| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 22 | 8 | 167 | 101 | 165.3 | 41.8 | 14 | 9 | 85.2 Scout Score 85.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production91.540% Impact9527% Versatility7515% Shot quality456% Trajectory7512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.22×[57, 8, 11] | 91.5 Production 91.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.33× parp9535% True Avg2.64× parp9530% Balls / boundary3.58p7517.5% Balls / dismissal43p9517.5% | 45 Shot Quality 45 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation85.7% Control · Build73.9% Phase-weighted control82.3% | 95 Impact 95 = WPA percentile · total +62.6 WPA · Powerplay+63 WPA · Consolidation-0.4 | 75 Versatility 75 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp8526.7% vs Spin SRp5526.7% Accel into Consp7520% Pressure entryp8526.7% | |
| 2 | LHB | 29 | 8 | 202 | 148 | 136.5 | 40.4 | 19 | 8 | 62.8 Scout Score 62.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production69.240% Impact5527% Versatility4515% Shot quality556% Trajectory8512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.22×[41, 33, 53] | 69.2 Production 69.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp5535% True Avg1.59× parp8530% Balls / boundary4.75p5517.5% Balls / dismissal38p8517.5% | 55 Shot Quality 55 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build78.4% Phase-weighted control82.3% | 55 Impact 55 = WPA percentile · total -5 WPA · Powerplay-13.1 WPA · Consolidation+8.1 | 45 Versatility 45 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp2526.7% vs Spin SRp4526.7% Accel into Consp6520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 3 | LHB | 28 | 10 | 226 | 136 | 166.2 | 45.2 | 21 | 12 | 58.6 Scout Score 58.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production56.540% Impact6527% Versatility5715% Shot quality956% Trajectory3512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.98×[106, 77, 1] | 56.5 Production 56.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.1× parp8535% True Avg1.19× parp2530% Balls / boundary3.33p9517.5% Balls / dismissal23.33p1517.5% | 95 Shot Quality 95 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87% Control · Build93.5% Phase-weighted control89.6% | 65 Impact 65 = WPA percentile · total +6.9 WPA · Powerplay+15.6 WPA · Consolidation-8.7 | 57 Versatility 57 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp4526.7% vs Spin SRp8526.7% Accel into Consp4520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 4 | LHB | 23 | 8 | 176 | 112 | 157.1 | 35.2 | 14 | 11 | 56.3 Scout Score 56.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production3440% Impact7527% Versatility39.715% Shot quality856% Trajectory9512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.25×[29, 62, 14] | 34 Production 34 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.72× parp1535% True Avgn/ap5530% Balls / boundary7p1517.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap5517.5% | 85 Shot Quality 85 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation89.2% Control · Build79.6% Phase-weighted control85.2% | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile · total +11.3 WPA · Powerplay-1.2 WPA · Consolidation+12.6 | 39.7 Versatility 39.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp7526.7% vs Spin SRp526.7% Accel into Consp8520% Pressure entryp526.7% | |
| 5 | RHB | 24 | 8 | 155 | 93 | 166.7 | 25.8 | 14 | 10 | 52.3 Scout Score 52.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production43.540% Impact8527% Versatility61.715% Shot quality156% Trajectory1512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.84×[45, 12, 32] | 43.5 Production 43.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.11× parp7535% True Avg1.05× parp530% Balls / boundary3.42p8517.5% Balls / dismissal20.5p517.5% | 15 Shot Quality 15 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70% Control · Build77.3% Phase-weighted control72% | 85 Impact 85 = WPA percentile · total +23 WPA · Powerplay+6.8 WPA · Consolidation+16.2 | 61.7 Versatility 61.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp9526.7% vs Spin SRp1526.7% Accel into Consp9520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | 21 | 2 | 136 | 65 | 209.2 | 136 | 7 | 13 | 47.9 Scout Score 47.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production46.240% Impact3527% Versatility6315% Shot quality756% Trajectory5012% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[58, 78] | 46.2 Production 46.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp4535% True Avgn/ap5530% Balls / boundary5p2517.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap5517.5% | 75 Shot Quality 75 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.4% Control · Build85.7% Phase-weighted control84.1% | 35 Impact 35 = WPA percentile · total -10.5 WPA · Powerplay-0.4 WPA · Consolidation-10.1 | 63 Versatility 63 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp6526.7% vs Spin SRp9526.7% Accel into Consp3520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 7 | RHB | — | 5 | 132 | 99 | 133.3 | 66 | 14 | 4 | 47.3 Scout Score 47.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production45.440% Impact4527% Versatility3515% Shot quality656% Trajectory6512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.04×[11, 25, 27] | 45.4 Production 45.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.78× parp3535% True Avgn/ap5530% Balls / boundary5.5p4017.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap5517.5% | 65 Shot Quality 65 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation93.8% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control83.3% | 45 Impact 45 = WPA percentile · total -9.6 WPA · Powerplay-0.4 WPA · Consolidation-9.2 | 35 Versatility 35 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp3526.7% vs Spin SRp3526.7% Accel into Consp1520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 8 | RHB | — | 8 | 144 | 86 | 167.4 | 36 | 12 | 9 | 40.6 Scout Score 40.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production60.240% Impact527% Versatility7115% Shot quality256% Trajectory2512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[5, 2, 62] | 60.2 Production 60.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.15× parp6535% True Avgn/ap5530% Balls / boundary3.5p6517.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap5517.5% | 25 Shot Quality 25 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86.7% Control · Build73.9% Phase-weighted control78.9% | 5 Impact 5 = WPA percentile · total -62.5 WPA · Powerplay+10.2 WPA · Consolidation-72.8 | 71 Versatility 71 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5526.7% vs Spin SRp7526.7% Accel into Consp5520% Pressure entryp9526.7% | |
| 9 | RHB | 26 | 3 | 36 | 42 | 85.7 | 18 | 2 | 2 | 27.8 Scout Score 27.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production28.840% Impact1527% Versatility27.715% Shot quality356% Trajectory5012% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[8, 23, 5] | 28.8 Production 28.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.3× parp535% True Avgn/ap5530% Balls / boundary21p517.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap5517.5% | 35 Shot Quality 35 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation92.3% Control · Build33.3% Phase-weighted control81.2% | 15 Impact 15 = WPA percentile · total -33.3 WPA · Powerplay-22.6 WPA · Consolidation-10.7 | 27.7 Versatility 27.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp526.7% vs Spin SRp6526.7% Accel into Consp2520% Pressure entryp1526.7% | |
| 10 | LHB | 33 | 8 | 33 | 41 | 80.5 | 8.2 | 3 | 1 | 21.2 Scout Score 21.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production24.640% Impact2527% Versatility2515% Shot quality56% Trajectory512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.78×[5, 9, 11] | 24.6 Production 24.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.75× parp2535% True Avg0.76× parp1530% Balls / boundary5.5p4017.5% Balls / dismissal22p2517.5% | 5 Shot Quality 5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation33.3% Control · Build55.6% Phase-weighted control40.7% | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile · total -26.2 WPA · Powerplay-11.7 WPA · Consolidation-14.5 | 25 Versatility 25 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp1526.7% vs Spin SRp2526.7% Accel into Consp520% Pressure entryp5026.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 23 | 7 | 109 | 52 | 209.6 | 54.5 | 9 | 9 | 77.4 Scout Score 77.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production8628% Impact89.327% Versatility48.127% Shot quality82.18% Trajectory96.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.18×[70, 14, 24] | 86 Production 86 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.43× parp96.442.9% True Avg1.65× parp7532.1% Balls / boundary3.29p82.125% | 82.1 Shot Quality 82.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build85% Phase-weighted control82.6% | 89.3 Impact 89.3 = WPA percentile · total +28 WPA · Consolidation-14.8 WPA · Build+42.8 | 48.1 Versatility 48.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox5b5b <min vs Leg-spin6b6b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp4529.6% Off-spin3b3b <min LA-orthodox10bp45 Leg-spin6b6b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p17.914.8% Reach deathp89.311.1% | |
| 2 | LHB | 21 | 5 | 86 | 61 | 141 | 28.7 | 5 | 6 | 64.6 Scout Score 64.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production64.428% Impact96.427% Versatility38.227% Shot quality60.78% Trajectory53.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[23, 12, 51] | 64.4 Production 64.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.05× parp53.642.9% True Avg2.56× parp92.932.1% Balls / boundary5.44p46.425% | 60.7 Shot Quality 60.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation79.3% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control79.6% | 96.4 Impact 96.4 = WPA percentile · total +38.6 WPA · Consolidation+18.1 WPA · Build+20.4 | 38.2 Versatility 38.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep2544.4% vs Off-spin20bp25 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp33.829.6% Off-spin23bp50 LA-orthodox13bp5 Leg-spin4b4b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p7514.8% Reach deathp53.611.1% | |
| 3 | LHB | — | 7 | 108 | 69 | 156.5 | 27 | 14 | 4 | 61.8 Scout Score 61.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.328% Impact82.127% Versatility61.527% Shot quality3.68% Trajectory39.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[48, 26, 10] | 67.3 Production 67.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.15× parp82.142.9% True Avg1.02× parp2532.1% Balls / boundary3.79p96.425% | 3.6 Shot Quality 3.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation58.1% Control · Build77.3% Phase-weighted control66% | 82.1 Impact 82.1 = WPA percentile · total +18.1 WPA · Consolidation+24.3 WPA · Build-6.2 | 61.5 Versatility 61.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin4b4b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp7529.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox11bp75 Leg-spin9b9b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p96.414.8% Reach deathp2511.1% | |
| 4 | RHB | 20 | 4 | 88 | 54 | 163 | 29.3 | 7 | 5 | 58.6 Scout Score 58.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production6428% Impact67.927% Versatility4427% Shot quality46.48% Trajectory67.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[24, 44, 20] | 64 Production 64 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.16× parp7542.9% True Avg1.07× parp46.432.1% Balls / boundary4.62p67.925% | 46.4 Shot Quality 46.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build82.4% Phase-weighted control78.4% | 67.9 Impact 67.9 = WPA percentile · total +14.4 WPA · Consolidation+9.3 WPA · Build+5.1 | 44 Versatility 44 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep2544.4% vs LA-orthodox11bp25 vs Leg-spin9b9b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp6529.6% Off-spin2b2b <min LA-orthodox16bp65 Leg-spin9b9b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p46.414.8% Reach deathp60.711.1% | |
| 5 | RHB | 22 | 10 | 137 | 92 | 148.9 | 22.8 | 12 | 6 | 56.6 Scout Score 56.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production51.528% Impact60.727% Versatility68.727% Shot quality32.18% Trajectory46.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[4, 81, 4] | 51.5 Production 51.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.08× parp60.742.9% True Avg1.04× parp32.132.1% Balls / boundary5.27p60.725% | 32.1 Shot Quality 32.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.8% Control · Build69.4% Phase-weighted control74.1% | 60.7 Impact 60.7 = WPA percentile · total +13.2 WPA · Consolidation-2.2 WPA · Build+15.4 | 68.7 Versatility 68.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7544.4% vs LA-orthodox23bp75 vs Leg-spin15bp75 vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp67.229.6% Off-spin1b1b <min LA-orthodox25bp55 Leg-spin15bp87.5 Chinaman6b6b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p53.614.8% Reach deathp67.911.1% | |
| 6 | RHB | 33 | 9 | 203 | 134 | 151.5 | 33.8 | 21 | 11 | 52.9 Scout Score 52.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production51.328% Impact7527% Versatility53.627% Shot quality258% Trajectory17.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.86×[31, 16, 39] | 51.3 Production 51.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.03× parp46.442.9% True Avg1.06× parp39.332.1% Balls / boundary4.77p7525% | 25 Shot Quality 25 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation69.2% Control · Build73.9% Phase-weighted control71% | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile · total +16.9 WPA · Consolidation+4.2 WPA · Build+12.7 | 53.6 Versatility 53.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep58.344.4% vs LA-orthodox28bp58.3 vs Leg-spin7b7b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp3529.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox39bp35 Leg-spin7b7b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p82.114.8% Reach deathp46.411.1% | |
| 7 | RHB | — | 5 | 74 | 54 | 137 | 24.7 | 7 | 3 | 51.4 Scout Score 51.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production68.928% Impact39.327% Versatility24.527% Shot quality758% Trajectory89.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.15×[56, 7, 8] | 68.9 Production 68.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.12× parp67.942.9% True Avg1.79× parp82.132.1% Balls / boundary5.33p53.625% | 75 Shot Quality 75 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build84.6% Phase-weighted control81.2% | 39.3 Impact 39.3 = WPA percentile · total +7.1 WPA · Consolidation-0.4 WPA · Build+7.5 | 24.5 Versatility 24.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep8.344.4% vs LA-orthodox11bp8.3 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp24.229.6% Off-spin11bp30 LA-orthodox15bp20 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p89.314.8% Reach deathp3.611.1% | |
| 8 | LHB | — | 9 | 88 | 41 | 214.6 | 22 | 8 | 7 | 49.4 Scout Score 49.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production66.328% Impact53.627% Versatility53.627% Shot quality10.78% Trajectory10.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.85×[1, 7, 7] | 66.3 Production 66.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.34× parp89.342.9% True Avg0.7× parp17.932.1% Balls / boundary3p89.325% | 10.7 Shot Quality 10.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation57.1% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 53.6 Impact 53.6 = WPA percentile · total +9.5 WPA · Consolidation+3.4 WPA · Build+6.1 | 53.6 Versatility 53.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin3b3b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp5029.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox8b8b <min Leg-spin7b7b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p39.314.8% Reach deathp96.411.1% | |
| 9 | RHB | 22 | 6 | 153 | 100 | 153 | 76.5 | 14 | 9 | 44.6 Scout Score 44.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production40.728% Impact17.927% Versatility7127% Shot quality39.38% Trajectory60.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[36, 56, 61] | 40.7 Production 40.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.9× parp10.742.9% True Avg2.56× parp92.932.1% Balls / boundary6.33p2525% | 39.3 Shot Quality 39.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation90.5% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control75.4% | 17.9 Impact 17.9 = WPA percentile · total -6.3 WPA · Consolidation-6.7 WPA · Build+0.4 | 71 Versatility 71 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep91.744.4% vs LA-orthodox28bp91.7 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp58.829.6% Off-spin15bp10 LA-orthodox28bp85 Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2514.8% Reach deathp82.111.1% | |
| 10 | LHB | — | 7 | 102 | 73 | 139.7 | 34 | 9 | 5 | 43.6 Scout Score 43.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production2728% Impact32.127% Versatility69.427% Shot quality67.98% Trajectory32.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[7, 62, 15] | 27 Production 27 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.96× parp32.142.9% True Avg0.74× parp10.732.1% Balls / boundary5.75p39.325% | 67.9 Shot Quality 67.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.2% Control · Build77.8% Phase-weighted control80.4% | 32.1 Impact 32.1 = WPA percentile · total +3.8 WPA · Consolidation-2.6 WPA · Build+6.4 | 69.4 Versatility 69.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7544.4% vs Off-spin12bp75 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp59.729.6% Off-spin17bp90 LA-orthodox13bp20 Leg-spin9b9b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p67.914.8% Reach deathp7511.1% | |
| 11 | LHB | 27 | 7 | 92 | 68 | 135.3 | 18.4 | 6 | 5 | 40.6 Scout Score 40.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production46.728% Impact46.427% Versatility38.527% Shot quality53.68% Trajectory3.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.49×[0, 6, 1] | 46.7 Production 46.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp39.342.9% True Avg1.39× parp67.932.1% Balls / boundary6.22p32.125% | 53.6 Shot Quality 53.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76% Control · Build80.6% Phase-weighted control78.6% | 46.4 Impact 46.4 = WPA percentile · total +7.5 WPA · Consolidation-14.1 WPA · Build+21.7 | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin6b6b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp12.529.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox7b7b <min Leg-spin14bp12.5 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p60.714.8% Reach deathp32.111.1% | |
| 12 | RHB | 22 | 6 | 42 | 35 | 120 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 37.2 Scout Score 37.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production32.928% Impact2527% Versatility4327% Shot quality89.38% Trajectory2510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.88×[0, 17, 6] | 32.9 Production 32.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp2542.9% True Avg1.4× parp60.732.1% Balls / boundary7.75p10.725% | 89.3 Shot Quality 89.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build81.5% Phase-weighted control83.9% | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile · total -2 WPA · Consolidation+0.1 WPA · Build-2.1 | 43 Versatility 43 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox1b1b <min vs Leg-spin7b7b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp5029.6% Off-spin4b4b <min LA-orthodox1b1b <min Leg-spin7b7b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p32.114.8% Reach deathp10.711.1% | |
| 13 | RHB | 30 | 7 | 82 | 70 | 117.1 | 27.3 | 2 | 7 | 35.3 Scout Score 35.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production19.628% Impact10.727% Versatility43.227% Shot quality96.48% Trajectory7510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.12×[4, 25, 17] | 19.6 Production 19.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.79× parp3.642.9% True Avgn/ap53.632.1% Balls / boundary9.4p3.625% | 96.4 Shot Quality 96.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build88.9% Phase-weighted control89.4% | 10.7 Impact 10.7 = WPA percentile · total -8 WPA · Consolidation-0.1 WPA · Build-7.9 | 43.2 Versatility 43.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep3544.4% vs LA-orthodox18bp41.7 vs Leg-spin12bp25 vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp73.229.6% Off-spin3b3b <min LA-orthodox23bp95 Leg-spin14bp37.5 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p10.714.8% Reach deathp39.311.1% | |
| 14 | LHB | — | 8 | 83 | 66 | 125.8 | 20.8 | 8 | 3 | 26.3 Scout Score 26.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production13.328% Impact3.627% Versatility44.427% Shot quality17.98% Trajectory82.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.12×[16, 34, 6] | 13.3 Production 13.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.88× parp17.942.9% True Avg0.69× parp3.632.1% Balls / boundary6.71p17.925% | 17.9 Shot Quality 17.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.1% Control · Build61.9% Phase-weighted control68.1% | 3.6 Impact 3.6 = WPA percentile · total -13.2 WPA · Consolidation-14.9 WPA · Build+1.7 | 44.4 Versatility 44.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin8b8b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp66.429.6% Off-spin11bp70 LA-orthodox9b9b <min Leg-spin10bp62.5 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p3.614.8% Reach deathp17.911.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | — | 8 | 117 | 66 | 177.3 | 29.2 | 10 | 8 | 80.4 Scout Score 80.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production83.740% Impact88.525% Versatility61.518% Shot quality84.64% Trajectory79.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[1, 46, 64] | 83.7 Production 83.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.75× parp88.532.5% Balls / boundary2p80.820% Balls / six3p96.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 84.6 Shot Quality 84.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation92.9% Control · Build87.1% Phase-weighted control88.9% | 88.5 Impact 88.5 = WPA percentile · total +30.8 WPA · Death+30.8 | 61.5 Versatility 61.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p57.716.7% Reach buildp96.222.2% | |
| 2 | RHB | 19 | 5 | 149 | 80 | 186.2 | 149 | 13 | 9 | 78.2 Scout Score 78.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production80.240% Impact80.825% Versatility53.418% Shot quality96.24% Trajectory95.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.11×[33, 92, 24] | 80.2 Production 80.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.33× parp80.832.5% Balls / boundary3p88.520% Balls / six5.57p88.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 96.2 Shot Quality 96.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation85.7% Control · Build92.3% Phase-weighted control90.9% | 80.8 Impact 80.8 = WPA percentile · total +8.9 WPA · Death+8.9 | 53.4 Versatility 53.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p19.216.7% Reach buildp88.522.2% | |
| 3 | RHB | 23 | 7 | 196 | 112 | 175 | 196 | 21 | 11 | 74.8 Scout Score 74.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production84.240% Impact96.225% Versatility51.318% Shot quality73.14% Trajectory37.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[60, 68, 15] | 84.2 Production 84.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.29× parp96.232.5% Balls / boundary2.62p96.220% Balls / six6.11p80.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 73.1 Shot Quality 73.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build80.8% Phase-weighted control82.5% | 96.2 Impact 96.2 = WPA percentile · total +43.4 WPA · Death+43.4 | 51.3 Versatility 51.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker5b5b <min vs Slower ball8b8b <min vs Spin (death)p57.716.7% Reach buildp5022.2% | |
| 4 | RHB | 26 | 6 | 54 | 38 | 142.1 | 13.5 | 4 | 4 | 58.1 Scout Score 58.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production69.640% Impact73.125% Versatility54.318% Shot quality15.44% Trajectory12.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.81×[2, 22, 5] | 69.6 Production 69.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR2.15× parp73.132.5% Balls / boundary1.67p73.120% Balls / six1.67p73.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 15.4 Shot Quality 15.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation61.5% Control · Build63.6% Phase-weighted control62.5% | 73.1 Impact 73.1 = WPA percentile · total +6.6 WPA · Death+6.6 | 54.3 Versatility 54.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p96.216.7% Reach buildp34.622.2% | |
| 5 | RHB | — | 3 | 33 | 20 | 165 | 16.5 | 3 | 3 | 52.2 Scout Score 52.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production43.140% Impact65.425% Versatility63.218% Shot quality3.84% Trajectory54.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[38, 18, 15] | 43.1 Production 43.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.82× parp42.332.5% Balls / boundary4p65.420% Balls / six8p26.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 3.8 Shot Quality 3.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation36.4% Control · Build100% Phase-weighted control41.7% | 65.4 Impact 65.4 = WPA percentile · total +0.9 WPA · Death+0.9 | 63.2 Versatility 63.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p88.516.7% Reach buildp80.822.2% | |
| 6 | LHB | 27 | 5 | 60 | 39 | 153.8 | 15 | 3 | 5 | 49.5 Scout Score 49.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4040% Impact42.325% Versatility56.418% Shot quality34.64% Trajectory87.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[10, 43, 1] | 40 Production 40 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp5032.5% Balls / boundary5p5020% Balls / six10p19.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 34.6 Shot Quality 34.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation55.6% Control · Build72% Phase-weighted control67.6% | 42.3 Impact 42.3 = WPA percentile · total -2.7 WPA · Death-2.7 | 56.4 Versatility 56.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p57.716.7% Reach buildp73.122.2% | |
| 7 | RHB | 26 | 7 | 105 | 79 | 132.9 | 26.2 | 15 | 1 | 46.8 Scout Score 46.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production45.440% Impact5025% Versatility49.618% Shot quality84.64% Trajectory29.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[32, 16, 20] | 45.4 Production 45.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap57.732.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap26.920% Balls / sixn/ap42.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 84.6 Shot Quality 84.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build87.5% Phase-weighted control88.9% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 49.6 Versatility 49.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p57.716.7% Reach buildp42.322.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | 23 | 1 | 24 | 20 | 120 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 42.7 Scout Score 42.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production42.740% Impact34.625% Versatility47.918% Shot quality46.24% Trajectory5013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)n/a[24] | 42.7 Production 42.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0× parp30.832.5% Balls / boundary2p38.520% Balls / six2p53.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 46.2 Shot Quality 46.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build73.7% Phase-weighted control73.7% | 34.6 Impact 34.6 = WPA percentile · total -3.1 WPA · Death-3.1 | 47.9 Versatility 47.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p26.916.7% Reach buildp57.722.2% | |
| 9 | RHB | — | 6 | 34 | 30 | 113.3 | 11.3 | 2 | 1 | 41.1 Scout Score 41.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production61.540% Impact11.525% Versatility46.218% Shot quality65.44% Trajectory20.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[25, 9, 0] | 61.5 Production 61.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.19× parp65.432.5% Balls / boundary2p57.720% Balls / six4p65.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 65.4 Shot Quality 65.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70% Control · Build83.3% Phase-weighted control78.6% | 11.5 Impact 11.5 = WPA percentile · total -11 WPA · Death-11 | 46.2 Versatility 46.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p57.716.7% Reach buildp26.922.2% | |
| 10 | LHB | — | 3 | 28 | 26 | 107.7 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 38.7 Scout Score 38.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production17.340% Impact57.725% Versatility4718% Shot quality46.24% Trajectory54.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[1, 5, 23] | 17.3 Production 17.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.43× parp11.532.5% Balls / boundary14p11.520% Balls / six14p11.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 46.2 Shot Quality 46.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control73.7% | 57.7 Impact 57.7 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 47 Versatility 47 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p11.516.7% Reach buildp65.422.2% | |
| 11 | RHB | 31 | 6 | 28 | 28 | 100 | 9.3 | 3 | 0 | 36.9 Scout Score 36.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production42.740% Impact3.825% Versatility4118% Shot quality57.74% Trajectory70.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.02×[20, 5, 3] | 42.7 Production 42.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0× parp30.832.5% Balls / boundary2p38.520% Balls / six2p53.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 57.7 Shot Quality 57.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build78.3% Phase-weighted control77.8% | 3.8 Impact 3.8 = WPA percentile · total -11.9 WPA · Death-11.9 | 41 Versatility 41 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p57.716.7% Reach buildp3.822.2% | |
| 12 | RHB | 22 | 5 | 20 | 25 | 80 | 6.7 | 0 | 1 | 27.1 Scout Score 27.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production28.840% Impact26.925% Versatility42.718% Shot quality15.44% Trajectory4.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.67×[5, 2, 13] | 28.8 Production 28.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.3× parp19.232.5% Balls / boundary8p19.220% Balls / six8p34.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 15.4 Shot Quality 15.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation62.5% Control · Build62.5% Phase-weighted control62.5% | 26.9 Impact 26.9 = WPA percentile · total -7.9 WPA · Death-7.9 | 42.7 Versatility 42.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p57.716.7% Reach buildp11.522.2% | |
| 13 | RHB | — | 2 | 26 | 43 | 60.5 | 26 | 0 | 1 | 23.6 Scout Score 23.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production10.840% Impact19.225% Versatility35.518% Shot quality26.94% Trajectory54.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[22, 4] | 10.8 Production 10.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.28× parp3.832.5% Balls / boundary30p3.820% Balls / six30p3.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 26.9 Shot Quality 26.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control65.4% | 19.2 Impact 19.2 = WPA percentile · total -9.2 WPA · Death-9.2 | 35.5 Versatility 35.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p3.816.7% Reach buildp19.222.2% |
Satya Setu
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 22
85.2
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 167 · Balls 101 · SR 165.3 · Avg 41.8 · 4s 14 · 6s 9
85.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production91.540%36.6
Impact *9527%25.6
Versatility7515%11.2
Shot quality456%2.7
Trajectory7512%9.0
Scout Score85.2
91.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1931.33×43bp9535%
True Avg832.64×1wp9530%
Balls / boundary3.6—43bp7517.5%
Balls / dismissal43—1wp9517.5%
95Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +62.6
WPA · Powerplay+63
WPA · Consolidation-0.4
75VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR190 SR1.22×50bp8526.7%
vs Spin SR141.2 SR1.04×51bp5526.7%
Accel into Cons164.3 SR—28bp7520%
Pressure entry131.4 SR0.91×70bp8526.7%
45Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation85.7%
Control · Build73.9%
Phase-weighted control82.3% → p45
75Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.22×
Recent scores[57, 8, 11]
Innings8
Harsh Rana
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB
80.4
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 117 · Balls 66 · SR 177.3 · Avg 29.2 · 4s 10 · 6s 8
80.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production83.740%33.5
Impact *88.525%22.1
Versatility61.518%11.1
Shot quality84.64%3.4
Trajectory79.213%10.3
Scout Score80.4
83.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR294.41.75×18bp88.532.5%
Balls / boundary2—18bp80.820%
Balls / six3—18bp96.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
88.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +30.8
WPA · Death+30.8
61.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.716.7%
Reach build171 SR1.12×31bp96.222.2%
84.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation92.9%
Control · Build87.1%
Phase-weighted control88.9% → p84.6
79.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[1, 46, 64]
Innings8
Anmol Raj
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 19
78.2
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 149 · Balls 80 · SR 186.2 · Avg 149 · 4s 13 · 6s 9
78.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production80.240%32.1
Impact *80.825%20.2
Versatility53.418%9.6
Shot quality96.24%3.8
Trajectory95.813%12.5
Scout Score78.2
80.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR223.11.33×39bp80.832.5%
Balls / boundary3—39bp88.520%
Balls / six5.6—39bp88.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
80.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +8.9
WPA · Death+8.9
53.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball140 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)80 SR0.51×5bp19.216.7%
Reach build169.2 SR1.11×26bp88.522.2%
96.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation85.7%
Control · Build92.3%
Phase-weighted control90.9% → p96.2
95.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.11×
Recent scores[33, 92, 24]
Innings5
Rajandeep Singh
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 23
77.4
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 109 · Balls 52 · SR 209.6 · Avg 54.5 · 4s 9 · 6s 9
77.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production8628%24.1
Impact *89.327%24.1
Versatility48.127%13.0
Shot quality82.18%6.6
Trajectory96.410%9.6
Scout Score77.4
86ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR204.31.43×23bp96.442.9%
True Avg471.65×1wp7532.1%
Balls / boundary3.3—23bp82.125%
89.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +28
WPA · Consolidation-14.8
WPA · Build+42.8
48.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox140 SR5b5b <min
vs Leg-spin467 SR6b6b <min
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p4529.6%
Off-spin167 SR3b3b <min
LA-orthodox130 SR10bp45
Leg-spin467 SR6b6b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)50 SR0.32×6bp17.914.8%
Reach death213.8 SR1.27×29bp89.311.1%
82.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build85%
Phase-weighted control82.6% → p82.1
96.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.18×
Recent scores[70, 14, 24]
Innings7
Md Kounain Quraishi
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 23
74.8
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 196 · Balls 112 · SR 175 · Avg 196 · 4s 21 · 6s 11
74.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production84.240%33.7
Impact *96.225%24.1
Versatility51.318%9.2
Shot quality73.14%2.9
Trajectory37.513%4.9
Scout Score74.8
84.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR216.41.29×55bp96.232.5%
Balls / boundary2.6—55bp96.220%
Balls / six6.1—55bp80.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
96.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +43.4
WPA · Death+43.4
51.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker60 SR5b5b <min
vs Slower ball312 SR8b8b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.716.7%
Reach build134.6 SR0.88×52bp5022.2%
73.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build80.8%
Phase-weighted control82.5% → p73.1
37.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[60, 68, 15]
Innings6
Himanshu Dwivedi
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 21
64.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 86 · Balls 61 · SR 141 · Avg 28.7 · 4s 5 · 6s 6
64.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production64.428%18.0
Impact *96.427%26.0
Versatility38.227%10.3
Shot quality60.78%4.9
Trajectory53.610%5.4
Scout Score64.6
64.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1491.05×49bp53.642.9%
True Avg732.56×1wp92.932.1%
Balls / boundary5.4—49bp46.425%
96.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +38.6
WPA · Consolidation+18.1
WPA · Build+20.4
38.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p2544.4%
vs Off-spin145 SR20bp25
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball600 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p33.829.6%
Off-spin135 SR23bp50
LA-orthodox92 SR13bp5
Leg-spin150 SR4b4b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)200 SR1.27×16bp7514.8%
Reach death150 SR0.89×8bp53.611.1%
60.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation79.3%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control79.6% → p60.7
53.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[23, 12, 51]
Innings5
Kumar Suraj
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 29
62.8
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 202 · Balls 148 · SR 136.5 · Avg 40.4 · 4s 19 · 6s 8
62.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production69.240%27.7
Impact *5527%14.8
Versatility4515%6.8
Shot quality556%3.3
Trajectory8512%10.2
Scout Score62.8
69.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR131.60.91×38bp5535%
True Avg501.59×1wp8530%
Balls / boundary4.8—38bp5517.5%
Balls / dismissal38—1wp8517.5%
55Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5
WPA · Powerplay-13.1
WPA · Consolidation+8.1
45VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR129.5 SR0.83×61bp2526.7%
vs Spin SR141.4 SR1.04×87bp4526.7%
Accel into Cons140.3 SR—72bp6520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
55Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build78.4%
Phase-weighted control82.3% → p55
85Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.22×
Recent scores[41, 33, 53]
Innings8
Lakshya
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB
61.8
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 108 · Balls 69 · SR 156.5 · Avg 27 · 4s 14 · 6s 4
61.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.328%18.8
Impact *82.127%22.2
Versatility61.527%16.6
Shot quality3.68%0.3
Trajectory39.310%3.9
Scout Score61.8
67.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR164.21.15×53bp82.142.9%
True Avg291.02×3wp2532.1%
Balls / boundary3.8—53bp96.425%
82.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +18.1
WPA · Consolidation+24.3
WPA · Build-6.2
61.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin75 SR4b4b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball320 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p7529.6%
Off-spin100 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox145 SR11bp75
Leg-spin111 SR9b9b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)200 SR1.27×29bp96.414.8%
Reach death50 SR0.3×2bp2511.1%
3.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation58.1%
Control · Build77.3%
Phase-weighted control66% → p3.6
39.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[48, 26, 10]
Innings7
Virat Singh
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 28
58.6
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 226 · Balls 136 · SR 166.2 · Avg 45.2 · 4s 21 · 6s 12
58.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production56.540%22.6
Impact *6527%17.6
Versatility5715%8.6
Shot quality956%5.7
Trajectory3512%4.2
Scout Score58.6
56.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1601.1×70bp8535%
True Avg37.31.19×3wp2530%
Balls / boundary3.3—70bp9517.5%
Balls / dismissal23.3—3wp1517.5%
65Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +6.9
WPA · Powerplay+15.6
WPA · Consolidation-8.7
57VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR162.5 SR1.04×56bp4526.7%
vs Spin SR168.8 SR1.24×80bp8526.7%
Accel into Cons117.4 SR—23bp4520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
95Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87%
Control · Build93.5%
Phase-weighted control89.6% → p95
35Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.98×
Recent scores[106, 77, 1]
Innings10
Bisesh Dutta
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 20
58.6
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 88 · Balls 54 · SR 163 · Avg 29.3 · 4s 7 · 6s 5
58.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production6428%17.9
Impact *67.927%18.3
Versatility4427%11.9
Shot quality46.48%3.7
Trajectory67.910%6.8
Scout Score58.6
64ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR164.91.16×37bp7542.9%
True Avg30.51.07×2wp46.432.1%
Balls / boundary4.6—37bp67.925%
67.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +14.4
WPA · Consolidation+9.3
WPA · Build+5.1
44VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p2544.4%
vs LA-orthodox109 SR11bp25
vs Leg-spin233 SR9b9b <min
vs Short ball600 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p6529.6%
Off-spin100 SR2b2b <min
LA-orthodox138 SR16bp65
Leg-spin233 SR9b9b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)173.3 SR1.1×15bp46.414.8%
Reach death171.4 SR1.02×7bp60.711.1%
46.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build82.4%
Phase-weighted control78.4% → p46.4
67.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[24, 44, 20]
Innings4
Pankaj Kumar
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 26
58.1
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 54 · Balls 38 · SR 142.1 · Avg 13.5 · 4s 4 · 6s 4
58.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production69.640%27.8
Impact *73.125%18.3
Versatility54.318%9.8
Shot quality15.44%0.6
Trajectory12.513%1.6
Scout Score58.1
69.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR3602.15×5bp73.132.5%
Balls / boundary1.7—5bp73.120%
Balls / six1.7—5bp73.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
73.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +6.6
WPA · Death+6.6
54.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)300 SR1.93×2bp96.216.7%
Reach build90.9 SR0.6×11bp34.622.2%
15.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation61.5%
Control · Build63.6%
Phase-weighted control62.5% → p15.4
12.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.81×
Recent scores[2, 22, 5]
Innings6
Ravi Sharma
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 22
56.6
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 137 · Balls 92 · SR 148.9 · Avg 22.8 · 4s 12 · 6s 6
56.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production51.528%14.4
Impact *60.727%16.4
Versatility68.727%18.5
Shot quality32.18%2.6
Trajectory46.410%4.6
Scout Score56.6
51.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR153.41.08×58bp60.742.9%
True Avg29.71.04×3wp32.132.1%
Balls / boundary5.3—58bp60.725%
60.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +13.2
WPA · Consolidation-2.2
WPA · Build+15.4
68.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7544.4%
vs LA-orthodox139 SR23bp75
vs Leg-spin167 SR15bp75
vs Short ball100 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p67.229.6%
Off-spin100 SR1b1b <min
LA-orthodox136 SR25bp55
Leg-spin167 SR15bp87.5
Chinaman150 SR6b6b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)181.8 SR1.15×11bp53.614.8%
Reach death158.3 SR0.94×24bp67.911.1%
32.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.8%
Control · Build69.4%
Phase-weighted control74.1% → p32.1
46.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[4, 81, 4]
Innings10
Robin Minz
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 23
56.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 176 · Balls 112 · SR 157.1 · Avg 35.2 · 4s 14 · 6s 11
56.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production3440%13.6
Impact *7527%20.2
Versatility39.715%6.0
Shot quality856%5.1
Trajectory9512%11.4
Scout Score56.3
34ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR104.80.72×21bp1535%
True Avg——0wp5530%
Balls / boundary7—21bp1517.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp5517.5%
75Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +11.3
WPA · Powerplay-1.2
WPA · Consolidation+12.6
39.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR177.5 SR1.14×71bp7526.7%
vs Spin SR122 SR0.9×41bp526.7%
Accel into Cons164.9 SR—37bp8520%
Pressure entry62.5 SR0.43×16bp526.7%
85Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation89.2%
Control · Build79.6%
Phase-weighted control85.2% → p85
95Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.25×
Recent scores[29, 62, 14]
Innings8
Kumar Deobrat
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 33
52.9
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 203 · Balls 134 · SR 151.5 · Avg 33.8 · 4s 21 · 6s 11
52.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production51.328%14.4
Impact *7527%20.2
Versatility53.627%14.5
Shot quality258%2.0
Trajectory17.910%1.8
Scout Score52.9
51.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR146.81.03×62bp46.442.9%
True Avg30.31.06×3wp39.332.1%
Balls / boundary4.8—62bp7525%
75Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +16.9
WPA · Consolidation+4.2
WPA · Build+12.7
53.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p58.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox118 SR28bp58.3
vs Leg-spin114 SR7b7b <min
vs Short ball175 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p3529.6%
Off-spin150 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox105 SR39bp35
Leg-spin114 SR7b7b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)200 SR1.27×19bp82.114.8%
Reach death——0bp46.411.1%
25Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation69.2%
Control · Build73.9%
Phase-weighted control71% → p25
17.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.86×
Recent scores[31, 16, 39]
Innings9
Ram Roshan Saran
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 24
52.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 155 · Balls 93 · SR 166.7 · Avg 25.8 · 4s 14 · 6s 10
52.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production43.540%17.4
Impact *8527%22.9
Versatility61.715%9.3
Shot quality156%0.9
Trajectory1512%1.8
Scout Score52.3
43.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1611.11×41bp7535%
True Avg331.05×2wp530%
Balls / boundary3.4—41bp8517.5%
Balls / dismissal20.5—2wp517.5%
85Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +23
WPA · Powerplay+6.8
WPA · Consolidation+16.2
61.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR185.1 SR1.19×67bp9526.7%
vs Spin SR119.2 SR0.88×26bp1526.7%
Accel into Cons176.7 SR—30bp9520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
15Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70%
Control · Build77.3%
Phase-weighted control72% → p15
15Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.84×
Recent scores[45, 12, 32]
Innings8
Yuvraj Kumar
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB
52.2
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 33 · Balls 20 · SR 165 · Avg 16.5 · 4s 3 · 6s 3
52.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production43.140%17.2
Impact *65.425%16.4
Versatility63.218%11.4
Shot quality3.84%0.2
Trajectory54.213%7.0
Scout Score52.2
43.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR137.50.82×8bp42.332.5%
Balls / boundary4—8bp65.420%
Balls / six8—8bp26.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
65.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0.9
WPA · Death+0.9
63.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)175 SR1.13×4bp88.516.7%
Reach build400 SR2.63×1bp80.822.2%
3.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation36.4%
Control · Build100%
Phase-weighted control41.7% → p3.8
54.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[38, 18, 15]
Innings3
Yogesh Bhaskar
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
51.4
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 74 · Balls 54 · SR 137 · Avg 24.7 · 4s 7 · 6s 3
51.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production68.928%19.3
Impact *39.327%10.6
Versatility24.527%6.6
Shot quality758%6.0
Trajectory89.310%8.9
Scout Score51.4
68.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR159.41.12×32bp67.942.9%
True Avg511.79×1wp82.132.1%
Balls / boundary5.3—32bp53.625%
39.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +7.1
WPA · Consolidation-0.4
WPA · Build+7.5
24.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p8.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox82 SR11bp8.3
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p24.229.6%
Off-spin118 SR11bp30
LA-orthodox100 SR15bp20
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)223.1 SR1.41×13bp89.314.8%
Reach death100 SR0.6×12bp3.611.1%
75Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build84.6%
Phase-weighted control81.2% → p75
89.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.15×
Recent scores[56, 7, 8]
Innings5
Atul Singh Surwar
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 27
49.5
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 60 · Balls 39 · SR 153.8 · Avg 15 · 4s 3 · 6s 5
49.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4040%16.0
Impact *42.325%10.6
Versatility56.418%10.2
Shot quality34.64%1.4
Trajectory87.513%11.4
Scout Score49.5
40ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1400.83×5bp5032.5%
Balls / boundary5—5bp5020%
Balls / six——5bp19.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
42.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -2.7
WPA · Death-2.7
56.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball50 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.716.7%
Reach build152 SR1×25bp73.122.2%
34.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation55.6%
Control · Build72%
Phase-weighted control67.6% → p34.6
87.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[10, 43, 1]
Innings5
Chandan Mukhi
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB
49.4
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 88 · Balls 41 · SR 214.6 · Avg 22 · 4s 8 · 6s 7
49.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production66.328%18.6
Impact *53.627%14.5
Versatility53.627%14.5
Shot quality10.78%0.9
Trajectory10.710%1.1
Scout Score49.4
66.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR190.51.34×21bp89.342.9%
True Avg200.7×2wp17.932.1%
Balls / boundary3—21bp89.325%
53.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +9.5
WPA · Consolidation+3.4
WPA · Build+6.1
53.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin233 SR3b3b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball250 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p5029.6%
Off-spin275 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox100 SR8b8b <min
Leg-spin271 SR7b7b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)150 SR0.95×4bp39.314.8%
Reach death240 SR1.43×20bp96.411.1%
10.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation57.1%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p10.7
10.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.85×
Recent scores[1, 7, 7]
Innings9
Kumar Kushagra
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 21
47.9
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 136 · Balls 65 · SR 209.2 · Avg 136 · 4s 7 · 6s 13
47.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production46.240%18.5
Impact *3527%9.4
Versatility6315%9.4
Shot quality756%4.5
Trajectory5012%6.0
Scout Score47.9
46.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1200.83×10bp4535%
True Avg——0wp5530%
Balls / boundary5—10bp2517.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp5517.5%
35Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -10.5
WPA · Powerplay-0.4
WPA · Consolidation-10.1
63VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR209.5 SR1.34×21bp6526.7%
vs Spin SR209.1 SR1.54×44bp9526.7%
Accel into Cons105.9 SR—17bp3520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
75Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.4%
Control · Build85.7%
Phase-weighted control84.1% → p75
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[58, 78]
Innings2
Shresth Sagar
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
47.3
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 132 · Balls 99 · SR 133.3 · Avg 66 · 4s 14 · 6s 4
47.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production45.440%18.2
Impact *4527%12.2
Versatility3515%5.2
Shot quality656%3.9
Trajectory6512%7.8
Scout Score47.3
45.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR113.60.78×22bp3535%
True Avg——0wp5530%
Balls / boundary5.5—22bp4017.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp5517.5%
45Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -9.6
WPA · Powerplay-0.4
WPA · Consolidation-9.2
35VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR136.7 SR0.88×60bp3526.7%
vs Spin SR128.2 SR0.94×39bp3526.7%
Accel into Cons87.5 SR—16bp1520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
65Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation93.8%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control83.3% → p65
65Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.04×
Recent scores[11, 25, 27]
Innings5
Aryaman Sen
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 26
46.8
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 105 · Balls 79 · SR 132.9 · Avg 26.2 · 4s 15 · 6s 1
46.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production45.440%18.2
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility49.618%8.9
Shot quality84.64%3.4
Trajectory29.213%3.8
Scout Score46.8
45.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp57.732.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp26.920%
Balls / six——0bp42.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
49.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.716.7%
Reach build112.5 SR0.74×16bp42.322.2%
84.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build87.5%
Phase-weighted control88.9% → p84.6
29.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[32, 16, 20]
Innings7
Sahil Raj
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 22
44.6
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 153 · Balls 100 · SR 153 · Avg 76.5 · 4s 14 · 6s 9
44.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production40.728%11.4
Impact *17.927%4.8
Versatility7127%19.2
Shot quality39.38%3.1
Trajectory60.710%6.1
Scout Score44.6
40.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR128.10.9×57bp10.742.9%
True Avg732.56×1wp92.932.1%
Balls / boundary6.3—57bp2525%
17.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -6.3
WPA · Consolidation-6.7
WPA · Build+0.4
71VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p91.744.4%
vs LA-orthodox146 SR28bp91.7
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball100 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p58.829.6%
Off-spin113 SR15bp10
LA-orthodox146 SR28bp85
Leg-spin333 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)107.1 SR0.68×14bp2514.8%
Reach death206.7 SR1.23×15bp82.111.1%
39.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation90.5%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control75.4% → p39.3
60.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[36, 56, 61]
Innings6
Arvind Kumar
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB
43.6
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 102 · Balls 73 · SR 139.7 · Avg 34 · 4s 9 · 6s 5
43.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production2728%7.6
Impact *32.127%8.7
Versatility69.427%18.7
Shot quality67.98%5.4
Trajectory32.110%3.2
Scout Score43.6
27ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1370.96×46bp32.142.9%
True Avg210.74×3wp10.732.1%
Balls / boundary5.8—46bp39.325%
32.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +3.8
WPA · Consolidation-2.6
WPA · Build+6.4
69.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7544.4%
vs Off-spin150 SR12bp75
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball367 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p59.729.6%
Off-spin147 SR17bp90
LA-orthodox100 SR13bp20
Leg-spin78 SR9b9b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)200 SR1.27×13bp67.914.8%
Reach death225 SR1.34×8bp7511.1%
67.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.2%
Control · Build77.8%
Phase-weighted control80.4% → p67.9
32.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[7, 62, 15]
Innings7
Amit Kumar
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 23
42.7
Scout Score
Inns 1 · Runs 24 · Balls 20 · SR 120 · Avg 24 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
42.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production42.740%17.1
Impact *34.625%8.7
Versatility47.918%8.6
Shot quality46.24%1.8
Trajectory5013%6.5
Scout Score42.7
42.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR00×1bp30.832.5%
Balls / boundary——1bp38.520%
Balls / six——1bp53.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
34.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.1
WPA · Death-3.1
47.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)00×1bp26.916.7%
Reach build126.3 SR0.83×19bp57.722.2%
46.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build73.7%
Phase-weighted control73.7% → p46.2
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)n/a
Recent scores[24]
Innings1
Mohit Kumar
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB
41.1
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 34 · Balls 30 · SR 113.3 · Avg 11.3 · 4s 2 · 6s 1
41.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production61.540%24.6
Impact *11.525%2.9
Versatility46.218%8.3
Shot quality65.44%2.6
Trajectory20.813%2.7
Scout Score41.1
61.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2001.19×2bp65.432.5%
Balls / boundary2—2bp57.720%
Balls / six——2bp65.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
11.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -11
WPA · Death-11
46.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball200 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.716.7%
Reach build105.6 SR0.69×18bp26.922.2%
65.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70%
Control · Build83.3%
Phase-weighted control78.6% → p65.4
20.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[25, 9, 0]
Innings6
Shrestha
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
40.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 144 · Balls 86 · SR 167.4 · Avg 36 · 4s 12 · 6s 9
40.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production60.240%24.1
Impact *527%1.4
Versatility7115%10.7
Shot quality256%1.5
Trajectory2512%3.0
Scout Score40.6
60.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR166.71.15×21bp6535%
True Avg——0wp5530%
Balls / boundary3.5—21bp6517.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp5517.5%
5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -62.5
WPA · Powerplay+10.2
WPA · Consolidation-72.8
71VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR185.7 SR1.19×35bp5526.7%
vs Spin SR154.9 SR1.14×51bp7526.7%
Accel into Cons120 SR—15bp5520%
Pressure entry172.2 SR1.19×36bp9526.7%
25Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86.7%
Control · Build73.9%
Phase-weighted control78.9% → p25
25Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[5, 2, 62]
Innings8
Aditya Singh
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 27
40.6
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 92 · Balls 68 · SR 135.3 · Avg 18.4 · 4s 6 · 6s 5
40.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production46.728%13.1
Impact *46.427%12.5
Versatility38.527%10.4
Shot quality53.68%4.3
Trajectory3.610%0.4
Scout Score40.6
46.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR141.10.99×56bp39.342.9%
True Avg39.51.39×2wp67.932.1%
Balls / boundary6.2—56bp32.125%
46.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +7.5
WPA · Consolidation-14.1
WPA · Build+21.7
38.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin150 SR6b6b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball200 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p12.529.6%
Off-spin150 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox57 SR7b7b <min
Leg-spin79 SR14bp12.5
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)175 SR1.11×32bp60.714.8%
Reach death116.7 SR0.7×6bp32.111.1%
53.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76%
Control · Build80.6%
Phase-weighted control78.6% → p53.6
3.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.49×
Recent scores[0, 6, 1]
Innings7
Kumar Ankit
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB
38.7
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 28 · Balls 26 · SR 107.7 · Avg 28 · 4s 3 · 6s 0
38.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production17.340%6.9
Impact *57.725%14.4
Versatility4718%8.5
Shot quality46.24%1.8
Trajectory54.213%7.0
Scout Score38.7
17.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR71.40.43×7bp11.532.5%
Balls / boundary——7bp11.520%
Balls / six——7bp11.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
57.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
47VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)71.4 SR0.46×7bp11.516.7%
Reach build140 SR0.92×15bp65.422.2%
46.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control73.7% → p46.2
54.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[1, 5, 23]
Innings3
Shubh Sharma
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 22
37.2
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 42 · Balls 35 · SR 120 · Avg 14 · 4s 3 · 6s 1
37.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production32.928%9.2
Impact *2527%6.8
Versatility4327%11.6
Shot quality89.38%7.1
Trajectory2510%2.5
Scout Score37.2
32.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1290.91×31bp2542.9%
True Avg401.4×1wp60.732.1%
Balls / boundary7.8—31bp10.725%
25Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -2
WPA · Consolidation+0.1
WPA · Build-2.1
43VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox0 SR1b1b <min
vs Leg-spin100 SR7b7b <min
vs Short ball225 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p5029.6%
Off-spin150 SR4b4b <min
LA-orthodox0 SR1b1b <min
Leg-spin100 SR7b7b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)142.1 SR0.9×19bp32.114.8%
Reach death50 SR0.3×4bp10.711.1%
89.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build81.5%
Phase-weighted control83.9% → p89.3
25Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.88×
Recent scores[0, 17, 6]
Innings6
Supriyo Chakraborty
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 31
36.9
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 28 · Balls 28 · SR 100 · Avg 9.3 · 4s 3 · 6s 0
36.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production42.740%17.1
Impact *3.825%0.9
Versatility4118%7.4
Shot quality57.74%2.3
Trajectory70.813%9.2
Scout Score36.9
42.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR00×1bp30.832.5%
Balls / boundary——1bp38.520%
Balls / six——1bp53.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
3.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -11.9
WPA · Death-11.9
41VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.716.7%
Reach build100 SR0.66×23bp3.822.2%
57.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build78.3%
Phase-weighted control77.8% → p57.7
70.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.02×
Recent scores[20, 5, 3]
Innings6
Sumit Kumar
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 30
35.3
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 82 · Balls 70 · SR 117.1 · Avg 27.3 · 4s 2 · 6s 7
35.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production19.628%5.5
Impact *10.727%2.9
Versatility43.227%11.7
Shot quality96.48%7.7
Trajectory7510%7.5
Scout Score35.3
19.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR112.80.79×47bp3.642.9%
True Avg——0wp53.632.1%
Balls / boundary9.4—47bp3.625%
10.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -8
WPA · Consolidation-0.1
WPA · Build-7.9
43.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p3544.4%
vs LA-orthodox111 SR18bp41.7
vs Leg-spin117 SR12bp25
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p73.229.6%
Off-spin267 SR3b3b <min
LA-orthodox148 SR23bp95
Leg-spin107 SR14bp37.5
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)83.3 SR0.53×12bp10.714.8%
Reach death138.9 SR0.83×18bp39.311.1%
96.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build88.9%
Phase-weighted control89.4% → p96.4
75Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.12×
Recent scores[4, 25, 17]
Innings7
Himanshu Gupta
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 26
27.8
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 36 · Balls 42 · SR 85.7 · Avg 18 · 4s 2 · 6s 2
27.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production28.840%11.5
Impact *1527%4.0
Versatility27.715%4.2
Shot quality356%2.1
Trajectory5012%6.0
Scout Score27.8
28.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR42.90.3×21bp535%
True Avg——0wp5530%
Balls / boundary21—21bp517.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp5517.5%
15Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -33.3
WPA · Powerplay-22.6
WPA · Consolidation-10.7
27.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR63.3 SR0.41×30bp526.7%
vs Spin SR141.7 SR1.04×12bp6526.7%
Accel into Cons100 SR—13bp2520%
Pressure entry104.5 SR0.72×22bp1526.7%
35Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation92.3%
Control · Build33.3%
Phase-weighted control81.2% → p35
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[8, 23, 5]
Innings3
Adarsh Giri
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 22
27.1
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 20 · Balls 25 · SR 80 · Avg 6.7 · 4s 0 · 6s 1
27.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production28.840%11.5
Impact *26.925%6.7
Versatility42.718%7.7
Shot quality15.44%0.6
Trajectory4.213%0.5
Scout Score27.1
28.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR500.3×4bp19.232.5%
Balls / boundary——4bp19.220%
Balls / six——4bp34.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
26.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -7.9
WPA · Death-7.9
42.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp57.716.7%
Reach build62.5 SR0.41×8bp11.522.2%
15.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation62.5%
Control · Build62.5%
Phase-weighted control62.5% → p15.4
4.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.67×
Recent scores[5, 2, 13]
Innings5
Niteen Kumar Pandey
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB
26.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 83 · Balls 66 · SR 125.8 · Avg 20.8 · 4s 8 · 6s 3
26.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production13.328%3.7
Impact *3.627%1.0
Versatility44.427%12.0
Shot quality17.98%1.4
Trajectory82.110%8.2
Scout Score26.3
13.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR125.50.88×47bp17.942.9%
True Avg19.70.69×3wp3.632.1%
Balls / boundary6.7—47bp17.925%
3.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -13.2
WPA · Consolidation-14.9
WPA · Build+1.7
44.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin125 SR8b8b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p66.429.6%
Off-spin136 SR11bp70
LA-orthodox111 SR9b9b <min
Leg-spin150 SR10bp62.5
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)105.3 SR0.67×19bp3.614.8%
Reach death100 SR0.6×7bp17.911.1%
17.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.1%
Control · Build61.9%
Phase-weighted control68.1% → p17.9
82.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.12×
Recent scores[16, 34, 6]
Innings8
Shakti Singh
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB
23.6
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 26 · Balls 43 · SR 60.5 · Avg 26 · 4s 0 · 6s 1
23.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production10.840%4.3
Impact *19.225%4.8
Versatility35.518%6.4
Shot quality26.94%1.1
Trajectory54.213%7.0
Scout Score23.6
10.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR46.70.28×15bp3.832.5%
Balls / boundary——15bp3.820%
Balls / six——15bp3.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
19.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -9.2
WPA · Death-9.2
35.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)50 SR0.32×6bp3.816.7%
Reach build100 SR0.66×16bp19.222.2%
26.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control65.4% → p26.9
54.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[22, 4]
Innings2
Anurag Singh Sengar
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 33
21.2
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 33 · Balls 41 · SR 80.5 · Avg 8.2 · 4s 3 · 6s 1
21.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production24.640%9.8
Impact *2527%6.8
Versatility2515%3.8
Shot quality56%0.3
Trajectory512%0.6
Scout Score21.2
24.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR109.10.75×22bp2535%
True Avg240.76×1wp1530%
Balls / boundary5.5—22bp4017.5%
Balls / dismissal22—1wp2517.5%
25Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -26.2
WPA · Powerplay-11.7
WPA · Consolidation-14.5
25VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR72.4 SR0.46×29bp1526.7%
vs Spin SR100 SR0.73×12bp2526.7%
Accel into Cons44.4 SR—9bp520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation33.3%
Control · Build55.6%
Phase-weighted control40.7% → p5
5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.78×
Recent scores[5, 9, 11]
Innings8
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 4 | 10 | 2.5 | 88.7 Scout Score 88.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle88.775% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50n/a | 95.8 Bowling Production 95.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 1.67 econp95.875% | 98.8 Quality 98.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle50%p98.8 | 86.6 Impact 86.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +28.1p86.675% | 90.2 Versatility 90.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep90.275% | |
| 2 | LA pace | 25 | 15.4 | 2 | 114 | 7.28 | 77.1 Scout Score 77.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay79.251.1% Middle7112.8% Death76.236.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p90.60.89× | 69.8 Bowling Production 69.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 7.88 econp67.451.1% Middle0w · 3.5 econp61.812.8% Death0w · 7.76 econp76.136.2% | 93.7 Quality 93.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay46%p98.5 False-shot · Middle33%p74.4 | 85.8 Impact 85.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +11.7p86.451.1% MiddleWPA +9.4p74.412.8% DeathWPA +13p89.136.2% | 57.8 Versatility 57.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp64.251.1% Middlep72.612.8% Deathp43.536.2% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 23.4 | 8 | 169 | 7.14 | 75.9 Scout Score 75.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay49.216.9% Middle80.463.4% Death84.319.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p94.80.85× | 73.4 Bowling Production 73.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9 econp4816.9% Middle4w · 6.73 econp75.363.4% Death3w · 6.86 econp89.119.7% | 73.8 Quality 73.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p16.7 False-shot · Middle28%p89 | 77.3 Impact 77.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -0.8p5316.9% MiddleWPA +23.9p84.163.4% DeathWPA +3.9p76.119.7% | 61.5 Versatility 61.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp46.416.9% Middlep65.963.4% Deathp60.719.7% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 11.0 | 6 | 87 | 7.91 | 75.6 Scout Score 75.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle77.881.8% Death65.618.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p83.30.92× | 76.9 Bowling Production 76.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 7.78 econp79.881.8% Death1w · 8.5 econp63.718.2% | 91.5 Quality 91.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle30%p91.5 | 71.1 Impact 71.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +9p7281.8% DeathWPA +0.1p67.418.2% | 59.3 Versatility 59.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep62.281.8% Deathp46.418.2% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 11.0 | 6 | 78 | 7.09 | 73.2 Scout Score 73.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle73.2100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p13.51.19× | 85.9 Bowling Production 85.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle6w · 7.09 econp85.9100% | 46.3 Quality 46.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p46.3 | 91.5 Impact 91.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +39.2p91.5100% | 78 Versatility 78 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep78100% | |
| 6 | RA pace | — | 22.3 | 8 | 165 | 7.33 | 72.7 Scout Score 72.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay67.353.3% Death78.946.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p15.61.16× | 79.1 Bowling Production 79.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 8.25 econp67.253.3% Death5w · 6.29 econp92.846.7% | 89.4 Quality 89.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay38%p89.4 | 84.8 Impact 84.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +6.9p77.353.3% DeathWPA +23.9p93.546.7% | 59.8 Versatility 59.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp58.853.3% Deathp6146.7% | |
| 7 | LA pace | — | 18.3 | 8 | 164 | 8.86 | 70.2 Scout Score 70.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay81.237.8% Middle63.927% Death63.335.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p42.71.04× | 70.8 Bowling Production 70.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 7.86 econp86.837.8% Middle2w · 10.8 econp42.427% Death2w · 8.46 econp75.435.1% | 78.2 Quality 78.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p65.2 False-shot · Middle40%p96.3 | 81.5 Impact 81.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +31.2p98.537.8% MiddleWPA +70.6p98.827% DeathWPA -4.2p5035.1% | 60.7 Versatility 60.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp75.837.8% Middlep3627% Deathp63.535.1% | |
| 8 | Leg-spin | — | 23.0 | 7 | 170 | 7.39 | 70.1 Scout Score 70.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay2421.7% Middle83.773.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p9.41.23× | 73.4 Bowling Production 73.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.4 econp24.521.7% Middle6w · 6.29 econp87.773.9% | 81.5 Quality 81.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p39.4 False-shot · Middle28%p93.9 | 77.5 Impact 77.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -19.8p13.621.7% MiddleWPA +46.8p96.373.9% | 82 Versatility 82 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp41.521.7% Middlep93.973.9% | |
| 9 | Off-spin | — | 9.0 | 2 | 57 | 6.33 | 68.8 Scout Score 68.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay77.622.2% Middle66.377.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p62.51× | 60.6 Bowling Production 60.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 3.5 econp85.122.2% Middle1w · 7.14 econp53.677.8% | 79.2 Quality 79.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p62.1 False-shot · Middle29%p84.1 | 71.9 Impact 71.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +9.3p80.322.2% MiddleWPA +6.2p69.577.8% | 80.4 Versatility 80.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp8022.2% Middlep80.577.8% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 6.0 | 2 | 42 | 7 | 68.1 Scout Score 68.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle68.183.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p740.99× | 61.5 Bowling Production 61.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 7.2 econp61.583.3% | 80.5 Quality 80.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle30%p80.5 | 67.1 Impact 67.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +4.5p67.183.3% | 70.7 Versatility 70.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep70.783.3% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | — | 11.0 | 4 | 65 | 5.91 | 66.5 Scout Score 66.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay74.927.3% Middle63.372.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p83.30.92× | 73.8 Bowling Production 73.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 7.33 econp73.427.3% Middle2w · 5.38 econp7472.7% | 26.1 Quality 26.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p50 False-shot · Middle17%p17.1 | 66.1 Impact 66.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +11.9p89.427.3% MiddleWPA -2.8p57.372.7% | 79.4 Versatility 79.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp7027.3% Middlep82.972.7% | |
| 12 | RA pace | — | 17.1 | 7 | 139 | 8.1 | 63.5 Scout Score 63.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay6752.4% Middle42.417.5% Death69.830.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p19.81.12× | 73.5 Bowling Production 73.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 7.67 econp82.252.4% Middle0w · 9 econp3317.5% Death4w · 8.32 econp81.930.1% | 22.5 Quality 22.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay18%p7.6 False-shot · Middle28%p67.1 | 83.1 Impact 83.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +15.3p92.452.4% MiddleWPA -4.2p52.417.5% DeathWPA +9.1p84.830.1% | 60.7 Versatility 60.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp76.452.4% Middlep3917.5% Deathp4630.1% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 31 | 12.0 | 6 | 110 | 9.17 | 62.4 Scout Score 62.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay70.616.7% Middle70.366.7% Death22.516.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p34.41.06× | 67.3 Bowling Production 67.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.5 econp73.916.7% Middle5w · 8.12 econp7766.7% Death0w · 15 econp22.116.7% | 75.1 Quality 75.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay42%p68.2 False-shot · Middle27%p76.8 | 66.9 Impact 66.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +10p83.316.7% MiddleWPA +16.6p76.866.7% DeathWPA -17.3p10.916.7% | 54.4 Versatility 54.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp63.316.7% Middlep57.366.7% Deathp33.516.7% | |
| 14 | LA pace | — | 12.0 | 5 | 130 | 10.83 | 62.3 Scout Score 62.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay62.383.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p241.1× | 59.6 Bowling Production 59.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 9.2 econp59.683.3% | 83.3 Quality 83.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay37%p83.3 | 68.2 Impact 68.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +6.1p68.283.3% | 63.9 Versatility 63.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp63.983.3% | |
| 15 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 17.0 | 4 | 133 | 7.82 | 62.3 Scout Score 62.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay4523.5% Middle68.170.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p491.02× | 63.8 Bowling Production 63.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 8.5 econp39.823.5% Middle4w · 7.92 econp71.870.6% | 33.4 Quality 33.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p34.8 False-shot · Middle19%p32.9 | 84.4 Impact 84.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0.2p56.123.5% MiddleWPA +40.8p93.970.6% | 58.1 Versatility 58.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp45.923.5% Middlep62.270.6% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 30 | 4.0 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 62.3 Scout Score 62.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay62.375% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p62.51× | 58.1 Bowling Production 58.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 5.67 econp58.175% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p50 | 74.2 Impact 74.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +6.7p74.275% | 64.1 Versatility 64.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp64.175% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | — | 26.0 | 11 | 200 | 7.69 | 62 Scout Score 62 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay40.530.8% Middle76.253.8% Death55.515.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p11.53× | 76.1 Bowling Production 76.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 9.38 econp52.130.8% Middle7w · 5.93 econp95.653.8% Death1w · 10.5 econp56.315.4% | 41.4 Quality 41.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p13.6 False-shot · Middle23%p57.3 | 70.4 Impact 70.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2p5030.8% MiddleWPA +17.2p79.353.8% DeathWPA +7p80.415.4% | 74.9 Versatility 74.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp50.330.8% Middlep95.153.8% Deathp53.615.4% | |
| 18 | Chinaman | — | 5.0 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 59.6 Scout Score 59.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle59.680% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p62.51× | 72.3 Bowling Production 72.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 8.25 econp72.380% | 86.6 Quality 86.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle33%p86.6 | 25.6 Impact 25.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -13.1p25.680% | 54.3 Versatility 54.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep54.380% | |
| 19 | Leg-spin | 23 | 4.0 | 0 | 19 | 4.75 | 59.2 Scout Score 59.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle59.275% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p62.51× | 56.7 Bowling Production 56.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 3.67 econp56.775% | 54.9 Quality 54.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle22%p54.9 | 59.8 Impact 59.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0p59.875% | 68.3 Versatility 68.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep68.375% | |
| 20 | Off-spin | 28 | 10.0 | 3 | 83 | 8.3 | 57.9 Scout Score 57.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay50.560% Middle68.940% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p990.82× | 59.6 Bowling Production 59.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8.67 econp51.160% Middle2w · 7.75 econp72.240% | 24 Quality 24 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p31.8 False-shot · Middle12%p12.2 | 62 Impact 62 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.7p43.960% MiddleWPA +30.9p8940% | 52.4 Versatility 52.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp45.960% Middlep62.240% | |
| 21 | Off-spin | 28 | 9.1 | 3 | 80 | 8.73 | 57.3 Scout Score 57.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle52.976.4% Death71.423.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p96.90.85× | 46.6 Bowling Production 46.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 8.71 econp38.976.4% Death2w · 8.77 econp71.723.6% | 52.4 Quality 52.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p52.4 | 64.3 Impact 64.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +3.4p64.676.4% DeathWPA +0p6323.6% | 41.9 Versatility 41.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep37.276.4% Deathp57.123.6% | |
| 22 | SLA orthodox | — | 19.0 | 4 | 149 | 7.84 | 56.8 Scout Score 56.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay76.336.8% Middle36.442.1% Death63.521.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p86.50.9× | 55.1 Bowling Production 55.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 5.57 econp84.436.8% Middle0w · 9.25 econp22.142.1% Death2w · 9 econp69.621.1% | 26.2 Quality 26.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p21.2 False-shot · Middle19%p30.5 | 62.9 Impact 62.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +19.9p95.536.8% MiddleWPA -6p45.142.1% DeathWPA -7.4p41.321.1% | 48.6 Versatility 48.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp65.836.8% Middlep29.342.1% Deathp57.121.1% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 22 | 7.0 | 1 | 68 | 9.71 | 55.8 Scout Score 55.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay6157.1% Death45.228.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p80.20.94× | 52.4 Bowling Production 52.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.25 econp64.757.1% Death0w · 15.5 econp27.928.6% | 74.2 Quality 74.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay38%p74.2 | 46.8 Impact 46.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -3.2p40.957.1% DeathWPA +0p58.728.6% | 58.5 Versatility 58.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp62.657.1% Deathp50.228.6% | |
| 24 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 1 | 45 | 9 | 54.9 Scout Score 54.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle54.980% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p62.51× | 45.5 Bowling Production 45.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9 econp45.580% | 62.2 Quality 62.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle25%p62.2 | 62.2 Impact 62.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +1.1p62.280% | 53.7 Versatility 53.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep53.780% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 22 | 18.2 | 3 | 164 | 8.95 | 53.8 Scout Score 53.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay61.154.5% Middle28.610.9% Death50.134.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p21.91.1× | 46.6 Bowling Production 46.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 6.3 econp60.454.5% Middle0w · 11 econp31.510.9% Death2w · 12.47 econp29.734.5% | 65.4 Quality 65.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay35%p77.3 False-shot · Middle0%p6.1 | 73.5 Impact 73.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +3.1p65.254.5% MiddleWPA -8.3p37.810.9% DeathWPA +30.4p97.834.5% | 61.1 Versatility 61.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp68.254.5% Middlep34.110.9% Deathp58.534.5% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 25 | 19.0 | 9 | 183 | 9.63 | 51.7 Scout Score 51.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay51.836.8% Middle38.826.3% Death60.836.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p88.50.9× | 53.1 Bowling Production 53.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.43 econp6036.8% Middle1w · 9.8 econp34.526.3% Death6w · 10.71 econp59.436.8% | 50.5 Quality 50.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p56.1 False-shot · Middle20%p42.7 | 33.9 Impact 33.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -10.7p22.736.8% MiddleWPA -17p20.726.3% DeathWPA -1.3p54.336.8% | 51.8 Versatility 51.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp55.836.8% Middlep43.926.3% Deathp53.536.8% | |
| 27 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 7.3 | 2 | 70 | 9.33 | 49.4 Scout Score 49.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle49.480% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p40.61.04× | 56.6 Bowling Production 56.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 8.67 econp56.680% | 37.8 Quality 37.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle19%p37.8 | 50 Impact 50 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5.3p5080% | 47.6 Versatility 47.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep47.680% | |
| 28 | RA pace | — | 21.0 | 12 | 215 | 10.24 | 48.7 Scout Score 48.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay52.971.4% Death36.123.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p5.21.36× | 52.2 Bowling Production 52.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay8w · 10 econp54.171.4% Death4w · 11.6 econp46.423.8% | 92.4 Quality 92.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay37%p92.4 | 41.2 Impact 41.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.6p4771.4% DeathWPA -10.9p23.923.8% | 51.9 Versatility 51.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp5371.4% Deathp48.523.8% | |
| 29 | Off-spin | — | 15.0 | 1 | 134 | 8.93 | 43.1 Scout Score 43.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay47.746.7% Middle38.840% Death40.213.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p78.10.97× | 36.4 Bowling Production 36.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 8.29 econp35.646.7% Middle0w · 8.5 econp36.640% Death1w · 12.5 econp38.713.3% | 15.3 Quality 15.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p21.2 False-shot · Middle14%p8.5 | 54 Impact 54 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +6.5p71.246.7% MiddleWPA -6.2p40.240% DeathWPA -8.2p34.813.3% | 39 Versatility 39 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.746.7% Middlep47.640% Deathp10.713.3% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 26 | 17.2 | 7 | 173 | 9.98 | 42.7 Scout Score 42.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay53.451.9% Death29.542.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p11.51.2× | 45.8 Bowling Production 45.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.78 econp54.851.9% Death4w · 12.14 econp34.842.3% | 59.1 Quality 59.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p59.1 | 41.1 Impact 41.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +2.7p62.151.9% DeathWPA -16.9p15.242.3% | 54.8 Versatility 54.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp57.951.9% Deathp5142.3% | |
| 31 | RA pace | — | 16.0 | 6 | 176 | 11 | 41.8 Scout Score 41.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle4375% Death37.218.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p36.51.06× | 46 Bowling Production 46 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 9.92 econp47.675% Death1w · 12.67 econp39.918.8% | 72 Quality 72 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle25%p72 | 25.5 Impact 25.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -16.5p23.275% DeathWPA -8.2p34.818.8% | 37.9 Versatility 37.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep3975% Deathp33.518.8% | |
| 32 | Leg-spin | 24 | 5.2 | 1 | 50 | 9.38 | 41.5 Scout Score 41.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle41.593.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p62.51× | 47.5 Bowling Production 47.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 8.8 econp47.593.8% | 1.2 Quality 1.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle7%p1.2 | 47.6 Impact 47.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5.4p47.693.8% | 42.7 Versatility 42.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep42.793.8% | |
| 33 | LA pace | 32 | 20.0 | 6 | 221 | 11.05 | 39.7 Scout Score 39.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay13.525% Middle70.725% Death37.250% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p32.31.07× | 43.6 Bowling Production 43.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 14.6 econp4.425% Middle2w · 7.4 econp72.825% Death4w · 11.1 econp48.650% | 60 Quality 60 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p39.4 False-shot · Middle30%p80.5 | 24.8 Impact 24.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -28.2p4.525% MiddleWPA +21.4p81.725% DeathWPA -20.6p6.550% | 47 Versatility 47 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp14.825% Middlep6125% Deathp5650% | |
| 34 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 5.0 | 1 | 50 | 10 | 38.5 Scout Score 38.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle38.580% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p62.51× | 45.3 Bowling Production 45.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9.75 econp45.380% | 12.2 Quality 12.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle12%p12.2 | 35.4 Impact 35.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -10.3p35.480% | 36.6 Versatility 36.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep36.680% | |
| 35 | RA pace | — | 16.0 | 5 | 192 | 12 | 37.9 Scout Score 37.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay43.850% Middle27.837.5% Death44.612.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p760.98× | 28.8 Bowling Production 28.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 11.5 econp42.750% Middle0w · 10.83 econp14.637.5% Death1w · 17.5 econp15.912.5% | 51.7 Quality 51.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p71.2 False-shot · Middle17%p25.6 | 30.2 Impact 30.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13.8p19.750% MiddleWPA -12.4p30.537.5% DeathWPA +1.9p71.712.5% | 38.2 Versatility 38.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.750% Middlep26.837.5% Deathp6612.5% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 27 | 15.0 | 4 | 165 | 11 | 37.4 Scout Score 37.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay39.473.3% Middle29.920% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p28.11.09× | 42.3 Bowling Production 42.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 10 econp44.373.3% Middle1w · 12.33 econp3520% | 72.3 Quality 72.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay38%p86.4 False-shot · Middle11%p20.7 | 15.4 Impact 15.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -23.1p10.673.3% MiddleWPA -11.1p32.920% | 35.6 Versatility 35.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.773.3% Middlep20.720% | |
| 37 | Off-spin | 27 | 14.0 | 2 | 121 | 8.64 | 36.8 Scout Score 36.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay29.428.6% Middle40.164.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p44.81.03× | 48.8 Bowling Production 48.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 9 econp32.128.6% Middle2w · 8.22 econp56.264.3% | 3 Quality 3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p1.5 False-shot · Middle13%p3.7 | 29.2 Impact 29.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -6.8p31.828.6% MiddleWPA -12.8p2864.3% | 51.1 Versatility 51.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.728.6% Middlep56.164.3% | |
| 38 | RA pace | — | 9.0 | 1 | 87 | 9.67 | 36.3 Scout Score 36.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay52.822.2% Middle31.677.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p62.51× | 30 Bowling Production 30 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 8 econp50.222.2% Middle1w · 10.14 econp24.277.8% | 56.3 Quality 56.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p43.9 False-shot · Middle24%p59.8 | 23.6 Impact 23.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +2.6p59.122.2% MiddleWPA -21.3p13.477.8% | 35.6 Versatility 35.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp49.222.2% Middlep31.777.8% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 23 | 17.4 | 6 | 201 | 11.38 | 34.2 Scout Score 34.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay14.617% Middle24.845.3% Death54.437.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p7.31.34× | 40.7 Bowling Production 40.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 13.33 econp1717% Middle2w · 12.12 econp24.445.3% Death4w · 9.6 econp7137.7% | 51.8 Quality 51.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay6%p4.5 False-shot · Middle25%p69.5 | 20.6 Impact 20.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -19.2p16.717% MiddleWPA -54.2p1.245.3% DeathWPA -4.6p45.737.7% | 39.5 Versatility 39.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp22.417% Middlep34.145.3% Deathp53.537.7% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 37 | 15.0 | 1 | 144 | 9.6 | 33.6 Scout Score 33.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay29.420% Middle34.773.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p511× | 33.1 Bowling Production 33.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11.33 econp25.920% Middle1w · 8.73 econp3573.3% | 41.9 Quality 41.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p25.8 False-shot · Middle21%p46.3 | 18 Impact 18 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -8.4p25.820% MiddleWPA -19.9p15.973.3% | 43.3 Versatility 43.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.720% Middlep45.173.3% | |
| 41 | Off-spin | 22 | 10.3 | 3 | 112 | 10.67 | 32.5 Scout Score 32.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle37.966.7% Death17.323.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p3.11.37× | 33.6 Bowling Production 33.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 8.71 econp42.666.7% Death1w · 16.8 econp8.523.8% | 35.4 Quality 35.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle19%p35.4 | 38.9 Impact 38.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -6p42.766.7% DeathWPA -9.8p28.323.8% | 50.2 Versatility 50.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep45.166.7% Deathp64.323.8% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 27 | 9.0 | 0 | 104 | 11.56 | 31.8 Scout Score 31.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle32.966.7% Death28.622.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p92.70.88× | 17.8 Bowling Production 17.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 10 econp2066.7% Death0w · 16.5 econp11.222.2% | 64.6 Quality 64.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle25%p64.6 | 11.3 Impact 11.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -25.9p8.566.7% DeathWPA -14.6p19.622.2% | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep35.466.7% Deathp47.722.2% | |
| 43 | Leg-spin | 23 | 8.4 | 3 | 89 | 10.27 | 28.8 Scout Score 28.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle28.8100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p261.09× | 38.2 Bowling Production 38.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 10.27 econp38.2100% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p50 | 6.1 Impact 6.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -32.9p6.1100% | 22 Versatility 22 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep22100% | |
| 44 | LA pace | 23 | 4.0 | 0 | 51 | 12.75 | 28.1 Scout Score 28.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay33.650% Death22.650% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p62.51× | 25.3 Bowling Production 25.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 12 econp30.750% Death0w · 13.5 econp19.950% | 28.8 Quality 28.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p28.8 | 15.5 Impact 15.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -8.1p28.850% DeathWPA -39.6p2.250% | 34.5 Versatility 34.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp35.550% Deathp33.550% | |
| 45 | RA pace | 22 | 7.0 | 2 | 99 | 14.14 | 27.4 Scout Score 27.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay27.471.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p30.21.08× | 20.2 Bowling Production 20.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 14.4 econp20.271.4% | 80.3 Quality 80.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay40%p80.3 | 7.6 Impact 7.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -25.3p7.671.4% | 25.8 Versatility 25.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp25.871.4% | |
| 46 | Off-spin | 23 | 12.5 | 5 | 139 | 10.83 | 27.3 Scout Score 27.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay38.923.4% Middle2362.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p38.51.06× | 37 Bowling Production 37 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 9.33 econp36.123.4% Middle3w · 11.5 econp37.362.3% | 26.1 Quality 26.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p50 False-shot · Middle17%p17.1 | 13 Impact 13 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -6.1p37.923.4% MiddleWPA -36.9p3.762.3% | 18.7 Versatility 18.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.123.4% Middlep12.262.3% | |
| 47 | Leg-spin | — | 10.0 | 1 | 89 | 8.9 | 26.3 Scout Score 26.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle26.390% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p62.51× | 22.5 Bowling Production 22.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 9 econp22.590% | 28 Quality 28 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle18%p28 | 11 Impact 11 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -21.7p1190% | 37.8 Versatility 37.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep37.890% | |
| 48 | RA pace | — | 11.0 | 1 | 128 | 11.64 | 25.5 Scout Score 25.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay48.936.4% Middle12.163.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p17.71.15× | 21.1 Bowling Production 21.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10 econp51.636.4% Middle0w · 12.57 econp3.763.6% | 49.5 Quality 49.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay50%p95.5 False-shot · Middle17%p23.2 | 24.3 Impact 24.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -6.3p34.836.4% MiddleWPA -19.8p18.363.6% | 18.6 Versatility 18.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp38.336.4% Middlep7.363.6% | |
| 49 | RA pace | 22 | 15.0 | 1 | 162 | 10.8 | 16.6 Scout Score 16.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay13.480% Middle36.313.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p46.91.03× | 12.9 Bowling Production 12.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.25 econp11.680% Middle0w · 14 econp21.213.3% | 14.8 Quality 14.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p10.6 False-shot · Middle17%p40.2 | 9.1 Impact 9.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -32.9p1.580% MiddleWPA -4.2p54.913.3% | 24 Versatility 24 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp22.780% Middlep31.713.3% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LA pace | — | 7.0 | 4 | 55 | 7.86 | 86.8 Phase Production 86.8 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.85× parp77.336.8% Wicket rate0.57/ovp95.542.1% Boundary %19%p86.421.1% | 65.2 Quality 65.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 98.5 Impact 98.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+31.2 | 75.8 Versatility 75.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp89.430% Econ vs LHBp40.930% Wkt vs RHBp92.420% Wkt vs LHBp90.920% | |
| 2 | Off-spin | — | 2.0 | 1 | 7 | 3.5 | 85.1 Phase Production 85.1 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.378× parp92.436.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp75.842.1% Boundary %8%p90.921.1% | 62.1 Quality 62.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 80.3 Impact 80.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.3 | 80 Versatility 80 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.430% Econ vs LHBp92.430% Wkt vs RHBp56.120% Wkt vs LHBp75.820% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | — | 7.0 | 2 | 39 | 5.57 | 84.4 Phase Production 84.4 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.602× parp98.536.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp66.742.1% Boundary %12%p95.521.1% | 21.2 Quality 21.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 95.5 Impact 95.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+19.9 | 65.8 Versatility 65.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.530% Econ vs LHBp28.830% Wkt vs RHBp62.120% Wkt vs LHBp75.820% | |
| 4 | RA pace | — | 9.0 | 3 | 69 | 7.67 | 82.2 Phase Production 82.2 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.829× parp86.436.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp80.342.1% Boundary %20%p78.821.1% | 7.6 Quality 7.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 92.4 Impact 92.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15.3 | 76.4 Versatility 76.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp74.230% Econ vs LHBp83.330% Wkt vs RHBp65.220% Wkt vs LHBp80.320% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 31 | 2.0 | 1 | 15 | 7.5 | 73.9 Phase Production 73.9 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.811× parp62.136.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp75.842.1% Boundary %8%p90.921.1% | 68.2 Quality 68.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 83.3 Impact 83.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10 | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp25.830% Econ vs LHBp95.530% Wkt vs RHBp5020% Wkt vs LHBp84.820% | |
| 6 | SLA orthodox | — | 3.0 | 2 | 22 | 7.33 | 73.4 Phase Production 73.4 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.793× parp71.236.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp86.442.1% Boundary %22%p51.521.1% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 89.4 Impact 89.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.9 | 70 Versatility 70 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp68.230% Econ vs LHBp71.230% Wkt vs RHBp95.520% Wkt vs LHBp45.520% | |
| 7 | LA pace | 25 | 8.0 | 2 | 63 | 7.88 | 67.4 Phase Production 67.4 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.852× parp83.336.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp59.142.1% Boundary %23%p56.121.1% | 98.5 Quality 98.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %46% | 86.4 Impact 86.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.7 | 64.2 Versatility 64.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp77.330% Econ vs LHBp74.230% Wkt vs RHBp86.420% Wkt vs LHBp7.620% | |
| 8 | RA pace | — | 12.0 | 3 | 99 | 8.25 | 67.2 Phase Production 67.2 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.892× parp74.236.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp62.142.1% Boundary %22%p65.221.1% | 89.4 Quality 89.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 77.3 Impact 77.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.9 | 58.8 Versatility 58.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp92.430% Econ vs LHBp31.830% Wkt vs RHBp40.920% Wkt vs LHBp66.720% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 22 | 4.0 | 1 | 29 | 7.25 | 64.7 Phase Production 64.7 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.784× parp80.336.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp5342.1% Boundary %21%p60.621.1% | 74.2 Quality 74.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 40.9 Impact 40.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.2 | 62.6 Versatility 62.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.830% Econ vs LHBp59.130% Wkt vs RHBp71.220% Wkt vs LHBp30.320% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 22 | 10.0 | 1 | 63 | 6.3 | 60.4 Phase Production 60.4 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.681× parp95.536.8% Wicket rate0.10/ovp10.642.1% Boundary %13%p98.521.1% | 77.3 Quality 77.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 65.2 Impact 65.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.1 | 68.2 Versatility 68.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp95.530% Econ vs LHBp98.530% Wkt vs RHBp28.820% Wkt vs LHBp21.220% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 25 | 7.0 | 2 | 59 | 8.43 | 60 Phase Production 60 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.911× parp65.236.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp66.742.1% Boundary %26%p37.921.1% | 56.1 Quality 56.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 22.7 Impact 22.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.7 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp34.830% Econ vs LHBp86.430% Wkt vs RHBp1.520% Wkt vs LHBp95.520% | |
| 12 | LA pace | — | 10.0 | 5 | 92 | 9.2 | 59.6 Phase Production 59.6 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.995× parp37.936.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp92.442.1% Boundary %27%p31.821.1% | 83.3 Quality 83.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %37% | 68.2 Impact 68.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.1 | 63.9 Versatility 63.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.230% Econ vs LHBp16.730% Wkt vs RHBp89.420% Wkt vs LHBp98.520% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 30 | 3.0 | 0 | 17 | 5.67 | 58.1 Phase Production 58.1 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.613× parp89.436.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp24.242.1% Boundary %17%p71.221.1% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 74.2 Impact 74.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.7 | 64.1 Versatility 64.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.830% Econ vs LHBp89.430% Wkt vs RHBp22.720% Wkt vs LHBp40.920% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 26 | 9.0 | 2 | 79 | 8.78 | 54.8 Phase Production 54.8 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.949× parp5036.8% Wicket rate0.22/ovp4742.1% Boundary %20%p78.821.1% | 59.1 Quality 59.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 62.1 Impact 62.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.7 | 57.9 Versatility 57.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp59.130% Econ vs LHBp5330% Wkt vs RHBp59.120% Wkt vs LHBp62.120% | |
| 15 | RA pace | — | 15.0 | 8 | 150 | 10 | 54.1 Phase Production 54.1 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.081× parp19.736.8% Wicket rate0.53/ovp98.542.1% Boundary %27%p25.821.1% | 92.4 Quality 92.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %37% | 47 Impact 47 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.6 | 53 Versatility 53 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.630% Econ vs LHBp56.130% Wkt vs RHBp98.520% Wkt vs LHBp66.720% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | — | 8.0 | 3 | 75 | 9.38 | 52.1 Phase Production 52.1 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.014× parp34.836.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp83.342.1% Boundary %29%p19.721.1% | 13.6 Quality 13.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2 | 50.3 Versatility 50.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp43.930% Econ vs LHBp34.830% Wkt vs RHBp83.320% Wkt vs LHBp5020% | |
| 17 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 1 | 40 | 10 | 51.6 Phase Production 51.6 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.081× parp31.836.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp5342.1% Boundary %17%p83.321.1% | 95.5 Quality 95.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %50% | 34.8 Impact 34.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.3 | 38.3 Versatility 38.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.430% Econ vs LHBp19.730% Wkt vs RHBp18.220% Wkt vs LHBp84.820% | |
| 18 | Off-spin | 28 | 6.0 | 1 | 52 | 8.67 | 51.1 Phase Production 51.1 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.937× parp5336.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp37.942.1% Boundary %19%p74.221.1% | 31.8 Quality 31.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 43.9 Impact 43.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.7 | 45.9 Versatility 45.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.430% Econ vs LHBp62.130% Wkt vs RHBp18.220% Wkt vs LHBp59.120% | |
| 19 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 16 | 8 | 50.2 Phase Production 50.2 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.865× parp59.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp33.342.1% Boundary %17%p68.221.1% | 43.9 Quality 43.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 59.1 Impact 59.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.6 | 49.2 Versatility 49.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp62.130% Econ vs LHBp48.530% Wkt vs RHBp25.820% Wkt vs LHBp54.520% | |
| 20 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 4.0 | 1 | 36 | 9 | 48 Phase Production 48 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.973× parp45.536.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp5342.1% Boundary %25%p42.421.1% | 16.7 Quality 16.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 53 Impact 53 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.8 | 46.4 Versatility 46.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5330% Econ vs LHBp37.930% Wkt vs RHBp74.220% Wkt vs LHBp21.220% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 27 | 11.0 | 3 | 110 | 10 | 44.3 Phase Production 44.3 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.081× parp25.836.8% Wicket rate0.27/ovp71.242.1% Boundary %27%p22.721.1% | 86.4 Quality 86.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 10.6 Impact 10.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-23.1 | 39.7 Versatility 39.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4730% Econ vs LHBp10.630% Wkt vs RHBp77.320% Wkt vs LHBp34.820% | |
| 22 | RA pace | — | 8.0 | 4 | 92 | 11.5 | 42.7 Phase Production 42.7 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.244× parp7.636.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp89.442.1% Boundary %33%p10.621.1% | 71.2 Quality 71.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 19.7 Impact 19.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.8 | 39.7 Versatility 39.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp13.630% Econ vs LHBp4.530% Wkt vs RHBp80.320% Wkt vs LHBp90.920% | |
| 23 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 4.0 | 0 | 34 | 8.5 | 39.8 Phase Production 39.8 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.919× parp56.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp15.242.1% Boundary %21%p60.621.1% | 34.8 Quality 34.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 56.1 Impact 56.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.2 | 45.9 Versatility 45.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp65.230% Econ vs LHBp48.530% Wkt vs RHBp4.520% Wkt vs LHBp54.520% | |
| 24 | Off-spin | 23 | 3.0 | 0 | 28 | 9.33 | 36.1 Phase Production 36.1 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.009× parp40.936.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp24.242.1% Boundary %22%p51.521.1% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 37.9 Impact 37.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.1 | 36.1 Versatility 36.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5030% Econ vs LHBp25.830% Wkt vs RHBp45.520% Wkt vs LHBp21.220% | |
| 25 | Off-spin | — | 7.0 | 0 | 58 | 8.29 | 35.6 Phase Production 35.6 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.896× parp68.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.542.1% Boundary %24%p4721.1% | 21.2 Quality 21.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 71.2 Impact 71.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.5 | 39.7 Versatility 39.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp56.130% Econ vs LHBp65.230% Wkt vs RHBp12.120% Wkt vs LHBp4.520% | |
| 26 | Off-spin | 27 | 4.0 | 0 | 36 | 9 | 32.1 Phase Production 32.1 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.973× parp45.536.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp15.242.1% Boundary %25%p42.421.1% | 1.5 Quality 1.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 31.8 Impact 31.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.8 | 39.7 Versatility 39.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp22.730% Econ vs LHBp77.330% Wkt vs RHBp36.420% Wkt vs LHBp12.120% | |
| 27 | LA pace | 23 | 2.0 | 0 | 24 | 12 | 30.7 Phase Production 30.7 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.298× parp28.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp33.342.1% Boundary %33%p28.821.1% | 28.8 Quality 28.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 28.8 Impact 28.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.1 | 35.5 Versatility 35.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp19.730% Econ vs LHBp43.930% Wkt vs RHBp36.420% Wkt vs LHBp45.520% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 37 | 3.0 | 0 | 34 | 11.33 | 25.9 Phase Production 25.9 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.226× parp22.736.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp24.242.1% Boundary %28%p34.821.1% | 25.8 Quality 25.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 25.8 Impact 25.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.4 | 36.7 Versatility 36.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7.630% Econ vs LHBp68.230% Wkt vs RHBp31.820% Wkt vs LHBp37.920% | |
| 29 | Leg-spin | — | 5.0 | 1 | 57 | 11.4 | 24.5 Phase Production 24.5 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.233× parp13.636.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp42.442.1% Boundary %37%p7.621.1% | 39.4 Quality 39.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 13.6 Impact 13.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.8 | 41.5 Versatility 41.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4.530% Econ vs LHBp80.330% Wkt vs RHBp68.220% Wkt vs LHBp12.120% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 22 | 5.0 | 1 | 72 | 14.4 | 20.2 Phase Production 20.2 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.557× parp4.536.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp42.442.1% Boundary %47%p321.1% | 80.3 Quality 80.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 7.6 Impact 7.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-25.3 | 25.8 Versatility 25.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.830% Econ vs LHBp1.530% Wkt vs RHBp12.120% Wkt vs LHBp71.220% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 23 | 3.0 | 0 | 40 | 13.33 | 17 Phase Production 17 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.442× parp10.636.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp24.242.1% Boundary %39%p13.621.1% | 4.5 Quality 4.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %6% | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.2 | 22.4 Versatility 22.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp16.730% Econ vs LHBp13.630% Wkt vs RHBp45.520% Wkt vs LHBp21.220% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 22 | 12.0 | 1 | 123 | 10.25 | 11.6 Phase Production 11.6 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.108× parp16.736.8% Wicket rate0.08/ovp4.542.1% Boundary %29%p16.721.1% | 10.6 Quality 10.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 1.5 Impact 1.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-32.9 | 22.7 Versatility 22.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp31.830% Econ vs LHBp7.630% Wkt vs RHBp5320% Wkt vs LHBp1.520% | |
| 33 | LA pace | 32 | 5.0 | 0 | 73 | 14.6 | 4.4 Phase Production 4.4 vs all bowlers · n=33 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.579× parp1.536.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp7.642.1% Boundary %47%p321.1% | 39.4 Quality 39.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 4.5 Impact 4.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-28.2 | 14.8 Versatility 14.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.530% Econ vs LHBp22.730% Wkt vs RHBp7.620% Wkt vs LHBp30.320% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 3 | 5 | 1.67 | 95.8 Phase Production 95.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.193× parp96.344.1% Wicket rate1.00/ovp96.344.1% Boundary %0%p91.511.8% | 98.8 Quality 98.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %50% | 86.6 Impact 86.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+28.1 | 90.2 Versatility 90.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.650% Econ vs LHBp93.950% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | — | 14.0 | 7 | 83 | 5.93 | 95.6 Phase Production 95.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.686× parp98.844.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp91.544.1% Boundary %8%p98.811.8% | 57.3 Quality 57.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 79.3 Impact 79.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+17.2 | 95.1 Versatility 95.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.850% Econ vs LHBp91.550% | |
| 3 | Leg-spin | — | 17.0 | 6 | 107 | 6.29 | 87.7 Phase Production 87.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.728× parp93.944.1% Wicket rate0.35/ovp79.344.1% Boundary %10%p96.311.8% | 93.9 Quality 93.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 96.3 Impact 96.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+46.8 | 93.9 Versatility 93.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8950% Econ vs LHBp98.850% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 11.0 | 6 | 78 | 7.09 | 85.9 Phase Production 85.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.82× parp84.144.1% Wicket rate0.55/ovp93.944.1% Boundary %15%p62.211.8% | 46.3 Quality 46.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 91.5 Impact 91.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+39.2 | 78 Versatility 78 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp79.350% Econ vs LHBp76.850% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 9.0 | 5 | 70 | 7.78 | 79.8 Phase Production 79.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.899× parp74.444.1% Wicket rate0.56/ovp8944.1% Boundary %15%p65.911.8% | 91.5 Quality 91.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 72 Impact 72 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9 | 62.2 Versatility 62.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp74.450% Econ vs LHBp5050% | |
| 6 | RA pace | 31 | 8.0 | 5 | 65 | 8.12 | 77 Phase Production 77 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.94× parp64.644.1% Wicket rate0.62/ovp98.844.1% Boundary %19%p41.511.8% | 76.8 Quality 76.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 76.8 Impact 76.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+16.6 | 57.3 Versatility 57.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp18.350% Econ vs LHBp96.350% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 15.0 | 4 | 101 | 6.73 | 75.3 Phase Production 75.3 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.779× parp8944.1% Wicket rate0.26/ovp59.844.1% Boundary %13%p81.711.8% | 89 Quality 89 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 84.1 Impact 84.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+23.9 | 65.9 Versatility 65.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp93.950% Econ vs LHBp37.850% | |
| 8 | SLA orthodox | — | 8.0 | 2 | 43 | 5.38 | 74 Phase Production 74 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.622× parp91.544.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp51.244.1% Boundary %8%p93.911.8% | 17.1 Quality 17.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 57.3 Impact 57.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.8 | 82.9 Versatility 82.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.350% Econ vs LHBp69.550% | |
| 9 | LA pace | 32 | 5.0 | 2 | 37 | 7.4 | 72.8 Phase Production 72.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.856× parp7244.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp73.244.1% Boundary %13%p74.411.8% | 80.5 Quality 80.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 81.7 Impact 81.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+21.4 | 61 Versatility 61 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp76.850% Econ vs LHBp45.150% | |
| 10 | Chinaman | — | 4.0 | 2 | 33 | 8.25 | 72.3 Phase Production 72.3 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.954× parp59.844.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp82.944.1% Boundary %12%p79.311.8% | 86.6 Quality 86.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 25.6 Impact 25.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.1 | 54.3 Versatility 54.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp34.150% Econ vs LHBp74.450% | |
| 11 | Off-spin | 28 | 4.0 | 2 | 31 | 7.75 | 72.2 Phase Production 72.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.896× parp67.144.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp82.944.1% Boundary %17%p51.211.8% | 12.2 Quality 12.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 89 Impact 89 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+30.9 | 62.2 Versatility 62.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp45.150% Econ vs LHBp79.350% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 12.0 | 4 | 95 | 7.92 | 71.8 Phase Production 71.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.915× parp69.544.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp69.544.1% Boundary %11%p8911.8% | 32.9 Quality 32.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 93.9 Impact 93.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+40.8 | 62.2 Versatility 62.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp69.550% Econ vs LHBp54.950% | |
| 13 | LA pace | 25 | 2.0 | 0 | 7 | 3.5 | 61.8 Phase Production 61.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.405× parp81.744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp35.444.1% Boundary %0%p86.611.8% | 74.4 Quality 74.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 74.4 Impact 74.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.4 | 72.6 Versatility 72.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp84.150% Econ vs LHBp6150% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 5.0 | 1 | 36 | 7.2 | 61.5 Phase Production 61.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.833× parp76.844.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp42.744.1% Boundary %13%p74.411.8% | 80.5 Quality 80.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 67.1 Impact 67.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.5 | 70.7 Versatility 70.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp59.850% Econ vs LHBp81.750% | |
| 15 | Leg-spin | 23 | 3.0 | 0 | 11 | 3.67 | 56.7 Phase Production 56.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.424× parp86.644.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp19.544.1% Boundary %6%p84.111.8% | 54.9 Quality 54.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 59.8 Impact 59.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 68.3 Versatility 68.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp91.550% Econ vs LHBp45.150% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 27 | 6.0 | 2 | 52 | 8.67 | 56.6 Phase Production 56.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.002× parp54.944.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp64.644.1% Boundary %19%p32.911.8% | 37.8 Quality 37.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.3 | 47.6 Versatility 47.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp30.550% Econ vs LHBp64.650% | |
| 17 | Off-spin | 27 | 9.0 | 2 | 74 | 8.22 | 56.2 Phase Production 56.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.951× parp62.244.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp47.644.1% Boundary %15%p65.911.8% | 3.7 Quality 3.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 28 Impact 28 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.8 | 56.1 Versatility 56.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2850% Econ vs LHBp84.150% | |
| 18 | Off-spin | — | 7.0 | 1 | 50 | 7.14 | 53.6 Phase Production 53.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.826× parp79.344.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp26.844.1% Boundary %17%p57.311.8% | 84.1 Quality 84.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 69.5 Impact 69.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.2 | 80.5 Versatility 80.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7250% Econ vs LHBp8950% | |
| 19 | RA pace | — | 12.0 | 5 | 119 | 9.92 | 47.6 Phase Production 47.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.147× parp18.344.1% Wicket rate0.41/ovp86.644.1% Boundary %22%p1111.8% | 72 Quality 72 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 23.2 Impact 23.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16.5 | 39 Versatility 39 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6.150% Econ vs LHBp7250% | |
| 20 | Leg-spin | 24 | 5.0 | 1 | 44 | 8.8 | 47.5 Phase Production 47.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.018× parp45.144.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp42.744.1% Boundary %13%p74.411.8% | 1.2 Quality 1.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %7% | 47.6 Impact 47.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.4 | 42.7 Versatility 42.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp52.450% Econ vs LHBp32.950% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.0 | 1 | 36 | 9 | 45.5 Phase Production 45.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp40.244.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp56.144.1% Boundary %21%p25.611.8% | 62.2 Quality 62.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 62.2 Impact 62.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.1 | 53.7 Versatility 53.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp20.750% Econ vs LHBp86.650% | |
| 22 | SLA orthodox | 36 | 4.0 | 1 | 39 | 9.75 | 45.3 Phase Production 45.3 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.127× parp32.944.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp56.144.1% Boundary %17%p51.211.8% | 12.2 Quality 12.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 35.4 Impact 35.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.3 | 36.6 Versatility 36.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp54.950% Econ vs LHBp18.350% | |
| 23 | Off-spin | 22 | 7.0 | 1 | 61 | 8.71 | 42.6 Phase Production 42.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.008× parp51.244.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp26.844.1% Boundary %14%p69.511.8% | 35.4 Quality 35.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 42.7 Impact 42.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6 | 45.1 Versatility 45.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp64.650% Econ vs LHBp25.650% | |
| 24 | LA pace | — | 5.0 | 2 | 54 | 10.8 | 42.4 Phase Production 42.4 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.249× parp20.744.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp73.244.1% Boundary %30%p8.511.8% | 96.3 Quality 96.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 98.8 Impact 98.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+70.6 | 36 Versatility 36 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1150% Econ vs LHBp6150% | |
| 25 | Off-spin | 28 | 7.0 | 1 | 61 | 8.71 | 38.9 Phase Production 38.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.008× parp51.244.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp26.844.1% Boundary %19%p37.811.8% | 52.4 Quality 52.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 64.6 Impact 64.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.4 | 37.2 Versatility 37.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp34.150% Econ vs LHBp40.250% | |
| 26 | Leg-spin | 23 | 8.4 | 3 | 89 | 10.27 | 38.2 Phase Production 38.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.187× parp15.944.1% Wicket rate0.35/ovp67.144.1% Boundary %23%p13.411.8% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 6.1 Impact 6.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-32.9 | 22 Versatility 22 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp13.450% Econ vs LHBp30.550% | |
| 27 | Off-spin | 23 | 8.0 | 3 | 92 | 11.5 | 37.3 Phase Production 37.3 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.33× parp6.144.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp76.844.1% Boundary %29%p6.111.8% | 17.1 Quality 17.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 3.7 Impact 3.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-36.9 | 12.2 Versatility 12.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp15.950% Econ vs LHBp8.550% | |
| 28 | Off-spin | — | 6.0 | 0 | 51 | 8.5 | 36.6 Phase Production 36.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.983× parp57.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1144.1% Boundary %17%p54.911.8% | 8.5 Quality 8.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 40.2 Impact 40.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.2 | 47.6 Versatility 47.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp40.250% Econ vs LHBp54.950% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 27 | 3.0 | 1 | 37 | 12.33 | 35 Phase Production 35 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.426× parp1144.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp62.244.1% Boundary %22%p23.211.8% | 20.7 Quality 20.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 32.9 Impact 32.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.1 | 20.7 Versatility 20.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp25.650% Econ vs LHBp15.950% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 37 | 11.0 | 1 | 96 | 8.73 | 35 Phase Production 35 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.009× parp47.644.1% Wicket rate0.09/ovp15.944.1% Boundary %17%p59.811.8% | 46.3 Quality 46.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 15.9 Impact 15.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.9 | 45.1 Versatility 45.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp67.150% Econ vs LHBp23.250% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 25 | 5.0 | 1 | 49 | 9.8 | 34.5 Phase Production 34.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.133× parp2844.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp42.744.1% Boundary %20%p2811.8% | 42.7 Quality 42.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 20.7 Impact 20.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17 | 43.9 Versatility 43.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.750% Econ vs LHBp6.150% | |
| 32 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 0 | 27 | 9 | 33 Phase Production 33 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp42.744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp19.544.1% Boundary %17%p47.611.8% | 67.1 Quality 67.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 52.4 Impact 52.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.2 | 39 Versatility 39 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp42.750% Econ vs LHBp35.450% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 22 | 2.0 | 0 | 22 | 11 | 31.5 Phase Production 31.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.272× parp30.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp35.444.1% Boundary %25%p20.711.8% | 6.1 Quality 6.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 37.8 Impact 37.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.3 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp23.250% Econ vs LHBp45.150% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 23 | 8.0 | 2 | 97 | 12.12 | 24.4 Phase Production 24.4 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.402× parp3.744.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp51.244.1% Boundary %31%p1.211.8% | 69.5 Quality 69.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 1.2 Impact 1.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-54.2 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.250% Econ vs LHBp67.150% | |
| 35 | RA pace | — | 7.0 | 1 | 71 | 10.14 | 24.2 Phase Production 24.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.173× parp23.244.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp26.844.1% Boundary %21%p18.311.8% | 59.8 Quality 59.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 13.4 Impact 13.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.3 | 31.7 Versatility 31.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8.550% Econ vs LHBp54.950% | |
| 36 | Leg-spin | — | 9.0 | 0 | 81 | 9 | 22.5 Phase Production 22.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp37.844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.244.1% Boundary %18%p45.111.8% | 28 Quality 28 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 11 Impact 11 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.7 | 37.8 Versatility 37.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp47.650% Econ vs LHBp2850% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | — | 8.0 | 0 | 74 | 9.25 | 22.1 Phase Production 22.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.07× parp35.444.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.744.1% Boundary %19%p41.511.8% | 30.5 Quality 30.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 45.1 Impact 45.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6 | 29.3 Versatility 29.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp37.850% Econ vs LHBp20.750% | |
| 38 | RA pace | 22 | 2.0 | 0 | 28 | 14 | 21.2 Phase Production 21.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.619× parp8.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp35.444.1% Boundary %33%p15.911.8% | 40.2 Quality 40.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 54.9 Impact 54.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.2 | 31.7 Versatility 31.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp62.250% Econ vs LHBp1.250% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 27 | 6.0 | 0 | 60 | 10 | 20 Phase Production 20 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.156× parp25.644.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1144.1% Boundary %19%p32.911.8% | 64.6 Quality 64.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 8.5 Impact 8.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-25.9 | 35.4 Versatility 35.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp57.350% Econ vs LHBp13.450% | |
| 40 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 0 | 65 | 10.83 | 14.6 Phase Production 14.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.253× parp13.444.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1144.1% Boundary %19%p32.911.8% | 25.6 Quality 25.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 30.5 Impact 30.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.4 | 26.8 Versatility 26.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5050% Econ vs LHBp3.750% | |
| 41 | RA pace | — | 7.0 | 0 | 88 | 12.57 | 3.7 Phase Production 3.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.454× parp1.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp6.144.1% Boundary %31%p3.711.8% | 23.2 Quality 23.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 18.3 Impact 18.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.8 | 7.3 Versatility 7.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.750% Econ vs LHBp1150% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | — | 10.3 | 5 | 66 | 6.29 | 92.8 Phase Production 92.8 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.601× parp97.850% Wicket rate0.47/ovp67.416.7% Boundary %11%p97.833.3% | — | 93.5 Impact 93.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+23.9 | 61 Versatility 61 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep84.440% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 4.4 | 3 | 32 | 6.86 | 89.1 Phase Production 89.1 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.656× parp93.543.6% Boundary %14%p89.141.8% Wicket rate0.64/ovp76.114.5% | — | 76.1 Impact 76.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.9 | 60.7 Versatility 60.7 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep60.7100% | |
| 3 | RA pace | — | 5.1 | 4 | 43 | 8.32 | 81.9 Phase Production 81.9 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.796× parp80.450% Wicket rate0.77/ovp89.116.7% Boundary %19%p80.433.3% | — | 84.8 Impact 84.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.1 | 46 Versatility 46 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep46.940% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 4 | LA pace | 25 | 5.4 | 0 | 44 | 7.76 | 76.1 Phase Production 76.1 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.743× parp89.150% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2.216.7% Boundary %15%p93.533.3% | — | 89.1 Impact 89.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+13 | 43.5 Versatility 43.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep40.640% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 5 | LA pace | — | 6.3 | 2 | 55 | 8.46 | 75.4 Phase Production 75.4 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.809× parp84.850% Wicket rate0.31/ovp28.316.7% Boundary %18%p84.833.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.2 | 63.5 Versatility 63.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep90.640% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | 28 | 2.1 | 2 | 19 | 8.77 | 71.7 Phase Production 71.7 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.839× parp6343.6% Boundary %15%p76.141.8% Wicket rate0.92/ovp84.814.5% | — | 63 Impact 63 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 57.1 Versatility 57.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep57.1100% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 23 | 6.4 | 4 | 64 | 9.6 | 71 Phase Production 71 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.918× parp76.150% Wicket rate0.60/ovp80.416.7% Boundary %25%p58.733.3% | — | 45.7 Impact 45.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.6 | 53.5 Versatility 53.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep34.440% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp90.626.7% | |
| 8 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.0 | 2 | 36 | 9 | 69.6 Phase Production 69.6 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.861× parp71.743.6% Boundary %21%p69.641.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp6314.5% | — | 41.3 Impact 41.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.4 | 57.1 Versatility 57.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep57.1100% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | 19 | 2.0 | 1 | 17 | 8.5 | 63.7 Phase Production 63.7 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.813× parp67.443.6% Boundary %17%p6341.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp54.314.5% | — | 67.4 Impact 67.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.1 | 46.4 Versatility 46.4 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep46.4100% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 25 | 7.0 | 6 | 75 | 10.71 | 59.4 Phase Production 59.4 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.025× parp58.750% Wicket rate0.86/ovp97.816.7% Boundary %29%p41.333.3% | — | 54.3 Impact 54.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.3 | 53.5 Versatility 53.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep65.640% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.0 | 1 | 42 | 10.5 | 56.3 Phase Production 56.3 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.005× parp54.343.6% Boundary %21%p69.641.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp23.914.5% | — | 80.4 Impact 80.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7 | 53.6 Versatility 53.6 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep53.6100% | |
| 12 | LA pace | 32 | 10.0 | 4 | 111 | 11.1 | 48.6 Phase Production 48.6 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.062× parp5050% Wicket rate0.40/ovp41.316.7% Boundary %27%p5033.3% | — | 6.5 Impact 6.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-20.6 | 56 Versatility 56 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep71.940% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 13 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 4 | 58 | 11.6 | 46.4 Phase Production 46.4 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.11× parp45.750% Wicket rate0.80/ovp93.516.7% Boundary %30%p23.933.3% | — | 23.9 Impact 23.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.9 | 48.5 Versatility 48.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep53.140% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 14 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 1 | 38 | 12.67 | 39.9 Phase Production 39.9 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.212× parp3750% Wicket rate0.34/ovp3716.7% Boundary %28%p45.733.3% | — | 34.8 Impact 34.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.2 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.640% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 15 | Off-spin | — | 2.0 | 1 | 25 | 12.5 | 38.7 Phase Production 38.7 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.196× parp41.343.6% Boundary %33%p30.441.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp54.314.5% | — | 34.8 Impact 34.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.2 | 10.7 Versatility 10.7 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep10.7100% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 26 | 7.2 | 4 | 89 | 12.14 | 34.8 Phase Production 34.8 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.161× parp32.650% Wicket rate0.55/ovp71.716.7% Boundary %32%p19.633.3% | — | 15.2 Impact 15.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16.9 | 51 Versatility 51 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep59.440% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 22 | 6.2 | 2 | 79 | 12.47 | 29.7 Phase Production 29.7 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.193× parp23.950% Wicket rate0.32/ovp32.616.7% Boundary %29%p3733.3% | — | 97.8 Impact 97.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+30.4 | 58.5 Versatility 58.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep78.140% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 22 | 2.0 | 0 | 31 | 15.5 | 27.9 Phase Production 27.9 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.483× parp15.250% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1316.7% Boundary %25%p54.333.3% | — | 58.7 Impact 58.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50.2 Versatility 50.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.640% Slower ballp96.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 31 | 2.0 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 22.1 Phase Production 22.1 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.435× parp19.650% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1316.7% Boundary %33%p30.433.3% | — | 10.9 Impact 10.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.3 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.640% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 20 | LA pace | 23 | 2.0 | 0 | 27 | 13.5 | 19.9 Phase Production 19.9 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.292× parp28.350% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1316.7% Boundary %42%p10.933.3% | — | 2.2 Impact 2.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-39.6 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.640% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 21 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 1 | 35 | 17.5 | 15.9 Phase Production 15.9 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.674× parp6.550% Wicket rate0.50/ovp54.316.7% Boundary %42%p10.933.3% | — | 71.7 Impact 71.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.9 | 66 Versatility 66 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep96.940% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp43.826.7% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 0 | 33 | 16.5 | 11.2 Phase Production 11.2 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.579× parp10.950% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1316.7% Boundary %42%p10.933.3% | — | 19.6 Impact 19.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.6 | 47.7 Versatility 47.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep15.640% Slower ballp46.933.3% Slow bouncerp96.926.7% | |
| 23 | Off-spin | 22 | 2.3 | 1 | 42 | 16.8 | 8.5 Phase Production 8.5 vs all bowlers · n=23 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.607× parp2.243.6% Boundary %47%p2.241.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp45.714.5% | — | 28.3 Impact 28.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.8 | 64.3 Versatility 64.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep64.3100% |
Sanjeet Sharma
Bowler · RA pace
88.7
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 10 · Econ 2.5
88.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle88.775%66.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50n/a
Scout Score88.7
88.7Middle75% of overs · 3w · 1.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp95.838%
Impactp86.625%
Qualityp98.815%
Versatilityp90.212%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.193× par18bp96.344.1%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp96.344.1%
Boundary %0%18bp91.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.295× par12bp86.650%
Econ vs LHB0× par6bp93.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +28.1 · induced false-shot 50%
Sushant Mishra
Bowler · LA pace · age 25
77.1
Scout Score
Overs 15.4 · Wkts 2 · Runs 114 · Econ 7.28
77.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay79.251.1%40.5
Middle7112.8%9.1
Death76.236.2%27.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p90.60.89×
Scout Score77.1
79.2Powerplay51.1% of overs · 2w · 7.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.438%
Impactp86.427%
Qualityp98.515%
Versatilityp64.210%
Trajectoryp90.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.852× par48bp83.336.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp59.142.1%
Boundary %23%48bp56.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.865× par28bp77.330%
Econ vs LHB0.831× par20bp74.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.43/ov28bp86.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov20bp7.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.7 · induced false-shot 46%
71Middle12.8% of overs · 0w · 3.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.838%
Impactp74.425%
Qualityp74.415%
Versatilityp72.612%
Trajectoryp90.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.405× par12bp81.744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp35.444.1%
Boundary %0%12bp86.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.354× par10bp84.150%
Econ vs LHB0.673× par2bp6150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.4 · induced false-shot 33%
76.2Death36.2% of overs · 0w · 7.76 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.148%
Impactp89.125%
Versatilityp43.515%
Trajectoryp90.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.743× par34bp89.150%
Wicket rate0.00/ov34bp2.216.7%
Boundary %15%34bp93.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%34bp40.640%
Slower ball034bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer034bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +13
Manishi
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
75.9
Scout Score
Overs 23.4 · Wkts 8 · Runs 169 · Econ 7.14
75.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay49.216.9%8.3
Middle80.463.4%51.0
Death84.319.7%16.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p94.80.85×
Scout Score75.9
49.2Powerplay16.9% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp4838%
Impactp5327%
Qualityp16.715%
Versatilityp46.410%
Trajectoryp94.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.973× par24bp45.536.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp5342.1%
Boundary %25%24bp42.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.906× par13bp5330%
Econ vs LHB1.046× par11bp37.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.46/ov13bp74.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp21.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.8 · induced false-shot 17%
80.4Middle63.4% of overs · 4w · 6.73 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.338%
Impactp84.125%
Qualityp8915%
Versatilityp65.912%
Trajectoryp94.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.779× par90bp8944.1%
Wicket rate0.26/ov90bp59.844.1%
Boundary %13%90bp81.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.718× par68bp93.950%
Econ vs LHB0.978× par22bp37.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +23.9 · induced false-shot 28%
84.3Death19.7% of overs · 3w · 6.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp89.155%
Impactp76.125%
Versatilityp60.78%
Trajectoryp94.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.656× par28bp93.543.6%
Boundary %14%28bp89.141.8%
Wicket rate0.64/ov28bp76.114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7224bp60.7100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.9
Anmol Raj
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 19
75.6
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 87 · Econ 7.91
75.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle77.881.8%63.6
Death65.618.2%11.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p83.30.92×
Scout Score75.6
77.8Middle81.8% of overs · 5w · 7.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.838%
Impactp7225%
Qualityp91.515%
Versatilityp62.212%
Trajectoryp83.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.899× par54bp74.444.1%
Wicket rate0.56/ov54bp8944.1%
Boundary %15%54bp65.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.91× par49bp74.450%
Econ vs LHB0.942× par5bp5050%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9 · induced false-shot 30%
65.6Death18.2% of overs · 1w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.755%
Impactp67.425%
Versatilityp46.48%
Trajectoryp83.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.813× par12bp67.443.6%
Boundary %17%12bp6341.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp54.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.8112bp46.4100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.1
Anurag Singh Sengar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 33
73.2
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 78 · Econ 7.09
73.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle73.2100%73.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p13.51.19×
Scout Score73.2
73.2Middle100% of overs · 6w · 7.09 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp85.938%
Impactp91.525%
Qualityp46.315%
Versatilityp7812%
Trajectoryp13.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.82× par66bp84.144.1%
Wicket rate0.55/ov66bp93.944.1%
Boundary %15%66bp62.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.816× par46bp79.350%
Econ vs LHB0.841× par20bp76.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +39.2 · induced false-shot 21%
Pratyush Kumar
Bowler · RA pace
72.7
Scout Score
Overs 22.3 · Wkts 8 · Runs 165 · Econ 7.33
72.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay67.353.3%35.9
Death78.946.7%36.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p15.61.16×
Scout Score72.7
67.3Powerplay53.3% of overs · 3w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.238%
Impactp77.327%
Qualityp89.415%
Versatilityp58.810%
Trajectoryp15.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.892× par72bp74.236.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov72bp62.142.1%
Boundary %22%72bp65.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.822× par43bp92.430%
Econ vs LHB0.992× par29bp31.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.14/ov43bp40.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.41/ov29bp66.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.9 · induced false-shot 38%
78.9Death46.7% of overs · 5w · 6.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp92.848%
Impactp93.525%
Versatilityp6115%
Trajectoryp15.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.601× par63bp97.850%
Wicket rate0.47/ov63bp67.416.7%
Boundary %11%63bp97.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate13%63bp84.440%
Slower ball063bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer063bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +23.9
Harsh Raj
Bowler · LA pace
70.2
Scout Score
Overs 18.3 · Wkts 8 · Runs 164 · Econ 8.86
70.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay81.237.8%30.7
Middle63.927%17.3
Death63.335.1%22.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p42.71.04×
Scout Score70.2
81.2Powerplay37.8% of overs · 4w · 7.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp86.838%
Impactp98.527%
Qualityp65.215%
Versatilityp75.810%
Trajectoryp42.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.85× par42bp77.336.8%
Wicket rate0.57/ov42bp95.542.1%
Boundary %19%42bp86.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.759× par25bp89.430%
Econ vs LHB0.977× par17bp40.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.48/ov25bp92.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.71/ov17bp90.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +31.2 · induced false-shot 33%
63.9Middle27% of overs · 2w · 10.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.438%
Impactp98.825%
Qualityp96.315%
Versatilityp3612%
Trajectoryp42.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.249× par30bp20.744.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp73.244.1%
Boundary %30%30bp8.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.315× par28bp1150%
Econ vs LHB0.673× par2bp6150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +70.6 · induced false-shot 40%
63.3Death35.1% of overs · 2w · 8.46 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.448%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp63.515%
Trajectoryp42.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.809× par39bp84.850%
Wicket rate0.31/ov39bp28.316.7%
Boundary %18%39bp84.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate15%39bp90.640%
Slower ball039bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer039bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.2
Prince Anurag Murmu
Bowler · Leg-spin
70.1
Scout Score
Overs 23.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 170 · Econ 7.39
70.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay2421.7%5.2
Middle83.773.9%61.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p9.41.23×
Scout Score70.1
24Powerplay21.7% of overs · 1w · 11.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.538%
Impactp13.627%
Qualityp39.415%
Versatilityp41.510%
Trajectoryp9.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.233× par30bp13.636.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp42.442.1%
Boundary %37%30bp7.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.745× par15bp4.530%
Econ vs LHB0.724× par15bp80.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.40/ov15bp68.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov15bp12.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.8 · induced false-shot 27%
83.7Middle73.9% of overs · 6w · 6.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp87.738%
Impactp96.325%
Qualityp93.915%
Versatilityp93.912%
Trajectoryp9.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.728× par102bp93.944.1%
Wicket rate0.35/ov102bp79.344.1%
Boundary %10%102bp96.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.735× par52bp8950%
Econ vs LHB0.713× par50bp98.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +46.8 · induced false-shot 28%
Mohit Kumar
Bowler · Off-spin
68.8
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 57 · Econ 6.33
68.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay77.622.2%17.2
Middle66.377.8%51.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p62.51×
Scout Score68.8
77.6Powerplay22.2% of overs · 1w · 3.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp85.138%
Impactp80.327%
Qualityp62.115%
Versatilityp8010%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.378× par12bp92.436.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp75.842.1%
Boundary %8%12bp90.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.164× par4bp86.430%
Econ vs LHB0.479× par8bp92.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov4bp56.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.75/ov8bp75.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.3 · induced false-shot 33%
66.3Middle77.8% of overs · 1w · 7.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.638%
Impactp69.525%
Qualityp84.115%
Versatilityp80.512%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.826× par42bp79.344.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp26.844.1%
Boundary %17%42bp57.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.869× par22bp7250%
Econ vs LHB0.774× par20bp8950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.2 · induced false-shot 29%
Sonu Singh
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 30
68.1
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 42 · Econ 7
68.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle68.183.3%56.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p740.99×
Scout Score68.1
68.1Middle83.3% of overs · 1w · 7.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.538%
Impactp67.125%
Qualityp80.515%
Versatilityp70.712%
Trajectoryp7410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.833× par30bp76.844.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp42.744.1%
Boundary %13%30bp74.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.91× par21bp59.850%
Econ vs LHB0.673× par9bp81.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.5 · induced false-shot 30%
Chandan Mukhi
Bowler · SLA orthodox
66.5
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 65 · Econ 5.91
66.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay74.927.3%20.4
Middle63.372.7%46.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p83.30.92×
Scout Score66.5
74.9Powerplay27.3% of overs · 2w · 7.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.438%
Impactp89.427%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp7010%
Trajectoryp83.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.793× par18bp71.236.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp86.442.1%
Boundary %22%18bp51.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.873× par15bp68.230%
Econ vs LHB0.426× par3bp71.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.80/ov15bp95.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp45.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.9 · induced false-shot 28%
63.3Middle72.7% of overs · 2w · 5.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp7438%
Impactp57.325%
Qualityp17.115%
Versatilityp82.912%
Trajectoryp83.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.622× par48bp91.544.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp51.244.1%
Boundary %8%48bp93.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.607× par42bp96.350%
Econ vs LHB0.785× par6bp69.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.8 · induced false-shot 17%
Sadab Hussein
Bowler · RA pace
63.5
Scout Score
Overs 17.1 · Wkts 7 · Runs 139 · Econ 8.1
63.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay6752.4%35.1
Middle42.417.5%7.4
Death69.830.1%21.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p19.81.12×
Scout Score63.5
67Powerplay52.4% of overs · 3w · 7.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.238%
Impactp92.427%
Qualityp7.615%
Versatilityp76.410%
Trajectoryp19.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.829× par54bp86.436.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp80.342.1%
Boundary %20%54bp78.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.873× par30bp74.230%
Econ vs LHB0.772× par24bp83.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.20/ov30bp65.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.50/ov24bp80.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15.3 · induced false-shot 18%
42.4Middle17.5% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp3338%
Impactp52.425%
Qualityp67.115%
Versatilityp3912%
Trajectoryp19.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par18bp42.744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp19.544.1%
Boundary %17%18bp47.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.062× par8bp42.750%
Econ vs LHB1.009× par10bp35.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.2 · induced false-shot 28%
69.8Death30.1% of overs · 4w · 8.32 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.948%
Impactp84.825%
Versatilityp4615%
Trajectoryp19.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.796× par31bp80.450%
Wicket rate0.77/ov31bp89.116.7%
Boundary %19%31bp80.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%31bp46.940%
Slower ball031bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer031bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.1
Supriyo Chakraborty
Bowler · RA pace · age 31
62.4
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 110 · Econ 9.17
62.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay70.616.7%11.8
Middle70.366.7%46.9
Death22.516.7%3.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p34.41.06×
Scout Score62.4
70.6Powerplay16.7% of overs · 1w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.938%
Impactp83.327%
Qualityp68.215%
Versatilityp63.310%
Trajectoryp34.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.811× par12bp62.136.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp75.842.1%
Boundary %8%12bp90.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.418× par6bp25.830%
Econ vs LHB0.213× par6bp95.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov6bp5020%
Wkt vs LHB1.00/ov6bp84.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10 · induced false-shot 42%
70.3Middle66.7% of overs · 5w · 8.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp7738%
Impactp76.825%
Qualityp76.815%
Versatilityp57.312%
Trajectoryp34.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.94× par48bp64.644.1%
Wicket rate0.62/ov48bp98.844.1%
Boundary %19%48bp41.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.302× par25bp18.350%
Econ vs LHB0.556× par23bp96.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +16.6 · induced false-shot 27%
22.5Death16.7% of overs · 0w · 15 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.148%
Impactp10.925%
Versatilityp33.515%
Trajectoryp34.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.435× par12bp19.650%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp1316.7%
Boundary %33%12bp30.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp15.640%
Slower ball012bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer012bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.3
Junaid Ashra
Bowler · LA pace
62.3
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 130 · Econ 10.83
62.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay62.383.3%51.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p241.1×
Scout Score62.3
62.3Powerplay83.3% of overs · 5w · 9.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.638%
Impactp68.227%
Qualityp83.315%
Versatilityp63.910%
Trajectoryp2410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.995× par60bp37.936.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov60bp92.442.1%
Boundary %27%60bp31.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.948× par49bp71.230%
Econ vs LHB1.22× par11bp16.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov49bp89.420%
Wkt vs LHB1.09/ov11bp98.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.1 · induced false-shot 37%
Rahul Prasad
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 33
62.3
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 133 · Econ 7.82
62.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay4523.5%10.6
Middle68.170.6%48.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p491.02×
Scout Score62.3
45Powerplay23.5% of overs · 0w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.838%
Impactp56.127%
Qualityp34.815%
Versatilityp45.910%
Trajectoryp4910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.919× par24bp56.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp15.242.1%
Boundary %21%24bp60.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.927× par24bp65.230%
Econ vs LHB—0bp48.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov24bp4.520%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp54.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.2 · induced false-shot 25%
68.1Middle70.6% of overs · 4w · 7.92 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.838%
Impactp93.925%
Qualityp32.915%
Versatilityp62.212%
Trajectoryp4910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.915× par72bp69.544.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp69.544.1%
Boundary %11%72bp8911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.918× par54bp69.550%
Econ vs LHB0.934× par18bp54.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +40.8 · induced false-shot 19%
Vikash Kumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 30
62.3
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 20 · Econ 5
62.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay62.375%46.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p62.51×
Scout Score62.3
62.3Powerplay75% of overs · 0w · 5.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.138%
Impactp74.227%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp64.110%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.613× par18bp89.436.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp24.242.1%
Boundary %17%18bp71.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.748× par14bp81.830%
Econ vs LHB0.16× par4bp89.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov14bp22.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp40.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.7 · induced false-shot 28%
Pratik Ranjan
Bowler · SLA orthodox
62
Scout Score
Overs 26.0 · Wkts 11 · Runs 200 · Econ 7.69
62OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay40.530.8%12.5
Middle76.253.8%41.0
Death55.515.4%8.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p11.53×
Scout Score62
40.5Powerplay30.8% of overs · 3w · 9.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.138%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp13.615%
Versatilityp50.310%
Trajectoryp110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.014× par48bp34.836.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp83.342.1%
Boundary %29%48bp19.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.016× par29bp43.930%
Econ vs LHB1.009× par19bp34.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.41/ov29bp83.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.32/ov19bp5020%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2 · induced false-shot 21%
76.2Middle53.8% of overs · 7w · 5.93 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp95.638%
Impactp79.325%
Qualityp57.315%
Versatilityp95.112%
Trajectoryp110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.686× par84bp98.844.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov84bp91.544.1%
Boundary %8%84bp98.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.648× par59bp98.850%
Econ vs LHB0.78× par25bp91.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +17.2 · induced false-shot 23%
55.5Death15.4% of overs · 1w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.355%
Impactp80.425%
Versatilityp53.68%
Trajectoryp112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.005× par24bp54.343.6%
Boundary %21%24bp69.641.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp23.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.5314bp53.6100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7
Gunjan Yadav
Bowler · Chinaman
59.6
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 40 · Econ 8
59.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle59.680%47.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p62.51×
Scout Score59.6
59.6Middle80% of overs · 2w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp72.338%
Impactp25.625%
Qualityp86.615%
Versatilityp54.312%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.954× par24bp59.844.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp82.944.1%
Boundary %12%24bp79.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.03× par22bp34.150%
Econ vs LHB0.336× par2bp74.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.1 · induced false-shot 33%
Pankaj Yadav
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 23
59.2
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 19 · Econ 4.75
59.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle59.275%44.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p62.51×
Scout Score59.2
59.2Middle75% of overs · 0w · 3.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.738%
Impactp59.825%
Qualityp54.915%
Versatilityp68.312%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.424× par18bp86.644.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp19.544.1%
Boundary %6%18bp84.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.433× par18bp91.550%
Econ vs LHB—0bp45.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
Utkarsh Singh
Bowler · Off-spin · age 28
57.9
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 83 · Econ 8.3
57.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay50.560%30.3
Middle68.940%27.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p990.82×
Scout Score57.9
50.5Powerplay60% of overs · 1w · 8.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.138%
Impactp43.927%
Qualityp31.815%
Versatilityp45.910%
Trajectoryp9910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.937× par36bp5336.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp37.942.1%
Boundary %19%36bp74.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.018× par18bp39.430%
Econ vs LHB0.852× par18bp62.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov18bp18.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.34/ov18bp59.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.7 · induced false-shot 25%
68.9Middle40% of overs · 2w · 7.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp72.238%
Impactp8925%
Qualityp12.215%
Versatilityp62.212%
Trajectoryp9910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.896× par24bp67.144.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp82.944.1%
Boundary %17%24bp51.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.03× par11bp45.150%
Econ vs LHB0.776× par13bp79.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +30.9 · induced false-shot 12%
Durgesh Kumar
Bowler · Off-spin · age 28
57.3
Scout Score
Overs 9.1 · Wkts 3 · Runs 80 · Econ 8.73
57.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle52.976.4%40.4
Death71.423.6%16.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p96.90.85×
Scout Score57.3
52.9Middle76.4% of overs · 1w · 8.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.938%
Impactp64.625%
Qualityp52.415%
Versatilityp37.212%
Trajectoryp96.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.008× par42bp51.244.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp26.844.1%
Boundary %19%42bp37.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.03× par22bp34.150%
Econ vs LHB0.975× par20bp40.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.4 · induced false-shot 21%
71.4Death23.6% of overs · 2w · 8.77 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.755%
Impactp6325%
Versatilityp57.18%
Trajectoryp96.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.839× par13bp6343.6%
Boundary %15%13bp76.141.8%
Wicket rate0.92/ov13bp84.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.97bp57.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Deepanshu Rawat
Bowler · SLA orthodox
56.8
Scout Score
Overs 19.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 149 · Econ 7.84
56.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay76.336.8%28.1
Middle36.442.1%15.3
Death63.521.1%13.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p86.50.9×
Scout Score56.8
76.3Powerplay36.8% of overs · 2w · 5.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.438%
Impactp95.527%
Qualityp21.215%
Versatilityp65.810%
Trajectoryp86.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.602× par42bp98.536.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp66.742.1%
Boundary %12%42bp95.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.481× par34bp98.530%
Econ vs LHB1.118× par8bp28.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.17/ov34bp62.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.75/ov8bp75.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +19.9 · induced false-shot 21%
36.4Middle42.1% of overs · 0w · 9.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.138%
Impactp45.125%
Qualityp30.515%
Versatilityp29.312%
Trajectoryp86.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.07× par48bp35.444.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov48bp3.744.1%
Boundary %19%48bp41.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.003× par36bp37.850%
Econ vs LHB1.289× par12bp20.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6 · induced false-shot 19%
63.5Death21.1% of overs · 2w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.655%
Impactp41.325%
Versatilityp57.18%
Trajectoryp86.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.861× par24bp71.743.6%
Boundary %21%24bp69.641.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp6314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.8219bp57.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.4
Sahil Raj
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
55.8
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 68 · Econ 9.71
55.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay6157.1%34.8
Death45.228.6%12.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p80.20.94×
Scout Score55.8
61Powerplay57.1% of overs · 1w · 7.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.738%
Impactp40.927%
Qualityp74.215%
Versatilityp62.610%
Trajectoryp80.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.784× par24bp80.336.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp5342.1%
Boundary %21%24bp60.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.748× par14bp81.830%
Econ vs LHB0.831× par10bp59.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.43/ov14bp71.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov10bp30.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.2 · induced false-shot 38%
45.2Death28.6% of overs · 0w · 15.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.948%
Impactp58.725%
Versatilityp50.215%
Trajectoryp80.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.483× par12bp15.250%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp1316.7%
Boundary %25%12bp54.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp15.640%
Slower ball20.83312bp96.933.3%
Slow bouncer012bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Aditya Raj Jha
Bowler · SLA orthodox
54.9
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 45 · Econ 9
54.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle54.980%43.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p62.51×
Scout Score54.9
54.9Middle80% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.538%
Impactp62.225%
Qualityp62.215%
Versatilityp53.712%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par24bp40.244.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp56.144.1%
Boundary %21%24bp25.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.203× par20bp20.750%
Econ vs LHB0.336× par4bp86.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.1 · induced false-shot 25%
Shubh Sharma
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
53.8
Scout Score
Overs 18.2 · Wkts 3 · Runs 164 · Econ 8.95
53.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay61.154.5%33.3
Middle28.610.9%3.1
Death50.134.5%17.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p21.91.1×
Scout Score53.8
61.1Powerplay54.5% of overs · 1w · 6.3 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.438%
Impactp65.227%
Qualityp77.315%
Versatilityp68.210%
Trajectoryp21.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.681× par60bp95.536.8%
Wicket rate0.10/ov60bp10.642.1%
Boundary %13%60bp98.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.748× par49bp95.530%
Econ vs LHB0.407× par11bp98.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.12/ov49bp28.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp21.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.1 · induced false-shot 35%
28.6Middle10.9% of overs · 0w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp31.538%
Impactp37.825%
Qualityp6.115%
Versatilityp34.112%
Trajectoryp21.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.272× par12bp30.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp35.444.1%
Boundary %25%12bp20.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.298× par12bp23.250%
Econ vs LHB—0bp45.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.3 · induced false-shot 0%
50.1Death34.5% of overs · 2w · 12.47 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.748%
Impactp97.825%
Versatilityp58.515%
Trajectoryp21.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.193× par38bp23.950%
Wicket rate0.32/ov38bp32.616.7%
Boundary %29%38bp3733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%38bp78.140%
Slower ball038bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer038bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +30.4
Aman Kumar Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
51.7
Scout Score
Overs 19.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 183 · Econ 9.63
51.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay51.836.8%19.1
Middle38.826.3%10.2
Death60.836.8%22.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p88.50.9×
Scout Score51.7
51.8Powerplay36.8% of overs · 2w · 8.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp6038%
Impactp22.727%
Qualityp56.115%
Versatilityp55.810%
Trajectoryp88.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.911× par42bp65.236.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp66.742.1%
Boundary %26%42bp37.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.029× par28bp34.830%
Econ vs LHB0.685× par14bp86.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov28bp1.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.86/ov14bp95.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.7 · induced false-shot 29%
38.8Middle26.3% of overs · 1w · 9.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.538%
Impactp20.725%
Qualityp42.715%
Versatilityp43.912%
Trajectoryp88.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.133× par30bp2844.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp42.744.1%
Boundary %20%30bp2811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.531× par12bp81.750%
Econ vs LHB1.495× par18bp6.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17 · induced false-shot 20%
60.8Death36.8% of overs · 6w · 10.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.448%
Impactp54.325%
Versatilityp53.515%
Trajectoryp88.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.025× par42bp58.750%
Wicket rate0.86/ov42bp97.816.7%
Boundary %29%42bp41.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%42bp65.640%
Slower ball042bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer042bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.3
Atul Singh Surwar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 27
49.4
Scout Score
Overs 7.3 · Wkts 2 · Runs 70 · Econ 9.33
49.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle49.480%39.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p40.61.04×
Scout Score49.4
49.4Middle80% of overs · 2w · 8.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.638%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp37.815%
Versatilityp47.612%
Trajectoryp40.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.002× par36bp54.944.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp64.644.1%
Boundary %19%36bp32.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.05× par29bp30.550%
Econ vs LHB0.865× par7bp64.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.3 · induced false-shot 19%
Rahul Rajak
Bowler · RA pace
48.7
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 12 · Runs 215 · Econ 10.24
48.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay52.971.4%37.8
Death36.123.8%8.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p5.21.36×
Scout Score48.7
52.9Powerplay71.4% of overs · 8w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.138%
Impactp4727%
Qualityp92.415%
Versatilityp5310%
Trajectoryp5.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.081× par90bp19.736.8%
Wicket rate0.53/ov90bp98.542.1%
Boundary %27%90bp25.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.17× par61bp10.630%
Econ vs LHB0.903× par29bp56.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.59/ov61bp98.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.41/ov29bp66.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.6 · induced false-shot 37%
36.1Death23.8% of overs · 4w · 11.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.448%
Impactp23.925%
Versatilityp48.515%
Trajectoryp5.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.11× par30bp45.750%
Wicket rate0.80/ov30bp93.516.7%
Boundary %30%30bp23.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%30bp53.140%
Slower ball030bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer030bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.9
Shakti Singh
Bowler · Off-spin
43.1
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 134 · Econ 8.93
43.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay47.746.7%22.3
Middle38.840%15.5
Death40.213.3%5.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p78.10.97×
Scout Score43.1
47.7Powerplay46.7% of overs · 0w · 8.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.638%
Impactp71.227%
Qualityp21.215%
Versatilityp39.710%
Trajectoryp78.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.896× par42bp68.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov42bp1.542.1%
Boundary %24%42bp4721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.93× par19bp56.130%
Econ vs LHB0.861× par23bp65.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov19bp12.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov23bp4.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.5 · induced false-shot 21%
38.8Middle40% of overs · 0w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.638%
Impactp40.225%
Qualityp8.515%
Versatilityp47.612%
Trajectoryp78.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.983× par36bp57.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp1144.1%
Boundary %17%36bp54.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.022× par18bp40.250%
Econ vs LHB0.934× par18bp54.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.2 · induced false-shot 14%
40.2Death13.3% of overs · 1w · 12.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.755%
Impactp34.825%
Versatilityp10.78%
Trajectoryp78.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.196× par12bp41.343.6%
Boundary %33%12bp30.441.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp54.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.289bp10.7100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.2
Saurabh Shekhar
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
42.7
Scout Score
Overs 17.2 · Wkts 7 · Runs 173 · Econ 9.98
42.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay53.451.9%27.7
Death29.542.3%12.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p11.51.2×
Scout Score42.7
53.4Powerplay51.9% of overs · 2w · 8.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.838%
Impactp62.127%
Qualityp59.115%
Versatilityp57.910%
Trajectoryp11.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.949× par54bp5036.8%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp4742.1%
Boundary %20%54bp78.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.965× par38bp59.130%
Econ vs LHB0.919× par16bp5330%
Wkt vs RHB0.16/ov38bp59.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.37/ov16bp62.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.7 · induced false-shot 30%
29.5Death42.3% of overs · 4w · 12.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.848%
Impactp15.225%
Versatilityp5115%
Trajectoryp11.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.161× par44bp32.650%
Wicket rate0.55/ov44bp71.716.7%
Boundary %32%44bp19.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%44bp59.440%
Slower ball044bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer044bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16.9
Yuvraj Kumar
Bowler · RA pace
41.8
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 176 · Econ 11
41.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle4375%32.2
Death37.218.8%7.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p36.51.06×
Scout Score41.8
43Middle75% of overs · 5w · 9.92 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.638%
Impactp23.225%
Qualityp7215%
Versatilityp3912%
Trajectoryp36.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.147× par72bp18.344.1%
Wicket rate0.41/ov72bp86.644.1%
Boundary %22%72bp1111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.36× par38bp6.150%
Econ vs LHB0.91× par34bp7250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16.5 · induced false-shot 25%
37.2Death18.8% of overs · 1w · 12.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.948%
Impactp34.825%
Versatilityp33.515%
Trajectoryp36.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.212× par18bp3750%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp3716.7%
Boundary %28%18bp45.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%18bp15.640%
Slower ball018bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer018bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.2
Pranjal Kumar
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 24
41.5
Scout Score
Overs 5.2 · Wkts 1 · Runs 50 · Econ 9.38
41.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle41.593.8%38.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p62.51×
Scout Score41.5
41.5Middle93.8% of overs · 1w · 8.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.538%
Impactp47.625%
Qualityp1.215%
Versatilityp42.712%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.018× par30bp45.144.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp42.744.1%
Boundary %13%30bp74.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.991× par15bp52.450%
Econ vs LHB1.031× par15bp32.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.4 · induced false-shot 7%
Vikash Singh
Bowler · LA pace · age 32
39.7
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 221 · Econ 11.05
39.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay13.525%3.4
Middle70.725%17.7
Death37.250%18.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p32.31.07×
Scout Score39.7
13.5Powerplay25% of overs · 0w · 14.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp4.438%
Impactp4.527%
Qualityp39.415%
Versatilityp14.810%
Trajectoryp32.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.579× par30bp1.536.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp7.642.1%
Boundary %47%30bp321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.8× par20bp1.530%
Econ vs LHB1.15× par10bp22.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov20bp7.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov10bp30.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -28.2 · induced false-shot 27%
70.7Middle25% of overs · 2w · 7.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp72.838%
Impactp81.725%
Qualityp80.515%
Versatilityp6112%
Trajectoryp32.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.856× par30bp7244.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp73.244.1%
Boundary %13%30bp74.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.873× par30bp76.850%
Econ vs LHB—0bp45.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +21.4 · induced false-shot 30%
37.2Death50% of overs · 4w · 11.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.648%
Impactp6.525%
Versatilityp5615%
Trajectoryp32.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.062× par60bp5050%
Wicket rate0.40/ov60bp41.316.7%
Boundary %27%60bp5033.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%60bp71.940%
Slower ball060bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer060bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -20.6
Priyanshu Choubey
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 36
38.5
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 50 · Econ 10
38.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle38.580%30.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p62.51×
Scout Score38.5
38.5Middle80% of overs · 1w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.338%
Impactp35.425%
Qualityp12.215%
Versatilityp36.612%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.127× par24bp32.944.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp56.144.1%
Boundary %17%24bp51.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.91× par14bp54.950%
Econ vs LHB1.413× par10bp18.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.3 · induced false-shot 12%
Harsh Rana
Bowler · RA pace
37.9
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 192 · Econ 12
37.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay43.850%21.9
Middle27.837.5%10.4
Death44.612.5%5.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p760.98×
Scout Score37.9
43.8Powerplay50% of overs · 4w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.738%
Impactp19.727%
Qualityp71.215%
Versatilityp39.710%
Trajectoryp7610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.244× par48bp7.636.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov48bp89.442.1%
Boundary %33%48bp10.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.182× par31bp13.630%
Econ vs LHB1.353× par17bp4.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.39/ov31bp80.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.71/ov17bp90.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.8 · induced false-shot 33%
27.8Middle37.5% of overs · 0w · 10.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp14.638%
Impactp30.525%
Qualityp25.615%
Versatilityp26.812%
Trajectoryp7610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.253× par36bp13.444.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp1144.1%
Boundary %19%36bp32.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.991× par20bp5050%
Econ vs LHB1.555× par16bp3.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.4 · induced false-shot 17%
44.6Death12.5% of overs · 1w · 17.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp15.948%
Impactp71.725%
Versatilityp6615%
Trajectoryp7612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.674× par12bp6.550%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp54.316.7%
Boundary %42%12bp10.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate17%12bp96.940%
Slower ball012bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer012bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.9
Vivekanand Tiwari
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
37.4
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 165 · Econ 11
37.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay39.473.3%28.9
Middle29.920%6.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p28.11.09×
Scout Score37.4
39.4Powerplay73.3% of overs · 3w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.338%
Impactp10.627%
Qualityp86.415%
Versatilityp39.710%
Trajectoryp28.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.081× par66bp25.836.8%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp71.242.1%
Boundary %27%66bp22.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.016× par38bp4730%
Econ vs LHB1.164× par28bp10.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.32/ov38bp77.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.22/ov28bp34.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -23.1 · induced false-shot 38%
29.9Middle20% of overs · 1w · 12.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp3538%
Impactp32.925%
Qualityp20.715%
Versatilityp20.712%
Trajectoryp28.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.426× par18bp1144.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp62.244.1%
Boundary %22%18bp23.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.327× par8bp25.650%
Econ vs LHB1.48× par10bp15.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.1 · induced false-shot 11%
Aditya Singh
Bowler · Off-spin · age 27
36.8
Scout Score
Overs 14.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 121 · Econ 8.64
36.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay29.428.6%8.4
Middle40.164.3%25.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p44.81.03×
Scout Score36.8
29.4Powerplay28.6% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.138%
Impactp31.827%
Qualityp1.515%
Versatilityp39.710%
Trajectoryp44.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.973× par24bp45.536.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp15.242.1%
Boundary %25%24bp42.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.309× par9bp22.730%
Econ vs LHB0.767× par15bp77.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov9bp36.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov15bp12.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.8 · induced false-shot 8%
40.1Middle64.3% of overs · 2w · 8.22 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.238%
Impactp2825%
Qualityp3.715%
Versatilityp56.112%
Trajectoryp44.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.951× par54bp62.244.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp47.644.1%
Boundary %15%54bp65.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.106× par16bp2850%
Econ vs LHB0.867× par38bp84.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.8 · induced false-shot 13%
Rayan Sapkota
Bowler · RA pace
36.3
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 87 · Econ 9.67
36.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay52.822.2%11.7
Middle31.677.8%24.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p62.51×
Scout Score36.3
52.8Powerplay22.2% of overs · 0w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.238%
Impactp59.127%
Qualityp43.915%
Versatilityp49.210%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.865× par12bp59.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp33.342.1%
Boundary %17%12bp68.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.873× par12bp62.130%
Econ vs LHB—0bp48.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp25.820%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp54.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.6 · induced false-shot 25%
31.6Middle77.8% of overs · 1w · 10.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.238%
Impactp13.425%
Qualityp59.815%
Versatilityp31.712%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.173× par42bp23.244.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp26.844.1%
Boundary %21%42bp18.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.357× par24bp8.550%
Econ vs LHB0.934× par18bp54.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.3 · induced false-shot 24%
Rajandeep Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
34.2
Scout Score
Overs 17.4 · Wkts 6 · Runs 201 · Econ 11.38
34.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay14.617%2.5
Middle24.845.3%11.2
Death54.437.7%20.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p7.31.34×
Scout Score34.2
14.6Powerplay17% of overs · 0w · 13.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp1738%
Impactp16.727%
Qualityp4.515%
Versatilityp22.410%
Trajectoryp7.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.442× par18bp10.636.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp24.242.1%
Boundary %39%18bp13.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.496× par7bp16.730%
Econ vs LHB1.394× par11bp13.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov7bp45.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp21.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.2 · induced false-shot 6%
24.8Middle45.3% of overs · 2w · 12.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.438%
Impactp1.225%
Qualityp69.515%
Versatilityp34.112%
Trajectoryp7.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.402× par48bp3.744.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp51.244.1%
Boundary %31%48bp1.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.618× par35bp1.250%
Econ vs LHB0.88× par13bp67.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -54.2 · induced false-shot 25%
54.4Death37.7% of overs · 4w · 9.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp7148%
Impactp45.725%
Versatilityp53.515%
Trajectoryp7.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.918× par40bp76.150%
Wicket rate0.60/ov40bp80.416.7%
Boundary %25%40bp58.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%40bp34.440%
Slower ball040bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer540bp90.626.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.6
Ashish Kumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 37
33.6
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 144 · Econ 9.6
33.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay29.420%5.9
Middle34.773.3%25.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p511×
Scout Score33.6
29.4Powerplay20% of overs · 0w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp25.938%
Impactp25.827%
Qualityp25.815%
Versatilityp36.710%
Trajectoryp5110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.226× par18bp22.736.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp24.242.1%
Boundary %28%18bp34.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.547× par11bp7.630%
Econ vs LHB0.73× par7bp68.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov11bp31.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp37.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.4 · induced false-shot 17%
34.7Middle73.3% of overs · 1w · 8.73 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp3538%
Impactp15.925%
Qualityp46.315%
Versatilityp45.112%
Trajectoryp5110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.009× par66bp47.644.1%
Wicket rate0.09/ov66bp15.944.1%
Boundary %17%66bp59.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.897× par30bp67.150%
Econ vs LHB1.084× par36bp23.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.9 · induced false-shot 21%
Ravi Sharma
Bowler · Off-spin · age 22
32.5
Scout Score
Overs 10.3 · Wkts 3 · Runs 112 · Econ 10.67
32.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle37.966.7%25.3
Death17.323.8%4.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p3.11.37×
Scout Score32.5
37.9Middle66.7% of overs · 1w · 8.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.638%
Impactp42.725%
Qualityp35.415%
Versatilityp45.112%
Trajectoryp3.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.008× par42bp51.244.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp26.844.1%
Boundary %14%42bp69.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.865× par18bp64.650%
Econ vs LHB1.093× par24bp25.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6 · induced false-shot 19%
17.3Death23.8% of overs · 1w · 16.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp8.555%
Impactp28.325%
Versatilityp64.38%
Trajectoryp3.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.607× par15bp2.243.6%
Boundary %47%15bp2.241.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov15bp45.714.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.810bp64.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.8
Bal Krishna
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
31.8
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 104 · Econ 11.56
31.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle32.966.7%21.9
Death28.622.2%6.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p92.70.88×
Scout Score31.8
32.9Middle66.7% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp2038%
Impactp8.525%
Qualityp64.615%
Versatilityp35.412%
Trajectoryp92.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.156× par36bp25.644.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp1144.1%
Boundary %19%36bp32.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.708× par4bp57.350%
Econ vs LHB1.177× par32bp13.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -25.9 · induced false-shot 25%
28.6Death22.2% of overs · 0w · 16.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp11.248%
Impactp19.625%
Versatilityp47.715%
Trajectoryp92.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.579× par12bp10.950%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp1316.7%
Boundary %42%12bp10.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp15.640%
Slower ball012bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer33.33312bp96.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.6
Amit Kumar
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 23
28.8
Scout Score
Overs 8.4 · Wkts 3 · Runs 89 · Econ 10.27
28.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle28.8100%28.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p261.09×
Scout Score28.8
28.8Middle100% of overs · 3w · 10.27 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.238%
Impactp6.125%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp2212%
Trajectoryp2610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.187× par52bp15.944.1%
Wicket rate0.35/ov52bp67.144.1%
Boundary %23%52bp13.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.274× par30bp13.450%
Econ vs LHB1.07× par22bp30.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -32.9 · induced false-shot 21%
Raunak Kumar
Bowler · LA pace · age 23
28.1
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 51 · Econ 12.75
28.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay33.650%16.8
Death22.650%11.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p62.51×
Scout Score28.1
33.6Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.738%
Impactp28.827%
Qualityp28.815%
Versatilityp35.510%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.298× par12bp28.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp33.342.1%
Boundary %33%12bp28.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.382× par9bp19.730%
Econ vs LHB1.065× par3bp43.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov9bp36.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp45.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.1 · induced false-shot 17%
22.6Death50% of overs · 0w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=23
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.948%
Impactp2.225%
Versatilityp33.515%
Trajectoryp62.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.292× par12bp28.350%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp1316.7%
Boundary %42%12bp10.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp15.640%
Slower ball012bp46.933.3%
Slow bouncer012bp43.826.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -39.6
Shamshad
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
27.4
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 99 · Econ 14.14
27.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay27.471.4%19.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p30.21.08×
Scout Score27.4
27.4Powerplay71.4% of overs · 1w · 14.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.238%
Impactp7.627%
Qualityp80.315%
Versatilityp25.810%
Trajectoryp30.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.557× par30bp4.536.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp42.442.1%
Boundary %47%30bp321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.102× par19bp28.830%
Econ vs LHB2.324× par11bp1.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov19bp12.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.55/ov11bp71.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -25.3 · induced false-shot 40%
Md Kounain Quraishi
Bowler · Off-spin · age 23
27.3
Scout Score
Overs 12.5 · Wkts 5 · Runs 139 · Econ 10.83
27.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay38.923.4%9.1
Middle2362.3%14.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p38.51.06×
Scout Score27.3
38.9Powerplay23.4% of overs · 0w · 9.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.138%
Impactp37.927%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp36.110%
Trajectoryp38.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.009× par18bp40.936.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp24.242.1%
Boundary %22%18bp51.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.842× par7bp5030%
Econ vs LHB1.104× par11bp25.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov7bp45.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp21.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.1 · induced false-shot 28%
23Middle62.3% of overs · 3w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.338%
Impactp3.725%
Qualityp17.115%
Versatilityp12.212%
Trajectoryp38.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.33× par48bp6.144.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp76.844.1%
Boundary %29%48bp6.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.327× par24bp15.950%
Econ vs LHB1.317× par24bp8.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -36.9 · induced false-shot 17%
Meet Jain
Bowler · Leg-spin
26.3
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 89 · Econ 8.9
26.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle26.390%23.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p62.51×
Scout Score26.3
26.3Middle90% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.538%
Impactp1125%
Qualityp2815%
Versatilityp37.812%
Trajectoryp62.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par54bp37.844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov54bp1.244.1%
Boundary %18%54bp45.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.991× par25bp47.650%
Econ vs LHB1.067× par29bp2850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.7 · induced false-shot 18%
Sachin Yadav
Bowler · RA pace
25.5
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 128 · Econ 11.64
25.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay48.936.4%17.8
Middle12.163.6%7.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p17.71.15×
Scout Score25.5
48.9Powerplay36.4% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.638%
Impactp34.827%
Qualityp95.515%
Versatilityp38.310%
Trajectoryp17.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.081× par24bp31.836.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp5342.1%
Boundary %17%24bp83.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.018× par18bp39.430%
Econ vs LHB1.278× par6bp19.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov18bp18.220%
Wkt vs LHB1.00/ov6bp84.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.3 · induced false-shot 50%
12.1Middle63.6% of overs · 0w · 12.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp3.738%
Impactp18.325%
Qualityp23.215%
Versatilityp7.312%
Trajectoryp17.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.454× par42bp1.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov42bp6.144.1%
Boundary %31%42bp3.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.691× par18bp3.750%
Econ vs LHB1.261× par24bp1150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.8 · induced false-shot 17%
Jatin Pandey
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
16.6
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 162 · Econ 10.8
16.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay13.480%10.7
Middle36.313.3%4.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p46.91.03×
Scout Score16.6
13.4Powerplay80% of overs · 1w · 10.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=33
Componentpctweight
Productionp11.638%
Impactp1.527%
Qualityp10.615%
Versatilityp22.710%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.108× par72bp16.736.8%
Wicket rate0.08/ov72bp4.542.1%
Boundary %29%72bp16.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.054× par41bp31.830%
Econ vs LHB1.175× par31bp7.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.14/ov41bp5320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov31bp1.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -32.9 · induced false-shot 22%
36.3Middle13.3% of overs · 0w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.238%
Impactp54.925%
Qualityp40.215%
Versatilityp31.712%
Trajectoryp46.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.619× par12bp8.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp35.444.1%
Boundary %33%12bp15.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.472× par3bp62.250%
Econ vs LHB1.943× par9bp1.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.2 · induced false-shot 17%