| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 28 | 7 | 135 | 108 | 125 | 27 | 16 | 5 | 74.9 Scout Score 74.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production83.340% Impact83.327% Versatility44.815% Shot quality61.16% Trajectory72.212% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.04×[35, 14, 39] | 83.3 Production 83.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.07× parp83.335% True Avg1.67× parp83.330% Balls / boundary3.81p83.317.5% Balls / dismissal30.5p83.317.5% | 61.1 Shot Quality 61.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.9% Control · Build95.2% Phase-weighted control82.2% | 83.3 Impact 83.3 = WPA percentile · total +17.8 WPA · Powerplay+21 WPA · Consolidation-3.2 | 44.8 Versatility 44.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp83.326.7% vs Spin SRp5.626.7% Accel into Consp38.920% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 2 | RHB | 28 | 6 | 325 | 206 | 157.8 | 65 | 39 | 6 | 74.2 Scout Score 74.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production94.440% Impact72.227% Versatility70.715% Shot quality94.46% Trajectory5.612% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.88×[56, 60, 6] | 94.4 Production 94.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.11× parp94.435% True Avg1.93× parp94.430% Balls / boundary3.58p94.417.5% Balls / dismissal34p94.417.5% | 94.4 Shot Quality 94.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.3% Control · Build95.7% Phase-weighted control85.7% | 72.2 Impact 72.2 = WPA percentile · total +17.7 WPA · Powerplay+20.7 WPA · Consolidation-3.1 | 70.7 Versatility 70.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp94.426.7% vs Spin SRp83.326.7% Accel into Consp5020% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 3 | RHB | 21 | 5 | 91 | 51 | 178.4 | 18.2 | 4 | 9 | 55.9 Scout Score 55.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production14.740% Impact94.427% Versatility76.715% Shot quality27.86% Trajectory94.412% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.12×[42, 7, 35] | 14.7 Production 14.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.69× parp16.735% True Avg0.27× parp16.730% Balls / boundary7.5p16.717.5% Balls / dismissal7.5p5.617.5% | 27.8 Shot Quality 27.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75.9% Control · Build57.1% Phase-weighted control73.8% | 94.4 Impact 94.4 = WPA percentile · total +35.9 WPA · Powerplay-16.1 WPA · Consolidation+52 | 76.7 Versatility 76.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp72.226.7% vs Spin SRp94.426.7% Accel into Consp94.420% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 4 | RHB | 25 | 6 | 112 | 88 | 127.3 | 18.7 | 11 | 4 | 49.7 Scout Score 49.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production64.440% Impact27.827% Versatility40.415% Shot quality72.26% Trajectory5012% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[4, 22, 8] | 64.4 Production 64.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp61.135% True Avg1× parp72.230% Balls / boundary5.91p5017.5% Balls / dismissal21.67p72.217.5% | 72.2 Shot Quality 72.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.5% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control84.6% | 27.8 Impact 27.8 = WPA percentile · total -15.7 WPA · Powerplay-9 WPA · Consolidation-6.7 | 40.4 Versatility 40.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp27.826.7% vs Spin SRp61.126.7% Accel into Consp16.720% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 5 | LHB | — | 3 | 63 | 58 | 108.6 | 31.5 | 4 | 2 | 48.7 Scout Score 48.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production52.540% Impact5027% Versatility47.815% Shot quality38.96% Trajectory38.912% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[39, 24, 0] | 52.5 Production 52.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp72.235% True Avg0.71× parp38.930% Balls / boundary4.67p61.117.5% Balls / dismissal14p27.817.5% | 38.9 Shot Quality 38.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control76.5% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total -6.2 WPA · Powerplay-6 WPA · Consolidation-0.1 | 47.8 Versatility 47.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp38.926.7% vs Spin SRp27.826.7% Accel into Consp83.320% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | 25 | 5 | 50 | 44 | 113.6 | 50 | 2 | 1 | 47.7 Scout Score 47.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production47.840% Impact61.127% Versatility51.515% Shot quality16.76% Trajectory27.812% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.98×[4, 10, 24] | 47.8 Production 47.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap44.435% True Avgn/ap55.630% Balls / boundaryn/ap33.317.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap55.617.5% | 16.7 Shot Quality 16.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build69.2% Phase-weighted control69.2% | 61.1 Impact 61.1 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 51.5 Versatility 51.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5026.7% vs Spin SRp38.926.7% Accel into Consp72.220% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 7 | RHB | 36 | 4 | 81 | 64 | 126.6 | 20.2 | 8 | 1 | 40.3 Scout Score 40.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production47.840% Impact38.927% Versatility38.115% Shot quality506% Trajectory16.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[22, 2, 41] | 47.8 Production 47.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap44.435% True Avgn/ap55.630% Balls / boundaryn/ap33.317.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap55.617.5% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.2% Control · Build78.6% Phase-weighted control79.7% | 38.9 Impact 38.9 = WPA percentile · total -9.2 WPA · Powerplay+0 WPA · Consolidation-9.2 | 38.1 Versatility 38.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp16.726.7% vs Spin SRp72.226.7% Accel into Consp5.620% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 8 | RHB | — | 4 | 42 | 40 | 105 | 10.5 | 6 | 1 | 35.8 Scout Score 35.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production37.540% Impact16.727% Versatility39.615% Shot quality5.66% Trajectory83.312% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.04×[17, 0, 19] | 37.5 Production 37.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.82× parp27.835% True Avg0.69× parp27.830% Balls / boundary4.71p72.217.5% Balls / dismissal16.5p38.917.5% | 5.6 Shot Quality 5.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation60% Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted control60% | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = WPA percentile · total -21.9 WPA · Powerplay-14.3 WPA · Consolidation-7.6 | 39.6 Versatility 39.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp61.126.7% vs Spin SRp16.726.7% Accel into Consp27.820% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 9 | RHB | 22 | 4 | 68 | 63 | 107.9 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 22.9 Scout Score 22.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production7.540% Impact5.627% Versatility40.415% Shot quality83.36% Trajectory61.112% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[12, 10, 46] | 7.5 Production 7.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.57× parp5.635% True Avg0.38× parp5.630% Balls / boundary13p5.617.5% Balls / dismissal13p16.717.5% | 83.3 Shot Quality 83.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build92.9% Phase-weighted control85.3% | 5.6 Impact 5.6 = WPA percentile · total -27.6 WPA · Powerplay-26.9 WPA · Consolidation-0.8 | 40.4 Versatility 40.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5.626.7% vs Spin SRp5026.7% Accel into Consp61.120% Pressure entryp5026.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LHB | — | 7 | 351 | 229 | 153.3 | 117 | 43 | 8 | 82.5 Scout Score 82.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production92.928% Impact96.227% Versatility7027% Shot quality73.18% Trajectory57.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.02×[53, 53, 39] | 92.9 Production 92.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.19× parp88.542.9% True Avg5.34× parp96.232.1% Balls / boundary4.65p96.225% | 73.1 Shot Quality 73.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.9% Control · Build86.1% Phase-weighted control83.1% | 96.2 Impact 96.2 = WPA percentile · total +54.9 WPA · Consolidation+15.6 WPA · Build+39.2 | 70 Versatility 70 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep66.744.4% vs Off-spin40bp83.3 vs Chinaman5b5b <min vs Short ball16bp25 Spin hittingp8129.6% Off-spin43bp62.5 LA-orthodox24bp94.4 Leg-spin44bp91.7 Chinaman5b5b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p5014.8% Reach deathp80.811.1% | |
| 2 | LHB | 22 | 6 | 266 | 159 | 167.3 | 44.3 | 21 | 12 | 77.6 Scout Score 77.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production91.828% Impact88.527% Versatility64.827% Shot quality508% Trajectory65.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.02×[73, 24, 9] | 91.8 Production 91.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.32× parp96.242.9% True Avg3.92× parp88.532.1% Balls / boundary4.75p88.525% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.3% Control · Build76.5% Phase-weighted control77.2% | 88.5 Impact 88.5 = WPA percentile · total +29.8 WPA · Consolidation+10.4 WPA · Build+19.4 | 64.8 Versatility 64.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep57.344.4% vs Off-spin23bp50 vs Chinaman11bp50 vs Short ball14bp75 Spin hittingp55.329.6% Off-spin27bp37.5 LA-orthodox32bp72.2 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman11bp50 Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p88.514.8% Reach deathp88.511.1% | |
| 3 | LHB | 27 | 5 | 117 | 66 | 177.3 | 58.5 | 3 | 11 | 60.5 Scout Score 60.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production70.928% Impact80.827% Versatility3627% Shot quality80.88% Trajectory26.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[31, 32, 30] | 70.9 Production 70.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.26× parp80.842.9% True Avg1.77× parp5032.1% Balls / boundary5.4p80.825% | 80.8 Shot Quality 80.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72.7% Control · Build86% Phase-weighted control83.3% | 80.8 Impact 80.8 = WPA percentile · total +21.9 WPA · Consolidation-4.2 WPA · Build+26.1 | 36 Versatility 36 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep16.744.4% vs Off-spin27bp16.7 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp12.529.6% Off-spin30bp12.5 LA-orthodox5b5b <min Leg-spin4b4b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p96.214.8% Reach deathp96.211.1% | |
| 4 | LHB | 23 | 5 | 88 | 59 | 149.2 | 44 | 8 | 3 | 58.1 Scout Score 58.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production53.628% Impact57.727% Versatility4927% Shot quality57.78% Trajectory96.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.14×[9, 37, 22] | 53.6 Production 53.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.01× parp42.342.9% True Avgn/ap65.432.1% Balls / boundary6.2p57.725% | 57.7 Shot Quality 57.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build70% Phase-weighted control80.6% | 57.7 Impact 57.7 = WPA percentile · total +3.6 WPA · Consolidation+11.6 WPA · Build-8.1 | 49 Versatility 49 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin6b6b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp61.129.6% Off-spin9b9b <min LA-orthodox17bp61.1 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p26.914.8% Reach deathp42.311.1% | |
| 5 | RHB | 25 | 5 | 88 | 71 | 123.9 | 22 | 11 | 3 | 55.6 Scout Score 55.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production6928% Impact73.127% Versatility51.227% Shot quality19.28% Trajectory11.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.89×[0, 31, 1] | 69 Production 69 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.07× parp57.742.9% True Avg2.11× parp80.832.1% Balls / boundary4.75p73.125% | 19.2 Shot Quality 19.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation64.3% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control71.1% | 73.1 Impact 73.1 = WPA percentile · total +10 WPA · Consolidation+0.2 WPA · Build+9.7 | 51.2 Versatility 51.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep62.544.4% vs LA-orthodox10bp62.5 vs Leg-spin7b7b <min vs Short ball8b8b <min Spin hittingp45.829.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox10bp50 Leg-spin10bp41.7 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p57.714.8% Reach deathp11.511.1% | |
| 6 | RHB | 23 | 6 | 76 | 62 | 122.6 | 15.2 | 8 | 2 | 55.1 Scout Score 55.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production51.128% Impact5027% Versatility42.827% Shot quality96.28% Trajectory80.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[12, 22, 29] | 51.1 Production 51.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.04× parp5042.9% True Avgn/ap65.432.1% Balls / boundary5.67p34.625% | 96.2 Shot Quality 96.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build100% Phase-weighted control100% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +2.8 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+2.8 | 42.8 Versatility 42.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox6b6b <min vs Leg-spin4b4b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp27.829.6% Off-spin5b5b <min LA-orthodox12bp27.8 Leg-spin4b4b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p80.814.8% Reach deathp3.811.1% | |
| 7 | RHB | 26 | 5 | 87 | 65 | 133.8 | 21.8 | 4 | 5 | 54.2 Scout Score 54.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production56.328% Impact19.227% Versatility70.927% Shot quality65.48% Trajectory88.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.13×[41, 0, 0] | 56.3 Production 56.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.08× parp73.142.9% True Avg1.16× parp26.932.1% Balls / boundary5.86p65.425% | 65.4 Shot Quality 65.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation58.3% Control · Build93.1% Phase-weighted control82.9% | 19.2 Impact 19.2 = WPA percentile · total -5.4 WPA · Consolidation-10.8 WPA · Build+5.4 | 70.9 Versatility 70.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep80.644.4% vs LA-orthodox14bp87.5 vs Leg-spin17bp75 vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp78.529.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox15bp83.3 Leg-spin21bp75 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p65.414.8% Reach deathp19.211.1% | |
| 8 | LHB | 20 | 4 | 40 | 31 | 129 | 13.3 | 6 | 0 | 53.1 Scout Score 53.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production49.728% Impact65.427% Versatility51.727% Shot quality3.88% Trajectory73.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.04×[25, 4, 10] | 49.7 Production 49.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.17× parp65.442.9% True Avg0.92× parp34.632.1% Balls / boundary5p42.325% | 3.8 Shot Quality 3.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 65.4 Impact 65.4 = WPA percentile · total +5.1 WPA · Consolidation+7.5 WPA · Build-2.4 | 51.7 Versatility 51.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin0b0b <min vs Chinaman5b5b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp5029.6% Off-spin5b5b <min LA-orthodox4b4b <min Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman5b5b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p73.114.8% Reach deathp34.611.1% | |
| 9 | LHB | 36 | 5 | 118 | 89 | 132.6 | 29.5 | 11 | 2 | 39.6 Scout Score 39.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production33.528% Impact42.327% Versatility5027% Shot quality42.38% Trajectory19.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.9×[43, 7, 25] | 33.5 Production 33.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp34.642.9% True Avg1.22× parp19.232.1% Balls / boundary7.1p5025% | 42.3 Shot Quality 42.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build72.3% Phase-weighted control76.1% | 42.3 Impact 42.3 = WPA percentile · total +1.8 WPA · Consolidation-5.9 WPA · Build+7.7 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin7b7b <min vs Chinaman3b3b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp48.129.6% Off-spin17bp87.5 LA-orthodox45bp38.9 Leg-spin11bp25 Chinaman3b3b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p42.314.8% Reach deathp65.411.1% | |
| 10 | RHB | 30 | 5 | 47 | 46 | 102.2 | 11.8 | 5 | 1 | 34 Scout Score 34 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production27.928% Impact34.627% Versatility23.427% Shot quality88.58% Trajectory34.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.98×[0, 0, 31] | 27.9 Production 27.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.61× parp11.542.9% True Avgn/ap65.432.1% Balls / boundary17p7.725% | 88.5 Shot Quality 88.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.5% Control · Build92.3% Phase-weighted control91.2% | 34.6 Impact 34.6 = WPA percentile · total -2.3 WPA · Consolidation-0.7 WPA · Build-1.6 | 23.4 Versatility 23.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep2544.4% vs LA-orthodox8b8b <min vs Leg-spin13bp25 vs Short ball9b9b <min Spin hittingp8.329.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox8b8b <min Leg-spin13bp8.3 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p11.514.8% Reach deathp73.111.1% | |
| 11 | RHB | — | 2 | 41 | 42 | 97.6 | 20.5 | 3 | 0 | 28.3 Scout Score 28.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production23.828% Impact26.927% Versatility27.427% Shot quality34.68% Trajectory42.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[7, 34] | 23.8 Production 23.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.74× parp19.242.9% True Avg1.31× parp42.332.1% Balls / boundary17p7.725% | 34.6 Shot Quality 34.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation63.2% Control · Build86.7% Phase-weighted control73.5% | 26.9 Impact 26.9 = WPA percentile · total -3.6 WPA · Consolidation-0.8 WPA · Build-2.7 | 27.4 Versatility 27.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep37.544.4% vs LA-orthodox16bp37.5 vs Leg-spin6b6b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp16.729.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox25bp16.7 Leg-spin6b6b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p19.214.8% Reach deathp26.911.1% | |
| 12 | RHB | — | 4 | 55 | 50 | 110 | 13.8 | 5 | 1 | 21.2 Scout Score 21.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production2228% Impact11.527% Versatility17.927% Shot quality26.98% Trajectory5010% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.01×[6, 38, 5] | 22 Production 22 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.86× parp26.942.9% True Avg0.48× parp11.532.1% Balls / boundary10.67p26.925% | 26.9 Shot Quality 26.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation61.5% Control · Build78.9% Phase-weighted control71.9% | 11.5 Impact 11.5 = WPA percentile · total -34.4 WPA · Consolidation-11.7 WPA · Build-22.7 | 17.9 Versatility 17.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep12.544.4% vs LA-orthodox10bp12.5 vs Leg-spin5b5b <min vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp5.629.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox11bp5.6 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p34.614.8% Reach deathp5011.1% | |
| 13 | LHB | 28 | 5 | 44 | 48 | 91.7 | 8.8 | 3 | 1 | 17 Scout Score 17 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production7.728% Impact3.827% Versatility46.527% Shot quality11.58% Trajectory3.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.86×[0, 12, 3] | 7.7 Production 7.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.67× parp3.842.9% True Avg0.4× parp3.832.1% Balls / boundary15.33p19.225% | 11.5 Shot Quality 11.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.9% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control69.6% | 3.8 Impact 3.8 = WPA percentile · total -37.1 WPA · Consolidation-4.8 WPA · Build-32.3 | 46.5 Versatility 46.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin0b0b <min vs Chinaman6b6b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp58.329.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox6b6b <min Leg-spin14bp58.3 Chinaman6b6b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p3.814.8% Reach deathp57.711.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 23 | 6 | 86 | 44 | 195.5 | 14.3 | 4 | 8 | 82.4 Scout Score 82.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production8940% Impact95.825% Versatility53.518% Shot quality20.84% Trajectory95.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.32×[18, 0, 0] | 89 Production 89 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR2.57× parp95.832.5% Balls / boundary1.43p95.820% Balls / six2.5p95.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 20.8 Shot Quality 20.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build64.3% Phase-weighted control67.6% | 95.8 Impact 95.8 = WPA percentile · total +71 WPA · Death+71 | 53.5 Versatility 53.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p20.816.7% Reach buildp87.522.2% | |
| 2 | LHB | 30 | 5 | 213 | 117 | 182.1 | 42.6 | 15 | 16 | 58.1 Scout Score 58.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production55.640% Impact45.825% Versatility62.318% Shot quality79.24% Trajectory77.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.02×[2, 46, 60] | 55.6 Production 55.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap79.232.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap37.520% Balls / sixn/ap45.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 79.2 Shot Quality 79.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation89.3% Control · Build78.3% Phase-weighted control84.3% | 45.8 Impact 45.8 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 62.3 Versatility 62.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p62.516.7% Reach buildp95.822.2% | |
| 3 | RHB | — | 3 | 39 | 39 | 100 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 53.3 Scout Score 53.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production55.640% Impact45.825% Versatility5318% Shot quality29.24% Trajectory68.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[4, 8, 27] | 55.6 Production 55.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap79.232.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap37.520% Balls / sixn/ap45.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 29.2 Shot Quality 29.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build70.8% Phase-weighted control69.2% | 45.8 Impact 45.8 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 53 Versatility 53 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p62.516.7% Reach buildp54.222.2% | |
| 4 | RHB | — | 5 | 44 | 36 | 122.2 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 52.7 Scout Score 52.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production5940% Impact87.525% Versatility3418% Shot quality12.54% Trajectory4.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.55×[9, 3, 4] | 59 Production 59 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.14× parp45.832.5% Balls / boundary4.5p54.220% Balls / six6p79.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 12.5 Shot Quality 12.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 87.5 Impact 87.5 = WPA percentile · total +9.7 WPA · Death+9.7 | 34 Versatility 34 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p4.216.7% Reach buildp12.522.2% | |
| 5 | RHB | 20 | 4 | 36 | 43 | 83.7 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 49.1 Scout Score 49.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production52.540% Impact62.525% Versatility52.118% Shot quality4.24% Trajectory22.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.78×[1, 13, 9] | 52.5 Production 52.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.07× parp37.532.5% Balls / boundary4p62.520% Balls / six8p62.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 4.2 Shot Quality 4.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation56.2% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control60% | 62.5 Impact 62.5 = WPA percentile · total +1.3 WPA · Death+1.3 | 52.1 Versatility 52.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p45.816.7% Reach buildp62.522.2% | |
| 6 | RHB | 32 | 5 | 50 | 30 | 166.7 | 12.5 | 4 | 2 | 49.1 Scout Score 49.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production3640% Impact70.825% Versatility5318% Shot quality54.24% Trajectory40.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.9×[1, 23, 12] | 36 Production 36 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.14× parp62.532.5% Balls / boundary5p20.820% Balls / six15p12.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 54.2 Shot Quality 54.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control73.3% | 70.8 Impact 70.8 = WPA percentile · total +5.4 WPA · Death+5.4 | 53 Versatility 53 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p29.216.7% Reach buildp79.222.2% | |
| 7 | RHB | 32 | 4 | 47 | 40 | 117.5 | 15.7 | 3 | 3 | 48.2 Scout Score 48.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production27.740% Impact79.225% Versatility39.118% Shot quality95.84% Trajectory5013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.95×[26, 0, 14] | 27.7 Production 27.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.95× parp4.232.5% Balls / boundary4p87.520% Balls / six16p4.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 95.8 Shot Quality 95.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build94.4% Phase-weighted control91.3% | 79.2 Impact 79.2 = WPA percentile · total +5.6 WPA · Death+5.6 | 39.1 Versatility 39.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p12.516.7% Reach buildp29.222.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | — | 4 | 68 | 50 | 136 | 22.7 | 3 | 5 | 47 Scout Score 47 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.740% Impact4.225% Versatility47.518% Shot quality66.74% Trajectory59.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[24, 27, 3] | 67.7 Production 67.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.14× parp54.232.5% Balls / boundary4.33p70.820% Balls / six6.5p87.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 66.7 Shot Quality 66.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build72.2% Phase-weighted control75% | 4.2 Impact 4.2 = WPA percentile · total -12.5 WPA · Death-12.5 | 47.5 Versatility 47.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p95.816.7% Reach buildp4.222.2% | |
| 9 | RHB | 25 | 4 | 15 | 24 | 62.5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 46.2 Scout Score 46.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production55.640% Impact45.825% Versatility49.318% Shot quality45.84% Trajectory13.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.73×[1, 3, 1] | 55.6 Production 55.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap79.232.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap37.520% Balls / sixn/ap45.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 45.8 Shot Quality 45.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.9% Control · Build60% Phase-weighted control72.2% | 45.8 Impact 45.8 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 49.3 Versatility 49.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p62.516.7% Reach buildp37.522.2% | |
| 10 | RHB | — | 1 | 25 | 27 | 92.6 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 41.7 Scout Score 41.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.840% Impact29.225% Versatility4718% Shot quality87.54% Trajectory5013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)n/a[25] | 39.8 Production 39.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.44× parp20.832.5% Balls / boundary6p12.520% Balls / six6p70.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 87.5 Shot Quality 87.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build92.3% Phase-weighted control87% | 29.2 Impact 29.2 = WPA percentile · total -1.3 WPA · Death-1.3 | 47 Versatility 47 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p37.516.7% Reach buildp45.822.2% | |
| 11 | LHB | 18 | 5 | 38 | 30 | 126.7 | 12.7 | 1 | 2 | 38.8 Scout Score 38.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production21.940% Impact20.825% Versatility60.918% Shot quality66.74% Trajectory86.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.24×[8, 3, 0] | 21.9 Production 21.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.86× parp12.532.5% Balls / boundary10p4.220% Balls / six10p29.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 66.7 Shot Quality 66.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control75% | 20.8 Impact 20.8 = WPA percentile · total -1.6 WPA · Death-1.6 | 60.9 Versatility 60.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p87.516.7% Reach buildp70.822.2% | |
| 12 | RHB | 22 | 6 | 59 | 46 | 128.3 | 9.8 | 5 | 2 | 33.3 Scout Score 33.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.640% Impact12.525% Versatility48.418% Shot quality37.54% Trajectory31.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.88×[6, 7, 14] | 39.6 Production 39.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.1× parp29.232.5% Balls / boundary4.2p79.220% Balls / six10.5p20.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 37.5 Shot Quality 37.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build63.2% Phase-weighted control72% | 12.5 Impact 12.5 = WPA percentile · total -8.8 WPA · Death-8.8 | 48.4 Versatility 48.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball6b6b <min vs Spin (death)p79.216.7% Reach buildp20.822.2% |
Vikalp Tiwari
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB
82.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 351 · Balls 229 · SR 153.3 · Avg 117 · 4s 43 · 6s 8
82.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production92.928%26.0
Impact *96.227%26.0
Versatility7027%18.9
Shot quality73.18%5.8
Trajectory57.710%5.8
Scout Score82.5
92.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR155.81.19×172bp88.542.9%
True Avg1345.34×2wp96.232.1%
Balls / boundary4.6—172bp96.225%
96.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +54.9
WPA · Consolidation+15.6
WPA · Build+39.2
70VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p66.744.4%
vs Off-spin152 SR40bp83.3
vs Chinaman220 SR5b5b <min
vs Short ball138 SR16bp25
Spin hitting———p8129.6%
Off-spin147 SR43bp62.5
LA-orthodox179 SR24bp94.4
Leg-spin148 SR44bp91.7
Chinaman220 SR5b5b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)149.2 SR1.03×63bp5014.8%
Reach death171.4 SR1.13×14bp80.811.1%
73.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.9%
Control · Build86.1%
Phase-weighted control83.1% → p73.1
57.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.02×
Recent scores[53, 53, 39]
Innings7
Vijay Yadav
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 23
82.4
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 86 · Balls 44 · SR 195.5 · Avg 14.3 · 4s 4 · 6s 8
82.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production8940%35.6
Impact *95.825%23.9
Versatility53.518%9.6
Shot quality20.84%0.8
Trajectory95.513%12.4
Scout Score82.4
89ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR3902.57×10bp95.832.5%
Balls / boundary1.4—10bp95.820%
Balls / six2.5—10bp95.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
95.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +71
WPA · Death+71
53.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball320 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)00×1bp20.816.7%
Reach build160.7 SR1.18×28bp87.522.2%
20.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build64.3%
Phase-weighted control67.6% → p20.8
95.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.32×
Recent scores[18, 0, 0]
Innings6
Rahul Pradhan
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 22
77.6
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 266 · Balls 159 · SR 167.3 · Avg 44.3 · 4s 21 · 6s 12
77.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production91.828%25.7
Impact *88.527%23.9
Versatility64.827%17.5
Shot quality508%4.0
Trajectory65.410%6.5
Scout Score77.6
91.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR172.81.32×114bp96.242.9%
True Avg98.53.92×2wp88.532.1%
Balls / boundary4.8—114bp88.525%
88.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +29.8
WPA · Consolidation+10.4
WPA · Build+19.4
64.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p57.344.4%
vs Off-spin139 SR23bp50
vs Chinaman155 SR11bp50
vs Short ball200 SR14bp75
Spin hitting———p55.329.6%
Off-spin133 SR27bp37.5
LA-orthodox159 SR32bp72.2
Leg-spin180 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman155 SR11bp50
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)189.4 SR1.31×47bp88.514.8%
Reach death165.4 SR1.09×26bp88.511.1%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.3%
Control · Build76.5%
Phase-weighted control77.2% → p50
65.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.02×
Recent scores[73, 24, 9]
Innings6
Pawan Parnate
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 28
74.9
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 135 · Balls 108 · SR 125 · Avg 27 · 4s 16 · 6s 5
74.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production83.340%33.3
Impact *83.327%22.5
Versatility44.815%6.7
Shot quality61.16%3.7
Trajectory72.212%8.7
Scout Score74.9
83.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR154.11.07×61bp83.335%
True Avg471.67×2wp83.330%
Balls / boundary3.8—61bp83.317.5%
Balls / dismissal30.5—2wp83.317.5%
83.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +17.8
WPA · Powerplay+21
WPA · Consolidation-3.2
44.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR152.5 SR1.04×59bp83.326.7%
vs Spin SR91.8 SR0.72×49bp5.626.7%
Accel into Cons103.8 SR—26bp38.920%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
61.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.9%
Control · Build95.2%
Phase-weighted control82.2% → p61.1
72.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.04×
Recent scores[35, 14, 39]
Innings7
Amandeep Khare
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 28
74.2
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 325 · Balls 206 · SR 157.8 · Avg 65 · 4s 39 · 6s 6
74.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production94.440%37.8
Impact *72.227%19.5
Versatility70.715%10.6
Shot quality94.46%5.7
Trajectory5.612%0.7
Scout Score74.2
94.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR160.31.11×68bp94.435%
True Avg54.51.93×2wp94.430%
Balls / boundary3.6—68bp94.417.5%
Balls / dismissal34—2wp94.417.5%
72.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +17.7
WPA · Powerplay+20.7
WPA · Consolidation-3.1
70.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR189.9 SR1.29×89bp94.426.7%
vs Spin SR133.3 SR1.04×117bp83.326.7%
Accel into Cons110.9 SR—46bp5020%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
94.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.3%
Control · Build95.7%
Phase-weighted control85.7% → p94.4
5.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.88×
Recent scores[56, 60, 6]
Innings6
Prateek Yadav
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 27
60.5
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 117 · Balls 66 · SR 177.3 · Avg 58.5 · 4s 3 · 6s 11
60.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production70.928%19.9
Impact *80.827%21.8
Versatility3627%9.7
Shot quality80.88%6.5
Trajectory26.910%2.7
Scout Score60.5
70.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR164.81.26×54bp80.842.9%
True Avg44.51.77×2wp5032.1%
Balls / boundary5.4—54bp80.825%
80.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +21.9
WPA · Consolidation-4.2
WPA · Build+26.1
36VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p16.744.4%
vs Off-spin115 SR27bp16.7
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball600 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p12.529.6%
Off-spin117 SR30bp12.5
LA-orthodox40 SR5b5b <min
Leg-spin250 SR4b4b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)255 SR1.76×20bp96.214.8%
Reach death233.3 SR1.54×12bp96.211.1%
80.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72.7%
Control · Build86%
Phase-weighted control83.3% → p80.8
26.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[31, 32, 30]
Innings5
Deepak Yadav
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 23
58.1
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 88 · Balls 59 · SR 149.2 · Avg 44 · 4s 8 · 6s 3
58.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production53.628%15.0
Impact *57.727%15.6
Versatility4927%13.2
Shot quality57.78%4.6
Trajectory96.210%9.6
Scout Score58.1
53.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR132.31.01×31bp42.342.9%
True Avg——0wp65.432.1%
Balls / boundary6.2—31bp57.725%
57.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +3.6
WPA · Consolidation+11.6
WPA · Build-8.1
49VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin117 SR6b6b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p61.129.6%
Off-spin111 SR9b9b <min
LA-orthodox153 SR17bp61.1
Leg-spin180 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)100 SR0.69×8bp26.914.8%
Reach death145.5 SR0.96×22bp42.311.1%
57.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build70%
Phase-weighted control80.6% → p57.7
96.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.14×
Recent scores[9, 37, 22]
Innings5
Ajay Mandal
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 30
58.1
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 213 · Balls 117 · SR 182.1 · Avg 42.6 · 4s 15 · 6s 16
58.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production55.640%22.2
Impact *45.825%11.4
Versatility62.318%11.2
Shot quality79.24%3.2
Trajectory77.313%10.0
Scout Score58.1
55.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp79.232.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp37.520%
Balls / six——0bp45.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
45.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
62.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp62.516.7%
Reach build200 SR1.47×23bp95.822.2%
79.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation89.3%
Control · Build78.3%
Phase-weighted control84.3% → p79.2
77.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.02×
Recent scores[2, 46, 60]
Innings5
Kritesh Sahu
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 21
55.9
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 91 · Balls 51 · SR 178.4 · Avg 18.2 · 4s 4 · 6s 9
55.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production14.740%5.9
Impact *94.427%25.5
Versatility76.715%11.5
Shot quality27.86%1.7
Trajectory94.412%11.3
Scout Score55.9
14.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.69×15bp16.735%
True Avg7.50.27×2wp16.730%
Balls / boundary7.5—15bp16.717.5%
Balls / dismissal7.5—2wp5.617.5%
94.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +35.9
WPA · Powerplay-16.1
WPA · Consolidation+52
76.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR166.7 SR1.14×21bp72.226.7%
vs Spin SR186.7 SR1.46×30bp94.426.7%
Accel into Cons244.8 SR—29bp94.420%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
27.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75.9%
Control · Build57.1%
Phase-weighted control73.8% → p27.8
94.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.12×
Recent scores[42, 7, 35]
Innings5
Harsh Sharma
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 25
55.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 88 · Balls 71 · SR 123.9 · Avg 22 · 4s 11 · 6s 3
55.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production6928%19.3
Impact *73.127%19.7
Versatility51.227%13.8
Shot quality19.28%1.5
Trajectory11.510%1.1
Scout Score55.6
69ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR139.51.07×38bp57.742.9%
True Avg532.11×1wp80.832.1%
Balls / boundary4.8—38bp73.125%
73.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +10
WPA · Consolidation+0.2
WPA · Build+9.7
51.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p62.544.4%
vs LA-orthodox140 SR10bp62.5
vs Leg-spin43 SR7b7b <min
vs Short ball112 SR8b8b <min
Spin hitting———p45.829.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox140 SR10bp50
Leg-spin90 SR10bp41.7
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)166.7 SR1.15×18bp57.714.8%
Reach death100 SR0.66×8bp11.511.1%
19.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation64.3%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control71.1% → p19.2
11.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.89×
Recent scores[0, 31, 1]
Innings5
Abdul Anas Khan
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 23
55.1
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 76 · Balls 62 · SR 122.6 · Avg 15.2 · 4s 8 · 6s 2
55.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production51.128%14.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility42.827%11.6
Shot quality96.28%7.7
Trajectory80.810%8.1
Scout Score55.1
51.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR135.31.04×17bp5042.9%
True Avg——0wp65.432.1%
Balls / boundary5.7—17bp34.625%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2.8
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+2.8
42.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox67 SR6b6b <min
vs Leg-spin150 SR4b4b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p27.829.6%
Off-spin140 SR5b5b <min
LA-orthodox108 SR12bp27.8
Leg-spin150 SR4b4b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)250 SR1.73×4bp80.814.8%
Reach death126.8 SR0.84×41bp3.811.1%
96.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build100%
Phase-weighted control100% → p96.2
80.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[12, 22, 29]
Innings6
Anand Rao
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 26
54.2
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 87 · Balls 65 · SR 133.8 · Avg 21.8 · 4s 4 · 6s 5
54.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production56.328%15.8
Impact *19.227%5.2
Versatility70.927%19.1
Shot quality65.48%5.2
Trajectory88.510%8.8
Scout Score54.2
56.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR141.51.08×41bp73.142.9%
True Avg291.16×2wp26.932.1%
Balls / boundary5.9—41bp65.425%
19.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5.4
WPA · Consolidation-10.8
WPA · Build+5.4
70.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p80.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox164 SR14bp87.5
vs Leg-spin112 SR17bp75
vs Short ball250 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p78.529.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox160 SR15bp83.3
Leg-spin105 SR21bp75
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)187.5 SR1.3×8bp65.414.8%
Reach death133.3 SR0.88×21bp19.211.1%
65.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation58.3%
Control · Build93.1%
Phase-weighted control82.9% → p65.4
88.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.13×
Recent scores[41, 0, 0]
Innings5
Aman Tripathi
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB
53.3
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 39 · Balls 39 · SR 100 · Avg 13 · 4s 3 · 6s 3
53.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production55.640%22.2
Impact *45.825%11.4
Versatility5318%9.5
Shot quality29.24%1.2
Trajectory68.213%8.9
Scout Score53.3
55.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp79.232.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp37.520%
Balls / six——0bp45.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
45.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
53VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp62.516.7%
Reach build112.5 SR0.83×24bp54.222.2%
29.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build70.8%
Phase-weighted control69.2% → p29.2
68.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[4, 8, 27]
Innings3
Rishi Sharma
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 20
53.1
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 40 · Balls 31 · SR 129 · Avg 13.3 · 4s 6 · 6s 0
53.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production49.728%13.9
Impact *65.427%17.7
Versatility51.727%14.0
Shot quality3.88%0.3
Trajectory73.110%7.3
Scout Score53.1
49.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR153.31.17×15bp65.442.9%
True Avg230.92×1wp34.632.1%
Balls / boundary5—15bp42.325%
65.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +5.1
WPA · Consolidation+7.5
WPA · Build-2.4
51.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin—0b0b <min
vs Chinaman80 SR5b5b <min
vs Short ball400 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p5029.6%
Off-spin180 SR5b5b <min
LA-orthodox150 SR4b4b <min
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman80 SR5b5b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)216.7 SR1.5×6bp73.114.8%
Reach death125 SR0.82×4bp34.611.1%
3.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p3.8
73.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.04×
Recent scores[25, 4, 10]
Innings4
Harsh Yadav
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB
52.7
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 44 · Balls 36 · SR 122.2 · Avg 11 · 4s 3 · 6s 3
52.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production5940%23.6
Impact *87.525%21.9
Versatility3418%6.1
Shot quality12.54%0.5
Trajectory4.513%0.6
Scout Score52.7
59ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR172.21.14×18bp45.832.5%
Balls / boundary4.5—18bp54.220%
Balls / six6—18bp79.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
87.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +9.7
WPA · Death+9.7
34VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)33.3 SR0.29×6bp4.216.7%
Reach build72.2 SR0.53×18bp12.522.2%
12.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p12.5
4.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.55×
Recent scores[9, 3, 4]
Innings5
Abhijeet Tah
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 25
49.7
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 112 · Balls 88 · SR 127.3 · Avg 18.7 · 4s 11 · 6s 4
49.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production64.440%25.8
Impact *27.827%7.5
Versatility40.415%6.1
Shot quality72.26%4.3
Trajectory5012%6.0
Scout Score49.7
64.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR130.80.91×65bp61.135%
True Avg28.31×3wp72.230%
Balls / boundary5.9—65bp5017.5%
Balls / dismissal21.7—3wp72.217.5%
27.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -15.7
WPA · Powerplay-9
WPA · Consolidation-6.7
40.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR120.3 SR0.82×64bp27.826.7%
vs Spin SR145.8 SR1.14×24bp61.126.7%
Accel into Cons81.2 SR—16bp16.720%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
72.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.5%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control84.6% → p72.2
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[4, 22, 8]
Innings6
Pratham Jachak
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 20
49.1
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 36 · Balls 43 · SR 83.7 · Avg 9 · 4s 3 · 6s 1
49.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production52.540%21.0
Impact *62.525%15.6
Versatility52.118%9.4
Shot quality4.24%0.2
Trajectory22.713%3.0
Scout Score49.1
52.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR162.51.07×8bp37.532.5%
Balls / boundary4—8bp62.520%
Balls / six8—8bp62.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
62.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +1.3
WPA · Death+1.3
52.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball175 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.87×1bp45.816.7%
Reach build111.1 SR0.81×9bp62.522.2%
4.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation56.2%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control60% → p4.2
22.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.78×
Recent scores[1, 13, 9]
Innings4
Shubham Agarwal
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 32
49.1
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 50 · Balls 30 · SR 166.7 · Avg 12.5 · 4s 4 · 6s 2
49.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production3640%14.4
Impact *70.825%17.7
Versatility5318%9.5
Shot quality54.24%2.2
Trajectory40.913%5.3
Scout Score49.1
36ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR173.31.14×15bp62.532.5%
Balls / boundary5—15bp20.820%
Balls / six15—15bp12.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
70.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +5.4
WPA · Death+5.4
53VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker400 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball233 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.87×4bp29.216.7%
Reach build164.3 SR1.2×14bp79.222.2%
54.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control73.3% → p54.2
40.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.9×
Recent scores[1, 23, 12]
Innings5
Shubham Maurya
Top order · pos 3 · LHB
48.7
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 63 · Balls 58 · SR 108.6 · Avg 31.5 · 4s 4 · 6s 2
48.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production52.540%21.0
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility47.815%7.2
Shot quality38.96%2.3
Trajectory38.912%4.7
Scout Score48.7
52.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR142.90.99×14bp72.235%
True Avg200.71×1wp38.930%
Balls / boundary4.7—14bp61.117.5%
Balls / dismissal14—1wp27.817.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -6.2
WPA · Powerplay-6
WPA · Consolidation-0.1
47.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR123.8 SR0.84×21bp38.926.7%
vs Spin SR100 SR0.78×37bp27.826.7%
Accel into Cons120.8 SR—24bp83.320%
Pressure entry130 SR0.9×30bp5026.7%
38.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control76.5% → p38.9
38.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[39, 24, 0]
Innings3
Aishwarya Mourya
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 32
48.2
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 47 · Balls 40 · SR 117.5 · Avg 15.7 · 4s 3 · 6s 3
48.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production27.740%11.1
Impact *79.225%19.8
Versatility39.118%7.0
Shot quality95.84%3.8
Trajectory5013%6.5
Scout Score48.2
27.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR143.80.95×16bp4.232.5%
Balls / boundary4—16bp87.520%
Balls / six16—16bp4.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
79.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +5.6
WPA · Death+5.6
39.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball50 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)50 SR0.43×6bp12.516.7%
Reach build94.4 SR0.69×18bp29.222.2%
95.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build94.4%
Phase-weighted control91.3% → p95.8
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.95×
Recent scores[26, 0, 14]
Innings4
Vaibhav Sahu
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 25
47.7
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 50 · Balls 44 · SR 113.6 · Avg 50 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
47.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production47.840%19.1
Impact *61.127%16.5
Versatility51.515%7.7
Shot quality16.76%1.0
Trajectory27.812%3.3
Scout Score47.7
47.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp44.435%
True Avg——0wp55.630%
Balls / boundary——0bp33.317.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp55.617.5%
61.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation+0
51.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR125.9 SR0.86×27bp5026.7%
vs Spin SR94.1 SR0.73×17bp38.926.7%
Accel into Cons——0bp72.220%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
16.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build69.2%
Phase-weighted control69.2% → p16.7
27.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.98×
Recent scores[4, 10, 24]
Innings5
Aryan Jaiswal
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB
47
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 68 · Balls 50 · SR 136 · Avg 22.7 · 4s 3 · 6s 5
47OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.740%27.1
Impact *4.225%1.1
Versatility47.518%8.6
Shot quality66.74%2.7
Trajectory59.113%7.7
Scout Score47
67.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR173.11.14×26bp54.232.5%
Balls / boundary4.3—26bp70.820%
Balls / six6.5—26bp87.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
4.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -12.5
WPA · Death-12.5
47.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball120 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)166.7 SR1.45×9bp95.816.7%
Reach build61.1 SR0.45×18bp4.222.2%
66.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build72.2%
Phase-weighted control75% → p66.7
59.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[24, 27, 3]
Innings4
Mohammad Irfan
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 25
46.2
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 15 · Balls 24 · SR 62.5 · Avg 5 · 4s 0 · 6s 1
46.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production55.640%22.2
Impact *45.825%11.4
Versatility49.318%8.9
Shot quality45.84%1.8
Trajectory13.613%1.8
Scout Score46.2
55.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp79.232.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp37.520%
Balls / six——0bp45.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
45.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
49.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp62.516.7%
Reach build80 SR0.59×5bp37.522.2%
45.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.9%
Control · Build60%
Phase-weighted control72.2% → p45.8
13.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.73×
Recent scores[1, 3, 1]
Innings4
Ambrish Kumar Singh
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB
41.7
Scout Score
Inns 1 · Runs 25 · Balls 27 · SR 92.6 · Avg 25 · 4s 1 · 6s 0
41.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.840%15.9
Impact *29.225%7.3
Versatility4718%8.5
Shot quality87.54%3.5
Trajectory5013%6.5
Scout Score41.7
39.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR66.70.44×3bp20.832.5%
Balls / boundary——3bp12.520%
Balls / six——3bp70.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
29.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -1.3
WPA · Death-1.3
47VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.87×2bp37.516.7%
Reach build100 SR0.73×13bp45.822.2%
87.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build92.3%
Phase-weighted control87% → p87.5
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)n/a
Recent scores[25]
Innings1
Nayan Rajkumar Chowhan
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 36
40.3
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 81 · Balls 64 · SR 126.6 · Avg 20.2 · 4s 8 · 6s 1
40.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production47.840%19.1
Impact *38.927%10.5
Versatility38.115%5.7
Shot quality506%3.0
Trajectory16.712%2.0
Scout Score40.3
47.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp44.435%
True Avg——0wp55.630%
Balls / boundary——0bp33.317.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp55.617.5%
38.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -9.2
WPA · Powerplay+0
WPA · Consolidation-9.2
38.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR85.7 SR0.58×14bp16.726.7%
vs Spin SR138 SR1.08×50bp72.226.7%
Accel into Cons62.5 SR—16bp5.620%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.2%
Control · Build78.6%
Phase-weighted control79.7% → p50
16.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[22, 2, 41]
Innings4
Alok Sahu
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 36
39.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 118 · Balls 89 · SR 132.6 · Avg 29.5 · 4s 11 · 6s 2
39.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production33.528%9.4
Impact *42.327%11.4
Versatility5027%13.5
Shot quality42.38%3.4
Trajectory19.210%1.9
Scout Score39.6
33.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR129.60.99×71bp34.642.9%
True Avg30.71.22×3wp19.232.1%
Balls / boundary7.1—71bp5025%
42.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +1.8
WPA · Consolidation-5.9
WPA · Build+7.7
50VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin257 SR7b7b <min
vs Chinaman200 SR3b3b <min
vs Short ball133 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p48.129.6%
Off-spin212 SR17bp87.5
LA-orthodox116 SR45bp38.9
Leg-spin73 SR11bp25
Chinaman200 SR3b3b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)130 SR0.9×10bp42.314.8%
Reach death161.5 SR1.07×13bp65.411.1%
42.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build72.3%
Phase-weighted control76.1% → p42.3
19.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.9×
Recent scores[43, 7, 25]
Innings5
Md Faiz Khan
Finisher · pos 8 · LHB · age 18
38.8
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 38 · Balls 30 · SR 126.7 · Avg 12.7 · 4s 1 · 6s 2
38.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production21.940%8.8
Impact *20.825%5.2
Versatility60.918%11.0
Shot quality66.74%2.7
Trajectory86.413%11.2
Scout Score38.8
21.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1300.86×10bp12.532.5%
Balls / boundary10—10bp4.220%
Balls / six10—10bp29.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
20.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -1.6
WPA · Death-1.6
60.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball400 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)225 SR1.96×4bp87.516.7%
Reach build125 SR0.92×20bp70.822.2%
66.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control75% → p66.7
86.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.24×
Recent scores[8, 3, 0]
Innings5
Ameya Morey
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
35.8
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 42 · Balls 40 · SR 105 · Avg 10.5 · 4s 6 · 6s 1
35.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production37.540%15.0
Impact *16.727%4.5
Versatility39.615%5.9
Shot quality5.66%0.3
Trajectory83.312%10.0
Scout Score35.8
37.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR118.20.82×33bp27.835%
True Avg19.50.69×2wp27.830%
Balls / boundary4.7—33bp72.217.5%
Balls / dismissal16.5—2wp38.917.5%
16.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -21.9
WPA · Powerplay-14.3
WPA · Consolidation-7.6
39.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR128.6 SR0.88×28bp61.126.7%
vs Spin SR50 SR0.39×12bp16.726.7%
Accel into Cons60 SR—5bp27.820%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
5.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation60%
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted control60% → p5.6
83.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.04×
Recent scores[17, 0, 19]
Innings4
Sahban Khan
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 30
34
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 47 · Balls 46 · SR 102.2 · Avg 11.8 · 4s 5 · 6s 1
34OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production27.928%7.8
Impact *34.627%9.3
Versatility23.427%6.3
Shot quality88.58%7.1
Trajectory34.610%3.5
Scout Score34
27.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR79.40.61×34bp11.542.9%
True Avg——0wp65.432.1%
Balls / boundary17—34bp7.725%
34.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -2.3
WPA · Consolidation-0.7
WPA · Build-1.6
23.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p2544.4%
vs LA-orthodox112 SR8b8b <min
vs Leg-spin69 SR13bp25
vs Short ball78 SR9b9b <min
Spin hitting———p8.329.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox112 SR8b8b <min
Leg-spin69 SR13bp8.3
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)69.2 SR0.48×13bp11.514.8%
Reach death166.7 SR1.1×12bp73.111.1%
88.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.5%
Control · Build92.3%
Phase-weighted control91.2% → p88.5
34.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.98×
Recent scores[0, 0, 31]
Innings5
Dev Aditya Singh
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 22
33.3
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 59 · Balls 46 · SR 128.3 · Avg 9.8 · 4s 5 · 6s 2
33.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.640%15.8
Impact *12.525%3.1
Versatility48.418%8.7
Shot quality37.54%1.5
Trajectory31.813%4.1
Scout Score33.3
39.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR166.71.1×21bp29.232.5%
Balls / boundary4.2—21bp79.220%
Balls / six10.5—21bp20.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
12.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -8.8
WPA · Death-8.8
48.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball17 SR6b6b <min
vs Spin (death)160 SR1.39×5bp79.216.7%
Reach build84.2 SR0.62×19bp20.822.2%
37.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build63.2%
Phase-weighted control72% → p37.5
31.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.88×
Recent scores[6, 7, 14]
Innings6
Shashwat Sharda
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
28.3
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 41 · Balls 42 · SR 97.6 · Avg 20.5 · 4s 3 · 6s 0
28.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production23.828%6.7
Impact *26.927%7.3
Versatility27.427%7.4
Shot quality34.68%2.8
Trajectory42.310%4.2
Scout Score28.3
23.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR97.10.74×34bp19.242.9%
True Avg331.31×1wp42.332.1%
Balls / boundary17—34bp7.725%
26.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.6
WPA · Consolidation-0.8
WPA · Build-2.7
27.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p37.544.4%
vs LA-orthodox100 SR16bp37.5
vs Leg-spin150 SR6b6b <min
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p16.729.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox100 SR25bp16.7
Leg-spin150 SR6b6b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)55.6 SR0.38×9bp19.214.8%
Reach death50 SR0.33×2bp26.911.1%
34.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation63.2%
Control · Build86.7%
Phase-weighted control73.5% → p34.6
42.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[7, 34]
Innings2
Mayank Verma
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 22
22.9
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 68 · Balls 63 · SR 107.9 · Avg 17 · 4s 7 · 6s 0
22.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production7.540%3.0
Impact *5.627%1.5
Versatility40.415%6.1
Shot quality83.36%5.0
Trajectory61.112%7.3
Scout Score22.9
7.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR82.10.57×39bp5.635%
True Avg10.70.38×3wp5.630%
Balls / boundary13—39bp5.617.5%
Balls / dismissal13—3wp16.717.5%
5.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -27.6
WPA · Powerplay-26.9
WPA · Consolidation-0.8
40.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR95.6 SR0.65×45bp5.626.7%
vs Spin SR138.9 SR1.08×18bp5026.7%
Accel into Cons110 SR—10bp61.120%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
83.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build92.9%
Phase-weighted control85.3% → p83.3
61.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[12, 10, 46]
Innings4
Sahil Rajat Shariff
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB
21.2
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 55 · Balls 50 · SR 110 · Avg 13.8 · 4s 5 · 6s 1
21.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production2228%6.2
Impact *11.527%3.1
Versatility17.927%4.8
Shot quality26.98%2.2
Trajectory5010%5.0
Scout Score21.2
22ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR112.50.86×32bp26.942.9%
True Avg120.48×3wp11.532.1%
Balls / boundary10.7—32bp26.925%
11.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -34.4
WPA · Consolidation-11.7
WPA · Build-22.7
17.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p12.544.4%
vs LA-orthodox90 SR10bp12.5
vs Leg-spin80 SR5b5b <min
vs Short ball240 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p5.629.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox91 SR11bp5.6
Leg-spin80 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)135.3 SR0.94×17bp34.614.8%
Reach death——0bp5011.1%
26.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation61.5%
Control · Build78.9%
Phase-weighted control71.9% → p26.9
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.01×
Recent scores[6, 38, 5]
Innings4
Gagandeep Singh
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 28
17
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 44 · Balls 48 · SR 91.7 · Avg 8.8 · 4s 3 · 6s 1
17OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production7.728%2.2
Impact *3.827%1.0
Versatility46.527%12.6
Shot quality11.58%0.9
Trajectory3.810%0.4
Scout Score17
7.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR870.67×46bp3.842.9%
True Avg100.4×4wp3.832.1%
Balls / boundary15.3—46bp19.225%
3.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -37.1
WPA · Consolidation-4.8
WPA · Build-32.3
46.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin—0b0b <min
vs Chinaman100 SR6b6b <min
vs Short ball100 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p58.329.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox67 SR6b6b <min
Leg-spin100 SR14bp58.3
Chinaman100 SR6b6b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)80 SR0.55×20bp3.814.8%
Reach death200 SR1.32×2bp57.711.1%
11.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.9%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control69.6% → p11.5
3.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.86×
Recent scores[0, 12, 3]
Innings5
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leg-spin | — | 18.5 | 7 | 144 | 7.65 | 78.9 Scout Score 78.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle78.990.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p94.90.86× | 83 Bowling Production 83 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle7w · 7.41 econp8390.3% | 80.2 Quality 80.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle26%p80.2 | 68.6 Impact 68.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +1.9p68.690.3% | 72.1 Versatility 72.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep72.190.3% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 23.5 | 13 | 150 | 6.29 | 77.6 Scout Score 77.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay57.612.6% Middle8067.1% Death82.220.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p23.51.04× | 85.3 Bowling Production 85.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 9.67 econp62.812.6% Middle6w · 6.25 econp8767.1% Death4w · 4.34 econp93.720.3% | 67.5 Quality 67.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p36.8 False-shot · Middle25%p73.3 | 88.8 Impact 88.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +6p72.112.6% MiddleWPA +34.3p94.267.1% DeathWPA +11p81.220.3% | 83.3 Versatility 83.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp6412.6% Middlep83.767.1% Deathp93.820.3% | |
| 3 | RA pace | — | 23.0 | 11 | 171 | 7.43 | 76.6 Scout Score 76.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay79.778.3% Middle63.28.7% Death66.713% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p25.51× | 85.8 Bowling Production 85.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 7.67 econp89.678.3% Middle1w · 7 econp67.28.7% Death3w · 6.33 econp7613% | 67.8 Quality 67.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p69.1 False-shot · Middle17%p55.8 | 91.8 Impact 91.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +30.1p95.678.3% MiddleWPA +9.4p80.28.7% DeathWPA +10.6p77.113% | 66 Versatility 66 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp69.478.3% Middlep55.88.7% Deathp52.513% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 23 | 26.1 | 11 | 196 | 7.49 | 76.2 Scout Score 76.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay77.157.3% Middle58.911.5% Death80.831.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p90.80.87× | 72.7 Bowling Production 72.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 7.53 econp70.557.3% Middle0w · 7.67 econp39.611.5% Death8w · 7.35 econp88.931.2% | 88.5 Quality 88.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay34%p89.7 False-shot · Middle33%p82.6 | 78.7 Impact 78.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +10.8p77.957.3% MiddleWPA +0.6p6411.5% DeathWPA +11.4p85.431.2% | 57.1 Versatility 57.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp67.557.3% Middlep53.511.5% Deathp39.231.2% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 25.0 | 12 | 143 | 5.72 | 74.7 Scout Score 74.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay7136% Middle74.340% Death8124% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p9.21.19× | 84.5 Bowling Production 84.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 6.78 econp83.736% Middle3w · 4.2 econp79.940% Death6w · 6.67 econp93.424% | 36.2 Quality 36.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p22.1 False-shot · Middle20%p48.8 | 97.6 Impact 97.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +30.5p98.536% MiddleWPA +34.6p96.540% DeathWPA +73.6p97.924% | 80.6 Versatility 80.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp83.236% Middlep96.540% Deathp5024% | |
| 6 | SLA orthodox | — | 7.0 | 3 | 51 | 7.29 | 74.5 Scout Score 74.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle74.585.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 83.9 Bowling Production 83.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 6.83 econp83.985.7% | 52.3 Quality 52.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle19%p52.3 | 89.5 Impact 89.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +23.6p89.585.7% | 64 Versatility 64 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep6485.7% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 27 | 22.0 | 8 | 176 | 8 | 74.5 Scout Score 74.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay87.863.6% Middle52.918.2% Death49.618.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p84.70.89× | 69.4 Bowling Production 69.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 7.5 econp89.963.6% Middle0w · 8 econp33.418.2% Death1w · 9.75 econp33.718.2% | 91.4 Quality 91.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay36%p92.6 False-shot · Middle33%p87.2 | 75.3 Impact 75.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +15.1p86.863.6% MiddleWPA -2.1p5018.2% DeathWPA +1.1p60.418.2% | 69.1 Versatility 69.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp78.563.6% Middlep51.218.2% Deathp54.218.2% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 25 | 18.2 | 15 | 140 | 7.64 | 74.3 Scout Score 74.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay78.254.5% Middle72.510.9% Death68.634.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p19.41.08× | 80 Bowling Production 80 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 8.1 econp82.754.5% Middle4w · 8 econp68.710.9% Death6w · 6.79 econp79.234.5% | 98.2 Quality 98.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay40%p98.5 False-shot · Middle67%p96.5 | 85.8 Impact 85.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +13.2p80.954.5% MiddleWPA +65.5p98.810.9% DeathWPA +16.7p89.634.5% | 63.1 Versatility 63.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp82.154.5% Middlep44.210.9% Deathp39.234.5% | |
| 9 | Leg-spin | 32 | 24.3 | 7 | 175 | 7.14 | 70.7 Scout Score 70.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle75.681.6% Death42.814.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p15.31.11× | 73.3 Bowling Production 73.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle6w · 6.4 econp7781.6% Death1w · 8.29 econp5214.3% | 68.6 Quality 68.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle24%p68.6 | 84.1 Impact 84.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +31.2p91.981.6% DeathWPA -1p39.614.3% | 86.8 Versatility 86.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep96.581.6% Deathp31.214.3% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 11.3 | 5 | 71 | 6.17 | 66.2 Scout Score 66.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay89.234.8% Middle52.458% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p74.50.93× | 65.6 Bowling Production 65.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 4.75 econp92.534.8% Middle1w · 7.65 econp49.558% | 43.4 Quality 43.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay42%p86.8 False-shot · Middle15%p17.4 | 79.1 Impact 79.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +20.3p92.634.8% MiddleWPA +2p70.958% | 62.4 Versatility 62.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp85.934.8% Middlep48.358% | |
| 11 | RA pace | — | 11.0 | 8 | 88 | 8 | 65.5 Scout Score 65.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay71.145.5% Middle80.227.3% Death41.427.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 69.5 Bowling Production 69.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 8.8 econp7445.5% Middle3w · 5.67 econp87.827.3% Death1w · 9 econp43.827.3% | 74 Quality 74 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p63.2 False-shot · Middle44%p91.9 | 69 Impact 69 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +15p83.845.5% MiddleWPA +9.3p77.927.3% DeathWPA -1.2p35.427.3% | 58.9 Versatility 58.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp61.545.5% Middlep74.427.3% Deathp39.227.3% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 23 | 14.3 | 6 | 127 | 8.76 | 63.1 Scout Score 63.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay67.675.9% Death43.717.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p13.31.12× | 68.7 Bowling Production 68.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 8.73 econp74.475.9% Death2w · 10 econp43.817.2% | 48.5 Quality 48.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay26%p48.5 | 81.2 Impact 81.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +17.5p89.775.9% DeathWPA -0.7p43.817.2% | 65.3 Versatility 65.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp64.775.9% Deathp67.917.2% | |
| 13 | Off-spin | 30 | 12.0 | 3 | 81 | 6.75 | 62.2 Scout Score 62.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle62.2100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p68.40.94× | 69.3 Bowling Production 69.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 6.75 econp69.3100% | 3.5 Quality 3.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle11%p3.5 | 73.3 Impact 73.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +2.3p73.3100% | 84.9 Versatility 84.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep84.9100% | |
| 14 | LA pace | — | 8.0 | 1 | 75 | 9.38 | 60.4 Scout Score 60.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay60.487.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p990.75× | 55.3 Bowling Production 55.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.71 econp55.387.5% | 19.1 Quality 19.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p19.1 | 75 Impact 75 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +9.2p7587.5% | 63.4 Versatility 63.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp63.487.5% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 28 | 17.0 | 9 | 150 | 8.82 | 59.3 Scout Score 59.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay6376.5% Death43.217.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p7.11.2× | 68.6 Bowling Production 68.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 9.15 econp73.176.5% Death3w · 9.33 econp4917.6% | 77.9 Quality 77.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p77.9 | 61.1 Impact 61.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +5.2p63.276.5% DeathWPA +0.3p52.117.6% | 53.7 Versatility 53.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp57.176.5% Deathp39.217.6% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 13.0 | 3 | 92 | 7.08 | 59.2 Scout Score 59.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay44.915.4% Middle62.176.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p11.21.13× | 68.7 Bowling Production 68.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 6 econp55.715.4% Middle3w · 7.2 econp71.376.9% | 27.4 Quality 27.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p7.4 False-shot · Middle18%p31.4 | 78.4 Impact 78.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +4.9p57.415.4% MiddleWPA +9.9p82.676.9% | 69.1 Versatility 69.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp6015.4% Middlep70.976.9% | |
| 17 | Off-spin | 28 | 9.0 | 2 | 68 | 7.56 | 58.8 Scout Score 58.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay51.255.6% Middle68.244.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 62.1 Bowling Production 62.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8.8 econp55.455.6% Middle1w · 6 econp70.644.4% | 55.7 Quality 55.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p39.7 False-shot · Middle29%p75.6 | 59.7 Impact 59.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +3.9p54.455.6% MiddleWPA +1.8p66.344.4% | 59.4 Versatility 59.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp48.255.6% Middlep73.344.4% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 23 | 8.1 | 4 | 66 | 8.08 | 55.6 Scout Score 55.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle21.336.7% Death75.563.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 54.2 Bowling Production 54.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 10.33 econp1636.7% Death4w · 6.77 econp76.463.3% | 10.5 Quality 10.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle6%p10.5 | 67.4 Impact 67.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -7.4p22.136.7% DeathWPA +24.1p93.863.3% | 51.9 Versatility 51.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep28.536.7% Deathp65.463.3% | |
| 19 | SLA orthodox | 18 | 11.4 | 6 | 89 | 7.63 | 55 Scout Score 55 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle55.474.3% Death53.417.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p11.29× | 72.3 Bowling Production 72.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 7.96 econp73.774.3% Death2w · 6 econp66.317.1% | 43 Quality 43 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle19%p43 | 58.7 Impact 58.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0.1p59.374.3% DeathWPA +0.9p56.217.1% | 47.1 Versatility 47.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep5074.3% Deathp34.417.1% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 23 | 15.0 | 5 | 155 | 10.33 | 54.2 Scout Score 54.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay65.940% Middle67.333.3% Death20.226.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p72.40.94× | 50.3 Bowling Production 50.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9 econp61.840% Middle2w · 6.8 econp73.533.3% Death1w · 16.75 econp3.826.7% | 60 Quality 60 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p80.9 False-shot · Middle17%p34.9 | 53.3 Impact 53.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +5.5p66.240% MiddleWPA +5.6p75.633.3% DeathWPA -21.1p6.226.7% | 57 Versatility 57 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp51.240% Middlep66.333.3% Deathp54.226.7% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 21 | 16.0 | 8 | 144 | 9 | 52.8 Scout Score 52.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay48.525% Middle7347.9% Death2127.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p21.41.07× | 55.9 Bowling Production 55.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8.5 econp60.525% Middle3w · 7.43 econp73.347.9% Death4w · 12.23 econp20.827.1% | 72.5 Quality 72.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p30.9 False-shot · Middle37%p94.2 | 55.6 Impact 55.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +1.4p48.525% MiddleWPA +11.1p84.947.9% DeathWPA -9.1p10.427.1% | 55.4 Versatility 55.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp56.525% Middlep6447.9% Deathp39.227.1% | |
| 22 | Off-spin | 47 | 5.0 | 3 | 43 | 8.6 | 52.2 Scout Score 52.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle46.160% Death61.340% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 56.4 Bowling Production 56.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 9.67 econp53.560% Death1w · 7 econp60.940% | 45.3 Quality 45.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p45.3 | 50.5 Impact 50.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5.7p38.460% DeathWPA +1.2p68.840% | 48.4 Versatility 48.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep3960% Deathp62.540% | |
| 23 | RA pace | — | 10.0 | 5 | 108 | 10.8 | 48.6 Scout Score 48.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay54.520% Middle53.950% Death35.830% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p76.50.93× | 35.1 Bowling Production 35.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.5 econp46.720% Middle2w · 9.8 econp36.650% Death2w · 12 econp2530% | 86.5 Quality 86.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p55.9 False-shot · Middle47%p98.8 | 46.3 Impact 46.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +5p60.320% MiddleWPA -0.5p54.750% DeathWPA -3.4p22.930% | 42.7 Versatility 42.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4520% Middlep3250% Deathp59.230% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 23 | 16.0 | 6 | 150 | 9.38 | 45.5 Scout Score 45.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay42.750% Middle56.612.5% Death45.637.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p82.70.89× | 39.9 Bowling Production 39.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 9.38 econp3150% Middle0w · 7 econp50.212.5% Death6w · 10.17 econp48.337.5% | 90.7 Quality 90.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay40%p95.6 False-shot · Middle33%p70.9 | 21 Impact 21 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -12.5p19.150% MiddleWPA -2.4p47.712.5% DeathWPA -8.2p14.637.5% | 44.9 Versatility 44.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp31.550% Middlep55.812.5% Deathp59.237.5% | |
| 25 | RA pace | — | 10.2 | 5 | 94 | 9.1 | 45 Scout Score 45 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle52.351.6% Death35.238.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p92.90.86× | 37 Bowling Production 37 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 8.06 econp43.751.6% Death3w · 12.25 econp28.138.7% | 77.9 Quality 77.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle28%p77.9 | 27.3 Impact 27.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -6.5p33.751.6% DeathWPA -3.6p18.838.7% | 46.7 Versatility 46.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep52.351.6% Deathp39.238.7% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 23 | 14.0 | 6 | 134 | 9.57 | 45 Scout Score 45 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay43.371.4% Middle50.421.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p78.60.92× | 38.7 Bowling Production 38.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.8 econp34.971.4% Middle3w · 10.67 econp51.421.4% | 79.8 Quality 79.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p83.8 False-shot · Middle28%p66.3 | 26.4 Impact 26.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -10.4p22.171.4% MiddleWPA -4.3p40.721.4% | 33.9 Versatility 33.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.871.4% Middlep24.421.4% | |
| 27 | RA pace | — | 8.0 | 2 | 79 | 9.88 | 44.9 Scout Score 44.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay3662.5% Middle59.637.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 42 Bowling Production 42 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.2 econp29.662.5% Middle1w · 7.67 econp62.637.5% | 48.6 Quality 48.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p63.2 False-shot · Middle11%p24.4 | 50.2 Impact 50.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -8.5p27.962.5% MiddleWPA +13.9p87.237.5% | 36.8 Versatility 36.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp30.362.5% Middlep47.737.5% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | — | 7.0 | 2 | 58 | 8.29 | 44.6 Scout Score 44.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay19.728.6% Middle57.157.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 58 Bowling Production 58 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 13.5 econp19.328.6% Middle2w · 6.75 econp77.357.1% | 28.1 Quality 28.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay0%p2.9 False-shot · Middle17%p40.7 | 29.4 Impact 29.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13p16.228.6% MiddleWPA -5.9p3657.1% | 53.7 Versatility 53.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp28.528.6% Middlep66.357.1% | |
| 29 | Chinaman | 30 | 17.1 | 4 | 137 | 7.98 | 42.1 Scout Score 42.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay35.517.5% Middle43.676.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p96.90.82× | 45 Bowling Production 45 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 9.33 econp28.617.5% Middle4w · 8.2 econp48.776.7% | 34 Quality 34 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p14.7 False-shot · Middle19%p38.4 | 19.9 Impact 19.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -7.7p30.917.5% MiddleWPA -10.3p17.476.7% | 44.1 Versatility 44.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4417.5% Middlep44.276.7% | |
| 30 | Off-spin | 21 | 7.0 | 1 | 61 | 8.71 | 41.9 Scout Score 41.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay26.442.9% Middle53.657.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 43 Bowling Production 43 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11.33 econp17.142.9% Middle1w · 6.75 econp62.457.1% | 18.2 Quality 18.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p14.7 False-shot · Middle12%p20.9 | 48.3 Impact 48.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -5.3p36.842.9% MiddleWPA +0p5757.1% | 50.2 Versatility 50.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp30.342.9% Middlep65.157.1% | |
| 31 | Leg-spin | 24 | 17.0 | 10 | 137 | 8.06 | 41.6 Scout Score 41.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle3470.6% Death64.323.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p3.11.29× | 56.6 Bowling Production 56.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 8.67 econp5170.6% Death3w · 7 econp73.623.5% | 59.3 Quality 59.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p59.3 | 20.8 Impact 20.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -17.3p3.570.6% DeathWPA +3.1p72.923.5% | 45.2 Versatility 45.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep38.470.6% Deathp65.623.5% | |
| 32 | RA pace | — | 13.0 | 3 | 145 | 11.15 | 41.4 Scout Score 41.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay73.630.8% Middle35.930.8% Death20.138.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p86.70.88× | 37.7 Bowling Production 37.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.5 econp75.430.8% Middle1w · 8.5 econp38.430.8% Death0w · 15.4 econp6.938.5% | 41 Quality 41 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p75 False-shot · Middle8%p7 | 29.6 Impact 29.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +5.7p69.130.8% MiddleWPA -7.2p24.430.8% DeathWPA -23p2.138.5% | 48.6 Versatility 48.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp63.730.8% Middlep45.330.8% Deathp39.238.5% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 22 | 13.0 | 5 | 120 | 9.23 | 41.1 Scout Score 41.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.923.1% Middle42.269.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p80.60.89× | 41.7 Bowling Production 41.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11 econp43.123.1% Middle3w · 8.78 econp41.269.2% | 80 Quality 80 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p51.5 False-shot · Middle30%p89.5 | 5.5 Impact 5.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -20.8p4.423.1% MiddleWPA -16.4p5.869.2% | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp45.923.1% Middlep30.269.2% | |
| 34 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 0 | 44 | 11 | 40.5 Scout Score 40.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay47.150% Middle33.950% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 34.5 Bowling Production 34.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 7 econp51.650% Middle0w · 15 econp17.450% | 44.6 Quality 44.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p26.5 False-shot · Middle25%p62.8 | 48.4 Impact 48.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +2.6p51.550% MiddleWPA -3.4p45.350% | 32.3 Versatility 32.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp49.450% Middlep15.150% | |
| 35 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.0 | 1 | 36 | 9 | 39.1 Scout Score 39.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle39.1100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 42.6 Bowling Production 42.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9 econp42.6100% | 20.9 Quality 20.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle12%p20.9 | 43 Impact 43 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -3.9p43100% | 36 Versatility 36 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep36100% | |
| 36 | Off-spin | 25 | 4.0 | 0 | 41 | 10.25 | 38.1 Scout Score 38.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay3150% Middle45.250% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 29.2 Bowling Production 29.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 10.5 econp29.850% Middle0w · 10 econp28.750% | 32.8 Quality 32.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay0%p2.9 False-shot · Middle25%p62.8 | 50.7 Impact 50.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -5.2p39.750% MiddleWPA +0.3p61.650% | 38.9 Versatility 38.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp38.250% Middlep39.550% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | — | 12.0 | 1 | 92 | 7.67 | 37.7 Scout Score 37.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle31.275% Death66.816.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p88.80.87× | 33.9 Bowling Production 33.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 8.33 econp26.975% Death0w · 5 econp65.416.7% | 15.1 Quality 15.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle15%p15.1 | 27.9 Impact 27.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -7.8p19.875% DeathWPA +1.2p64.616.7% | 42.4 Versatility 42.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep40.775% Deathp5016.7% | |
| 38 | Leg-spin | — | 15.0 | 4 | 134 | 8.93 | 37.5 Scout Score 37.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle39.480% Death25.813.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p70.40.94× | 47.8 Bowling Production 47.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 8.25 econp53.280% Death0w · 14.5 econp15.513.3% | 26.7 Quality 26.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle18%p26.7 | 11.4 Impact 11.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -15.6p8.180% DeathWPA -2.3p31.213.3% | 45.6 Versatility 45.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep51.280% Deathp12.513.3% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 27 | 9.0 | 1 | 87 | 9.67 | 35.8 Scout Score 35.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.577.8% Middle29.622.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 33.3 Bowling Production 33.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9.43 econp35.577.8% Middle0w · 10.5 econp25.622.2% | 45.5 Quality 45.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p42.6 False-shot · Middle17%p55.8 | 29.1 Impact 29.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -7.3p33.877.8% MiddleWPA -11.4p12.822.2% | 36.2 Versatility 36.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp37.977.8% Middlep30.222.2% | |
| 40 | RA pace | — | 9.1 | 2 | 99 | 10.8 | 35.8 Scout Score 35.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay25.943.6% Death45.445.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 29.8 Bowling Production 29.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11 econp2143.6% Death2w · 10.08 econp38.245.5% | 45.6 Quality 45.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p45.6 | 29.5 Impact 29.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -18.1p10.343.6% DeathWPA +0.3p47.945.5% | 49.8 Versatility 49.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.243.6% Deathp62.945.5% | |
| 41 | Leg-spin | — | 8.0 | 1 | 84 | 10.5 | 34.8 Scout Score 34.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle34.887.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 12.7 Bowling Production 12.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 10.14 econp12.787.5% | 84.9 Quality 84.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle29%p84.9 | 29.1 Impact 29.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -6.7p29.187.5% | 44.2 Versatility 44.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep44.287.5% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 26 | 6.0 | 1 | 80 | 13.33 | 31.6 Scout Score 31.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay31.683.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 22.4 Bowling Production 22.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 13 econp22.483.3% | 63.2 Quality 63.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p63.2 | 25 Impact 25 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -9.4p2583.3% | 21.8 Versatility 21.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp21.883.3% | |
| 43 | RA pace | 17 | 4.0 | 0 | 46 | 11.5 | 30.7 Scout Score 30.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay26.350% Middle3550% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 32.6 Bowling Production 32.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 14.5 econp24.750% Middle0w · 8.5 econp40.550% | 34.4 Quality 34.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p55.9 False-shot · Middle0%p12.8 | 16.4 Impact 16.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -24.6p1.550% MiddleWPA -6.7p31.450% | 38.8 Versatility 38.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp34.650% Middlep4350% | |
| 44 | Off-spin | 26 | 10.0 | 1 | 104 | 10.4 | 29.5 Scout Score 29.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay34.730% Middle26.960% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 22.2 Bowling Production 22.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 13 econp36.630% Middle0w · 9.17 econp1560% | 24.8 Quality 24.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p72.1 False-shot · Middle6%p1.2 | 37.3 Impact 37.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -19.8p7.430% MiddleWPA -2p52.360% | 28.9 Versatility 28.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp33.230% Middlep26.760% | |
| 45 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 6.0 | 0 | 63 | 10.5 | 25.3 Scout Score 25.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay31.633.3% Middle22.166.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 23.3 Bowling Production 23.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 13.5 econp20.633.3% Middle0w · 9 econp24.766.7% | 13.5 Quality 13.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p26.5 False-shot · Middle8%p7 | 21.2 Impact 21.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -3.8p42.633.3% MiddleWPA -11.6p10.566.7% | 36.1 Versatility 36.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.333.3% Middlep3666.7% | |
| 46 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 14.0 | 3 | 130 | 9.29 | 24.2 Scout Score 24.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.928.6% Middle19.171.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p5.11.2× | 29.6 Bowling Production 29.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9.75 econp46.828.6% Middle2w · 9.1 econp22.771.4% | 37.8 Quality 37.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p10.3 False-shot · Middle20%p48.8 | 13.9 Impact 13.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -1.9p45.628.6% MiddleWPA -18.4p1.271.4% | 27.6 Versatility 27.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp47.228.6% Middlep19.871.4% | |
| 47 | RA pace | — | 18.0 | 4 | 175 | 9.72 | 23.8 Scout Score 23.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle21.861.1% Death27.138.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p17.31.08× | 17.3 Bowling Production 17.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 9.09 econp14.161.1% Death2w · 10.71 econp22.238.9% | 29.1 Quality 29.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle18%p29.1 | 26.9 Impact 26.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -6.8p26.761.1% DeathWPA -2.7p27.138.9% | 38.1 Versatility 38.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep30.261.1% Deathp50.438.9% | |
| 48 | Leg-spin | 29 | 5.0 | 0 | 52 | 10.4 | 17.7 Scout Score 17.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle17.7100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 4.5 Bowling Production 4.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 10.4 econp4.5100% | 34.9 Quality 34.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p34.9 | 15.1 Impact 15.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -11.1p15.1100% | 18.6 Versatility 18.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep18.6100% | |
| 49 | LA pace | — | 7.0 | 1 | 88 | 12.57 | 16.2 Scout Score 16.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay16.285.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91× | 3.3 Bowling Production 3.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 13.5 econp3.385.7% | 33.8 Quality 33.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p33.8 | 13.2 Impact 13.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -15.7p13.285.7% | 16.2 Versatility 16.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp16.285.7% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 4.0 | 3 | 19 | 4.75 | 92.5 Phase Production 92.5 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.522× parp95.636.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp89.742.1% Boundary %8%p92.621.1% | 86.8 Quality 86.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 92.6 Impact 92.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+20.3 | 85.9 Versatility 85.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp92.630% Econ vs LHBp7530% Wkt vs RHBp86.820% Wkt vs LHBp91.220% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 27 | 14.0 | 7 | 105 | 7.5 | 89.9 Phase Production 89.9 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.824× parp86.836.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp92.642.1% Boundary %18%p89.721.1% | 92.6 Quality 92.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 86.8 Impact 86.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15.1 | 78.5 Versatility 78.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.830% Econ vs LHBp98.530% Wkt vs RHBp95.620% Wkt vs LHBp19.120% | |
| 3 | RA pace | — | 18.0 | 7 | 138 | 7.67 | 89.6 Phase Production 89.6 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.842× parp92.636.8% Wicket rate0.39/ovp83.842.1% Boundary %18%p95.621.1% | 69.1 Quality 69.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 95.6 Impact 95.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+30.1 | 69.4 Versatility 69.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.530% Econ vs LHBp27.930% Wkt vs RHBp92.620% Wkt vs LHBp64.720% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 9.0 | 3 | 61 | 6.78 | 83.7 Phase Production 83.7 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.744× parp98.536.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp69.142.1% Boundary %17%p86.821.1% | 22.1 Quality 22.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 98.5 Impact 98.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+30.5 | 83.2 Versatility 83.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp95.630% Econ vs LHBp83.830% Wkt vs RHBp60.320% Wkt vs LHBp86.820% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 25 | 10.0 | 5 | 81 | 8.1 | 82.7 Phase Production 82.7 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.889× parp80.936.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp86.842.1% Boundary %18%p77.921.1% | 98.5 Quality 98.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 80.9 Impact 80.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+13.2 | 82.1 Versatility 82.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp77.930% Econ vs LHBp77.930% Wkt vs RHBp80.920% Wkt vs LHBp95.620% | |
| 6 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 2 | 34 | 8.5 | 75.4 Phase Production 75.4 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.933× parp67.636.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp77.942.1% Boundary %12%p83.821.1% | 75 Quality 75 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 69.1 Impact 69.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.7 | 63.7 Versatility 63.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp63.230% Econ vs LHBp44.130% Wkt vs RHBp83.820% Wkt vs LHBp73.520% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 23 | 11.0 | 4 | 96 | 8.73 | 74.4 Phase Production 74.4 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.958× parp7536.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp7542.1% Boundary %20%p72.121.1% | 48.5 Quality 48.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 89.7 Impact 89.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+17.5 | 64.7 Versatility 64.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp83.830% Econ vs LHBp33.830% Wkt vs RHBp66.220% Wkt vs LHBp80.920% | |
| 8 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 4 | 44 | 8.8 | 74 Phase Production 74 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.966× parp58.836.8% Wicket rate0.80/ovp98.542.1% Boundary %23%p51.521.1% | 63.2 Quality 63.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 83.8 Impact 83.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15 | 61.5 Versatility 61.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp48.530% Econ vs LHBp60.330% Wkt vs RHBp98.520% Wkt vs LHBp45.620% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 28 | 13.0 | 5 | 119 | 9.15 | 73.1 Phase Production 73.1 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.005× parp63.236.8% Wicket rate0.38/ovp80.942.1% Boundary %19%p7521.1% | 77.9 Quality 77.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 63.2 Impact 63.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.2 | 57.1 Versatility 57.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp60.330% Econ vs LHBp51.530% Wkt vs RHBp89.720% Wkt vs LHBp27.920% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 23 | 15.0 | 3 | 113 | 7.53 | 70.5 Phase Production 70.5 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.827× parp89.736.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp39.742.1% Boundary %17%p98.521.1% | 89.7 Quality 89.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %34% | 77.9 Impact 77.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.8 | 67.5 Versatility 67.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp89.730% Econ vs LHBp94.130% Wkt vs RHBp57.420% Wkt vs LHBp4.420% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 3.0 | 3 | 29 | 9.67 | 62.8 Phase Production 62.8 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.061× parp42.636.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp95.642.1% Boundary %28%p32.421.1% | 36.8 Quality 36.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 72.1 Impact 72.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6 | 64 Versatility 64 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp17.630% Econ vs LHBp80.930% Wkt vs RHBp73.520% Wkt vs LHBp98.520% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 23 | 6.0 | 2 | 54 | 9 | 61.8 Phase Production 61.8 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.988× parp54.436.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp66.242.1% Boundary %19%p66.221.1% | 80.9 Quality 80.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 66.2 Impact 66.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.5 | 51.2 Versatility 51.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp54.430% Econ vs LHBp54.430% Wkt vs RHBp77.920% Wkt vs LHBp14.720% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 21 | 4.0 | 1 | 34 | 8.5 | 60.5 Phase Production 60.5 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.933× parp67.636.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp55.942.1% Boundary %21%p57.421.1% | 30.9 Quality 30.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 48.5 Impact 48.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.4 | 56.5 Versatility 56.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp57.430% Econ vs LHBp63.230% Wkt vs RHBp10.320% Wkt vs LHBp91.220% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 2.0 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 55.7 Phase Production 55.7 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.659× parp77.936.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp29.442.1% Boundary %8%p69.121.1% | 7.4 Quality 7.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 57.4 Impact 57.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.9 | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp69.130% Econ vs LHBp69.130% Wkt vs RHBp35.320% Wkt vs LHBp57.420% | |
| 15 | Off-spin | 28 | 5.0 | 1 | 44 | 8.8 | 55.4 Phase Production 55.4 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.966× parp58.836.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp48.542.1% Boundary %20%p63.221.1% | 39.7 Quality 39.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 54.4 Impact 54.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.9 | 48.2 Versatility 48.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp42.630% Econ vs LHBp66.230% Wkt vs RHBp26.520% Wkt vs LHBp51.520% | |
| 16 | LA pace | — | 7.0 | 1 | 54 | 7.71 | 55.3 Phase Production 55.3 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.847× parp83.836.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp17.642.1% Boundary %17%p80.921.1% | 19.1 Quality 19.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.2 | 63.4 Versatility 63.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp72.130% Econ vs LHBp94.130% Wkt vs RHBp7.420% Wkt vs LHBp60.320% | |
| 17 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 51.6 Phase Production 51.6 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.769× parp72.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp29.442.1% Boundary %17%p60.321.1% | 26.5 Quality 26.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 51.5 Impact 51.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.6 | 49.4 Versatility 49.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp33.830% Econ vs LHBp89.730% Wkt vs RHBp51.520% Wkt vs LHBp10.320% | |
| 18 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 4.0 | 1 | 39 | 9.75 | 46.8 Phase Production 46.8 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.071× parp39.736.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp55.942.1% Boundary %25%p41.221.1% | 10.3 Quality 10.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 45.6 Impact 45.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.9 | 47.2 Versatility 47.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp27.930% Econ vs LHBp44.130% Wkt vs RHBp54.420% Wkt vs LHBp73.520% | |
| 19 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 1 | 23 | 11.5 | 46.7 Phase Production 46.7 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.263× parp30.936.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp72.142.1% Boundary %33%p23.521.1% | 55.9 Quality 55.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 60.3 Impact 60.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5 | 45 Versatility 45 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2530% Econ vs LHBp36.830% Wkt vs RHBp48.520% Wkt vs LHBp83.820% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 22 | 3.0 | 1 | 33 | 11 | 43.1 Phase Production 43.1 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.208× parp27.936.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp61.842.1% Boundary %28%p32.421.1% | 51.5 Quality 51.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 4.4 Impact 4.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-20.8 | 45.9 Versatility 45.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7530% Econ vs LHBp4.430% Wkt vs RHBp73.520% Wkt vs LHBp36.820% | |
| 21 | Off-spin | 26 | 3.0 | 1 | 39 | 13 | 36.6 Phase Production 36.6 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.427× parp10.336.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp61.842.1% Boundary %28%p32.421.1% | 72.1 Quality 72.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 7.4 Impact 7.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.8 | 33.2 Versatility 33.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp13.230% Econ vs LHBp2530% Wkt vs RHBp44.120% Wkt vs LHBp64.720% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 27 | 7.0 | 1 | 66 | 9.43 | 35.5 Phase Production 35.5 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.035× parp48.536.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp17.642.1% Boundary %24%p48.521.1% | 42.6 Quality 42.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 33.8 Impact 33.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.3 | 37.9 Versatility 37.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp80.930% Econ vs LHBp16.230% Wkt vs RHBp13.220% Wkt vs LHBp30.920% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 23 | 10.0 | 2 | 98 | 9.8 | 34.9 Phase Production 34.9 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.076× parp36.836.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp42.642.1% Boundary %30%p16.221.1% | 83.8 Quality 83.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 22.1 Impact 22.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.4 | 36.8 Versatility 36.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp66.230% Econ vs LHBp13.230% Wkt vs RHBp63.220% Wkt vs LHBp1.520% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 23 | 8.0 | 0 | 75 | 9.38 | 31 Phase Production 31 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.029× parp51.536.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.542.1% Boundary %23%p54.421.1% | 95.6 Quality 95.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 19.1 Impact 19.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.5 | 31.5 Versatility 31.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp30.930% Econ vs LHBp57.430% Wkt vs RHBp1.520% Wkt vs LHBp23.520% | |
| 25 | Off-spin | 25 | 2.0 | 0 | 21 | 10.5 | 29.8 Phase Production 29.8 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.153× parp33.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp29.442.1% Boundary %33%p23.521.1% | 2.9 Quality 2.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 39.7 Impact 39.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.2 | 38.2 Versatility 38.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp51.530% Econ vs LHBp30.930% Wkt vs RHBp44.120% Wkt vs LHBp23.520% | |
| 26 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 1 | 56 | 11.2 | 29.6 Phase Production 29.6 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.23× parp19.136.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp48.542.1% Boundary %33%p10.321.1% | 63.2 Quality 63.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 27.9 Impact 27.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.5 | 30.3 Versatility 30.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.730% Econ vs LHBp10.330% Wkt vs RHBp69.120% Wkt vs LHBp7.420% | |
| 27 | Chinaman | 30 | 3.0 | 0 | 28 | 9.33 | 28.6 Phase Production 28.6 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.025× parp45.636.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp11.842.1% Boundary %28%p32.421.1% | 14.7 Quality 14.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 30.9 Impact 30.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.7 | 44 Versatility 44 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp17.630% Econ vs LHBp86.830% Wkt vs RHBp26.520% Wkt vs LHBp36.820% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 17 | 2.0 | 0 | 29 | 14.5 | 24.7 Phase Production 24.7 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.592× parp7.436.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp29.442.1% Boundary %25%p45.621.1% | 55.9 Quality 55.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 1.5 Impact 1.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-24.6 | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4.430% Econ vs LHBp44.130% Wkt vs RHBp26.520% Wkt vs LHBp73.520% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 26 | 5.0 | 1 | 65 | 13 | 22.4 Phase Production 22.4 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.427× parp4.436.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp48.542.1% Boundary %43%p1.521.1% | 63.2 Quality 63.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.4 | 21.8 Versatility 21.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp22.130% Econ vs LHBp1.530% Wkt vs RHBp19.120% Wkt vs LHBp54.420% | |
| 30 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 0 | 44 | 11 | 21 Phase Production 21 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.208× parp2536.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp7.442.1% Boundary %25%p41.221.1% | 45.6 Quality 45.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 10.3 Impact 10.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.1 | 36.2 Versatility 36.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7.430% Econ vs LHBp72.130% Wkt vs RHBp16.220% Wkt vs LHBp45.620% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 2.0 | 0 | 27 | 13.5 | 20.6 Phase Production 20.6 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.482× parp14.736.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp29.442.1% Boundary %42%p13.221.1% | 26.5 Quality 26.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 42.6 Impact 42.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.8 | 36.3 Versatility 36.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.330% Econ vs LHBp44.130% Wkt vs RHBp26.520% Wkt vs LHBp73.520% | |
| 32 | SLA orthodox | — | 2.0 | 0 | 27 | 13.5 | 19.3 Phase Production 19.3 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.482× parp14.736.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp29.442.1% Boundary %50%p7.421.1% | 2.9 Quality 2.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 16.2 Impact 16.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13 | 28.5 Versatility 28.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp36.830% Econ vs LHBp7.430% Wkt vs RHBp39.720% Wkt vs LHBp36.820% | |
| 33 | Off-spin | 21 | 3.0 | 0 | 34 | 11.33 | 17.1 Phase Production 17.1 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.244× parp22.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp11.842.1% Boundary %33%p19.121.1% | 14.7 Quality 14.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 36.8 Impact 36.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.3 | 30.3 Versatility 30.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp45.630% Econ vs LHBp22.130% Wkt vs RHBp35.320% Wkt vs LHBp14.720% | |
| 34 | LA pace | — | 6.0 | 0 | 81 | 13.5 | 3.3 Phase Production 3.3 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.482× parp1.536.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp4.442.1% Boundary %39%p4.421.1% | 33.8 Quality 33.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 13.2 Impact 13.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.7 | 16.2 Versatility 16.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.530% Econ vs LHBp19.130% Wkt vs RHBp4.420% Wkt vs LHBp45.620% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 3 | 17 | 5.67 | 87.8 Phase Production 87.8 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.701× parp87.244.1% Wicket rate1.00/ovp95.344.1% Boundary %11%p61.611.8% | 91.9 Quality 91.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %44% | 77.9 Impact 77.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.3 | 74.4 Versatility 74.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp75.650% Econ vs LHBp73.350% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 16.0 | 6 | 100 | 6.25 | 87 Phase Production 87 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.773× parp94.244.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp77.944.1% Boundary %8%p94.211.8% | 73.3 Quality 73.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 94.2 Impact 94.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+34.3 | 83.7 Versatility 83.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.550% Econ vs LHBp70.950% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | — | 6.0 | 3 | 41 | 6.83 | 83.9 Phase Production 83.9 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.845× parp80.244.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp87.244.1% Boundary %8%p84.911.8% | 52.3 Quality 52.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 89.5 Impact 89.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+23.6 | 64 Versatility 64 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp89.550% Econ vs LHBp38.450% | |
| 4 | Leg-spin | — | 17.0 | 7 | 126 | 7.41 | 83 Phase Production 83 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.916× parp84.944.1% Wicket rate0.41/ovp84.944.1% Boundary %13%p68.611.8% | 80.2 Quality 80.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 68.6 Impact 68.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.9 | 72.1 Versatility 72.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp80.250% Econ vs LHBp6450% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 10.0 | 3 | 42 | 4.2 | 79.9 Phase Production 79.9 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.519× parp98.844.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp55.844.1% Boundary %3%p98.811.8% | 48.8 Quality 48.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 96.5 Impact 96.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+34.6 | 96.5 Versatility 96.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.850% Econ vs LHBp94.250% | |
| 6 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.0 | 2 | 27 | 6.75 | 77.3 Phase Production 77.3 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.835× parp74.444.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp80.244.1% Boundary %8%p76.711.8% | 40.7 Quality 40.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 36 Impact 36 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.9 | 66.3 Versatility 66.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6450% Econ vs LHBp68.650% | |
| 7 | Leg-spin | 32 | 20.0 | 6 | 128 | 6.4 | 77 Phase Production 77 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.791× parp96.544.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp52.344.1% Boundary %8%p96.511.8% | 68.6 Quality 68.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 91.9 Impact 91.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+31.2 | 96.5 Versatility 96.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp94.250% Econ vs LHBp98.850% | |
| 8 | SLA orthodox | 18 | 8.4 | 4 | 69 | 7.96 | 73.7 Phase Production 73.7 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.984× parp61.644.1% Wicket rate0.46/ovp89.544.1% Boundary %14%p59.311.8% | 43 Quality 43 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 59.3 Impact 59.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.1 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp77.950% Econ vs LHBp22.150% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 23 | 5.0 | 2 | 34 | 6.8 | 73.5 Phase Production 73.5 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.841× parp77.944.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp69.844.1% Boundary %10%p70.911.8% | 34.9 Quality 34.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 75.6 Impact 75.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.6 | 66.3 Versatility 66.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5050% Econ vs LHBp82.650% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 21 | 7.4 | 3 | 57 | 7.43 | 73.3 Phase Production 73.3 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.919× parp70.944.1% Wicket rate0.39/ovp75.644.1% Boundary %11%p73.311.8% | 94.2 Quality 94.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %37% | 84.9 Impact 84.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.1 | 64 Versatility 64 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp52.350% Econ vs LHBp75.650% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 10.0 | 3 | 72 | 7.2 | 71.3 Phase Production 71.3 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.89× parp82.644.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp55.844.1% Boundary %10%p87.211.8% | 31.4 Quality 31.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 82.6 Impact 82.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.9 | 70.9 Versatility 70.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp61.650% Econ vs LHBp80.250% | |
| 12 | Off-spin | 28 | 4.0 | 1 | 24 | 6 | 70.6 Phase Production 70.6 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.742× parp89.544.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp46.544.1% Boundary %4%p89.511.8% | 75.6 Quality 75.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 66.3 Impact 66.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.8 | 73.3 Versatility 73.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5750% Econ vs LHBp89.550% | |
| 13 | Off-spin | 30 | 12.0 | 3 | 81 | 6.75 | 69.3 Phase Production 69.3 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.835× parp91.944.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp40.744.1% Boundary %10%p91.911.8% | 3.5 Quality 3.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 73.3 Impact 73.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.3 | 84.9 Versatility 84.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp84.950% Econ vs LHBp84.950% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 25 | 2.0 | 4 | 16 | 8 | 68.7 Phase Production 68.7 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.989× parp5044.1% Wicket rate2.00/ovp98.844.1% Boundary %25%p25.611.8% | 96.5 Quality 96.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %67% | 98.8 Impact 98.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+65.5 | 44.2 Versatility 44.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp40.750% Econ vs LHBp47.750% | |
| 15 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 67.2 Phase Production 67.2 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.865× parp65.144.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp73.344.1% Boundary %17%p52.311.8% | 55.8 Quality 55.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 80.2 Impact 80.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.4 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp33.750% Econ vs LHBp77.950% | |
| 16 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 1 | 23 | 7.67 | 62.6 Phase Production 62.6 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.948× parp58.144.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp61.644.1% Boundary %6%p82.611.8% | 24.4 Quality 24.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 87.2 Impact 87.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+13.9 | 47.7 Versatility 47.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp87.250% Econ vs LHBp8.150% | |
| 17 | Off-spin | 21 | 4.0 | 1 | 27 | 6.75 | 62.4 Phase Production 62.4 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.835× parp74.444.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp46.544.1% Boundary %8%p76.711.8% | 20.9 Quality 20.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 57 Impact 57 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 65.1 Versatility 65.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp70.950% Econ vs LHBp59.350% | |
| 18 | Off-spin | 47 | 3.0 | 2 | 29 | 9.67 | 53.5 Phase Production 53.5 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.195× parp24.444.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp91.944.1% Boundary %22%p18.611.8% | 45.3 Quality 45.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 38.4 Impact 38.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.7 | 39 Versatility 39 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp73.350% Econ vs LHBp4.750% | |
| 19 | Leg-spin | — | 12.0 | 4 | 99 | 8.25 | 53.2 Phase Production 53.2 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.02× parp45.344.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp66.344.1% Boundary %17%p33.711.8% | 26.7 Quality 26.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 8.1 Impact 8.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.6 | 51.2 Versatility 51.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5.850% Econ vs LHBp96.550% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 23 | 3.0 | 3 | 32 | 10.67 | 51.4 Phase Production 51.4 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.319× parp8.144.1% Wicket rate1.00/ovp95.344.1% Boundary %17%p48.811.8% | 66.3 Quality 66.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 40.7 Impact 40.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.3 | 24.4 Versatility 24.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp38.450% Econ vs LHBp10.550% | |
| 21 | Leg-spin | 24 | 12.0 | 5 | 104 | 8.67 | 51 Phase Production 51 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.072× parp31.444.1% Wicket rate0.41/ovp82.644.1% Boundary %21%p5.811.8% | 59.3 Quality 59.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 3.5 Impact 3.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.3 | 38.4 Versatility 38.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.550% Econ vs LHBp66.350% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 23 | 2.0 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 50.2 Phase Production 50.2 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.865× parp65.144.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp31.444.1% Boundary %8%p65.111.8% | 70.9 Quality 70.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 47.7 Impact 47.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.4 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp54.750% Econ vs LHBp5750% | |
| 23 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 6.4 | 1 | 51 | 7.65 | 49.5 Phase Production 49.5 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.946× parp68.644.1% Wicket rate0.15/ovp22.144.1% Boundary %10%p80.211.8% | 17.4 Quality 17.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 70.9 Impact 70.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2 | 48.3 Versatility 48.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp91.950% Econ vs LHBp4.750% | |
| 24 | Chinaman | 30 | 13.1 | 4 | 108 | 8.2 | 48.7 Phase Production 48.7 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.014× parp47.744.1% Wicket rate0.31/ovp59.344.1% Boundary %19%p12.811.8% | 38.4 Quality 38.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 17.4 Impact 17.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.3 | 44.2 Versatility 44.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4350% Econ vs LHBp45.350% | |
| 25 | RA pace | — | 5.2 | 1 | 43 | 8.06 | 43.7 Phase Production 43.7 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.997× parp52.344.1% Wicket rate0.19/ovp38.444.1% Boundary %19%p31.411.8% | 77.9 Quality 77.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 33.7 Impact 33.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.5 | 52.3 Versatility 52.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp68.650% Econ vs LHBp3650% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.0 | 1 | 36 | 9 | 42.6 Phase Production 42.6 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.113× parp34.944.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp46.544.1% Boundary %12%p5711.8% | 20.9 Quality 20.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 43 Impact 43 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.9 | 36 Versatility 36 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp22.150% Econ vs LHBp5050% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 22 | 9.0 | 3 | 79 | 8.78 | 41.2 Phase Production 41.2 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.085× parp29.144.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp6444.1% Boundary %24%p1.211.8% | 89.5 Quality 89.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 5.8 Impact 5.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16.4 | 30.2 Versatility 30.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3650% Econ vs LHBp24.450% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 17 | 2.0 | 0 | 17 | 8.5 | 40.5 Phase Production 40.5 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.051× parp4344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp31.444.1% Boundary %8%p65.111.8% | 12.8 Quality 12.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 31.4 Impact 31.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.7 | 43 Versatility 43 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp31.450% Econ vs LHBp54.750% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 23 | 3.0 | 0 | 23 | 7.67 | 39.6 Phase Production 39.6 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.948× parp58.144.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.644.1% Boundary %17%p48.811.8% | 82.6 Quality 82.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 64 Impact 64 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.6 | 53.5 Versatility 53.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp15.150% Econ vs LHBp91.950% | |
| 30 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 1 | 34 | 8.5 | 38.4 Phase Production 38.4 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.051× parp38.444.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp46.544.1% Boundary %25%p8.111.8% | 7 Quality 7 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 24.4 Impact 24.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.2 | 45.3 Versatility 45.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp29.150% Econ vs LHBp61.650% | |
| 31 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 2 | 49 | 9.8 | 36.6 Phase Production 36.6 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.212× parp10.544.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp69.844.1% Boundary %23%p10.511.8% | 98.8 Quality 98.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %47% | 54.7 Impact 54.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.5 | 32 Versatility 32 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.550% Econ vs LHBp17.450% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 0 | 32 | 8 | 33.4 Phase Production 33.4 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.989× parp54.744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp9.344.1% Boundary %17%p44.211.8% | 87.2 Quality 87.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.1 | 51.2 Versatility 51.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp82.650% Econ vs LHBp19.850% | |
| 33 | Off-spin | 25 | 2.0 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 28.7 Phase Production 28.7 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.236× parp26.744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp31.444.1% Boundary %25%p25.611.8% | 62.8 Quality 62.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 61.6 Impact 61.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.3 | 39.5 Versatility 39.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.550% Econ vs LHBp32.650% | |
| 34 | SLA orthodox | — | 9.0 | 1 | 75 | 8.33 | 26.9 Phase Production 26.9 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.03× parp40.744.1% Wicket rate0.11/ovp5.844.1% Boundary %15%p54.711.8% | 15.1 Quality 15.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 19.8 Impact 19.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.8 | 40.7 Versatility 40.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp66.350% Econ vs LHBp15.150% | |
| 35 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 0 | 21 | 10.5 | 25.6 Phase Production 25.6 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.298× parp19.844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp31.444.1% Boundary %25%p25.611.8% | 55.8 Quality 55.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 12.8 Impact 12.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.4 | 30.2 Versatility 30.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp17.450% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 36 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 4.0 | 0 | 36 | 9 | 24.7 Phase Production 24.7 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.113× parp34.944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp9.344.1% Boundary %17%p44.211.8% | 7 Quality 7 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 10.5 Impact 10.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.6 | 36 Versatility 36 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp19.850% Econ vs LHBp52.350% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 10.0 | 2 | 91 | 9.1 | 22.7 Phase Production 22.7 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.125× parp17.444.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp24.444.1% Boundary %17%p3611.8% | 48.8 Quality 48.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 1.2 Impact 1.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.4 | 19.8 Versatility 19.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp26.750% Econ vs LHBp12.850% | |
| 38 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 17.4 Phase Production 17.4 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.855× parp1.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp31.444.1% Boundary %25%p25.611.8% | 62.8 Quality 62.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 45.3 Impact 45.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.4 | 15.1 Versatility 15.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.550% Econ vs LHBp26.750% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 23 | 3.0 | 0 | 31 | 10.33 | 16 Phase Production 16 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.278× parp12.844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.644.1% Boundary %22%p18.611.8% | 10.5 Quality 10.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %6% | 22.1 Impact 22.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.4 | 28.5 Versatility 28.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp24.450% Econ vs LHBp32.650% | |
| 40 | Off-spin | 26 | 6.0 | 0 | 55 | 9.17 | 15 Phase Production 15 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.133× parp22.144.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.244.1% Boundary %17%p40.711.8% | 1.2 Quality 1.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %6% | 52.3 Impact 52.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2 | 26.7 Versatility 26.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp12.850% Econ vs LHBp40.750% | |
| 41 | RA pace | — | 11.0 | 2 | 100 | 9.09 | 14.1 Phase Production 14.1 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.124× parp15.144.1% Wicket rate0.18/ovp12.844.1% Boundary %18%p15.111.8% | 29.1 Quality 29.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 26.7 Impact 26.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.8 | 30.2 Versatility 30.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp59.350% Econ vs LHBp1.250% | |
| 42 | Leg-spin | — | 7.0 | 1 | 71 | 10.14 | 12.7 Phase Production 12.7 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.254× parp3.544.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp15.144.1% Boundary %17%p38.411.8% | 84.9 Quality 84.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 29.1 Impact 29.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.7 | 44.2 Versatility 44.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.250% Econ vs LHBp87.250% | |
| 43 | Leg-spin | 29 | 5.0 | 0 | 52 | 10.4 | 4.5 Phase Production 4.5 vs all bowlers · n=43 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.286× parp5.844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.544.1% Boundary %27%p3.511.8% | 34.9 Quality 34.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 15.1 Impact 15.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.1 | 18.6 Versatility 18.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8.150% Econ vs LHBp29.150% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 4.5 | 4 | 21 | 4.34 | 93.7 Phase Production 93.7 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.472× parp97.943.6% Boundary %3%p97.941.8% Wicket rate0.83/ovp68.814.5% | — | 81.2 Impact 81.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11 | 93.8 Versatility 93.8 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep93.8100% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 6.0 | 6 | 40 | 6.67 | 93.4 Phase Production 93.4 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.724× parp93.843.6% Boundary %8%p93.841.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp91.714.5% | — | 97.9 Impact 97.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+73.6 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep50100% | |
| 3 | RA pace | 23 | 8.1 | 8 | 60 | 7.35 | 88.9 Phase Production 88.9 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.798× parp85.450% Wicket rate0.98/ovp97.916.7% Boundary %12%p89.633.3% | — | 85.4 Impact 85.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.4 | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep2540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 25 | 6.2 | 6 | 43 | 6.79 | 79.2 Phase Production 79.2 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.738× parp89.650% Wicket rate0.95/ovp85.416.7% Boundary %18%p60.433.3% | — | 89.6 Impact 89.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+16.7 | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep2540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 23 | 5.1 | 4 | 35 | 6.77 | 76.4 Phase Production 76.4 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.736× parp81.250% Wicket rate0.77/ovp60.416.7% Boundary %13%p77.133.3% | — | 93.8 Impact 93.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+24.1 | 65.4 Versatility 65.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep90.640% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 6 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 3 | 19 | 6.33 | 76 Phase Production 76 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.688× parp72.950% Wicket rate1.00/ovp7516.7% Boundary %6%p81.233.3% | — | 77.1 Impact 77.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.6 | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep2540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp96.926.7% | |
| 7 | Leg-spin | 24 | 4.0 | 3 | 28 | 7 | 73.6 Phase Production 73.6 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.76× parp68.843.6% Boundary %8%p85.441.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp54.214.5% | — | 72.9 Impact 72.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.1 | 65.6 Versatility 65.6 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep65.6100% | |
| 8 | SLA orthodox | 18 | 2.0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 66.3 Phase Production 66.3 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.652× parp64.643.6% Boundary %8%p68.841.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp64.614.5% | — | 56.2 Impact 56.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.9 | 34.4 Versatility 34.4 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep34.4100% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | — | 2.0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 65.4 Phase Production 65.4 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.543× parp77.143.6% Boundary %8%p68.841.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.814.5% | — | 64.6 Impact 64.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.2 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep50100% | |
| 10 | Off-spin | 47 | 2.0 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 60.9 Phase Production 60.9 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.76× parp60.443.6% Boundary %8%p68.841.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp39.614.5% | — | 68.8 Impact 68.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.2 | 62.5 Versatility 62.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep62.5100% | |
| 11 | Leg-spin | 32 | 3.3 | 1 | 29 | 8.29 | 52 Phase Production 52 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.9× parp56.243.6% Boundary %19%p56.241.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp27.114.5% | — | 39.6 Impact 39.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1 | 31.2 Versatility 31.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep31.2100% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 28 | 3.0 | 3 | 28 | 9.33 | 49 Phase Production 49 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.014× parp47.950% Wicket rate1.00/ovp7516.7% Boundary %22%p37.533.3% | — | 52.1 Impact 52.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.3 | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep2540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 23 | 6.0 | 6 | 61 | 10.17 | 48.3 Phase Production 48.3 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.104× parp31.250% Wicket rate1.00/ovp91.716.7% Boundary %19%p52.133.3% | — | 14.6 Impact 14.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.2 | 59.2 Versatility 59.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep7540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 14 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 1 | 27 | 9 | 43.8 Phase Production 43.8 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.978× parp52.150% Wicket rate0.34/ovp31.216.7% Boundary %22%p37.533.3% | — | 35.4 Impact 35.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.2 | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep2540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 23 | 2.3 | 2 | 25 | 10 | 43.8 Phase Production 43.8 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.086× parp39.650% Wicket rate0.80/ovp47.916.7% Boundary %20%p47.933.3% | — | 43.8 Impact 43.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.7 | 67.9 Versatility 67.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep96.940% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 16 | RA pace | — | 4.1 | 2 | 42 | 10.08 | 38.2 Phase Production 38.2 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.095× parp35.450% Wicket rate0.48/ovp35.416.7% Boundary %20%p43.833.3% | — | 47.9 Impact 47.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.3 | 62.9 Versatility 62.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep84.440% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 1 | 39 | 9.75 | 33.7 Phase Production 33.7 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.059× parp43.850% Wicket rate0.25/ovp12.516.7% Boundary %25%p29.233.3% | — | 60.4 Impact 60.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.1 | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep62.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 18 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 3 | 49 | 12.25 | 28.1 Phase Production 28.1 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.331× parp18.850% Wicket rate0.75/ovp54.216.7% Boundary %25%p29.233.3% | — | 18.8 Impact 18.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.6 | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep2540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 19 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 2 | 36 | 12 | 25 Phase Production 25 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.304× parp22.950% Wicket rate0.67/ovp43.816.7% Boundary %28%p18.833.3% | — | 22.9 Impact 22.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.4 | 59.2 Versatility 59.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep7540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 20 | RA pace | — | 7.0 | 2 | 75 | 10.71 | 22.2 Phase Production 22.2 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.164× parp27.150% Wicket rate0.29/ovp6.216.7% Boundary %24%p22.933.3% | — | 27.1 Impact 27.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.7 | 50.4 Versatility 50.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep53.140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 21 | 4.2 | 4 | 53 | 12.23 | 20.8 Phase Production 20.8 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.329× parp10.450% Wicket rate0.92/ovp81.216.7% Boundary %38%p6.233.3% | — | 10.4 Impact 10.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.1 | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep2540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 22 | Leg-spin | — | 2.0 | 0 | 29 | 14.5 | 15.5 Phase Production 15.5 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.575× parp14.643.6% Boundary %33%p14.641.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.814.5% | — | 31.2 Impact 31.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.3 | 12.5 Versatility 12.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep12.5100% | |
| 23 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 0 | 77 | 15.4 | 6.9 Phase Production 6.9 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.673× parp6.250% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2.116.7% Boundary %30%p10.433.3% | — | 2.1 Impact 2.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-23 | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep2540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 23 | 4.0 | 1 | 67 | 16.75 | 3.8 Phase Production 3.8 vs all bowlers · n=24 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.82× parp2.150% Wicket rate0.25/ovp12.516.7% Boundary %50%p2.133.3% | — | 6.2 Impact 6.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.1 | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep62.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp46.926.7% |
Utkarsh Tiwari
Bowler · Leg-spin
78.9
Scout Score
Overs 18.5 · Wkts 7 · Runs 144 · Econ 7.65
78.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle78.990.3%71.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p94.90.86×
Scout Score78.9
78.9Middle90.3% of overs · 7w · 7.41 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp8338%
Impactp68.625%
Qualityp80.215%
Versatilityp72.112%
Trajectoryp94.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.916× par102bp84.944.1%
Wicket rate0.41/ov102bp84.944.1%
Boundary %13%102bp68.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.928× par64bp80.250%
Econ vs LHB0.907× par38bp6450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.9 · induced false-shot 26%
Mohit Raut
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 28
77.6
Scout Score
Overs 23.5 · Wkts 13 · Runs 150 · Econ 6.29
77.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay57.612.6%7.3
Middle8067.1%53.7
Death82.220.3%16.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p23.51.04×
Scout Score77.6
57.6Powerplay12.6% of overs · 3w · 9.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.838%
Impactp72.127%
Qualityp36.815%
Versatilityp6410%
Trajectoryp23.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.061× par18bp42.636.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp95.642.1%
Boundary %28%18bp32.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.325× par12bp17.630%
Econ vs LHB0.592× par6bp80.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.50/ov12bp73.520%
Wkt vs LHB2.00/ov6bp98.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6 · induced false-shot 22%
80Middle67.1% of overs · 6w · 6.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp8738%
Impactp94.225%
Qualityp73.315%
Versatilityp83.712%
Trajectoryp23.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.773× par96bp94.244.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov96bp77.944.1%
Boundary %8%96bp94.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.76× par72bp96.550%
Econ vs LHB0.862× par24bp70.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +34.3 · induced false-shot 25%
82.2Death20.3% of overs · 4w · 4.34 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp93.755%
Impactp81.225%
Versatilityp93.88%
Trajectoryp23.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.472× par29bp97.943.6%
Boundary %3%29bp97.941.8%
Wicket rate0.83/ov29bp68.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.3817bp93.8100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11
Praveen Kumar Yadav
Bowler · RA pace
76.6
Scout Score
Overs 23.0 · Wkts 11 · Runs 171 · Econ 7.43
76.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay79.778.3%62.4
Middle63.28.7%5.5
Death66.713%8.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p25.51×
Scout Score76.6
79.7Powerplay78.3% of overs · 7w · 7.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp89.638%
Impactp95.627%
Qualityp69.115%
Versatilityp69.410%
Trajectoryp25.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.842× par108bp92.636.8%
Wicket rate0.39/ov108bp83.842.1%
Boundary %18%108bp95.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.824× par94bp98.530%
Econ vs LHB1.1× par14bp27.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.38/ov94bp92.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.43/ov14bp64.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +30.1 · induced false-shot 28%
63.2Middle8.7% of overs · 1w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.238%
Impactp80.225%
Qualityp55.815%
Versatilityp55.812%
Trajectoryp25.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.865× par12bp65.144.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp73.344.1%
Boundary %17%12bp52.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.172× par8bp33.750%
Econ vs LHB0.345× par4bp77.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.4 · induced false-shot 17%
66.7Death13% of overs · 3w · 6.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp7648%
Impactp77.125%
Versatilityp52.515%
Trajectoryp25.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.688× par18bp72.950%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp7516.7%
Boundary %6%18bp81.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%18bp2540%
Slower ball018bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer22.22218bp96.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.6
Aayush Thakur
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
76.2
Scout Score
Overs 26.1 · Wkts 11 · Runs 196 · Econ 7.49
76.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay77.157.3%44.2
Middle58.911.5%6.8
Death80.831.2%25.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p90.80.87×
Scout Score76.2
77.1Powerplay57.3% of overs · 3w · 7.53 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.538%
Impactp77.927%
Qualityp89.715%
Versatilityp67.510%
Trajectoryp90.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.827× par90bp89.736.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov90bp39.742.1%
Boundary %17%90bp98.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.878× par74bp89.730%
Econ vs LHB0.703× par16bp94.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.25/ov74bp57.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov16bp4.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.8 · induced false-shot 34%
58.9Middle11.5% of overs · 0w · 7.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.638%
Impactp6425%
Qualityp82.615%
Versatilityp53.512%
Trajectoryp90.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.948× par18bp58.144.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp18.644.1%
Boundary %17%18bp48.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.367× par12bp15.150%
Econ vs LHB0.23× par6bp91.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.6 · induced false-shot 33%
80.8Death31.2% of overs · 8w · 7.35 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp88.948%
Impactp85.425%
Versatilityp39.215%
Trajectoryp90.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.798× par49bp85.450%
Wicket rate0.98/ov49bp97.916.7%
Boundary %12%49bp89.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%49bp2540%
Slower ball049bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer049bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.4
Varun Singh Bhuie
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 21
74.7
Scout Score
Overs 25.0 · Wkts 12 · Runs 143 · Econ 5.72
74.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay7136%25.6
Middle74.340%29.7
Death8124%19.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p9.21.19×
Scout Score74.7
71Powerplay36% of overs · 3w · 6.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.738%
Impactp98.527%
Qualityp22.115%
Versatilityp83.210%
Trajectoryp9.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.744× par54bp98.536.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp69.142.1%
Boundary %17%54bp86.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.783× par45bp95.630%
Econ vs LHB0.658× par9bp83.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.26/ov45bp60.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.67/ov9bp86.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +30.5 · induced false-shot 22%
74.3Middle40% of overs · 3w · 4.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.938%
Impactp96.525%
Qualityp48.815%
Versatilityp96.512%
Trajectoryp9.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.519× par60bp98.844.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp55.844.1%
Boundary %3%60bp98.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.476× par41bp98.850%
Econ vs LHB0.617× par19bp94.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +34.6 · induced false-shot 20%
81Death24% of overs · 6w · 6.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp93.455%
Impactp97.925%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp9.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.724× par36bp93.843.6%
Boundary %8%36bp93.841.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov36bp91.714.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.6527bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +73.6
Manraj Singh Dhillon
Bowler · SLA orthodox
74.5
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 51 · Econ 7.29
74.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle74.585.7%63.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score74.5
74.5Middle85.7% of overs · 3w · 6.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.938%
Impactp89.525%
Qualityp52.315%
Versatilityp6412%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.845× par36bp80.244.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp87.244.1%
Boundary %8%36bp84.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.675× par22bp89.550%
Econ vs LHB1.083× par14bp38.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +23.6 · induced false-shot 19%
Sourabh Majumdar
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
74.5
Scout Score
Overs 22.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 176 · Econ 8
74.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay87.863.6%55.8
Middle52.918.2%9.6
Death49.618.2%9.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p84.70.89×
Scout Score74.5
87.8Powerplay63.6% of overs · 7w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp89.938%
Impactp86.827%
Qualityp92.615%
Versatilityp78.510%
Trajectoryp84.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.824× par84bp86.836.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov84bp92.642.1%
Boundary %18%84bp89.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.91× par60bp86.830%
Econ vs LHB0.642× par24bp98.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.60/ov60bp95.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.25/ov24bp19.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15.1 · induced false-shot 36%
52.9Middle18.2% of overs · 0w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp33.438%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp87.215%
Versatilityp51.212%
Trajectoryp84.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.989× par24bp54.744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp9.344.1%
Boundary %17%24bp44.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.568× par11bp82.650%
Econ vs LHB1.273× par13bp19.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.1 · induced false-shot 33%
49.6Death18.2% of overs · 1w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp33.748%
Impactp60.425%
Versatilityp54.215%
Trajectoryp84.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.059× par24bp43.850%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp12.516.7%
Boundary %25%24bp29.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%24bp62.540%
Slower ball024bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer024bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.1
Rudra Pratap
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
74.3
Scout Score
Overs 18.2 · Wkts 15 · Runs 140 · Econ 7.64
74.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay78.254.5%42.6
Middle72.510.9%7.9
Death68.634.5%23.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p19.41.08×
Scout Score74.3
78.2Powerplay54.5% of overs · 5w · 8.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.738%
Impactp80.927%
Qualityp98.515%
Versatilityp82.110%
Trajectoryp19.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.889× par60bp80.936.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov60bp86.842.1%
Boundary %18%60bp77.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.941× par47bp77.930%
Econ vs LHB0.774× par13bp77.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.38/ov47bp80.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.92/ov13bp95.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +13.2 · induced false-shot 40%
72.5Middle10.9% of overs · 4w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp68.738%
Impactp98.825%
Qualityp96.515%
Versatilityp44.212%
Trajectoryp19.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.989× par12bp5044.1%
Wicket rate2.00/ov12bp98.844.1%
Boundary %25%12bp25.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.065× par11bp40.750%
Econ vs LHB0.689× par1bp47.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +65.5 · induced false-shot 67%
68.6Death34.5% of overs · 6w · 6.79 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.248%
Impactp89.625%
Versatilityp39.215%
Trajectoryp19.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.738× par38bp89.650%
Wicket rate0.95/ov38bp85.416.7%
Boundary %18%38bp60.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%38bp2540%
Slower ball038bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer038bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +16.7
Shubham Agarwal
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 32
70.7
Scout Score
Overs 24.3 · Wkts 7 · Runs 175 · Econ 7.14
70.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle75.681.6%61.7
Death42.814.3%6.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p15.31.11×
Scout Score70.7
75.6Middle81.6% of overs · 6w · 6.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp7738%
Impactp91.925%
Qualityp68.615%
Versatilityp96.512%
Trajectoryp15.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.791× par120bp96.544.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov120bp52.344.1%
Boundary %8%120bp96.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.88× par87bp94.250%
Econ vs LHB0.627× par33bp98.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +31.2 · induced false-shot 24%
42.8Death14.3% of overs · 1w · 8.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp5255%
Impactp39.625%
Versatilityp31.28%
Trajectoryp15.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.9× par21bp56.243.6%
Boundary %19%21bp56.241.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov21bp27.114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7218bp31.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1
Sumit Ruikar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 36
66.2
Scout Score
Overs 11.3 · Wkts 5 · Runs 71 · Econ 6.17
66.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay89.234.8%31.0
Middle52.458%30.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p74.50.93×
Scout Score66.2
89.2Powerplay34.8% of overs · 3w · 4.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp92.538%
Impactp92.627%
Qualityp86.815%
Versatilityp85.910%
Trajectoryp74.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.522× par24bp95.636.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp89.742.1%
Boundary %8%24bp92.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.597× par22bp92.630%
Econ vs LHB0× par2bp7530%
Wkt vs RHB0.55/ov22bp86.820%
Wkt vs LHB3.00/ov2bp91.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +20.3 · induced false-shot 42%
52.4Middle58% of overs · 1w · 7.65 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.538%
Impactp70.925%
Qualityp17.415%
Versatilityp48.312%
Trajectoryp74.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.946× par40bp68.644.1%
Wicket rate0.15/ov40bp22.144.1%
Boundary %10%40bp80.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.726× par28bp91.950%
Econ vs LHB1.436× par12bp4.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2 · induced false-shot 15%
Bhawesh Sahu
Bowler · RA pace
65.5
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 88 · Econ 8
65.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay71.145.5%32.4
Middle80.227.3%21.9
Death41.427.3%11.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score65.5
71.1Powerplay45.5% of overs · 4w · 8.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp7438%
Impactp83.827%
Qualityp63.215%
Versatilityp61.510%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.966× par30bp58.836.8%
Wicket rate0.80/ov30bp98.542.1%
Boundary %23%30bp51.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.051× par25bp48.530%
Econ vs LHB0.711× par5bp60.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.96/ov25bp98.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp45.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15 · induced false-shot 30%
80.2Middle27.3% of overs · 3w · 5.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp87.838%
Impactp77.925%
Qualityp91.915%
Versatilityp74.412%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.701× par18bp87.244.1%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp95.344.1%
Boundary %11%18bp61.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.703× par10bp75.650%
Econ vs LHB0.689× par8bp73.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.3 · induced false-shot 44%
41.4Death27.3% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.848%
Impactp35.425%
Versatilityp39.215%
Trajectoryp46.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.978× par18bp52.150%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp31.216.7%
Boundary %22%18bp37.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%18bp2540%
Slower ball018bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer018bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.2
Mayank Yadav
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
63.1
Scout Score
Overs 14.3 · Wkts 6 · Runs 127 · Econ 8.76
63.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay67.675.9%51.3
Death43.717.2%7.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p13.31.12×
Scout Score63.1
67.6Powerplay75.9% of overs · 4w · 8.73 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.438%
Impactp89.727%
Qualityp48.515%
Versatilityp64.710%
Trajectoryp13.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.958× par66bp7536.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov66bp7542.1%
Boundary %20%66bp72.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.881× par40bp83.830%
Econ vs LHB1.025× par26bp33.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.30/ov40bp66.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.46/ov26bp80.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +17.5 · induced false-shot 26%
43.7Death17.2% of overs · 2w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.848%
Impactp43.825%
Versatilityp67.915%
Trajectoryp13.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.086× par15bp39.650%
Wicket rate0.80/ov15bp47.916.7%
Boundary %20%15bp47.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate20%15bp96.940%
Slower ball015bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer015bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.7
Sahban Khan
Bowler · Off-spin · age 30
62.2
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 81 · Econ 6.75
62.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle62.2100%62.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p68.40.94×
Scout Score62.2
62.2Middle100% of overs · 3w · 6.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.338%
Impactp73.325%
Qualityp3.515%
Versatilityp84.912%
Trajectoryp68.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.835× par72bp91.944.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov72bp40.744.1%
Boundary %10%72bp91.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.625× par15bp84.950%
Econ vs LHB0.835× par57bp84.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.3 · induced false-shot 11%
Imtiyaj Khan
Bowler · LA pace
60.4
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 75 · Econ 9.38
60.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay60.487.5%52.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p990.75×
Scout Score60.4
60.4Powerplay87.5% of overs · 1w · 7.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.338%
Impactp7527%
Qualityp19.115%
Versatilityp63.410%
Trajectoryp9910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.847× par42bp83.836.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp17.642.1%
Boundary %17%42bp80.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.93× par26bp72.130%
Econ vs LHB0.703× par16bp94.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov26bp7.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.37/ov16bp60.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.2 · induced false-shot 21%
Ashish Chouhan
Bowler · RA pace · age 28
59.3
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 150 · Econ 8.82
59.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay6376.5%48.2
Death43.217.6%7.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p7.11.2×
Scout Score59.3
63Powerplay76.5% of overs · 5w · 9.15 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.138%
Impactp63.227%
Qualityp77.915%
Versatilityp57.110%
Trajectoryp7.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.005× par78bp63.236.8%
Wicket rate0.38/ov78bp80.942.1%
Boundary %19%78bp7521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.037× par42bp60.330%
Econ vs LHB0.921× par36bp51.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.43/ov42bp89.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.34/ov36bp27.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.2 · induced false-shot 30%
43.2Death17.6% of overs · 3w · 9.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp4948%
Impactp52.125%
Versatilityp39.215%
Trajectoryp7.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.014× par18bp47.950%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp7516.7%
Boundary %22%18bp37.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%18bp2540%
Slower ball018bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer018bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.3
Gagandeep Singh
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 28
59.2
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 92 · Econ 7.08
59.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay44.915.4%6.9
Middle62.176.9%47.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p11.21.13×
Scout Score59.2
44.9Powerplay15.4% of overs · 0w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.738%
Impactp57.427%
Qualityp7.415%
Versatilityp6010%
Trajectoryp11.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.659× par12bp77.936.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp29.442.1%
Boundary %8%12bp69.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.768× par9bp69.130%
Econ vs LHB0.395× par3bp69.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov9bp35.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp57.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.9 · induced false-shot 8%
62.1Middle76.9% of overs · 3w · 7.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.338%
Impactp82.625%
Qualityp31.415%
Versatilityp70.912%
Trajectoryp11.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.89× par60bp82.644.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp55.844.1%
Boundary %10%60bp87.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.99× par45bp61.650%
Econ vs LHB0.689× par15bp80.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.9 · induced false-shot 18%
Jivesh Butte
Bowler · Off-spin · age 28
58.8
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 68 · Econ 7.56
58.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay51.255.6%28.5
Middle68.244.4%30.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score58.8
51.2Powerplay55.6% of overs · 1w · 8.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.438%
Impactp54.427%
Qualityp39.715%
Versatilityp48.210%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.966× par30bp58.836.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp48.542.1%
Boundary %20%30bp63.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.037× par12bp42.630%
Econ vs LHB0.855× par18bp66.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp26.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.34/ov18bp51.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.9 · induced false-shot 23%
68.2Middle44.4% of overs · 1w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.638%
Impactp66.325%
Qualityp75.615%
Versatilityp73.312%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.742× par24bp89.544.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp46.544.1%
Boundary %4%24bp89.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.781× par5bp5750%
Econ vs LHB0.689× par19bp89.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.8 · induced false-shot 29%
Abdul Anas Khan
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
55.6
Scout Score
Overs 8.1 · Wkts 4 · Runs 66 · Econ 8.08
55.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle21.336.7%7.8
Death75.563.3%47.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score55.6
21.3Middle36.7% of overs · 0w · 10.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp1638%
Impactp22.125%
Qualityp10.515%
Versatilityp28.512%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.278× par18bp12.844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp18.644.1%
Boundary %22%18bp18.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.432× par6bp24.450%
Econ vs LHB1.149× par12bp32.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.4 · induced false-shot 6%
75.5Death63.3% of overs · 4w · 6.77 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.448%
Impactp93.825%
Versatilityp65.415%
Trajectoryp46.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.736× par31bp81.250%
Wicket rate0.77/ov31bp60.416.7%
Boundary %13%31bp77.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate19%31bp90.640%
Slower ball031bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer031bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +24.1
Md Faiz Khan
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 18
55
Scout Score
Overs 11.4 · Wkts 6 · Runs 89 · Econ 7.63
55OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle55.474.3%41.2
Death53.417.1%9.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p11.29×
Scout Score55
55.4Middle74.3% of overs · 4w · 7.96 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.738%
Impactp59.325%
Qualityp4315%
Versatilityp5012%
Trajectoryp110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.984× par52bp61.644.1%
Wicket rate0.46/ov52bp89.544.1%
Boundary %14%52bp59.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.915× par35bp77.950%
Econ vs LHB1.136× par17bp22.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.1 · induced false-shot 19%
53.4Death17.1% of overs · 2w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.355%
Impactp56.225%
Versatilityp34.48%
Trajectoryp112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.652× par12bp64.643.6%
Boundary %8%12bp68.841.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp64.614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.589bp34.4100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.9
Vijay Yadav
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
54.2
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 155 · Econ 10.33
54.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay65.940%26.4
Middle67.333.3%22.4
Death20.226.7%5.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p72.40.94×
Scout Score54.2
65.9Powerplay40% of overs · 2w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.838%
Impactp66.227%
Qualityp80.915%
Versatilityp51.210%
Trajectoryp72.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.988× par36bp54.436.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp66.242.1%
Boundary %19%36bp66.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.05× par27bp54.430%
Econ vs LHB0.855× par9bp54.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.44/ov27bp77.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov9bp14.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.5 · induced false-shot 33%
67.3Middle33.3% of overs · 2w · 6.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.538%
Impactp75.625%
Qualityp34.915%
Versatilityp66.312%
Trajectoryp72.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.841× par30bp77.944.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp69.844.1%
Boundary %10%30bp70.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.005× par14bp5050%
Econ vs LHB0.689× par16bp82.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.6 · induced false-shot 17%
20.2Death26.7% of overs · 1w · 16.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp3.848%
Impactp6.225%
Versatilityp54.215%
Trajectoryp72.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.82× par24bp2.150%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp12.516.7%
Boundary %50%24bp2.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%24bp62.540%
Slower ball024bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer024bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.1
Bharat Gondwani
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
52.8
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 144 · Econ 9
52.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay48.525%12.1
Middle7347.9%35.0
Death2127.1%5.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p21.41.07×
Scout Score52.8
48.5Powerplay25% of overs · 1w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.538%
Impactp48.527%
Qualityp30.915%
Versatilityp56.510%
Trajectoryp21.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.933× par24bp67.636.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp55.942.1%
Boundary %21%24bp57.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.037× par22bp57.430%
Econ vs LHB0.296× par2bp63.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov22bp10.320%
Wkt vs LHB3.00/ov2bp91.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.4 · induced false-shot 21%
73Middle47.9% of overs · 3w · 7.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.338%
Impactp84.925%
Qualityp94.215%
Versatilityp6412%
Trajectoryp21.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.919× par46bp70.944.1%
Wicket rate0.39/ov46bp75.644.1%
Boundary %11%46bp73.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1× par25bp52.350%
Econ vs LHB0.821× par21bp75.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.1 · induced false-shot 37%
21Death27.1% of overs · 4w · 12.23 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.848%
Impactp10.425%
Versatilityp39.215%
Trajectoryp21.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.329× par26bp10.450%
Wicket rate0.92/ov26bp81.216.7%
Boundary %38%26bp6.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%26bp2540%
Slower ball026bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer026bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.1
Aditya Agarwal
Bowler · Off-spin · age 47
52.2
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 43 · Econ 8.6
52.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle46.160%27.7
Death61.340%24.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score52.2
46.1Middle60% of overs · 2w · 9.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.538%
Impactp38.425%
Qualityp45.315%
Versatilityp3912%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.195× par18bp24.444.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp91.944.1%
Boundary %22%18bp18.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.521× par6bp73.350%
Econ vs LHB1.436× par12bp4.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.7 · induced false-shot 17%
61.3Death40% of overs · 1w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.955%
Impactp68.825%
Versatilityp62.58%
Trajectoryp46.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.76× par12bp60.443.6%
Boundary %8%12bp68.841.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp39.614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.567bp62.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.2
Harsh Yadav
Bowler · RA pace
48.6
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 108 · Econ 10.8
48.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay54.520%10.9
Middle53.950%26.9
Death35.830%10.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p76.50.93×
Scout Score48.6
54.5Powerplay20% of overs · 1w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.738%
Impactp60.327%
Qualityp55.915%
Versatilityp4510%
Trajectoryp76.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.263× par12bp30.936.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp72.142.1%
Boundary %33%12bp23.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.728× par2bp2530%
Econ vs LHB1.066× par10bp36.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov2bp48.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.60/ov10bp83.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5 · induced false-shot 33%
53.9Middle50% of overs · 2w · 9.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.638%
Impactp54.725%
Qualityp98.815%
Versatilityp3212%
Trajectoryp76.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.212× par30bp10.544.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp69.844.1%
Boundary %23%30bp10.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB—0bp46.550%
Econ vs LHB1.126× par30bp17.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.5 · induced false-shot 47%
35.8Death30% of overs · 2w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp2548%
Impactp22.925%
Versatilityp59.215%
Trajectoryp76.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.304× par18bp22.950%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp43.816.7%
Boundary %28%18bp18.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%18bp7540%
Slower ball018bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer018bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.4
Satyam Dubey
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
45.5
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 150 · Econ 9.38
45.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay42.750%21.4
Middle56.612.5%7.1
Death45.637.5%17.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p82.70.89×
Scout Score45.5
42.7Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 9.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp3138%
Impactp19.127%
Qualityp95.615%
Versatilityp31.510%
Trajectoryp82.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.029× par48bp51.536.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov48bp1.542.1%
Boundary %23%48bp54.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.106× par40bp30.930%
Econ vs LHB0.814× par8bp57.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov40bp1.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp23.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.5 · induced false-shot 40%
56.6Middle12.5% of overs · 0w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.238%
Impactp47.725%
Qualityp70.915%
Versatilityp55.812%
Trajectoryp82.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.865× par12bp65.144.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp31.444.1%
Boundary %8%12bp65.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.781× par4bp54.750%
Econ vs LHB0.862× par8bp5750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.4 · induced false-shot 33%
45.6Death37.5% of overs · 6w · 10.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.348%
Impactp14.625%
Versatilityp59.215%
Trajectoryp82.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.104× par36bp31.250%
Wicket rate1.00/ov36bp91.716.7%
Boundary %19%36bp52.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%36bp7540%
Slower ball036bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer036bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.2
Aryan Jaiswal
Bowler · RA pace
45
Scout Score
Overs 10.2 · Wkts 5 · Runs 94 · Econ 9.1
45OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle52.351.6%27.0
Death35.238.7%13.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p92.90.86×
Scout Score45
52.3Middle51.6% of overs · 1w · 8.06 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.738%
Impactp33.725%
Qualityp77.915%
Versatilityp52.312%
Trajectoryp92.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.997× par32bp52.344.1%
Wicket rate0.19/ov32bp38.444.1%
Boundary %19%32bp31.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.837× par14bp68.650%
Econ vs LHB1.073× par18bp3650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.5 · induced false-shot 28%
35.2Death38.7% of overs · 3w · 12.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.148%
Impactp18.825%
Versatilityp39.215%
Trajectoryp92.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.331× par24bp18.850%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp54.216.7%
Boundary %25%24bp29.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%24bp2540%
Slower ball024bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer024bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.6
Vashudev Bareth
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
45
Scout Score
Overs 14.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 134 · Econ 9.57
45OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay43.371.4%30.9
Middle50.421.4%10.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p78.60.92×
Scout Score45
43.3Powerplay71.4% of overs · 2w · 9.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.938%
Impactp22.127%
Qualityp83.815%
Versatilityp36.810%
Trajectoryp78.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.076× par60bp36.836.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp42.642.1%
Boundary %30%60bp16.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.004× par42bp66.230%
Econ vs LHB1.217× par18bp13.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.29/ov42bp63.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov18bp1.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.4 · induced false-shot 33%
50.4Middle21.4% of overs · 3w · 10.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.438%
Impactp40.725%
Qualityp66.315%
Versatilityp24.412%
Trajectoryp78.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.319× par18bp8.144.1%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp95.344.1%
Boundary %17%18bp48.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.129× par9bp38.450%
Econ vs LHB1.456× par9bp10.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.3 · induced false-shot 28%
Harsh Rathore
Bowler · RA pace
44.9
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 79 · Econ 9.88
44.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay3662.5%22.5
Middle59.637.5%22.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score44.9
36Powerplay62.5% of overs · 1w · 11.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.638%
Impactp27.927%
Qualityp63.215%
Versatilityp30.310%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.23× par30bp19.136.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp48.542.1%
Boundary %33%30bp10.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.06× par15bp39.730%
Econ vs LHB1.303× par15bp10.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.40/ov15bp69.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov15bp7.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.5 · induced false-shot 30%
59.6Middle37.5% of overs · 1w · 7.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.638%
Impactp87.225%
Qualityp24.415%
Versatilityp47.712%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.948× par18bp58.144.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp61.644.1%
Boundary %6%18bp82.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.541× par13bp87.250%
Econ vs LHB1.931× par5bp8.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +13.9 · induced false-shot 11%
Dhananjay Nayak
Bowler · SLA orthodox
44.6
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 58 · Econ 8.29
44.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay19.728.6%5.6
Middle57.157.1%32.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score44.6
19.7Powerplay28.6% of overs · 0w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.338%
Impactp16.227%
Qualityp2.915%
Versatilityp28.510%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.482× par12bp14.736.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp29.442.1%
Boundary %50%12bp7.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.037× par6bp36.830%
Econ vs LHB1.777× par6bp7.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov6bp39.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov6bp36.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13 · induced false-shot 0%
57.1Middle57.1% of overs · 2w · 6.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp77.338%
Impactp3625%
Qualityp40.715%
Versatilityp66.312%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.835× par24bp74.444.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp80.244.1%
Boundary %8%24bp76.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.912× par18bp6450%
Econ vs LHB0.689× par6bp68.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.9 · induced false-shot 17%
Ajay Mandal
Bowler · Chinaman · age 30
42.1
Scout Score
Overs 17.1 · Wkts 4 · Runs 137 · Econ 7.98
42.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay35.517.5%6.2
Middle43.676.7%33.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p96.90.82×
Scout Score42.1
35.5Powerplay17.5% of overs · 0w · 9.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.638%
Impactp30.927%
Qualityp14.715%
Versatilityp4410%
Trajectoryp96.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.025× par18bp45.636.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp11.842.1%
Boundary %28%18bp32.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.325× par12bp17.630%
Econ vs LHB0.493× par6bp86.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp26.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov6bp36.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.7 · induced false-shot 17%
43.6Middle76.7% of overs · 4w · 8.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.738%
Impactp17.425%
Qualityp38.415%
Versatilityp44.212%
Trajectoryp96.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.014× par79bp47.744.1%
Wicket rate0.31/ov79bp59.344.1%
Boundary %19%79bp12.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.048× par44bp4350%
Econ vs LHB0.965× par35bp45.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.3 · induced false-shot 19%
Arin Dwivedi
Bowler · Off-spin · age 21
41.9
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 61 · Econ 8.71
41.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay26.442.9%11.3
Middle53.657.1%30.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score41.9
26.4Powerplay42.9% of overs · 0w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp17.138%
Impactp36.827%
Qualityp14.715%
Versatilityp30.310%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.244× par18bp22.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp11.842.1%
Boundary %33%18bp19.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.998× par9bp45.630%
Econ vs LHB1.382× par9bp22.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov9bp35.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov9bp14.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.3 · induced false-shot 17%
53.6Middle57.1% of overs · 1w · 6.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.438%
Impactp5725%
Qualityp20.915%
Versatilityp65.112%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.835× par24bp74.444.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp46.544.1%
Boundary %8%24bp76.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.781× par13bp70.950%
Econ vs LHB0.878× par11bp59.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 12%
Gaurav Chaturvedi
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 24
41.6
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 137 · Econ 8.06
41.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle3470.6%24.0
Death64.323.5%15.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p3.11.29×
Scout Score41.6
34Middle70.6% of overs · 5w · 8.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp5138%
Impactp3.525%
Qualityp59.315%
Versatilityp38.412%
Trajectoryp3.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.072× par72bp31.444.1%
Wicket rate0.41/ov72bp82.644.1%
Boundary %21%72bp5.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.188× par50bp10.550%
Econ vs LHB0.878× par22bp66.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.3 · induced false-shot 21%
64.3Death23.5% of overs · 3w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.655%
Impactp72.925%
Versatilityp65.68%
Trajectoryp3.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.76× par24bp68.843.6%
Boundary %8%24bp85.441.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp54.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.5818bp65.6100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.1
Soumya Keshri
Bowler · RA pace
41.4
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 145 · Econ 11.15
41.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay73.630.8%22.7
Middle35.930.8%11.1
Death20.138.5%7.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p86.70.88×
Scout Score41.4
73.6Powerplay30.8% of overs · 2w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.438%
Impactp69.127%
Qualityp7515%
Versatilityp63.710%
Trajectoryp86.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.933× par24bp67.636.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp77.942.1%
Boundary %12%24bp83.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.979× par24bp63.230%
Econ vs LHB—0bp44.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.50/ov24bp83.820%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp73.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.7 · induced false-shot 33%
35.9Middle30.8% of overs · 1w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.438%
Impactp24.425%
Qualityp715%
Versatilityp45.312%
Trajectoryp86.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.051× par24bp38.444.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp46.544.1%
Boundary %25%24bp8.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.155× par23bp29.150%
Econ vs LHB0× par1bp61.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.2 · induced false-shot 8%
20.1Death38.5% of overs · 0w · 15.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp6.948%
Impactp2.125%
Versatilityp39.215%
Trajectoryp86.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.673× par30bp6.250%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp2.116.7%
Boundary %30%30bp10.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%30bp2540%
Slower ball030bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer030bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -23
Dev Aditya Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
41.1
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 120 · Econ 9.23
41.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.923.1%8.8
Middle42.269.2%29.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p80.60.89×
Scout Score41.1
37.9Powerplay23.1% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.138%
Impactp4.427%
Qualityp51.515%
Versatilityp45.910%
Trajectoryp80.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.208× par18bp27.936.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp61.842.1%
Boundary %28%18bp32.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.749× par12bp7530%
Econ vs LHB1.974× par6bp4.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.50/ov12bp73.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov6bp36.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -20.8 · induced false-shot 28%
42.2Middle69.2% of overs · 3w · 8.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.238%
Impactp5.825%
Qualityp89.515%
Versatilityp30.212%
Trajectoryp80.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.085× par54bp29.144.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp6444.1%
Boundary %24%54bp1.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.078× par29bp3650%
Econ vs LHB1.076× par25bp24.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16.4 · induced false-shot 30%
Shivam Yadav
Bowler · RA pace
40.5
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 44 · Econ 11
40.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay47.150%23.6
Middle33.950%16.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score40.5
47.1Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.638%
Impactp51.527%
Qualityp26.515%
Versatilityp49.410%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.769× par12bp72.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp29.442.1%
Boundary %17%12bp60.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB—0bp33.830%
Econ vs LHB0.691× par12bp89.730%
Wkt vs RHB—0bp51.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov12bp10.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.6 · induced false-shot 17%
33.9Middle50% of overs · 0w · 15 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp17.438%
Impactp45.325%
Qualityp62.815%
Versatilityp15.112%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.855× par12bp1.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp31.444.1%
Boundary %25%12bp25.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB2.344× par6bp3.550%
Econ vs LHB1.379× par6bp26.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.4 · induced false-shot 25%
Shreyam Sundram
Bowler · SLA orthodox
39.1
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 36 · Econ 9
39.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle39.1100%39.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score39.1
39.1Middle100% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.638%
Impactp4325%
Qualityp20.915%
Versatilityp3612%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.113× par24bp34.944.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp46.544.1%
Boundary %12%24bp5711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.211× par20bp22.150%
Econ vs LHB0.862× par4bp5050%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.9 · induced false-shot 12%
Mohammad Irfan
Bowler · Off-spin · age 25
38.1
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 41 · Econ 10.25
38.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay3150%15.5
Middle45.250%22.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score38.1
31Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.838%
Impactp39.727%
Qualityp2.915%
Versatilityp38.210%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.153× par12bp33.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp29.442.1%
Boundary %33%12bp23.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.864× par4bp51.530%
Econ vs LHB1.184× par8bp30.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov4bp44.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp23.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.2 · induced false-shot 0%
45.2Middle50% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.738%
Impactp61.625%
Qualityp62.815%
Versatilityp39.512%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.236× par12bp26.744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp31.444.1%
Boundary %25%12bp25.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB—0bp46.550%
Econ vs LHB1.149× par12bp32.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.3 · induced false-shot 25%
Vikalp Tiwari
Bowler · SLA orthodox
37.7
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 92 · Econ 7.67
37.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle31.275%23.4
Death66.816.7%11.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p88.80.87×
Scout Score37.7
31.2Middle75% of overs · 1w · 8.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.938%
Impactp19.825%
Qualityp15.115%
Versatilityp40.712%
Trajectoryp88.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.03× par54bp40.744.1%
Wicket rate0.11/ov54bp5.844.1%
Boundary %15%54bp54.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.967× par42bp66.350%
Econ vs LHB1.322× par12bp15.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.8 · induced false-shot 15%
66.8Death16.7% of overs · 0w · 5 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.455%
Impactp64.625%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp88.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.543× par12bp77.143.6%
Boundary %8%12bp68.841.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp20.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.5412bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.2
Om Koshle
Bowler · Leg-spin
37.5
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 134 · Econ 8.93
37.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle39.480%31.5
Death25.813.3%3.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p70.40.94×
Scout Score37.5
39.4Middle80% of overs · 4w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.238%
Impactp8.125%
Qualityp26.715%
Versatilityp51.212%
Trajectoryp70.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.02× par72bp45.344.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp66.344.1%
Boundary %17%72bp33.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.22× par57bp5.850%
Econ vs LHB0.46× par15bp96.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.6 · induced false-shot 18%
25.8Death13.3% of overs · 0w · 14.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp15.555%
Impactp31.225%
Versatilityp12.58%
Trajectoryp70.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.575× par12bp14.643.6%
Boundary %33%12bp14.641.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp20.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.599bp12.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.3
Naman Dhruw
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
35.8
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 87 · Econ 9.67
35.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.577.8%29.2
Middle29.622.2%6.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score35.8
37.5Powerplay77.8% of overs · 1w · 9.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.538%
Impactp33.827%
Qualityp42.615%
Versatilityp37.910%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.035× par42bp48.536.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp17.642.1%
Boundary %24%42bp48.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.79× par21bp80.930%
Econ vs LHB1.184× par21bp16.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov21bp13.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.29/ov21bp30.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.3 · induced false-shot 24%
29.6Middle22.2% of overs · 0w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp25.638%
Impactp12.825%
Qualityp55.815%
Versatilityp30.212%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.298× par12bp19.844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp31.444.1%
Boundary %25%12bp25.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.563× par6bp17.450%
Econ vs LHB1.034× par6bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.4 · induced false-shot 17%
Snehil Chadda
Bowler · RA pace
35.8
Scout Score
Overs 9.1 · Wkts 2 · Runs 99 · Econ 10.8
35.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay25.943.6%11.3
Death45.445.5%20.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score35.8
25.9Powerplay43.6% of overs · 0w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp2138%
Impactp10.327%
Qualityp45.615%
Versatilityp36.210%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.208× par24bp2536.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp7.442.1%
Boundary %25%24bp41.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.419× par19bp7.430%
Econ vs LHB0.592× par5bp72.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov19bp16.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp45.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.1 · induced false-shot 25%
45.4Death45.5% of overs · 2w · 10.08 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.248%
Impactp47.925%
Versatilityp62.915%
Trajectoryp46.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.095× par25bp35.450%
Wicket rate0.48/ov25bp35.416.7%
Boundary %20%25bp43.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate12%25bp84.440%
Slower ball025bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer025bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.3
Abhyuday Singh
Bowler · Leg-spin
34.8
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 84 · Econ 10.5
34.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle34.887.5%30.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score34.8
34.8Middle87.5% of overs · 1w · 10.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp12.738%
Impactp29.125%
Qualityp84.915%
Versatilityp44.212%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.254× par42bp3.544.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp15.144.1%
Boundary %17%42bp38.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.563× par31bp1.250%
Econ vs LHB0.564× par11bp87.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.7 · induced false-shot 29%
Anand Rao
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
31.6
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 80 · Econ 13.33
31.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay31.683.3%26.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score31.6
31.6Powerplay83.3% of overs · 1w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.438%
Impactp2527%
Qualityp63.215%
Versatilityp21.810%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.427× par30bp4.436.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp48.542.1%
Boundary %43%30bp1.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.276× par13bp22.130%
Econ vs LHB1.428× par17bp1.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov13bp19.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.35/ov17bp54.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.4 · induced false-shot 30%
Amit Kumar Yadav
Bowler · RA pace · age 17
30.7
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 46 · Econ 11.5
30.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay26.350%13.2
Middle3550%17.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score30.7
26.3Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 14.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.738%
Impactp1.527%
Qualityp55.915%
Versatilityp34.610%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.592× par12bp7.436.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp29.442.1%
Boundary %25%12bp45.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.67× par12bp4.430%
Econ vs LHB—0bp44.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp26.520%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp73.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -24.6 · induced false-shot 33%
35Middle50% of overs · 0w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.538%
Impactp31.425%
Qualityp12.815%
Versatilityp4312%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.051× par12bp4344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp31.444.1%
Boundary %8%12bp65.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.228× par7bp31.450%
Econ vs LHB0.827× par5bp54.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.7 · induced false-shot 0%
Amitesh Pandey
Bowler · Off-spin · age 26
29.5
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 104 · Econ 10.4
29.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay34.730%10.4
Middle26.960%16.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score29.5
34.7Powerplay30% of overs · 1w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.638%
Impactp7.427%
Qualityp72.115%
Versatilityp33.210%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.427× par18bp10.336.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp61.842.1%
Boundary %28%18bp32.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.901× par4bp13.230%
Econ vs LHB1.184× par14bp2530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov4bp44.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.43/ov14bp64.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.8 · induced false-shot 33%
26.9Middle60% of overs · 0w · 9.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp1538%
Impactp52.325%
Qualityp1.215%
Versatilityp26.712%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.133× par36bp22.144.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp1.244.1%
Boundary %17%36bp40.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.953× par4bp12.850%
Econ vs LHB0.97× par32bp40.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2 · induced false-shot 6%
Shashank Tiwari
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
25.3
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 63 · Econ 10.5
25.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay31.633.3%10.5
Middle22.166.7%14.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score25.3
31.6Powerplay33.3% of overs · 0w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.638%
Impactp42.627%
Qualityp26.515%
Versatilityp36.310%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.482× par12bp14.736.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp29.442.1%
Boundary %42%12bp13.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.555× par12bp10.330%
Econ vs LHB—0bp44.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp26.520%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp73.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.8 · induced false-shot 17%
22.1Middle66.7% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.738%
Impactp10.525%
Qualityp715%
Versatilityp3612%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.113× par24bp34.944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp9.344.1%
Boundary %17%24bp44.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.207× par22bp19.850%
Econ vs LHB0.689× par2bp52.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.6 · induced false-shot 8%
Deepak Yadav
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 23
24.2
Scout Score
Overs 14.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 130 · Econ 9.29
24.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.928.6%10.6
Middle19.171.4%13.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p5.11.2×
Scout Score24.2
36.9Powerplay28.6% of overs · 1w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.838%
Impactp45.627%
Qualityp10.315%
Versatilityp47.210%
Trajectoryp5.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.071× par24bp39.736.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp55.942.1%
Boundary %25%24bp41.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.123× par24bp27.930%
Econ vs LHB—0bp44.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.25/ov24bp54.420%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp73.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.9 · induced false-shot 17%
19.1Middle71.4% of overs · 2w · 9.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.738%
Impactp1.225%
Qualityp48.815%
Versatilityp19.812%
Trajectoryp5.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.125× par60bp17.444.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp24.444.1%
Boundary %17%60bp3611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.108× par55bp26.750%
Econ vs LHB1.793× par5bp12.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.4 · induced false-shot 20%
Raja Kurre
Bowler · RA pace
23.8
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 175 · Econ 9.72
23.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle21.861.1%13.3
Death27.138.9%10.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p17.31.08×
Scout Score23.8
21.8Middle61.1% of overs · 2w · 9.09 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp14.138%
Impactp26.725%
Qualityp29.115%
Versatilityp30.212%
Trajectoryp17.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.124× par66bp15.144.1%
Wicket rate0.18/ov66bp12.844.1%
Boundary %18%66bp15.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.987× par38bp59.350%
Econ vs LHB1.28× par28bp1.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.8 · induced false-shot 18%
27.1Death38.9% of overs · 2w · 10.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=24
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.248%
Impactp27.125%
Versatilityp50.415%
Trajectoryp17.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.164× par42bp27.150%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp6.216.7%
Boundary %24%42bp22.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%42bp53.140%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer042bp46.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.7
Shubham Singh
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 29
17.7
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 52 · Econ 10.4
17.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle17.7100%17.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score17.7
17.7Middle100% of overs · 0w · 10.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=43
Componentpctweight
Productionp4.538%
Impactp15.125%
Qualityp34.915%
Versatilityp18.612%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.286× par30bp5.844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp3.544.1%
Boundary %27%30bp3.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.339× par21bp8.150%
Econ vs LHB1.226× par9bp29.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.1 · induced false-shot 17%
Diwakar Tamrakar
Bowler · LA pace
16.2
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 88 · Econ 12.57
16.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay16.285.7%13.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91×
Scout Score16.2
16.2Powerplay85.7% of overs · 0w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp3.338%
Impactp13.227%
Qualityp33.815%
Versatilityp16.210%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.482× par36bp1.536.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp4.442.1%
Boundary %39%36bp4.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.472× par31bp1.530%
Econ vs LHB1.777× par5bp19.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov31bp4.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp45.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.7 · induced false-shot 22%