| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LHB | 23 | 6 | 274 | 172 | 159.3 | 68.5 | 25 | 14 | 77 Scout Score 77 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production92.140% Impact65.427% Versatility71.515% Shot quality65.46% Trajectory65.412% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.01×[24, 76, 94] | 92.1 Production 92.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.08× parp88.535% True Avg1.6× parp96.230% Balls / boundary4.39p88.517.5% Balls / dismissal26.33p96.217.5% | 65.4 Shot Quality 65.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.6% Control · Build82.9% Phase-weighted control84.1% | 65.4 Impact 65.4 = WPA percentile · total -13.7 WPA · Powerplay-7.2 WPA · Consolidation-6.4 | 71.5 Versatility 71.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp88.526.7% vs Spin SRp80.826.7% Accel into Consp96.220% Pressure entryp26.926.7% | |
| 2 | LHB | 32 | 4 | 104 | 61 | 170.5 | 34.7 | 13 | 4 | 71.9 Scout Score 71.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production88.540% Impact73.127% Versatility54.615% Shot quality42.36% Trajectory5012% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.95×[24, 41, 26] | 88.5 Production 88.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.43× parp96.235% True Avg2.34× parp88.530% Balls / boundary2.42p96.217.5% Balls / dismissal29p65.417.5% | 42.3 Shot Quality 42.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72.7% Control · Build81.8% Phase-weighted control75.8% | 73.1 Impact 73.1 = WPA percentile · total -6.7 WPA · Powerplay+23.3 WPA · Consolidation-30 | 54.6 Versatility 54.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp96.226.7% vs Spin SRp11.526.7% Accel into Consp11.520% Pressure entryp88.526.7% | |
| 3 | LHB | 32 | 6 | 166 | 112 | 148.2 | 33.2 | 19 | 7 | 67.5 Scout Score 67.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.940% Impact5027% Versatility63.315% Shot quality96.26% Trajectory96.212% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.19×[14, 26, 43] | 67.9 Production 67.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.01× parp57.735% True Avg1.34× parp69.230% Balls / boundary4.44p80.817.5% Balls / dismissal23.67p73.117.5% | 96.2 Shot Quality 96.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build82.4% Phase-weighted control94.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total -14.9 WPA · Powerplay-7.7 WPA · Consolidation-7.3 | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp80.826.7% vs Spin SRp34.626.7% Accel into Consp34.620% Pressure entryp96.226.7% | |
| 4 | LHB | 36 | 8 | 176 | 146 | 120.5 | 22 | 18 | 5 | 65.3 Scout Score 65.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production59.840% Impact80.827% Versatility36.715% Shot quality88.56% Trajectory73.112% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[17, 49, 23] | 59.8 Production 59.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.93× parp42.335% True Avg1.34× parp69.230% Balls / boundary5.13p5017.5% Balls / dismissal25.67p88.517.5% | 88.5 Shot Quality 88.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.5% Control · Build88.2% Phase-weighted control87.6% | 80.8 Impact 80.8 = WPA percentile · total -6.7 WPA · Powerplay-6.5 WPA · Consolidation-0.2 | 36.7 Versatility 36.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp3.826.7% vs Spin SRp73.126.7% Accel into Consp65.420% Pressure entryp11.526.7% | |
| 5 | RHB | 27 | 7 | 132 | 88 | 150 | 22 | 12 | 6 | 60.2 Scout Score 60.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.140% Impact57.727% Versatility67.915% Shot quality57.76% Trajectory34.612% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[21, 23, 0] | 67.1 Production 67.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.07× parp80.835% True Avg1.2× parp57.730% Balls / boundary4.62p65.417.5% Balls / dismissal20p57.717.5% | 57.7 Shot Quality 57.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.1% Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted control82.1% | 57.7 Impact 57.7 = WPA percentile · total -13.7 WPA · Powerplay-3.7 WPA · Consolidation-10 | 67.9 Versatility 67.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp34.626.7% vs Spin SRp96.226.7% Accel into Consp88.520% Pressure entryp57.726.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | 26 | 5 | 148 | 99 | 149.5 | 37 | 20 | 4 | 56 Scout Score 56 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production7440% Impact34.627% Versatility6915% Shot quality26.96% Trajectory42.312% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[16, 1, 70] | 74 Production 74 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.05× parp65.435% True Avg2.01× parp80.830% Balls / boundary3.78p73.117.5% Balls / dismissal34p80.817.5% | 26.9 Shot Quality 26.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72% Control · Build72.7% Phase-weighted control72.2% | 34.6 Impact 34.6 = WPA percentile · total -19.7 WPA · Powerplay-3.5 WPA · Consolidation-16.3 | 69 Versatility 69 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp57.726.7% vs Spin SRp88.526.7% Accel into Consp73.120% Pressure entryp57.726.7% | |
| 7 | RHB | 21 | 6 | 86 | 55 | 156.4 | 17.2 | 6 | 5 | 52.3 Scout Score 52.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production33.540% Impact88.527% Versatility55.615% Shot quality73.16% Trajectory19.212% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.89×[1, 15, 2] | 33.5 Production 33.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.09× parp73.135% True Avg0.49× parp3.830% Balls / boundary5.33p34.617.5% Balls / dismissal8p3.817.5% | 73.1 Shot Quality 73.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build87.5% Phase-weighted control85.7% | 88.5 Impact 88.5 = WPA percentile · total -4.2 WPA · Powerplay-5.5 WPA · Consolidation+1.3 | 55.6 Versatility 55.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp73.126.7% vs Spin SRp57.726.7% Accel into Consp26.920% Pressure entryp57.726.7% | |
| 8 | LHB | 20 | 8 | 220 | 159 | 138.4 | 31.4 | 21 | 11 | 50.3 Scout Score 50.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production28.840% Impact96.227% Versatility62.315% Shot quality34.66% Trajectory11.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.77×[18, 28, 33] | 28.8 Production 28.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.7× parp3.835% True Avg0.6× parp42.330% Balls / boundary5p42.317.5% Balls / dismissal15p42.317.5% | 34.6 Shot Quality 34.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.3% Control · Build65.1% Phase-weighted control72.9% | 96.2 Impact 96.2 = WPA percentile · total -2.7 WPA · Powerplay-12.9 WPA · Consolidation+10.2 | 62.3 Versatility 62.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5026.7% vs Spin SRp65.426.7% Accel into Consp80.820% Pressure entryp57.726.7% | |
| 9 | RHB | 33 | 6 | 129 | 102 | 126.5 | 21.5 | 7 | 6 | 34.2 Scout Score 34.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production22.940% Impact11.527% Versatility49.515% Shot quality80.86% Trajectory80.812% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[27, 64, 20] | 22.9 Production 22.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp19.235% True Avg0.69× parp26.930% Balls / boundary7.38p11.517.5% Balls / dismissal14.75p34.617.5% | 80.8 Shot Quality 80.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation90.9% Control · Build76.2% Phase-weighted control86.2% | 11.5 Impact 11.5 = WPA percentile · total -31.6 WPA · Powerplay-31.9 WPA · Consolidation+0.2 | 49.5 Versatility 49.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp65.426.7% vs Spin SRp19.226.7% Accel into Consp57.720% Pressure entryp57.726.7% | |
| 10 | LHB | — | 4 | 75 | 64 | 117.2 | 18.8 | 7 | 2 | 34.1 Scout Score 34.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production29.240% Impact42.327% Versatility32.115% Shot quality506% Trajectory26.912% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.89×[10, 30, 13] | 29.2 Production 29.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.84× parp26.935% True Avg0.62× parp34.630% Balls / boundary6.5p26.917.5% Balls / dismissal13p26.917.5% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build73.7% Phase-weighted control81.5% | 42.3 Impact 42.3 = WPA percentile · total -16.8 WPA · Powerplay-12.3 WPA · Consolidation-4.5 | 32.1 Versatility 32.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp26.926.7% vs Spin SRp26.926.7% Accel into Consp42.320% Pressure entryp34.626.7% | |
| 11 | RHB | 30 | 5 | 47 | 39 | 120.5 | 11.8 | 5 | 1 | 30 Scout Score 30 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production2140% Impact26.927% Versatility47.915% Shot quality3.86% Trajectory57.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.98×[10, 3, 20] | 21 Production 21 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp34.635% True Avg0.35× parp11.530% Balls / boundary7.5p19.217.5% Balls / dismissal7.5p11.517.5% | 3.8 Shot Quality 3.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build33.3% Phase-weighted control60% | 26.9 Impact 26.9 = WPA percentile · total -21.3 WPA · Powerplay-20.1 WPA · Consolidation-1.2 | 47.9 Versatility 47.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp11.526.7% vs Spin SRp5026.7% Accel into Consp5020% Pressure entryp80.826.7% | |
| 12 | LHB | — | 5 | 91 | 70 | 130 | 30.3 | 10 | 3 | 26.9 Scout Score 26.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production28.540% Impact3.827% Versatility18.215% Shot quality19.26% Trajectory88.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.18×[3, 72, 3] | 28.5 Production 28.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.57× parp11.535% True Avg0.45× parp5030% Balls / boundary14p3.817.5% Balls / dismissal14p5017.5% | 19.2 Shot Quality 19.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation46.7% Control · Build89.7% Phase-weighted control67.8% | 3.8 Impact 3.8 = WPA percentile · total -46 WPA · Powerplay-13.6 WPA · Consolidation-32.4 | 18.2 Versatility 18.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp19.226.7% vs Spin SRp42.326.7% Accel into Consp3.820% Pressure entryp3.826.7% | |
| 13 | RHB | 29 | 4 | 48 | 46 | 104.3 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 24.2 Scout Score 24.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production36.740% Impact19.227% Versatility21.315% Shot quality11.56% Trajectory3.812% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.76×[6, 7, 18] | 36.7 Production 36.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.93× parp5035% True Avg0.56× parp19.230% Balls / boundary4.57p57.717.5% Balls / dismissal10.67p19.217.5% | 11.5 Shot Quality 11.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build0% Phase-weighted control61.5% | 19.2 Impact 19.2 = WPA percentile · total -21.9 WPA · Powerplay-13.2 WPA · Consolidation-8.7 | 21.3 Versatility 21.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp42.326.7% vs Spin SRp3.826.7% Accel into Consp19.220% Pressure entryp19.226.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LHB | 31 | 8 | 319 | 212 | 150.5 | 53.2 | 27 | 16 | 88.2 Scout Score 88.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production97.228% Impact91.727% Versatility8127% Shot quality58.38% Trajectory97.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.18×[78, 31, 88] | 97.2 Production 97.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.23× parp97.242.9% True Avg2.4× parp97.232.1% Balls / boundary4.73p97.225% | 58.3 Shot Quality 58.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build82.6% Phase-weighted control79.5% | 91.7 Impact 91.7 = WPA percentile · total +24.1 WPA · Consolidation+2.1 WPA · Build+21.9 | 81 Versatility 81 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep9044.4% vs Off-spin59bp90 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp61.529.6% Off-spin74bp67.9 LA-orthodox43bp55.9 Leg-spin20bp50 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p97.214.8% Reach deathp7511.1% | |
| 2 | LHB | 26 | 6 | 255 | 156 | 163.5 | 51 | 19 | 12 | 81.7 Scout Score 81.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production91.728% Impact97.227% Versatility68.227% Shot quality97.28% Trajectory36.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[40, 60, 0] | 91.7 Production 91.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.23× parp91.742.9% True Avg2.96× parp91.732.1% Balls / boundary5.33p91.725% | 97.2 Shot Quality 97.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.5% Control · Build86.4% Phase-weighted control87.5% | 97.2 Impact 97.2 = WPA percentile · total +32.2 WPA · Consolidation-4 WPA · Build+36.2 | 68.2 Versatility 68.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin32bp50 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball7b7b <min Spin hittingp76.929.6% Off-spin50bp60.7 LA-orthodox57bp91.2 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p91.714.8% Reach deathp86.111.1% | |
| 3 | RHB | 34 | 6 | 137 | 97 | 141.2 | 34.2 | 15 | 2 | 73.1 Scout Score 73.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production8128% Impact86.127% Versatility65.327% Shot quality80.68% Trajectory30.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[1, 16, 60] | 81 Production 81 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.13× parp80.642.9% True Avg3× parp86.132.1% Balls / boundary5.3p7525% | 80.6 Shot Quality 80.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation68.4% Control · Build91.2% Phase-weighted control83% | 86.1 Impact 86.1 = WPA percentile · total +12.7 WPA · Consolidation+4.8 WPA · Build+7.9 | 65.3 Versatility 65.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep72.244.4% vs LA-orthodox21bp72.2 vs Leg-spin5b5b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp63.129.6% Off-spin12bp46.4 LA-orthodox44bp67.6 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p7514.8% Reach deathp30.611.1% | |
| 4 | RHB | 23 | 7 | 119 | 95 | 125.3 | 23.8 | 7 | 5 | 61.1 Scout Score 61.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production55.828% Impact80.627% Versatility71.527% Shot quality30.68% Trajectory19.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.82×[32, 1, 1] | 55.8 Production 55.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.03× parp63.942.9% True Avg1.22× parp47.232.1% Balls / boundary7.1p52.825% | 30.6 Shot Quality 30.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.5% Control · Build75.7% Phase-weighted control74.6% | 80.6 Impact 80.6 = WPA percentile · total +11 WPA · Consolidation-4.3 WPA · Build+15.4 | 71.5 Versatility 71.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep94.444.4% vs LA-orthodox34bp94.4 vs Leg-spin3b3b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp65.529.6% Off-spin24bp89.3 LA-orthodox37bp50 Leg-spin6b6b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p30.614.8% Reach deathp5011.1% | |
| 5 | LHB | 21 | 6 | 103 | 72 | 143.1 | 20.6 | 4 | 7 | 61.1 Scout Score 61.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production64.528% Impact7527% Versatility62.727% Shot quality41.78% Trajectory2510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.88×[0, 22, 2] | 64.5 Production 64.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.15× parp86.142.9% True Avg0.88× parp36.132.1% Balls / boundary6.78p63.925% | 41.7 Shot Quality 41.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.2% Control · Build73.3% Phase-weighted control75.4% | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile · total +6.8 WPA · Consolidation+16.5 WPA · Build-9.6 | 62.7 Versatility 62.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7044.4% vs Off-spin11bp70 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp7029.6% Off-spin17bp39.3 LA-orthodox28bp79.4 Leg-spin13bp90 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p58.314.8% Reach deathp19.411.1% | |
| 6 | RHB | 33 | 7 | 178 | 118 | 150.8 | 44.5 | 23 | 5 | 60.1 Scout Score 60.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production72.428% Impact58.327% Versatility38.127% Shot quality86.18% Trajectory69.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.04×[35, 20, 28] | 72.4 Production 72.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp58.342.9% True Avg2.72× parp80.632.1% Balls / boundary4.58p86.125% | 86.1 Shot Quality 86.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build83.6% Phase-weighted control83.6% | 58.3 Impact 58.3 = WPA percentile · total -4.3 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build-4.3 | 38.1 Versatility 38.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5.644.4% vs LA-orthodox14bp5.6 vs Leg-spin5b5b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp49.729.6% Off-spin18bp78.6 LA-orthodox38bp26.5 Leg-spin18bp70 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p80.614.8% Reach deathp80.611.1% | |
| 7 | RHB | — | 3 | 47 | 36 | 130.6 | 15.7 | 5 | 2 | 54.4 Scout Score 54.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.728% Impact69.427% Versatility4227% Shot quality8.38% Trajectory47.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[47, 0, 0] | 67.7 Production 67.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.16× parp69.442.9% True Avg1.34× parp63.932.1% Balls / boundary4.6p69.425% | 8.3 Shot Quality 8.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72.7% Control · Build58.3% Phase-weighted control65.2% | 69.4 Impact 69.4 = WPA percentile · total +3.2 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+3.2 | 42 Versatility 42 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox8b8b <min vs Leg-spin1b1b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp41.229.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox16bp41.2 Leg-spin1b1b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p13.914.8% Reach deathp5011.1% | |
| 8 | LHB | 25 | 7 | 195 | 136 | 143.4 | 39 | 17 | 9 | 52.3 Scout Score 52.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production65.728% Impact41.727% Versatility39.927% Shot quality758% Trajectory58.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[56, 40, 15] | 65.7 Production 65.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.07× parp7542.9% True Avg1.24× parp41.732.1% Balls / boundary6.2p80.625% | 75 Shot Quality 75 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87% Control · Build78.7% Phase-weighted control82.8% | 41.7 Impact 41.7 = WPA percentile · total -8.4 WPA · Consolidation-11.5 WPA · Build+3.1 | 39.9 Versatility 39.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep1044.4% vs Off-spin47bp10 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp48.429.6% Off-spin54bp28.6 LA-orthodox29bp85.3 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p69.414.8% Reach deathp97.211.1% | |
| 9 | RHB | — | 8 | 200 | 166 | 120.5 | 28.6 | 10 | 11 | 51.7 Scout Score 51.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production49.428% Impact52.827% Versatility41.927% Shot quality52.88% Trajectory80.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.13×[10, 3, 55] | 49.4 Production 49.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.95× parp47.242.9% True Avg1.34× parp58.332.1% Balls / boundary8.07p41.725% | 52.8 Shot Quality 52.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation91.1% Control · Build64.9% Phase-weighted control77.9% | 52.8 Impact 52.8 = WPA percentile · total -5 WPA · Consolidation+11.4 WPA · Build-16.5 | 41.9 Versatility 41.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep42.244.4% vs LA-orthodox43bp38.9 vs Leg-spin18bp50 vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp39.729.6% Off-spin32bp96.4 LA-orthodox53bp8.8 Leg-spin18bp30 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2514.8% Reach deathp69.411.1% | |
| 10 | RHB | 26 | 6 | 85 | 84 | 101.2 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 50.6 Scout Score 50.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production40.528% Impact63.927% Versatility33.527% Shot quality47.28% Trajectory91.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.15×[19, 0, 31] | 40.5 Production 40.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.94× parp41.742.9% True Avg0.62× parp2532.1% Balls / boundary6.62p58.325% | 47.2 Shot Quality 47.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86.4% Control · Build71% Phase-weighted control77.4% | 63.9 Impact 63.9 = WPA percentile · total -3.7 WPA · Consolidation+3.9 WPA · Build-7.7 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep27.844.4% vs LA-orthodox20bp27.8 vs Leg-spin6b6b <min vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp23.129.6% Off-spin13bp53.6 LA-orthodox30bp14.7 Leg-spin11bp10 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p86.114.8% Reach deathp13.911.1% | |
| 11 | RHB | 27 | 4 | 66 | 71 | 93 | 33 | 6 | 2 | 49.1 Scout Score 49.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.128% Impact47.227% Versatility45.727% Shot quality69.48% Trajectory7510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.06×[21, 28, 15] | 39.1 Production 39.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.77× parp13.942.9% True Avg2.05× parp7532.1% Balls / boundary8.83p36.125% | 69.4 Shot Quality 69.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86.4% Control · Build77.4% Phase-weighted control81.1% | 47.2 Impact 47.2 = WPA percentile · total -5.2 WPA · Consolidation-7.3 WPA · Build+2.1 | 45.7 Versatility 45.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep61.144.4% vs LA-orthodox41bp61.1 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp35.729.6% Off-spin11bp10.7 LA-orthodox50bp41.2 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p47.214.8% Reach deathp8.311.1% | |
| 12 | RHB | 42 | 5 | 116 | 91 | 127.5 | 38.7 | 14 | 2 | 47.5 Scout Score 47.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production44.428% Impact2527% Versatility53.927% Shot quality91.78% Trajectory63.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[58, 32, 1] | 44.4 Production 44.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.96× parp52.842.9% True Avg1.2× parp52.832.1% Balls / boundary10p19.425% | 91.7 Shot Quality 91.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80.6% Control · Build92.9% Phase-weighted control84% | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile · total -13.6 WPA · Consolidation-7.9 WPA · Build-5.7 | 53.9 Versatility 53.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox34bp50 vs Leg-spin7b7b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp61.829.6% Off-spin9b9b <min LA-orthodox50bp61.8 Leg-spin7b7b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p52.814.8% Reach deathp5011.1% | |
| 13 | LHB | 25 | 3 | 58 | 48 | 120.8 | 19.3 | 2 | 5 | 43.2 Scout Score 43.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production43.128% Impact36.127% Versatility54.227% Shot quality258% Trajectory47.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[5, 5, 48] | 43.1 Production 43.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.92× parp30.642.9% True Avg1.66× parp69.432.1% Balls / boundary9p30.625% | 25 Shot Quality 25 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.8% Control · Build68% Phase-weighted control72.2% | 36.1 Impact 36.1 = WPA percentile · total -9.2 WPA · Consolidation-6.9 WPA · Build-2.3 | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin5b5b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp97.129.6% Off-spin5b5b <min LA-orthodox27bp97.1 Leg-spin2b2b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2.814.8% Reach deathp2511.1% | |
| 14 | RHB | 30 | 6 | 87 | 86 | 101.2 | 14.5 | 9 | 2 | 42.1 Scout Score 42.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production37.128% Impact19.427% Versatility61.927% Shot quality13.98% Trajectory86.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.14×[40, 33, 4] | 37.1 Production 37.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.93× parp36.142.9% True Avg0.76× parp30.632.1% Balls / boundary7p47.225% | 13.9 Shot Quality 13.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80.8% Control · Build56.5% Phase-weighted control69.4% | 19.4 Impact 19.4 = WPA percentile · total -14.8 WPA · Consolidation-1.8 WPA · Build-12.9 | 61.9 Versatility 61.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep83.344.4% vs LA-orthodox32bp83.3 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp44.329.6% Off-spin15bp78.6 LA-orthodox43bp32.4 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p41.714.8% Reach deathp5011.1% | |
| 15 | RHB | 28 | 3 | 46 | 48 | 95.8 | 15.3 | 4 | 1 | 25.4 Scout Score 25.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production11.528% Impact8.327% Versatility37.527% Shot quality63.98% Trajectory47.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[17, 29, 0] | 11.5 Production 11.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.7× parp8.342.9% True Avg0.43× parp13.932.1% Balls / boundary12.33p13.925% | 63.9 Shot Quality 63.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.2% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control81.1% | 8.3 Impact 8.3 = WPA percentile · total -39.1 WPA · Consolidation-5.2 WPA · Build-33.9 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox7b7b <min vs Leg-spin8b8b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp28.629.6% Off-spin16bp28.6 LA-orthodox7b7b <min Leg-spin8b8b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p8.314.8% Reach deathp5011.1% | |
| 16 | LHB | 22 | 4 | 68 | 62 | 109.7 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 24.9 Scout Score 24.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production13.728% Impact30.627% Versatility41.427% Shot quality2.88% Trajectory13.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.82×[23, 10, 12] | 13.7 Production 13.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.75× parp2542.9% True Avg0.28× parp2.832.1% Balls / boundary22p8.325% | 2.8 Shot Quality 2.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation65% Control · Build50% Phase-weighted control63.6% | 30.6 Impact 30.6 = WPA percentile · total -10.3 WPA · Consolidation-8.6 WPA · Build-1.7 | 41.4 Versatility 41.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin6b6b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp36.229.6% Off-spin16bp3.6 LA-orthodox14bp73.5 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p19.414.8% Reach deathp5011.1% | |
| 17 | LHB | 25 | 5 | 37 | 40 | 92.5 | 9.2 | 3 | 1 | 18.7 Scout Score 18.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production17.328% Impact13.927% Versatility28.727% Shot quality19.48% Trajectory8.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.81×[9, 7, 5] | 17.3 Production 17.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.76× parp19.442.9% True Avg0.39× parp8.332.1% Balls / boundary10.33p2525% | 19.4 Shot Quality 19.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation92.9% Control · Build52.9% Phase-weighted control71% | 13.9 Impact 13.9 = WPA percentile · total -18.4 WPA · Consolidation+0.2 WPA · Build-18.6 | 28.7 Versatility 28.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep3044.4% vs Off-spin10bp30 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp1929.6% Off-spin19bp17.9 LA-orthodox14bp20.6 Leg-spin4b4b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p63.914.8% Reach deathp2.811.1% | |
| 18 | RHB | 29 | 6 | 69 | 60 | 115 | 17.2 | 2 | 4 | 12.6 Scout Score 12.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production8.128% Impact2.827% Versatility23.827% Shot quality36.18% Trajectory2.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.35×[1, 5, 0] | 8.1 Production 8.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.61× parp2.842.9% True Avg0.45× parp19.432.1% Balls / boundary22p2.825% | 36.1 Shot Quality 36.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation69.2% Control · Build77.4% Phase-weighted control75% | 2.8 Impact 2.8 = WPA percentile · total -71.2 WPA · Consolidation-24.5 WPA · Build-46.7 | 23.8 Versatility 23.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep16.744.4% vs LA-orthodox22bp16.7 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp2.929.6% Off-spin7b7b <min LA-orthodox29bp2.9 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p36.114.8% Reach deathp91.711.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 24 | 5 | 68 | 26 | 261.5 | 22.7 | 7 | 5 | 82.2 Scout Score 82.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production88.640% Impact92.125% Versatility52.518% Shot quality39.54% Trajectory97.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.13×[17, 30, 9] | 88.6 Production 88.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.57× parp97.432.5% Balls / boundary2.2p97.420% Balls / six4.4p92.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 39.5 Shot Quality 39.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control75% | 92.1 Impact 92.1 = WPA percentile · total +52.2 WPA · Death+52.2 | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p36.816.7% Reach buildp71.122.2% | |
| 2 | LHB | 23 | 6 | 82 | 45 | 182.2 | 20.5 | 2 | 9 | 76.1 Scout Score 76.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production84.740% Impact86.825% Versatility40.218% Shot quality504% Trajectory86.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[37, 15, 4] | 84.7 Production 84.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.55× parp86.832.5% Balls / boundary2.5p86.820% Balls / six3.33p97.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build70% Phase-weighted control76% | 86.8 Impact 86.8 = WPA percentile · total +17.9 WPA · Death+17.9 | 40.2 Versatility 40.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p5.316.7% Reach buildp39.522.2% | |
| 3 | LHB | — | 5 | 57 | 28 | 203.6 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 69.5 Scout Score 69.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production64.940% Impact97.425% Versatility60.218% Shot quality97.44% Trajectory34.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[1, 28, 15] | 64.9 Production 64.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.12× parp81.632.5% Balls / boundary3.29p81.620% Balls / six11.5p44.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 97.4 Shot Quality 97.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build100% Phase-weighted control100% | 97.4 Impact 97.4 = WPA percentile · total +77.4 WPA · Death+77.4 | 60.2 Versatility 60.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p97.416.7% Reach buildp60.522.2% | |
| 4 | RHB | 27 | 5 | 96 | 68 | 141.2 | 32 | 4 | 6 | 66.6 Scout Score 66.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production84.140% Impact81.625% Versatility48.818% Shot quality86.84% Trajectory2.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.62×[6, 5, 9] | 84.1 Production 84.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.59× parp92.132.5% Balls / boundary2.33p92.120% Balls / six4.2p86.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 86.8 Shot Quality 86.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.5% Control · Build82.1% Phase-weighted control83% | 81.6 Impact 81.6 = WPA percentile · total +11.1 WPA · Death+11.1 | 48.8 Versatility 48.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p92.116.7% Reach buildp13.222.2% | |
| 5 | LHB | 33 | 5 | 124 | 93 | 133.3 | 31 | 9 | 5 | 62.6 Scout Score 62.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production68.940% Impact71.125% Versatility53.818% Shot quality44.74% Trajectory44.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.96×[19, 19, 21] | 68.9 Production 68.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.08× parp76.332.5% Balls / boundary3.88p76.320% Balls / six10.33p65.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 44.7 Shot Quality 44.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.6% Control · Build73.5% Phase-weighted control75.8% | 71.1 Impact 71.1 = WPA percentile · total +2.9 WPA · Death+2.9 | 53.8 Versatility 53.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball11bp50 vs Spin (death)p65.816.7% Reach buildp55.322.2% | |
| 6 | RHB | 32 | 5 | 56 | 59 | 94.9 | 28 | 3 | 2 | 53.8 Scout Score 53.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.240% Impact65.825% Versatility3218% Shot quality57.94% Trajectory18.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.77×[7, 8, 23] | 67.2 Production 67.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1× parp65.832.5% Balls / boundary4.25p63.220% Balls / six8.5p78.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 57.9 Shot Quality 57.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.8% Control · Build73.9% Phase-weighted control76.5% | 65.8 Impact 65.8 = WPA percentile · total +2.8 WPA · Death+2.8 | 32 Versatility 32 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p5.316.7% Reach buildp2.622.2% | |
| 7 | RHB | 27 | 7 | 85 | 64 | 132.8 | 21.2 | 7 | 4 | 51.5 Scout Score 51.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production64.540% Impact60.525% Versatility34.518% Shot quality65.84% Trajectory13.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.75×[12, 10, 1] | 64.5 Production 64.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.09× parp71.132.5% Balls / boundary3.33p71.120% Balls / six10p60.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 65.8 Shot Quality 65.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Build81.5% Phase-weighted control77.4% | 60.5 Impact 60.5 = WPA percentile · total +2.1 WPA · Death+2.1 | 34.5 Versatility 34.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p13.216.7% Reach buildp7.922.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | 32 | 4 | 121 | 78 | 155.1 | 30.2 | 12 | 6 | 49.2 Scout Score 49.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4040% Impact44.725% Versatility51.318% Shot quality71.14% Trajectory76.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[100, 7, 8] | 40 Production 40 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap44.732.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap34.220% Balls / sixn/ap34.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 71.1 Shot Quality 71.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation93.8% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control78.4% | 44.7 Impact 44.7 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 51.3 Versatility 51.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p36.816.7% Reach buildp65.822.2% | |
| 9 | LHB | 29 | 7 | 62 | 52 | 119.2 | 15.5 | 7 | 0 | 48.9 Scout Score 48.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production37.940% Impact55.325% Versatility52.618% Shot quality28.94% Trajectory71.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[3, 8, 16] | 37.9 Production 37.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.95× parp55.332.5% Balls / boundary8p23.720% Balls / six16p23.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 28.9 Shot Quality 28.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.2% Control · Build52.6% Phase-weighted control69.4% | 55.3 Impact 55.3 = WPA percentile · total +1 WPA · Death+1 | 52.6 Versatility 52.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p86.816.7% Reach buildp34.222.2% | |
| 10 | RHB | 32 | 4 | 31 | 25 | 124 | 15.5 | 2 | 1 | 48.2 Scout Score 48.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production19.240% Impact76.325% Versatility43.118% Shot quality76.34% Trajectory81.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.04×[8, 14, 9] | 19.2 Production 19.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.85× parp15.832.5% Balls / boundary6.67p15.820% Balls / six20p10.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 76.3 Shot Quality 76.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control80% | 76.3 Impact 76.3 = WPA percentile · total +5.6 WPA · Death+5.6 | 43.1 Versatility 43.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker4b4b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p36.816.7% Reach buildp28.922.2% | |
| 11 | RHB | 28 | 3 | 50 | 31 | 161.3 | 25 | 4 | 3 | 47.3 Scout Score 47.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production56.940% Impact18.425% Versatility61.418% Shot quality34.24% Trajectory57.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[16, 11, 23] | 56.9 Production 56.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.93× parp34.232.5% Balls / boundary4.25p63.220% Balls / six8.5p78.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 34.2 Shot Quality 34.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control71.4% | 18.4 Impact 18.4 = WPA percentile · total -7.1 WPA · Death-7.1 | 61.4 Versatility 61.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p76.316.7% Reach buildp81.622.2% | |
| 12 | LHB | 26 | 3 | 17 | 23 | 73.9 | 5.7 | 1 | 0 | 43.4 Scout Score 43.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4040% Impact44.725% Versatility47.818% Shot quality2.64% Trajectory57.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[8, 2, 7] | 40 Production 40 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap44.732.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap34.220% Balls / sixn/ap34.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 2.6 Shot Quality 2.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Build55.6% Phase-weighted control54.5% | 44.7 Impact 44.7 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 47.8 Versatility 47.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p36.816.7% Reach buildp5022.2% | |
| 13 | LHB | 26 | 6 | 170 | 108 | 157.4 | 28.3 | 11 | 13 | 43.4 Scout Score 43.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production43.240% Impact13.225% Versatility58.318% Shot quality7.94% Trajectory92.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.11×[50, 0, 98] | 43.2 Production 43.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0× parp28.932.5% Balls / boundary2p5020% Balls / six2p5032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 7.9 Shot Quality 7.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.7% Control · Build54.3% Phase-weighted control63.1% | 13.2 Impact 13.2 = WPA percentile · total -11.8 WPA · Death-11.8 | 58.3 Versatility 58.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p36.816.7% Reach buildp97.422.2% | |
| 14 | RHB | — | 3 | 20 | 26 | 76.9 | 6.7 | 2 | 1 | 43.2 Scout Score 43.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4040% Impact44.725% Versatility4218% Shot quality23.74% Trajectory57.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[3, 17, 0] | 40 Production 40 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap44.732.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap34.220% Balls / sixn/ap34.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 23.7 Shot Quality 23.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build68.2% Phase-weighted control68.2% | 44.7 Impact 44.7 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 42 Versatility 42 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p36.816.7% Reach buildp23.722.2% | |
| 15 | RHB | 28 | 3 | 17 | 23 | 73.9 | 8.5 | 0 | 1 | 43.2 Scout Score 43.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production42.140% Impact28.925% Versatility46.618% Shot quality81.64% Trajectory57.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[10, 6, 1] | 42.1 Production 42.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.29× parp23.732.5% Balls / boundary4p44.720% Balls / six4p55.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 81.6 Shot Quality 81.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation90% Control · Build72.7% Phase-weighted control81% | 28.9 Impact 28.9 = WPA percentile · total -4 WPA · Death-4 | 46.6 Versatility 46.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p36.816.7% Reach buildp44.722.2% | |
| 16 | RHB | 26 | 4 | 48 | 41 | 117.1 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 36.1 Scout Score 36.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production61.340% Impact7.925% Versatility44.718% Shot quality13.24% Trajectory7.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.67×[11, 4, 0] | 61.3 Production 61.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.96× parp60.532.5% Balls / boundary4.75p55.320% Balls / six9.5p71.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 13.2 Shot Quality 13.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation0% Control · Build70% Phase-weighted control63.6% | 7.9 Impact 7.9 = WPA percentile · total -35.2 WPA · Death-35.2 | 44.7 Versatility 44.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p60.516.7% Reach buildp18.422.2% | |
| 17 | RHB | 21 | 5 | 82 | 53 | 154.7 | 20.5 | 5 | 5 | 29.3 Scout Score 29.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production16.640% Impact34.225% Versatility57.218% Shot quality18.44% Trajectory23.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.85×[1, 24, 9] | 16.6 Production 16.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.62× parp7.932.5% Balls / boundary16p2.620% Balls / six16p18.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 18.4 Shot Quality 18.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build67.6% Phase-weighted control67.6% | 34.2 Impact 34.2 = WPA percentile · total -3.9 WPA · Death-3.9 | 57.2 Versatility 57.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p36.816.7% Reach buildp92.122.2% | |
| 18 | RHB | 35 | 5 | 120 | 88 | 136.4 | 60 | 10 | 2 | 28.1 Scout Score 28.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production19.240% Impact2.625% Versatility61.118% Shot quality92.14% Trajectory39.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[8, 40, 42] | 19.2 Production 19.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.85× parp15.832.5% Balls / boundary6.67p15.820% Balls / six20p10.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 92.1 Shot Quality 92.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation94.1% Control · Build90.6% Phase-weighted control91.8% | 2.6 Impact 2.6 = WPA percentile · total -50 WPA · Death-50 | 61.1 Versatility 61.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p81.616.7% Reach buildp76.322.2% | |
| 19 | RHB | 28 | 5 | 71 | 55 | 129.1 | 17.8 | 4 | 3 | 27.4 Scout Score 27.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production10.840% Impact23.725% Versatility61.718% Shot quality57.94% Trajectory28.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.91×[21, 4, 22] | 10.8 Production 10.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.61× parp2.632.5% Balls / boundary10.5p7.920% Balls / six42p2.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 57.9 Shot Quality 57.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build76.5% Phase-weighted control76.5% | 23.7 Impact 23.7 = WPA percentile · total -5.5 WPA · Death-5.5 | 61.7 Versatility 61.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p71.116.7% Reach buildp86.822.2% |
Shahbaz Ahmed
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 31
88.2
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 319 · Balls 212 · SR 150.5 · Avg 53.2 · 4s 27 · 6s 16
88.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production97.228%27.2
Impact *91.727%24.8
Versatility8127%21.9
Shot quality58.38%4.7
Trajectory97.210%9.7
Scout Score88.2
97.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR155.81.23×156bp97.242.9%
True Avg60.82.4×4wp97.232.1%
Balls / boundary4.7—156bp97.225%
91.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +24.1
WPA · Consolidation+2.1
WPA · Build+21.9
81VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p9044.4%
vs Off-spin142 SR59bp90
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball250 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p61.529.6%
Off-spin131 SR74bp67.9
LA-orthodox109 SR43bp55.9
Leg-spin160 SR20bp50
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)198 SR1.27×51bp97.214.8%
Reach death176.9 SR1.04×13bp7511.1%
58.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build82.6%
Phase-weighted control79.5% → p58.3
97.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.18×
Recent scores[78, 31, 88]
Innings8
Rohit Kumar
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 24
82.2
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 68 · Balls 26 · SR 261.5 · Avg 22.7 · 4s 7 · 6s 5
82.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production88.640%35.4
Impact *92.125%23.0
Versatility52.518%9.4
Shot quality39.54%1.6
Trajectory97.413%12.7
Scout Score82.2
88.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR268.21.57×22bp97.432.5%
Balls / boundary2.2—22bp97.420%
Balls / six4.4—22bp92.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
92.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +52.2
WPA · Death+52.2
52.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker150 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball440 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp36.816.7%
Reach build225 SR1.69×4bp71.122.2%
39.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control75% → p39.5
97.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.13×
Recent scores[17, 30, 9]
Innings5
Shakir Habib Gandhi
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 26
81.7
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 255 · Balls 156 · SR 163.5 · Avg 51 · 4s 19 · 6s 12
81.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production91.728%25.7
Impact *97.227%26.2
Versatility68.227%18.4
Shot quality97.28%7.8
Trajectory36.110%3.6
Scout Score81.7
91.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR156.21.23×96bp91.742.9%
True Avg752.96×2wp91.732.1%
Balls / boundary5.3—96bp91.725%
97.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +32.2
WPA · Consolidation-4
WPA · Build+36.2
68.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin116 SR32bp50
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball271 SR7b7b <min
Spin hitting———p76.929.6%
Off-spin124 SR50bp60.7
LA-orthodox165 SR57bp91.2
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)204.2 SR1.31×24bp91.714.8%
Reach death215.4 SR1.26×13bp86.111.1%
97.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.5%
Control · Build86.4%
Phase-weighted control87.5% → p97.2
36.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[40, 60, 0]
Innings6
Abishek Porel
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 23
77
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 274 · Balls 172 · SR 159.3 · Avg 68.5 · 4s 25 · 6s 14
77OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production92.140%36.8
Impact *65.427%17.7
Versatility71.515%10.7
Shot quality65.46%3.9
Trajectory65.412%7.8
Scout Score77
92.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR148.11.08×79bp88.535%
True Avg391.6×3wp96.230%
Balls / boundary4.4—79bp88.517.5%
Balls / dismissal26.3—3wp96.217.5%
65.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -13.7
WPA · Powerplay-7.2
WPA · Consolidation-6.4
71.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR176.8 SR1.16×82bp88.526.7%
vs Spin SR143.3 SR1.14×90bp80.826.7%
Accel into Cons148.7 SR—39bp96.220%
Pressure entry40 SR0.29×5bp26.926.7%
65.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.6%
Control · Build82.9%
Phase-weighted control84.1% → p65.4
65.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.01×
Recent scores[24, 76, 94]
Innings6
Toufik Uddin Mondal
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 23
76.1
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 82 · Balls 45 · SR 182.2 · Avg 20.5 · 4s 2 · 6s 9
76.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production84.740%33.9
Impact *86.825%21.7
Versatility40.218%7.2
Shot quality504%2.0
Trajectory86.813%11.3
Scout Score76.1
84.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2651.55×20bp86.832.5%
Balls / boundary2.5—20bp86.820%
Balls / six3.3—20bp97.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
86.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +17.9
WPA · Death+17.9
40.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)50 SR0.33×4bp5.316.7%
Reach build90 SR0.68×10bp39.522.2%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build70%
Phase-weighted control76% → p50
86.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[37, 15, 4]
Innings6
Shashank Singh-I
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 34
73.1
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 137 · Balls 97 · SR 141.2 · Avg 34.2 · 4s 15 · 6s 2
73.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production8128%22.7
Impact *86.127%23.2
Versatility65.327%17.6
Shot quality80.68%6.4
Trajectory30.610%3.1
Scout Score73.1
81ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR143.41.13×53bp80.642.9%
True Avg763×1wp86.132.1%
Balls / boundary5.3—53bp7525%
86.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +12.7
WPA · Consolidation+4.8
WPA · Build+7.9
65.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p72.244.4%
vs LA-orthodox105 SR21bp72.2
vs Leg-spin180 SR5b5b <min
vs Short ball233 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p63.129.6%
Off-spin117 SR12bp46.4
LA-orthodox118 SR44bp67.6
Leg-spin180 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)194.1 SR1.25×17bp7514.8%
Reach death136.4 SR0.8×11bp30.611.1%
80.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation68.4%
Control · Build91.2%
Phase-weighted control83% → p80.6
30.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[1, 16, 60]
Innings6
Vivek Singh
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 32
71.9
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 104 · Balls 61 · SR 170.5 · Avg 34.7 · 4s 13 · 6s 4
71.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production88.540%35.4
Impact *73.127%19.7
Versatility54.615%8.2
Shot quality42.36%2.5
Trajectory5012%6.0
Scout Score71.9
88.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR196.61.43×29bp96.235%
True Avg572.34×1wp88.530%
Balls / boundary2.4—29bp96.217.5%
Balls / dismissal29—1wp65.417.5%
73.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -6.7
WPA · Powerplay+23.3
WPA · Consolidation-30
54.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR243.8 SR1.6×32bp96.226.7%
vs Spin SR89.7 SR0.71×29bp11.526.7%
Accel into Cons54.5 SR—11bp11.520%
Pressure entry150 SR1.09×16bp88.526.7%
42.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72.7%
Control · Build81.8%
Phase-weighted control75.8% → p42.3
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.95×
Recent scores[24, 41, 26]
Innings4
Subham Sarkar
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB
69.5
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 57 · Balls 28 · SR 203.6 · Avg 19 · 4s 5 · 6s 4
69.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production64.940%26.0
Impact *97.425%24.4
Versatility60.218%10.8
Shot quality97.44%3.9
Trajectory34.213%4.4
Scout Score69.5
64.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR191.31.12×23bp81.632.5%
Balls / boundary3.3—23bp81.620%
Balls / six11.5—23bp44.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
97.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +77.4
WPA · Death+77.4
60.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)220 SR1.43×5bp97.416.7%
Reach build100 SR0.75×1bp60.522.2%
97.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build100%
Phase-weighted control100% → p97.4
34.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[1, 28, 15]
Innings5
Abhishek Raman
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 32
67.5
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 166 · Balls 112 · SR 148.2 · Avg 33.2 · 4s 19 · 6s 7
67.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.940%27.2
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility63.315%9.5
Shot quality96.26%5.8
Trajectory96.212%11.5
Scout Score67.5
67.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1381.01×71bp57.735%
True Avg32.71.34×3wp69.230%
Balls / boundary4.4—71bp80.817.5%
Balls / dismissal23.7—3wp73.117.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -14.9
WPA · Powerplay-7.7
WPA · Consolidation-7.3
63.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR163.5 SR1.07×63bp80.826.7%
vs Spin SR128.6 SR1.02×49bp34.626.7%
Accel into Cons94.7 SR—19bp34.620%
Pressure entry138.2 SR1.01×34bp96.226.7%
96.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build82.4%
Phase-weighted control94.5% → p96.2
96.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.19×
Recent scores[14, 26, 43]
Innings6
Ronit Ghosh
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 27
66.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 96 · Balls 68 · SR 141.2 · Avg 32 · 4s 4 · 6s 6
66.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production84.140%33.6
Impact *81.625%20.4
Versatility48.818%8.8
Shot quality86.84%3.5
Trajectory2.613%0.3
Scout Score66.6
84.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR271.41.59×21bp92.132.5%
Balls / boundary2.3—21bp92.120%
Balls / six4.2—21bp86.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
81.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +11.1
WPA · Death+11.1
48.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)225 SR1.47×4bp92.116.7%
Reach build87.2 SR0.66×39bp13.222.2%
86.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.5%
Control · Build82.1%
Phase-weighted control83% → p86.8
2.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.62×
Recent scores[6, 5, 9]
Innings5
Writam Porel
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 36
65.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 176 · Balls 146 · SR 120.5 · Avg 22 · 4s 18 · 6s 5
65.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production59.840%23.9
Impact *80.827%21.8
Versatility36.715%5.5
Shot quality88.56%5.3
Trajectory73.112%8.8
Scout Score65.3
59.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR127.30.93×77bp42.335%
True Avg32.71.34×3wp69.230%
Balls / boundary5.1—77bp5017.5%
Balls / dismissal25.7—3wp88.517.5%
80.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -6.7
WPA · Powerplay-6.5
WPA · Consolidation-0.2
36.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR84 SR0.55×50bp3.826.7%
vs Spin SR139.6 SR1.11×96bp73.126.7%
Accel into Cons107.5 SR—40bp65.420%
Pressure entry60 SR0.44×10bp11.526.7%
88.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.5%
Control · Build88.2%
Phase-weighted control87.6% → p88.5
73.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[17, 49, 23]
Innings8
Sachin Kumar Yadav
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 33
62.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 124 · Balls 93 · SR 133.3 · Avg 31 · 4s 9 · 6s 5
62.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production68.940%27.6
Impact *71.125%17.8
Versatility53.818%9.7
Shot quality44.74%1.8
Trajectory44.713%5.8
Scout Score62.6
68.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR183.91.08×31bp76.332.5%
Balls / boundary3.9—31bp76.320%
Balls / six10.3—31bp65.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
71.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2.9
WPA · Death+2.9
53.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball209 SR11bp50
vs Spin (death)140 SR0.91×10bp65.816.7%
Reach build114.3 SR0.86×49bp55.322.2%
44.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.6%
Control · Build73.5%
Phase-weighted control75.8% → p44.7
44.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.96×
Recent scores[19, 19, 21]
Innings5
Prayas Ray Barman
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 23
61.1
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 119 · Balls 95 · SR 125.3 · Avg 23.8 · 4s 7 · 6s 5
61.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production55.828%15.6
Impact *80.627%21.8
Versatility71.527%19.3
Shot quality30.68%2.4
Trajectory19.410%1.9
Scout Score61.1
55.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1311.03×71bp63.942.9%
True Avg311.22×3wp47.232.1%
Balls / boundary7.1—71bp52.825%
80.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +11
WPA · Consolidation-4.3
WPA · Build+15.4
71.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p94.444.4%
vs LA-orthodox115 SR34bp94.4
vs Leg-spin233 SR3b3b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p65.529.6%
Off-spin142 SR24bp89.3
LA-orthodox108 SR37bp50
Leg-spin200 SR6b6b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)135.7 SR0.87×14bp30.614.8%
Reach death——0bp5011.1%
30.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.5%
Control · Build75.7%
Phase-weighted control74.6% → p30.6
19.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.82×
Recent scores[32, 1, 1]
Innings7
Snehashish Saha
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 21
61.1
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 103 · Balls 72 · SR 143.1 · Avg 20.6 · 4s 4 · 6s 7
61.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production64.528%18.1
Impact *7527%20.2
Versatility62.727%16.9
Shot quality41.78%3.3
Trajectory2510%2.5
Scout Score61.1
64.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR145.91.15×61bp86.142.9%
True Avg22.20.88×4wp36.132.1%
Balls / boundary6.8—61bp63.925%
75Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +6.8
WPA · Consolidation+16.5
WPA · Build-9.6
62.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7044.4%
vs Off-spin136 SR11bp70
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p7029.6%
Off-spin106 SR17bp39.3
LA-orthodox143 SR28bp79.4
Leg-spin238 SR13bp90
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)171.4 SR1.1×7bp58.314.8%
Reach death87.5 SR0.51×8bp19.411.1%
41.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.2%
Control · Build73.3%
Phase-weighted control75.4% → p41.7
25Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.88×
Recent scores[0, 22, 2]
Innings6
Sudip Kumar Gharami
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 27
60.2
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 132 · Balls 88 · SR 150 · Avg 22 · 4s 12 · 6s 6
60.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.140%26.8
Impact *57.727%15.6
Versatility67.915%10.2
Shot quality57.76%3.5
Trajectory34.612%4.2
Scout Score60.2
67.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR146.71.07×60bp80.835%
True Avg29.31.2×3wp57.730%
Balls / boundary4.6—60bp65.417.5%
Balls / dismissal20—3wp57.717.5%
57.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -13.7
WPA · Powerplay-3.7
WPA · Consolidation-10
67.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR136.7 SR0.9×49bp34.626.7%
vs Spin SR166.7 SR1.33×39bp96.226.7%
Accel into Cons157.1 SR—28bp88.520%
Pressure entry——0bp57.726.7%
57.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.1%
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted control82.1% → p57.7
34.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[21, 23, 0]
Innings7
Pramod Chandila
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 33
60.1
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 178 · Balls 118 · SR 150.8 · Avg 44.5 · 4s 23 · 6s 5
60.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production72.428%20.3
Impact *58.327%15.7
Versatility38.127%10.3
Shot quality86.18%6.9
Trajectory69.410%6.9
Scout Score60.1
72.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR125.50.99×55bp58.342.9%
True Avg692.72×1wp80.632.1%
Balls / boundary4.6—55bp86.125%
58.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.3
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build-4.3
38.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox57 SR14bp5.6
vs Leg-spin200 SR5b5b <min
vs Short ball100 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p49.729.6%
Off-spin133 SR18bp78.6
LA-orthodox82 SR38bp26.5
Leg-spin183 SR18bp70
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)222.2 SR1.43×9bp80.614.8%
Reach death173 SR1.01×63bp80.611.1%
86.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build83.6%
Phase-weighted control83.6% → p86.1
69.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.04×
Recent scores[35, 20, 28]
Innings7
Priyanshu Gaurav Srivastav
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 26
56
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 148 · Balls 99 · SR 149.5 · Avg 37 · 4s 20 · 6s 4
56OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production7440%29.6
Impact *34.627%9.3
Versatility6915%10.3
Shot quality26.96%1.6
Trajectory42.312%5.1
Scout Score56
74ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR144.11.05×34bp65.435%
True Avg492.01×1wp80.830%
Balls / boundary3.8—34bp73.117.5%
Balls / dismissal34—1wp80.817.5%
34.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -19.7
WPA · Powerplay-3.5
WPA · Consolidation-16.3
69VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR140.6 SR0.92×32bp57.726.7%
vs Spin SR153.7 SR1.22×67bp88.526.7%
Accel into Cons128 SR—25bp73.120%
Pressure entry——0bp57.726.7%
26.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72%
Control · Build72.7%
Phase-weighted control72.2% → p26.9
42.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[16, 1, 70]
Innings5
Deepanshu
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB
54.4
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 47 · Balls 36 · SR 130.6 · Avg 15.7 · 4s 5 · 6s 2
54.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.728%19.0
Impact *69.427%18.7
Versatility4227%11.3
Shot quality8.38%0.7
Trajectory47.210%4.7
Scout Score54.4
67.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR147.81.16×23bp69.442.9%
True Avg341.34×1wp63.932.1%
Balls / boundary4.6—23bp69.425%
69.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +3.2
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+3.2
42VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox112 SR8b8b <min
vs Leg-spin100 SR1b1b <min
vs Short ball167 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p41.229.6%
Off-spin283 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox100 SR16bp41.2
Leg-spin100 SR1b1b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)118.2 SR0.76×11bp13.914.8%
Reach death——0bp5011.1%
8.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72.7%
Control · Build58.3%
Phase-weighted control65.2% → p8.3
47.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[47, 0, 0]
Innings3
Mithilesh Das
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 32
53.8
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 56 · Balls 59 · SR 94.9 · Avg 28 · 4s 3 · 6s 2
53.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.240%26.9
Impact *65.825%16.4
Versatility3218%5.8
Shot quality57.94%2.3
Trajectory18.413%2.4
Scout Score53.8
67.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR170.61×17bp65.832.5%
Balls / boundary4.2—17bp63.220%
Balls / six8.5—17bp78.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
65.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2.8
WPA · Death+2.8
32VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball240 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)50 SR0.33×4bp5.316.7%
Reach build65.2 SR0.49×23bp2.622.2%
57.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.8%
Control · Build73.9%
Phase-weighted control76.5% → p57.9
18.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.77×
Recent scores[7, 8, 23]
Innings5
Sumit Nag
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 21
52.3
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 86 · Balls 55 · SR 156.4 · Avg 17.2 · 4s 6 · 6s 5
52.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production33.540%13.4
Impact *88.527%23.9
Versatility55.615%8.3
Shot quality73.16%4.4
Trajectory19.212%2.3
Scout Score52.3
33.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1501.09×32bp73.135%
True Avg120.49×4wp3.830%
Balls / boundary5.3—32bp34.617.5%
Balls / dismissal8—4wp3.817.5%
88.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.2
WPA · Powerplay-5.5
WPA · Consolidation+1.3
55.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR168 SR1.1×25bp73.126.7%
vs Spin SR146.7 SR1.17×30bp57.726.7%
Accel into Cons66.7 SR—6bp26.920%
Pressure entry——0bp57.726.7%
73.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build87.5%
Phase-weighted control85.7% → p73.1
19.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.89×
Recent scores[1, 15, 2]
Innings6
Yuvraj Keswani
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 25
52.3
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 195 · Balls 136 · SR 143.4 · Avg 39 · 4s 17 · 6s 9
52.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production65.728%18.4
Impact *41.727%11.3
Versatility39.927%10.8
Shot quality758%6.0
Trajectory58.310%5.8
Scout Score52.3
65.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR135.51.07×93bp7542.9%
True Avg31.51.24×4wp41.732.1%
Balls / boundary6.2—93bp80.625%
41.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -8.4
WPA · Consolidation-11.5
WPA · Build+3.1
39.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p1044.4%
vs Off-spin100 SR47bp10
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball100 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p48.429.6%
Off-spin100 SR54bp28.6
LA-orthodox152 SR29bp85.3
Leg-spin160 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)193.3 SR1.24×15bp69.414.8%
Reach death246.2 SR1.44×13bp97.211.1%
75Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87%
Control · Build78.7%
Phase-weighted control82.8% → p75
58.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[56, 40, 15]
Innings7
Gaurav Chauhan
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB
51.7
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 200 · Balls 166 · SR 120.5 · Avg 28.6 · 4s 10 · 6s 11
51.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production49.428%13.8
Impact *52.827%14.3
Versatility41.927%11.3
Shot quality52.88%4.2
Trajectory80.610%8.1
Scout Score51.7
49.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR120.40.95×113bp47.242.9%
True Avg341.34×4wp58.332.1%
Balls / boundary8.1—113bp41.725%
52.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5
WPA · Consolidation+11.4
WPA · Build-16.5
41.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p42.244.4%
vs LA-orthodox70 SR43bp38.9
vs Leg-spin144 SR18bp50
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p39.729.6%
Off-spin156 SR32bp96.4
LA-orthodox68 SR53bp8.8
Leg-spin144 SR18bp30
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)139.1 SR0.89×23bp2514.8%
Reach death173.3 SR1.02×15bp69.411.1%
52.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation91.1%
Control · Build64.9%
Phase-weighted control77.9% → p52.8
80.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.13×
Recent scores[10, 3, 55]
Innings8
Pradipta Pramanik
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 27
51.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 85 · Balls 64 · SR 132.8 · Avg 21.2 · 4s 7 · 6s 4
51.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production64.540%25.8
Impact *60.525%15.1
Versatility34.518%6.2
Shot quality65.84%2.6
Trajectory13.213%1.7
Scout Score51.5
64.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1851.09×20bp71.132.5%
Balls / boundary3.3—20bp71.120%
Balls / six10—20bp60.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
60.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2.1
WPA · Death+2.1
34.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker200 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)00×1bp13.216.7%
Reach build77.8 SR0.59×27bp7.922.2%
65.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Build81.5%
Phase-weighted control77.4% → p65.8
13.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.75×
Recent scores[12, 10, 1]
Innings7
Badal Singh Balyan
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 26
50.6
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 85 · Balls 84 · SR 101.2 · Avg 17 · 4s 5 · 6s 4
50.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production40.528%11.3
Impact *63.927%17.3
Versatility33.527%9.0
Shot quality47.28%3.8
Trajectory91.710%9.2
Scout Score50.6
40.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR118.90.94×53bp41.742.9%
True Avg15.80.62×4wp2532.1%
Balls / boundary6.6—53bp58.325%
63.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.7
WPA · Consolidation+3.9
WPA · Build-7.7
33.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p27.844.4%
vs LA-orthodox60 SR20bp27.8
vs Leg-spin83 SR6b6b <min
vs Short ball300 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p23.129.6%
Off-spin123 SR13bp53.6
LA-orthodox70 SR30bp14.7
Leg-spin64 SR11bp10
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)223.1 SR1.43×13bp86.114.8%
Reach death112.5 SR0.66×16bp13.911.1%
47.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86.4%
Control · Build71%
Phase-weighted control77.4% → p47.2
91.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.15×
Recent scores[19, 0, 31]
Innings6
Vishal Bhati
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 20
50.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 220 · Balls 159 · SR 138.4 · Avg 31.4 · 4s 21 · 6s 11
50.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production28.840%11.5
Impact *96.227%26.0
Versatility62.315%9.3
Shot quality34.66%2.1
Trajectory11.512%1.4
Scout Score50.3
28.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR96.70.7×30bp3.835%
True Avg14.50.6×2wp42.330%
Balls / boundary5—30bp42.317.5%
Balls / dismissal15—2wp42.317.5%
96.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -2.7
WPA · Powerplay-12.9
WPA · Consolidation+10.2
62.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR139.6 SR0.92×48bp5026.7%
vs Spin SR137.8 SR1.1×111bp65.426.7%
Accel into Cons123.9 SR—46bp80.820%
Pressure entry——0bp57.726.7%
34.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.3%
Control · Build65.1%
Phase-weighted control72.9% → p34.6
11.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.77×
Recent scores[18, 28, 33]
Innings8
Priyam Sarkar
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 32
49.2
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 121 · Balls 78 · SR 155.1 · Avg 30.2 · 4s 12 · 6s 6
49.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4040%16.0
Impact *44.725%11.2
Versatility51.318%9.2
Shot quality71.14%2.8
Trajectory76.313%9.9
Scout Score49.2
40ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp44.732.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp34.220%
Balls / six——0bp34.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
44.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
51.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp36.816.7%
Reach build119 SR0.9×21bp65.822.2%
71.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation93.8%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control78.4% → p71.1
76.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[100, 7, 8]
Innings4
Ranjot Singh Khaira
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 27
49.1
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 66 · Balls 71 · SR 93 · Avg 33 · 4s 6 · 6s 2
49.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.128%10.9
Impact *47.227%12.7
Versatility45.727%12.3
Shot quality69.48%5.6
Trajectory7510%7.5
Scout Score49.1
39.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR98.10.77×53bp13.942.9%
True Avg522.05×1wp7532.1%
Balls / boundary8.8—53bp36.125%
47.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5.2
WPA · Consolidation-7.3
WPA · Build+2.1
45.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p61.144.4%
vs LA-orthodox102 SR41bp61.1
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p35.729.6%
Off-spin82 SR11bp10.7
LA-orthodox100 SR50bp41.2
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)——0bp47.214.8%
Reach death100 SR0.59×12bp8.311.1%
69.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86.4%
Control · Build77.4%
Phase-weighted control81.1% → p69.4
75Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.06×
Recent scores[21, 28, 15]
Innings4
Agniv Pan
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 29
48.9
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 62 · Balls 52 · SR 119.2 · Avg 15.5 · 4s 7 · 6s 0
48.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production37.940%15.2
Impact *55.325%13.8
Versatility52.618%9.5
Shot quality28.94%1.2
Trajectory71.113%9.2
Scout Score48.9
37.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR162.50.95×8bp55.332.5%
Balls / boundary8—8bp23.720%
Balls / six——8bp23.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
55.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +1
WPA · Death+1
52.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)200 SR1.3×4bp86.816.7%
Reach build94.7 SR0.71×19bp34.222.2%
28.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.2%
Control · Build52.6%
Phase-weighted control69.4% → p28.9
71.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[3, 8, 16]
Innings7
Dipanjan Mukherjee
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 32
48.2
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 31 · Balls 25 · SR 124 · Avg 15.5 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
48.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production19.240%7.7
Impact *76.325%19.1
Versatility43.118%7.8
Shot quality76.34%3.1
Trajectory81.613%10.6
Scout Score48.2
19.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1450.85×20bp15.832.5%
Balls / boundary6.7—20bp15.820%
Balls / six20—20bp10.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
76.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +5.6
WPA · Death+5.6
43.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker50 SR4b4b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp36.816.7%
Reach build40 SR0.3×5bp28.922.2%
76.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control80% → p76.3
81.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.04×
Recent scores[8, 14, 9]
Innings4
Anustup Mazumder
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 42
47.5
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 116 · Balls 91 · SR 127.5 · Avg 38.7 · 4s 14 · 6s 2
47.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production44.428%12.4
Impact *2527%6.8
Versatility53.927%14.6
Shot quality91.78%7.3
Trajectory63.910%6.4
Scout Score47.5
44.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1220.96×50bp52.842.9%
True Avg30.51.2×2wp52.832.1%
Balls / boundary10—50bp19.425%
25Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -13.6
WPA · Consolidation-7.9
WPA · Build-5.7
53.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox94 SR34bp50
vs Leg-spin200 SR7b7b <min
vs Short ball100 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p61.829.6%
Off-spin189 SR9b9b <min
LA-orthodox110 SR50bp61.8
Leg-spin200 SR7b7b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)175 SR1.12×4bp52.814.8%
Reach death——0bp5011.1%
91.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80.6%
Control · Build92.9%
Phase-weighted control84% → p91.7
63.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[58, 32, 1]
Innings5
Kanishk Seth
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 28
47.3
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 50 · Balls 31 · SR 161.3 · Avg 25 · 4s 4 · 6s 3
47.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production56.940%22.8
Impact *18.425%4.6
Versatility61.418%11.1
Shot quality34.24%1.4
Trajectory57.913%7.5
Scout Score47.3
56.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR158.80.93×17bp34.232.5%
Balls / boundary4.2—17bp63.220%
Balls / six8.5—17bp78.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
18.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -7.1
WPA · Death-7.1
61.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)155.6 SR1.01×9bp76.316.7%
Reach build164.3 SR1.24×14bp81.622.2%
34.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control71.4% → p34.2
57.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[16, 11, 23]
Innings3
Debojyoti Ghosh
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 26
43.4
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 17 · Balls 23 · SR 73.9 · Avg 5.7 · 4s 1 · 6s 0
43.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4040%16.0
Impact *44.725%11.2
Versatility47.818%8.6
Shot quality2.64%0.1
Trajectory57.913%7.5
Scout Score43.4
40ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp44.732.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp34.220%
Balls / six——0bp34.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
44.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
47.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp36.816.7%
Reach build100 SR0.75×9bp5022.2%
2.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Build55.6%
Phase-weighted control54.5% → p2.6
57.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[8, 2, 7]
Innings3
Saksham Chaudhary
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 26
43.4
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 170 · Balls 108 · SR 157.4 · Avg 28.3 · 4s 11 · 6s 13
43.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production43.240%17.3
Impact *13.225%3.3
Versatility58.318%10.5
Shot quality7.94%0.3
Trajectory92.113%12.0
Scout Score43.4
43.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR00×1bp28.932.5%
Balls / boundary——1bp5020%
Balls / six——1bp5032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
13.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -11.8
WPA · Death-11.8
58.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp36.816.7%
Reach build178.3 SR1.34×46bp97.422.2%
7.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.7%
Control · Build54.3%
Phase-weighted control63.1% → p7.9
92.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.11×
Recent scores[50, 0, 98]
Innings6
Lokesh Gait
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 25
43.2
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 58 · Balls 48 · SR 120.8 · Avg 19.3 · 4s 2 · 6s 5
43.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production43.128%12.1
Impact *36.127%9.7
Versatility54.227%14.6
Shot quality258%2.0
Trajectory47.210%4.7
Scout Score43.2
43.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR116.70.92×36bp30.642.9%
True Avg421.66×1wp69.432.1%
Balls / boundary9—36bp30.625%
36.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -9.2
WPA · Consolidation-6.9
WPA · Build-2.3
54.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin40 SR5b5b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball50 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p97.129.6%
Off-spin40 SR5b5b <min
LA-orthodox174 SR27bp97.1
Leg-spin50 SR2b2b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)37.5 SR0.24×8bp2.814.8%
Reach death133.3 SR0.78×12bp2511.1%
25Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.8%
Control · Build68%
Phase-weighted control72.2% → p25
47.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[5, 5, 48]
Innings3
Harsh Dev Gautam
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB
43.2
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 20 · Balls 26 · SR 76.9 · Avg 6.7 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
43.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4040%16.0
Impact *44.725%11.2
Versatility4218%7.6
Shot quality23.74%0.9
Trajectory57.913%7.5
Scout Score43.2
40ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp44.732.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp34.220%
Balls / six——0bp34.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
44.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
42VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp36.816.7%
Reach build90.9 SR0.68×22bp23.722.2%
23.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build68.2%
Phase-weighted control68.2% → p23.7
57.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[3, 17, 0]
Innings3
Pawan
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 28
43.2
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 17 · Balls 23 · SR 73.9 · Avg 8.5 · 4s 0 · 6s 1
43.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production42.140%16.8
Impact *28.925%7.2
Versatility46.618%8.4
Shot quality81.64%3.3
Trajectory57.913%7.5
Scout Score43.2
42.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR500.29×2bp23.732.5%
Balls / boundary——2bp44.720%
Balls / six——2bp55.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
28.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4
WPA · Death-4
46.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp36.816.7%
Reach build100 SR0.75×11bp44.722.2%
81.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation90%
Control · Build72.7%
Phase-weighted control81% → p81.6
57.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[10, 6, 1]
Innings3
Ritwik Roy Chowdhury
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 30
42.1
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 87 · Balls 86 · SR 101.2 · Avg 14.5 · 4s 9 · 6s 2
42.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production37.128%10.4
Impact *19.427%5.2
Versatility61.927%16.7
Shot quality13.98%1.1
Trajectory86.110%8.6
Scout Score42.1
37.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR118.40.93×49bp36.142.9%
True Avg19.30.76×3wp30.632.1%
Balls / boundary7—49bp47.225%
19.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -14.8
WPA · Consolidation-1.8
WPA · Build-12.9
61.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p83.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox106 SR32bp83.3
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball100 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p44.329.6%
Off-spin133 SR15bp78.6
LA-orthodox91 SR43bp32.4
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)140 SR0.9×5bp41.714.8%
Reach death——0bp5011.1%
13.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80.8%
Control · Build56.5%
Phase-weighted control69.4% → p13.9
86.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.14×
Recent scores[40, 33, 4]
Innings6
Vikas Singh
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 26
36.1
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 48 · Balls 41 · SR 117.1 · Avg 16 · 4s 2 · 6s 3
36.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production61.340%24.5
Impact *7.925%2.0
Versatility44.718%8.0
Shot quality13.24%0.5
Trajectory7.913%1.0
Scout Score36.1
61.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR163.20.96×19bp60.532.5%
Balls / boundary4.8—19bp55.320%
Balls / six9.5—19bp71.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
7.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -35.2
WPA · Death-35.2
44.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)138.5 SR0.9×13bp60.516.7%
Reach build85 SR0.64×20bp18.422.2%
13.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation0%
Control · Build70%
Phase-weighted control63.6% → p13.2
7.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.67×
Recent scores[11, 4, 0]
Innings4
Writtick Chatterjee
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 33
34.2
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 129 · Balls 102 · SR 126.5 · Avg 21.5 · 4s 7 · 6s 6
34.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production22.940%9.2
Impact *11.527%3.1
Versatility49.515%7.4
Shot quality80.86%4.8
Trajectory80.812%9.7
Scout Score34.2
22.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR113.60.83×59bp19.235%
True Avg16.80.69×4wp26.930%
Balls / boundary7.4—59bp11.517.5%
Balls / dismissal14.8—4wp34.617.5%
11.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -31.6
WPA · Powerplay-31.9
WPA · Consolidation+0.2
49.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR151.4 SR0.99×37bp65.426.7%
vs Spin SR112.3 SR0.89×65bp19.226.7%
Accel into Cons109.1 SR—22bp57.720%
Pressure entry——0bp57.726.7%
80.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation90.9%
Control · Build76.2%
Phase-weighted control86.2% → p80.8
80.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[27, 64, 20]
Innings6
Aishik Patel
Top order · pos 3 · LHB
34.1
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 75 · Balls 64 · SR 117.2 · Avg 18.8 · 4s 7 · 6s 2
34.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production29.240%11.7
Impact *42.327%11.4
Versatility32.115%4.8
Shot quality506%3.0
Trajectory26.912%3.2
Scout Score34.1
29.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR115.40.84×39bp26.935%
True Avg150.62×3wp34.630%
Balls / boundary6.5—39bp26.917.5%
Balls / dismissal13—3wp26.917.5%
42.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -16.8
WPA · Powerplay-12.3
WPA · Consolidation-4.5
32.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR100 SR0.66×9bp26.926.7%
vs Spin SR120 SR0.96×55bp26.926.7%
Accel into Cons100 SR—4bp42.320%
Pressure entry92.9 SR0.68×14bp34.626.7%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build73.7%
Phase-weighted control81.5% → p50
26.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.89×
Recent scores[10, 30, 13]
Innings4
Shubham Chatterjee
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 30
30
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 47 · Balls 39 · SR 120.5 · Avg 11.8 · 4s 5 · 6s 1
30OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production2140%8.4
Impact *26.927%7.3
Versatility47.915%7.2
Shot quality3.86%0.2
Trajectory57.712%6.9
Scout Score30
21ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR113.30.83×15bp34.635%
True Avg8.50.35×2wp11.530%
Balls / boundary7.5—15bp19.217.5%
Balls / dismissal7.5—2wp11.517.5%
26.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -21.3
WPA · Powerplay-20.1
WPA · Consolidation-1.2
47.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR111.1 SR0.73×27bp11.526.7%
vs Spin SR141.7 SR1.13×12bp5026.7%
Accel into Cons100 SR—6bp5020%
Pressure entry128.6 SR0.94×21bp80.826.7%
3.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build33.3%
Phase-weighted control60% → p3.8
57.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.98×
Recent scores[10, 3, 20]
Innings5
Rahul Prasad
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 21
29.3
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 82 · Balls 53 · SR 154.7 · Avg 20.5 · 4s 5 · 6s 5
29.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production16.640%6.6
Impact *34.225%8.6
Versatility57.218%10.3
Shot quality18.44%0.7
Trajectory23.713%3.1
Scout Score29.3
16.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR106.20.62×16bp7.932.5%
Balls / boundary16—16bp2.620%
Balls / six16—16bp18.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
34.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.9
WPA · Death-3.9
57.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker33 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp36.816.7%
Reach build175.7 SR1.32×37bp92.122.2%
18.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build67.6%
Phase-weighted control67.6% → p18.4
23.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.85×
Recent scores[1, 24, 9]
Innings5
Abhishek Das
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 35
28.1
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 120 · Balls 88 · SR 136.4 · Avg 60 · 4s 10 · 6s 2
28.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production19.240%7.7
Impact *2.625%0.7
Versatility61.118%11.0
Shot quality92.14%3.7
Trajectory39.513%5.1
Scout Score28.1
19.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1450.85×20bp15.832.5%
Balls / boundary6.7—20bp15.820%
Balls / six20—20bp10.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
2.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -50
WPA · Death-50
61.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball160 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)171.4 SR1.12×7bp81.616.7%
Reach build140.6 SR1.06×32bp76.322.2%
92.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation94.1%
Control · Build90.6%
Phase-weighted control91.8% → p92.1
39.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[8, 40, 42]
Innings5
Sourav Halder
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 28
27.4
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 71 · Balls 55 · SR 129.1 · Avg 17.8 · 4s 4 · 6s 3
27.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production10.840%4.3
Impact *23.725%5.9
Versatility61.718%11.1
Shot quality57.94%2.3
Trajectory28.913%3.8
Scout Score27.4
10.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR104.80.61×21bp2.632.5%
Balls / boundary10.5—21bp7.920%
Balls / six——21bp2.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
23.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5.5
WPA · Death-5.5
61.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker50 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball60 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)150 SR0.98×4bp71.116.7%
Reach build144.1 SR1.08×34bp86.822.2%
57.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build76.5%
Phase-weighted control76.5% → p57.9
28.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.91×
Recent scores[21, 4, 22]
Innings5
Aditya Sharma
Top order · pos 3 · LHB
26.9
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 91 · Balls 70 · SR 130 · Avg 30.3 · 4s 10 · 6s 3
26.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production28.540%11.4
Impact *3.827%1.0
Versatility18.215%2.7
Shot quality19.26%1.2
Trajectory88.512%10.6
Scout Score26.9
28.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR78.60.57×14bp11.535%
True Avg110.45×1wp5030%
Balls / boundary14—14bp3.817.5%
Balls / dismissal14—1wp5017.5%
3.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -46
WPA · Powerplay-13.6
WPA · Consolidation-32.4
18.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR126.8 SR0.83×41bp19.226.7%
vs Spin SR134.5 SR1.07×29bp42.326.7%
Accel into Cons40 SR—15bp3.820%
Pressure entry70.6 SR0.51×17bp3.826.7%
19.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation46.7%
Control · Build89.7%
Phase-weighted control67.8% → p19.2
88.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.18×
Recent scores[3, 72, 3]
Innings5
Saurabh Singh
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 28
25.4
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 46 · Balls 48 · SR 95.8 · Avg 15.3 · 4s 4 · 6s 1
25.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production11.528%3.2
Impact *8.327%2.2
Versatility37.527%10.1
Shot quality63.98%5.1
Trajectory47.210%4.7
Scout Score25.4
11.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR89.20.7×37bp8.342.9%
True Avg110.43×3wp13.932.1%
Balls / boundary12.3—37bp13.925%
8.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -39.1
WPA · Consolidation-5.2
WPA · Build-33.9
37.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox43 SR7b7b <min
vs Leg-spin112 SR8b8b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p28.629.6%
Off-spin100 SR16bp28.6
LA-orthodox43 SR7b7b <min
Leg-spin112 SR8b8b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)83.3 SR0.53×6bp8.314.8%
Reach death——0bp5011.1%
63.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.2%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control81.1% → p63.9
47.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[17, 29, 0]
Innings3
Ayush Kumar Singh
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 22
24.9
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 68 · Balls 62 · SR 109.7 · Avg 17 · 4s 5 · 6s 2
24.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production13.728%3.8
Impact *30.627%8.3
Versatility41.427%11.2
Shot quality2.88%0.2
Trajectory13.910%1.4
Scout Score24.9
13.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR95.50.75×22bp2542.9%
True Avg70.28×3wp2.832.1%
Balls / boundary22—22bp8.325%
30.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -10.3
WPA · Consolidation-8.6
WPA · Build-1.7
41.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin50 SR6b6b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p36.229.6%
Off-spin44 SR16bp3.6
LA-orthodox129 SR14bp73.5
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)33.3 SR0.21×3bp19.414.8%
Reach death——0bp5011.1%
2.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation65%
Control · Build50%
Phase-weighted control63.6% → p2.8
13.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.82×
Recent scores[23, 10, 12]
Innings4
Avijit Singh
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 29
24.2
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 48 · Balls 46 · SR 104.3 · Avg 12 · 4s 5 · 6s 2
24.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production36.740%14.7
Impact *19.227%5.2
Versatility21.315%3.2
Shot quality11.56%0.7
Trajectory3.812%0.5
Scout Score24.2
36.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR128.10.93×32bp5035%
True Avg13.70.56×3wp19.230%
Balls / boundary4.6—32bp57.717.5%
Balls / dismissal10.7—3wp19.217.5%
19.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -21.9
WPA · Powerplay-13.2
WPA · Consolidation-8.7
21.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR136 SR0.89×25bp42.326.7%
vs Spin SR66.7 SR0.53×21bp3.826.7%
Accel into Cons58.3 SR—12bp19.220%
Pressure entry78.3 SR0.57×23bp19.226.7%
11.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build0%
Phase-weighted control61.5% → p11.5
3.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.76×
Recent scores[6, 7, 18]
Innings4
Jayveer Singh
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 25
18.7
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 37 · Balls 40 · SR 92.5 · Avg 9.2 · 4s 3 · 6s 1
18.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production17.328%4.8
Impact *13.927%3.8
Versatility28.727%7.7
Shot quality19.48%1.6
Trajectory8.310%0.8
Scout Score18.7
17.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR96.80.76×31bp19.442.9%
True Avg100.39×3wp8.332.1%
Balls / boundary10.3—31bp2525%
13.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -18.4
WPA · Consolidation+0.2
WPA · Build-18.6
28.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p3044.4%
vs Off-spin110 SR10bp30
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball400 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p1929.6%
Off-spin95 SR19bp17.9
LA-orthodox71 SR14bp20.6
Leg-spin50 SR4b4b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)233.3 SR1.5×3bp63.914.8%
Reach death77.8 SR0.46×9bp2.811.1%
19.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation92.9%
Control · Build52.9%
Phase-weighted control71% → p19.4
8.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.81×
Recent scores[9, 7, 5]
Innings5
Kaif Ahmed
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 29
12.6
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 69 · Balls 60 · SR 115 · Avg 17.2 · 4s 2 · 6s 4
12.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production8.128%2.3
Impact *2.827%0.8
Versatility23.827%6.4
Shot quality36.18%2.9
Trajectory2.810%0.3
Scout Score12.6
8.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR77.30.61×44bp2.842.9%
True Avg11.30.45×3wp19.432.1%
Balls / boundary22—44bp2.825%
2.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -71.2
WPA · Consolidation-24.5
WPA · Build-46.7
23.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p16.744.4%
vs LA-orthodox59 SR22bp16.7
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p2.929.6%
Off-spin57 SR7b7b <min
LA-orthodox52 SR29bp2.9
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)141.7 SR0.91×12bp36.114.8%
Reach death233.3 SR1.37×15bp91.711.1%
36.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation69.2%
Control · Build77.4%
Phase-weighted control75% → p36.1
2.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.35×
Recent scores[1, 5, 0]
Innings6
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 24 | 23.0 | 12 | 165 | 7.17 | 82.3 Scout Score 82.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay93.669.6% Death56.530.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p69.30.96× | 78.8 Bowling Production 78.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay8w · 5.56 econp94.669.6% Death4w · 10.86 econp42.630.4% | 99 Quality 99 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay45%p99 | 93.8 Impact 93.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +96p9969.6% DeathWPA +30.1p81.930.4% | 78.5 Versatility 78.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp91.769.6% Deathp48.530.4% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | — | 17.2 | 11 | 93 | 5.37 | 81.5 Scout Score 81.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay86.228.8% Middle79.957.7% Death78.213.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p83.30.88× | 84.8 Bowling Production 84.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 5.6 econp9328.8% Middle3w · 5.6 econp80.457.7% Death3w · 3.86 econp85.913.5% | 76.8 Quality 76.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p67.7 False-shot · Middle28%p81.4 | 77.9 Impact 77.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +27.7p88.528.8% MiddleWPA +20.6p77.557.7% DeathWPA +2.1p56.913.5% | 80.9 Versatility 80.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp84.828.8% Middlep78.457.7% Deathp83.313.5% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 21.0 | 9 | 140 | 6.67 | 77.8 Scout Score 77.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle84.881% Death37.614.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p34.21.02× | 88.6 Bowling Production 88.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle8w · 5.82 econp97.381% Death1w · 10.67 econp39.614.3% | 69.6 Quality 69.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle26%p69.6 | 86 Impact 86 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +53p95.181% DeathWPA -4.4p34.714.3% | 78.2 Versatility 78.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep85.381% Deathp38.314.3% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 27 | 25.0 | 13 | 207 | 8.28 | 70.9 Scout Score 70.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay82.172% Middle34.98% Death44.820% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p18.41.11× | 73.1 Bowling Production 73.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay8w · 7.17 econp87.272% Middle0w · 11.5 econp30.78% Death5w · 11 econp39.420% | 91 Quality 91 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay36%p92.7 False-shot · Middle33%p75.5 | 82.1 Impact 82.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +59.1p96.972% MiddleWPA -13.3p26.58% DeathWPA +1p51.420% | 67.7 Versatility 67.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp70.872% Middlep28.48% Deathp72.220% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 35 | 12.3 | 7 | 86 | 6.88 | 68.3 Scout Score 68.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay69.664% Death6636% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p361.01× | 76.3 Bowling Production 76.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 6 econp79.464% Death4w · 8.44 econp70.836% | 96.9 Quality 96.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay44%p96.9 | 61.5 Impact 61.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +4.6p53.164% DeathWPA +21.8p76.436% | 65.2 Versatility 65.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp69.664% Deathp57.536% | |
| 6 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 29.0 | 6 | 176 | 6.07 | 67.3 Scout Score 67.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay64.344.8% Middle72.848.3% Death496.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p640.96× | 62.1 Bowling Production 62.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 5.38 econp58.344.8% Middle3w · 6.29 econp67.848.3% Death1w · 9 econp47.26.9% | 40.5 Quality 40.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay20%p21.9 False-shot · Middle25%p57.8 | 89.9 Impact 89.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +53p94.844.8% MiddleWPA +39.8p91.248.3% DeathWPA -0p48.66.9% | 70.5 Versatility 70.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp68.844.8% Middlep76.548.3% Deathp406.9% | |
| 7 | Off-spin | 25 | 23.0 | 11 | 158 | 6.87 | 67 Scout Score 67 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay42.221.7% Middle76.769.6% Death50.98.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p23.71.08× | 79.4 Bowling Production 79.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.8 econp53.221.7% Middle10w · 6.56 econp90.469.6% Death0w · 7 econp56.18.7% | 36.1 Quality 36.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay13%p7.3 False-shot · Middle23%p45.1 | 83.4 Impact 83.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +3p4921.7% MiddleWPA +53.6p97.169.6% DeathWPA +2.7p59.78.7% | 65.9 Versatility 65.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp53.321.7% Middlep74.569.6% Deathp28.38.7% | |
| 8 | SLA orthodox | — | 10.5 | 3 | 76 | 7.02 | 66.2 Scout Score 66.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle65.546.2% Death66.853.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 65 Bowling Production 65 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 5.8 econp62.946.2% Death2w · 8.06 econp66.853.8% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle23%p50 | 85.6 Impact 85.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +32.2p83.346.2% DeathWPA +45.1p87.553.8% | 46.1 Versatility 46.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep68.646.2% Deathp26.753.8% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 26 | 30.0 | 19 | 244 | 8.13 | 65.4 Scout Score 65.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay81.646.7% Middle33.830% Death73.823.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p7.91.14× | 74.9 Bowling Production 74.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay9w · 7.21 econp89.346.7% Middle3w · 10.67 econp36.530% Death7w · 6.71 econp95.423.3% | 86.5 Quality 86.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay37%p88.5 False-shot · Middle30%p83.3 | 67.9 Impact 67.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +49.5p92.746.7% MiddleWPA -15.8p20.630% DeathWPA +29.9p79.223.3% | 54.9 Versatility 54.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp85.246.7% Middlep12.730% Deathp48.523.3% | |
| 10 | Off-spin | 29 | 17.0 | 7 | 124 | 7.29 | 65 Scout Score 65 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay65.723.5% Middle64.870.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p9.61.13× | 80 Bowling Production 80 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 7.5 econp75.623.5% Middle4w · 6.5 econp81.470.6% | 18.2 Quality 18.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p52.1 False-shot · Middle15%p6.9 | 86 Impact 86 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +23.7p82.323.5% MiddleWPA +37.1p87.370.6% | 77.5 Versatility 77.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp6023.5% Middlep83.370.6% | |
| 11 | Off-spin | 26 | 22.0 | 4 | 158 | 7.18 | 65 Scout Score 65 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay39.69.1% Middle64.572.7% Death79.818.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p99.10.73× | 53.6 Bowling Production 53.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11 econp28.79.1% Middle2w · 7.12 econp49.272.7% Death2w · 5.5 econp83.818.2% | 39.1 Quality 39.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p30.2 False-shot · Middle22%p40.2 | 80.8 Impact 80.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -4p38.59.1% MiddleWPA +39p89.272.7% DeathWPA +12.1p68.118.2% | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp38.59.1% Middlep62.772.7% Deathp6018.2% | |
| 12 | Leg-spin | 23 | 26.3 | 13 | 192 | 7.25 | 64.9 Scout Score 64.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle60.584.9% Death89.815.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p78.10.92× | 76.1 Bowling Production 76.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle10w · 7.78 econp73.584.9% Death3w · 4.25 econp90.515.1% | 20.6 Quality 20.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle20%p20.6 | 65.2 Impact 65.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +5.1p59.884.9% DeathWPA +59.2p95.815.1% | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep55.984.9% Deathp83.315.1% | |
| 13 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 21.5 | 5 | 138 | 6.32 | 64.2 Scout Score 64.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay51.118.3% Middle67.181.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p20.21.11× | 70.5 Bowling Production 70.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 6.25 econp48.518.3% Middle5w · 6.34 econp75.581.7% | 24.7 Quality 24.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p52.1 False-shot · Middle20%p18.6 | 88.1 Impact 88.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +10.8p65.618.3% MiddleWPA +46.7p93.181.7% | 79.7 Versatility 79.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp50.618.3% Middlep86.381.7% | |
| 14 | Off-spin | 28 | 18.0 | 8 | 137 | 7.61 | 63.7 Scout Score 63.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay50.238.9% Middle74.644.4% Death66.216.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p71.10.95× | 60.3 Bowling Production 60.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 7.71 econp40.138.9% Middle7w · 7.25 econp79.244.4% Death1w · 8.33 econp57.416.7% | 70.5 Quality 70.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p46.9 False-shot · Middle33%p91.2 | 68.5 Impact 68.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +10.6p63.538.9% MiddleWPA +8.2p63.744.4% DeathWPA +53.4p93.116.7% | 49.1 Versatility 49.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.938.9% Middlep65.244.4% Deathp3516.7% | |
| 15 | Off-spin | 23 | 17.0 | 9 | 142 | 8.35 | 63.7 Scout Score 63.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.729.4% Middle75.158.8% Death73.811.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p81.60.9× | 64.1 Bowling Production 64.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 11.4 econp34.729.4% Middle5w · 7.3 econp76.258.8% Death2w · 6 econp7711.8% | 62.6 Quality 62.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p42.7 False-shot · Middle27%p72.5 | 58.6 Impact 58.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13p19.829.4% MiddleWPA +19.2p75.558.8% DeathWPA +15.7p70.811.8% | 56.9 Versatility 56.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.129.4% Middlep68.658.8% Deathp5011.8% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 32 | 6.0 | 3 | 50 | 8.33 | 60.6 Scout Score 60.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay74.366.7% Death33.233.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 65.1 Bowling Production 65.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 5.5 econp84.466.7% Death0w · 14 econp26.633.3% | 33.3 Quality 33.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p33.3 | 72.9 Impact 72.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +34.2p90.666.7% DeathWPA -4.1p37.533.3% | 63 Versatility 63 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp77.766.7% Deathp33.533.3% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 13.0 | 7 | 103 | 7.92 | 60 Scout Score 60 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay55.923.1% Middle64.961.5% Death46.115.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p86.80.87× | 67.4 Bowling Production 67.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9 econp57.723.1% Middle4w · 6.88 econp77.961.5% Death1w · 10.5 econp4015.4% | 27.9 Quality 27.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p70.8 False-shot · Middle15%p11.8 | 54.9 Impact 54.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -7.2p32.323.1% MiddleWPA +8.3p65.761.5% DeathWPA -1.6p45.815.4% | 61.5 Versatility 61.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp59.423.1% Middlep70.661.5% Deathp28.315.4% | |
| 18 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 21.0 | 9 | 168 | 8 | 59.6 Scout Score 59.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay50.123.8% Middle60.361.9% Death72.214.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p21.91.1× | 62 Bowling Production 62 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9 econp55.623.8% Middle4w · 7.85 econp61.461.9% Death3w · 7 econp75.214.3% | 41 Quality 41 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay13%p7.3 False-shot · Middle24%p53.9 | 81.4 Impact 81.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +12.7p7623.8% MiddleWPA +30.5p81.461.9% DeathWPA +50.8p90.314.3% | 55 Versatility 55 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp51.523.8% Middlep52.961.9% Deathp7014.3% | |
| 19 | SLA orthodox | 17 | 6.0 | 1 | 47 | 7.83 | 58.4 Scout Score 58.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle55.350% Death6333.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 60 Bowling Production 60 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 7 econp55.250% Death0w · 6 econp67.333.3% | 36.3 Quality 36.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p36.3 | 66.8 Impact 66.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +12.9p69.650% DeathWPA +3.1p62.533.3% | 54.4 Versatility 54.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep53.950% Deathp5533.3% | |
| 20 | SLA orthodox | — | 19.0 | 5 | 134 | 7.05 | 56.5 Scout Score 56.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay4931.6% Middle65.552.6% Death41.415.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p30.71.05× | 61.3 Bowling Production 61.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.67 econp52.931.6% Middle2w · 5.3 econp71.352.6% Death1w · 9.67 econp44.415.8% | 43.7 Quality 43.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p36.5 False-shot · Middle23%p48 | 63.2 Impact 63.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +7p57.331.6% MiddleWPA +15.4p73.552.6% DeathWPA -2.3p40.315.8% | 64.7 Versatility 64.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp49.231.6% Middlep81.452.6% Deathp4015.8% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 23.0 | 1 | 153 | 6.65 | 55.7 Scout Score 55.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay50.813% Middle56.482.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p62.31× | 51.8 Bowling Production 51.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 6.67 econp49.813% Middle1w · 6.42 econp52.182.6% | 6.5 Quality 6.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay11%p16.7 False-shot · Middle15%p4.9 | 82.9 Impact 82.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +11.1p67.713% MiddleWPA +36.5p85.382.6% | 66.7 Versatility 66.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp48.113% Middlep69.682.6% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 32 | 29.0 | 10 | 247 | 8.52 | 55.7 Scout Score 55.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay70.558.6% Middle29.813.8% Death37.327.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p2.61.21× | 60.1 Bowling Production 60.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 7.06 econp72.658.6% Middle1w · 12.5 econp28.113.8% Death4w · 9.62 econp49.527.6% | 89.8 Quality 89.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay36%p90.6 False-shot · Middle38%p86.3 | 57.4 Impact 57.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +21.4p80.258.6% MiddleWPA -16.2p16.713.8% DeathWPA -6.4p29.227.6% | 56 Versatility 56 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp73.558.6% Middlep14.713.8% Deathp39.527.6% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 31 | 20.0 | 8 | 179 | 8.95 | 55.3 Scout Score 55.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay54.160% Middle27.615% Death7525% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p16.71.12× | 57.7 Bowling Production 57.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 9.25 econp56.460% Middle0w · 12.33 econp15.315% Death3w · 6.2 econp86.125% | 68.6 Quality 68.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay26%p61.5 False-shot · Middle50%p97.1 | 63.1 Impact 63.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +8.2p61.560% MiddleWPA -20.3p10.815% DeathWPA +62p98.625% | 46.1 Versatility 46.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp51.560% Middlep23.515% Deathp46.825% | |
| 24 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 7.0 | 3 | 50 | 7.14 | 53.9 Scout Score 53.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay63.242.9% Middle44.542.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p14.91.12× | 63.5 Bowling Production 63.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 4.33 econp80.642.9% Middle1w · 9.67 econp46.342.9% | 76.2 Quality 76.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p59.4 False-shot · Middle44%p93.1 | 41.8 Impact 41.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +5.1p55.242.9% MiddleWPA -13.2p28.442.9% | 54.6 Versatility 54.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp72.942.9% Middlep36.342.9% | |
| 25 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 4 | 54 | 9 | 53.4 Scout Score 53.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.466.7% Death41.233.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 54.9 Bowling Production 54.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.5 econp58.766.7% Death2w · 10 econp47.233.3% | 26 Quality 26 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p26 | 59.5 Impact 59.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +24.9p84.466.7% DeathWPA -30.8p9.733.3% | 58.7 Versatility 58.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp54.366.7% Deathp67.533.3% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | 35 | 11.0 | 4 | 93 | 8.45 | 53.2 Scout Score 53.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay21.418.2% Middle61.272.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p85.10.88× | 68.2 Bowling Production 68.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 15 econp14.418.2% Middle4w · 6.75 econp81.672.7% | 10.1 Quality 10.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay0%p3.1 False-shot · Middle15%p11.8 | 39.6 Impact 39.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -20.2p13.518.2% MiddleWPA -3p46.172.7% | 62.2 Versatility 62.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp32.718.2% Middlep69.672.7% | |
| 27 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 18.1 | 4 | 134 | 7.38 | 53.1 Scout Score 53.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay46.444% Middle5950.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p6.11.15× | 57.5 Bowling Production 57.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.25 econp49.144% Middle2w · 6.55 econp64.950.5% | 42 Quality 42 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p55.2 False-shot · Middle20%p30.4 | 66.2 Impact 66.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +3.9p5144% MiddleWPA +29.4p79.450.5% | 65.2 Versatility 65.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp51.244% Middlep77.550.5% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 22 | 10.0 | 2 | 98 | 9.8 | 51.5 Scout Score 51.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle53.230% Death50.660% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p72.80.95× | 49.3 Bowling Production 49.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 10 econp45.430% Death1w · 9.5 econp51.260% | 78.4 Quality 78.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle33%p78.4 | 46.7 Impact 46.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0.7p53.930% DeathWPA -2.3p43.160% | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep28.430% Deathp43.560% | |
| 29 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 18.0 | 3 | 127 | 7.06 | 50.9 Scout Score 50.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay64.938.9% Middle41.255.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p65.80.96× | 57 Bowling Production 57 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 7.43 econp79.138.9% Middle0w · 7.1 econp41.555.6% | 10.5 Quality 10.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay19%p24 False-shot · Middle7%p1 | 54.7 Impact 54.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +11.7p69.838.9% MiddleWPA -4.1p44.155.6% | 61.2 Versatility 61.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp57.738.9% Middlep63.755.6% | |
| 30 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 15.0 | 2 | 118 | 7.87 | 50.3 Scout Score 50.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay23.713.3% Middle54.486.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p74.60.94× | 46.4 Bowling Production 46.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 13 econp24.113.3% Middle2w · 7.08 econp49.886.7% | 61.2 Quality 61.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p19.8 False-shot · Middle26%p67.6 | 31.9 Impact 31.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -34.3p3.113.3% MiddleWPA -9.1p36.386.7% | 68.1 Versatility 68.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp32.613.3% Middlep73.586.7% | |
| 31 | Off-spin | 32 | 19.0 | 7 | 172 | 9.05 | 50.2 Scout Score 50.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay5636.8% Middle46.652.6% Death48.310.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p76.30.93× | 47.4 Bowling Production 47.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 9.86 econp59.336.8% Middle2w · 8.3 econp38.152.6% Death1w · 10 econp51.710.5% | 69.7 Quality 69.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p65.6 False-shot · Middle27%p72.5 | 33.4 Impact 33.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.8p40.636.8% MiddleWPA -12.8p30.452.6% DeathWPA -8.7p23.610.5% | 51.2 Versatility 51.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp50.336.8% Middlep5052.6% Deathp6010.5% | |
| 32 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 17.0 | 3 | 150 | 8.82 | 49.2 Scout Score 49.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay4247.1% Middle47.129.4% Death66.223.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p92.10.86× | 40 Bowling Production 40 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.88 econp32.947.1% Middle0w · 7.6 econp30.729.4% Death1w · 8.25 econp65.823.5% | 63.6 Quality 63.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p63.5 False-shot · Middle27%p63.7 | 37.4 Impact 37.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -11.2p2647.1% MiddleWPA -6.4p42.229.4% DeathWPA +2p54.223.5% | 48.5 Versatility 48.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp37.147.1% Middlep5129.4% Deathp68.323.5% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 22 | 21.0 | 9 | 200 | 9.52 | 47.9 Scout Score 47.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay34.852.4% Middle82.614.3% Death53.533.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p95.60.77× | 32.3 Bowling Production 32.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.36 econp21.752.4% Middle2w · 5.33 econp75.714.3% Death5w · 11.57 econp30.633.3% | 55.3 Quality 55.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p49 False-shot · Middle33%p78.4 | 53.8 Impact 53.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -12.1p21.952.4% MiddleWPA +78.2p9914.3% DeathWPA +34.5p84.733.3% | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp37.152.4% Middlep64.714.3% Deathp41.533.3% | |
| 34 | LA pace | 31 | 16.0 | 5 | 144 | 9 | 46.4 Scout Score 46.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.450% Middle63.712.5% Death52.837.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 39.4 Bowling Production 39.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.25 econp17.450% Middle1w · 5.5 econp63.712.5% Death3w · 8.5 econp60.637.5% | 83.7 Quality 83.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay35%p82.3 False-shot · Middle50%p89.2 | 37.2 Impact 37.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -5.1p36.550% MiddleWPA +1p55.912.5% DeathWPA -4.7p31.937.5% | 49.6 Versatility 49.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp35.850% Middlep59.812.5% Deathp64.537.5% | |
| 35 | Off-spin | 33 | 6.0 | 3 | 58 | 9.67 | 46.1 Scout Score 46.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle46.183.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 52.4 Bowling Production 52.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 9.6 econp52.483.3% | 14.7 Quality 14.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle13%p14.7 | 61.8 Impact 61.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +5.5p61.883.3% | 29.4 Versatility 29.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep29.483.3% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 22 | 12.5 | 5 | 127 | 9.9 | 45.5 Scout Score 45.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay51.168.8% Death33.331.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p79.80.92× | 39.8 Bowling Production 39.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.83 econp45.168.8% Death3w · 12.25 econp2831.2% | 94.8 Quality 94.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay42%p94.8 | 25.9 Impact 25.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -10.9p28.168.8% DeathWPA -10.3p20.831.2% | 39.1 Versatility 39.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp41.768.8% Deathp33.531.2% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 26 | 18.0 | 6 | 166 | 9.22 | 45.2 Scout Score 45.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay27.950% Middle27.511.1% Death72.438.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p12.31.12× | 49.4 Bowling Production 49.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10.56 econp22.150% Middle0w · 12.5 econp27.211.1% Death4w · 6.57 econp90.738.9% | 75.6 Quality 75.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay39%p86.5 False-shot · Middle8%p26.5 | 37.1 Impact 37.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -25.9p9.450% MiddleWPA -9.2p34.311.1% DeathWPA +16.2p73.638.9% | 40.3 Versatility 40.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp27.950% Middlep28.411.1% Deathp59.538.9% | |
| 38 | Off-spin | 21 | 24.0 | 7 | 186 | 7.75 | 44.9 Scout Score 44.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay51.520.8% Middle43.279.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 58.1 Bowling Production 58.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 7.8 econp61.820.8% Middle5w · 7.74 econp57.279.2% | 53.1 Quality 53.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p42.7 False-shot · Middle25%p55.9 | 14.3 Impact 14.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.4p42.720.8% MiddleWPA -24.7p6.979.2% | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp50.620.8% Middlep52.979.2% | |
| 39 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 1 | 33 | 8.25 | 44.2 Scout Score 44.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle44.2100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 45.9 Bowling Production 45.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 8.25 econp45.9100% | 42.2 Quality 42.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p42.2 | 40.2 Impact 40.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -7.9p40.2100% | 45.1 Versatility 45.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep45.1100% | |
| 40 | RA pace | — | 9.0 | 1 | 77 | 8.56 | 44.1 Scout Score 44.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay55.155.6% Middle25.733.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 38.9 Bowling Production 38.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.8 econp50.455.6% Middle0w · 11 econp19.733.3% | 66.4 Quality 66.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay40%p84.4 False-shot · Middle17%p36.3 | 34.1 Impact 34.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -0.1p46.955.6% MiddleWPA -19.8p12.733.3% | 49.4 Versatility 49.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp5655.6% Middlep38.233.3% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 18 | 5.4 | 5 | 57 | 10.06 | 40.9 Scout Score 40.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle40.970.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 43.3 Bowling Production 43.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 12 econp43.370.6% | 86.3 Quality 86.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle38%p86.3 | 18.6 Impact 18.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -15.9p18.670.6% | 15.7 Versatility 15.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep15.770.6% | |
| 42 | SLA orthodox | 31 | 27.5 | 12 | 246 | 8.84 | 40.4 Scout Score 40.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay73.321.6% Middle38.843.1% Death22.435.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p32.51.04× | 45.6 Bowling Production 45.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 5.5 econp91.421.6% Middle2w · 8.17 econp36.943.1% Death5w · 11.69 econp28.235.3% | 20.5 Quality 20.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay19%p28.1 False-shot · Middle18%p16.7 | 40.7 Impact 40.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +27.6p86.521.6% MiddleWPA -0.2p5043.1% DeathWPA -70.3p1.435.3% | 51.7 Versatility 51.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp77.521.6% Middlep53.943.1% Deathp33.335.3% | |
| 43 | LA pace | 22 | 14.4 | 5 | 161 | 10.98 | 39.6 Scout Score 39.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay3961.4% Middle40.734.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p67.50.96× | 29.4 Bowling Production 29.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10.22 econp22.961.4% Middle2w · 12.4 econp41.134.1% | 82.8 Quality 82.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p76 False-shot · Middle40%p95.1 | 22.4 Impact 22.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -6.6p34.461.4% MiddleWPA -47.8p134.1% | 29.6 Versatility 29.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp28.561.4% Middlep31.434.1% | |
| 44 | LA pace | 16 | 16.0 | 3 | 152 | 9.5 | 39.3 Scout Score 39.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay42.287.5% Death18.612.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p28.91.06× | 36.8 Bowling Production 36.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 8.64 econp4087.5% Death0w · 15.5 econp14.612.5% | 80.2 Quality 80.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay32%p80.2 | 28 Impact 28 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -8.2p30.287.5% DeathWPA -18.7p12.512.5% | 39 Versatility 39 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.887.5% Deathp33.512.5% | |
| 45 | Leg-spin | 16 | 11.1 | 1 | 101 | 9.04 | 38.3 Scout Score 38.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay51.135.8% Middle31.164.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p90.40.86× | 28.6 Bowling Production 28.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 7 econp43.635.8% Middle1w · 10.19 econp20.364.2% | 50.3 Quality 50.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p33.3 False-shot · Middle26%p59.8 | 26.9 Impact 26.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +7.2p59.435.8% MiddleWPA -22.2p8.864.2% | 33 Versatility 33 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp44.835.8% Middlep26.564.2% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 29 | 18.0 | 3 | 170 | 9.44 | 38.2 Scout Score 38.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay39.127.8% Middle59.738.9% Death12.333.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p12.31.12× | 35.6 Bowling Production 35.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9.6 econp40.327.8% Middle1w · 6.29 econp59.438.9% Death1w · 13 econp3.933.3% | 56.1 Quality 56.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p42.7 False-shot · Middle26%p65.7 | 41.7 Impact 41.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -0.8p44.827.8% MiddleWPA +13.2p71.638.9% DeathWPA -50.9p4.233.3% | 55.3 Versatility 55.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.627.8% Middlep68.138.9% Deathp52.533.3% | |
| 47 | RA pace | 19 | 16.4 | 3 | 168 | 10.08 | 37.6 Scout Score 37.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay19.636% Middle55.848% Death23.516% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p25.41.08× | 29.7 Bowling Production 29.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11.33 econp5.136% Middle2w · 7.75 econp50.448% Death1w · 14.25 econp22.716% | 90 Quality 90 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p78.1 False-shot · Middle40%p99 | 29.7 Impact 29.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -31.7p5.236% MiddleWPA +0.2p5248% DeathWPA -16p18.116% | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp20.136% Middlep5248% Deathp33.516% | |
| 48 | Off-spin | 26 | 21.0 | 3 | 186 | 8.86 | 36.6 Scout Score 36.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.819% Middle36.576.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p97.40.73× | 25.5 Bowling Production 25.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9.75 econp41.919% Middle2w · 8.62 econp21.476.2% | 38.4 Quality 38.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay12%p11.5 False-shot · Middle23%p45.1 | 23.1 Impact 23.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13.8p17.719% MiddleWPA -14.5p24.576.2% | 47.7 Versatility 47.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp46.219% Middlep4876.2% | |
| 49 | SLA orthodox | — | 13.4 | 5 | 128 | 9.37 | 35.5 Scout Score 35.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle35.592.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p88.60.87× | 47.9 Bowling Production 47.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 9.71 econp47.992.7% | 32.4 Quality 32.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p32.4 | 4.9 Impact 4.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -27.8p4.992.7% | 19.6 Versatility 19.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep19.692.7% | |
| 50 | LA pace | 28 | 13.0 | 5 | 142 | 10.92 | 35.4 Scout Score 35.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay53.538.5% Middle52.615.4% Death14.746.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p4.41.21× | 36.8 Bowling Production 36.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 7.6 econp64.138.5% Middle1w · 5.5 econp63.715.4% Death2w · 15.5 econp5.146.2% | 12.8 Quality 12.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay13%p7.3 False-shot · Middle8%p26.5 | 47.5 Impact 47.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +15.9p78.138.5% MiddleWPA +9p67.615.4% DeathWPA -16.7p15.346.2% | 58.2 Versatility 58.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp64.738.5% Middlep58.815.4% Deathp52.546.2% | |
| 51 | Off-spin | 33 | 17.0 | 4 | 133 | 7.82 | 34 Scout Score 34 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay54.329.4% Middle25.670.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p0.91.38× | 46.5 Bowling Production 46.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 7.2 econp72.629.4% Middle2w · 8.08 econp35.770.6% | 2.3 Quality 2.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay10%p1 False-shot · Middle11%p2.9 | 37.7 Impact 37.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +12.5p7429.4% MiddleWPA -14.9p22.570.6% | 53.7 Versatility 53.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp64.829.4% Middlep4970.6% | |
| 52 | RA pace | 33 | 17.5 | 5 | 207 | 11.61 | 33.3 Scout Score 33.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay49.139.3% Middle8.733.6% Death40.927.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p27.21.07× | 24.3 Bowling Production 24.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.86 econp38.739.3% Middle0w · 13.17 econp2.733.6% Death3w · 12.21 econp30.127.1% | 41.2 Quality 41.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay26%p57.3 False-shot · Middle17%p22.5 | 46.9 Impact 46.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +12p71.939.3% MiddleWPA -35.7p2.933.6% DeathWPA +6.3p65.327.1% | 29.2 Versatility 29.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp37.139.3% Middlep6.933.6% Deathp45.527.1% | |
| 53 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 0 | 44 | 11 | 30 Scout Score 30 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle3075% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50n/a | 22.3 Bowling Production 22.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 10.67 econp22.375% | 36.3 Quality 36.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p36.3 | 32.4 Impact 32.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -11.8p32.475% | 24.5 Versatility 24.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep24.575% | |
| 54 | RA pace | 23 | 11.0 | 5 | 132 | 12 | 29.4 Scout Score 29.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay34.727.3% Death27.263.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 23.5 Bowling Production 23.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 13 econp28.727.3% Death4w · 12.14 econp21.363.6% | 70.8 Quality 70.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p70.8 | 9.5 Impact 9.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -14.2p15.627.3% DeathWPA -35.7p6.963.6% | 54.9 Versatility 54.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.427.3% Deathp61.563.6% | |
| 55 | RA pace | 23 | 12.2 | 2 | 170 | 13.78 | 29.2 Scout Score 29.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay24.264.9% Middle38.535.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p93.90.79× | 11.8 Bowling Production 11.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 14 econp5.964.9% Middle1w · 13.38 econp22.835.1% | 69.7 Quality 69.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p74 False-shot · Middle27%p61.8 | 14.1 Impact 14.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -58.7p164.9% MiddleWPA -8.1p38.235.1% | 12.7 Versatility 12.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp12.164.9% Middlep13.735.1% | |
| 56 | Off-spin | 24 | 7.0 | 0 | 77 | 11 | 28.7 Scout Score 28.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay28.142.9% Middle29.157.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 19.9 Bowling Production 19.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11.67 econp2142.9% Middle0w · 10.5 econp19.157.1% | 21.5 Quality 21.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p38.5 False-shot · Middle8%p8.8 | 37.7 Impact 37.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -11.9p2442.9% MiddleWPA -2p4857.1% | 29.1 Versatility 29.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp28.842.9% Middlep29.457.1% | |
| 57 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 1 | 82 | 13.67 | 27.8 Scout Score 27.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay31.250% Middle22.733.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 33.5 Bowling Production 33.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.33 econp42.650% Middle0w · 16 econp19.933.3% | 20.6 Quality 20.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay11%p16.7 False-shot · Middle8%p26.5 | 12.8 Impact 12.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -24.7p11.550% MiddleWPA -17.2p14.733.3% | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4450% Middlep20.633.3% | |
| 58 | RA pace | 19 | 12.0 | 1 | 138 | 11.5 | 22.7 Scout Score 22.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay14.158.3% Middle47.516.7% Death26.425% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p37.71.01× | 16.9 Bowling Production 16.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.43 econp12.358.3% Middle0w · 7 econp40.716.7% Death0w · 14.67 econp11.625% | 22.1 Quality 22.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p13.5 False-shot · Middle25%p52 | 20.5 Impact 20.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -28.8p7.358.3% MiddleWPA +3.9p57.816.7% DeathWPA -7.5p26.425% | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp16.558.3% Middlep5016.7% Deathp64.525% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 24 | 16.0 | 8 | 89 | 5.56 | 94.6 Phase Production 94.6 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.655× parp9936.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp88.542.1% Boundary %12%p9921.1% | 99 Quality 99 = false-shots induced False-shot %45% | 99 Impact 99 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+96 | 91.7 Versatility 91.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.930% Econ vs LHBp94.830% Wkt vs RHBp96.920% Wkt vs LHBp7420% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 5 | 28 | 5.6 | 93 Phase Production 93 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.66× parp86.536.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp9942.1% Boundary %10%p92.721.1% | 67.7 Quality 67.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 88.5 Impact 88.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+27.7 | 84.8 Versatility 84.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.530% Econ vs LHBp7430% Wkt vs RHBp9920% Wkt vs LHBp84.420% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 31 | 6.0 | 5 | 33 | 5.5 | 91.4 Phase Production 91.4 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.648× parp92.736.8% Wicket rate0.83/ovp94.842.1% Boundary %14%p82.321.1% | 28.1 Quality 28.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 86.5 Impact 86.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+27.6 | 77.5 Versatility 77.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp94.830% Econ vs LHBp42.730% Wkt vs RHBp90.620% Wkt vs LHBp90.620% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 26 | 14.0 | 9 | 101 | 7.21 | 89.3 Phase Production 89.3 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.85× parp82.336.8% Wicket rate0.64/ovp96.942.1% Boundary %17%p86.521.1% | 88.5 Quality 88.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %37% | 92.7 Impact 92.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+49.5 | 85.2 Versatility 85.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp92.730% Econ vs LHBp67.730% Wkt vs RHBp86.520% Wkt vs LHBp9920% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 27 | 18.0 | 8 | 129 | 7.17 | 87.2 Phase Production 87.2 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.844× parp88.536.8% Wicket rate0.44/ovp84.442.1% Boundary %17%p90.621.1% | 92.7 Quality 92.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 96.9 Impact 96.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+59.1 | 70.8 Versatility 70.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.930% Econ vs LHBp9930% Wkt vs RHBp92.720% Wkt vs LHBp42.720% | |
| 6 | RA pace | 32 | 4.0 | 3 | 22 | 5.5 | 84.4 Phase Production 84.4 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.648× parp80.236.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp91.742.1% Boundary %12%p77.121.1% | 33.3 Quality 33.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 90.6 Impact 90.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+34.2 | 77.7 Versatility 77.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7430% Econ vs LHBp7630% Wkt vs RHBp68.820% Wkt vs LHBp94.820% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 3.0 | 2 | 13 | 4.33 | 80.6 Phase Production 80.6 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.511× parp84.436.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp81.242.1% Boundary %11%p72.921.1% | 59.4 Quality 59.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 55.2 Impact 55.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.1 | 72.9 Versatility 72.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp90.630% Econ vs LHBp65.630% Wkt vs RHBp84.420% Wkt vs LHBp45.820% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 35 | 8.0 | 3 | 48 | 6 | 79.4 Phase Production 79.4 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.707× parp94.836.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp61.542.1% Boundary %15%p88.521.1% | 96.9 Quality 96.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %44% | 53.1 Impact 53.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.6 | 69.6 Versatility 69.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4930% Econ vs LHBp96.930% Wkt vs RHBp80.220% Wkt vs LHBp4920% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 7.0 | 3 | 52 | 7.43 | 79.1 Phase Production 79.1 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.875× parp7636.8% Wicket rate0.43/ovp7442.1% Boundary %12%p94.821.1% | 24 Quality 24 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 69.8 Impact 69.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.7 | 57.7 Versatility 57.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp44.830% Econ vs LHBp80.230% Wkt vs RHBp94.820% Wkt vs LHBp6.220% | |
| 10 | Off-spin | 29 | 4.0 | 3 | 30 | 7.5 | 75.6 Phase Production 75.6 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.884× parp63.536.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp91.742.1% Boundary %17%p64.621.1% | 52.1 Quality 52.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 82.3 Impact 82.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+23.7 | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.130% Econ vs LHBp84.430% Wkt vs RHBp34.420% Wkt vs LHBp96.920% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 32 | 17.0 | 5 | 120 | 7.06 | 72.6 Phase Production 72.6 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.832× parp90.636.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp5142.1% Boundary %18%p84.421.1% | 90.6 Quality 90.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 80.2 Impact 80.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+21.4 | 73.5 Versatility 73.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp84.430% Econ vs LHBp92.730% Wkt vs RHBp13.520% Wkt vs LHBp88.520% | |
| 12 | Off-spin | 33 | 5.0 | 2 | 36 | 7.2 | 72.6 Phase Production 72.6 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.848× parp7436.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp67.742.1% Boundary %13%p80.221.1% | 1 Quality 1 = false-shots induced False-shot %10% | 74 Impact 74 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+12.5 | 64.8 Versatility 64.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp57.330% Econ vs LHBp71.930% Wkt vs RHBp68.820% Wkt vs LHBp61.520% | |
| 13 | LA pace | 28 | 5.0 | 2 | 38 | 7.6 | 64.1 Phase Production 64.1 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.896× parp65.636.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp67.742.1% Boundary %20%p54.221.1% | 7.3 Quality 7.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 78.1 Impact 78.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15.9 | 64.7 Versatility 64.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7630% Econ vs LHBp52.130% Wkt vs RHBp5120% Wkt vs LHBp80.220% | |
| 14 | Off-spin | 21 | 5.0 | 2 | 39 | 7.8 | 61.8 Phase Production 61.8 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.919× parp59.436.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp67.742.1% Boundary %20%p54.221.1% | 42.7 Quality 42.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 42.7 Impact 42.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.4 | 50.6 Versatility 50.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp19.830% Econ vs LHBp86.530% Wkt vs RHBp82.320% Wkt vs LHBp11.520% | |
| 15 | Off-spin | 32 | 7.0 | 4 | 69 | 9.86 | 59.3 Phase Production 59.3 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.162× parp27.136.8% Wicket rate0.57/ovp86.542.1% Boundary %19%p61.521.1% | 65.6 Quality 65.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 40.6 Impact 40.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.8 | 50.3 Versatility 50.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.730% Econ vs LHBp21.930% Wkt vs RHBp63.520% Wkt vs LHBp92.720% | |
| 16 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 2 | 34 | 8.5 | 58.7 Phase Production 58.7 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.002× parp5136.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp7642.1% Boundary %25%p37.521.1% | 26 Quality 26 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 84.4 Impact 84.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+24.9 | 54.3 Versatility 54.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp55.230% Econ vs LHBp52.130% Wkt vs RHBp88.520% Wkt vs LHBp21.920% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 13.0 | 2 | 70 | 5.38 | 58.3 Phase Production 58.3 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.635× parp96.936.8% Wicket rate0.16/ovp5.242.1% Boundary %13%p96.921.1% | 21.9 Quality 21.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 94.8 Impact 94.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+53 | 68.8 Versatility 68.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9930% Econ vs LHBp82.330% Wkt vs RHBp120% Wkt vs LHBp70.820% | |
| 18 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 3.0 | 2 | 27 | 9 | 57.7 Phase Production 57.7 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.061× parp44.836.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp81.242.1% Boundary %28%p33.321.1% | 70.8 Quality 70.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 32.3 Impact 32.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.2 | 59.4 Versatility 59.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp69.830% Econ vs LHBp2430% Wkt vs RHBp78.120% Wkt vs LHBp78.120% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 31 | 12.0 | 5 | 111 | 9.25 | 56.4 Phase Production 56.4 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.09× parp40.636.8% Wicket rate0.41/ovp78.142.1% Boundary %24%p40.621.1% | 61.5 Quality 61.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 61.5 Impact 61.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.2 | 51.5 Versatility 51.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp38.530% Econ vs LHBp30.230% Wkt vs RHBp71.920% Wkt vs LHBp82.320% | |
| 20 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 5.0 | 2 | 45 | 9 | 55.6 Phase Production 55.6 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.061× parp42.736.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp67.742.1% Boundary %20%p54.221.1% | 7.3 Quality 7.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 76 Impact 76 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+12.7 | 51.5 Versatility 51.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp65.630% Econ vs LHBp19.830% Wkt vs RHBp53.120% Wkt vs LHBp7620% | |
| 21 | Off-spin | 25 | 5.0 | 1 | 39 | 7.8 | 53.2 Phase Production 53.2 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.919× parp59.436.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp40.642.1% Boundary %17%p67.721.1% | 7.3 Quality 7.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 49 Impact 49 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3 | 53.3 Versatility 53.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp82.330% Econ vs LHBp38.530% Wkt vs RHBp20.820% Wkt vs LHBp64.620% | |
| 22 | SLA orthodox | — | 6.0 | 2 | 52 | 8.67 | 52.9 Phase Production 52.9 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.021× parp4936.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp59.442.1% Boundary %22%p46.921.1% | 36.5 Quality 36.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 57.3 Impact 57.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7 | 49.2 Versatility 49.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.130% Econ vs LHBp44.830% Wkt vs RHBp59.420% Wkt vs LHBp39.620% | |
| 23 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 1 | 39 | 7.8 | 50.4 Phase Production 50.4 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.919× parp59.436.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp40.642.1% Boundary %20%p54.221.1% | 84.4 Quality 84.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 46.9 Impact 46.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.1 | 56 Versatility 56 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp78.130% Econ vs LHBp4930% Wkt vs RHBp30.220% Wkt vs LHBp59.420% | |
| 24 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 3.0 | 0 | 20 | 6.67 | 49.8 Phase Production 49.8 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.786× parp69.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.842.1% Boundary %11%p72.921.1% | 16.7 Quality 16.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 67.7 Impact 67.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.1 | 48.1 Versatility 48.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp88.530% Econ vs LHBp32.330% Wkt vs RHBp34.420% Wkt vs LHBp2520% | |
| 25 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 8.0 | 2 | 66 | 8.25 | 49.1 Phase Production 49.1 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.972× parp55.236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp45.842.1% Boundary %23%p44.821.1% | 55.2 Quality 55.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 51 Impact 51 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.9 | 51.2 Versatility 51.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.930% Econ vs LHBp34.430% Wkt vs RHBp2620% Wkt vs LHBp70.820% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 4.0 | 0 | 25 | 6.25 | 48.5 Phase Production 48.5 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.736× parp78.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp8.342.1% Boundary %12%p77.121.1% | 52.1 Quality 52.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 65.6 Impact 65.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.8 | 50.6 Versatility 50.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp61.530% Econ vs LHBp78.130% Wkt vs RHBp9.420% Wkt vs LHBp34.420% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 22 | 8.5 | 2 | 78 | 8.83 | 45.1 Phase Production 45.1 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp46.936.8% Wicket rate0.23/ovp36.542.1% Boundary %21%p59.421.1% | 94.8 Quality 94.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 28.1 Impact 28.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.9 | 41.7 Versatility 41.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp36.530% Econ vs LHBp59.430% Wkt vs RHBp55.220% Wkt vs LHBp9.420% | |
| 28 | Leg-spin | 16 | 4.0 | 0 | 28 | 7 | 43.6 Phase Production 43.6 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.825× parp71.936.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp8.342.1% Boundary %17%p64.621.1% | 33.3 Quality 33.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 59.4 Impact 59.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7.2 | 44.8 Versatility 44.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5130% Econ vs LHBp69.830% Wkt vs RHBp28.120% Wkt vs LHBp14.620% | |
| 29 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 1 | 31 | 10.33 | 42.6 Phase Production 42.6 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.218× parp32.336.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp56.242.1% Boundary %28%p33.321.1% | 16.7 Quality 16.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 11.5 Impact 11.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-24.7 | 44 Versatility 44 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp17.730% Econ vs LHBp61.530% Wkt vs RHBp61.520% Wkt vs LHBp39.620% | |
| 30 | Off-spin | 26 | 4.0 | 1 | 39 | 9.75 | 41.9 Phase Production 41.9 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.149× parp36.536.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp4942.1% Boundary %25%p37.521.1% | 11.5 Quality 11.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 17.7 Impact 17.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.8 | 46.2 Versatility 46.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2630% Econ vs LHBp57.330% Wkt vs RHBp41.720% Wkt vs LHBp64.620% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 29 | 5.0 | 1 | 48 | 9.6 | 40.3 Phase Production 40.3 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.131× parp38.536.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp40.642.1% Boundary %23%p42.721.1% | 42.7 Quality 42.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 44.8 Impact 44.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.8 | 40.6 Versatility 40.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2430% Econ vs LHBp63.530% Wkt vs RHBp57.320% Wkt vs LHBp14.620% | |
| 32 | Off-spin | 28 | 7.0 | 0 | 54 | 7.71 | 40.1 Phase Production 40.1 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.909× parp67.736.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp142.1% Boundary %17%p69.821.1% | 46.9 Quality 46.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 63.5 Impact 63.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.6 | 36.9 Versatility 36.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp21.930% Econ vs LHBp88.530% Wkt vs RHBp15.620% Wkt vs LHBp3.120% | |
| 33 | LA pace | 16 | 14.0 | 3 | 121 | 8.64 | 40 Phase Production 40 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.018× parp53.136.8% Wicket rate0.22/ovp2442.1% Boundary %21%p4921.1% | 80.2 Quality 80.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 30.2 Impact 30.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.2 | 39.8 Versatility 39.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.130% Econ vs LHBp90.630% Wkt vs RHBp38.520% Wkt vs LHBp19.820% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 33 | 7.0 | 2 | 69 | 9.86 | 38.7 Phase Production 38.7 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.162× parp27.136.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp53.142.1% Boundary %26%p30.221.1% | 57.3 Quality 57.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 71.9 Impact 71.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+12 | 37.1 Versatility 37.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp34.430% Econ vs LHBp28.130% Wkt vs RHBp5.220% Wkt vs LHBp86.520% | |
| 35 | Off-spin | 23 | 5.0 | 2 | 57 | 11.4 | 34.7 Phase Production 34.7 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.343× parp11.536.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp67.742.1% Boundary %33%p9.421.1% | 42.7 Quality 42.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 19.8 Impact 19.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13 | 36.1 Versatility 36.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.630% Econ vs LHBp17.730% Wkt vs RHBp7520% Wkt vs LHBp57.320% | |
| 36 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 8.0 | 2 | 79 | 9.88 | 32.9 Phase Production 32.9 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.164× parp2436.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp45.842.1% Boundary %27%p22.921.1% | 63.5 Quality 63.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 26 Impact 26 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.2 | 37.1 Versatility 37.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp32.330% Econ vs LHBp2630% Wkt vs RHBp44.820% Wkt vs LHBp53.120% | |
| 37 | Off-spin | 26 | 2.0 | 0 | 22 | 11 | 28.7 Phase Production 28.7 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.296× parp30.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.142.1% Boundary %33%p27.121.1% | 30.2 Quality 30.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 38.5 Impact 38.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4 | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp67.730% Econ vs LHBp9.430% Wkt vs RHBp46.920% Wkt vs LHBp30.220% | |
| 38 | RA pace | 23 | 3.0 | 1 | 39 | 13 | 28.7 Phase Production 28.7 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.532× parp9.436.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp56.242.1% Boundary %39%p7.321.1% | 70.8 Quality 70.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 15.6 Impact 15.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.2 | 39.4 Versatility 39.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp59.430% Econ vs LHBp5.230% Wkt vs RHBp7520% Wkt vs LHBp2520% | |
| 39 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 2.0 | 0 | 26 | 13 | 24.1 Phase Production 24.1 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.532× parp17.736.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.142.1% Boundary %33%p27.121.1% | 19.8 Quality 19.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 3.1 Impact 3.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-34.3 | 32.6 Versatility 32.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.630% Econ vs LHBp40.630% Wkt vs RHBp34.420% Wkt vs LHBp45.820% | |
| 40 | LA pace | 22 | 9.0 | 2 | 92 | 10.22 | 22.9 Phase Production 22.9 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.205× parp15.636.8% Wicket rate0.22/ovp33.342.1% Boundary %28%p14.621.1% | 76 Quality 76 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 34.4 Impact 34.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.6 | 28.5 Versatility 28.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7.330% Econ vs LHBp36.530% Wkt vs RHBp9.420% Wkt vs LHBp67.720% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 26 | 9.0 | 2 | 95 | 10.56 | 22.1 Phase Production 22.1 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.244× parp13.536.8% Wicket rate0.22/ovp33.342.1% Boundary %28%p14.621.1% | 86.5 Quality 86.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %39% | 9.4 Impact 9.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-25.9 | 27.9 Versatility 27.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp30.230% Econ vs LHBp11.530% Wkt vs RHBp4920% Wkt vs LHBp28.120% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 22 | 11.0 | 2 | 103 | 9.36 | 21.7 Phase Production 21.7 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.103× parp34.436.8% Wicket rate0.18/ovp15.642.1% Boundary %27%p11.521.1% | 49 Quality 49 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 21.9 Impact 21.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.1 | 37.1 Versatility 37.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp63.530% Econ vs LHBp15.630% Wkt vs RHBp65.620% Wkt vs LHBp120% | |
| 43 | Off-spin | 24 | 3.0 | 0 | 35 | 11.67 | 21 Phase Production 21 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.375× parp21.936.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.842.1% Boundary %33%p19.821.1% | 38.5 Quality 38.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 24 Impact 24 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.9 | 28.8 Versatility 28.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9.430% Econ vs LHBp46.930% Wkt vs RHBp41.720% Wkt vs LHBp17.720% | |
| 44 | LA pace | 31 | 8.0 | 1 | 82 | 10.25 | 17.4 Phase Production 17.4 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.208× parp19.836.8% Wicket rate0.13/ovp12.542.1% Boundary %27%p22.921.1% | 82.3 Quality 82.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 36.5 Impact 36.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.1 | 35.8 Versatility 35.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp80.230% Econ vs LHBp3.130% Wkt vs RHBp3.120% Wkt vs LHBp5120% | |
| 45 | SLA orthodox | 35 | 2.0 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 14.4 Phase Production 14.4 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.768× parp5.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.142.1% Boundary %50%p3.121.1% | 3.1 Quality 3.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 13.5 Impact 13.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-20.2 | 32.7 Versatility 32.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp130% Econ vs LHBp55.230% Wkt vs RHBp2420% Wkt vs LHBp55.220% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 19 | 7.0 | 1 | 80 | 11.43 | 12.3 Phase Production 12.3 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.347× parp3.136.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp17.742.1% Boundary %29%p17.721.1% | 13.5 Quality 13.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 7.3 Impact 7.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-28.8 | 16.5 Versatility 16.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5.230% Econ vs LHBp13.530% Wkt vs RHBp17.720% Wkt vs LHBp36.520% | |
| 47 | RA pace | 23 | 8.0 | 1 | 112 | 14 | 5.9 Phase Production 5.9 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.65× parp136.8% Wicket rate0.13/ovp12.542.1% Boundary %42%p121.1% | 74 Quality 74 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 1 Impact 1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-58.7 | 12.1 Versatility 12.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp11.530% Econ vs LHBp130% Wkt vs RHBp9.420% Wkt vs LHBp32.320% | |
| 48 | RA pace | 19 | 6.0 | 0 | 68 | 11.33 | 5.1 Phase Production 5.1 vs all bowlers · n=48 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.335× parp7.336.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.142.1% Boundary %33%p5.221.1% | 78.1 Quality 78.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 5.2 Impact 5.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-31.7 | 20.1 Versatility 20.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.730% Econ vs LHBp7.330% Wkt vs RHBp20.820% Wkt vs LHBp6.220% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 17.0 | 8 | 99 | 5.82 | 97.3 Phase Production 97.3 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.742× parp9944.1% Wicket rate0.47/ovp95.144.1% Boundary %8%p9911.8% | 69.6 Quality 69.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 95.1 Impact 95.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+53 | 85.3 Versatility 85.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp97.150% Econ vs LHBp73.550% | |
| 2 | Off-spin | 25 | 16.0 | 10 | 105 | 6.56 | 90.4 Phase Production 90.4 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.836× parp87.344.1% Wicket rate0.62/ovp97.144.1% Boundary %10%p77.511.8% | 45.1 Quality 45.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 97.1 Impact 97.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+53.6 | 74.5 Versatility 74.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.950% Econ vs LHBp95.150% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 35 | 8.0 | 4 | 54 | 6.75 | 81.6 Phase Production 81.6 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.86× parp73.544.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp88.244.1% Boundary %6%p87.311.8% | 11.8 Quality 11.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 46.1 Impact 46.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3 | 69.6 Versatility 69.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp69.650% Econ vs LHBp69.650% | |
| 4 | Off-spin | 29 | 12.0 | 4 | 78 | 6.5 | 81.4 Phase Production 81.4 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.828× parp85.344.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp75.544.1% Boundary %8%p89.211.8% | 6.9 Quality 6.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 87.3 Impact 87.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+37.1 | 83.3 Versatility 83.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp79.450% Econ vs LHBp87.350% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | — | 10.0 | 3 | 56 | 5.6 | 80.4 Phase Production 80.4 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.713× parp95.144.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp65.744.1% Boundary %8%p80.411.8% | 81.4 Quality 81.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 77.5 Impact 77.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+20.6 | 78.4 Versatility 78.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp95.150% Econ vs LHBp61.850% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | 28 | 8.0 | 7 | 58 | 7.25 | 79.2 Phase Production 79.2 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.923× parp63.744.1% Wicket rate0.88/ovp9944.1% Boundary %12%p62.711.8% | 91.2 Quality 91.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 63.7 Impact 63.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.2 | 65.2 Versatility 65.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp47.150% Econ vs LHBp83.350% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 8.0 | 4 | 55 | 6.88 | 77.9 Phase Production 77.9 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.876× parp71.644.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp88.244.1% Boundary %12%p62.711.8% | 11.8 Quality 11.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 65.7 Impact 65.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.3 | 70.6 Versatility 70.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp75.550% Econ vs LHBp65.750% | |
| 8 | Off-spin | 23 | 10.0 | 5 | 73 | 7.3 | 76.2 Phase Production 76.2 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.93× parp65.744.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp91.244.1% Boundary %13%p59.811.8% | 72.5 Quality 72.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 75.5 Impact 75.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+19.2 | 68.6 Versatility 68.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp59.850% Econ vs LHBp77.550% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 22 | 3.0 | 2 | 16 | 5.33 | 75.7 Phase Production 75.7 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.679× parp67.644.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp85.344.1% Boundary %6%p69.611.8% | 78.4 Quality 78.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 99 Impact 99 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+78.2 | 64.7 Versatility 64.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.650% Econ vs LHBp57.850% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 17.5 | 5 | 113 | 6.34 | 75.5 Phase Production 75.5 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.807× parp93.144.1% Wicket rate0.28/ovp57.844.1% Boundary %11%p75.511.8% | 18.6 Quality 18.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 93.1 Impact 93.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+46.7 | 86.3 Versatility 86.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp87.350% Econ vs LHBp85.350% | |
| 11 | Leg-spin | 23 | 22.3 | 10 | 175 | 7.78 | 73.5 Phase Production 73.5 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.991× parp61.844.1% Wicket rate0.44/ovp93.144.1% Boundary %16%p44.111.8% | 20.6 Quality 20.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 59.8 Impact 59.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.1 | 55.9 Versatility 55.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp77.550% Econ vs LHBp34.350% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | — | 10.0 | 2 | 53 | 5.3 | 71.3 Phase Production 71.3 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.675× parp97.144.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp39.244.1% Boundary %7%p95.111.8% | 48 Quality 48 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 73.5 Impact 73.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15.4 | 81.4 Versatility 81.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp91.250% Econ vs LHBp71.650% | |
| 13 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 14.0 | 3 | 88 | 6.29 | 67.8 Phase Production 67.8 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.801× parp89.244.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp42.244.1% Boundary %10%p83.311.8% | 57.8 Quality 57.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 91.2 Impact 91.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+39.8 | 76.5 Versatility 76.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp93.150% Econ vs LHBp59.850% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 9.1 | 2 | 60 | 6.55 | 64.9 Phase Production 64.9 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.834× parp83.344.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp44.144.1% Boundary %9%p73.511.8% | 30.4 Quality 30.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 79.4 Impact 79.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+29.4 | 77.5 Versatility 77.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp73.550% Econ vs LHBp81.450% | |
| 15 | LA pace | 31 | 2.0 | 1 | 11 | 5.5 | 63.7 Phase Production 63.7 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.7× parp56.944.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp72.544.1% Boundary %8%p55.911.8% | 89.2 Quality 89.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %50% | 55.9 Impact 55.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1 | 59.8 Versatility 59.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp44.150% Econ vs LHBp75.550% | |
| 16 | LA pace | 28 | 2.0 | 1 | 11 | 5.5 | 63.7 Phase Production 63.7 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.7× parp56.944.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp72.544.1% Boundary %8%p55.911.8% | 26.5 Quality 26.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 67.6 Impact 67.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9 | 58.8 Versatility 58.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp65.750% Econ vs LHBp5250% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 1 | 29 | 5.8 | 62.9 Phase Production 62.9 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.739× parp77.544.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp46.144.1% Boundary %7%p71.611.8% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 83.3 Impact 83.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+32.2 | 68.6 Versatility 68.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp83.350% Econ vs LHBp53.950% | |
| 18 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 13.0 | 4 | 102 | 7.85 | 61.4 Phase Production 61.4 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.999× parp53.944.1% Wicket rate0.31/ovp67.644.1% Boundary %13%p65.711.8% | 53.9 Quality 53.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 81.4 Impact 81.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+30.5 | 52.9 Versatility 52.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp89.250% Econ vs LHBp16.750% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 29 | 7.0 | 1 | 44 | 6.29 | 59.4 Phase Production 59.4 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.801× parp81.444.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp28.444.1% Boundary %5%p93.111.8% | 65.7 Quality 65.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 71.6 Impact 71.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+13.2 | 68.1 Versatility 68.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp47.150% Econ vs LHBp89.250% | |
| 20 | Off-spin | 21 | 19.0 | 5 | 147 | 7.74 | 57.2 Phase Production 57.2 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.985× parp59.844.1% Wicket rate0.26/ovp55.944.1% Boundary %15%p5211.8% | 55.9 Quality 55.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 6.9 Impact 6.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-24.7 | 52.9 Versatility 52.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6.950% Econ vs LHBp9950% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | 17 | 3.0 | 1 | 21 | 7 | 55.2 Phase Production 55.2 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.891× parp5044.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp61.844.1% Boundary %11%p5011.8% | 36.3 Quality 36.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 69.6 Impact 69.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+12.9 | 53.9 Versatility 53.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5250% Econ vs LHBp55.950% | |
| 22 | Off-spin | 33 | 5.0 | 2 | 48 | 9.6 | 52.4 Phase Production 52.4 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.223× parp30.444.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp78.444.1% Boundary %20%p37.311.8% | 14.7 Quality 14.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 61.8 Impact 61.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.5 | 29.4 Versatility 29.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.450% Econ vs LHBp30.450% | |
| 23 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 19.0 | 1 | 122 | 6.42 | 52.1 Phase Production 52.1 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.818× parp91.244.1% Wicket rate0.05/ovp144.1% Boundary %9%p97.111.8% | 4.9 Quality 4.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 85.3 Impact 85.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+36.5 | 69.6 Versatility 69.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9950% Econ vs LHBp40.250% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 19 | 8.0 | 2 | 62 | 7.75 | 50.4 Phase Production 50.4 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.987× parp5244.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp5044.1% Boundary %15%p46.111.8% | 99 Quality 99 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 52 Impact 52 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.2 | 52 Versatility 52 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp55.950% Econ vs LHBp4850% | |
| 25 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 13.0 | 2 | 92 | 7.08 | 49.8 Phase Production 49.8 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.901× parp75.544.1% Wicket rate0.16/ovp14.744.1% Boundary %9%p85.311.8% | 67.6 Quality 67.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 36.3 Impact 36.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.1 | 73.5 Versatility 73.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp67.650% Econ vs LHBp79.450% | |
| 26 | Off-spin | 26 | 16.0 | 2 | 114 | 7.12 | 49.2 Phase Production 49.2 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.907× parp79.444.1% Wicket rate0.13/ovp7.844.1% Boundary %9%p91.211.8% | 40.2 Quality 40.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 89.2 Impact 89.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+39 | 62.7 Versatility 62.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp32.450% Econ vs LHBp93.150% | |
| 27 | SLA orthodox | — | 12.4 | 5 | 123 | 9.71 | 47.9 Phase Production 47.9 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.237× parp18.644.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp83.344.1% Boundary %20%p24.511.8% | 32.4 Quality 32.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 4.9 Impact 4.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-27.8 | 19.6 Versatility 19.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp12.750% Econ vs LHBp26.550% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 3.0 | 1 | 29 | 9.67 | 46.3 Phase Production 46.3 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.231× parp34.344.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp61.844.1% Boundary %22%p33.311.8% | 93.1 Quality 93.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %44% | 28.4 Impact 28.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.2 | 36.3 Versatility 36.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp30.450% Econ vs LHBp42.250% | |
| 29 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 1 | 33 | 8.25 | 45.9 Phase Production 45.9 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.051× parp38.244.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp52.944.1% Boundary %12%p4811.8% | 42.2 Quality 42.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 40.2 Impact 40.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.9 | 45.1 Versatility 45.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp26.550% Econ vs LHBp63.750% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 22 | 3.0 | 1 | 30 | 10 | 45.4 Phase Production 45.4 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.274× parp32.444.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp61.844.1% Boundary %22%p33.311.8% | 78.4 Quality 78.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 53.9 Impact 53.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.7 | 28.4 Versatility 28.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp24.550% Econ vs LHBp32.450% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 18 | 4.0 | 2 | 48 | 12 | 43.3 Phase Production 43.3 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.528× parp12.744.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.444.1% Boundary %29%p14.711.8% | 86.3 Quality 86.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 18.6 Impact 18.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.9 | 15.7 Versatility 15.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp22.550% Econ vs LHBp8.850% | |
| 32 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 10.0 | 0 | 71 | 7.1 | 41.5 Phase Production 41.5 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.904× parp69.644.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2.944.1% Boundary %8%p80.411.8% | 1 Quality 1 = false-shots induced False-shot %7% | 44.1 Impact 44.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.1 | 63.7 Versatility 63.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.450% Econ vs LHBp46.150% | |
| 33 | LA pace | 22 | 5.0 | 2 | 62 | 12.4 | 41.1 Phase Production 41.1 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.579× parp4.944.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp78.444.1% Boundary %20%p37.311.8% | 95.1 Quality 95.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 1 Impact 1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-47.8 | 31.4 Versatility 31.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp61.850% Econ vs LHBp150% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 19 | 2.0 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 40.7 Phase Production 40.7 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.891× parp44.144.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp33.344.1% Boundary %8%p55.911.8% | 52 Quality 52 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 57.8 Impact 57.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.9 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5050% Econ vs LHBp5050% | |
| 35 | Off-spin | 32 | 10.0 | 2 | 83 | 8.3 | 38.1 Phase Production 38.1 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.057× parp40.244.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp39.244.1% Boundary %20%p26.511.8% | 72.5 Quality 72.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 30.4 Impact 30.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.8 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp63.750% Econ vs LHBp36.350% | |
| 36 | SLA orthodox | 31 | 12.0 | 2 | 98 | 8.17 | 36.9 Phase Production 36.9 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.04× parp42.244.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp23.544.1% Boundary %12%p67.611.8% | 16.7 Quality 16.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.2 | 53.9 Versatility 53.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.350% Econ vs LHBp22.550% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 26 | 9.0 | 3 | 96 | 10.67 | 36.5 Phase Production 36.5 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.358× parp10.844.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp69.644.1% Boundary %26%p8.811.8% | 83.3 Quality 83.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 20.6 Impact 20.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.8 | 12.7 Versatility 12.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.750% Econ vs LHBp10.850% | |
| 38 | Off-spin | 33 | 12.0 | 2 | 97 | 8.08 | 35.7 Phase Production 35.7 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.029× parp46.144.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp23.544.1% Boundary %15%p42.211.8% | 2.9 Quality 2.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 22.5 Impact 22.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.9 | 49 Versatility 49 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp150% Econ vs LHBp97.150% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 0 | 23 | 11.5 | 30.7 Phase Production 30.7 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.465× parp28.444.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp33.344.1% Boundary %25%p29.411.8% | 75.5 Quality 75.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 26.5 Impact 26.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.3 | 28.4 Versatility 28.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp18.650% Econ vs LHBp38.250% | |
| 40 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 5.0 | 0 | 38 | 7.6 | 30.7 Phase Production 30.7 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.968× parp4844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp10.844.1% Boundary %17%p40.211.8% | 63.7 Quality 63.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 42.2 Impact 42.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.4 | 51 Versatility 51 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp57.850% Econ vs LHBp44.150% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 32 | 4.0 | 1 | 50 | 12.5 | 28.1 Phase Production 28.1 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.592× parp8.844.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp52.944.1% Boundary %33%p6.911.8% | 86.3 Quality 86.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16.2 | 14.7 Versatility 14.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp16.750% Econ vs LHBp12.750% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 26 | 2.0 | 0 | 25 | 12.5 | 27.2 Phase Production 27.2 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.592× parp20.644.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp33.344.1% Boundary %25%p29.411.8% | 26.5 Quality 26.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 34.3 Impact 34.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.2 | 28.4 Versatility 28.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp42.250% Econ vs LHBp14.750% | |
| 43 | RA pace | 23 | 4.2 | 1 | 58 | 13.38 | 22.8 Phase Production 22.8 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.705× parp2.944.1% Wicket rate0.23/ovp4844.1% Boundary %35%p2.911.8% | 61.8 Quality 61.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 38.2 Impact 38.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.1 | 13.7 Versatility 13.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2.950% Econ vs LHBp24.550% | |
| 44 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 0 | 32 | 10.67 | 22.3 Phase Production 22.3 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.358× parp26.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.644.1% Boundary %28%p20.611.8% | 36.3 Quality 36.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 32.4 Impact 32.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.8 | 24.5 Versatility 24.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp20.650% Econ vs LHBp28.450% | |
| 45 | Off-spin | 26 | 16.0 | 2 | 138 | 8.62 | 21.4 Phase Production 21.4 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.098× parp36.344.1% Wicket rate0.13/ovp7.844.1% Boundary %21%p16.711.8% | 45.1 Quality 45.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 24.5 Impact 24.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.5 | 48 Versatility 48 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4.950% Econ vs LHBp91.250% | |
| 46 | Leg-spin | 16 | 7.1 | 1 | 73 | 10.19 | 20.3 Phase Production 20.3 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.297× parp16.744.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp26.544.1% Boundary %26%p10.811.8% | 59.8 Quality 59.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 8.8 Impact 8.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-22.2 | 26.5 Versatility 26.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp34.350% Econ vs LHBp18.650% | |
| 47 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 32 | 16 | 19.9 Phase Production 19.9 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy2.038× parp6.944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp33.344.1% Boundary %33%p18.611.8% | 26.5 Quality 26.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 14.7 Impact 14.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.2 | 20.6 Versatility 20.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp36.350% Econ vs LHBp4.950% | |
| 48 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 0 | 33 | 11 | 19.7 Phase Production 19.7 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.401× parp22.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.644.1% Boundary %33%p12.711.8% | 36.3 Quality 36.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 12.7 Impact 12.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.8 | 38.2 Versatility 38.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8.850% Econ vs LHBp67.650% | |
| 49 | Off-spin | 24 | 4.0 | 0 | 42 | 10.5 | 19.1 Phase Production 19.1 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.337× parp24.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp12.744.1% Boundary %25%p22.511.8% | 8.8 Quality 8.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 48 Impact 48 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2 | 29.4 Versatility 29.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp38.250% Econ vs LHBp20.650% | |
| 50 | RA pace | 31 | 3.0 | 0 | 37 | 12.33 | 15.3 Phase Production 15.3 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.571× parp14.744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.644.1% Boundary %39%p4.911.8% | 97.1 Quality 97.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %50% | 10.8 Impact 10.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-20.3 | 23.5 Versatility 23.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp40.250% Econ vs LHBp6.950% | |
| 51 | RA pace | 33 | 6.0 | 0 | 79 | 13.17 | 2.7 Phase Production 2.7 vs all bowlers · n=51 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.677× parp144.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp4.944.1% Boundary %33%p111.8% | 22.5 Quality 22.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 2.9 Impact 2.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-35.7 | 6.9 Versatility 6.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.850% Econ vs LHBp2.950% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 26 | 7.0 | 7 | 47 | 6.71 | 95.4 Phase Production 95.4 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.683× parp93.150% Wicket rate1.00/ovp98.616.7% Boundary %10%p97.233.3% | — | 79.2 Impact 79.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+29.9 | 48.5 Versatility 48.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep5040% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 26 | 7.0 | 4 | 46 | 6.57 | 90.7 Phase Production 90.7 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.669× parp95.850% Wicket rate0.57/ovp62.516.7% Boundary %10%p97.233.3% | — | 73.6 Impact 73.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+16.2 | 59.5 Versatility 59.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep77.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 3 | Leg-spin | 23 | 4.0 | 3 | 17 | 4.25 | 90.5 Phase Production 90.5 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.432× parp98.643.6% Boundary %8%p87.541.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp7514.5% | — | 95.8 Impact 95.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+59.2 | 83.3 Versatility 83.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep83.3100% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 31 | 5.0 | 3 | 31 | 6.2 | 86.1 Phase Production 86.1 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.631× parp87.550% Wicket rate0.60/ovp68.116.7% Boundary %7%p93.133.3% | — | 98.6 Impact 98.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+62 | 46.8 Versatility 46.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep12.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp97.526.7% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | — | 2.2 | 3 | 9 | 3.86 | 85.9 Phase Production 85.9 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.392× parp84.743.6% Boundary %7%p84.741.8% Wicket rate1.28/ovp93.114.5% | — | 56.9 Impact 56.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.1 | 83.3 Versatility 83.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep83.3100% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | 26 | 4.0 | 2 | 22 | 5.5 | 83.8 Phase Production 83.8 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.56× parp90.343.6% Boundary %4%p90.341.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp45.814.5% | — | 68.1 Impact 68.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+12.1 | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep60100% | |
| 7 | Off-spin | 23 | 2.0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 77 Phase Production 77 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.61× parp7543.6% Boundary %8%p77.841.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp80.614.5% | — | 70.8 Impact 70.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15.7 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 8 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 3.0 | 3 | 21 | 7 | 75.2 Phase Production 75.2 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.712× parp81.943.6% Boundary %17%p63.941.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp87.514.5% | — | 90.3 Impact 90.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+50.8 | 70 Versatility 70 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep70100% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 35 | 4.3 | 4 | 38 | 8.44 | 70.8 Phase Production 70.8 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.859× parp62.550% Wicket rate0.89/ovp90.316.7% Boundary %15%p73.633.3% | — | 76.4 Impact 76.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+21.8 | 57.5 Versatility 57.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep72.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 17 | 2.0 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 67.3 Phase Production 67.3 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.61× parp7543.6% Boundary %8%p77.841.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp13.914.5% | — | 62.5 Impact 62.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.1 | 55 Versatility 55 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep55100% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.5 | 2 | 47 | 8.06 | 66.8 Phase Production 66.8 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.82× parp79.243.6% Boundary %17%p68.141.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp26.414.5% | — | 87.5 Impact 87.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+45.1 | 26.7 Versatility 26.7 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep26.7100% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 4.0 | 1 | 33 | 8.25 | 65.8 Phase Production 65.8 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.839× parp65.343.6% Boundary %12%p81.941.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp20.814.5% | — | 54.2 Impact 54.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2 | 68.3 Versatility 68.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep68.3100% | |
| 13 | LA pace | 31 | 6.0 | 3 | 51 | 8.5 | 60.6 Phase Production 60.6 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.865× parp70.850% Wicket rate0.50/ovp43.116.7% Boundary %19%p54.233.3% | — | 31.9 Impact 31.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.7 | 64.5 Versatility 64.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep9040% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 14 | Off-spin | 28 | 3.0 | 1 | 25 | 8.33 | 57.4 Phase Production 57.4 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.848× parp59.743.6% Boundary %17%p63.941.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp31.914.5% | — | 93.1 Impact 93.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+53.4 | 35 Versatility 35 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep35100% | |
| 15 | Off-spin | 25 | 2.0 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 56.1 Phase Production 56.1 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.712× parp68.143.6% Boundary %17%p58.341.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp13.914.5% | — | 59.7 Impact 59.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.7 | 28.3 Versatility 28.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep28.3100% | |
| 16 | Off-spin | 32 | 2.0 | 1 | 20 | 10 | 51.7 Phase Production 51.7 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.017× parp44.443.6% Boundary %17%p58.341.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp54.214.5% | — | 23.6 Impact 23.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.7 | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep60100% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 22 | 6.0 | 1 | 57 | 9.5 | 51.2 Phase Production 51.2 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.967× parp54.250% Wicket rate0.17/ovp2.816.7% Boundary %17%p70.833.3% | — | 43.1 Impact 43.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.3 | 43.5 Versatility 43.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep37.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 32 | 8.0 | 4 | 77 | 9.62 | 49.5 Phase Production 49.5 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.979× parp51.450% Wicket rate0.50/ovp40.316.7% Boundary %21%p51.433.3% | — | 29.2 Impact 29.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.4 | 39.5 Versatility 39.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep27.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 19 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 2.0 | 1 | 18 | 9 | 47.2 Phase Production 47.2 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.916× parp56.943.6% Boundary %25%p34.741.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp54.214.5% | — | 48.6 Impact 48.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0 | 40 Versatility 40 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep40100% | |
| 20 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 2 | 20 | 10 | 47.2 Phase Production 47.2 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.017× parp44.450% Wicket rate1.00/ovp80.616.7% Boundary %25%p34.733.3% | — | 9.7 Impact 9.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-30.8 | 67.5 Versatility 67.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep97.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | — | 3.0 | 1 | 29 | 9.67 | 44.4 Phase Production 44.4 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.983× parp48.643.6% Boundary %22%p44.441.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp31.914.5% | — | 40.3 Impact 40.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.3 | 40 Versatility 40 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep40100% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 24 | 7.0 | 4 | 76 | 10.86 | 42.6 Phase Production 42.6 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.105× parp31.950% Wicket rate0.57/ovp62.516.7% Boundary %21%p48.633.3% | — | 81.9 Impact 81.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+30.1 | 48.5 Versatility 48.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep5040% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 23 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 2.0 | 1 | 21 | 10.5 | 40 Phase Production 40 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.068× parp40.343.6% Boundary %25%p34.741.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp54.214.5% | — | 45.8 Impact 45.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.6 | 28.3 Versatility 28.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep28.3100% | |
| 24 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 3.0 | 1 | 32 | 10.67 | 39.6 Phase Production 39.6 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.085× parp37.543.6% Boundary %22%p44.441.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp31.914.5% | — | 34.7 Impact 34.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.4 | 38.3 Versatility 38.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep38.3100% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 27 | 5.0 | 5 | 55 | 11 | 39.4 Phase Production 39.4 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.119× parp34.750% Wicket rate1.00/ovp95.816.7% Boundary %30%p18.133.3% | — | 51.4 Impact 51.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1 | 72.2 Versatility 72.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep67.540% Slower ballp97.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 22 | 7.0 | 5 | 81 | 11.57 | 30.6 Phase Production 30.6 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.177× parp23.650% Wicket rate0.71/ovp84.716.7% Boundary %29%p13.933.3% | — | 84.7 Impact 84.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+34.5 | 41.5 Versatility 41.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep32.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 33 | 4.5 | 3 | 59 | 12.21 | 30.1 Phase Production 30.1 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.242× parp20.850% Wicket rate0.62/ovp70.816.7% Boundary %28%p23.633.3% | — | 65.3 Impact 65.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.3 | 45.5 Versatility 45.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep42.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | 31 | 9.5 | 5 | 115 | 11.69 | 28.2 Phase Production 28.2 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.19× parp9.743.6% Boundary %22%p40.341.8% Wicket rate0.51/ovp48.614.5% | — | 1.4 Impact 1.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-70.3 | 33.3 Versatility 33.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep33.3100% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 22 | 4.0 | 3 | 49 | 12.25 | 28 Phase Production 28 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.246× parp26.450% Wicket rate0.75/ovp7516.7% Boundary %33%p6.933.3% | — | 20.8 Impact 20.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.3 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep12.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 32 | 2.0 | 0 | 28 | 14 | 26.6 Phase Production 26.6 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.424× parp29.250% Wicket rate0.00/ovp13.916.7% Boundary %33%p29.233.3% | — | 37.5 Impact 37.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.1 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep12.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 19 | 2.4 | 1 | 38 | 14.25 | 22.7 Phase Production 22.7 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.45× parp15.350% Wicket rate0.37/ovp37.516.7% Boundary %31%p26.433.3% | — | 18.1 Impact 18.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep12.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 23 | 7.0 | 4 | 85 | 12.14 | 21.3 Phase Production 21.3 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.235× parp12.550% Wicket rate0.57/ovp62.516.7% Boundary %29%p13.933.3% | — | 6.9 Impact 6.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-35.7 | 61.5 Versatility 61.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep82.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 33 | LA pace | 16 | 2.0 | 0 | 31 | 15.5 | 14.6 Phase Production 14.6 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.577× parp18.150% Wicket rate0.00/ovp13.916.7% Boundary %42%p9.733.3% | — | 12.5 Impact 12.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.7 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep12.540% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 19 | 3.0 | 0 | 44 | 14.67 | 11.6 Phase Production 11.6 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.492× parp6.950% Wicket rate0.00/ovp6.916.7% Boundary %33%p20.833.3% | — | 26.4 Impact 26.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.5 | 64.5 Versatility 64.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep9040% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 35 | LA pace | 28 | 6.0 | 2 | 93 | 15.5 | 5.1 Phase Production 5.1 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.577× parp1.450% Wicket rate0.34/ovp23.616.7% Boundary %44%p1.433.3% | — | 15.3 Impact 15.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16.7 | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6040% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 29 | 6.0 | 1 | 78 | 13 | 3.9 Phase Production 3.9 vs all bowlers · n=36 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.323× parp4.250% Wicket rate0.17/ovp2.816.7% Boundary %31%p4.233.3% | — | 4.2 Impact 4.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-50.9 | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep6040% Slower ballp47.533.3% Slow bouncerp47.526.7% |
Rohit Kumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
82.3
Scout Score
Overs 23.0 · Wkts 12 · Runs 165 · Econ 7.17
82.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay93.669.6%65.1
Death56.530.4%17.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p69.30.96×
Scout Score82.3
93.6Powerplay69.6% of overs · 8w · 5.56 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp94.638%
Impactp9927%
Qualityp9915%
Versatilityp91.710%
Trajectoryp69.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.655× par96bp9936.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov96bp88.542.1%
Boundary %12%96bp9921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.573× par44bp96.930%
Econ vs LHB0.719× par52bp94.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.68/ov44bp96.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.35/ov52bp7420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +96 · induced false-shot 45%
56.5Death30.4% of overs · 4w · 10.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.648%
Impactp81.925%
Versatilityp48.515%
Trajectoryp69.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.105× par42bp31.950%
Wicket rate0.57/ov42bp62.516.7%
Boundary %21%42bp48.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%42bp5040%
Slower ball042bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer042bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +30.1
Akhilesh Yadav
Bowler · SLA orthodox
81.5
Scout Score
Overs 17.2 · Wkts 11 · Runs 93 · Econ 5.37
81.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay86.228.8%24.8
Middle79.957.7%46.1
Death78.213.5%10.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p83.30.88×
Scout Score81.5
86.2Powerplay28.8% of overs · 5w · 5.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp9338%
Impactp88.527%
Qualityp67.715%
Versatilityp84.810%
Trajectoryp83.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.66× par30bp86.536.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov30bp9942.1%
Boundary %10%30bp92.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.752× par23bp86.530%
Econ vs LHB0.396× par7bp7430%
Wkt vs RHB1.04/ov23bp9920%
Wkt vs LHB0.86/ov7bp84.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +27.7 · induced false-shot 30%
79.9Middle57.7% of overs · 3w · 5.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp80.438%
Impactp77.525%
Qualityp81.415%
Versatilityp78.412%
Trajectoryp83.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.713× par60bp95.144.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp65.744.1%
Boundary %8%60bp80.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.629× par42bp95.150%
Econ vs LHB0.922× par18bp61.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +20.6 · induced false-shot 28%
78.2Death13.5% of overs · 3w · 3.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp85.955%
Impactp56.925%
Versatilityp83.38%
Trajectoryp83.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.392× par14bp84.743.6%
Boundary %7%14bp84.741.8%
Wicket rate1.28/ov14bp93.114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.479bp83.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.1
Vishal Bhati
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 20
77.8
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 140 · Econ 6.67
77.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle84.881%68.7
Death37.614.3%5.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p34.21.02×
Scout Score77.8
84.8Middle81% of overs · 8w · 5.82 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp97.338%
Impactp95.125%
Qualityp69.615%
Versatilityp85.312%
Trajectoryp34.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.742× par102bp9944.1%
Wicket rate0.47/ov102bp95.144.1%
Boundary %8%102bp9911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.659× par68bp97.150%
Econ vs LHB0.913× par34bp73.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +53 · induced false-shot 26%
37.6Death14.3% of overs · 1w · 10.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.655%
Impactp34.725%
Versatilityp38.38%
Trajectoryp34.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.085× par18bp37.543.6%
Boundary %22%18bp44.441.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp31.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.516bp38.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.4
Ishan Porel
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
70.9
Scout Score
Overs 25.0 · Wkts 13 · Runs 207 · Econ 8.28
70.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay82.172%59.1
Middle34.98%2.8
Death44.820%9.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p18.41.11×
Scout Score70.9
82.1Powerplay72% of overs · 8w · 7.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp87.238%
Impactp96.927%
Qualityp92.715%
Versatilityp70.810%
Trajectoryp18.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.844× par108bp88.536.8%
Wicket rate0.44/ov108bp84.442.1%
Boundary %17%108bp90.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.045× par60bp46.930%
Econ vs LHB0.606× par48bp9930%
Wkt vs RHB0.60/ov60bp92.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.25/ov48bp42.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +59.1 · induced false-shot 36%
34.9Middle8% of overs · 0w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.738%
Impactp26.525%
Qualityp75.515%
Versatilityp28.412%
Trajectoryp18.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.465× par12bp28.444.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp33.344.1%
Boundary %25%12bp29.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.735× par6bp18.650%
Econ vs LHB1.203× par6bp38.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.3 · induced false-shot 33%
44.8Death20% of overs · 5w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.448%
Impactp51.425%
Versatilityp72.215%
Trajectoryp18.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.119× par30bp34.750%
Wicket rate1.00/ov30bp95.816.7%
Boundary %30%30bp18.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%30bp67.540%
Slower ball26.66730bp97.533.3%
Slow bouncer030bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1
Mohammed Shami
Bowler · RA pace · age 35
68.3
Scout Score
Overs 12.3 · Wkts 7 · Runs 86 · Econ 6.88
68.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay69.664%44.5
Death6636%23.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p361.01×
Scout Score68.3
69.6Powerplay64% of overs · 3w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.438%
Impactp53.127%
Qualityp96.915%
Versatilityp69.610%
Trajectoryp3610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.707× par48bp94.836.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp61.542.1%
Boundary %15%48bp88.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.034× par23bp4930%
Econ vs LHB0.416× par25bp96.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.52/ov23bp80.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.24/ov25bp4920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.6 · induced false-shot 44%
66Death36% of overs · 4w · 8.44 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.848%
Impactp76.425%
Versatilityp57.515%
Trajectoryp3612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.859× par27bp62.550%
Wicket rate0.89/ov27bp90.316.7%
Boundary %15%27bp73.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate11%27bp72.540%
Slower ball027bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer027bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +21.8
Ramesh Prasad
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 32
67.3
Scout Score
Overs 29.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 176 · Econ 6.07
67.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay64.344.8%28.8
Middle72.848.3%35.2
Death496.9%3.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p640.96×
Scout Score67.3
64.3Powerplay44.8% of overs · 2w · 5.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.338%
Impactp94.827%
Qualityp21.915%
Versatilityp68.810%
Trajectoryp6410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.635× par78bp96.936.8%
Wicket rate0.16/ov78bp5.242.1%
Boundary %13%78bp96.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.652× par63bp9930%
Econ vs LHB0.6× par15bp82.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.10/ov63bp120%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp70.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +53 · induced false-shot 20%
72.8Middle48.3% of overs · 3w · 6.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.838%
Impactp91.225%
Qualityp57.815%
Versatilityp76.512%
Trajectoryp6410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.801× par84bp89.244.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov84bp42.244.1%
Boundary %10%84bp83.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.713× par55bp93.150%
Econ vs LHB0.971× par29bp59.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +39.8 · induced false-shot 25%
49Death6.9% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.255%
Impactp48.625%
Versatilityp408%
Trajectoryp6412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.916× par12bp56.943.6%
Boundary %25%12bp34.741.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp54.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.9411bp40100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0
Karan Lal
Bowler · Off-spin · age 25
67
Scout Score
Overs 23.0 · Wkts 11 · Runs 158 · Econ 6.87
67OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay42.221.7%9.2
Middle76.769.6%53.4
Death50.98.7%4.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p23.71.08×
Scout Score67
42.2Powerplay21.7% of overs · 1w · 7.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.238%
Impactp4927%
Qualityp7.315%
Versatilityp53.310%
Trajectoryp23.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.919× par30bp59.436.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp40.642.1%
Boundary %17%30bp67.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.665× par13bp82.330%
Econ vs LHB1.1× par17bp38.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov13bp20.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.35/ov17bp64.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3 · induced false-shot 13%
76.7Middle69.6% of overs · 10w · 6.56 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp90.438%
Impactp97.125%
Qualityp45.115%
Versatilityp74.512%
Trajectoryp23.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.836× par96bp87.344.1%
Wicket rate0.62/ov96bp97.144.1%
Boundary %10%96bp77.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.011× par38bp53.950%
Econ vs LHB0.709× par58bp95.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +53.6 · induced false-shot 23%
50.9Death8.7% of overs · 0w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.155%
Impactp59.725%
Versatilityp28.38%
Trajectoryp23.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.712× par12bp68.143.6%
Boundary %17%12bp58.341.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp13.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7310bp28.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.7
Harsh Dev Gautam
Bowler · SLA orthodox
66.2
Scout Score
Overs 10.5 · Wkts 3 · Runs 76 · Econ 7.02
66.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle65.546.2%30.3
Death66.853.8%35.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score66.2
65.5Middle46.2% of overs · 1w · 5.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.938%
Impactp83.325%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp68.612%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.739× par30bp77.544.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp46.144.1%
Boundary %7%30bp71.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.334× par12bp83.350%
Econ vs LHB0.963× par18bp53.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +32.2 · induced false-shot 23%
66.8Death53.8% of overs · 2w · 8.06 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.855%
Impactp87.525%
Versatilityp26.78%
Trajectoryp5012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.82× par35bp79.243.6%
Boundary %17%35bp68.141.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov35bp26.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.9323bp26.7100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +45.1
Suraj Sindhu Jaiswal
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
65.4
Scout Score
Overs 30.0 · Wkts 19 · Runs 244 · Econ 8.13
65.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay81.646.7%38.1
Middle33.830%10.1
Death73.823.3%17.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p7.91.14×
Scout Score65.4
81.6Powerplay46.7% of overs · 9w · 7.21 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp89.338%
Impactp92.727%
Qualityp88.515%
Versatilityp85.210%
Trajectoryp7.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.85× par84bp82.336.8%
Wicket rate0.64/ov84bp96.942.1%
Boundary %17%84bp86.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.83× par59bp92.730%
Econ vs LHB0.914× par25bp67.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.51/ov59bp86.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.96/ov25bp9920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +49.5 · induced false-shot 37%
33.8Middle30% of overs · 3w · 10.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.538%
Impactp20.625%
Qualityp83.315%
Versatilityp12.712%
Trajectoryp7.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.358× par54bp10.844.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp69.644.1%
Boundary %26%54bp8.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.312× par36bp14.750%
Econ vs LHB1.484× par18bp10.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.8 · induced false-shot 30%
73.8Death23.3% of overs · 7w · 6.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp95.448%
Impactp79.225%
Versatilityp48.515%
Trajectoryp7.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.683× par42bp93.150%
Wicket rate1.00/ov42bp98.616.7%
Boundary %10%42bp97.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%42bp5040%
Slower ball042bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer042bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +29.9
Aamir Gani
Bowler · Off-spin · age 29
65
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 124 · Econ 7.29
65OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay65.723.5%15.4
Middle64.870.6%45.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p9.61.13×
Scout Score65
65.7Powerplay23.5% of overs · 3w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.638%
Impactp82.327%
Qualityp52.115%
Versatilityp6010%
Trajectoryp9.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.884× par24bp63.536.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp91.742.1%
Boundary %17%24bp64.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.441× par9bp28.130%
Econ vs LHB0.554× par15bp84.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov9bp34.420%
Wkt vs LHB1.20/ov15bp96.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +23.7 · induced false-shot 25%
64.8Middle70.6% of overs · 4w · 6.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.438%
Impactp87.325%
Qualityp6.915%
Versatilityp83.312%
Trajectoryp9.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.828× par72bp85.344.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp75.544.1%
Boundary %8%72bp89.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.881× par40bp79.450%
Econ vs LHB0.767× par32bp87.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +37.1 · induced false-shot 15%
Kaushik Maity
Bowler · Off-spin · age 26
65
Scout Score
Overs 22.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 158 · Econ 7.18
65OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay39.69.1%3.6
Middle64.572.7%46.9
Death79.818.2%14.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p99.10.73×
Scout Score65
39.6Powerplay9.1% of overs · 0w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.738%
Impactp38.527%
Qualityp30.215%
Versatilityp38.510%
Trajectoryp99.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.296× par12bp30.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp28.142.1%
Boundary %33%12bp27.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.36× par4bp67.730%
Econ vs LHB1.731× par8bp9.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov4bp46.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp30.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4 · induced false-shot 17%
64.5Middle72.7% of overs · 2w · 7.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.238%
Impactp89.225%
Qualityp40.215%
Versatilityp62.712%
Trajectoryp99.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.907× par96bp79.444.1%
Wicket rate0.13/ov96bp7.844.1%
Boundary %9%96bp91.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.137× par50bp32.450%
Econ vs LHB0.675× par46bp93.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +39 · induced false-shot 22%
79.8Death18.2% of overs · 2w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.855%
Impactp68.125%
Versatilityp608%
Trajectoryp99.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.56× par24bp90.343.6%
Boundary %4%24bp90.341.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp45.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.4213bp60100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +12.1
Prayas Ray Barman
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 23
64.9
Scout Score
Overs 26.3 · Wkts 13 · Runs 192 · Econ 7.25
64.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle60.584.9%51.4
Death89.815.1%13.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p78.10.92×
Scout Score64.9
60.5Middle84.9% of overs · 10w · 7.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.538%
Impactp59.825%
Qualityp20.615%
Versatilityp55.912%
Trajectoryp78.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.991× par135bp61.844.1%
Wicket rate0.44/ov135bp93.144.1%
Boundary %16%135bp44.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.961× par95bp77.550%
Econ vs LHB1.101× par40bp34.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.1 · induced false-shot 20%
89.8Death15.1% of overs · 3w · 4.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp90.555%
Impactp95.825%
Versatilityp83.38%
Trajectoryp78.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.432× par24bp98.643.6%
Boundary %8%24bp87.541.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp7514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.3519bp83.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +59.2
Irshad Alam
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 20
64.2
Scout Score
Overs 21.5 · Wkts 5 · Runs 138 · Econ 6.32
64.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay51.118.3%9.4
Middle67.181.7%54.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p20.21.11×
Scout Score64.2
51.1Powerplay18.3% of overs · 0w · 6.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.538%
Impactp65.627%
Qualityp52.115%
Versatilityp50.610%
Trajectoryp20.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.736× par24bp78.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp8.342.1%
Boundary %12%24bp77.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.932× par17bp61.530%
Econ vs LHB0.297× par7bp78.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov17bp9.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp34.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.8 · induced false-shot 25%
67.1Middle81.7% of overs · 5w · 6.34 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.538%
Impactp93.125%
Qualityp18.615%
Versatilityp86.312%
Trajectoryp20.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.807× par107bp93.144.1%
Wicket rate0.28/ov107bp57.844.1%
Boundary %11%107bp75.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.832× par77bp87.350%
Econ vs LHB0.794× par30bp85.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +46.7 · induced false-shot 20%
Sourav Halder
Bowler · Off-spin · age 28
63.7
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 137 · Econ 7.61
63.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay50.238.9%19.5
Middle74.644.4%33.1
Death66.216.7%11.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p71.10.95×
Scout Score63.7
50.2Powerplay38.9% of overs · 0w · 7.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.138%
Impactp63.527%
Qualityp46.915%
Versatilityp36.910%
Trajectoryp71.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.909× par42bp67.736.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov42bp142.1%
Boundary %17%42bp69.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.345× par15bp21.930%
Econ vs LHB0.667× par27bp88.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov15bp15.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov27bp3.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.6 · induced false-shot 24%
74.6Middle44.4% of overs · 7w · 7.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.238%
Impactp63.725%
Qualityp91.215%
Versatilityp65.212%
Trajectoryp71.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.923× par48bp63.744.1%
Wicket rate0.88/ov48bp9944.1%
Boundary %12%48bp62.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.044× par23bp47.150%
Econ vs LHB0.809× par25bp83.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.2 · induced false-shot 33%
66.2Death16.7% of overs · 1w · 8.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.455%
Impactp93.125%
Versatilityp358%
Trajectoryp71.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.848× par18bp59.743.6%
Boundary %17%18bp63.941.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp31.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.77bp35100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +53.4
Toufik Uddin Mondal
Bowler · Off-spin · age 23
63.7
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 142 · Econ 8.35
63.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.729.4%10.8
Middle75.158.8%44.2
Death73.811.8%8.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p81.60.9×
Scout Score63.7
36.7Powerplay29.4% of overs · 2w · 11.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.738%
Impactp19.827%
Qualityp42.715%
Versatilityp36.110%
Trajectoryp81.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.343× par30bp11.536.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp67.742.1%
Boundary %33%30bp9.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.601× par9bp14.630%
Econ vs LHB1.22× par21bp17.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.67/ov9bp7520%
Wkt vs LHB0.29/ov21bp57.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13 · induced false-shot 23%
75.1Middle58.8% of overs · 5w · 7.3 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.238%
Impactp75.525%
Qualityp72.515%
Versatilityp68.612%
Trajectoryp81.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.93× par60bp65.744.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov60bp91.244.1%
Boundary %13%60bp59.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.995× par33bp59.850%
Econ vs LHB0.856× par27bp77.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +19.2 · induced false-shot 27%
73.8Death11.8% of overs · 2w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp7755%
Impactp70.825%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp81.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.61× par12bp7543.6%
Boundary %8%12bp77.841.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp80.614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15.7
Dipanjan Mukherjee
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
60.6
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 50 · Econ 8.33
60.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay74.366.7%49.6
Death33.233.3%11.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score60.6
74.3Powerplay66.7% of overs · 3w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.438%
Impactp90.627%
Qualityp33.315%
Versatilityp77.710%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.648× par24bp80.236.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp91.742.1%
Boundary %12%24bp77.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.72× par12bp7430%
Econ vs LHB0.577× par12bp7630%
Wkt vs RHB0.50/ov12bp68.820%
Wkt vs LHB1.00/ov12bp94.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +34.2 · induced false-shot 21%
33.2Death33.3% of overs · 0w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.648%
Impactp37.525%
Versatilityp33.515%
Trajectoryp5012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.424× par12bp29.250%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp13.916.7%
Boundary %33%12bp29.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp12.540%
Slower ball012bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer012bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.1
Raju Halder
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 30
60
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 103 · Econ 7.92
60OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay55.923.1%12.9
Middle64.961.5%39.9
Death46.115.4%7.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p86.80.87×
Scout Score60
55.9Powerplay23.1% of overs · 2w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.738%
Impactp32.327%
Qualityp70.815%
Versatilityp59.410%
Trajectoryp86.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.061× par18bp44.836.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp81.242.1%
Boundary %28%18bp33.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.617× par7bp69.830%
Econ vs LHB1.322× par11bp2430%
Wkt vs RHB0.86/ov7bp78.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.55/ov11bp78.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.2 · induced false-shot 33%
64.9Middle61.5% of overs · 4w · 6.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp77.938%
Impactp65.725%
Qualityp11.815%
Versatilityp70.612%
Trajectoryp86.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.876× par48bp71.644.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov48bp88.244.1%
Boundary %12%48bp62.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.833× par25bp75.550%
Econ vs LHB0.91× par23bp65.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.3 · induced false-shot 15%
46.1Death15.4% of overs · 1w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp4055%
Impactp45.825%
Versatilityp28.38%
Trajectoryp86.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.068× par12bp40.343.6%
Boundary %25%12bp34.741.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp54.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.0712bp28.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.6
Pradipta Pramanik
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
59.6
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 168 · Econ 8
59.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay50.123.8%11.9
Middle60.361.9%37.3
Death72.214.3%10.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p21.91.1×
Scout Score59.6
50.1Powerplay23.8% of overs · 2w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.638%
Impactp7627%
Qualityp7.315%
Versatilityp51.510%
Trajectoryp21.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.061× par30bp42.736.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp67.742.1%
Boundary %20%30bp54.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.88× par18bp65.630%
Econ vs LHB1.327× par12bp19.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov18bp53.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.50/ov12bp7620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +12.7 · induced false-shot 13%
60.3Middle61.9% of overs · 4w · 7.85 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.438%
Impactp81.425%
Qualityp53.915%
Versatilityp52.912%
Trajectoryp21.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.999× par78bp53.944.1%
Wicket rate0.31/ov78bp67.644.1%
Boundary %13%78bp65.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.628× par37bp89.250%
Econ vs LHB1.285× par41bp16.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +30.5 · induced false-shot 24%
72.2Death14.3% of overs · 3w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.255%
Impactp90.325%
Versatilityp708%
Trajectoryp21.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.712× par18bp81.943.6%
Boundary %17%18bp63.941.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp87.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7112bp70100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +50.8
Ashutosh Kumar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 17
58.4
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 47 · Econ 7.83
58.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle55.350%27.6
Death6333.3%21.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score58.4
55.3Middle50% of overs · 1w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.238%
Impactp69.625%
Qualityp36.315%
Versatilityp53.912%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.891× par18bp5044.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp61.844.1%
Boundary %11%18bp5011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.985× par13bp5250%
Econ vs LHB0.722× par5bp55.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +12.9 · induced false-shot 17%
63Death33.3% of overs · 0w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.355%
Impactp62.525%
Versatilityp558%
Trajectoryp5012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.61× par12bp7543.6%
Boundary %8%12bp77.841.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp13.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.349bp55100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.1
Akhil
Bowler · SLA orthodox
56.5
Scout Score
Overs 19.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 134 · Econ 7.05
56.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay4931.6%15.5
Middle65.552.6%34.5
Death41.415.8%6.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p30.71.05×
Scout Score56.5
49Powerplay31.6% of overs · 2w · 8.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.938%
Impactp57.327%
Qualityp36.515%
Versatilityp49.210%
Trajectoryp30.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.021× par36bp4936.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp59.442.1%
Boundary %22%36bp46.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.013× par32bp53.130%
Econ vs LHB1.212× par4bp44.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov32bp59.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp39.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7 · induced false-shot 22%
65.5Middle52.6% of overs · 2w · 5.3 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.338%
Impactp73.525%
Qualityp4815%
Versatilityp81.412%
Trajectoryp30.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.675× par60bp97.144.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp39.244.1%
Boundary %7%60bp95.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.706× par51bp91.250%
Econ vs LHB0.642× par9bp71.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15.4 · induced false-shot 23%
41.4Death15.8% of overs · 1w · 9.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.455%
Impactp40.325%
Versatilityp408%
Trajectoryp30.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.983× par18bp48.643.6%
Boundary %22%18bp44.441.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp31.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.0410bp40100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.3
Dilshad Khan
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
55.7
Scout Score
Overs 23.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 153 · Econ 6.65
55.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay50.813%6.6
Middle56.482.6%46.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p62.31×
Scout Score55.7
50.8Powerplay13% of overs · 0w · 6.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.838%
Impactp67.727%
Qualityp16.715%
Versatilityp48.110%
Trajectoryp62.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.786× par18bp69.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp20.842.1%
Boundary %11%18bp72.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.32× par9bp88.530%
Econ vs LHB1.231× par9bp32.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov9bp34.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov9bp2520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.1 · induced false-shot 11%
56.4Middle82.6% of overs · 1w · 6.42 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.138%
Impactp85.325%
Qualityp4.915%
Versatilityp69.612%
Trajectoryp62.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.818× par114bp91.244.1%
Wicket rate0.05/ov114bp144.1%
Boundary %9%114bp97.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.48× par55bp9950%
Econ vs LHB1.089× par59bp40.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +36.5 · induced false-shot 15%
Mukesh Kumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
55.7
Scout Score
Overs 29.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 247 · Econ 8.52
55.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay70.558.6%41.3
Middle29.813.8%4.1
Death37.327.6%10.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p2.61.21×
Scout Score55.7
70.5Powerplay58.6% of overs · 5w · 7.06 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp72.638%
Impactp80.227%
Qualityp90.615%
Versatilityp73.510%
Trajectoryp2.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.832× par102bp90.636.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov102bp5142.1%
Boundary %18%102bp84.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.9× par60bp84.430%
Econ vs LHB0.742× par42bp92.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.20/ov60bp13.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.43/ov42bp88.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +21.4 · induced false-shot 36%
29.8Middle13.8% of overs · 1w · 12.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.138%
Impactp16.725%
Qualityp86.315%
Versatilityp14.712%
Trajectoryp2.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.592× par24bp8.844.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp52.944.1%
Boundary %33%24bp6.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.528× par11bp16.750%
Econ vs LHB1.61× par13bp12.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16.2 · induced false-shot 38%
37.3Death27.6% of overs · 4w · 9.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.548%
Impactp29.225%
Versatilityp39.515%
Trajectoryp2.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.979× par48bp51.450%
Wicket rate0.50/ov48bp40.316.7%
Boundary %21%48bp51.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%48bp27.540%
Slower ball048bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer048bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.4
Pritam Chakraborty
Bowler · RA pace · age 31
55.3
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 179 · Econ 8.95
55.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay54.160%32.5
Middle27.615%4.1
Death7525%18.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p16.71.12×
Scout Score55.3
54.1Powerplay60% of overs · 5w · 9.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.438%
Impactp61.527%
Qualityp61.515%
Versatilityp51.510%
Trajectoryp16.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.09× par72bp40.636.8%
Wicket rate0.41/ov72bp78.142.1%
Boundary %24%72bp40.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.081× par26bp38.530%
Econ vs LHB1.084× par46bp30.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.46/ov26bp71.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.39/ov46bp82.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.2 · induced false-shot 26%
27.6Middle15% of overs · 0w · 12.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp15.338%
Impactp10.825%
Qualityp97.115%
Versatilityp23.512%
Trajectoryp16.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.571× par18bp14.744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp18.644.1%
Boundary %39%18bp4.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.068× par3bp40.250%
Econ vs LHB1.588× par15bp6.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -20.3 · induced false-shot 50%
75Death25% of overs · 3w · 6.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp86.148%
Impactp98.625%
Versatilityp46.815%
Trajectoryp16.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.631× par30bp87.550%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp68.116.7%
Boundary %7%30bp93.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%30bp12.540%
Slower ball030bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer11.66730bp97.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +62
Lokesh Gait
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 25
53.9
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 50 · Econ 7.14
53.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay63.242.9%27.1
Middle44.542.9%19.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p14.91.12×
Scout Score53.9
63.2Powerplay42.9% of overs · 2w · 4.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp80.638%
Impactp55.227%
Qualityp59.415%
Versatilityp72.910%
Trajectoryp14.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.511× par18bp84.436.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp81.242.1%
Boundary %11%18bp72.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.528× par15bp90.630%
Econ vs LHB0.462× par3bp65.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.80/ov15bp84.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp45.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.1 · induced false-shot 28%
44.5Middle42.9% of overs · 1w · 9.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.338%
Impactp28.425%
Qualityp93.115%
Versatilityp36.312%
Trajectoryp14.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.231× par18bp34.344.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp61.844.1%
Boundary %22%18bp33.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.334× par9bp30.450%
Econ vs LHB1.123× par9bp42.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.2 · induced false-shot 44%
Sonu Himanshu
Bowler · RA pace
53.4
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 54 · Econ 9
53.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.466.7%39.6
Death41.233.3%13.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score53.4
59.4Powerplay66.7% of overs · 2w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.738%
Impactp84.427%
Qualityp2615%
Versatilityp54.310%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.002× par24bp5136.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp7642.1%
Boundary %25%24bp37.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.978× par14bp55.230%
Econ vs LHB1.039× par10bp52.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.86/ov14bp88.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov10bp21.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +24.9 · induced false-shot 17%
41.2Death33.3% of overs · 2w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.248%
Impactp9.725%
Versatilityp67.515%
Trajectoryp5012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.017× par12bp44.450%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp80.616.7%
Boundary %25%12bp34.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate33%12bp97.540%
Slower ball012bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer012bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -30.8
Sujit Kumar Yadav
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 35
53.2
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 93 · Econ 8.45
53.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay21.418.2%3.9
Middle61.272.7%44.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p85.10.88×
Scout Score53.2
21.4Powerplay18.2% of overs · 0w · 15 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp14.438%
Impactp13.527%
Qualityp3.115%
Versatilityp32.710%
Trajectoryp85.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.768× par12bp5.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp28.142.1%
Boundary %50%12bp3.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.801× par12bp130%
Econ vs LHB—0bp55.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp2420%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp55.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -20.2 · induced false-shot 0%
61.2Middle72.7% of overs · 4w · 6.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.638%
Impactp46.125%
Qualityp11.815%
Versatilityp69.612%
Trajectoryp85.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.86× par48bp73.544.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov48bp88.244.1%
Boundary %6%48bp87.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.93× par37bp69.650%
Econ vs LHB0.722× par11bp69.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3 · induced false-shot 15%
Vaibhav Yadav
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 25
53.1
Scout Score
Overs 18.1 · Wkts 4 · Runs 134 · Econ 7.38
53.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay46.444%20.4
Middle5950.5%29.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p6.11.15×
Scout Score53.1
46.4Powerplay44% of overs · 2w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.138%
Impactp5127%
Qualityp55.215%
Versatilityp51.210%
Trajectoryp6.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.972× par48bp55.236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp45.842.1%
Boundary %23%48bp44.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.895× par33bp71.930%
Econ vs LHB1.154× par15bp34.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.18/ov33bp2620%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp70.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.9 · induced false-shot 25%
59Middle50.5% of overs · 2w · 6.55 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.938%
Impactp79.425%
Qualityp30.415%
Versatilityp77.512%
Trajectoryp6.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.834× par55bp83.344.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov55bp44.144.1%
Boundary %9%55bp73.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.906× par38bp73.550%
Econ vs LHB0.722× par17bp81.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +29.4 · induced false-shot 20%
Nuruddin Mandal
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
51.5
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 98 · Econ 9.8
51.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle53.230%16.0
Death50.660%30.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p72.80.95×
Scout Score51.5
53.2Middle30% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.438%
Impactp53.925%
Qualityp78.415%
Versatilityp28.412%
Trajectoryp72.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.274× par18bp32.444.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp61.844.1%
Boundary %22%18bp33.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.281× par15bp24.550%
Econ vs LHB1.444× par3bp32.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.7 · induced false-shot 33%
50.6Death60% of overs · 1w · 9.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.248%
Impactp43.125%
Versatilityp43.515%
Trajectoryp72.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.967× par36bp54.250%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp2.816.7%
Boundary %17%36bp70.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%36bp37.540%
Slower ball036bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer036bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.3
Anurag Tiwari
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 30
50.9
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 127 · Econ 7.06
50.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay64.938.9%25.2
Middle41.255.6%22.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p65.80.96×
Scout Score50.9
64.9Powerplay38.9% of overs · 3w · 7.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.138%
Impactp69.827%
Qualityp2415%
Versatilityp57.710%
Trajectoryp65.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.875× par42bp7636.8%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp7442.1%
Boundary %12%42bp94.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.062× par19bp44.830%
Econ vs LHB0.723× par23bp80.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.95/ov19bp94.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov23bp6.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.7 · induced false-shot 19%
41.2Middle55.6% of overs · 0w · 7.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.538%
Impactp44.125%
Qualityp115%
Versatilityp63.712%
Trajectoryp65.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.904× par60bp69.644.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov60bp2.944.1%
Boundary %8%60bp80.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.712× par27bp81.450%
Econ vs LHB1.028× par33bp46.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.1 · induced false-shot 7%
Shreyan Swarup Chakraborty
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 30
50.3
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 118 · Econ 7.87
50.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay23.713.3%3.2
Middle54.486.7%47.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p74.60.94×
Scout Score50.3
23.7Powerplay13.3% of overs · 0w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.138%
Impactp3.127%
Qualityp19.815%
Versatilityp32.610%
Trajectoryp74.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.532× par12bp17.736.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp28.142.1%
Boundary %33%12bp27.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.601× par9bp14.630%
Econ vs LHB1.385× par3bp40.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov9bp34.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp45.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -34.3 · induced false-shot 8%
54.4Middle86.7% of overs · 2w · 7.08 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.838%
Impactp36.325%
Qualityp67.615%
Versatilityp73.512%
Trajectoryp74.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.901× par78bp75.544.1%
Wicket rate0.16/ov78bp14.744.1%
Boundary %9%78bp85.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.958× par51bp67.650%
Econ vs LHB0.829× par27bp79.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.1 · induced false-shot 26%
Mithilesh Das
Bowler · Off-spin · age 32
50.2
Scout Score
Overs 19.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 172 · Econ 9.05
50.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay5636.8%20.6
Middle46.652.6%24.5
Death48.310.5%5.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p76.30.93×
Scout Score50.2
56Powerplay36.8% of overs · 4w · 9.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.338%
Impactp40.627%
Qualityp65.615%
Versatilityp50.310%
Trajectoryp76.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.162× par42bp27.136.8%
Wicket rate0.57/ov42bp86.542.1%
Boundary %19%42bp61.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.108× par13bp41.730%
Econ vs LHB1.17× par29bp21.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.46/ov13bp63.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.62/ov29bp92.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.8 · induced false-shot 29%
46.6Middle52.6% of overs · 2w · 8.3 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.138%
Impactp30.425%
Qualityp72.515%
Versatilityp5012%
Trajectoryp76.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.057× par60bp40.244.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp39.244.1%
Boundary %20%60bp26.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.934× par24bp63.750%
Econ vs LHB1.103× par36bp36.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.8 · induced false-shot 27%
48.3Death10.5% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.755%
Impactp23.625%
Versatilityp608%
Trajectoryp76.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.017× par12bp44.443.6%
Boundary %17%12bp58.341.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp54.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.889bp60100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.7
Vikas Singh
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 25
49.2
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 150 · Econ 8.82
49.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay4247.1%19.8
Middle47.129.4%13.8
Death66.223.5%15.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p92.10.86×
Scout Score49.2
42Powerplay47.1% of overs · 2w · 9.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.938%
Impactp2627%
Qualityp63.515%
Versatilityp37.110%
Trajectoryp92.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.164× par48bp2436.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp45.842.1%
Boundary %27%48bp22.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.164× par26bp32.330%
Econ vs LHB1.165× par22bp2630%
Wkt vs RHB0.23/ov26bp44.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.27/ov22bp53.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.2 · induced false-shot 27%
47.1Middle29.4% of overs · 0w · 7.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.738%
Impactp42.225%
Qualityp63.715%
Versatilityp5112%
Trajectoryp92.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.968× par30bp4844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp10.844.1%
Boundary %17%30bp40.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.975× par23bp57.850%
Econ vs LHB1.031× par7bp44.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.4 · induced false-shot 27%
66.2Death23.5% of overs · 1w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.855%
Impactp54.225%
Versatilityp68.38%
Trajectoryp92.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.839× par24bp65.343.6%
Boundary %12%24bp81.941.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp20.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.3612bp68.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2
Sukhmeet Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
47.9
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 200 · Econ 9.52
47.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay34.852.4%18.2
Middle82.614.3%11.8
Death53.533.3%17.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p95.60.77×
Scout Score47.9
34.8Powerplay52.4% of overs · 2w · 9.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.738%
Impactp21.927%
Qualityp4915%
Versatilityp37.110%
Trajectoryp95.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.103× par66bp34.436.8%
Wicket rate0.18/ov66bp15.642.1%
Boundary %27%66bp11.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.96× par30bp63.530%
Econ vs LHB1.212× par36bp15.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.40/ov30bp65.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov36bp120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.1 · induced false-shot 24%
82.6Middle14.3% of overs · 2w · 5.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.738%
Impactp9925%
Qualityp78.415%
Versatilityp64.712%
Trajectoryp95.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.679× par18bp67.644.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp85.344.1%
Boundary %6%18bp69.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.747× par15bp71.650%
Econ vs LHB0.481× par3bp57.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +78.2 · induced false-shot 33%
53.5Death33.3% of overs · 5w · 11.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.648%
Impactp84.725%
Versatilityp41.515%
Trajectoryp95.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.177× par42bp23.650%
Wicket rate0.71/ov42bp84.716.7%
Boundary %29%42bp13.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%42bp32.540%
Slower ball042bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer042bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +34.5
Geet Puri
Bowler · LA pace · age 31
46.4
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 144 · Econ 9
46.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.450%18.7
Middle63.712.5%8.0
Death52.837.5%19.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score46.4
37.4Powerplay50% of overs · 1w · 10.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp17.438%
Impactp36.527%
Qualityp82.315%
Versatilityp35.810%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.208× par48bp19.836.8%
Wicket rate0.13/ov48bp12.542.1%
Boundary %27%48bp22.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.836× par25bp80.230%
Econ vs LHB1.596× par23bp3.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov25bp3.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.26/ov23bp5120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.1 · induced false-shot 35%
63.7Middle12.5% of overs · 1w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.738%
Impactp55.925%
Qualityp89.215%
Versatilityp59.812%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.7× par12bp56.944.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp72.544.1%
Boundary %8%12bp55.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.801× par1bp44.150%
Econ vs LHB0.656× par11bp75.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1 · induced false-shot 50%
52.8Death37.5% of overs · 3w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.648%
Impactp31.925%
Versatilityp64.515%
Trajectoryp5012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.865× par36bp70.850%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp43.116.7%
Boundary %19%36bp54.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate17%36bp9040%
Slower ball036bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer036bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.7
Sachin Kumar Yadav
Bowler · Off-spin · age 33
46.1
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 58 · Econ 9.67
46.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle46.183.3%38.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score46.1
46.1Middle83.3% of overs · 2w · 9.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.438%
Impactp61.825%
Qualityp14.715%
Versatilityp29.412%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.223× par30bp30.444.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp78.444.1%
Boundary %20%30bp37.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.258× par14bp28.450%
Econ vs LHB1.173× par16bp30.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.5 · induced false-shot 13%
Sayed Irfan-Aftab
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
45.5
Scout Score
Overs 12.5 · Wkts 5 · Runs 127 · Econ 9.9
45.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay51.168.8%35.2
Death33.331.2%10.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p79.80.92×
Scout Score45.5
51.1Powerplay68.8% of overs · 2w · 8.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.138%
Impactp28.127%
Qualityp94.815%
Versatilityp41.710%
Trajectoryp79.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par53bp46.936.8%
Wicket rate0.23/ov53bp36.542.1%
Boundary %21%53bp59.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.101× par36bp36.530%
Econ vs LHB0.937× par17bp59.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov36bp55.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov17bp9.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.9 · induced false-shot 42%
33.3Death31.2% of overs · 3w · 12.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp2848%
Impactp20.825%
Versatilityp33.515%
Trajectoryp79.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.246× par24bp26.450%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp7516.7%
Boundary %33%24bp6.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%24bp12.540%
Slower ball024bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer024bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.3
Saksham Chaudhary
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
45.2
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 166 · Econ 9.22
45.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay27.950%13.9
Middle27.511.1%3.1
Death72.438.9%28.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p12.31.12×
Scout Score45.2
27.9Powerplay50% of overs · 2w · 10.56 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.138%
Impactp9.427%
Qualityp86.515%
Versatilityp27.910%
Trajectoryp12.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.244× par54bp13.536.8%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp33.342.1%
Boundary %28%54bp14.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.235× par21bp30.230%
Econ vs LHB1.238× par33bp11.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.29/ov21bp4920%
Wkt vs LHB0.18/ov33bp28.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -25.9 · induced false-shot 39%
27.5Middle11.1% of overs · 0w · 12.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.238%
Impactp34.325%
Qualityp26.515%
Versatilityp28.412%
Trajectoryp12.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.592× par12bp20.644.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp33.344.1%
Boundary %25%12bp29.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.068× par9bp42.250%
Econ vs LHB3.128× par3bp14.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.2 · induced false-shot 8%
72.4Death38.9% of overs · 4w · 6.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp90.748%
Impactp73.625%
Versatilityp59.515%
Trajectoryp12.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.669× par42bp95.850%
Wicket rate0.57/ov42bp62.516.7%
Boundary %10%42bp97.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate12%42bp77.540%
Slower ball042bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer042bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +16.2
Rahul Prasad
Bowler · Off-spin · age 21
44.9
Scout Score
Overs 24.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 186 · Econ 7.75
44.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay51.520.8%10.7
Middle43.279.2%34.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score44.9
51.5Powerplay20.8% of overs · 2w · 7.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.838%
Impactp42.727%
Qualityp42.715%
Versatilityp50.610%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.919× par30bp59.436.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp67.742.1%
Boundary %20%30bp54.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.351× par16bp19.830%
Econ vs LHB0.445× par14bp86.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.75/ov16bp82.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov14bp11.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.4 · induced false-shot 23%
43.2Middle79.2% of overs · 5w · 7.74 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.238%
Impactp6.925%
Qualityp55.915%
Versatilityp52.912%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.985× par114bp59.844.1%
Wicket rate0.26/ov114bp55.944.1%
Boundary %15%114bp5211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.388× par45bp6.950%
Econ vs LHB0.722× par69bp9950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -24.7 · induced false-shot 25%
Viraj Krishna
Bowler · RA pace
44.2
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 33 · Econ 8.25
44.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle44.2100%44.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score44.2
44.2Middle100% of overs · 1w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.938%
Impactp40.225%
Qualityp42.215%
Versatilityp45.112%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.051× par24bp38.244.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp52.944.1%
Boundary %12%24bp4811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.245× par18bp26.550%
Econ vs LHB0.602× par6bp63.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.9 · induced false-shot 21%
Mohammad Kaif
Bowler · RA pace
44.1
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 77 · Econ 8.56
44.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay55.155.6%30.6
Middle25.733.3%8.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score44.1
55.1Powerplay55.6% of overs · 1w · 7.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.438%
Impactp46.927%
Qualityp84.415%
Versatilityp5610%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.919× par30bp59.436.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp40.642.1%
Boundary %20%30bp54.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.648× par10bp78.130%
Econ vs LHB1.039× par20bp4930%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov10bp30.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.30/ov20bp59.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.1 · induced false-shot 40%
25.7Middle33.3% of overs · 0w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.738%
Impactp12.725%
Qualityp36.315%
Versatilityp38.212%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.401× par18bp22.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp18.644.1%
Boundary %33%18bp12.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.848× par13bp8.850%
Econ vs LHB0.433× par5bp67.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.8 · induced false-shot 17%
Shivamm Bharati
Bowler · RA pace · age 18
40.9
Scout Score
Overs 5.4 · Wkts 5 · Runs 57 · Econ 10.06
40.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle40.970.6%28.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score40.9
40.9Middle70.6% of overs · 2w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.338%
Impactp18.625%
Qualityp86.315%
Versatilityp15.712%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.528× par24bp12.744.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp81.444.1%
Boundary %29%24bp14.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.334× par12bp22.550%
Econ vs LHB1.684× par12bp8.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.9 · induced false-shot 38%
Shahbaz Ahmed
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 31
40.4
Scout Score
Overs 27.5 · Wkts 12 · Runs 246 · Econ 8.84
40.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay73.321.6%15.8
Middle38.843.1%16.7
Death22.435.3%7.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p32.51.04×
Scout Score40.4
73.3Powerplay21.6% of overs · 5w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp91.438%
Impactp86.527%
Qualityp28.115%
Versatilityp77.510%
Trajectoryp32.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.648× par36bp92.736.8%
Wicket rate0.83/ov36bp94.842.1%
Boundary %14%36bp82.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.36× par22bp94.830%
Econ vs LHB1.088× par14bp42.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.82/ov22bp90.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.86/ov14bp90.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +27.6 · induced false-shot 19%
38.8Middle43.1% of overs · 2w · 8.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.938%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp16.715%
Versatilityp53.912%
Trajectoryp32.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.04× par72bp42.244.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov72bp23.544.1%
Boundary %12%72bp67.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.582× par22bp85.350%
Econ vs LHB1.184× par50bp22.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.2 · induced false-shot 18%
22.4Death35.3% of overs · 5w · 11.69 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.255%
Impactp1.425%
Versatilityp33.38%
Trajectoryp32.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.19× par59bp9.743.6%
Boundary %22%59bp40.341.8%
Wicket rate0.51/ov59bp48.614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.9222bp33.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -70.3
Ravi Kumar
Bowler · LA pace · age 22
39.6
Scout Score
Overs 14.4 · Wkts 5 · Runs 161 · Econ 10.98
39.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay3961.4%23.9
Middle40.734.1%13.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p67.50.96×
Scout Score39.6
39Powerplay61.4% of overs · 2w · 10.22 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.938%
Impactp34.427%
Qualityp7615%
Versatilityp28.510%
Trajectoryp67.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.205× par54bp15.636.8%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp33.342.1%
Boundary %28%54bp14.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.441× par17bp7.330%
Econ vs LHB1.086× par37bp36.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov17bp9.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.32/ov37bp67.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.6 · induced false-shot 30%
40.7Middle34.1% of overs · 2w · 12.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.138%
Impactp125%
Qualityp95.115%
Versatilityp31.412%
Trajectoryp67.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.579× par30bp4.944.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp78.444.1%
Boundary %20%30bp37.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.686× par7bp61.850%
Econ vs LHB1.758× par23bp150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -47.8 · induced false-shot 40%
Rohit Kumar Das
Bowler · LA pace · age 16
39.3
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 152 · Econ 9.5
39.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay42.287.5%36.9
Death18.612.5%2.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p28.91.06×
Scout Score39.3
42.2Powerplay87.5% of overs · 3w · 8.64 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp4038%
Impactp30.227%
Qualityp80.215%
Versatilityp39.810%
Trajectoryp28.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.018× par84bp53.136.8%
Wicket rate0.22/ov84bp2442.1%
Boundary %21%84bp4921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.25× par49bp3.130%
Econ vs LHB0.712× par35bp90.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.25/ov49bp38.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.17/ov35bp19.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.2 · induced false-shot 32%
18.6Death12.5% of overs · 0w · 15.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp14.648%
Impactp12.525%
Versatilityp33.515%
Trajectoryp28.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.577× par12bp18.150%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp13.916.7%
Boundary %42%12bp9.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp12.540%
Slower ball012bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer012bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.7
Rohit
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 16
38.3
Scout Score
Overs 11.1 · Wkts 1 · Runs 101 · Econ 9.04
38.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay51.135.8%18.3
Middle31.164.2%20.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p90.40.86×
Scout Score38.3
51.1Powerplay35.8% of overs · 0w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.638%
Impactp59.427%
Qualityp33.315%
Versatilityp44.810%
Trajectoryp90.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.825× par24bp71.936.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp8.342.1%
Boundary %17%24bp64.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.982× par11bp5130%
Econ vs LHB0.693× par13bp69.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov11bp28.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov13bp14.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7.2 · induced false-shot 21%
31.1Middle64.2% of overs · 1w · 10.19 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.338%
Impactp8.825%
Qualityp59.815%
Versatilityp26.512%
Trajectoryp90.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.297× par43bp16.744.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov43bp26.544.1%
Boundary %26%43bp10.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.201× par18bp34.350%
Econ vs LHB1.328× par25bp18.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -22.2 · induced false-shot 26%
Saksham Sharma
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
38.2
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 170 · Econ 9.44
38.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay39.127.8%10.9
Middle59.738.9%23.2
Death12.333.3%4.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p12.31.12×
Scout Score38.2
39.1Powerplay27.8% of overs · 1w · 9.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.338%
Impactp44.827%
Qualityp42.715%
Versatilityp40.610%
Trajectoryp12.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.131× par30bp38.536.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp40.642.1%
Boundary %23%30bp42.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.314× par17bp2430%
Econ vs LHB0.906× par13bp63.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.35/ov17bp57.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov13bp14.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.8 · induced false-shot 23%
59.7Middle38.9% of overs · 1w · 6.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.438%
Impactp71.625%
Qualityp65.715%
Versatilityp68.112%
Trajectoryp12.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.801× par42bp81.444.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp28.444.1%
Boundary %5%42bp93.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.044× par23bp47.150%
Econ vs LHB0.532× par19bp89.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +13.2 · induced false-shot 26%
12.3Death33.3% of overs · 1w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp3.948%
Impactp4.225%
Versatilityp52.515%
Trajectoryp12.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.323× par36bp4.250%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp2.816.7%
Boundary %31%36bp4.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%36bp6040%
Slower ball036bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer036bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -50.9
Siddharth Ghosh
Bowler · RA pace · age 19
37.6
Scout Score
Overs 16.4 · Wkts 3 · Runs 168 · Econ 10.08
37.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay19.636%7.1
Middle55.848%26.8
Death23.516%3.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p25.41.08×
Scout Score37.6
19.6Powerplay36% of overs · 0w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp5.138%
Impactp5.227%
Qualityp78.115%
Versatilityp20.110%
Trajectoryp25.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.335× par36bp7.336.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp3.142.1%
Boundary %33%36bp5.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.108× par13bp41.730%
Econ vs LHB1.445× par23bp7.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov13bp20.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov23bp6.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -31.7 · induced false-shot 33%
55.8Middle48% of overs · 2w · 7.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.438%
Impactp5225%
Qualityp9915%
Versatilityp5212%
Trajectoryp25.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.987× par48bp5244.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp5044.1%
Boundary %15%48bp46.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.994× par29bp55.950%
Econ vs LHB0.988× par19bp4850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.2 · induced false-shot 40%
23.5Death16% of overs · 1w · 14.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.748%
Impactp18.125%
Versatilityp33.515%
Trajectoryp25.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.45× par16bp15.350%
Wicket rate0.37/ov16bp37.516.7%
Boundary %31%16bp26.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%16bp12.540%
Slower ball016bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer016bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16
Vikas Singh
Bowler · Off-spin · age 26
36.6
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 186 · Econ 8.86
36.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.819%7.0
Middle36.576.2%27.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p97.40.73×
Scout Score36.6
36.8Powerplay19% of overs · 1w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.938%
Impactp17.727%
Qualityp11.515%
Versatilityp46.210%
Trajectoryp97.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.149× par24bp36.536.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp4942.1%
Boundary %25%24bp37.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.544× par7bp2630%
Econ vs LHB0.978× par17bp57.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov7bp41.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.35/ov17bp64.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.8 · induced false-shot 12%
36.5Middle76.2% of overs · 2w · 8.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.438%
Impactp24.525%
Qualityp45.115%
Versatilityp4812%
Trajectoryp97.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.098× par96bp36.344.1%
Wicket rate0.13/ov96bp7.844.1%
Boundary %21%96bp16.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.435× par53bp4.950%
Econ vs LHB0.722× par43bp91.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.5 · induced false-shot 23%
Aditya Sharma
Bowler · SLA orthodox
35.5
Scout Score
Overs 13.4 · Wkts 5 · Runs 128 · Econ 9.37
35.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle35.592.7%32.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p88.60.87×
Scout Score35.5
35.5Middle92.7% of overs · 5w · 9.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.938%
Impactp4.925%
Qualityp32.415%
Versatilityp19.612%
Trajectoryp88.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.237× par76bp18.644.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov76bp83.344.1%
Boundary %20%76bp24.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.276× par59bp12.750%
Econ vs LHB1.231× par17bp26.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -27.8 · induced false-shot 21%
Kanishk Seth
Bowler · LA pace · age 28
35.4
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 142 · Econ 10.92
35.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay53.538.5%20.6
Middle52.615.4%8.1
Death14.746.2%6.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p4.41.21×
Scout Score35.4
53.5Powerplay38.5% of overs · 2w · 7.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.138%
Impactp78.127%
Qualityp7.315%
Versatilityp64.710%
Trajectoryp4.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.896× par30bp65.636.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp67.742.1%
Boundary %20%30bp54.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.828× par20bp7630%
Econ vs LHB1.039× par10bp52.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.30/ov20bp5120%
Wkt vs LHB0.60/ov10bp80.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15.9 · induced false-shot 13%
52.6Middle15.4% of overs · 1w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.738%
Impactp67.625%
Qualityp26.515%
Versatilityp58.812%
Trajectoryp4.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.7× par12bp56.944.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp72.544.1%
Boundary %8%12bp55.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.48× par5bp65.750%
Econ vs LHB0.825× par7bp5250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9 · induced false-shot 8%
14.7Death46.2% of overs · 2w · 15.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp5.148%
Impactp15.325%
Versatilityp52.515%
Trajectoryp4.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.577× par36bp1.450%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp23.616.7%
Boundary %44%36bp1.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%36bp6040%
Slower ball036bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer036bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16.7
Writtick Chatterjee
Bowler · Off-spin · age 33
34
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 133 · Econ 7.82
34OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay54.329.4%16.0
Middle25.670.6%18.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p0.91.38×
Scout Score34
54.3Powerplay29.4% of overs · 2w · 7.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp72.638%
Impactp7427%
Qualityp115%
Versatilityp64.810%
Trajectoryp0.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.848× par30bp7436.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp67.742.1%
Boundary %13%30bp80.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.96× par12bp57.330%
Econ vs LHB0.769× par18bp71.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.50/ov12bp68.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.34/ov18bp61.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +12.5 · induced false-shot 10%
25.6Middle70.6% of overs · 2w · 8.08 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.738%
Impactp22.525%
Qualityp2.915%
Versatilityp4912%
Trajectoryp0.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.029× par72bp46.144.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov72bp23.544.1%
Boundary %15%72bp42.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.556× par35bp150%
Econ vs LHB0.566× par37bp97.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.9 · induced false-shot 11%
Sayan Ghosh
Bowler · RA pace · age 33
33.3
Scout Score
Overs 17.5 · Wkts 5 · Runs 207 · Econ 11.61
33.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay49.139.3%19.3
Middle8.733.6%2.9
Death40.927.1%11.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p27.21.07×
Scout Score33.3
49.1Powerplay39.3% of overs · 2w · 9.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.738%
Impactp71.927%
Qualityp57.315%
Versatilityp37.110%
Trajectoryp27.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.162× par42bp27.136.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp53.142.1%
Boundary %26%42bp30.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.201× par18bp34.430%
Econ vs LHB1.125× par24bp28.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov18bp5.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.50/ov24bp86.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +12 · induced false-shot 26%
8.7Middle33.6% of overs · 0w · 13.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp2.738%
Impactp2.925%
Qualityp22.515%
Versatilityp6.912%
Trajectoryp27.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.677× par36bp144.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp4.944.1%
Boundary %33%36bp111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.565× par22bp10.850%
Econ vs LHB1.856× par14bp2.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -35.7 · induced false-shot 17%
40.9Death27.1% of overs · 3w · 12.21 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.148%
Impactp65.325%
Versatilityp45.515%
Trajectoryp27.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.242× par29bp20.850%
Wicket rate0.62/ov29bp70.816.7%
Boundary %28%29bp23.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%29bp42.540%
Slower ball029bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer029bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.3
Suraj Singh
Bowler · RA pace
30
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 44 · Econ 11
30OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle3075%22.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50n/a
Scout Score30
30Middle75% of overs · 0w · 10.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.338%
Impactp32.425%
Qualityp36.315%
Versatilityp24.512%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.358× par18bp26.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp18.644.1%
Boundary %28%18bp20.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.501× par8bp20.650%
Econ vs LHB1.227× par10bp28.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.8 · induced false-shot 17%
Debopratim Haldar
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
29.4
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 132 · Econ 12
29.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay34.727.3%9.5
Death27.263.6%17.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score29.4
34.7Powerplay27.3% of overs · 1w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.738%
Impactp15.627%
Qualityp70.815%
Versatilityp39.410%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.532× par18bp9.436.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp56.242.1%
Boundary %39%18bp7.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.88× par9bp59.430%
Econ vs LHB2.155× par9bp5.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.67/ov9bp7520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov9bp2520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.2 · induced false-shot 33%
27.2Death63.6% of overs · 4w · 12.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.348%
Impactp6.925%
Versatilityp61.515%
Trajectoryp5012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.235× par42bp12.550%
Wicket rate0.57/ov42bp62.516.7%
Boundary %29%42bp13.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate14%42bp82.540%
Slower ball042bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer042bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -35.7
Soumyadip Mandal
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
29.2
Scout Score
Overs 12.2 · Wkts 2 · Runs 170 · Econ 13.78
29.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay24.264.9%15.7
Middle38.535.1%13.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p93.90.79×
Scout Score29.2
24.2Powerplay64.9% of overs · 1w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp5.938%
Impactp127%
Qualityp7415%
Versatilityp12.110%
Trajectoryp93.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.65× par48bp136.8%
Wicket rate0.13/ov48bp12.542.1%
Boundary %42%48bp121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.398× par17bp11.530%
Econ vs LHB1.765× par31bp130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov17bp9.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.19/ov31bp32.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -58.7 · induced false-shot 29%
38.5Middle35.1% of overs · 1w · 13.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.838%
Impactp38.225%
Qualityp61.815%
Versatilityp13.712%
Trajectoryp93.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.705× par26bp2.944.1%
Wicket rate0.23/ov26bp4844.1%
Boundary %35%26bp2.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB2.094× par13bp2.950%
Econ vs LHB1.333× par13bp24.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.1 · induced false-shot 27%
Rishabh Chaudhary
Bowler · Off-spin · age 24
28.7
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 77 · Econ 11
28.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay28.142.9%12.1
Middle29.157.1%16.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score28.7
28.1Powerplay42.9% of overs · 0w · 11.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp2138%
Impactp2427%
Qualityp38.515%
Versatilityp28.810%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.375× par18bp21.936.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp20.842.1%
Boundary %33%18bp19.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.852× par7bp9.430%
Econ vs LHB1.07× par11bp46.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov7bp41.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp17.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.9 · induced false-shot 22%
29.1Middle57.1% of overs · 0w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.138%
Impactp4825%
Qualityp8.815%
Versatilityp29.412%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.337× par24bp24.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp12.744.1%
Boundary %25%24bp22.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.101× par8bp38.250%
Econ vs LHB1.399× par16bp20.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2 · induced false-shot 8%
Subham Sarkar
Bowler · RA pace
27.8
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 82 · Econ 13.67
27.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay31.250%15.6
Middle22.733.3%7.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score27.8
31.2Powerplay50% of overs · 1w · 10.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.638%
Impactp11.527%
Qualityp16.715%
Versatilityp4410%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.218× par18bp32.336.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp56.242.1%
Boundary %28%18bp33.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.389× par14bp17.730%
Econ vs LHB0.693× par4bp61.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.43/ov14bp61.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp39.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -24.7 · induced false-shot 11%
22.7Middle33.3% of overs · 0w · 16 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.938%
Impactp14.725%
Qualityp26.515%
Versatilityp20.612%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy2.038× par12bp6.944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp33.344.1%
Boundary %33%12bp18.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB2.002× par2bp36.350%
Econ vs LHB1.949× par10bp4.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.2 · induced false-shot 8%
Yudhajit Guha
Bowler · RA pace · age 19
22.7
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 138 · Econ 11.5
22.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay14.158.3%8.2
Middle47.516.7%7.9
Death26.425%6.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p37.71.01×
Scout Score22.7
14.1Powerplay58.3% of overs · 1w · 11.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=48
Componentpctweight
Productionp12.338%
Impactp7.327%
Qualityp13.515%
Versatilityp16.510%
Trajectoryp37.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.347× par42bp3.136.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp17.742.1%
Boundary %29%42bp17.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.265× par37bp5.230%
Econ vs LHB2.078× par5bp13.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.16/ov37bp17.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp36.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -28.8 · induced false-shot 17%
47.5Middle16.7% of overs · 0w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=51
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.738%
Impactp57.825%
Qualityp5215%
Versatilityp5012%
Trajectoryp37.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.891× par12bp44.144.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp33.344.1%
Boundary %8%12bp55.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.934× par6bp5050%
Econ vs LHB0.842× par6bp5050%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.9 · induced false-shot 25%
26.4Death25% of overs · 0w · 14.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=36
Componentpctweight
Productionp11.648%
Impactp26.425%
Versatilityp64.515%
Trajectoryp37.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.492× par18bp6.950%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp6.916.7%
Boundary %33%18bp20.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate17%18bp9040%
Slower ball018bp47.533.3%
Slow bouncer018bp47.526.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.5