| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 21 | 9 | 223 | 175 | 127.4 | 27.9 | 22 | 6 | 63.4 Scout Score 63.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production66.840% Impact5027% Versatility4915% Shot quality78.66% Trajectory92.912% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.3×[50, 27, 1] | 66.8 Production 66.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.02× parp64.335% True Avg1.01× parp64.330% Balls / boundary3.95p64.317.5% Balls / dismissal21.75p78.617.5% | 78.6 Shot Quality 78.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.4% Control · Build79.4% Phase-weighted control85.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 49 Versatility 49 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp35.726.7% vs Spin SRp5026.7% Accel into Consp64.320% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 2 | LHB | 20 | 6 | 120 | 63 | 190.5 | 24 | 10 | 9 | 60 Scout Score 60 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production73.640% Impact5027% Versatility65.215% Shot quality506% Trajectory35.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.83×[11, 16, 0] | 73.6 Production 73.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.57× parp78.635% True Avg1.42× parp78.630% Balls / boundary2.86p78.617.5% Balls / dismissal20p5017.5% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.8% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control79.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 65.2 Versatility 65.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp64.326.7% vs Spin SRp92.926.7% Accel into Consp5020% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 3 | RHB | 24 | 10 | 269 | 177 | 152 | 29.9 | 25 | 16 | 58.7 Scout Score 58.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production87.940% Impact5027% Versatility41.415% Shot quality21.46% Trajectory21.412% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.76×[20, 17, 0] | 87.9 Production 87.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.38× parp92.935% True Avg1.32× parp92.930% Balls / boundary3.21p92.917.5% Balls / dismissal21.2p64.317.5% | 21.4 Shot Quality 21.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.2% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control74.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 41.4 Versatility 41.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp92.926.7% vs Spin SRp7.126.7% Accel into Consp7.120% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 4 | RHB | 24 | 10 | 215 | 149 | 144.3 | 21.5 | 17 | 12 | 48.6 Scout Score 48.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production29.640% Impact5027% Versatility66.215% Shot quality64.36% Trajectory78.612% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.19×[24, 42, 1] | 29.6 Production 29.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.95× parp5035% True Avg0.49× parp7.130% Balls / boundary4.93p5017.5% Balls / dismissal11.5p7.117.5% | 64.3 Shot Quality 64.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation89.8% Control · Build64.5% Phase-weighted control83.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 66.2 Versatility 66.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5026.7% vs Spin SRp78.626.7% Accel into Consp92.920% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 5 | RHB | 29 | 8 | 266 | 174 | 152.9 | 38 | 13 | 17 | 41.6 Scout Score 41.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production28.940% Impact5027% Versatility67.115% Shot quality92.96% Trajectory7.112% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.43×[0, 2, 13] | 28.9 Production 28.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp35.735% True Avg0.62× parp21.430% Balls / boundary5.62p35.717.5% Balls / dismissal15p21.417.5% | 92.9 Shot Quality 92.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation90.7% Control · Build79.7% Phase-weighted control86.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 67.1 Versatility 67.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp78.626.7% vs Spin SRp64.326.7% Accel into Consp78.620% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | 36 | 2 | 35 | 39 | 89.7 | 17.5 | 2 | 1 | 40.1 Scout Score 40.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4040% Impact5027% Versatility28.115% Shot quality7.16% Trajectory5012% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[13, 22] | 40 Production 40 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.71× parp21.435% True Avg0.92× parp5030% Balls / boundary9.67p7.117.5% Balls / dismissal29p92.917.5% | 7.1 Shot Quality 7.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Build33.3% Phase-weighted control64.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 28.1 Versatility 28.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp7.126.7% vs Spin SRp21.426.7% Accel into Consp35.720% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 7 | RHB | 31 | 11 | 202 | 165 | 122.4 | 18.4 | 21 | 4 | 37.6 Scout Score 37.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production23.240% Impact5027% Versatility32.915% Shot quality35.76% Trajectory64.312% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.01×[22, 9, 43] | 23.2 Production 23.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp7.135% True Avg0.68× parp35.730% Balls / boundary6p21.417.5% Balls / dismissal18p35.717.5% | 35.7 Shot Quality 35.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build82.9% Phase-weighted control76.9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 32.9 Versatility 32.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp21.426.7% vs Spin SRp35.726.7% Accel into Consp21.420% Pressure entryp5026.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 33 | 9 | 244 | 166 | 147 | 48.8 | 18 | 13 | 70.8 Scout Score 70.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production91.628% Impact5027% Versatility77.427% Shot quality67.98% Trajectory53.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[1, 19, 37] | 91.6 Production 91.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.2× parp89.342.9% True Avg2.75× parp96.432.1% Balls / boundary5.21p89.325% | 67.9 Shot Quality 67.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation89.3% Control · Build77.5% Phase-weighted control80.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 77.4 Versatility 77.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep74.844.4% vs LA-orthodox21bp85 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball13bp58.3 Spin hittingp82.629.6% Off-spin25bp93.8 LA-orthodox37bp75 Leg-spin1b1b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p82.114.8% Reach deathp67.911.1% | |
| 2 | LHB | 22 | 8 | 159 | 118 | 134.7 | 26.5 | 6 | 10 | 64.3 Scout Score 64.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.128% Impact5027% Versatility63.327% Shot quality758% Trajectory89.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.14×[14, 52, 28] | 67.1 Production 67.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.98× parp67.942.9% True Avg2.18× parp82.132.1% Balls / boundary9.6p46.425% | 75 Shot Quality 75 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86.4% Control · Build79.7% Phase-weighted control81.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep62.544.4% vs Off-spin29bp62.5 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball6b6b <min Spin hittingp62.429.6% Off-spin31bp31.2 LA-orthodox36bp89.3 Leg-spin4b4b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p53.614.8% Reach deathp82.111.1% | |
| 3 | RHB | 28 | 9 | 218 | 157 | 138.9 | 24.2 | 17 | 9 | 62.2 Scout Score 62.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production58.928% Impact5027% Versatility59.327% Shot quality82.18% Trajectory96.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.26×[46, 8, 28] | 58.9 Production 58.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.06× parp7542.9% True Avg0.82× parp2532.1% Balls / boundary6.7p7525% | 82.1 Shot Quality 82.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.9% Control · Build79.5% Phase-weighted control81.3% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 59.3 Versatility 59.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7144.4% vs LA-orthodox60bp75 vs Leg-spin12bp25 vs Short ball15bp91.7 Spin hittingp53.229.6% Off-spin17bp81.2 LA-orthodox65bp46.4 Leg-spin12bp50 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p67.914.8% Reach deathp17.911.1% | |
| 4 | LHB | 21 | 9 | 200 | 131 | 152.7 | 25 | 12 | 15 | 60.3 Scout Score 60.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production89.528% Impact5027% Versatility66.327% Shot quality258% Trajectory17.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[29, 26, 4] | 89.5 Production 89.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.26× parp96.442.9% True Avg1.35× parp7532.1% Balls / boundary4.65p96.425% | 25 Shot Quality 25 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation63.3% Control · Build76.2% Phase-weighted control72% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 66.3 Versatility 66.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep56.944.4% vs Off-spin27bp87.5 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball17bp8.3 Spin hittingp76.329.6% Off-spin28bp56.2 LA-orthodox28bp96.4 Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p89.314.8% Reach deathp46.411.1% | |
| 5 | RHB | 21 | 9 | 252 | 200 | 126 | 36 | 26 | 7 | 56.4 Scout Score 56.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production61.728% Impact5027% Versatility46.527% Shot quality60.78% Trajectory82.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.08×[5, 36, 56] | 61.7 Production 61.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.9× parp53.642.9% True Avg1.21× parp67.932.1% Balls / boundary7.68p67.925% | 60.7 Shot Quality 60.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation77.4% Control · Build81% Phase-weighted control79.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 46.5 Versatility 46.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep37.344.4% vs LA-orthodox49bp25 vs Leg-spin1b1b <min vs Short ball16bp75 Spin hittingp24.529.6% Off-spin40bp43.8 LA-orthodox56bp10.7 Leg-spin1b1b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p96.414.8% Reach deathp7511.1% | |
| 6 | LHB | 27 | 10 | 296 | 260 | 113.8 | 49.3 | 19 | 7 | 55.7 Scout Score 55.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production68.128% Impact5027% Versatility3427% Shot quality89.38% Trajectory67.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.07×[0, 1, 44] | 68.1 Production 68.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp60.742.9% True Avg2.05× parp89.332.1% Balls / boundary9.8p53.625% | 89.3 Shot Quality 89.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.8% Control · Build84.4% Phase-weighted control84.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 34 Versatility 34 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep19.944.4% vs Off-spin68bp12.5 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball23bp41.7 Spin hittingp34.329.6% Off-spin68bp6.2 LA-orthodox44bp82.1 Leg-spin11bp16.7 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p60.714.8% Reach deathp53.611.1% | |
| 7 | RHB | 24 | 5 | 59 | 65 | 90.8 | 14.8 | 5 | 1 | 50.9 Scout Score 50.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production37.828% Impact5027% Versatility59.827% Shot quality39.38% Trajectory7510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.08×[0, 28, 14] | 37.8 Production 37.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.8× parp2542.9% True Avg1.02× parp53.632.1% Balls / boundary9.17p39.325% | 39.3 Shot Quality 39.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.1% Control · Build75.9% Phase-weighted control74.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 59.8 Versatility 59.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep9544.4% vs LA-orthodox31bp95 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp53.629.6% Off-spin9b9b <min LA-orthodox35bp53.6 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p3.614.8% Reach deathp10.711.1% | |
| 8 | RHB | 28 | 9 | 211 | 162 | 130.2 | 23.4 | 18 | 7 | 49.2 Scout Score 49.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production70.728% Impact5027% Versatility45.527% Shot quality32.18% Trajectory10.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.93×[45, 0, 37] | 70.7 Production 70.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.06× parp82.142.9% True Avg1.05× parp46.432.1% Balls / boundary6.45p82.125% | 32.1 Shot Quality 32.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.7% Control · Build68.8% Phase-weighted control74.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 45.5 Versatility 45.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep43.944.4% vs LA-orthodox30bp45 vs Leg-spin13bp75 vs Short ball23bp25 Spin hittingp48.929.6% Off-spin23bp68.8 LA-orthodox38bp17.9 Leg-spin21bp83.3 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p7514.8% Reach deathp3.611.1% | |
| 9 | RHB | — | 4 | 43 | 41 | 104.9 | 10.8 | 4 | 1 | 40.9 Scout Score 40.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production37.528% Impact5027% Versatility4727% Shot quality3.68% Trajectory39.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[1, 25, 16] | 37.5 Production 37.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.81× parp39.342.9% True Avg0.64× parp39.332.1% Balls / boundary8.5p32.125% | 3.6 Shot Quality 3.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build53.8% Phase-weighted control58.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 47 Versatility 47 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep6544.4% vs LA-orthodox15bp65 vs Leg-spin2b2b <min vs Short ball7b7b <min Spin hittingp32.129.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox17bp32.1 Leg-spin2b2b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p39.314.8% Reach deathp2511.1% | |
| 10 | LHB | 22 | 10 | 130 | 107 | 121.5 | 21.7 | 13 | 2 | 40.9 Scout Score 40.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production40.828% Impact5027% Versatility44.527% Shot quality17.98% Trajectory2510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[24, 9, 0] | 40.8 Production 40.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.89× parp46.442.9% True Avg0.65× parp17.932.1% Balls / boundary8p60.725% | 17.9 Shot Quality 17.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation65.6% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control71.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 44.5 Versatility 44.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep37.544.4% vs Off-spin22bp37.5 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp47.929.6% Off-spin22bp18.8 LA-orthodox32bp67.9 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p46.414.8% Reach deathp60.711.1% | |
| 11 | RHB | 30 | 2 | 47 | 45 | 104.4 | 47 | 3 | 1 | 39.3 Scout Score 39.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.528% Impact5027% Versatility28.927% Shot quality46.48% Trajectory32.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[24, 23] | 39.5 Production 39.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.79× parp32.142.9% True Avgn/ap60.732.1% Balls / boundary13.33p2525% | 46.4 Shot Quality 46.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation62.5% Control · Build81.2% Phase-weighted control77.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 28.9 Versatility 28.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep3544.4% vs LA-orthodox16bp35 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball9b9b <min Spin hittingp2529.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox20bp25 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p10.714.8% Reach deathp39.311.1% | |
| 12 | RHB | 27 | 5 | 85 | 67 | 126.9 | 21.2 | 6 | 4 | 35.7 Scout Score 35.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production17.628% Impact5027% Versatility38.327% Shot quality10.78% Trajectory60.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.06×[11, 27, 24] | 17.6 Production 17.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.7× parp10.742.9% True Avg0.44× parp32.132.1% Balls / boundary27p10.725% | 10.7 Shot Quality 10.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation65% Control · Build42.9% Phase-weighted control59.3% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 38.3 Versatility 38.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep1544.4% vs LA-orthodox10bp15 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp60.729.6% Off-spin2b2b <min LA-orthodox20bp60.7 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2514.8% Reach deathp89.311.1% | |
| 13 | RHB | 29 | 8 | 147 | 89 | 165.2 | 24.5 | 6 | 12 | 35.2 Scout Score 35.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production13.328% Impact5027% Versatility49.427% Shot quality53.68% Trajectory3.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.26×[2, 4, 1] | 13.3 Production 13.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.77× parp17.942.9% True Avg0.41× parp3.632.1% Balls / boundary15.33p17.925% | 53.6 Shot Quality 53.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build78.3% Phase-weighted control78.3% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 49.4 Versatility 49.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5544.4% vs LA-orthodox24bp55 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp39.329.6% Off-spin9b9b <min LA-orthodox24bp39.3 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p17.914.8% Reach deathp96.411.1% | |
| 14 | RHB | 29 | 4 | 36 | 45 | 80 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 30.6 Scout Score 30.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production5.928% Impact5027% Versatility11.627% Shot quality96.48% Trajectory46.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[4, 8, 24] | 5.9 Production 5.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.66× parp3.642.9% True Avg0.3× parp10.732.1% Balls / boundary30p3.625% | 96.4 Shot Quality 96.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.9% Control · Build91.7% Phase-weighted control90% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+0 | 11.6 Versatility 11.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep544.4% vs LA-orthodox15bp5 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp3.629.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox19bp3.6 Leg-spin1b1b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p32.114.8% Reach deathp32.111.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 23 | 9 | 140 | 67 | 209 | 17.5 | 13 | 10 | 65.1 Scout Score 65.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production87.140% Impact5025% Versatility5218% Shot quality96.44% Trajectory34.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[30, 7, 7] | 87.1 Production 87.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.36× parp96.432.5% Balls / boundary2.68p96.420% Balls / six6.56p89.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 96.4 Shot Quality 96.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build87.5% Phase-weighted control87.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 52 Versatility 52 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball12bp50 vs Spin (death)p57.116.7% Reach buildp53.622.2% | |
| 2 | LHB | 27 | 10 | 264 | 164 | 161 | 37.7 | 16 | 19 | 64.7 Scout Score 64.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production85.740% Impact5025% Versatility71.418% Shot quality89.34% Trajectory11.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.56×[10, 19, 18] | 85.7 Production 85.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.3× parp89.332.5% Balls / boundary2.94p89.320% Balls / six5p96.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 89.3 Shot Quality 89.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build86.8% Phase-weighted control86.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 71.4 Versatility 71.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p83.361.1% vs Yorker5b5b <min vs Slower ball15bp83.3 vs Spin (death)p32.116.7% Reach buildp67.922.2% | |
| 3 | RHB | 29 | 6 | 49 | 31 | 158.1 | 24.5 | 5 | 2 | 59 Scout Score 59 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production59.640% Impact5025% Versatility53.818% Shot quality10.74% Trajectory96.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.33×[17, 0, 4] | 59.6 Production 59.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.17× parp67.932.5% Balls / boundary3p7520% Balls / six10.5p46.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 10.7 Shot Quality 10.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build60% Phase-weighted control60% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 53.8 Versatility 53.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p96.416.7% Reach buildp32.122.2% | |
| 4 | RHB | 29 | 7 | 148 | 126 | 117.5 | 24.7 | 12 | 5 | 58.2 Scout Score 58.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production6740% Impact5025% Versatility40.918% Shot quality754% Trajectory65.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[1, 30, 53] | 67 Production 67 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.35× parp82.132.5% Balls / boundary2.75p53.620% Balls / six5.5p67.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 75 Shot Quality 75 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation93% Control · Build80.9% Phase-weighted control85.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 40.9 Versatility 40.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p57.116.7% Reach buildp3.622.2% | |
| 5 | LHB | 18 | 7 | 107 | 64 | 167.2 | 15.3 | 4 | 9 | 56.3 Scout Score 56.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production65.240% Impact5025% Versatility52.818% Shot quality17.94% Trajectory57.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.04×[8, 13, 19] | 65.2 Production 65.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.02× parp53.632.5% Balls / boundary4.78p67.920% Balls / six6.14p82.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 17.9 Shot Quality 17.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 52.8 Versatility 52.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p14.316.7% Reach buildp89.322.2% | |
| 6 | RHB | — | 5 | 63 | 46 | 137 | 31.5 | 2 | 5 | 51.9 Scout Score 51.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production60.940% Impact5025% Versatility46.618% Shot quality3.64% Trajectory5013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[20, 4, 27] | 60.9 Production 60.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.07× parp60.732.5% Balls / boundary5.2p46.420% Balls / six6.5p7532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 3.6 Shot Quality 3.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build55% Phase-weighted control55% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 46.6 Versatility 46.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p82.116.7% Reach buildp10.722.2% | |
| 7 | RHB | 23 | 7 | 102 | 81 | 125.9 | 17 | 7 | 6 | 50.9 Scout Score 50.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production38.640% Impact5025% Versatility56.718% Shot quality32.14% Trajectory88.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.21×[41, 30, 11] | 38.6 Production 38.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.06× parp46.432.5% Balls / boundary4.67p39.320% Balls / six14p2532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 32.1 Shot Quality 32.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build70% Phase-weighted control70% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 56.7 Versatility 56.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball9b9b <min vs Spin (death)p57.116.7% Reach buildp7522.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | — | 7 | 110 | 87 | 126.4 | 22 | 9 | 4 | 47 Scout Score 47 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production59.940% Impact5025% Versatility45.618% Shot quality46.44% Trajectory3.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.56×[9, 3, 7] | 59.9 Production 59.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.16× parp7532.5% Balls / boundary3.25p82.120% Balls / six13p35.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 46.4 Shot Quality 46.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build72.2% Phase-weighted control78.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 45.6 Versatility 45.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p57.116.7% Reach buildp2522.2% | |
| 9 | RHB | 47 | 3 | 67 | 47 | 142.6 | 22.3 | 1 | 6 | 46.2 Scout Score 46.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production41.840% Impact5025% Versatility58.318% Shot quality254% Trajectory42.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[9, 54, 4] | 41.8 Production 41.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.93× parp32.132.5% Balls / boundary6p32.120% Balls / six6p53.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 25 Shot Quality 25 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation63.6% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control68.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 58.3 Versatility 58.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p57.116.7% Reach buildp82.122.2% | |
| 10 | RHB | 27 | 7 | 34 | 32 | 106.2 | 11.3 | 1 | 2 | 45 Scout Score 45 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production26.240% Impact5025% Versatility54.218% Shot quality67.94% Trajectory73.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.13×[1, 5, 6] | 26.2 Production 26.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.71× parp10.732.5% Balls / boundary8.67p17.920% Balls / six13p35.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 67.9 Shot Quality 67.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build83.3% Phase-weighted control83.3% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p89.316.7% Reach buildp39.322.2% | |
| 11 | RHB | 21 | 7 | 68 | 65 | 104.6 | 13.6 | 5 | 3 | 44.3 Scout Score 44.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production52.140% Impact5025% Versatility35.118% Shot quality53.64% Trajectory19.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.62×[3, 10, 0] | 52.1 Production 52.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.97× parp39.332.5% Balls / boundary3.8p60.720% Balls / six9.5p60.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 53.6 Shot Quality 53.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build86.4% Phase-weighted control80.4% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 35.1 Versatility 35.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p3.616.7% Reach buildp17.922.2% | |
| 12 | RHB | 21 | 6 | 76 | 58 | 131 | 19 | 7 | 2 | 41 Scout Score 41 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production21.840% Impact5025% Versatility33.218% Shot quality82.14% Trajectory80.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.16×[21, 1, 36] | 21.8 Production 21.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.79× parp2532.5% Balls / boundary7.25p2520% Balls / six29p3.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 82.1 Shot Quality 82.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build85.7% Phase-weighted control86.2% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 33.2 Versatility 33.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p16.761.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball11bp16.7 vs Spin (death)p57.116.7% Reach buildp60.722.2% | |
| 13 | RHB | 22 | 1 | 49 | 24 | 204.2 | 49 | 2 | 5 | 39.1 Scout Score 39.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production18.940% Impact5025% Versatility56.218% Shot quality60.74% Trajectory5013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)n/a[49] | 18.9 Production 18.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.57× parp17.932.5% Balls / boundary13p10.720% Balls / six26p10.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 60.7 Shot Quality 60.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build81.8% Phase-weighted control81.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 56.2 Versatility 56.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p2516.7% Reach buildp96.422.2% | |
| 14 | RHB | 19 | 6 | 45 | 50 | 90 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 31.4 Scout Score 31.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production15.240% Impact5025% Versatility43.318% Shot quality39.34% Trajectory26.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.7×[5, 2, 5] | 15.2 Production 15.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.31× parp3.632.5% Balls / boundary20p3.620% Balls / six20p17.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 39.3 Shot Quality 39.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation63.6% Control · Build83.3% Phase-weighted control70.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 43.3 Versatility 43.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p14.316.7% Reach buildp46.422.2% |
Vishnu Solanki
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 33
70.8
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 244 · Balls 166 · SR 147 · Avg 48.8 · 4s 18 · 6s 13
70.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production91.628%25.6
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility77.427%20.9
Shot quality67.98%5.4
Trajectory53.610%5.4
Scout Score70.8
91.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR152.51.2×99bp89.342.9%
True Avg75.52.75×2wp96.432.1%
Balls / boundary5.2—99bp89.325%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
77.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p74.844.4%
vs LA-orthodox124 SR21bp85
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball177 SR13bp58.3
Spin hitting———p82.629.6%
Off-spin180 SR25bp93.8
LA-orthodox138 SR37bp75
Leg-spin100 SR1b1b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)148.9 SR1.14×47bp82.114.8%
Reach death146.6 SR0.9×58bp67.911.1%
67.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation89.3%
Control · Build77.5%
Phase-weighted control80.8% → p67.9
53.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[1, 19, 37]
Innings9
Utsav Dahya Chaudhary
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 23
65.1
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 140 · Balls 67 · SR 209 · Avg 17.5 · 4s 13 · 6s 10
65.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production87.140%34.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility5218%9.4
Shot quality96.44%3.9
Trajectory34.613%4.5
Scout Score65.1
87.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR220.31.36×59bp96.432.5%
Balls / boundary2.7—59bp96.420%
Balls / six6.6—59bp89.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
52VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker67 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball200 SR12bp50
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.116.7%
Reach build125 SR0.91×8bp53.622.2%
96.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build87.5%
Phase-weighted control87.5% → p96.4
34.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[30, 7, 7]
Innings9
Ninad Rathva
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 27
64.7
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 264 · Balls 164 · SR 161 · Avg 37.7 · 4s 16 · 6s 19
64.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production85.740%34.3
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility71.418%12.9
Shot quality89.34%3.6
Trajectory11.513%1.5
Scout Score64.7
85.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2101.3×50bp89.332.5%
Balls / boundary2.9—50bp89.320%
Balls / six5—50bp96.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
71.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p83.361.1%
vs Yorker120 SR5b5b <min
vs Slower ball293 SR15bp83.3
vs Spin (death)140 SR0.76×5bp32.116.7%
Reach build139.5 SR1.02×114bp67.922.2%
89.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build86.8%
Phase-weighted control86.8% → p89.3
11.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.56×
Recent scores[10, 19, 18]
Innings10
Deep Patel
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 22
64.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 159 · Balls 118 · SR 134.7 · Avg 26.5 · 4s 6 · 6s 10
64.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.128%18.8
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility63.327%17.1
Shot quality758%6.0
Trajectory89.310%8.9
Scout Score64.3
67.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1250.98×96bp67.942.9%
True Avg602.18×2wp82.132.1%
Balls / boundary9.6—96bp46.425%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
63.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p62.544.4%
vs Off-spin86 SR29bp62.5
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball167 SR6b6b <min
Spin hitting———p62.429.6%
Off-spin87 SR31bp31.2
LA-orthodox153 SR36bp89.3
Leg-spin50 SR4b4b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)132.1 SR1.01×28bp53.614.8%
Reach death200 SR1.23×19bp82.111.1%
75Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86.4%
Control · Build79.7%
Phase-weighted control81.2% → p75
89.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.14×
Recent scores[14, 52, 28]
Innings8
Priyanshu Moliya
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 21
63.4
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 223 · Balls 175 · SR 127.4 · Avg 27.9 · 4s 22 · 6s 6
63.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production66.840%26.7
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility4915%7.3
Shot quality78.66%4.7
Trajectory92.912%11.1
Scout Score63.4
66.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR140.21.02×87bp64.335%
True Avg30.51.01×4wp64.330%
Balls / boundary4—87bp64.317.5%
Balls / dismissal21.8—4wp78.617.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
49VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR121.8 SR0.85×87bp35.726.7%
vs Spin SR133 SR1.04×88bp5026.7%
Accel into Cons114 SR—43bp64.320%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
78.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.4%
Control · Build79.4%
Phase-weighted control85.8% → p78.6
92.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.3×
Recent scores[50, 27, 1]
Innings9
Abhimanyusingh Rajput
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 28
62.2
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 218 · Balls 157 · SR 138.9 · Avg 24.2 · 4s 17 · 6s 9
62.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production58.928%16.5
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility59.327%16.0
Shot quality82.18%6.6
Trajectory96.410%9.6
Scout Score62.2
58.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR134.31.06×134bp7542.9%
True Avg22.50.82×8wp2532.1%
Balls / boundary6.7—134bp7525%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
59.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7144.4%
vs LA-orthodox120 SR60bp75
vs Leg-spin125 SR12bp25
vs Short ball200 SR15bp91.7
Spin hitting———p53.229.6%
Off-spin176 SR17bp81.2
LA-orthodox114 SR65bp46.4
Leg-spin125 SR12bp50
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)140 SR1.07×45bp67.914.8%
Reach death00×1bp17.911.1%
82.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.9%
Control · Build79.5%
Phase-weighted control81.3% → p82.1
96.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.26×
Recent scores[46, 8, 28]
Innings9
Narayan Kartikey
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 21
60.3
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 200 · Balls 131 · SR 152.7 · Avg 25 · 4s 12 · 6s 15
60.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production89.528%25.1
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility66.327%17.9
Shot quality258%2.0
Trajectory17.910%1.8
Scout Score60.3
89.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR160.21.26×93bp96.442.9%
True Avg37.21.35×4wp7532.1%
Balls / boundary4.7—93bp96.425%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
66.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p56.944.4%
vs Off-spin111 SR27bp87.5
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball106 SR17bp8.3
Spin hitting———p76.329.6%
Off-spin107 SR28bp56.2
LA-orthodox211 SR28bp96.4
Leg-spin133 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)163.2 SR1.25×38bp89.314.8%
Reach death140.9 SR0.87×22bp46.411.1%
25Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation63.3%
Control · Build76.2%
Phase-weighted control72% → p25
17.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[29, 26, 4]
Innings9
Pavan Patel
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 20
60
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 120 · Balls 63 · SR 190.5 · Avg 24 · 4s 10 · 6s 9
60OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production73.640%29.4
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility65.215%9.8
Shot quality506%3.0
Trajectory35.712%4.3
Scout Score60
73.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2151.57×40bp78.635%
True Avg431.42×2wp78.630%
Balls / boundary2.9—40bp78.617.5%
Balls / dismissal20—2wp5017.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
65.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR169.7 SR1.19×33bp64.326.7%
vs Spin SR213.3 SR1.67×30bp92.926.7%
Accel into Cons100 SR—11bp5020%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.8%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control79.4% → p50
35.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.83×
Recent scores[11, 16, 0]
Innings6
Pradeep Yadav
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 29
59
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 49 · Balls 31 · SR 158.1 · Avg 24.5 · 4s 5 · 6s 2
59OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production59.640%23.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility53.818%9.7
Shot quality10.74%0.4
Trajectory96.213%12.5
Scout Score59
59.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR190.51.17×21bp67.932.5%
Balls / boundary3—21bp7520%
Balls / six10.5—21bp46.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
53.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker50 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball240 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)300 SR1.63×4bp96.416.7%
Reach build90 SR0.66×10bp32.122.2%
10.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build60%
Phase-weighted control60% → p10.7
96.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.33×
Recent scores[17, 0, 4]
Innings6
Lakshy Padhiyar
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 24
58.7
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 269 · Balls 177 · SR 152 · Avg 29.9 · 4s 25 · 6s 16
58.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production87.940%35.2
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility41.415%6.2
Shot quality21.46%1.3
Trajectory21.412%2.6
Scout Score58.7
87.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR188.71.38×106bp92.935%
True Avg401.32×5wp92.930%
Balls / boundary3.2—106bp92.917.5%
Balls / dismissal21.2—5wp64.317.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
41.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR181.7 SR1.27×115bp92.926.7%
vs Spin SR96.8 SR0.76×62bp7.126.7%
Accel into Cons92.7 SR—41bp7.120%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
21.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.2%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control74.5% → p21.4
21.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.76×
Recent scores[20, 17, 0]
Innings10
Parth Kohli
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 29
58.2
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 148 · Balls 126 · SR 117.5 · Avg 24.7 · 4s 12 · 6s 5
58.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production6740%26.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility40.918%7.4
Shot quality754%3.0
Trajectory65.413%8.5
Scout Score58.2
67ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR218.21.35×11bp82.132.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—11bp53.620%
Balls / six5.5—11bp67.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
40.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball180 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.116.7%
Reach build102.9 SR0.75×68bp3.622.2%
75Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation93%
Control · Build80.9%
Phase-weighted control85.6% → p75
65.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[1, 30, 53]
Innings7
Aayush Rajgor
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 21
56.4
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 252 · Balls 200 · SR 126 · Avg 36 · 4s 26 · 6s 7
56.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production61.728%17.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility46.527%12.6
Shot quality60.78%4.9
Trajectory82.110%8.2
Scout Score56.4
61.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR114.40.9×146bp53.642.9%
True Avg33.41.21×5wp67.932.1%
Balls / boundary7.7—146bp67.925%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
46.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p37.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox80 SR49bp25
vs Leg-spin100 SR1b1b <min
vs Short ball181 SR16bp75
Spin hitting———p24.529.6%
Off-spin100 SR40bp43.8
LA-orthodox80 SR56bp10.7
Leg-spin100 SR1b1b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)151.6 SR1.16×62bp96.414.8%
Reach death176.7 SR1.09×30bp7511.1%
60.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation77.4%
Control · Build81%
Phase-weighted control79.5% → p60.7
82.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.08×
Recent scores[5, 36, 56]
Innings9
Divyanshu Desai
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 18
56.3
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 107 · Balls 64 · SR 167.2 · Avg 15.3 · 4s 4 · 6s 9
56.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production65.240%26.1
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility52.818%9.5
Shot quality17.94%0.7
Trajectory57.713%7.5
Scout Score56.3
65.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR165.11.02×43bp53.632.5%
Balls / boundary4.8—43bp67.920%
Balls / six6.1—43bp82.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
52.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball60 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)66.7 SR0.36×3bp14.316.7%
Reach build171.4 SR1.25×21bp89.322.2%
17.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p17.9
57.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.04×
Recent scores[8, 13, 19]
Innings7
Shivalik Sharma
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 27
55.7
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 296 · Balls 260 · SR 113.8 · Avg 49.3 · 4s 19 · 6s 7
55.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production68.128%19.1
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility3427%9.2
Shot quality89.38%7.1
Trajectory67.910%6.8
Scout Score55.7
68.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR115.30.91×196bp60.742.9%
True Avg56.52.05×4wp89.332.1%
Balls / boundary9.8—196bp53.625%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
34VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p19.944.4%
vs Off-spin72 SR68bp12.5
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball161 SR23bp41.7
Spin hitting———p34.329.6%
Off-spin72 SR68bp6.2
LA-orthodox150 SR44bp82.1
Leg-spin118 SR11bp16.7
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)129.9 SR1×77bp60.714.8%
Reach death138.1 SR0.85×42bp53.611.1%
89.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.8%
Control · Build84.4%
Phase-weighted control84.2% → p89.3
67.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.07×
Recent scores[0, 1, 44]
Innings10
Krish Patel
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB
51.9
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 63 · Balls 46 · SR 137 · Avg 31.5 · 4s 2 · 6s 5
51.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production60.940%24.4
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility46.618%8.4
Shot quality3.64%0.1
Trajectory5013%6.5
Scout Score51.9
60.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR173.11.07×26bp60.732.5%
Balls / boundary5.2—26bp46.420%
Balls / six6.5—26bp7532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
46.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball214 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)200 SR1.09×3bp82.116.7%
Reach build90 SR0.66×20bp10.722.2%
3.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build55%
Phase-weighted control55% → p3.6
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[20, 4, 27]
Innings5
Kinit Patel
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 24
50.9
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 59 · Balls 65 · SR 90.8 · Avg 14.8 · 4s 5 · 6s 1
50.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production37.828%10.6
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility59.827%16.1
Shot quality39.38%3.1
Trajectory7510%7.5
Scout Score50.9
37.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR101.80.8×55bp2542.9%
True Avg281.02×2wp53.632.1%
Balls / boundary9.2—55bp39.325%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
59.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p9544.4%
vs LA-orthodox126 SR31bp95
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball250 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p53.629.6%
Off-spin89 SR9b9b <min
LA-orthodox117 SR35bp53.6
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)57.1 SR0.44×14bp3.614.8%
Reach death00×2bp10.711.1%
39.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.1%
Control · Build75.9%
Phase-weighted control74.5% → p39.3
75Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.08×
Recent scores[0, 28, 14]
Innings5
Vishv Chaudhary
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 23
50.9
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 102 · Balls 81 · SR 125.9 · Avg 17 · 4s 7 · 6s 6
50.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production38.640%15.4
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility56.718%10.2
Shot quality32.14%1.3
Trajectory88.513%11.5
Scout Score50.9
38.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR171.41.06×14bp46.432.5%
Balls / boundary4.7—14bp39.320%
Balls / six14—14bp2532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
56.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball222 SR9b9b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.116.7%
Reach build145 SR1.06×40bp7522.2%
32.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build70%
Phase-weighted control70% → p32.1
88.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.21×
Recent scores[41, 30, 11]
Innings7
Shlok Desai
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 28
49.2
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 211 · Balls 162 · SR 130.2 · Avg 23.4 · 4s 18 · 6s 7
49.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production70.728%19.8
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility45.527%12.3
Shot quality32.18%2.6
Trajectory10.710%1.1
Scout Score49.2
70.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR134.91.06×129bp82.142.9%
True Avg291.05×6wp46.432.1%
Balls / boundary6.5—129bp82.125%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
45.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p43.944.4%
vs LA-orthodox107 SR30bp45
vs Leg-spin200 SR13bp75
vs Short ball152 SR23bp25
Spin hitting———p48.929.6%
Off-spin109 SR23bp68.8
LA-orthodox103 SR38bp17.9
Leg-spin176 SR21bp83.3
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)143.8 SR1.1×64bp7514.8%
Reach death44.4 SR0.27×9bp3.611.1%
32.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.7%
Control · Build68.8%
Phase-weighted control74.4% → p32.1
10.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.93×
Recent scores[45, 0, 37]
Innings9
Parikshit Patidar
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 24
48.6
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 215 · Balls 149 · SR 144.3 · Avg 21.5 · 4s 17 · 6s 12
48.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production29.640%11.8
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility66.215%9.9
Shot quality64.36%3.9
Trajectory78.612%9.4
Scout Score48.6
29.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR130.40.95×69bp5035%
True Avg150.49×6wp7.130%
Balls / boundary4.9—69bp5017.5%
Balls / dismissal11.5—6wp7.117.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
66.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR141.7 SR0.99×72bp5026.7%
vs Spin SR146.8 SR1.15×77bp78.626.7%
Accel into Cons165.3 SR—49bp92.920%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
64.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation89.8%
Control · Build64.5%
Phase-weighted control83.7% → p64.3
78.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.19×
Recent scores[24, 42, 1]
Innings10
Najim Patel
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB
47
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 110 · Balls 87 · SR 126.4 · Avg 22 · 4s 9 · 6s 4
47OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production59.940%24.0
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility45.618%8.2
Shot quality46.44%1.9
Trajectory3.813%0.5
Scout Score47
59.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR188.51.16×26bp7532.5%
Balls / boundary3.2—26bp82.120%
Balls / six13—26bp35.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
45.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball57 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.116.7%
Reach build100 SR0.73×18bp2522.2%
46.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build72.2%
Phase-weighted control78.6% → p46.4
3.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.56×
Recent scores[9, 3, 7]
Innings7
Amit Bhandari
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 47
46.2
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 67 · Balls 47 · SR 142.6 · Avg 22.3 · 4s 1 · 6s 6
46.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production41.840%16.7
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility58.318%10.5
Shot quality254%1.0
Trajectory42.313%5.5
Scout Score46.2
41.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1500.93×6bp32.132.5%
Balls / boundary6—6bp32.120%
Balls / six6—6bp53.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
58.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball233 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.116.7%
Reach build212.5 SR1.55×8bp82.122.2%
25Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation63.6%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control68.4% → p25
42.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[9, 54, 4]
Innings3
Ram Bharwad
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 27
45
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 34 · Balls 32 · SR 106.2 · Avg 11.3 · 4s 1 · 6s 2
45OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production26.240%10.5
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility54.218%9.8
Shot quality67.94%2.7
Trajectory73.113%9.5
Scout Score45
26.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR115.40.71×26bp10.732.5%
Balls / boundary8.7—26bp17.920%
Balls / six13—26bp35.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
54.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)225 SR1.22×4bp89.316.7%
Reach build66.7 SR0.49×6bp39.322.2%
67.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build83.3%
Phase-weighted control83.3% → p67.9
73.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.13×
Recent scores[1, 5, 6]
Innings7
Irfan Shaikh
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 21
44.3
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 68 · Balls 65 · SR 104.6 · Avg 13.6 · 4s 5 · 6s 3
44.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production52.140%20.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility35.118%6.3
Shot quality53.64%2.1
Trajectory19.213%2.5
Scout Score44.3
52.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR157.90.97×19bp39.332.5%
Balls / boundary3.8—19bp60.720%
Balls / six9.5—19bp60.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
35.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker167 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball25 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)33.3 SR0.18×3bp3.616.7%
Reach build100 SR0.73×22bp17.922.2%
53.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build86.4%
Phase-weighted control80.4% → p53.6
19.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.62×
Recent scores[3, 10, 0]
Innings7
Akshay More
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 29
41.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 266 · Balls 174 · SR 152.9 · Avg 38 · 4s 13 · 6s 17
41.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production28.940%11.6
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility67.115%10.1
Shot quality92.96%5.6
Trajectory7.112%0.9
Scout Score41.6
28.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR124.40.91×45bp35.735%
True Avg18.70.62×3wp21.430%
Balls / boundary5.6—45bp35.717.5%
Balls / dismissal15—3wp21.417.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
67.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR165.2 SR1.16×92bp78.626.7%
vs Spin SR139 SR1.09×82bp64.326.7%
Accel into Cons141.9 SR—43bp78.620%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
92.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation90.7%
Control · Build79.7%
Phase-weighted control86.2% → p92.9
7.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.43×
Recent scores[0, 2, 13]
Innings8
Priyanshu Bhoite
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 21
41
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 76 · Balls 58 · SR 131 · Avg 19 · 4s 7 · 6s 2
41OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production21.840%8.7
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility33.218%6.0
Shot quality82.14%3.3
Trajectory80.813%10.5
Scout Score41
21.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR127.60.79×29bp2532.5%
Balls / boundary7.2—29bp2520%
Balls / six29—29bp3.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
33.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p16.761.1%
vs Yorker100 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball73 SR11bp16.7
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.116.7%
Reach build135.7 SR0.99×28bp60.722.2%
82.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build85.7%
Phase-weighted control86.2% → p82.1
80.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.16×
Recent scores[21, 1, 36]
Innings6
Dhruv Patel
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
40.9
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 43 · Balls 41 · SR 104.9 · Avg 10.8 · 4s 4 · 6s 1
40.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production37.528%10.5
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility4727%12.7
Shot quality3.68%0.3
Trajectory39.310%3.9
Scout Score40.9
37.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR102.90.81×34bp39.342.9%
True Avg17.50.64×2wp39.332.1%
Balls / boundary8.5—34bp32.125%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
47VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p6544.4%
vs LA-orthodox113 SR15bp65
vs Leg-spin50 SR2b2b <min
vs Short ball100 SR7b7b <min
Spin hitting———p32.129.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox112 SR17bp32.1
Leg-spin50 SR2b2b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)100 SR0.77×15bp39.314.8%
Reach death114.3 SR0.7×7bp2511.1%
3.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build53.8%
Phase-weighted control58.8% → p3.6
39.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[1, 25, 16]
Innings4
Rajveer Jadhav
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 22
40.9
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 130 · Balls 107 · SR 121.5 · Avg 21.7 · 4s 13 · 6s 2
40.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production40.828%11.4
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility44.527%12.0
Shot quality17.98%1.4
Trajectory2510%2.5
Scout Score40.9
40.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR112.50.89×80bp46.442.9%
True Avg180.65×5wp17.932.1%
Balls / boundary8—80bp60.725%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
44.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p37.544.4%
vs Off-spin73 SR22bp37.5
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball140 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p47.929.6%
Off-spin73 SR22bp18.8
LA-orthodox128 SR32bp67.9
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)122.2 SR0.94×27bp46.414.8%
Reach death153.8 SR0.95×26bp60.711.1%
17.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation65.6%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control71.2% → p17.9
25Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[24, 9, 0]
Innings10
Smith Rathwa
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 36
40.1
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 35 · Balls 39 · SR 89.7 · Avg 17.5 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
40.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4040%16.0
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility28.115%4.2
Shot quality7.16%0.4
Trajectory5012%6.0
Scout Score40.1
40ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR96.60.71×29bp21.435%
True Avg280.92×1wp5030%
Balls / boundary9.7—29bp7.117.5%
Balls / dismissal29—1wp92.917.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
28.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR53.3 SR0.37×15bp7.126.7%
vs Spin SR112.5 SR0.88×24bp21.426.7%
Accel into Cons85.7 SR—7bp35.720%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
7.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Build33.3%
Phase-weighted control64.7% → p7.1
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[13, 22]
Innings2
Atit Sheth
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 30
39.3
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 47 · Balls 45 · SR 104.4 · Avg 47 · 4s 3 · 6s 1
39.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.528%11.1
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility28.927%7.8
Shot quality46.48%3.7
Trajectory32.110%3.2
Scout Score39.3
39.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.79×40bp32.142.9%
True Avg——0wp60.732.1%
Balls / boundary13.3—40bp2525%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
28.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p3544.4%
vs LA-orthodox100 SR16bp35
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball67 SR9b9b <min
Spin hitting———p2529.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox110 SR20bp25
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)90 SR0.69×20bp10.714.8%
Reach death140 SR0.86×5bp39.311.1%
46.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation62.5%
Control · Build81.2%
Phase-weighted control77.5% → p46.4
32.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[24, 23]
Innings2
Shyam Jhonjat
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 22
39.1
Scout Score
Inns 1 · Runs 49 · Balls 24 · SR 204.2 · Avg 49 · 4s 2 · 6s 5
39.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production18.940%7.6
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility56.218%10.1
Shot quality60.74%2.4
Trajectory5013%6.5
Scout Score39.1
18.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR92.30.57×13bp17.932.5%
Balls / boundary13—13bp10.720%
Balls / six——13bp10.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
56.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball33 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.54×1bp2516.7%
Reach build336.4 SR2.46×11bp96.422.2%
60.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build81.8%
Phase-weighted control81.8% → p60.7
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)n/a
Recent scores[49]
Innings1
Anant Bharwad
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 31
37.6
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 202 · Balls 165 · SR 122.4 · Avg 18.4 · 4s 21 · 6s 4
37.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production23.240%9.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility32.915%4.9
Shot quality35.76%2.1
Trajectory64.312%7.7
Scout Score37.6
23.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR113.90.83×72bp7.135%
True Avg20.50.68×4wp35.730%
Balls / boundary6—72bp21.417.5%
Balls / dismissal18—4wp35.717.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
32.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR117.4 SR0.82×92bp21.426.7%
vs Spin SR128.8 SR1.01×73bp35.726.7%
Accel into Cons107.1 SR—56bp21.420%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
35.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build82.9%
Phase-weighted control76.9% → p35.7
64.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.01×
Recent scores[22, 9, 43]
Innings11
Mohit Mongia
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 27
35.7
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 85 · Balls 67 · SR 126.9 · Avg 21.2 · 4s 6 · 6s 4
35.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production17.628%4.9
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility38.327%10.3
Shot quality10.78%0.9
Trajectory60.710%6.1
Scout Score35.7
17.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR88.90.7×27bp10.742.9%
True Avg120.44×2wp32.132.1%
Balls / boundary27—27bp10.725%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
38.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p1544.4%
vs LA-orthodox70 SR10bp15
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball125 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p60.729.6%
Off-spin100 SR2b2b <min
LA-orthodox120 SR20bp60.7
Leg-spin240 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)100 SR0.77×17bp2514.8%
Reach death212.5 SR1.31×16bp89.311.1%
10.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation65%
Control · Build42.9%
Phase-weighted control59.3% → p10.7
60.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.06×
Recent scores[11, 27, 24]
Innings5
Bhanu Pania
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 29
35.2
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 147 · Balls 89 · SR 165.2 · Avg 24.5 · 4s 6 · 6s 12
35.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production13.328%3.7
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility49.427%13.3
Shot quality53.68%4.3
Trajectory3.610%0.4
Scout Score35.2
13.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR97.80.77×46bp17.942.9%
True Avg11.20.41×4wp3.632.1%
Balls / boundary15.3—46bp17.925%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
49.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5544.4%
vs LA-orthodox112 SR24bp55
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p39.329.6%
Off-spin44 SR9b9b <min
LA-orthodox112 SR24bp39.3
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)81.8 SR0.63×11bp17.914.8%
Reach death237.2 SR1.46×43bp96.411.1%
53.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build78.3%
Phase-weighted control78.3% → p53.6
3.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.26×
Recent scores[2, 4, 1]
Innings8
Henil Patel
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 19
31.4
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 45 · Balls 50 · SR 90 · Avg 9 · 4s 4 · 6s 2
31.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production15.240%6.1
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility43.318%7.8
Shot quality39.34%1.6
Trajectory26.913%3.5
Scout Score31.4
15.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR500.31×10bp3.632.5%
Balls / boundary——10bp3.620%
Balls / six——10bp17.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
43.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)66.7 SR0.36×3bp14.316.7%
Reach build116.7 SR0.85×12bp46.422.2%
39.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation63.6%
Control · Build83.3%
Phase-weighted control70.6% → p39.3
26.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.7×
Recent scores[5, 2, 5]
Innings6
Keyur Solanki
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 29
30.6
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 36 · Balls 45 · SR 80 · Avg 9 · 4s 1 · 6s 0
30.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production5.928%1.7
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility11.627%3.1
Shot quality96.48%7.7
Trajectory46.410%4.6
Scout Score30.6
5.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR83.30.66×30bp3.642.9%
True Avg8.30.3×3wp10.732.1%
Balls / boundary30—30bp3.625%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+0
11.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p544.4%
vs LA-orthodox60 SR15bp5
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball67 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p3.629.6%
Off-spin125 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox58 SR19bp3.6
Leg-spin100 SR1b1b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)90 SR0.69×10bp32.114.8%
Reach death——0bp32.111.1%
96.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.9%
Control · Build91.7%
Phase-weighted control90% → p96.4
46.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[4, 8, 24]
Innings4
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LA pace | 27 | 41.0 | 24 | 323 | 7.88 | 66.8 Scout Score 66.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay65.936.6% Middle599.8% Death68.853.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p361.06× | 87.4 Bowling Production 87.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 7.53 econp81.736.6% Middle2w · 6.75 econp73.79.8% Death15w · 8.32 econp93.853.7% | 64.1 Quality 64.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p67.2 False-shot · Middle21%p52.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5036.6% MiddleWPA +0p509.8% DeathWPA +0p5053.7% | 58.9 Versatility 58.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp77.236.6% Middlep58.89.8% Deathp46.553.7% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 28 | 34.4 | 12 | 255 | 7.36 | 65.2 Scout Score 65.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay73.623.1% Middle63.857.7% Death59.519.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p77.90.98× | 65.2 Bowling Production 65.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 6.62 econp84.623.1% Middle5w · 7.1 econp57.157.7% Death4w · 9 econp6619.2% | 88 Quality 88 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay35%p85.9 False-shot · Middle28%p88.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5023.1% MiddleWPA +0p5057.7% DeathWPA +0p5019.2% | 65.2 Versatility 65.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp72.823.1% Middlep70.657.7% Deathp39.619.2% | |
| 3 | RA pace | 25 | 37.4 | 14 | 325 | 8.63 | 64.3 Scout Score 64.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay63.155.8% Middle56.513.3% Death69.831% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p82.60.97× | 60.9 Bowling Production 60.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 8.14 econp54.955.8% Middle3w · 10.2 econp45.413.3% Death6w · 8.83 econp78.431% | 98 Quality 98 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay41%p98.4 False-shot · Middle43%p96.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5055.8% MiddleWPA +0p5013.3% DeathWPA +0p5031% | 56.8 Versatility 56.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp57.855.8% Middlep33.813.3% Deathp64.831% | |
| 4 | Off-spin | 24 | 33.0 | 7 | 240 | 7.27 | 63.2 Scout Score 63.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay47.621.2% Middle73.466.7% Death34.712.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p80.20.98× | 65.7 Bowling Production 65.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.14 econp51.721.2% Middle6w · 6 econp78.666.7% Death0w · 14.5 econp19.212.1% | 65.8 Quality 65.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay7%p1.6 False-shot · Middle28%p86.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5021.2% MiddleWPA +0p5066.7% DeathWPA +0p5012.1% | 72 Versatility 72 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp61.721.2% Middlep83.866.7% Deathp2512.1% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 22 | 29.1 | 7 | 176 | 6.03 | 62.9 Scout Score 62.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay6937.7% Middle53.220.6% Death62.141.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p22.11.12× | 77 Bowling Production 77 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 5.09 econp82.637.7% Middle1w · 6.33 econp5520.6% Death3w · 6.74 econp82.741.7% | 83.3 Quality 83.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay39%p95.3 False-shot · Middle22%p61.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5037.7% MiddleWPA +0p5020.6% DeathWPA +0p5041.7% | 63.1 Versatility 63.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp75.637.7% Middlep7020.6% Deathp48.341.7% | |
| 6 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 4.0 | 2 | 20 | 5 | 60.5 Scout Score 60.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle60.5100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50n/a | 84.6 Bowling Production 84.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 5 econp84.6100% | 21.2 Quality 21.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle12%p21.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p50100% | 63.8 Versatility 63.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep63.8100% | |
| 7 | Off-spin | 28 | 6.5 | 3 | 53 | 7.76 | 60.5 Scout Score 60.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle60.5100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p29.11.07× | 67 Bowling Production 67 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 7.76 econp67100% | 91.2 Quality 91.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle34%p91.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p50100% | 49.4 Versatility 49.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep49.4100% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 25 | 21.0 | 12 | 208 | 9.9 | 60.1 Scout Score 60.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay70.752.4% Death47.142.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p75.60.99× | 58.2 Bowling Production 58.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 7.55 econp75.652.4% Death8w · 12.22 econp3742.9% | 92.2 Quality 92.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay35%p92.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5052.4% DeathWPA +0p5042.9% | 62.3 Versatility 62.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp70.952.4% Deathp51.742.9% | |
| 9 | Off-spin | 29 | 30.0 | 7 | 200 | 6.67 | 57.9 Scout Score 57.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay41.516.7% Middle61.283.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p84.90.96× | 66.1 Bowling Production 66.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.6 econp35.416.7% Middle6w · 5.88 econp72.383.3% | 18 Quality 18 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay13%p14.1 False-shot · Middle19%p18.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5016.7% MiddleWPA +0p5083.3% | 75.3 Versatility 75.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.416.7% Middlep82.583.3% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 27 | 34.4 | 13 | 288 | 8.31 | 57.3 Scout Score 57.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle58.660.6% Death55.336.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p70.90.99× | 55.2 Bowling Production 55.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 6.71 econp53.960.6% Death9w · 10.5 econp57.436.5% | 56.2 Quality 56.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle22%p56.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5060.6% DeathWPA +0p5036.5% | 69.1 Versatility 69.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep83.860.6% Deathp44.836.5% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 31 | 20.0 | 8 | 164 | 8.2 | 56.8 Scout Score 56.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay6130% Middle43.740% Death70.130% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.71× | 56.6 Bowling Production 56.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 8.83 econp63.230% Middle2w · 9.25 econp30.240% Death3w · 6.17 econp85.230% | 80.5 Quality 80.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay36%p82.8 False-shot · Middle29%p78.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5030% MiddleWPA +0p5040% DeathWPA +0p5030% | 44.8 Versatility 44.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp55.330% Middlep2040% Deathp67.430% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 31.0 | 8 | 206 | 6.65 | 55.9 Scout Score 55.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay3732.3% Middle67.161.3% Death45.26.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p12.81.16× | 69.9 Bowling Production 69.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.3 econp43.332.3% Middle6w · 5.58 econp8661.3% Death0w · 8.5 econp49.46.5% | 46.1 Quality 46.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay15%p7.8 False-shot · Middle23%p66.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5032.3% MiddleWPA +0p5061.3% DeathWPA +0p506.5% | 72.3 Versatility 72.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp45.632.3% Middlep88.861.3% Deathp506.5% | |
| 13 | Off-spin | 24 | 32.0 | 7 | 197 | 6.16 | 54.7 Scout Score 54.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay57.962.5% Middle49.437.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p10.51.17× | 67.1 Bowling Production 67.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 6.2 econp65.262.5% Middle3w · 6.08 econp70.337.5% | 50.2 Quality 50.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p76.6 False-shot · Middle14%p6.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5062.5% MiddleWPA +0p5037.5% | 70.1 Versatility 70.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp70.962.5% Middlep68.837.5% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 21 | 4.0 | 1 | 50 | 12.5 | 52.6 Scout Score 52.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle52.650% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.71× | 50.5 Bowling Production 50.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9.5 econp50.550% | 73.8 Quality 73.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle33%p73.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5050% | 36.2 Versatility 36.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep36.250% | |
| 15 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 33.1 | 8 | 224 | 6.75 | 52.2 Scout Score 52.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.151.3% Middle41.542.7% Death706% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p91.90.88× | 54 Bowling Production 54 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 6 econp73.651.3% Middle2w · 7.84 econp2842.7% Death2w · 5.5 econp71.86% | 21.3 Quality 21.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p17.2 False-shot · Middle19%p26.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5051.3% MiddleWPA +0p5042.7% DeathWPA +0p506% | 53.9 Versatility 53.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp58.451.3% Middlep43.842.7% Deathp87.56% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 21 | 4.0 | 1 | 26 | 6.5 | 51.5 Scout Score 51.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay52.150% Death50.850% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50n/a | 52 Bowling Production 52 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 3.5 econp55.850% Death1w · 9.5 econp48.150% | 42.2 Quality 42.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p42.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5050% DeathWPA +0p5050% | 61 Versatility 61 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp60.850% Deathp61.350% | |
| 17 | Leg-spin | 31 | 26.0 | 8 | 235 | 9.04 | 50.4 Scout Score 50.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay65.442.3% Middle38.753.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p89.50.92× | 42.5 Bowling Production 42.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 8.73 econp6642.3% Middle3w · 8.93 econp2453.8% | 55.3 Quality 55.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay32%p79.7 False-shot · Middle20%p36.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5042.3% MiddleWPA +0p5053.8% | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp58.842.3% Middlep22.553.8% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 30 | 10.0 | 3 | 82 | 8.2 | 50.3 Scout Score 50.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay49.660% Middle49.820% Death52.920% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.71× | 52.5 Bowling Production 52.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.67 econp52.460% Middle1w · 8.5 econp54.220% Death1w · 9.5 econp51.220% | 38.5 Quality 38.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p35.9 False-shot · Middle17%p46.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5060% MiddleWPA +0p5020% DeathWPA +0p5020% | 51.6 Versatility 51.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp53.460% Middlep36.220% Deathp61.320% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 22 | 34.5 | 18 | 343 | 9.85 | 49.7 Scout Score 49.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay42.745.9% Middle77.717.2% Death45.336.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p68.61× | 45.4 Bowling Production 45.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 11.12 econp33.845.9% Middle4w · 5 econp93.217.2% Death9w · 10.52 econp37.736.8% | 60.8 Quality 60.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay26%p48.4 False-shot · Middle39%p93.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5045.9% MiddleWPA +0p5017.2% DeathWPA +0p5036.8% | 38.9 Versatility 38.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp22.545.9% Middlep73.817.2% Deathp4336.8% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 20 | 22.0 | 10 | 186 | 8.45 | 49.5 Scout Score 49.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay30.640.9% Middle65.531.8% Death59.327.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p17.41.15× | 55.9 Bowling Production 55.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10.89 econp24.840.9% Middle2w · 5.43 econp75.131.8% Death6w · 8.33 econp80.227.3% | 54.6 Quality 54.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p20.3 False-shot · Middle40%p98.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5040.9% MiddleWPA +0p5031.8% DeathWPA +0p5027.3% | 43.9 Versatility 43.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp28.840.9% Middlep65.631.8% Deathp41.327.3% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 26.0 | 5 | 195 | 7.5 | 49.1 Scout Score 49.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay54.546.2% Middle44.553.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p15.11.16× | 50.5 Bowling Production 50.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 7.42 econp66.746.2% Middle2w · 7.57 econp36.653.8% | 62.2 Quality 62.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay26%p51.6 False-shot · Middle25%p71.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5046.2% MiddleWPA +0p5053.8% | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp64.146.2% Middlep48.853.8% | |
| 22 | RA pace | — | 22.4 | 12 | 214 | 9.44 | 48.9 Scout Score 48.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay26.38.8% Middle66.335.3% Death41.455.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p3.51.27× | 58 Bowling Production 58 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 16 econp16.48.8% Middle5w · 6.38 econp83.935.3% Death7w · 10.34 econp48.155.9% | 72 Quality 72 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p25 False-shot · Middle31%p83.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p508.8% MiddleWPA +0p5035.3% DeathWPA +0p5055.9% | 48.8 Versatility 48.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp258.8% Middlep7535.3% Deathp36.155.9% | |
| 23 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 9.0 | 1 | 72 | 8 | 48.8 Scout Score 48.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle48.888.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p94.20.85× | 44.6 Bowling Production 44.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 6.62 econp44.688.9% | 23.8 Quality 23.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p23.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5088.9% | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep52.588.9% | |
| 24 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 39.0 | 10 | 330 | 8.46 | 48.1 Scout Score 48.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.638.5% Middle40.151.3% Death45.310.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p73.30.99× | 46.3 Bowling Production 46.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 6.93 econp62.738.5% Middle6w · 9.1 econp35.651.3% Death1w · 11 econp38.210.3% | 45.4 Quality 45.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p60.9 False-shot · Middle20%p33.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5038.5% MiddleWPA +0p5051.3% DeathWPA +0p5010.3% | 33.3 Versatility 33.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp58.138.5% Middlep13.851.3% Deathp37.510.3% | |
| 25 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 17.3 | 5 | 146 | 8.34 | 47.8 Scout Score 47.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay35.334.3% Middle55.257.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p19.81.14× | 59.8 Bowling Production 59.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 11.17 econp39.734.3% Middle3w · 6.4 econp71.857.1% | 28.3 Quality 28.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay11%p10.9 False-shot · Middle20%p38.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5034.3% MiddleWPA +0p5057.1% | 51.3 Versatility 51.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp30.634.3% Middlep63.857.1% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 26 | 6.0 | 3 | 65 | 10.83 | 47.6 Scout Score 47.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay41.650% Middle56.733.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.71× | 49.2 Bowling Production 49.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 12.67 econp37.650% Middle1w · 7 econp66.633.3% | 38.2 Quality 38.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p32.8 False-shot · Middle17%p46.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5050% MiddleWPA +0p5033.3% | 41.9 Versatility 41.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp34.150% Middlep53.833.3% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 24 | 15.1 | 6 | 139 | 9.16 | 47 Scout Score 47 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay42.852.7% Death52.540.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p5.81.23× | 50.8 Bowling Production 50.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.88 econp40.952.7% Death3w · 9.41 econp63.640.7% | 57.8 Quality 57.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p57.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5052.7% DeathWPA +0p5040.7% | 51 Versatility 51 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4552.7% Deathp58.740.7% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 25.4 | 3 | 207 | 8.06 | 46.6 Scout Score 46.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay2719.5% Middle51.577.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p96.50.81× | 38.6 Bowling Production 38.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 13.2 econp4.719.5% Middle3w · 6.7 econp47.177.9% | 13.9 Quality 13.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay7%p4.7 False-shot · Middle18%p16.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5019.5% MiddleWPA +0p5077.9% | 62.8 Versatility 62.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp14.119.5% Middlep7577.9% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 26 | 17.0 | 7 | 171 | 10.06 | 46.4 Scout Score 46.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay62.523.5% Middle47.435.3% Death36.341.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p40.71× | 38.8 Bowling Production 38.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 8.5 econp66.523.5% Middle1w · 7.67 econp40.335.3% Death3w · 13 econp21.641.2% | 72.4 Quality 72.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay42%p89.1 False-shot · Middle22%p61.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5023.5% MiddleWPA +0p5035.3% DeathWPA +0p5041.2% | 56.7 Versatility 56.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp62.523.5% Middlep52.535.3% Deathp5741.2% | |
| 30 | LA pace | 36 | 8.4 | 0 | 84 | 9.69 | 45.5 Scout Score 45.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.346.2% Death55.542.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.71× | 36.9 Bowling Production 36.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 10 econp2146.2% Death0w · 8.73 econp54.342.3% | 39.1 Quality 39.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p39.1 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5046.2% DeathWPA +0p5042.3% | 51.2 Versatility 51.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp34.746.2% Deathp69.142.3% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 19 | 12.2 | 6 | 128 | 10.38 | 45.2 Scout Score 45.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle48.181.1% Death32.718.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p31.41.07× | 45.4 Bowling Production 45.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 8.9 econp50.481.1% Death1w · 16.71 econp24.118.9% | 68.8 Quality 68.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle25%p68.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5081.1% DeathWPA +0p5018.9% | 26.4 Versatility 26.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep2581.1% Deathp32.618.9% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 23 | 5.0 | 2 | 46 | 9.2 | 45.2 Scout Score 45.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle45.280% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.71× | 37.5 Bowling Production 37.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9.25 econp37.580% | 52.5 Quality 52.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p52.5 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5080% | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep42.580% | |
| 33 | Off-spin | 30 | 21.0 | 7 | 216 | 10.29 | 44.6 Scout Score 44.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay4733.3% Middle43.261.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p87.20.93× | 37.3 Bowling Production 37.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10.71 econp36.833.3% Middle5w · 9.85 econp37.661.9% | 42.6 Quality 42.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay26%p45.3 False-shot · Middle20%p41.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5033.3% MiddleWPA +0p5061.9% | 22.3 Versatility 22.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.633.3% Middlep12.561.9% | |
| 34 | SLA orthodox | — | 8.0 | 2 | 74 | 9.25 | 44.4 Scout Score 44.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle44.487.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.71× | 51.3 Bowling Production 51.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 7.86 econp51.387.5% | 11.2 Quality 11.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle14%p11.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5087.5% | 43.8 Versatility 43.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep43.887.5% | |
| 35 | LA pace | 24 | 33.2 | 8 | 282 | 8.46 | 44.4 Scout Score 44.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay44.815% Middle37.651% Death54.434% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p8.11.18× | 42.2 Bowling Production 42.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9.2 econp4015% Middle2w · 8.06 econp2251% Death5w · 8.74 econp73.534% | 75.2 Quality 75.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p71.9 False-shot · Middle26%p76.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5015% MiddleWPA +0p5051% DeathWPA +0p5034% | 38.7 Versatility 38.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp44.715% Middlep37.551% Deathp37.834% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 28 | 23.4 | 9 | 252 | 10.65 | 44 Scout Score 44 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay50.742.3% Middle45.616.9% Death36.440.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p33.71.06× | 38.1 Bowling Production 38.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 9.1 econp53.742.3% Middle1w · 10.25 econp33.116.9% Death5w · 12.41 econp24.140.8% | 62.3 Quality 62.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p54.7 False-shot · Middle33%p81.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5042.3% MiddleWPA +0p5016.9% DeathWPA +0p5040.8% | 51.7 Versatility 51.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp52.542.3% Middlep41.216.9% Deathp55.240.8% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 30 | 9.3 | 1 | 97 | 10.21 | 43.5 Scout Score 43.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay46.452.6% Death39.436.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.71× | 33.3 Bowling Production 33.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 8.8 econp34.152.6% Death1w · 12.86 econp32.136.8% | 71.9 Quality 71.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p71.9 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5052.6% DeathWPA +0p5036.8% | 34.9 Versatility 34.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.652.6% Deathp32.636.8% | |
| 38 | RA pace | — | 10.0 | 1 | 100 | 10 | 41.9 Scout Score 41.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay39.420% Middle47.960% Death26.420% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p26.71.07× | 38 Bowling Production 38 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 8.5 econp38.620% Middle1w · 7.33 econp46.560% Death0w · 19.5 econp1220% | 52.2 Quality 52.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p25 False-shot · Middle22%p61.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5020% MiddleWPA +0p5060% DeathWPA +0p5020% | 45.9 Versatility 45.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp48.620% Middlep49.460% Deathp32.620% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 25 | 18.0 | 3 | 155 | 8.61 | 40.9 Scout Score 40.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay31.661.1% Middle37.611.1% Death62.727.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p1.21.42× | 37.5 Bowling Production 37.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 9.91 econp16.961.1% Middle0w · 8.5 econp35.211.1% Death3w · 5.8 econp8427.8% | 61.3 Quality 61.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p64.1 False-shot · Middle17%p46.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5061.1% MiddleWPA +0p5011.1% DeathWPA +0p5027.8% | 34.5 Versatility 34.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp2061.1% Middlep38.811.1% Deathp64.827.8% | |
| 40 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 5.0 | 1 | 43 | 8.6 | 40.9 Scout Score 40.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle40.9100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.71× | 35.7 Bowling Production 35.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 8.6 econp35.7100% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p31.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p50100% | 38.8 Versatility 38.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep38.8100% | |
| 41 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 27.0 | 8 | 225 | 8.33 | 39.7 Scout Score 39.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay65.814.8% Middle3581.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p98.80.77× | 31.8 Bowling Production 31.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 6.5 econp7914.8% Middle4w · 8.41 econp23.281.5% | 5.6 Quality 5.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p29.7 False-shot · Middle9%p1.2 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0p5014.8% MiddleWPA +0p5081.5% | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp78.914.8% Middlep3081.5% | |
| 42 | LA pace | 26 | 10.0 | 2 | 100 | 10 | 38.2 Scout Score 38.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle40.470% Death3330% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.71× | 30.9 Bowling Production 30.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 7.57 econp38.670% Death1w · 15.67 econp1330% | 8.8 Quality 8.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle12%p8.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5070% DeathWPA +0p5030% | 53.1 Versatility 53.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep53.870% Deathp51.730% | |
| 43 | Off-spin | 21 | 13.0 | 2 | 98 | 7.54 | 34.5 Scout Score 34.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle34.592.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p38.41.05× | 30.8 Bowling Production 30.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 7.75 econp30.892.3% | 3.8 Quality 3.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle12%p3.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5092.3% | 48.8 Versatility 48.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep48.892.3% | |
| 44 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 6.0 | 1 | 67 | 11.17 | 30 Scout Score 30 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle30100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.71× | 15.9 Bowling Production 15.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 11.17 econp15.9100% | 28.8 Quality 28.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p28.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p50100% | 13.8 Versatility 13.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep13.8100% | |
| 45 | RA pace | 21 | 11.0 | 1 | 132 | 12 | 26.7 Scout Score 26.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle27.845.5% Death25.954.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p24.41.08× | 10.6 Bowling Production 10.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 9.2 econp16.545.5% Death1w · 14.33 econp5.654.5% | 13.8 Quality 13.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle13%p13.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p5045.5% DeathWPA +0p5054.5% | 45.3 Versatility 45.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep37.545.5% Deathp51.754.5% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 28 | 8.0 | 3 | 53 | 6.62 | 84.6 Phase Production 84.6 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.781× parp85.936.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp79.742.1% Boundary %12%p92.221.1% | 85.9 Quality 85.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 72.8 Versatility 72.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp60.930% Econ vs LHBp92.230% Wkt vs RHBp70.320% Wkt vs LHBp64.120% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 22 | 11.0 | 3 | 56 | 5.09 | 82.6 Phase Production 82.6 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.6× parp98.436.8% Wicket rate0.27/ovp60.942.1% Boundary %8%p98.421.1% | 95.3 Quality 95.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %39% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 75.6 Versatility 75.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp95.330% Econ vs LHBp82.830% Wkt vs RHBp46.920% Wkt vs LHBp64.120% | |
| 3 | LA pace | 27 | 15.0 | 7 | 113 | 7.53 | 81.7 Phase Production 81.7 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.888× parp79.736.8% Wicket rate0.47/ovp92.242.1% Boundary %19%p64.121.1% | 67.2 Quality 67.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 77.2 Versatility 77.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp89.130% Econ vs LHBp45.330% Wkt vs RHBp89.120% Wkt vs LHBp95.320% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 4.0 | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 79 Phase Production 79 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.767× parp67.236.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp98.442.1% Boundary %17%p60.921.1% | 29.7 Quality 29.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 78.9 Versatility 78.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7530% Econ vs LHBp60.930% Wkt vs RHBp98.420% Wkt vs LHBp92.220% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 25 | 11.0 | 4 | 83 | 7.55 | 75.6 Phase Production 75.6 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.89× parp70.336.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp84.442.1% Boundary %17%p67.221.1% | 92.2 Quality 92.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 70.9 Versatility 70.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp57.830% Econ vs LHBp89.130% Wkt vs RHBp82.820% Wkt vs LHBp51.620% | |
| 6 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 17.0 | 4 | 102 | 6 | 73.6 Phase Production 73.6 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.708× parp95.336.8% Wicket rate0.23/ovp48.442.1% Boundary %16%p85.921.1% | 17.2 Quality 17.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 58.4 Versatility 58.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.430% Econ vs LHBp35.930% Wkt vs RHBp20.320% Wkt vs LHBp70.320% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 12.0 | 3 | 89 | 7.42 | 66.7 Phase Production 66.7 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.875× parp76.636.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp54.742.1% Boundary %17%p73.421.1% | 51.6 Quality 51.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 64.1 Versatility 64.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp82.830% Econ vs LHBp64.130% Wkt vs RHBp1.620% Wkt vs LHBp98.420% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 26 | 4.0 | 3 | 34 | 8.5 | 66.5 Phase Production 66.5 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.002× parp54.736.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp95.342.1% Boundary %25%p29.721.1% | 89.1 Quality 89.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 62.5 Versatility 62.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp67.230% Econ vs LHBp20.330% Wkt vs RHBp92.220% Wkt vs LHBp89.120% | |
| 9 | Leg-spin | 31 | 11.0 | 4 | 96 | 8.73 | 66 Phase Production 66 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.029× parp51.636.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp84.442.1% Boundary %21%p54.721.1% | 79.7 Quality 79.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 58.8 Versatility 58.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp48.430% Econ vs LHBp54.730% Wkt vs RHBp64.120% Wkt vs LHBp7520% | |
| 10 | Off-spin | 24 | 20.0 | 4 | 124 | 6.2 | 65.2 Phase Production 65.2 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.731× parp92.236.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp26.642.1% Boundary %12%p95.321.1% | 76.6 Quality 76.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 70.9 Versatility 70.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.930% Econ vs LHBp98.430% Wkt vs RHBp76.620% Wkt vs LHBp1.620% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 31 | 6.0 | 3 | 53 | 8.83 | 63.2 Phase Production 63.2 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.042× parp42.236.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp89.142.1% Boundary %22%p48.421.1% | 82.8 Quality 82.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 55.3 Versatility 55.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp35.930% Econ vs LHBp73.430% Wkt vs RHBp95.320% Wkt vs LHBp17.220% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 15.0 | 3 | 104 | 6.93 | 62.7 Phase Production 62.7 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.818× parp89.136.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp29.742.1% Boundary %16%p82.821.1% | 60.9 Quality 60.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 58.1 Versatility 58.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp92.230% Econ vs LHBp57.830% Wkt vs RHBp60.920% Wkt vs LHBp4.720% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 21 | 2.0 | 0 | 7 | 3.5 | 55.8 Phase Production 55.8 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.413× parp82.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.342.1% Boundary %0%p79.721.1% | 42.2 Quality 42.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 60.8 Versatility 60.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp79.730% Econ vs LHBp68.830% Wkt vs RHBp37.520% Wkt vs LHBp43.820% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 25 | 21.0 | 5 | 171 | 8.14 | 54.9 Phase Production 54.9 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.96× parp64.136.8% Wicket rate0.24/ovp51.642.1% Boundary %22%p45.321.1% | 98.4 Quality 98.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %41% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 57.8 Versatility 57.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp45.330% Econ vs LHBp95.330% Wkt vs RHBp57.820% Wkt vs LHBp20.320% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 28 | 10.0 | 3 | 91 | 9.1 | 53.7 Phase Production 53.7 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.073× parp35.936.8% Wicket rate0.30/ovp70.342.1% Boundary %22%p51.621.1% | 54.7 Quality 54.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.130% Econ vs LHBp79.730% Wkt vs RHBp46.920% Wkt vs LHBp7520% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 30 | 6.0 | 1 | 46 | 7.67 | 52.4 Phase Production 52.4 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.904× parp60.936.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp32.842.1% Boundary %14%p76.621.1% | 35.9 Quality 35.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 53.4 Versatility 53.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp42.230% Econ vs LHBp85.930% Wkt vs RHBp51.620% Wkt vs LHBp23.420% | |
| 17 | Off-spin | 24 | 7.0 | 1 | 50 | 7.14 | 51.7 Phase Production 51.7 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.842× parp73.436.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp14.142.1% Boundary %12%p89.121.1% | 1.6 Quality 1.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 61.7 Versatility 61.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7530% Econ vs LHBp76.630% Wkt vs RHBp23.420% Wkt vs LHBp57.820% | |
| 18 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 10.0 | 2 | 83 | 8.3 | 43.3 Phase Production 43.3 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.979× parp57.836.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp35.942.1% Boundary %23%p32.821.1% | 7.8 Quality 7.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 45.6 Versatility 45.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp70.330% Econ vs LHBp17.230% Wkt vs RHBp10.920% Wkt vs LHBp85.920% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 24 | 8.0 | 2 | 79 | 9.88 | 40.9 Phase Production 40.9 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.165× parp29.736.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp57.842.1% Boundary %25%p26.621.1% | 57.8 Quality 57.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 45 Versatility 45 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp26.630% Econ vs LHBp48.430% Wkt vs RHBp29.720% Wkt vs LHBp82.820% | |
| 20 | LA pace | 24 | 5.0 | 1 | 46 | 9.2 | 40 Phase Production 40 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.085× parp39.136.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp40.642.1% Boundary %23%p40.621.1% | 71.9 Quality 71.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 44.7 Versatility 44.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp54.730% Econ vs LHBp23.430% Wkt vs RHBp26.620% Wkt vs LHBp79.720% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 6.0 | 2 | 67 | 11.17 | 39.7 Phase Production 39.7 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.317× parp14.136.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp73.442.1% Boundary %31%p17.221.1% | 10.9 Quality 10.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 30.6 Versatility 30.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7.830% Econ vs LHBp29.730% Wkt vs RHBp67.220% Wkt vs LHBp29.720% | |
| 22 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 17 | 8.5 | 38.6 Phase Production 38.6 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.002× parp48.436.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.342.1% Boundary %17%p57.821.1% | 25 Quality 25 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 48.6 Versatility 48.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.130% Econ vs LHBp68.830% Wkt vs RHBp37.520% Wkt vs LHBp43.820% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 26 | 3.0 | 1 | 38 | 12.67 | 37.6 Phase Production 37.6 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.494× parp17.236.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp67.242.1% Boundary %39%p14.121.1% | 32.8 Quality 32.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp20.330% Econ vs LHBp26.630% Wkt vs RHBp73.420% Wkt vs LHBp26.620% | |
| 24 | Off-spin | 30 | 7.0 | 2 | 75 | 10.71 | 36.8 Phase Production 36.8 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.264× parp20.336.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp64.142.1% Boundary %31%p10.921.1% | 45.3 Quality 45.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 40.6 Versatility 40.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4.730% Econ vs LHBp51.630% Wkt vs RHBp54.720% Wkt vs LHBp64.120% | |
| 25 | Off-spin | 29 | 5.0 | 1 | 53 | 10.6 | 35.4 Phase Production 35.4 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.25× parp26.636.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp40.642.1% Boundary %23%p40.621.1% | 14.1 Quality 14.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 39.4 Versatility 39.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp64.130% Econ vs LHBp4.730% Wkt vs RHBp79.720% Wkt vs LHBp14.120% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 30 | 5.0 | 0 | 44 | 8.8 | 34.1 Phase Production 34.1 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.038× parp45.336.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp6.242.1% Boundary %13%p70.321.1% | 71.9 Quality 71.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 36.6 Versatility 36.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp51.630% Econ vs LHBp39.130% Wkt vs RHBp14.120% Wkt vs LHBp32.820% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 22 | 16.0 | 5 | 178 | 11.12 | 33.8 Phase Production 33.8 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.312× parp1.636.8% Wicket rate0.31/ovp76.642.1% Boundary %28%p4.721.1% | 48.4 Quality 48.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 22.5 Versatility 22.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.930% Econ vs LHBp1.630% Wkt vs RHBp85.920% Wkt vs LHBp7.820% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 20 | 9.0 | 2 | 98 | 10.89 | 24.8 Phase Production 24.8 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.284× parp10.936.8% Wicket rate0.22/ovp45.342.1% Boundary %30%p7.821.1% | 20.3 Quality 20.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 28.8 Versatility 28.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp29.730% Econ vs LHBp7.830% Wkt vs RHBp32.820% Wkt vs LHBp54.720% | |
| 29 | LA pace | 36 | 4.0 | 0 | 40 | 10 | 21 Phase Production 21 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.179× parp32.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp10.942.1% Boundary %33%p20.321.1% | 39.1 Quality 39.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 34.7 Versatility 34.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp32.830% Econ vs LHBp42.230% Wkt vs RHBp17.220% Wkt vs LHBp43.820% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 25 | 11.0 | 0 | 109 | 9.91 | 16.9 Phase Production 16.9 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.169× parp23.436.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.642.1% Boundary %23%p35.921.1% | 64.1 Quality 64.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 20 Versatility 20 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp23.430% Econ vs LHBp32.830% Wkt vs RHBp4.720% Wkt vs LHBp10.920% | |
| 31 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 32 | 16 | 16.4 Phase Production 16.4 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.887× parp7.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.342.1% Boundary %42%p23.421.1% | 25 Quality 25 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 25 Versatility 25 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp17.230% Econ vs LHBp14.130% Wkt vs RHBp42.220% Wkt vs LHBp35.920% | |
| 32 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 5.0 | 0 | 66 | 13.2 | 4.7 Phase Production 4.7 vs all bowlers · n=32 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.557× parp4.736.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp6.242.1% Boundary %37%p1.621.1% | 4.7 Quality 4.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 14.1 Versatility 14.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.630% Econ vs LHBp10.930% Wkt vs RHBp7.820% Wkt vs LHBp43.820% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 22 | 6.0 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 93.2 Phase Production 93.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.668× parp91.244.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp96.244.1% Boundary %6%p88.811.8% | 93.8 Quality 93.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %39% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 73.8 Versatility 73.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.250% Econ vs LHBp51.250% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 19.0 | 6 | 106 | 5.58 | 86 Phase Production 86 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.745× parp98.844.1% Wicket rate0.32/ovp71.244.1% Boundary %8%p93.811.8% | 66.2 Quality 66.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 88.8 Versatility 88.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.850% Econ vs LHBp78.850% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 4.0 | 2 | 20 | 5 | 84.6 Phase Production 84.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.668× parp83.844.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp8544.1% Boundary %4%p86.211.8% | 21.2 Quality 21.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 63.8 Versatility 63.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.250% Econ vs LHBp46.250% | |
| 4 | RA pace | — | 8.0 | 5 | 51 | 6.38 | 83.9 Phase Production 83.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.851× parp73.844.1% Wicket rate0.62/ovp98.844.1% Boundary %10%p66.211.8% | 83.8 Quality 83.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 75 Versatility 75 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp63.850% Econ vs LHBp86.250% | |
| 5 | Off-spin | 24 | 22.0 | 6 | 132 | 6 | 78.6 Phase Production 78.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.801× parp93.844.1% Wicket rate0.27/ovp58.844.1% Boundary %7%p96.211.8% | 86.2 Quality 86.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 83.8 Versatility 83.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.250% Econ vs LHBp96.250% | |
| 6 | RA pace | 20 | 7.0 | 2 | 38 | 5.43 | 75.1 Phase Production 75.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.725× parp88.844.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp62.544.1% Boundary %10%p71.211.8% | 98.8 Quality 98.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 65.6 Versatility 65.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp93.850% Econ vs LHBp37.550% | |
| 7 | LA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 2 | 27 | 6.75 | 73.7 Phase Production 73.7 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.901× parp63.844.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp8544.1% Boundary %8%p68.811.8% | 52.5 Quality 52.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 58.8 Versatility 58.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp33.850% Econ vs LHBp83.850% | |
| 8 | Off-spin | 29 | 25.0 | 6 | 147 | 5.88 | 72.3 Phase Production 72.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.785× parp96.244.1% Wicket rate0.24/ovp41.244.1% Boundary %6%p98.811.8% | 18.8 Quality 18.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 82.5 Versatility 82.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp66.250% Econ vs LHBp98.850% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 10.0 | 3 | 64 | 6.4 | 71.8 Phase Production 71.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.854× parp76.244.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp66.244.1% Boundary %10%p76.211.8% | 38.8 Quality 38.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 63.8 Versatility 63.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.250% Econ vs LHBp41.250% | |
| 10 | Off-spin | 24 | 12.0 | 3 | 73 | 6.08 | 70.3 Phase Production 70.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.812× parp86.244.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp48.844.1% Boundary %7%p91.211.8% | 6.2 Quality 6.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 68.8 Versatility 68.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp43.850% Econ vs LHBp93.850% | |
| 11 | Off-spin | 28 | 6.5 | 3 | 53 | 7.76 | 67 Phase Production 67 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.035× parp48.844.1% Wicket rate0.44/ovp88.844.1% Boundary %12%p53.811.8% | 91.2 Quality 91.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %34% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 49.4 Versatility 49.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp31.250% Econ vs LHBp67.550% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 26 | 2.0 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 66.6 Phase Production 66.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.935× parp58.844.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp76.244.1% Boundary %8%p6011.8% | 46.2 Quality 46.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 53.8 Versatility 53.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.850% Econ vs LHBp53.850% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 28 | 20.0 | 5 | 142 | 7.1 | 57.1 Phase Production 57.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.948× parp66.244.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp46.244.1% Boundary %12%p63.811.8% | 88.8 Quality 88.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 70.6 Versatility 70.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp73.850% Econ vs LHBp67.550% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 22 | 6.0 | 1 | 38 | 6.33 | 55 Phase Production 55 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.846× parp71.244.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp32.544.1% Boundary %8%p78.811.8% | 61.2 Quality 61.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 70 Versatility 70 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp58.850% Econ vs LHBp81.250% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 30 | 2.0 | 1 | 17 | 8.5 | 54.2 Phase Production 54.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.135× parp37.544.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp76.244.1% Boundary %17%p33.811.8% | 46.2 Quality 46.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 36.2 Versatility 36.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp38.850% Econ vs LHBp33.850% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 27 | 21.0 | 4 | 141 | 6.71 | 53.9 Phase Production 53.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.896× parp81.244.1% Wicket rate0.19/ovp21.244.1% Boundary %11%p73.811.8% | 56.2 Quality 56.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 83.8 Versatility 83.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp78.850% Econ vs LHBp88.850% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | — | 7.0 | 2 | 55 | 7.86 | 51.3 Phase Production 51.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.049× parp43.844.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp62.544.1% Boundary %14%p37.511.8% | 11.2 Quality 11.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 43.8 Versatility 43.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.250% Econ vs LHBp46.250% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 21 | 2.0 | 1 | 19 | 9.5 | 50.5 Phase Production 50.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.268× parp31.244.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp76.244.1% Boundary %25%p26.211.8% | 73.8 Quality 73.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 36.2 Versatility 36.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp26.250% Econ vs LHBp46.250% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 19 | 10.0 | 5 | 89 | 8.9 | 50.4 Phase Production 50.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.188× parp18.844.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp93.844.1% Boundary %20%p6.211.8% | 68.8 Quality 68.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 25 Versatility 25 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp23.850% Econ vs LHBp26.250% | |
| 20 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 20.0 | 3 | 134 | 6.7 | 47.1 Phase Production 47.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.894× parp78.844.1% Wicket rate0.15/ovp6.244.1% Boundary %11%p81.211.8% | 16.2 Quality 16.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 75 Versatility 75 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp88.850% Econ vs LHBp61.250% | |
| 21 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 1 | 44 | 7.33 | 46.5 Phase Production 46.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.979× parp61.244.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp32.544.1% Boundary %14%p43.811.8% | 61.2 Quality 61.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 49.4 Versatility 49.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp61.250% Econ vs LHBp37.550% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 25 | 5.0 | 3 | 51 | 10.2 | 45.4 Phase Production 45.4 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.362× parp8.844.1% Wicket rate0.60/ovp91.244.1% Boundary %23%p11.211.8% | 96.2 Quality 96.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %43% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 33.8 Versatility 33.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.850% Econ vs LHBp63.850% | |
| 23 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 8.0 | 1 | 53 | 6.62 | 44.6 Phase Production 44.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.884× parp68.844.1% Wicket rate0.13/ovp18.844.1% Boundary %12%p51.211.8% | 23.8 Quality 23.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp91.250% Econ vs LHBp13.850% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 26 | 6.0 | 1 | 46 | 7.67 | 40.3 Phase Production 40.3 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.024× parp51.244.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp32.544.1% Boundary %17%p28.811.8% | 61.2 Quality 61.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.850% Econ vs LHBp76.250% | |
| 25 | LA pace | 26 | 7.0 | 1 | 53 | 7.57 | 38.6 Phase Production 38.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.011× parp53.844.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp23.844.1% Boundary %14%p37.511.8% | 8.8 Quality 8.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 53.8 Versatility 53.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp51.250% Econ vs LHBp56.250% | |
| 26 | Off-spin | 30 | 13.0 | 5 | 128 | 9.85 | 37.6 Phase Production 37.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.314× parp3.844.1% Wicket rate0.38/ovp81.244.1% Boundary %23%p1.211.8% | 41.2 Quality 41.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 12.5 Versatility 12.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.250% Econ vs LHBp23.850% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 23 | 4.0 | 1 | 37 | 9.25 | 37.5 Phase Production 37.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.235× parp26.244.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp5544.1% Boundary %25%p13.811.8% | 52.5 Quality 52.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp13.850% Econ vs LHBp71.250% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 14.0 | 2 | 106 | 7.57 | 36.6 Phase Production 36.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.011× parp56.244.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp13.844.1% Boundary %13%p48.811.8% | 71.2 Quality 71.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 48.8 Versatility 48.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp68.850% Econ vs LHBp28.850% | |
| 29 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 5.0 | 1 | 43 | 8.6 | 35.7 Phase Production 35.7 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.148× parp28.844.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp43.844.1% Boundary %17%p31.211.8% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 38.8 Versatility 38.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp76.250% Econ vs LHBp1.250% | |
| 30 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 20.0 | 6 | 182 | 9.1 | 35.6 Phase Production 35.6 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.215× parp6.244.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp68.844.1% Boundary %17%p21.211.8% | 33.8 Quality 33.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 13.8 Versatility 13.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp21.250% Econ vs LHBp6.250% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 25 | 2.0 | 0 | 17 | 8.5 | 35.2 Phase Production 35.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.135× parp37.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp26.244.1% Boundary %8%p6011.8% | 46.2 Quality 46.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 38.8 Versatility 38.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.250% Econ vs LHBp31.250% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 28 | 4.0 | 1 | 41 | 10.25 | 33.1 Phase Production 33.1 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.368× parp13.844.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp5544.1% Boundary %21%p23.811.8% | 81.2 Quality 81.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 41.2 Versatility 41.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8.850% Econ vs LHBp73.850% | |
| 33 | Off-spin | 21 | 12.0 | 1 | 93 | 7.75 | 30.8 Phase Production 30.8 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.035× parp46.244.1% Wicket rate0.08/ovp1.244.1% Boundary %10%p83.811.8% | 3.8 Quality 3.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 48.8 Versatility 48.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6.250% Econ vs LHBp91.250% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 31 | 8.0 | 2 | 74 | 9.25 | 30.2 Phase Production 30.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.235× parp16.244.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp51.244.1% Boundary %23%p3.811.8% | 78.8 Quality 78.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 20 Versatility 20 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp18.850% Econ vs LHBp21.250% | |
| 35 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 14.1 | 2 | 111 | 7.84 | 28 Phase Production 28 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.046× parp41.244.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp11.244.1% Boundary %14%p41.211.8% | 26.2 Quality 26.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 43.8 Versatility 43.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp83.850% Econ vs LHBp3.850% | |
| 36 | Leg-spin | 31 | 14.0 | 3 | 125 | 8.93 | 24 Phase Production 24 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.192× parp11.244.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp38.844.1% Boundary %18%p16.211.8% | 36.2 Quality 36.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 22.5 Versatility 22.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp36.250% Econ vs LHBp8.850% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 22.0 | 4 | 185 | 8.41 | 23.2 Phase Production 23.2 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.123× parp21.244.1% Wicket rate0.18/ovp16.244.1% Boundary %13%p56.211.8% | 1.2 Quality 1.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 30 Versatility 30 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp48.850% Econ vs LHBp11.250% | |
| 38 | LA pace | 24 | 17.0 | 2 | 137 | 8.06 | 22 Phase Production 22 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.076× parp33.844.1% Wicket rate0.12/ovp3.844.1% Boundary %14%p46.211.8% | 76.2 Quality 76.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp56.250% Econ vs LHBp18.850% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 21 | 5.0 | 0 | 46 | 9.2 | 16.5 Phase Production 16.5 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.228× parp23.844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp8.844.1% Boundary %20%p18.811.8% | 13.8 Quality 13.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp16.250% Econ vs LHBp58.850% | |
| 40 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 6.0 | 1 | 67 | 11.17 | 15.9 Phase Production 15.9 vs all bowlers · n=40 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.491× parp1.244.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp32.544.1% Boundary %22%p8.811.8% | 28.8 Quality 28.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 13.8 Versatility 13.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp11.250% Econ vs LHBp16.250% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LA pace | 27 | 22.0 | 15 | 183 | 8.32 | 93.8 Phase Production 93.8 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.81× parp94.450% Wicket rate0.68/ovp90.716.7% Boundary %16%p94.433.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 46.5 Versatility 46.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep41.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 31 | 6.0 | 3 | 37 | 6.17 | 85.2 Phase Production 85.2 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.6× parp90.750% Wicket rate0.50/ovp57.416.7% Boundary %11%p90.733.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 67.4 Versatility 67.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep93.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 3 | RA pace | 25 | 5.0 | 3 | 29 | 5.8 | 84 Phase Production 84 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.565× parp8750% Wicket rate0.60/ovp68.516.7% Boundary %10%p8733.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 64.8 Versatility 64.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep8740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 22 | 12.1 | 3 | 82 | 6.74 | 82.7 Phase Production 82.7 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.656× parp98.150% Wicket rate0.25/ovp5.616.7% Boundary %8%p98.133.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 48.3 Versatility 48.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep45.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 20 | 6.0 | 6 | 50 | 8.33 | 80.2 Phase Production 80.2 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.811× parp75.950% Wicket rate1.00/ovp94.416.7% Boundary %14%p79.633.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 41.3 Versatility 41.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep28.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 6 | RA pace | 25 | 11.4 | 6 | 103 | 8.83 | 78.4 Phase Production 78.4 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.86× parp79.650% Wicket rate0.52/ovp64.816.7% Boundary %16%p83.333.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 64.8 Versatility 64.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep8740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 7 | LA pace | 24 | 11.2 | 5 | 99 | 8.74 | 73.5 Phase Production 73.5 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.85× parp83.350% Wicket rate0.44/ovp38.916.7% Boundary %18%p75.933.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 37.8 Versatility 37.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep19.640% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 8 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 2.0 | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 71.8 Phase Production 71.8 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.535× parp72.243.6% Boundary %8%p68.541.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp79.614.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 87.5 Versatility 87.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep87.5100% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 28 | 6.4 | 4 | 60 | 9 | 66 Phase Production 66 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.876× parp68.550% Wicket rate0.60/ovp75.916.7% Boundary %20%p57.433.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 39.6 Versatility 39.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep23.940% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 24 | 6.1 | 3 | 58 | 9.41 | 63.6 Phase Production 63.6 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.916× parp61.150% Wicket rate0.49/ovp53.716.7% Boundary %16%p72.233.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 58.7 Versatility 58.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep71.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 27 | 12.4 | 9 | 133 | 10.5 | 57.4 Phase Production 57.4 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.022× parp42.650% Wicket rate0.71/ovp8716.7% Boundary %20%p64.833.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 44.8 Versatility 44.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep3740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 12 | LA pace | 36 | 3.4 | 0 | 32 | 8.73 | 54.3 Phase Production 54.3 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.85× parp64.850% Wicket rate0.00/ovp9.316.7% Boundary %18%p61.133.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 69.1 Versatility 69.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep97.840% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 30 | 2.0 | 1 | 19 | 9.5 | 51.2 Phase Production 51.2 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.925× parp51.950% Wicket rate0.50/ovp48.116.7% Boundary %17%p51.933.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 61.3 Versatility 61.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep78.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 2.0 | 0 | 17 | 8.5 | 49.4 Phase Production 49.4 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.828× parp57.443.6% Boundary %17%p51.941.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.514.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep50100% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 21 | 2.0 | 1 | 19 | 9.5 | 48.1 Phase Production 48.1 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.925× parp51.950% Wicket rate0.50/ovp48.116.7% Boundary %25%p42.633.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 61.3 Versatility 61.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep78.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 16 | RA pace | — | 12.4 | 7 | 131 | 10.34 | 48.1 Phase Production 48.1 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.007× parp46.350% Wicket rate0.55/ovp72.216.7% Boundary %25%p38.933.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 36.1 Versatility 36.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.240% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 4.0 | 1 | 44 | 11 | 38.2 Phase Production 38.2 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.071× parp35.243.6% Boundary %21%p46.341.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp24.114.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep37.5100% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 22 | 12.5 | 9 | 135 | 10.52 | 37.7 Phase Production 37.7 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.024× parp38.950% Wicket rate0.70/ovp83.316.7% Boundary %29%p1333.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 43 Versatility 43 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep32.640% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 25 | 9.0 | 8 | 110 | 12.22 | 37 Phase Production 37 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.19× parp27.850% Wicket rate0.89/ovp98.116.7% Boundary %30%p20.433.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 51.7 Versatility 51.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep54.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 30 | 3.3 | 1 | 45 | 12.86 | 32.1 Phase Production 32.1 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.252× parp31.550% Wicket rate0.29/ovp27.816.7% Boundary %29%p35.233.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 32.6 Versatility 32.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 19 | 2.2 | 1 | 39 | 16.71 | 24.1 Phase Production 24.1 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.627× parp1350% Wicket rate0.43/ovp42.616.7% Boundary %36%p31.533.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 32.6 Versatility 32.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 28 | 9.4 | 5 | 120 | 12.41 | 24.1 Phase Production 24.1 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.209× parp24.150% Wicket rate0.52/ovp61.116.7% Boundary %31%p5.633.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 55.2 Versatility 55.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 26 | 7.0 | 3 | 91 | 13 | 21.6 Phase Production 21.6 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.266× parp20.450% Wicket rate0.43/ovp35.216.7% Boundary %31%p16.733.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 57 Versatility 57 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep67.440% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 24 | Off-spin | 24 | 4.0 | 0 | 58 | 14.5 | 19.2 Phase Production 19.2 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.412× parp16.743.6% Boundary %33%p27.841.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.914.5% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 25 Versatility 25 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep25100% | |
| 25 | LA pace | 26 | 3.0 | 1 | 47 | 15.67 | 13 Phase Production 13 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.525× parp9.350% Wicket rate0.34/ovp31.516.7% Boundary %39%p9.333.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 51.7 Versatility 51.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep54.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 26 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 39 | 19.5 | 12 Phase Production 12 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.898× parp1.950% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.516.7% Boundary %42%p24.133.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 32.6 Versatility 32.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 21 | 6.0 | 1 | 86 | 14.33 | 5.6 Phase Production 5.6 vs all bowlers · n=27 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.395× parp5.650% Wicket rate0.17/ovp1316.7% Boundary %36%p1.933.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 51.7 Versatility 51.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep54.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% |
Safvan Patel
Bowler · LA pace · age 27
66.8
Scout Score
Overs 41.0 · Wkts 24 · Runs 323 · Econ 7.88
66.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay65.936.6%24.1
Middle599.8%5.8
Death68.853.7%36.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p361.06×
Scout Score66.8
65.9Powerplay36.6% of overs · 7w · 7.53 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp67.215%
Versatilityp77.210%
Trajectoryp3610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.888× par90bp79.736.8%
Wicket rate0.47/ov90bp92.242.1%
Boundary %19%90bp64.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.707× par45bp89.130%
Econ vs LHB1.052× par45bp45.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.53/ov45bp89.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov45bp95.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 29%
59Middle9.8% of overs · 2w · 6.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.738%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp52.515%
Versatilityp58.812%
Trajectoryp3610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.901× par24bp63.844.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp8544.1%
Boundary %8%24bp68.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.087× par17bp33.850%
Econ vs LHB0.455× par7bp83.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 21%
68.8Death53.7% of overs · 15w · 8.32 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp93.848%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp46.515%
Trajectoryp3612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.81× par132bp94.450%
Wicket rate0.68/ov132bp90.716.7%
Boundary %16%132bp94.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%132bp41.340%
Slower ball0132bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer0132bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Abhimanyusingh Rajput
Bowler · RA pace · age 28
65.2
Scout Score
Overs 34.4 · Wkts 12 · Runs 255 · Econ 7.36
65.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay73.623.1%17.0
Middle63.857.7%36.8
Death59.519.2%11.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p77.90.98×
Scout Score65.2
73.6Powerplay23.1% of overs · 3w · 6.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp85.915%
Versatilityp72.810%
Trajectoryp77.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.781× par48bp85.936.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp79.742.1%
Boundary %12%48bp92.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.897× par25bp60.930%
Econ vs LHB0.656× par23bp92.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.48/ov25bp70.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.26/ov23bp64.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 35%
63.8Middle57.7% of overs · 5w · 7.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp88.815%
Versatilityp70.612%
Trajectoryp77.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.948× par120bp66.244.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov120bp46.244.1%
Boundary %12%120bp63.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.945× par91bp73.850%
Econ vs LHB0.961× par29bp67.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
59.5Death19.2% of overs · 4w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp6648%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp39.615%
Trajectoryp77.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.876× par40bp68.550%
Wicket rate0.60/ov40bp75.916.7%
Boundary %20%40bp57.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%40bp23.940%
Slower ball040bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer040bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Lakshit Toksiya
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
64.3
Scout Score
Overs 37.4 · Wkts 14 · Runs 325 · Econ 8.63
64.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay63.155.8%35.2
Middle56.513.3%7.5
Death69.831%21.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p82.60.97×
Scout Score64.3
63.1Powerplay55.8% of overs · 5w · 8.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.938%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp98.415%
Versatilityp57.810%
Trajectoryp82.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.96× par126bp64.136.8%
Wicket rate0.24/ov126bp51.642.1%
Boundary %22%126bp45.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.075× par72bp45.330%
Econ vs LHB0.813× par54bp95.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov72bp57.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.11/ov54bp20.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 41%
56.5Middle13.3% of overs · 3w · 10.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp96.215%
Versatilityp33.812%
Trajectoryp82.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.362× par30bp8.844.1%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp91.244.1%
Boundary %23%30bp11.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.855× par13bp3.850%
Econ vs LHB0.984× par17bp63.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 43%
69.8Death31% of overs · 6w · 8.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp78.448%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp64.815%
Trajectoryp82.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.86× par70bp79.650%
Wicket rate0.52/ov70bp64.816.7%
Boundary %16%70bp83.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%70bp8740%
Slower ball070bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer070bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Mahesh Pithiya
Bowler · Off-spin · age 24
63.2
Scout Score
Overs 33.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 240 · Econ 7.27
63.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay47.621.2%10.1
Middle73.466.7%49.0
Death34.712.1%4.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p80.20.98×
Scout Score63.2
47.6Powerplay21.2% of overs · 1w · 7.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp1.615%
Versatilityp61.710%
Trajectoryp80.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.842× par42bp73.436.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp14.142.1%
Boundary %12%42bp89.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.723× par17bp7530%
Econ vs LHB0.905× par25bp76.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov17bp23.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.24/ov25bp57.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 7%
73.4Middle66.7% of overs · 6w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp78.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp86.215%
Versatilityp83.812%
Trajectoryp80.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.801× par132bp93.844.1%
Wicket rate0.27/ov132bp58.844.1%
Boundary %7%132bp96.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.951× par82bp71.250%
Econ vs LHB0.557× par50bp96.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
34.7Death12.1% of overs · 0w · 14.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.255%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp258%
Trajectoryp80.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.412× par24bp16.743.6%
Boundary %33%24bp27.841.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp1.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.3612bp25100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Karan Umatt
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
62.9
Scout Score
Overs 29.1 · Wkts 7 · Runs 176 · Econ 6.03
62.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay6937.7%26.0
Middle53.220.6%11.0
Death62.141.7%25.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p22.11.12×
Scout Score62.9
69Powerplay37.7% of overs · 3w · 5.09 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp95.315%
Versatilityp75.610%
Trajectoryp22.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.6× par66bp98.436.8%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp60.942.1%
Boundary %8%66bp98.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.521× par43bp95.330%
Econ vs LHB0.746× par23bp82.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.28/ov43bp46.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.26/ov23bp64.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 39%
53.2Middle20.6% of overs · 1w · 6.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp5538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp61.215%
Versatilityp7012%
Trajectoryp22.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.846× par36bp71.244.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp32.544.1%
Boundary %8%36bp78.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.888× par19bp58.850%
Econ vs LHB0.796× par17bp81.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
62.1Death41.7% of overs · 3w · 6.74 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.748%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp48.315%
Trajectoryp22.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.656× par73bp98.150%
Wicket rate0.25/ov73bp5.616.7%
Boundary %8%73bp98.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%73bp45.740%
Slower ball073bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer073bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Rajveer Jadhav
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
60.5
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 20 · Econ 5
60.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle60.5100%60.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50n/a
Scout Score60.5
60.5Middle100% of overs · 2w · 5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp21.215%
Versatilityp63.812%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.668× par24bp83.844.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp8544.1%
Boundary %4%24bp86.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.67× par24bp81.250%
Econ vs LHB—0bp46.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 12%
Shlok Desai
Bowler · Off-spin · age 28
60.5
Scout Score
Overs 6.5 · Wkts 3 · Runs 53 · Econ 7.76
60.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle60.5100%60.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p29.11.07×
Scout Score60.5
60.5Middle100% of overs · 3w · 7.76 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp6738%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp91.215%
Versatilityp49.412%
Trajectoryp29.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.035× par41bp48.844.1%
Wicket rate0.44/ov41bp88.844.1%
Boundary %12%41bp53.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.206× par12bp31.250%
Econ vs LHB0.961× par29bp67.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 34%
Jaypal Chad
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
60.1
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 12 · Runs 208 · Econ 9.9
60.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay70.752.4%37.0
Death47.142.9%20.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p75.60.99×
Scout Score60.1
70.7Powerplay52.4% of overs · 4w · 7.55 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp92.215%
Versatilityp70.910%
Trajectoryp75.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.89× par66bp70.336.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov66bp84.442.1%
Boundary %17%66bp67.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.977× par37bp57.830%
Econ vs LHB0.781× par29bp89.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.49/ov37bp82.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.20/ov29bp51.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 35%
47.1Death42.9% of overs · 8w · 12.22 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp3748%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp51.715%
Trajectoryp75.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.19× par54bp27.850%
Wicket rate0.89/ov54bp98.116.7%
Boundary %30%54bp20.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%54bp54.340%
Slower ball054bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer054bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Pradeep Yadav
Bowler · Off-spin · age 29
57.9
Scout Score
Overs 30.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 200 · Econ 6.67
57.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay41.516.7%6.9
Middle61.283.3%51.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p84.90.96×
Scout Score57.9
41.5Powerplay16.7% of overs · 1w · 10.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.438%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp14.115%
Versatilityp39.410%
Trajectoryp84.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.25× par30bp26.636.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp40.642.1%
Boundary %23%30bp40.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.482× par6bp64.130%
Econ vs LHB1.4× par24bp4.730%
Wkt vs RHB1.00/ov6bp79.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov24bp14.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 13%
61.2Middle83.3% of overs · 6w · 5.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp72.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp18.815%
Versatilityp82.512%
Trajectoryp84.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.785× par150bp96.244.1%
Wicket rate0.24/ov150bp41.244.1%
Boundary %6%150bp98.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.969× par73bp66.250%
Econ vs LHB0.61× par77bp98.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 19%
Ram Bharwad
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
57.3
Scout Score
Overs 34.4 · Wkts 13 · Runs 288 · Econ 8.31
57.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle58.660.6%35.5
Death55.336.5%20.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p70.90.99×
Scout Score57.3
58.6Middle60.6% of overs · 4w · 6.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp56.215%
Versatilityp83.812%
Trajectoryp70.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.896× par126bp81.244.1%
Wicket rate0.19/ov126bp21.244.1%
Boundary %11%126bp73.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.913× par81bp78.850%
Econ vs LHB0.867× par45bp88.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
55.3Death36.5% of overs · 9w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.448%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp44.815%
Trajectoryp70.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.022× par76bp42.650%
Wicket rate0.71/ov76bp8716.7%
Boundary %20%76bp64.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%76bp3740%
Slower ball076bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer076bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Babasafi Pathan
Bowler · RA pace · age 31
56.8
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 164 · Econ 8.2
56.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay6130%18.3
Middle43.740%17.5
Death70.130%21.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.71×
Scout Score56.8
61Powerplay30% of overs · 3w · 8.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.238%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp82.815%
Versatilityp55.310%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.042× par36bp42.236.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp89.142.1%
Boundary %22%36bp48.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.205× par18bp35.930%
Econ vs LHB0.876× par18bp73.430%
Wkt vs RHB1.00/ov18bp95.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov18bp17.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 36%
43.7Middle40% of overs · 2w · 9.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp78.815%
Versatilityp2012%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.235× par48bp16.244.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp51.244.1%
Boundary %23%48bp3.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.228× par36bp18.850%
Econ vs LHB1.261× par12bp21.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 29%
70.1Death30% of overs · 3w · 6.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp85.248%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp67.415%
Trajectoryp54.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.6× par36bp90.750%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp57.416.7%
Boundary %11%36bp90.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate11%36bp93.540%
Slower ball036bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer036bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Deep Patel
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
55.9
Scout Score
Overs 31.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 206 · Econ 6.65
55.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay3732.3%12.0
Middle67.161.3%41.1
Death45.26.5%2.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p12.81.16×
Scout Score55.9
37Powerplay32.3% of overs · 2w · 8.3 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp7.815%
Versatilityp45.610%
Trajectoryp12.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.979× par60bp57.836.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp35.942.1%
Boundary %23%60bp32.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.893× par47bp70.330%
Econ vs LHB1.319× par13bp17.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.13/ov47bp10.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.46/ov13bp85.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 15%
67.1Middle61.3% of overs · 6w · 5.58 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp8638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp66.215%
Versatilityp88.812%
Trajectoryp12.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.745× par114bp98.844.1%
Wicket rate0.32/ov114bp71.244.1%
Boundary %8%114bp93.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.702× par87bp98.850%
Econ vs LHB0.885× par27bp78.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 23%
45.2Death6.5% of overs · 0w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.455%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp12.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.828× par12bp57.443.6%
Boundary %17%12bp51.941.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp18.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.8312bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Parikshit Patidar
Bowler · Off-spin · age 24
54.7
Scout Score
Overs 32.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 197 · Econ 6.16
54.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay57.962.5%36.2
Middle49.437.5%18.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p10.51.17×
Scout Score54.7
57.9Powerplay62.5% of overs · 4w · 6.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.238%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp76.615%
Versatilityp70.910%
Trajectoryp10.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.731× par120bp92.236.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov120bp26.642.1%
Boundary %12%120bp95.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.791× par53bp85.930%
Econ vs LHB0.676× par67bp98.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.45/ov53bp76.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov67bp1.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 30%
49.4Middle37.5% of overs · 3w · 6.08 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp6.215%
Versatilityp68.812%
Trajectoryp10.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.812× par72bp86.244.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov72bp48.844.1%
Boundary %7%72bp91.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.03× par32bp43.850%
Econ vs LHB0.637× par40bp93.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 14%
Harshit Maurya
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
52.6
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 50 · Econ 12.5
52.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle52.650%26.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.71×
Scout Score52.6
52.6Middle50% of overs · 1w · 9.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp73.815%
Versatilityp36.212%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.268× par12bp31.244.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp76.244.1%
Boundary %25%12bp26.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.273× par12bp26.250%
Econ vs LHB—0bp46.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
Bhargav Bhatt
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 36
52.2
Scout Score
Overs 33.1 · Wkts 8 · Runs 224 · Econ 6.75
52.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.151.3%30.3
Middle41.542.7%17.7
Death706%4.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p91.90.88×
Scout Score52.2
59.1Powerplay51.3% of overs · 4w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp17.215%
Versatilityp58.410%
Trajectoryp91.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.708× par102bp95.336.8%
Wicket rate0.23/ov102bp48.442.1%
Boundary %16%102bp85.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.629× par84bp98.430%
Econ vs LHB1.105× par18bp35.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.22/ov84bp20.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.34/ov18bp70.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
41.5Middle42.7% of overs · 2w · 7.84 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp2838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp26.215%
Versatilityp43.812%
Trajectoryp91.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.046× par85bp41.244.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov85bp11.244.1%
Boundary %14%85bp41.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.804× par50bp83.850%
Econ vs LHB1.388× par35bp3.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 19%
70Death6% of overs · 2w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.855%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp87.58%
Trajectoryp91.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.535× par12bp72.243.6%
Boundary %8%12bp68.541.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp79.614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.5412bp87.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Raj Limbani
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
51.5
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 26 · Econ 6.5
51.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay52.150%26.1
Death50.850%25.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50n/a
Scout Score51.5
52.1Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 3.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp42.215%
Versatilityp60.810%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.413× par12bp82.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp20.342.1%
Boundary %0%12bp79.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.31× par7bp79.730%
Econ vs LHB0.549× par5bp68.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov7bp37.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp43.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
50.8Death50% of overs · 1w · 9.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.148%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp61.315%
Trajectoryp5012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.925× par12bp51.950%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp48.116.7%
Boundary %25%12bp42.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%12bp78.340%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Chinta Gandhi
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 31
50.4
Scout Score
Overs 26.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 235 · Econ 9.04
50.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay65.442.3%27.7
Middle38.753.8%20.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p89.50.92×
Scout Score50.4
65.4Powerplay42.3% of overs · 4w · 8.73 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp6638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp79.715%
Versatilityp58.810%
Trajectoryp89.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.029× par66bp51.636.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov66bp84.442.1%
Boundary %21%66bp54.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.048× par49bp48.430%
Econ vs LHB1.009× par17bp54.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov49bp64.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.35/ov17bp7520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 32%
38.7Middle53.8% of overs · 3w · 8.93 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp2438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp36.215%
Versatilityp22.512%
Trajectoryp89.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.192× par84bp11.244.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov84bp38.844.1%
Boundary %18%84bp16.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.06× par47bp36.250%
Econ vs LHB1.356× par37bp8.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
Atit Sheth
Bowler · RA pace · age 30
50.3
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 82 · Econ 8.2
50.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay49.660%29.8
Middle49.820%10.0
Death52.920%10.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.71×
Scout Score50.3
49.6Powerplay60% of overs · 1w · 7.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.438%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp35.915%
Versatilityp53.410%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.904× par36bp60.936.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp32.842.1%
Boundary %14%36bp76.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.121× par20bp42.230%
Econ vs LHB0.643× par16bp85.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.30/ov20bp51.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov16bp23.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
49.8Middle20% of overs · 1w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp46.215%
Versatilityp36.212%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.135× par12bp37.544.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp76.244.1%
Boundary %17%12bp33.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.072× par6bp38.850%
Econ vs LHB1.194× par6bp33.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
52.9Death20% of overs · 1w · 9.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.248%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp61.315%
Trajectoryp54.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.925× par12bp51.950%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp48.116.7%
Boundary %17%12bp51.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%12bp78.340%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Keyur Kale
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
49.7
Scout Score
Overs 34.5 · Wkts 18 · Runs 343 · Econ 9.85
49.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay42.745.9%19.6
Middle77.717.2%13.4
Death45.336.8%16.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p68.61×
Scout Score49.7
42.7Powerplay45.9% of overs · 5w · 11.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp33.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp48.415%
Versatilityp22.510%
Trajectoryp68.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.312× par96bp1.636.8%
Wicket rate0.31/ov96bp76.642.1%
Boundary %28%96bp4.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.209× par64bp10.930%
Econ vs LHB1.522× par32bp1.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.47/ov64bp85.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov32bp7.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 26%
77.7Middle17.2% of overs · 4w · 5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp93.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp93.815%
Versatilityp73.812%
Trajectoryp68.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.668× par36bp91.244.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov36bp96.244.1%
Boundary %6%36bp88.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.362× par20bp96.250%
Econ vs LHB1.045× par16bp51.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 39%
45.3Death36.8% of overs · 9w · 10.52 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.748%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp4315%
Trajectoryp68.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.024× par77bp38.950%
Wicket rate0.70/ov77bp83.316.7%
Boundary %29%77bp1333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%77bp32.640%
Slower ball077bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer077bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Abhishek Swaminathan
Bowler · RA pace · age 20
49.5
Scout Score
Overs 22.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 186 · Econ 8.45
49.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay30.640.9%12.5
Middle65.531.8%20.8
Death59.327.3%16.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p17.41.15×
Scout Score49.5
30.6Powerplay40.9% of overs · 2w · 10.89 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp20.315%
Versatilityp28.810%
Trajectoryp17.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.284× par54bp10.936.8%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp45.342.1%
Boundary %30%54bp7.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.232× par27bp29.730%
Econ vs LHB1.321× par27bp7.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.22/ov27bp32.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.22/ov27bp54.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
65.5Middle31.8% of overs · 2w · 5.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp98.815%
Versatilityp65.612%
Trajectoryp17.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.725× par42bp88.844.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp62.544.1%
Boundary %10%42bp71.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.609× par33bp93.850%
Econ vs LHB1.15× par9bp37.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 40%
59.3Death27.3% of overs · 6w · 8.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp80.248%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp41.315%
Trajectoryp17.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.811× par36bp75.950%
Wicket rate1.00/ov36bp94.416.7%
Boundary %14%36bp79.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%36bp28.340%
Slower ball036bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer036bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Aaryan Chavda
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 24
49.1
Scout Score
Overs 26.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 195 · Econ 7.5
49.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay54.546.2%25.2
Middle44.553.8%23.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p15.11.16×
Scout Score49.1
54.5Powerplay46.2% of overs · 3w · 7.42 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp51.615%
Versatilityp64.110%
Trajectoryp15.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.875× par72bp76.636.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov72bp54.742.1%
Boundary %17%72bp73.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.776× par41bp82.830%
Econ vs LHB0.996× par31bp64.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov41bp1.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.58/ov31bp98.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 26%
44.5Middle53.8% of overs · 2w · 7.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp71.215%
Versatilityp48.812%
Trajectoryp15.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.011× par84bp56.244.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov84bp13.844.1%
Boundary %13%84bp48.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.94× par53bp68.850%
Econ vs LHB1.13× par31bp28.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
Sanket Agrawal
Bowler · RA pace
48.9
Scout Score
Overs 22.4 · Wkts 12 · Runs 214 · Econ 9.44
48.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay26.38.8%2.3
Middle66.335.3%23.4
Death41.455.9%23.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p3.51.27×
Scout Score48.9
26.3Powerplay8.8% of overs · 0w · 16 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp16.438%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp2515%
Versatilityp2510%
Trajectoryp3.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.887× par12bp7.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp20.342.1%
Boundary %42%12bp23.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB2.17× par5bp17.230%
Econ vs LHB1.666× par7bp14.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov5bp42.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp35.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
66.3Middle35.3% of overs · 5w · 6.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp83.815%
Versatilityp7512%
Trajectoryp3.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.851× par48bp73.844.1%
Wicket rate0.62/ov48bp98.844.1%
Boundary %10%48bp66.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.931× par38bp63.850%
Econ vs LHB0.557× par10bp86.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 31%
41.4Death55.9% of overs · 7w · 10.34 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.148%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp36.115%
Trajectoryp3.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.007× par76bp46.350%
Wicket rate0.55/ov76bp72.216.7%
Boundary %25%76bp38.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate1%76bp15.240%
Slower ball076bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer076bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Mohit Mongia
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
48.8
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 72 · Econ 8
48.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle48.888.9%43.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p94.20.85×
Scout Score48.8
48.8Middle88.9% of overs · 1w · 6.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp23.815%
Versatilityp52.512%
Trajectoryp94.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.884× par48bp68.844.1%
Wicket rate0.13/ov48bp18.844.1%
Boundary %12%48bp51.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.662× par34bp91.250%
Econ vs LHB1.422× par14bp13.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
Ninad Rathva
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
48.1
Scout Score
Overs 39.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 330 · Econ 8.46
48.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.638.5%22.9
Middle40.151.3%20.6
Death45.310.3%4.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p73.30.99×
Scout Score48.1
59.6Powerplay38.5% of overs · 3w · 6.93 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp60.915%
Versatilityp58.110%
Trajectoryp73.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.818× par90bp89.136.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov90bp29.742.1%
Boundary %16%90bp82.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.668× par52bp92.230%
Econ vs LHB1.011× par38bp57.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.35/ov52bp60.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov38bp4.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 28%
40.1Middle51.3% of overs · 6w · 9.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp33.815%
Versatilityp13.812%
Trajectoryp73.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.215× par120bp6.244.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov120bp68.844.1%
Boundary %17%120bp21.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.15× par93bp21.250%
Econ vs LHB1.445× par27bp6.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
45.3Death10.3% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.255%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp37.58%
Trajectoryp73.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.071× par24bp35.243.6%
Boundary %21%24bp46.341.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp24.114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.0515bp37.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Kartik Bharwad
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 23
47.8
Scout Score
Overs 17.3 · Wkts 5 · Runs 146 · Econ 8.34
47.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay35.334.3%12.1
Middle55.257.1%31.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p19.81.14×
Scout Score47.8
35.3Powerplay34.3% of overs · 2w · 11.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp10.915%
Versatilityp30.610%
Trajectoryp19.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.317× par36bp14.136.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp73.442.1%
Boundary %31%36bp17.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.366× par27bp7.830%
Econ vs LHB1.219× par9bp29.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.44/ov27bp67.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov9bp29.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 11%
55.2Middle57.1% of overs · 3w · 6.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp38.815%
Versatilityp63.812%
Trajectoryp19.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.854× par60bp76.244.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp66.244.1%
Boundary %10%60bp76.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.766× par43bp86.250%
Econ vs LHB1.077× par17bp41.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
Rushabh Jain
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
47.6
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 65 · Econ 10.83
47.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay41.650%20.8
Middle56.733.3%18.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.71×
Scout Score47.6
41.6Powerplay50% of overs · 1w · 12.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp32.815%
Versatilityp34.110%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.494× par18bp17.236.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp67.242.1%
Boundary %39%18bp14.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.86× par7bp20.330%
Econ vs LHB1.247× par11bp26.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.86/ov7bp73.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp26.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
56.7Middle33.3% of overs · 1w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp46.215%
Versatilityp53.812%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.935× par12bp58.844.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp76.244.1%
Boundary %8%12bp6011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.804× par5bp53.850%
Econ vs LHB1.024× par7bp53.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
Shivam Bhardwaj
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
47
Scout Score
Overs 15.1 · Wkts 6 · Runs 139 · Econ 9.16
47OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay42.852.7%22.6
Death52.540.7%21.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p5.81.23×
Scout Score47
42.8Powerplay52.7% of overs · 2w · 9.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.938%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp57.815%
Versatilityp4510%
Trajectoryp5.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.165× par48bp29.736.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp57.842.1%
Boundary %25%48bp26.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.227× par33bp26.630%
Econ vs LHB1.052× par15bp48.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.18/ov33bp29.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp82.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 27%
52.5Death40.7% of overs · 3w · 9.41 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.648%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp58.715%
Trajectoryp5.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.916× par37bp61.150%
Wicket rate0.49/ov37bp53.716.7%
Boundary %16%37bp72.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%37bp71.740%
Slower ball037bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer037bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Manan Solanki
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 24
46.6
Scout Score
Overs 25.4 · Wkts 3 · Runs 207 · Econ 8.06
46.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay2719.5%5.3
Middle51.577.9%40.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p96.50.81×
Scout Score46.6
27Powerplay19.5% of overs · 0w · 13.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp4.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp4.715%
Versatilityp14.110%
Trajectoryp96.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.557× par30bp4.736.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp6.242.1%
Boundary %37%30bp1.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.504× par25bp1.630%
Econ vs LHB1.921× par5bp10.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov25bp7.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp43.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 7%
51.5Middle77.9% of overs · 3w · 6.7 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp16.215%
Versatilityp7512%
Trajectoryp96.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.894× par120bp78.844.1%
Wicket rate0.15/ov120bp6.244.1%
Boundary %11%120bp81.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.825× par77bp88.850%
Econ vs LHB1.018× par43bp61.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 18%
Vishal Yadav
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
46.4
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 171 · Econ 10.06
46.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay62.523.5%14.7
Middle47.435.3%16.7
Death36.341.2%15.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p40.71×
Scout Score46.4
62.5Powerplay23.5% of overs · 3w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.538%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp89.115%
Versatilityp62.510%
Trajectoryp40.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.002× par24bp54.736.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp95.342.1%
Boundary %25%24bp29.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.723× par12bp67.230%
Econ vs LHB1.258× par12bp20.330%
Wkt vs RHB1.00/ov12bp92.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.50/ov12bp89.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 42%
47.4Middle35.3% of overs · 1w · 7.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp61.215%
Versatilityp52.512%
Trajectoryp40.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.024× par36bp51.244.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp32.544.1%
Boundary %17%36bp28.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.136× par29bp28.850%
Econ vs LHB0.569× par7bp76.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
36.3Death41.2% of overs · 3w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.648%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp5715%
Trajectoryp40.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.266× par42bp20.450%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp35.216.7%
Boundary %31%42bp16.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%42bp67.440%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer042bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Gaurav Chaudhary
Bowler · LA pace · age 36
45.5
Scout Score
Overs 8.4 · Wkts 0 · Runs 84 · Econ 9.69
45.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.346.2%16.8
Death55.542.3%23.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.71×
Scout Score45.5
36.3Powerplay46.2% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp2138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp39.115%
Versatilityp34.710%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.179× par24bp32.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp10.942.1%
Boundary %33%24bp20.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.218× par19bp32.830%
Econ vs LHB1.097× par5bp42.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov19bp17.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp43.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
55.5Death42.3% of overs · 0w · 8.73 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.348%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp69.115%
Trajectoryp54.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.85× par22bp64.850%
Wicket rate0.00/ov22bp9.316.7%
Boundary %18%22bp61.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate36%22bp97.840%
Slower ball022bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer022bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Henil Patel
Bowler · RA pace · age 19
45.2
Scout Score
Overs 12.2 · Wkts 6 · Runs 128 · Econ 10.38
45.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle48.181.1%39.0
Death32.718.9%6.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p31.41.07×
Scout Score45.2
48.1Middle81.1% of overs · 5w · 8.9 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp68.815%
Versatilityp2512%
Trajectoryp31.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.188× par60bp18.844.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov60bp93.844.1%
Boundary %20%60bp6.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.206× par38bp23.850%
Econ vs LHB1.158× par22bp26.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 25%
32.7Death18.9% of overs · 1w · 16.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.148%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp32.615%
Trajectoryp31.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.627× par14bp1350%
Wicket rate0.43/ov14bp42.616.7%
Boundary %36%14bp31.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%14bp6.540%
Slower ball014bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer014bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Shehbaj Natha
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
45.2
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 46 · Econ 9.2
45.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle45.280%36.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.71×
Scout Score45.2
45.2Middle80% of overs · 1w · 9.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp52.515%
Versatilityp42.512%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.235× par24bp26.244.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp5544.1%
Boundary %25%24bp13.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.909× par8bp13.850%
Econ vs LHB0.896× par16bp71.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 21%
Kartik Kakade
Bowler · Off-spin · age 30
44.6
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 216 · Econ 10.29
44.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay4733.3%15.7
Middle43.261.9%26.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p87.20.93×
Scout Score44.6
47Powerplay33.3% of overs · 2w · 10.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.838%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp45.315%
Versatilityp40.610%
Trajectoryp87.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.264× par42bp20.336.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp64.142.1%
Boundary %31%42bp10.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.523× par19bp4.730%
Econ vs LHB1.044× par23bp51.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.32/ov19bp54.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.26/ov23bp64.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 26%
43.2Middle61.9% of overs · 5w · 9.85 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp41.215%
Versatilityp12.512%
Trajectoryp87.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.314× par78bp3.844.1%
Wicket rate0.38/ov78bp81.244.1%
Boundary %23%78bp1.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.539× par35bp1.250%
Econ vs LHB1.129× par43bp23.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 20%
Krish Patel
Bowler · SLA orthodox
44.4
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 74 · Econ 9.25
44.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle44.487.5%38.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.71×
Scout Score44.4
44.4Middle87.5% of overs · 2w · 7.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.338%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp11.215%
Versatilityp43.812%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.049× par42bp43.844.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp62.544.1%
Boundary %14%42bp37.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.053× par42bp41.250%
Econ vs LHB—0bp46.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 14%
Prasoon Jangid
Bowler · LA pace · age 24
44.4
Scout Score
Overs 33.2 · Wkts 8 · Runs 282 · Econ 8.46
44.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay44.815%6.7
Middle37.651%19.2
Death54.434%18.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p8.11.18×
Scout Score44.4
44.8Powerplay15% of overs · 1w · 9.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp4038%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp71.915%
Versatilityp44.710%
Trajectoryp8.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.085× par30bp39.136.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp40.642.1%
Boundary %23%30bp40.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.93× par14bp54.730%
Econ vs LHB1.2× par16bp23.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov14bp26.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.37/ov16bp79.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
37.6Middle51% of overs · 2w · 8.06 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp2238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp76.215%
Versatilityp37.512%
Trajectoryp8.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.076× par102bp33.844.1%
Wicket rate0.12/ov102bp3.844.1%
Boundary %14%102bp46.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.017× par64bp56.250%
Econ vs LHB1.173× par38bp18.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 26%
54.4Death34% of overs · 5w · 8.74 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.548%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp37.815%
Trajectoryp8.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.85× par68bp83.350%
Wicket rate0.44/ov68bp38.916.7%
Boundary %18%68bp75.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%68bp19.640%
Slower ball068bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer068bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Vishal Solanki
Bowler · RA pace · age 28
44
Scout Score
Overs 23.4 · Wkts 9 · Runs 252 · Econ 10.65
44OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay50.742.3%21.4
Middle45.616.9%7.7
Death36.440.8%14.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p33.71.06×
Scout Score44
50.7Powerplay42.3% of overs · 3w · 9.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp54.715%
Versatilityp52.510%
Trajectoryp33.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.073× par60bp35.936.8%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp70.342.1%
Boundary %22%60bp51.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.245× par43bp14.130%
Econ vs LHB0.686× par17bp79.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.28/ov43bp46.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.35/ov17bp7520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 27%
45.6Middle16.9% of overs · 1w · 10.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp33.138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp81.215%
Versatilityp41.212%
Trajectoryp33.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.368× par24bp13.844.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp5544.1%
Boundary %21%24bp23.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.655× par17bp8.850%
Econ vs LHB0.682× par7bp73.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
36.4Death40.8% of overs · 5w · 12.41 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.148%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp55.215%
Trajectoryp33.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.209× par58bp24.150%
Wicket rate0.52/ov58bp61.116.7%
Boundary %31%58bp5.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%58bp6340%
Slower ball058bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer058bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Sahejadkhan Yakubkhan Pathan
Bowler · RA pace · age 30
43.5
Scout Score
Overs 9.3 · Wkts 1 · Runs 97 · Econ 10.21
43.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay46.452.6%24.4
Death39.436.8%14.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.71×
Scout Score43.5
46.4Powerplay52.6% of overs · 0w · 8.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp71.915%
Versatilityp36.610%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.038× par30bp45.336.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp6.242.1%
Boundary %13%30bp70.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.019× par22bp51.630%
Econ vs LHB1.115× par8bp39.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov22bp14.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp32.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 33%
39.4Death36.8% of overs · 1w · 12.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.148%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp32.615%
Trajectoryp54.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.252× par21bp31.550%
Wicket rate0.29/ov21bp27.816.7%
Boundary %29%21bp35.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%21bp6.540%
Slower ball021bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer021bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Dhruv Patel
Bowler · RA pace
41.9
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 100 · Econ 10
41.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay39.420%7.9
Middle47.960%28.7
Death26.420%5.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p26.71.07×
Scout Score41.9
39.4Powerplay20% of overs · 0w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.638%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp2515%
Versatilityp48.610%
Trajectoryp26.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.002× par12bp48.436.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp20.342.1%
Boundary %17%12bp57.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.343× par7bp39.130%
Econ vs LHB0.549× par5bp68.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov7bp37.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp43.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
47.9Middle60% of overs · 1w · 7.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp61.215%
Versatilityp49.412%
Trajectoryp26.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.979× par36bp61.244.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp32.544.1%
Boundary %14%36bp43.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.923× par27bp61.250%
Econ vs LHB1.15× par9bp37.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
26.4Death20% of overs · 0w · 19.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp1248%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp32.615%
Trajectoryp26.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.898× par12bp1.950%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp18.516.7%
Boundary %42%12bp24.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp6.540%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Ashutosh Das
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
40.9
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 155 · Econ 8.61
40.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay31.661.1%19.3
Middle37.611.1%4.2
Death62.727.8%17.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p1.21.42×
Scout Score40.9
31.6Powerplay61.1% of overs · 0w · 9.91 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp16.938%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp64.115%
Versatilityp2010%
Trajectoryp1.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.169× par66bp23.436.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov66bp1.642.1%
Boundary %23%66bp35.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.211× par40bp23.430%
Econ vs LHB1.108× par26bp32.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov40bp4.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov26bp10.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 29%
37.6Middle11.1% of overs · 0w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp46.215%
Versatilityp38.812%
Trajectoryp1.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.135× par12bp37.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp26.244.1%
Boundary %8%12bp6011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.938× par6bp46.250%
Econ vs LHB1.327× par6bp31.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
62.7Death27.8% of overs · 3w · 5.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp8448%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp64.815%
Trajectoryp1.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.565× par30bp8750%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp68.516.7%
Boundary %10%30bp8733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%30bp8740%
Slower ball030bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer030bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Vaibhav Bhrambhatt
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 21
40.9
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 43 · Econ 8.6
40.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle40.9100%40.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.71×
Scout Score40.9
40.9Middle100% of overs · 1w · 8.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.738%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp31.215%
Versatilityp38.812%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.148× par30bp28.844.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp43.844.1%
Boundary %17%30bp31.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.769× par23bp76.250%
Econ vs LHB2.389× par7bp1.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
Hemant Punde
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 28
39.7
Scout Score
Overs 27.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 225 · Econ 8.33
39.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay65.814.8%9.7
Middle3581.5%28.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p98.80.77×
Scout Score39.7
65.8Powerplay14.8% of overs · 4w · 6.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=32
Componentpctweight
Productionp7938%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp29.715%
Versatilityp78.910%
Trajectoryp98.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.767× par24bp67.236.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov24bp98.442.1%
Boundary %17%24bp60.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.723× par17bp7530%
Econ vs LHB0.882× par7bp60.930%
Wkt vs RHB1.06/ov17bp98.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.86/ov7bp92.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 21%
35Middle81.5% of overs · 4w · 8.41 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp23.238%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp1.215%
Versatilityp3012%
Trajectoryp98.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.123× par132bp21.244.1%
Wicket rate0.18/ov132bp16.244.1%
Boundary %13%132bp56.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.036× par83bp48.850%
Econ vs LHB1.267× par49bp11.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 9%
Jay Ganesh Abhale
Bowler · LA pace · age 26
38.2
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 100 · Econ 10
38.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle40.470%28.3
Death3330%9.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.71×
Scout Score38.2
40.4Middle70% of overs · 1w · 7.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp8.815%
Versatilityp53.812%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.011× par42bp53.844.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp23.844.1%
Boundary %14%42bp37.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.986× par22bp51.250%
Econ vs LHB1.035× par20bp56.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 12%
33Death30% of overs · 1w · 15.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp1348%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp51.715%
Trajectoryp54.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.525× par18bp9.350%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp31.516.7%
Boundary %39%18bp9.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%18bp54.340%
Slower ball018bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer018bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Priyanshu Moliya
Bowler · Off-spin · age 21
34.5
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 98 · Econ 7.54
34.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle34.592.3%31.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p38.41.05×
Scout Score34.5
34.5Middle92.3% of overs · 1w · 7.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.838%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp3.815%
Versatilityp48.812%
Trajectoryp38.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.035× par72bp46.244.1%
Wicket rate0.08/ov72bp1.244.1%
Boundary %10%72bp83.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.489× par27bp6.250%
Econ vs LHB0.761× par45bp91.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 12%
Prince Prajapati
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
30
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 67 · Econ 11.17
30OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle30100%30.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.71×
Scout Score30
30Middle100% of overs · 1w · 11.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp15.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp28.815%
Versatilityp13.812%
Trajectoryp54.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.491× par36bp1.244.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp32.544.1%
Boundary %22%36bp8.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.459× par27bp11.250%
Econ vs LHB1.592× par9bp16.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
Irfan Shaikh
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
26.7
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 132 · Econ 12
26.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle27.845.5%12.6
Death25.954.5%14.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p24.41.08×
Scout Score26.7
27.8Middle45.5% of overs · 0w · 9.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=40
Componentpctweight
Productionp16.538%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp13.815%
Versatilityp37.512%
Trajectoryp24.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.228× par30bp23.844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp8.844.1%
Boundary %20%30bp18.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.384× par18bp16.250%
Econ vs LHB0.995× par12bp58.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 13%
25.9Death54.5% of overs · 1w · 14.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=27
Componentpctweight
Productionp5.648%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp51.715%
Trajectoryp24.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.395× par36bp5.650%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp1316.7%
Boundary %36%36bp1.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%36bp54.340%
Slower ball036bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer036bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0