| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 24 | 9 | 177 | 86 | 205.8 | 35.4 | 15 | 13 | 77 Scout Score 77 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production95.240% Impact96.427% Versatility70.215% Shot quality17.96% Trajectory10.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.78×[12, 31, 30] | 95.2 Production 95.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.59× parp96.435% True Avg3.4× parp96.430% Balls / boundary2.24p96.417.5% Balls / dismissal47p89.317.5% | 17.9 Shot Quality 17.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build93.3% Phase-weighted control73% | 96.4 Impact 96.4 = WPA percentile · total +47.5 WPA · Powerplay+55 WPA · Consolidation-7.5 | 70.2 Versatility 70.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp96.426.7% vs Spin SRp53.626.7% Accel into Consp32.120% Pressure entryp89.326.7% | |
| 2 | RHB | 23 | 10 | 179 | 104 | 172.1 | 44.8 | 17 | 11 | 76.5 Scout Score 76.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production77.440% Impact89.327% Versatility52.615% Shot quality46.46% Trajectory89.312% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.2×[17, 63, 66] | 77.4 Production 77.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.53× parp89.335% True Avgn/ap64.330% Balls / boundary2.14p89.317.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap64.317.5% | 46.4 Shot Quality 46.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.5% Control · Build72.7% Phase-weighted control77.6% | 89.3 Impact 89.3 = WPA percentile · total +34 WPA · Powerplay+31.3 WPA · Consolidation+2.7 | 52.6 Versatility 52.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp39.326.7% vs Spin SRp82.126.7% Accel into Consp39.320% Pressure entryp46.426.7% | |
| 3 | RHB | 28 | 9 | 237 | 137 | 173 | 79 | 16 | 16 | 66.8 Scout Score 66.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production55.540% Impact67.927% Versatility59.315% Shot quality96.46% Trajectory96.412% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.39×[8, 51, 21] | 55.5 Production 55.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.14× parp7535% True Avg0.98× parp39.330% Balls / boundary3.17p67.917.5% Balls / dismissal19p32.117.5% | 96.4 Shot Quality 96.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.8% Control · Build87.2% Phase-weighted control85.6% | 67.9 Impact 67.9 = WPA percentile · total +20.2 WPA · Powerplay+8.8 WPA · Consolidation+11.5 | 59.3 Versatility 59.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp82.126.7% vs Spin SRp67.926.7% Accel into Consp82.120% Pressure entryp10.726.7% | |
| 4 | LHB | 32 | 9 | 174 | 110 | 158.2 | 29 | 18 | 7 | 66.5 Scout Score 66.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production77.540% Impact82.127% Versatility41.715% Shot quality256% Trajectory46.412% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[9, 31, 44] | 77.5 Production 77.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.1× parp82.135% True Avg1.33× parp7530% Balls / boundary3.64p7517.5% Balls / dismissal26.67p7517.5% | 25 Shot Quality 25 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.9% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control73.6% | 82.1 Impact 82.1 = WPA percentile · total +25.1 WPA · Powerplay+26.4 WPA · Consolidation-1.4 | 41.7 Versatility 41.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp67.926.7% vs Spin SRp39.326.7% Accel into Consp3.620% Pressure entryp46.426.7% | |
| 5 | RHB | 22 | 7 | 125 | 82 | 152.4 | 31.2 | 19 | 2 | 65.4 Scout Score 65.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production81.840% Impact60.727% Versatility4415% Shot quality82.16% Trajectory39.312% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[51, 5, 29] | 81.8 Production 81.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.07× parp67.935% True Avg2.97× parp89.330% Balls / boundary3.21p82.117.5% Balls / dismissal61p96.417.5% | 82.1 Shot Quality 82.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation85.7% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control82.9% | 60.7 Impact 60.7 = WPA percentile · total +5 WPA · Powerplay+15.9 WPA · Consolidation-10.9 | 44 Versatility 44 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp7526.7% vs Spin SRp2526.7% Accel into Consp2520% Pressure entryp46.426.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | 24 | 9 | 102 | 52 | 196.2 | 34 | 9 | 8 | 57.4 Scout Score 57.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production40.940% Impact7527% Versatility56.915% Shot quality67.96% Trajectory67.912% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[42, 60, 0] | 40.9 Production 40.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.97× parp53.635% True Avg0.57× parp32.130% Balls / boundary3.25p46.417.5% Balls / dismissal13p2517.5% | 67.9 Shot Quality 67.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build78.9% Phase-weighted control79.7% | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile · total +22.3 WPA · Powerplay+2.2 WPA · Consolidation+20.1 | 56.9 Versatility 56.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp32.126.7% vs Spin SRp96.426.7% Accel into Consp89.320% Pressure entryp17.926.7% | |
| 7 | LHB | 24 | 8 | 216 | 130 | 166.2 | 54 | 20 | 11 | 53.9 Scout Score 53.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production70.940% Impact46.427% Versatility36.915% Shot quality60.76% Trajectory32.112% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[36, 27, 9] | 70.9 Production 70.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.02× parp60.735% True Avg1.41× parp82.130% Balls / boundary3.59p60.717.5% Balls / dismissal30.5p82.117.5% | 60.7 Shot Quality 60.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build76.7% Phase-weighted control78.9% | 46.4 Impact 46.4 = WPA percentile · total +0.8 WPA · Powerplay+2.4 WPA · Consolidation-1.5 | 36.9 Versatility 36.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp2526.7% vs Spin SRp7526.7% Accel into Consp46.420% Pressure entryp3.626.7% | |
| 8 | RHB | 32 | 10 | 169 | 114 | 148.2 | 33.8 | 16 | 5 | 47.4 Scout Score 47.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production44.840% Impact39.327% Versatility41.215% Shot quality89.36% Trajectory60.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.08×[15, 6, 57] | 44.8 Production 44.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.86× parp39.335% True Avg0.94× parp53.630% Balls / boundary4.8p32.117.5% Balls / dismissal24p53.617.5% | 89.3 Shot Quality 89.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81% Control · Build91.2% Phase-weighted control83.9% | 39.3 Impact 39.3 = WPA percentile · total -0.8 WPA · Powerplay-0.2 WPA · Consolidation-0.5 | 41.2 Versatility 41.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp53.626.7% vs Spin SRp10.726.7% Accel into Consp10.720% Pressure entryp82.126.7% | |
| 9 | LHB | 31 | 8 | 144 | 89 | 161.8 | 36 | 12 | 9 | 46.5 Scout Score 46.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production40.240% Impact53.627% Versatility73.615% Shot quality32.16% Trajectory2512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[27, 57, 12] | 40.2 Production 40.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.87× parp46.435% True Avg0.83× parp46.430% Balls / boundary5.25p10.717.5% Balls / dismissal21p46.417.5% | 32.1 Shot Quality 32.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation69.7% Control · Build88.9% Phase-weighted control75.3% | 53.6 Impact 53.6 = WPA percentile · total +4.6 WPA · Powerplay-8.4 WPA · Consolidation+13 | 73.6 Versatility 73.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp17.926.7% vs Spin SRp89.326.7% Accel into Consp96.420% Pressure entryp96.426.7% | |
| 10 | RHB | 28 | 8 | 78 | 49 | 159.2 | 39 | 6 | 4 | 43.8 Scout Score 43.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production37.440% Impact2527% Versatility51.715% Shot quality756% Trajectory82.112% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.17×[22, 1, 55] | 37.4 Production 37.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.58× parp17.935% True Avgn/ap64.330% Balls / boundary14p3.617.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap64.317.5% | 75 Shot Quality 75 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control80% | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile · total -5.5 WPA · Powerplay-4.9 WPA · Consolidation-0.6 | 51.7 Versatility 51.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp60.726.7% vs Spin SRp46.426.7% Accel into Consp53.620% Pressure entryp46.426.7% | |
| 11 | RHB | 25 | 9 | 72 | 39 | 184.6 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 35.3 Scout Score 35.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production17.340% Impact32.127% Versatility67.415% Shot quality10.76% Trajectory7512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.12×[6, 14, 51] | 17.3 Production 17.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.72× parp2535% True Avg0.23× parp3.630% Balls / boundary4.67p39.317.5% Balls / dismissal7p3.617.5% | 10.7 Shot Quality 10.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build70.6% Phase-weighted control72.7% | 32.1 Impact 32.1 = WPA percentile · total -3 WPA · Powerplay-3 WPA · Consolidation+0 | 67.4 Versatility 67.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp89.326.7% vs Spin SRp60.726.7% Accel into Consp7520% Pressure entryp46.426.7% | |
| 12 | LHB | 21 | 8 | 98 | 78 | 125.6 | 24.5 | 16 | 1 | 22.2 Scout Score 22.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production19.140% Impact3.627% Versatility31.715% Shot quality39.36% Trajectory53.612% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[0, 15, 71] | 19.1 Production 19.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.76× parp3.635% True Avg0.67× parp17.930% Balls / boundary4.14p53.617.5% Balls / dismissal19.33p17.917.5% | 39.3 Shot Quality 39.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build70% Phase-weighted control76.7% | 3.6 Impact 3.6 = WPA percentile · total -21.4 WPA · Powerplay-21.2 WPA · Consolidation-0.2 | 31.7 Versatility 31.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp3.626.7% vs Spin SRp17.926.7% Accel into Consp67.920% Pressure entryp46.426.7% | |
| 13 | RHB | 31 | 8 | 124 | 87 | 142.5 | 24.8 | 10 | 8 | 21.8 Scout Score 21.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production21.240% Impact10.727% Versatility45.515% Shot quality53.66% Trajectory3.612% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.56×[4, 1, 13] | 21.2 Production 21.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.74× parp10.735% True Avg0.67× parp2530% Balls / boundary5p17.917.5% Balls / dismissal20p39.317.5% | 53.6 Shot Quality 53.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation77.8% Control · Build78.6% Phase-weighted control78% | 10.7 Impact 10.7 = WPA percentile · total -13.1 WPA · Powerplay-9.3 WPA · Consolidation-3.9 | 45.5 Versatility 45.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp46.426.7% vs Spin SRp3.626.7% Accel into Consp60.720% Pressure entryp7526.7% | |
| 14 | RHB | 27 | 8 | 58 | 48 | 120.8 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 19.6 Scout Score 19.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production20.740% Impact17.927% Versatility27.415% Shot quality3.66% Trajectory17.912% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.84×[49, 9, 0] | 20.7 Production 20.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.75× parp32.135% True Avg0.27× parp10.730% Balls / boundary5.33p2517.5% Balls / dismissal8p10.717.5% | 3.6 Shot Quality 3.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Build92.3% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 17.9 Impact 17.9 = WPA percentile · total -12.3 WPA · Powerplay-8.7 WPA · Consolidation-3.6 | 27.4 Versatility 27.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp10.726.7% vs Spin SRp32.126.7% Accel into Consp17.920% Pressure entryp46.426.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | — | 8 | 141 | 78 | 180.8 | 23.5 | 5 | 14 | 85.8 Scout Score 85.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production88.828% Impact97.627% Versatility7027% Shot quality73.88% Trajectory97.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.17×[27, 21, 7] | 88.8 Production 88.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.37× parp97.642.9% True Avg1.44× parp73.832.1% Balls / boundary4p92.925% | 73.8 Shot Quality 73.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation93.1% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control81.2% | 97.6 Impact 97.6 = WPA percentile · total +40.1 WPA · Consolidation+13.1 WPA · Build+26.9 | 70 Versatility 70 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep76.944.4% vs LA-orthodox16bp83.3 vs Leg-spin15bp70 vs Short ball6b6b <min Spin hittingp67.729.6% Off-spin12bp50 LA-orthodox21bp70 Leg-spin15bp78.6 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p97.614.8% Reach deathp11.911.1% | |
| 2 | RHB | 33 | 8 | 155 | 85 | 182.4 | 38.8 | 14 | 10 | 77.8 Scout Score 77.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production92.528% Impact83.327% Versatility88.627% Shot quality35.78% Trajectory26.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.87×[45, 37, 37] | 92.5 Production 92.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.3× parp92.942.9% True Avg1.75× parp88.132.1% Balls / boundary3.57p97.625% | 35.7 Shot Quality 35.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.3% Control · Build69.5% Phase-weighted control72% | 83.3 Impact 83.3 = WPA percentile · total +15.9 WPA · Consolidation+0.8 WPA · Build+15 | 88.6 Versatility 88.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep94.444.4% vs LA-orthodox17bp94.4 vs Leg-spin8b8b <min vs Short ball8b8b <min Spin hittingp96.729.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox17bp96.7 Leg-spin8b8b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p92.914.8% Reach deathp38.111.1% | |
| 3 | LHB | — | 4 | 104 | 72 | 144.4 | 34.7 | 9 | 3 | 77.7 Scout Score 77.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production78.428% Impact92.927% Versatility59.627% Shot quality78.68% Trajectory83.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.08×[51, 29, 24] | 78.4 Production 78.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.17× parp78.642.9% True Avg2.54× parp92.932.1% Balls / boundary5.5p59.525% | 78.6 Shot Quality 78.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.9% Control · Build84% Phase-weighted control81.8% | 92.9 Impact 92.9 = WPA percentile · total +24.7 WPA · Consolidation+11.8 WPA · Build+12.9 | 59.6 Versatility 59.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin0b0b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball8b8b <min Spin hittingp86.729.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox12bp86.7 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p73.814.8% Reach deathp7.111.1% | |
| 4 | RHB | 24 | 10 | 133 | 78 | 170.5 | 33.2 | 7 | 12 | 71.9 Scout Score 71.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production82.728% Impact88.127% Versatility48.727% Shot quality90.58% Trajectory45.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.9×[16, 13, 43] | 82.7 Production 82.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.09× parp73.842.9% True Avg2.68× parp97.632.1% Balls / boundary5p78.625% | 90.5 Shot Quality 90.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build83.7% Phase-weighted control84% | 88.1 Impact 88.1 = WPA percentile · total +22.9 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build+22.9 | 48.7 Versatility 48.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox21bp50 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp43.329.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox23bp43.3 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman9b9b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p6914.8% Reach deathp3111.1% | |
| 5 | LHB | — | 9 | 131 | 70 | 187.1 | 32.8 | 11 | 10 | 64.3 Scout Score 64.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production73.828% Impact78.627% Versatility59.627% Shot quality40.58% Trajectory3110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.88×[45, 4, 38] | 73.8 Production 73.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.19× parp83.342.9% True Avg1.05× parp5032.1% Balls / boundary3.86p88.125% | 40.5 Shot Quality 40.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build69.2% Phase-weighted control72.2% | 78.6 Impact 78.6 = WPA percentile · total +10.9 WPA · Consolidation-1 WPA · Build+11.9 | 59.6 Versatility 59.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin9b9b <min vs Chinaman9b9b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp78.329.6% Off-spin12bp64.3 LA-orthodox20bp86.7 Leg-spin4b4b <min Chinaman9b9b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p26.214.8% Reach deathp92.911.1% | |
| 6 | RHB | — | 8 | 63 | 35 | 180 | 15.8 | 4 | 5 | 59.6 Scout Score 59.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production60.428% Impact6927% Versatility67.527% Shot quality64.38% Trajectory7.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.57×[7, 3, 0] | 60.4 Production 60.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.46× parp88.142.9% True Avg0.7× parp16.732.1% Balls / boundary3.22p6925% | 64.3 Shot Quality 64.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build85% Phase-weighted control79.3% | 69 Impact 69 = WPA percentile · total +3.3 WPA · Consolidation-7 WPA · Build+10.3 | 67.5 Versatility 67.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox1b1b <min vs Leg-spin3b3b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp92.929.6% Off-spin15bp92.9 LA-orthodox3b3b <min Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman1b1b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p78.614.8% Reach deathp54.811.1% | |
| 7 | LHB | 33 | 4 | 71 | 49 | 144.9 | — | 5 | 4 | 58.1 Scout Score 58.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production49.528% Impact73.827% Versatility46.127% Shot quality508% Trajectory78.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.07×[28, 32, 39] | 49.5 Production 49.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.88× parp5042.9% True Avgn/ap59.532.1% Balls / boundary7p35.725% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Build79.2% Phase-weighted control75% | 73.8 Impact 73.8 = WPA percentile · total +8.8 WPA · Consolidation+2.6 WPA · Build+6.2 | 46.1 Versatility 46.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin0b0b <min vs Chinaman7b7b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp5029.6% Off-spin3b3b <min LA-orthodox9b9b <min Leg-spin2b2b <min Chinaman7b7b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p45.214.8% Reach deathp21.411.1% | |
| 8 | LHB | 33 | 9 | 94 | 61 | 154.1 | 47 | 5 | 6 | 57.5 Scout Score 57.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production60.928% Impact40.527% Versatility65.427% Shot quality97.68% Trajectory40.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.89×[27, 41, 33] | 60.9 Production 60.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp59.542.9% True Avg2.33× parp78.632.1% Balls / boundary8p40.525% | 97.6 Shot Quality 97.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.6% Control · Build91.4% Phase-weighted control89.6% | 40.5 Impact 40.5 = WPA percentile · total -3.7 WPA · Consolidation-1.2 WPA · Build-2.4 | 65.4 Versatility 65.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep83.344.4% vs Off-spin12bp83.3 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp49.129.6% Off-spin16bp78.6 LA-orthodox5b5b <min Leg-spin17bp21.4 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p59.514.8% Reach deathp45.211.1% | |
| 9 | LHB | 31 | 9 | 137 | 86 | 159.3 | 45.7 | 10 | 9 | 56.3 Scout Score 56.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production60.228% Impact45.227% Versatility5227% Shot quality54.88% Trajectory88.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.13×[2, 47, 87] | 60.2 Production 60.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.88× parp40.542.9% True Avg2.43× parp83.332.1% Balls / boundary6.22p64.325% | 54.8 Shot Quality 54.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build75.6% Phase-weighted control76.8% | 45.2 Impact 45.2 = WPA percentile · total -1.8 WPA · Consolidation-3.1 WPA · Build+1.4 | 52 Versatility 52 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin10bp50 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp43.629.6% Off-spin10bp21.4 LA-orthodox17bp56.7 Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p54.814.8% Reach deathp78.611.1% | |
| 10 | RHB | 21 | 8 | 69 | 37 | 186.5 | 23 | 3 | 6 | 53.8 Scout Score 53.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production59.528% Impact35.727% Versatility54.727% Shot quality90.58% Trajectory54.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.9×[31, 6, 14] | 59.5 Production 59.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.1× parp64.342.9% True Avg1.36× parp64.332.1% Balls / boundary6.25p45.225% | 90.5 Shot Quality 90.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build84% Phase-weighted control84% | 35.7 Impact 35.7 = WPA percentile · total -8 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build-8 | 54.7 Versatility 54.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox9b9b <min vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp63.329.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox15bp63.3 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p40.514.8% Reach deathp6911.1% | |
| 11 | RHB | 27 | 11 | 87 | 52 | 167.3 | 21.8 | 3 | 9 | 51 Scout Score 51 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production54.928% Impact59.527% Versatility58.627% Shot quality2.48% Trajectory35.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.89×[30, 32, 0] | 54.9 Production 54.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.1× parp6942.9% True Avg0.74× parp21.432.1% Balls / boundary4.56p73.825% | 2.4 Shot Quality 2.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation60% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control61% | 59.5 Impact 59.5 = WPA percentile · total +1.7 WPA · Consolidation+4.9 WPA · Build-3.2 | 58.6 Versatility 58.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox6b6b <min vs Leg-spin8b8b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp5029.6% Off-spin1b1b <min LA-orthodox7b7b <min Leg-spin8b8b <min Chinaman1b1b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p83.314.8% Reach deathp83.311.1% | |
| 12 | LHB | 35 | 9 | 69 | 58 | 119 | 34.5 | 8 | 1 | 46.8 Scout Score 46.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production49.528% Impact54.827% Versatility37.227% Shot quality21.48% Trajectory64.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.93×[4, 0, 33] | 49.5 Production 49.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.89× parp45.242.9% True Avg1.03× parp54.832.1% Balls / boundary5.88p5025% | 21.4 Shot Quality 21.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.7% Control · Build67.9% Phase-weighted control70.2% | 54.8 Impact 54.8 = WPA percentile · total +1 WPA · Consolidation+6.3 WPA · Build-5.3 | 37.2 Versatility 37.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin0b0b <min vs Chinaman1b1b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp3029.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox17bp30 Leg-spin7b7b <min Chinaman1b1b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p21.414.8% Reach deathp26.211.1% | |
| 13 | RHB | 22 | 9 | 84 | 66 | 127.3 | 21 | 7 | 5 | 44.9 Scout Score 44.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.128% Impact64.327% Versatility51.827% Shot quality11.98% Trajectory16.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.74×[15, 31, 20] | 39.1 Production 39.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.78× parp21.442.9% True Avg1.49× parp6932.1% Balls / boundary7.8p3125% | 11.9 Shot Quality 11.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70% Control · Build65.5% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 64.3 Impact 64.3 = WPA percentile · total +3.1 WPA · Consolidation-4.4 WPA · Build+7.5 | 51.8 Versatility 51.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep72.244.4% vs LA-orthodox16bp72.2 vs Leg-spin7b7b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp36.829.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox27bp50 Leg-spin12bp7.1 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p3114.8% Reach deathp38.111.1% | |
| 14 | RHB | 35 | 8 | 123 | 85 | 144.7 | 41 | 7 | 5 | 40 Scout Score 40 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production33.728% Impact3127% Versatility49.727% Shot quality83.38% Trajectory21.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.76×[15, 12, 18] | 33.7 Production 33.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.87× parp35.742.9% True Avg1.03× parp40.532.1% Balls / boundary10.29p21.425% | 83.3 Shot Quality 83.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation92.3% Control · Build69.7% Phase-weighted control81.9% | 31 Impact 31 = WPA percentile · total -10.4 WPA · Consolidation+1.9 WPA · Build-12.4 | 49.7 Versatility 49.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep44.344.4% vs LA-orthodox23bp38.9 vs Leg-spin12bp50 vs Short ball10bp50 Spin hittingp35.929.6% Off-spin7b7b <min LA-orthodox27bp23.3 Leg-spin12bp64.3 Chinaman3b3b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p64.314.8% Reach deathp88.111.1% | |
| 15 | RHB | 23 | 10 | 125 | 85 | 147.1 | 20.8 | 10 | 9 | 37.6 Scout Score 37.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production32.828% Impact26.227% Versatility73.227% Shot quality16.78% Trajectory2.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.56×[0, 9, 14] | 32.8 Production 32.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.85× parp26.242.9% True Avg0.53× parp2.432.1% Balls / boundary5.85p83.325% | 16.7 Shot Quality 16.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build64.3% Phase-weighted control68.4% | 26.2 Impact 26.2 = WPA percentile · total -12 WPA · Consolidation-8 WPA · Build-4 | 73.2 Versatility 73.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep65.644.4% vs LA-orthodox11bp5.6 vs Leg-spin27bp90 vs Short ball5b5b <min Spin hittingp87.129.6% Off-spin7b7b <min LA-orthodox15bp76.7 Leg-spin27bp92.9 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p5014.8% Reach deathp97.611.1% | |
| 16 | RHB | 25 | 8 | 87 | 67 | 129.9 | 21.8 | 6 | 4 | 36.2 Scout Score 36.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4128% Impact5027% Versatility29.527% Shot quality26.28% Trajectory11.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.67×[0, 22, 22] | 41 Production 41 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.92× parp54.842.9% True Avg0.76× parp11.932.1% Balls / boundary6.7p54.825% | 26.2 Shot Quality 26.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build70.2% Phase-weighted control71.6% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +0.1 WPA · Consolidation-10.1 WPA · Build+10.2 | 29.5 Versatility 29.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep16.744.4% vs LA-orthodox28bp16.7 vs Leg-spin0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp1029.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox28bp10 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p88.114.8% Reach deathp54.811.1% | |
| 17 | RHB | 27 | 7 | 112 | 89 | 125.8 | 56 | 9 | 4 | 30.9 Scout Score 30.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production18.528% Impact11.927% Versatility35.527% Shot quality45.28% Trajectory92.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.14×[17, 26, 70] | 18.5 Production 18.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.71× parp16.742.9% True Avg0.73× parp26.232.1% Balls / boundary14p11.925% | 45.2 Shot Quality 45.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70.8% Control · Build77.8% Phase-weighted control73.8% | 11.9 Impact 11.9 = WPA percentile · total -23.7 WPA · Consolidation-21.7 WPA · Build-2 | 35.5 Versatility 35.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep35.644.4% vs LA-orthodox11bp61.1 vs Leg-spin11bp10 vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp36.429.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox23bp36.7 Leg-spin11bp35.7 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p11.914.8% Reach deathp64.311.1% | |
| 18 | RHB | 26 | 11 | 56 | 51 | 109.8 | 18.7 | 4 | 2 | 29.9 Scout Score 29.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production14.728% Impact16.727% Versatility39.827% Shot quality698% Trajectory5010% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.9×[6, 19, 23] | 14.7 Production 14.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.4× parp4.842.9% True Avg0.49× parp35.732.1% Balls / boundary50p4.825% | 69 Shot Quality 69 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control80% | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = WPA percentile · total -21.6 WPA · Consolidation+0 WPA · Build-21.6 | 39.8 Versatility 39.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox6b6b <min vs Leg-spin1b1b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp5029.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox9b9b <min Leg-spin1b1b <min Chinaman4b4b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p16.714.8% Reach deathp2.411.1% | |
| 19 | LHB | 25 | 8 | 97 | 65 | 149.2 | 48.5 | 5 | 5 | 29.4 Scout Score 29.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production3228% Impact21.427% Versatility2327% Shot quality318% Trajectory59.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[58, 9, 4] | 32 Production 32 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.84× parp3142.9% True Avg0.96× parp45.232.1% Balls / boundary11.5p16.725% | 31 Shot Quality 31 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation72.7% Control · Build70.8% Phase-weighted control71.7% | 21.4 Impact 21.4 = WPA percentile · total -12.9 WPA · Consolidation+0.2 WPA · Build-13.1 | 23 Versatility 23 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep16.744.4% vs Off-spin11bp16.7 vs Chinaman5b5b <min vs Short ball6b6b <min Spin hittingp7.129.6% Off-spin12bp7.1 LA-orthodox6b6b <min Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman5b5b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p35.714.8% Reach deathp73.811.1% | |
| 20 | RHB | 29 | 9 | 127 | 116 | 109.5 | 25.4 | 10 | 3 | 24.7 Scout Score 24.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production21.628% Impact2.427% Versatility23.527% Shot quality59.58% Trajectory6910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[55, 25, 12] | 21.6 Production 21.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.77× parp11.942.9% True Avg0.96× parp3132.1% Balls / boundary9.27p26.225% | 59.5 Shot Quality 59.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.1% Control · Build76.2% Phase-weighted control78.4% | 2.4 Impact 2.4 = WPA percentile · total -36.2 WPA · Consolidation-6.7 WPA · Build-29.5 | 23.5 Versatility 23.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep28.544.4% vs LA-orthodox28bp27.8 vs Leg-spin13bp30 vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp29.329.6% Off-spin13bp35.7 LA-orthodox28bp16.7 Leg-spin13bp50 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2.414.8% Reach deathp16.711.1% | |
| 21 | RHB | — | 3 | 29 | 40 | 72.5 | 14.5 | 2 | 0 | 19.6 Scout Score 19.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production5.528% Impact7.127% Versatility30.427% Shot quality7.18% Trajectory73.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[18, 21, 8] | 5.5 Production 5.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.4× parp4.842.9% True Avg0.24× parp7.132.1% Balls / boundary50p4.825% | 7.1 Shot Quality 7.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation68.2% Control · Build33.3% Phase-weighted control64% | 7.1 Impact 7.1 = WPA percentile · total -25.2 WPA · Consolidation-19.9 WPA · Build-5.4 | 30.4 Versatility 30.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox8b8b <min vs Leg-spin3b3b <min vs Short ball0b0b <min Spin hittingp3.329.6% Off-spin1b1b <min LA-orthodox13bp3.3 Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p7.114.8% Reach deathp54.811.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | — | 5 | 166 | 81 | 204.9 | 166 | 9 | 16 | 77.1 Scout Score 77.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production90.440% Impact82.525% Versatility60.118% Shot quality82.54% Trajectory47.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.02×[55, 38, 73] | 90.4 Production 90.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.23× parp97.532.5% Balls / boundary2.42p97.520% Balls / six3.29p97.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 82.5 Shot Quality 82.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control80% | 82.5 Impact 82.5 = WPA percentile · total +32.7 WPA · Death+32.7 | 60.1 Versatility 60.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker4b4b <min vs Slower ball8b8b <min vs Spin (death)p87.516.7% Reach buildp67.522.2% | |
| 2 | RHB | 22 | 8 | 108 | 60 | 180 | 108 | 9 | 7 | 73.5 Scout Score 73.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production85.140% Impact77.525% Versatility52.618% Shot quality62.54% Trajectory62.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.06×[28, 56, 24] | 85.1 Production 85.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.2× parp92.532.5% Balls / boundary2.64p87.520% Balls / six4.83p92.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 62.5 Shot Quality 62.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build69.2% Phase-weighted control74.2% | 77.5 Impact 77.5 = WPA percentile · total +32.2 WPA · Death+32.2 | 52.6 Versatility 52.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball8b8b <min vs Spin (death)p82.516.7% Reach buildp37.522.2% | |
| 3 | LHB | 22 | 6 | 54 | 43 | 125.6 | 27 | 2 | 3 | 66.7 Scout Score 66.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.640% Impact92.525% Versatility34.418% Shot quality72.54% Trajectory57.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[29, 0, 25] | 67.6 Production 67.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.13× parp7032.5% Balls / boundary2.75p6520% Balls / six5.5p7532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 72.5 Shot Quality 72.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build76.5% Phase-weighted control75.9% | 92.5 Impact 92.5 = WPA percentile · total +47 WPA · Death+47 | 34.4 Versatility 34.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p2016.7% Reach buildp2.522.2% | |
| 4 | RHB | 27 | 8 | 41 | 20 | 205 | 41 | 6 | 2 | 65.9 Scout Score 65.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production66.240% Impact62.525% Versatility58.118% Shot quality504% Trajectory87.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.11×[20, 4, 17] | 66.2 Production 66.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.49× parp87.532.5% Balls / boundary1.6p82.520% Balls / six8p42.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation60% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 62.5 Impact 62.5 = WPA percentile · total +5.3 WPA · Death+5.3 | 58.1 Versatility 58.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp82.522.2% | |
| 5 | RHB | 31 | 6 | 116 | 62 | 187.1 | 116 | 9 | 8 | 64.7 Scout Score 64.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production47.440% Impact97.525% Versatility50.418% Shot quality87.54% Trajectory67.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.07×[24, 66, 26] | 47.4 Production 47.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.01× parp57.532.5% Balls / boundary3p77.520% Balls / six10p17.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 87.5 Shot Quality 87.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build87.5% Phase-weighted control87.5% | 97.5 Impact 97.5 = WPA percentile · total +63.5 WPA · Death+63.5 | 50.4 Versatility 50.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker5b5b <min vs Slower ball6b6b <min vs Spin (death)p2.516.7% Reach buildp87.522.2% | |
| 6 | RHB | 24 | 9 | 67 | 34 | 197.1 | 22.3 | 5 | 6 | 63 Scout Score 63 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production61.240% Impact87.525% Versatility51.118% Shot quality97.54% Trajectory27.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[16, 30, 0] | 61.2 Production 61.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.96× parp42.532.5% Balls / boundary3.2p57.520% Balls / six5.33p87.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 97.5 Shot Quality 97.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build100% Phase-weighted control100% | 87.5 Impact 87.5 = WPA percentile · total +37.9 WPA · Death+37.9 | 51.1 Versatility 51.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball10bp50 vs Spin (death)p2016.7% Reach buildp77.522.2% | |
| 7 | RHB | 29 | 8 | 38 | 21 | 181 | 12.7 | 2 | 3 | 60.6 Scout Score 60.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.640% Impact57.525% Versatility51.418% Shot quality12.54% Trajectory72.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[27, 11, 0] | 67.6 Production 67.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.13× parp7032.5% Balls / boundary2.75p6520% Balls / six5.5p7532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 12.5 Shot Quality 12.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build50% Phase-weighted control50% | 57.5 Impact 57.5 = WPA percentile · total +4.9 WPA · Death+4.9 | 51.4 Versatility 51.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp52.522.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | 26 | 7 | 99 | 49 | 202 | 99 | 10 | 7 | 53.5 Scout Score 53.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production79.640% Impact32.525% Versatility50.318% Shot quality7.54% Trajectory32.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[30, 21, 13] | 79.6 Production 79.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.11× parp82.532.5% Balls / boundary2.53p92.520% Balls / six6.33p82.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 7.5 Shot Quality 7.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build45.5% Phase-weighted control45.5% | 32.5 Impact 32.5 = WPA percentile · total +1.8 WPA · Death+1.8 | 50.3 Versatility 50.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker4b4b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp47.522.2% | |
| 9 | RHB | 43 | 6 | 44 | 22 | 200 | 14.7 | 4 | 3 | 48 Scout Score 48 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production28.140% Impact47.525% Versatility56.518% Shot quality504% Trajectory97.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.28×[25, 12, 7] | 28.1 Production 28.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.86× parp22.532.5% Balls / boundary3.8p3020% Balls / six9.5p22.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 47.5 Impact 47.5 = WPA percentile · total +3.7 WPA · Death+3.7 | 56.5 Versatility 56.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p32.516.7% Reach buildp92.522.2% | |
| 10 | RHB | — | 10 | 88 | 65 | 135.4 | 17.6 | 7 | 4 | 47.7 Scout Score 47.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production66.740% Impact12.525% Versatility51.818% Shot quality42.54% Trajectory52.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[18, 16, 17] | 66.7 Production 66.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.2× parp77.532.5% Balls / boundary2.33p72.520% Balls / six7p6032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 42.5 Shot Quality 42.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.3% Control · Build55.6% Phase-weighted control66% | 12.5 Impact 12.5 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 51.8 Versatility 51.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p97.516.7% Reach buildp22.522.2% | |
| 11 | RHB | 31 | 5 | 38 | 27 | 140.7 | 9.5 | 2 | 3 | 46.7 Scout Score 46.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production24.240% Impact67.525% Versatility44.618% Shot quality2.54% Trajectory92.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.16×[15, 14, 2] | 24.2 Production 24.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.74× parp2.532.5% Balls / boundary4.8p2.520% Balls / six8p47.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 2.5 Shot Quality 2.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build33.3% Phase-weighted control33.3% | 67.5 Impact 67.5 = WPA percentile · total +18.8 WPA · Death+18.8 | 44.6 Versatility 44.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p27.516.7% Reach buildp42.522.2% | |
| 12 | RHB | 26 | 2 | 38 | 30 | 126.7 | 38 | 2 | 2 | 45.1 Scout Score 45.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production41.540% Impact52.525% Versatility43.618% Shot quality57.54% Trajectory4013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[12, 26] | 41.5 Production 41.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.88× parp32.532.5% Balls / boundary4.67p7.520% Balls / six7p67.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 57.5 Shot Quality 57.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build68.8% Phase-weighted control68.8% | 52.5 Impact 52.5 = WPA percentile · total +4.2 WPA · Death+4.2 | 43.6 Versatility 43.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp17.522.2% | |
| 13 | RHB | 26 | 5 | 107 | 56 | 191.1 | 35.7 | 14 | 5 | 43.6 Scout Score 43.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production45.140% Impact12.525% Versatility53.618% Shot quality67.54% Trajectory77.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[27, 48, 32] | 45.1 Production 45.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap5032.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap5020% Balls / sixn/ap3532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 67.5 Shot Quality 67.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted control75% | 12.5 Impact 12.5 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 53.6 Versatility 53.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp62.522.2% | |
| 14 | RHB | 28 | 5 | 57 | 36 | 158.3 | 57 | 7 | 2 | 39.6 Scout Score 39.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production17.540% Impact42.525% Versatility58.818% Shot quality17.54% Trajectory82.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[50, 2, 5] | 17.5 Production 17.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.81× parp7.532.5% Balls / boundary4p17.520% Balls / six16p12.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 17.5 Shot Quality 17.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation33.3% Control · Build64.7% Phase-weighted control60% | 42.5 Impact 42.5 = WPA percentile · total +2.8 WPA · Death+2.8 | 58.8 Versatility 58.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p92.516.7% Reach buildp57.522.2% | |
| 15 | RHB | 24 | 6 | 45 | 31 | 145.2 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 38.6 Scout Score 38.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production18.140% Impact72.525% Versatility49.618% Shot quality354% Trajectory22.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.91×[5, 10, 16] | 18.1 Production 18.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.85× parp17.532.5% Balls / boundary4.25p12.520% Balls / six17p7.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 35 Shot Quality 35 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build64.3% Phase-weighted control64.3% | 72.5 Impact 72.5 = WPA percentile · total +29.1 WPA · Death+29.1 | 49.6 Versatility 49.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p77.516.7% Reach buildp27.522.2% | |
| 16 | RHB | 20 | 8 | 41 | 45 | 91.1 | 20.5 | 1 | 2 | 38.3 Scout Score 38.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production55.840% Impact27.525% Versatility42.518% Shot quality27.54% Trajectory2.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.61×[1, 25, 15] | 55.8 Production 55.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.13× parp62.532.5% Balls / boundary3.5p42.520% Balls / six7p6032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 27.5 Shot Quality 27.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation37.5% Control · Build92.9% Phase-weighted control63.3% | 27.5 Impact 27.5 = WPA percentile · total +1.4 WPA · Death+1.4 | 42.5 Versatility 42.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp12.522.2% | |
| 17 | LHB | — | 7 | 58 | 39 | 148.7 | 19.3 | 4 | 5 | 35.4 Scout Score 35.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production45.140% Impact12.525% Versatility61.418% Shot quality22.54% Trajectory17.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.87×[29, 28, 1] | 45.1 Production 45.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap5032.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap5020% Balls / sixn/ap3532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 22.5 Shot Quality 22.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation60% Control · Build61.5% Phase-weighted control61.1% | 12.5 Impact 12.5 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 61.4 Versatility 61.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp97.522.2% | |
| 18 | RHB | 20 | 3 | 25 | 24 | 104.2 | 12.5 | 3 | 0 | 31.7 Scout Score 31.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production36.140% Impact2.525% Versatility55.818% Shot quality354% Trajectory4013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[37, 11, 14] | 36.1 Production 36.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0× parp12.532.5% Balls / boundary4p37.520% Balls / six4p52.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 35 Shot Quality 35 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation60% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control64.3% | 2.5 Impact 2.5 = WPA percentile · total -5.1 WPA · Death-5.1 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p5516.7% Reach buildp72.522.2% | |
| 19 | RHB | 27 | 8 | 141 | 91 | 154.9 | 28.2 | 8 | 7 | 30.6 Scout Score 30.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production33.140% Impact22.525% Versatility3918% Shot quality92.54% Trajectory7.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.79×[22, 21, 7] | 33.1 Production 33.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.93× parp37.532.5% Balls / boundary3.71p22.520% Balls / six8.67p27.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 92.5 Shot Quality 92.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.6% Control · Build90.4% Phase-weighted control89.2% | 22.5 Impact 22.5 = WPA percentile · total +0.7 WPA · Death+0.7 | 39 Versatility 39 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p7.516.7% Reach buildp32.522.2% | |
| 20 | RHB | 29 | 8 | 69 | 56 | 123.2 | 23 | 5 | 3 | 29.6 Scout Score 29.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production23.240% Impact37.525% Versatility34.318% Shot quality77.54% Trajectory12.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.82×[22, 26, 21] | 23.2 Production 23.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.89× parp27.532.5% Balls / boundary3.8p3020% Balls / six19p2.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 77.5 Shot Quality 77.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation33.3% Control · Build82.4% Phase-weighted control78.4% | 37.5 Impact 37.5 = WPA percentile · total +2 WPA · Death+2 | 34.3 Versatility 34.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p12.516.7% Reach buildp7.522.2% |
Vedant Awasthi
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB
85.8
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 141 · Balls 78 · SR 180.8 · Avg 23.5 · 4s 5 · 6s 14
85.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production88.828%24.9
Impact *97.627%26.4
Versatility7027%18.9
Shot quality73.88%5.9
Trajectory97.610%9.8
Scout Score85.8
88.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR193.81.37×64bp97.642.9%
True Avg41.31.44×3wp73.832.1%
Balls / boundary4—64bp92.925%
97.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +40.1
WPA · Consolidation+13.1
WPA · Build+26.9
70VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p76.944.4%
vs LA-orthodox181 SR16bp83.3
vs Leg-spin120 SR15bp70
vs Short ball283 SR6b6b <min
Spin hitting———p67.729.6%
Off-spin167 SR12bp50
LA-orthodox181 SR21bp70
Leg-spin120 SR15bp78.6
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)271.4 SR1.92×21bp97.614.8%
Reach death133.3 SR0.66×12bp11.911.1%
73.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation93.1%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control81.2% → p73.8
97.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.17×
Recent scores[27, 21, 7]
Innings8
Rajat Patidar
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 33
77.8
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 155 · Balls 85 · SR 182.4 · Avg 38.8 · 4s 14 · 6s 10
77.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production92.528%25.9
Impact *83.327%22.5
Versatility88.627%23.9
Shot quality35.78%2.9
Trajectory26.210%2.6
Scout Score77.8
92.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR184.11.3×82bp92.942.9%
True Avg50.31.75×3wp88.132.1%
Balls / boundary3.6—82bp97.625%
83.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +15.9
WPA · Consolidation+0.8
WPA · Build+15
88.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p94.444.4%
vs LA-orthodox206 SR17bp94.4
vs Leg-spin238 SR8b8b <min
vs Short ball188 SR8b8b <min
Spin hitting———p96.729.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox206 SR17bp96.7
Leg-spin238 SR8b8b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)170.2 SR1.2×57bp92.914.8%
Reach death133.3 SR0.66×3bp38.111.1%
35.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.3%
Control · Build69.5%
Phase-weighted control72% → p35.7
26.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.87×
Recent scores[45, 37, 37]
Innings8
Ansh Bagadia
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB
77.7
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 104 · Balls 72 · SR 144.4 · Avg 34.7 · 4s 9 · 6s 3
77.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production78.428%22.0
Impact *92.927%25.1
Versatility59.627%16.1
Shot quality78.68%6.3
Trajectory83.310%8.3
Scout Score77.7
78.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR165.91.17×44bp78.642.9%
True Avg732.54×1wp92.932.1%
Balls / boundary5.5—44bp59.525%
92.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +24.7
WPA · Consolidation+11.8
WPA · Build+12.9
59.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin—0b0b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball138 SR8b8b <min
Spin hitting———p86.729.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox200 SR12bp86.7
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)153.1 SR1.08×32bp73.814.8%
Reach death109.1 SR0.54×11bp7.111.1%
78.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.9%
Control · Build84%
Phase-weighted control81.8% → p78.6
83.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.08×
Recent scores[51, 29, 24]
Innings4
Abhishek Mavi
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB
77.1
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 166 · Balls 81 · SR 204.9 · Avg 166 · 4s 9 · 6s 16
77.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production90.440%36.2
Impact *82.525%20.6
Versatility60.118%10.8
Shot quality82.54%3.3
Trajectory47.513%6.2
Scout Score77.1
90.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR247.81.23×46bp97.532.5%
Balls / boundary2.4—46bp97.520%
Balls / six3.3—46bp97.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
82.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +32.7
WPA · Death+32.7
60.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker75 SR4b4b <min
vs Slower ball288 SR8b8b <min
vs Spin (death)200 SR1.03×10bp87.516.7%
Reach build148.6 SR1.02×35bp67.522.2%
82.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control80% → p82.5
47.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.02×
Recent scores[55, 38, 73]
Innings5
Shivang Kumar
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 24
77
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 177 · Balls 86 · SR 205.8 · Avg 35.4 · 4s 15 · 6s 13
77OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production95.240%38.1
Impact *96.427%26.0
Versatility70.215%10.5
Shot quality17.96%1.1
Trajectory10.712%1.3
Scout Score77
95.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR253.21.59×47bp96.435%
True Avg1193.4×1wp96.430%
Balls / boundary2.2—47bp96.417.5%
Balls / dismissal47—1wp89.317.5%
96.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +47.5
WPA · Powerplay+55
WPA · Consolidation-7.5
70.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR255 SR1.55×40bp96.426.7%
vs Spin SR163 SR1.11×46bp53.626.7%
Accel into Cons120.8 SR—24bp32.120%
Pressure entry172.2 SR1.08×18bp89.326.7%
17.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build93.3%
Phase-weighted control73% → p17.9
10.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.78×
Recent scores[12, 31, 30]
Innings9
Akhil Yadav
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 23
76.5
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 179 · Balls 104 · SR 172.1 · Avg 44.8 · 4s 17 · 6s 11
76.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production77.440%31.0
Impact *89.327%24.1
Versatility52.615%7.9
Shot quality46.46%2.8
Trajectory89.312%10.7
Scout Score76.5
77.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR243.31.53×30bp89.335%
True Avg——0wp64.330%
Balls / boundary2.1—30bp89.317.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp64.317.5%
89.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +34
WPA · Powerplay+31.3
WPA · Consolidation+2.7
52.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR156.4 SR0.95×55bp39.326.7%
vs Spin SR189.8 SR1.29×49bp82.126.7%
Accel into Cons133.3 SR—27bp39.320%
Pressure entry——0bp46.426.7%
46.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.5%
Control · Build72.7%
Phase-weighted control77.6% → p46.4
89.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.2×
Recent scores[17, 63, 66]
Innings10
Aryan Pandey
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 22
73.5
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 108 · Balls 60 · SR 180 · Avg 108 · 4s 9 · 6s 7
73.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production85.140%34.0
Impact *77.525%19.4
Versatility52.618%9.5
Shot quality62.54%2.5
Trajectory62.513%8.1
Scout Score73.5
85.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR241.41.2×29bp92.532.5%
Balls / boundary2.6—29bp87.520%
Balls / six4.8—29bp92.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
77.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +32.2
WPA · Death+32.2
52.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball325 SR8b8b <min
vs Spin (death)171.4 SR0.88×7bp82.516.7%
Reach build130.8 SR0.9×26bp37.522.2%
62.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build69.2%
Phase-weighted control74.2% → p62.5
62.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.06×
Recent scores[28, 56, 24]
Innings8
Tripuresh Singh
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 24
71.9
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 133 · Balls 78 · SR 170.5 · Avg 33.2 · 4s 7 · 6s 12
71.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production82.728%23.2
Impact *88.127%23.8
Versatility48.727%13.1
Shot quality90.58%7.2
Trajectory45.210%4.5
Scout Score71.9
82.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1541.09×50bp73.842.9%
True Avg772.68×1wp97.632.1%
Balls / boundary5—50bp78.625%
88.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +22.9
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build+22.9
48.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox124 SR21bp50
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball33 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p43.329.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox143 SR23bp43.3
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman222 SR9b9b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)155 SR1.1×20bp6914.8%
Reach death200 SR0.99×28bp3111.1%
90.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build83.7%
Phase-weighted control84% → p90.5
45.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.9×
Recent scores[16, 13, 43]
Innings10
Kanishk Dubey
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 28
66.8
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 237 · Balls 137 · SR 173 · Avg 79 · 4s 16 · 6s 16
66.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production55.540%22.2
Impact *67.927%18.3
Versatility59.315%8.9
Shot quality96.46%5.8
Trajectory96.412%11.6
Scout Score66.8
55.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR181.61.14×38bp7535%
True Avg34.50.98×2wp39.330%
Balls / boundary3.2—38bp67.917.5%
Balls / dismissal19—2wp32.117.5%
67.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +20.2
WPA · Powerplay+8.8
WPA · Consolidation+11.5
59.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR169.8 SR1.03×63bp82.126.7%
vs Spin SR175.7 SR1.2×74bp67.926.7%
Accel into Cons171.7 SR—46bp82.120%
Pressure entry115.4 SR0.72×26bp10.726.7%
96.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.8%
Control · Build87.2%
Phase-weighted control85.6% → p96.4
96.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.39×
Recent scores[8, 51, 21]
Innings9
Atharv Mahajan
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 22
66.7
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 54 · Balls 43 · SR 125.6 · Avg 27 · 4s 2 · 6s 3
66.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.640%27.0
Impact *92.525%23.1
Versatility34.418%6.2
Shot quality72.54%2.9
Trajectory57.513%7.5
Scout Score66.7
67.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR227.31.13×11bp7032.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—11bp6520%
Balls / six5.5—11bp7532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
92.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +47
WPA · Death+47
34.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball260 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.51×1bp2016.7%
Reach build58.8 SR0.4×17bp2.522.2%
72.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build76.5%
Phase-weighted control75.9% → p72.5
57.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[29, 0, 25]
Innings6
Himanshu Mantri
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 32
66.5
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 174 · Balls 110 · SR 158.2 · Avg 29 · 4s 18 · 6s 7
66.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production77.540%31.0
Impact *82.127%22.2
Versatility41.715%6.3
Shot quality256%1.5
Trajectory46.412%5.6
Scout Score66.5
77.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1751.1×80bp82.135%
True Avg46.71.33×3wp7530%
Balls / boundary3.6—80bp7517.5%
Balls / dismissal26.7—3wp7517.5%
82.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +25.1
WPA · Powerplay+26.4
WPA · Consolidation-1.4
41.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR166.7 SR1.01×54bp67.926.7%
vs Spin SR150 SR1.02×56bp39.326.7%
Accel into Cons87 SR—23bp3.620%
Pressure entry——0bp46.426.7%
25Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.9%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control73.6% → p25
46.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[9, 31, 44]
Innings9
Kamal Tripathi
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 27
65.9
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 41 · Balls 20 · SR 205 · Avg 41 · 4s 6 · 6s 2
65.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production66.240%26.5
Impact *62.525%15.6
Versatility58.118%10.5
Shot quality504%2.0
Trajectory87.513%11.4
Scout Score65.9
66.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR3001.49×8bp87.532.5%
Balls / boundary1.6—8bp82.520%
Balls / six8—8bp42.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
62.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +5.3
WPA · Death+5.3
58.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker400 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build214.3 SR1.47×7bp82.522.2%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation60%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p50
87.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.11×
Recent scores[20, 4, 17]
Innings8
Saksham Purohit
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 22
65.4
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 125 · Balls 82 · SR 152.4 · Avg 31.2 · 4s 19 · 6s 2
65.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production81.840%32.7
Impact *60.727%16.4
Versatility4415%6.6
Shot quality82.16%4.9
Trajectory39.312%4.7
Scout Score65.4
81.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR170.51.07×61bp67.935%
True Avg1042.97×1wp89.330%
Balls / boundary3.2—61bp82.117.5%
Balls / dismissal61—1wp96.417.5%
60.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +5
WPA · Powerplay+15.9
WPA · Consolidation-10.9
44VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR169 SR1.03×58bp7526.7%
vs Spin SR112.5 SR0.77×24bp2526.7%
Accel into Cons107.1 SR—14bp2520%
Pressure entry——0bp46.426.7%
82.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation85.7%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control82.9% → p82.1
39.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[51, 5, 29]
Innings7
Sanjog Nijjer
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 31
64.7
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 116 · Balls 62 · SR 187.1 · Avg 116 · 4s 9 · 6s 8
64.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production47.440%19.0
Impact *97.525%24.4
Versatility50.418%9.1
Shot quality87.54%3.5
Trajectory67.513%8.8
Scout Score64.7
47.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR203.31.01×30bp57.532.5%
Balls / boundary3—30bp77.520%
Balls / six10—30bp17.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
97.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +63.5
WPA · Death+63.5
50.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker140 SR5b5b <min
vs Slower ball133 SR6b6b <min
vs Spin (death)83.3 SR0.43×6bp2.516.7%
Reach build171.9 SR1.18×32bp87.522.2%
87.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build87.5%
Phase-weighted control87.5% → p87.5
67.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.07×
Recent scores[24, 66, 26]
Innings6
Ojaswa Yadav
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB
64.3
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 131 · Balls 70 · SR 187.1 · Avg 32.8 · 4s 11 · 6s 10
64.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production73.828%20.7
Impact *78.627%21.2
Versatility59.627%16.1
Shot quality40.58%3.2
Trajectory3110%3.1
Scout Score64.3
73.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR168.51.19×54bp83.342.9%
True Avg30.31.05×3wp5032.1%
Balls / boundary3.9—54bp88.125%
78.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +10.9
WPA · Consolidation-1
WPA · Build+11.9
59.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin156 SR9b9b <min
vs Chinaman200 SR9b9b <min
vs Short ball400 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p78.329.6%
Off-spin183 SR12bp64.3
LA-orthodox200 SR20bp86.7
Leg-spin100 SR4b4b <min
Chinaman200 SR9b9b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)100 SR0.71×13bp26.214.8%
Reach death383.3 SR1.9×6bp92.911.1%
40.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build69.2%
Phase-weighted control72.2% → p40.5
31Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.88×
Recent scores[45, 4, 38]
Innings9
Aman B Bhadoriya
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 24
63
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 67 · Balls 34 · SR 197.1 · Avg 22.3 · 4s 5 · 6s 6
63OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production61.240%24.5
Impact *87.525%21.9
Versatility51.118%9.2
Shot quality97.54%3.9
Trajectory27.513%3.6
Scout Score63
61.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR193.80.96×32bp42.532.5%
Balls / boundary3.2—32bp57.520%
Balls / six5.3—32bp87.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
87.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +37.9
WPA · Death+37.9
51.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball250 SR10bp50
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.51×1bp2016.7%
Reach build250 SR1.71×2bp77.522.2%
97.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build100%
Phase-weighted control100% → p97.5
27.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[16, 30, 0]
Innings9
Pranjul Puri
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 29
60.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 38 · Balls 21 · SR 181 · Avg 12.7 · 4s 2 · 6s 3
60.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.640%27.0
Impact *57.525%14.4
Versatility51.418%9.3
Shot quality12.54%0.5
Trajectory72.513%9.4
Scout Score60.6
67.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR227.31.13×11bp7032.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—11bp6520%
Balls / six5.5—11bp7532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
57.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +4.9
WPA · Death+4.9
51.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build130 SR0.89×10bp52.522.2%
12.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build50%
Phase-weighted control50% → p12.5
72.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[27, 11, 0]
Innings8
Anant Verma
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB
59.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 63 · Balls 35 · SR 180 · Avg 15.8 · 4s 4 · 6s 5
59.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production60.428%16.9
Impact *6927%18.6
Versatility67.527%18.2
Shot quality64.38%5.1
Trajectory7.110%0.7
Scout Score59.6
60.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR206.91.46×29bp88.142.9%
True Avg200.7×3wp16.732.1%
Balls / boundary3.2—29bp6925%
69Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +3.3
WPA · Consolidation-7
WPA · Build+10.3
67.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox0 SR1b1b <min
vs Leg-spin233 SR3b3b <min
vs Short ball400 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p92.929.6%
Off-spin233 SR15bp92.9
LA-orthodox0 SR3b3b <min
Leg-spin233 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman0 SR1b1b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)200 SR1.42×9bp78.614.8%
Reach death——0bp54.811.1%
64.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build85%
Phase-weighted control79.3% → p64.3
7.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.57×
Recent scores[7, 3, 0]
Innings8
Saransh Jain
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 33
58.1
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 71 · Balls 49 · SR 144.9 · Avg — · 4s 5 · 6s 4
58.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production49.528%13.9
Impact *73.827%19.9
Versatility46.127%12.4
Shot quality508%4.0
Trajectory78.610%7.9
Scout Score58.1
49.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1250.88×28bp5042.9%
True Avg——0wp59.532.1%
Balls / boundary7—28bp35.725%
73.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +8.8
WPA · Consolidation+2.6
WPA · Build+6.2
46.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin—0b0b <min
vs Chinaman129 SR7b7b <min
vs Short ball33 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p5029.6%
Off-spin200 SR3b3b <min
LA-orthodox89 SR9b9b <min
Leg-spin500 SR2b2b <min
Chinaman129 SR7b7b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)133.3 SR0.94×18bp45.214.8%
Reach death171.4 SR0.85×21bp21.411.1%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Build79.2%
Phase-weighted control75% → p50
78.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.07×
Recent scores[28, 32, 39]
Innings4
Parth Sahani
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 33
57.5
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 94 · Balls 61 · SR 154.1 · Avg 47 · 4s 5 · 6s 6
57.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production60.928%17.1
Impact *40.527%10.9
Versatility65.427%17.7
Shot quality97.68%7.8
Trajectory40.510%4.0
Scout Score57.5
60.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR139.60.99×48bp59.542.9%
True Avg672.33×1wp78.632.1%
Balls / boundary8—48bp40.525%
40.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.7
WPA · Consolidation-1.2
WPA · Build-2.4
65.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p83.344.4%
vs Off-spin175 SR12bp83.3
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p49.129.6%
Off-spin194 SR16bp78.6
LA-orthodox120 SR5b5b <min
Leg-spin88 SR17bp21.4
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)150 SR1.06×10bp59.514.8%
Reach death207.7 SR1.03×13bp45.211.1%
97.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.6%
Control · Build91.4%
Phase-weighted control89.6% → p97.6
40.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.89×
Recent scores[27, 41, 33]
Innings9
Aniket Verma
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 24
57.4
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 102 · Balls 52 · SR 196.2 · Avg 34 · 4s 9 · 6s 8
57.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production40.940%16.4
Impact *7527%20.2
Versatility56.915%8.5
Shot quality67.96%4.1
Trajectory67.912%8.1
Scout Score57.4
40.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR153.80.97×13bp53.635%
True Avg200.57×1wp32.130%
Balls / boundary3.2—13bp46.417.5%
Balls / dismissal13—1wp2517.5%
75Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +22.3
WPA · Powerplay+2.2
WPA · Consolidation+20.1
56.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR152.9 SR0.93×34bp32.126.7%
vs Spin SR277.8 SR1.89×18bp96.426.7%
Accel into Cons200 SR—20bp89.320%
Pressure entry33.3 SR0.21×3bp17.926.7%
67.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build78.9%
Phase-weighted control79.7% → p67.9
67.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[42, 60, 0]
Innings9
Venkatesh Iyer
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 31
56.3
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 137 · Balls 86 · SR 159.3 · Avg 45.7 · 4s 10 · 6s 9
56.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production60.228%16.9
Impact *45.227%12.2
Versatility5227%14.0
Shot quality54.88%4.4
Trajectory88.110%8.8
Scout Score56.3
60.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1250.88×56bp40.542.9%
True Avg702.43×1wp83.332.1%
Balls / boundary6.2—56bp64.325%
45.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -1.8
WPA · Consolidation-3.1
WPA · Build+1.4
52VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin110 SR10bp50
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball220 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p43.629.6%
Off-spin110 SR10bp21.4
LA-orthodox159 SR17bp56.7
Leg-spin33 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)137.1 SR0.97×35bp54.814.8%
Reach death250 SR1.24×26bp78.611.1%
54.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build75.6%
Phase-weighted control76.8% → p54.8
88.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.13×
Recent scores[2, 47, 87]
Innings9
Mohd Arham Aquil
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 24
53.9
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 216 · Balls 130 · SR 166.2 · Avg 54 · 4s 20 · 6s 11
53.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production70.940%28.4
Impact *46.427%12.5
Versatility36.915%5.5
Shot quality60.76%3.6
Trajectory32.112%3.9
Scout Score53.9
70.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR162.31.02×61bp60.735%
True Avg49.51.41×2wp82.130%
Balls / boundary3.6—61bp60.717.5%
Balls / dismissal30.5—2wp82.117.5%
46.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0.8
WPA · Powerplay+2.4
WPA · Consolidation-1.5
36.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR153.1 SR0.93×81bp2526.7%
vs Spin SR187.8 SR1.28×49bp7526.7%
Accel into Cons136.7 SR—30bp46.420%
Pressure entry113.8 SR0.71×29bp3.626.7%
60.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build76.7%
Phase-weighted control78.9% → p60.7
32.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[36, 27, 9]
Innings8
Vikas Sharma
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 21
53.8
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 69 · Balls 37 · SR 186.5 · Avg 23 · 4s 3 · 6s 6
53.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production59.528%16.7
Impact *35.727%9.6
Versatility54.727%14.8
Shot quality90.58%7.2
Trajectory54.810%5.5
Scout Score53.8
59.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1561.1×25bp64.342.9%
True Avg391.36×1wp64.332.1%
Balls / boundary6.2—25bp45.225%
35.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -8
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build-8
54.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox78 SR9b9b <min
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball100 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p63.329.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox173 SR15bp63.3
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)130 SR0.92×10bp40.514.8%
Reach death250 SR1.24×12bp6911.1%
90.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build84%
Phase-weighted control84% → p90.5
54.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.9×
Recent scores[31, 6, 14]
Innings8
Arpit Patel
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 26
53.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 99 · Balls 49 · SR 202 · Avg 99 · 4s 10 · 6s 7
53.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production79.640%31.8
Impact *32.525%8.1
Versatility50.318%9.1
Shot quality7.54%0.3
Trajectory32.513%4.2
Scout Score53.5
79.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR223.71.11×38bp82.532.5%
Balls / boundary2.5—38bp92.520%
Balls / six6.3—38bp82.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
32.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +1.8
WPA · Death+1.8
50.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker125 SR4b4b <min
vs Slower ball214 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build127.3 SR0.87×11bp47.522.2%
7.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build45.5%
Phase-weighted control45.5% → p7.5
32.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[30, 21, 13]
Innings7
Ashutosh Sharma
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 27
51
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 87 · Balls 52 · SR 167.3 · Avg 21.8 · 4s 3 · 6s 9
51OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production54.928%15.4
Impact *59.527%16.1
Versatility58.627%15.8
Shot quality2.48%0.2
Trajectory35.710%3.6
Scout Score51
54.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR156.11.1×41bp6942.9%
True Avg21.30.74×3wp21.432.1%
Balls / boundary4.6—41bp73.825%
59.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +1.7
WPA · Consolidation+4.9
WPA · Build-3.2
58.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox117 SR6b6b <min
vs Leg-spin188 SR8b8b <min
vs Short ball200 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p5029.6%
Off-spin0 SR1b1b <min
LA-orthodox114 SR7b7b <min
Leg-spin188 SR8b8b <min
Chinaman100 SR1b1b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)164 SR1.16×25bp83.314.8%
Reach death380 SR1.88×5bp83.311.1%
2.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation60%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control61% → p2.4
35.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.89×
Recent scores[30, 32, 0]
Innings11
Sachin Vishwakarma
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 43
48
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 44 · Balls 22 · SR 200 · Avg 14.7 · 4s 4 · 6s 3
48OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production28.140%11.2
Impact *47.525%11.9
Versatility56.518%10.2
Shot quality504%2.0
Trajectory97.513%12.7
Scout Score48
28.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR173.70.86×19bp22.532.5%
Balls / boundary3.8—19bp3020%
Balls / six9.5—19bp22.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
47.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +3.7
WPA · Death+3.7
56.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)150 SR0.77×2bp32.516.7%
Reach build366.7 SR2.51×3bp92.522.2%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p50
97.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.28×
Recent scores[25, 12, 7]
Innings6
Rohit Kumar Gupta
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB
47.7
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 88 · Balls 65 · SR 135.4 · Avg 17.6 · 4s 7 · 6s 4
47.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production66.740%26.7
Impact *12.525%3.1
Versatility51.818%9.3
Shot quality42.54%1.7
Trajectory52.513%6.8
Scout Score47.7
66.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR242.91.2×7bp77.532.5%
Balls / boundary2.3—7bp72.520%
Balls / six7—7bp6032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
12.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
51.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker400 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)375 SR1.92×4bp97.516.7%
Reach build118.5 SR0.81×27bp22.522.2%
42.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.3%
Control · Build55.6%
Phase-weighted control66% → p42.5
52.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[18, 16, 17]
Innings10
Shubham Sharma
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 32
47.4
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 169 · Balls 114 · SR 148.2 · Avg 33.8 · 4s 16 · 6s 5
47.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production44.840%17.9
Impact *39.327%10.6
Versatility41.215%6.2
Shot quality89.36%5.4
Trajectory60.712%7.3
Scout Score47.4
44.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR137.50.86×24bp39.335%
True Avg330.94×1wp53.630%
Balls / boundary4.8—24bp32.117.5%
Balls / dismissal24—1wp53.617.5%
39.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -0.8
WPA · Powerplay-0.2
WPA · Consolidation-0.5
41.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR163.8 SR1×69bp53.626.7%
vs Spin SR124.4 SR0.85×45bp10.726.7%
Accel into Cons119 SR—42bp10.720%
Pressure entry150 SR0.94×38bp82.126.7%
89.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81%
Control · Build91.2%
Phase-weighted control83.9% → p89.3
60.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.08×
Recent scores[15, 6, 57]
Innings10
Gautam Raghuwanshi
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 35
46.8
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 69 · Balls 58 · SR 119 · Avg 34.5 · 4s 8 · 6s 1
46.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production49.528%13.9
Impact *54.827%14.8
Versatility37.227%10.0
Shot quality21.48%1.7
Trajectory64.310%6.4
Scout Score46.8
49.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR125.50.89×47bp45.242.9%
True Avg29.51.03×2wp54.832.1%
Balls / boundary5.9—47bp5025%
54.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +1
WPA · Consolidation+6.3
WPA · Build-5.3
37.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin—0b0b <min
vs Chinaman100 SR1b1b <min
vs Short ball50 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p3029.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox129 SR17bp30
Leg-spin129 SR7b7b <min
Chinaman100 SR1b1b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)116.7 SR0.83×30bp21.414.8%
Reach death133.3 SR0.66×6bp26.211.1%
21.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.7%
Control · Build67.9%
Phase-weighted control70.2% → p21.4
64.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.93×
Recent scores[4, 0, 33]
Innings9
Puneet Datey
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 31
46.7
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 38 · Balls 27 · SR 140.7 · Avg 9.5 · 4s 2 · 6s 3
46.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production24.240%9.7
Impact *67.525%16.9
Versatility44.618%8.0
Shot quality2.54%0.1
Trajectory92.513%12.0
Scout Score46.7
24.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1500.74×24bp2.532.5%
Balls / boundary4.8—24bp2.520%
Balls / six8—24bp47.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
67.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +18.8
WPA · Death+18.8
44.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker167 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball60 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)150 SR0.77×10bp27.516.7%
Reach build66.7 SR0.46×3bp42.522.2%
2.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build33.3%
Phase-weighted control33.3% → p2.5
92.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.16×
Recent scores[15, 14, 2]
Innings5
Kuldeep Gehi
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 31
46.5
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 144 · Balls 89 · SR 161.8 · Avg 36 · 4s 12 · 6s 9
46.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production40.240%16.1
Impact *53.627%14.5
Versatility73.615%11.0
Shot quality32.16%1.9
Trajectory2512%3.0
Scout Score46.5
40.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR138.10.87×21bp46.435%
True Avg290.83×1wp46.430%
Balls / boundary5.2—21bp10.717.5%
Balls / dismissal21—1wp46.417.5%
53.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +4.6
WPA · Powerplay-8.4
WPA · Consolidation+13
73.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR146.5 SR0.89×71bp17.926.7%
vs Spin SR222.2 SR1.52×18bp89.326.7%
Accel into Cons190.9 SR—33bp96.420%
Pressure entry212.5 SR1.33×48bp96.426.7%
32.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation69.7%
Control · Build88.9%
Phase-weighted control75.3% → p32.1
25Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[27, 57, 12]
Innings8
Lucky Mishra
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 26
45.1
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 38 · Balls 30 · SR 126.7 · Avg 38 · 4s 2 · 6s 2
45.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production41.540%16.6
Impact *52.525%13.1
Versatility43.618%7.8
Shot quality57.54%2.3
Trajectory4013%5.2
Scout Score45.1
41.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR178.60.88×14bp32.532.5%
Balls / boundary4.7—14bp7.520%
Balls / six7—14bp67.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
52.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +4.2
WPA · Death+4.2
43.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball25 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build81.2 SR0.56×16bp17.522.2%
57.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build68.8%
Phase-weighted control68.8% → p57.5
40Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[12, 26]
Innings2
Madhav Tiwari
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 22
44.9
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 84 · Balls 66 · SR 127.3 · Avg 21 · 4s 7 · 6s 5
44.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.128%10.9
Impact *64.327%17.4
Versatility51.827%14.0
Shot quality11.98%1.0
Trajectory16.710%1.7
Scout Score44.9
39.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR110.30.78×39bp21.442.9%
True Avg431.49×1wp6932.1%
Balls / boundary7.8—39bp3125%
64.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +3.1
WPA · Consolidation-4.4
WPA · Build+7.5
51.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p72.244.4%
vs LA-orthodox138 SR16bp72.2
vs Leg-spin57 SR7b7b <min
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p36.829.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox156 SR27bp50
Leg-spin50 SR12bp7.1
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)113.3 SR0.8×15bp3114.8%
Reach death133.3 SR0.66×3bp38.111.1%
11.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70%
Control · Build65.5%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p11.9
16.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.74×
Recent scores[15, 31, 20]
Innings9
Siddharth Mahesh Patidar
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 28
43.8
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 78 · Balls 49 · SR 159.2 · Avg 39 · 4s 6 · 6s 4
43.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production37.440%15.0
Impact *2527%6.8
Versatility51.715%7.8
Shot quality756%4.5
Trajectory82.112%9.9
Scout Score43.8
37.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR92.90.58×14bp17.935%
True Avg——0wp64.330%
Balls / boundary14—14bp3.617.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp64.317.5%
25Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5.5
WPA · Powerplay-4.9
WPA · Consolidation-0.6
51.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR164.7 SR1×34bp60.726.7%
vs Spin SR146.7 SR1×15bp46.426.7%
Accel into Cons133.3 SR—12bp53.620%
Pressure entry——0bp46.426.7%
75Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control80% → p75
82.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.17×
Recent scores[22, 1, 55]
Innings8
Harsh Dixit
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 26
43.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 107 · Balls 56 · SR 191.1 · Avg 35.7 · 4s 14 · 6s 5
43.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production45.140%18.0
Impact *12.525%3.1
Versatility53.618%9.6
Shot quality67.54%2.7
Trajectory77.513%10.1
Scout Score43.6
45.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp5032.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp5020%
Balls / six——0bp3532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
12.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
53.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build——0bp62.522.2%
67.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted control75% → p67.5
77.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[27, 48, 32]
Innings5
Anand Bais
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 35
40
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 123 · Balls 85 · SR 144.7 · Avg 41 · 4s 7 · 6s 5
40OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production33.728%9.4
Impact *3127%8.4
Versatility49.727%13.4
Shot quality83.38%6.7
Trajectory21.410%2.1
Scout Score40
33.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR123.60.87×72bp35.742.9%
True Avg29.71.03×3wp40.532.1%
Balls / boundary10.3—72bp21.425%
31Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -10.4
WPA · Consolidation+1.9
WPA · Build-12.4
49.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p44.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox122 SR23bp38.9
vs Leg-spin117 SR12bp50
vs Short ball140 SR10bp50
Spin hitting———p35.929.6%
Off-spin86 SR7b7b <min
LA-orthodox119 SR27bp23.3
Leg-spin117 SR12bp64.3
Chinaman67 SR3b3b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)142.9 SR1.01×28bp64.314.8%
Reach death310 SR1.54×10bp88.111.1%
83.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation92.3%
Control · Build69.7%
Phase-weighted control81.9% → p83.3
21.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.76×
Recent scores[15, 12, 18]
Innings8
Ankur Singh Chauhan
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 28
39.6
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 57 · Balls 36 · SR 158.3 · Avg 57 · 4s 7 · 6s 2
39.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production17.540%7.0
Impact *42.525%10.6
Versatility58.818%10.6
Shot quality17.54%0.7
Trajectory82.513%10.7
Scout Score39.6
17.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR162.50.81×16bp7.532.5%
Balls / boundary4—16bp17.520%
Balls / six16—16bp12.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
42.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2.8
WPA · Death+2.8
58.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)228.6 SR1.17×7bp92.516.7%
Reach build147.1 SR1.01×17bp57.522.2%
17.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation33.3%
Control · Build64.7%
Phase-weighted control60% → p17.5
82.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[50, 2, 5]
Innings5
Goutam Joshi
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 24
38.6
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 45 · Balls 31 · SR 145.2 · Avg 15 · 4s 3 · 6s 2
38.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production18.140%7.2
Impact *72.525%18.1
Versatility49.618%8.9
Shot quality354%1.4
Trajectory22.513%2.9
Scout Score38.6
18.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR170.60.85×17bp17.532.5%
Balls / boundary4.2—17bp12.520%
Balls / six17—17bp7.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
72.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +29.1
WPA · Death+29.1
49.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball250 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)166.7 SR0.85×6bp77.516.7%
Reach build114.3 SR0.78×14bp27.522.2%
35Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build64.3%
Phase-weighted control64.3% → p35
22.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.91×
Recent scores[5, 10, 16]
Innings6
Saransh Surana
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 20
38.3
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 41 · Balls 45 · SR 91.1 · Avg 20.5 · 4s 1 · 6s 2
38.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production55.840%22.3
Impact *27.525%6.9
Versatility42.518%7.7
Shot quality27.54%1.1
Trajectory2.513%0.3
Scout Score38.3
55.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR228.61.13×7bp62.532.5%
Balls / boundary3.5—7bp42.520%
Balls / six7—7bp6032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
27.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +1.4
WPA · Death+1.4
42.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker250 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build64.3 SR0.44×14bp12.522.2%
27.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation37.5%
Control · Build92.9%
Phase-weighted control63.3% → p27.5
2.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.61×
Recent scores[1, 25, 15]
Innings8
Ritik Tada
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 23
37.6
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 125 · Balls 85 · SR 147.1 · Avg 20.8 · 4s 10 · 6s 9
37.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production32.828%9.2
Impact *26.227%7.1
Versatility73.227%19.8
Shot quality16.78%1.3
Trajectory2.410%0.2
Scout Score37.6
32.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR119.70.85×76bp26.242.9%
True Avg15.20.53×6wp2.432.1%
Balls / boundary5.8—76bp83.325%
26.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -12
WPA · Consolidation-8
WPA · Build-4
73.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p65.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox82 SR11bp5.6
vs Leg-spin122 SR27bp90
vs Short ball60 SR5b5b <min
Spin hitting———p87.129.6%
Off-spin100 SR7b7b <min
LA-orthodox187 SR15bp76.7
Leg-spin122 SR27bp92.9
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)135.5 SR0.96×31bp5014.8%
Reach death377.8 SR1.87×9bp97.611.1%
16.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build64.3%
Phase-weighted control68.4% → p16.7
2.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.56×
Recent scores[0, 9, 14]
Innings10
Vikrant Bhadoriya
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 25
36.2
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 87 · Balls 67 · SR 129.9 · Avg 21.8 · 4s 6 · 6s 4
36.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4128%11.5
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility29.527%8.0
Shot quality26.28%2.1
Trajectory11.910%1.2
Scout Score36.2
41ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR129.90.92×67bp54.842.9%
True Avg21.80.76×4wp11.932.1%
Balls / boundary6.7—67bp54.825%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0.1
WPA · Consolidation-10.1
WPA · Build+10.2
29.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p16.744.4%
vs LA-orthodox104 SR28bp16.7
vs Leg-spin—0b0b <min
vs Short ball267 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p1029.6%
Off-spin50 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox104 SR28bp10
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)174.2 SR1.23×31bp88.114.8%
Reach death——0bp54.811.1%
26.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build70.2%
Phase-weighted control71.6% → p26.2
11.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.67×
Recent scores[0, 22, 22]
Innings8
Rishi Miglani
Finisher · pos 8 · LHB
35.4
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 58 · Balls 39 · SR 148.7 · Avg 19.3 · 4s 4 · 6s 5
35.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production45.140%18.0
Impact *12.525%3.1
Versatility61.418%11.1
Shot quality22.54%0.9
Trajectory17.513%2.3
Scout Score35.4
45.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp5032.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp5020%
Balls / six——0bp3532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
12.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
61.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build223.1 SR1.53×13bp97.522.2%
22.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation60%
Control · Build61.5%
Phase-weighted control61.1% → p22.5
17.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.87×
Recent scores[29, 28, 1]
Innings7
Apurve Dwivedi
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 25
35.3
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 72 · Balls 39 · SR 184.6 · Avg 18 · 4s 7 · 6s 5
35.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production17.340%6.9
Impact *32.127%8.7
Versatility67.415%10.1
Shot quality10.76%0.6
Trajectory7512%9.0
Scout Score35.3
17.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR114.30.72×14bp2535%
True Avg80.23×2wp3.630%
Balls / boundary4.7—14bp39.317.5%
Balls / dismissal7—2wp3.617.5%
32.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3
WPA · Powerplay-3
WPA · Consolidation+0
67.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR175 SR1.07×28bp89.326.7%
vs Spin SR209.1 SR1.43×11bp60.726.7%
Accel into Cons250 SR—8bp7520%
Pressure entry——0bp46.426.7%
10.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build70.6%
Phase-weighted control72.7% → p10.7
75Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.12×
Recent scores[6, 14, 51]
Innings9
Rudransh Singh
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 20
31.7
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 25 · Balls 24 · SR 104.2 · Avg 12.5 · 4s 3 · 6s 0
31.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production36.140%14.4
Impact *2.525%0.6
Versatility55.818%10.0
Shot quality354%1.4
Trajectory4013%5.2
Scout Score31.7
36.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR00×2bp12.532.5%
Balls / boundary——2bp37.520%
Balls / six——2bp52.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
2.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5.1
WPA · Death-5.1
55.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp5516.7%
Reach build155.6 SR1.07×9bp72.522.2%
35Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation60%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control64.3% → p35
40Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[37, 11, 14]
Innings3
Harsh Gawli
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 27
30.9
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 112 · Balls 89 · SR 125.8 · Avg 56 · 4s 9 · 6s 4
30.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production18.528%5.2
Impact *11.927%3.2
Versatility35.527%9.6
Shot quality45.28%3.6
Trajectory92.910%9.3
Scout Score30.9
18.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.71×42bp16.742.9%
True Avg210.73×2wp26.232.1%
Balls / boundary14—42bp11.925%
11.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -23.7
WPA · Consolidation-21.7
WPA · Build-2
35.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p35.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox136 SR11bp61.1
vs Leg-spin100 SR11bp10
vs Short ball67 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p36.429.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox135 SR23bp36.7
Leg-spin100 SR11bp35.7
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)80 SR0.57×20bp11.914.8%
Reach death226.7 SR1.12×15bp64.311.1%
45.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70.8%
Control · Build77.8%
Phase-weighted control73.8% → p45.2
92.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.14×
Recent scores[17, 26, 70]
Innings7
Rahul Batham
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 27
30.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 141 · Balls 91 · SR 154.9 · Avg 28.2 · 4s 8 · 6s 7
30.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production33.140%13.2
Impact *22.525%5.6
Versatility3918%7.0
Shot quality92.54%3.7
Trajectory7.513%1.0
Scout Score30.6
33.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR188.50.93×26bp37.532.5%
Balls / boundary3.7—26bp22.520%
Balls / six8.7—26bp27.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
22.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0.7
WPA · Death+0.7
39VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball186 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)116.7 SR0.6×6bp7.516.7%
Reach build136.5 SR0.94×52bp32.522.2%
92.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.6%
Control · Build90.4%
Phase-weighted control89.2% → p92.5
7.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.79×
Recent scores[22, 21, 7]
Innings8
Rishabh Chouhan
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 26
29.9
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 56 · Balls 51 · SR 109.8 · Avg 18.7 · 4s 4 · 6s 2
29.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production14.728%4.1
Impact *16.727%4.5
Versatility39.827%10.7
Shot quality698%5.5
Trajectory5010%5.0
Scout Score29.9
14.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR560.4×25bp4.842.9%
True Avg140.49×1wp35.732.1%
Balls / boundary——25bp4.825%
16.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -21.6
WPA · Consolidation+0
WPA · Build-21.6
39.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox50 SR6b6b <min
vs Leg-spin100 SR1b1b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p5029.6%
Off-spin50 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox44 SR9b9b <min
Leg-spin100 SR1b1b <min
Chinaman200 SR4b4b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)58.3 SR0.41×12bp16.714.8%
Reach death161.5 SR0.8×26bp2.411.1%
69Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control80% → p69
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.9×
Recent scores[6, 19, 23]
Innings11
Shubham Rathore
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 29
29.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 69 · Balls 56 · SR 123.2 · Avg 23 · 4s 5 · 6s 3
29.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production23.240%9.3
Impact *37.525%9.4
Versatility34.318%6.2
Shot quality77.54%3.1
Trajectory12.513%1.6
Scout Score29.6
23.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR178.90.89×19bp27.532.5%
Balls / boundary3.8—19bp3020%
Balls / six19—19bp2.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
37.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2
WPA · Death+2
34.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball75 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)00×1bp12.516.7%
Reach build100 SR0.69×34bp7.522.2%
77.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation33.3%
Control · Build82.4%
Phase-weighted control78.4% → p77.5
12.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.82×
Recent scores[22, 26, 21]
Innings8
Sagar Solanki
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 25
29.4
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 97 · Balls 65 · SR 149.2 · Avg 48.5 · 4s 5 · 6s 5
29.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production3228%9.0
Impact *21.427%5.8
Versatility2327%6.2
Shot quality318%2.5
Trajectory59.510%6.0
Scout Score29.4
32ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR119.60.84×46bp3142.9%
True Avg27.50.96×2wp45.232.1%
Balls / boundary11.5—46bp16.725%
21.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -12.9
WPA · Consolidation+0.2
WPA · Build-13.1
23VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p16.744.4%
vs Off-spin82 SR11bp16.7
vs Chinaman80 SR5b5b <min
vs Short ball183 SR6b6b <min
Spin hitting———p7.129.6%
Off-spin83 SR12bp7.1
LA-orthodox67 SR6b6b <min
Leg-spin260 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman80 SR5b5b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)120 SR0.85×20bp35.714.8%
Reach death247.1 SR1.22×17bp73.811.1%
31Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation72.7%
Control · Build70.8%
Phase-weighted control71.7% → p31
59.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[58, 9, 4]
Innings8
Parth Goswami
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 29
24.7
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 127 · Balls 116 · SR 109.5 · Avg 25.4 · 4s 10 · 6s 3
24.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production21.628%6.0
Impact *2.427%0.6
Versatility23.527%6.3
Shot quality59.58%4.8
Trajectory6910%6.9
Scout Score24.7
21.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR108.80.77×102bp11.942.9%
True Avg27.80.96×4wp3132.1%
Balls / boundary9.3—102bp26.225%
2.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -36.2
WPA · Consolidation-6.7
WPA · Build-29.5
23.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p28.544.4%
vs LA-orthodox118 SR28bp27.8
vs Leg-spin115 SR13bp30
vs Short ball100 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p29.329.6%
Off-spin131 SR13bp35.7
LA-orthodox118 SR28bp16.7
Leg-spin115 SR13bp50
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)95.8 SR0.68×48bp2.414.8%
Reach death122.2 SR0.61×9bp16.711.1%
59.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.1%
Control · Build76.2%
Phase-weighted control78.4% → p59.5
69Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[55, 25, 12]
Innings9
Kartik Parihar
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 21
22.2
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 98 · Balls 78 · SR 125.6 · Avg 24.5 · 4s 16 · 6s 1
22.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production19.140%7.6
Impact *3.627%1.0
Versatility31.715%4.8
Shot quality39.36%2.4
Trajectory53.612%6.4
Scout Score22.2
19.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR120.70.76×58bp3.635%
True Avg23.30.67×3wp17.930%
Balls / boundary4.1—58bp53.617.5%
Balls / dismissal19.3—3wp17.917.5%
3.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -21.4
WPA · Powerplay-21.2
WPA · Consolidation-0.2
31.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR135.7 SR0.83×56bp3.626.7%
vs Spin SR100 SR0.68×22bp17.926.7%
Accel into Cons150 SR—10bp67.920%
Pressure entry——0bp46.426.7%
39.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build70%
Phase-weighted control76.7% → p39.3
53.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[0, 15, 71]
Innings8
Abhishek Bhandari
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 31
21.8
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 124 · Balls 87 · SR 142.5 · Avg 24.8 · 4s 10 · 6s 8
21.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production21.240%8.5
Impact *10.727%2.9
Versatility45.515%6.8
Shot quality53.66%3.2
Trajectory3.612%0.4
Scout Score21.8
21.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR117.50.74×40bp10.735%
True Avg23.50.67×2wp2530%
Balls / boundary5—40bp17.917.5%
Balls / dismissal20—2wp39.317.5%
10.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -13.1
WPA · Powerplay-9.3
WPA · Consolidation-3.9
45.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR162 SR0.99×50bp46.426.7%
vs Spin SR116.2 SR0.79×37bp3.626.7%
Accel into Cons138.9 SR—18bp60.720%
Pressure entry175 SR1.1×8bp7526.7%
53.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation77.8%
Control · Build78.6%
Phase-weighted control78% → p53.6
3.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.56×
Recent scores[4, 1, 13]
Innings8
Yash Dubey
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 27
19.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 58 · Balls 48 · SR 120.8 · Avg 29 · 4s 5 · 6s 1
19.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production20.740%8.3
Impact *17.927%4.8
Versatility27.415%4.1
Shot quality3.66%0.2
Trajectory17.912%2.1
Scout Score19.6
20.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR118.80.75×16bp32.135%
True Avg9.50.27×2wp10.730%
Balls / boundary5.3—16bp2517.5%
Balls / dismissal8—2wp10.717.5%
17.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -12.3
WPA · Powerplay-8.7
WPA · Consolidation-3.6
27.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR131 SR0.8×29bp10.726.7%
vs Spin SR105.3 SR0.72×19bp32.126.7%
Accel into Cons90 SR—10bp17.920%
Pressure entry——0bp46.426.7%
3.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Build92.3%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p3.6
17.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.84×
Recent scores[49, 9, 0]
Innings8
Aayaam Verma
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB
19.6
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 29 · Balls 40 · SR 72.5 · Avg 14.5 · 4s 2 · 6s 0
19.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production5.528%1.5
Impact *7.127%1.9
Versatility30.427%8.2
Shot quality7.18%0.6
Trajectory73.810%7.4
Scout Score19.6
5.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR560.4×25bp4.842.9%
True Avg70.24×2wp7.132.1%
Balls / boundary——25bp4.825%
7.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -25.2
WPA · Consolidation-19.9
WPA · Build-5.4
30.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox75 SR8b8b <min
vs Leg-spin67 SR3b3b <min
vs Short ball—0b0b <min
Spin hitting———p3.329.6%
Off-spin0 SR1b1b <min
LA-orthodox92 SR13bp3.3
Leg-spin67 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)46.2 SR0.33×13bp7.114.8%
Reach death——0bp54.811.1%
7.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation68.2%
Control · Build33.3%
Phase-weighted control64% → p7.1
73.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[18, 21, 8]
Innings3
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chinaman | 23 | 4.0 | 3 | 19 | 4.75 | 85.1 Scout Score 85.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle85.1100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p64.51× | 93.7 Bowling Production 93.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 4.75 econp93.7100% | 94.5 Quality 94.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle46%p94.5 | 72.7 Impact 72.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +7.4p72.7100% | 89.1 Versatility 89.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep89.1100% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 22 | 24.4 | 12 | 206 | 8.35 | 83.8 Scout Score 83.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay93.656.8% Middle52.28.1% Death75.135.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p96.40.77× | 83.3 Bowling Production 83.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 6.57 econp93.356.8% Middle1w · 10 econp48.28.1% Death5w · 10.85 econp75.435.1% | 87.3 Quality 87.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p92.2 False-shot · Middle25%p53.1 | 88.7 Impact 88.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +28.2p98.956.8% MiddleWPA -0.7p47.78.1% DeathWPA +3p81.735.1% | 64.8 Versatility 64.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp80.256.8% Middlep36.38.1% Deathp46.335.1% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 11.0 | 4 | 73 | 6.64 | 80.2 Scout Score 80.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay89.872.7% Middle54.727.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p76.10.96× | 81.6 Bowling Production 81.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 6.62 econp9372.7% Middle0w · 6.67 econp51.227.3% | 62.7 Quality 62.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p80 False-shot · Middle11%p16.4 | 88.4 Impact 88.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +21.6p96.772.7% MiddleWPA +4.3p66.427.3% | 83.2 Versatility 83.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp87.672.7% Middlep71.527.3% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 6.1 | 3 | 42 | 6.81 | 80.1 Scout Score 80.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle80.1100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p64.51× | 84.8 Bowling Production 84.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 6.81 econp84.8100% | 83.6 Quality 83.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle30%p83.6 | 86.7 Impact 86.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +15.5p86.7100% | 59.8 Versatility 59.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep59.8100% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 17.0 | 7 | 112 | 6.59 | 78.1 Scout Score 78.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay73.258.8% Middle8541.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p94.90.83× | 84.2 Bowling Production 84.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 8.7 econp80.458.8% Middle3w · 3.57 econp89.741.2% | 32.8 Quality 32.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p30 False-shot · Middle21%p36.7 | 89.2 Impact 89.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +7.2p83.358.8% MiddleWPA +35.5p97.741.2% | 76 Versatility 76 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp6258.8% Middlep96.141.2% | |
| 6 | Leg-spin | 30 | 14.1 | 5 | 82 | 5.79 | 76.5 Scout Score 76.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay77.928.2% Middle75.863.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p99.30.73× | 76.9 Bowling Production 76.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 3.25 econp78.428.2% Middle3w · 6.78 econp76.363.5% | 26.8 Quality 26.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p37.8 False-shot · Middle20%p21.9 | 92.7 Impact 92.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +14.8p92.228.2% MiddleWPA +18.3p9363.5% | 83.4 Versatility 83.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp75.828.2% Middlep86.763.5% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 31 | 22.4 | 8 | 180 | 7.94 | 76.3 Scout Score 76.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay74.152.9% Middle53.48.8% Death84.538.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p48.61.05× | 78.1 Bowling Production 78.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 7.83 econp70.452.9% Middle0w · 7 econp46.38.8% Death5w · 8.31 econp96.138.2% | 73.3 Quality 73.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p76.7 False-shot · Middle25%p53.1 | 87.8 Impact 87.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +10.3p87.852.9% MiddleWPA +3.5p61.78.8% DeathWPA +7.1p93.938.2% | 67.3 Versatility 67.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp72.952.9% Middlep63.38.8% Deathp60.538.2% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 36 | 20.0 | 6 | 175 | 8.75 | 76.1 Scout Score 76.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle79.540% Death73.860% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p31.21.13× | 81.6 Bowling Production 81.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 7.25 econp79.640% Death3w · 9.75 econp82.960% | 99.2 Quality 99.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle42%p99.2 | 90 Impact 90 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +18.2p91.440% DeathWPA +6.6p8960% | 59.9 Versatility 59.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep69.540% Deathp53.460% | |
| 9 | Leg-spin | — | 17.0 | 5 | 121 | 7.12 | 72.2 Scout Score 72.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle72.294.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p42.81.08× | 68.8 Bowling Production 68.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 7.06 econp68.894.1% | 74.2 Quality 74.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle27%p74.2 | 78.9 Impact 78.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +9.4p78.994.1% | 90.6 Versatility 90.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep90.694.1% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 25.0 | 14 | 215 | 8.6 | 72.1 Scout Score 72.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay78.124% Middle85.856% Death26.520% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p81.2× | 77.6 Bowling Production 77.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 7 econp92.924% Middle8w · 6.79 econp92.956% Death2w · 15.6 econp16.720% | 85.1 Quality 85.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p55.6 False-shot · Middle36%p97.7 | 87.3 Impact 87.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +15.6p94.424% MiddleWPA +47p99.256% DeathWPA -9.3p45.120% | 80 Versatility 80 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp81.124% Middlep85.256% Deathp64.320% | |
| 11 | LA pace | — | 7.0 | 1 | 47 | 6.71 | 69.5 Scout Score 69.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle76.371.4% Death52.528.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p73.20.97× | 65.3 Bowling Production 65.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 5.2 econp70.771.4% Death0w · 10.5 econp51.828.6% | 88.3 Quality 88.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle33%p88.3 | 69.8 Impact 69.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +8.1p75.871.4% DeathWPA -5.7p54.928.6% | 68.6 Versatility 68.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep82.471.4% Deathp34.128.6% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 22 | 11.5 | 6 | 97 | 8.2 | 69.4 Scout Score 69.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay74.733.8% Middle67.925.4% Death65.940.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p97.80.75× | 72.3 Bowling Production 72.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.75 econp6633.8% Middle0w · 5.33 econp56.825.4% Death4w · 8.69 econp8740.8% | 89.8 Quality 89.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay46%p96.7 False-shot · Middle33%p80.5 | 49.9 Impact 49.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +2.2p74.433.8% MiddleWPA +3.2p60.225.4% DeathWPA -21.9p23.240.8% | 55.6 Versatility 55.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp51.833.8% Middlep78.925.4% Deathp44.440.8% | |
| 13 | Off-spin | 21 | 12.4 | 6 | 111 | 8.76 | 67 Scout Score 67 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle67.678.9% Death64.821.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p71.70.97× | 68.6 Bowling Production 68.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 8.3 econp70.678.9% Death1w · 10.5 econp61.221.1% | 46.1 Quality 46.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle23%p46.1 | 79.2 Impact 79.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +9.5p80.578.9% DeathWPA -1.9p74.421.1% | 53.7 Versatility 53.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep54.778.9% Deathp5021.1% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 20 | 4.0 | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 66.9 Scout Score 66.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle66.975% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p89.10.9× | 73 Bowling Production 73 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 7.67 econp7375% | 60.2 Quality 60.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle28%p60.2 | 55.5 Impact 55.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +1.8p55.575% | 61.7 Versatility 61.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep61.775% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 25 | 5.0 | 3 | 46 | 9.2 | 66.5 Scout Score 66.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.160% Death77.740% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p920.87× | 63.5 Bowling Production 63.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9.67 econp56.460% Death2w · 8.5 econp74.240% | 74.4 Quality 74.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p74.4 | 60.6 Impact 60.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -4.5p43.360% DeathWPA +5.1p86.640% | 58.7 Versatility 58.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp56.260% Deathp62.540% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 26 | 7.0 | 0 | 37 | 5.29 | 62.7 Scout Score 62.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle62.785.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p64.51× | 52 Bowling Production 52 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 5.67 econp5285.7% | 85.2 Quality 85.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle31%p85.2 | 52.3 Impact 52.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +1.1p52.385.7% | 88.3 Versatility 88.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep88.385.7% | |
| 17 | RA pace | — | 14.0 | 7 | 139 | 9.93 | 62.1 Scout Score 62.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay62.957.1% Death61.142.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p86.20.9× | 72.7 Bowling Production 72.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 9.25 econp71.457.1% Death4w · 10.83 econp74.442.9% | 18.9 Quality 18.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay19%p18.9 | 48.4 Impact 48.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0.4p65.657.1% DeathWPA -21.7p25.642.9% | 62.4 Versatility 62.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp66.257.1% Deathp57.342.9% | |
| 18 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 16.0 | 6 | 133 | 8.31 | 60.1 Scout Score 60.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay66.525% Middle61.862.5% Death3912.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p28.31.13× | 64.5 Bowling Production 64.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 11.5 econp6125% Middle2w · 5.9 econp7162.5% Death1w · 14 econp38.912.5% | 27.2 Quality 27.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay38%p85.6 False-shot · Middle15%p3.9 | 85.7 Impact 85.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +4p78.925% MiddleWPA +20.9p96.162.5% DeathWPA -8.1p47.612.5% | 58.1 Versatility 58.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp6425% Middlep61.762.5% Deathp28.612.5% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 20 | 13.0 | 7 | 125 | 9.62 | 58.8 Scout Score 58.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay61.353.8% Middle4815.4% Death59.730.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11.06× | 69.1 Bowling Production 69.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 9.86 econp68.753.8% Middle1w · 9.5 econp51.615.4% Death2w · 9.25 econp78.530.8% | 81.8 Quality 81.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay36%p90 False-shot · Middle25%p53.1 | 43 Impact 43 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -3.5p45.653.8% MiddleWPA -1p44.515.4% DeathWPA -12.4p37.830.8% | 45.5 Versatility 45.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp47.153.8% Middlep38.315.4% Deathp46.130.8% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 23 | 16.0 | 6 | 159 | 9.94 | 58 Scout Score 58 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay50.912.5% Middle76.656.2% Death27.531.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p38.41.1× | 58.6 Bowling Production 58.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 7.5 econp50.912.5% Middle5w · 7.89 econp81.156.2% Death1w · 14.6 econp21.131.2% | 56.9 Quality 56.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p21.1 False-shot · Middle26%p64.8 | 71.7 Impact 71.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +1.3p72.212.5% MiddleWPA +20.8p94.556.2% DeathWPA -19.9p30.531.2% | 57.2 Versatility 57.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp50.912.5% Middlep71.556.2% Deathp34.131.2% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 34 | 11.5 | 3 | 124 | 10.48 | 55.3 Scout Score 55.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay56.650.7% Middle53.333.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p12.31.18× | 56.7 Bowling Production 56.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9.17 econp51.650.7% Middle2w · 8.25 econp64.233.8% | 72.3 Quality 72.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay39%p94.4 False-shot · Middle21%p39.1 | 60.6 Impact 60.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -1.2p58.950.7% MiddleWPA +3.7p63.333.8% | 54.1 Versatility 54.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp56.950.7% Middlep5033.8% | |
| 22 | LA pace | 20 | 20.0 | 7 | 181 | 9.05 | 54.7 Scout Score 54.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay58.250% Middle61.915% Death46.835% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p57.21.01× | 59.5 Bowling Production 59.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.2 econp6150% Middle0w · 6.33 econp48.315% Death5w · 11.43 econp62.235% | 63.9 Quality 63.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p58.9 False-shot · Middle33%p80.5 | 41.5 Impact 41.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2p54.450% MiddleWPA +5.9p69.515% DeathWPA -32.8p1135% | 56.2 Versatility 56.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp57.350% Middlep69.515% Deathp48.935% | |
| 23 | SLA orthodox | — | 14.0 | 2 | 117 | 8.36 | 54.6 Scout Score 54.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay77.857.1% Middle23.742.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p83.30.92× | 48.6 Bowling Production 48.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 7.62 econp69.357.1% Middle0w · 9.33 econp21.142.9% | 46.7 Quality 46.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p80 False-shot · Middle8%p2.3 | 57.1 Impact 57.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +10.8p9057.1% MiddleWPA -13.2p13.342.9% | 52.3 Versatility 52.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp68.757.1% Middlep30.542.9% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 22 | 16.0 | 6 | 169 | 10.56 | 54.5 Scout Score 54.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay58.162.5% Death47.231.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p790.94× | 61.9 Bowling Production 61.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 10.1 econp64.962.5% Death1w · 11.8 econp56.131.2% | 41.1 Quality 41.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p41.1 | 34.7 Impact 34.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.8p47.862.5% DeathWPA -36.8p8.531.2% | 62.6 Versatility 62.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp65.162.5% Deathp57.531.2% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 24 | 20.0 | 6 | 201 | 10.05 | 54.3 Scout Score 54.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay4555% Middle43.810% Death7235% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p34.11.11× | 61.1 Bowling Production 61.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 10.45 econp50.755% Middle1w · 10 econp48.210% Death2w · 9.43 econp81.135% | 63.7 Quality 63.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p65.6 False-shot · Middle25%p53.1 | 47.1 Impact 47.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -10.1p3055% MiddleWPA -3.7p36.710% DeathWPA -1.7p76.835% | 50.9 Versatility 50.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp43.655% Middlep41.410% Deathp65.135% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 29 | 12.0 | 5 | 136 | 11.33 | 53.9 Scout Score 53.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay55.341.7% Middle67.825% Death41.833.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p32.61.12× | 43.9 Bowling Production 43.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.6 econp40.841.7% Middle2w · 6.67 econp81.825% Death2w · 15.75 econp19.533.3% | 78.8 Quality 78.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay30%p72.2 False-shot · Middle44%p89.8 | 68 Impact 68 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +5.2p81.141.7% MiddleWPA +0.2p50.825% DeathWPA -3.2p64.633.3% | 58.5 Versatility 58.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp3841.7% Middlep60.925% Deathp82.333.3% | |
| 27 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 2 | 50 | 12.5 | 52.7 Scout Score 52.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle52.750% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50n/a | 52.6 Bowling Production 52.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9 econp52.650% | 69.5 Quality 69.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle33%p69.5 | 49.2 Impact 49.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +0.1p49.250% | 41.4 Versatility 41.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep41.450% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 29 | 12.0 | 5 | 137 | 11.42 | 52.4 Scout Score 52.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay58.650% Middle65.916.7% Death36.433.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p51.41.01× | 51.4 Bowling Production 51.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 11.33 econp52.950% Middle2w · 8 econp72.416.7% Death0w · 13.25 econp38.633.3% | 82.6 Quality 82.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay44%p98.9 False-shot · Middle17%p33.6 | 45.3 Impact 45.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.2p52.250% MiddleWPA +17.1p88.316.7% DeathWPA -30.4p13.433.3% | 49 Versatility 49 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4450% Middlep51.216.7% Deathp55.433.3% | |
| 29 | SLA orthodox | — | 13.0 | 4 | 115 | 8.85 | 52.4 Scout Score 52.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay52.238.5% Middle33.638.5% Death84.123.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p80.40.94× | 59.2 Bowling Production 59.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8.8 econp5538.5% Middle2w · 9.4 econp49.638.5% Death1w · 8 econp82.223.1% | 9.3 Quality 9.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay13%p10 False-shot · Middle13%p8.6 | 49 Impact 49 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -0.9p61.138.5% MiddleWPA -17.1p738.5% DeathWPA +14.3p98.823.1% | 45 Versatility 45 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp52.238.5% Middlep30.538.5% Deathp57.123.1% | |
| 30 | Off-spin | 24 | 8.0 | 3 | 100 | 12.5 | 52.3 Scout Score 52.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle66.662.5% Death16.725% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p45.71.06× | 44.4 Bowling Production 44.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 9 econp58.662.5% Death0w · 21.5 econp8.925% | 76.6 Quality 76.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle30%p76.6 | 69.4 Impact 69.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +17.2p89.862.5% DeathWPA -27.5p18.325% | 40.7 Versatility 40.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep48.462.5% Deathp21.425% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 9.0 | 3 | 93 | 10.33 | 52.2 Scout Score 52.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay43.644.4% Middle60.844.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p25.41.15× | 52.9 Bowling Production 52.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 12 econp47.844.4% Middle1w · 7.5 econp58.144.4% | 69.5 Quality 69.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p52.2 False-shot · Middle33%p86.7 | 53 Impact 53 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -5.1p41.144.4% MiddleWPA +4.2p64.844.4% | 48.8 Versatility 48.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.844.4% Middlep57.844.4% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 34 | 10.2 | 3 | 85 | 8.23 | 51.4 Scout Score 51.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle51.480.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p6.51.2× | 51.1 Bowling Production 51.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 9 econp51.180.6% | 63.3 Quality 63.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle26%p63.3 | 71.1 Impact 71.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +6p71.180.6% | 34 Versatility 34 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep3480.6% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 29 | 7.0 | 0 | 58 | 8.29 | 51.3 Scout Score 51.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay55.857.1% Middle42.428.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p371.1× | 49.9 Bowling Production 49.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 5 econp57.657.1% Middle0w · 10 econp34.628.6% | 40.2 Quality 40.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p25.6 False-shot · Middle33%p69.5 | 65.4 Impact 65.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +3.9p76.757.1% MiddleWPA -1.5p4328.6% | 50.2 Versatility 50.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp57.157.1% Middlep36.328.6% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 23 | 5.0 | 2 | 50 | 10 | 50.4 Scout Score 50.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle47.440% Death53.440% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p87.70.9× | 52.4 Bowling Production 52.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9 econp5640% Death0w · 11.5 econp48.840% | 33.6 Quality 33.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p33.6 | 41.5 Impact 41.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5.8p25.840% DeathWPA -5.7p57.340% | 41.5 Versatility 41.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep48.840% Deathp34.140% | |
| 35 | Leg-spin | 23 | 7.0 | 1 | 65 | 9.29 | 50.1 Scout Score 50.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle50.185.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p64.51× | 52.5 Bowling Production 52.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 7.67 econp52.585.7% | 7 Quality 7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle14%p7 | 58.6 Impact 58.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +2.5p58.685.7% | 66.4 Versatility 66.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep66.485.7% | |
| 36 | LA pace | — | 25.0 | 8 | 236 | 9.44 | 49.5 Scout Score 49.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay44.556% Middle60.128% Death48.316% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p9.41.19× | 50.8 Bowling Production 50.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8.57 econp51.856% Middle4w · 9.71 econp52.228% Death2w · 12 econp44.716% | 37.2 Quality 37.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay18%p7.8 False-shot · Middle40%p96.1 | 69.6 Impact 69.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -0.8p63.356% MiddleWPA +12.5p8228% DeathWPA -2.5p69.516% | 50.9 Versatility 50.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp56.756% Middlep36.728% Deathp55.416% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | — | 17.1 | 3 | 136 | 7.92 | 48 Scout Score 48 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay68.523.3% Middle23.652.4% Death8124.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p22.51.17× | 49.6 Bowling Production 49.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 6 econp71.123.3% Middle1w · 9 econp23.152.4% Death1w · 7.44 econp86.124.3% | 20 Quality 20 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p63.3 False-shot · Middle9%p0.8 | 61.8 Impact 61.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +9.3p85.623.3% MiddleWPA -4p35.252.4% DeathWPA +11.5p96.324.3% | 52.4 Versatility 52.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp66.923.3% Middlep30.552.4% Deathp85.724.3% | |
| 38 | RA pace | 24 | 11.4 | 1 | 104 | 8.91 | 46.2 Scout Score 46.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay4560% Middle26.417.1% Death64.222.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p19.61.17× | 51.5 Bowling Production 51.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8.57 econp50.660% Middle0w · 12 econp24.417.1% Death0w · 7.5 econp74.422.9% | 16.3 Quality 16.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay10%p1.1 False-shot · Middle33%p69.5 | 60.8 Impact 60.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0.4p67.860% MiddleWPA -17.6p5.517.1% DeathWPA +3.5p84.122.9% | 44.5 Versatility 44.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp53.160% Middlep28.117.1% Deathp34.122.9% | |
| 39 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 21.0 | 10 | 207 | 9.86 | 45.5 Scout Score 45.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay26.233.3% Middle55.266.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501.03× | 55.9 Bowling Production 55.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 12 econp35.733.3% Middle8w · 8.79 econp6666.7% | 18 Quality 18 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay14%p5.6 False-shot · Middle21%p24.2 | 48.6 Impact 48.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -23.1p1033.3% MiddleWPA +4.4p6866.7% | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.433.3% Middlep37.566.7% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 25 | 8.0 | 3 | 92 | 11.5 | 44.7 Scout Score 44.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.725% Middle38.850% Death41.725% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p54.31.01× | 42.9 Bowling Production 42.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9.5 econp59.625% Middle2w · 11 econp40.950% Death0w · 14.5 econp30.325% | 67.2 Quality 67.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p68.9 False-shot · Middle29%p66.4 | 41.8 Impact 41.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -1.5p56.725% MiddleWPA -6.2p24.250% DeathWPA -3.7p62.225% | 30.8 Versatility 30.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp59.325% Middlep14.850% Deathp34.125% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 27 | 13.0 | 3 | 129 | 9.92 | 44.5 Scout Score 44.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle49.976.9% Death26.323.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p55.81.01× | 46.3 Bowling Production 46.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 8 econp53.476.9% Death1w · 16.33 econp22.823.1% | 30.5 Quality 30.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle22%p30.5 | 36.3 Impact 36.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -0.8p46.176.9% DeathWPA -43.7p3.723.1% | 63 Versatility 63 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep66.476.9% Deathp51.523.1% | |
| 42 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 15.0 | 0 | 160 | 10.67 | 44.1 Scout Score 44.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay5153.3% Middle33.233.3% Death43.613.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p90.60.89× | 28.7 Bowling Production 28.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 9.62 econp38.953.3% Middle0w · 11 econp10.733.3% Death0w · 14 econp32.813.3% | 83.5 Quality 83.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p87.8 False-shot · Middle30%p76.6 | 29 Impact 29 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -6.5p34.453.3% MiddleWPA -11.9p14.833.3% DeathWPA -10p42.713.3% | 45.2 Versatility 45.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp47.153.3% Middlep40.233.3% Deathp5013.3% | |
| 43 | RA pace | 29 | 7.0 | 3 | 75 | 10.71 | 43.6 Scout Score 43.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay35.142.9% Middle52.242.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p41.31.08× | 39.1 Bowling Production 39.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 14 econp36.942.9% Middle0w · 8 econp41.242.9% | 62.4 Quality 62.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p44.4 False-shot · Middle33%p80.5 | 39.7 Impact 39.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -15.8p25.642.9% MiddleWPA +1.3p53.942.9% | 45.1 Versatility 45.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp33.642.9% Middlep56.642.9% | |
| 44 | RA pace | — | 16.0 | 2 | 158 | 9.88 | 43.1 Scout Score 43.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay32.137.5% Middle44.343.8% Death62.118.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p58.71× | 37.2 Bowling Production 37.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.67 econp24.637.5% Middle1w · 8.43 econp37.143.8% Death0w · 9.67 econp62.818.8% | 64.8 Quality 64.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p55.6 False-shot · Middle29%p72.7 | 35.8 Impact 35.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -21.4p16.737.5% MiddleWPA -4.1p33.643.8% DeathWPA +2.4p79.318.8% | 40 Versatility 40 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.437.5% Middlep42.243.8% Deathp34.118.8% | |
| 45 | LA pace | 31 | 5.0 | 0 | 64 | 12.8 | 42.3 Scout Score 42.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle42.380% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p81.90.92× | 32.1 Bowling Production 32.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 8.5 econp32.180% | 39.1 Quality 39.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p39.1 | 39.8 Impact 39.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -2.9p39.880% | 50.8 Versatility 50.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep50.880% | |
| 46 | Leg-spin | 23 | 9.2 | 4 | 90 | 9.64 | 42.3 Scout Score 42.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle42.3100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p39.91.09× | 50.5 Bowling Production 50.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 9.64 econp50.5100% | 44.5 Quality 44.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle23%p44.5 | 32 Impact 32 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5p32100% | 36.7 Versatility 36.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep36.7100% | |
| 47 | Off-spin | 28 | 5.0 | 1 | 50 | 10 | 42.2 Scout Score 42.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle2960% Death61.940% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p3.61.22× | 47.4 Bowling Production 47.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 11.67 econp29.760% Death0w · 7.5 econp7440% | 26.6 Quality 26.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p26.6 | 49.8 Impact 49.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -3.1p38.360% DeathWPA -2.5p67.140% | 39.2 Versatility 39.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep3260% Deathp5040% | |
| 48 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 13.0 | 2 | 115 | 8.85 | 41.9 Scout Score 41.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay43.623.1% Middle45.361.5% Death25.615.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p2.21.31× | 49.4 Bowling Production 49.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 8 econp50.723.1% Middle2w · 8 econp53.661.5% Death0w · 13.5 econp30.415.4% | 83.1 Quality 83.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p61.1 False-shot · Middle35%p91.4 | 19.4 Impact 19.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -5.7p38.923.1% MiddleWPA -13.9p11.761.5% DeathWPA -22.5p20.715.4% | 58.3 Versatility 58.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4423.1% Middlep67.661.5% Deathp42.915.4% | |
| 49 | RA pace | 30 | 16.0 | 6 | 182 | 11.38 | 41.5 Scout Score 41.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay25.937.5% Middle68.118.8% Death43.543.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p211.17× | 48.6 Bowling Production 48.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 13.67 econp35.137.5% Middle1w · 4.67 econp72.518.8% Death3w · 12.29 econp49.843.8% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p16.7 False-shot · Middle28%p60.2 | 35.8 Impact 35.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -21.9p14.437.5% MiddleWPA +12.8p85.218.8% DeathWPA -19.4p32.943.8% | 53.8 Versatility 53.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.437.5% Middlep6818.8% Deathp59.243.8% | |
| 50 | Off-spin | 33 | 11.0 | 7 | 100 | 9.09 | 40.6 Scout Score 40.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle33.681.8% Death72.218.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p29.71.13× | 46.7 Bowling Production 46.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 9.22 econp40.281.8% Death4w · 8.5 econp75.918.2% | 21.9 Quality 21.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle20%p21.9 | 40.3 Impact 40.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5.2p28.981.8% DeathWPA +6.7p91.518.2% | 42.3 Versatility 42.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep40.681.8% Deathp5018.2% | |
| 51 | LA pace | — | 8.0 | 3 | 76 | 9.5 | 40.4 Scout Score 40.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle40.487.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p77.50.95× | 50.5 Bowling Production 50.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 9.29 econp50.587.5% | 49.2 Quality 49.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle24%p49.2 | 8.6 Impact 8.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -15.9p8.687.5% | 32.8 Versatility 32.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep32.887.5% | |
| 52 | LA pace | 24 | 16.0 | 6 | 196 | 12.25 | 40 Scout Score 40 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.143.8% Middle36.718.8% Death45.137.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p44.21.06× | 34.6 Bowling Production 34.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 11.43 econp41.143.8% Middle1w · 11.33 econp30.318.8% Death3w · 13.67 econp29.337.5% | 49.3 Quality 49.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p50 False-shot · Middle22%p47.7 | 45 Impact 45 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -19.7p23.343.8% MiddleWPA -1.7p41.418.8% DeathWPA -2.4p7237.5% | 38.6 Versatility 38.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp32.443.8% Middlep27.318.8% Deathp51.537.5% | |
| 53 | LA pace | 22 | 5.0 | 1 | 73 | 14.6 | 39.3 Scout Score 39.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay46.360% Death28.840% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p64.51× | 29.7 Bowling Production 29.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 9.67 econp39.560% Death1w · 22 econp14.840% | 83.3 Quality 83.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay39%p83.3 | 33.5 Impact 33.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -9.3p32.260% DeathWPA -15.4p35.440% | 35.2 Versatility 35.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp3660% Deathp34.140% | |
| 54 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 6.0 | 1 | 70 | 11.67 | 37.2 Scout Score 37.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay24.950% Middle55.633.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p16.71.18× | 41.6 Bowling Production 41.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 16.67 econp30.850% Middle0w · 5 econp57.733.3% | 30.1 Quality 30.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p27.8 False-shot · Middle17%p33.6 | 38.3 Impact 38.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -22.1p12.250% MiddleWPA +8.2p77.333.3% | 49.8 Versatility 49.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.950% Middlep63.333.3% | |
| 55 | RA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 0 | 50 | 12.5 | 36.8 Scout Score 36.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.150% Death36.550% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p5.11.21× | 31.6 Bowling Production 31.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 10 econp35.350% Death0w · 15 econp27.850% | 34.4 Quality 34.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p34.4 | 51.2 Impact 51.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.6p5050% DeathWPA -6.1p52.450% | 54.1 Versatility 54.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp45.850% Deathp62.550% | |
| 56 | RA pace | 21 | 23.0 | 3 | 237 | 10.3 | 36.2 Scout Score 36.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay11.147.8% Middle62.143.5% Death44.68.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p70.31× | 29.6 Bowling Production 29.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 12.36 econp5.847.8% Middle2w · 7.8 econp51.743.5% Death1w · 11.5 econp508.7% | 46 Quality 46 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p3.3 False-shot · Middle35%p93 | 27.8 Impact 27.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -44.2p1.147.8% MiddleWPA +1.9p5743.5% DeathWPA -20p288.7% | 34.3 Versatility 34.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp10.947.8% Middlep60.243.5% Deathp34.18.7% | |
| 57 | RA pace | 29 | 12.0 | 3 | 163 | 13.58 | 34.8 Scout Score 34.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay3333.3% Middle58.325% Death22.241.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p84.80.91× | 28.2 Bowling Production 28.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 13 econp32.833.3% Middle1w · 8 econp57.425% Death1w · 17.4 econp6.941.7% | 19 Quality 19 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay12%p13.3 False-shot · Middle17%p26.6 | 26.1 Impact 26.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -21.1p21.133.3% MiddleWPA +7.7p74.225% DeathWPA -53.2p1.241.7% | 49.1 Versatility 49.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp43.633.3% Middlep45.325% Deathp55.841.7% | |
| 58 | LA pace | 28 | 22.0 | 7 | 263 | 11.95 | 33.6 Scout Score 33.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay25.140.9% Middle3127.3% Death46.931.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p64.51× | 32.3 Bowling Production 32.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 12.44 econp24.940.9% Middle2w · 10.33 econp3227.3% Death3w · 12.71 econp42.131.8% | 35.9 Quality 35.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p32.2 False-shot · Middle22%p41.4 | 19.8 Impact 19.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -32.3p5.640.9% MiddleWPA -11.4p17.227.3% DeathWPA -10.5p40.231.8% | 34.8 Versatility 34.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp28.740.9% Middlep15.627.3% Deathp59.231.8% | |
| 59 | RA pace | 27 | 27.0 | 5 | 262 | 9.7 | 33.6 Scout Score 33.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay607.4% Middle34.466.7% Death2425.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p26.81.15× | 37.9 Bowling Production 37.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9.5 econp59.67.4% Middle2w · 7.94 econp42.666.7% Death2w · 14.29 econp19.725.9% | 45.6 Quality 45.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p68.9 False-shot · Middle23%p43 | 16.1 Impact 16.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +1.2p707.4% MiddleWPA -15.3p10.266.7% DeathWPA -29.9p15.925.9% | 53.2 Versatility 53.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp54.27.4% Middlep54.766.7% Deathp48.925.9% | |
| 60 | LA pace | 23 | 8.0 | 0 | 91 | 11.38 | 32.7 Scout Score 32.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay29.237.5% Middle53.525% Death22.337.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p23.91.16× | 30.8 Bowling Production 30.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 12.33 econp23.637.5% Middle0w · 6 econp53.425% Death0w · 14 econp2337.5% | 34.2 Quality 34.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p44.4 False-shot · Middle8%p18.8 | 33.6 Impact 33.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -12.6p27.837.5% MiddleWPA +12.5p83.625% DeathWPA -40.8p6.137.5% | 46.1 Versatility 46.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp37.337.5% Middlep59.425% Deathp46.137.5% | |
| 61 | Off-spin | 27 | 5.0 | 1 | 51 | 10.2 | 31 Scout Score 31 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle3180% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p13.81.18× | 35.5 Bowling Production 35.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9.75 econp35.580% | 57 Quality 57 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle25%p57 | 17.2 Impact 17.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -11.4p17.280% | 27.7 Versatility 27.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep27.780% | |
| 62 | RA pace | 24 | 9.0 | 2 | 101 | 11.22 | 30.6 Scout Score 30.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay24.777.8% Death51.422.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p15.21.18× | 35.2 Bowling Production 35.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11 econp30.277.8% Death1w · 12 econp52.622.2% | 23.3 Quality 23.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay19%p23.3 | 28 Impact 28 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -21.3p18.977.8% DeathWPA -4.7p59.822.2% | 37.9 Versatility 37.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp30.977.8% Deathp62.522.2% | |
| 63 | RA pace | 43 | 4.0 | 1 | 42 | 10.5 | 30 Scout Score 30 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle30100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p35.51.11× | 33 Bowling Production 33 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 10.5 econp33100% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle12%p12.5 | 30.5 Impact 30.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5.1p30.5100% | 36.7 Versatility 36.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep36.7100% | |
| 64 | RA pace | 31 | 4.2 | 1 | 48 | 11.08 | 28.6 Scout Score 28.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle28.692.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p18.11.17× | 38.9 Bowling Production 38.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9.5 econp38.992.3% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle12%p12.5 | 22.7 Impact 22.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -7.5p22.792.3% | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep37.592.3% | |
| 65 | RA pace | 26 | 10.0 | 0 | 117 | 11.7 | 26.7 Scout Score 26.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.740% Middle17.850% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p74.60.96× | 18 Bowling Production 18 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 10.25 econp27.840% Middle0w · 10.4 econp10.150% | 19.9 Quality 19.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p37.8 False-shot · Middle10%p5.5 | 18.5 Impact 18.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -5.9p36.740% MiddleWPA -18.2p3.950% | 40.2 Versatility 40.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp41.640% Middlep39.150% | |
| 66 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.0 | 0 | 42 | 10.5 | 24.7 Scout Score 24.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle24.7100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p52.91.01× | 18.7 Bowling Production 18.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 10.5 econp18.7100% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle12%p12.5 | 27.3 Impact 27.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5.3p27.3100% | 29.7 Versatility 29.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep29.7100% | |
| 67 | RA pace | 24 | 11.0 | 1 | 159 | 14.45 | 23.4 Scout Score 23.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay13.245.5% Middle21.127.3% Death42.827.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p10.91.18× | 16.5 Bowling Production 16.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 16.2 econp345.5% Middle0w · 13 econp9.127.3% Death1w · 13 econp46.327.3% | 52.5 Quality 52.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p47.8 False-shot · Middle28%p60.2 | 22.9 Impact 22.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -27.6p7.845.5% MiddleWPA -8.9p21.127.3% DeathWPA -6.5p5027.3% | 25.3 Versatility 25.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp17.645.5% Middlep18.827.3% Deathp44.827.3% | |
| 68 | Chinaman | 24 | 18.0 | 5 | 194 | 10.78 | 23.3 Scout Score 23.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle23.388.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p93.50.85× | 20.3 Bowling Production 20.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 10.38 econp20.388.9% | 28.9 Quality 28.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle22%p28.9 | 0.8 Impact 0.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -36.5p0.888.9% | 14.1 Versatility 14.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep14.188.9% | |
| 69 | SLA orthodox | 35 | 4.0 | 0 | 47 | 11.75 | 17.7 Scout Score 17.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle17.7100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p64.51× | 7.4 Bowling Production 7.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 11.75 econp7.4100% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle12%p12.5 | 19.5 Impact 19.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -10.6p19.5100% | 13.7 Versatility 13.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep13.7100% | |
| 70 | RA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 1 | 49 | 12.25 | 17.4 Scout Score 17.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle17.450% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50n/a | 16.4 Bowling Production 16.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 14 econp16.450% | 18.8 Quality 18.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle8%p18.8 | 2.3 Impact 2.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -20.1p2.350% | 22.7 Versatility 22.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep22.750% | |
| 71 | RA pace | 28 | 4.0 | 0 | 67 | 16.75 | 8.3 Scout Score 8.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay8.3100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p0.71.4× | 6.1 Bowling Production 6.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 16.75 econp6.1100% | 13.3 Quality 13.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay12%p13.3 | 3.3 Impact 3.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -40.4p3.3100% | 29.8 Versatility 29.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp29.8100% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 22 | 14.0 | 6 | 92 | 6.57 | 93.3 Phase Production 93.3 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.666× parp98.936.8% Wicket rate0.43/ovp87.842.1% Boundary %18%p94.421.1% | 92.2 Quality 92.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 98.9 Impact 98.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+28.2 | 80.2 Versatility 80.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.930% Econ vs LHBp98.930% Wkt vs RHBp96.720% Wkt vs LHBp7.820% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 8.0 | 4 | 53 | 6.62 | 93 Phase Production 93 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.671× parp94.436.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp9042.1% Boundary %12%p96.721.1% | 80 Quality 80 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 96.7 Impact 96.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+21.6 | 87.6 Versatility 87.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp92.230% Econ vs LHBp85.630% Wkt vs RHBp74.420% Wkt vs LHBp96.720% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 6.0 | 4 | 42 | 7 | 92.9 Phase Production 92.9 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.709× parp87.836.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp98.942.1% Boundary %14%p9021.1% | 55.6 Quality 55.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 94.4 Impact 94.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15.6 | 81.1 Versatility 81.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp83.330% Econ vs LHBp7030% Wkt vs RHBp76.720% Wkt vs LHBp98.920% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 10.0 | 4 | 87 | 8.7 | 80.4 Phase Production 80.4 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.881× parp76.736.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp83.342.1% Boundary %20%p81.121.1% | 30 Quality 30 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 83.3 Impact 83.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7.2 | 62 Versatility 62 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp87.830% Econ vs LHBp14.430% Wkt vs RHBp78.920% Wkt vs LHBp77.820% | |
| 5 | Leg-spin | 30 | 4.0 | 1 | 13 | 3.25 | 78.4 Phase Production 78.4 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.329× parp96.736.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp52.242.1% Boundary %0%p98.921.1% | 37.8 Quality 37.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 92.2 Impact 92.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+14.8 | 75.8 Versatility 75.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.730% Econ vs LHBp87.830% Wkt vs RHBp18.920% Wkt vs LHBp83.320% | |
| 6 | RA pace | — | 8.0 | 3 | 74 | 9.25 | 71.4 Phase Production 71.4 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.937× parp65.636.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp76.742.1% Boundary %23%p71.121.1% | 18.9 Quality 18.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 65.6 Impact 65.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.4 | 66.2 Versatility 66.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp61.130% Econ vs LHBp78.930% Wkt vs RHBp81.120% Wkt vs LHBp4020% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.0 | 1 | 24 | 6 | 71.1 Phase Production 71.1 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.608× parp85.636.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp52.242.1% Boundary %12%p83.321.1% | 63.3 Quality 63.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 85.6 Impact 85.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.3 | 66.9 Versatility 66.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9030% Econ vs LHBp58.930% Wkt vs RHBp61.120% Wkt vs LHBp5020% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 31 | 12.0 | 3 | 94 | 7.83 | 70.4 Phase Production 70.4 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.794× parp9036.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp45.642.1% Boundary %19%p85.621.1% | 76.7 Quality 76.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 87.8 Impact 87.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.3 | 72.9 Versatility 72.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.130% Econ vs LHBp96.730% Wkt vs RHBp5020% Wkt vs LHBp47.820% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | — | 8.0 | 2 | 61 | 7.62 | 69.3 Phase Production 69.3 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.772× parp83.336.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp47.842.1% Boundary %17%p87.821.1% | 80 Quality 80 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 90 Impact 90 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.8 | 68.7 Versatility 68.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.630% Econ vs LHBp72.230% Wkt vs RHBp23.320% Wkt vs LHBp83.320% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 20 | 7.0 | 4 | 69 | 9.86 | 68.7 Phase Production 68.7 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.999× parp58.936.8% Wicket rate0.57/ovp94.442.1% Boundary %29%p34.421.1% | 90 Quality 90 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 45.6 Impact 45.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.5 | 47.1 Versatility 47.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp65.630% Econ vs LHBp18.930% Wkt vs RHBp98.920% Wkt vs LHBp1020% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 22 | 4.0 | 2 | 39 | 9.75 | 66 Phase Production 66 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.988× parp56.736.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp8042.1% Boundary %25%p54.421.1% | 96.7 Quality 96.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %46% | 74.4 Impact 74.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.2 | 51.8 Versatility 51.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7030% Econ vs LHBp16.730% Wkt vs RHBp88.920% Wkt vs LHBp4020% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 22 | 10.0 | 5 | 101 | 10.1 | 64.9 Phase Production 64.9 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.023× parp43.336.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp92.242.1% Boundary %27%p47.821.1% | 41.1 Quality 41.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 47.8 Impact 47.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.8 | 65.1 Versatility 65.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp34.430% Econ vs LHBp67.830% Wkt vs RHBp94.420% Wkt vs LHBp77.820% | |
| 13 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 4.0 | 3 | 46 | 11.5 | 61 Phase Production 61 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.165× parp32.236.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp96.742.1% Boundary %29%p4021.1% | 85.6 Quality 85.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 78.9 Impact 78.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4 | 64 Versatility 64 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp18.930% Econ vs LHBp74.430% Wkt vs RHBp85.620% Wkt vs LHBp94.420% | |
| 14 | LA pace | 20 | 10.0 | 2 | 82 | 8.2 | 61 Phase Production 61 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.831× parp81.136.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp36.742.1% Boundary %23%p74.421.1% | 58.9 Quality 58.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 54.4 Impact 54.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2 | 57.3 Versatility 57.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp58.930% Econ vs LHBp94.430% Wkt vs RHBp4020% Wkt vs LHBp16.720% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 25 | 2.0 | 1 | 19 | 9.5 | 59.6 Phase Production 59.6 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.962× parp48.936.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp73.342.1% Boundary %25%p51.121.1% | 68.9 Quality 68.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 56.7 Impact 56.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.5 | 59.3 Versatility 59.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3030% Econ vs LHBp81.130% Wkt vs RHBp46.720% Wkt vs LHBp83.320% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 1 | 19 | 9.5 | 59.6 Phase Production 59.6 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.962× parp48.936.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp73.342.1% Boundary %25%p51.121.1% | 68.9 Quality 68.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 70 Impact 70 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.2 | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.130% Econ vs LHBp63.330% Wkt vs RHBp83.320% Wkt vs LHBp31.120% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 29 | 4.0 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 57.6 Phase Production 57.6 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.507× parp92.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1042.1% Boundary %8%p92.221.1% | 25.6 Quality 25.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 76.7 Impact 76.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.9 | 57.1 Versatility 57.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp94.430% Econ vs LHBp47.830% Wkt vs RHBp11.120% Wkt vs LHBp61.120% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 25 | 3.0 | 1 | 29 | 9.67 | 56.4 Phase Production 56.4 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.979× parp53.336.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp65.642.1% Boundary %28%p43.321.1% | 74.4 Quality 74.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 43.3 Impact 43.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.5 | 56.2 Versatility 56.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp52.230% Econ vs LHBp56.730% Wkt vs RHBp65.620% Wkt vs LHBp52.220% | |
| 19 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 1 | 44 | 8.8 | 55 Phase Production 55 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.891× parp7036.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp4042.1% Boundary %23%p58.921.1% | 10 Quality 10 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 61.1 Impact 61.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.9 | 52.2 Versatility 52.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp74.430% Econ vs LHBp34.430% Wkt vs RHBp52.220% Wkt vs LHBp45.620% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 29 | 6.0 | 3 | 68 | 11.33 | 52.9 Phase Production 52.9 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.148× parp3036.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp85.642.1% Boundary %31%p27.821.1% | 98.9 Quality 98.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %44% | 52.2 Impact 52.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.2 | 44 Versatility 44 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp32.230% Econ vs LHBp32.230% Wkt vs RHBp92.220% Wkt vs LHBp31.120% | |
| 21 | LA pace | — | 14.0 | 2 | 120 | 8.57 | 51.8 Phase Production 51.8 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.868× parp78.936.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp14.442.1% Boundary %23%p78.921.1% | 7.8 Quality 7.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 63.3 Impact 63.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.8 | 56.7 Versatility 56.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp72.230% Econ vs LHBp92.230% Wkt vs RHBp32.220% Wkt vs LHBp4.420% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 34 | 6.0 | 1 | 55 | 9.17 | 51.6 Phase Production 51.6 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.929× parp63.336.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp33.342.1% Boundary %22%p67.821.1% | 94.4 Quality 94.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %39% | 58.9 Impact 58.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.2 | 56.9 Versatility 56.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp43.330% Econ vs LHBp83.330% Wkt vs RHBp5.620% Wkt vs LHBp88.920% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 23 | 2.0 | 0 | 15 | 7.5 | 50.9 Phase Production 50.9 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.76× parp67.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.942.1% Boundary %17%p65.621.1% | 21.1 Quality 21.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 72.2 Impact 72.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.3 | 50.9 Versatility 50.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp56.730% Econ vs LHBp65.630% Wkt vs RHBp46.720% Wkt vs LHBp24.420% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 24 | 11.0 | 3 | 115 | 10.45 | 50.7 Phase Production 50.7 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.059× parp36.736.8% Wicket rate0.27/ovp56.742.1% Boundary %24%p63.321.1% | 65.6 Quality 65.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 30 Impact 30 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.1 | 43.6 Versatility 43.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5030% Econ vs LHBp12.230% Wkt vs RHBp54.420% Wkt vs LHBp7020% | |
| 25 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 3.0 | 0 | 24 | 8 | 50.7 Phase Production 50.7 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.81× parp72.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.942.1% Boundary %17%p76.721.1% | 61.1 Quality 61.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 38.9 Impact 38.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.7 | 44 Versatility 44 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp78.930% Econ vs LHBp3030% Wkt vs RHBp43.320% Wkt vs LHBp13.320% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 24 | 7.0 | 1 | 60 | 8.57 | 50.6 Phase Production 50.6 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.868× parp74.436.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp24.442.1% Boundary %24%p61.121.1% | 1.1 Quality 1.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %10% | 67.8 Impact 67.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.4 | 53.1 Versatility 53.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp54.430% Econ vs LHBp76.730% Wkt vs RHBp67.820% Wkt vs LHBp1.120% | |
| 27 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 4.0 | 2 | 48 | 12 | 47.8 Phase Production 47.8 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.216× parp25.636.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp8042.1% Boundary %33%p22.221.1% | 52.2 Quality 52.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 41.1 Impact 41.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.1 | 39.8 Versatility 39.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp36.730% Econ vs LHBp1030% Wkt vs RHBp88.920% Wkt vs LHBp4020% | |
| 28 | LA pace | 24 | 7.0 | 2 | 80 | 11.43 | 41.1 Phase Production 41.1 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.158× parp23.336.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp6042.1% Boundary %29%p34.421.1% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 23.3 Impact 23.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.7 | 32.4 Versatility 32.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp47.830% Econ vs LHBp3.330% Wkt vs RHBp72.220% Wkt vs LHBp13.320% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 29 | 5.0 | 1 | 53 | 10.6 | 40.8 Phase Production 40.8 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.074× parp38.936.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp4042.1% Boundary %27%p45.621.1% | 72.2 Quality 72.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 81.1 Impact 81.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.2 | 38 Versatility 38 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp63.330% Econ vs LHBp7.830% Wkt vs RHBp58.920% Wkt vs LHBp24.420% | |
| 30 | LA pace | 22 | 3.0 | 0 | 29 | 9.67 | 39.5 Phase Production 39.5 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.979× parp53.336.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.942.1% Boundary %22%p56.721.1% | 83.3 Quality 83.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %39% | 32.2 Impact 32.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.3 | 36 Versatility 36 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp76.730% Econ vs LHBp5.630% Wkt vs RHBp36.720% Wkt vs LHBp2020% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 8.0 | 0 | 77 | 9.62 | 38.9 Phase Production 38.9 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.975× parp61.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.342.1% Boundary %23%p71.121.1% | 87.8 Quality 87.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 34.4 Impact 34.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.5 | 47.1 Versatility 47.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp67.830% Econ vs LHBp47.830% Wkt vs RHBp1.120% Wkt vs LHBp61.120% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 29 | 3.0 | 1 | 42 | 14 | 36.9 Phase Production 36.9 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.418× parp14.436.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp65.642.1% Boundary %39%p18.921.1% | 44.4 Quality 44.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 25.6 Impact 25.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.8 | 33.6 Versatility 33.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp16.730% Econ vs LHBp27.830% Wkt vs RHBp7020% Wkt vs LHBp31.120% | |
| 33 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 7.0 | 2 | 84 | 12 | 35.7 Phase Production 35.7 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.216× parp18.936.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp6042.1% Boundary %36%p16.721.1% | 5.6 Quality 5.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 10 Impact 10 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-23.1 | 40.4 Versatility 40.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp12.230% Econ vs LHBp36.730% Wkt vs RHBp56.720% Wkt vs LHBp72.220% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 35.3 Phase Production 35.3 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.013× parp45.636.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.942.1% Boundary %33%p3021.1% | 34.4 Quality 34.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.6 | 45.8 Versatility 45.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp45.630% Econ vs LHBp47.830% Wkt vs RHBp27.820% Wkt vs LHBp61.120% | |
| 35 | RA pace | 30 | 6.0 | 2 | 82 | 13.67 | 35.1 Phase Production 35.1 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.384× parp7.836.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp7042.1% Boundary %39%p13.321.1% | 16.7 Quality 16.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 14.4 Impact 14.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.9 | 40.4 Versatility 40.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7.830% Econ vs LHBp38.930% Wkt vs RHBp4020% Wkt vs LHBp92.220% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 29 | 4.0 | 1 | 52 | 13 | 32.8 Phase Production 32.8 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.317× parp16.736.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp52.242.1% Boundary %33%p22.221.1% | 13.3 Quality 13.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 21.1 Impact 21.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.1 | 43.6 Versatility 43.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.430% Econ vs LHBp61.130% Wkt vs RHBp15.620% Wkt vs LHBp88.920% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 3.0 | 1 | 50 | 16.67 | 30.8 Phase Production 30.8 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.688× parp5.636.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp65.642.1% Boundary %50%p5.621.1% | 27.8 Quality 27.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 12.2 Impact 12.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-22.1 | 40.9 Versatility 40.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5.630% Econ vs LHBp47.830% Wkt vs RHBp63.320% Wkt vs LHBp61.120% | |
| 38 | RA pace | 24 | 7.0 | 1 | 77 | 11 | 30.2 Phase Production 30.2 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.114× parp34.436.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp24.442.1% Boundary %29%p34.421.1% | 23.3 Quality 23.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 18.9 Impact 18.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.3 | 30.9 Versatility 30.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp38.930% Econ vs LHBp23.330% Wkt vs RHBp3020% Wkt vs LHBp31.120% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 26 | 4.0 | 0 | 41 | 10.25 | 27.8 Phase Production 27.8 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.038× parp41.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1042.1% Boundary %29%p4021.1% | 37.8 Quality 37.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 36.7 Impact 36.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.9 | 41.6 Versatility 41.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp21.130% Econ vs LHBp9030% Wkt vs RHBp21.120% Wkt vs LHBp2020% | |
| 40 | LA pace | 28 | 9.0 | 2 | 112 | 12.44 | 24.9 Phase Production 24.9 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.261× parp12.236.8% Wicket rate0.22/ovp43.342.1% Boundary %37%p1021.1% | 32.2 Quality 32.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 5.6 Impact 5.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-32.3 | 28.7 Versatility 28.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp27.830% Econ vs LHBp1.130% Wkt vs RHBp25.620% Wkt vs LHBp74.420% | |
| 41 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 1 | 70 | 11.67 | 24.6 Phase Production 24.6 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.182× parp21.136.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp33.342.1% Boundary %39%p13.321.1% | 55.6 Quality 55.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.4 | 40.4 Versatility 40.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp23.330% Econ vs LHBp47.830% Wkt vs RHBp34.420% Wkt vs LHBp61.120% | |
| 42 | LA pace | 23 | 3.0 | 0 | 37 | 12.33 | 23.6 Phase Production 23.6 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.249× parp27.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp18.942.1% Boundary %33%p25.621.1% | 44.4 Quality 44.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 27.8 Impact 27.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.6 | 37.3 Versatility 37.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp25.630% Econ vs LHBp47.830% Wkt vs RHBp15.620% Wkt vs LHBp61.120% | |
| 43 | RA pace | 28 | 4.0 | 0 | 67 | 16.75 | 6.1 Phase Production 6.1 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.697× parp3.336.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1042.1% Boundary %50%p3.321.1% | 13.3 Quality 13.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 3.3 Impact 3.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-40.4 | 29.8 Versatility 29.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.330% Econ vs LHBp47.830% Wkt vs RHBp11.120% Wkt vs LHBp61.120% | |
| 44 | RA pace | 21 | 11.0 | 0 | 136 | 12.36 | 5.8 Phase Production 5.8 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.252× parp1036.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.142.1% Boundary %36%p7.821.1% | 3.3 Quality 3.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 1.1 Impact 1.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-44.2 | 10.9 Versatility 10.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1030% Econ vs LHBp21.130% Wkt vs RHBp3.320% Wkt vs LHBp4.420% | |
| 45 | RA pace | 24 | 5.0 | 0 | 81 | 16.2 | 3 Phase Production 3 vs all bowlers · n=45 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.641× parp1.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp5.642.1% Boundary %53%p1.121.1% | 47.8 Quality 47.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 7.8 Impact 7.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-27.6 | 17.6 Versatility 17.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.130% Econ vs LHBp25.630% Wkt vs RHBp7.820% Wkt vs LHBp4020% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chinaman | 23 | 4.0 | 3 | 19 | 4.75 | 93.7 Phase Production 93.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.55× parp9344.1% Wicket rate0.75/ovp94.544.1% Boundary %4%p9311.8% | 94.5 Quality 94.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %46% | 72.7 Impact 72.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7.4 | 89.1 Versatility 89.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp91.450% Econ vs LHBp86.750% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 14.0 | 8 | 95 | 6.79 | 92.9 Phase Production 92.9 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.785× parp91.444.1% Wicket rate0.57/ovp98.444.1% Boundary %13%p77.311.8% | 97.7 Quality 97.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 99.2 Impact 99.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+47 | 85.2 Versatility 85.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.150% Econ vs LHBp74.250% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 7.0 | 3 | 25 | 3.57 | 89.7 Phase Production 89.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.413× parp99.244.1% Wicket rate0.43/ovp78.144.1% Boundary %2%p97.711.8% | 36.7 Quality 36.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 97.7 Impact 97.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+35.5 | 96.1 Versatility 96.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp99.250% Econ vs LHBp9350% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 23 | 6.1 | 3 | 42 | 6.81 | 84.8 Phase Production 84.8 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.788× parp83.644.1% Wicket rate0.49/ovp85.244.1% Boundary %8%p88.311.8% | 83.6 Quality 83.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 86.7 Impact 86.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15.5 | 59.8 Versatility 59.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp89.850% Econ vs LHBp29.750% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 29 | 3.0 | 2 | 20 | 6.67 | 81.8 Phase Production 81.8 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.771× parp76.644.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp87.544.1% Boundary %6%p80.511.8% | 89.8 Quality 89.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %44% | 50.8 Impact 50.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.2 | 60.9 Versatility 60.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp78.950% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 6 | RA pace | 23 | 9.0 | 5 | 71 | 7.89 | 81.1 Phase Production 81.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.913× parp6844.1% Wicket rate0.56/ovp96.144.1% Boundary %13%p74.211.8% | 64.8 Quality 64.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 94.5 Impact 94.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+20.8 | 71.5 Versatility 71.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp63.350% Econ vs LHBp79.750% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 36 | 8.0 | 3 | 58 | 7.25 | 79.6 Phase Production 79.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.839× parp8244.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp75.844.1% Boundary %10%p85.211.8% | 99.2 Quality 99.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 91.4 Impact 91.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+18.2 | 69.5 Versatility 69.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.250% Econ vs LHBp53.950% | |
| 8 | Leg-spin | 30 | 9.0 | 3 | 61 | 6.78 | 76.3 Phase Production 76.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.784× parp86.744.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp60.944.1% Boundary %9%p94.511.8% | 21.9 Quality 21.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 93 Impact 93 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+18.3 | 86.7 Versatility 86.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp77.350% Econ vs LHBp96.150% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 20 | 3.0 | 2 | 23 | 7.67 | 73 Phase Production 73 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.887× parp60.244.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp87.544.1% Boundary %11%p66.411.8% | 60.2 Quality 60.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 55.5 Impact 55.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.8 | 61.7 Versatility 61.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp55.550% Econ vs LHBp6850% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 30 | 3.0 | 1 | 14 | 4.67 | 72.5 Phase Production 72.5 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.54× parp88.344.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp54.744.1% Boundary %6%p80.511.8% | 60.2 Quality 60.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 85.2 Impact 85.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+12.8 | 68 Versatility 68 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9350% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 29 | 2.0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 72.4 Phase Production 72.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.926× parp53.944.1% Wicket rate1.00/ovp91.444.1% Boundary %8%p70.311.8% | 33.6 Quality 33.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 88.3 Impact 88.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+17.1 | 51.2 Versatility 51.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp59.450% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 10.0 | 2 | 59 | 5.9 | 71 Phase Production 71 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.683× parp97.744.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp36.744.1% Boundary %5%p99.211.8% | 3.9 Quality 3.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 96.1 Impact 96.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+20.9 | 61.7 Versatility 61.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp97.750% Econ vs LHBp25.850% | |
| 13 | LA pace | — | 5.0 | 1 | 26 | 5.2 | 70.7 Phase Production 70.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.602× parp96.144.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp39.844.1% Boundary %7%p91.411.8% | 88.3 Quality 88.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 75.8 Impact 75.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.1 | 82.4 Versatility 82.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp94.550% Econ vs LHBp70.350% | |
| 14 | Off-spin | 21 | 10.0 | 5 | 83 | 8.3 | 70.6 Phase Production 70.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.96× parp55.544.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp89.844.1% Boundary %15%p55.511.8% | 46.1 Quality 46.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 80.5 Impact 80.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.5 | 54.7 Versatility 54.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp24.250% Econ vs LHBp85.250% | |
| 15 | Leg-spin | — | 16.0 | 4 | 113 | 7.06 | 68.8 Phase Production 68.8 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.817× parp89.844.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp42.244.1% Boundary %12%p89.811.8% | 74.2 Quality 74.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 78.9 Impact 78.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.4 | 90.6 Versatility 90.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.750% Econ vs LHBp94.550% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 14.0 | 8 | 123 | 8.79 | 66 Phase Production 66 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.017× parp41.444.1% Wicket rate0.57/ovp98.444.1% Boundary %17%p36.711.8% | 24.2 Quality 24.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 68 Impact 68 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.4 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp66.450% Econ vs LHBp8.650% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 34 | 4.0 | 2 | 33 | 8.25 | 64.2 Phase Production 64.2 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.955× parp52.344.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.244.1% Boundary %17%p44.511.8% | 39.1 Quality 39.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 63.3 Impact 63.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.7 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5750% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 18 | Off-spin | 24 | 5.0 | 2 | 45 | 9 | 58.6 Phase Production 58.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp4344.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp73.444.1% Boundary %13%p61.711.8% | 76.6 Quality 76.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 89.8 Impact 89.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+17.2 | 48.4 Versatility 48.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.850% Econ vs LHBp8250% | |
| 19 | SLA orthodox | 33 | 4.0 | 1 | 30 | 7.5 | 58.1 Phase Production 58.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.868× parp66.444.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp48.444.1% Boundary %12%p63.311.8% | 86.7 Quality 86.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 64.8 Impact 64.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.2 | 57.8 Versatility 57.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp72.750% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 20 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 2.0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 57.7 Phase Production 57.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.579× parp80.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.144.1% Boundary %0%p83.611.8% | 33.6 Quality 33.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 77.3 Impact 77.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.2 | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp83.650% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 29 | 3.0 | 1 | 24 | 8 | 57.4 Phase Production 57.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.926× parp57.844.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp54.744.1% Boundary %11%p66.411.8% | 26.6 Quality 26.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 74.2 Impact 74.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7.7 | 45.3 Versatility 45.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp74.250% Econ vs LHBp16.450% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 22 | 3.0 | 0 | 16 | 5.33 | 56.8 Phase Production 56.8 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.617× parp85.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1844.1% Boundary %0%p96.111.8% | 80.5 Quality 80.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 60.2 Impact 60.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.2 | 78.9 Versatility 78.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp80.550% Econ vs LHBp77.350% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 23 | 2.0 | 1 | 18 | 9 | 56 Phase Production 56 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp46.944.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp66.444.1% Boundary %17%p50.811.8% | 33.6 Quality 33.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 25.8 Impact 25.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.8 | 48.8 Versatility 48.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp36.750% Econ vs LHBp60.950% | |
| 24 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 8.0 | 2 | 64 | 8 | 53.6 Phase Production 53.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.926× parp61.744.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp44.544.1% Boundary %15%p5711.8% | 91.4 Quality 91.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 11.7 Impact 11.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.9 | 67.6 Versatility 67.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp64.850% Econ vs LHBp70.350% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 27 | 10.0 | 2 | 80 | 8 | 53.4 Phase Production 53.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.926× parp64.844.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp36.744.1% Boundary %13%p72.711.8% | 30.5 Quality 30.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 46.1 Impact 46.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.8 | 66.4 Versatility 66.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.450% Econ vs LHBp91.450% | |
| 26 | LA pace | 23 | 2.0 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 53.4 Phase Production 53.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.694× parp74.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.144.1% Boundary %8%p70.311.8% | 18.8 Quality 18.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 83.6 Impact 83.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+12.5 | 59.4 Versatility 59.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp75.850% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 27 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 1 | 18 | 9 | 52.6 Phase Production 52.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp46.944.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp66.444.1% Boundary %25%p22.711.8% | 69.5 Quality 69.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 49.2 Impact 49.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.1 | 41.4 Versatility 41.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp61.750% Econ vs LHBp21.150% | |
| 28 | Leg-spin | 23 | 6.0 | 1 | 46 | 7.67 | 52.5 Phase Production 52.5 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.887× parp69.544.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp33.644.1% Boundary %14%p59.411.8% | 7 Quality 7 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 58.6 Impact 58.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.5 | 66.4 Versatility 66.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp35.250% Econ vs LHBp97.750% | |
| 29 | LA pace | — | 7.0 | 4 | 68 | 9.71 | 52.2 Phase Production 52.2 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.124× parp22.744.1% Wicket rate0.57/ovp9344.1% Boundary %24%p10.211.8% | 96.1 Quality 96.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 82 Impact 82 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+12.5 | 36.7 Versatility 36.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.150% Econ vs LHBp2.350% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 26 | 6.0 | 0 | 34 | 5.67 | 52 Phase Production 52 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.656× parp94.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.144.1% Boundary %11%p75.811.8% | 85.2 Quality 85.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 52.3 Impact 52.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.1 | 88.3 Versatility 88.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp88.350% Econ vs LHBp88.350% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 21 | 10.0 | 2 | 78 | 7.8 | 51.7 Phase Production 51.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.903× parp71.144.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp36.744.1% Boundary %18%p35.211.8% | 93 Quality 93 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 57 Impact 57 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.9 | 60.2 Versatility 60.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp21.150% Econ vs LHBp99.250% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 20 | 2.0 | 1 | 19 | 9.5 | 51.6 Phase Production 51.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.099× parp44.544.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp66.444.1% Boundary %25%p22.711.8% | 53.1 Quality 53.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 44.5 Impact 44.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1 | 38.3 Versatility 38.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp44.550% Econ vs LHBp3250% | |
| 33 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 3.0 | 0 | 20 | 6.67 | 51.2 Phase Production 51.2 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.771× parp76.644.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1844.1% Boundary %6%p80.511.8% | 16.4 Quality 16.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 66.4 Impact 66.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.3 | 71.5 Versatility 71.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp59.450% Econ vs LHBp83.650% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 34 | 8.2 | 3 | 75 | 9 | 51.1 Phase Production 51.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp39.844.1% Wicket rate0.36/ovp71.144.1% Boundary %20%p1811.8% | 63.3 Quality 63.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 71.1 Impact 71.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6 | 34 Versatility 34 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp38.350% Econ vs LHBp29.750% | |
| 35 | Leg-spin | 23 | 9.2 | 4 | 90 | 9.64 | 50.5 Phase Production 50.5 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.116× parp16.444.1% Wicket rate0.43/ovp83.644.1% Boundary %16%p53.911.8% | 44.5 Quality 44.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 32 Impact 32 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5 | 36.7 Versatility 36.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp750% Econ vs LHBp66.450% | |
| 36 | LA pace | — | 7.0 | 3 | 65 | 9.29 | 50.5 Phase Production 50.5 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.075× parp27.344.1% Wicket rate0.43/ovp78.144.1% Boundary %19%p33.611.8% | 49.2 Quality 49.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 8.6 Impact 8.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.9 | 32.8 Versatility 32.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp22.750% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 2 | 47 | 9.4 | 49.6 Phase Production 49.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.088× parp30.544.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp73.444.1% Boundary %20%p3211.8% | 8.6 Quality 8.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 7 Impact 7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.1 | 30.5 Versatility 30.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp50.850% Econ vs LHBp10.250% | |
| 38 | LA pace | 20 | 3.0 | 0 | 19 | 6.33 | 48.3 Phase Production 48.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.733× parp78.944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1844.1% Boundary %17%p47.711.8% | 80.5 Quality 80.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 69.5 Impact 69.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.9 | 69.5 Versatility 69.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp49.250% Econ vs LHBp89.850% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 22 | 2.0 | 1 | 20 | 10 | 48.2 Phase Production 48.2 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.157× parp36.744.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp66.444.1% Boundary %25%p22.711.8% | 53.1 Quality 53.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 47.7 Impact 47.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.7 | 36.3 Versatility 36.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp29.750% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 24 | 2.0 | 1 | 20 | 10 | 48.2 Phase Production 48.2 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.157× parp36.744.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp66.444.1% Boundary %25%p22.711.8% | 53.1 Quality 53.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 36.7 Impact 36.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.7 | 41.4 Versatility 41.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp25.850% Econ vs LHBp5750% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 31 | 2.0 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 46.3 Phase Production 46.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.81× parp63.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.144.1% Boundary %17%p50.811.8% | 53.1 Quality 53.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 61.7 Impact 61.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.5 | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.950% Econ vs LHBp72.750% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 27 | 18.0 | 2 | 143 | 7.94 | 42.6 Phase Production 42.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.919× parp72.744.1% Wicket rate0.11/ovp0.844.1% Boundary %12%p86.711.8% | 43 Quality 43 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 10.2 Impact 10.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.3 | 54.7 Versatility 54.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8250% Econ vs LHBp27.350% | |
| 43 | RA pace | 29 | 3.0 | 0 | 24 | 8 | 41.2 Phase Production 41.2 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.926× parp57.844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1844.1% Boundary %11%p66.411.8% | 80.5 Quality 80.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 53.9 Impact 53.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.3 | 56.6 Versatility 56.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp52.350% Econ vs LHBp60.950% | |
| 44 | RA pace | 25 | 4.0 | 2 | 44 | 11 | 40.9 Phase Production 40.9 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.273× parp10.244.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.244.1% Boundary %29%p4.711.8% | 66.4 Quality 66.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 24.2 Impact 24.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.2 | 14.8 Versatility 14.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.250% Econ vs LHBp19.550% | |
| 45 | Off-spin | 33 | 9.0 | 3 | 83 | 9.22 | 40.2 Phase Production 40.2 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.067× parp25.844.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp60.944.1% Boundary %20%p16.411.8% | 21.9 Quality 21.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 28.9 Impact 28.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.2 | 40.6 Versatility 40.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1850% Econ vs LHBp63.350% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 31 | 4.0 | 1 | 38 | 9.5 | 38.9 Phase Production 38.9 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.099× parp3244.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp48.444.1% Boundary %21%p28.911.8% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 22.7 Impact 22.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.5 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6850% Econ vs LHBp750% | |
| 47 | RA pace | — | 7.0 | 1 | 59 | 8.43 | 37.1 Phase Production 37.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.975× parp50.844.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp22.744.1% Boundary %17%p39.811.8% | 72.7 Quality 72.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 33.6 Impact 33.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.1 | 42.2 Versatility 42.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp69.550% Econ vs LHBp14.850% | |
| 48 | Off-spin | 27 | 4.0 | 1 | 39 | 9.75 | 35.5 Phase Production 35.5 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.128× parp24.244.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp48.444.1% Boundary %21%p28.911.8% | 57 Quality 57 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 17.2 Impact 17.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.4 | 27.7 Versatility 27.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3250% Econ vs LHBp23.450% | |
| 49 | RA pace | 29 | 2.0 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 34.6 Phase Production 34.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.157× parp36.744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.144.1% Boundary %17%p50.811.8% | 69.5 Quality 69.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 43 Impact 43 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.5 | 36.3 Versatility 36.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp29.750% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 50 | RA pace | 43 | 4.0 | 1 | 42 | 10.5 | 33 Phase Production 33 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.215× parp18.844.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp48.444.1% Boundary %21%p28.911.8% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 30.5 Impact 30.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.1 | 36.7 Versatility 36.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8.650% Econ vs LHBp64.850% | |
| 51 | LA pace | 31 | 4.0 | 0 | 34 | 8.5 | 32.1 Phase Production 32.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.984× parp49.244.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp11.744.1% Boundary %17%p44.511.8% | 39.1 Quality 39.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 39.8 Impact 39.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.9 | 50.8 Versatility 50.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.150% Econ vs LHBp55.550% | |
| 52 | LA pace | 28 | 6.0 | 2 | 62 | 10.33 | 32 Phase Production 32 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.196× parp11.744.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp58.644.1% Boundary %25%p8.611.8% | 41.4 Quality 41.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 17.2 Impact 17.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.4 | 15.6 Versatility 15.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp19.550% Econ vs LHBp11.750% | |
| 53 | LA pace | 24 | 3.0 | 1 | 34 | 11.33 | 30.3 Phase Production 30.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.312× parp13.344.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp54.744.1% Boundary %33%p2.311.8% | 47.7 Quality 47.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 41.4 Impact 41.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.7 | 27.3 Versatility 27.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp11.750% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 54 | Off-spin | 28 | 3.0 | 1 | 35 | 11.67 | 29.7 Phase Production 29.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.35× parp8.644.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp54.744.1% Boundary %28%p14.811.8% | 26.6 Quality 26.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 38.3 Impact 38.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.1 | 32 Versatility 32 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5.550% Econ vs LHBp58.650% | |
| 55 | RA pace | 24 | 2.0 | 0 | 24 | 12 | 24.4 Phase Production 24.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.389× parp21.144.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.144.1% Boundary %25%p22.711.8% | 69.5 Quality 69.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 5.5 Impact 5.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.6 | 28.1 Versatility 28.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp13.350% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 56 | SLA orthodox | — | 9.0 | 1 | 81 | 9 | 23.1 Phase Production 23.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp33.644.1% Wicket rate0.11/ovp8.644.1% Boundary %17%p38.311.8% | 0.8 Quality 0.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %9% | 35.2 Impact 35.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4 | 30.5 Versatility 30.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp47.750% Econ vs LHBp13.350% | |
| 57 | SLA orthodox | — | 6.0 | 0 | 56 | 9.33 | 21.1 Phase Production 21.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.08× parp28.944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.144.1% Boundary %14%p59.411.8% | 2.3 Quality 2.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 13.3 Impact 13.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.2 | 30.5 Versatility 30.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4350% Econ vs LHBp1850% | |
| 58 | Chinaman | 24 | 16.0 | 4 | 166 | 10.38 | 20.3 Phase Production 20.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.201× parp0.844.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp42.244.1% Boundary %21%p11.711.8% | 28.9 Quality 28.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 0.8 Impact 0.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-36.5 | 14.1 Versatility 14.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp27.350% Econ vs LHBp0.850% | |
| 59 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.0 | 0 | 42 | 10.5 | 18.7 Phase Production 18.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.215× parp18.844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp11.744.1% Boundary %17%p44.511.8% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 27.3 Impact 27.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.3 | 29.7 Versatility 29.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp16.450% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 60 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 0 | 28 | 14 | 16.4 Phase Production 16.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.62× parp5.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp28.144.1% Boundary %33%p13.311.8% | 18.8 Quality 18.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 2.3 Impact 2.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-20.1 | 22.7 Versatility 22.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.850% Econ vs LHBp5.550% | |
| 61 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 5.0 | 0 | 55 | 11 | 10.7 Phase Production 10.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.273× parp744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp6.244.1% Boundary %17%p41.411.8% | 76.6 Quality 76.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 14.8 Impact 14.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.9 | 40.2 Versatility 40.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp0.850% Econ vs LHBp79.750% | |
| 62 | RA pace | 26 | 5.0 | 0 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.1 Phase Production 10.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.203× parp14.844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp6.244.1% Boundary %27%p711.8% | 5.5 Quality 5.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %10% | 3.9 Impact 3.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.2 | 39.1 Versatility 39.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2.350% Econ vs LHBp75.850% | |
| 63 | RA pace | 24 | 3.0 | 0 | 39 | 13 | 9.1 Phase Production 9.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.504× parp2.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1844.1% Boundary %39%p0.811.8% | 60.2 Quality 60.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 21.1 Impact 21.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.9 | 18.8 Versatility 18.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp33.650% Econ vs LHBp3.950% | |
| 64 | SLA orthodox | 35 | 4.0 | 0 | 47 | 11.75 | 7.4 Phase Production 7.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.36× parp3.944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp11.744.1% Boundary %29%p4.711.8% | 12.5 Quality 12.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 19.5 Impact 19.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.6 | 13.7 Versatility 13.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.950% Econ vs LHBp23.450% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 31 | 8.4 | 5 | 72 | 8.31 | 96.1 Phase Production 96.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.676× parp98.850% Wicket rate0.58/ovp87.816.7% Boundary %17%p96.333.3% | — | 93.9 Impact 93.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7.1 | 60.5 Versatility 60.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep48.440% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp91.926.7% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 22 | 4.5 | 4 | 42 | 8.69 | 87 Phase Production 87 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.707× parp8950% Wicket rate0.83/ovp96.316.7% Boundary %21%p79.333.3% | — | 23.2 Impact 23.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.9 | 44.4 Versatility 44.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep43.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.1 | 1 | 31 | 7.44 | 86.1 Phase Production 86.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.606× parp93.943.6% Boundary %12%p93.941.8% Wicket rate0.24/ovp40.214.5% | — | 96.3 Impact 96.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.5 | 85.7 Versatility 85.7 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep85.7100% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 36 | 12.0 | 3 | 117 | 9.75 | 82.9 Phase Production 82.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.794× parp96.350% Wicket rate0.25/ovp1116.7% Boundary %18%p98.833.3% | — | 89 Impact 89 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.6 | 53.4 Versatility 53.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep66.140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | — | 3.0 | 1 | 24 | 8 | 82.2 Phase Production 82.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.651× parp84.143.6% Boundary %11%p91.541.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp5014.5% | — | 98.8 Impact 98.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+14.3 | 57.1 Versatility 57.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep57.1100% | |
| 6 | RA pace | 24 | 7.0 | 2 | 66 | 9.43 | 81.1 Phase Production 81.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.768× parp91.550% Wicket rate0.29/ovp43.916.7% Boundary %21%p84.133.3% | — | 76.8 Impact 76.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.7 | 65.1 Versatility 65.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep95.240% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 20 | 4.0 | 2 | 37 | 9.25 | 78.5 Phase Production 78.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.753× parp81.750% Wicket rate0.50/ovp76.816.7% Boundary %21%p74.433.3% | — | 37.8 Impact 37.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.4 | 46.1 Versatility 46.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep17.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp83.926.7% | |
| 8 | Off-spin | 33 | 2.0 | 4 | 17 | 8.5 | 75.9 Phase Production 75.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.692× parp73.243.6% Boundary %17%p70.741.8% Wicket rate2.00/ovp98.814.5% | — | 91.5 Impact 91.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.7 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 22 | 8.4 | 5 | 94 | 10.85 | 75.4 Phase Production 75.4 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.883× parp76.850% Wicket rate0.58/ovp87.816.7% Boundary %25%p67.133.3% | — | 81.7 Impact 81.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3 | 46.3 Versatility 46.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep48.440% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 10 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 4 | 65 | 10.83 | 74.4 Phase Production 74.4 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.882× parp67.150% Wicket rate0.67/ovp91.516.7% Boundary %22%p76.833.3% | — | 25.6 Impact 25.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.7 | 57.3 Versatility 57.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep75.840% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 24 | 2.4 | 0 | 20 | 7.5 | 74.4 Phase Production 74.4 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.611× parp86.650% Wicket rate0.00/ovp8.516.7% Boundary %12%p8933.3% | — | 84.1 Impact 84.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.5 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep17.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 25 | 2.0 | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 74.2 Phase Production 74.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.692× parp73.250% Wicket rate1.00/ovp84.116.7% Boundary %17%p70.733.3% | — | 86.6 Impact 86.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.1 | 62.5 Versatility 62.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep88.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 13 | Off-spin | 28 | 2.0 | 0 | 15 | 7.5 | 74 Phase Production 74 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.611× parp79.343.6% Boundary %8%p86.641.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2214.5% | — | 67.1 Impact 67.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.5 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 14 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 0 | 29 | 9.67 | 62.8 Phase Production 62.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.787× parp69.550% Wicket rate0.00/ovp4.916.7% Boundary %17%p81.733.3% | — | 79.3 Impact 79.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.4 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep17.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 15 | LA pace | 20 | 7.0 | 5 | 80 | 11.43 | 62.2 Phase Production 62.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.93× parp62.250% Wicket rate0.71/ovp93.916.7% Boundary %29%p46.333.3% | — | 11 Impact 11 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-32.8 | 48.9 Versatility 48.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep54.840% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 16 | Off-spin | 21 | 2.4 | 1 | 28 | 10.5 | 61.2 Phase Production 61.2 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.855× parp64.643.6% Boundary %25%p59.841.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp54.914.5% | — | 74.4 Impact 74.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.9 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 22 | 5.0 | 1 | 59 | 11.8 | 56.1 Phase Production 56.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.961× parp57.350% Wicket rate0.20/ovp35.416.7% Boundary %23%p64.633.3% | — | 8.5 Impact 8.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-36.8 | 57.5 Versatility 57.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep38.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp95.226.7% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 24 | 2.0 | 1 | 24 | 12 | 52.6 Phase Production 52.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.977× parp47.650% Wicket rate0.50/ovp63.416.7% Boundary %25%p54.933.3% | — | 59.8 Impact 59.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.7 | 62.5 Versatility 62.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep88.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 19 | LA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 21 | 10.5 | 51.8 Phase Production 51.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.855× parp59.850% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2216.7% Boundary %25%p54.933.3% | — | 54.9 Impact 54.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.7 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep17.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 21 | 2.0 | 1 | 23 | 11.5 | 50 Phase Production 50 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.936× parp53.750% Wicket rate0.50/ovp63.416.7% Boundary %33%p37.833.3% | — | 28 Impact 28 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-20 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep17.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 30 | 7.0 | 3 | 86 | 12.29 | 49.8 Phase Production 49.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1× parp45.150% Wicket rate0.43/ovp70.716.7% Boundary %29%p46.333.3% | — | 32.9 Impact 32.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.4 | 59.2 Versatility 59.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep80.640% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 23 | 2.0 | 0 | 23 | 11.5 | 48.8 Phase Production 48.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.936× parp53.750% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2216.7% Boundary %25%p54.933.3% | — | 57.3 Impact 57.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.7 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep17.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 24 | 3.0 | 1 | 39 | 13 | 46.3 Phase Production 46.3 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.058× parp42.750% Wicket rate0.34/ovp5016.7% Boundary %28%p5033.3% | — | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.5 | 44.8 Versatility 44.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep17.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp7926.7% | |
| 24 | LA pace | — | 4.0 | 2 | 48 | 12 | 44.7 Phase Production 44.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.977× parp5050% Wicket rate0.50/ovp76.816.7% Boundary %38%p20.733.3% | — | 69.5 Impact 69.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.5 | 55.4 Versatility 55.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep7140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 25 | LA pace | 28 | 7.0 | 3 | 89 | 12.71 | 42.1 Phase Production 42.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.035× parp40.250% Wicket rate0.43/ovp70.716.7% Boundary %31%p30.533.3% | — | 40.2 Impact 40.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.5 | 59.2 Versatility 59.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep80.640% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 2.0 | 1 | 28 | 14 | 38.9 Phase Production 38.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.14× parp31.743.6% Boundary %33%p37.841.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp63.414.5% | — | 47.6 Impact 47.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.1 | 28.6 Versatility 28.6 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep28.6100% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 29 | 4.0 | 0 | 53 | 13.25 | 38.6 Phase Production 38.6 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.079× parp35.450% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.216.7% Boundary %25%p62.233.3% | — | 13.4 Impact 13.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-30.4 | 55.4 Versatility 55.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep7140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 2.0 | 0 | 28 | 14 | 32.8 Phase Production 32.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.14× parp31.743.6% Boundary %33%p37.841.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2214.5% | — | 42.7 Impact 42.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep50100% | |
| 29 | SLA orthodox | 21 | 2.0 | 0 | 27 | 13.5 | 30.4 Phase Production 30.4 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.099× parp37.843.6% Boundary %42%p25.641.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2214.5% | — | 20.7 Impact 20.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-22.5 | 42.9 Versatility 42.9 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep42.9100% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 25 | 2.0 | 0 | 29 | 14.5 | 30.3 Phase Production 30.3 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.18× parp2850% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2216.7% Boundary %33%p37.833.3% | — | 62.2 Impact 62.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.7 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep17.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 31 | LA pace | 24 | 6.0 | 3 | 82 | 13.67 | 29.3 Phase Production 29.3 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.113× parp20.750% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.716.7% Boundary %36%p15.933.3% | — | 72 Impact 72 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.4 | 51.5 Versatility 51.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep61.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 27.8 Phase Production 27.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.221× parp23.250% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2216.7% Boundary %33%p37.833.3% | — | 52.4 Impact 52.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.1 | 62.5 Versatility 62.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep88.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 33 | LA pace | 23 | 3.0 | 0 | 42 | 14 | 23 Phase Production 23 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.14× parp25.650% Wicket rate0.00/ovp4.916.7% Boundary %33%p2833.3% | — | 6.1 Impact 6.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-40.8 | 46.1 Versatility 46.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep17.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp83.926.7% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 27 | 3.0 | 1 | 49 | 16.33 | 22.8 Phase Production 22.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.33× parp13.450% Wicket rate0.34/ovp5016.7% Boundary %39%p23.233.3% | — | 3.7 Impact 3.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-43.7 | 51.5 Versatility 51.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep61.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 35 | RA pace | 23 | 5.0 | 1 | 73 | 14.6 | 21.1 Phase Production 21.1 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.189× parp18.350% Wicket rate0.20/ovp35.416.7% Boundary %37%p18.333.3% | — | 30.5 Impact 30.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.9 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep17.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 27 | 7.0 | 2 | 100 | 14.29 | 19.7 Phase Production 19.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.163× parp15.950% Wicket rate0.29/ovp43.916.7% Boundary %36%p13.433.3% | — | 15.9 Impact 15.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-29.9 | 48.9 Versatility 48.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep54.840% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 29 | 4.0 | 2 | 63 | 15.75 | 19.5 Phase Production 19.5 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.282× parp1150% Wicket rate0.50/ovp76.816.7% Boundary %50%p3.733.3% | — | 64.6 Impact 64.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.2 | 82.3 Versatility 82.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep98.440% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp98.426.7% | |
| 38 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 5.0 | 2 | 78 | 15.6 | 16.7 Phase Production 16.7 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.27× parp8.543.6% Boundary %40%p1141.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp57.314.5% | — | 45.1 Impact 45.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.3 | 64.3 Versatility 64.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep64.3100% | |
| 39 | LA pace | 22 | 2.0 | 1 | 44 | 22 | 14.8 Phase Production 14.8 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.791× parp3.750% Wicket rate0.50/ovp63.416.7% Boundary %58%p7.333.3% | — | 35.4 Impact 35.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.4 | 34.1 Versatility 34.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep17.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.726.7% | |
| 40 | Off-spin | 24 | 2.0 | 0 | 43 | 21.5 | 8.9 Phase Production 8.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.75× parp6.143.6% Boundary %58%p7.341.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2214.5% | — | 18.3 Impact 18.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-27.5 | 21.4 Versatility 21.4 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep21.4100% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 29 | 5.0 | 1 | 87 | 17.4 | 6.9 Phase Production 6.9 vs all bowlers · n=41 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.417× parp1.250% Wicket rate0.20/ovp35.416.7% Boundary %50%p1.233.3% | — | 1.2 Impact 1.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-53.2 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep38.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp88.726.7% |
Aditya Mishra
Bowler · Chinaman · age 23
85.1
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 19 · Econ 4.75
85.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle85.1100%85.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p64.51×
Scout Score85.1
85.1Middle100% of overs · 3w · 4.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp93.738%
Impactp72.725%
Qualityp94.515%
Versatilityp89.112%
Trajectoryp64.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.55× par24bp9344.1%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp94.544.1%
Boundary %4%24bp9311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.099× par7bp91.450%
Econ vs LHB0.736× par17bp86.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7.4 · induced false-shot 46%
Parush Mandal
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
83.8
Scout Score
Overs 24.4 · Wkts 12 · Runs 206 · Econ 8.35
83.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay93.656.8%53.2
Middle52.28.1%4.2
Death75.135.1%26.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p96.40.77×
Scout Score83.8
93.6Powerplay56.8% of overs · 6w · 6.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp93.338%
Impactp98.927%
Qualityp92.215%
Versatilityp80.210%
Trajectoryp96.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.666× par84bp98.936.8%
Wicket rate0.43/ov84bp87.842.1%
Boundary %18%84bp94.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.731× par71bp98.930%
Econ vs LHB0.206× par13bp98.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.51/ov71bp96.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov13bp7.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +28.2 · induced false-shot 33%
52.2Middle8.1% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.238%
Impactp47.725%
Qualityp53.115%
Versatilityp36.312%
Trajectoryp96.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.157× par12bp36.744.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp66.444.1%
Boundary %25%12bp22.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.157× par12bp29.750%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.7 · induced false-shot 25%
75.1Death35.1% of overs · 5w · 10.85 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.448%
Impactp81.725%
Versatilityp46.315%
Trajectoryp96.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.883× par52bp76.850%
Wicket rate0.58/ov52bp87.816.7%
Boundary %25%52bp67.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%52bp48.440%
Slower ball052bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer052bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3
Harshit Parsai
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
80.2
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 73 · Econ 6.64
80.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay89.872.7%65.3
Middle54.727.3%14.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p76.10.96×
Scout Score80.2
89.8Powerplay72.7% of overs · 4w · 6.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp9338%
Impactp96.727%
Qualityp8015%
Versatilityp87.610%
Trajectoryp76.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.671× par48bp94.436.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov48bp9042.1%
Boundary %12%48bp96.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.627× par31bp92.230%
Econ vs LHB0.787× par17bp85.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.39/ov31bp74.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.71/ov17bp96.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +21.6 · induced false-shot 31%
54.7Middle27.3% of overs · 0w · 6.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.238%
Impactp66.425%
Qualityp16.415%
Versatilityp71.512%
Trajectoryp76.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.771× par18bp76.644.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp1844.1%
Boundary %6%18bp80.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.925× par12bp59.450%
Econ vs LHB0.464× par6bp83.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.3 · induced false-shot 11%
MD Masoom Raza Kaif
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 23
80.1
Scout Score
Overs 6.1 · Wkts 3 · Runs 42 · Econ 6.81
80.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle80.1100%80.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p64.51×
Scout Score80.1
80.1Middle100% of overs · 3w · 6.81 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.838%
Impactp86.725%
Qualityp83.615%
Versatilityp59.812%
Trajectoryp64.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.788× par37bp83.644.1%
Wicket rate0.49/ov37bp85.244.1%
Boundary %8%37bp88.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.737× par32bp89.850%
Econ vs LHB1.112× par5bp29.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15.5 · induced false-shot 30%
Aman B Bhadoriya
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 24
78.1
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 112 · Econ 6.59
78.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay73.258.8%43.0
Middle8541.2%35.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p94.90.83×
Scout Score78.1
73.2Powerplay58.8% of overs · 4w · 8.7 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp80.438%
Impactp83.327%
Qualityp3015%
Versatilityp6210%
Trajectoryp94.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.881× par60bp76.736.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov60bp83.342.1%
Boundary %20%60bp81.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.76× par45bp87.830%
Econ vs LHB1.294× par15bp14.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.40/ov45bp78.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp77.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7.2 · induced false-shot 22%
85Middle41.2% of overs · 3w · 3.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp89.738%
Impactp97.725%
Qualityp36.715%
Versatilityp96.112%
Trajectoryp94.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.413× par42bp99.244.1%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp78.144.1%
Boundary %2%42bp97.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.381× par31bp99.250%
Econ vs LHB0.506× par11bp9350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +35.5 · induced false-shot 21%
Shivam Shukla
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 30
76.5
Scout Score
Overs 14.1 · Wkts 5 · Runs 82 · Econ 5.79
76.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay77.928.2%22.0
Middle75.863.5%48.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p99.30.73×
Scout Score76.5
77.9Powerplay28.2% of overs · 1w · 3.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp78.438%
Impactp92.227%
Qualityp37.815%
Versatilityp75.810%
Trajectoryp99.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.329× par24bp96.736.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp52.242.1%
Boundary %0%24bp98.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.277× par17bp96.730%
Econ vs LHB0.478× par7bp87.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov17bp18.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.86/ov7bp83.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +14.8 · induced false-shot 21%
75.8Middle63.5% of overs · 3w · 6.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.338%
Impactp9325%
Qualityp21.915%
Versatilityp86.712%
Trajectoryp99.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.784× par54bp86.744.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp60.944.1%
Boundary %9%54bp94.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.863× par37bp77.350%
Econ vs LHB0.613× par17bp96.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +18.3 · induced false-shot 20%
Puneet Datey
Bowler · RA pace · age 31
76.3
Scout Score
Overs 22.4 · Wkts 8 · Runs 180 · Econ 7.94
76.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay74.152.9%39.2
Middle53.48.8%4.7
Death84.538.2%32.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p48.61.05×
Scout Score76.3
74.1Powerplay52.9% of overs · 3w · 7.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.438%
Impactp87.827%
Qualityp76.715%
Versatilityp72.910%
Trajectoryp48.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.794× par72bp9036.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov72bp45.642.1%
Boundary %19%72bp85.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.867× par51bp81.130%
Econ vs LHB0.605× par21bp96.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.23/ov51bp5020%
Wkt vs LHB0.29/ov21bp47.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.3 · induced false-shot 29%
53.4Middle8.8% of overs · 0w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.338%
Impactp61.725%
Qualityp53.115%
Versatilityp63.312%
Trajectoryp48.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.81× par12bp63.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp28.144.1%
Boundary %17%12bp50.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.925× par6bp53.950%
Econ vs LHB0.695× par6bp72.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.5 · induced false-shot 25%
84.5Death38.2% of overs · 5w · 8.31 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp96.148%
Impactp93.925%
Versatilityp60.515%
Trajectoryp48.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.676× par52bp98.850%
Wicket rate0.58/ov52bp87.816.7%
Boundary %17%52bp96.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%52bp48.440%
Slower ball052bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer29.80852bp91.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7.1
Sandeep Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 36
76.1
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 175 · Econ 8.75
76.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle79.540%31.8
Death73.860%44.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p31.21.13×
Scout Score76.1
79.5Middle40% of overs · 3w · 7.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.638%
Impactp91.425%
Qualityp99.215%
Versatilityp69.512%
Trajectoryp31.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.839× par48bp8244.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp75.844.1%
Boundary %10%48bp85.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.807× par37bp85.250%
Econ vs LHB0.948× par11bp53.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +18.2 · induced false-shot 42%
73.8Death60% of overs · 3w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.948%
Impactp8925%
Versatilityp53.415%
Trajectoryp31.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.794× par72bp96.350%
Wicket rate0.25/ov72bp1116.7%
Boundary %18%72bp98.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%72bp66.140%
Slower ball072bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer072bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.6
Mayur Singh
Bowler · Leg-spin
72.2
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 121 · Econ 7.12
72.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle72.294.1%67.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p42.81.08×
Scout Score72.2
72.2Middle94.1% of overs · 4w · 7.06 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp68.838%
Impactp78.925%
Qualityp74.215%
Versatilityp90.612%
Trajectoryp42.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.817× par96bp89.844.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov96bp42.244.1%
Boundary %12%96bp89.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.858× par76bp86.750%
Econ vs LHB0.66× par20bp94.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.4 · induced false-shot 27%
Kumar Kartikeya
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 28
72.1
Scout Score
Overs 25.0 · Wkts 14 · Runs 215 · Econ 8.6
72.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay78.124%18.7
Middle85.856%48.0
Death26.520%5.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p81.2×
Scout Score72.1
78.1Powerplay24% of overs · 4w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp92.938%
Impactp94.427%
Qualityp55.615%
Versatilityp81.110%
Trajectoryp810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.709× par36bp87.836.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov36bp98.942.1%
Boundary %14%36bp9021.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.699× par27bp83.330%
Econ vs LHB0.744× par9bp7030%
Wkt vs RHB0.44/ov27bp76.720%
Wkt vs LHB1.33/ov9bp98.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15.6 · induced false-shot 25%
85.8Middle56% of overs · 8w · 6.79 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp92.938%
Impactp99.225%
Qualityp97.715%
Versatilityp85.212%
Trajectoryp810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.785× par84bp91.444.1%
Wicket rate0.57/ov84bp98.444.1%
Boundary %13%84bp77.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.759× par64bp96.150%
Econ vs LHB0.869× par20bp74.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +47 · induced false-shot 36%
26.5Death20% of overs · 2w · 15.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp16.755%
Impactp45.125%
Versatilityp64.38%
Trajectoryp812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.27× par30bp8.543.6%
Boundary %40%30bp1141.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp57.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.2428bp64.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.3
Naveen Nagle
Bowler · LA pace
69.5
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 47 · Econ 6.71
69.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle76.371.4%54.5
Death52.528.6%15.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p73.20.97×
Scout Score69.5
76.3Middle71.4% of overs · 1w · 5.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.738%
Impactp75.825%
Qualityp88.315%
Versatilityp82.412%
Trajectoryp73.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.602× par30bp96.144.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp39.844.1%
Boundary %7%30bp91.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.536× par22bp94.550%
Econ vs LHB0.782× par8bp70.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.1 · induced false-shot 33%
52.5Death28.6% of overs · 0w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.848%
Impactp54.925%
Versatilityp34.115%
Trajectoryp73.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.855× par12bp59.850%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp2216.7%
Boundary %25%12bp54.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp17.740%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.7
Aryan Pandey
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
69.4
Scout Score
Overs 11.5 · Wkts 6 · Runs 97 · Econ 8.2
69.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay74.733.8%25.2
Middle67.925.4%17.2
Death65.940.8%26.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p97.80.75×
Scout Score69.4
74.7Powerplay33.8% of overs · 2w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp6638%
Impactp74.427%
Qualityp96.715%
Versatilityp51.810%
Trajectoryp97.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.988× par24bp56.736.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp8042.1%
Boundary %25%24bp54.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.825× par20bp7030%
Econ vs LHB1.84× par4bp16.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.60/ov20bp88.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp4020%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.2 · induced false-shot 46%
67.9Middle25.4% of overs · 0w · 5.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.838%
Impactp60.225%
Qualityp80.515%
Versatilityp78.912%
Trajectoryp97.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.617× par18bp85.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp1844.1%
Boundary %0%18bp96.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.636× par12bp80.550%
Econ vs LHB0.579× par6bp77.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.2 · induced false-shot 33%
65.9Death40.8% of overs · 4w · 8.69 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp8748%
Impactp23.225%
Versatilityp44.415%
Trajectoryp97.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.707× par29bp8950%
Wicket rate0.83/ov29bp96.316.7%
Boundary %21%29bp79.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%29bp43.540%
Slower ball029bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer029bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.9
Kartik Parihar
Bowler · Off-spin · age 21
67
Scout Score
Overs 12.4 · Wkts 6 · Runs 111 · Econ 8.76
67OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle67.678.9%53.3
Death64.821.1%13.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p71.70.97×
Scout Score67
67.6Middle78.9% of overs · 5w · 8.3 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.638%
Impactp80.525%
Qualityp46.115%
Versatilityp54.712%
Trajectoryp71.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.96× par60bp55.544.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov60bp89.844.1%
Boundary %15%60bp55.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.069× par37bp24.250%
Econ vs LHB0.786× par23bp85.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.5 · induced false-shot 23%
64.8Death21.1% of overs · 1w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.255%
Impactp74.425%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp71.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.855× par16bp64.643.6%
Boundary %25%16bp59.841.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov16bp54.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.9
Saransh Surana
Bowler · RA pace · age 20
66.9
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 34 · Econ 8.5
66.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle66.975%50.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p89.10.9×
Scout Score66.9
66.9Middle75% of overs · 2w · 7.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp7338%
Impactp55.525%
Qualityp60.215%
Versatilityp61.712%
Trajectoryp89.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.887× par18bp60.244.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp87.544.1%
Boundary %11%18bp66.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.954× par16bp55.550%
Econ vs LHB0.348× par2bp6850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.8 · induced false-shot 28%
Anurag Malvia
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
66.5
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 46 · Econ 9.2
66.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.160%35.5
Death77.740%31.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p920.87×
Scout Score66.5
59.1Powerplay60% of overs · 1w · 9.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.438%
Impactp43.327%
Qualityp74.415%
Versatilityp56.210%
Trajectoryp9210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.979× par18bp53.336.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp65.642.1%
Boundary %28%18bp43.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.971× par17bp52.230%
Econ vs LHB0.669× par1bp56.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.35/ov17bp65.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov1bp52.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.5 · induced false-shot 33%
77.7Death40% of overs · 2w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.248%
Impactp86.625%
Versatilityp62.515%
Trajectoryp9212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.692× par12bp73.250%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp84.116.7%
Boundary %17%12bp70.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate17%12bp88.740%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.1
Lucky Mishra
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
62.7
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 37 · Econ 5.29
62.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle62.785.7%53.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p64.51×
Scout Score62.7
62.7Middle85.7% of overs · 0w · 5.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp5238%
Impactp52.325%
Qualityp85.215%
Versatilityp88.312%
Trajectoryp64.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.656× par36bp94.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp3.144.1%
Boundary %11%36bp75.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.694× par24bp88.350%
Econ vs LHB0.579× par12bp88.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.1 · induced false-shot 31%
Ishan Chaudhary
Bowler · RA pace
62.1
Scout Score
Overs 14.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 139 · Econ 9.93
62.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay62.957.1%35.9
Death61.142.9%26.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p86.20.9×
Scout Score62.1
62.9Powerplay57.1% of overs · 3w · 9.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.438%
Impactp65.627%
Qualityp18.915%
Versatilityp66.210%
Trajectoryp86.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.937× par48bp65.636.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp76.742.1%
Boundary %23%48bp71.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.964× par44bp61.130%
Econ vs LHB0.335× par4bp78.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.41/ov44bp81.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp4020%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.4 · induced false-shot 19%
61.1Death42.9% of overs · 4w · 10.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.448%
Impactp25.625%
Versatilityp57.315%
Trajectoryp86.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.882× par36bp67.150%
Wicket rate0.67/ov36bp91.516.7%
Boundary %22%36bp76.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate14%36bp75.840%
Slower ball036bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer036bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.7
Sagar Solanki
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 25
60.1
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 133 · Econ 8.31
60.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay66.525%16.6
Middle61.862.5%38.6
Death3912.5%4.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p28.31.13×
Scout Score60.1
66.5Powerplay25% of overs · 3w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp6138%
Impactp78.927%
Qualityp85.615%
Versatilityp6410%
Trajectoryp28.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.165× par24bp32.236.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp96.742.1%
Boundary %29%24bp4021.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.263× par21bp18.930%
Econ vs LHB0.223× par3bp74.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.57/ov21bp85.620%
Wkt vs LHB2.00/ov3bp94.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4 · induced false-shot 38%
61.8Middle62.5% of overs · 2w · 5.9 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp7138%
Impactp96.125%
Qualityp3.915%
Versatilityp61.712%
Trajectoryp28.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.683× par60bp97.744.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp36.744.1%
Boundary %5%60bp99.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.614× par52bp97.750%
Econ vs LHB1.13× par8bp25.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +20.9 · induced false-shot 15%
39Death12.5% of overs · 1w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.955%
Impactp47.625%
Versatilityp28.68%
Trajectoryp28.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.14× par12bp31.743.6%
Boundary %33%12bp37.841.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp63.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.2411bp28.6100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.1
Anvesh Chawla
Bowler · RA pace · age 20
58.8
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 125 · Econ 9.62
58.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay61.353.8%33.0
Middle4815.4%7.4
Death59.730.8%18.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11.06×
Scout Score58.8
61.3Powerplay53.8% of overs · 4w · 9.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp68.738%
Impactp45.627%
Qualityp9015%
Versatilityp47.110%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.999× par42bp58.936.8%
Wicket rate0.57/ov42bp94.442.1%
Boundary %29%42bp34.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.786× par9bp65.630%
Econ vs LHB1.156× par33bp18.930%
Wkt vs RHB2.00/ov9bp98.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.18/ov33bp1020%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.5 · induced false-shot 36%
48Middle15.4% of overs · 1w · 9.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.638%
Impactp44.525%
Qualityp53.115%
Versatilityp38.312%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.099× par12bp44.544.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp66.444.1%
Boundary %25%12bp22.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.08× par9bp44.550%
Econ vs LHB1.159× par3bp3250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1 · induced false-shot 25%
59.7Death30.8% of overs · 2w · 9.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp78.548%
Impactp37.825%
Versatilityp46.115%
Trajectoryp47.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.753× par24bp81.750%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp76.816.7%
Boundary %21%24bp74.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%24bp17.740%
Slower ball024bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer2524bp83.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.4
Akash Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
58
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 159 · Econ 9.94
58OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay50.912.5%6.4
Middle76.656.2%43.0
Death27.531.2%8.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p38.41.1×
Scout Score58
50.9Powerplay12.5% of overs · 0w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.938%
Impactp72.227%
Qualityp21.115%
Versatilityp50.910%
Trajectoryp38.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.76× par12bp67.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp28.942.1%
Boundary %17%12bp65.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.825× par5bp56.730%
Econ vs LHB0.765× par7bp65.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov5bp46.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp24.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.3 · induced false-shot 8%
76.6Middle56.2% of overs · 5w · 7.89 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.138%
Impactp94.525%
Qualityp64.815%
Versatilityp71.512%
Trajectoryp38.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.913× par54bp6844.1%
Wicket rate0.56/ov54bp96.144.1%
Boundary %13%54bp74.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.96× par47bp63.350%
Econ vs LHB0.596× par7bp79.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +20.8 · induced false-shot 26%
27.5Death31.2% of overs · 1w · 14.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.148%
Impactp30.525%
Versatilityp34.115%
Trajectoryp38.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.189× par30bp18.350%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp35.416.7%
Boundary %37%30bp18.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%30bp17.740%
Slower ball030bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer030bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.9
Ankit Kushwah
Bowler · RA pace · age 34
55.3
Scout Score
Overs 11.5 · Wkts 3 · Runs 124 · Econ 10.48
55.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay56.650.7%28.7
Middle53.333.8%18.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p12.31.18×
Scout Score55.3
56.6Powerplay50.7% of overs · 1w · 9.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.638%
Impactp58.927%
Qualityp94.415%
Versatilityp56.910%
Trajectoryp12.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.929× par36bp63.336.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp33.342.1%
Boundary %22%36bp67.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.002× par30bp43.330%
Econ vs LHB0.446× par6bp83.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov30bp5.620%
Wkt vs LHB1.00/ov6bp88.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.2 · induced false-shot 39%
53.3Middle33.8% of overs · 2w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.238%
Impactp63.325%
Qualityp39.115%
Versatilityp5012%
Trajectoryp12.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.955× par24bp52.344.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp81.244.1%
Boundary %17%24bp44.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.954× par24bp5750%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.7 · induced false-shot 21%
Anant Dubey
Bowler · LA pace · age 20
54.7
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 181 · Econ 9.05
54.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay58.250%29.1
Middle61.915%9.3
Death46.835%16.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p57.21.01×
Scout Score54.7
58.2Powerplay50% of overs · 2w · 8.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp6138%
Impactp54.427%
Qualityp58.915%
Versatilityp57.310%
Trajectoryp57.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.831× par60bp81.136.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp36.742.1%
Boundary %23%60bp74.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.958× par32bp58.930%
Econ vs LHB0.717× par28bp94.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.19/ov32bp4020%
Wkt vs LHB0.22/ov28bp16.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2 · induced false-shot 25%
61.9Middle15% of overs · 0w · 6.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.338%
Impactp69.525%
Qualityp80.515%
Versatilityp69.512%
Trajectoryp57.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.733× par18bp78.944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp1844.1%
Boundary %17%18bp47.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.002× par9bp49.250%
Econ vs LHB0.464× par9bp89.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.9 · induced false-shot 33%
46.8Death35% of overs · 5w · 11.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.248%
Impactp1125%
Versatilityp48.915%
Trajectoryp57.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.93× par42bp62.250%
Wicket rate0.71/ov42bp93.916.7%
Boundary %29%42bp46.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%42bp54.840%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer042bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -32.8
Rishi Miglani
Bowler · SLA orthodox
54.6
Scout Score
Overs 14.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 117 · Econ 8.36
54.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay77.857.1%44.4
Middle23.742.9%10.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p83.30.92×
Scout Score54.6
77.8Powerplay57.1% of overs · 2w · 7.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.338%
Impactp9027%
Qualityp8015%
Versatilityp68.710%
Trajectoryp83.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.772× par48bp83.336.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp47.842.1%
Boundary %17%48bp87.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.776× par41bp85.630%
Econ vs LHB0.669× par7bp72.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.14/ov41bp23.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.86/ov7bp83.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.8 · induced false-shot 31%
23.7Middle42.9% of overs · 0w · 9.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp21.138%
Impactp13.325%
Qualityp2.315%
Versatilityp30.512%
Trajectoryp83.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.08× par36bp28.944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp3.144.1%
Boundary %14%36bp59.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.041× par28bp4350%
Econ vs LHB1.217× par8bp1850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.2 · induced false-shot 8%
Madhav Tiwari
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
54.5
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 169 · Econ 10.56
54.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay58.162.5%36.3
Death47.231.2%14.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p790.94×
Scout Score54.5
58.1Powerplay62.5% of overs · 5w · 10.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.938%
Impactp47.827%
Qualityp41.115%
Versatilityp65.110%
Trajectoryp7910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.023× par60bp43.336.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov60bp92.242.1%
Boundary %27%60bp47.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.074× par45bp34.430%
Econ vs LHB0.848× par15bp67.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.53/ov45bp94.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp77.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.8 · induced false-shot 23%
47.2Death31.2% of overs · 1w · 11.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.148%
Impactp8.525%
Versatilityp57.515%
Trajectoryp7912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.961× par30bp57.350%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp35.416.7%
Boundary %23%30bp64.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%30bp38.740%
Slower ball030bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer43.33330bp95.226.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -36.8
Tripuresh Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
54.3
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 201 · Econ 10.05
54.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay4555%24.8
Middle43.810%4.4
Death7235%25.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p34.11.11×
Scout Score54.3
45Powerplay55% of overs · 3w · 10.45 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.738%
Impactp3027%
Qualityp65.615%
Versatilityp43.610%
Trajectoryp34.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.059× par66bp36.736.8%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp56.742.1%
Boundary %24%66bp63.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.995× par48bp5030%
Econ vs LHB1.264× par18bp12.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.25/ov48bp54.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.34/ov18bp7020%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.1 · induced false-shot 27%
43.8Middle10% of overs · 1w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.238%
Impactp36.725%
Qualityp53.115%
Versatilityp41.412%
Trajectoryp34.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.157× par12bp36.744.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp66.444.1%
Boundary %25%12bp22.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.199× par11bp25.850%
Econ vs LHB0.695× par1bp5750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.7 · induced false-shot 25%
72Death35% of overs · 2w · 9.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.148%
Impactp76.825%
Versatilityp65.115%
Trajectoryp34.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.768× par42bp91.550%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp43.916.7%
Boundary %21%42bp84.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate21%42bp95.240%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer042bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.7
Avesh Khan
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
53.9
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 136 · Econ 11.33
53.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay55.341.7%23.1
Middle67.825%16.9
Death41.833.3%13.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p32.61.12×
Scout Score53.9
55.3Powerplay41.7% of overs · 1w · 10.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.838%
Impactp81.127%
Qualityp72.215%
Versatilityp3810%
Trajectoryp32.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.074× par30bp38.936.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp4042.1%
Boundary %27%30bp45.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.923× par23bp63.330%
Econ vs LHB1.625× par7bp7.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.26/ov23bp58.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp24.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.2 · induced false-shot 30%
67.8Middle25% of overs · 2w · 6.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.838%
Impactp50.825%
Qualityp89.815%
Versatilityp60.912%
Trajectoryp32.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.771× par18bp76.644.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp87.544.1%
Boundary %6%18bp80.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.771× par18bp78.950%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.2 · induced false-shot 44%
41.8Death33.3% of overs · 2w · 15.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.548%
Impactp64.625%
Versatilityp82.315%
Trajectoryp32.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.282× par24bp1150%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp76.816.7%
Boundary %50%24bp3.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate25%24bp98.440%
Slower ball024bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer5024bp98.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.2
Kartik Rajoriya
Bowler · RA pace
52.7
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 50 · Econ 12.5
52.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle52.750%26.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50n/a
Scout Score52.7
52.7Middle50% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.638%
Impactp49.225%
Qualityp69.515%
Versatilityp41.412%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par12bp46.944.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp66.444.1%
Boundary %25%12bp22.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.833× par5bp61.750%
Econ vs LHB1.192× par7bp21.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.1 · induced false-shot 33%
Anubhav Agarwal
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
52.4
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 137 · Econ 11.42
52.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay58.650%29.3
Middle65.916.7%11.0
Death36.433.3%12.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p51.41.01×
Scout Score52.4
58.6Powerplay50% of overs · 3w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.938%
Impactp52.227%
Qualityp98.915%
Versatilityp4410%
Trajectoryp51.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.148× par36bp3036.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp85.642.1%
Boundary %31%36bp27.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.103× par31bp32.230%
Econ vs LHB1.338× par5bp32.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.58/ov31bp92.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp31.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.2 · induced false-shot 44%
65.9Middle16.7% of overs · 2w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp72.438%
Impactp88.325%
Qualityp33.615%
Versatilityp51.212%
Trajectoryp51.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.926× par12bp53.944.1%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp91.444.1%
Boundary %8%12bp70.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.925× par12bp59.450%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +17.1 · induced false-shot 17%
36.4Death33.3% of overs · 0w · 13.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.648%
Impactp13.425%
Versatilityp55.415%
Trajectoryp51.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.079× par24bp35.450%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp1.216.7%
Boundary %25%24bp62.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate12%24bp7140%
Slower ball024bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer024bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -30.4
Prashant Kasde
Bowler · SLA orthodox
52.4
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 115 · Econ 8.85
52.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay52.238.5%20.1
Middle33.638.5%12.9
Death84.123.1%19.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p80.40.94×
Scout Score52.4
52.2Powerplay38.5% of overs · 1w · 8.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp5538%
Impactp61.127%
Qualityp1015%
Versatilityp52.210%
Trajectoryp80.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.891× par30bp7036.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp4042.1%
Boundary %23%30bp58.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.83× par27bp74.430%
Econ vs LHB1.338× par3bp34.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.22/ov27bp52.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp45.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.9 · induced false-shot 13%
33.6Middle38.5% of overs · 2w · 9.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.638%
Impactp725%
Qualityp8.615%
Versatilityp30.512%
Trajectoryp80.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.088× par30bp30.544.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp73.444.1%
Boundary %20%30bp3211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.988× par26bp50.850%
Econ vs LHB1.738× par4bp10.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.1 · induced false-shot 13%
84.1Death23.1% of overs · 1w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.255%
Impactp98.825%
Versatilityp57.18%
Trajectoryp80.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.651× par18bp84.143.6%
Boundary %11%18bp91.541.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp5014.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7316bp57.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +14.3
Adheer Pratap Singh
Bowler · Off-spin · age 24
52.3
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 100 · Econ 12.5
52.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle66.662.5%41.6
Death16.725%4.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p45.71.06×
Scout Score52.3
66.6Middle62.5% of overs · 2w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.638%
Impactp89.825%
Qualityp76.615%
Versatilityp48.412%
Trajectoryp45.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par30bp4344.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp73.444.1%
Boundary %13%30bp61.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.338× par14bp14.850%
Econ vs LHB0.782× par16bp8250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +17.2 · induced false-shot 30%
16.7Death25% of overs · 0w · 21.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp8.955%
Impactp18.325%
Versatilityp21.48%
Trajectoryp45.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.75× par12bp6.143.6%
Boundary %58%12bp7.341.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp2214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.956bp21.4100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -27.5
Parth Sahani
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 33
52.2
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 93 · Econ 10.33
52.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay43.644.4%19.4
Middle60.844.4%27.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p25.41.15×
Scout Score52.2
43.6Powerplay44.4% of overs · 2w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.838%
Impactp41.127%
Qualityp52.215%
Versatilityp39.810%
Trajectoryp25.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.216× par24bp25.636.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp8042.1%
Boundary %33%24bp22.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.061× par20bp36.730%
Econ vs LHB2.008× par4bp1030%
Wkt vs RHB0.60/ov20bp88.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp4020%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.1 · induced false-shot 25%
60.8Middle44.4% of overs · 1w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.138%
Impactp64.825%
Qualityp86.715%
Versatilityp57.812%
Trajectoryp25.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.868× par24bp66.444.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp48.444.1%
Boundary %12%24bp63.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.868× par24bp72.750%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.2 · induced false-shot 33%
Dharmesh Patel
Bowler · RA pace · age 34
51.4
Scout Score
Overs 10.2 · Wkts 3 · Runs 85 · Econ 8.23
51.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle51.480.6%41.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p6.51.2×
Scout Score51.4
51.4Middle80.6% of overs · 3w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.138%
Impactp71.125%
Qualityp63.315%
Versatilityp3412%
Trajectoryp6.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par50bp39.844.1%
Wicket rate0.36/ov50bp71.144.1%
Boundary %20%50bp1811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.033× par45bp38.350%
Econ vs LHB1.112× par5bp29.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6 · induced false-shot 26%
Akshay Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
51.3
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 58 · Econ 8.29
51.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay55.857.1%31.9
Middle42.428.6%12.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p371.1×
Scout Score51.3
55.8Powerplay57.1% of overs · 0w · 5 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.638%
Impactp76.727%
Qualityp25.615%
Versatilityp57.110%
Trajectoryp3710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.507× par24bp92.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp1042.1%
Boundary %8%24bp92.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.491× par24bp94.430%
Econ vs LHB—0bp47.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov24bp11.120%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp61.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.9 · induced false-shot 17%
42.4Middle28.6% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.638%
Impactp4325%
Qualityp69.515%
Versatilityp36.312%
Trajectoryp3710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.157× par12bp36.744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp28.144.1%
Boundary %17%12bp50.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.157× par12bp29.750%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.5 · induced false-shot 33%
Aryan Deshmukh
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
50.4
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 50 · Econ 10
50.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle47.440%19.0
Death53.440%21.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p87.70.9×
Scout Score50.4
47.4Middle40% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp5638%
Impactp25.825%
Qualityp33.615%
Versatilityp48.812%
Trajectoryp87.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par12bp46.944.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp66.444.1%
Boundary %17%12bp50.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.157× par9bp36.750%
Econ vs LHB0.695× par3bp60.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.8 · induced false-shot 17%
53.4Death40% of overs · 0w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.848%
Impactp57.325%
Versatilityp34.115%
Trajectoryp87.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.936× par12bp53.750%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp2216.7%
Boundary %25%12bp54.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp17.740%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.7
Prabhanshu Shukla
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 23
50.1
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 65 · Econ 9.29
50.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle50.185.7%42.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p64.51×
Scout Score50.1
50.1Middle85.7% of overs · 1w · 7.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.538%
Impactp58.625%
Qualityp715%
Versatilityp66.412%
Trajectoryp64.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.887× par36bp69.544.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp33.644.1%
Boundary %14%36bp59.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.066× par28bp35.250%
Econ vs LHB0.261× par8bp97.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.5 · induced false-shot 14%
Devendra Singh Katheit
Bowler · LA pace
49.5
Scout Score
Overs 25.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 236 · Econ 9.44
49.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay44.556%24.9
Middle60.128%16.8
Death48.316%7.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p9.41.19×
Scout Score49.5
44.5Powerplay56% of overs · 2w · 8.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.838%
Impactp63.327%
Qualityp7.815%
Versatilityp56.710%
Trajectoryp9.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.868× par84bp78.936.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov84bp14.442.1%
Boundary %23%84bp78.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.918× par61bp72.230%
Econ vs LHB0.727× par23bp92.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.20/ov61bp32.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov23bp4.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.8 · induced false-shot 18%
60.1Middle28% of overs · 4w · 9.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.238%
Impactp8225%
Qualityp96.115%
Versatilityp36.712%
Trajectoryp9.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.124× par42bp22.744.1%
Wicket rate0.57/ov42bp9344.1%
Boundary %24%42bp10.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.906× par36bp71.150%
Econ vs LHB2.433× par6bp2.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +12.5 · induced false-shot 40%
48.3Death16% of overs · 2w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.748%
Impactp69.525%
Versatilityp55.415%
Trajectoryp9.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.977× par24bp5050%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp76.816.7%
Boundary %38%24bp20.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate12%24bp7140%
Slower ball024bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer024bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.5
Bhumesh Muzalda
Bowler · SLA orthodox
48
Scout Score
Overs 17.1 · Wkts 3 · Runs 136 · Econ 7.92
48OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay68.523.3%16.0
Middle23.652.4%12.4
Death8124.3%19.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p22.51.17×
Scout Score48
68.5Powerplay23.3% of overs · 1w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.138%
Impactp85.627%
Qualityp63.315%
Versatilityp66.910%
Trajectoryp22.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.608× par24bp85.636.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp52.242.1%
Boundary %12%24bp83.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.589× par22bp9030%
Econ vs LHB0.669× par2bp58.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.27/ov22bp61.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov2bp5020%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.3 · induced false-shot 29%
23.6Middle52.4% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp23.138%
Impactp35.225%
Qualityp0.815%
Versatilityp30.512%
Trajectoryp22.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par54bp33.644.1%
Wicket rate0.11/ov54bp8.644.1%
Boundary %17%54bp38.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.993× par51bp47.750%
Econ vs LHB1.854× par3bp13.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4 · induced false-shot 9%
81Death24.3% of overs · 1w · 7.44 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp86.155%
Impactp96.325%
Versatilityp85.78%
Trajectoryp22.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.606× par25bp93.943.6%
Boundary %12%25bp93.941.8%
Wicket rate0.24/ov25bp40.214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.6419bp85.7100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.5
Roshan Kewat
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
46.2
Scout Score
Overs 11.4 · Wkts 1 · Runs 104 · Econ 8.91
46.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay4560%27.0
Middle26.417.1%4.5
Death64.222.9%14.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p19.61.17×
Scout Score46.2
45Powerplay60% of overs · 1w · 8.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.638%
Impactp67.827%
Qualityp1.115%
Versatilityp53.110%
Trajectoryp19.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.868× par42bp74.436.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp24.442.1%
Boundary %24%42bp61.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.943× par15bp54.430%
Econ vs LHB0.892× par27bp76.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.40/ov15bp67.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov27bp1.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.4 · induced false-shot 10%
26.4Middle17.1% of overs · 0w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.438%
Impactp5.525%
Qualityp69.515%
Versatilityp28.112%
Trajectoryp19.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.389× par12bp21.144.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp28.144.1%
Boundary %25%12bp22.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.388× par12bp13.350%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.6 · induced false-shot 33%
64.2Death22.9% of overs · 0w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.448%
Impactp84.125%
Versatilityp34.115%
Trajectoryp19.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.611× par16bp86.650%
Wicket rate0.00/ov16bp8.516.7%
Boundary %12%16bp8933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%16bp17.740%
Slower ball016bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer016bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.5
Nayanraj Mewada
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 25
45.5
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 207 · Econ 9.86
45.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay26.233.3%8.7
Middle55.266.7%36.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501.03×
Scout Score45.5
26.2Powerplay33.3% of overs · 2w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.738%
Impactp1027%
Qualityp5.615%
Versatilityp40.410%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.216× par42bp18.936.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp6042.1%
Boundary %36%42bp16.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.344× par25bp12.230%
Econ vs LHB1.063× par17bp36.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.24/ov25bp56.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.35/ov17bp72.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -23.1 · induced false-shot 14%
55.2Middle66.7% of overs · 8w · 8.79 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp6638%
Impactp6825%
Qualityp24.215%
Versatilityp37.512%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.017× par84bp41.444.1%
Wicket rate0.57/ov84bp98.444.1%
Boundary %17%84bp36.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.954× par56bp66.450%
Econ vs LHB1.142× par28bp8.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.4 · induced false-shot 21%
Vikrant Bhadoriya
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
44.7
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 92 · Econ 11.5
44.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.725%14.9
Middle38.850%19.4
Death41.725%10.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p54.31.01×
Scout Score44.7
59.7Powerplay25% of overs · 1w · 9.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.638%
Impactp56.727%
Qualityp68.915%
Versatilityp59.310%
Trajectoryp54.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.962× par12bp48.936.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp73.342.1%
Boundary %25%12bp51.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.532× par5bp3030%
Econ vs LHB0.574× par7bp81.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov5bp46.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.86/ov7bp83.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.5 · induced false-shot 33%
38.8Middle50% of overs · 2w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.938%
Impactp24.225%
Qualityp66.415%
Versatilityp14.812%
Trajectoryp54.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.273× par24bp10.244.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp81.244.1%
Boundary %29%24bp4.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.527× par10bp10.250%
Econ vs LHB1.093× par14bp19.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.2 · induced false-shot 29%
41.7Death25% of overs · 0w · 14.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.348%
Impactp62.225%
Versatilityp34.115%
Trajectoryp54.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.18× par12bp2850%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp2216.7%
Boundary %33%12bp37.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp17.740%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.7
Ashutosh Sharma
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
44.5
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 129 · Econ 9.92
44.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle49.976.9%38.4
Death26.323.1%6.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p55.81.01×
Scout Score44.5
49.9Middle76.9% of overs · 2w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.438%
Impactp46.125%
Qualityp30.515%
Versatilityp66.412%
Trajectoryp55.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.926× par60bp64.844.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp36.744.1%
Boundary %13%60bp72.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.026× par46bp41.450%
Econ vs LHB0.596× par14bp91.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.8 · induced false-shot 22%
26.3Death23.1% of overs · 1w · 16.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.848%
Impactp3.725%
Versatilityp51.515%
Trajectoryp55.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.33× par18bp13.450%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp5016.7%
Boundary %39%18bp23.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%18bp61.340%
Slower ball018bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer018bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -43.7
Saumy Pandey
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 21
44.1
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 160 · Econ 10.67
44.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay5153.3%27.2
Middle33.233.3%11.1
Death43.613.3%5.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p90.60.89×
Scout Score44.1
51Powerplay53.3% of overs · 0w · 9.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.938%
Impactp34.427%
Qualityp87.815%
Versatilityp47.110%
Trajectoryp90.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.975× par48bp61.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov48bp3.342.1%
Boundary %23%48bp71.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.945× par48bp67.830%
Econ vs LHB—0bp47.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov48bp1.120%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp61.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.5 · induced false-shot 33%
33.2Middle33.3% of overs · 0w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp10.738%
Impactp14.825%
Qualityp76.615%
Versatilityp40.212%
Trajectoryp90.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.273× par30bp744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp6.244.1%
Boundary %17%30bp41.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.479× par23bp0.850%
Econ vs LHB0.596× par7bp79.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.9 · induced false-shot 30%
43.6Death13.3% of overs · 0w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.855%
Impactp42.725%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp90.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.14× par12bp31.743.6%
Boundary %33%12bp37.841.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp2214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.816bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10
Pranjul Puri
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
43.6
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 75 · Econ 10.71
43.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay35.142.9%15.1
Middle52.242.9%22.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p41.31.08×
Scout Score43.6
35.1Powerplay42.9% of overs · 1w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.938%
Impactp25.627%
Qualityp44.415%
Versatilityp33.610%
Trajectoryp41.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.418× par18bp14.436.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp65.642.1%
Boundary %39%18bp18.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.405× par13bp16.730%
Econ vs LHB1.472× par5bp27.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.46/ov13bp7020%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp31.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.8 · induced false-shot 22%
52.2Middle42.9% of overs · 0w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.238%
Impactp53.925%
Qualityp80.515%
Versatilityp56.612%
Trajectoryp41.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.926× par18bp57.844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp1844.1%
Boundary %11%18bp66.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.972× par15bp52.350%
Econ vs LHB0.695× par3bp60.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.3 · induced false-shot 33%
Pushkar Vishwakarma
Bowler · RA pace
43.1
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 158 · Econ 9.88
43.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay32.137.5%12.0
Middle44.343.8%19.4
Death62.118.8%11.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p58.71×
Scout Score43.1
32.1Powerplay37.5% of overs · 1w · 11.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.638%
Impactp16.727%
Qualityp55.615%
Versatilityp40.410%
Trajectoryp58.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.182× par36bp21.136.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp33.342.1%
Boundary %39%36bp13.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.146× par36bp23.330%
Econ vs LHB—0bp47.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.17/ov36bp34.420%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp61.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.4 · induced false-shot 25%
44.3Middle43.8% of overs · 1w · 8.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.138%
Impactp33.625%
Qualityp72.715%
Versatilityp42.212%
Trajectoryp58.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.975× par42bp50.844.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp22.744.1%
Boundary %17%42bp39.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.904× par33bp69.550%
Econ vs LHB1.236× par9bp14.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.1 · induced false-shot 29%
62.1Death18.8% of overs · 0w · 9.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.848%
Impactp79.325%
Versatilityp34.115%
Trajectoryp58.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.787× par18bp69.550%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp4.916.7%
Boundary %17%18bp81.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%18bp17.740%
Slower ball018bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer018bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.4
Gajendra Goswami
Bowler · LA pace · age 31
42.3
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 64 · Econ 12.8
42.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle42.380%33.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p81.90.92×
Scout Score42.3
42.3Middle80% of overs · 0w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.138%
Impactp39.825%
Qualityp39.115%
Versatilityp50.812%
Trajectoryp81.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.984× par24bp49.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp11.744.1%
Boundary %17%24bp44.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.002× par18bp46.150%
Econ vs LHB0.927× par6bp55.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.9 · induced false-shot 21%
Yuvraj Neema
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 23
42.3
Scout Score
Overs 9.2 · Wkts 4 · Runs 90 · Econ 9.64
42.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle42.3100%42.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p39.91.09×
Scout Score42.3
42.3Middle100% of overs · 4w · 9.64 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.538%
Impactp3225%
Qualityp44.515%
Versatilityp36.712%
Trajectoryp39.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.116× par56bp16.444.1%
Wicket rate0.43/ov56bp83.644.1%
Boundary %16%56bp53.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.177× par46bp750%
Econ vs LHB0.834× par10bp66.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5 · induced false-shot 23%
Himanshu Shinde
Bowler · Off-spin · age 28
42.2
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 50 · Econ 10
42.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle2960%17.4
Death61.940%24.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p3.61.22×
Scout Score42.2
29Middle60% of overs · 1w · 11.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.738%
Impactp38.325%
Qualityp26.615%
Versatilityp3212%
Trajectoryp3.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.35× par18bp8.644.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp54.744.1%
Boundary %28%18bp14.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.431× par16bp5.550%
Econ vs LHB0.695× par2bp58.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.1 · induced false-shot 17%
61.9Death40% of overs · 0w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp7455%
Impactp67.125%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp3.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.611× par12bp79.343.6%
Boundary %8%12bp86.641.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp2214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.5
Vishnu Bhardwaj
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 21
41.9
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 115 · Econ 8.85
41.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay43.623.1%10.1
Middle45.361.5%27.9
Death25.615.4%3.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p2.21.31×
Scout Score41.9
43.6Powerplay23.1% of overs · 0w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.738%
Impactp38.927%
Qualityp61.115%
Versatilityp4410%
Trajectoryp2.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.81× par18bp72.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp18.942.1%
Boundary %17%18bp76.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.442× par8bp78.930%
Econ vs LHB1.205× par10bp3030%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov8bp43.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov10bp13.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.7 · induced false-shot 28%
45.3Middle61.5% of overs · 2w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.638%
Impactp11.725%
Qualityp91.415%
Versatilityp67.612%
Trajectoryp2.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.926× par48bp61.744.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp44.544.1%
Boundary %15%48bp5711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.954× par40bp64.850%
Econ vs LHB0.782× par8bp70.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.9 · induced false-shot 35%
25.6Death15.4% of overs · 0w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.455%
Impactp20.725%
Versatilityp42.98%
Trajectoryp2.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.099× par12bp37.843.6%
Boundary %42%12bp25.641.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp2214.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.112bp42.9100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -22.5
Ashwin Das
Bowler · RA pace · age 30
41.5
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 182 · Econ 11.38
41.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay25.937.5%9.7
Middle68.118.8%12.8
Death43.543.8%19.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p211.17×
Scout Score41.5
25.9Powerplay37.5% of overs · 2w · 13.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.138%
Impactp14.427%
Qualityp16.715%
Versatilityp40.410%
Trajectoryp2110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.384× par36bp7.836.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp7042.1%
Boundary %39%36bp13.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.381× par32bp7.830%
Econ vs LHB1.171× par4bp38.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.19/ov32bp4020%
Wkt vs LHB1.50/ov4bp92.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.9 · induced false-shot 17%
68.1Middle18.8% of overs · 1w · 4.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp72.538%
Impactp85.225%
Qualityp60.215%
Versatilityp6812%
Trajectoryp2110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.54× par18bp88.344.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp54.744.1%
Boundary %6%18bp80.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.54× par18bp9350%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +12.8 · induced false-shot 28%
43.5Death43.8% of overs · 3w · 12.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.848%
Impactp32.925%
Versatilityp59.215%
Trajectoryp2112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1× par42bp45.150%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp70.716.7%
Boundary %29%42bp46.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate14%42bp80.640%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer042bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.4
Saransh Jain
Bowler · Off-spin · age 33
40.6
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 100 · Econ 9.09
40.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle33.681.8%27.5
Death72.218.2%13.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p29.71.13×
Scout Score40.6
33.6Middle81.8% of overs · 3w · 9.22 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.238%
Impactp28.925%
Qualityp21.915%
Versatilityp40.612%
Trajectoryp29.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.067× par54bp25.844.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp60.944.1%
Boundary %20%54bp16.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.128× par40bp1850%
Econ vs LHB0.894× par14bp63.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.2 · induced false-shot 20%
72.2Death18.2% of overs · 4w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.955%
Impactp91.525%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp29.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.692× par12bp73.243.6%
Boundary %17%12bp70.741.8%
Wicket rate2.00/ov12bp98.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.7
Pawan Yadav
Bowler · LA pace
40.4
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 76 · Econ 9.5
40.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle40.487.5%35.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p77.50.95×
Scout Score40.4
40.4Middle87.5% of overs · 3w · 9.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.538%
Impactp8.625%
Qualityp49.215%
Versatilityp32.812%
Trajectoryp77.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.075× par42bp27.344.1%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp78.144.1%
Boundary %19%42bp33.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.074× par42bp22.750%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.9 · induced false-shot 24%
Ramveer Singh Gurjar
Bowler · LA pace · age 24
40
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 196 · Econ 12.25
40OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.143.8%16.2
Middle36.718.8%6.9
Death45.137.5%16.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p44.21.06×
Scout Score40
37.1Powerplay43.8% of overs · 2w · 11.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.138%
Impactp23.327%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp32.410%
Trajectoryp44.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.158× par42bp23.336.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp6042.1%
Boundary %29%42bp34.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.995× par32bp47.830%
Econ vs LHB1.74× par10bp3.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov32bp72.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov10bp13.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.7 · induced false-shot 24%
36.7Middle18.8% of overs · 1w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.338%
Impactp41.425%
Qualityp47.715%
Versatilityp27.312%
Trajectoryp44.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.312× par18bp13.344.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp54.744.1%
Boundary %33%18bp2.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.311× par18bp11.750%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.7 · induced false-shot 22%
45.1Death37.5% of overs · 3w · 13.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.348%
Impactp7225%
Versatilityp51.515%
Trajectoryp44.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.113× par36bp20.750%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp81.716.7%
Boundary %36%36bp15.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%36bp61.340%
Slower ball036bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer036bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.4
Yash Patidar
Bowler · LA pace · age 22
39.3
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 73 · Econ 14.6
39.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay46.360%27.8
Death28.840%11.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p64.51×
Scout Score39.3
46.3Powerplay60% of overs · 0w · 9.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.538%
Impactp32.227%
Qualityp83.315%
Versatilityp3610%
Trajectoryp64.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.979× par18bp53.336.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp18.942.1%
Boundary %22%18bp56.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.589× par10bp76.730%
Econ vs LHB1.589× par8bp5.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov10bp36.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp2020%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.3 · induced false-shot 39%
28.8Death40% of overs · 1w · 22 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp14.848%
Impactp35.425%
Versatilityp34.115%
Trajectoryp64.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.791× par12bp3.750%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp63.416.7%
Boundary %58%12bp7.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp17.740%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.4
Pawan Nirwani
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 28
37.2
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 70 · Econ 11.67
37.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay24.950%12.4
Middle55.633.3%18.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p16.71.18×
Scout Score37.2
24.9Powerplay50% of overs · 1w · 16.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.838%
Impactp12.227%
Qualityp27.815%
Versatilityp40.910%
Trajectoryp16.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.688× par18bp5.636.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp65.642.1%
Boundary %50%18bp5.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.637× par18bp5.630%
Econ vs LHB—0bp47.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov18bp63.320%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp61.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -22.1 · induced false-shot 17%
55.6Middle33.3% of overs · 0w · 5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.738%
Impactp77.325%
Qualityp33.615%
Versatilityp63.312%
Trajectoryp16.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.579× par12bp80.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp28.144.1%
Boundary %0%12bp83.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.578× par12bp83.650%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.2 · induced false-shot 17%
Harshvardhan Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
36.8
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 50 · Econ 12.5
36.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.150%18.6
Death36.550%18.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p5.11.21×
Scout Score36.8
37.1Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.338%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp34.415%
Versatilityp45.810%
Trajectoryp5.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.013× par12bp45.636.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp28.942.1%
Boundary %33%12bp3021.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.982× par12bp45.630%
Econ vs LHB—0bp47.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp27.820%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp61.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.6 · induced false-shot 17%
36.5Death50% of overs · 0w · 15 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.848%
Impactp52.425%
Versatilityp62.515%
Trajectoryp5.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.221× par12bp23.250%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp2216.7%
Boundary %33%12bp37.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate17%12bp88.740%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.1
Akshay Sharma
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
36.2
Scout Score
Overs 23.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 237 · Econ 10.3
36.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay11.147.8%5.3
Middle62.143.5%27.0
Death44.68.7%3.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p70.31×
Scout Score36.2
11.1Powerplay47.8% of overs · 0w · 12.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp5.838%
Impactp1.127%
Qualityp3.315%
Versatilityp10.910%
Trajectoryp70.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.252× par66bp1036.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov66bp1.142.1%
Boundary %36%66bp7.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.302× par43bp1030%
Econ vs LHB1.193× par23bp21.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov43bp3.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov23bp4.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -44.2 · induced false-shot 17%
62.1Middle43.5% of overs · 2w · 7.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.738%
Impactp5725%
Qualityp9315%
Versatilityp60.212%
Trajectoryp70.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.903× par60bp71.144.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov60bp36.744.1%
Boundary %18%60bp35.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.093× par40bp21.150%
Econ vs LHB0.521× par20bp99.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.9 · induced false-shot 35%
44.6Death8.7% of overs · 1w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp5048%
Impactp2825%
Versatilityp34.115%
Trajectoryp70.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.936× par12bp53.750%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp63.416.7%
Boundary %33%12bp37.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp17.740%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -20
Kuldeep Sen
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
34.8
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 163 · Econ 13.58
34.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay3333.3%11.0
Middle58.325%14.6
Death22.241.7%9.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p84.80.91×
Scout Score34.8
33Powerplay33.3% of overs · 1w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.838%
Impactp21.127%
Qualityp13.315%
Versatilityp43.610%
Trajectoryp84.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.317× par24bp16.736.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp52.242.1%
Boundary %33%24bp22.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.441× par18bp14.430%
Econ vs LHB0.892× par6bp61.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov18bp15.620%
Wkt vs LHB1.00/ov6bp88.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.1 · induced false-shot 12%
58.3Middle25% of overs · 1w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.438%
Impactp74.225%
Qualityp26.615%
Versatilityp45.312%
Trajectoryp84.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.926× par18bp57.844.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp54.744.1%
Boundary %11%18bp66.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.747× par13bp74.250%
Econ vs LHB1.391× par5bp16.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7.7 · induced false-shot 17%
22.2Death41.7% of overs · 1w · 17.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp6.948%
Impactp1.225%
Versatilityp55.815%
Trajectoryp84.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.417× par30bp1.250%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp35.416.7%
Boundary %50%30bp1.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%30bp38.740%
Slower ball030bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer26.66730bp88.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -53.2
Pankaj Patil
Bowler · LA pace · age 28
33.6
Scout Score
Overs 22.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 263 · Econ 11.95
33.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay25.140.9%10.3
Middle3127.3%8.5
Death46.931.8%14.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p64.51×
Scout Score33.6
25.1Powerplay40.9% of overs · 2w · 12.44 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.938%
Impactp5.627%
Qualityp32.215%
Versatilityp28.710%
Trajectoryp64.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.261× par54bp12.236.8%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp43.342.1%
Boundary %37%54bp1021.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.117× par38bp27.830%
Econ vs LHB1.673× par16bp1.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.16/ov38bp25.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.37/ov16bp74.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -32.3 · induced false-shot 22%
31Middle27.3% of overs · 2w · 10.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp3238%
Impactp17.225%
Qualityp41.415%
Versatilityp15.612%
Trajectoryp64.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.196× par36bp11.744.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp58.644.1%
Boundary %25%36bp8.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.234× par18bp19.550%
Econ vs LHB1.159× par18bp11.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.4 · induced false-shot 22%
46.9Death31.8% of overs · 3w · 12.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.148%
Impactp40.225%
Versatilityp59.215%
Trajectoryp64.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.035× par42bp40.250%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp70.716.7%
Boundary %31%42bp30.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate14%42bp80.640%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer042bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.5
Rahul Batham
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
33.6
Scout Score
Overs 27.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 262 · Econ 9.7
33.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay607.4%4.4
Middle34.466.7%22.9
Death2425.9%6.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p26.81.15×
Scout Score33.6
60Powerplay7.4% of overs · 1w · 9.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.638%
Impactp7027%
Qualityp68.915%
Versatilityp54.210%
Trajectoryp26.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.962× par12bp48.936.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp73.342.1%
Boundary %25%12bp51.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.095× par7bp41.130%
Econ vs LHB0.803× par5bp63.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.86/ov7bp83.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp31.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.2 · induced false-shot 33%
34.4Middle66.7% of overs · 2w · 7.94 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.638%
Impactp10.225%
Qualityp4315%
Versatilityp54.712%
Trajectoryp26.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.919× par108bp72.744.1%
Wicket rate0.11/ov108bp0.844.1%
Boundary %12%108bp86.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.878× par68bp8250%
Econ vs LHB0.991× par40bp27.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.3 · induced false-shot 23%
24Death25.9% of overs · 2w · 14.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.748%
Impactp15.925%
Versatilityp48.915%
Trajectoryp26.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.163× par42bp15.950%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp43.916.7%
Boundary %36%42bp13.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%42bp54.840%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer042bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -29.9
Mangesh Yadav
Bowler · LA pace · age 23
32.7
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 91 · Econ 11.38
32.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay29.237.5%10.9
Middle53.525%13.4
Death22.337.5%8.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p23.91.16×
Scout Score32.7
29.2Powerplay37.5% of overs · 0w · 12.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp23.638%
Impactp27.827%
Qualityp44.415%
Versatilityp37.310%
Trajectoryp23.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.249× par18bp27.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp18.942.1%
Boundary %33%18bp25.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.212× par18bp25.630%
Econ vs LHB—0bp47.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov18bp15.620%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp61.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.6 · induced false-shot 22%
53.5Middle25% of overs · 0w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.438%
Impactp83.625%
Qualityp18.815%
Versatilityp59.412%
Trajectoryp23.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.694× par12bp74.244.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp28.144.1%
Boundary %8%12bp70.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.694× par12bp75.850%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +12.5 · induced false-shot 8%
22.3Death37.5% of overs · 0w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp2348%
Impactp6.125%
Versatilityp46.115%
Trajectoryp23.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.14× par18bp25.650%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp4.916.7%
Boundary %33%18bp2833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%18bp17.740%
Slower ball018bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer2518bp83.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -40.8
Kamal Tripathi
Bowler · Off-spin · age 27
31
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 51 · Econ 10.2
31OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle3180%24.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p13.81.18×
Scout Score31
31Middle80% of overs · 1w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.538%
Impactp17.225%
Qualityp5715%
Versatilityp27.712%
Trajectoryp13.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.128× par24bp24.244.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp48.444.1%
Boundary %21%24bp28.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.096× par19bp3250%
Econ vs LHB1.251× par5bp23.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.4 · induced false-shot 25%
Priyanshu Shukla
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
30.6
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 101 · Econ 11.22
30.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay24.777.8%19.2
Death51.422.2%11.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p15.21.18×
Scout Score30.6
24.7Powerplay77.8% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.238%
Impactp18.927%
Qualityp23.315%
Versatilityp30.910%
Trajectoryp15.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.114× par42bp34.436.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp24.442.1%
Boundary %29%42bp34.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.035× par37bp38.930%
Econ vs LHB1.606× par5bp23.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.16/ov37bp3020%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp31.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.3 · induced false-shot 19%
51.4Death22.2% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.648%
Impactp59.825%
Versatilityp62.515%
Trajectoryp15.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.977× par12bp47.650%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp63.416.7%
Boundary %25%12bp54.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate17%12bp88.740%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.7
Sachin Vishwakarma
Bowler · RA pace · age 43
30
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 42 · Econ 10.5
30OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle30100%30.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p35.51.11×
Scout Score30
30Middle100% of overs · 1w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp3338%
Impactp30.525%
Qualityp12.515%
Versatilityp36.712%
Trajectoryp35.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.215× par24bp18.844.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp48.444.1%
Boundary %21%24bp28.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.319× par20bp8.650%
Econ vs LHB0.695× par4bp64.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.1 · induced false-shot 12%
Sanjog Nijjer
Bowler · RA pace · age 31
28.6
Scout Score
Overs 4.2 · Wkts 1 · Runs 48 · Econ 11.08
28.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle28.692.3%26.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p18.11.17×
Scout Score28.6
28.6Middle92.3% of overs · 1w · 9.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.938%
Impactp22.725%
Qualityp12.515%
Versatilityp37.512%
Trajectoryp18.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.099× par24bp3244.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp48.444.1%
Boundary %21%24bp28.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.843× par14bp6850%
Econ vs LHB1.46× par10bp750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.5 · induced false-shot 12%
Omkarnath Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
26.7
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 117 · Econ 11.7
26.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.740%15.1
Middle17.850%8.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p74.60.96×
Scout Score26.7
37.7Powerplay40% of overs · 0w · 10.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.838%
Impactp36.727%
Qualityp37.815%
Versatilityp41.610%
Trajectoryp74.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.038× par24bp41.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp1042.1%
Boundary %29%24bp4021.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.289× par16bp21.130%
Econ vs LHB0.502× par8bp9030%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov16bp21.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp2020%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.9 · induced false-shot 21%
17.8Middle50% of overs · 0w · 10.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp10.138%
Impactp3.925%
Qualityp5.515%
Versatilityp39.112%
Trajectoryp74.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.203× par30bp14.844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp6.244.1%
Boundary %27%30bp711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.388× par22bp2.350%
Econ vs LHB0.695× par8bp75.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.2 · induced false-shot 10%
Shivansh Chaturvedi
Bowler · SLA orthodox
24.7
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 42 · Econ 10.5
24.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle24.7100%24.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p52.91.01×
Scout Score24.7
24.7Middle100% of overs · 0w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp18.738%
Impactp27.325%
Qualityp12.515%
Versatilityp29.712%
Trajectoryp52.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.215× par24bp18.844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp11.744.1%
Boundary %17%24bp44.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.215× par24bp16.450%
Econ vs LHB—0bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.3 · induced false-shot 12%
Ishan Afridi
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
23.4
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 159 · Econ 14.45
23.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay13.245.5%6.0
Middle21.127.3%5.8
Death42.827.3%11.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p10.91.18×
Scout Score23.4
13.2Powerplay45.5% of overs · 0w · 16.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp338%
Impactp7.827%
Qualityp47.815%
Versatilityp17.610%
Trajectoryp10.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.641× par30bp1.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov30bp5.642.1%
Boundary %53%30bp1.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.609× par26bp1.130%
Econ vs LHB1.673× par4bp25.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov26bp7.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp4020%
Impact · Quality — WPA -27.6 · induced false-shot 23%
21.1Middle27.3% of overs · 0w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp9.138%
Impactp21.125%
Qualityp60.215%
Versatilityp18.812%
Trajectoryp10.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.504× par18bp2.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp1844.1%
Boundary %39%18bp0.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.215× par8bp33.650%
Econ vs LHB1.738× par10bp3.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.9 · induced false-shot 28%
42.8Death27.3% of overs · 1w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=41
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.348%
Impactp5025%
Versatilityp44.815%
Trajectoryp10.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.058× par18bp42.750%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp5016.7%
Boundary %28%18bp5033.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%18bp17.740%
Slower ball018bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer22.22218bp7926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.5
Shivang Kumar
Bowler · Chinaman · age 24
23.3
Scout Score
Overs 18.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 194 · Econ 10.78
23.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle23.388.9%20.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p93.50.85×
Scout Score23.3
23.3Middle88.9% of overs · 4w · 10.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.338%
Impactp0.825%
Qualityp28.915%
Versatilityp14.112%
Trajectoryp93.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.201× par96bp0.844.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov96bp42.244.1%
Boundary %21%96bp11.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.036× par69bp27.350%
Econ vs LHB1.622× par27bp0.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -36.5 · induced false-shot 22%
Gautam Raghuwanshi
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 35
17.7
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 47 · Econ 11.75
17.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle17.7100%17.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p64.51×
Scout Score17.7
17.7Middle100% of overs · 0w · 11.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp7.438%
Impactp19.525%
Qualityp12.515%
Versatilityp13.712%
Trajectoryp64.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.36× par24bp3.944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp11.744.1%
Boundary %29%24bp4.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.388× par19bp3.950%
Econ vs LHB1.251× par5bp23.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.6 · induced false-shot 12%
Ritwik Diwan
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
17.4
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 49 · Econ 12.25
17.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle17.450%8.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50n/a
Scout Score17.4
17.4Middle50% of overs · 0w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp16.438%
Impactp2.325%
Qualityp18.815%
Versatilityp22.712%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.62× par12bp5.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp28.144.1%
Boundary %33%12bp13.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.249× par5bp39.850%
Econ vs LHB1.887× par7bp5.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -20.1 · induced false-shot 8%
Vineet Rawat
Bowler · RA pace · age 28
8.3
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 67 · Econ 16.75
8.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay8.3100%8.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p0.71.4×
Scout Score8.3
8.3Powerplay100% of overs · 0w · 16.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=45
Componentpctweight
Productionp6.138%
Impactp3.327%
Qualityp13.315%
Versatilityp29.810%
Trajectoryp0.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.697× par24bp3.336.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp1042.1%
Boundary %50%24bp3.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.645× par24bp3.330%
Econ vs LHB—0bp47.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov24bp11.120%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp61.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -40.4 · induced false-shot 12%