| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 24 | 8 | 258 | 154 | 167.5 | 36.9 | 29 | 13 | 81.3 Scout Score 81.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production74.540% Impact8527% Versatility84.315% Shot quality756% Trajectory9512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.39×[72, 14, 19] | 74.5 Production 74.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.98× parp5535% True Avg1.21× parp8530% Balls / boundary3.39p8517.5% Balls / dismissal26p8517.5% | 75 Shot Quality 75 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.2% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control81.8% | 85 Impact 85 = WPA percentile · total +45.9 WPA · Powerplay+45.9 WPA · Consolidation+0.1 | 84.3 Versatility 84.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp7526.7% vs Spin SRp7526.7% Accel into Consp9520% Pressure entryp9526.7% | |
| 2 | LHB | 28 | 11 | 397 | 236 | 168.2 | 49.6 | 45 | 15 | 81 Scout Score 81 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production9540% Impact9527% Versatility65.715% Shot quality356% Trajectory4512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.88×[69, 5, 34] | 95 Production 95 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.18× parp9535% True Avg6.18× parp9530% Balls / boundary2.89p9517.5% Balls / dismissal110p9517.5% | 35 Shot Quality 35 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70.2% Control · Build81.1% Phase-weighted control73.7% | 95 Impact 95 = WPA percentile · total +82.5 WPA · Powerplay+93.3 WPA · Consolidation-10.8 | 65.7 Versatility 65.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp4526.7% vs Spin SRp9526.7% Accel into Consp7520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 3 | RHB | — | 3 | 61 | 40 | 152.5 | 20.3 | 7 | 2 | 65.1 Scout Score 65.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production71.540% Impact7527% Versatility54.315% Shot quality256% Trajectory5512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[5, 27, 29] | 71.5 Production 71.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.14× parp7535% True Avg0.92× parp7530% Balls / boundary2.83p6517.5% Balls / dismissal17p6517.5% | 25 Shot Quality 25 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control70.3% | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile · total +7 WPA · Powerplay+9.5 WPA · Consolidation-2.5 | 54.3 Versatility 54.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp8526.7% vs Spin SRp3526.7% Accel into Consp4520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 4 | RHB | 25 | 8 | 143 | 91 | 157.1 | 17.9 | 17 | 5 | 53.6 Scout Score 53.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production59.540% Impact4527% Versatility47.715% Shot quality56% Trajectory8512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.24×[39, 33, 0] | 59.5 Production 59.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp8535% True Avg0.77× parp3530% Balls / boundary3.86p7517.5% Balls / dismissal16.2p3517.5% | 5 Shot Quality 5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted control50% | 45 Impact 45 = WPA percentile · total -6.6 WPA · Powerplay+7.2 WPA · Consolidation-13.8 | 47.7 Versatility 47.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5526.7% vs Spin SRp5526.7% Accel into Consp2520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 5 | RHB | — | 10 | 88 | 51 | 172.5 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 46.1 Scout Score 46.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production34.840% Impact6527% Versatility59.715% Shot quality456% Trajectory2512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.75×[17, 1, 0] | 34.8 Production 34.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.05× parp6535% True Avg0.3× parp530% Balls / boundary3.75p5517.5% Balls / dismissal6p517.5% | 45 Shot Quality 45 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation77.8% Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted control77.8% | 65 Impact 65 = WPA percentile · total -1.6 WPA · Powerplay+2.6 WPA · Consolidation-4.2 | 59.7 Versatility 59.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp2526.7% vs Spin SRp8526.7% Accel into Consp8520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | 30 | 10 | 296 | 176 | 168.2 | 37 | 22 | 17 | 39.5 Scout Score 39.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production23.840% Impact3527% Versatility5115% Shot quality856% Trajectory6512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.12×[74, 4, 18] | 23.8 Production 23.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.5× parp3535% True Avg0.07× parp1530% Balls / boundary6p1517.5% Balls / dismissal3p2517.5% | 85 Shot Quality 85 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation89.7% Control · Build84.8% Phase-weighted control86.7% | 35 Impact 35 = WPA percentile · total -16.2 WPA · Powerplay-13.3 WPA · Consolidation-2.9 | 51 Versatility 51 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp9526.7% vs Spin SRp6526.7% Accel into Consp3520% Pressure entryp526.7% | |
| 7 | RHB | 22 | 9 | 239 | 173 | 138.2 | 34.1 | 22 | 11 | 36.8 Scout Score 36.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4140% Impact1527% Versatility2315% Shot quality656% Trajectory7512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.13×[4, 71, 0] | 41 Production 41 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.79× parp2535% True Avg0.74× parp5530% Balls / boundary4.21p4517.5% Balls / dismissal19.67p4517.5% | 65 Shot Quality 65 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.6% Control · Build76.6% Phase-weighted control81.5% | 15 Impact 15 = WPA percentile · total -32.8 WPA · Powerplay-15.5 WPA · Consolidation-17.3 | 23 Versatility 23 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp1526.7% vs Spin SRp4526.7% Accel into Consp1520% Pressure entryp1526.7% | |
| 8 | RHB | — | 11 | 166 | 122 | 136.1 | 15.1 | 9 | 11 | 35.2 Scout Score 35.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production3240% Impact5527% Versatility40.315% Shot quality156% Trajectory512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.67×[14, 9, 7] | 32 Production 32 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.96× parp4535% True Avg0.63× parp2530% Balls / boundary4.6p3517.5% Balls / dismissal13.8p1517.5% | 15 Shot Quality 15 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation62.5% Control · Build71% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 55 Impact 55 = WPA percentile · total -6.5 WPA · Powerplay+4.5 WPA · Consolidation-11 | 40.3 Versatility 40.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp3526.7% vs Spin SRp2526.7% Accel into Consp5520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 9 | LHB | 18 | 7 | 187 | 164 | 114 | 26.7 | 13 | 12 | 34.1 Scout Score 34.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production32.840% Impact2527% Versatility2915% Shot quality956% Trajectory3512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.84×[4, 43, 15] | 32.8 Production 32.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.76× parp1535% True Avg0.79× parp4530% Balls / boundary4.63p2517.5% Balls / dismissal22p5517.5% | 95 Shot Quality 95 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.4% Control · Build87.1% Phase-weighted control88% | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile · total -17.1 WPA · Powerplay-22.3 WPA · Consolidation+5.2 | 29 Versatility 29 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp526.7% vs Spin SRp526.7% Accel into Consp6520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 10 | RHB | 21 | 10 | 308 | 239 | 128.9 | 44 | 23 | 9 | 27.3 Scout Score 27.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production35.240% Impact527% Versatility4515% Shot quality556% Trajectory1512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.74×[0, 11, 33] | 35.2 Production 35.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.57× parp535% True Avg0.68× parp6530% Balls / boundary12.5p517.5% Balls / dismissal25p7517.5% | 55 Shot Quality 55 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.9% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control81.2% | 5 Impact 5 = WPA percentile · total -63.6 WPA · Powerplay-40.4 WPA · Consolidation-23.3 | 45 Versatility 45 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp6526.7% vs Spin SRp1526.7% Accel into Consp520% Pressure entryp8526.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LHB | 19 | 10 | 317 | 161 | 196.9 | 39.6 | 32 | 19 | 83.6 Scout Score 83.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production85.728% Impact91.227% Versatility8927% Shot quality67.68% Trajectory55.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.98×[30, 11, 103] | 85.7 Production 85.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.33× parp97.142.9% True Avg1.14× parp61.832.1% Balls / boundary3.58p97.125% | 67.6 Shot Quality 67.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.2% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control81.4% | 91.2 Impact 91.2 = WPA percentile · total +56.7 WPA · Consolidation+9.3 WPA · Build+47.4 | 89 Versatility 89 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep9044.4% vs Off-spin40bp90 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp89.429.6% Off-spin56bp90.6 LA-orthodox43bp91.2 Leg-spin10bp75 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p79.414.8% Reach deathp97.111.1% | |
| 2 | RHB | 24 | 7 | 212 | 114 | 186 | 42.4 | 13 | 16 | 71.4 Scout Score 71.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production72.928% Impact85.327% Versatility58.427% Shot quality97.18% Trajectory44.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[62, 10, 8] | 72.9 Production 72.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.09× parp67.642.9% True Avg1.66× parp79.432.1% Balls / boundary5.83p73.525% | 97.1 Shot Quality 97.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.9% Control · Build94.7% Phase-weighted control91.4% | 85.3 Impact 85.3 = WPA percentile · total +56.7 WPA · Consolidation-5.8 WPA · Build+62.5 | 58.4 Versatility 58.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep4544.4% vs LA-orthodox33bp45 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp69.529.6% Off-spin26bp34.4 LA-orthodox58bp85.3 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p55.914.8% Reach deathp85.311.1% | |
| 3 | RHB | 24 | 11 | 276 | 179 | 154.2 | 34.5 | 19 | 13 | 71.2 Scout Score 71.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production69.728% Impact79.427% Versatility7127% Shot quality91.28% Trajectory38.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[6, 25, 10] | 69.7 Production 69.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.06× parp79.442.9% True Avg1.16× parp67.632.1% Balls / boundary6.86p55.925% | 91.2 Shot Quality 91.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation89.7% Control · Build92.8% Phase-weighted control91.4% | 79.4 Impact 79.4 = WPA percentile · total +22 WPA · Consolidation+6.1 WPA · Build+15.9 | 71 Versatility 71 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7544.4% vs LA-orthodox62bp75 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball7b7b <min Spin hittingp72.329.6% Off-spin66bp84.4 LA-orthodox75bp61.8 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p5014.8% Reach deathp79.411.1% | |
| 4 | RHB | 28 | 7 | 117 | 60 | 195 | 23.4 | 7 | 9 | 70.2 Scout Score 70.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production76.528% Impact73.527% Versatility59.127% Shot quality85.38% Trajectory61.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[0, 27, 45] | 76.5 Production 76.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.43× parp91.242.9% True Avg0.96× parp5032.1% Balls / boundary3.88p85.325% | 85.3 Shot Quality 85.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build84.6% Phase-weighted control83.9% | 73.5 Impact 73.5 = WPA percentile · total +15.2 WPA · Consolidation-6.6 WPA · Build+21.8 | 59.1 Versatility 59.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox7b7b <min vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp96.929.6% Off-spin30bp96.9 LA-orthodox15bp97.1 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p26.514.8% Reach deathp38.211.1% | |
| 5 | RHB | 29 | 10 | 299 | 199 | 150.3 | 37.4 | 38 | 4 | 68.5 Scout Score 68.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production86.828% Impact61.827% Versatility79.327% Shot quality508% Trajectory20.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.8×[25, 19, 10] | 86.8 Production 86.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.1× parp85.342.9% True Avg1.41× parp85.332.1% Balls / boundary4.93p91.225% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.4% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control79.1% | 61.8 Impact 61.8 = WPA percentile · total -0.9 WPA · Consolidation+33.6 WPA · Build-34.5 | 79.3 Versatility 79.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep9544.4% vs LA-orthodox74bp95 vs Leg-spin9b9b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp68.229.6% Off-spin53bp59.4 LA-orthodox89bp73.5 Leg-spin9b9b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p67.614.8% Reach deathp61.811.1% | |
| 6 | RHB | 25 | 10 | 253 | 196 | 129.1 | 25.3 | 19 | 11 | 68.4 Scout Score 68.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production80.728% Impact97.127% Versatility51.527% Shot quality38.28% Trajectory26.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.83×[7, 26, 42] | 80.7 Production 80.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.06× parp73.542.9% True Avg1.48× parp91.232.1% Balls / boundary6.1p79.425% | 38.2 Shot Quality 38.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.6% Control · Build75.6% Phase-weighted control77.3% | 97.1 Impact 97.1 = WPA percentile · total +59.1 WPA · Consolidation-0.3 WPA · Build+59.4 | 51.5 Versatility 51.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep6544.4% vs LA-orthodox42bp65 vs Leg-spin4b4b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp5729.6% Off-spin59bp65.6 LA-orthodox73bp50 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p32.414.8% Reach deathp8.811.1% | |
| 7 | LHB | 25 | 11 | 249 | 173 | 143.9 | 35.6 | 19 | 11 | 67.7 Scout Score 67.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production69.528% Impact67.627% Versatility66.527% Shot quality44.18% Trajectory85.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.01×[19, 26, 3] | 69.5 Production 69.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.01× parp5042.9% True Avg1.79× parp97.132.1% Balls / boundary6.42p67.625% | 44.1 Shot Quality 44.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control77.9% | 67.6 Impact 67.6 = WPA percentile · total +4.1 WPA · Consolidation-15.6 WPA · Build+19.7 | 66.5 Versatility 66.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7044.4% vs Off-spin52bp70 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp45.729.6% Off-spin70bp28.1 LA-orthodox56bp67.6 Leg-spin1b1b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p97.114.8% Reach deathp67.611.1% | |
| 8 | RHB | 23 | 7 | 121 | 80 | 151.2 | 17.3 | 12 | 6 | 50.6 Scout Score 50.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production49.828% Impact55.927% Versatility3827% Shot quality79.48% Trajectory5010% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[23, 35, 21] | 49.8 Production 49.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.05× parp55.942.9% True Avg0.76× parp32.432.1% Balls / boundary6.25p61.825% | 79.4 Shot Quality 79.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build88.5% Phase-weighted control82% | 55.9 Impact 55.9 = WPA percentile · total -3.3 WPA · Consolidation-12.1 WPA · Build+8.8 | 38 Versatility 38 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep3544.4% vs LA-orthodox24bp35 vs Leg-spin3b3b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp62.229.6% Off-spin16bp78.1 LA-orthodox40bp55.9 Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2.914.8% Reach deathp32.411.1% | |
| 9 | RHB | 19 | 4 | 105 | 80 | 131.2 | 26.2 | 7 | 6 | 46.6 Scout Score 46.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production48.128% Impact5027% Versatility32.727% Shot quality20.68% Trajectory91.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.08×[11, 4, 46] | 48.1 Production 48.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.89× parp38.242.9% True Avg1.63× parp73.532.1% Balls / boundary8.4p32.425% | 20.6 Shot Quality 20.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build73.3% Phase-weighted control73.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total -4.3 WPA · Consolidation+1 WPA · Build-5.3 | 32.7 Versatility 32.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep1544.4% vs LA-orthodox19bp15 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp46.229.6% Off-spin27bp71.9 LA-orthodox22bp14.7 Leg-spin6b6b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p41.214.8% Reach deathp55.911.1% | |
| 10 | LHB | 27 | 10 | 280 | 188 | 148.9 | 28 | 16 | 15 | 43.2 Scout Score 43.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production45.828% Impact26.527% Versatility57.427% Shot quality55.98% Trajectory32.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.89×[60, 6, 4] | 45.8 Production 45.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.03× parp61.842.9% True Avg0.89× parp44.132.1% Balls / boundary8.18p20.625% | 55.9 Shot Quality 55.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.9% Control · Build80.5% Phase-weighted control79.1% | 26.5 Impact 26.5 = WPA percentile · total -15.9 WPA · Consolidation-4.4 WPA · Build-11.5 | 57.4 Versatility 57.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin70bp50 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp63.429.6% Off-spin80bp53.1 LA-orthodox51bp79.4 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p91.214.8% Reach deathp26.511.1% | |
| 11 | RHB | — | 6 | 112 | 110 | 101.8 | 22.4 | 11 | 2 | 38.8 Scout Score 38.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production32.828% Impact32.427% Versatility39.927% Shot quality26.58% Trajectory79.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[36, 8, 10] | 32.8 Production 32.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp32.442.9% True Avg0.79× parp38.232.1% Balls / boundary8.25p26.525% | 26.5 Shot Quality 26.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.1% Control · Build76.5% Phase-weighted control77.3% | 32.4 Impact 32.4 = WPA percentile · total -14.8 WPA · Consolidation-16.4 WPA · Build+1.6 | 39.9 Versatility 39.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep6844.4% vs LA-orthodox18bp85 vs Leg-spin17bp50 vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp27.229.6% Off-spin26bp12.5 LA-orthodox38bp38.2 Leg-spin17bp25 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p8.814.8% Reach deathp2.911.1% | |
| 12 | RHB | 19 | 5 | 58 | 46 | 126.1 | 11.6 | 3 | 4 | 38.3 Scout Score 38.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production32.828% Impact38.227% Versatility48.127% Shot quality61.88% Trajectory8.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.73×[12, 4, 8] | 32.8 Production 32.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.9× parp44.142.9% True Avg0.46× parp8.832.1% Balls / boundary7p44.125% | 61.8 Shot Quality 61.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation85.7% Control · Build78.6% Phase-weighted control80% | 38.2 Impact 38.2 = WPA percentile · total -12.8 WPA · Consolidation-12 WPA · Build-0.8 | 48.1 Versatility 48.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5544.4% vs LA-orthodox13bp55 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp32.429.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox13bp32.4 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p61.814.8% Reach deathp44.111.1% | |
| 13 | LHB | 29 | 10 | 216 | 144 | 150 | 27 | 18 | 14 | 31.7 Scout Score 31.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production24.828% Impact8.827% Versatility37.227% Shot quality32.48% Trajectory97.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.26×[13, 25, 15] | 24.8 Production 24.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp26.542.9% True Avg0.58× parp2.932.1% Balls / boundary6.93p5025% | 32.4 Shot Quality 32.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.7% Control · Build72.2% Phase-weighted control77.3% | 8.8 Impact 8.8 = WPA percentile · total -38.4 WPA · Consolidation-8.4 WPA · Build-29.9 | 37.2 Versatility 37.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep1044.4% vs Off-spin59bp10 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp46.129.6% Off-spin80bp46.9 LA-orthodox30bp44.1 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p73.514.8% Reach deathp73.511.1% | |
| 14 | RHB | — | 2 | 28 | 32 | 87.5 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 27.5 Scout Score 27.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production9.728% Impact44.127% Versatility20.727% Shot quality2.98% Trajectory70.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[2, 26] | 9.7 Production 9.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.56× parp2.942.9% True Avg0.29× parp14.732.1% Balls / boundary12p14.725% | 2.9 Shot Quality 2.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation60% Control · Build44.4% Phase-weighted control54.2% | 44.1 Impact 44.1 = WPA percentile · total -10.6 WPA · Consolidation-1.8 WPA · Build-8.8 | 20.7 Versatility 20.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep544.4% vs LA-orthodox13bp5 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp23.129.6% Off-spin15bp40.6 LA-orthodox13bp2.9 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p41.214.8% Reach deathp5011.1% | |
| 15 | RHB | 34 | 10 | 348 | 243 | 143.2 | 49.7 | 22 | 17 | 25.5 Scout Score 25.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production22.528% Impact2.927% Versatility41.127% Shot quality73.58% Trajectory14.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.78×[2, 59, 31] | 22.5 Production 22.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.82× parp8.842.9% True Avg1.13× parp55.932.1% Balls / boundary12.15p2.925% | 73.5 Shot Quality 73.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.4% Control · Build81% Phase-weighted control81.6% | 2.9 Impact 2.9 = WPA percentile · total -52.2 WPA · Consolidation-22.1 WPA · Build-30.1 | 41.1 Versatility 41.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep2544.4% vs LA-orthodox64bp25 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp24.329.6% Off-spin74bp21.9 LA-orthodox83bp26.5 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p85.314.8% Reach deathp91.211.1% | |
| 16 | LHB | — | 3 | 39 | 41 | 95.1 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 24.2 Scout Score 24.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production1728% Impact20.627% Versatility2127% Shot quality14.78% Trajectory70.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[13, 26, 0] | 17 Production 17 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.71× parp14.742.9% True Avg0.54× parp26.532.1% Balls / boundary11.67p8.825% | 14.7 Shot Quality 14.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build53.3% Phase-weighted control68.6% | 20.6 Impact 20.6 = WPA percentile · total -19.1 WPA · Consolidation-11.1 WPA · Build-7.9 | 21 Versatility 21 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep3044.4% vs Off-spin16bp30 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp10.729.6% Off-spin18bp12.5 LA-orthodox17bp8.8 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p14.714.8% Reach deathp20.611.1% | |
| 17 | RHB | 28 | 5 | 26 | 36 | 72.2 | 6.5 | 2 | 1 | 20.1 Scout Score 20.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production2528% Impact14.727% Versatility30.327% Shot quality8.88% Trajectory2.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.46×[2, 0, 3] | 25 Production 25 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.66× parp20.642.9% True Avg0.37× parp20.632.1% Balls / boundary8.67p38.225% | 8.8 Shot Quality 8.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Build60% Phase-weighted control57.7% | 14.7 Impact 14.7 = WPA percentile · total -20.8 WPA · Consolidation-11.7 WPA · Build-9 | 30.3 Versatility 30.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox6b6b <min vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp11.429.6% Off-spin11bp3.1 LA-orthodox10bp20.6 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p20.614.8% Reach deathp14.711.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 22 | 9 | 185 | 90 | 205.6 | 30.8 | 14 | 13 | 80.5 Scout Score 80.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production8740% Impact76.725% Versatility62.618% Shot quality904% Trajectory9013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.46×[12, 18, 6] | 87 Production 87 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.5× parp96.732.5% Balls / boundary2.25p83.320% Balls / six4.5p96.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 90 Shot Quality 90 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build87.8% Phase-weighted control86.7% | 76.7 Impact 76.7 = WPA percentile · total +25.5 WPA · Death+25.5 | 62.6 Versatility 62.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker4b4b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p9016.7% Reach buildp76.722.2% | |
| 2 | RHB | 28 | 11 | 290 | 141 | 205.7 | 58 | 33 | 13 | 76.9 Scout Score 76.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production8140% Impact96.725% Versatility53.318% Shot quality63.34% Trajectory63.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.06×[3, 39, 8] | 81 Production 81 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.4× parp9032.5% Balls / boundary2.18p96.720% Balls / six9.6p76.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 63.3 Shot Quality 63.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80.8% Control · Build81% Phase-weighted control80.9% | 96.7 Impact 96.7 = WPA percentile · total +126.5 WPA · Death+126.5 | 53.3 Versatility 53.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p16.716.7% Reach buildp9022.2% | |
| 3 | RHB | 23 | 9 | 195 | 114 | 171.1 | 32.5 | 16 | 13 | 72.3 Scout Score 72.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production73.540% Impact83.325% Versatility5318% Shot quality43.34% Trajectory83.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.28×[23, 7, 16] | 73.5 Production 73.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.26× parp76.732.5% Balls / boundary2.83p7020% Balls / six5.67p83.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 43.3 Shot Quality 43.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.6% Control · Build73.4% Phase-weighted control75.3% | 83.3 Impact 83.3 = WPA percentile · total +25.8 WPA · Death+25.8 | 53 Versatility 53 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p23.316.7% Reach buildp83.322.2% | |
| 4 | RHB | 25 | 9 | 195 | 122 | 159.8 | 48.8 | 16 | 8 | 65.5 Scout Score 65.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production81.840% Impact63.325% Versatility47.418% Shot quality704% Trajectory43.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.98×[23, 1, 75] | 81.8 Production 81.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.29× parp83.332.5% Balls / boundary2.82p9020% Balls / six7.75p9032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 70 Shot Quality 70 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation85.7% Control · Build80.4% Phase-weighted control81.7% | 63.3 Impact 63.3 = WPA percentile · total +2.5 WPA · Death+2.5 | 47.4 Versatility 47.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker4b4b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p96.716.7% Reach buildp3.322.2% | |
| 5 | LHB | 25 | 9 | 200 | 137 | 146 | 33.3 | 20 | 8 | 64.3 Scout Score 64.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production68.340% Impact9025% Versatility5718% Shot quality504% Trajectory16.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.82×[22, 27, 32] | 68.3 Production 68.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.08× parp7032.5% Balls / boundary3.11p76.720% Balls / six14.75p7032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation33.3% Control · Build77.3% Phase-weighted control75.6% | 90 Impact 90 = WPA percentile · total +79 WPA · Death+79 | 57 Versatility 57 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p83.316.7% Reach buildp56.722.2% | |
| 6 | RHB | 30 | 11 | 608 | 334 | 182 | 76 | 60 | 30 | 54.6 Scout Score 54.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production41.840% Impact56.725% Versatility59.318% Shot quality76.74% Trajectory76.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.23×[171, 66, 35] | 41.8 Production 41.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp63.332.5% Balls / boundary4.17p63.320% Balls / six50p3.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 76.7 Shot Quality 76.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.9% Control · Build82.8% Phase-weighted control83.8% | 56.7 Impact 56.7 = WPA percentile · total +2.2 WPA · Death+2.2 | 59.3 Versatility 59.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p43.316.7% Reach buildp96.722.2% | |
| 7 | RHB | 23 | 4 | 73 | 68 | 107.4 | 73 | 7 | 1 | 53.4 Scout Score 53.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production37.840% Impact7025% Versatility5318% Shot quality96.74% Trajectory56.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[24, 48, 0] | 37.8 Production 37.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.8× parp36.732.5% Balls / boundary6.25p43.320% Balls / six25p3032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 96.7 Shot Quality 96.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build83.3% Phase-weighted control90.5% | 70 Impact 70 = WPA percentile · total +5.6 WPA · Death+5.6 | 53 Versatility 53 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p5016.7% Reach buildp63.322.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | 32 | 5 | 36 | 40 | 90 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 52 Scout Score 52 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production48.240% Impact43.325% Versatility44.418% Shot quality33.34% Trajectory96.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.67×[4, 0, 17] | 48.2 Production 48.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.76× parp43.332.5% Balls / boundary8p3020% Balls / six8p63.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 33.3 Shot Quality 33.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control75% | 43.3 Impact 43.3 = WPA percentile · total -4 WPA · Death-4 | 44.4 Versatility 44.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p7016.7% Reach buildp1022.2% | |
| 9 | RHB | 36 | 4 | 46 | 41 | 112.2 | 15.3 | 4 | 0 | 43 Scout Score 43 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production41.340% Impact5025% Versatility43.718% Shot quality33.34% Trajectory36.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[5, 1, 30] | 41.3 Production 41.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.8× parp5032.5% Balls / boundary6p5020% Balls / six36p23.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 33.3 Shot Quality 33.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control75% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total -2.2 WPA · Death-2.2 | 43.7 Versatility 43.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p3016.7% Reach buildp36.722.2% | |
| 10 | RHB | 38 | 6 | 46 | 49 | 93.9 | 7.7 | 2 | 2 | 42.9 Scout Score 42.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.840% Impact36.725% Versatility44.818% Shot quality16.74% Trajectory7013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.16×[7, 3, 26] | 39.8 Production 39.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.67× parp3032.5% Balls / boundary7.5p36.720% Balls / six15p46.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 16.7 Shot Quality 16.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build65.4% Phase-weighted control67.6% | 36.7 Impact 36.7 = WPA percentile · total -4.1 WPA · Death-4.1 | 44.8 Versatility 44.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p63.316.7% Reach buildp16.722.2% | |
| 11 | RHB | 30 | 7 | 114 | 95 | 120 | 22.8 | 12 | 2 | 34.4 Scout Score 34.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production42.740% Impact16.725% Versatility46.318% Shot quality23.34% Trajectory3013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.93×[11, 26, 12] | 42.7 Production 42.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.86× parp56.732.5% Balls / boundary4.71p56.720% Balls / six33p16.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 23.3 Shot Quality 23.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.9% Control · Build72% Phase-weighted control73.7% | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = WPA percentile · total -15.8 WPA · Death-15.8 | 46.3 Versatility 46.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p36.716.7% Reach buildp43.322.2% | |
| 12 | RHB | 27 | 6 | 76 | 65 | 116.9 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 34.4 Scout Score 34.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production31.740% Impact23.325% Versatility58.918% Shot quality56.74% Trajectory23.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.91×[5, 19, 22] | 31.7 Production 31.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.7× parp23.332.5% Balls / boundary7.67p23.320% Balls / six23p36.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 56.7 Shot Quality 56.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build79.4% Phase-weighted control80% | 23.3 Impact 23.3 = WPA percentile · total -9.8 WPA · Death-9.8 | 58.9 Versatility 58.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p76.716.7% Reach buildp7022.2% | |
| 13 | LHB | 25 | 3 | 31 | 36 | 86.1 | 15.5 | 2 | 1 | 32.8 Scout Score 32.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production26.640% Impact3025% Versatility43.318% Shot quality104% Trajectory5013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[14, 1, 16] | 26.6 Production 26.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.37× parp1032.5% Balls / boundary15p3.320% Balls / six15p46.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 10 Shot Quality 10 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build61.9% Phase-weighted control61.9% | 30 Impact 30 = WPA percentile · total -9 WPA · Death-9 | 43.3 Versatility 43.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p1016.7% Reach buildp5022.2% | |
| 14 | RHB | 24 | 5 | 40 | 40 | 100 | 13.3 | 1 | 2 | 29.1 Scout Score 29.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production34.740% Impact1025% Versatility45.218% Shot quality83.34% Trajectory1013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.81×[0, 2, 19] | 34.7 Production 34.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.64× parp16.732.5% Balls / boundary8.67p16.720% Balls / six13p56.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 83.3 Shot Quality 83.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build85.7% Phase-weighted control85.7% | 10 Impact 10 = WPA percentile · total -17.5 WPA · Death-17.5 | 45.2 Versatility 45.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p56.716.7% Reach buildp23.322.2% | |
| 15 | LHB | 26 | 8 | 50 | 55 | 90.9 | 8.3 | 4 | 1 | 13.7 Scout Score 13.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production13.840% Impact3.325% Versatility37.818% Shot quality3.34% Trajectory3.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.8×[3, 0, 5] | 13.8 Production 13.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.55× parp3.332.5% Balls / boundary8.5p1020% Balls / six34p1032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 3.3 Shot Quality 3.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation42.9% Control · Build64.3% Phase-weighted control57.1% | 3.3 Impact 3.3 = WPA percentile · total -27.4 WPA · Death-27.4 | 37.8 Versatility 37.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p3.316.7% Reach buildp3022.2% |
Nikhil Kumar
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 19
83.6
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 317 · Balls 161 · SR 196.9 · Avg 39.6 · 4s 32 · 6s 19
83.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production85.728%24.0
Impact *91.227%24.6
Versatility8927%24.0
Shot quality67.68%5.4
Trajectory55.910%5.6
Scout Score83.6
85.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1781.33×118bp97.142.9%
True Avg351.14×6wp61.832.1%
Balls / boundary3.6—118bp97.125%
91.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +56.7
WPA · Consolidation+9.3
WPA · Build+47.4
89VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p9044.4%
vs Off-spin150 SR40bp90
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball200 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p89.429.6%
Off-spin195 SR56bp90.6
LA-orthodox191 SR43bp91.2
Leg-spin230 SR10bp75
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)153.8 SR1.07×26bp79.414.8%
Reach death273.7 SR1.52×38bp97.111.1%
67.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.2%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control81.4% → p67.6
55.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.98×
Recent scores[30, 11, 103]
Innings10
Prashant Ahlawat
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 24
81.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 258 · Balls 154 · SR 167.5 · Avg 36.9 · 4s 29 · 6s 13
81.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production74.540%29.8
Impact *8527%22.9
Versatility84.315%12.6
Shot quality756%4.5
Trajectory9512%11.4
Scout Score81.3
74.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR161.50.98×78bp5535%
True Avg421.21×3wp8530%
Balls / boundary3.4—78bp8517.5%
Balls / dismissal26—3wp8517.5%
85Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +45.9
WPA · Powerplay+45.9
WPA · Consolidation+0.1
84.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR188.2 SR1.11×51bp7526.7%
vs Spin SR157.3 SR1.12×103bp7526.7%
Accel into Cons162.2 SR—45bp9520%
Pressure entry195 SR1.18×60bp9526.7%
75Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.2%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control81.8% → p75
95Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.39×
Recent scores[72, 14, 19]
Innings8
Nikhil Thakur
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 28
81
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 397 · Balls 236 · SR 168.2 · Avg 49.6 · 4s 45 · 6s 15
81OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production9540%38.0
Impact *9527%25.6
Versatility65.715%9.9
Shot quality356%2.1
Trajectory4512%5.4
Scout Score81
95ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR194.51.18×110bp9535%
True Avg2146.18×1wp9530%
Balls / boundary2.9—110bp9517.5%
Balls / dismissal110—1wp9517.5%
95Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +82.5
WPA · Powerplay+93.3
WPA · Consolidation-10.8
65.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR166 SR0.98×106bp4526.7%
vs Spin SR170 SR1.21×130bp9526.7%
Accel into Cons131.6 SR—57bp7520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
35Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70.2%
Control · Build81.1%
Phase-weighted control73.7% → p35
45Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.88×
Recent scores[69, 5, 34]
Innings11
Harish Kumar
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 22
80.5
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 185 · Balls 90 · SR 205.6 · Avg 30.8 · 4s 14 · 6s 13
80.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production8740%34.8
Impact *76.725%19.2
Versatility62.618%11.3
Shot quality904%3.6
Trajectory9013%11.7
Scout Score80.5
87ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR271.11.5×45bp96.732.5%
Balls / boundary2.2—45bp83.320%
Balls / six4.5—45bp96.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
76.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +25.5
WPA · Death+25.5
62.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker300 SR4b4b <min
vs Slower ball286 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)243.8 SR1.51×16bp9016.7%
Reach build143.9 SR1.05×41bp76.722.2%
90Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build87.8%
Phase-weighted control86.7% → p90
90Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.46×
Recent scores[12, 18, 6]
Innings9
Raman Bishnoi
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 28
76.9
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 290 · Balls 141 · SR 205.7 · Avg 58 · 4s 33 · 6s 13
76.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production8140%32.4
Impact *96.725%24.2
Versatility53.318%9.6
Shot quality63.34%2.5
Trajectory63.313%8.2
Scout Score76.9
81ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR252.11.4×48bp9032.5%
Balls / boundary2.2—48bp96.720%
Balls / six9.6—48bp76.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
96.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +126.5
WPA · Death+126.5
53.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker50 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball229 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.62×6bp16.716.7%
Reach build171.4 SR1.25×63bp9022.2%
63.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80.8%
Control · Build81%
Phase-weighted control80.9% → p63.3
63.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.06×
Recent scores[3, 39, 8]
Innings11
Abhishek Singh
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 23
72.3
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 195 · Balls 114 · SR 171.1 · Avg 32.5 · 4s 16 · 6s 13
72.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production73.540%29.4
Impact *83.325%20.8
Versatility5318%9.5
Shot quality43.34%1.7
Trajectory83.313%10.8
Scout Score72.3
73.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR226.51.26×34bp76.732.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—34bp7020%
Balls / six5.7—34bp83.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
83.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +25.8
WPA · Death+25.8
53VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball280 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)127.3 SR0.79×11bp23.316.7%
Reach build162.5 SR1.19×64bp83.322.2%
43.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.6%
Control · Build73.4%
Phase-weighted control75.3% → p43.3
83.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.28×
Recent scores[23, 7, 16]
Innings9
Surya Narayan Yadav
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 24
71.4
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 212 · Balls 114 · SR 186 · Avg 42.4 · 4s 13 · 6s 16
71.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production72.928%20.4
Impact *85.327%23.0
Versatility58.427%15.8
Shot quality97.18%7.8
Trajectory44.110%4.4
Scout Score71.4
72.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR145.71.09×70bp67.642.9%
True Avg511.66×2wp79.432.1%
Balls / boundary5.8—70bp73.525%
85.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +56.7
WPA · Consolidation-5.8
WPA · Build+62.5
58.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p4544.4%
vs LA-orthodox103 SR33bp45
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball100 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p69.529.6%
Off-spin119 SR26bp34.4
LA-orthodox181 SR58bp85.3
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)175 SR1.22×4bp55.914.8%
Reach death247.5 SR1.37×40bp85.311.1%
97.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.9%
Control · Build94.7%
Phase-weighted control91.4% → p97.1
44.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[62, 10, 8]
Innings7
Akshit Rana
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 24
71.2
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 276 · Balls 179 · SR 154.2 · Avg 34.5 · 4s 19 · 6s 13
71.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production69.728%19.5
Impact *79.427%21.4
Versatility7127%19.2
Shot quality91.28%7.3
Trajectory38.210%3.8
Scout Score71.2
69.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR141.71.06×151bp79.442.9%
True Avg35.71.16×6wp67.632.1%
Balls / boundary6.9—151bp55.925%
79.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +22
WPA · Consolidation+6.1
WPA · Build+15.9
71VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7544.4%
vs LA-orthodox134 SR62bp75
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball171 SR7b7b <min
Spin hitting———p72.329.6%
Off-spin170 SR66bp84.4
LA-orthodox131 SR75bp61.8
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)137.5 SR0.96×24bp5014.8%
Reach death270 SR1.5×20bp79.411.1%
91.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation89.7%
Control · Build92.8%
Phase-weighted control91.4% → p91.2
38.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[6, 25, 10]
Innings11
Taranpreet Singh
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 28
70.2
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 117 · Balls 60 · SR 195 · Avg 23.4 · 4s 7 · 6s 9
70.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production76.528%21.4
Impact *73.527%19.8
Versatility59.127%16.0
Shot quality85.38%6.8
Trajectory61.810%6.2
Scout Score70.2
76.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR190.31.43×31bp91.242.9%
True Avg29.50.96×2wp5032.1%
Balls / boundary3.9—31bp85.325%
73.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +15.2
WPA · Consolidation-6.6
WPA · Build+21.8
59.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox171 SR7b7b <min
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p96.929.6%
Off-spin213 SR30bp96.9
LA-orthodox240 SR15bp97.1
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)100 SR0.7×2bp26.514.8%
Reach death142.9 SR0.79×14bp38.211.1%
85.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build84.6%
Phase-weighted control83.9% → p85.3
61.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[0, 27, 45]
Innings7
Amrit Lubana
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 29
68.5
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 299 · Balls 199 · SR 150.3 · Avg 37.4 · 4s 38 · 6s 4
68.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production86.828%24.3
Impact *61.827%16.7
Versatility79.327%21.4
Shot quality508%4.0
Trajectory20.610%2.1
Scout Score68.5
86.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR146.61.1×148bp85.342.9%
True Avg43.41.41×5wp85.332.1%
Balls / boundary4.9—148bp91.225%
61.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -0.9
WPA · Consolidation+33.6
WPA · Build-34.5
79.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p9544.4%
vs LA-orthodox149 SR74bp95
vs Leg-spin167 SR9b9b <min
vs Short ball300 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p68.229.6%
Off-spin136 SR53bp59.4
LA-orthodox155 SR89bp73.5
Leg-spin167 SR9b9b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)152.6 SR1.06×19bp67.614.8%
Reach death178 SR0.99×41bp61.811.1%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.4%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control79.1% → p50
20.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.8×
Recent scores[25, 19, 10]
Innings10
Pratham Singh
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 25
68.4
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 253 · Balls 196 · SR 129.1 · Avg 25.3 · 4s 19 · 6s 11
68.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production80.728%22.6
Impact *97.127%26.2
Versatility51.527%13.9
Shot quality38.28%3.1
Trajectory26.510%2.6
Scout Score68.4
80.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR142.21.06×128bp73.542.9%
True Avg45.51.48×4wp91.232.1%
Balls / boundary6.1—128bp79.425%
97.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +59.1
WPA · Consolidation-0.3
WPA · Build+59.4
51.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p6544.4%
vs LA-orthodox131 SR42bp65
vs Leg-spin75 SR4b4b <min
vs Short ball100 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p5729.6%
Off-spin147 SR59bp65.6
LA-orthodox127 SR73bp50
Leg-spin80 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)133.3 SR0.93×27bp32.414.8%
Reach death118.8 SR0.66×32bp8.811.1%
38.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.6%
Control · Build75.6%
Phase-weighted control77.3% → p38.2
26.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.83×
Recent scores[7, 26, 42]
Innings10
Nipun Sharda
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 25
67.7
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 249 · Balls 173 · SR 143.9 · Avg 35.6 · 4s 19 · 6s 11
67.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production69.528%19.5
Impact *67.627%18.3
Versatility66.527%18.0
Shot quality44.18%3.5
Trajectory85.310%8.5
Scout Score67.7
69.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR135.21.01×122bp5042.9%
True Avg551.79×3wp97.132.1%
Balls / boundary6.4—122bp67.625%
67.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +4.1
WPA · Consolidation-15.6
WPA · Build+19.7
66.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7044.4%
vs Off-spin113 SR52bp70
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball100 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p45.729.6%
Off-spin117 SR70bp28.1
LA-orthodox150 SR56bp67.6
Leg-spin100 SR1b1b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)196.4 SR1.37×28bp97.114.8%
Reach death202.7 SR1.12×37bp67.611.1%
44.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control77.9% → p44.1
85.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.01×
Recent scores[19, 26, 3]
Innings11
Chiragvir Dhindsa
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 25
65.5
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 195 · Balls 122 · SR 159.8 · Avg 48.8 · 4s 16 · 6s 8
65.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production81.840%32.7
Impact *63.325%15.8
Versatility47.418%8.5
Shot quality704%2.8
Trajectory43.313%5.6
Scout Score65.5
81.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR232.31.29×62bp83.332.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—62bp9020%
Balls / six7.8—62bp9032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
63.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2.5
WPA · Death+2.5
47.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker25 SR4b4b <min
vs Slower ball257 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)266.7 SR1.65×24bp96.716.7%
Reach build78.3 SR0.57×46bp3.322.2%
70Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation85.7%
Control · Build80.4%
Phase-weighted control81.7% → p70
43.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.98×
Recent scores[23, 1, 75]
Innings9
Harjit Singh
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
65.1
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 61 · Balls 40 · SR 152.5 · Avg 20.3 · 4s 7 · 6s 2
65.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production71.540%28.6
Impact *7527%20.2
Versatility54.315%8.1
Shot quality256%1.5
Trajectory5512%6.6
Scout Score65.1
71.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR188.21.14×17bp7535%
True Avg320.92×1wp7530%
Balls / boundary2.8—17bp6517.5%
Balls / dismissal17—1wp6517.5%
75Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +7
WPA · Powerplay+9.5
WPA · Consolidation-2.5
54.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR233.3 SR1.37×12bp8526.7%
vs Spin SR117.9 SR0.84×28bp3526.7%
Accel into Cons114.3 SR—14bp4520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
25Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control70.3% → p25
55Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[5, 27, 29]
Innings3
Hardik Choudhary
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 25
64.3
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 200 · Balls 137 · SR 146 · Avg 33.3 · 4s 20 · 6s 8
64.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production68.340%27.3
Impact *9025%22.5
Versatility5718%10.3
Shot quality504%2.0
Trajectory16.713%2.2
Scout Score64.3
68.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR194.91.08×59bp7032.5%
Balls / boundary3.1—59bp76.720%
Balls / six14.8—59bp7032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
90Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +79
WPA · Death+79
57VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker67 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball80 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)196.7 SR1.22×30bp83.316.7%
Reach build106.7 SR0.78×75bp56.722.2%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation33.3%
Control · Build77.3%
Phase-weighted control75.6% → p50
16.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.82×
Recent scores[22, 27, 32]
Innings9
Shivam Bhambri
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 30
54.6
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 608 · Balls 334 · SR 182 · Avg 76 · 4s 60 · 6s 30
54.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production41.840%16.7
Impact *56.725%14.2
Versatility59.318%10.7
Shot quality76.74%3.1
Trajectory76.713%10.0
Scout Score54.6
41.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1640.91×25bp63.332.5%
Balls / boundary4.2—25bp63.320%
Balls / six——25bp3.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
56.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2.2
WPA · Death+2.2
59.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)128.6 SR0.8×7bp43.316.7%
Reach build167.8 SR1.23×87bp96.722.2%
76.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.9%
Control · Build82.8%
Phase-weighted control83.8% → p76.7
76.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.23×
Recent scores[171, 66, 35]
Innings11
Tushar Joshi
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 25
53.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 143 · Balls 91 · SR 157.1 · Avg 17.9 · 4s 17 · 6s 5
53.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production59.540%23.8
Impact *4527%12.2
Versatility47.715%7.2
Shot quality56%0.3
Trajectory8512%10.2
Scout Score53.6
59.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR164.20.99×81bp8535%
True Avg26.60.77×5wp3530%
Balls / boundary3.9—81bp7517.5%
Balls / dismissal16.2—5wp3517.5%
45Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -6.6
WPA · Powerplay+7.2
WPA · Consolidation-13.8
47.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR165.5 SR0.97×55bp5526.7%
vs Spin SR144.4 SR1.03×36bp5526.7%
Accel into Cons100 SR—10bp2520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted control50% → p5
85Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.24×
Recent scores[39, 33, 0]
Innings8
Jaskirat Singh Mehra
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 23
53.4
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 73 · Balls 68 · SR 107.4 · Avg 73 · 4s 7 · 6s 1
53.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production37.840%15.1
Impact *7025%17.5
Versatility5318%9.5
Shot quality96.74%3.9
Trajectory56.713%7.4
Scout Score53.4
37.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1440.8×25bp36.732.5%
Balls / boundary6.2—25bp43.320%
Balls / six25—25bp3032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
70Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +5.6
WPA · Death+5.6
53VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)147.1 SR0.91×17bp5016.7%
Reach build104.2 SR0.76×24bp63.322.2%
96.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build83.3%
Phase-weighted control90.5% → p96.7
56.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[24, 48, 0]
Innings4
Manish Saini
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 32
52
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 36 · Balls 40 · SR 90 · Avg 12 · 4s 1 · 6s 2
52OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production48.240%19.3
Impact *43.325%10.8
Versatility44.418%8.0
Shot quality33.34%1.3
Trajectory96.713%12.6
Scout Score52
48.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR137.50.76×16bp43.332.5%
Balls / boundary8—16bp3020%
Balls / six8—16bp63.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
43.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4
WPA · Death-4
44.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball133 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)180 SR1.11×5bp7016.7%
Reach build57.1 SR0.42×21bp1022.2%
33.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control75% → p33.3
96.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.67×
Recent scores[4, 0, 17]
Innings5
Sohail Khan
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 23
50.6
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 121 · Balls 80 · SR 151.2 · Avg 17.3 · 4s 12 · 6s 6
50.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production49.828%13.9
Impact *55.927%15.1
Versatility3827%10.3
Shot quality79.48%6.4
Trajectory5010%5.0
Scout Score50.6
49.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1401.05×50bp55.942.9%
True Avg23.30.76×3wp32.432.1%
Balls / boundary6.2—50bp61.825%
55.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.3
WPA · Consolidation-12.1
WPA · Build+8.8
38VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p3544.4%
vs LA-orthodox100 SR24bp35
vs Leg-spin200 SR3b3b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p62.229.6%
Off-spin169 SR16bp78.1
LA-orthodox130 SR40bp55.9
Leg-spin200 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)40 SR0.28×5bp2.914.8%
Reach death00×1bp32.411.1%
79.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build88.5%
Phase-weighted control82% → p79.4
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[23, 35, 21]
Innings7
Abhimanyu
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 19
46.6
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 105 · Balls 80 · SR 131.2 · Avg 26.2 · 4s 7 · 6s 6
46.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production48.128%13.5
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility32.727%8.8
Shot quality20.68%1.6
Trajectory91.210%9.1
Scout Score46.6
48.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1190.89×42bp38.242.9%
True Avg501.63×1wp73.532.1%
Balls / boundary8.4—42bp32.425%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.3
WPA · Consolidation+1
WPA · Build-5.3
32.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p1544.4%
vs LA-orthodox68 SR19bp15
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p46.229.6%
Off-spin152 SR27bp71.9
LA-orthodox95 SR22bp14.7
Leg-spin100 SR6b6b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)——0bp41.214.8%
Reach death200 SR1.11×15bp55.911.1%
20.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build73.3%
Phase-weighted control73.8% → p20.6
91.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.08×
Recent scores[11, 4, 46]
Innings4
Rajveer Sehgal
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
46.1
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 88 · Balls 51 · SR 172.5 · Avg 11 · 4s 8 · 6s 5
46.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production34.840%13.9
Impact *6527%17.6
Versatility59.715%9.0
Shot quality456%2.7
Trajectory2512%3.0
Scout Score46.1
34.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR173.31.05×30bp6535%
True Avg10.40.3×5wp530%
Balls / boundary3.8—30bp5517.5%
Balls / dismissal6—5wp517.5%
65Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -1.6
WPA · Powerplay+2.6
WPA · Consolidation-4.2
59.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR153.6 SR0.9×28bp2526.7%
vs Spin SR195.7 SR1.39×23bp8526.7%
Accel into Cons166.7 SR—9bp8520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
45Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation77.8%
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted control77.8% → p45
25Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.75×
Recent scores[17, 1, 0]
Innings10
Sanyam Saini
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 27
43.2
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 280 · Balls 188 · SR 148.9 · Avg 28 · 4s 16 · 6s 15
43.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production45.828%12.8
Impact *26.527%7.2
Versatility57.427%15.5
Shot quality55.98%4.5
Trajectory32.410%3.2
Scout Score43.2
45.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR138.11.03×139bp61.842.9%
True Avg27.40.89×7wp44.132.1%
Balls / boundary8.2—139bp20.625%
26.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -15.9
WPA · Consolidation-4.4
WPA · Build-11.5
57.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin110 SR70bp50
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball133 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p63.429.6%
Off-spin123 SR80bp53.1
LA-orthodox163 SR51bp79.4
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)182.6 SR1.27×23bp91.214.8%
Reach death116.7 SR0.65×6bp26.511.1%
55.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.9%
Control · Build80.5%
Phase-weighted control79.1% → p55.9
32.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.89×
Recent scores[60, 6, 4]
Innings10
Ashutosh Gautam
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 36
43
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 46 · Balls 41 · SR 112.2 · Avg 15.3 · 4s 4 · 6s 0
43OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production41.340%16.5
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility43.718%7.9
Shot quality33.34%1.3
Trajectory36.713%4.8
Scout Score43
41.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR144.40.8×18bp5032.5%
Balls / boundary6—18bp5020%
Balls / six——18bp23.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -2.2
WPA · Death-2.2
43.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)135.7 SR0.84×14bp3016.7%
Reach build95 SR0.69×20bp36.722.2%
33.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control75% → p33.3
36.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[5, 1, 30]
Innings4
Gaurav Gambhir
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 38
42.9
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 46 · Balls 49 · SR 93.9 · Avg 7.7 · 4s 2 · 6s 2
42.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.840%15.9
Impact *36.725%9.2
Versatility44.818%8.1
Shot quality16.74%0.7
Trajectory7013%9.1
Scout Score42.9
39.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1200.67×15bp3032.5%
Balls / boundary7.5—15bp36.720%
Balls / six15—15bp46.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
36.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.1
WPA · Death-4.1
44.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)171.4 SR1.06×7bp63.316.7%
Reach build84.6 SR0.62×26bp16.722.2%
16.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build65.4%
Phase-weighted control67.6% → p16.7
70Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.16×
Recent scores[7, 3, 26]
Innings6
Arjit Singh
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 30
39.5
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 296 · Balls 176 · SR 168.2 · Avg 37 · 4s 22 · 6s 17
39.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production23.840%9.5
Impact *3527%9.4
Versatility5115%7.7
Shot quality856%5.1
Trajectory6512%7.8
Scout Score39.5
23.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR83.30.5×6bp3535%
True Avg2.50.07×2wp1530%
Balls / boundary6—6bp1517.5%
Balls / dismissal3—2wp2517.5%
35Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -16.2
WPA · Powerplay-13.3
WPA · Consolidation-2.9
51VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR196.7 SR1.16×60bp9526.7%
vs Spin SR153.4 SR1.09×116bp6526.7%
Accel into Cons117.2 SR—29bp3520%
Pressure entry90.6 SR0.55×32bp526.7%
85Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation89.7%
Control · Build84.8%
Phase-weighted control86.7% → p85
65Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.12×
Recent scores[74, 4, 18]
Innings10
Mridul Chawla
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB
38.8
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 112 · Balls 110 · SR 101.8 · Avg 22.4 · 4s 11 · 6s 2
38.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production32.828%9.2
Impact *32.427%8.7
Versatility39.927%10.8
Shot quality26.58%2.1
Trajectory79.410%7.9
Scout Score38.8
32.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR110.60.83×66bp32.442.9%
True Avg24.30.79×3wp38.232.1%
Balls / boundary8.2—66bp26.525%
32.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -14.8
WPA · Consolidation-16.4
WPA · Build+1.6
39.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p6844.4%
vs LA-orthodox139 SR18bp85
vs Leg-spin82 SR17bp50
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p27.229.6%
Off-spin100 SR26bp12.5
LA-orthodox113 SR38bp38.2
Leg-spin82 SR17bp25
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)100 SR0.7×13bp8.814.8%
Reach death69.2 SR0.38×13bp2.911.1%
26.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.1%
Control · Build76.5%
Phase-weighted control77.3% → p26.5
79.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[36, 8, 10]
Innings6
Yuvraj Singh
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 19
38.3
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 58 · Balls 46 · SR 126.1 · Avg 11.6 · 4s 3 · 6s 4
38.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production32.828%9.2
Impact *38.227%10.3
Versatility48.127%13.0
Shot quality61.88%4.9
Trajectory8.810%0.9
Scout Score38.3
32.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1200.9×35bp44.142.9%
True Avg140.46×3wp8.832.1%
Balls / boundary7—35bp44.125%
38.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -12.8
WPA · Consolidation-12
WPA · Build-0.8
48.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5544.4%
vs LA-orthodox108 SR13bp55
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball250 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p32.429.6%
Off-spin88 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox108 SR13bp32.4
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)150 SR1.04×14bp61.814.8%
Reach death145.5 SR0.81×11bp44.111.1%
61.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation85.7%
Control · Build78.6%
Phase-weighted control80% → p61.8
8.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.73×
Recent scores[12, 4, 8]
Innings5
Gurtaj Singh Bains
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 22
36.8
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 239 · Balls 173 · SR 138.2 · Avg 34.1 · 4s 22 · 6s 11
36.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4140%16.4
Impact *1527%4.0
Versatility2315%3.5
Shot quality656%3.9
Trajectory7512%9.0
Scout Score36.8
41ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR130.50.79×59bp2535%
True Avg25.70.74×3wp5530%
Balls / boundary4.2—59bp4517.5%
Balls / dismissal19.7—3wp4517.5%
15Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -32.8
WPA · Powerplay-15.5
WPA · Consolidation-17.3
23VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR138.5 SR0.82×52bp1526.7%
vs Spin SR138 SR0.98×121bp4526.7%
Accel into Cons114.5 SR—55bp1520%
Pressure entry80 SR0.48×5bp1526.7%
65Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.6%
Control · Build76.6%
Phase-weighted control81.5% → p65
75Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.13×
Recent scores[4, 71, 0]
Innings9
Adhiraj Singh
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
35.2
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 166 · Balls 122 · SR 136.1 · Avg 15.1 · 4s 9 · 6s 11
35.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production3240%12.8
Impact *5527%14.8
Versatility40.315%6.0
Shot quality156%0.9
Trajectory512%0.6
Scout Score35.2
32ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1580.96×69bp4535%
True Avg21.80.63×5wp2530%
Balls / boundary4.6—69bp3517.5%
Balls / dismissal13.8—5wp1517.5%
55Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -6.5
WPA · Powerplay+4.5
WPA · Consolidation-11
40.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR164.5 SR0.97×62bp3526.7%
vs Spin SR106.7 SR0.76×60bp2526.7%
Accel into Cons118.8 SR—16bp5520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
15Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation62.5%
Control · Build71%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p15
5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.67×
Recent scores[14, 9, 7]
Innings11
Arpit Singh Pannu
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 30
34.4
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 114 · Balls 95 · SR 120 · Avg 22.8 · 4s 12 · 6s 2
34.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production42.740%17.1
Impact *16.725%4.2
Versatility46.318%8.3
Shot quality23.34%0.9
Trajectory3013%3.9
Scout Score34.4
42.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR154.50.86×33bp56.732.5%
Balls / boundary4.7—33bp56.720%
Balls / six33—33bp16.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
16.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -15.8
WPA · Death-15.8
46.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)142.1 SR0.88×19bp36.716.7%
Reach build100 SR0.73×25bp43.322.2%
23.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.9%
Control · Build72%
Phase-weighted control73.7% → p23.3
30Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.93×
Recent scores[11, 26, 12]
Innings7
Nikhil Sharma
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 27
34.4
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 76 · Balls 65 · SR 116.9 · Avg 19 · 4s 5 · 6s 2
34.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production31.740%12.7
Impact *23.325%5.8
Versatility58.918%10.6
Shot quality56.74%2.3
Trajectory23.313%3.0
Scout Score34.4
31.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR126.10.7×23bp23.332.5%
Balls / boundary7.7—23bp23.320%
Balls / six23—23bp36.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
23.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -9.8
WPA · Death-9.8
58.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)171.4 SR1.06×14bp76.716.7%
Reach build126.5 SR0.92×34bp7022.2%
56.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build79.4%
Phase-weighted control80% → p56.7
23.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.91×
Recent scores[5, 19, 22]
Innings6
Markanday Panchal
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 18
34.1
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 187 · Balls 164 · SR 114 · Avg 26.7 · 4s 13 · 6s 12
34.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production32.840%13.1
Impact *2527%6.8
Versatility2915%4.3
Shot quality956%5.7
Trajectory3512%4.2
Scout Score34.1
32.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1250.76×88bp1535%
True Avg27.50.79×4wp4530%
Balls / boundary4.6—88bp2517.5%
Balls / dismissal22—4wp5517.5%
25Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -17.1
WPA · Powerplay-22.3
WPA · Consolidation+5.2
29VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR134 SR0.79×50bp526.7%
vs Spin SR105.3 SR0.75×114bp526.7%
Accel into Cons130.2 SR—43bp6520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
95Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.4%
Control · Build87.1%
Phase-weighted control88% → p95
35Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.84×
Recent scores[4, 43, 15]
Innings7
Somit
Finisher · pos 8 · LHB · age 25
32.8
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 31 · Balls 36 · SR 86.1 · Avg 15.5 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
32.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production26.640%10.6
Impact *3025%7.5
Versatility43.318%7.8
Shot quality104%0.4
Trajectory5013%6.5
Scout Score32.8
26.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR66.70.37×15bp1032.5%
Balls / boundary15—15bp3.320%
Balls / six15—15bp46.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
30Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -9
WPA · Death-9
43.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball120 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)50 SR0.31×6bp1016.7%
Reach build100 SR0.73×21bp5022.2%
10Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build61.9%
Phase-weighted control61.9% → p10
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[14, 1, 16]
Innings3
Bhagmender Lather
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 29
31.7
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 216 · Balls 144 · SR 150 · Avg 27 · 4s 18 · 6s 14
31.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production24.828%6.9
Impact *8.827%2.4
Versatility37.227%10.0
Shot quality32.48%2.6
Trajectory97.110%9.7
Scout Score31.7
24.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR110.30.83×97bp26.542.9%
True Avg17.80.58×6wp2.932.1%
Balls / boundary6.9—97bp5025%
8.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -38.4
WPA · Consolidation-8.4
WPA · Build-29.9
37.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p1044.4%
vs Off-spin97 SR59bp10
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p46.129.6%
Off-spin121 SR80bp46.9
LA-orthodox123 SR30bp44.1
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)156.2 SR1.09×16bp73.514.8%
Reach death242.3 SR1.34×26bp73.511.1%
32.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.7%
Control · Build72.2%
Phase-weighted control77.3% → p32.4
97.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.26×
Recent scores[13, 25, 15]
Innings10
Harshit Singh
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 24
29.1
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 40 · Balls 40 · SR 100 · Avg 13.3 · 4s 1 · 6s 2
29.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production34.740%13.9
Impact *1025%2.5
Versatility45.218%8.1
Shot quality83.34%3.3
Trajectory1013%1.3
Scout Score29.1
34.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR115.40.64×26bp16.732.5%
Balls / boundary8.7—26bp16.720%
Balls / six13—26bp56.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
10Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -17.5
WPA · Death-17.5
45.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)160 SR0.99×15bp56.716.7%
Reach build71.4 SR0.52×14bp23.322.2%
83.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build85.7%
Phase-weighted control85.7% → p83.3
10Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.81×
Recent scores[0, 2, 19]
Innings5
Vikas Sangwan
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
27.5
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 28 · Balls 32 · SR 87.5 · Avg 14 · 4s 4 · 6s 0
27.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production9.728%2.7
Impact *44.127%11.9
Versatility20.727%5.6
Shot quality2.98%0.2
Trajectory70.610%7.1
Scout Score27.5
9.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR750.56×24bp2.942.9%
True Avg90.29×2wp14.732.1%
Balls / boundary12—24bp14.725%
44.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -10.6
WPA · Consolidation-1.8
WPA · Build-8.8
20.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p544.4%
vs LA-orthodox38 SR13bp5
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p23.129.6%
Off-spin120 SR15bp40.6
LA-orthodox38 SR13bp2.9
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)——0bp41.214.8%
Reach death——0bp5011.1%
2.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation60%
Control · Build44.4%
Phase-weighted control54.2% → p2.9
70.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[2, 26]
Innings2
Dipender Ajaib Kush
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 21
27.3
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 308 · Balls 239 · SR 128.9 · Avg 44 · 4s 23 · 6s 9
27.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production35.240%14.1
Impact *527%1.4
Versatility4515%6.8
Shot quality556%3.3
Trajectory1512%1.8
Scout Score27.3
35.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR940.57×50bp535%
True Avg23.50.68×2wp6530%
Balls / boundary12.5—50bp517.5%
Balls / dismissal25—2wp7517.5%
5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -63.6
WPA · Powerplay-40.4
WPA · Consolidation-23.3
45VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR168.8 SR0.99×77bp6526.7%
vs Spin SR109.9 SR0.78×162bp1526.7%
Accel into Cons109.7 SR—72bp520%
Pressure entry130.6 SR0.79×144bp8526.7%
55Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.9%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control81.2% → p55
15Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.74×
Recent scores[0, 11, 33]
Innings10
Ankit Kaushik
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 34
25.5
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 348 · Balls 243 · SR 143.2 · Avg 49.7 · 4s 22 · 6s 17
25.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production22.528%6.3
Impact *2.927%0.8
Versatility41.127%11.1
Shot quality73.58%5.9
Trajectory14.710%1.5
Scout Score25.5
22.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR109.50.82×158bp8.842.9%
True Avg34.61.13×5wp55.932.1%
Balls / boundary12.2—158bp2.925%
2.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -52.2
WPA · Consolidation-22.1
WPA · Build-30.1
41.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p2544.4%
vs LA-orthodox89 SR64bp25
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball160 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p24.329.6%
Off-spin114 SR74bp21.9
LA-orthodox101 SR83bp26.5
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)171 SR1.19×31bp85.314.8%
Reach death253.1 SR1.4×49bp91.211.1%
73.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.4%
Control · Build81%
Phase-weighted control81.6% → p73.5
14.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.78×
Recent scores[2, 59, 31]
Innings10
Ranvijay Singh Lalotra
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB
24.2
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 39 · Balls 41 · SR 95.1 · Avg 13 · 4s 4 · 6s 0
24.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production1728%4.8
Impact *20.627%5.6
Versatility2127%5.7
Shot quality14.78%1.2
Trajectory70.610%7.1
Scout Score24.2
17ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR94.30.71×35bp14.742.9%
True Avg16.50.54×2wp26.532.1%
Balls / boundary11.7—35bp8.825%
20.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -19.1
WPA · Consolidation-11.1
WPA · Build-7.9
21VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p3044.4%
vs Off-spin106 SR16bp30
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball100 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p10.729.6%
Off-spin100 SR18bp12.5
LA-orthodox82 SR17bp8.8
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)50 SR0.35×4bp14.714.8%
Reach death00×2bp20.611.1%
14.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build53.3%
Phase-weighted control68.6% → p14.7
70.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[13, 26, 0]
Innings3
Pardeep Yadhav
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 28
20.1
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 26 · Balls 36 · SR 72.2 · Avg 6.5 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
20.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production2528%7.0
Impact *14.727%4.0
Versatility30.327%8.2
Shot quality8.88%0.7
Trajectory2.910%0.3
Scout Score20.1
25ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR88.50.66×26bp20.642.9%
True Avg11.50.37×2wp20.632.1%
Balls / boundary8.7—26bp38.225%
14.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -20.8
WPA · Consolidation-11.7
WPA · Build-9
30.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox50 SR6b6b <min
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p11.429.6%
Off-spin36 SR11bp3.1
LA-orthodox100 SR10bp20.6
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)110 SR0.77×10bp20.614.8%
Reach death20 SR0.11×5bp14.711.1%
8.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Build60%
Phase-weighted control57.7% → p8.8
2.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.46×
Recent scores[2, 0, 3]
Innings5
Ivraj Ranauta
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 26
13.7
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 50 · Balls 55 · SR 90.9 · Avg 8.3 · 4s 4 · 6s 1
13.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production13.840%5.5
Impact *3.325%0.8
Versatility37.818%6.8
Shot quality3.34%0.1
Trajectory3.313%0.4
Scout Score13.7
13.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.55×34bp3.332.5%
Balls / boundary8.5—34bp1020%
Balls / six34—34bp1032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
3.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -27.4
WPA · Death-27.4
37.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)85.7 SR0.53×14bp3.316.7%
Reach build78.6 SR0.57×14bp3022.2%
3.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation42.9%
Control · Build64.3%
Phase-weighted control57.1% → p3.3
3.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.8×
Recent scores[3, 0, 5]
Innings8
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 47.0 | 11 | 362 | 7.7 | 75.7 Scout Score 75.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay44.110.6% Middle81.170.2% Death73.319.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p93.30.76× | 73 Bowling Production 73 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 12.2 econp38.210.6% Middle8w · 7.12 econp74.870.2% Death2w · 7.33 econp85.319.1% | 78.1 Quality 78.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p25 False-shot · Middle25%p86.2 | 69.4 Impact 69.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -14.9p46.610.6% MiddleWPA +29.2p79.870.2% DeathWPA -8p4419.1% | 75.5 Versatility 75.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.110.6% Middlep87.270.2% Deathp52.519.1% | |
| 2 | Off-spin | 30 | 22.0 | 7 | 147 | 6.68 | 74.4 Scout Score 74.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle80.177.3% Death55.122.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p66.30.99× | 84.7 Bowling Production 84.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle6w · 5.59 econp9477.3% Death1w · 10.4 econp53.322.7% | 22.3 Quality 22.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle16%p22.3 | 84.8 Impact 84.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +55.7p92.677.3% DeathWPA -3.6p58.322.7% | 81.4 Versatility 81.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep93.677.3% Deathp4022.7% | |
| 3 | Off-spin | 36 | 10.4 | 7 | 80 | 7.5 | 72.7 Scout Score 72.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.828.1% Middle74.837.5% Death80.934.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p33.71.03× | 77.2 Bowling Production 77.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.67 econp54.828.1% Middle3w · 5.75 econp84.437.5% Death3w · 6.82 econp87.634.4% | 76.1 Quality 76.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p73.9 False-shot · Middle29%p77.7 | 84.8 Impact 84.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -3.1p71.628.1% MiddleWPA +30.9p81.937.5% DeathWPA +27.7p98.834.4% | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp51.628.1% Middlep60.137.5% Deathp5034.4% | |
| 4 | Off-spin | — | 30.0 | 10 | 232 | 7.73 | 70.3 Scout Score 70.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.216.7% Middle7376.7% Death66.36.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p6.71.22× | 73.7 Bowling Production 73.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9 econp71.116.7% Middle7w · 7.61 econp74.276.7% Death1w · 6 econp74.56.7% | 77 Quality 77 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p25 False-shot · Middle25%p88.3 | 87.9 Impact 87.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +1.6p78.416.7% MiddleWPA +48.7p90.476.7% DeathWPA +3.1p82.16.7% | 67.3 Versatility 67.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp65.916.7% Middlep69.176.7% Deathp506.7% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | — | 29.0 | 7 | 220 | 7.59 | 67 Scout Score 67 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.124.1% Middle75.469% Death86.86.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p77.90.93× | 62.8 Bowling Production 62.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.14 econp35.924.1% Middle4w · 6.75 econp69.869% Death2w · 3.5 econp87.76.9% | 44.4 Quality 44.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay19%p28.4 False-shot · Middle20%p50 | 77.6 Impact 77.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -21.5p26.124.1% MiddleWPA +63.3p94.769% DeathWPA +6.4p86.96.9% | 74.2 Versatility 74.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp43.424.1% Middlep8369% Deathp93.86.9% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | 25 | 34.4 | 12 | 307 | 8.86 | 66.9 Scout Score 66.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay63.140.4% Middle61.740.4% Death85.919.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p22.11.1× | 66.2 Bowling Production 66.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 9.14 econp70.340.4% Middle4w · 9.14 econp48.840.4% Death4w · 7.65 econp9419.2% | 92.2 Quality 92.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p87.5 False-shot · Middle29%p96.8 | 74.1 Impact 74.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -12.1p53.440.4% MiddleWPA +33.3p8440.4% DeathWPA +9.6p96.419.2% | 62.8 Versatility 62.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp66.840.4% Middlep44.740.4% Deathp92.519.2% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 21.4 | 7 | 189 | 8.72 | 66.6 Scout Score 66.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay34.69.2% Middle71.981.5% Death51.49.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p85.60.91× | 69.2 Bowling Production 69.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 15.5 econp25.29.2% Middle6w · 7.7 econp75.781.5% Death1w · 11 econp55.79.2% | 46.6 Quality 46.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p35.2 False-shot · Middle20%p47.9 | 77.1 Impact 77.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -21p28.49.2% MiddleWPA +39.8p88.381.5% DeathWPA -13p27.49.2% | 43.9 Versatility 43.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp34.89.2% Middlep44.781.5% Deathp46.29.2% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 23 | 37.3 | 9 | 349 | 9.31 | 66.2 Scout Score 66.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay82.961.3% Middle55.98% Death35.730.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p89.40.88× | 57.4 Bowling Production 57.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 7.91 econp77.161.3% Middle1w · 9 econp52.18% Death2w · 12.17 econp19.430.7% | 95.5 Quality 95.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p98.9 False-shot · Middle28%p69.1 | 58.7 Impact 58.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +3.8p8361.3% MiddleWPA -4.1p47.98% DeathWPA -36p13.130.7% | 73.8 Versatility 73.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp73.961.3% Middlep40.48% Deathp82.430.7% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 38.5 | 16 | 311 | 8.01 | 65.2 Scout Score 65.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay41.933.5% Middle91.836.1% Death59.530.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p760.94× | 76.4 Bowling Production 76.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 10.15 econp5533.5% Middle8w · 5 econp98.936.1% Death5w · 9.21 econp73.330.5% | 38.6 Quality 38.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay12%p1.1 False-shot · Middle24%p73.4 | 52.1 Impact 52.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -20.6p30.733.5% MiddleWPA +87.5p96.836.1% DeathWPA -13.8p22.630.5% | 67.6 Versatility 67.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp49.833.5% Middlep94.736.1% Deathp5530.5% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 21 | 8.0 | 4 | 68 | 8.5 | 64.4 Scout Score 64.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay71.450% Middle61.225% Death53.725% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p56.71× | 66.7 Bowling Production 66.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.25 econp76.450% Middle1w · 6.5 econp6825% Death1w · 11 econp4625% | 40.1 Quality 40.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p42 False-shot · Middle8%p36.2 | 77.3 Impact 77.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +9.6p87.550% MiddleWPA +7.9p71.325% DeathWPA -3.2p63.125% | 62.3 Versatility 62.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp67.750% Middlep53.725% Deathp60.225% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 36.1 | 11 | 320 | 8.85 | 63 Scout Score 63 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay20.819.4% Middle8161.3% Death48.119.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p20.21.11× | 69.5 Bowling Production 69.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 12.57 econp28.619.4% Middle8w · 6.95 econp90.461.3% Death2w · 11.14 econp44.219.4% | 67.4 Quality 67.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p21.6 False-shot · Middle25%p81.9 | 75.4 Impact 75.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -58.8p3.419.4% MiddleWPA +106.8p98.961.3% DeathWPA +1.2p72.619.4% | 54.1 Versatility 54.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp37.319.4% Middlep63.861.3% Deathp4019.4% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 35 | 36.0 | 12 | 314 | 8.72 | 62.1 Scout Score 62.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay67.447.2% Middle59.519.4% Death56.233.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 68.8 Bowling Production 68.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 9.12 econp64.447.2% Middle1w · 6.71 econp54.819.4% Death7w · 9.33 econp83.333.3% | 90.4 Quality 90.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p96.6 False-shot · Middle26%p75.5 | 45.5 Impact 45.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -6.8p64.847.2% MiddleWPA +0.5p58.519.4% DeathWPA -39.6p10.733.3% | 60.1 Versatility 60.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp62.747.2% Middlep6719.4% Deathp52.433.3% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 30 | 18.0 | 7 | 169 | 9.39 | 61.2 Scout Score 61.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay43.316.7% Middle69.950% Death57.233.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p81.70.92× | 60.8 Bowling Production 60.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 12.33 econp26.916.7% Middle3w · 8 econp65.850% Death4w · 10 econp70.233.3% | 75.5 Quality 75.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p50 False-shot · Middle28%p84 | 55.8 Impact 55.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -14.1p48.916.7% MiddleWPA +9.6p75.550% DeathWPA -12.7p29.833.3% | 42.6 Versatility 42.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4216.7% Middlep43.650% Deathp41.333.3% | |
| 14 | Off-spin | 38 | 39.0 | 14 | 297 | 7.62 | 61.1 Scout Score 61.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay74.859% Middle34.433.3% Death71.87.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p18.31.15× | 76.9 Bowling Production 76.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay9w · 7.22 econp9559% Middle3w · 8.77 econp42.133.3% Death2w · 5.67 econp897.7% | 29.1 Quality 29.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p14.8 False-shot · Middle20%p54.3 | 68 Impact 68 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +62.1p98.959% MiddleWPA -24.9p13.833.3% DeathWPA +0p66.77.7% | 64.3 Versatility 64.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp79.159% Middlep41.533.3% Deathp507.7% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 32 | 25.0 | 9 | 248 | 9.92 | 60.6 Scout Score 60.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay61.464% Middle41.612% Death67.824% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p68.30.98× | 61.7 Bowling Production 61.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 9.25 econp66.264% Middle2w · 13 econp46.412% Death3w · 10.17 econp57.524% | 81.5 Quality 81.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p85.2 False-shot · Middle22%p61.7 | 47.2 Impact 47.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -19.1p35.264% MiddleWPA -15p22.312% DeathWPA +7.1p91.724% | 62.4 Versatility 62.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp71.464% Middlep19.112% Deathp60.224% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | — | 28.0 | 6 | 203 | 7.25 | 60.3 Scout Score 60.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay90.617.9% Middle53.175% Death59.97.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p87.50.9× | 57.3 Bowling Production 57.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 7 econp92.617.9% Middle1w · 7.05 econp49.675% Death0w · 10 econp49.97.1% | 34 Quality 34 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay40%p92 False-shot · Middle16%p20.2 | 61.1 Impact 61.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +19.6p9217.9% MiddleWPA -2.9p52.175% DeathWPA +1.9p77.47.1% | 75.6 Versatility 75.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp79.817.9% Middlep78.775% Deathp32.57.1% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 36.0 | 13 | 277 | 7.69 | 59.4 Scout Score 59.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay64.830.6% Middle69.550% Death25.319.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p11.29× | 74.8 Bowling Production 74.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 6.45 econp79.830.6% Middle6w · 6.83 econp87.450% Death4w · 11.86 econp34.719.4% | 39.7 Quality 39.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p19.3 False-shot · Middle20%p52.1 | 67.4 Impact 67.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +17.2p89.830.6% MiddleWPA +9.8p77.750% DeathWPA -53.6p619.4% | 70.4 Versatility 70.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp7230.6% Middlep74.550% Deathp57.519.4% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 27 | 35.1 | 8 | 322 | 9.16 | 59 Scout Score 59 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay73.214.2% Middle72.856.9% Death24.928.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p990.68× | 44.6 Bowling Production 44.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10.2 econp63.614.2% Middle3w · 7.05 econp57.856.9% Death3w · 12.79 econp9.528.9% | 69.1 Quality 69.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p77.3 False-shot · Middle22%p67 | 60.8 Impact 60.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +2.8p80.714.2% MiddleWPA +36.5p86.256.9% DeathWPA -69.8p1.228.9% | 68.2 Versatility 68.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp5814.2% Middlep77.756.9% Deathp54.628.9% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 27 | 20.3 | 7 | 188 | 9.17 | 58.3 Scout Score 58.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay47.448.8% Middle59.917.1% Death73.134.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p45.21× | 56.8 Bowling Production 56.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10 econp39.148.8% Middle1w · 8 econp53.817.1% Death5w · 8.57 econp83.734.1% | 55.2 Quality 55.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p46.6 False-shot · Middle33%p79.8 | 70.9 Impact 70.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -9.2p60.248.8% MiddleWPA +4.2p64.917.1% DeathWPA +6.6p89.334.1% | 44.6 Versatility 44.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp47.548.8% Middlep56.417.1% Deathp34.634.1% | |
| 20 | Off-spin | — | 17.0 | 6 | 142 | 8.35 | 56.5 Scout Score 56.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay65.229.4% Middle56.358.8% Death35.911.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p261.08× | 71.2 Bowling Production 71.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.6 econp70.329.4% Middle3w · 6.7 econp78.558.8% Death1w · 13.5 econp36.911.8% | 88.9 Quality 88.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p77.3 False-shot · Middle30%p94.7 | 24.4 Impact 24.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -5.9p6729.4% MiddleWPA -66.5p1.158.8% DeathWPA -9.2p34.511.8% | 70 Versatility 70 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp61.629.4% Middlep78.758.8% Deathp47.511.8% | |
| 21 | Off-spin | 29 | 29.0 | 6 | 258 | 8.9 | 55.6 Scout Score 55.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay48.220.7% Middle59.865.5% Death46.913.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p83.70.92× | 53.6 Bowling Production 53.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.33 econp36.520.7% Middle4w · 7.47 econp60.865.5% Death1w · 12 econp45.113.8% | 4.4 Quality 4.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay11%p8 False-shot · Middle13%p3.2 | 68.3 Impact 68.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0.7p76.120.7% MiddleWPA +8.2p73.465.5% DeathWPA -9.8p32.113.8% | 67.1 Versatility 67.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp41.820.7% Middlep78.765.5% Deathp5013.8% | |
| 22 | SLA orthodox | 18 | 7.0 | 1 | 60 | 8.57 | 53.3 Scout Score 53.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle33.657.1% Death79.542.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p56.71× | 48.8 Bowling Production 48.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 10.5 econp22.157.1% Death1w · 6 econp84.442.9% | 39.4 Quality 39.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p39.4 | 58.1 Impact 58.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -9.1p38.357.1% DeathWPA +3.5p84.542.9% | 47 Versatility 47 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep33.557.1% Deathp6542.9% | |
| 23 | Off-spin | 23 | 28.0 | 9 | 244 | 8.71 | 52.5 Scout Score 52.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay82.132.1% Middle3350% Death53.617.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p91.30.85× | 56.9 Bowling Production 56.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 8.44 econp8332.1% Middle2w · 8.36 econp39.250% Death3w · 10.2 econp59.617.9% | 27.2 Quality 27.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p54.5 False-shot · Middle13%p9.6 | 38.5 Impact 38.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +23.2p94.332.1% MiddleWPA -39.3p3.250% DeathWPA -9.1p36.917.9% | 54.7 Versatility 54.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp78.232.1% Middlep56.450% Deathp7.517.9% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 26 | 22.0 | 4 | 223 | 10.14 | 50.2 Scout Score 50.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.345.5% Middle65.836.4% Death53.818.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p72.10.96× | 42.2 Bowling Production 42.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 10.8 econp29.745.5% Middle3w · 8.12 econp61.636.4% Death1w · 12.5 econp34.318.2% | 79.7 Quality 79.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p69.3 False-shot · Middle31%p92.6 | 47.7 Impact 47.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -36.4p1745.5% MiddleWPA +2.5p62.836.4% DeathWPA +7.6p9418.2% | 35.8 Versatility 35.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp27.545.5% Middlep46.836.4% Deathp34.618.2% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 32 | 8.2 | 2 | 90 | 10.8 | 50.1 Scout Score 50.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay35.148% Middle70.136% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p56.71× | 39.7 Bowling Production 39.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 12.25 econp20.248% Middle1w · 6.33 econp65.636% | 66.4 Quality 66.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p42 False-shot · Middle44%p98.9 | 55 Impact 55 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -16p44.348% MiddleWPA +5.2p69.136% | 46.3 Versatility 46.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp34.848% Middlep61.736% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 41.0 | 9 | 341 | 8.32 | 47.2 Scout Score 47.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay38.141.5% Middle54.441.5% Death5217.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p10.61.2× | 63.2 Bowling Production 63.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 8.94 econp59.941.5% Middle4w · 7.35 econp66.341.5% Death2w · 9.14 econp63.617.1% | 16.2 Quality 16.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay15%p5.7 False-shot · Middle17%p26.6 | 47.5 Impact 47.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -19.7p3341.5% MiddleWPA +0.5p60.641.5% DeathWPA -4.6p51.217.1% | 55.9 Versatility 55.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4541.5% Middlep74.541.5% Deathp37.517.1% | |
| 27 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 18.0 | 2 | 159 | 8.83 | 47 Scout Score 47 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay58.544.4% Middle26.538.9% Death64.516.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p70.20.97× | 41.2 Bowling Production 41.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8.62 econp52.244.4% Middle0w · 9.29 econp20.338.9% Death1w · 8.33 econp60.616.7% | 36.4 Quality 36.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p58 False-shot · Middle12%p11.7 | 47.3 Impact 47.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -7.4p62.544.4% MiddleWPA -18.3p18.138.9% DeathWPA +1.8p7516.7% | 52.9 Versatility 52.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp60.244.4% Middlep45.738.9% Deathp5016.7% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 22 | 6.0 | 1 | 69 | 11.5 | 46.9 Scout Score 46.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle46.983.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p56.71× | 33.9 Bowling Production 33.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 10 econp33.983.3% | 90.4 Quality 90.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle33%p90.4 | 41.5 Impact 41.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -8.5p41.583.3% | 37.2 Versatility 37.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep37.283.3% | |
| 29 | Off-spin | 23 | 36.0 | 7 | 343 | 9.53 | 46.3 Scout Score 46.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay26.311.1% Middle37.547.2% Death61.541.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p12.51.18× | 44.9 Bowling Production 44.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 12 econp23.911.1% Middle2w · 8.94 econp2547.2% Death5w · 9.53 econp73.141.7% | 37.2 Quality 37.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p10.2 False-shot · Middle20%p43.6 | 53.4 Impact 53.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -18p39.811.1% MiddleWPA -0.6p56.447.2% DeathWPA -4.3p53.641.7% | 61.6 Versatility 61.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp37.311.1% Middlep51.147.2% Deathp8041.7% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 25 | 4.0 | 3 | 49 | 12.25 | 45.1 Scout Score 45.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay45.175% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p56.71× | 37.5 Bowling Production 37.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 14 econp37.575% | 65.9 Quality 65.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p65.9 | 42 Impact 42 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -17.8p4275% | 39.3 Versatility 39.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.375% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 27 | 17.2 | 4 | 200 | 11.54 | 44.5 Scout Score 44.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay64.451.9% Middle2528.8% Death20.219.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p241.08× | 43.9 Bowling Production 43.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 9.33 econp71.751.9% Middle1w · 12 econp20.828.8% Death0w · 16.8 econp3.619.2% | 58.2 Quality 58.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p54.5 False-shot · Middle23%p64.9 | 51 Impact 51 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -0.9p73.951.9% MiddleWPA -20p1628.8% DeathWPA -8.3p41.719.2% | 43.3 Versatility 43.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp65.951.9% Middlep8.528.8% Deathp34.619.2% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 19 | 30.5 | 18 | 381 | 12.36 | 44.4 Scout Score 44.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay50.471.4% Death29.428.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p31.71.03× | 44.8 Bowling Production 44.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay11w · 11.5 econp55.971.4% Death7w · 14.49 econp17.128.6% | 94.3 Quality 94.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p94.3 | 31 Impact 31 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -28p23.971.4% DeathWPA -6p48.828.6% | 48.5 Versatility 48.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp54.171.4% Deathp34.628.6% | |
| 33 | Off-spin | 24 | 19.0 | 4 | 186 | 9.79 | 43.5 Scout Score 43.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay26.315.8% Middle52.657.9% Death33.826.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p8.71.22× | 47.7 Bowling Production 47.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 13 econp26.615.8% Middle3w · 7.18 econp6757.9% Death1w · 13.6 econp17.826.3% | 38.6 Quality 38.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay6%p12.5 False-shot · Middle20%p45.7 | 55.9 Impact 55.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -18.3p37.515.8% MiddleWPA -3.8p5057.9% DeathWPA +2.2p79.826.3% | 48.4 Versatility 48.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp33.415.8% Middlep57.457.9% Deathp37.526.3% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 28 | 37.0 | 14 | 405 | 10.95 | 42.5 Scout Score 42.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay34.359.5% Middle55.28.1% Death54.232.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p16.31.16× | 51.4 Bowling Production 51.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay9w · 11.77 econp44.159.5% Middle1w · 7.67 econp61.18.1% Death4w · 10.25 econp62.332.4% | 78 Quality 78 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p83 False-shot · Middle17%p41.5 | 25.8 Impact 25.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -88.8p1.159.5% MiddleWPA +4.8p678.1% DeathWPA -3.4p60.732.4% | 39.6 Versatility 39.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp3259.5% Middlep61.78.1% Deathp4832.4% | |
| 35 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 38.0 | 11 | 403 | 10.61 | 41.6 Scout Score 41.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay14.221.1% Middle56.850% Death35.328.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p95.20.74× | 43.1 Bowling Production 43.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 14.88 econp3.521.1% Middle6w · 8.32 econp63.850% Death5w · 11.45 econp36.328.9% | 51.2 Quality 51.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p3.4 False-shot · Middle23%p71.3 | 17.7 Impact 17.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -57.7p5.721.1% MiddleWPA -9.7p30.950% DeathWPA -58.2p3.628.9% | 32.7 Versatility 32.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp12.721.1% Middlep38.350% Deathp37.528.9% | |
| 36 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 7.0 | 3 | 68 | 9.71 | 41.2 Scout Score 41.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle28.871.4% Death7228.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p79.80.93× | 39.2 Bowling Production 39.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 10.8 econp27.271.4% Death2w · 7 econp69.428.6% | 14.9 Quality 14.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle10%p14.9 | 37.5 Impact 37.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -13.8p24.571.4% DeathWPA +0.5p70.228.6% | 36.9 Versatility 36.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep18.171.4% Deathp83.828.6% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 34.0 | 6 | 330 | 9.71 | 39.7 Scout Score 39.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay55.532.4% Middle30.652.9% Death37.814.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p740.95× | 36.1 Bowling Production 36.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 10.82 econp49.632.4% Middle2w · 8.44 econp29.652.9% Death1w · 11.8 econp29.714.7% | 24.4 Quality 24.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p62.5 False-shot · Middle12%p1.1 | 38.6 Impact 38.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -9.6p5832.4% MiddleWPA -12.2p26.652.9% DeathWPA -8.4p39.314.7% | 41.1 Versatility 41.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4232.4% Middlep42.652.9% Deathp33.814.7% | |
| 38 | RA pace | 26 | 6.5 | 0 | 82 | 12 | 39.4 Scout Score 39.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay40.643.9% Middle38.243.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p29.81.03× | 29.5 Bowling Production 29.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11.33 econp32.543.9% Middle0w · 10.67 econp26.543.9% | 55.9 Quality 55.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p50 False-shot · Middle22%p61.7 | 47.4 Impact 47.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13.7p51.143.9% MiddleWPA -7.4p43.643.9% | 40.7 Versatility 40.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4043.9% Middlep41.543.9% | |
| 39 | LA pace | 26 | 23.0 | 7 | 273 | 11.87 | 39.2 Scout Score 39.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.339.1% Middle40.652.2% Death40.38.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p97.10.73× | 36.1 Bowling Production 36.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 12.78 econp36.139.1% Middle4w · 10.33 econp39.752.2% Death0w · 17 econp14.18.7% | 34.3 Quality 34.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay20%p37.5 False-shot · Middle17%p31.9 | 31.6 Impact 31.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -38.4p14.839.1% MiddleWPA -9.1p38.352.2% DeathWPA +0p66.78.7% | 25.7 Versatility 25.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp42.339.1% Middlep11.752.2% Deathp34.68.7% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 35 | 6.0 | 1 | 94 | 15.67 | 38.4 Scout Score 38.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay3666.7% Death43.233.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p56.71× | 24.7 Bowling Production 24.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 16 econp2366.7% Death0w · 15 econp2833.3% | 89.8 Quality 89.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay42%p89.8 | 31.5 Impact 31.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -36.4p19.366.7% DeathWPA -3.9p5633.3% | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp28.666.7% Deathp60.233.3% | |
| 41 | SLA orthodox | 29 | 26.4 | 7 | 232 | 8.7 | 37.7 Scout Score 37.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay71.115% Middle31.777.5% Death32.17.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p2.91.29× | 47.5 Bowling Production 47.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 5 econp88.715% Middle5w · 9 econp40.777.5% Death0w · 13 econp35.27.5% | 30.9 Quality 30.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p42 False-shot · Middle17%p28.7 | 41.8 Impact 41.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +6.5p85.215% MiddleWPA -9.5p3377.5% DeathWPA -7.2p46.47.5% | 34.7 Versatility 34.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp7815% Middlep28.777.5% Deathp107.5% | |
| 42 | Leg-spin | 24 | 9.0 | 1 | 86 | 9.56 | 36.5 Scout Score 36.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle36.588.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p56.71× | 38.2 Bowling Production 38.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 8.5 econp38.288.9% | 58.5 Quality 58.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p58.5 | 7.4 Impact 7.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -29.2p7.488.9% | 47.3 Versatility 47.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep47.388.9% | |
| 43 | LA pace | 23 | 7.0 | 1 | 83 | 11.86 | 36.2 Scout Score 36.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay52.642.9% Middle23.957.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p56.71× | 28.4 Bowling Production 28.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11 econp49.242.9% Middle0w · 12.5 econp12.757.1% | 45.4 Quality 45.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p30.7 False-shot · Middle21%p56.4 | 35.2 Impact 35.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -4.3p69.342.9% MiddleWPA -27.9p9.657.1% | 33.4 Versatility 33.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp49.542.9% Middlep21.357.1% | |
| 44 | RA pace | 21 | 16.0 | 6 | 206 | 12.88 | 36.1 Scout Score 36.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay35.675% Death37.525% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p41.31.01× | 36.2 Bowling Production 36.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 12.67 econp36.275% Death2w · 13.5 econp36.125% | 80.7 Quality 80.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p80.7 | 11 Impact 11 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -53.8p875% DeathWPA -14.1p20.225% | 43.2 Versatility 43.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp3575% Deathp6825% | |
| 45 | Off-spin | 28 | 13.0 | 1 | 118 | 9.08 | 35.3 Scout Score 35.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.215.4% Middle35.284.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p37.51.02× | 38.8 Bowling Production 38.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 15 econp28.815.4% Middle1w · 8 econp40.784.6% | 8.9 Quality 8.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay0%p17 False-shot · Middle12%p7.4 | 32.9 Impact 32.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -9.7p55.715.4% MiddleWPA -12.1p28.784.6% | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.115.4% Middlep63.884.6% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 30 | 31.0 | 7 | 347 | 11.19 | 33.1 Scout Score 33.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.764.5% Middle31.26.5% Death25.629% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p35.61.02× | 37.1 Bowling Production 37.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 10.3 econp47.464.5% Middle0w · 13 econp24.26.5% Death3w · 12.78 econp17.129% | 33.3 Quality 33.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p33 False-shot · Middle8%p36.2 | 23.5 Impact 23.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -29.7p21.664.5% MiddleWPA -9.4p35.16.5% DeathWPA -13.6p2529% | 43.7 Versatility 43.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp43.664.5% Middlep35.16.5% Deathp45.729% | |
| 47 | RA pace | 22 | 10.0 | 3 | 113 | 11.3 | 30.5 Scout Score 30.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle33.950% Death27.150% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p39.41.02× | 24.9 Bowling Production 24.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 9 econp24.850% Death3w · 13.6 econp2550% | 14.9 Quality 14.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle10%p14.9 | 34.9 Impact 34.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -0.7p54.350% DeathWPA -19.3p15.550% | 41.4 Versatility 41.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep39.450% Deathp43.550% | |
| 48 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 5.0 | 1 | 54 | 10.8 | 29.9 Scout Score 29.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle29.980% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p56.71× | 22.1 Bowling Production 22.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 10.5 econp22.180% | 5.3 Quality 5.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle4%p5.3 | 45.7 Impact 45.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5.5p45.780% | 29.8 Versatility 29.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep29.880% | |
| 49 | Off-spin | 30 | 29.0 | 8 | 274 | 9.45 | 23.9 Scout Score 23.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay79.910.3% Middle17.286.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p14.41.16× | 33.4 Bowling Production 33.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 5.33 econp90.810.3% Middle5w · 9.72 econp26.586.2% | 23.2 Quality 23.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p65.9 False-shot · Middle16%p18.1 | 15.1 Impact 15.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +31p96.610.3% MiddleWPA -29.2p5.386.2% | 20.9 Versatility 20.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp79.510.3% Middlep13.886.2% | |
| 50 | RA pace | 32 | 24.0 | 5 | 275 | 11.46 | 23.5 Scout Score 23.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay32.725% Middle17.141.7% Death24.633.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p27.91.07× | 18.4 Bowling Production 18.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 10.67 econp3325% Middle1w · 10.6 econp11.341.7% Death4w · 13.12 econp16.333.3% | 42.2 Quality 42.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p71.6 False-shot · Middle15%p24.5 | 17.5 Impact 17.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -38.7p12.525% MiddleWPA -16.6p20.241.7% DeathWPA -15.2p17.933.3% | 32.6 Versatility 32.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp32.525% Middlep10.641.7% Deathp60.233.3% | |
| 51 | RA pace | 27 | 16.3 | 7 | 200 | 12.12 | 23.1 Scout Score 23.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay18.254.5% Death29.839.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p4.81.24× | 22.7 Bowling Production 22.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 13.11 econp9.554.5% Death6w · 11.69 econp40.939.4% | 60.2 Quality 60.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p60.2 | 9.4 Impact 9.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -53.5p10.254.5% DeathWPA -43.3p8.339.4% | 34.5 Versatility 34.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp23.254.5% Deathp50.239.4% | |
| 52 | Leg-spin | — | 13.0 | 2 | 123 | 9.46 | 19.1 Scout Score 19.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle19.192.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p43.31× | 11.6 Bowling Production 11.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9.67 econp11.692.3% | 31.9 Quality 31.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p31.9 | 11.7 Impact 11.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -25.7p11.792.3% | 22.3 Versatility 22.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep22.392.3% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Off-spin | 38 | 23.0 | 9 | 166 | 7.22 | 95 Phase Production 95 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.709× parp98.936.8% Wicket rate0.39/ovp89.842.1% Boundary %17%p98.921.1% | 14.8 Quality 14.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 98.9 Impact 98.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+62.1 | 79.1 Versatility 79.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.930% Econ vs LHBp9230% Wkt vs RHBp98.920% Wkt vs LHBp10.220% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 92.6 Phase Production 92.6 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.688× parp89.836.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp98.942.1% Boundary %17%p85.221.1% | 92 Quality 92 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 92 Impact 92 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+19.6 | 79.8 Versatility 79.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp87.530% Econ vs LHBp51.130% Wkt vs RHBp9220% Wkt vs LHBp98.920% | |
| 3 | Off-spin | 30 | 3.0 | 3 | 16 | 5.33 | 90.8 Phase Production 90.8 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.524× parp87.536.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp94.342.1% Boundary %6%p89.821.1% | 65.9 Quality 65.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 96.6 Impact 96.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+31 | 79.5 Versatility 79.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.430% Econ vs LHBp96.630% Wkt vs RHBp76.120% Wkt vs LHBp96.620% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 29 | 4.0 | 2 | 20 | 5 | 88.7 Phase Production 88.7 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.491× parp9236.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp84.142.1% Boundary %4%p9221.1% | 42 Quality 42 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 85.2 Impact 85.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.5 | 78 Versatility 78 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp89.830% Econ vs LHBp69.330% Wkt vs RHBp87.520% Wkt vs LHBp63.620% | |
| 5 | Off-spin | 23 | 9.0 | 4 | 76 | 8.44 | 83 Phase Production 83 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.83× parp8336.8% Wicket rate0.44/ovp87.542.1% Boundary %24%p73.921.1% | 54.5 Quality 54.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 94.3 Impact 94.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+23.2 | 78.2 Versatility 78.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp64.830% Econ vs LHBp94.330% Wkt vs RHBp60.220% Wkt vs LHBp9220% | |
| 6 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 11.0 | 3 | 71 | 6.45 | 79.8 Phase Production 79.8 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.634× parp96.636.8% Wicket rate0.27/ovp56.842.1% Boundary %15%p96.621.1% | 19.3 Quality 19.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 89.8 Impact 89.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+17.2 | 72 Versatility 72 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.630% Econ vs LHBp8330% Wkt vs RHBp85.220% Wkt vs LHBp5.720% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 23 | 23.0 | 6 | 182 | 7.91 | 77.1 Phase Production 77.1 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.777× parp94.336.8% Wicket rate0.26/ovp53.442.1% Boundary %20%p94.321.1% | 98.9 Quality 98.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 83 Impact 83 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.8 | 73.9 Versatility 73.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp94.330% Econ vs LHBp98.930% Wkt vs RHBp64.820% Wkt vs LHBp14.820% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 21 | 4.0 | 2 | 33 | 8.25 | 76.4 Phase Production 76.4 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.81× parp71.636.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp84.142.1% Boundary %21%p69.321.1% | 42 Quality 42 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 87.5 Impact 87.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.6 | 67.7 Versatility 67.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp80.730% Econ vs LHBp4230% Wkt vs RHBp80.720% Wkt vs LHBp73.920% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 27 | 9.0 | 3 | 84 | 9.33 | 71.7 Phase Production 71.7 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.917× parp69.336.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp70.542.1% Boundary %22%p78.421.1% | 54.5 Quality 54.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 73.9 Impact 73.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.9 | 65.9 Versatility 65.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp60.230% Econ vs LHBp76.130% Wkt vs RHBp37.520% Wkt vs LHBp87.520% | |
| 10 | Off-spin | — | 5.0 | 2 | 45 | 9 | 71.1 Phase Production 71.1 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.884× parp6736.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp78.442.1% Boundary %23%p63.621.1% | 25 Quality 25 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 78.4 Impact 78.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.6 | 65.9 Versatility 65.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp55.730% Econ vs LHBp71.630% Wkt vs RHBp5820% Wkt vs LHBp80.720% | |
| 11 | Off-spin | 25 | 14.0 | 4 | 128 | 9.14 | 70.3 Phase Production 70.3 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.898× parp78.436.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp60.242.1% Boundary %24%p76.121.1% | 87.5 Quality 87.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 53.4 Impact 53.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.1 | 66.8 Versatility 66.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6730% Econ vs LHBp87.530% Wkt vs RHBp12.520% Wkt vs LHBp89.820% | |
| 12 | Off-spin | — | 5.0 | 2 | 48 | 9.6 | 70.3 Phase Production 70.3 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.943× parp64.836.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp78.442.1% Boundary %23%p63.621.1% | 77.3 Quality 77.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 67 Impact 67 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.9 | 61.6 Versatility 61.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.830% Econ vs LHBp73.930% Wkt vs RHBp54.520% Wkt vs LHBp8320% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 32 | 16.0 | 4 | 148 | 9.25 | 66.2 Phase Production 66.2 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.909× parp73.936.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp48.942.1% Boundary %22%p87.521.1% | 85.2 Quality 85.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 35.2 Impact 35.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.1 | 71.4 Versatility 71.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp76.130% Econ vs LHBp89.830% Wkt vs RHBp47.720% Wkt vs LHBp60.220% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 35 | 17.0 | 4 | 155 | 9.12 | 64.4 Phase Production 64.4 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.896× parp80.736.8% Wicket rate0.23/ovp46.642.1% Boundary %26%p71.621.1% | 96.6 Quality 96.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 64.8 Impact 64.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.8 | 62.7 Versatility 62.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.230% Econ vs LHBp78.430% Wkt vs RHBp6720% Wkt vs LHBp1.120% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 27 | 5.0 | 2 | 51 | 10.2 | 63.6 Phase Production 63.6 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.002× parp55.736.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp78.442.1% Boundary %30%p47.721.1% | 77.3 Quality 77.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 80.7 Impact 80.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.8 | 58 Versatility 58 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp78.430% Econ vs LHBp23.930% Wkt vs RHBp78.420% Wkt vs LHBp5820% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 17.0 | 3 | 152 | 8.94 | 59.9 Phase Production 59.9 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.878× parp85.236.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp26.142.1% Boundary %24%p8321.1% | 5.7 Quality 5.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 33 Impact 33 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.7 | 45 Versatility 45 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9230% Econ vs LHBp21.630% Wkt vs RHBp4220% Wkt vs LHBp12.520% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 19 | 22.0 | 11 | 253 | 11.5 | 55.9 Phase Production 55.9 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.13× parp23.936.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp96.642.1% Boundary %31%p30.721.1% | 94.3 Quality 94.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 23.9 Impact 23.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-28 | 54.1 Versatility 54.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5830% Econ vs LHBp1.130% Wkt vs RHBp96.620% Wkt vs LHBp85.220% | |
| 18 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 13.0 | 3 | 132 | 10.15 | 55 Phase Production 55 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.997× parp60.236.8% Wicket rate0.23/ovp44.342.1% Boundary %26%p6721.1% | 1.1 Quality 1.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 30.7 Impact 30.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-20.6 | 49.8 Versatility 49.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8330% Econ vs LHBp19.330% Wkt vs RHBp47.720% Wkt vs LHBp47.720% | |
| 19 | Off-spin | 36 | 3.0 | 1 | 32 | 10.67 | 54.8 Phase Production 54.8 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.048× parp53.436.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp64.842.1% Boundary %33%p37.521.1% | 73.9 Quality 73.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 71.6 Impact 71.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.1 | 51.6 Versatility 51.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp30.730% Econ vs LHBp62.530% Wkt vs RHBp70.520% Wkt vs LHBp47.720% | |
| 20 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 8.0 | 1 | 69 | 8.62 | 52.2 Phase Production 52.2 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.847× parp76.136.8% Wicket rate0.13/ovp1742.1% Boundary %21%p80.721.1% | 58 Quality 58 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 62.5 Impact 62.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.4 | 60.2 Versatility 60.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.630% Econ vs LHBp85.230% Wkt vs RHBp30.720% Wkt vs LHBp35.220% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 11.0 | 3 | 119 | 10.82 | 49.6 Phase Production 49.6 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.063× parp44.336.8% Wicket rate0.27/ovp56.842.1% Boundary %30%p44.321.1% | 62.5 Quality 62.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 58 Impact 58 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.6 | 42 Versatility 42 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp51.130% Econ vs LHBp28.430% Wkt vs RHBp73.920% Wkt vs LHBp1720% | |
| 22 | LA pace | 23 | 3.0 | 1 | 33 | 11 | 49.2 Phase Production 49.2 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.081× parp46.636.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp64.842.1% Boundary %39%p22.721.1% | 30.7 Quality 30.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 69.3 Impact 69.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.3 | 49.5 Versatility 49.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp35.230% Econ vs LHBp55.730% Wkt vs RHBp1720% Wkt vs LHBp94.320% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 30 | 20.0 | 4 | 206 | 10.3 | 47.4 Phase Production 47.4 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.012× parp5836.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp3342.1% Boundary %28%p5821.1% | 33 Quality 33 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 21.6 Impact 21.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-29.7 | 43.6 Versatility 43.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp62.530% Econ vs LHBp46.630% Wkt vs RHBp51.120% Wkt vs LHBp3.420% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 28 | 22.0 | 9 | 259 | 11.77 | 44.1 Phase Production 44.1 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.157× parp12.536.8% Wicket rate0.41/ovp9242.1% Boundary %36%p3.421.1% | 83 Quality 83 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 1.1 Impact 1.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-88.8 | 32 Versatility 32 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp23.930% Econ vs LHBp5.730% Wkt vs RHBp94.320% Wkt vs LHBp21.620% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 27 | 10.0 | 1 | 100 | 10 | 39.1 Phase Production 39.1 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.982× parp62.536.8% Wicket rate0.10/ovp842.1% Boundary %27%p60.221.1% | 46.6 Quality 46.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 60.2 Impact 60.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.2 | 47.5 Versatility 47.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp44.330% Econ vs LHBp80.730% Wkt vs RHBp820% Wkt vs LHBp4220% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 5.0 | 1 | 61 | 12.2 | 38.2 Phase Production 38.2 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.198× parp28.436.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp4242.1% Boundary %30%p47.721.1% | 25 Quality 25 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 46.6 Impact 46.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.9 | 39.1 Versatility 39.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp69.330% Econ vs LHBp3.430% Wkt vs RHBp62.520% Wkt vs LHBp23.920% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 25 | 3.0 | 1 | 42 | 14 | 37.5 Phase Production 37.5 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.375× parp19.336.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp64.842.1% Boundary %44%p14.821.1% | 65.9 Quality 65.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 42 Impact 42 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.8 | 39.3 Versatility 39.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp26.130% Econ vs LHBp26.130% Wkt vs RHBp70.520% Wkt vs LHBp47.720% | |
| 28 | Off-spin | 29 | 6.0 | 1 | 68 | 11.33 | 36.5 Phase Production 36.5 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.113× parp37.536.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp39.842.1% Boundary %33%p28.421.1% | 8 Quality 8 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 76.1 Impact 76.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.7 | 41.8 Versatility 41.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp19.330% Econ vs LHBp5830% Wkt vs RHBp14.820% Wkt vs LHBp78.420% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 21 | 12.0 | 4 | 152 | 12.67 | 36.2 Phase Production 36.2 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.244× parp836.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp73.942.1% Boundary %36%p10.221.1% | 80.7 Quality 80.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 8 Impact 8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-53.8 | 35 Versatility 35 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5.730% Econ vs LHBp37.530% Wkt vs RHBp8320% Wkt vs LHBp27.320% | |
| 30 | LA pace | 26 | 9.0 | 3 | 115 | 12.78 | 36.1 Phase Production 36.1 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.255× parp10.236.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp70.542.1% Boundary %37%p12.521.1% | 37.5 Quality 37.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 14.8 Impact 14.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-38.4 | 42.3 Versatility 42.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.430% Econ vs LHBp64.830% Wkt vs RHBp89.820% Wkt vs LHBp19.320% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | — | 7.0 | 1 | 78 | 11.14 | 35.9 Phase Production 35.9 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.095× parp39.836.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp29.542.1% Boundary %31%p4221.1% | 28.4 Quality 28.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 26.1 Impact 26.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.5 | 43.4 Versatility 43.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp37.530% Econ vs LHBp4230% Wkt vs RHBp23.920% Wkt vs LHBp73.920% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 32 | 6.0 | 0 | 64 | 10.67 | 33 Phase Production 33 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.048× parp51.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp5.742.1% Boundary %28%p55.721.1% | 71.6 Quality 71.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 12.5 Impact 12.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-38.7 | 32.5 Versatility 32.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3330% Econ vs LHBp53.430% Wkt vs RHBp5.720% Wkt vs LHBp27.320% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 26 | 3.0 | 0 | 34 | 11.33 | 32.5 Phase Production 32.5 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.113× parp4236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp21.642.1% Boundary %33%p37.521.1% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 51.1 Impact 51.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.7 | 40 Versatility 40 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp48.930% Econ vs LHBp30.730% Wkt vs RHBp3320% Wkt vs LHBp47.720% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 26 | 10.0 | 0 | 108 | 10.8 | 29.7 Phase Production 29.7 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.061× parp48.936.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.142.1% Boundary %28%p53.421.1% | 69.3 Quality 69.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 17 Impact 17 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-36.4 | 27.5 Versatility 27.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp73.930% Econ vs LHBp10.230% Wkt vs RHBp3.420% Wkt vs LHBp820% | |
| 35 | Off-spin | 28 | 2.0 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 28.8 Phase Production 28.8 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.474× parp21.636.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp36.442.1% Boundary %42%p26.121.1% | 17 Quality 17 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 55.7 Impact 55.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.7 | 39.1 Versatility 39.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp12.530% Econ vs LHBp48.930% Wkt vs RHBp39.820% Wkt vs LHBp63.620% | |
| 36 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 7.0 | 1 | 88 | 12.57 | 28.6 Phase Production 28.6 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.235× parp14.836.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp29.542.1% Boundary %29%p51.121.1% | 21.6 Quality 21.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 3.4 Impact 3.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-58.8 | 37.3 Versatility 37.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1730% Econ vs LHBp4230% Wkt vs RHBp23.920% Wkt vs LHBp73.920% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 30 | 3.0 | 0 | 37 | 12.33 | 26.9 Phase Production 26.9 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.212× parp35.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp21.642.1% Boundary %39%p22.721.1% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 48.9 Impact 48.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.1 | 42 Versatility 42 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp21.630% Econ vs LHBp60.230% Wkt vs RHBp19.320% Wkt vs LHBp68.220% | |
| 38 | Off-spin | 24 | 3.0 | 0 | 39 | 13 | 26.6 Phase Production 26.6 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.277× parp26.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp21.642.1% Boundary %33%p37.521.1% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %6% | 37.5 Impact 37.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.3 | 33.4 Versatility 33.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.630% Econ vs LHBp14.830% Wkt vs RHBp35.220% Wkt vs LHBp39.820% | |
| 39 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 2.0 | 0 | 31 | 15.5 | 25.2 Phase Production 25.2 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.523× parp1736.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp36.442.1% Boundary %50%p1721.1% | 35.2 Quality 35.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 28.4 Impact 28.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21 | 34.8 Versatility 34.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4230% Econ vs LHBp830% Wkt vs RHBp44.320% Wkt vs LHBp54.520% | |
| 40 | Off-spin | 23 | 4.0 | 0 | 48 | 12 | 23.9 Phase Production 23.9 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.179× parp3336.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp11.442.1% Boundary %33%p3321.1% | 10.2 Quality 10.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 39.8 Impact 39.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18 | 37.3 Versatility 37.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.830% Econ vs LHBp6730% Wkt vs RHBp28.420% Wkt vs LHBp35.220% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 35 | 4.0 | 1 | 64 | 16 | 23 Phase Production 23 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.572× parp3.436.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp51.142.1% Boundary %54%p1.121.1% | 89.8 Quality 89.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 19.3 Impact 19.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-36.4 | 28.6 Versatility 28.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.230% Econ vs LHBp12.530% Wkt vs RHBp54.520% Wkt vs LHBp54.520% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 32 | 4.0 | 0 | 49 | 12.25 | 20.2 Phase Production 20.2 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.203× parp30.736.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp11.442.1% Boundary %38%p19.321.1% | 42 Quality 42 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 44.3 Impact 44.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16 | 34.8 Versatility 34.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.430% Econ vs LHBp35.230% Wkt vs RHBp10.220% Wkt vs LHBp68.220% | |
| 43 | RA pace | 27 | 9.0 | 1 | 118 | 13.11 | 9.5 Phase Production 9.5 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.288× parp5.736.8% Wicket rate0.11/ovp14.842.1% Boundary %39%p5.721.1% | 60.2 Quality 60.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 10.2 Impact 10.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-53.5 | 23.2 Versatility 23.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp830% Econ vs LHBp3330% Wkt vs RHBp23.920% Wkt vs LHBp30.720% | |
| 44 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 8.0 | 0 | 119 | 14.88 | 3.5 Phase Production 3.5 vs all bowlers · n=44 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.461× parp1.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.442.1% Boundary %40%p821.1% | 3.4 Quality 3.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 5.7 Impact 5.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-57.7 | 12.7 Versatility 12.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.130% Econ vs LHBp1730% Wkt vs RHBp1.120% Wkt vs LHBp35.220% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 14.0 | 8 | 70 | 5 | 98.9 Phase Production 98.9 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.621× parp98.944.1% Wicket rate0.57/ovp98.944.1% Boundary %4%p98.911.8% | 73.4 Quality 73.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 96.8 Impact 96.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+87.5 | 94.7 Versatility 94.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.950% Econ vs LHBp90.450% | |
| 2 | Off-spin | 30 | 17.0 | 6 | 95 | 5.59 | 94 Phase Production 94 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.694× parp96.844.1% Wicket rate0.35/ovp90.444.1% Boundary %5%p96.811.8% | 22.3 Quality 22.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %16% | 92.6 Impact 92.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+55.7 | 93.6 Versatility 93.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp88.350% Econ vs LHBp98.950% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 22.1 | 8 | 154 | 6.95 | 90.4 Phase Production 90.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.863× parp90.444.1% Wicket rate0.36/ovp92.644.1% Boundary %12%p81.911.8% | 81.9 Quality 81.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 98.9 Impact 98.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+106.8 | 63.8 Versatility 63.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp94.750% Econ vs LHBp3350% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 18.0 | 6 | 123 | 6.83 | 87.4 Phase Production 87.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.849× parp88.344.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp86.244.1% Boundary %11%p88.311.8% | 52.1 Quality 52.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 77.7 Impact 77.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.8 | 74.5 Versatility 74.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.850% Econ vs LHBp52.150% | |
| 5 | Off-spin | 36 | 4.0 | 3 | 23 | 5.75 | 84.4 Phase Production 84.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.715× parp77.744.1% Wicket rate0.75/ovp96.844.1% Boundary %12%p62.811.8% | 77.7 Quality 77.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 81.9 Impact 81.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+30.9 | 60.1 Versatility 60.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp75.550% Econ vs LHBp44.750% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | — | 10.0 | 3 | 67 | 6.7 | 78.5 Phase Production 78.5 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.833× parp81.944.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp71.344.1% Boundary %8%p92.611.8% | 94.7 Quality 94.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 1.1 Impact 1.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-66.5 | 78.7 Versatility 78.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.350% Econ vs LHBp86.250% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 17.4 | 6 | 136 | 7.7 | 75.7 Phase Production 75.7 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.957× parp6744.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp88.344.1% Boundary %15%p60.611.8% | 47.9 Quality 47.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 88.3 Impact 88.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+39.8 | 44.7 Versatility 44.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp77.750% Econ vs LHBp11.750% | |
| 8 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 33.0 | 8 | 235 | 7.12 | 74.8 Phase Production 74.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.885× parp92.644.1% Wicket rate0.24/ovp56.444.1% Boundary %14%p77.711.8% | 86.2 Quality 86.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 79.8 Impact 79.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+29.2 | 87.2 Versatility 87.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp90.450% Econ vs LHBp8450% | |
| 9 | Off-spin | — | 23.0 | 7 | 175 | 7.61 | 74.2 Phase Production 74.2 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.946× parp69.144.1% Wicket rate0.31/ovp77.744.1% Boundary %13%p79.811.8% | 88.3 Quality 88.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 90.4 Impact 90.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+48.7 | 69.1 Versatility 69.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp43.650% Econ vs LHBp94.750% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | — | 20.0 | 4 | 135 | 6.75 | 69.8 Phase Production 69.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.839× parp94.744.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp39.444.1% Boundary %11%p90.411.8% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 94.7 Impact 94.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+63.3 | 83 Versatility 83 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.250% Econ vs LHBp79.850% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 21 | 2.0 | 1 | 13 | 6.5 | 68 Phase Production 68 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.808× parp62.844.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp73.444.1% Boundary %8%p6711.8% | 36.2 Quality 36.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 71.3 Impact 71.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7.9 | 53.7 Versatility 53.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp62.850% Econ vs LHBp44.750% | |
| 12 | Off-spin | 24 | 11.0 | 3 | 79 | 7.18 | 67 Phase Production 67 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.893× parp71.344.1% Wicket rate0.27/ovp60.644.1% Boundary %12%p74.511.8% | 45.7 Quality 45.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.8 | 57.4 Versatility 57.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp18.150% Econ vs LHBp96.850% | |
| 13 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 17.0 | 4 | 125 | 7.35 | 66.3 Phase Production 66.3 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.914× parp79.844.1% Wicket rate0.23/ovp52.144.1% Boundary %14%p69.111.8% | 26.6 Quality 26.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 60.6 Impact 60.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.5 | 74.5 Versatility 74.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.950% Econ vs LHBp6750% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 30 | 9.0 | 3 | 72 | 8 | 65.8 Phase Production 65.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.994× parp58.544.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp75.544.1% Boundary %15%p56.411.8% | 84 Quality 84 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 75.5 Impact 75.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.6 | 43.6 Versatility 43.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp69.150% Econ vs LHBp18.150% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 32 | 3.0 | 1 | 19 | 6.33 | 65.6 Phase Production 65.6 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.787× parp64.944.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp64.944.1% Boundary %6%p71.311.8% | 98.9 Quality 98.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %44% | 69.1 Impact 69.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.2 | 61.7 Versatility 61.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp47.950% Econ vs LHBp75.550% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 19.0 | 6 | 158 | 8.32 | 63.8 Phase Production 63.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.033× parp52.144.1% Wicket rate0.32/ovp81.944.1% Boundary %18%p39.411.8% | 71.3 Quality 71.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 30.9 Impact 30.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.7 | 38.3 Versatility 38.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp73.450% Econ vs LHBp3.250% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 26 | 8.0 | 3 | 65 | 8.12 | 61.6 Phase Production 61.6 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.01× parp54.344.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp8444.1% Boundary %25%p5.311.8% | 92.6 Quality 92.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 62.8 Impact 62.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.5 | 46.8 Versatility 46.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6750% Econ vs LHBp26.650% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 28 | 3.0 | 1 | 23 | 7.67 | 61.1 Phase Production 61.1 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.953× parp56.444.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp64.944.1% Boundary %11%p64.911.8% | 41.5 Quality 41.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 67 Impact 67 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.8 | 61.7 Versatility 61.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp58.550% Econ vs LHBp64.950% | |
| 19 | Off-spin | 29 | 19.0 | 4 | 142 | 7.47 | 60.8 Phase Production 60.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.929× parp73.444.1% Wicket rate0.21/ovp41.544.1% Boundary %11%p86.211.8% | 3.2 Quality 3.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 73.4 Impact 73.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.2 | 78.7 Versatility 78.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp64.950% Econ vs LHBp92.650% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 27 | 20.0 | 3 | 141 | 7.05 | 57.8 Phase Production 57.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.876× parp8444.1% Wicket rate0.15/ovp24.544.1% Boundary %12%p8411.8% | 67 Quality 67 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 86.2 Impact 86.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+36.5 | 77.7 Versatility 77.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp92.650% Econ vs LHBp62.850% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 35 | 7.0 | 1 | 47 | 6.71 | 54.8 Phase Production 54.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.834× parp75.544.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp3344.1% Boundary %14%p58.511.8% | 75.5 Quality 75.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 58.5 Impact 58.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.5 | 67 Versatility 67 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp79.850% Econ vs LHBp54.350% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 27 | 3.3 | 1 | 28 | 8 | 53.8 Phase Production 53.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.994× parp5044.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp58.544.1% Boundary %14%p5011.8% | 79.8 Quality 79.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 64.9 Impact 64.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.2 | 56.4 Versatility 56.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp54.350% Econ vs LHBp58.550% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 23 | 3.0 | 1 | 27 | 9 | 52.1 Phase Production 52.1 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.118× parp41.544.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp64.944.1% Boundary %17%p43.611.8% | 69.1 Quality 69.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 47.9 Impact 47.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.1 | 40.4 Versatility 40.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp52.150% Econ vs LHBp28.750% | |
| 24 | SLA orthodox | — | 21.0 | 1 | 148 | 7.05 | 49.6 Phase Production 49.6 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.876× parp86.244.1% Wicket rate0.05/ovp1.144.1% Boundary %10%p94.711.8% | 20.2 Quality 20.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %16% | 52.1 Impact 52.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.9 | 78.7 Versatility 78.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8450% Econ vs LHBp73.450% | |
| 25 | Off-spin | 25 | 14.0 | 4 | 128 | 9.14 | 48.8 Phase Production 48.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.136× parp28.744.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp69.144.1% Boundary %17%p47.911.8% | 96.8 Quality 96.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 84 Impact 84 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+33.3 | 44.7 Versatility 44.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp20.250% Econ vs LHBp69.150% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 32 | 3.0 | 2 | 39 | 13 | 46.4 Phase Production 46.4 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.616× parp9.644.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp94.744.1% Boundary %33%p3.211.8% | 61.7 Quality 61.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 22.3 Impact 22.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15 | 19.1 Versatility 19.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.250% Econ vs LHBp35.150% | |
| 27 | Off-spin | 38 | 13.0 | 3 | 114 | 8.77 | 42.1 Phase Production 42.1 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.09× parp39.444.1% Wicket rate0.23/ovp5044.1% Boundary %20%p22.311.8% | 54.3 Quality 54.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 13.8 Impact 13.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-24.9 | 41.5 Versatility 41.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp45.750% Econ vs LHBp37.250% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | 29 | 20.4 | 5 | 186 | 9 | 40.7 Phase Production 40.7 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.118× parp30.944.1% Wicket rate0.24/ovp54.344.1% Boundary %19%p26.611.8% | 28.7 Quality 28.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 33 Impact 33 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.5 | 28.7 Versatility 28.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp37.250% Econ vs LHBp20.250% | |
| 29 | Off-spin | 28 | 11.0 | 1 | 88 | 8 | 40.7 Phase Production 40.7 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.994× parp60.644.1% Wicket rate0.09/ovp11.744.1% Boundary %12%p74.511.8% | 7.4 Quality 7.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 28.7 Impact 28.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.1 | 63.8 Versatility 63.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp56.450% Econ vs LHBp71.350% | |
| 30 | LA pace | 26 | 12.0 | 4 | 124 | 10.33 | 39.7 Phase Production 39.7 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.284× parp7.444.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp79.844.1% Boundary %22%p10.611.8% | 31.9 Quality 31.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 38.3 Impact 38.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.1 | 11.7 Versatility 11.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7.450% Econ vs LHBp1650% | |
| 31 | Off-spin | 23 | 14.0 | 2 | 117 | 8.36 | 39.2 Phase Production 39.2 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.039× parp47.944.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp26.644.1% Boundary %16%p54.311.8% | 9.6 Quality 9.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 3.2 Impact 3.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-39.3 | 56.4 Versatility 56.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp35.150% Econ vs LHBp77.750% | |
| 32 | Leg-spin | 24 | 8.0 | 1 | 68 | 8.5 | 38.2 Phase Production 38.2 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.056× parp43.644.1% Wicket rate0.13/ovp30.944.1% Boundary %17%p45.711.8% | 58.5 Quality 58.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 7.4 Impact 7.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-29.2 | 47.3 Versatility 47.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5050% Econ vs LHBp44.750% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 22 | 5.0 | 1 | 50 | 10 | 33.9 Phase Production 33.9 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.243× parp24.544.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp45.744.1% Boundary %23%p24.511.8% | 90.4 Quality 90.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 41.5 Impact 41.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.5 | 37.2 Versatility 37.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp24.550% Econ vs LHBp5050% | |
| 34 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 18.0 | 2 | 152 | 8.44 | 29.6 Phase Production 29.6 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.049× parp45.744.1% Wicket rate0.11/ovp7.444.1% Boundary %16%p52.111.8% | 1.1 Quality 1.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 26.6 Impact 26.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.2 | 42.6 Versatility 42.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp60.650% Econ vs LHBp24.550% | |
| 35 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 5.0 | 1 | 54 | 10.8 | 27.2 Phase Production 27.2 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.342× parp13.844.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp45.744.1% Boundary %27%p7.411.8% | 14.9 Quality 14.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %10% | 24.5 Impact 24.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.8 | 18.1 Versatility 18.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp26.650% Econ vs LHBp9.650% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 26 | 3.0 | 0 | 32 | 10.67 | 26.5 Phase Production 26.5 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.326× parp26.644.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.744.1% Boundary %28%p18.111.8% | 61.7 Quality 61.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 43.6 Impact 43.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.4 | 41.5 Versatility 41.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.150% Econ vs LHBp81.950% | |
| 37 | Off-spin | 30 | 25.0 | 5 | 243 | 9.72 | 26.5 Phase Production 26.5 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.208× parp11.744.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp37.244.1% Boundary %17%p41.511.8% | 18.1 Quality 18.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %16% | 5.3 Impact 5.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-29.2 | 13.8 Versatility 13.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5.350% Econ vs LHBp22.350% | |
| 38 | Off-spin | 23 | 17.0 | 2 | 152 | 8.94 | 25 Phase Production 25 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.111× parp35.144.1% Wicket rate0.12/ovp13.844.1% Boundary %19%p28.711.8% | 43.6 Quality 43.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 56.4 Impact 56.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.6 | 51.1 Versatility 51.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp13.850% Econ vs LHBp88.350% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 22 | 5.0 | 0 | 45 | 9 | 24.8 Phase Production 24.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.118× parp37.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp9.644.1% Boundary %20%p35.111.8% | 14.9 Quality 14.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %10% | 54.3 Impact 54.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.7 | 39.4 Versatility 39.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.450% Econ vs LHBp39.450% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 30 | 2.0 | 0 | 26 | 13 | 24.2 Phase Production 24.2 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.616× parp1644.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp35.144.1% Boundary %33%p13.811.8% | 36.2 Quality 36.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 35.1 Impact 35.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.4 | 35.1 Versatility 35.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp11.750% Econ vs LHBp58.550% | |
| 41 | SLA orthodox | 18 | 4.0 | 0 | 42 | 10.5 | 22.1 Phase Production 22.1 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.305× parp21.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.244.1% Boundary %21%p31.911.8% | 39.4 Quality 39.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 38.3 Impact 38.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.1 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp22.350% Econ vs LHBp44.750% | |
| 42 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 4.0 | 0 | 42 | 10.5 | 22.1 Phase Production 22.1 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.305× parp21.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.244.1% Boundary %21%p31.911.8% | 5.3 Quality 5.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %4% | 45.7 Impact 45.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.5 | 29.8 Versatility 29.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.750% Econ vs LHBp30.950% | |
| 43 | RA pace | 27 | 5.0 | 1 | 60 | 12 | 20.8 Phase Production 20.8 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.491× parp1.144.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp45.744.1% Boundary %33%p1.111.8% | 64.9 Quality 64.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 16 Impact 16 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-20 | 8.5 Versatility 8.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9.650% Econ vs LHBp7.450% | |
| 44 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 7.0 | 0 | 65 | 9.29 | 20.3 Phase Production 20.3 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.154× parp3344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.244.1% Boundary %19%p37.211.8% | 11.7 Quality 11.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 18.1 Impact 18.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.3 | 45.7 Versatility 45.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3350% Econ vs LHBp58.550% | |
| 45 | LA pace | 23 | 4.0 | 0 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.7 Phase Production 12.7 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.553× parp3.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.244.1% Boundary %25%p20.211.8% | 56.4 Quality 56.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 9.6 Impact 9.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-27.9 | 21.3 Versatility 21.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.550% Econ vs LHBp1.150% | |
| 46 | Leg-spin | — | 12.0 | 1 | 116 | 9.67 | 11.6 Phase Production 11.6 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.201× parp18.144.1% Wicket rate0.08/ovp5.344.1% Boundary %22%p10.611.8% | 31.9 Quality 31.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 11.7 Impact 11.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-25.7 | 22.3 Versatility 22.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp30.950% Econ vs LHBp13.850% | |
| 47 | RA pace | 32 | 10.0 | 1 | 106 | 10.6 | 11.3 Phase Production 11.3 vs all bowlers · n=47 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.317× parp5.344.1% Wicket rate0.10/ovp1644.1% Boundary %22%p1611.8% | 24.5 Quality 24.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 20.2 Impact 20.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16.6 | 10.6 Versatility 10.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1650% Econ vs LHBp5.350% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Off-spin | 25 | 6.4 | 4 | 51 | 7.65 | 94 Phase Production 94 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.704× parp96.443.6% Boundary %12%p96.441.8% Wicket rate0.60/ovp79.814.5% | — | 96.4 Impact 96.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.6 | 92.5 Versatility 92.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep92.5100% | |
| 2 | Off-spin | 38 | 3.0 | 2 | 17 | 5.67 | 89 Phase Production 89 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.522× parp91.743.6% Boundary %6%p92.941.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp70.214.5% | — | 66.7 Impact 66.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | — | 2.0 | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 87.7 Phase Production 87.7 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.322× parp9443.6% Boundary %8%p8141.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp88.114.5% | — | 86.9 Impact 86.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.4 | 93.8 Versatility 93.8 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep93.8100% | |
| 4 | Off-spin | 36 | 3.4 | 3 | 25 | 6.82 | 87.6 Phase Production 87.6 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.628× parp86.943.6% Boundary %14%p86.941.8% Wicket rate0.82/ovp91.714.5% | — | 98.8 Impact 98.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+27.7 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 9.0 | 2 | 66 | 7.33 | 85.3 Phase Production 85.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.675× parp98.843.6% Boundary %11%p98.841.8% Wicket rate0.22/ovp614.5% | — | 44 Impact 44 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8 | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep52.5100% | |
| 6 | SLA orthodox | 18 | 3.0 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 84.4 Phase Production 84.4 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.552× parp89.343.6% Boundary %6%p92.941.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp45.214.5% | — | 84.5 Impact 84.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.5 | 65 Versatility 65 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep65100% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 27 | 7.0 | 5 | 60 | 8.57 | 83.7 Phase Production 83.7 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.789× parp84.550% Wicket rate0.71/ovp9416.7% Boundary %19%p77.433.3% | — | 89.3 Impact 89.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.6 | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep13.940% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 35 | 12.0 | 7 | 112 | 9.33 | 83.3 Phase Production 83.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.859× parp79.850% Wicket rate0.58/ovp82.116.7% Boundary %19%p89.333.3% | — | 10.7 Impact 10.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-39.6 | 52.4 Versatility 52.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep58.340% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 9 | Off-spin | — | 2.0 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 74.5 Phase Production 74.5 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.552× parp7543.6% Boundary %8%p8141.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp54.814.5% | — | 82.1 Impact 82.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.1 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 11.5 | 5 | 109 | 9.21 | 73.3 Phase Production 73.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.848× parp82.143.6% Boundary %21%p72.641.8% Wicket rate0.42/ovp48.814.5% | — | 22.6 Impact 22.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.8 | 55 Versatility 55 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep55100% | |
| 11 | Off-spin | 23 | 15.0 | 5 | 143 | 9.53 | 73.1 Phase Production 73.1 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.878× parp77.443.6% Boundary %20%p84.541.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp27.414.5% | — | 53.6 Impact 53.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.3 | 80 Versatility 80 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep80100% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 30 | 6.0 | 4 | 60 | 10 | 70.2 Phase Production 70.2 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.921× parp65.550% Wicket rate0.67/ovp84.516.7% Boundary %19%p70.233.3% | — | 29.8 Impact 29.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.7 | 41.3 Versatility 41.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep30.640% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 13 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 2.0 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 69.4 Phase Production 69.4 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.644× parp70.243.6% Boundary %17%p61.941.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp88.114.5% | — | 70.2 Impact 70.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.5 | 83.8 Versatility 83.8 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep83.8100% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 7.0 | 2 | 64 | 9.14 | 63.6 Phase Production 63.6 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.842× parp72.643.6% Boundary %21%p65.541.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp3114.5% | — | 51.2 Impact 51.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.6 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep37.5100% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 28 | 12.0 | 4 | 123 | 10.25 | 62.3 Phase Production 62.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.944× parp63.150% Wicket rate0.34/ovp34.516.7% Boundary %21%p7533.3% | — | 60.7 Impact 60.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.4 | 48 Versatility 48 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep47.240% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 3.0 | 1 | 25 | 8.33 | 60.6 Phase Production 60.6 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.767× parp67.943.6% Boundary %22%p58.341.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp45.214.5% | — | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.8 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep50100% | |
| 17 | Off-spin | 23 | 5.0 | 3 | 51 | 10.2 | 59.6 Phase Production 59.6 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.939× parp58.343.6% Boundary %23%p5641.8% Wicket rate0.60/ovp73.814.5% | — | 36.9 Impact 36.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.1 | 7.5 Versatility 7.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep7.5100% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 32 | 6.0 | 3 | 61 | 10.17 | 57.5 Phase Production 57.5 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.936× parp60.750% Wicket rate0.50/ovp65.516.7% Boundary %25%p48.833.3% | — | 91.7 Impact 91.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7.1 | 60.2 Versatility 60.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep77.840% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 19 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 2.0 | 1 | 22 | 11 | 55.7 Phase Production 55.7 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.013× parp5043.6% Boundary %17%p61.941.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp54.814.5% | — | 27.4 Impact 27.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13 | 46.2 Versatility 46.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep46.2100% | |
| 20 | Off-spin | 30 | 5.0 | 1 | 52 | 10.4 | 53.3 Phase Production 53.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.958× parp53.643.6% Boundary %20%p67.941.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp10.714.5% | — | 58.3 Impact 58.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.6 | 40 Versatility 40 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep40100% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | — | 2.0 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 49.9 Phase Production 49.9 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.921× parp5643.6% Boundary %25%p53.641.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp21.414.5% | — | 77.4 Impact 77.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.9 | 32.5 Versatility 32.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep32.5100% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 21 | 2.0 | 1 | 22 | 11 | 46 Phase Production 46 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.013× parp5050% Wicket rate0.50/ovp54.816.7% Boundary %33%p35.733.3% | — | 63.1 Impact 63.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.2 | 60.2 Versatility 60.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep77.840% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 23 | Off-spin | 29 | 4.0 | 1 | 48 | 12 | 45.1 Phase Production 45.1 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.105× parp41.743.6% Boundary %25%p51.241.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp38.114.5% | — | 32.1 Impact 32.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.8 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 24 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 7.0 | 2 | 78 | 11.14 | 44.2 Phase Production 44.2 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.026× parp46.443.6% Boundary %26%p46.441.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp3114.5% | — | 72.6 Impact 72.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.2 | 40 Versatility 40 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep40100% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 27 | 6.3 | 6 | 76 | 11.69 | 40.9 Phase Production 40.9 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.077× parp36.950% Wicket rate0.92/ovp98.816.7% Boundary %31%p17.933.3% | — | 8.3 Impact 8.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-43.3 | 50.2 Versatility 50.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep52.840% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 26 | Off-spin | — | 2.0 | 1 | 27 | 13.5 | 36.9 Phase Production 36.9 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.243× parp32.143.6% Boundary %33%p35.741.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp54.814.5% | — | 34.5 Impact 34.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.2 | 47.5 Versatility 47.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep47.5100% | |
| 27 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 11.0 | 5 | 126 | 11.45 | 36.3 Phase Production 36.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.055× parp34.543.6% Boundary %27%p29.841.8% Wicket rate0.46/ovp60.714.5% | — | 3.6 Impact 3.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-58.2 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep37.5100% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 21 | 4.0 | 2 | 54 | 13.5 | 36.1 Phase Production 36.1 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.243× parp22.650% Wicket rate0.50/ovp63.116.7% Boundary %29%p42.933.3% | — | 20.2 Impact 20.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.1 | 68 Versatility 68 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep97.240% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 29 | SLA orthodox | 29 | 2.0 | 0 | 26 | 13 | 35.2 Phase Production 35.2 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.197× parp39.343.6% Boundary %33%p35.741.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp21.414.5% | — | 46.4 Impact 46.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.2 | 10 Versatility 10 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep10100% | |
| 30 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 7.0 | 4 | 83 | 11.86 | 34.7 Phase Production 34.7 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.092× parp29.843.6% Boundary %29%p2541.8% Wicket rate0.57/ovp77.414.5% | — | 6 Impact 6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-53.6 | 57.5 Versatility 57.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep57.5100% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 26 | 4.0 | 1 | 50 | 12.5 | 34.3 Phase Production 34.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.151× parp27.450% Wicket rate0.25/ovp38.116.7% Boundary %29%p42.933.3% | — | 94 Impact 94 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7.6 | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep13.940% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 32 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 5.0 | 1 | 59 | 11.8 | 29.7 Phase Production 29.7 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.086× parp4443.6% Boundary %30%p21.441.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp10.714.5% | — | 39.3 Impact 39.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.4 | 33.8 Versatility 33.8 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep33.8100% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 35 | 2.0 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 28 Phase Production 28 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.381× parp2550% Wicket rate0.00/ovp21.416.7% Boundary %33%p35.733.3% | — | 56 Impact 56 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.9 | 60.2 Versatility 60.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep77.840% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 22 | 5.0 | 3 | 68 | 13.6 | 25 Phase Production 25 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.252× parp16.750% Wicket rate0.60/ovp73.816.7% Boundary %33%p13.133.3% | — | 15.5 Impact 15.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.3 | 43.5 Versatility 43.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep36.140% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 35 | RA pace | 23 | 11.3 | 2 | 140 | 12.17 | 19.4 Phase Production 19.4 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.121× parp20.250% Wicket rate0.17/ovp1.216.7% Boundary %28%p27.433.3% | — | 13.1 Impact 13.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-36 | 82.4 Versatility 82.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep91.740% Slower ballp97.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 36 | Off-spin | 24 | 5.0 | 1 | 68 | 13.6 | 17.8 Phase Production 17.8 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.252× parp16.743.6% Boundary %30%p21.441.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp10.714.5% | — | 79.8 Impact 79.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.2 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep37.5100% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 19 | 8.5 | 7 | 128 | 14.49 | 17.1 Phase Production 17.1 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.334× parp1.250% Wicket rate0.79/ovp96.416.7% Boundary %38%p1.233.3% | — | 48.8 Impact 48.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6 | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep13.940% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 38 | RA pace | 30 | 9.0 | 3 | 115 | 12.78 | 17.1 Phase Production 17.1 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.176× parp13.150% Wicket rate0.34/ovp41.716.7% Boundary %32%p10.733.3% | — | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.6 | 45.7 Versatility 45.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep41.740% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 32 | 8.0 | 4 | 105 | 13.12 | 16.3 Phase Production 16.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.208× parp650% Wicket rate0.50/ovp67.916.7% Boundary %35%p633.3% | — | 17.9 Impact 17.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.2 | 60.2 Versatility 60.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep77.840% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 40 | LA pace | 26 | 2.0 | 0 | 34 | 17 | 14.1 Phase Production 14.1 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.565× parp10.750% Wicket rate0.00/ovp21.416.7% Boundary %42%p15.533.3% | — | 66.7 Impact 66.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep13.940% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 27 | 10.1 | 3 | 130 | 12.79 | 9.5 Phase Production 9.5 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.177× parp8.350% Wicket rate0.29/ovp15.516.7% Boundary %33%p8.333.3% | — | 1.2 Impact 1.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-69.8 | 54.6 Versatility 54.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep63.940% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 27 | 3.2 | 0 | 56 | 16.8 | 3.6 Phase Production 3.6 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.547× parp3.650% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.616.7% Boundary %45%p3.633.3% | — | 41.7 Impact 41.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.3 | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep13.940% Slower ballp47.233.3% Slow bouncerp5026.7% |
Nishunk Birla
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 21
75.7
Scout Score
Overs 47.0 · Wkts 11 · Runs 362 · Econ 7.7
75.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay44.110.6%4.7
Middle81.170.2%56.9
Death73.319.1%14.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p93.30.76×
Scout Score75.7
44.1Powerplay10.6% of overs · 1w · 12.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.238%
Impactp46.627%
Qualityp2515%
Versatilityp39.110%
Trajectoryp93.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.198× par30bp28.436.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp4242.1%
Boundary %30%30bp47.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.831× par16bp69.330%
Econ vs LHB1.678× par14bp3.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov16bp62.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov14bp23.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.9 · induced false-shot 17%
81.1Middle70.2% of overs · 8w · 7.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.838%
Impactp79.825%
Qualityp86.215%
Versatilityp87.212%
Trajectoryp93.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.885× par198bp92.644.1%
Wicket rate0.24/ov198bp56.444.1%
Boundary %14%198bp77.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.876× par152bp90.450%
Econ vs LHB0.915× par46bp8450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +29.2 · induced false-shot 25%
73.3Death19.1% of overs · 2w · 7.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp85.355%
Impactp4425%
Versatilityp52.58%
Trajectoryp93.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.675× par54bp98.843.6%
Boundary %11%54bp98.841.8%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.6751bp52.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8
Shivam Bhambri
Bowler · Off-spin · age 30
74.4
Scout Score
Overs 22.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 147 · Econ 6.68
74.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle80.177.3%61.9
Death55.122.7%12.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p66.30.99×
Scout Score74.4
80.1Middle77.3% of overs · 6w · 5.59 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp9438%
Impactp92.625%
Qualityp22.315%
Versatilityp93.612%
Trajectoryp66.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.694× par102bp96.844.1%
Wicket rate0.35/ov102bp90.444.1%
Boundary %5%102bp96.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.776× par55bp88.350%
Econ vs LHB0.597× par47bp98.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +55.7 · induced false-shot 16%
55.1Death22.7% of overs · 1w · 10.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.355%
Impactp58.325%
Versatilityp408%
Trajectoryp66.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.958× par30bp53.643.6%
Boundary %20%30bp67.941.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp10.714.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.689bp40100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.6
Gaganpreet Singh
Bowler · Off-spin · age 36
72.7
Scout Score
Overs 10.4 · Wkts 7 · Runs 80 · Econ 7.5
72.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.828.1%16.8
Middle74.837.5%28.1
Death80.934.4%27.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p33.71.03×
Scout Score72.7
59.8Powerplay28.1% of overs · 1w · 10.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.838%
Impactp71.627%
Qualityp73.915%
Versatilityp51.610%
Trajectoryp33.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.048× par18bp53.436.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp64.842.1%
Boundary %33%18bp37.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.209× par11bp30.730%
Econ vs LHB0.795× par7bp62.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.55/ov11bp70.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp47.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.1 · induced false-shot 33%
74.8Middle37.5% of overs · 3w · 5.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.438%
Impactp81.925%
Qualityp77.715%
Versatilityp60.112%
Trajectoryp33.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.715× par24bp77.744.1%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp96.844.1%
Boundary %12%24bp62.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.717× par24bp75.550%
Econ vs LHB—0bp44.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +30.9 · induced false-shot 29%
80.9Death34.4% of overs · 3w · 6.82 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp87.655%
Impactp98.825%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp33.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.628× par22bp86.943.6%
Boundary %14%22bp86.941.8%
Wicket rate0.82/ov22bp91.714.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +27.7
Chetan Rehdu
Bowler · Off-spin
70.3
Scout Score
Overs 30.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 232 · Econ 7.73
70.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.216.7%9.9
Middle7376.7%56.0
Death66.36.7%4.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p6.71.22×
Scout Score70.3
59.2Powerplay16.7% of overs · 2w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.138%
Impactp78.427%
Qualityp2515%
Versatilityp65.910%
Trajectoryp6.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.884× par30bp6736.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp78.442.1%
Boundary %23%30bp63.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.986× par17bp55.730%
Econ vs LHB0.761× par13bp71.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.35/ov17bp5820%
Wkt vs LHB0.46/ov13bp80.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.6 · induced false-shot 17%
73Middle76.7% of overs · 7w · 7.61 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.238%
Impactp90.425%
Qualityp88.315%
Versatilityp69.112%
Trajectoryp6.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.946× par138bp69.144.1%
Wicket rate0.31/ov138bp77.744.1%
Boundary %13%138bp79.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.072× par97bp43.650%
Econ vs LHB0.649× par41bp94.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +48.7 · induced false-shot 25%
66.3Death6.7% of overs · 1w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.555%
Impactp82.125%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp6.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.552× par12bp7543.6%
Boundary %8%12bp8141.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp54.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.1
Vardan Verma
Bowler · SLA orthodox
67
Scout Score
Overs 29.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 220 · Econ 7.59
67OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.124.1%8.9
Middle75.469%52.0
Death86.86.9%6.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p77.90.93×
Scout Score67
37.1Powerplay24.1% of overs · 1w · 11.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.938%
Impactp26.127%
Qualityp28.415%
Versatilityp43.410%
Trajectoryp77.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.095× par42bp39.836.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp29.542.1%
Boundary %31%42bp4221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.074× par42bp37.530%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4230%
Wkt vs RHB0.14/ov42bp23.920%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp73.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.5 · induced false-shot 19%
75.4Middle69% of overs · 4w · 6.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.838%
Impactp94.725%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp8312%
Trajectoryp77.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.839× par120bp94.744.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov120bp39.444.1%
Boundary %11%120bp90.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.865× par109bp86.250%
Econ vs LHB0.604× par11bp79.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +63.3 · induced false-shot 20%
86.8Death6.9% of overs · 2w · 3.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp87.755%
Impactp86.925%
Versatilityp93.88%
Trajectoryp77.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.322× par12bp9443.6%
Boundary %8%12bp8141.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp88.114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.3212bp93.8100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.4
Chiragvir Dhindsa
Bowler · Off-spin · age 25
66.9
Scout Score
Overs 34.4 · Wkts 12 · Runs 307 · Econ 8.86
66.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay63.140.4%25.5
Middle61.740.4%24.9
Death85.919.2%16.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p22.11.1×
Scout Score66.9
63.1Powerplay40.4% of overs · 4w · 9.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.338%
Impactp53.427%
Qualityp87.515%
Versatilityp66.810%
Trajectoryp22.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.898× par84bp78.436.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov84bp60.242.1%
Boundary %24%84bp76.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.96× par50bp6730%
Econ vs LHB0.818× par34bp87.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.12/ov50bp12.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.53/ov34bp89.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.1 · induced false-shot 29%
61.7Middle40.4% of overs · 4w · 9.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.838%
Impactp8425%
Qualityp96.815%
Versatilityp44.712%
Trajectoryp22.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.136× par84bp28.744.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov84bp69.144.1%
Boundary %17%84bp47.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.205× par59bp20.250%
Econ vs LHB0.975× par25bp69.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +33.3 · induced false-shot 29%
85.9Death19.2% of overs · 4w · 7.65 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp9455%
Impactp96.425%
Versatilityp92.58%
Trajectoryp22.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.704× par40bp96.443.6%
Boundary %12%40bp96.441.8%
Wicket rate0.60/ov40bp79.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.558bp92.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.6
Taranpreet Singh
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 28
66.6
Scout Score
Overs 21.4 · Wkts 7 · Runs 189 · Econ 8.72
66.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay34.69.2%3.2
Middle71.981.5%58.6
Death51.49.2%4.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p85.60.91×
Scout Score66.6
34.6Powerplay9.2% of overs · 0w · 15.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp25.238%
Impactp28.427%
Qualityp35.215%
Versatilityp34.810%
Trajectoryp85.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.523× par12bp1736.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp36.442.1%
Boundary %50%12bp1721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.06× par6bp4230%
Econ vs LHB2.06× par6bp830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov6bp44.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov6bp54.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21 · induced false-shot 17%
71.9Middle81.5% of overs · 6w · 7.7 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.738%
Impactp88.325%
Qualityp47.915%
Versatilityp44.712%
Trajectoryp85.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.957× par106bp6744.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov106bp88.344.1%
Boundary %15%106bp60.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.906× par95bp77.750%
Econ vs LHB1.41× par11bp11.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +39.8 · induced false-shot 20%
51.4Death9.2% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.755%
Impactp27.425%
Versatilityp46.28%
Trajectoryp85.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.013× par12bp5043.6%
Boundary %17%12bp61.941.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp54.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.0112bp46.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13
Jaskirat Singh Mehra
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
66.2
Scout Score
Overs 37.3 · Wkts 9 · Runs 349 · Econ 9.31
66.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay82.961.3%50.8
Middle55.98%4.5
Death35.730.7%11.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p89.40.88×
Scout Score66.2
82.9Powerplay61.3% of overs · 6w · 7.91 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp77.138%
Impactp8327%
Qualityp98.915%
Versatilityp73.910%
Trajectoryp89.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.777× par138bp94.336.8%
Wicket rate0.26/ov138bp53.442.1%
Boundary %20%138bp94.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.79× par93bp94.330%
Econ vs LHB0.755× par45bp98.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.32/ov93bp64.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.13/ov45bp14.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.8 · induced false-shot 33%
55.9Middle8% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.138%
Impactp47.925%
Qualityp69.115%
Versatilityp40.412%
Trajectoryp89.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.118× par18bp41.544.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp64.944.1%
Boundary %17%18bp43.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.998× par12bp52.150%
Econ vs LHB1.354× par6bp28.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.1 · induced false-shot 28%
35.7Death30.7% of overs · 2w · 12.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.448%
Impactp13.125%
Versatilityp82.415%
Trajectoryp89.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.121× par69bp20.250%
Wicket rate0.17/ov69bp1.216.7%
Boundary %28%69bp27.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate9%69bp91.740%
Slower ball3.62369bp97.233.3%
Slow bouncer069bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -36
Sahil Kumar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
65.2
Scout Score
Overs 38.5 · Wkts 16 · Runs 311 · Econ 8.01
65.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay41.933.5%14.0
Middle91.836.1%33.1
Death59.530.5%18.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p760.94×
Scout Score65.2
41.9Powerplay33.5% of overs · 3w · 10.15 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp5538%
Impactp30.727%
Qualityp1.115%
Versatilityp49.810%
Trajectoryp7610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.997× par78bp60.236.8%
Wicket rate0.23/ov78bp44.342.1%
Boundary %26%78bp6721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.92× par71bp8330%
Econ vs LHB1.678× par7bp19.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.25/ov71bp47.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp47.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -20.6 · induced false-shot 12%
91.8Middle36.1% of overs · 8w · 5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp98.938%
Impactp96.825%
Qualityp73.415%
Versatilityp94.712%
Trajectoryp7610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.621× par84bp98.944.1%
Wicket rate0.57/ov84bp98.944.1%
Boundary %4%84bp98.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.596× par64bp98.950%
Econ vs LHB0.702× par20bp90.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +87.5 · induced false-shot 24%
59.5Death30.5% of overs · 5w · 9.21 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.355%
Impactp22.625%
Versatilityp558%
Trajectoryp7612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.848× par71bp82.143.6%
Boundary %21%71bp72.641.8%
Wicket rate0.42/ov71bp48.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.8147bp55100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.8
Manhar Bawa
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
64.4
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 68 · Econ 8.5
64.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay71.450%35.7
Middle61.225%15.3
Death53.725%13.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p56.71×
Scout Score64.4
71.4Powerplay50% of overs · 2w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.438%
Impactp87.527%
Qualityp4215%
Versatilityp67.710%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.81× par24bp71.636.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp84.142.1%
Boundary %21%24bp69.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.795× par24bp80.730%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4230%
Wkt vs RHB0.50/ov24bp80.720%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp73.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.6 · induced false-shot 21%
61.2Middle25% of overs · 1w · 6.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp6838%
Impactp71.325%
Qualityp36.215%
Versatilityp53.712%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.808× par12bp62.844.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp73.444.1%
Boundary %8%12bp6711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.811× par12bp62.850%
Econ vs LHB—0bp44.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7.9 · induced false-shot 8%
53.7Death25% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp4648%
Impactp63.125%
Versatilityp60.215%
Trajectoryp56.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.013× par12bp5050%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp54.816.7%
Boundary %33%12bp35.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%12bp77.840%
Slower ball012bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer012bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.2
Arbab Iqbal
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 23
63
Scout Score
Overs 36.1 · Wkts 11 · Runs 320 · Econ 8.85
63OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay20.819.4%4.0
Middle8161.3%49.7
Death48.119.4%9.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p20.21.11×
Scout Score63
20.8Powerplay19.4% of overs · 1w · 12.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.638%
Impactp3.427%
Qualityp21.615%
Versatilityp37.310%
Trajectoryp20.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.235× par42bp14.836.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp29.542.1%
Boundary %29%42bp51.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.211× par42bp1730%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4230%
Wkt vs RHB0.14/ov42bp23.920%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp73.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -58.8 · induced false-shot 17%
81Middle61.3% of overs · 8w · 6.95 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp90.438%
Impactp98.925%
Qualityp81.915%
Versatilityp63.812%
Trajectoryp20.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.863× par133bp90.444.1%
Wicket rate0.36/ov133bp92.644.1%
Boundary %12%133bp81.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.834× par122bp94.750%
Econ vs LHB1.209× par11bp3350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +106.8 · induced false-shot 25%
48.1Death19.4% of overs · 2w · 11.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.255%
Impactp72.625%
Versatilityp408%
Trajectoryp20.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.026× par42bp46.443.6%
Boundary %26%42bp46.441.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp3114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.9436bp40100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.2
Harjot Singh Dhillon
Bowler · RA pace · age 35
62.1
Scout Score
Overs 36.0 · Wkts 12 · Runs 314 · Econ 8.72
62.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay67.447.2%31.8
Middle59.519.4%11.5
Death56.233.3%18.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score62.1
67.4Powerplay47.2% of overs · 4w · 9.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.438%
Impactp64.827%
Qualityp96.615%
Versatilityp62.710%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.896× par102bp80.736.8%
Wicket rate0.23/ov102bp46.642.1%
Boundary %26%102bp71.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.912× par71bp85.230%
Econ vs LHB0.857× par31bp78.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov71bp6720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov31bp1.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.8 · induced false-shot 33%
59.5Middle19.4% of overs · 1w · 6.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.838%
Impactp58.525%
Qualityp75.515%
Versatilityp6712%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.834× par42bp75.544.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp3344.1%
Boundary %14%42bp58.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.655× par24bp79.850%
Econ vs LHB1.067× par18bp54.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.5 · induced false-shot 26%
56.2Death33.3% of overs · 7w · 9.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.348%
Impactp10.725%
Versatilityp52.415%
Trajectoryp47.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.859× par72bp79.850%
Wicket rate0.58/ov72bp82.116.7%
Boundary %19%72bp89.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%72bp58.340%
Slower ball072bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer072bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -39.6
Sarthak Saharan
Bowler · RA pace · age 30
61.2
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 169 · Econ 9.39
61.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay43.316.7%7.2
Middle69.950%35.0
Death57.233.3%19.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p81.70.92×
Scout Score61.2
43.3Powerplay16.7% of overs · 0w · 12.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.938%
Impactp48.927%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp4210%
Trajectoryp81.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.212× par18bp35.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp21.642.1%
Boundary %39%18bp22.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.301× par16bp21.630%
Econ vs LHB0.309× par2bp60.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov16bp19.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov2bp68.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.1 · induced false-shot 22%
69.9Middle50% of overs · 3w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.838%
Impactp75.525%
Qualityp8415%
Versatilityp43.612%
Trajectoryp81.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.994× par54bp58.544.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp75.544.1%
Boundary %15%54bp56.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.922× par43bp69.150%
Econ vs LHB1.276× par11bp18.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.6 · induced false-shot 28%
57.2Death33.3% of overs · 4w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.248%
Impactp29.825%
Versatilityp41.315%
Trajectoryp81.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.921× par36bp65.550%
Wicket rate0.67/ov36bp84.516.7%
Boundary %19%36bp70.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%36bp30.640%
Slower ball036bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer036bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.7
Gaurav Gambhir
Bowler · Off-spin · age 38
61.1
Scout Score
Overs 39.0 · Wkts 14 · Runs 297 · Econ 7.62
61.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay74.859%44.1
Middle34.433.3%11.5
Death71.87.7%5.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p18.31.15×
Scout Score61.1
74.8Powerplay59% of overs · 9w · 7.22 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp9538%
Impactp98.927%
Qualityp14.815%
Versatilityp79.110%
Trajectoryp18.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.709× par138bp98.936.8%
Wicket rate0.39/ov138bp89.842.1%
Boundary %17%138bp98.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.596× par65bp98.930%
Econ vs LHB0.838× par73bp9230%
Wkt vs RHB0.65/ov65bp98.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.16/ov73bp10.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +62.1 · induced false-shot 17%
34.4Middle33.3% of overs · 3w · 8.77 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.138%
Impactp13.825%
Qualityp54.315%
Versatilityp41.512%
Trajectoryp18.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.09× par78bp39.444.1%
Wicket rate0.23/ov78bp5044.1%
Boundary %20%78bp22.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.064× par45bp45.750%
Econ vs LHB1.119× par33bp37.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -24.9 · induced false-shot 20%
71.8Death7.7% of overs · 2w · 5.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp8955%
Impactp66.725%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp18.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.522× par18bp91.743.6%
Boundary %6%18bp92.941.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp70.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Anirudh Kanwar
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
60.6
Scout Score
Overs 25.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 248 · Econ 9.92
60.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay61.464%39.3
Middle41.612%5.0
Death67.824%16.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p68.30.98×
Scout Score60.6
61.4Powerplay64% of overs · 4w · 9.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.238%
Impactp35.227%
Qualityp85.215%
Versatilityp71.410%
Trajectoryp68.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.909× par96bp73.936.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov96bp48.942.1%
Boundary %22%96bp87.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.953× par71bp76.130%
Econ vs LHB0.766× par25bp89.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.25/ov71bp47.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.24/ov25bp60.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.1 · induced false-shot 28%
41.6Middle12% of overs · 2w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.438%
Impactp22.325%
Qualityp61.715%
Versatilityp19.112%
Trajectoryp68.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.616× par18bp9.644.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp94.744.1%
Boundary %33%18bp3.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.637× par16bp3.250%
Econ vs LHB1.477× par2bp35.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15 · induced false-shot 22%
67.8Death24% of overs · 3w · 10.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.548%
Impactp91.725%
Versatilityp60.215%
Trajectoryp68.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.936× par36bp60.750%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp65.516.7%
Boundary %25%36bp48.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%36bp77.840%
Slower ball036bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer036bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7.1
Ranvijay Singh Lalotra
Bowler · SLA orthodox
60.3
Scout Score
Overs 28.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 203 · Econ 7.25
60.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay90.617.9%16.2
Middle53.175%39.8
Death59.97.1%4.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p87.50.9×
Scout Score60.3
90.6Powerplay17.9% of overs · 5w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp92.638%
Impactp9227%
Qualityp9215%
Versatilityp79.810%
Trajectoryp87.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.688× par30bp89.836.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov30bp98.942.1%
Boundary %17%30bp85.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.514× par18bp87.530%
Econ vs LHB0.979× par12bp51.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.67/ov18bp9220%
Wkt vs LHB1.50/ov12bp98.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +19.6 · induced false-shot 40%
53.1Middle75% of overs · 1w · 7.05 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.638%
Impactp52.125%
Qualityp20.215%
Versatilityp78.712%
Trajectoryp87.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.876× par126bp86.244.1%
Wicket rate0.05/ov126bp1.144.1%
Boundary %10%126bp94.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.85× par88bp8450%
Econ vs LHB0.933× par38bp73.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.9 · induced false-shot 16%
59.9Death7.1% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.955%
Impactp77.425%
Versatilityp32.58%
Trajectoryp87.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.921× par12bp5643.6%
Boundary %25%12bp53.641.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp21.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.8310bp32.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.9
Ivraj Ranauta
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 26
59.4
Scout Score
Overs 36.0 · Wkts 13 · Runs 277 · Econ 7.69
59.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay64.830.6%19.8
Middle69.550%34.8
Death25.319.4%4.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p11.29×
Scout Score59.4
64.8Powerplay30.6% of overs · 3w · 6.45 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.838%
Impactp89.827%
Qualityp19.315%
Versatilityp7210%
Trajectoryp110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.634× par66bp96.636.8%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp56.842.1%
Boundary %15%66bp96.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.534× par39bp96.630%
Econ vs LHB0.801× par27bp8330%
Wkt vs RHB0.46/ov39bp85.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov27bp5.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +17.2 · induced false-shot 17%
69.5Middle50% of overs · 6w · 6.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp87.438%
Impactp77.725%
Qualityp52.115%
Versatilityp74.512%
Trajectoryp110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.849× par108bp88.344.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov108bp86.244.1%
Boundary %11%108bp88.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.784× par84bp96.850%
Econ vs LHB1.077× par24bp52.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.8 · induced false-shot 20%
25.3Death19.4% of overs · 4w · 11.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.755%
Impactp625%
Versatilityp57.58%
Trajectoryp112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.092× par42bp29.843.6%
Boundary %29%42bp2541.8%
Wicket rate0.57/ov42bp77.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.9423bp57.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -53.6
Nikhil Sharma
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
59
Scout Score
Overs 35.1 · Wkts 8 · Runs 322 · Econ 9.16
59OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay73.214.2%10.4
Middle72.856.9%41.4
Death24.928.9%7.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p990.68×
Scout Score59
73.2Powerplay14.2% of overs · 2w · 10.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.638%
Impactp80.727%
Qualityp77.315%
Versatilityp5810%
Trajectoryp9910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.002× par30bp55.736.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp78.442.1%
Boundary %30%30bp47.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.856× par25bp78.430%
Econ vs LHB1.731× par5bp23.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.48/ov25bp78.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp5820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.8 · induced false-shot 30%
72.8Middle56.9% of overs · 3w · 7.05 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.838%
Impactp86.225%
Qualityp6715%
Versatilityp77.712%
Trajectoryp9910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.876× par120bp8444.1%
Wicket rate0.15/ov120bp24.544.1%
Boundary %12%120bp8411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.833× par97bp92.650%
Econ vs LHB1.06× par23bp62.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +36.5 · induced false-shot 22%
24.9Death28.9% of overs · 3w · 12.79 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp9.548%
Impactp1.225%
Versatilityp54.615%
Trajectoryp9912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.177× par61bp8.350%
Wicket rate0.29/ov61bp15.516.7%
Boundary %33%61bp8.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%61bp63.940%
Slower ball061bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer061bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -69.8
Vivek Vashisht
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
58.3
Scout Score
Overs 20.3 · Wkts 7 · Runs 188 · Econ 9.17
58.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay47.448.8%23.1
Middle59.917.1%10.2
Death73.134.1%24.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p45.21×
Scout Score58.3
47.4Powerplay48.8% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.138%
Impactp60.227%
Qualityp46.615%
Versatilityp47.510%
Trajectoryp45.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.982× par60bp62.536.8%
Wicket rate0.10/ov60bp842.1%
Boundary %27%60bp60.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.045× par52bp44.330%
Econ vs LHB0.464× par8bp80.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.11/ov52bp820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp4220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.2 · induced false-shot 22%
59.9Middle17.1% of overs · 1w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.838%
Impactp64.925%
Qualityp79.815%
Versatilityp56.412%
Trajectoryp45.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.994× par21bp5044.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov21bp58.544.1%
Boundary %14%21bp5011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.01× par20bp54.350%
Econ vs LHB0.739× par1bp58.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.2 · induced false-shot 33%
73.1Death34.1% of overs · 5w · 8.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.748%
Impactp89.325%
Versatilityp34.615%
Trajectoryp45.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.789× par42bp84.550%
Wicket rate0.71/ov42bp9416.7%
Boundary %19%42bp77.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%42bp13.940%
Slower ball042bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer042bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.6
Ishaan Garg
Bowler · Off-spin
56.5
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 142 · Econ 8.35
56.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay65.229.4%19.2
Middle56.358.8%33.1
Death35.911.8%4.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p261.08×
Scout Score56.5
65.2Powerplay29.4% of overs · 2w · 9.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.338%
Impactp6727%
Qualityp77.315%
Versatilityp61.610%
Trajectoryp2610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.943× par30bp64.836.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp78.442.1%
Boundary %23%30bp63.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.092× par18bp39.830%
Econ vs LHB0.721× par12bp73.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov18bp54.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.50/ov12bp8320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.9 · induced false-shot 30%
56.3Middle58.8% of overs · 3w · 6.7 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp78.538%
Impactp1.125%
Qualityp94.715%
Versatilityp78.712%
Trajectoryp2610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.833× par60bp81.944.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp71.344.1%
Boundary %8%60bp92.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.821× par31bp71.350%
Econ vs LHB0.841× par29bp86.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -66.5 · induced false-shot 30%
35.9Death11.8% of overs · 1w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.955%
Impactp34.525%
Versatilityp47.58%
Trajectoryp2612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.243× par12bp32.143.6%
Boundary %33%12bp35.741.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp54.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.048bp47.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.2
Amrit Lubana
Bowler · Off-spin · age 29
55.6
Scout Score
Overs 29.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 258 · Econ 8.9
55.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay48.220.7%10.0
Middle59.865.5%39.2
Death46.913.8%6.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p83.70.92×
Scout Score55.6
48.2Powerplay20.7% of overs · 1w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.538%
Impactp76.127%
Qualityp815%
Versatilityp41.810%
Trajectoryp83.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.113× par36bp37.536.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp39.842.1%
Boundary %33%36bp28.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.317× par18bp19.330%
Econ vs LHB0.927× par18bp5830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov18bp14.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.34/ov18bp78.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.7 · induced false-shot 11%
59.8Middle65.5% of overs · 4w · 7.47 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.838%
Impactp73.425%
Qualityp3.215%
Versatilityp78.712%
Trajectoryp83.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.929× par114bp73.444.1%
Wicket rate0.21/ov114bp41.544.1%
Boundary %11%114bp86.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.974× par53bp64.950%
Econ vs LHB0.884× par61bp92.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.2 · induced false-shot 13%
46.9Death13.8% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.155%
Impactp32.125%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp83.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.105× par24bp41.743.6%
Boundary %25%24bp51.241.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp38.114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.8
Markanday Panchal
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 18
53.3
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 60 · Econ 8.57
53.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle33.657.1%19.2
Death79.542.9%34.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p56.71×
Scout Score53.3
33.6Middle57.1% of overs · 0w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.138%
Impactp38.325%
Qualityp39.415%
Versatilityp33.512%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.305× par24bp21.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp20.244.1%
Boundary %21%24bp31.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.31× par24bp22.350%
Econ vs LHB—0bp44.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.1 · induced false-shot 17%
79.5Death42.9% of overs · 1w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.455%
Impactp84.525%
Versatilityp658%
Trajectoryp56.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.552× par18bp89.343.6%
Boundary %6%18bp92.941.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp45.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.5518bp65100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.5
Sahibjit Singh Billing
Bowler · Off-spin · age 23
52.5
Scout Score
Overs 28.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 244 · Econ 8.71
52.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay82.132.1%26.4
Middle3350%16.5
Death53.617.9%9.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p91.30.85×
Scout Score52.5
82.1Powerplay32.1% of overs · 4w · 8.44 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp8338%
Impactp94.327%
Qualityp54.515%
Versatilityp78.210%
Trajectoryp91.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.83× par54bp8336.8%
Wicket rate0.44/ov54bp87.542.1%
Boundary %24%54bp73.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.969× par37bp64.830%
Econ vs LHB0.509× par17bp94.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.32/ov37bp60.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.71/ov17bp9220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +23.2 · induced false-shot 22%
33Middle50% of overs · 2w · 8.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.238%
Impactp3.225%
Qualityp9.615%
Versatilityp56.412%
Trajectoryp91.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.039× par84bp47.944.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov84bp26.644.1%
Boundary %16%84bp54.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.162× par38bp35.150%
Econ vs LHB0.931× par46bp77.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -39.3 · induced false-shot 13%
53.6Death17.9% of overs · 3w · 10.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.655%
Impactp36.925%
Versatilityp7.58%
Trajectoryp91.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.939× par30bp58.343.6%
Boundary %23%30bp5641.8%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp73.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.4715bp7.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.1
Mohit Soni
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
50.2
Scout Score
Overs 22.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 223 · Econ 10.14
50.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.345.5%16.5
Middle65.836.4%24.0
Death53.818.2%9.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p72.10.96×
Scout Score50.2
36.3Powerplay45.5% of overs · 0w · 10.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.738%
Impactp1727%
Qualityp69.315%
Versatilityp27.510%
Trajectoryp72.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.061× par60bp48.936.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov60bp1.142.1%
Boundary %28%60bp53.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.901× par34bp73.930%
Econ vs LHB1.307× par26bp10.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov34bp3.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov26bp820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -36.4 · induced false-shot 25%
65.8Middle36.4% of overs · 3w · 8.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.638%
Impactp62.825%
Qualityp92.615%
Versatilityp46.812%
Trajectoryp72.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.01× par48bp54.344.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp8444.1%
Boundary %25%48bp5.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.935× par36bp6750%
Econ vs LHB1.231× par12bp26.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.5 · induced false-shot 31%
53.8Death18.2% of overs · 1w · 12.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.348%
Impactp9425%
Versatilityp34.615%
Trajectoryp72.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.151× par24bp27.450%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp38.116.7%
Boundary %29%24bp42.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%24bp13.940%
Slower ball024bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer024bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7.6
Anish Mittal
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
50.1
Scout Score
Overs 8.2 · Wkts 2 · Runs 90 · Econ 10.8
50.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay35.148%16.8
Middle70.136%25.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p56.71×
Scout Score50.1
35.1Powerplay48% of overs · 0w · 12.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.238%
Impactp44.327%
Qualityp4215%
Versatilityp34.810%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.203× par24bp30.736.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp11.442.1%
Boundary %38%24bp19.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.156× par22bp28.430%
Econ vs LHB1.545× par2bp35.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov22bp10.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov2bp68.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16 · induced false-shot 21%
70.1Middle36% of overs · 1w · 6.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.638%
Impactp69.125%
Qualityp98.915%
Versatilityp61.712%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.787× par18bp64.944.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp64.944.1%
Boundary %6%18bp71.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.029× par8bp47.950%
Econ vs LHB0.591× par10bp75.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.2 · induced false-shot 44%
Rahul Khajan Singh
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 33
47.2
Scout Score
Overs 41.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 341 · Econ 8.32
47.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay38.141.5%15.8
Middle54.441.5%22.6
Death5217.1%8.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p10.61.2×
Scout Score47.2
38.1Powerplay41.5% of overs · 3w · 8.94 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.938%
Impactp3327%
Qualityp5.715%
Versatilityp4510%
Trajectoryp10.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.878× par102bp85.236.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov102bp26.142.1%
Boundary %24%102bp8321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.773× par80bp9230%
Econ vs LHB1.264× par22bp21.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.22/ov80bp4220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov22bp12.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.7 · induced false-shot 15%
54.4Middle41.5% of overs · 4w · 7.35 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.338%
Impactp60.625%
Qualityp26.615%
Versatilityp74.512%
Trajectoryp10.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.914× par102bp79.844.1%
Wicket rate0.23/ov102bp52.144.1%
Boundary %14%102bp69.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.839× par66bp81.950%
Econ vs LHB1.046× par36bp6750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.5 · induced false-shot 17%
52Death17.1% of overs · 2w · 9.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.655%
Impactp51.225%
Versatilityp37.58%
Trajectoryp10.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.842× par42bp72.643.6%
Boundary %21%42bp65.541.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp3114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.8530bp37.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.6
Somit
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 25
47
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 159 · Econ 8.83
47OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay58.544.4%26.0
Middle26.538.9%10.3
Death64.516.7%10.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p70.20.97×
Scout Score47
58.5Powerplay44.4% of overs · 1w · 8.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.238%
Impactp62.527%
Qualityp5815%
Versatilityp60.210%
Trajectoryp70.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.847× par48bp76.136.8%
Wicket rate0.13/ov48bp1742.1%
Boundary %21%48bp80.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.922× par37bp71.630%
Econ vs LHB0.562× par11bp85.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.16/ov37bp30.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp35.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.4 · induced false-shot 23%
26.5Middle38.9% of overs · 0w · 9.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.338%
Impactp18.125%
Qualityp11.715%
Versatilityp45.712%
Trajectoryp70.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.154× par42bp3344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov42bp3.244.1%
Boundary %19%42bp37.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.168× par41bp3350%
Econ vs LHB0.739× par1bp58.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.3 · induced false-shot 12%
64.5Death16.7% of overs · 1w · 8.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.655%
Impactp7525%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp70.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.767× par18bp67.943.6%
Boundary %22%18bp58.341.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp45.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.9215bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.8
Gurtaj Singh Bains
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
46.9
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 69 · Econ 11.5
46.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle46.983.3%39.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p56.71×
Scout Score46.9
46.9Middle83.3% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp33.938%
Impactp41.525%
Qualityp90.415%
Versatilityp37.212%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.243× par30bp24.544.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp45.744.1%
Boundary %23%30bp24.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.319× par21bp24.550%
Econ vs LHB1.067× par9bp5050%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.5 · induced false-shot 33%
Abhishek Singh
Bowler · Off-spin · age 23
46.3
Scout Score
Overs 36.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 343 · Econ 9.53
46.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay26.311.1%2.9
Middle37.547.2%17.7
Death61.541.7%25.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p12.51.18×
Scout Score46.3
26.3Powerplay11.1% of overs · 0w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp23.938%
Impactp39.827%
Qualityp10.215%
Versatilityp37.310%
Trajectoryp12.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.179× par24bp3336.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp11.442.1%
Boundary %33%24bp3321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.468× par13bp14.830%
Econ vs LHB0.843× par11bp6730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov13bp28.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp35.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18 · induced false-shot 8%
37.5Middle47.2% of overs · 2w · 8.94 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp2538%
Impactp56.425%
Qualityp43.615%
Versatilityp51.112%
Trajectoryp12.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.111× par102bp35.144.1%
Wicket rate0.12/ov102bp13.844.1%
Boundary %19%102bp28.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.226× par72bp13.850%
Econ vs LHB0.837× par30bp88.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.6 · induced false-shot 20%
61.5Death41.7% of overs · 5w · 9.53 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.155%
Impactp53.625%
Versatilityp808%
Trajectoryp12.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.878× par90bp77.443.6%
Boundary %20%90bp84.541.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov90bp27.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.5522bp80100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.3
Anant Malik
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
45.1
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 49 · Econ 12.25
45.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay45.175%33.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p56.71×
Scout Score45.1
45.1Powerplay75% of overs · 1w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.538%
Impactp4227%
Qualityp65.915%
Versatilityp39.310%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.375× par18bp19.336.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp64.842.1%
Boundary %44%18bp14.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.367× par11bp26.130%
Econ vs LHB1.413× par7bp26.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.55/ov11bp70.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp47.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.8 · induced false-shot 28%
Mandeep Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
44.5
Scout Score
Overs 17.2 · Wkts 4 · Runs 200 · Econ 11.54
44.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay64.451.9%33.4
Middle2528.8%7.2
Death20.219.2%3.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p241.08×
Scout Score44.5
64.4Powerplay51.9% of overs · 3w · 9.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.738%
Impactp73.927%
Qualityp54.515%
Versatilityp65.910%
Trajectoryp2410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.917× par54bp69.336.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp70.542.1%
Boundary %22%54bp78.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.981× par33bp60.230%
Econ vs LHB0.824× par21bp76.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.18/ov33bp37.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.57/ov21bp87.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.9 · induced false-shot 22%
25Middle28.8% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.838%
Impactp1625%
Qualityp64.915%
Versatilityp8.512%
Trajectoryp2410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.491× par30bp1.144.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp45.744.1%
Boundary %33%30bp1.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.541× par17bp9.650%
Econ vs LHB1.421× par13bp7.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -20 · induced false-shot 23%
20.2Death19.2% of overs · 0w · 16.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp3.648%
Impactp41.725%
Versatilityp34.615%
Trajectoryp2412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.547× par20bp3.650%
Wicket rate0.00/ov20bp3.616.7%
Boundary %45%20bp3.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%20bp13.940%
Slower ball020bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer020bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.3
Yuvraj Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 19
44.4
Scout Score
Overs 30.5 · Wkts 18 · Runs 381 · Econ 12.36
44.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay50.471.4%36.0
Death29.428.6%8.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p31.71.03×
Scout Score44.4
50.4Powerplay71.4% of overs · 11w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.938%
Impactp23.927%
Qualityp94.315%
Versatilityp54.110%
Trajectoryp31.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.13× par132bp23.936.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov132bp96.642.1%
Boundary %31%132bp30.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.021× par90bp5830%
Econ vs LHB1.383× par42bp1.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.53/ov90bp96.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.43/ov42bp85.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -28 · induced false-shot 30%
29.4Death28.6% of overs · 7w · 14.49 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp17.148%
Impactp48.825%
Versatilityp34.615%
Trajectoryp31.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.334× par53bp1.250%
Wicket rate0.79/ov53bp96.416.7%
Boundary %38%53bp1.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%53bp13.940%
Slower ball053bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer053bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6
Harshit Singh
Bowler · Off-spin · age 24
43.5
Scout Score
Overs 19.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 186 · Econ 9.79
43.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay26.315.8%4.2
Middle52.657.9%30.5
Death33.826.3%8.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p8.71.22×
Scout Score43.5
26.3Powerplay15.8% of overs · 0w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.638%
Impactp37.527%
Qualityp12.515%
Versatilityp33.410%
Trajectoryp8.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.277× par18bp26.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp21.642.1%
Boundary %33%18bp37.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.028× par9bp46.630%
Econ vs LHB1.58× par9bp14.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov9bp35.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov9bp39.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.3 · induced false-shot 6%
52.6Middle57.9% of overs · 3w · 7.18 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp6738%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp45.715%
Versatilityp57.412%
Trajectoryp8.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.893× par66bp71.344.1%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp60.644.1%
Boundary %12%66bp74.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.316× par29bp18.150%
Econ vs LHB0.559× par37bp96.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.8 · induced false-shot 20%
33.8Death26.3% of overs · 1w · 13.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp17.855%
Impactp79.825%
Versatilityp37.58%
Trajectoryp8.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.252× par30bp16.743.6%
Boundary %30%30bp21.441.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp10.714.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7514bp37.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.2
Rohit Dhanda
Bowler · RA pace · age 28
42.5
Scout Score
Overs 37.0 · Wkts 14 · Runs 405 · Econ 10.95
42.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay34.359.5%20.4
Middle55.28.1%4.5
Death54.232.4%17.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p16.31.16×
Scout Score42.5
34.3Powerplay59.5% of overs · 9w · 11.77 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.138%
Impactp1.127%
Qualityp8315%
Versatilityp3210%
Trajectoryp16.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.157× par132bp12.536.8%
Wicket rate0.41/ov132bp9242.1%
Boundary %36%132bp3.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.119× par94bp23.930%
Econ vs LHB1.252× par38bp5.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.51/ov94bp94.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.16/ov38bp21.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -88.8 · induced false-shot 27%
55.2Middle8.1% of overs · 1w · 7.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.138%
Impactp6725%
Qualityp41.515%
Versatilityp61.712%
Trajectoryp16.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.953× par18bp56.444.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp64.944.1%
Boundary %11%18bp64.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.915× par9bp58.550%
Econ vs LHB0.985× par9bp64.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.8 · induced false-shot 17%
54.2Death32.4% of overs · 4w · 10.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.348%
Impactp60.725%
Versatilityp4815%
Trajectoryp16.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.944× par72bp63.150%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp34.516.7%
Boundary %21%72bp7533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%72bp47.240%
Slower ball072bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer072bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.4
Raman Bishnoi
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 28
41.6
Scout Score
Overs 38.0 · Wkts 11 · Runs 403 · Econ 10.61
41.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay14.221.1%3.0
Middle56.850%28.4
Death35.328.9%10.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p95.20.74×
Scout Score41.6
14.2Powerplay21.1% of overs · 0w · 14.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp3.538%
Impactp5.727%
Qualityp3.415%
Versatilityp12.710%
Trajectoryp95.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.461× par48bp1.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov48bp3.442.1%
Boundary %40%48bp821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.453× par37bp1.130%
Econ vs LHB1.461× par11bp1730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov37bp1.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp35.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -57.7 · induced false-shot 8%
56.8Middle50% of overs · 6w · 8.32 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.838%
Impactp30.925%
Qualityp71.315%
Versatilityp38.312%
Trajectoryp95.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.033× par114bp52.144.1%
Wicket rate0.32/ov114bp81.944.1%
Boundary %18%114bp39.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.925× par89bp73.450%
Econ vs LHB1.418× par25bp3.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.7 · induced false-shot 23%
35.3Death28.9% of overs · 5w · 11.45 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.355%
Impactp3.625%
Versatilityp37.58%
Trajectoryp95.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.055× par66bp34.543.6%
Boundary %27%66bp29.841.8%
Wicket rate0.46/ov66bp60.714.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.151bp37.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -58.2
Devang Kaushik
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 21
41.2
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 68 · Econ 9.71
41.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle28.871.4%20.6
Death7228.6%20.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p79.80.93×
Scout Score41.2
28.8Middle71.4% of overs · 1w · 10.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.238%
Impactp24.525%
Qualityp14.915%
Versatilityp18.112%
Trajectoryp79.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.342× par30bp13.844.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp45.744.1%
Boundary %27%30bp7.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.269× par23bp26.650%
Econ vs LHB1.583× par7bp9.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.8 · induced false-shot 10%
72Death28.6% of overs · 2w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.455%
Impactp70.225%
Versatilityp83.88%
Trajectoryp79.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.644× par12bp70.243.6%
Boundary %17%12bp61.941.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp88.114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.6412bp83.8100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.5
Hardik Choudhary
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 25
39.7
Scout Score
Overs 34.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 330 · Econ 9.71
39.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay55.532.4%18.0
Middle30.652.9%16.2
Death37.814.7%5.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p740.95×
Scout Score39.7
55.5Powerplay32.4% of overs · 3w · 10.82 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.638%
Impactp5827%
Qualityp62.515%
Versatilityp4210%
Trajectoryp7410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.063× par66bp44.336.8%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp56.842.1%
Boundary %30%66bp44.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.024× par48bp51.130%
Econ vs LHB1.167× par18bp28.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov48bp73.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov18bp1720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.6 · induced false-shot 24%
30.6Middle52.9% of overs · 2w · 8.44 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.638%
Impactp26.625%
Qualityp1.115%
Versatilityp42.612%
Trajectoryp7410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.049× par108bp45.744.1%
Wicket rate0.11/ov108bp7.444.1%
Boundary %16%108bp52.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.018× par86bp60.650%
Econ vs LHB1.175× par22bp24.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.2 · induced false-shot 12%
37.8Death14.7% of overs · 1w · 11.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.755%
Impactp39.325%
Versatilityp33.88%
Trajectoryp7412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.086× par30bp4443.6%
Boundary %30%30bp21.441.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp10.714.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.0118bp33.8100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.4
Sunny Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
39.4
Scout Score
Overs 6.5 · Wkts 0 · Runs 82 · Econ 12
39.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay40.643.9%17.8
Middle38.243.9%16.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p29.81.03×
Scout Score39.4
40.6Powerplay43.9% of overs · 0w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.538%
Impactp51.127%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp4010%
Trajectoryp29.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.113× par18bp4236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp21.642.1%
Boundary %33%18bp37.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.999× par11bp48.930%
Econ vs LHB1.324× par7bp30.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov11bp3320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp47.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.7 · induced false-shot 22%
38.2Middle43.9% of overs · 0w · 10.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.538%
Impactp43.625%
Qualityp61.715%
Versatilityp41.512%
Trajectoryp29.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.326× par18bp26.644.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp28.744.1%
Boundary %28%18bp18.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.871× par12bp1.150%
Econ vs LHB0.246× par6bp81.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.4 · induced false-shot 22%
Karthik Sandil
Bowler · LA pace · age 26
39.2
Scout Score
Overs 23.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 273 · Econ 11.87
39.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.339.1%14.6
Middle40.652.2%21.2
Death40.38.7%3.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p97.10.73×
Scout Score39.2
37.3Powerplay39.1% of overs · 3w · 12.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.138%
Impactp14.827%
Qualityp37.515%
Versatilityp42.310%
Trajectoryp97.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.255× par54bp10.236.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp70.542.1%
Boundary %37%54bp12.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.406× par37bp3.430%
Econ vs LHB0.909× par17bp64.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.49/ov37bp89.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov17bp19.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -38.4 · induced false-shot 20%
40.6Middle52.2% of overs · 4w · 10.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.738%
Impactp38.325%
Qualityp31.915%
Versatilityp11.712%
Trajectoryp97.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.284× par72bp7.444.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp79.844.1%
Boundary %22%72bp10.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.295× par52bp7.450%
Econ vs LHB1.256× par20bp1650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.1 · induced false-shot 17%
40.3Death8.7% of overs · 0w · 17 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp14.148%
Impactp66.725%
Versatilityp34.615%
Trajectoryp97.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.565× par12bp10.750%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp21.416.7%
Boundary %42%12bp15.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp13.940%
Slower ball012bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer012bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Sukhdeep Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 35
38.4
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 94 · Econ 15.67
38.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay3666.7%24.0
Death43.233.3%14.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p56.71×
Scout Score38.4
36Powerplay66.7% of overs · 1w · 16 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp2338%
Impactp19.327%
Qualityp89.815%
Versatilityp28.610%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.572× par24bp3.436.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp51.142.1%
Boundary %54%24bp1.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.445× par18bp10.230%
Econ vs LHB1.957× par6bp12.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov18bp54.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov6bp54.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -36.4 · induced false-shot 42%
43.2Death33.3% of overs · 0w · 15 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp2848%
Impactp5625%
Versatilityp60.215%
Trajectoryp56.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.381× par12bp2550%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp21.416.7%
Boundary %33%12bp35.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%12bp77.840%
Slower ball012bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer012bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.9
Bhagmender Lather
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 29
37.7
Scout Score
Overs 26.4 · Wkts 7 · Runs 232 · Econ 8.7
37.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay71.115%10.7
Middle31.777.5%24.6
Death32.17.5%2.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p2.91.29×
Scout Score37.7
71.1Powerplay15% of overs · 2w · 5 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp88.738%
Impactp85.227%
Qualityp4215%
Versatilityp7810%
Trajectoryp2.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.491× par24bp9236.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp84.142.1%
Boundary %4%24bp9221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.52× par20bp89.830%
Econ vs LHB0.309× par4bp69.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.60/ov20bp87.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp63.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.5 · induced false-shot 21%
31.7Middle77.5% of overs · 5w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.738%
Impactp3325%
Qualityp28.715%
Versatilityp28.712%
Trajectoryp2.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.118× par124bp30.944.1%
Wicket rate0.24/ov124bp54.344.1%
Boundary %19%124bp26.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.102× par91bp37.250%
Econ vs LHB1.164× par33bp20.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.5 · induced false-shot 17%
32.1Death7.5% of overs · 0w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.255%
Impactp46.425%
Versatilityp108%
Trajectoryp2.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.197× par12bp39.343.6%
Boundary %33%12bp35.741.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp21.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.2611bp10100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.2
Arjun Azad
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 24
36.5
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 86 · Econ 9.56
36.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle36.588.9%32.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p56.71×
Scout Score36.5
36.5Middle88.9% of overs · 1w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.238%
Impactp7.425%
Qualityp58.515%
Versatilityp47.312%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.056× par48bp43.644.1%
Wicket rate0.13/ov48bp30.944.1%
Boundary %17%48bp45.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.06× par48bp5050%
Econ vs LHB—0bp44.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -29.2 · induced false-shot 21%
Mohd Ashad
Bowler · LA pace · age 23
36.2
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 83 · Econ 11.86
36.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay52.642.9%22.6
Middle23.957.1%13.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p56.71×
Scout Score36.2
52.6Powerplay42.9% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.238%
Impactp69.327%
Qualityp30.715%
Versatilityp49.510%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.081× par18bp46.636.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp64.842.1%
Boundary %39%18bp22.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.122× par17bp35.230%
Econ vs LHB0× par1bp55.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov17bp1720%
Wkt vs LHB6.00/ov1bp94.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.3 · induced false-shot 17%
23.9Middle57.1% of overs · 0w · 12.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp12.738%
Impactp9.625%
Qualityp56.415%
Versatilityp21.312%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.553× par24bp3.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp20.244.1%
Boundary %25%24bp20.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.103× par19bp41.550%
Econ vs LHB3.25× par5bp1.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -27.9 · induced false-shot 21%
Aryan Duggal
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
36.1
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 206 · Econ 12.88
36.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay35.675%26.7
Death37.525%9.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p41.31.01×
Scout Score36.1
35.6Powerplay75% of overs · 4w · 12.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.238%
Impactp827%
Qualityp80.715%
Versatilityp3510%
Trajectoryp41.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.244× par72bp836.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp73.942.1%
Boundary %36%72bp10.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.264× par59bp5.730%
Econ vs LHB1.094× par13bp37.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.41/ov59bp8320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov13bp27.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -53.8 · induced false-shot 28%
37.5Death25% of overs · 2w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.148%
Impactp20.225%
Versatilityp6815%
Trajectoryp41.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.243× par24bp22.650%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp63.116.7%
Boundary %29%24bp42.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate12%24bp97.240%
Slower ball024bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer024bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.1
Vishu Kashyap
Bowler · Off-spin · age 28
35.3
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 118 · Econ 9.08
35.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.215.4%5.6
Middle35.284.6%29.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p37.51.02×
Scout Score35.3
36.2Powerplay15.4% of overs · 0w · 15 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.838%
Impactp55.727%
Qualityp1715%
Versatilityp39.110%
Trajectoryp37.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.474× par12bp21.636.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp36.442.1%
Boundary %42%12bp26.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.735× par8bp12.530%
Econ vs LHB0.927× par4bp48.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov8bp39.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp63.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.7 · induced false-shot 0%
35.2Middle84.6% of overs · 1w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.738%
Impactp28.725%
Qualityp7.415%
Versatilityp63.812%
Trajectoryp37.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.994× par66bp60.644.1%
Wicket rate0.09/ov66bp11.744.1%
Boundary %12%66bp74.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.035× par47bp56.450%
Econ vs LHB0.894× par19bp71.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.1 · induced false-shot 12%
Hartejassvi Kapoor
Bowler · RA pace · age 30
33.1
Scout Score
Overs 31.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 347 · Econ 11.19
33.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.764.5%23.7
Middle31.26.5%2.0
Death25.629%7.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p35.61.02×
Scout Score33.1
36.7Powerplay64.5% of overs · 4w · 10.3 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.438%
Impactp21.627%
Qualityp3315%
Versatilityp43.610%
Trajectoryp35.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.012× par120bp5836.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov120bp3342.1%
Boundary %28%120bp5821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.009× par90bp62.530%
Econ vs LHB1.01× par30bp46.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.26/ov90bp51.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov30bp3.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -29.7 · induced false-shot 21%
31.2Middle6.5% of overs · 0w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.238%
Impactp35.125%
Qualityp36.215%
Versatilityp35.112%
Trajectoryp35.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.616× par12bp1644.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp35.144.1%
Boundary %33%12bp13.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.701× par11bp11.750%
Econ vs LHB0.739× par1bp58.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.4 · induced false-shot 8%
25.6Death29% of overs · 3w · 12.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp17.148%
Impactp2525%
Versatilityp45.715%
Trajectoryp35.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.176× par54bp13.150%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp41.716.7%
Boundary %32%54bp10.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%54bp41.740%
Slower ball054bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer054bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.6
Harish Kumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
30.5
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 113 · Econ 11.3
30.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle33.950%16.9
Death27.150%13.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p39.41.02×
Scout Score30.5
33.9Middle50% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.838%
Impactp54.325%
Qualityp14.915%
Versatilityp39.412%
Trajectoryp39.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.118× par30bp37.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp9.644.1%
Boundary %20%30bp35.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.105× par21bp39.450%
Econ vs LHB1.149× par9bp39.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.7 · induced false-shot 10%
27.1Death50% of overs · 3w · 13.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp2548%
Impactp15.525%
Versatilityp43.515%
Trajectoryp39.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.252× par30bp16.750%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp73.816.7%
Boundary %33%30bp13.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%30bp36.140%
Slower ball030bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer030bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.3
Sukrant Sharma
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
29.9
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 54 · Econ 10.8
29.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle29.980%23.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p56.71×
Scout Score29.9
29.9Middle80% of overs · 0w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.138%
Impactp45.725%
Qualityp5.315%
Versatilityp29.812%
Trajectoryp56.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.305× par24bp21.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp20.244.1%
Boundary %21%24bp31.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.259× par22bp28.750%
Econ vs LHB1.847× par2bp30.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.5 · induced false-shot 4%
Arpit Singh Pannu
Bowler · Off-spin · age 30
23.9
Scout Score
Overs 29.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 274 · Econ 9.45
23.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay79.910.3%8.2
Middle17.286.2%14.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p14.41.16×
Scout Score23.9
79.9Powerplay10.3% of overs · 3w · 5.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp90.838%
Impactp96.627%
Qualityp65.915%
Versatilityp79.510%
Trajectoryp14.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.524× par18bp87.536.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp94.342.1%
Boundary %6%18bp89.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.94× par8bp53.430%
Econ vs LHB0.185× par10bp96.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.75/ov8bp76.120%
Wkt vs LHB1.20/ov10bp96.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +31 · induced false-shot 28%
17.2Middle86.2% of overs · 5w · 9.72 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.538%
Impactp5.325%
Qualityp18.115%
Versatilityp13.812%
Trajectoryp14.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.208× par150bp11.744.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov150bp37.244.1%
Boundary %17%150bp41.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.235× par103bp5.350%
Econ vs LHB1.147× par47bp22.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -29.2 · induced false-shot 16%
Manish Saini
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
23.5
Scout Score
Overs 24.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 275 · Econ 11.46
23.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay32.725%8.2
Middle17.141.7%7.1
Death24.633.3%8.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p27.91.07×
Scout Score23.5
32.7Powerplay25% of overs · 0w · 10.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp3338%
Impactp12.527%
Qualityp71.615%
Versatilityp32.510%
Trajectoryp27.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.048× par36bp51.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp5.742.1%
Boundary %28%36bp55.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.106× par23bp3330%
Econ vs LHB0.951× par13bp53.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov23bp5.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov13bp27.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -38.7 · induced false-shot 28%
17.1Middle41.7% of overs · 1w · 10.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp11.338%
Impactp20.225%
Qualityp24.515%
Versatilityp10.612%
Trajectoryp27.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.317× par60bp5.344.1%
Wicket rate0.10/ov60bp1644.1%
Boundary %22%60bp1611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.294× par37bp1650%
Econ vs LHB1.349× par23bp5.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16.6 · induced false-shot 15%
24.6Death33.3% of overs · 4w · 13.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp16.348%
Impactp17.925%
Versatilityp60.215%
Trajectoryp27.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.208× par48bp650%
Wicket rate0.50/ov48bp67.916.7%
Boundary %35%48bp633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%48bp77.840%
Slower ball048bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer048bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.2
Abhishek Saini
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
23.1
Scout Score
Overs 16.3 · Wkts 7 · Runs 200 · Econ 12.12
23.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay18.254.5%9.9
Death29.839.4%11.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p4.81.24×
Scout Score23.1
18.2Powerplay54.5% of overs · 1w · 13.11 econ · vs all bowlers n=44
Componentpctweight
Productionp9.538%
Impactp10.227%
Qualityp60.215%
Versatilityp23.210%
Trajectoryp4.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.288× par54bp5.736.8%
Wicket rate0.11/ov54bp14.842.1%
Boundary %39%54bp5.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.308× par42bp830%
Econ vs LHB1.185× par12bp3330%
Wkt vs RHB0.14/ov42bp23.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov12bp30.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -53.5 · induced false-shot 24%
29.8Death39.4% of overs · 6w · 11.69 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.948%
Impactp8.325%
Versatilityp50.215%
Trajectoryp4.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.077× par39bp36.950%
Wicket rate0.92/ov39bp98.816.7%
Boundary %31%39bp17.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%39bp52.840%
Slower ball039bp47.233.3%
Slow bouncer039bp5026.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -43.3
Nitesh Gorsi
Bowler · Leg-spin
19.1
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 123 · Econ 9.46
19.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle19.192.3%17.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p43.31×
Scout Score19.1
19.1Middle92.3% of overs · 1w · 9.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=47
Componentpctweight
Productionp11.638%
Impactp11.725%
Qualityp31.915%
Versatilityp22.312%
Trajectoryp43.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.201× par72bp18.144.1%
Wicket rate0.08/ov72bp5.344.1%
Boundary %22%72bp10.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.183× par43bp30.950%
Econ vs LHB1.223× par29bp13.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -25.7 · induced false-shot 17%