%48bp9221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.681× par34bp9230%
Econ vs LHB0.326× par14bp94.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.53/ov34bp85.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.43/ov14bp64.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 40%
66.3Middle15.6% of overs · 2w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp66.315%
Versatilityp60.612%
Trajectoryp82.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.715× par12bp64.444.1%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp90.444.1%
Boundary %8%12bp52.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.675× par7bp62.550%
Econ vs LHB0.766× par5bp58.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
62.2Death22.1% of overs · 4w · 7.76 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.848%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp61.215%
Trajectoryp82.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.804× par17bp59.850%
Wicket rate1.41/ov17bp98.816.7%
Boundary %18%17bp52.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%17bp52.340%
Slower ball017bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer38.23517bp88.626.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Pravesh Pal
Bowler · Off-spin · age 23
71.3
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 48 · Econ 5.33
71.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle70.266.7%46.8
Death73.433.3%24.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score71.3
70.2Middle66.7% of overs · 3w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp88.515%
Versatilityp65.412%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.78× par36bp85.644.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp86.544.1%
Boundary %11%36bp59.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.703× par28bp93.350%
Econ vs LHB1.053× par8bp37.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
73.4Death33.3% of overs · 4w · 4 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp92.455%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp50.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.414× par18bp96.343.6%
Boundary %6%18bp87.841.8%
Wicket rate1.33/ov18bp93.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Prasoon Singh
Bowler · Off-spin · age 17
67.4
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 95 · Econ 6.33
67.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay67.526.7%18.0
Middle64.646.7%30.2
Death72.426.7%19.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p84.20.89×
Scout Score67.4
67.5Powerplay26.7% of overs · 2w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp7638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp64.815%
Versatilityp69.310%
Trajectoryp84.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.646× par24bp78.436.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp76.142.1%
Boundary %17%24bp71.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.643× par17bp80.730%
Econ vs LHB0.652× par7bp76.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.71/ov17bp89.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp21.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
64.6Middle46.7% of overs · 3w · 6.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp23.115%
Versatilityp7512%
Trajectoryp84.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.798× par42bp88.544.1%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp77.944.1%
Boundary %10%42bp7411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.88× par17bp58.750%
Econ vs LHB0.735× par25bp91.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
72.4Death26.7% of overs · 4w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.755%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp758%
Trajectoryp84.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.725× par24bp79.343.6%
Boundary %12%24bp76.841.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov24bp8914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7213bp75100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Mayuresh Tandel
Bowler · Off-spin · age 33
67
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 56 · Econ 8
67OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle6785.7%57.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score67
67Middle85.7% of overs · 5w · 6.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp72.115%
Versatilityp64.412%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.845× par36bp70.244.1%
Wicket rate0.83/ov36bp98.144.1%
Boundary %11%36bp59.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.931× par22bp5150%
Econ vs LHB0.711× par14bp77.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
Arjun Tendulkar
Bowler · LA pace · age 26
66
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 167 · Econ 7.95
66OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay68.652.4%35.9
Middle42.59.5%4.0
Death68.238.1%26.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p85.80.89×
Scout Score66
68.6Powerplay52.4% of overs · 4w · 7.45 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp80.338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp60.215%
Versatilityp69.810%
Trajectoryp85.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.802× par66bp87.536.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov66bp71.642.1%
Boundary %18%66bp85.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.964× par50bp62.530%
Econ vs LHB0.285× par16bp98.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.12/ov50bp820%
Wkt vs LHB1.13/ov16bp98.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 30%
42.5Middle9.5% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp54.815%
Versatilityp2512%
Trajectoryp85.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.3× par12bp21.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp36.544.1%
Boundary %25%12bp12.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.313× par6bp22.150%
Econ vs LHB1.277× par6bp27.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
68.2Death38.1% of overs · 3w · 8.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp77.248%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp55.815%
Trajectoryp85.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.841× par48bp81.750%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp30.516.7%
Boundary %12%48bp93.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%48bp7540%
Slower ball048bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer048bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Ashutosh Ghagre
Bowler · Off-spin
63.1
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 33 · Econ 6.6
63.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle63.180%50.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score63.1
63.1Middle80% of overs · 2w · 6.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp92.315%
Versatilityp55.812%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.877× par24bp60.644.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp81.744.1%
Boundary %17%24bp2611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.09× par13bp29.850%
Econ vs LHB0.627× par11bp81.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 38%
Pratik Mishra
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
62
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 159 · Econ 7.95
62OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay6325%15.8
Middle71.340%28.5
Death50.635%17.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p79.20.94×
Scout Score62
63Powerplay25% of overs · 2w · 8.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp7515%
Versatilityp53.210%
Trajectoryp79.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.882× par30bp62.536.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp68.242.1%
Boundary %20%30bp6721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.847× par22bp69.330%
Econ vs LHB0.977× par8bp44.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.55/ov22bp80.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp14.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 37%
71.3Middle40% of overs · 3w · 5.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp58.715%
Versatilityp82.712%
Trajectoryp79.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.747× par48bp95.244.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp70.244.1%
Boundary %6%48bp9911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.893× par30bp66.350%
Econ vs LHB0.511× par18bp9950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
50.6Death35% of overs · 2w · 10.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.148%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp52.715%
Trajectoryp79.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.065× par42bp47.650%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp15.916.7%
Boundary %19%42bp5033.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%42bp2540%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer51.1942bp97.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Siddhant Singh
Bowler · Off-spin · age 26
61.4
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 60 · Econ 7.5
61.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle66.275%49.6
Death46.725%11.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score61.4
66.2Middle75% of overs · 2w · 6.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp7438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp88.515%
Versatilityp60.612%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.823× par36bp79.844.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp65.444.1%
Boundary %8%36bp84.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.151× par13bp2450%
Econ vs LHB0.633× par23bp97.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
46.7Death25% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.855%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp50.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.139× par12bp45.143.6%
Boundary %25%12bp37.841.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp57.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Tushar Deshpande
Bowler · RA pace · age 31
60.2
Scout Score
Overs 25.0 · Wkts 12 · Runs 165 · Econ 6.6
60.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay43.944%19.3
Middle75.524%18.1
Death71.232%22.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p7.51.17×
Scout Score60.2
43.9Powerplay44% of overs · 0w · 7.55 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.938%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp37.515%
Versatilityp5010%
Trajectoryp7.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.812× par66bp8336.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov66bp1.142.1%
Boundary %17%66bp89.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.921× par44bp71.630%
Econ vs LHB0.592× par22bp9230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov44bp1.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov22bp3.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 27%
75.5Middle24% of overs · 5w · 4.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp97.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp9915%
Versatilityp85.612%
Trajectoryp7.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.628× par36bp9944.1%
Wicket rate0.83/ov36bp98.144.1%
Boundary %6%36bp92.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.722× par24bp77.950%
Econ vs LHB0.447× par12bp93.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 42%
71.2Death32% of overs · 7w · 6.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp97.648%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp73.315%
Trajectoryp7.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.686× par48bp98.850%
Wicket rate0.88/ov48bp91.516.7%
Boundary %8%48bp98.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%48bp88.640%
Slower ball048bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer29.16748bp79.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Vaibhav Mali
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 32
60
Scout Score
Overs 22.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 177 · Econ 8.05
60OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay50.331.8%16.0
Middle68.859.1%40.7
Death36.19.1%3.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p75.80.97×
Scout Score60
50.3Powerplay31.8% of overs · 2w · 8.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp815%
Versatilityp58.910%
Trajectoryp75.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.922× par42bp60.236.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp48.942.1%
Boundary %19%42bp73.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.921× par37bp6730%
Econ vs LHB0.912× par5bp5830%
Wkt vs RHB0.16/ov37bp21.620%
Wkt vs LHB1.20/ov5bp85.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
68.8Middle59.1% of overs · 4w · 6.69 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp81.715%
Versatilityp70.212%
Trajectoryp75.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.87× par78bp83.744.1%
Wicket rate0.31/ov78bp60.644.1%
Boundary %10%78bp87.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.844× par56bp79.850%
Econ vs LHB0.94× par22bp60.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
36.1Death9.1% of overs · 1w · 15 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.455%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp34.48%
Trajectoryp75.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.553× par12bp15.943.6%
Boundary %33%12bp14.641.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp57.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.5512bp34.4100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Aditya Dhumal
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 32
59.9
Scout Score
Overs 19.1 · Wkts 6 · Runs 160 · Econ 8.35
59.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay46.620.9%9.7
Middle63.773%46.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p99.20.67×
Scout Score59.9
46.6Powerplay20.9% of overs · 1w · 13.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.938%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp53.415%
Versatilityp4210%
Trajectoryp99.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.426× par24bp10.236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp45.542.1%
Boundary %33%24bp28.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.42× par24bp830%
Econ vs LHB—0bp51.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.25/ov24bp52.320%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp69.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 29%
63.7Middle73% of overs · 5w · 7.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.738%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp60.615%
Versatilityp53.812%
Trajectoryp99.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.956× par84bp58.744.1%
Wicket rate0.36/ov84bp7444.1%
Boundary %11%84bp77.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.716× par44bp9950%
Econ vs LHB1.207× par40bp8.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
Ajay Mishra
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 31
59.9
Scout Score
Overs 26.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 149 · Econ 5.73
59.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay61.453.8%33.0
Middle55.938.5%21.5
Death69.57.7%5.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p17.51.09×
Scout Score59.9
61.4Powerplay53.8% of overs · 6w · 5.93 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp94.138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp28.415%
Versatilityp61.810%
Trajectoryp17.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.638× par84bp98.936.8%
Wicket rate0.43/ov84bp87.542.1%
Boundary %14%84bp98.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.463× par68bp98.930%
Econ vs LHB1.385× par16bp5.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.35/ov68bp62.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.75/ov16bp89.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
55.9Middle38.5% of overs · 2w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp51.915%
Versatilityp81.712%
Trajectoryp17.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.78× par60bp97.144.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp2544.1%
Boundary %10%60bp80.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.803× par52bp95.250%
Econ vs LHB0.67× par8bp68.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 23%
69.5Death7.7% of overs · 2w · 3 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp86.155%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp93.88%
Trajectoryp17.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.311× par12bp91.543.6%
Boundary %0%12bp84.141.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp75.614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.2811bp93.8100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Rohan Raje
Bowler · RA pace · age 39
58.7
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 64 · Econ 9.14
58.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle57.957.1%33.1
Death60.428.6%17.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p69.20.98×
Scout Score58.7
57.9Middle57.1% of overs · 2w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp97.115%
Versatilityp33.712%
Trajectoryp69.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.17× par24bp2444.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp81.744.1%
Boundary %12%24bp47.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.333× par13bp20.250%
Econ vs LHB0.975× par11bp47.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 42%
60.4Death28.6% of overs · 1w · 5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp6548%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp55.815%
Trajectoryp69.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.518× par12bp74.450%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp57.316.7%
Boundary %17%12bp54.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%12bp7540%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Kartik Mishra
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
57
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 73 · Econ 7.3
57OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay56.920%11.4
Middle5770%39.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p74.20.97×
Scout Score57
56.9Powerplay20% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp71.615%
Versatilityp53.410%
Trajectoryp74.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.076× par12bp48.936.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp63.642.1%
Boundary %33%12bp36.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.378× par7bp30.730%
Econ vs LHB0.652× par5bp71.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.86/ov7bp76.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp37.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 42%
57Middle70% of overs · 2w · 6.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp23.115%
Versatilityp66.812%
Trajectoryp74.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.854× par42bp7644.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp56.744.1%
Boundary %10%42bp7411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.848× par26bp68.350%
Econ vs LHB0.862× par16bp65.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
Akhil Herwadkar
Bowler · Off-spin · age 31
56.2
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 35 · Econ 5.83
56.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle56.283.3%46.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score56.2
56.2Middle83.3% of overs · 1w · 6.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp62.515%
Versatilityp6312%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.858× par30bp68.344.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp5044.1%
Boundary %13%30bp42.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.844× par14bp60.650%
Econ vs LHB0.862× par16bp65.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 27%
Karsh Kothari
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 30
56
Scout Score
Overs 13.2 · Wkts 3 · Runs 104 · Econ 7.8
56OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay52.745%23.7
Middle59.345%26.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p94.20.82×
Scout Score56
52.7Powerplay45% of overs · 2w · 9.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp26.115%
Versatilityp58.210%
Trajectoryp94.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.022× par36bp51.136.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp59.142.1%
Boundary %28%36bp43.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.079× par28bp44.330%
Econ vs LHB0.815× par8bp69.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.22/ov28bp44.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.75/ov8bp76.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
59.3Middle45% of overs · 1w · 6.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp37.515%
Versatilityp7412%
Trajectoryp94.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.801× par36bp81.744.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp29.844.1%
Boundary %6%36bp92.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.863× par21bp64.450%
Econ vs LHB0.715× par15bp83.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 19%
Shams Mulani
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 29
55.2
Scout Score
Overs 22.5 · Wkts 10 · Runs 170 · Econ 7.45
55.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay67.643.8%29.6
Middle45.639.4%18.0
Death45.516.8%7.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p2.51.24×
Scout Score55.2
67.6Powerplay43.8% of overs · 6w · 6.7 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp94.438%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp69.315%
Versatilityp75.510%
Trajectoryp2.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.721× par60bp9236.8%
Wicket rate0.60/ov60bp96.642.1%
Boundary %13%60bp94.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.582× par42bp96.630%
Econ vs LHB1.05× par18bp37.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.57/ov42bp94.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.67/ov18bp81.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 32%
45.6Middle39.4% of overs · 2w · 6.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp16.315%
Versatilityp60.612%
Trajectoryp2.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.881× par54bp7444.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp46.244.1%
Boundary %11%54bp66.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.788× par39bp89.450%
Econ vs LHB1.124× par15bp31.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
45.5Death16.8% of overs · 2w · 10.96 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp5255%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp51.68%
Trajectoryp2.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.134× par23bp42.743.6%
Boundary %17%23bp57.341.8%
Wicket rate0.52/ov23bp64.614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.1316bp51.6100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Sagar Chabria
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 26
54.8
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 81 · Econ 6.75
54.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle54.891.7%50.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p29.21.02×
Scout Score54.8
54.8Middle91.7% of overs · 4w · 6.91 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp20.215%
Versatilityp68.312%
Trajectoryp29.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.898× par66bp72.144.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov66bp72.144.1%
Boundary %9%66bp89.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.975× par42bp47.150%
Econ vs LHB0.766× par24bp89.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 18%
Shashank Attarde
Bowler · Off-spin · age 34
54.4
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 148 · Econ 7.4
54.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay73.135%25.6
Middle44.365%28.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p15.81.1×
Scout Score54.4
73.1Powerplay35% of overs · 5w · 5.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp96.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp9215%
Versatilityp74.810%
Trajectoryp15.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.615× par42bp94.336.8%
Wicket rate0.71/ov42bp98.942.1%
Boundary %10%42bp96.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.536× par18bp87.530%
Econ vs LHB0.679× par24bp87.530%
Wkt vs RHB1.33/ov18bp98.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.25/ov24bp12.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 43%
44.3Middle65% of overs · 5w · 8.31 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp35.615%
Versatilityp43.312%
Trajectoryp15.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.08× par78bp27.944.1%
Wicket rate0.38/ov78bp7644.1%
Boundary %13%78bp5111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.298× par37bp6.750%
Econ vs LHB0.878× par41bp79.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
Amartya Raje
Bowler · Off-spin · age 18
54.2
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 102 · Econ 7.85
54.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay43.130.8%13.3
Middle58.246.2%26.9
Death61.223.1%14.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p72.50.98×
Scout Score54.2
43.1Powerplay30.8% of overs · 0w · 7.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp1715%
Versatilityp51.610%
Trajectoryp72.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.834× par24bp64.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp4.542.1%
Boundary %21%24bp60.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.964× par4bp51.130%
Econ vs LHB0.815× par20bp78.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov4bp55.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov20bp820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
58.2Middle46.2% of overs · 3w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp47.115%
Versatilityp47.112%
Trajectoryp72.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.975× par36bp44.244.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp86.544.1%
Boundary %8%36bp84.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.066× par17bp31.750%
Econ vs LHB0.887× par19bp62.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
61.2Death23.1% of overs · 1w · 8.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.655%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp76.68%
Trajectoryp72.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.897× par18bp57.343.6%
Boundary %11%18bp74.441.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp37.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.628bp76.6100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Naman Pushpak
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 19
54.2
Scout Score
Overs 19.1 · Wkts 3 · Runs 140 · Econ 7.3
54.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle51.683.5%43.1
Death67.616.5%11.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p89.20.87×
Scout Score54.2
51.6Middle83.5% of overs · 2w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.738%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp77.915%
Versatilityp56.712%
Trajectoryp89.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.975× par96bp52.944.1%
Wicket rate0.13/ov96bp6.744.1%
Boundary %15%96bp37.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.05× par60bp27.950%
Econ vs LHB0.851× par36bp85.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 27%
67.6Death16.5% of overs · 1w · 6.32 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.755%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp42.28%
Trajectoryp89.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.654× par19bp84.143.6%
Boundary %10%19bp79.341.8%
Wicket rate0.32/ov19bp32.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.6917bp42.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Akash Parkar
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
53.1
Scout Score
Overs 14.2 · Wkts 4 · Runs 111 · Econ 7.74
53.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay42.927.9%12.0
Middle42.427.9%11.8
Death66.444.2%29.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p34.21.01×
Scout Score53.1
42.9Powerplay27.9% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp4338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp35.215%
Versatilityp43.210%
Trajectoryp34.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.076× par24bp4236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp45.542.1%
Boundary %29%24bp39.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.286× par3bp46.630%
Econ vs LHB1.055× par21bp35.230%
Wkt vs RHB2.00/ov3bp87.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov21bp5.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
42.4Middle27.9% of overs · 0w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp43.315%
Versatilityp54.812%
Trajectoryp34.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.91× par24bp54.844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp12.544.1%
Boundary %12%24bp47.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.63× par5bp56.750%
Econ vs LHB0.968× par19bp52.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 21%
66.4Death44.2% of overs · 3w · 6.79 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp8748%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp53.315%
Trajectoryp34.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.703× par38bp93.950%
Wicket rate0.47/ov38bp47.616.7%
Boundary %10%38bp96.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%38bp29.540%
Slower ball038bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer47.36838bp93.226.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Ankur Singh
Bowler · LA pace · age 28
52.2
Scout Score
Overs 9.3 · Wkts 6 · Runs 101 · Econ 10.63
52.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay43.752.6%23.0
Death61.747.4%29.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score52.2
43.7Powerplay52.6% of overs · 1w · 13.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp94.315%
Versatilityp26.610%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.442× par30bp836.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp38.642.1%
Boundary %37%30bp12.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.2× par15bp3330%
Econ vs LHB1.694× par15bp1.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov15bp23.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp5820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 47%
61.7Death47.4% of overs · 5w · 7.56 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.648%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp52.115%
Trajectoryp50.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.782× par27bp7250%
Wicket rate1.11/ov27bp96.316.7%
Boundary %15%27bp64.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%27bp65.940%
Slower ball027bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer027bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Irfan Umair
Bowler · LA pace · age 29
52.1
Scout Score
Overs 24.5 · Wkts 10 · Runs 228 · Econ 9.18
52.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay5452.3%28.2
Middle34.78.1%2.8
Death53.139.6%21.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p19.21.08×
Scout Score52.1
54Powerplay52.3% of overs · 4w · 9.08 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp6715%
Versatilityp58.410%
Trajectoryp19.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.977× par78bp53.436.8%
Wicket rate0.31/ov78bp55.742.1%
Boundary %20%78bp78.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.042× par58bp48.930%
Econ vs LHB0.782× par20bp85.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.31/ov58bp5820%
Wkt vs LHB0.30/ov20bp3320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 31%
34.7Middle8.1% of overs · 0w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp41.315%
Versatilityp28.412%
Trajectoryp19.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.365× par12bp18.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp36.544.1%
Boundary %17%12bp33.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.706× par6bp15.450%
Econ vs LHB1.021× par6bp41.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
53.1Death39.6% of overs · 6w · 9.05 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.648%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp48.515%
Trajectoryp19.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.937× par59bp64.650%
Wicket rate0.61/ov59bp69.516.7%
Boundary %17%59bp62.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%59bp56.840%
Slower ball059bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer059bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Omkar Tarmale
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
51.5
Scout Score
Overs 15.3 · Wkts 7 · Runs 140 · Econ 9.03
51.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay61.745.2%27.9
Middle53.623.7%12.7
Death3531.2%10.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p0.81.36×
Scout Score51.5
61.7Powerplay45.2% of overs · 3w · 7.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp98.915%
Versatilityp6310%
Trajectoryp0.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.83× par42bp71.636.8%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp73.942.1%
Boundary %21%42bp64.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.714× par27bp85.230%
Econ vs LHB1.043× par15bp39.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.44/ov27bp69.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp5820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 48%
53.6Middle23.7% of overs · 3w · 8.73 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp95.215%
Versatilityp44.212%
Trajectoryp0.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.134× par22bp29.844.1%
Wicket rate0.82/ov22bp93.344.1%
Boundary %18%22bp18.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.43× par11bp85.650%
Econ vs LHB1.811× par11bp2.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 41%
35Death31.2% of overs · 1w · 11.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.948%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp50.315%
Trajectoryp0.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.157× par29bp35.450%
Wicket rate0.20/ov29bp13.416.7%
Boundary %24%29bp32.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%29bp61.440%
Slower ball029bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer029bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Yash Dicholkar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 30
50.1
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 152 · Econ 8.44
50.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay61.227.8%17.0
Middle50.355.6%28.0
Death30.716.7%5.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p22.51.05×
Scout Score50.1
61.2Powerplay27.8% of overs · 2w · 7.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp87.515%
Versatilityp74.310%
Trajectoryp22.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.796× par30bp6736.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp68.242.1%
Boundary %23%30bp5821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.865× par26bp73.930%
Econ vs LHB0.326× par4bp80.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.23/ov26bp47.720%
Wkt vs LHB1.50/ov4bp9220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 40%
50.3Middle55.6% of overs · 6w · 7.9 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp51.915%
Versatilityp37.512%
Trajectoryp22.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.027× par60bp35.644.1%
Wicket rate0.60/ov60bp95.244.1%
Boundary %15%60bp29.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.03× par39bp35.650%
Econ vs LHB1.021× par21bp39.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 23%
30.7Death16.7% of overs · 0w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.955%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp21.98%
Trajectoryp22.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.243× par18bp32.943.6%
Boundary %28%18bp24.441.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp2.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.1316bp21.9100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Vedant Gore
Bowler · Leg-spin
49.8
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 122 · Econ 6.78
49.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle48.283.3%40.2
Death61.511.1%6.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p4.21.22×
Scout Score49.8
48.2Middle83.3% of overs · 3w · 6.47 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp12.515%
Versatilityp83.712%
Trajectoryp4.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.84× par90bp93.344.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov90bp20.244.1%
Boundary %9%90bp97.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.788× par52bp97.150%
Econ vs LHB0.907× par38bp70.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 18%
61.5Death11.1% of overs · 2w · 4.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp77.355%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp758%
Trajectoryp4.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.466× par12bp86.643.6%
Boundary %8%12bp68.341.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp75.614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.5111bp75100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Maxwell Swaminathan
Bowler · Off-spin · age 27
49.5
Scout Score
Overs 25.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 209 · Econ 8.36
49.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay75.324%18.1
Middle39.664%25.3
Death50.312%6.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p90.80.86×
Scout Score49.5
75.3Powerplay24% of overs · 3w · 6.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp96.615%
Versatilityp67.310%
Trajectoryp90.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.699× par36bp85.236.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp81.842.1%
Boundary %17%36bp80.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.169× par11bp39.830%
Econ vs LHB0.495× par25bp96.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov11bp37.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.72/ov25bp94.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 47%
39.6Middle64% of overs · 5w · 8.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp33.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp2.915%
Versatilityp39.412%
Trajectoryp90.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.137× par96bp10.644.1%
Wicket rate0.31/ov96bp62.544.1%
Boundary %17%96bp14.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.295× par59bp4.850%
Econ vs LHB0.89× par37bp7450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 14%
50.3Death12% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.255%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp39.18%
Trajectoryp90.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.035× par18bp54.943.6%
Boundary %22%18bp45.141.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp2.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.717bp39.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Musheer Khan
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 21
49.4
Scout Score
Overs 22.2 · Wkts 5 · Runs 181 · Econ 8.1
49.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.626.9%10.1
Middle63.553.7%34.1
Death2719.4%5.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p9.21.14×
Scout Score49.4
37.6Powerplay26.9% of overs · 1w · 8.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp4538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp5.715%
Versatilityp52.310%
Trajectoryp9.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.933× par36bp5836.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp29.542.1%
Boundary %25%36bp53.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.944× par32bp60.230%
Econ vs LHB0.815× par4bp60.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.19/ov32bp35.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp45.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 14%
63.5Middle53.7% of overs · 3w · 6.58 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp85.615%
Versatilityp73.112%
Trajectoryp9.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.856× par72bp91.344.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov72bp52.944.1%
Boundary %8%72bp95.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.83× par56bp91.350%
Econ vs LHB0.958× par16bp54.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 29%
27Death19.4% of overs · 1w · 11.54 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.555%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp32.88%
Trajectoryp9.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.195× par26bp30.543.6%
Boundary %27%26bp8.541.8%
Wicket rate0.23/ov26bp18.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7915bp32.8100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Deepak Shetty
Bowler · RA pace · age 34
49.2
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 67 · Econ 9.57
49.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay32.628.6%9.3
Middle57.557.1%32.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score49.2
32.6Powerplay28.6% of overs · 0w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp19.315%
Versatilityp32.510%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.506× par12bp21.636.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp2542.1%
Boundary %50%12bp10.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.366× par8bp28.430%
Econ vs LHB1.792× par4bp21.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov8bp4220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp45.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 8%
57.5Middle57.1% of overs · 2w · 7.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.738%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp92.315%
Versatilityp41.312%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.007× par24bp37.544.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp81.744.1%
Boundary %17%24bp2611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.853× par12bp52.950%
Econ vs LHB1.149× par12bp29.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 38%
Parikshit Valsangkar
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 31
47.9
Scout Score
Overs 16.4 · Wkts 4 · Runs 156 · Econ 9.36
47.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay57.318%10.3
Middle49.666%32.7
Death30.616%4.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p95.80.8×
Scout Score47.9
57.3Powerplay18% of overs · 1w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.238%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp60.710%
Trajectoryp95.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.861× par18bp55.736.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp52.342.1%
Boundary %22%18bp55.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.857× par18bp64.830%
Econ vs LHB—0bp51.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov18bp60.220%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp69.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
49.6Middle66% of overs · 2w · 7.45 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp3738%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp4915%
Versatilityp5112%
Trajectoryp95.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.969× par66bp5144.1%
Wicket rate0.18/ov66bp18.344.1%
Boundary %12%66bp54.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.981× par53bp45.250%
Econ vs LHB0.943× par13bp56.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 23%
30.6Death16% of overs · 1w · 18.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp8.755%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp23.48%
Trajectoryp95.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.941× par16bp3.743.6%
Boundary %44%16bp1.241.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov16bp45.114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.9416bp23.4100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Shivam Dube
Bowler · RA pace · age 33
47
Scout Score
Overs 21.2 · Wkts 9 · Runs 175 · Econ 8.2
47OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay64.723.4%15.1
Middle55.232.8%18.1
Death31.443.8%13.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p5.81.2×
Scout Score47
64.7Powerplay23.4% of overs · 3w · 5.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp87.938%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp7515%
Versatilityp59.810%
Trajectoryp5.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.624× par30bp89.836.8%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp9242.1%
Boundary %17%30bp76.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.391× par23bp94.330%
Econ vs LHB1.396× par7bp26.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.78/ov23bp96.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp21.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 37%
55.2Middle32.8% of overs · 1w · 6.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp83.715%
Versatilityp72.112%
Trajectoryp5.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.798× par42bp88.544.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp16.344.1%
Boundary %10%42bp7411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.956× par28bp4950%
Econ vs LHB0.492× par14bp95.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 31%
31.4Death43.8% of overs · 5w · 11.04 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.848%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp41.815%
Trajectoryp5.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.143× par56bp23.250%
Wicket rate0.53/ov56bp67.116.7%
Boundary %25%56bp6.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%56bp15.940%
Slower ball056bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer11.60756bp70.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Siddharth Raut
Bowler · RA pace · age 33
46.8
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 121 · Econ 10.08
46.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay46.891.7%42.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p70.80.98×
Scout Score46.8
46.8Powerplay91.7% of overs · 2w · 10.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp3138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp8315%
Versatilityp20.210%
Trajectoryp70.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.115× par66bp3336.8%
Wicket rate0.18/ov66bp21.642.1%
Boundary %27%66bp46.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.108× par29bp37.530%
Econ vs LHB1.127× par37bp14.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov29bp5.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.32/ov37bp1720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 35%
Atharva Bhosale
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
46.6
Scout Score
Overs 22.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 171 · Econ 7.77
46.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay58.327.3%15.9
Middle40.759.1%24.1
Death48.313.6%6.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p14.21.11×
Scout Score46.6
58.3Powerplay27.3% of overs · 3w · 7.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp46.615%
Versatilityp72.710%
Trajectoryp14.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.789× par36bp7536.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp81.842.1%
Boundary %19%36bp69.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.989× par26bp55.730%
Econ vs LHB0.261× par10bp89.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.46/ov26bp71.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.60/ov10bp73.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
40.7Middle59.1% of overs · 3w · 7.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp18.315%
Versatilityp46.212%
Trajectoryp14.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.96× par78bp56.744.1%
Wicket rate0.23/ov78bp43.344.1%
Boundary %14%78bp39.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.843× par57bp81.750%
Econ vs LHB1.277× par21bp10.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 18%
48.3Death13.6% of overs · 3w · 10.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.855%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp56.28%
Trajectoryp14.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.07× par18bp52.443.6%
Boundary %22%18bp45.141.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp82.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.9716bp56.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Rahul Sawant
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 35
45.6
Scout Score
Overs 19.3 · Wkts 5 · Runs 168 · Econ 8.62
45.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.741%15.0
Middle52.751.3%27.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p97.50.72×
Scout Score45.6
36.7Powerplay41% of overs · 1w · 11.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp10.138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp39.815%
Versatilityp36.810%
Trajectoryp97.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.278× par48bp12.536.8%
Wicket rate0.13/ov48bp9.142.1%
Boundary %35%48bp821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.328× par46bp5.730%
Econ vs LHB0× par2bp73.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.13/ov46bp12.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov2bp52.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 27%
52.7Middle51.3% of overs · 2w · 6.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp6.715%
Versatilityp71.212%
Trajectoryp97.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.884× par60bp77.944.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp2544.1%
Boundary %10%60bp80.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.957× par51bp54.850%
Econ vs LHB0.511× par9bp87.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 13%
Saksham Parashar
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
45.2
Scout Score
Overs 4.3 · Wkts 1 · Runs 50 · Econ 11.11
45.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Death45.255.6%25.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score45.2
45.2Death55.6% of overs · 0w · 10.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.548%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp28.515%
Trajectoryp50.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.077× par15bp5050%
Wicket rate0.00/ov15bp9.816.7%
Boundary %13%15bp59.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%15bp6.840%
Slower ball015bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer015bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Atharva Ankolekar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 25
44.6
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 133 · Econ 7.82
44.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.147.1%17.5
Middle37.129.4%10.9
Death69.123.5%16.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p27.51.02×
Scout Score44.6
37.1Powerplay47.1% of overs · 1w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp1.115%
Versatilityp45.710%
Trajectoryp27.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.861× par48bp69.336.8%
Wicket rate0.13/ov48bp9.142.1%
Boundary %23%48bp62.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.794× par34bp8330%
Econ vs LHB1.024× par14bp4230%
Wkt vs RHB0.17/ov34bp30.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov14bp10.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 12%
37.1Middle29.4% of overs · 1w · 8.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp14.415%
Versatilityp42.312%
Trajectoryp27.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.144× par30bp2644.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp5044.1%
Boundary %13%30bp42.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.591× par16bp83.750%
Econ vs LHB1.751× par14bp150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 13%
69.1Death23.5% of overs · 3w · 6.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp87.655%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp64.18%
Trajectoryp27.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.647× par24bp8943.6%
Boundary %8%24bp91.541.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp7214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.6214bp64.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Dhrumil Matkar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 30
44.6
Scout Score
Overs 15.5 · Wkts 5 · Runs 144 · Econ 9.09
44.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay52.112.6%6.6
Middle4474.7%32.9
Death40.712.6%5.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p80.80.92×
Scout Score44.6
52.1Powerplay12.6% of overs · 1w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp43.215%
Versatilityp53.510%
Trajectoryp80.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.237× par12bp39.836.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp63.642.1%
Boundary %33%12bp36.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.344× par11bp26.130%
Econ vs LHB0× par1bp65.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.55/ov11bp6720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov1bp62.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
44Middle74.7% of overs · 4w · 8.03 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp8.715%
Versatilityp33.712%
Trajectoryp80.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.043× par71bp33.744.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov71bp68.344.1%
Boundary %16%71bp22.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.029× par49bp33.750%
Econ vs LHB1.08× par22bp33.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
40.7Death12.6% of overs · 0w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp31.155%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp17.28%
Trajectoryp80.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.346× par12bp26.843.6%
Boundary %25%12bp37.841.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp24.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.146bp17.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Pragnesh Durgesh Kanpillewar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 24
44.6
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 79 · Econ 7.18
44.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle44.690.9%40.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p10.81.14×
Scout Score44.6
44.6Middle90.9% of overs · 2w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp7415%
Versatilityp40.912%
Trajectoryp10.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.975× par60bp47.144.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp2544.1%
Boundary %12%60bp64.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.862× par53bp7550%
Econ vs LHB1.861× par7bp6.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 27%
Hitesh Kadam
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 37
44.5
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 109 · Econ 9.08
44.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay38.541.7%16.1
Middle49.550%24.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score44.5
38.5Powerplay41.7% of overs · 1w · 10.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp3738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp12.515%
Versatilityp40.210%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.141× par30bp37.536.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp38.642.1%
Boundary %30%30bp3321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.09× par23bp4230%
Econ vs LHB1.303× par7bp3330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov23bp10.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.86/ov7bp78.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
49.5Middle50% of overs · 2w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp10.615%
Versatilityp51.912%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.91× par36bp62.544.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp65.444.1%
Boundary %11%36bp59.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.729× par27bp87.550%
Econ vs LHB1.447× par9bp16.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 14%
Sagar Mishra
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 32
44.5
Scout Score
Overs 19.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 159 · Econ 8.37
44.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay64.131.6%20.3
Middle2952.6%15.3
Death56.715.8%9.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p12.51.12×
Scout Score44.5
64.1Powerplay31.6% of overs · 3w · 7.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp80.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp78.415%
Versatilityp70.510%
Trajectoryp12.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.789× par36bp7536.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp81.842.1%
Boundary %14%36bp87.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.842× par29bp76.130%
Econ vs LHB0.559× par7bp8330%
Wkt vs RHB0.62/ov29bp9220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp21.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 36%
29Middle52.6% of overs · 2w · 9.3 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp1538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp33.715%
Versatilityp37.512%
Trajectoryp12.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.209× par60bp6.744.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp2544.1%
Boundary %18%60bp8.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.323× par50bp2.950%
Econ vs LHB0.689× par10bp72.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
56.7Death15.8% of overs · 1w · 7.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.555%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp42.28%
Trajectoryp12.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.759× par18bp67.143.6%
Boundary %6%18bp87.841.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp37.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.8216bp42.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Harsh Tanna
Bowler · LA pace · age 27
44.4
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 93 · Econ 11.62
44.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay45.637.5%17.1
Middle44.637.5%16.7
Death42.325%10.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score44.4
45.6Powerplay37.5% of overs · 1w · 12.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.938%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp47.410%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.327× par18bp28.436.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp52.342.1%
Boundary %33%18bp30.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.399× par17bp14.830%
Econ vs LHB0× par1bp65.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov17bp19.320%
Wkt vs LHB6.00/ov1bp96.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
44.6Middle37.5% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp33.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp7615%
Versatilityp2412%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.3× par18bp14.444.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp58.744.1%
Boundary %22%18bp10.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.329× par16bp12.550%
Econ vs LHB1.149× par2bp35.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
42.3Death25% of overs · 1w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.848%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp69.115%
Trajectoryp50.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.346× par12bp26.850%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp57.316.7%
Boundary %33%12bp14.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%12bp7540%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer33.33312bp84.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Mohit Avasthi
Bowler · RA pace · age 33
44.1
Scout Score
Overs 18.5 · Wkts 8 · Runs 203 · Econ 10.78
44.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay40.563.7%25.8
Middle35.910.6%3.8
Death56.525.7%14.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p25.81.03×
Scout Score44.1
40.5Powerplay63.7% of overs · 6w · 11.92 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp10.215%
Versatilityp49.110%
Trajectoryp25.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.282× par72bp5.736.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov72bp94.342.1%
Boundary %31%72bp26.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.393× par54bp1.130%
Econ vs LHB0.941× par18bp55.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.44/ov54bp78.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.67/ov18bp81.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 21%
35.9Middle10.6% of overs · 0w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp66.315%
Versatilityp2612%
Trajectoryp25.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.56× par12bp8.744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp36.544.1%
Boundary %33%12bp4.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.575× par12bp8.750%
Econ vs LHB—0bp43.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
56.5Death25.7% of overs · 2w · 7.45 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.548%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp50.315%
Trajectoryp25.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.771× par29bp76.850%
Wicket rate0.41/ov29bp42.716.7%
Boundary %14%29bp7233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%29bp34.140%
Slower ball029bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer22.41429bp7526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Ashray Sajnani
Bowler · RA pace
44
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 107 · Econ 11.89
44OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay4966.7%32.7
Middle2922.2%6.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p32.51.01×
Scout Score44
49Powerplay66.7% of overs · 2w · 9.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp56.815%
Versatilityp42.710%
Trajectoryp32.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.058× par36bp46.636.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp59.142.1%
Boundary %28%36bp43.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.986× par15bp53.430%
Econ vs LHB1.117× par21bp28.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.40/ov15bp64.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.29/ov21bp26.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 31%
29Middle22.2% of overs · 0w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp18.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp27.915%
Versatilityp16.312%
Trajectoryp32.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.69× par12bp4.844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp36.544.1%
Boundary %33%12bp4.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.969× par4bp18.350%
Econ vs LHB1.532× par8bp14.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 8%
Shardul Thakur
Bowler · RA pace · age 34
43.8
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 86 · Econ 10.75
43.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay43.875%32.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p67.50.99×
Scout Score43.8
43.8Powerplay75% of overs · 1w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.238%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp56.815%
Versatilityp39.510%
Trajectoryp67.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.13× par36bp35.236.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp29.542.1%
Boundary %33%36bp18.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.5× par9bp78.430%
Econ vs LHB1.352× par27bp3.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.67/ov9bp73.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov27bp1.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 31%
Prathamesh Dake
Bowler · RA pace · age 35
43.2
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 180 · Econ 10
43.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay42.533.3%14.2
Middle48.322.2%10.7
Death41.244.4%18.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p20.81.05×
Scout Score43.2
42.5Powerplay33.3% of overs · 3w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp3315%
Versatilityp40.510%
Trajectoryp20.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.237× par36bp23.936.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp81.842.1%
Boundary %33%36bp18.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.255× par21bp21.630%
Econ vs LHB1.216× par15bp19.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.57/ov21bp8320%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp5820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
48.3Middle22.2% of overs · 0w · 6.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp70.215%
Versatilityp57.712%
Trajectoryp20.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.845× par24bp66.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp12.544.1%
Boundary %8%24bp68.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.006× par18bp39.450%
Econ vs LHB0.383× par6bp7650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 29%
41.2Death44.4% of overs · 6w · 10.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.948%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp33.915%
Trajectoryp20.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.1× par48bp40.250%
Wicket rate0.75/ov48bp86.616.7%
Boundary %23%48bp2833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%48bp20.540%
Slower ball048bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer048bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Royston Dias
Bowler · LA pace · age 33
43.1
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 199 · Econ 12.44
43.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay44.856.2%25.2
Middle59.812.5%7.5
Death33.331.2%10.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p87.50.88×
Scout Score43.1
44.8Powerplay56.2% of overs · 2w · 11.56 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp80.715%
Versatilityp26.410%
Trajectoryp87.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.243× par54bp14.836.8%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp3342.1%
Boundary %35%54bp5.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.199× par37bp19.330%
Econ vs LHB1.342× par17bp830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov37bp3.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.71/ov17bp87.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 35%
59.8Middle12.5% of overs · 2w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp66.315%
Versatilityp44.212%
Trajectoryp87.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.975× par12bp39.444.1%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp90.444.1%
Boundary %17%12bp33.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.05× par9bp37.550%
Econ vs LHB0.766× par3bp5150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
33.3Death31.2% of overs · 1w · 16 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp2.848%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp59.415%
Trajectoryp87.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.657× par30bp1.250%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp6.116.7%
Boundary %33%30bp3.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%30bp84.140%
Slower ball030bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer030bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Siddhesh Lad
Bowler · Off-spin · age 34
43.1
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 30 · Econ 7.5
43.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle43.1100%43.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score43.1
43.1Middle100% of overs · 0w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp56.715%
Versatilityp4912%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.975× par24bp41.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp12.544.1%
Boundary %12%24bp47.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.492× par8bp72.150%
Econ vs LHB1.197× par16bp2650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
Jamshed Alam
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
42.5
Scout Score
Overs 9.1 · Wkts 5 · Runs 109 · Econ 11.89
42.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay48.232.7%15.8
Death39.256.4%22.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score42.5
48.2Powerplay32.7% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp33.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp85.215%
Versatilityp40.910%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.076× par18bp44.336.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp15.942.1%
Boundary %28%18bp5021.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.918× par14bp5830%
Econ vs LHB1.629× par4bp30.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov14bp26.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp45.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 44%
39.2Death56.4% of overs · 4w · 13.16 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp23.248%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp6315%
Trajectoryp50.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.363× par31bp6.150%
Wicket rate0.77/ov31bp79.316.7%
Boundary %26%31bp20.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate13%31bp93.240%
Slower ball031bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer031bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Minad Manjrekar
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
42.2
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 131 · Econ 10.92
42.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay40.541.7%16.9
Middle44.533.3%14.8
Death42.125%10.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p77.50.97×
Scout Score42.2
40.5Powerplay41.7% of overs · 1w · 11.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp22.715%
Versatilityp34.110%
Trajectoryp77.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.205× par30bp30.736.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp38.642.1%
Boundary %33%30bp23.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.125× par24bp35.230%
Econ vs LHB1.52× par6bp23.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.25/ov24bp52.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov6bp29.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
44.5Middle33.3% of overs · 1w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp31.715%
Versatilityp31.712%
Trajectoryp77.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.105× par24bp31.744.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp54.844.1%
Boundary %17%24bp2611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.963× par18bp41.350%
Econ vs LHB1.532× par6bp22.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
42.1Death25% of overs · 3w · 13.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.748%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp43.915%
Trajectoryp77.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.415× par18bp13.450%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp82.916.7%
Boundary %28%18bp24.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%18bp45.540%
Slower ball018bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer018bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Tanush Kotian
Bowler · Off-spin · age 27
41.8
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 127 · Econ 9.77
41.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle38.176.9%29.3
Death60.215.4%9.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p92.50.84×
Scout Score41.8
38.1Middle76.9% of overs · 1w · 10.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp4.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp79.815%
Versatilityp23.112%
Trajectoryp92.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.352× par60bp144.1%
Wicket rate0.10/ov60bp8.744.1%
Boundary %22%60bp111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.598× par35bp150%
Econ vs LHB1.011× par25bp45.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
60.2Death15.4% of overs · 0w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.255%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp92.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.725× par12bp62.243.6%
Boundary %8%12bp68.341.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp24.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Vinayak Bhoir
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 37
41.1
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 127 · Econ 7.06
41.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay49.427.8%13.7
Middle37.666.7%25.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p24.21.03×
Scout Score41.1
49.4Powerplay27.8% of overs · 1w · 6.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp22.715%
Versatilityp59.510%
Trajectoryp24.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.689× par30bp80.736.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp38.642.1%
Boundary %13%30bp8321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.643× par26bp89.830%
Econ vs LHB0.977× par4bp46.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.23/ov26bp47.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp45.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
37.6Middle66.7% of overs · 1w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp39.415%
Versatilityp43.812%
Trajectoryp24.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.975× par72bp4944.1%
Wicket rate0.08/ov72bp144.1%
Boundary %11%72bp70.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.862× par53bp7550%
Econ vs LHB1.29× par19bp12.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 21%
Shashikant Kadam
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 39
37.8
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 80 · Econ 8.89
37.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle37.8100%37.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score37.8
37.8Middle100% of overs · 2w · 8.89 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp45.215%
Versatilityp2412%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.155× par54bp12.544.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp46.244.1%
Boundary %17%54bp16.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.971× par30bp43.350%
Econ vs LHB1.373× par24bp4.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
Aishwary Surve
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
37.4
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 84 · Econ 12
37.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay34.342.9%14.7
Death40.442.9%17.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score37.4
34.3Powerplay42.9% of overs · 0w · 12.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.438%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp30.715%
Versatilityp37.710%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.363× par18bp26.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp15.942.1%
Boundary %39%18bp14.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.357× par18bp1730%
Econ vs LHB—0bp51.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov18bp1720%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp69.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
40.4Death42.9% of overs · 1w · 12.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp31.748%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp43.915%
Trajectoryp50.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.277× par18bp20.750%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp37.816.7%
Boundary %22%18bp45.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%18bp45.540%
Slower ball018bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer018bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Kruthik Hanagavadi
Bowler · RA pace · age 30
35.7
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 90 · Econ 12.86
35.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay32.542.9%13.9
Death3857.1%21.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score35.7
32.5Powerplay42.9% of overs · 0w · 13.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp14.815%
Versatilityp24.810%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.435× par18bp19.336.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp15.942.1%
Boundary %28%18bp5021.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.339× par12bp23.930%
Econ vs LHB1.629× par6bp1730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp3320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov6bp29.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 11%
38Death57.1% of overs · 2w · 12.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.648%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp41.215%
Trajectoryp50.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.294× par24bp18.350%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp5016.7%
Boundary %25%24bp30.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%24bp38.640%
Slower ball024bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer024bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Sairaj Patil
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
34.8
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 75 · Econ 15
34.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.240%14.9
Death32.440%13.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score34.8
37.2Powerplay40% of overs · 0w · 15 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.438%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp43.215%
Versatilityp40.210%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.614× par12bp1736.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp2542.1%
Boundary %42%12bp21.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.8× par10bp10.230%
Econ vs LHB0.652× par2bp62.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov10bp39.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov2bp52.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
32.4Death40% of overs · 1w · 15.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.948%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp28.515%
Trajectoryp50.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.605× par12bp1150%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp57.316.7%
Boundary %33%12bp14.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp6.840%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Divyaansh Saxena
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 25
34.7
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 54 · Econ 7.71
34.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle34.785.7%29.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score34.7
34.7Middle85.7% of overs · 0w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp4.815%
Versatilityp47.112%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.975× par36bp44.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp3.844.1%
Boundary %11%36bp59.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.822× par23bp70.250%
Econ vs LHB1.238× par13bp2450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 8%
Atif Attarwala
Bowler · LA pace · age 33
33.1
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 98 · Econ 14
33.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay33.342.9%14.3
Middle36.828.6%10.5
Death29.228.6%8.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score33.1
33.3Powerplay42.9% of overs · 0w · 15.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp8.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp62.515%
Versatilityp20.310%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.65× par18bp3.436.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp15.942.1%
Boundary %50%18bp3.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.533× par13bp12.530%
Econ vs LHB1.955× par5bp11.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov13bp28.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp37.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
36.8Middle28.6% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp27.915%
Versatilityp32.212%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.3× par12bp21.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp36.544.1%
Boundary %17%12bp33.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.706× par6bp15.450%
Econ vs LHB0.894× par6bp4950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 8%
29.2Death28.6% of overs · 0w · 16 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp13.248%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp28.515%
Trajectoryp50.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.657× par12bp8.550%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp24.416.7%
Boundary %33%12bp14.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp6.840%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Vedant Gurav
Bowler · Leg-spin
32.8
Scout Score
Overs 8.3 · Wkts 0 · Runs 71 · Econ 8.35
32.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle22.870.6%16.1
Death56.829.4%16.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p30.81.02×
Scout Score32.8
22.8Middle70.6% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp11.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp115%
Versatilityp23.112%
Trajectoryp30.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.17× par36bp16.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp3.844.1%
Boundary %17%36bp20.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.09× par26bp2650%
Econ vs LHB1.379× par10bp20.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 6%
56.8Death29.4% of overs · 0w · 6.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.955%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp54.78%
Trajectoryp30.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.704× par15bp69.543.6%
Boundary %7%15bp81.741.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov15bp9.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.489bp54.7100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Dhanit Raut
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
29.7
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 114 · Econ 14.25
29.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay21.650%10.8
Middle30.325%7.6
Death45.425%11.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50.81×
Scout Score29.7
21.6Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 15.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp2.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp3.415%
Versatilityp14.910%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.668× par24bp1.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp4.542.1%
Boundary %54%24bp1.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.59× par19bp3.430%
Econ vs LHB1.955× par5bp11.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov19bp14.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp37.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 4%
30.3Middle25% of overs · 0w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=52
Componentpctweight
Productionp1838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp27.915%
Versatilityp14.412%
Trajectoryp50.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.82× par12bp2.944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp36.544.1%
Boundary %33%12bp4.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.772× par8bp10.650%
Econ vs LHB1.915× par4bp18.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 8%
45.4Death25% of overs · 0w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.648%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp64.815%
Trajectoryp50.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.243× par12bp37.850%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp24.416.7%
Boundary %25%12bp37.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate17%12bp97.740%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp34.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0