| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 33 | 9 | 230 | 149 | 154.4 | 28.8 | 18 | 14 | 76.4 Scout Score 76.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production87.140% Impact95.827% Versatility66.415% Shot quality54.26% Trajectory20.812% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.52×[4, 4, 8] | 87.1 Production 87.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.17× parp79.235% True Avg3.07× parp95.830% Balls / boundary3.69p79.217.5% Balls / dismissal48p95.817.5% | 54.2 Shot Quality 54.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.1% Control · Build69.7% Phase-weighted control79.3% | 95.8 Impact 95.8 = WPA percentile · total +66.5 WPA · Powerplay+31.8 WPA · Consolidation+34.7 | 66.4 Versatility 66.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp37.526.7% vs Spin SRp95.826.7% Accel into Consp87.520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 2 | RHB | 35 | 4 | 144 | 83 | 173.5 | 48 | 13 | 8 | 72.5 Scout Score 72.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production67.940% Impact79.227% Versatility61.415% Shot quality87.56% Trajectory79.212% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[28, 16, 81] | 67.9 Production 67.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.16× parp70.835% True Avg1.34× parp70.830% Balls / boundary3.82p62.517.5% Balls / dismissal21p62.517.5% | 87.5 Shot Quality 87.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation92.9% Control · Build68.4% Phase-weighted control83% | 79.2 Impact 79.2 = WPA percentile · total +46 WPA · Powerplay+30.9 WPA · Consolidation+15.2 | 61.4 Versatility 61.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp95.826.7% vs Spin SRp12.526.7% Accel into Consp95.820% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 3 | RHB | 34 | 10 | 337 | 213 | 158.2 | 33.7 | 33 | 16 | 72.1 Scout Score 72.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production79.240% Impact87.527% Versatility50.315% Shot quality62.56% Trajectory45.812% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.95×[65, 2, 41] | 79.2 Production 79.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.28× parp87.535% True Avg1.31× parp79.230% Balls / boundary3.57p87.517.5% Balls / dismissal18.75p54.217.5% | 62.5 Shot Quality 62.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.8% Control · Build76.1% Phase-weighted control80.5% | 87.5 Impact 87.5 = WPA percentile · total +64.3 WPA · Powerplay+49.1 WPA · Consolidation+15.2 | 50.3 Versatility 50.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp87.526.7% vs Spin SRp29.226.7% Accel into Consp29.220% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 4 | LHB | 20 | 7 | 153 | 101 | 151.5 | 30.6 | 16 | 7 | 61.4 Scout Score 61.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production74.440% Impact54.227% Versatility48.115% Shot quality37.56% Trajectory62.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[1, 8, 66] | 74.4 Production 74.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.08× parp62.535% True Avg1.47× parp87.530% Balls / boundary4.11p70.817.5% Balls / dismissal24.67p79.217.5% | 37.5 Shot Quality 37.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation68.8% Control · Build81.8% Phase-weighted control72.1% | 54.2 Impact 54.2 = WPA percentile · total -4.4 WPA · Powerplay-1.4 WPA · Consolidation-3 | 48.1 Versatility 48.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp45.826.7% vs Spin SRp87.526.7% Accel into Consp45.820% Pressure entryp12.526.7% | |
| 5 | RHB | 29 | 8 | 125 | 70 | 178.6 | 15.6 | 11 | 9 | 58.7 Scout Score 58.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production52.340% Impact62.527% Versatility57.515% Shot quality95.86% Trajectory54.212% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.96×[16, 4, 4] | 52.3 Production 52.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.43× parp95.835% True Avg0.64× parp4.230% Balls / boundary2.85p95.817.5% Balls / dismissal8.14p4.217.5% | 95.8 Shot Quality 95.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build60% Phase-weighted control90.5% | 62.5 Impact 62.5 = WPA percentile · total +8.9 WPA · Powerplay+8.7 WPA · Consolidation+0.1 | 57.5 Versatility 57.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp79.226.7% vs Spin SRp70.826.7% Accel into Consp20.820% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | 25 | 11 | 290 | 188 | 154.3 | 36.2 | 20 | 15 | 54.7 Scout Score 54.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production19.840% Impact70.827% Versatility76.415% Shot quality79.26% Trajectory95.812% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.12×[35, 55, 38] | 19.8 Production 19.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.77× parp29.235% True Avg0.35× parp12.530% Balls / boundary6.25p20.817.5% Balls / dismissal8.33p12.517.5% | 79.2 Shot Quality 79.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.5% Control · Build83.3% Phase-weighted control82.8% | 70.8 Impact 70.8 = WPA percentile · total +18.4 WPA · Powerplay-6.5 WPA · Consolidation+25 | 76.4 Versatility 76.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp70.826.7% vs Spin SRp79.226.7% Accel into Consp54.220% Pressure entryp95.826.7% | |
| 7 | LHB | 29 | 11 | 251 | 170 | 147.6 | 27.9 | 28 | 5 | 43.9 Scout Score 43.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production44.840% Impact45.827% Versatility59.215% Shot quality70.86% Trajectory4.212% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.42×[8, 2, 0] | 44.8 Production 44.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.97× parp54.235% True Avg0.77× parp37.530% Balls / boundary4.8p54.217.5% Balls / dismissal14.4p29.217.5% | 70.8 Shot Quality 70.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.2% Control · Build78% Phase-weighted control82.6% | 45.8 Impact 45.8 = WPA percentile · total -4.5 WPA · Powerplay-6.6 WPA · Consolidation+2.1 | 59.2 Versatility 59.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp62.526.7% vs Spin SRp62.526.7% Accel into Consp62.520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 8 | RHB | 32 | 13 | 206 | 157 | 131.2 | 15.8 | 12 | 15 | 38.2 Scout Score 38.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production3440% Impact37.527% Versatility54.715% Shot quality29.26% Trajectory37.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.78×[3, 12, 24] | 34 Production 34 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.97× parp45.835% True Avg0.71× parp20.830% Balls / boundary4.89p45.817.5% Balls / dismissal13.29p20.817.5% | 29.2 Shot Quality 29.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70.4% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control69% | 37.5 Impact 37.5 = WPA percentile · total -11 WPA · Powerplay-7 WPA · Consolidation-4.1 | 54.7 Versatility 54.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp54.226.7% vs Spin SRp4.226.7% Accel into Consp79.220% Pressure entryp87.526.7% | |
| 9 | RHB | 26 | 12 | 211 | 168 | 125.6 | 19.2 | 15 | 11 | 36.6 Scout Score 36.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production33.540% Impact20.827% Versatility29.215% Shot quality45.86% Trajectory87.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.01×[53, 14, 0] | 33.5 Production 33.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.9× parp37.535% True Avg0.76× parp29.230% Balls / boundary5.41p29.217.5% Balls / dismissal15.33p37.517.5% | 45.8 Shot Quality 45.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.1% Control · Build77.8% Phase-weighted control75% | 20.8 Impact 20.8 = WPA percentile · total -15.4 WPA · Powerplay-12.6 WPA · Consolidation-2.9 | 29.2 Versatility 29.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp4.226.7% vs Spin SRp45.826.7% Accel into Consp12.520% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 10 | RHB | 19 | 8 | 165 | 121 | 136.4 | 20.6 | 17 | 9 | 33.1 Scout Score 33.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production39.640% Impact29.227% Versatility47.515% Shot quality12.56% Trajectory12.512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.47×[9, 3, 4] | 39.6 Production 39.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.88× parp12.535% True Avg1× parp54.230% Balls / boundary5.19p37.517.5% Balls / dismissal20.75p70.817.5% | 12.5 Shot Quality 12.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation58.1% Control · Build42.9% Phase-weighted control56.5% | 29.2 Impact 29.2 = WPA percentile · total -11 WPA · Powerplay-16.8 WPA · Consolidation+5.7 | 47.5 Versatility 47.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp20.826.7% vs Spin SRp54.226.7% Accel into Consp70.820% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 11 | RHB | 22 | 3 | 35 | 35 | 100 | 11.7 | 4 | 0 | 27.5 Scout Score 27.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production31.240% Impact4.227% Versatility27.515% Shot quality20.86% Trajectory70.812% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[3, 23, 9] | 31.2 Production 31.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.76× parp20.835% True Avg0.54× parp45.830% Balls / boundary6.5p12.517.5% Balls / dismissal13p45.817.5% | 20.8 Shot Quality 20.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted control66.7% | 4.2 Impact 4.2 = WPA percentile · total -29.2 WPA · Powerplay-19.8 WPA · Consolidation-9.4 | 27.5 Versatility 27.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp29.226.7% vs Spin SRp20.826.7% Accel into Consp4.220% Pressure entryp5026.7% | |
| 12 | LHB | — | 5 | 104 | 89 | 116.9 | 26 | 10 | 4 | 24.9 Scout Score 24.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production36.240% Impact12.527% Versatility21.915% Shot quality4.26% Trajectory29.212% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.75×[5, 5, 27] | 36.2 Production 36.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.56× parp4.235% True Avg1.05× parp62.530% Balls / boundary8.5p4.217.5% Balls / dismissal34p87.517.5% | 4.2 Shot Quality 4.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation53.6% Control · Build51.9% Phase-weighted control53% | 12.5 Impact 12.5 = WPA percentile · total -20.8 WPA · Powerplay-25.4 WPA · Consolidation+4.5 | 21.9 Versatility 21.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp12.526.7% vs Spin SRp37.526.7% Accel into Consp37.520% Pressure entryp4.226.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LHB | 22 | 10 | 253 | 159 | 159.1 | 31.6 | 22 | 12 | 81.8 Scout Score 81.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production82.828% Impact90.627% Versatility82.227% Shot quality28.18% Trajectory96.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.15×[51, 55, 7] | 82.8 Production 82.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.18× parp96.942.9% True Avg1× parp53.132.1% Balls / boundary4.91p96.925% | 28.1 Shot Quality 28.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation69.8% Control · Build74% Phase-weighted control71.7% | 90.6 Impact 90.6 = WPA percentile · total +31 WPA · Consolidation+16.5 WPA · Build+14.5 | 82.2 Versatility 82.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep82.744.4% vs Off-spin20bp70 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball20bp95.5 Spin hittingp83.329.6% Off-spin20bp83.3 LA-orthodox43bp83.3 Leg-spin14bp83.3 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p90.614.8% Reach deathp65.611.1% | |
| 2 | LHB | 23 | 9 | 250 | 182 | 137.4 | 41.7 | 25 | 5 | 72.1 Scout Score 72.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production79.928% Impact71.927% Versatility53.827% Shot quality84.48% Trajectory90.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.13×[19, 53, 40] | 79.9 Production 79.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp71.942.9% True Avg2.27× parp96.932.1% Balls / boundary5.95p71.925% | 84.4 Shot Quality 84.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.8% Control · Build82.9% Phase-weighted control84.7% | 71.9 Impact 71.9 = WPA percentile · total +10.5 WPA · Consolidation+8.9 WPA · Build+1.6 | 53.8 Versatility 53.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep56.444.4% vs Off-spin26bp50 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball14bp68.2 Spin hittingp63.129.6% Off-spin32bp50 LA-orthodox43bp90 Leg-spin21bp27.8 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p28.114.8% Reach deathp53.111.1% | |
| 3 | LHB | 23 | 6 | 151 | 105 | 143.8 | 30.2 | 9 | 10 | 72 Scout Score 72 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production86.628% Impact78.127% Versatility69.727% Shot quality15.68% Trajectory65.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.02×[31, 25, 0] | 86.6 Production 86.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.13× parp90.642.9% True Avg1.24× parp78.132.1% Balls / boundary4.94p90.625% | 15.6 Shot Quality 15.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation68.5% Control · Build76.7% Phase-weighted control71.4% | 78.1 Impact 78.1 = WPA percentile · total +11.8 WPA · Consolidation+12.9 WPA · Build-1.2 | 69.7 Versatility 69.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep9044.4% vs Off-spin14bp90 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball6b6b <min Spin hittingp76.429.6% Off-spin17bp94.4 LA-orthodox20bp96.7 Leg-spin19bp38.9 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p40.614.8% Reach deathp9.411.1% | |
| 4 | RHB | 32 | 8 | 173 | 120 | 144.2 | 28.8 | 19 | 3 | 70.7 Scout Score 70.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production78.328% Impact96.927% Versatility66.727% Shot quality53.18% Trajectory3.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.64×[2, 7, 13] | 78.3 Production 78.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.04× parp84.442.9% True Avg1.11× parp65.632.1% Balls / boundary5.67p84.425% | 53.1 Shot Quality 53.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86.4% Control · Build70.7% Phase-weighted control77.5% | 96.9 Impact 96.9 = WPA percentile · total +51 WPA · Consolidation-0.9 WPA · Build+51.9 | 66.7 Versatility 66.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep68.444.4% vs LA-orthodox33bp72.2 vs Leg-spin15bp70 vs Short ball16bp59.1 Spin hittingp59.529.6% Off-spin7b7b <min LA-orthodox39bp63.3 Leg-spin16bp50 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p71.914.8% Reach deathp71.911.1% | |
| 5 | RHB | 31 | 8 | 189 | 122 | 154.9 | 27 | 13 | 13 | 65.1 Scout Score 65.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production69.428% Impact84.427% Versatility32.327% Shot quality71.98% Trajectory84.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.1×[35, 38, 12] | 69.4 Production 69.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.97× parp53.142.9% True Avg1.39× parp84.432.1% Balls / boundary5.47p78.125% | 71.9 Shot Quality 71.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.5% Control · Build81.8% Phase-weighted control81.7% | 84.4 Impact 84.4 = WPA percentile · total +19.6 WPA · Consolidation+16.6 WPA · Build+3 | 32.3 Versatility 32.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep18.744.4% vs LA-orthodox31bp5.6 vs Leg-spin1b1b <min vs Short ball13bp50 Spin hittingp3.329.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox33bp3.3 Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p96.914.8% Reach deathp78.111.1% | |
| 6 | RHB | 20 | 8 | 191 | 149 | 128.2 | 27.3 | 17 | 7 | 55.5 Scout Score 55.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production71.428% Impact34.427% Versatility74.127% Shot quality34.48% Trajectory34.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.95×[40, 0, 37] | 71.4 Production 71.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.02× parp78.142.9% True Avg1.11× parp71.932.1% Balls / boundary6.5p59.425% | 34.4 Shot Quality 34.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation74.5% Control · Build69.4% Phase-weighted control72.1% | 34.4 Impact 34.4 = WPA percentile · total -17.4 WPA · Consolidation-4.6 WPA · Build-12.8 | 74.1 Versatility 74.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep91.344.4% vs LA-orthodox24bp94.4 vs Leg-spin7b7b <min vs Short ball15bp86.4 Spin hittingp74.329.6% Off-spin31bp72.2 LA-orthodox27bp76.7 Leg-spin7b7b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p46.914.8% Reach deathp40.611.1% | |
| 7 | RHB | 26 | 5 | 67 | 57 | 117.5 | 16.8 | 6 | 2 | 52.4 Scout Score 52.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production41.328% Impact40.627% Versatility64.627% Shot quality65.68% Trajectory71.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[35, 21, 8] | 41.3 Production 41.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.92× parp46.942.9% True Avg0.51× parp34.432.1% Balls / boundary8p40.625% | 65.6 Shot Quality 65.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81% Control · Build81.8% Phase-weighted control81.2% | 40.6 Impact 40.6 = WPA percentile · total -14.2 WPA · Consolidation-15.5 WPA · Build+1.2 | 64.6 Versatility 64.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep83.344.4% vs LA-orthodox14bp83.3 vs Leg-spin2b2b <min vs Short ball4b4b <min Spin hittingp7029.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox16bp70 Leg-spin2b2b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p34.414.8% Reach deathp15.611.1% | |
| 8 | LHB | 19 | 8 | 212 | 155 | 136.8 | 35.3 | 11 | 14 | 50 Scout Score 50 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production73.728% Impact46.927% Versatility38.527% Shot quality59.48% Trajectory15.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.77×[3, 37, 2] | 73.7 Production 73.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.98× parp65.642.9% True Avg1.43× parp90.632.1% Balls / boundary6.53p65.625% | 59.4 Shot Quality 59.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation69.8% Control · Build82.4% Phase-weighted control77.5% | 46.9 Impact 46.9 = WPA percentile · total -10.4 WPA · Consolidation-13.7 WPA · Build+3.3 | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep20.244.4% vs Off-spin12bp30 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball18bp13.6 Spin hittingp35.229.6% Off-spin17bp5.6 LA-orthodox34bp50 Leg-spin0b0b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p84.414.8% Reach deathp59.411.1% | |
| 9 | LHB | 23 | 3 | 66 | 58 | 113.8 | 33 | 10 | 0 | 45.9 Scout Score 45.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production3328% Impact59.427% Versatility53.627% Shot quality3.18% Trajectory59.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[23, 34, 9] | 33 Production 33 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.78× parp40.642.9% True Avg0.24× parp21.932.1% Balls / boundary12p34.425% | 3.1 Shot Quality 3.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation58.3% Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted control58.3% | 59.4 Impact 59.4 = WPA percentile · total -4.6 WPA · Consolidation-4.6 WPA · Build+0 | 53.6 Versatility 53.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin5b5b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp61.129.6% Off-spin19bp61.1 LA-orthodox4b4b <min Leg-spin2b2b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p59.414.8% Reach deathp40.611.1% | |
| 10 | LHB | 24 | 5 | 54 | 51 | 105.9 | 10.8 | 3 | 3 | 41.9 Scout Score 41.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production11.428% Impact65.627% Versatility44.127% Shot quality78.18% Trajectory28.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.86×[0, 29, 0] | 11.4 Production 11.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.66× parp9.442.9% True Avg0.39× parp15.632.1% Balls / boundary11.33p9.425% | 78.1 Shot Quality 78.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation90.9% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control82.4% | 65.6 Impact 65.6 = WPA percentile · total +6.5 WPA · Consolidation+19.6 WPA · Build-13.1 | 44.1 Versatility 44.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin3b3b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp36.729.6% Off-spin6b6b <min LA-orthodox12bp36.7 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p53.114.8% Reach deathp28.111.1% | |
| 11 | RHB | 21 | 8 | 145 | 111 | 130.6 | 24.2 | 14 | 3 | 41.7 Scout Score 41.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production53.828% Impact3.127% Versatility48.927% Shot quality90.68% Trajectory53.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[51, 15, 28] | 53.8 Production 53.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.98× parp59.442.9% True Avg0.96× parp46.932.1% Balls / boundary6.82p53.125% | 90.6 Shot Quality 90.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build89.1% Phase-weighted control86.7% | 3.1 Impact 3.1 = WPA percentile · total -50 WPA · Consolidation-26.6 WPA · Build-23.4 | 48.9 Versatility 48.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep50.644.4% vs LA-orthodox10bp61.1 vs Leg-spin16bp50 vs Short ball10bp40.9 Spin hittingp4929.6% Off-spin13bp38.9 LA-orthodox17bp43.3 Leg-spin19bp61.1 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p78.114.8% Reach deathp3.111.1% | |
| 12 | RHB | 20 | 10 | 234 | 192 | 121.9 | 26 | 14 | 9 | 37.2 Scout Score 37.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production37.728% Impact53.127% Versatility23.527% Shot quality46.98% Trajectory21.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.79×[36, 10, 9] | 37.7 Production 37.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.86× parp34.442.9% True Avg1.03× parp59.432.1% Balls / boundary9.5p15.625% | 46.9 Shot Quality 46.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76% Control · Build76.6% Phase-weighted control76.3% | 53.1 Impact 53.1 = WPA percentile · total -7.6 WPA · Consolidation-12.7 WPA · Build+5 | 23.5 Versatility 23.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep33.244.4% vs LA-orthodox17bp38.9 vs Leg-spin26bp30 vs Short ball11bp31.8 Spin hittingp16.729.6% Off-spin9b9b <min LA-orthodox24bp16.7 Leg-spin28bp16.7 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p9.414.8% Reach deathp21.911.1% | |
| 13 | LHB | 25 | 9 | 271 | 199 | 136.2 | 54.2 | 12 | 13 | 34.9 Scout Score 34.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production23.228% Impact28.127% Versatility33.527% Shot quality96.98% Trajectory40.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.96×[38, 65, 31] | 23.2 Production 23.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp21.942.9% True Avgn/ap40.632.1% Balls / boundary13.11p3.125% | 96.9 Shot Quality 96.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation91.9% Control · Build86.4% Phase-weighted control88.1% | 28.1 Impact 28.1 = WPA percentile · total -27.2 WPA · Consolidation-13.6 WPA · Build-13.7 | 33.5 Versatility 33.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep13.744.4% vs Off-spin27bp10 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball11bp22.7 Spin hittingp48.329.6% Off-spin35bp27.8 LA-orthodox37bp56.7 Leg-spin17bp72.2 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p15.614.8% Reach deathp96.911.1% | |
| 14 | RHB | 24 | 10 | 186 | 137 | 135.8 | 20.7 | 17 | 9 | 32.9 Scout Score 32.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production24.828% Impact15.627% Versatility48.927% Shot quality9.48% Trajectory78.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[27, 0, 44] | 24.8 Production 24.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.85× parp28.142.9% True Avg0.48× parp3.132.1% Balls / boundary7.08p46.925% | 9.4 Shot Quality 9.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation68.3% Control · Build63.6% Phase-weighted control67.1% | 15.6 Impact 15.6 = WPA percentile · total -34.1 WPA · Consolidation-22.3 WPA · Build-11.8 | 48.9 Versatility 48.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep51.244.4% vs LA-orthodox32bp16.7 vs Leg-spin17bp90 vs Short ball17bp77.3 Spin hittingp40.129.6% Off-spin13bp16.7 LA-orthodox40bp23.3 Leg-spin18bp94.4 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p65.614.8% Reach deathp40.611.1% | |
| 15 | RHB | — | 9 | 113 | 98 | 115.3 | 16.1 | 11 | 4 | 23.5 Scout Score 23.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production15.828% Impact21.927% Versatility33.427% Shot quality40.68% Trajectory9.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.65×[11, 3, 19] | 15.8 Production 15.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.68× parp3.142.9% True Avg0.59× parp28.132.1% Balls / boundary9.57p21.925% | 40.6 Shot Quality 40.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build80.6% Phase-weighted control73.1% | 21.9 Impact 21.9 = WPA percentile · total -33.8 WPA · Consolidation-19 WPA · Build-14.8 | 33.4 Versatility 33.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep3344.4% vs LA-orthodox20bp50 vs Leg-spin5b5b <min vs Short ball12bp4.5 Spin hittingp3029.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox20bp30 Leg-spin9b9b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p3.114.8% Reach deathp84.411.1% | |
| 16 | RHB | 21 | 11 | 167 | 134 | 124.6 | 15.2 | 7 | 13 | 20.5 Scout Score 20.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production16.728% Impact9.427% Versatility25.227% Shot quality21.98% Trajectory46.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.98×[8, 13, 17] | 16.7 Production 16.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.77× parp15.642.9% True Avg0.5× parp9.432.1% Balls / boundary9.25p28.125% | 21.9 Shot Quality 21.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70.5% Control · Build73.3% Phase-weighted control71.6% | 9.4 Impact 9.4 = WPA percentile · total -35.4 WPA · Consolidation-15.1 WPA · Build-20.4 | 25.2 Versatility 25.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep21.144.4% vs LA-orthodox30bp27.8 vs Leg-spin18bp10 vs Short ball6b6b <min Spin hittingp8.529.6% Off-spin9b9b <min LA-orthodox43bp10 Leg-spin23bp5.6 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p21.914.8% Reach deathp90.611.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | 33 | 9 | 350 | 184 | 190.2 | 87.5 | 34 | 14 | 82 Scout Score 82 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production90.540% Impact97.625% Versatility65.318% Shot quality78.64% Trajectory5013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.89×[2, 69, 12] | 90.5 Production 90.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.37× parp97.632.5% Balls / boundary2.77p97.620% Balls / six8p97.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 78.6 Shot Quality 78.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build84.5% Phase-weighted control83.9% | 97.6 Impact 97.6 = WPA percentile · total +186.1 WPA · Death+186.1 | 65.3 Versatility 65.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker7b7b <min vs Slower ball15bp50 vs Spin (death)p97.616.7% Reach buildp83.322.2% | |
| 2 | LHB | 22 | 7 | 147 | 72 | 204.2 | 24.5 | 9 | 13 | 73.9 Scout Score 73.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production84.940% Impact92.925% Versatility61.918% Shot quality23.84% Trajectory35.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.82×[28, 0, 12] | 84.9 Production 84.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.26× parp88.132.5% Balls / boundary2.75p92.920% Balls / six5.5p92.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 23.8 Shot Quality 23.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation60% Control · Build67.6% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 92.9 Impact 92.9 = WPA percentile · total +59.1 WPA · Death+59.1 | 61.9 Versatility 61.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker6b6b <min vs Slower ball6b6b <min vs Spin (death)p83.316.7% Reach buildp78.622.2% | |
| 3 | RHB | 23 | 7 | 129 | 83 | 155.4 | 21.5 | 11 | 8 | 71.9 Scout Score 71.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production74.540% Impact73.825% Versatility60.618% Shot quality314% Trajectory88.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.29×[46, 13, 29] | 74.5 Production 74.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.8× parp92.932.5% Balls / boundary2p64.320% Balls / six3.33p73.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 31 Shot Quality 31 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.3% Control · Build60% Phase-weighted control70.7% | 73.8 Impact 73.8 = WPA percentile · total +19.2 WPA · Death+19.2 | 60.6 Versatility 60.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p88.116.7% Reach buildp6922.2% | |
| 4 | LHB | 27 | 9 | 124 | 90 | 137.8 | 15.5 | 9 | 7 | 68.4 Scout Score 68.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production75.240% Impact64.325% Versatility41.918% Shot quality504% Trajectory97.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.37×[24, 38, 23] | 75.2 Production 75.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.16× parp73.832.5% Balls / boundary3.22p83.320% Balls / six7.25p83.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build74.6% Phase-weighted control75.4% | 64.3 Impact 64.3 = WPA percentile · total +13.6 WPA · Death+13.6 | 41.9 Versatility 41.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p52.416.7% Reach buildp11.922.2% | |
| 5 | RHB | 36 | 9 | 291 | 164 | 177.4 | 58.2 | 21 | 15 | 68.2 Scout Score 68.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production59.240% Impact83.325% Versatility64.618% Shot quality92.94% Trajectory64.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.95×[41, 2, 23] | 59.2 Production 59.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.17× parp83.332.5% Balls / boundary3.36p88.120% Balls / six15.67p21.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 92.9 Shot Quality 92.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70% Control · Build93.8% Phase-weighted control89.7% | 83.3 Impact 83.3 = WPA percentile · total +30.7 WPA · Death+30.7 | 64.6 Versatility 64.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball9b9b <min vs Spin (death)p73.816.7% Reach buildp97.622.2% | |
| 6 | RHB | 26 | 10 | 270 | 149 | 181.2 | 45 | 20 | 15 | 66.4 Scout Score 66.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production77.440% Impact6925% Versatility66.718% Shot quality694% Trajectory26.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.78×[11, 52, 9] | 77.4 Production 77.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.11× parp78.632.5% Balls / boundary4p78.620% Balls / six8.67p88.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 69 Shot Quality 69 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation69.2% Control · Build84.5% Phase-weighted control82.5% | 69 Impact 69 = WPA percentile · total +15.1 WPA · Death+15.1 | 66.7 Versatility 66.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker5b5b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p92.916.7% Reach buildp92.922.2% | |
| 7 | RHB | 32 | 4 | 95 | 56 | 169.6 | 95 | 6 | 6 | 55.6 Scout Score 55.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production65.840% Impact45.225% Versatility51.518% Shot quality40.54% Trajectory54.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[2, 8, 36] | 65.8 Production 65.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.12× parp64.332.5% Balls / boundary3.88p59.520% Balls / six7.75p78.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 40.5 Shot Quality 40.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build72% Phase-weighted control72% | 45.2 Impact 45.2 = WPA percentile · total +0.5 WPA · Death+0.5 | 51.5 Versatility 51.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker4b4b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p52.416.7% Reach buildp54.822.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | 20 | 7 | 65 | 42 | 154.8 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 54.9 Scout Score 54.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production5040% Impact88.125% Versatility46.818% Shot quality88.14% Trajectory7.113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.59×[10, 0, 0] | 50 Production 50 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.93× parp45.232.5% Balls / boundary4p5020% Balls / six10p54.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 88.1 Shot Quality 88.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation85.7% Control · Build85.7% Phase-weighted control85.7% | 88.1 Impact 88.1 = WPA percentile · total +40.6 WPA · Death+40.6 | 46.8 Versatility 46.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p11.916.7% Reach buildp64.322.2% | |
| 9 | RHB | 31 | 7 | 168 | 103 | 163.1 | 33.6 | 12 | 11 | 53.9 Scout Score 53.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production40.240% Impact59.525% Versatility55.318% Shot quality54.84% Trajectory83.313% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.12×[50, 52, 0] | 40.2 Production 40.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.75× parp16.732.5% Balls / boundary5.67p35.720% Balls / six8.5p61.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 54.8 Shot Quality 54.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation90.9% Control · Build70.5% Phase-weighted control75.9% | 59.5 Impact 59.5 = WPA percentile · total +4.3 WPA · Death+4.3 | 55.3 Versatility 55.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p3116.7% Reach buildp88.122.2% | |
| 10 | RHB | 35 | 9 | 153 | 105 | 145.7 | 38.2 | 12 | 8 | 46.7 Scout Score 46.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production56.940% Impact16.725% Versatility39.718% Shot quality59.54% Trajectory78.613% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[1, 53, 30] | 56.9 Production 56.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.95× parp40.532.5% Balls / boundary4.19p6920% Balls / six11.17p6932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 59.5 Shot Quality 59.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Build77.8% Phase-weighted control76.3% | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = WPA percentile · total -7.8 WPA · Death-7.8 | 39.7 Versatility 39.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball9b9b <min vs Spin (death)p26.216.7% Reach buildp21.422.2% | |
| 11 | RHB | 27 | 5 | 28 | 40 | 70 | 5.6 | 1 | 1 | 46.2 Scout Score 46.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production43.540% Impact40.525% Versatility39.818% Shot quality64.34% Trajectory6913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[12, 7, 0] | 43.5 Production 43.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SRn/ap54.832.5% Balls / boundaryn/ap40.520% Balls / sixn/ap3132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 64.3 Shot Quality 64.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation77.8% Control · Build80.6% Phase-weighted control80% | 40.5 Impact 40.5 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 39.8 Versatility 39.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p52.416.7% Reach buildp2.422.2% | |
| 12 | RHB | 29 | 7 | 70 | 61 | 114.8 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 45.9 Scout Score 45.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production22.340% Impact78.625% Versatility34.918% Shot quality83.34% Trajectory59.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[18, 9, 14] | 22.3 Production 22.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.81× parp26.232.5% Balls / boundary6.67p11.920% Balls / six20p11.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 83.3 Shot Quality 83.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build85.4% Phase-weighted control85.4% | 78.6 Impact 78.6 = WPA percentile · total +20.8 WPA · Death+20.8 | 34.9 Versatility 34.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball6b6b <min vs Spin (death)p16.716.7% Reach buildp7.122.2% | |
| 13 | RHB | 27 | 4 | 78 | 56 | 139.3 | 39 | 9 | 2 | 42.9 Scout Score 42.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production33.640% Impact54.825% Versatility50.418% Shot quality35.74% Trajectory40.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.86×[0, 31, 0] | 33.6 Production 33.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.87× parp35.732.5% Balls / boundary4.5p45.220% Balls / six18p16.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 35.7 Shot Quality 35.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation0% Control · Build73% Phase-weighted control71.1% | 54.8 Impact 54.8 = WPA percentile · total +4.2 WPA · Death+4.2 | 50.4 Versatility 50.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p52.416.7% Reach buildp5022.2% | |
| 14 | RHB | 24 | 4 | 44 | 38 | 115.8 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 40.6 Scout Score 40.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production1240% Impact5025% Versatility46.218% Shot quality73.84% Trajectory92.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.35×[6, 19, 0] | 12 Production 12 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.71× parp7.132.5% Balls / boundary6.4p7.120% Balls / six64p2.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 73.8 Shot Quality 73.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build83.3% Phase-weighted control83.3% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +3.2 WPA · Death+3.2 | 46.2 Versatility 46.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p52.416.7% Reach buildp3122.2% | |
| 15 | RHB | 25 | 4 | 21 | 23 | 91.3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 40.1 Scout Score 40.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production44.340% Impact35.725% Versatility37.818% Shot quality97.64% Trajectory21.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.73×[8, 1, 3] | 44.3 Production 44.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp5032.5% Balls / boundary7p21.420% Balls / six7p5032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 97.6 Shot Quality 97.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build91.7% Phase-weighted control91.7% | 35.7 Impact 35.7 = WPA percentile · total -0 WPA · Death-0 | 37.8 Versatility 37.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p21.416.7% Reach buildp16.722.2% | |
| 16 | RHB | 33 | 6 | 59 | 34 | 173.5 | 11.8 | 7 | 3 | 39.4 Scout Score 39.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production64.840% Impact7.125% Versatility53.718% Shot quality11.94% Trajectory11.913% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.62×[1, 1, 11] | 64.8 Production 64.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.23× parp6932.5% Balls / boundary2.83p73.820% Balls / six8.5p61.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 11.9 Shot Quality 11.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build58.8% Phase-weighted control58.8% | 7.1 Impact 7.1 = WPA percentile · total -16.4 WPA · Death-16.4 | 53.7 Versatility 53.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p78.616.7% Reach buildp45.222.2% | |
| 17 | RHB | 22 | 4 | 46 | 34 | 135.3 | 15.3 | 4 | 2 | 33.8 Scout Score 33.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production18.940% Impact21.425% Versatility52.518% Shot quality45.24% Trajectory73.813% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[24, 3, 9] | 18.9 Production 18.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.76× parp11.932.5% Balls / boundary5.75p26.220% Balls / six23p7.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 45.2 Shot Quality 45.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation0% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control72.7% | 21.4 Impact 21.4 = WPA percentile · total -5.5 WPA · Death-5.5 | 52.5 Versatility 52.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p52.416.7% Reach buildp59.522.2% | |
| 18 | RHB | 24 | 9 | 130 | 91 | 142.9 | 14.4 | 20 | 4 | 33.3 Scout Score 33.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production35.440% Impact26.225% Versatility47.218% Shot quality2.44% Trajectory3113% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.78×[4, 5, 10] | 35.4 Production 35.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.43× parp3132.5% Balls / boundary8p3120% Balls / six8p35.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 2.4 Shot Quality 2.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation42.9% Control · Build50% Phase-weighted control44.4% | 26.2 Impact 26.2 = WPA percentile · total -3.6 WPA · Death-3.6 | 47.2 Versatility 47.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p52.416.7% Reach buildp35.722.2% | |
| 19 | RHB | 26 | 5 | 69 | 49 | 140.8 | 13.8 | 8 | 1 | 30.3 Scout Score 30.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production26.340% Impact11.925% Versatility55.718% Shot quality23.84% Trajectory45.213% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.88×[31, 2, 8] | 26.3 Production 26.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.58× parp21.432.5% Balls / boundary8p16.720% Balls / six16p26.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 23.8 Shot Quality 23.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation60% Control · Build68.4% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 11.9 Impact 11.9 = WPA percentile · total -9.2 WPA · Death-9.2 | 55.7 Versatility 55.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball9b9b <min vs Spin (death)p52.416.7% Reach buildp73.822.2% | |
| 20 | RHB | 20 | 5 | 44 | 29 | 151.7 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 30.2 Scout Score 30.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production5140% Impact2.425% Versatility37.618% Shot quality7.14% Trajectory16.713% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.66×[2, 1, 1] | 51 Production 51 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1× parp59.532.5% Balls / boundary4.17p54.820% Balls / six12.5p40.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 7.1 Shot Quality 7.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build50% Phase-weighted control50% | 2.4 Impact 2.4 = WPA percentile · total -20.3 WPA · Death-20.3 | 37.6 Versatility 37.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball8b8b <min vs Spin (death)p7.116.7% Reach buildp26.222.2% | |
| 21 | RHB | 23 | 11 | 118 | 85 | 138.8 | 16.9 | 4 | 7 | 25.3 Scout Score 25.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production23.540% Impact3125% Versatility39.918% Shot quality16.74% Trajectory2.413% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.17×[0, 1, 2] | 23.5 Production 23.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.71× parp2.432.5% Balls / boundary12p2.420% Balls / six12p45.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 16.7 Shot Quality 16.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation52% Control · Build79.2% Phase-weighted control65.3% | 31 Impact 31 = WPA percentile · total -3 WPA · Death-3 | 39.9 Versatility 39.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball9b9b <min vs Spin (death)p2.416.7% Reach buildp40.522.2% |
Praveen Dubey
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 33
82
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 350 · Balls 184 · SR 190.2 · Avg 87.5 · 4s 34 · 6s 14
82OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production90.540%36.2
Impact *97.625%24.4
Versatility65.318%11.8
Shot quality78.64%3.1
Trajectory5013%6.5
Scout Score82
90.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR236.11.37×72bp97.632.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—72bp97.620%
Balls / six8—72bp97.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
97.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +186.1
WPA · Death+186.1
65.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker129 SR7b7b <min
vs Slower ball247 SR15bp50
vs Spin (death)233.3 SR1.32×21bp97.616.7%
Reach build162.9 SR1.11×97bp83.322.2%
78.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build84.5%
Phase-weighted control83.9% → p78.6
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.89×
Recent scores[2, 69, 12]
Innings9
Thippa Reddy
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 22
81.8
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 253 · Balls 159 · SR 159.1 · Avg 31.6 · 4s 22 · 6s 12
81.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production82.828%23.2
Impact *90.627%24.5
Versatility82.227%22.2
Shot quality28.18%2.2
Trajectory96.910%9.7
Scout Score81.8
82.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR164.61.18×113bp96.942.9%
True Avg26.61×7wp53.132.1%
Balls / boundary4.9—113bp96.925%
90.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +31
WPA · Consolidation+16.5
WPA · Build+14.5
82.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p82.744.4%
vs Off-spin140 SR20bp70
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball190 SR20bp95.5
Spin hitting———p83.329.6%
Off-spin140 SR20bp83.3
LA-orthodox140 SR43bp83.3
Leg-spin171 SR14bp83.3
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)184.1 SR1.27×44bp90.614.8%
Reach death172.7 SR1×11bp65.611.1%
28.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation69.8%
Control · Build74%
Phase-weighted control71.7% → p28.1
96.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.15×
Recent scores[51, 55, 7]
Innings10
Rithesh Bhatkal
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 33
76.4
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 230 · Balls 149 · SR 154.4 · Avg 28.8 · 4s 18 · 6s 14
76.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production87.140%34.8
Impact *95.827%25.9
Versatility66.415%10.0
Shot quality54.26%3.3
Trajectory20.812%2.5
Scout Score76.4
87.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR164.61.17×48bp79.235%
True Avg793.07×1wp95.830%
Balls / boundary3.7—48bp79.217.5%
Balls / dismissal48—1wp95.817.5%
95.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +66.5
WPA · Powerplay+31.8
WPA · Consolidation+34.7
66.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR134.2 SR0.9×73bp37.526.7%
vs Spin SR173.7 SR1.26×76bp95.826.7%
Accel into Cons155.4 SR—56bp87.520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
54.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.1%
Control · Build69.7%
Phase-weighted control79.3% → p54.2
20.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.52×
Recent scores[4, 4, 8]
Innings9
L Manvanth Kumar
Finisher · pos 8 · LHB · age 22
73.9
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 147 · Balls 72 · SR 204.2 · Avg 24.5 · 4s 9 · 6s 13
73.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production84.940%34.0
Impact *92.925%23.2
Versatility61.918%11.1
Shot quality23.84%1.0
Trajectory35.713%4.6
Scout Score73.9
84.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR218.21.26×33bp88.132.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—33bp92.920%
Balls / six5.5—33bp92.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
92.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +59.1
WPA · Death+59.1
61.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker167 SR6b6b <min
vs Slower ball183 SR6b6b <min
vs Spin (death)275 SR1.55×4bp83.316.7%
Reach build182.4 SR1.25×34bp78.622.2%
23.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation60%
Control · Build67.6%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p23.8
35.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.82×
Recent scores[28, 0, 12]
Innings7
Mayank Agarwal
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 35
72.5
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 144 · Balls 83 · SR 173.5 · Avg 48 · 4s 13 · 6s 8
72.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production67.940%27.2
Impact *79.227%21.4
Versatility61.415%9.2
Shot quality87.56%5.2
Trajectory79.212%9.5
Scout Score72.5
67.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR164.31.16×42bp70.835%
True Avg34.51.34×2wp70.830%
Balls / boundary3.8—42bp62.517.5%
Balls / dismissal21—2wp62.517.5%
79.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +46
WPA · Powerplay+30.9
WPA · Consolidation+15.2
61.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR207.1 SR1.38×56bp95.826.7%
vs Spin SR103.7 SR0.75×27bp12.526.7%
Accel into Cons214.3 SR—14bp95.820%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
87.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation92.9%
Control · Build68.4%
Phase-weighted control83% → p87.5
79.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[28, 16, 81]
Innings4
Karun Nair
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 34
72.1
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 337 · Balls 213 · SR 158.2 · Avg 33.7 · 4s 33 · 6s 16
72.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production79.240%31.7
Impact *87.527%23.6
Versatility50.315%7.5
Shot quality62.56%3.8
Trajectory45.812%5.5
Scout Score72.1
79.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1801.28×75bp87.535%
True Avg33.81.31×4wp79.230%
Balls / boundary3.6—75bp87.517.5%
Balls / dismissal18.8—4wp54.217.5%
87.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +64.3
WPA · Powerplay+49.1
WPA · Consolidation+15.2
50.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR176.4 SR1.18×140bp87.526.7%
vs Spin SR123.3 SR0.9×73bp29.226.7%
Accel into Cons126.6 SR—64bp29.220%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
62.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.8%
Control · Build76.1%
Phase-weighted control80.5% → p62.5
45.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.95×
Recent scores[65, 2, 41]
Innings10
Ravichandran Smaran
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 23
72.1
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 250 · Balls 182 · SR 137.4 · Avg 41.7 · 4s 25 · 6s 5
72.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production79.928%22.4
Impact *71.927%19.4
Versatility53.827%14.5
Shot quality84.48%6.8
Trajectory90.610%9.1
Scout Score72.1
79.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR138.20.99×131bp71.942.9%
True Avg60.32.27×3wp96.932.1%
Balls / boundary6—131bp71.925%
71.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +10.5
WPA · Consolidation+8.9
WPA · Build+1.6
53.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p56.444.4%
vs Off-spin131 SR26bp50
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball171 SR14bp68.2
Spin hitting———p63.129.6%
Off-spin122 SR32bp50
LA-orthodox156 SR43bp90
Leg-spin148 SR21bp27.8
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)125 SR0.87×48bp28.114.8%
Reach death161.3 SR0.93×31bp53.111.1%
84.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.8%
Control · Build82.9%
Phase-weighted control84.7% → p84.4
90.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.13×
Recent scores[19, 53, 40]
Innings9
Aneeshwar Gautam
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 23
72
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 151 · Balls 105 · SR 143.8 · Avg 30.2 · 4s 9 · 6s 10
72OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production86.628%24.2
Impact *78.127%21.1
Versatility69.727%18.8
Shot quality15.68%1.2
Trajectory65.610%6.6
Scout Score72
86.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR157.11.13×84bp90.642.9%
True Avg331.24×4wp78.132.1%
Balls / boundary4.9—84bp90.625%
78.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +11.8
WPA · Consolidation+12.9
WPA · Build-1.2
69.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p9044.4%
vs Off-spin179 SR14bp90
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball133 SR6b6b <min
Spin hitting———p76.429.6%
Off-spin159 SR17bp94.4
LA-orthodox190 SR20bp96.7
Leg-spin153 SR19bp38.9
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)129 SR0.89×31bp40.614.8%
Reach death114.3 SR0.66×7bp9.411.1%
15.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation68.5%
Control · Build76.7%
Phase-weighted control71.4% → p15.6
65.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.02×
Recent scores[31, 25, 0]
Innings6
Wahid Faizan Khan
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 23
71.9
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 129 · Balls 83 · SR 155.4 · Avg 21.5 · 4s 11 · 6s 8
71.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production74.540%29.8
Impact *73.825%18.4
Versatility60.618%10.9
Shot quality314%1.2
Trajectory88.113%11.5
Scout Score71.9
74.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR3101.8×10bp92.932.5%
Balls / boundary2—10bp64.320%
Balls / six3.3—10bp73.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
73.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +19.2
WPA · Death+19.2
60.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)600 SR3.39×1bp88.116.7%
Reach build175 SR1.2×20bp6922.2%
31Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.3%
Control · Build60%
Phase-weighted control70.7% → p31
88.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.29×
Recent scores[46, 13, 29]
Innings7
Shreyas Gopal
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 32
70.7
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 173 · Balls 120 · SR 144.2 · Avg 28.8 · 4s 19 · 6s 3
70.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production78.328%21.9
Impact *96.927%26.2
Versatility66.727%18.0
Shot quality53.18%4.2
Trajectory3.110%0.3
Scout Score70.7
78.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR144.11.04×102bp84.442.9%
True Avg29.41.11×5wp65.632.1%
Balls / boundary5.7—102bp84.425%
96.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +51
WPA · Consolidation-0.9
WPA · Build+51.9
66.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p68.444.4%
vs LA-orthodox130 SR33bp72.2
vs Leg-spin160 SR15bp70
vs Short ball162 SR16bp59.1
Spin hitting———p59.529.6%
Off-spin186 SR7b7b <min
LA-orthodox128 SR39bp63.3
Leg-spin156 SR16bp50
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)146.5 SR1.01×43bp71.914.8%
Reach death173.3 SR1×15bp71.911.1%
53.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86.4%
Control · Build70.7%
Phase-weighted control77.5% → p53.1
3.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.64×
Recent scores[2, 7, 13]
Innings8
Manoj Bhandage
Finisher · pos 7 · LHB · age 27
68.4
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 124 · Balls 90 · SR 137.8 · Avg 15.5 · 4s 9 · 6s 7
68.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production75.240%30.1
Impact *64.325%16.1
Versatility41.918%7.5
Shot quality504%2.0
Trajectory97.613%12.7
Scout Score68.4
75.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2001.16×29bp73.832.5%
Balls / boundary3.2—29bp83.320%
Balls / six7.2—29bp83.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
64.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +13.6
WPA · Death+13.6
41.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker50 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball175 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.416.7%
Reach build110.2 SR0.75×59bp11.922.2%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build74.6%
Phase-weighted control75.4% → p50
97.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.37×
Recent scores[24, 38, 23]
Innings9
Manish Pandey
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 36
68.2
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 291 · Balls 164 · SR 177.4 · Avg 58.2 · 4s 21 · 6s 15
68.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production59.240%23.7
Impact *83.325%20.8
Versatility64.618%11.6
Shot quality92.94%3.7
Trajectory64.313%8.4
Scout Score68.2
59.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR202.11.17×47bp83.332.5%
Balls / boundary3.4—47bp88.120%
Balls / six15.7—47bp21.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
83.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +30.7
WPA · Death+30.7
64.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker67 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball278 SR9b9b <min
vs Spin (death)185.7 SR1.05×7bp73.816.7%
Reach build181.4 SR1.24×97bp97.622.2%
92.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70%
Control · Build93.8%
Phase-weighted control89.7% → p92.9
64.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.95×
Recent scores[41, 2, 23]
Innings9
Suraj Ahuja
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 26
66.4
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 270 · Balls 149 · SR 181.2 · Avg 45 · 4s 20 · 6s 15
66.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production77.440%31.0
Impact *6925%17.2
Versatility66.718%12.0
Shot quality694%2.8
Trajectory26.213%3.4
Scout Score66.4
77.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR192.31.11×52bp78.632.5%
Balls / boundary4—52bp78.620%
Balls / six8.7—52bp88.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
69Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +15.1
WPA · Death+15.1
66.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker40 SR5b5b <min
vs Slower ball250 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)266.7 SR1.51×6bp92.916.7%
Reach build179.8 SR1.23×84bp92.922.2%
69Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation69.2%
Control · Build84.5%
Phase-weighted control82.5% → p69
26.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.78×
Recent scores[11, 52, 9]
Innings10
Abhinav Manohar
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 31
65.1
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 189 · Balls 122 · SR 154.9 · Avg 27 · 4s 13 · 6s 13
65.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production69.428%19.4
Impact *84.427%22.8
Versatility32.327%8.7
Shot quality71.98%5.8
Trajectory84.410%8.4
Scout Score65.1
69.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR135.40.97×82bp53.142.9%
True Avg371.39×3wp84.432.1%
Balls / boundary5.5—82bp78.125%
84.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +19.6
WPA · Consolidation+16.6
WPA · Build+3
32.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p18.744.4%
vs LA-orthodox65 SR31bp5.6
vs Leg-spin100 SR1b1b <min
vs Short ball162 SR13bp50
Spin hitting———p3.329.6%
Off-spin50 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox64 SR33bp3.3
Leg-spin200 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)195.2 SR1.35×42bp96.914.8%
Reach death182.8 SR1.06×29bp78.111.1%
71.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.5%
Control · Build81.8%
Phase-weighted control81.7% → p71.9
84.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.1×
Recent scores[35, 38, 12]
Innings8
Hardik Raj
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 20
61.4
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 153 · Balls 101 · SR 151.5 · Avg 30.6 · 4s 16 · 6s 7
61.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production74.440%29.8
Impact *54.227%14.6
Versatility48.115%7.2
Shot quality37.56%2.2
Trajectory62.512%7.5
Scout Score61.4
74.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR152.71.08×74bp62.535%
True Avg37.71.47×3wp87.530%
Balls / boundary4.1—74bp70.817.5%
Balls / dismissal24.7—3wp79.217.5%
54.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.4
WPA · Powerplay-1.4
WPA · Consolidation-3
48.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR134.4 SR0.9×61bp45.826.7%
vs Spin SR177.5 SR1.29×40bp87.526.7%
Accel into Cons143.8 SR—16bp45.820%
Pressure entry50 SR0.35×4bp12.526.7%
37.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation68.8%
Control · Build81.8%
Phase-weighted control72.1% → p37.5
62.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[1, 8, 66]
Innings7
BR Sharath
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 29
58.7
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 125 · Balls 70 · SR 178.6 · Avg 15.6 · 4s 11 · 6s 9
58.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production52.340%20.9
Impact *62.527%16.9
Versatility57.515%8.6
Shot quality95.86%5.7
Trajectory54.212%6.5
Scout Score58.7
52.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR201.81.43×57bp95.835%
True Avg16.40.64×7wp4.230%
Balls / boundary2.9—57bp95.817.5%
Balls / dismissal8.1—7wp4.217.5%
62.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +8.9
WPA · Powerplay+8.7
WPA · Consolidation+0.1
57.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR185 SR1.23×40bp79.226.7%
vs Spin SR170 SR1.23×30bp70.826.7%
Accel into Cons87.5 SR—8bp20.820%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
95.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build60%
Phase-weighted control90.5% → p95.8
54.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.96×
Recent scores[16, 4, 4]
Innings8
CA Karthik
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 32
55.6
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 95 · Balls 56 · SR 169.6 · Avg 95 · 4s 6 · 6s 6
55.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production65.840%26.3
Impact *45.225%11.3
Versatility51.518%9.3
Shot quality40.54%1.6
Trajectory54.813%7.1
Scout Score55.6
65.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR193.51.12×31bp64.332.5%
Balls / boundary3.9—31bp59.520%
Balls / six7.8—31bp78.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
45.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0.5
WPA · Death+0.5
51.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker175 SR4b4b <min
vs Slower ball325 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.416.7%
Reach build140 SR0.96×25bp54.822.2%
40.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build72%
Phase-weighted control72% → p40.5
54.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[2, 8, 36]
Innings4
Samit Dravid
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 20
55.5
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 191 · Balls 149 · SR 128.2 · Avg 27.3 · 4s 17 · 6s 7
55.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production71.428%20.0
Impact *34.427%9.3
Versatility74.127%20.0
Shot quality34.48%2.8
Trajectory34.410%3.4
Scout Score55.5
71.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR142.31.02×104bp78.142.9%
True Avg29.61.11×5wp71.932.1%
Balls / boundary6.5—104bp59.425%
34.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -17.4
WPA · Consolidation-4.6
WPA · Build-12.8
74.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p91.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox150 SR24bp94.4
vs Leg-spin171 SR7b7b <min
vs Short ball180 SR15bp86.4
Spin hitting———p74.329.6%
Off-spin139 SR31bp72.2
LA-orthodox137 SR27bp76.7
Leg-spin171 SR7b7b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)131.1 SR0.91×45bp46.914.8%
Reach death——0bp40.611.1%
34.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation74.5%
Control · Build69.4%
Phase-weighted control72.1% → p34.4
34.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.95×
Recent scores[40, 0, 37]
Innings8
Dheeraj J Gowda
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 20
54.9
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 65 · Balls 42 · SR 154.8 · Avg 13 · 4s 6 · 6s 3
54.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production5040%20.0
Impact *88.125%22.0
Versatility46.818%8.4
Shot quality88.14%3.5
Trajectory7.113%0.9
Scout Score54.9
50ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1600.93×20bp45.232.5%
Balls / boundary4—20bp5020%
Balls / six10—20bp54.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
88.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +40.6
WPA · Death+40.6
46.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball67 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)00×1bp11.916.7%
Reach build200 SR1.37×7bp64.322.2%
88.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation85.7%
Control · Build85.7%
Phase-weighted control85.7% → p88.1
7.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.59×
Recent scores[10, 0, 0]
Innings7
Aneesh K V
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 25
54.7
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 290 · Balls 188 · SR 154.3 · Avg 36.2 · 4s 20 · 6s 15
54.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production19.840%7.9
Impact *70.827%19.1
Versatility76.415%11.5
Shot quality79.26%4.8
Trajectory95.812%11.5
Scout Score54.7
19.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1080.77×25bp29.235%
True Avg90.35×3wp12.530%
Balls / boundary6.2—25bp20.817.5%
Balls / dismissal8.3—3wp12.517.5%
70.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +18.4
WPA · Powerplay-6.5
WPA · Consolidation+25
76.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR151.6 SR1.01×91bp70.826.7%
vs Spin SR156.7 SR1.14×97bp79.226.7%
Accel into Cons142.1 SR—57bp54.220%
Pressure entry142 SR1.01×100bp95.826.7%
79.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.5%
Control · Build83.3%
Phase-weighted control82.8% → p79.2
95.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.12×
Recent scores[35, 55, 38]
Innings11
Shivkumar Rakshith
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 31
53.9
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 168 · Balls 103 · SR 163.1 · Avg 33.6 · 4s 12 · 6s 11
53.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production40.240%16.1
Impact *59.525%14.9
Versatility55.318%10.0
Shot quality54.84%2.2
Trajectory83.313%10.8
Scout Score53.9
40.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR129.40.75×17bp16.732.5%
Balls / boundary5.7—17bp35.720%
Balls / six8.5—17bp61.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
59.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +4.3
WPA · Death+4.3
55.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker33 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)175 SR0.99×4bp3116.7%
Reach build178.7 SR1.22×61bp88.122.2%
54.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation90.9%
Control · Build70.5%
Phase-weighted control75.9% → p54.8
83.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.12×
Recent scores[50, 52, 0]
Innings7
Prajwal Pavan
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 26
52.4
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 67 · Balls 57 · SR 117.5 · Avg 16.8 · 4s 6 · 6s 2
52.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production41.328%11.6
Impact *40.627%11.0
Versatility64.627%17.4
Shot quality65.68%5.2
Trajectory71.910%7.2
Scout Score52.4
41.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR128.10.92×32bp46.942.9%
True Avg13.70.51×3wp34.432.1%
Balls / boundary8—32bp40.625%
40.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -14.2
WPA · Consolidation-15.5
WPA · Build+1.2
64.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p83.344.4%
vs LA-orthodox143 SR14bp83.3
vs Leg-spin100 SR2b2b <min
vs Short ball125 SR4b4b <min
Spin hitting———p7029.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox131 SR16bp70
Leg-spin100 SR2b2b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)118.8 SR0.82×16bp34.414.8%
Reach death100 SR0.58×3bp15.611.1%
65.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81%
Control · Build81.8%
Phase-weighted control81.2% → p65.6
71.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[35, 21, 8]
Innings5
Siddharth Akhil
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 19
50
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 212 · Balls 155 · SR 136.8 · Avg 35.3 · 4s 11 · 6s 14
50OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production73.728%20.6
Impact *46.927%12.7
Versatility38.527%10.4
Shot quality59.48%4.8
Trajectory15.610%1.6
Scout Score50
73.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR136.90.98×111bp65.642.9%
True Avg381.43×4wp90.632.1%
Balls / boundary6.5—111bp65.625%
46.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -10.4
WPA · Consolidation-13.7
WPA · Build+3.3
38.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p20.244.4%
vs Off-spin117 SR12bp30
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball89 SR18bp13.6
Spin hitting———p35.229.6%
Off-spin88 SR17bp5.6
LA-orthodox100 SR34bp50
Leg-spin—0b0b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)160 SR1.11×65bp84.414.8%
Reach death161.9 SR0.94×21bp59.411.1%
59.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation69.8%
Control · Build82.4%
Phase-weighted control77.5% → p59.4
15.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.77×
Recent scores[3, 37, 2]
Innings8
Melu Kranthi Kumar
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 35
46.7
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 153 · Balls 105 · SR 145.7 · Avg 38.2 · 4s 12 · 6s 8
46.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production56.940%22.8
Impact *16.725%4.2
Versatility39.718%7.1
Shot quality59.54%2.4
Trajectory78.613%10.2
Scout Score46.7
56.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR164.20.95×67bp40.532.5%
Balls / boundary4.2—67bp6920%
Balls / six11.2—67bp6932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
16.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -7.8
WPA · Death-7.8
39.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker33 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball122 SR9b9b <min
vs Spin (death)177.8 SR1×9bp26.216.7%
Reach build116.7 SR0.8×36bp21.422.2%
59.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Build77.8%
Phase-weighted control76.3% → p59.5
78.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[1, 53, 30]
Innings9
Sagar Gowtham
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 27
46.2
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 28 · Balls 40 · SR 70 · Avg 5.6 · 4s 1 · 6s 1
46.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production43.540%17.4
Impact *40.525%10.1
Versatility39.818%7.2
Shot quality64.34%2.6
Trajectory6913%9.0
Scout Score46.2
43.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR——0bp54.832.5%
Balls / boundary——0bp40.520%
Balls / six——0bp3132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
40.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
39.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.416.7%
Reach build74.2 SR0.51×31bp2.422.2%
64.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation77.8%
Control · Build80.6%
Phase-weighted control80% → p64.3
69Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[12, 7, 0]
Innings5
Kruthik Krishna
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 23
45.9
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 66 · Balls 58 · SR 113.8 · Avg 33 · 4s 10 · 6s 0
45.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production3328%9.2
Impact *59.427%16.0
Versatility53.627%14.5
Shot quality3.18%0.2
Trajectory59.410%5.9
Scout Score45.9
33ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR108.30.78×12bp40.642.9%
True Avg6.50.24×2wp21.932.1%
Balls / boundary12—12bp34.425%
59.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.6
WPA · Consolidation-4.6
WPA · Build+0
53.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin120 SR5b5b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball100 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p61.129.6%
Off-spin137 SR19bp61.1
LA-orthodox50 SR4b4b <min
Leg-spin50 SR2b2b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)150 SR1.04×4bp59.414.8%
Reach death——0bp40.611.1%
3.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation58.3%
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted control58.3% → p3.1
59.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[23, 34, 9]
Innings3
Vyshak VijayKumar
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 29
45.9
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 70 · Balls 61 · SR 114.8 · Avg 14 · 4s 5 · 6s 1
45.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production22.340%8.9
Impact *78.625%19.6
Versatility34.918%6.3
Shot quality83.34%3.3
Trajectory59.513%7.7
Scout Score45.9
22.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1400.81×20bp26.232.5%
Balls / boundary6.7—20bp11.920%
Balls / six20—20bp11.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
78.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +20.8
WPA · Death+20.8
34.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball200 SR6b6b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.56×2bp16.716.7%
Reach build102.4 SR0.7×41bp7.122.2%
83.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build85.4%
Phase-weighted control85.4% → p83.3
59.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[18, 9, 14]
Innings7
KL Shrijith
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 29
43.9
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 251 · Balls 170 · SR 147.6 · Avg 27.9 · 4s 28 · 6s 5
43.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production44.840%17.9
Impact *45.827%12.4
Versatility59.215%8.9
Shot quality70.86%4.2
Trajectory4.212%0.5
Scout Score43.9
44.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR137.50.97×72bp54.235%
True Avg19.80.77×5wp37.530%
Balls / boundary4.8—72bp54.217.5%
Balls / dismissal14.4—5wp29.217.5%
45.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.5
WPA · Powerplay-6.6
WPA · Consolidation+2.1
59.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR146.9 SR0.98×81bp62.526.7%
vs Spin SR148.3 SR1.08×89bp62.526.7%
Accel into Cons143.9 SR—57bp62.520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
70.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.2%
Control · Build78%
Phase-weighted control82.6% → p70.8
4.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.42×
Recent scores[8, 2, 0]
Innings11
Sujay Sateri
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 27
42.9
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 78 · Balls 56 · SR 139.3 · Avg 39 · 4s 9 · 6s 2
42.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production33.640%13.4
Impact *54.825%13.7
Versatility50.418%9.1
Shot quality35.74%1.4
Trajectory40.513%5.3
Scout Score42.9
33.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1500.87×18bp35.732.5%
Balls / boundary4.5—18bp45.220%
Balls / six18—18bp16.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
54.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +4.2
WPA · Death+4.2
50.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball233 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.416.7%
Reach build137.8 SR0.94×37bp5022.2%
35.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation0%
Control · Build73%
Phase-weighted control71.1% → p35.7
40.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.86×
Recent scores[0, 31, 0]
Innings4
Lankesh
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 24
41.9
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 54 · Balls 51 · SR 105.9 · Avg 10.8 · 4s 3 · 6s 3
41.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production11.428%3.2
Impact *65.627%17.7
Versatility44.127%11.9
Shot quality78.18%6.2
Trajectory28.110%2.8
Scout Score41.9
11.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR91.20.66×34bp9.442.9%
True Avg10.30.39×3wp15.632.1%
Balls / boundary11.3—34bp9.425%
65.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +6.5
WPA · Consolidation+19.6
WPA · Build-13.1
44.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin67 SR3b3b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball67 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p36.729.6%
Off-spin83 SR6b6b <min
LA-orthodox92 SR12bp36.7
Leg-spin0 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)130.8 SR0.91×13bp53.114.8%
Reach death144.4 SR0.84×9bp28.111.1%
78.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation90.9%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control82.4% → p78.1
28.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.86×
Recent scores[0, 29, 0]
Innings5
Dhruv Prabhakar
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 21
41.7
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 145 · Balls 111 · SR 130.6 · Avg 24.2 · 4s 14 · 6s 3
41.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production53.828%15.1
Impact *3.127%0.8
Versatility48.927%13.2
Shot quality90.68%7.2
Trajectory53.110%5.3
Scout Score41.7
53.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1360.98×75bp59.442.9%
True Avg25.50.96×4wp46.932.1%
Balls / boundary6.8—75bp53.125%
3.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -50
WPA · Consolidation-26.6
WPA · Build-23.4
48.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p50.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox100 SR10bp61.1
vs Leg-spin150 SR16bp50
vs Short ball140 SR10bp40.9
Spin hitting———p4929.6%
Off-spin108 SR13bp38.9
LA-orthodox94 SR17bp43.3
Leg-spin158 SR19bp61.1
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)153.8 SR1.07×39bp78.114.8%
Reach death107.1 SR0.62×14bp3.111.1%
90.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build89.1%
Phase-weighted control86.7% → p90.6
53.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[51, 15, 28]
Innings8
Bheem Rao Navale
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 24
40.6
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 44 · Balls 38 · SR 115.8 · Avg 22 · 4s 5 · 6s 0
40.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production1240%4.8
Impact *5025%12.5
Versatility46.218%8.3
Shot quality73.84%3.0
Trajectory92.913%12.1
Scout Score40.6
12ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR121.90.71×32bp7.132.5%
Balls / boundary6.4—32bp7.120%
Balls / six——32bp2.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +3.2
WPA · Death+3.2
46.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker67 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball200 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.416.7%
Reach build83.3 SR0.57×6bp3122.2%
73.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build83.3%
Phase-weighted control83.3% → p73.8
92.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.35×
Recent scores[6, 19, 0]
Innings4
Kumar L R
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 25
40.1
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 21 · Balls 23 · SR 91.3 · Avg 7 · 4s 0 · 6s 1
40.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production44.340%17.7
Impact *35.725%8.9
Versatility37.818%6.8
Shot quality97.64%3.9
Trajectory21.413%2.8
Scout Score40.1
44.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR157.10.91×7bp5032.5%
Balls / boundary7—7bp21.420%
Balls / six7—7bp5032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
35.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -0
WPA · Death-0
37.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball50 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.56×1bp21.416.7%
Reach build75 SR0.51×12bp16.722.2%
97.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build91.7%
Phase-weighted control91.7% → p97.6
21.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.73×
Recent scores[8, 1, 3]
Innings4
S Shivaraj
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 33
39.4
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 59 · Balls 34 · SR 173.5 · Avg 11.8 · 4s 7 · 6s 3
39.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production64.840%25.9
Impact *7.125%1.8
Versatility53.718%9.7
Shot quality11.94%0.5
Trajectory11.913%1.5
Scout Score39.4
64.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR211.81.23×17bp6932.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—17bp73.820%
Balls / six8.5—17bp61.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
7.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -16.4
WPA · Death-16.4
53.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)200 SR1.13×4bp78.616.7%
Reach build135.3 SR0.92×17bp45.222.2%
11.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build58.8%
Phase-weighted control58.8% → p11.9
11.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.62×
Recent scores[1, 1, 11]
Innings6
M G Naveen
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 32
38.2
Scout Score
Inns 13 · Runs 206 · Balls 157 · SR 131.2 · Avg 15.8 · 4s 12 · 6s 15
38.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production3440%13.6
Impact *37.527%10.1
Versatility54.715%8.2
Shot quality29.26%1.8
Trajectory37.512%4.5
Scout Score38.2
34ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR136.60.97×93bp45.835%
True Avg18.10.71×7wp20.830%
Balls / boundary4.9—93bp45.817.5%
Balls / dismissal13.3—7wp20.817.5%
37.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -11
WPA · Powerplay-7
WPA · Consolidation-4.1
54.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR141.9 SR0.95×93bp54.226.7%
vs Spin SR115.6 SR0.84×64bp4.226.7%
Accel into Cons155.6 SR—27bp79.220%
Pressure entry125 SR0.89×32bp87.526.7%
29.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70.4%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control69% → p29.2
37.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.78×
Recent scores[3, 12, 24]
Innings13
Karthikeya K P
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 20
37.2
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 234 · Balls 192 · SR 121.9 · Avg 26 · 4s 14 · 6s 9
37.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production37.728%10.6
Impact *53.127%14.3
Versatility23.527%6.3
Shot quality46.98%3.8
Trajectory21.910%2.2
Scout Score37.2
37.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR120.20.86×114bp34.442.9%
True Avg27.41.03×5wp59.432.1%
Balls / boundary9.5—114bp15.625%
53.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -7.6
WPA · Consolidation-12.7
WPA · Build+5
23.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p33.244.4%
vs LA-orthodox88 SR17bp38.9
vs Leg-spin142 SR26bp30
vs Short ball136 SR11bp31.8
Spin hitting———p16.729.6%
Off-spin200 SR9b9b <min
LA-orthodox79 SR24bp16.7
Leg-spin139 SR28bp16.7
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)108.1 SR0.75×62bp9.414.8%
Reach death154.3 SR0.89×35bp21.911.1%
46.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76%
Control · Build76.6%
Phase-weighted control76.3% → p46.9
21.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.79×
Recent scores[36, 10, 9]
Innings10
Tushar Singh
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 26
36.6
Scout Score
Inns 12 · Runs 211 · Balls 168 · SR 125.6 · Avg 19.2 · 4s 15 · 6s 11
36.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production33.540%13.4
Impact *20.827%5.6
Versatility29.215%4.4
Shot quality45.86%2.7
Trajectory87.512%10.5
Scout Score36.6
33.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR127.20.9×92bp37.535%
True Avg19.50.76×6wp29.230%
Balls / boundary5.4—92bp29.217.5%
Balls / dismissal15.3—6wp37.517.5%
20.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -15.4
WPA · Powerplay-12.6
WPA · Consolidation-2.9
29.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR115.1 SR0.77×106bp4.226.7%
vs Spin SR143.5 SR1.04×62bp45.826.7%
Accel into Cons115.4 SR—26bp12.520%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
45.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.1%
Control · Build77.8%
Phase-weighted control75% → p45.8
87.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.01×
Recent scores[53, 14, 0]
Innings12
Shubhang Hegde
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 25
34.9
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 271 · Balls 199 · SR 136.2 · Avg 54.2 · 4s 12 · 6s 13
34.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production23.228%6.5
Impact *28.127%7.6
Versatility33.527%9.0
Shot quality96.98%7.8
Trajectory40.610%4.1
Scout Score34.9
23.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR115.30.83×118bp21.942.9%
True Avg——0wp40.632.1%
Balls / boundary13.1—118bp3.125%
28.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -27.2
WPA · Consolidation-13.6
WPA · Build-13.7
33.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p13.744.4%
vs Off-spin100 SR27bp10
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball127 SR11bp22.7
Spin hitting———p48.329.6%
Off-spin106 SR35bp27.8
LA-orthodox122 SR37bp56.7
Leg-spin165 SR17bp72.2
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)115.9 SR0.8×44bp15.614.8%
Reach death200 SR1.16×62bp96.911.1%
96.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation91.9%
Control · Build86.4%
Phase-weighted control88.1% → p96.9
40.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.96×
Recent scores[38, 65, 31]
Innings9
Rajvir Wadhwa
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 22
33.8
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 46 · Balls 34 · SR 135.3 · Avg 15.3 · 4s 4 · 6s 2
33.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production18.940%7.6
Impact *21.425%5.3
Versatility52.518%9.4
Shot quality45.24%1.8
Trajectory73.813%9.6
Scout Score33.8
18.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR130.40.76×23bp11.932.5%
Balls / boundary5.8—23bp26.220%
Balls / six23—23bp7.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
21.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5.5
WPA · Death-5.5
52.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball20 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.416.7%
Reach build150 SR1.02×10bp59.522.2%
45.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation0%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control72.7% → p45.2
73.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[24, 3, 9]
Innings4
Lochan S Gowda
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 24
33.3
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 130 · Balls 91 · SR 142.9 · Avg 14.4 · 4s 20 · 6s 4
33.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production35.440%14.2
Impact *26.225%6.5
Versatility47.218%8.5
Shot quality2.44%0.1
Trajectory3113%4.0
Scout Score33.3
35.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR750.43×4bp3132.5%
Balls / boundary——4bp3120%
Balls / six——4bp35.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
26.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.6
WPA · Death-3.6
47.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.416.7%
Reach build100 SR0.68×2bp35.722.2%
2.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation42.9%
Control · Build50%
Phase-weighted control44.4% → p2.4
31Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.78×
Recent scores[4, 5, 10]
Innings9
Prakar Chaturvedi
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 19
33.1
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 165 · Balls 121 · SR 136.4 · Avg 20.6 · 4s 17 · 6s 9
33.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production39.640%15.8
Impact *29.227%7.9
Versatility47.515%7.1
Shot quality12.56%0.8
Trajectory12.512%1.5
Scout Score33.1
39.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR124.10.88×83bp12.535%
True Avg25.81×4wp54.230%
Balls / boundary5.2—83bp37.517.5%
Balls / dismissal20.8—4wp70.817.5%
29.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -11
WPA · Powerplay-16.8
WPA · Consolidation+5.7
47.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR129.7 SR0.87×91bp20.826.7%
vs Spin SR156.7 SR1.14×30bp54.226.7%
Accel into Cons151.6 SR—31bp70.820%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
12.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation58.1%
Control · Build42.9%
Phase-weighted control56.5% → p12.5
12.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.47×
Recent scores[9, 3, 4]
Innings8
Macneil Noronha
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB · age 24
32.9
Scout Score
Inns 10 · Runs 186 · Balls 137 · SR 135.8 · Avg 20.7 · 4s 17 · 6s 9
32.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production24.828%6.9
Impact *15.627%4.2
Versatility48.927%13.2
Shot quality9.48%0.8
Trajectory78.110%7.8
Scout Score32.9
24.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR118.80.85×85bp28.142.9%
True Avg12.60.48×8wp3.132.1%
Balls / boundary7.1—85bp46.925%
15.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -34.1
WPA · Consolidation-22.3
WPA · Build-11.8
48.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p51.244.4%
vs LA-orthodox75 SR32bp16.7
vs Leg-spin176 SR17bp90
vs Short ball176 SR17bp77.3
Spin hitting———p40.129.6%
Off-spin100 SR13bp16.7
LA-orthodox80 SR40bp23.3
Leg-spin172 SR18bp94.4
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)144.8 SR1×29bp65.614.8%
Reach death——0bp40.611.1%
9.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation68.3%
Control · Build63.6%
Phase-weighted control67.1% → p9.4
78.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[27, 0, 44]
Innings10
Aadarsh Prajwal
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 26
30.3
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 69 · Balls 49 · SR 140.8 · Avg 13.8 · 4s 8 · 6s 1
30.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production26.340%10.5
Impact *11.925%3.0
Versatility55.718%10.0
Shot quality23.84%1.0
Trajectory45.213%5.9
Scout Score30.3
26.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.58×8bp21.432.5%
Balls / boundary8—8bp16.720%
Balls / six——8bp26.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
11.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -9.2
WPA · Death-9.2
55.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball122 SR9b9b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp52.416.7%
Reach build184.2 SR1.26×19bp73.822.2%
23.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation60%
Control · Build68.4%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p23.8
45.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.88×
Recent scores[31, 2, 8]
Innings5
Shikhar Shetty
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB · age 20
30.2
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 44 · Balls 29 · SR 151.7 · Avg 22 · 4s 4 · 6s 2
30.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production5140%20.4
Impact *2.425%0.6
Versatility37.618%6.8
Shot quality7.14%0.3
Trajectory16.713%2.2
Scout Score30.2
51ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1721×25bp59.532.5%
Balls / boundary4.2—25bp54.820%
Balls / six12.5—25bp40.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
2.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -20.3
WPA · Death-20.3
37.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker200 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball262 SR8b8b <min
vs Spin (death)50 SR0.28×2bp7.116.7%
Reach build25 SR0.17×4bp26.222.2%
7.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build50%
Phase-weighted control50% → p7.1
16.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.66×
Recent scores[2, 1, 1]
Innings5
Vishal Onat
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 22
27.5
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 35 · Balls 35 · SR 100 · Avg 11.7 · 4s 4 · 6s 0
27.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production31.240%12.5
Impact *4.227%1.1
Versatility27.515%4.1
Shot quality20.86%1.2
Trajectory70.812%8.5
Scout Score27.5
31.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR107.70.76×26bp20.835%
True Avg140.54×2wp45.830%
Balls / boundary6.5—26bp12.517.5%
Balls / dismissal13—2wp45.817.5%
4.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -29.2
WPA · Powerplay-19.8
WPA · Consolidation-9.4
27.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR113 SR0.75×23bp29.226.7%
vs Spin SR75 SR0.54×12bp20.826.7%
Accel into Cons77.8 SR—9bp4.220%
Pressure entry——0bp5026.7%
20.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p20.8
70.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[3, 23, 9]
Innings3
Yashovardhan Parantap
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 23
25.3
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 118 · Balls 85 · SR 138.8 · Avg 16.9 · 4s 4 · 6s 7
25.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production23.540%9.4
Impact *3125%7.8
Versatility39.918%7.2
Shot quality16.74%0.7
Trajectory2.413%0.3
Scout Score25.3
23.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR122.20.71×36bp2.432.5%
Balls / boundary12—36bp2.420%
Balls / six12—36bp45.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
31Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3
WPA · Death-3
39.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker200 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball111 SR9b9b <min
vs Spin (death)00×3bp2.416.7%
Reach build133.3 SR0.91×24bp40.522.2%
16.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation52%
Control · Build79.2%
Phase-weighted control65.3% → p16.7
2.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.17×
Recent scores[0, 1, 2]
Innings11
Aarav Mahesh
Top order · pos 3 · LHB
24.9
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 104 · Balls 89 · SR 116.9 · Avg 26 · 4s 10 · 6s 4
24.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production36.240%14.5
Impact *12.527%3.4
Versatility21.915%3.3
Shot quality4.26%0.3
Trajectory29.212%3.5
Scout Score24.9
36.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR79.40.56×34bp4.235%
True Avg271.05×1wp62.530%
Balls / boundary8.5—34bp4.217.5%
Balls / dismissal34—1wp87.517.5%
12.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -20.8
WPA · Powerplay-25.4
WPA · Consolidation+4.5
21.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR110.8 SR0.74×37bp12.526.7%
vs Spin SR121.2 SR0.88×52bp37.526.7%
Accel into Cons128.6 SR—28bp37.520%
Pressure entry62.5 SR0.44×8bp4.226.7%
4.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation53.6%
Control · Build51.9%
Phase-weighted control53% → p4.2
29.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.75×
Recent scores[5, 5, 27]
Innings5
Yuvraj Arora
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
23.5
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 113 · Balls 98 · SR 115.3 · Avg 16.1 · 4s 11 · 6s 4
23.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production15.828%4.4
Impact *21.927%5.9
Versatility33.427%9.0
Shot quality40.68%3.2
Trajectory9.410%0.9
Scout Score23.5
15.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR940.68×67bp3.142.9%
True Avg15.80.59×4wp28.132.1%
Balls / boundary9.6—67bp21.925%
21.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -33.8
WPA · Consolidation-19
WPA · Build-14.8
33.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p3344.4%
vs LA-orthodox90 SR20bp50
vs Leg-spin160 SR5b5b <min
vs Short ball58 SR12bp4.5
Spin hitting———p3029.6%
Off-spin138 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox90 SR20bp30
Leg-spin111 SR9b9b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)80 SR0.55×30bp3.114.8%
Reach death210.5 SR1.22×19bp84.411.1%
40.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build80.6%
Phase-weighted control73.1% → p40.6
9.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.65×
Recent scores[11, 3, 19]
Innings9
Harshil Dharmani
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 21
20.5
Scout Score
Inns 11 · Runs 167 · Balls 134 · SR 124.6 · Avg 15.2 · 4s 7 · 6s 13
20.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production16.728%4.7
Impact *9.427%2.5
Versatility25.227%6.8
Shot quality21.98%1.8
Trajectory46.910%4.7
Scout Score20.5
16.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR106.80.77×74bp15.642.9%
True Avg13.20.5×6wp9.432.1%
Balls / boundary9.2—74bp28.125%
9.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -35.4
WPA · Consolidation-15.1
WPA · Build-20.4
25.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p21.144.4%
vs LA-orthodox87 SR30bp27.8
vs Leg-spin117 SR18bp10
vs Short ball133 SR6b6b <min
Spin hitting———p8.529.6%
Off-spin156 SR9b9b <min
LA-orthodox79 SR43bp10
Leg-spin135 SR23bp5.6
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)105.3 SR0.73×19bp21.914.8%
Reach death204.3 SR1.18×23bp90.611.1%
21.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70.5%
Control · Build73.3%
Phase-weighted control71.6% → p21.9
46.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.98×
Recent scores[8, 13, 17]
Innings11
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | — | 32.0 | 13 | 232 | 7.25 | 80.4 Scout Score 80.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay81.478.1% Middle76.921.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p31.21.03× | 84 Bowling Production 84 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay10w · 7.8 econp83.678.1% Middle3w · 5.29 econp85.421.9% | 85.4 Quality 85.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay36%p88.5 False-shot · Middle29%p74.5 | 92.4 Impact 92.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +36.7p93.678.1% MiddleWPA +20.3p88.221.9% | 77 Versatility 77 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp79.778.1% Middlep67.321.9% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 31.0 | 10 | 200 | 6.45 | 77.5 Scout Score 77.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay76.448.4% Middle78.451.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p79.50.93× | 76.4 Bowling Production 76.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 7.07 econp86.648.4% Middle4w · 5.88 econp66.851.6% | 43.9 Quality 43.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p6.4 False-shot · Middle28%p79.1 | 96.1 Impact 96.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +46.2p98.748.4% MiddleWPA +31.7p93.651.6% | 80.8 Versatility 80.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp79.748.4% Middlep81.851.6% | |
| 3 | RA pace | 27 | 19.4 | 12 | 169 | 8.59 | 72.1 Scout Score 72.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay88.530.5% Middle7425.4% Death59.744.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p68.80.97× | 65.3 Bowling Production 65.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 6 econp88.330.5% Middle3w · 6.6 econp81.825.4% Death5w · 11.54 econp39.744.1% | 80.2 Quality 80.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay47%p96.2 False-shot · Middle27%p60.9 | 92.4 Impact 92.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +36.8p96.230.5% MiddleWPA +10.8p77.325.4% DeathWPA +40.4p98.544.1% | 62.1 Versatility 62.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp76.930.5% Middlep62.725.4% Deathp51.544.1% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 7.0 | 3 | 66 | 9.43 | 71.7 Scout Score 71.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle71.771.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 73 Bowling Production 73 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 7.6 econp7371.4% | 45.5 Quality 45.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle23%p45.5 | 97.3 Impact 97.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +43.5p97.371.4% | 65.5 Versatility 65.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep65.571.4% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 45.0 | 14 | 343 | 7.62 | 68.2 Scout Score 68.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay72.126.7% Middle67.764.4% Death59.68.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p72.30.96× | 70 Bowling Production 70 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 5.92 econp84.726.7% Middle9w · 8.1 econp65.664.4% Death1w · 9.25 econp588.9% | 41.1 Quality 41.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay28%p37.2 False-shot · Middle23%p42.7 | 83.5 Impact 83.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +17.1p75.626.7% MiddleWPA +26.8p9064.4% DeathWPA -5p60.38.9% | 58.1 Versatility 58.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp67.226.7% Middlep55.564.4% Deathp508.9% | |
| 6 | RA pace | 21 | 25.0 | 11 | 192 | 7.68 | 67.9 Scout Score 67.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay82.328% Middle47.344% Death86.128% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p70.50.97× | 68.9 Bowling Production 68.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 7.86 econp8528% Middle1w · 7.73 econp42.744% Death5w · 7.43 econp94.128% | 77.3 Quality 77.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay40%p85.9 False-shot · Middle27%p71.8 | 58.6 Impact 58.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +24.6p80.828% MiddleWPA -9.9p22.744% DeathWPA +14.6p92.628% | 68 Versatility 68 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp82.328% Middlep62.744% Deathp61.928% | |
| 7 | LA pace | 28 | 38.0 | 18 | 328 | 8.63 | 64.5 Scout Score 64.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay75.465.8% Middle38.310.5% Death4623.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p25.91.04× | 75.6 Bowling Production 75.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay11w · 7.88 econp86.465.8% Middle2w · 8.5 econp57.910.5% Death5w · 10.78 econp53.423.7% | 92.7 Quality 92.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay45%p98.7 False-shot · Middle25%p55.5 | 51 Impact 51 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +8.3p62.865.8% MiddleWPA -34p2.710.5% DeathWPA -12.6p39.723.7% | 69.4 Versatility 69.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp81.865.8% Middlep39.110.5% Deathp48.523.7% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 32 | 40.0 | 13 | 381 | 9.52 | 64.4 Scout Score 64.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay31.925% Middle89.357.5% Death29.317.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p97.30.82× | 54.2 Bowling Production 54.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.3 econp15.725% Middle10w · 7.43 econp86.157.5% Death2w · 15.29 econp4.417.5% | 83 Quality 83 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p62.8 False-shot · Middle31%p91.8 | 66 Impact 66 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -14.3p16.725% MiddleWPA +52.5p99.157.5% DeathWPA -21.4p27.917.5% | 55.3 Versatility 55.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp22.625% Middlep69.157.5% Deathp56.717.5% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 33 | 40.5 | 13 | 341 | 8.35 | 63.6 Scout Score 63.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay71.571% Middle72.27.3% Death34.721.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p75.90.96× | 62.9 Bowling Production 62.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay9w · 7.52 econp73.571% Middle2w · 6.67 econp75.27.3% Death2w · 11.66 econp2421.6% | 41.5 Quality 41.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p39.7 False-shot · Middle28%p59.1 | 71.1 Impact 71.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +28p85.971% MiddleWPA +11.7p80.97.3% DeathWPA -32.6p19.121.6% | 66.3 Versatility 66.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp68.571% Middlep58.27.3% Deathp61.921.6% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 26.4 | 9 | 218 | 8.18 | 62.4 Scout Score 62.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay61.922.5% Middle60.367.5% Death78.210% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p920.89× | 57.9 Bowling Production 57.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 8 econp66.722.5% Middle5w · 8.28 econp52.267.5% Death2w · 7.88 econp76.310% | 45.2 Quality 45.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p30.8 False-shot · Middle24%p50 | 69.8 Impact 69.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +4.9p60.322.5% MiddleWPA +8p71.867.5% DeathWPA -0.2p77.910% | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp64.722.5% Middlep48.267.5% Deathp71.410% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 23 | 38.0 | 10 | 321 | 8.45 | 61.8 Scout Score 61.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay63.157.9% Middle49.621.1% Death70.421.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p670.98× | 56.2 Bowling Production 56.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 8 econp5557.9% Middle2w · 8.88 econp33.721.1% Death3w · 9.25 econp81.921.1% | 65 Quality 65 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p52.6 False-shot · Middle46%p99.1 | 67.2 Impact 67.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +26.1p83.357.9% MiddleWPA -1.7p35.521.1% DeathWPA -6.1p54.421.1% | 54 Versatility 54 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp5157.9% Middlep52.721.1% Deathp63.321.1% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 20 | 36.4 | 14 | 342 | 9.33 | 61.6 Scout Score 61.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay74.140.9% Middle54.216.4% Death52.342.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p86.60.89× | 61.5 Bowling Production 61.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 8.6 econp7440.9% Middle1w · 9 econp2616.4% Death6w · 10.15 econp63.242.7% | 91 Quality 91 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay39%p93.6 False-shot · Middle33%p84.5 | 41 Impact 41 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +9p65.440.9% MiddleWPA +7.6p68.216.4% DeathWPA -63.2p7.442.7% | 59.1 Versatility 59.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp56.740.9% Middlep5016.4% Deathp64.842.7% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 35 | 33.4 | 13 | 273 | 8.11 | 60.3 Scout Score 60.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay54.820.8% Middle80.342.1% Death40.637.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p11.61.11× | 72.3 Bowling Production 72.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 6.71 econp54.220.8% Middle7w · 6.99 econp92.842.1% Death5w · 10.16 econp59.337.1% | 70.2 Quality 70.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p44.9 False-shot · Middle29%p82.7 | 54.6 Impact 54.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +16.8p73.120.8% MiddleWPA +15.3p84.542.1% DeathWPA -48.2p10.337.1% | 70.3 Versatility 70.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp66.220.8% Middlep86.442.1% Deathp54.437.1% | |
| 14 | Off-spin | 24 | 23.0 | 6 | 175 | 7.61 | 59.4 Scout Score 59.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay57.943.5% Middle60.652.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p95.50.83× | 55.1 Bowling Production 55.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 8.6 econp55.843.5% Middle2w · 7.08 econp54.552.2% | 16.1 Quality 16.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p19.2 False-shot · Middle17%p13.6 | 72.2 Impact 72.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +10.5p70.543.5% MiddleWPA +8.3p73.652.2% | 68.9 Versatility 68.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp52.343.5% Middlep82.752.2% | |
| 15 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 43.0 | 15 | 339 | 7.88 | 59.2 Scout Score 59.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay40.818.6% Middle67.369.8% Death40.211.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p36.61.01× | 59 Bowling Production 59 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 10.5 econp41.218.6% Middle8w · 6.57 econp65.469.8% Death4w · 11.6 econp49.411.6% | 33.5 Quality 33.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay38%p80.8 False-shot · Middle20%p20.9 | 72.5 Impact 72.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -12.9p21.818.6% MiddleWPA +38.9p95.569.8% DeathWPA -41.4p16.211.6% | 81.6 Versatility 81.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp34.618.6% Middlep98.269.8% Deathp57.111.6% | |
| 16 | Leg-spin | 32 | 42.0 | 13 | 364 | 8.67 | 58.5 Scout Score 58.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay27.214.3% Middle64.671.4% Death59.414.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p65.20.98× | 62 Bowling Production 62 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11 econp17.914.3% Middle10w · 7.73 econp7471.4% Death2w · 11 econp46.114.3% | 10.5 Quality 10.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p30.8 False-shot · Middle17%p6.4 | 82.7 Impact 82.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -11p24.414.3% MiddleWPA +27.4p91.871.4% DeathWPA +30.4p95.614.3% | 44.3 Versatility 44.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp26.714.3% Middlep50.971.4% Deathp28.614.3% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 34.0 | 7 | 268 | 7.88 | 57.7 Scout Score 57.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay57.441.2% Middle57.955.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p13.41.1× | 58.3 Bowling Production 58.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 7.71 econp67.341.2% Middle3w · 7.53 econp51.755.9% | 21 Quality 21 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p3.8 False-shot · Middle21%p33.6 | 88.3 Impact 88.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +30.3p9141.2% MiddleWPA +20.1p86.455.9% | 71.9 Versatility 71.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp53.641.2% Middlep85.555.9% | |
| 18 | RA pace | — | 24.4 | 6 | 214 | 8.68 | 57.1 Scout Score 57.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle63.740.5% Death52.659.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p18.81.06× | 73.5 Bowling Production 73.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 7.1 econp7240.5% Death3w · 9.75 econp74.559.5% | 93.6 Quality 93.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle35%p93.6 | 31.2 Impact 31.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -0.3p44.540.5% DeathWPA -25.5p22.159.5% | 67.2 Versatility 67.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep77.340.5% Deathp60.459.5% | |
| 19 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 12.0 | 3 | 93 | 7.75 | 56.8 Scout Score 56.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay66.125% Middle53.775% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p99.10.77× | 51.4 Bowling Production 51.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 6.33 econp67.525% Middle2w · 8.22 econp4675% | 41.1 Quality 41.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p57.7 False-shot · Middle20%p35.5 | 57.4 Impact 57.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +4.8p57.725% MiddleWPA +4.6p57.375% | 57.3 Versatility 57.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp62.825% Middlep55.575% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 30 | 16.4 | 7 | 158 | 9.48 | 55.4 Scout Score 55.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle62.276% Death33.924% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p15.21.09× | 49 Bowling Production 49 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 8.61 econp55.176% Death2w · 12.25 econp29.924% | 97.3 Quality 97.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle40%p97.3 | 72.5 Impact 72.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +11.3p79.176% DeathWPA -6.3p51.524% | 41.6 Versatility 41.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep44.576% Deathp32.224% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 27 | 5.0 | 2 | 43 | 8.6 | 55.2 Scout Score 55.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle55.280% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 60.3 Bowling Production 60.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 8 econp60.380% | 68.2 Quality 68.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle29%p68.2 | 46.4 Impact 46.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -0.2p46.480% | 45.5 Versatility 45.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep45.580% | |
| 22 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 23.0 | 7 | 192 | 8.35 | 54.1 Scout Score 54.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay54.98.7% Middle52.669.6% Death58.321.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p24.11.05× | 62.3 Bowling Production 62.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 8.5 econp58.18.7% Middle5w · 7.94 econp62.869.6% Death1w · 9.6 econp62.421.7% | 29.3 Quality 29.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay42%p67.9 False-shot · Middle20%p24.5 | 62.6 Impact 62.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.5p52.68.7% MiddleWPA +5.4p62.769.6% DeathWPA -4.3p66.221.7% | 58.1 Versatility 58.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp608.7% Middlep58.269.6% Deathp57.121.7% | |
| 23 | Off-spin | 21 | 11.0 | 3 | 97 | 8.82 | 52.9 Scout Score 52.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle52.9100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p81.20.93× | 40.1 Bowling Production 40.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 8.82 econp40.1100% | 28.2 Quality 28.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle20%p28.2 | 75.5 Impact 75.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +9.4p75.5100% | 53.6 Versatility 53.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep53.6100% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 27 | 38.0 | 8 | 383 | 10.08 | 52 Scout Score 52 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay62.468.4% Middle42.75.3% Death26.926.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p77.70.93× | 41.7 Bowling Production 41.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay8w · 8.73 econp56.168.4% Middle0w · 11 econp315.3% Death0w · 13.4 econp6.426.3% | 49.2 Quality 49.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p50 False-shot · Middle17%p39.1 | 64.3 Impact 64.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +24.1p78.268.4% MiddleWPA +0p505.3% DeathWPA -15.4p30.926.3% | 46 Versatility 46 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp46.768.4% Middlep405.3% Deathp45.626.3% | |
| 25 | Leg-spin | 20 | 9.5 | 5 | 94 | 9.56 | 50.5 Scout Score 50.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle50.5100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 54 Bowling Production 54 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle5w · 9.56 econp54100% | 90 Quality 90 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle34%p90 | 31.8 Impact 31.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -3.4p31.8100% | 29.1 Versatility 29.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep29.1100% | |
| 26 | LA pace | 23 | 12.0 | 5 | 121 | 10.08 | 49.9 Scout Score 49.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay5066.7% Middle41.916.7% Death57.716.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p0.91.31× | 60 Bowling Production 60 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 9.62 econp6366.7% Middle1w · 15 econp37.316.7% Death0w · 7 econp70.816.7% | 76.7 Quality 76.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay35%p75.6 False-shot · Middle42%p80.9 | 43.6 Impact 43.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -8.8p34.666.7% MiddleWPA -0.2p48.216.7% DeathWPA -0.5p7516.7% | 45.4 Versatility 45.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp52.866.7% Middlep29.116.7% Deathp32.216.7% | |
| 27 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 3 | 37 | 7.4 | 49.2 Scout Score 49.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle49.280% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 53.9 Bowling Production 53.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 7.25 econp53.980% | 11.8 Quality 11.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle8%p11.8 | 59.1 Impact 59.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +4.8p59.180% | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep6080% | |
| 28 | LA pace | 30 | 26.0 | 9 | 260 | 10 | 47.4 Scout Score 47.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.223.1% Middle41.357.7% Death77.819.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p90.20.89× | 45.2 Bowling Production 45.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.5 econp25.423.1% Middle6w · 10.27 econp42.357.7% Death2w · 8.6 econp77.519.2% | 58.8 Quality 58.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p30.8 False-shot · Middle27%p70 | 34.7 Impact 34.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -8.8p37.223.1% MiddleWPA -11.6p17.357.7% DeathWPA +2.3p83.819.2% | 27.1 Versatility 27.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp3923.1% Middlep11.857.7% Deathp58.919.2% | |
| 29 | Leg-spin | 33 | 33.0 | 8 | 306 | 9.27 | 46.9 Scout Score 46.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay5312.1% Middle48.178.8% Death28.49.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p93.80.85× | 42.5 Bowling Production 42.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10.5 econp54.712.1% Middle5w · 8.23 econp44.278.8% Death1w · 16.67 econp11.79.1% | 38.4 Quality 38.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p21.8 False-shot · Middle22%p40.9 | 40.6 Impact 40.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +2.8p55.112.1% MiddleWPA -1.5p39.178.8% DeathWPA -13.2p33.89.1% | 47.6 Versatility 47.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp46.312.1% Middlep5078.8% Deathp28.69.1% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 30 | 4.0 | 1 | 39 | 9.75 | 46.4 Scout Score 46.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay39.550% Death53.250% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 41 Bowling Production 41 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 9 econp39.950% Death1w · 10.5 econp42.250% | 11.5 Quality 11.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p11.5 | 64.2 Impact 64.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -4.9p47.450% DeathWPA +1.3p80.950% | 46.6 Versatility 46.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp48.250% Deathp45.150% | |
| 31 | Off-spin | 25 | 8.0 | 2 | 62 | 7.75 | 45.6 Scout Score 45.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle45.6100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p22.31.05× | 56.6 Bowling Production 56.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 7.75 econp56.6100% | 64.5 Quality 64.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle27%p64.5 | 24.5 Impact 24.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -6.8p24.5100% | 50.9 Versatility 50.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep50.9100% | |
| 32 | Off-spin | 28 | 8.0 | 3 | 82 | 10.25 | 45.5 Scout Score 45.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle45.575% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 47.6 Bowling Production 47.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 8.83 econp47.675% | 16.4 Quality 16.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle14%p16.4 | 55.5 Impact 55.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +4.2p55.575% | 50.9 Versatility 50.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep50.975% | |
| 33 | LA pace | 19 | 24.2 | 10 | 280 | 11.51 | 44.9 Scout Score 44.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay65.857.5% Middle11.812.3% Death18.530.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p6.21.23× | 42.1 Bowling Production 42.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 9.43 econp60.957.5% Middle0w · 14.33 econp1312.3% Death4w · 14.32 econp18.130.1% | 70 Quality 70 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay36%p83.3 False-shot · Middle0%p8.2 | 52.1 Impact 52.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +28.2p88.557.5% MiddleWPA -27.4p6.412.3% DeathWPA -91p1.530.1% | 53.2 Versatility 53.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp56.257.5% Middlep28.212.3% Deathp57.930.1% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 27 | 7.0 | 4 | 82 | 11.71 | 44.5 Scout Score 44.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay47.142.9% Middle56.928.6% Death28.128.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 43.1 Bowling Production 43.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 11.33 econp46.142.9% Middle2w · 10 econp58.728.6% Death1w · 14 econp2328.6% | 55.7 Quality 55.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p57.7 False-shot · Middle25%p52.7 | 46.4 Impact 46.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -7p44.942.9% MiddleWPA +7.8p7028.6% DeathWPA -22.7p2528.6% | 35.6 Versatility 35.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp38.542.9% Middlep34.528.6% Deathp32.228.6% | |
| 35 | RA pace | 26 | 29.4 | 11 | 307 | 10.35 | 44.5 Scout Score 44.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay38.553.9% Middle56.613.5% Death49.532.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p74.10.96× | 32.6 Bowling Production 32.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 10.25 econp31.253.9% Middle1w · 7.5 econp54.113.5% Death5w · 11.69 econp2632.6% | 88.3 Quality 88.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay38%p91 False-shot · Middle33%p77.3 | 39.1 Impact 39.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -28.8p953.9% MiddleWPA -1.6p37.313.5% DeathWPA +4.9p89.732.6% | 38.1 Versatility 38.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp31.553.9% Middlep64.513.5% Deathp38.132.6% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 24 | 4.3 | 4 | 60 | 13.33 | 44.3 Scout Score 44.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle44.388.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 46.4 Bowling Production 46.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 13.75 econp46.488.9% | 88.2 Quality 88.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle42%p88.2 | 28.2 Impact 28.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5.4p28.288.9% | 11.8 Versatility 11.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep11.888.9% | |
| 37 | Off-spin | 22 | 13.0 | 3 | 119 | 9.15 | 44.2 Scout Score 44.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay17.846.2% Middle70.646.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p63.41× | 40.1 Bowling Production 40.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 11.33 econp10.346.2% Middle2w · 6.83 econp69.946.2% | 29.3 Quality 29.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay11%p1.3 False-shot · Middle25%p57.3 | 51 Impact 51 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -14p19.246.2% MiddleWPA +14.1p82.746.2% | 45.6 Versatility 45.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp21.346.2% Middlep7046.2% | |
| 38 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.0 | 2 | 54 | 13.5 | 43.1 Scout Score 43.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle43.175% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 42.3 Bowling Production 42.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 14 econp42.375% | 37.3 Quality 37.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p37.3 | 51.8 Impact 51.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +1.6p51.875% | 29.1 Versatility 29.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep29.175% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 27 | 12.4 | 5 | 123 | 9.71 | 42.9 Scout Score 42.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle45.368.4% Death37.731.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p4.51.27× | 44.6 Bowling Production 44.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 8.77 econp49.468.4% Death2w · 11.75 econp34.331.6% | 62.7 Quality 62.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle27%p62.7 | 49.2 Impact 49.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -0.4p42.768.4% DeathWPA -4.8p63.231.6% | 44.4 Versatility 44.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep5068.4% Deathp32.231.6% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 32 | 17.5 | 7 | 157 | 8.8 | 42.7 Scout Score 42.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay23.733.6% Middle49.322.4% Death53.843.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p171.06× | 57.4 Bowling Production 57.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.83 econp17.133.6% Middle1w · 6.25 econp65.122.4% Death5w · 8.55 econp84.343.9% | 30.5 Quality 30.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p30.8 False-shot · Middle17%p30 | 24 Impact 24 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -10.6p26.933.6% MiddleWPA -0.7p40.922.4% DeathWPA -44.4p13.243.9% | 50.8 Versatility 50.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.433.6% Middlep68.222.4% Deathp5343.9% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 23 | 10.3 | 2 | 109 | 10.38 | 42.6 Scout Score 42.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay45.119% Middle3447.6% Death53.433.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p331.02× | 38.8 Bowling Production 38.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 10 econp3719% Middle1w · 10.6 econp24.947.6% Death1w · 10.29 econp59.833.3% | 81.1 Quality 81.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay42%p67.9 False-shot · Middle37%p86.4 | 34.3 Impact 34.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.6p5019% MiddleWPA -18.2p11.847.6% DeathWPA -5.3p57.433.3% | 43.2 Versatility 43.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.819% Middlep44.547.6% Deathp42.633.3% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 22 | 7.0 | 1 | 66 | 9.43 | 42.5 Scout Score 42.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.242.9% Middle58.428.6% Death3628.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 38.9 Bowling Production 38.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 10 econp28.842.9% Middle1w · 6.5 econp62.628.6% Death0w · 11.5 econp30.128.6% | 55.7 Quality 55.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p57.7 False-shot · Middle25%p52.7 | 43.3 Impact 43.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -10.1p29.542.9% MiddleWPA +6.4p64.528.6% DeathWPA -9.4p42.628.6% | 38.2 Versatility 38.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.742.9% Middlep46.428.6% Deathp32.228.6% | |
| 43 | Off-spin | 20 | 17.0 | 3 | 153 | 9 | 42 Scout Score 42 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay30.823.5% Middle45.870.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p84.80.9× | 37.7 Bowling Production 37.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 10.25 econp35.723.5% Middle2w · 8.25 econp38.470.6% | 4.3 Quality 4.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p9 False-shot · Middle8%p2.7 | 48.6 Impact 48.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -18.5p11.523.5% MiddleWPA +5.1p60.970.6% | 55.1 Versatility 55.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp43.123.5% Middlep59.170.6% | |
| 44 | RA pace | 21 | 9.0 | 2 | 97 | 10.78 | 41.5 Scout Score 41.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay29.444.4% Middle51.255.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 35.5 Bowling Production 35.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 15 econp1944.4% Middle1w · 7.4 econp48.755.6% | 57.8 Quality 57.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay38%p73.1 False-shot · Middle23%p45.5 | 32.6 Impact 32.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -32.8p6.444.4% MiddleWPA +2.4p53.655.6% | 54.3 Versatility 54.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp44.944.4% Middlep61.855.6% | |
| 45 | RA pace | 24 | 13.0 | 6 | 162 | 12.46 | 41.4 Scout Score 41.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle31.653.8% Death5346.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p20.51.05× | 40.4 Bowling Production 40.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 13.57 econp33.453.8% Death3w · 11.17 econp48.546.2% | 74.5 Quality 74.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle29%p74.5 | 42.2 Impact 42.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -11.3p19.153.8% DeathWPA -4p69.146.2% | 34.5 Versatility 34.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep7.353.8% Deathp66.346.2% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 20 | 21.2 | 7 | 197 | 9.23 | 40.8 Scout Score 40.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay61.69.4% Middle33.456.2% Death47.334.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p9.81.12× | 39.3 Bowling Production 39.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 7.5 econp67.79.4% Middle2w · 8.33 econp35.356.2% Death3w · 11.18 econp38.234.4% | 51 Quality 51 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay42%p67.9 False-shot · Middle24%p48.2 | 44.9 Impact 44.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +10.4p67.99.4% MiddleWPA -13.8p15.556.2% DeathWPA +4p86.834.4% | 57.2 Versatility 57.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp63.69.4% Middlep66.456.2% Deathp40.434.4% | |
| 47 | RA pace | 34 | 24.3 | 9 | 232 | 9.47 | 39.9 Scout Score 39.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay22.953.1% Middle54.924.5% Death6422.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p2.71.29× | 44.4 Bowling Production 44.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 10.85 econp19.953.1% Middle3w · 8.83 econp56.424.5% Death3w · 6.91 econp89.222.4% | 74.5 Quality 74.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay35%p78.2 False-shot · Middle28%p66.4 | 27.8 Impact 27.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -72.4p1.353.1% MiddleWPA +6.7p66.424.5% DeathWPA -6.4p48.522.4% | 42.4 Versatility 42.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp29.753.1% Middlep55.524.5% Deathp57.922.4% | |
| 48 | RA pace | 29 | 30.5 | 10 | 331 | 10.74 | 36.8 Scout Score 36.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay13.548.6% Middle54.528.6% Death64.522.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p830.91× | 31.8 Bowling Production 31.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 12 econp1.348.6% Middle5w · 8.83 econp62.728.6% Death4w · 10.43 econp58.322.7% | 45.9 Quality 45.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay26%p16.7 False-shot · Middle40%p95.5 | 19.5 Impact 19.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -55.9p3.848.6% MiddleWPA -30.2p4.528.6% DeathWPA -1.9p72.122.7% | 34.9 Versatility 34.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp11.548.6% Middlep57.328.6% Deathp56.722.7% | |
| 49 | Off-spin | 33 | 27.0 | 10 | 231 | 8.56 | 34.3 Scout Score 34.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay49.944.4% Middle21.955.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p81.14× | 54.4 Bowling Production 54.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 8.75 econp79.744.4% Middle3w · 8.4 econp34.255.6% | 11.3 Quality 11.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay26%p24.4 False-shot · Middle9%p0.9 | 19.8 Impact 19.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -9.2p32.144.4% MiddleWPA -19.6p1055.6% | 54 Versatility 54 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp64.644.4% Middlep45.555.6% | |
| 50 | Off-spin | 23 | 15.0 | 3 | 152 | 10.13 | 33.6 Scout Score 33.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay43.146.7% Middle24.146.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p29.51.04× | 35.3 Bowling Production 35.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.29 econp47.846.7% Middle1w · 9.86 econp22.846.7% | 26 Quality 26 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p47.4 False-shot · Middle10%p4.5 | 36.7 Impact 36.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -8.1p39.746.7% MiddleWPA -3p33.646.7% | 34.9 Versatility 34.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp41.546.7% Middlep28.246.7% | |
| 51 | Off-spin | 19 | 7.0 | 1 | 60 | 8.57 | 33.2 Scout Score 33.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle33.2100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 30.4 Bowling Production 30.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 8.57 econp30.4100% | 31.8 Quality 31.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle19%p31.8 | 20.9 Impact 20.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -10.2p20.9100% | 55.5 Versatility 55.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep55.5100% | |
| 52 | RA pace | 25 | 26.2 | 9 | 264 | 10.03 | 32.6 Scout Score 32.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay23.641.8% Middle25.630.4% Death53.827.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p34.81.02× | 42.1 Bowling Production 42.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 9.55 econp27.741.8% Middle2w · 11.12 econp23.630.4% Death5w · 9.55 econp83.827.8% | 19.3 Quality 19.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p14.1 False-shot · Middle19%p26.4 | 16.2 Impact 16.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -17.6p14.141.8% MiddleWPA -4.5p3030.4% DeathWPA -67.6p4.427.8% | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.241.8% Middlep13.630.4% Deathp55.227.8% | |
| 53 | Off-spin | — | 7.0 | 2 | 79 | 11.29 | 30.3 Scout Score 30.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle30.385.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 35.9 Bowling Production 35.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 11.33 econp35.985.7% | 16.4 Quality 16.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle14%p16.4 | 26.4 Impact 26.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -5.7p26.485.7% | 21.4 Versatility 21.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep21.485.7% | |
| 54 | Leg-spin | 20 | 8.0 | 2 | 80 | 10 | 28.3 Scout Score 28.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle23.875% Death4225% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p27.71.04× | 31.4 Bowling Production 31.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 9.67 econp26.775% Death1w · 11 econp45.325% | 22.7 Quality 22.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p22.7 | 19.4 Impact 19.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -13.9p13.675% DeathWPA -12.8p36.825% | 39.5 Versatility 39.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep33.675% Deathp57.125% | |
| 55 | RA pace | 22 | 16.0 | 2 | 209 | 13.06 | 23.4 Scout Score 23.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay37.212.5% Middle11.362.5% Death46.625% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p88.40.89× | 12.2 Bowling Production 12.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 14 econp19.112.5% Middle0w · 12.7 econp1.162.5% Death2w · 13.5 econp36.325% | 15.4 Quality 15.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p42.3 False-shot · Middle15%p10 | 17.3 Impact 17.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -7.7p42.312.5% MiddleWPA -50.2p0.962.5% DeathWPA -7.8p45.625% | 17.9 Versatility 17.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp33.312.5% Middlep2.762.5% Deathp4825% | |
| 56 | Leg-spin | 29 | 5.0 | 1 | 57 | 11.4 | 22.4 Scout Score 22.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle22.480% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p501× | 25.9 Bowling Production 25.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 12.75 econp25.980% | 19.1 Quality 19.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle12%p19.1 | 8.2 Impact 8.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -24.2p8.280% | 22.3 Versatility 22.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep22.380% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 27 | 6.0 | 4 | 36 | 6 | 88.3 Phase Production 88.3 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.675× parp9136.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp93.642.1% Boundary %17%p73.121.1% | 96.2 Quality 96.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %47% | 96.2 Impact 96.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+36.8 | 76.9 Versatility 76.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp93.630% Econ vs LHBp57.730% Wkt vs RHBp88.520% Wkt vs LHBp69.220% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 15.0 | 6 | 106 | 7.07 | 86.6 Phase Production 86.6 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.795× parp93.636.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp75.642.1% Boundary %17%p96.221.1% | 6.4 Quality 6.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 98.7 Impact 98.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+46.2 | 79.7 Versatility 79.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9130% Econ vs LHBp88.530% Wkt vs RHBp67.920% Wkt vs LHBp61.520% | |
| 3 | LA pace | 28 | 25.0 | 11 | 197 | 7.88 | 86.4 Phase Production 86.4 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.886× parp85.936.8% Wicket rate0.44/ovp88.542.1% Boundary %19%p83.321.1% | 98.7 Quality 98.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %45% | 62.8 Impact 62.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.3 | 81.8 Versatility 81.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp83.330% Econ vs LHBp83.330% Wkt vs RHBp78.220% Wkt vs LHBp80.820% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 21 | 7.0 | 5 | 55 | 7.86 | 85 Phase Production 85 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.884× parp73.136.8% Wicket rate0.71/ovp98.742.1% Boundary %17%p78.221.1% | 85.9 Quality 85.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 80.8 Impact 80.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+24.6 | 82.3 Versatility 82.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp65.430% Econ vs LHBp85.930% Wkt vs RHBp93.620% Wkt vs LHBp9120% | |
| 5 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 12.0 | 4 | 71 | 5.92 | 84.7 Phase Production 84.7 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.666× parp98.736.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp65.442.1% Boundary %11%p98.721.1% | 37.2 Quality 37.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 75.6 Impact 75.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+17.1 | 67.2 Versatility 67.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.730% Econ vs LHBp60.330% Wkt vs RHBp57.720% Wkt vs LHBp39.720% | |
| 6 | RA pace | — | 25.0 | 10 | 195 | 7.8 | 83.6 Phase Production 83.6 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.877× parp88.536.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp78.242.1% Boundary %19%p85.921.1% | 88.5 Quality 88.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 93.6 Impact 93.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+36.7 | 79.7 Versatility 79.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp78.230% Econ vs LHBp93.630% Wkt vs RHBp52.620% Wkt vs LHBp88.520% | |
| 7 | Off-spin | 33 | 12.0 | 7 | 105 | 8.75 | 79.7 Phase Production 79.7 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.984× parp60.336.8% Wicket rate0.58/ovp96.242.1% Boundary %18%p80.821.1% | 24.4 Quality 24.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 32.1 Impact 32.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.2 | 64.6 Versatility 64.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp52.630% Econ vs LHBp62.830% Wkt vs RHBp98.720% Wkt vs LHBp51.320% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 20 | 15.0 | 7 | 129 | 8.6 | 74 Phase Production 74 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.967× parp65.436.8% Wicket rate0.47/ovp85.942.1% Boundary %21%p65.421.1% | 93.6 Quality 93.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %39% | 65.4 Impact 65.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9 | 56.7 Versatility 56.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp16.730% Econ vs LHBp98.730% Wkt vs RHBp96.220% Wkt vs LHBp14.120% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 33 | 29.0 | 9 | 218 | 7.52 | 73.5 Phase Production 73.5 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.846× parp96.236.8% Wicket rate0.31/ovp52.642.1% Boundary %20%p75.621.1% | 39.7 Quality 39.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 85.9 Impact 85.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+28 | 68.5 Versatility 68.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.930% Econ vs LHBp96.230% Wkt vs RHBp62.820% Wkt vs LHBp6.420% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 20 | 2.0 | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 67.7 Phase Production 67.7 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.844× parp57.736.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp9142.1% Boundary %25%p38.521.1% | 67.9 Quality 67.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 67.9 Impact 67.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.4 | 63.6 Versatility 63.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp47.430% Econ vs LHBp70.530% Wkt vs RHBp85.920% Wkt vs LHBp55.120% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 3.0 | 1 | 19 | 6.33 | 67.5 Phase Production 67.5 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.712× parp75.636.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp5942.1% Boundary %17%p70.521.1% | 57.7 Quality 57.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 57.7 Impact 57.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.8 | 62.8 Versatility 62.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp62.830% Econ vs LHBp80.830% Wkt vs RHBp70.520% Wkt vs LHBp28.220% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 14.0 | 4 | 108 | 7.71 | 67.3 Phase Production 67.3 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.868× parp80.836.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp42.342.1% Boundary %17%p93.621.1% | 3.8 Quality 3.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 91 Impact 91 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+30.3 | 53.6 Versatility 53.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.230% Econ vs LHBp11.530% Wkt vs RHBp32.120% Wkt vs LHBp74.420% | |
| 13 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 6.0 | 2 | 48 | 8 | 66.7 Phase Production 66.7 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.9× parp70.536.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp62.842.1% Boundary %19%p67.921.1% | 30.8 Quality 30.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 60.3 Impact 60.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.9 | 64.7 Versatility 64.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp70.530% Econ vs LHBp66.730% Wkt vs RHBp21.820% Wkt vs LHBp96.220% | |
| 14 | LA pace | 23 | 8.0 | 4 | 77 | 9.62 | 63 Phase Production 63 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.083× parp39.736.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp83.342.1% Boundary %21%p62.821.1% | 75.6 Quality 75.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 34.6 Impact 34.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.8 | 52.8 Versatility 52.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp37.230% Econ vs LHBp44.930% Wkt vs RHBp83.320% Wkt vs LHBp57.720% | |
| 15 | LA pace | 19 | 14.0 | 6 | 132 | 9.43 | 60.9 Phase Production 60.9 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.061× parp47.436.8% Wicket rate0.43/ovp80.842.1% Boundary %24%p44.921.1% | 83.3 Quality 83.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %36% | 88.5 Impact 88.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+28.2 | 56.2 Versatility 56.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp21.830% Econ vs LHBp75.630% Wkt vs RHBp73.120% Wkt vs LHBp61.520% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 2.0 | 1 | 17 | 8.5 | 58.1 Phase Production 58.1 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.956× parp55.136.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp70.542.1% Boundary %25%p38.521.1% | 67.9 Quality 67.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 52.6 Impact 52.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.5 | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp57.730% Econ vs LHBp5030% Wkt vs RHBp60.320% Wkt vs LHBp78.220% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 27 | 26.0 | 8 | 227 | 8.73 | 56.1 Phase Production 56.1 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.982× parp67.936.8% Wicket rate0.31/ovp5042.1% Boundary %24%p47.421.1% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 78.2 Impact 78.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+24.1 | 46.7 Versatility 46.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp80.830% Econ vs LHBp21.830% Wkt vs RHBp75.620% Wkt vs LHBp3.820% | |
| 18 | Off-spin | 24 | 10.0 | 3 | 86 | 8.6 | 55.8 Phase Production 55.8 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.967× parp62.836.8% Wicket rate0.30/ovp47.442.1% Boundary %22%p60.321.1% | 19.2 Quality 19.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 70.5 Impact 70.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.5 | 52.3 Versatility 52.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp34.630% Econ vs LHBp78.230% Wkt vs RHBp9120% Wkt vs LHBp1.320% | |
| 19 | RA pace | 23 | 22.0 | 5 | 176 | 8 | 55 Phase Production 55 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.9× parp78.236.8% Wicket rate0.23/ovp16.742.1% Boundary %18%p9121.1% | 52.6 Quality 52.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 83.3 Impact 83.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+26.1 | 51 Versatility 51 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp88.530% Econ vs LHBp52.630% Wkt vs RHBp34.620% Wkt vs LHBp920% | |
| 20 | Leg-spin | 33 | 4.0 | 2 | 42 | 10.5 | 54.7 Phase Production 54.7 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.181× parp32.136.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp73.142.1% Boundary %21%p57.721.1% | 21.8 Quality 21.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 55.1 Impact 55.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.8 | 46.3 Versatility 46.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.130% Econ vs LHBp66.730% Wkt vs RHBp11.520% Wkt vs LHBp98.720% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 35 | 7.0 | 1 | 47 | 6.71 | 54.2 Phase Production 54.2 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.755× parp83.336.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp11.542.1% Boundary %14%p88.521.1% | 44.9 Quality 44.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 73.1 Impact 73.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+16.8 | 66.2 Versatility 66.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp75.630% Econ vs LHBp9130% Wkt vs RHBp6.420% Wkt vs LHBp74.420% | |
| 22 | Off-spin | 23 | 7.0 | 2 | 65 | 9.29 | 47.8 Phase Production 47.8 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.045× parp5036.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp44.942.1% Boundary %24%p5021.1% | 47.4 Quality 47.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 39.7 Impact 39.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.1 | 41.5 Versatility 41.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp44.930% Econ vs LHBp42.330% Wkt vs RHBp55.120% Wkt vs LHBp21.820% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 27 | 3.0 | 1 | 34 | 11.33 | 46.1 Phase Production 46.1 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.275× parp26.936.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp5942.1% Boundary %22%p53.821.1% | 57.7 Quality 57.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 44.9 Impact 44.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7 | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp24.430% Econ vs LHBp32.130% Wkt vs RHBp65.420% Wkt vs LHBp42.320% | |
| 24 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 8.0 | 3 | 84 | 10.5 | 41.2 Phase Production 41.2 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.181× parp21.836.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp67.942.1% Boundary %27%p21.821.1% | 80.8 Quality 80.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 21.8 Impact 21.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.9 | 34.6 Versatility 34.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp19.230% Econ vs LHBp29.530% Wkt vs RHBp80.820% Wkt vs LHBp19.220% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 30 | 2.0 | 0 | 18 | 9 | 39.9 Phase Production 39.9 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.012× parp52.636.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp29.542.1% Boundary %25%p38.521.1% | 11.5 Quality 11.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 47.4 Impact 47.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.9 | 48.2 Versatility 48.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp60.330% Econ vs LHBp34.630% Wkt vs RHBp29.520% Wkt vs LHBp69.220% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 23 | 2.0 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 37 Phase Production 37 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.125× parp44.936.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp29.542.1% Boundary %25%p38.521.1% | 67.9 Quality 67.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.6 | 40.8 Versatility 40.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp55.130% Econ vs LHBp24.430% Wkt vs RHBp37.220% Wkt vs LHBp47.420% | |
| 27 | Off-spin | 20 | 4.0 | 1 | 41 | 10.25 | 35.7 Phase Production 35.7 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.153× parp34.636.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp38.542.1% Boundary %25%p32.121.1% | 9 Quality 9 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 11.5 Impact 11.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.5 | 43.1 Versatility 43.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp32.130% Econ vs LHBp37.230% Wkt vs RHBp26.920% Wkt vs LHBp84.620% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 26 | 16.0 | 5 | 164 | 10.25 | 31.2 Phase Production 31.2 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.153× parp16.736.8% Wicket rate0.31/ovp55.142.1% Boundary %29%p921.1% | 91 Quality 91 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 9 Impact 9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-28.8 | 31.5 Versatility 31.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp26.930% Econ vs LHBp14.130% Wkt vs RHBp44.920% Wkt vs LHBp51.320% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 22 | 3.0 | 0 | 30 | 10 | 28.8 Phase Production 28.8 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.125× parp37.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp942.1% Boundary %22%p53.821.1% | 57.7 Quality 57.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 29.5 Impact 29.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.1 | 36.7 Versatility 36.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp29.530% Econ vs LHBp47.430% Wkt vs RHBp39.720% Wkt vs LHBp28.220% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 25 | 11.0 | 2 | 105 | 9.55 | 27.7 Phase Production 27.7 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.074× parp42.336.8% Wicket rate0.18/ovp14.142.1% Boundary %26%p29.521.1% | 14.1 Quality 14.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 14.1 Impact 14.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.6 | 36.2 Versatility 36.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp67.930% Econ vs LHBp16.730% Wkt vs RHBp42.320% Wkt vs LHBp11.520% | |
| 31 | LA pace | 30 | 6.0 | 1 | 63 | 10.5 | 25.4 Phase Production 25.4 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.181× parp29.536.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp21.842.1% Boundary %28%p25.621.1% | 30.8 Quality 30.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 37.2 Impact 37.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.8 | 39 Versatility 39 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp73.130% Econ vs LHBp3.830% Wkt vs RHBp14.120% Wkt vs LHBp65.420% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 34 | 13.0 | 3 | 141 | 10.85 | 19.9 Phase Production 19.9 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.22× parp6.436.8% Wicket rate0.23/ovp34.642.1% Boundary %28%p14.121.1% | 78.2 Quality 78.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 1.3 Impact 1.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-72.4 | 29.7 Versatility 29.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.830% Econ vs LHBp55.130% Wkt vs RHBp24.420% Wkt vs LHBp35.920% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 22 | 2.0 | 0 | 28 | 14 | 19.1 Phase Production 19.1 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.575× parp11.536.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp29.542.1% Boundary %42%p11.521.1% | 42.3 Quality 42.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 42.3 Impact 42.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.7 | 33.3 Versatility 33.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5030% Econ vs LHBp930% Wkt vs RHBp5020% Wkt vs LHBp28.220% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 21 | 4.0 | 1 | 60 | 15 | 19 Phase Production 19 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.687× parp3.836.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp38.542.1% Boundary %38%p6.421.1% | 73.1 Quality 73.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 6.4 Impact 6.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-32.8 | 44.9 Versatility 44.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.330% Econ vs LHBp73.130% Wkt vs RHBp19.220% Wkt vs LHBp93.620% | |
| 35 | Leg-spin | 32 | 6.0 | 1 | 66 | 11 | 17.9 Phase Production 17.9 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.237× parp14.136.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp21.842.1% Boundary %31%p16.721.1% | 30.8 Quality 30.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 24.4 Impact 24.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11 | 26.7 Versatility 26.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp11.530% Econ vs LHBp26.930% Wkt vs RHBp47.420% Wkt vs LHBp28.220% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 32 | 6.0 | 1 | 65 | 10.83 | 17.1 Phase Production 17.1 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.219× parp19.236.8% Wicket rate0.17/ovp21.842.1% Boundary %36%p3.821.1% | 30.8 Quality 30.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 26.9 Impact 26.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.6 | 36.4 Versatility 36.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.730% Econ vs LHBp19.230% Wkt vs RHBp920% Wkt vs LHBp84.620% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 32 | 10.0 | 1 | 103 | 10.3 | 15.7 Phase Production 15.7 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.159× parp24.436.8% Wicket rate0.10/ovp6.442.1% Boundary %27%p19.221.1% | 62.8 Quality 62.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.3 | 22.6 Versatility 22.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp930% Econ vs LHBp39.730% Wkt vs RHBp3.820% Wkt vs LHBp35.920% | |
| 38 | Off-spin | 22 | 6.0 | 0 | 68 | 11.33 | 10.3 Phase Production 10.3 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.275× parp936.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3.842.1% Boundary %28%p25.621.1% | 1.3 Quality 1.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 19.2 Impact 19.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14 | 21.3 Versatility 21.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp42.330% Econ vs LHBp6.430% Wkt vs RHBp16.720% Wkt vs LHBp16.720% | |
| 39 | RA pace | 29 | 15.0 | 1 | 180 | 12 | 1.3 Phase Production 1.3 vs all bowlers · n=39 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.35× parp1.336.8% Wicket rate0.07/ovp1.342.1% Boundary %32%p1.321.1% | 16.7 Quality 16.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 3.8 Impact 3.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-55.9 | 11.5 Versatility 11.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6.430% Econ vs LHBp1.330% Wkt vs RHBp1.320% Wkt vs LHBp44.920% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 35 | 14.1 | 7 | 99 | 6.99 | 92.8 Phase Production 92.8 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.825× parp93.644.1% Wicket rate0.49/ovp93.644.1% Boundary %12%p86.411.8% | 82.7 Quality 82.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 84.5 Impact 84.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15.3 | 86.4 Versatility 86.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9050% Econ vs LHBp82.750% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 32 | 23.0 | 10 | 171 | 7.43 | 86.1 Phase Production 86.1 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.877× parp91.844.1% Wicket rate0.43/ovp82.744.1% Boundary %14%p77.311.8% | 91.8 Quality 91.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 99.1 Impact 99.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+52.5 | 69.1 Versatility 69.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp91.850% Econ vs LHBp46.450% | |
| 3 | RA pace | — | 7.0 | 3 | 37 | 5.29 | 85.4 Phase Production 85.4 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.624× parp95.544.1% Wicket rate0.43/ovp72.744.1% Boundary %5%p95.511.8% | 74.5 Quality 74.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 88.2 Impact 88.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+20.3 | 67.3 Versatility 67.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp95.550% Econ vs LHBp39.150% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 27 | 5.0 | 3 | 33 | 6.6 | 81.8 Phase Production 81.8 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.779× parp80.944.1% Wicket rate0.60/ovp89.144.1% Boundary %13%p58.211.8% | 60.9 Quality 60.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 77.3 Impact 77.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.8 | 62.7 Versatility 62.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp82.750% Econ vs LHBp42.750% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 33 | 3.0 | 2 | 20 | 6.67 | 75.2 Phase Production 75.2 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.787× parp68.244.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp85.544.1% Boundary %11%p62.711.8% | 59.1 Quality 59.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 80.9 Impact 80.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.7 | 58.2 Versatility 58.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp59.150% Econ vs LHBp57.350% | |
| 6 | Leg-spin | 32 | 30.0 | 10 | 232 | 7.73 | 74 Phase Production 74 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.913× parp86.444.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp57.344.1% Boundary %12%p9011.8% | 6.4 Quality 6.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 91.8 Impact 91.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+27.4 | 50.9 Versatility 50.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp93.650% Econ vs LHBp8.250% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 5.0 | 3 | 38 | 7.6 | 73 Phase Production 73 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.897× parp60.944.1% Wicket rate0.60/ovp89.144.1% Boundary %13%p58.211.8% | 45.5 Quality 45.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 97.3 Impact 97.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+43.5 | 65.5 Versatility 65.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp51.850% Econ vs LHBp79.150% | |
| 8 | RA pace | — | 10.0 | 3 | 71 | 7.1 | 72 Phase Production 72 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.838× parp84.544.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp53.644.1% Boundary %8%p93.611.8% | 93.6 Quality 93.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 44.5 Impact 44.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.3 | 77.3 Versatility 77.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7050% Econ vs LHBp84.550% | |
| 9 | Off-spin | 22 | 6.0 | 2 | 41 | 6.83 | 69.9 Phase Production 69.9 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.806× parp82.744.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp60.944.1% Boundary %14%p55.511.8% | 57.3 Quality 57.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 82.7 Impact 82.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+14.1 | 70 Versatility 70 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp42.750% Econ vs LHBp97.350% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 16.0 | 4 | 94 | 5.88 | 66.8 Phase Production 66.8 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.693× parp99.144.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp26.444.1% Boundary %7%p97.311.8% | 79.1 Quality 79.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 93.6 Impact 93.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+31.7 | 81.8 Versatility 81.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp99.150% Econ vs LHBp64.550% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 29.0 | 9 | 235 | 8.1 | 65.6 Phase Production 65.6 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.956× parp77.344.1% Wicket rate0.31/ovp51.844.1% Boundary %14%p73.611.8% | 42.7 Quality 42.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 90 Impact 90 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+26.8 | 55.5 Versatility 55.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp88.250% Econ vs LHBp22.750% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 30.0 | 8 | 197 | 6.57 | 65.4 Phase Production 65.4 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.775× parp97.344.1% Wicket rate0.26/ovp24.544.1% Boundary %9%p99.111.8% | 20.9 Quality 20.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 95.5 Impact 95.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+38.9 | 98.2 Versatility 98.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp97.350% Econ vs LHBp99.150% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 32 | 4.0 | 1 | 25 | 6.25 | 65.1 Phase Production 65.1 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.738× parp79.144.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp47.344.1% Boundary %8%p79.111.8% | 30 Quality 30 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 40.9 Impact 40.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.7 | 68.2 Versatility 68.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp62.750% Econ vs LHBp73.650% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 16.0 | 5 | 127 | 7.94 | 62.8 Phase Production 62.8 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.937× parp73.644.1% Wicket rate0.31/ovp55.544.1% Boundary %16%p5011.8% | 24.5 Quality 24.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 62.7 Impact 62.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.4 | 58.2 Versatility 58.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp79.150% Econ vs LHBp37.350% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 29 | 8.5 | 5 | 78 | 8.83 | 62.7 Phase Production 62.7 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.042× parp37.344.1% Wicket rate0.56/ovp97.344.1% Boundary %19%p28.211.8% | 95.5 Quality 95.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 4.5 Impact 4.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-30.2 | 57.3 Versatility 57.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp20.950% Econ vs LHBp93.650% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 22 | 2.0 | 1 | 13 | 6.5 | 62.6 Phase Production 62.6 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.767× parp57.344.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp67.344.1% Boundary %8%p65.511.8% | 52.7 Quality 52.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 64.5 Impact 64.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.4 | 46.4 Versatility 46.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp68.250% Econ vs LHBp24.550% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 2 | 32 | 8 | 60.3 Phase Production 60.3 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.944× parp48.244.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp78.244.1% Boundary %17%p39.111.8% | 68.2 Quality 68.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 46.4 Impact 46.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.2 | 45.5 Versatility 45.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.850% Econ vs LHBp19.150% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 2 | 20 | 10 | 58.7 Phase Production 58.7 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.18× parp28.244.1% Wicket rate1.00/ovp95.544.1% Boundary %17%p35.511.8% | 52.7 Quality 52.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 70 Impact 70 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7.8 | 34.5 Versatility 34.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.650% Econ vs LHBp15.550% | |
| 19 | LA pace | 28 | 4.0 | 2 | 34 | 8.5 | 57.9 Phase Production 57.9 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.003× parp42.744.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp78.244.1% Boundary %17%p39.111.8% | 55.5 Quality 55.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 2.7 Impact 2.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-34 | 39.1 Versatility 39.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp66.450% Econ vs LHBp11.850% | |
| 20 | Off-spin | 25 | 8.0 | 2 | 62 | 7.75 | 56.6 Phase Production 56.6 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.915× parp7044.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp39.144.1% Boundary %12%p71.811.8% | 64.5 Quality 64.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 24.5 Impact 24.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.8 | 50.9 Versatility 50.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp60.950% Econ vs LHBp40.950% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 34 | 6.0 | 3 | 53 | 8.83 | 56.4 Phase Production 56.4 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.042× parp34.544.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp80.944.1% Boundary %17%p46.411.8% | 66.4 Quality 66.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 66.4 Impact 66.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6.7 | 55.5 Versatility 55.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp37.350% Econ vs LHBp73.650% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 30 | 12.4 | 5 | 109 | 8.61 | 55.1 Phase Production 55.1 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.016× parp46.444.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp7044.1% Boundary %18%p31.811.8% | 97.3 Quality 97.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %40% | 79.1 Impact 79.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.3 | 44.5 Versatility 44.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.450% Econ vs LHBp2.750% | |
| 23 | Off-spin | 24 | 12.0 | 2 | 85 | 7.08 | 54.5 Phase Production 54.5 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.836× parp9044.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp1044.1% Boundary %11%p88.211.8% | 13.6 Quality 13.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 73.6 Impact 73.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.3 | 82.7 Versatility 82.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp73.650% Econ vs LHBp91.850% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 26 | 4.0 | 1 | 30 | 7.5 | 54.1 Phase Production 54.1 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.885× parp59.144.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp47.344.1% Boundary %12%p60.911.8% | 77.3 Quality 77.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 37.3 Impact 37.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.6 | 64.5 Versatility 64.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp33.650% Econ vs LHBp95.550% | |
| 25 | Leg-spin | 20 | 9.5 | 5 | 94 | 9.56 | 54 Phase Production 54 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.128× parp24.544.1% Wicket rate0.51/ovp91.844.1% Boundary %20%p22.711.8% | 90 Quality 90 = false-shots induced False-shot %34% | 31.8 Impact 31.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.4 | 29.1 Versatility 29.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp31.850% Econ vs LHBp26.450% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.0 | 1 | 29 | 7.25 | 53.9 Phase Production 53.9 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.856× parp64.544.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp47.344.1% Boundary %17%p39.111.8% | 11.8 Quality 11.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 59.1 Impact 59.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.8 | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp57.350% Econ vs LHBp62.750% | |
| 27 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 18.0 | 5 | 149 | 8.28 | 52.2 Phase Production 52.2 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.977× parp62.744.1% Wicket rate0.28/ovp35.544.1% Boundary %14%p75.511.8% | 50 Quality 50 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 71.8 Impact 71.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8 | 48.2 Versatility 48.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp75.550% Econ vs LHBp20.950% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | 24 | 19.0 | 3 | 143 | 7.53 | 51.7 Phase Production 51.7 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.888× parp88.244.1% Wicket rate0.16/ovp4.544.1% Boundary %11%p91.811.8% | 33.6 Quality 33.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 86.4 Impact 86.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+20.1 | 85.5 Versatility 85.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp80.950% Econ vs LHBp9050% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 27 | 8.4 | 3 | 76 | 8.77 | 49.4 Phase Production 49.4 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.035× parp40.944.1% Wicket rate0.35/ovp64.544.1% Boundary %19%p24.511.8% | 62.7 Quality 62.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 42.7 Impact 42.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.4 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp40.950% Econ vs LHBp59.150% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 21 | 5.0 | 1 | 37 | 7.4 | 48.7 Phase Production 48.7 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.873× parp66.444.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp32.744.1% Boundary %17%p42.711.8% | 45.5 Quality 45.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 53.6 Impact 53.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.4 | 61.8 Versatility 61.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp55.550% Econ vs LHBp68.250% | |
| 31 | Off-spin | 28 | 6.0 | 2 | 53 | 8.83 | 47.6 Phase Production 47.6 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.042× parp34.544.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp60.944.1% Boundary %17%p46.411.8% | 16.4 Quality 16.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 55.5 Impact 55.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.2 | 50.9 Versatility 50.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp35.550% Econ vs LHBp66.450% | |
| 32 | RA pace | 24 | 4.0 | 4 | 55 | 13.75 | 46.4 Phase Production 46.4 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.623× parp4.544.1% Wicket rate1.00/ovp99.144.1% Boundary %33%p5.511.8% | 88.2 Quality 88.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 28.2 Impact 28.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.4 | 11.8 Versatility 11.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6.450% Econ vs LHBp17.350% | |
| 33 | SLA orthodox | 32 | 9.0 | 2 | 74 | 8.22 | 46 Phase Production 46 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.97× parp53.644.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp28.244.1% Boundary %11%p84.511.8% | 35.5 Quality 35.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 57.3 Impact 57.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.6 | 55.5 Versatility 55.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5050% Econ vs LHBp60.950% | |
| 34 | Leg-spin | 33 | 26.0 | 5 | 214 | 8.23 | 44.2 Phase Production 44.2 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.971× parp71.844.1% Wicket rate0.19/ovp6.444.1% Boundary %14%p82.711.8% | 40.9 Quality 40.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 39.1 Impact 39.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.5 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp64.550% Econ vs LHBp35.550% | |
| 35 | RA pace | 21 | 11.0 | 1 | 85 | 7.73 | 42.7 Phase Production 42.7 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.912× parp75.544.1% Wicket rate0.09/ovp2.744.1% Boundary %14%p7011.8% | 71.8 Quality 71.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 22.7 Impact 22.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.9 | 62.7 Versatility 62.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp77.350% Econ vs LHBp48.250% | |
| 36 | LA pace | 30 | 15.0 | 6 | 154 | 10.27 | 42.3 Phase Production 42.3 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.212× parp17.344.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp75.544.1% Boundary %21%p11.811.8% | 70 Quality 70 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 17.3 Impact 17.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.6 | 11.8 Versatility 11.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp19.150% Econ vs LHBp4.550% | |
| 37 | SLA orthodox | — | 3.0 | 2 | 42 | 14 | 42.3 Phase Production 42.3 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.652× parp8.244.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp85.544.1% Boundary %33%p8.211.8% | 37.3 Quality 37.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 51.8 Impact 51.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.6 | 29.1 Versatility 29.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8.250% Econ vs LHBp5050% | |
| 38 | Off-spin | 21 | 11.0 | 3 | 97 | 8.82 | 40.1 Phase Production 40.1 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp39.144.1% Wicket rate0.27/ovp42.744.1% Boundary %18%p33.611.8% | 28.2 Quality 28.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 75.5 Impact 75.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.4 | 53.6 Versatility 53.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3050% Econ vs LHBp77.350% | |
| 39 | Off-spin | 20 | 12.0 | 2 | 99 | 8.25 | 38.4 Phase Production 38.4 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.974× parp55.544.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp1044.1% Boundary %12%p80.911.8% | 2.7 Quality 2.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 60.9 Impact 60.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.1 | 59.1 Versatility 59.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp48.250% Econ vs LHBp7050% | |
| 40 | LA pace | 23 | 2.0 | 1 | 30 | 15 | 37.3 Phase Production 37.3 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.77× parp13.644.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp67.344.1% Boundary %33%p13.611.8% | 80.9 Quality 80.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 48.2 Impact 48.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.2 | 29.1 Versatility 29.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp13.650% Econ vs LHBp44.550% | |
| 41 | Off-spin | — | 6.0 | 2 | 68 | 11.33 | 35.9 Phase Production 35.9 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.337× parp15.544.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp60.944.1% Boundary %22%p19.111.8% | 16.4 Quality 16.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 26.4 Impact 26.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.7 | 21.4 Versatility 21.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.950% Econ vs LHBp31.850% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 20 | 12.0 | 2 | 100 | 8.33 | 35.3 Phase Production 35.3 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.983× parp51.844.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp1044.1% Boundary %14%p68.211.8% | 48.2 Quality 48.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 15.5 Impact 15.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.8 | 66.4 Versatility 66.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.450% Econ vs LHBp86.450% | |
| 43 | Off-spin | 33 | 15.0 | 3 | 126 | 8.4 | 34.2 Phase Production 34.2 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.991× parp5044.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp13.644.1% Boundary %16%p51.811.8% | 0.9 Quality 0.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %9% | 10 Impact 10 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.6 | 45.5 Versatility 45.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp84.550% Econ vs LHBp6.450% | |
| 44 | RA pace | 23 | 8.0 | 2 | 71 | 8.88 | 33.7 Phase Production 33.7 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.047× parp31.844.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp39.144.1% Boundary %21%p20.911.8% | 99.1 Quality 99.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %46% | 35.5 Impact 35.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.7 | 52.7 Versatility 52.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp24.550% Econ vs LHBp80.950% | |
| 45 | RA pace | 24 | 7.0 | 3 | 95 | 13.57 | 33.4 Phase Production 33.4 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.602× parp2.744.1% Wicket rate0.43/ovp72.744.1% Boundary %33%p0.911.8% | 74.5 Quality 74.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 19.1 Impact 19.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.3 | 7.3 Versatility 7.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp0.950% Econ vs LHBp13.650% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 0 | 22 | 11 | 31 Phase Production 31 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.298× parp22.744.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3044.1% Boundary %8%p65.511.8% | 39.1 Quality 39.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 40 Versatility 40 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.250% Econ vs LHBp51.850% | |
| 47 | Off-spin | 19 | 7.0 | 1 | 60 | 8.57 | 30.4 Phase Production 30.4 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.012× parp44.544.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp16.444.1% Boundary %19%p3011.8% | 31.8 Quality 31.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 20.9 Impact 20.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.2 | 55.5 Versatility 55.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp22.750% Econ vs LHBp88.250% | |
| 48 | Leg-spin | 20 | 6.0 | 1 | 58 | 9.67 | 26.7 Phase Production 26.7 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.141× parp26.444.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp21.844.1% Boundary %17%p46.411.8% | 22.7 Quality 22.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 13.6 Impact 13.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.9 | 33.6 Versatility 33.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.150% Econ vs LHBp28.250% | |
| 49 | RA pace | 20 | 6.0 | 1 | 54 | 9 | 26 Phase Production 26 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.062× parp3044.1% Wicket rate0.17/ovp21.844.1% Boundary %19%p26.411.8% | 84.5 Quality 84.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 68.2 Impact 68.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7.6 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp44.550% Econ vs LHBp55.550% | |
| 50 | Leg-spin | 29 | 4.0 | 1 | 51 | 12.75 | 25.9 Phase Production 25.9 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.505× parp1044.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp47.344.1% Boundary %33%p5.511.8% | 19.1 Quality 19.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 8.2 Impact 8.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-24.2 | 22.3 Versatility 22.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.950% Econ vs LHBp33.650% | |
| 51 | RA pace | 23 | 5.0 | 1 | 53 | 10.6 | 24.9 Phase Production 24.9 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.251× parp19.144.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp32.744.1% Boundary %23%p17.311.8% | 86.4 Quality 86.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %37% | 11.8 Impact 11.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-18.2 | 44.5 Versatility 44.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp15.550% Econ vs LHBp73.650% | |
| 52 | RA pace | 25 | 8.0 | 2 | 89 | 11.12 | 23.6 Phase Production 23.6 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.313× parp11.844.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp39.144.1% Boundary %25%p1011.8% | 26.4 Quality 26.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 30 Impact 30 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.5 | 13.6 Versatility 13.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp17.350% Econ vs LHBp1050% | |
| 53 | Off-spin | 23 | 7.0 | 1 | 69 | 9.86 | 22.8 Phase Production 22.8 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.163× parp20.944.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp16.444.1% Boundary %14%p53.611.8% | 4.5 Quality 4.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %10% | 33.6 Impact 33.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3 | 28.2 Versatility 28.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp26.450% Econ vs LHBp3050% | |
| 54 | LA pace | 19 | 3.0 | 0 | 43 | 14.33 | 13 Phase Production 13 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.692× parp6.444.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp19.144.1% Boundary %28%p15.511.8% | 8.2 Quality 8.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 6.4 Impact 6.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-27.4 | 28.2 Versatility 28.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2.750% Econ vs LHBp53.650% | |
| 55 | RA pace | 22 | 10.0 | 0 | 127 | 12.7 | 1.1 Phase Production 1.1 vs all bowlers · n=55 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.499× parp0.944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp0.944.1% Boundary %28%p2.711.8% | 10 Quality 10 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 0.9 Impact 0.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-50.2 | 2.7 Versatility 2.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4.550% Econ vs LHBp0.950% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 21 | 7.0 | 5 | 52 | 7.43 | 94.1 Phase Production 94.1 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.684× parp98.550% Wicket rate0.71/ovp95.616.7% Boundary %17%p86.833.3% | — | 92.6 Impact 92.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+14.6 | 61.9 Versatility 61.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep8740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 34 | 5.3 | 3 | 38 | 6.91 | 89.2 Phase Production 89.2 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.636× parp95.650% Wicket rate0.55/ovp69.116.7% Boundary %15%p89.733.3% | — | 48.5 Impact 48.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.4 | 57.9 Versatility 57.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep42.640% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp90.726.7% | |
| 3 | RA pace | 32 | 7.5 | 5 | 67 | 8.55 | 84.3 Phase Production 84.3 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.788× parp92.650% Wicket rate0.64/ovp89.716.7% Boundary %19%p69.133.3% | — | 13.2 Impact 13.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-44.4 | 53 Versatility 53 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep64.840% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 4 | RA pace | 25 | 7.2 | 5 | 70 | 9.55 | 83.8 Phase Production 83.8 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.879× parp7550% Wicket rate0.68/ovp92.616.7% Boundary %16%p92.633.3% | — | 4.4 Impact 4.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-67.6 | 55.2 Versatility 55.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep33.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp94.426.7% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 23 | 8.0 | 3 | 74 | 9.25 | 81.9 Phase Production 81.9 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.852× parp86.850% Wicket rate0.37/ovp33.816.7% Boundary %15%p98.533.3% | — | 54.4 Impact 54.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.1 | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep90.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 6 | LA pace | 30 | 5.0 | 2 | 43 | 8.6 | 77.5 Phase Production 77.5 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.792× parp89.750% Wicket rate0.40/ovp42.616.7% Boundary %17%p76.533.3% | — | 83.8 Impact 83.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.3 | 58.9 Versatility 58.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep79.640% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 2.4 | 2 | 21 | 7.88 | 76.3 Phase Production 76.3 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.725× parp77.943.6% Boundary %12%p72.141.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp83.814.5% | — | 77.9 Impact 77.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.2 | 71.4 Versatility 71.4 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep71.4100% | |
| 8 | RA pace | — | 14.4 | 3 | 143 | 9.75 | 74.5 Phase Production 74.5 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.898× parp83.850% Wicket rate0.20/ovp4.416.7% Boundary %18%p95.633.3% | — | 22.1 Impact 22.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-25.5 | 60.4 Versatility 60.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep83.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 9 | LA pace | 23 | 2.0 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 70.8 Phase Production 70.8 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.645× parp80.950% Wicket rate0.00/ovp14.716.7% Boundary %8%p83.833.3% | — | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.5 | 32.2 Versatility 32.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep1340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 10 | RA pace | 20 | 15.4 | 6 | 159 | 10.15 | 63.2 Phase Production 63.2 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.934× parp72.150% Wicket rate0.38/ovp30.916.7% Boundary %21%p66.233.3% | — | 7.4 Impact 7.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-63.2 | 64.8 Versatility 64.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep94.440% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 11 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 5.0 | 1 | 48 | 9.6 | 62.4 Phase Production 62.4 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.884× parp66.243.6% Boundary %17%p76.541.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp10.314.5% | — | 66.2 Impact 66.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.3 | 57.1 Versatility 57.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep57.1100% | |
| 12 | RA pace | 23 | 3.3 | 1 | 36 | 10.29 | 59.8 Phase Production 59.8 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.947× parp57.450% Wicket rate0.29/ovp2516.7% Boundary %14%p80.933.3% | — | 57.4 Impact 57.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.3 | 42.6 Versatility 42.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep38.940% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 35 | 12.3 | 5 | 127 | 10.16 | 59.3 Phase Production 59.3 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.935× parp63.250% Wicket rate0.40/ovp39.716.7% Boundary %21%p63.233.3% | — | 10.3 Impact 10.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-48.2 | 54.4 Versatility 54.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep68.540% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 29 | 7.0 | 4 | 73 | 10.43 | 58.3 Phase Production 58.3 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.96× parp60.350% Wicket rate0.57/ovp77.916.7% Boundary %24%p45.633.3% | — | 72.1 Impact 72.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.9 | 56.7 Versatility 56.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep74.140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 15 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 4.0 | 1 | 37 | 9.25 | 58 Phase Production 58 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.852× parp69.143.6% Boundary %21%p58.841.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp22.114.5% | — | 60.3 Impact 60.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep50100% | |
| 16 | LA pace | 28 | 9.0 | 5 | 97 | 10.78 | 53.4 Phase Production 53.4 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.992× parp51.550% Wicket rate0.56/ovp80.916.7% Boundary %24%p42.633.3% | — | 39.7 Impact 39.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.6 | 48.5 Versatility 48.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep53.740% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 5.0 | 4 | 58 | 11.6 | 49.4 Phase Production 49.4 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.068× parp33.843.6% Boundary %23%p48.541.8% Wicket rate0.80/ovp98.514.5% | — | 16.2 Impact 16.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-41.4 | 57.1 Versatility 57.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep57.1100% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 24 | 6.0 | 3 | 67 | 11.17 | 48.5 Phase Production 48.5 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.028× parp39.750% Wicket rate0.50/ovp66.216.7% Boundary %22%p52.933.3% | — | 69.1 Impact 69.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4 | 66.3 Versatility 66.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep98.140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 19 | Leg-spin | 32 | 6.0 | 2 | 66 | 11 | 46.1 Phase Production 46.1 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.013× parp45.643.6% Boundary %22%p52.941.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp27.914.5% | — | 95.6 Impact 95.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+30.4 | 28.6 Versatility 28.6 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep28.6100% | |
| 20 | Leg-spin | 20 | 2.0 | 1 | 22 | 11 | 45.3 Phase Production 45.3 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.013× parp48.543.6% Boundary %25%p39.741.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp51.514.5% | — | 36.8 Impact 36.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.8 | 57.1 Versatility 57.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep57.1100% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 30 | 2.0 | 1 | 21 | 10.5 | 42.2 Phase Production 42.2 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.967× parp54.450% Wicket rate0.50/ovp51.516.7% Boundary %33%p19.133.3% | — | 80.9 Impact 80.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.3 | 45.1 Versatility 45.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep1340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp8726.7% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 27 | 8.4 | 5 | 100 | 11.54 | 39.7 Phase Production 39.7 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.062× parp27.950% Wicket rate0.58/ovp86.816.7% Boundary %25%p33.833.3% | — | 98.5 Impact 98.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+40.4 | 51.5 Versatility 51.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep61.140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 23 | RA pace | 20 | 7.2 | 3 | 82 | 11.18 | 38.2 Phase Production 38.2 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.03× parp36.850% Wicket rate0.41/ovp45.616.7% Boundary %25%p36.833.3% | — | 86.8 Impact 86.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4 | 40.4 Versatility 40.4 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep33.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 24 | RA pace | 22 | 4.0 | 2 | 54 | 13.5 | 36.3 Phase Production 36.3 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.243× parp13.250% Wicket rate0.50/ovp60.316.7% Boundary %21%p58.833.3% | — | 45.6 Impact 45.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.8 | 48 Versatility 48 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep1340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp98.126.7% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 27 | 4.0 | 2 | 47 | 11.75 | 34.3 Phase Production 34.3 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.082× parp30.950% Wicket rate0.50/ovp60.316.7% Boundary %29%p26.533.3% | — | 63.2 Impact 63.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.8 | 32.2 Versatility 32.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep1340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 22 | 2.0 | 0 | 23 | 11.5 | 30.1 Phase Production 30.1 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.059× parp42.650% Wicket rate0.00/ovp14.716.7% Boundary %33%p19.133.3% | — | 42.6 Impact 42.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.4 | 32.2 Versatility 32.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep1340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 30 | 4.0 | 2 | 49 | 12.25 | 29.9 Phase Production 29.9 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.128× parp22.150% Wicket rate0.50/ovp60.316.7% Boundary %29%p26.533.3% | — | 51.5 Impact 51.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.3 | 32.2 Versatility 32.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep1340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 26 | 9.4 | 5 | 113 | 11.69 | 26 Phase Production 26 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.076× parp19.150% Wicket rate0.52/ovp72.116.7% Boundary %28%p13.233.3% | — | 89.7 Impact 89.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.9 | 38.1 Versatility 38.1 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep27.840% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 29 | RA pace | 33 | 8.5 | 2 | 103 | 11.66 | 24 Phase Production 24 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.074× parp2550% Wicket rate0.23/ovp7.416.7% Boundary %26%p30.933.3% | — | 19.1 Impact 19.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-32.6 | 61.9 Versatility 61.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep57.440% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp83.326.7% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 27 | 2.0 | 1 | 28 | 14 | 23 Phase Production 23 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.289× parp16.250% Wicket rate0.50/ovp51.516.7% Boundary %33%p19.133.3% | — | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-22.7 | 32.2 Versatility 32.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep1340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 31 | LA pace | 19 | 7.2 | 4 | 105 | 14.32 | 18.1 Phase Production 18.1 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.318× parp4.450% Wicket rate0.55/ovp7516.7% Boundary %32%p10.333.3% | — | 1.5 Impact 1.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-91 | 57.9 Versatility 57.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep5040% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp79.626.7% | |
| 32 | Leg-spin | 33 | 3.0 | 1 | 50 | 16.67 | 11.7 Phase Production 11.7 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.535× parp10.343.6% Boundary %50%p4.441.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp36.814.5% | — | 33.8 Impact 33.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.2 | 28.6 Versatility 28.6 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep28.6100% | |
| 33 | RA pace | 27 | 10.0 | 0 | 134 | 13.4 | 6.4 Phase Production 6.4 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.234× parp7.450% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.516.7% Boundary %33%p7.433.3% | — | 30.9 Impact 30.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.4 | 45.6 Versatility 45.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep46.340% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 32 | 7.0 | 2 | 107 | 15.29 | 4.4 Phase Production 4.4 vs all bowlers · n=34 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.407× parp1.550% Wicket rate0.29/ovp19.116.7% Boundary %43%p1.533.3% | — | 27.9 Impact 27.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-21.4 | 56.7 Versatility 56.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep74.140% Slower ballp5033.3% Slow bouncerp38.926.7% |
Arbind Kumar Rai
Bowler · RA pace
80.4
Scout Score
Overs 32.0 · Wkts 13 · Runs 232 · Econ 7.25
80.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay81.478.1%63.6
Middle76.921.9%16.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p31.21.03×
Scout Score80.4
81.4Powerplay78.1% of overs · 10w · 7.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.638%
Impactp93.627%
Qualityp88.515%
Versatilityp79.710%
Trajectoryp31.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.877× par150bp88.536.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov150bp78.242.1%
Boundary %19%150bp85.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.938× par87bp78.230%
Econ vs LHB0.795× par63bp93.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.34/ov87bp52.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.47/ov63bp88.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +36.7 · induced false-shot 36%
76.9Middle21.9% of overs · 3w · 5.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp85.438%
Impactp88.225%
Qualityp74.515%
Versatilityp67.312%
Trajectoryp31.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.624× par42bp95.544.1%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp72.744.1%
Boundary %5%42bp95.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.508× par32bp95.550%
Econ vs LHB0.996× par10bp39.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +20.3 · induced false-shot 29%
Shikhar Shetty
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 20
77.5
Scout Score
Overs 31.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 200 · Econ 6.45
77.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay76.448.4%37.0
Middle78.451.6%40.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p79.50.93×
Scout Score77.5
76.4Powerplay48.4% of overs · 6w · 7.07 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp86.638%
Impactp98.727%
Qualityp6.415%
Versatilityp79.710%
Trajectoryp79.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.795× par90bp93.636.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov90bp75.642.1%
Boundary %17%90bp96.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.794× par59bp9130%
Econ vs LHB0.797× par31bp88.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.41/ov59bp67.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.39/ov31bp61.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +46.2 · induced false-shot 22%
78.4Middle51.6% of overs · 4w · 5.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.838%
Impactp93.625%
Qualityp79.115%
Versatilityp81.812%
Trajectoryp79.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.693× par96bp99.144.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov96bp26.444.1%
Boundary %7%96bp97.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.565× par60bp99.150%
Econ vs LHB0.909× par36bp64.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +31.7 · induced false-shot 28%
Nischith Rao
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
72.1
Scout Score
Overs 19.4 · Wkts 12 · Runs 169 · Econ 8.59
72.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay88.530.5%27.0
Middle7425.4%18.8
Death59.744.1%26.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p68.80.97×
Scout Score72.1
88.5Powerplay30.5% of overs · 4w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp88.338%
Impactp96.227%
Qualityp96.215%
Versatilityp76.910%
Trajectoryp68.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.675× par36bp9136.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov36bp93.642.1%
Boundary %17%36bp73.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.669× par34bp93.630%
Econ vs LHB0.686× par2bp57.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.71/ov34bp88.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov2bp69.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +36.8 · induced false-shot 47%
74Middle25.4% of overs · 3w · 6.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.838%
Impactp77.325%
Qualityp60.915%
Versatilityp62.712%
Trajectoryp68.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.779× par30bp80.944.1%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp89.144.1%
Boundary %13%30bp58.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.623× par17bp82.750%
Econ vs LHB0.985× par13bp42.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.8 · induced false-shot 27%
59.7Death44.1% of overs · 5w · 11.54 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.748%
Impactp98.525%
Versatilityp51.515%
Trajectoryp68.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.062× par52bp27.950%
Wicket rate0.58/ov52bp86.816.7%
Boundary %25%52bp33.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%52bp61.140%
Slower ball052bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer052bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +40.4
Nathan D Mello
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
71.7
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 66 · Econ 9.43
71.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle71.771.4%51.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score71.7
71.7Middle71.4% of overs · 3w · 7.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp7338%
Impactp97.325%
Qualityp45.515%
Versatilityp65.512%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.897× par30bp60.944.1%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp89.144.1%
Boundary %13%30bp58.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.968× par27bp51.850%
Econ vs LHB0.237× par3bp79.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +43.5 · induced false-shot 23%
Shubhang Hegde
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 25
68.2
Scout Score
Overs 45.0 · Wkts 14 · Runs 343 · Econ 7.62
68.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay72.126.7%19.3
Middle67.764.4%43.6
Death59.68.9%5.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p72.30.96×
Scout Score68.2
72.1Powerplay26.7% of overs · 4w · 5.92 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.738%
Impactp75.627%
Qualityp37.215%
Versatilityp67.210%
Trajectoryp72.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.666× par72bp98.736.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov72bp65.442.1%
Boundary %11%72bp98.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.627× par63bp98.730%
Econ vs LHB0.915× par9bp60.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.38/ov63bp57.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov9bp39.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +17.1 · induced false-shot 28%
67.7Middle64.4% of overs · 9w · 8.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.638%
Impactp9025%
Qualityp42.715%
Versatilityp55.512%
Trajectoryp72.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.956× par174bp77.344.1%
Wicket rate0.31/ov174bp51.844.1%
Boundary %14%174bp73.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.917× par114bp88.250%
Econ vs LHB1.032× par60bp22.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +26.8 · induced false-shot 23%
59.6Death8.9% of overs · 1w · 9.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp5855%
Impactp60.325%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp72.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.852× par24bp69.143.6%
Boundary %21%24bp58.841.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp22.114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.719bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5
Dhanush R Gowda
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
67.9
Scout Score
Overs 25.0 · Wkts 11 · Runs 192 · Econ 7.68
67.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay82.328%23.0
Middle47.344%20.8
Death86.128%24.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p70.50.97×
Scout Score67.9
82.3Powerplay28% of overs · 5w · 7.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp8538%
Impactp80.827%
Qualityp85.915%
Versatilityp82.310%
Trajectoryp70.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.884× par42bp73.136.8%
Wicket rate0.71/ov42bp98.742.1%
Boundary %17%42bp78.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.962× par32bp65.430%
Econ vs LHB0.618× par10bp85.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.75/ov32bp93.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.60/ov10bp9120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +24.6 · induced false-shot 40%
47.3Middle44% of overs · 1w · 7.73 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.738%
Impactp22.725%
Qualityp71.815%
Versatilityp62.712%
Trajectoryp70.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.912× par66bp75.544.1%
Wicket rate0.09/ov66bp2.744.1%
Boundary %14%66bp7011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.887× par47bp77.350%
Econ vs LHB0.974× par19bp48.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.9 · induced false-shot 27%
86.1Death28% of overs · 5w · 7.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp94.148%
Impactp92.625%
Versatilityp61.915%
Trajectoryp70.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.684× par42bp98.550%
Wicket rate0.71/ov42bp95.616.7%
Boundary %17%42bp86.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate12%42bp8740%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer042bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +14.6
Abhilash Shetty
Bowler · LA pace · age 28
64.5
Scout Score
Overs 38.0 · Wkts 18 · Runs 328 · Econ 8.63
64.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay75.465.8%49.6
Middle38.310.5%4.0
Death4623.7%10.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p25.91.04×
Scout Score64.5
75.4Powerplay65.8% of overs · 11w · 7.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp86.438%
Impactp62.827%
Qualityp98.715%
Versatilityp81.810%
Trajectoryp25.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.886× par150bp85.936.8%
Wicket rate0.44/ov150bp88.542.1%
Boundary %19%150bp83.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.885× par96bp83.330%
Econ vs LHB0.889× par54bp83.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.44/ov96bp78.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.44/ov54bp80.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.3 · induced false-shot 45%
38.3Middle10.5% of overs · 2w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.938%
Impactp2.725%
Qualityp55.515%
Versatilityp39.112%
Trajectoryp25.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.003× par24bp42.744.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp78.244.1%
Boundary %17%24bp39.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.746× par18bp66.450%
Econ vs LHB1.779× par6bp11.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -34 · induced false-shot 25%
46Death23.7% of overs · 5w · 10.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.448%
Impactp39.725%
Versatilityp48.515%
Trajectoryp25.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.992× par54bp51.550%
Wicket rate0.56/ov54bp80.916.7%
Boundary %24%54bp42.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%54bp53.740%
Slower ball054bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer054bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.6
M G Naveen
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
64.4
Scout Score
Overs 40.0 · Wkts 13 · Runs 381 · Econ 9.52
64.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay31.925%8.0
Middle89.357.5%51.3
Death29.317.5%5.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p97.30.82×
Scout Score64.4
31.9Powerplay25% of overs · 1w · 10.3 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp15.738%
Impactp16.727%
Qualityp62.815%
Versatilityp22.610%
Trajectoryp97.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.159× par60bp24.436.8%
Wicket rate0.10/ov60bp6.442.1%
Boundary %27%60bp19.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.24× par34bp930%
Econ vs LHB1.056× par26bp39.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov34bp3.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.23/ov26bp35.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.3 · induced false-shot 33%
89.3Middle57.5% of overs · 10w · 7.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp86.138%
Impactp99.125%
Qualityp91.815%
Versatilityp69.112%
Trajectoryp97.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.877× par138bp91.844.1%
Wicket rate0.43/ov138bp82.744.1%
Boundary %14%138bp77.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.821× par86bp91.850%
Econ vs LHB0.971× par52bp46.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +52.5 · induced false-shot 31%
29.3Death17.5% of overs · 2w · 15.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp4.448%
Impactp27.925%
Versatilityp56.715%
Trajectoryp97.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.407× par42bp1.550%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp19.116.7%
Boundary %43%42bp1.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%42bp74.140%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer042bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -21.4
Vasuki Koushik
Bowler · RA pace · age 33
63.6
Scout Score
Overs 40.5 · Wkts 13 · Runs 341 · Econ 8.35
63.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay71.571%50.8
Middle72.27.3%5.3
Death34.721.6%7.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p75.90.96×
Scout Score63.6
71.5Powerplay71% of overs · 9w · 7.52 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.538%
Impactp85.927%
Qualityp39.715%
Versatilityp68.510%
Trajectoryp75.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.846× par174bp96.236.8%
Wicket rate0.31/ov174bp52.642.1%
Boundary %20%174bp75.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.884× par112bp85.930%
Econ vs LHB0.775× par62bp96.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov112bp62.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.19/ov62bp6.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +28 · induced false-shot 29%
72.2Middle7.3% of overs · 2w · 6.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.238%
Impactp80.925%
Qualityp59.115%
Versatilityp58.212%
Trajectoryp75.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.787× par18bp68.244.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp85.544.1%
Boundary %11%18bp62.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.795× par16bp59.150%
Econ vs LHB0.711× par2bp57.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.7 · induced false-shot 28%
34.7Death21.6% of overs · 2w · 11.66 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp2448%
Impactp19.125%
Versatilityp61.915%
Trajectoryp75.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.074× par53bp2550%
Wicket rate0.23/ov53bp7.416.7%
Boundary %26%53bp30.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%53bp57.440%
Slower ball053bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer4.71753bp83.326.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -32.6
Madhav Prakash Bajaj
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 26
62.4
Scout Score
Overs 26.4 · Wkts 9 · Runs 218 · Econ 8.18
62.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay61.922.5%13.9
Middle60.367.5%40.7
Death78.210%7.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p920.89×
Scout Score62.4
61.9Powerplay22.5% of overs · 2w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.738%
Impactp60.327%
Qualityp30.815%
Versatilityp64.710%
Trajectoryp9210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.9× par36bp70.536.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp62.842.1%
Boundary %19%36bp67.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.944× par34bp70.530%
Econ vs LHB0× par2bp66.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.17/ov34bp21.820%
Wkt vs LHB3.00/ov2bp96.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.9 · induced false-shot 25%
60.3Middle67.5% of overs · 5w · 8.28 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.238%
Impactp71.825%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp48.212%
Trajectoryp9210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.977× par108bp62.744.1%
Wicket rate0.28/ov108bp35.544.1%
Boundary %14%108bp75.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.936× par80bp75.550%
Econ vs LHB1.093× par28bp20.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8 · induced false-shot 24%
78.2Death10% of overs · 2w · 7.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.355%
Impactp77.925%
Versatilityp71.48%
Trajectoryp9212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.725× par16bp77.943.6%
Boundary %12%16bp72.141.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov16bp83.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.7316bp71.4100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.2
Yashovardhan Parantap
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
61.8
Scout Score
Overs 38.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 321 · Econ 8.45
61.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay63.157.9%36.5
Middle49.621.1%10.5
Death70.421.1%14.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p670.98×
Scout Score61.8
63.1Powerplay57.9% of overs · 5w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp5538%
Impactp83.327%
Qualityp52.615%
Versatilityp5110%
Trajectoryp6710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.9× par132bp78.236.8%
Wicket rate0.23/ov132bp16.742.1%
Boundary %18%132bp9121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.857× par89bp88.530%
Econ vs LHB0.989× par43bp52.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.27/ov89bp34.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.14/ov43bp920%
Impact · Quality — WPA +26.1 · induced false-shot 31%
49.6Middle21.1% of overs · 2w · 8.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp33.738%
Impactp35.525%
Qualityp99.115%
Versatilityp52.712%
Trajectoryp6710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.047× par48bp31.844.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp39.144.1%
Boundary %21%48bp20.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.23× par27bp24.550%
Econ vs LHB0.813× par21bp80.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.7 · induced false-shot 46%
70.4Death21.1% of overs · 3w · 9.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.948%
Impactp54.425%
Versatilityp63.315%
Trajectoryp6712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.852× par48bp86.850%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp33.816.7%
Boundary %15%48bp98.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate12%48bp90.740%
Slower ball048bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer048bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.1
Samit Dravid
Bowler · RA pace · age 20
61.6
Scout Score
Overs 36.4 · Wkts 14 · Runs 342 · Econ 9.33
61.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay74.140.9%30.3
Middle54.216.4%8.9
Death52.342.7%22.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p86.60.89×
Scout Score61.6
74.1Powerplay40.9% of overs · 7w · 8.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp7438%
Impactp65.427%
Qualityp93.615%
Versatilityp56.710%
Trajectoryp86.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.967× par90bp65.436.8%
Wicket rate0.47/ov90bp85.942.1%
Boundary %21%90bp65.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.168× par55bp16.730%
Econ vs LHB0.647× par35bp98.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.65/ov55bp96.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.17/ov35bp14.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9 · induced false-shot 39%
54.2Middle16.4% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp2638%
Impactp68.225%
Qualityp84.515%
Versatilityp5012%
Trajectoryp86.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.062× par36bp3044.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp21.844.1%
Boundary %19%36bp26.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.096× par29bp44.550%
Econ vs LHB0.915× par7bp55.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7.6 · induced false-shot 33%
52.3Death42.7% of overs · 6w · 10.15 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.248%
Impactp7.425%
Versatilityp64.815%
Trajectoryp86.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.934× par94bp72.150%
Wicket rate0.38/ov94bp30.916.7%
Boundary %21%94bp66.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate14%94bp94.440%
Slower ball094bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer094bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -63.2
Melu Kranthi Kumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 35
60.3
Scout Score
Overs 33.4 · Wkts 13 · Runs 273 · Econ 8.11
60.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay54.820.8%11.4
Middle80.342.1%33.8
Death40.637.1%15.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p11.61.11×
Scout Score60.3
54.8Powerplay20.8% of overs · 1w · 6.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.238%
Impactp73.127%
Qualityp44.915%
Versatilityp66.210%
Trajectoryp11.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.755× par42bp83.336.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp11.542.1%
Boundary %14%42bp88.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.867× par27bp75.630%
Econ vs LHB0.549× par15bp9130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov27bp6.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp74.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +16.8 · induced false-shot 29%
80.3Middle42.1% of overs · 7w · 6.99 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp92.838%
Impactp84.525%
Qualityp82.715%
Versatilityp86.412%
Trajectoryp11.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.825× par85bp93.644.1%
Wicket rate0.49/ov85bp93.644.1%
Boundary %12%85bp86.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.846× par66bp9050%
Econ vs LHB0.749× par19bp82.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15.3 · induced false-shot 29%
40.6Death37.1% of overs · 5w · 10.16 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.348%
Impactp10.325%
Versatilityp54.415%
Trajectoryp11.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.935× par75bp63.250%
Wicket rate0.40/ov75bp39.716.7%
Boundary %21%75bp63.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate9%75bp68.540%
Slower ball075bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer075bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -48.2
Macneil Noronha
Bowler · Off-spin · age 24
59.4
Scout Score
Overs 23.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 175 · Econ 7.61
59.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay57.943.5%25.2
Middle60.652.2%31.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p95.50.83×
Scout Score59.4
57.9Powerplay43.5% of overs · 3w · 8.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.838%
Impactp70.527%
Qualityp19.215%
Versatilityp52.310%
Trajectoryp95.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.967× par60bp62.836.8%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp47.442.1%
Boundary %22%60bp60.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.137× par20bp34.630%
Econ vs LHB0.892× par40bp78.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.90/ov20bp9120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov40bp1.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.5 · induced false-shot 25%
60.6Middle52.2% of overs · 2w · 7.08 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.538%
Impactp73.625%
Qualityp13.615%
Versatilityp82.712%
Trajectoryp95.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.836× par72bp9044.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov72bp1044.1%
Boundary %11%72bp88.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.906× par53bp73.650%
Econ vs LHB0.637× par19bp91.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.3 · induced false-shot 17%
Shreesha Achar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 30
59.2
Scout Score
Overs 43.0 · Wkts 15 · Runs 339 · Econ 7.88
59.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay40.818.6%7.6
Middle67.369.8%47.0
Death40.211.6%4.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p36.61.01×
Scout Score59.2
40.8Powerplay18.6% of overs · 3w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.238%
Impactp21.827%
Qualityp80.815%
Versatilityp34.610%
Trajectoryp36.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.181× par48bp21.836.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp67.942.1%
Boundary %27%48bp21.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.2× par34bp19.230%
Econ vs LHB1.127× par14bp29.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.53/ov34bp80.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov14bp19.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.9 · induced false-shot 38%
67.3Middle69.8% of overs · 8w · 6.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.438%
Impactp95.525%
Qualityp20.915%
Versatilityp98.212%
Trajectoryp36.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.775× par180bp97.344.1%
Wicket rate0.26/ov180bp24.544.1%
Boundary %9%180bp99.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.803× par132bp97.350%
Econ vs LHB0.697× par48bp99.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +38.9 · induced false-shot 20%
40.2Death11.6% of overs · 4w · 11.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.455%
Impactp16.225%
Versatilityp57.18%
Trajectoryp36.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.068× par30bp33.843.6%
Boundary %23%30bp48.541.8%
Wicket rate0.80/ov30bp98.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.1321bp57.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -41.4
Shreyas Gopal
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 32
58.5
Scout Score
Overs 42.0 · Wkts 13 · Runs 364 · Econ 8.67
58.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay27.214.3%3.9
Middle64.671.4%46.1
Death59.414.3%8.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p65.20.98×
Scout Score58.5
27.2Powerplay14.3% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp17.938%
Impactp24.427%
Qualityp30.815%
Versatilityp26.710%
Trajectoryp65.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.237× par36bp14.136.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp21.842.1%
Boundary %31%36bp16.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.258× par25bp11.530%
Econ vs LHB1.185× par11bp26.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.24/ov25bp47.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp28.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11 · induced false-shot 25%
64.6Middle71.4% of overs · 10w · 7.73 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp7438%
Impactp91.825%
Qualityp6.415%
Versatilityp50.912%
Trajectoryp65.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.913× par180bp86.444.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov180bp57.344.1%
Boundary %12%180bp9011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.829× par127bp93.650%
Econ vs LHB1.114× par53bp8.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +27.4 · induced false-shot 17%
59.4Death14.3% of overs · 2w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.155%
Impactp95.625%
Versatilityp28.68%
Trajectoryp65.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.013× par36bp45.643.6%
Boundary %22%36bp52.941.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp27.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.0522bp28.6100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +30.4
Paras Gurbax Arya
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 24
57.7
Scout Score
Overs 34.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 268 · Econ 7.88
57.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay57.441.2%23.6
Middle57.955.9%32.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p13.41.1×
Scout Score57.7
57.4Powerplay41.2% of overs · 4w · 7.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.338%
Impactp9127%
Qualityp3.815%
Versatilityp53.610%
Trajectoryp13.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.868× par84bp80.836.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov84bp42.342.1%
Boundary %17%84bp93.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.747× par69bp96.230%
Econ vs LHB1.418× par15bp11.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.26/ov69bp32.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.40/ov15bp74.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA +30.3 · induced false-shot 21%
57.9Middle55.9% of overs · 3w · 7.53 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.738%
Impactp86.425%
Qualityp33.615%
Versatilityp85.512%
Trajectoryp13.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.888× par114bp88.244.1%
Wicket rate0.16/ov114bp4.544.1%
Boundary %11%114bp91.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.934× par84bp80.950%
Econ vs LHB0.759× par30bp9050%
Impact · Quality — WPA +20.1 · induced false-shot 21%
Suhas Purushotham
Bowler · RA pace
57.1
Scout Score
Overs 24.4 · Wkts 6 · Runs 214 · Econ 8.68
57.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle63.740.5%25.8
Death52.659.5%31.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p18.81.06×
Scout Score57.1
63.7Middle40.5% of overs · 3w · 7.1 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp7238%
Impactp44.525%
Qualityp93.615%
Versatilityp77.312%
Trajectoryp18.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.838× par60bp84.544.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp53.644.1%
Boundary %8%60bp93.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.887× par43bp7050%
Econ vs LHB0.711× par17bp84.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.3 · induced false-shot 35%
52.6Death59.5% of overs · 3w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.548%
Impactp22.125%
Versatilityp60.415%
Trajectoryp18.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.898× par88bp83.850%
Wicket rate0.20/ov88bp4.416.7%
Boundary %18%88bp95.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%88bp83.340%
Slower ball088bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer088bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -25.5
Prithviraj Shekhawat
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 32
56.8
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 93 · Econ 7.75
56.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay66.125%16.5
Middle53.775%40.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p99.10.77×
Scout Score56.8
66.1Powerplay25% of overs · 1w · 6.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.538%
Impactp57.727%
Qualityp57.715%
Versatilityp62.810%
Trajectoryp99.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.712× par18bp75.636.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp5942.1%
Boundary %17%18bp70.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.765× par7bp62.830%
Econ vs LHB0.686× par11bp80.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.86/ov7bp70.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp28.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.8 · induced false-shot 33%
53.7Middle75% of overs · 2w · 8.22 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp4638%
Impactp57.325%
Qualityp35.515%
Versatilityp55.512%
Trajectoryp99.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.97× par54bp53.644.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp28.244.1%
Boundary %11%54bp84.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.013× par30bp5050%
Econ vs LHB0.919× par24bp60.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.6 · induced false-shot 20%
Rohan Raju
Bowler · RA pace · age 30
55.4
Scout Score
Overs 16.4 · Wkts 7 · Runs 158 · Econ 9.48
55.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle62.276%47.3
Death33.924%8.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p15.21.09×
Scout Score55.4
62.2Middle76% of overs · 5w · 8.61 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.138%
Impactp79.125%
Qualityp97.315%
Versatilityp44.512%
Trajectoryp15.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.016× par76bp46.444.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov76bp7044.1%
Boundary %18%76bp31.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.868× par57bp86.450%
Econ vs LHB1.46× par19bp2.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.3 · induced false-shot 40%
33.9Death24% of overs · 2w · 12.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.948%
Impactp51.525%
Versatilityp32.215%
Trajectoryp15.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.128× par24bp22.150%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp60.316.7%
Boundary %29%24bp26.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%24bp1340%
Slower ball024bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer024bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.3
Abhishek Prabhakar
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
55.2
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 43 · Econ 8.6
55.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle55.280%44.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score55.2
55.2Middle80% of overs · 2w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.338%
Impactp46.425%
Qualityp68.215%
Versatilityp45.512%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.944× par24bp48.244.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp78.244.1%
Boundary %17%24bp39.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.706× par17bp71.850%
Econ vs LHB1.525× par7bp19.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.2 · induced false-shot 29%
Hardik Raj
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 20
54.1
Scout Score
Overs 23.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 192 · Econ 8.35
54.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay54.98.7%4.8
Middle52.669.6%36.6
Death58.321.7%12.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p24.11.05×
Scout Score54.1
54.9Powerplay8.7% of overs · 1w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.138%
Impactp52.627%
Qualityp67.915%
Versatilityp6010%
Trajectoryp24.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.956× par12bp55.136.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp70.542.1%
Boundary %25%12bp38.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.948× par12bp57.730%
Econ vs LHB—0bp5030%
Wkt vs RHB0.50/ov12bp60.320%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp78.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.5 · induced false-shot 42%
52.6Middle69.6% of overs · 5w · 7.94 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.838%
Impactp62.725%
Qualityp24.515%
Versatilityp58.212%
Trajectoryp24.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.937× par96bp73.644.1%
Wicket rate0.31/ov96bp55.544.1%
Boundary %16%96bp5011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.905× par57bp79.150%
Econ vs LHB0.985× par39bp37.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.4 · induced false-shot 20%
58.3Death21.7% of overs · 1w · 9.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.455%
Impactp66.225%
Versatilityp57.18%
Trajectoryp24.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.884× par30bp66.243.6%
Boundary %17%30bp76.541.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp10.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.6615bp57.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.3
Dhruv Prabhakar
Bowler · Off-spin · age 21
52.9
Scout Score
Overs 11.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 97 · Econ 8.82
52.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle52.9100%52.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p81.20.93×
Scout Score52.9
52.9Middle100% of overs · 3w · 8.82 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.138%
Impactp75.525%
Qualityp28.215%
Versatilityp53.612%
Trajectoryp81.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par66bp39.144.1%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp42.744.1%
Boundary %18%66bp33.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.171× par38bp3050%
Econ vs LHB0.864× par28bp77.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.4 · induced false-shot 20%
Vidhwath Kaverappa
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
52
Scout Score
Overs 38.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 383 · Econ 10.08
52OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay62.468.4%42.7
Middle42.75.3%2.3
Death26.926.3%7.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p77.70.93×
Scout Score52
62.4Powerplay68.4% of overs · 8w · 8.73 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.138%
Impactp78.227%
Qualityp5015%
Versatilityp46.710%
Trajectoryp77.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.982× par156bp67.936.8%
Wicket rate0.31/ov156bp5042.1%
Boundary %24%156bp47.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.899× par99bp80.830%
Econ vs LHB1.132× par57bp21.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.43/ov99bp75.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.11/ov57bp3.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA +24.1 · induced false-shot 31%
42.7Middle5.3% of overs · 0w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp3138%
Impactp5025%
Qualityp39.115%
Versatilityp4012%
Trajectoryp77.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.298× par12bp22.744.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp3044.1%
Boundary %8%12bp65.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.349× par11bp28.250%
Econ vs LHB0.711× par1bp51.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 17%
26.9Death26.3% of overs · 0w · 13.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp6.448%
Impactp30.925%
Versatilityp45.615%
Trajectoryp77.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.234× par60bp7.450%
Wicket rate0.00/ov60bp1.516.7%
Boundary %33%60bp7.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%60bp46.340%
Slower ball060bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer060bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.4
Yash Punja
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 20
50.5
Scout Score
Overs 9.5 · Wkts 5 · Runs 94 · Econ 9.56
50.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle50.5100%50.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score50.5
50.5Middle100% of overs · 5w · 9.56 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp5438%
Impactp31.825%
Qualityp9015%
Versatilityp29.112%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.128× par59bp24.544.1%
Wicket rate0.51/ov59bp91.844.1%
Boundary %20%59bp22.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.177× par33bp31.850%
Econ vs LHB1.067× par26bp26.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.4 · induced false-shot 34%
Gautam Mishra
Bowler · LA pace · age 23
49.9
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 121 · Econ 10.08
49.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay5066.7%33.4
Middle41.916.7%7.0
Death57.716.7%9.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p0.91.31×
Scout Score49.9
50Powerplay66.7% of overs · 4w · 9.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp6338%
Impactp34.627%
Qualityp75.615%
Versatilityp52.810%
Trajectoryp0.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.083× par48bp39.736.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov48bp83.342.1%
Boundary %21%48bp62.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.101× par31bp37.230%
Econ vs LHB1.049× par17bp44.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.58/ov31bp83.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.35/ov17bp57.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.8 · induced false-shot 35%
41.9Middle16.7% of overs · 1w · 15 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp37.338%
Impactp48.225%
Qualityp80.915%
Versatilityp29.112%
Trajectoryp0.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.77× par12bp13.644.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp67.344.1%
Boundary %33%12bp13.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.907× par10bp13.650%
Econ vs LHB1.067× par2bp44.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.2 · induced false-shot 42%
57.7Death16.7% of overs · 0w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.848%
Impactp7525%
Versatilityp32.215%
Trajectoryp0.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.645× par12bp80.950%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp14.716.7%
Boundary %8%12bp83.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp1340%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.5
Br Rathan
Bowler · SLA orthodox
49.2
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 37 · Econ 7.4
49.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle49.280%39.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score49.2
49.2Middle80% of overs · 1w · 7.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.938%
Impactp59.125%
Qualityp11.815%
Versatilityp6012%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.856× par24bp64.544.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp47.344.1%
Boundary %17%24bp39.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.891× par23bp57.350%
Econ vs LHB0× par1bp62.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.8 · induced false-shot 8%
Lavish Kaushal
Bowler · LA pace · age 30
47.4
Scout Score
Overs 26.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 260 · Econ 10
47.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.223.1%8.6
Middle41.357.7%23.8
Death77.819.2%14.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p90.20.89×
Scout Score47.4
37.2Powerplay23.1% of overs · 1w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp25.438%
Impactp37.227%
Qualityp30.815%
Versatilityp3910%
Trajectoryp90.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.181× par36bp29.536.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp21.842.1%
Boundary %28%36bp25.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.87× par20bp73.130%
Econ vs LHB1.587× par16bp3.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov20bp14.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.37/ov16bp65.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.8 · induced false-shot 25%
41.3Middle57.7% of overs · 6w · 10.27 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.338%
Impactp17.325%
Qualityp7015%
Versatilityp11.812%
Trajectoryp90.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.212× par90bp17.344.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov90bp75.544.1%
Boundary %21%90bp11.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.189× par63bp19.150%
Econ vs LHB1.265× par27bp4.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.6 · induced false-shot 27%
77.8Death19.2% of overs · 2w · 8.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp77.548%
Impactp83.825%
Versatilityp58.915%
Trajectoryp90.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.792× par30bp89.750%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp42.616.7%
Boundary %17%30bp76.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%30bp79.640%
Slower ball030bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer030bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.3
Praveen Dubey
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 33
46.9
Scout Score
Overs 33.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 306 · Econ 9.27
46.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay5312.1%6.4
Middle48.178.8%37.9
Death28.49.1%2.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p93.80.85×
Scout Score46.9
53Powerplay12.1% of overs · 2w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.738%
Impactp55.127%
Qualityp21.815%
Versatilityp46.310%
Trajectoryp93.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.181× par24bp32.136.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp73.142.1%
Boundary %21%24bp57.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.277× par22bp14.130%
Econ vs LHB0× par2bp66.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov22bp11.520%
Wkt vs LHB6.00/ov2bp98.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.8 · induced false-shot 21%
48.1Middle78.8% of overs · 5w · 8.23 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.238%
Impactp39.125%
Qualityp40.915%
Versatilityp5012%
Trajectoryp93.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.971× par156bp71.844.1%
Wicket rate0.19/ov156bp6.444.1%
Boundary %14%156bp82.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.965× par104bp64.550%
Econ vs LHB0.985× par52bp35.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.5 · induced false-shot 22%
28.4Death9.1% of overs · 1w · 16.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp11.755%
Impactp33.825%
Versatilityp28.68%
Trajectoryp93.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.535× par18bp10.343.6%
Boundary %50%18bp4.441.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp36.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.5318bp28.6100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.2
MB Darshan
Bowler · RA pace · age 30
46.4
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 39 · Econ 9.75
46.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay39.550%19.8
Death53.250%26.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score46.4
39.5Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.938%
Impactp47.427%
Qualityp11.515%
Versatilityp48.210%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.012× par12bp52.636.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp29.542.1%
Boundary %25%12bp38.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.87× par10bp60.330%
Econ vs LHB1.715× par2bp34.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov10bp29.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov2bp69.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.9 · induced false-shot 8%
53.2Death50% of overs · 1w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.248%
Impactp80.925%
Versatilityp45.115%
Trajectoryp5012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.967× par12bp54.450%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp51.516.7%
Boundary %33%12bp19.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp1340%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer8.33312bp8726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.3
Rohan Naveen
Bowler · Off-spin · age 25
45.6
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 62 · Econ 7.75
45.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle45.6100%45.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p22.31.05×
Scout Score45.6
45.6Middle100% of overs · 2w · 7.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.638%
Impactp24.525%
Qualityp64.515%
Versatilityp50.912%
Trajectoryp22.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.915× par48bp7044.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp39.144.1%
Boundary %12%48bp71.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.854× par24bp60.950%
Econ vs LHB0.978× par24bp40.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.8 · induced false-shot 27%
Abhishek Ahlahwat
Bowler · Off-spin · age 28
45.5
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 82 · Econ 10.25
45.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle45.575%34.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score45.5
45.5Middle75% of overs · 2w · 8.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.638%
Impactp55.525%
Qualityp16.415%
Versatilityp50.912%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.042× par36bp34.544.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp60.944.1%
Boundary %17%36bp46.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.148× par24bp35.550%
Econ vs LHB0.83× par12bp66.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.2 · induced false-shot 14%
Vaibhav Sharma A
Bowler · LA pace · age 19
44.9
Scout Score
Overs 24.2 · Wkts 10 · Runs 280 · Econ 11.51
44.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay65.857.5%37.8
Middle11.812.3%1.5
Death18.530.1%5.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p6.21.23×
Scout Score44.9
65.8Powerplay57.5% of overs · 6w · 9.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.938%
Impactp88.527%
Qualityp83.315%
Versatilityp56.210%
Trajectoryp6.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.061× par84bp47.436.8%
Wicket rate0.43/ov84bp80.842.1%
Boundary %24%84bp44.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.161× par53bp21.830%
Econ vs LHB0.885× par31bp75.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.45/ov53bp73.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.39/ov31bp61.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +28.2 · induced false-shot 36%
11.8Middle12.3% of overs · 0w · 14.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp1338%
Impactp6.425%
Qualityp8.215%
Versatilityp28.212%
Trajectoryp6.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.692× par18bp6.444.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp19.144.1%
Boundary %28%18bp15.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.918× par14bp2.750%
Econ vs LHB0.889× par4bp53.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -27.4 · induced false-shot 0%
18.5Death30.1% of overs · 4w · 14.32 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp18.148%
Impactp1.525%
Versatilityp57.915%
Trajectoryp6.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.318× par44bp4.450%
Wicket rate0.55/ov44bp7516.7%
Boundary %32%44bp10.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%44bp5040%
Slower ball044bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer3.40944bp79.626.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -91
Aditya Goyal
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
44.5
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 82 · Econ 11.71
44.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay47.142.9%20.2
Middle56.928.6%16.3
Death28.128.6%8.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score44.5
47.1Powerplay42.9% of overs · 1w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.138%
Impactp44.927%
Qualityp57.715%
Versatilityp38.510%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.275× par18bp26.936.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp5942.1%
Boundary %22%18bp53.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.338× par10bp24.430%
Econ vs LHB1.201× par8bp32.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.60/ov10bp65.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp42.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7 · induced false-shot 33%
56.9Middle28.6% of overs · 2w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.738%
Impactp7025%
Qualityp52.715%
Versatilityp34.512%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.18× par12bp28.244.1%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp95.544.1%
Boundary %17%12bp35.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.785× par9bp53.650%
Econ vs LHB2.372× par3bp15.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7.8 · induced false-shot 25%
28.1Death28.6% of overs · 1w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp2348%
Impactp2525%
Versatilityp32.215%
Trajectoryp5012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.289× par12bp16.250%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp51.516.7%
Boundary %33%12bp19.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp1340%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -22.7
Santokh Singh
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
44.5
Scout Score
Overs 29.4 · Wkts 11 · Runs 307 · Econ 10.35
44.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay38.553.9%20.8
Middle56.613.5%7.6
Death49.532.6%16.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p74.10.96×
Scout Score44.5
38.5Powerplay53.9% of overs · 5w · 10.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp31.238%
Impactp927%
Qualityp9115%
Versatilityp31.510%
Trajectoryp74.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.153× par96bp16.736.8%
Wicket rate0.31/ov96bp55.142.1%
Boundary %29%96bp921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.119× par64bp26.930%
Econ vs LHB1.222× par32bp14.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.28/ov64bp44.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.37/ov32bp51.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -28.8 · induced false-shot 38%
56.6Middle13.5% of overs · 1w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.138%
Impactp37.325%
Qualityp77.315%
Versatilityp64.512%
Trajectoryp74.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.885× par24bp59.144.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp47.344.1%
Boundary %12%24bp60.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.225× par15bp33.650%
Econ vs LHB0.316× par9bp95.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.6 · induced false-shot 33%
49.5Death32.6% of overs · 5w · 11.69 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp2648%
Impactp89.725%
Versatilityp38.115%
Trajectoryp74.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.076× par58bp19.150%
Wicket rate0.52/ov58bp72.116.7%
Boundary %28%58bp13.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%58bp27.840%
Slower ball058bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer058bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.9
Bheem Rao Navale
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
44.3
Scout Score
Overs 4.3 · Wkts 4 · Runs 60 · Econ 13.33
44.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle44.388.9%39.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score44.3
44.3Middle88.9% of overs · 4w · 13.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.438%
Impactp28.225%
Qualityp88.215%
Versatilityp11.812%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.623× par24bp4.544.1%
Wicket rate1.00/ov24bp99.144.1%
Boundary %33%24bp5.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.743× par15bp6.450%
Econ vs LHB1.423× par9bp17.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.4 · induced false-shot 42%
Mohsin Khan
Bowler · Off-spin · age 22
44.2
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 119 · Econ 9.15
44.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay17.846.2%8.2
Middle70.646.2%32.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p63.41×
Scout Score44.2
17.8Powerplay46.2% of overs · 0w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp10.338%
Impactp19.227%
Qualityp1.315%
Versatilityp21.310%
Trajectoryp63.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.275× par36bp936.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov36bp3.842.1%
Boundary %28%36bp25.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.092× par19bp42.330%
Econ vs LHB1.493× par17bp6.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov19bp16.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov17bp16.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14 · induced false-shot 11%
70.6Middle46.2% of overs · 2w · 6.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.938%
Impactp82.725%
Qualityp57.315%
Versatilityp7012%
Trajectoryp63.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.806× par36bp82.744.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp60.944.1%
Boundary %14%36bp55.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.13× par10bp42.750%
Econ vs LHB0.684× par26bp97.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +14.1 · induced false-shot 25%
Ambareesh K
Bowler · SLA orthodox
43.1
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 54 · Econ 13.5
43.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle43.175%32.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score43.1
43.1Middle75% of overs · 2w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.338%
Impactp51.825%
Qualityp37.315%
Versatilityp29.112%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.652× par18bp8.244.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp85.544.1%
Boundary %33%18bp8.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.648× par18bp8.250%
Econ vs LHB—0bp5050%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.6 · induced false-shot 17%
Manoj Bhandage
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
42.9
Scout Score
Overs 12.4 · Wkts 5 · Runs 123 · Econ 9.71
42.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle45.368.4%31.0
Death37.731.6%11.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p4.51.27×
Scout Score42.9
45.3Middle68.4% of overs · 3w · 8.77 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.438%
Impactp42.725%
Qualityp62.715%
Versatilityp5012%
Trajectoryp4.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.035× par52bp40.944.1%
Wicket rate0.35/ov52bp64.544.1%
Boundary %19%52bp24.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.121× par29bp40.950%
Econ vs LHB0.928× par23bp59.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.4 · induced false-shot 27%
37.7Death31.6% of overs · 2w · 11.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.348%
Impactp63.225%
Versatilityp32.215%
Trajectoryp4.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.082× par24bp30.950%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp60.316.7%
Boundary %29%24bp26.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%24bp1340%
Slower ball024bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer024bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.8
CA Karthik
Bowler · RA pace · age 32
42.7
Scout Score
Overs 17.5 · Wkts 7 · Runs 157 · Econ 8.8
42.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay23.733.6%8.0
Middle49.322.4%11.0
Death53.843.9%23.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p171.06×
Scout Score42.7
23.7Powerplay33.6% of overs · 1w · 10.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp17.138%
Impactp26.927%
Qualityp30.815%
Versatilityp36.410%
Trajectoryp1710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.219× par36bp19.236.8%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp21.842.1%
Boundary %36%36bp3.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.105× par23bp39.730%
Econ vs LHB1.425× par13bp19.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov23bp920%
Wkt vs LHB0.46/ov13bp84.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.6 · induced false-shot 25%
49.3Middle22.4% of overs · 1w · 6.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.138%
Impactp40.925%
Qualityp3015%
Versatilityp68.212%
Trajectoryp1710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.738× par24bp79.144.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp47.344.1%
Boundary %8%24bp79.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.785× par18bp62.750%
Econ vs LHB0.593× par6bp73.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.7 · induced false-shot 17%
53.8Death43.9% of overs · 5w · 8.55 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.348%
Impactp13.225%
Versatilityp5315%
Trajectoryp1712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.788× par47bp92.650%
Wicket rate0.64/ov47bp89.716.7%
Boundary %19%47bp69.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%47bp64.840%
Slower ball047bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer047bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -44.4
Monish Reddy
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
42.6
Scout Score
Overs 10.3 · Wkts 2 · Runs 109 · Econ 10.38
42.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay45.119%8.6
Middle3447.6%16.2
Death53.433.3%17.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p331.02×
Scout Score42.6
45.1Powerplay19% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp3738%
Impactp5027%
Qualityp67.915%
Versatilityp40.810%
Trajectoryp3310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.125× par12bp44.936.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp29.542.1%
Boundary %25%12bp38.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.92× par8bp55.130%
Econ vs LHB1.544× par4bp24.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov8bp37.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp47.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.6 · induced false-shot 42%
34Middle47.6% of overs · 1w · 10.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.938%
Impactp11.825%
Qualityp86.415%
Versatilityp44.512%
Trajectoryp3310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.251× par30bp19.144.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp32.744.1%
Boundary %23%30bp17.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.413× par24bp15.550%
Econ vs LHB0.593× par6bp73.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.2 · induced false-shot 37%
53.4Death33.3% of overs · 1w · 10.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.848%
Impactp57.425%
Versatilityp42.615%
Trajectoryp3312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.947× par21bp57.450%
Wicket rate0.29/ov21bp2516.7%
Boundary %14%21bp80.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate5%21bp38.940%
Slower ball021bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer021bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.3
Santosh Basavaraj Hatti
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
42.5
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 66 · Econ 9.43
42.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.242.9%15.5
Middle58.428.6%16.7
Death3628.6%10.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score42.5
36.2Powerplay42.9% of overs · 0w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.838%
Impactp29.527%
Qualityp57.715%
Versatilityp36.710%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.125× par18bp37.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp942.1%
Boundary %22%18bp53.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.338× par7bp29.530%
Econ vs LHB0.998× par11bp47.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov7bp39.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp28.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.1 · induced false-shot 33%
58.4Middle28.6% of overs · 1w · 6.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.638%
Impactp64.525%
Qualityp52.715%
Versatilityp46.412%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.767× par12bp57.344.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp67.344.1%
Boundary %8%12bp65.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.471× par9bp68.250%
Econ vs LHB1.66× par3bp24.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.4 · induced false-shot 25%
36Death28.6% of overs · 0w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.148%
Impactp42.625%
Versatilityp32.215%
Trajectoryp5012%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.059× par12bp42.650%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp14.716.7%
Boundary %33%12bp19.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp1340%
Slower ball012bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer012bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.4
Dheeraj J Gowda
Bowler · Off-spin · age 20
42
Scout Score
Overs 17.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 153 · Econ 9
42OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay30.823.5%7.2
Middle45.870.6%32.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p84.80.9×
Scout Score42
30.8Powerplay23.5% of overs · 1w · 10.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.738%
Impactp11.527%
Qualityp915%
Versatilityp43.110%
Trajectoryp84.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.153× par24bp34.636.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp38.542.1%
Boundary %25%24bp32.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.216× par11bp32.130%
Econ vs LHB1.108× par13bp37.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov11bp26.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.46/ov13bp84.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -18.5 · induced false-shot 17%
45.8Middle70.6% of overs · 2w · 8.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.438%
Impactp60.925%
Qualityp2.715%
Versatilityp59.112%
Trajectoryp84.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.974× par72bp55.544.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov72bp1044.1%
Boundary %12%72bp80.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.051× par41bp48.250%
Econ vs LHB0.872× par31bp7050%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.1 · induced false-shot 8%
Aaditya Nair
Bowler · RA pace · age 21
41.5
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 97 · Econ 10.78
41.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay29.444.4%13.1
Middle51.255.6%28.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score41.5
29.4Powerplay44.4% of overs · 1w · 15 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp1938%
Impactp6.427%
Qualityp73.115%
Versatilityp44.910%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.687× par24bp3.836.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp38.542.1%
Boundary %38%24bp6.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB2.174× par16bp1.330%
Econ vs LHB0.686× par8bp73.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov16bp19.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.75/ov8bp93.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -32.8 · induced false-shot 38%
51.2Middle55.6% of overs · 1w · 7.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.738%
Impactp53.625%
Qualityp45.515%
Versatilityp61.812%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.873× par30bp66.444.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp32.744.1%
Boundary %17%30bp42.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.916× par27bp55.550%
Econ vs LHB0.474× par3bp68.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.4 · induced false-shot 23%
Shreevathsa R Acharya
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
41.4
Scout Score
Overs 13.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 162 · Econ 12.46
41.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle31.653.8%17.0
Death5346.2%24.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p20.51.05×
Scout Score41.4
31.6Middle53.8% of overs · 3w · 13.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp33.438%
Impactp19.125%
Qualityp74.515%
Versatilityp7.312%
Trajectoryp20.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.602× par42bp2.744.1%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp72.744.1%
Boundary %33%42bp0.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.627× par33bp0.950%
Econ vs LHB1.502× par9bp13.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.3 · induced false-shot 29%
53Death46.2% of overs · 3w · 11.17 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp48.548%
Impactp69.125%
Versatilityp66.315%
Trajectoryp20.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.028× par36bp39.750%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp66.216.7%
Boundary %22%36bp52.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate14%36bp98.140%
Slower ball036bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer036bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4
Nishchith N Pai
Bowler · RA pace · age 20
40.8
Scout Score
Overs 21.2 · Wkts 7 · Runs 197 · Econ 9.23
40.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay61.69.4%5.8
Middle33.456.2%18.8
Death47.334.4%16.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p9.81.12×
Scout Score40.8
61.6Powerplay9.4% of overs · 2w · 7.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp67.738%
Impactp67.927%
Qualityp67.915%
Versatilityp63.610%
Trajectoryp9.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.844× par12bp57.736.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp9142.1%
Boundary %25%12bp38.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.041× par9bp47.430%
Econ vs LHB0.229× par3bp70.530%
Wkt vs RHB1.33/ov9bp85.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp55.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.4 · induced false-shot 42%
33.4Middle56.2% of overs · 2w · 8.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.338%
Impactp15.525%
Qualityp48.215%
Versatilityp66.412%
Trajectoryp9.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.983× par72bp51.844.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov72bp1044.1%
Boundary %14%72bp68.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.073× par54bp46.450%
Econ vs LHB0.711× par18bp86.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.8 · induced false-shot 24%
47.3Death34.4% of overs · 3w · 11.18 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.248%
Impactp86.825%
Versatilityp40.415%
Trajectoryp9.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.03× par44bp36.850%
Wicket rate0.41/ov44bp45.616.7%
Boundary %25%44bp36.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%44bp33.340%
Slower ball044bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer044bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4
Ronit More
Bowler · RA pace · age 34
39.9
Scout Score
Overs 24.3 · Wkts 9 · Runs 232 · Econ 9.47
39.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay22.953.1%12.2
Middle54.924.5%13.5
Death6422.4%14.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p2.71.29×
Scout Score39.9
22.9Powerplay53.1% of overs · 3w · 10.85 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.938%
Impactp1.327%
Qualityp78.215%
Versatilityp29.710%
Trajectoryp2.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.22× par78bp6.436.8%
Wicket rate0.23/ov78bp34.642.1%
Boundary %28%78bp14.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.338× par52bp3.830%
Econ vs LHB0.976× par26bp55.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.23/ov52bp24.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.23/ov26bp35.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -72.4 · induced false-shot 35%
54.9Middle24.5% of overs · 3w · 8.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp56.438%
Impactp66.425%
Qualityp66.415%
Versatilityp55.512%
Trajectoryp2.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.042× par36bp34.544.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp80.944.1%
Boundary %17%36bp46.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.13× par30bp37.350%
Econ vs LHB0.593× par6bp73.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6.7 · induced false-shot 28%
64Death22.4% of overs · 3w · 6.91 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp89.248%
Impactp48.525%
Versatilityp57.915%
Trajectoryp2.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.636× par33bp95.650%
Wicket rate0.55/ov33bp69.116.7%
Boundary %15%33bp89.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%33bp42.640%
Slower ball033bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer19.69733bp90.726.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.4
Vyshak VijayKumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
36.8
Scout Score
Overs 30.5 · Wkts 10 · Runs 331 · Econ 10.74
36.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay13.548.6%6.6
Middle54.528.6%15.6
Death64.522.7%14.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p830.91×
Scout Score36.8
13.5Powerplay48.6% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp1.338%
Impactp3.827%
Qualityp16.715%
Versatilityp11.510%
Trajectoryp8310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.35× par90bp1.336.8%
Wicket rate0.07/ov90bp1.342.1%
Boundary %32%90bp1.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.298× par67bp6.430%
Econ vs LHB1.492× par23bp1.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov67bp1.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.26/ov23bp44.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -55.9 · induced false-shot 26%
54.5Middle28.6% of overs · 5w · 8.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.738%
Impactp4.525%
Qualityp95.515%
Versatilityp57.312%
Trajectoryp8310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.042× par53bp37.344.1%
Wicket rate0.56/ov53bp97.344.1%
Boundary %19%53bp28.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.206× par41bp20.950%
Econ vs LHB0.474× par12bp93.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -30.2 · induced false-shot 40%
64.5Death22.7% of overs · 4w · 10.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.348%
Impactp72.125%
Versatilityp56.715%
Trajectoryp8312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.96× par42bp60.350%
Wicket rate0.57/ov42bp77.916.7%
Boundary %24%42bp45.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%42bp74.140%
Slower ball042bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer042bp38.926.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.9
Rithesh Bhatkal
Bowler · Off-spin · age 33
34.3
Scout Score
Overs 27.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 231 · Econ 8.56
34.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay49.944.4%22.2
Middle21.955.6%12.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p81.14×
Scout Score34.3
49.9Powerplay44.4% of overs · 7w · 8.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp79.738%
Impactp32.127%
Qualityp24.415%
Versatilityp64.610%
Trajectoryp810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.984× par72bp60.336.8%
Wicket rate0.58/ov72bp96.242.1%
Boundary %18%72bp80.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.02× par40bp52.630%
Econ vs LHB0.943× par32bp62.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.75/ov40bp98.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.37/ov32bp51.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.2 · induced false-shot 26%
21.9Middle55.6% of overs · 3w · 8.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.238%
Impactp1025%
Qualityp0.915%
Versatilityp45.512%
Trajectoryp810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.991× par90bp5044.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov90bp13.644.1%
Boundary %16%90bp51.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.827× par41bp84.550%
Econ vs LHB1.133× par49bp6.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.6 · induced false-shot 9%
Shashi Kumar Kamble
Bowler · Off-spin · age 23
33.6
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 152 · Econ 10.13
33.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay43.146.7%20.1
Middle24.146.7%11.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p29.51.04×
Scout Score33.6
43.1Powerplay46.7% of overs · 2w · 9.29 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.838%
Impactp39.727%
Qualityp47.415%
Versatilityp41.510%
Trajectoryp29.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.045× par42bp5036.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp44.942.1%
Boundary %24%42bp5021.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.07× par15bp44.930%
Econ vs LHB1.042× par27bp42.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.40/ov15bp55.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.22/ov27bp21.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.1 · induced false-shot 31%
24.1Middle46.7% of overs · 1w · 9.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.838%
Impactp33.625%
Qualityp4.515%
Versatilityp28.212%
Trajectoryp29.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.163× par42bp20.944.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp16.444.1%
Boundary %14%42bp53.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.223× par26bp26.450%
Econ vs LHB1.067× par16bp3050%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3 · induced false-shot 10%
Siddharth Akhil
Bowler · Off-spin · age 19
33.2
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 60 · Econ 8.57
33.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle33.2100%33.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score33.2
33.2Middle100% of overs · 1w · 8.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp30.438%
Impactp20.925%
Qualityp31.815%
Versatilityp55.512%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.012× par42bp44.544.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp16.444.1%
Boundary %19%42bp3011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.266× par24bp22.750%
Econ vs LHB0.672× par18bp88.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.2 · induced false-shot 19%
Kumar L R
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
32.6
Scout Score
Overs 26.2 · Wkts 9 · Runs 264 · Econ 10.03
32.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay23.641.8%9.9
Middle25.630.4%7.8
Death53.827.8%15.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p34.81.02×
Scout Score32.6
23.6Powerplay41.8% of overs · 2w · 9.55 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.738%
Impactp14.127%
Qualityp14.115%
Versatilityp36.210%
Trajectoryp34.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.074× par66bp42.336.8%
Wicket rate0.18/ov66bp14.142.1%
Boundary %26%66bp29.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.974× par46bp67.930%
Econ vs LHB1.304× par20bp16.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.26/ov46bp42.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov20bp11.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.6 · induced false-shot 24%
25.6Middle30.4% of overs · 2w · 11.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp23.638%
Impactp3025%
Qualityp26.415%
Versatilityp13.612%
Trajectoryp34.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.313× par48bp11.844.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov48bp39.144.1%
Boundary %25%48bp1011.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.306× par33bp17.350%
Econ vs LHB1.328× par15bp1050%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.5 · induced false-shot 19%
53.8Death27.8% of overs · 5w · 9.55 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.848%
Impactp4.425%
Versatilityp55.215%
Trajectoryp34.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.879× par44bp7550%
Wicket rate0.68/ov44bp92.616.7%
Boundary %16%44bp92.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%44bp33.340%
Slower ball044bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer20.45544bp94.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -67.6
Vikas Gowda
Bowler · Off-spin
30.3
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 79 · Econ 11.29
30.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle30.385.7%26.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score30.3
30.3Middle85.7% of overs · 2w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.938%
Impactp26.425%
Qualityp16.415%
Versatilityp21.412%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.337× par36bp15.544.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp60.944.1%
Boundary %22%36bp19.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.509× par22bp10.950%
Econ vs LHB1.067× par14bp31.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.7 · induced false-shot 14%
Karthikeya K P
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 20
28.3
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 80 · Econ 10
28.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle23.875%17.9
Death4225%10.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p27.71.04×
Scout Score28.3
23.8Middle75% of overs · 1w · 9.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.738%
Impactp13.625%
Qualityp22.715%
Versatilityp33.612%
Trajectoryp27.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.141× par36bp26.444.1%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp21.844.1%
Boundary %17%36bp46.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.13× par25bp39.150%
Econ vs LHB1.164× par11bp28.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.9 · induced false-shot 17%
42Death25% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.355%
Impactp36.825%
Versatilityp57.18%
Trajectoryp27.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.013× par12bp48.543.6%
Boundary %25%12bp39.741.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp51.514.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.0112bp57.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.8
L Manvanth Kumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
23.4
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 209 · Econ 13.06
23.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay37.212.5%4.7
Middle11.362.5%7.1
Death46.625%11.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p88.40.89×
Scout Score23.4
37.2Powerplay12.5% of overs · 0w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=39
Componentpctweight
Productionp19.138%
Impactp42.327%
Qualityp42.315%
Versatilityp33.310%
Trajectoryp88.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.575× par12bp11.536.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp29.542.1%
Boundary %42%12bp11.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.669× par1bp5030%
Econ vs LHB1.684× par11bp930%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov1bp5020%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov11bp28.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.7 · induced false-shot 25%
11.3Middle62.5% of overs · 0w · 12.7 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp1.138%
Impactp0.925%
Qualityp1015%
Versatilityp2.712%
Trajectoryp88.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.499× par60bp0.944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov60bp0.944.1%
Boundary %28%60bp2.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.484× par30bp4.550%
Econ vs LHB1.518× par30bp0.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -50.2 · induced false-shot 15%
46.6Death25% of overs · 2w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=34
Componentpctweight
Productionp36.348%
Impactp45.625%
Versatilityp4815%
Trajectoryp88.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.243× par24bp13.250%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp60.316.7%
Boundary %21%24bp58.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%24bp1340%
Slower ball024bp5033.3%
Slow bouncer27.08324bp98.126.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.8
Kushal Wadhwani
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 29
22.4
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 57 · Econ 11.4
22.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle22.480%17.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p501×
Scout Score22.4
22.4Middle80% of overs · 1w · 12.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=55
Componentpctweight
Productionp25.938%
Impactp8.225%
Qualityp19.115%
Versatilityp22.312%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.505× par24bp1044.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp47.344.1%
Boundary %33%24bp5.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.509× par22bp10.950%
Econ vs LHB1.423× par2bp33.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -24.2 · induced false-shot 12%