| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LHB | 24 | 8 | 461 | 256 | 180.1 | 92.2 | 36 | 31 | 78 Scout Score 78 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production8540% Impact96.727% Versatility59.815% Shot quality706% Trajectory39.312% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.9×[45, 103, 31] | 85 Production 85 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.14× parp7035% True Avg3.58× parp96.730% Balls / boundary3p83.317.5% Balls / dismissal69p96.717.5% | 70 Shot Quality 70 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.4% Control · Build77.4% Phase-weighted control81.6% | 96.7 Impact 96.7 = WPA percentile · total +69.8 WPA · Powerplay+39.4 WPA · Consolidation+30.4 | 59.8 Versatility 59.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp76.726.7% vs Spin SRp76.726.7% Accel into Consp63.320% Pressure entryp23.326.7% | |
| 2 | RHB | 22 | 7 | 297 | 121 | 245.5 | 42.4 | 31 | 23 | 72.5 Scout Score 72.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production76.740% Impact9027% Versatility85.115% Shot quality306% Trajectory2512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.81×[45, 14, 31] | 76.7 Production 76.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.52× parp96.735% True Avg1.23× parp76.730% Balls / boundary2.23p96.717.5% Balls / dismissal17.8p16.717.5% | 30 Shot Quality 30 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.5% Control · Build73.3% Phase-weighted control75.5% | 90 Impact 90 = WPA percentile · total +58.6 WPA · Powerplay+53.1 WPA · Consolidation+5.5 | 85.1 Versatility 85.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp9026.7% vs Spin SRp96.726.7% Accel into Consp96.720% Pressure entryp6026.7% | |
| 3 | RHB | 19 | 8 | 201 | 117 | 171.8 | 25.1 | 27 | 7 | 64.6 Scout Score 64.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production49.340% Impact83.327% Versatility62.915% Shot quality23.36% Trajectory96.412% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.25×[4, 91, 12] | 49.3 Production 49.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.15× parp76.735% True Avg0.73× parp16.730% Balls / boundary2.8p9017.5% Balls / dismissal14p1017.5% | 23.3 Shot Quality 23.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.5% Control · Build55.6% Phase-weighted control75% | 83.3 Impact 83.3 = WPA percentile · total +48.7 WPA · Powerplay+36.7 WPA · Consolidation+12 | 62.9 Versatility 62.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp83.326.7% vs Spin SRp3026.7% Accel into Consp83.320% Pressure entryp6026.7% | |
| 4 | LHB | 23 | 1 | 136 | 56 | 242.9 | — | 14 | 8 | 63.5 Scout Score 63.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production72.240% Impact43.327% Versatility79.815% Shot quality83.36% Trajectory5012% form Δ (last 3 vs season)n/a[136] | 72.2 Production 72.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.45× parp83.335% True Avgn/ap6030% Balls / boundary2.57p7017.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap73.317.5% | 83.3 Shot Quality 83.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation87.5% Control · Build76.5% Phase-weighted control81.8% | 43.3 Impact 43.3 = WPA percentile · total +0.2 WPA · Powerplay-0.2 WPA · Consolidation+0.4 | 79.8 Versatility 79.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp96.726.7% vs Spin SRp9026.7% Accel into Consp7020% Pressure entryp6026.7% | |
| 5 | RHB | 24 | 9 | 206 | 124 | 166.1 | 22.9 | 18 | 13 | 62.3 Scout Score 62.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production8140% Impact7027% Versatility46.415% Shot quality3.36% Trajectory32.112% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.87×[32, 15, 28] | 81 Production 81 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.19× parp9035% True Avg1.33× parp83.330% Balls / boundary3.27p76.717.5% Balls / dismissal24.5p63.317.5% | 3.3 Shot Quality 3.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation61.5% Control · Buildn/a Phase-weighted control61.5% | 70 Impact 70 = WPA percentile · total +18.3 WPA · Powerplay+55.6 WPA · Consolidation-37.4 | 46.4 Versatility 46.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp56.726.7% vs Spin SRp5026.7% Accel into Consp1020% Pressure entryp6026.7% | |
| 6 | RHB | 24 | 7 | 164 | 106 | 154.7 | 27.3 | 11 | 11 | 58.8 Scout Score 58.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production54.740% Impact76.727% Versatility54.915% Shot quality96.76% Trajectory17.912% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.8×[38, 1, 8] | 54.7 Production 54.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.14× parp63.335% True Avg0.83× parp5030% Balls / boundary3.56p56.717.5% Balls / dismissal16p43.317.5% | 96.7 Shot Quality 96.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.9% Control · Build84.2% Phase-weighted control87.3% | 76.7 Impact 76.7 = WPA percentile · total +26.9 WPA · Powerplay+17.3 WPA · Consolidation+9.6 | 54.9 Versatility 54.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp3026.7% vs Spin SRp83.326.7% Accel into Consp43.320% Pressure entryp6026.7% | |
| 7 | RHB | 36 | 6 | 195 | 116 | 168.1 | — | 8 | 15 | 56 Scout Score 56 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production48.940% Impact56.727% Versatility61.615% Shot quality76.76% Trajectory60.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[21, 25, 41] | 48.9 Production 48.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.62× parp43.335% True Avgn/ap6030% Balls / boundary10p16.717.5% Balls / dismissaln/ap73.317.5% | 76.7 Shot Quality 76.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84% Control · Build79.2% Phase-weighted control81.6% | 56.7 Impact 56.7 = WPA percentile · total +11.2 WPA · Powerplay-4.7 WPA · Consolidation+16 | 61.6 Versatility 61.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp7026.7% vs Spin SRp63.326.7% Accel into Consp5020% Pressure entryp6026.7% | |
| 8 | RHB | 25 | 7 | 217 | 146 | 148.6 | 31 | 22 | 11 | 50.3 Scout Score 50.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production73.740% Impact5027% Versatility36.215% Shot quality106% Trajectory10.712% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.79×[17, 21, 8] | 73.7 Production 73.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.05× parp56.735% True Avg2.96× parp9030% Balls / boundary3.88p63.317.5% Balls / dismissal62p9017.5% | 10 Shot Quality 10 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build77.8% Phase-weighted control69.7% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +5.9 WPA · Powerplay+17.9 WPA · Consolidation-12 | 36.2 Versatility 36.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp36.726.7% vs Spin SRp36.726.7% Accel into Consp3.320% Pressure entryp6026.7% | |
| 9 | RHB | — | 7 | 192 | 138 | 139.1 | 27.4 | 16 | 7 | 45.3 Scout Score 45.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production3440% Impact36.727% Versatility37.615% Shot quality906% Trajectory89.312% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.06×[15, 50, 38] | 34 Production 34 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.78× parp23.335% True Avg0.68× parp43.330% Balls / boundary5.43p23.317.5% Balls / dismissal19p5017.5% | 90 Shot Quality 90 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86% Control · Build85.7% Phase-weighted control85.9% | 36.7 Impact 36.7 = WPA percentile · total -0.9 WPA · Powerplay-7.2 WPA · Consolidation+6.3 | 37.6 Versatility 37.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp1026.7% vs Spin SRp43.326.7% Accel into Consp36.720% Pressure entryp6026.7% | |
| 10 | RHB | — | 7 | 252 | 174 | 144.8 | 42 | 20 | 14 | 40.5 Scout Score 40.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production61.840% Impact1027% Versatility19.315% Shot quality63.36% Trajectory53.612% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[10, 48, 7] | 61.8 Production 61.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.9× parp5035% True Avg1.19× parp7030% Balls / boundary3.62p5017.5% Balls / dismissal29p83.317.5% | 63.3 Shot Quality 63.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82% Control · Build80.3% Phase-weighted control81.4% | 10 Impact 10 = WPA percentile · total -17.7 WPA · Powerplay-6.2 WPA · Consolidation-11.5 | 19.3 Versatility 19.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp43.326.7% vs Spin SRp3.326.7% Accel into Consp3020% Pressure entryp3.326.7% | |
| 11 | RHB | 26 | 6 | 99 | 72 | 137.5 | 16.5 | 8 | 6 | 39.7 Scout Score 39.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production32.340% Impact3027% Versatility38.915% Shot quality506% Trajectory82.112% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.01×[1, 55, 4] | 32.3 Production 32.3 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.73× parp3035% True Avg0.45× parp3030% Balls / boundary4.5p36.717.5% Balls / dismissal13.5p36.717.5% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation77.8% Control · Build81.2% Phase-weighted control78.6% | 30 Impact 30 = WPA percentile · total -8.5 WPA · Powerplay-13.1 WPA · Consolidation+4.5 | 38.9 Versatility 38.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp5026.7% vs Spin SRp23.326.7% Accel into Consp56.720% Pressure entryp3026.7% | |
| 12 | RHB | — | 8 | 216 | 150 | 144 | 30.9 | 15 | 15 | 34.2 Scout Score 34.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production14.740% Impact63.327% Versatility57.115% Shot quality36.76% Trajectory3.612% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.68×[0, 40, 4] | 14.7 Production 14.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.77× parp3.335% True Avg0.63× parp1030% Balls / boundary5.14p3017.5% Balls / dismissal18p3017.5% | 36.7 Shot Quality 36.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75.6% Control · Build76.9% Phase-weighted control75.9% | 63.3 Impact 63.3 = WPA percentile · total +14.4 WPA · Powerplay-10.7 WPA · Consolidation+25.1 | 57.1 Versatility 57.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp3.326.7% vs Spin SRp56.726.7% Accel into Consp76.720% Pressure entryp96.726.7% | |
| 13 | LHB | 31 | 7 | 140 | 94 | 148.9 | 20 | 13 | 7 | 29.8 Scout Score 29.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production18.740% Impact23.327% Versatility47.315% Shot quality56.76% Trajectory46.412% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.9×[37, 33, 0] | 18.7 Production 18.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.64× parp16.735% True Avg0.38× parp23.330% Balls / boundary8.67p1017.5% Balls / dismissal13p23.317.5% | 56.7 Shot Quality 56.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation81.4% Control · Build72% Phase-weighted control79.3% | 23.3 Impact 23.3 = WPA percentile · total -10.7 WPA · Powerplay-21.7 WPA · Consolidation+11 | 47.3 Versatility 47.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp23.326.7% vs Spin SRp7026.7% Accel into Consp9020% Pressure entryp16.726.7% | |
| 14 | RHB | 20 | 7 | 158 | 122 | 129.5 | 26.3 | 14 | 4 | 27.3 Scout Score 27.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production2540% Impact3.327% Versatility37.615% Shot quality43.36% Trajectory67.912% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.97×[4, 40, 16] | 25 Production 25 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.68× parp1035% True Avg0.62× parp36.730% Balls / boundary8p3.317.5% Balls / dismissal20p56.717.5% | 43.3 Shot Quality 43.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation76.3% Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control77.6% | 3.3 Impact 3.3 = WPA percentile · total -26.9 WPA · Powerplay-27.1 WPA · Consolidation+0.2 | 37.6 Versatility 37.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp16.726.7% vs Spin SRp16.726.7% Accel into Consp23.320% Pressure entryp9026.7% | |
| 15 | RHB | 38 | 6 | 120 | 81 | 148.1 | 20 | 12 | 7 | 27.2 Scout Score 27.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production2240% Impact16.727% Versatility25.615% Shot quality16.76% Trajectory7512% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[0, 18, 32] | 22 Production 22 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.9× parp36.735% True Avg0.47× parp3.330% Balls / boundary4.07p43.317.5% Balls / dismissal11.4p3.317.5% | 16.7 Shot Quality 16.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control70.6% | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = WPA percentile · total -13.3 WPA · Powerplay-8.2 WPA · Consolidation-5 | 25.6 Versatility 25.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending vs Pace SRp63.326.7% vs Spin SRp1026.7% Accel into Consp16.720% Pressure entryp1026.7% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LHB | 23 | 9 | 260 | 152 | 171.1 | 32.5 | 22 | 16 | 92.2 Scout Score 92.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production97.428% Impact97.427% Versatility83.427% Shot quality86.88% Trajectory92.110% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[10, 14, 28] | 97.4 Production 97.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.35× parp97.442.9% True Avg2.24× parp97.432.1% Balls / boundary3.28p97.425% | 86.8 Shot Quality 86.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86% Control · Build82.7% Phase-weighted control84.2% | 97.4 Impact 97.4 = WPA percentile · total +64.9 WPA · Consolidation-2.1 WPA · Build+67.1 | 83.4 Versatility 83.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep91.144.4% vs Off-spin15bp90 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball10bp92.9 Spin hittingp80.629.6% Off-spin26bp62.5 LA-orthodox35bp94.1 Leg-spin9b9b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p86.814.8% Reach deathp55.311.1% | |
| 2 | RHB | — | 8 | 251 | 145 | 173.1 | 50.2 | 14 | 18 | 82.6 Scout Score 82.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production92.128% Impact92.127% Versatility80.427% Shot quality65.88% Trajectory5010% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[21, 12, 27] | 92.1 Production 92.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.16× parp92.142.9% True Avg1.72× parp92.132.1% Balls / boundary4.91p92.125% | 65.8 Shot Quality 65.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.3% Control · Build79% Phase-weighted control81.4% | 92.1 Impact 92.1 = WPA percentile · total +41.1 WPA · Consolidation+46 WPA · Build-4.8 | 80.4 Versatility 80.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep86.644.4% vs LA-orthodox32bp94.4 vs Leg-spin20bp78.6 vs Short ball11bp78.6 Spin hittingp66.229.6% Off-spin13bp79.2 LA-orthodox33bp61.8 Leg-spin21bp65 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p81.614.8% Reach deathp92.111.1% | |
| 3 | RHB | 28 | 8 | 316 | 179 | 176.5 | 52.7 | 14 | 26 | 78 Scout Score 78 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production83.828% Impact86.827% Versatility64.327% Shot quality76.38% Trajectory76.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.02×[15, 76, 65] | 83.8 Production 83.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.06× parp86.842.9% True Avg1.44× parp81.632.1% Balls / boundary5.61p81.625% | 76.3 Shot Quality 76.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.5% Control · Build84.3% Phase-weighted control83.7% | 86.8 Impact 86.8 = WPA percentile · total +32.4 WPA · Consolidation-5.3 WPA · Build+37.8 | 64.3 Versatility 64.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep55.644.4% vs LA-orthodox39bp50 vs Leg-spin23bp64.3 vs Short ball10bp57.1 Spin hittingp64.229.6% Off-spin35bp87.5 LA-orthodox44bp38.2 Leg-spin30bp75 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p65.814.8% Reach deathp97.411.1% | |
| 4 | LHB | 20 | 7 | 114 | 92 | 123.9 | 28.5 | 9 | 3 | 58.8 Scout Score 58.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production44.228% Impact81.627% Versatility46.427% Shot quality92.18% Trajectory44.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.9×[3, 26, 19] | 44.2 Production 44.2 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.87× parp28.942.9% True Avg1.6× parp76.332.1% Balls / boundary7.78p28.925% | 92.1 Shot Quality 92.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build83.8% Phase-weighted control84.3% | 81.6 Impact 81.6 = WPA percentile · total +22.9 WPA · Consolidation-2.3 WPA · Build+25.1 | 46.4 Versatility 46.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep57.144.4% vs Off-spin7b7b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball10bp57.1 Spin hittingp42.929.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox17bp26.5 Leg-spin23bp55 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p5014.8% Reach deathp7.911.1% | |
| 5 | RHB | 26 | 4 | 97 | 73 | 132.9 | 24.2 | 5 | 4 | 57.7 Scout Score 57.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production45.528% Impact76.327% Versatility33.827% Shot quality81.68% Trajectory86.810% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.03×[13, 5, 53] | 45.5 Production 45.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.93× parp44.742.9% True Avg1.13× parp55.332.1% Balls / boundary7.67p34.225% | 81.6 Shot Quality 81.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation95.7% Control · Build78.3% Phase-weighted control84.1% | 76.3 Impact 76.3 = WPA percentile · total +13 WPA · Consolidation+0.3 WPA · Build+12.7 | 33.8 Versatility 33.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep28.544.4% vs LA-orthodox16bp33.3 vs Leg-spin11bp21.4 vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp14.329.6% Off-spin31bp4.2 LA-orthodox17bp32.4 Leg-spin11bp15 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p92.114.8% Reach deathp28.911.1% | |
| 6 | RHB | 28 | 9 | 246 | 162 | 151.9 | 30.8 | 18 | 14 | 55.7 Scout Score 55.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production71.628% Impact65.827% Versatility46.627% Shot quality508% Trajectory13.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.57×[16, 3, 7] | 71.6 Production 71.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1× parp71.142.9% True Avg1.21× parp60.532.1% Balls / boundary5.48p86.825% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78% Control · Build79.7% Phase-weighted control79.1% | 65.8 Impact 65.8 = WPA percentile · total +8.9 WPA · Consolidation-2.3 WPA · Build+11.2 | 46.6 Versatility 46.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep4044.4% vs LA-orthodox18bp33.3 vs Leg-spin21bp50 vs Short ball21bp35.7 Spin hittingp4329.6% Off-spin33bp70.8 LA-orthodox28bp8.8 Leg-spin21bp45 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p55.314.8% Reach deathp71.111.1% | |
| 7 | LHB | 36 | 5 | 87 | 59 | 147.5 | 17.4 | 3 | 7 | 54.2 Scout Score 54.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production54.528% Impact60.527% Versatility49.627% Shot quality39.58% Trajectory60.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[19, 1, 36] | 54.5 Production 54.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.11× parp76.342.9% True Avg0.6× parp28.932.1% Balls / boundary6.2p5025% | 39.5 Shot Quality 39.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation82.6% Control · Build62.5% Phase-weighted control77.4% | 60.5 Impact 60.5 = WPA percentile · total +8.3 WPA · Consolidation+4.2 WPA · Build+4.1 | 49.6 Versatility 49.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin5b5b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp79.429.6% Off-spin5b5b <min LA-orthodox14bp79.4 Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p23.714.8% Reach deathp2.611.1% | |
| 8 | LHB | 28 | 7 | 177 | 124 | 142.7 | 35.4 | 13 | 8 | 51.2 Scout Score 51.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production75.628% Impact39.527% Versatility28.427% Shot quality97.48% Trajectory39.510% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.89×[12, 20, 11] | 75.6 Production 75.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.07× parp81.642.9% True Avg1.32× parp71.132.1% Balls / boundary5.53p71.125% | 97.4 Shot Quality 97.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation86.5% Control · Build84.2% Phase-weighted control85.1% | 39.5 Impact 39.5 = WPA percentile · total -1.1 WPA · Consolidation+2.3 WPA · Build-3.4 | 28.4 Versatility 28.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep1044.4% vs Off-spin19bp10 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball9b9b <min Spin hittingp25.129.6% Off-spin24bp37.5 LA-orthodox25bp2.9 Leg-spin26bp35 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p97.414.8% Reach deathp18.411.1% | |
| 9 | RHB | — | 7 | 147 | 101 | 145.5 | 24.5 | 11 | 7 | 49.7 Scout Score 49.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production42.528% Impact55.327% Versatility68.627% Shot quality18.48% Trajectory28.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.83×[9, 44, 0] | 42.5 Production 42.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.91× parp39.542.9% True Avg0.84× parp44.732.1% Balls / boundary7.1p44.725% | 18.4 Shot Quality 18.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.3% Control · Build71.4% Phase-weighted control71.8% | 55.3 Impact 55.3 = WPA percentile · total +3.9 WPA · Consolidation+0.5 WPA · Build+3.5 | 68.6 Versatility 68.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep84.544.4% vs LA-orthodox13bp72.2 vs Leg-spin19bp92.9 vs Short ball8b8b <min Spin hittingp69.829.6% Off-spin13bp25 LA-orthodox27bp73.5 Leg-spin19bp95 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p13.214.8% Reach deathp76.311.1% | |
| 10 | RHB | — | 8 | 303 | 195 | 155.4 | 43.3 | 24 | 19 | 49.4 Scout Score 49.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production61.728% Impact7.927% Versatility58.627% Shot quality55.38% Trajectory97.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.08×[43, 77, 17] | 61.7 Production 61.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.95× parp5042.9% True Avg1.23× parp65.832.1% Balls / boundary5.59p76.325% | 55.3 Shot Quality 55.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84.5% Control · Build76.9% Phase-weighted control80.5% | 7.9 Impact 7.9 = WPA percentile · total -15.9 WPA · Consolidation+0.9 WPA · Build-16.8 | 58.6 Versatility 58.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep4944.4% vs LA-orthodox26bp83.3 vs Leg-spin38bp35.7 vs Short ball14bp21.4 Spin hittingp61.329.6% Off-spin32bp95.8 LA-orthodox43bp67.6 Leg-spin38bp25 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p60.514.8% Reach deathp86.811.1% | |
| 11 | LHB | 25 | 8 | 157 | 109 | 144 | 19.6 | 11 | 7 | 48.5 Scout Score 48.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production53.628% Impact71.127% Versatility26.927% Shot quality44.78% Trajectory34.210% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.87×[32, 18, 15] | 53.6 Production 53.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.98× parp55.342.9% True Avg1.04× parp5032.1% Balls / boundary6.75p55.325% | 44.7 Shot Quality 44.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation78.6% Control · Build77.4% Phase-weighted control77.8% | 71.1 Impact 71.1 = WPA percentile · total +12.7 WPA · Consolidation+9.8 WPA · Build+3 | 26.9 Versatility 26.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep22.244.4% vs Off-spin25bp30 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball13bp7.1 Spin hittingp47.229.6% Off-spin31bp12.5 LA-orthodox10bp94.1 Leg-spin16bp85 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p2.614.8% Reach deathp23.711.1% | |
| 12 | LHB | 31 | 6 | 131 | 116 | 112.9 | 32.8 | 6 | 5 | 45.7 Scout Score 45.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production40.428% Impact5027% Versatility53.327% Shot quality71.18% Trajectory7.910% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.51×[7, 4, 5] | 40.4 Production 40.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp18.442.9% True Avg2.52× parp86.832.1% Balls / boundary9.67p18.425% | 71.1 Shot Quality 71.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation84% Control · Build81.8% Phase-weighted control82.8% | 50 Impact 50 = WPA percentile · total +3.4 WPA · Consolidation+10.7 WPA · Build-7.2 | 53.3 Versatility 53.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep7044.4% vs Off-spin19bp70 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball7b7b <min Spin hittingp52.129.6% Off-spin27bp54.2 LA-orthodox27bp50 Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p7.914.8% Reach deathp5011.1% | |
| 13 | LHB | — | 4 | 49 | 37 | 132.4 | 12.2 | 7 | 1 | 45.5 Scout Score 45.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production5028% Impact23.727% Versatility55.627% Shot quality23.78% Trajectory81.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.02×[22, 0, 24] | 50 Production 50 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.05× parp60.542.9% True Avg0.59× parp23.732.1% Balls / boundary4p65.825% | 23.7 Shot Quality 23.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation73.9% Control · Build66.7% Phase-weighted control71.9% | 23.7 Impact 23.7 = WPA percentile · total -3.7 WPA · Consolidation-3.7 WPA · Build+0 | 55.6 Versatility 55.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin8b8b <min vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp85.329.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox12bp85.3 Leg-spin5b5b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p44.714.8% Reach deathp13.211.1% | |
| 14 | RHB | — | 3 | 61 | 47 | 129.8 | 20.3 | 9 | 0 | 40.4 Scout Score 40.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production36.428% Impact44.727% Versatility39.427% Shot quality7.98% Trajectory68.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[54, 2, 5] | 36.4 Production 36.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.82× parp34.242.9% True Avg0.54× parp36.832.1% Balls / boundary6.25p39.525% | 7.9 Shot Quality 7.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation71.4% Control · Build63.6% Phase-weighted control68% | 44.7 Impact 44.7 = WPA percentile · total +1 WPA · Consolidation+2.8 WPA · Build-1.8 | 39.4 Versatility 39.4 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox0b0b <min vs Leg-spin8b8b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp2529.6% Off-spin13bp25 LA-orthodox0b0b <min Leg-spin8b8b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p34.214.8% Reach deathp42.111.1% | |
| 15 | RHB | 28 | 6 | 115 | 71 | 162 | 23 | 5 | 8 | 34.3 Scout Score 34.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production13.528% Impact28.927% Versatility55.127% Shot quality28.98% Trajectory55.310% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.99×[53, 6, 7] | 13.5 Production 13.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.79× parp13.242.9% True Avg0.54× parp18.432.1% Balls / boundary13p7.925% | 28.9 Shot Quality 28.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation75% Control · Build74.1% Phase-weighted control74.4% | 28.9 Impact 28.9 = WPA percentile · total -1.9 WPA · Consolidation-5.3 WPA · Build+3.4 | 55.1 Versatility 55.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep61.144.4% vs LA-orthodox12bp61.1 vs Leg-spin6b6b <min vs Short ball2b2b <min Spin hittingp44.129.6% Off-spin8b8b <min LA-orthodox12bp44.1 Leg-spin9b9b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p39.514.8% Reach deathp81.611.1% | |
| 16 | LHB | 21 | 6 | 96 | 57 | 168.4 | 16 | 6 | 7 | 29.2 Scout Score 29.2 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production45.928% Impact2.627% Versatility53.127% Shot quality13.28% Trajectory2.610% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.47×[1, 4, 10] | 45.9 Production 45.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.06× parp65.842.9% True Avg0.4× parp7.932.1% Balls / boundary4.83p60.525% | 13.2 Shot Quality 13.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation65% Control · Build77.8% Phase-weighted control69% | 2.6 Impact 2.6 = WPA percentile · total -21.8 WPA · Consolidation-16.1 WPA · Build-5.7 | 53.1 Versatility 53.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs Off-spin12bp50 vs Chinaman0b0b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp45.829.6% Off-spin17bp45.8 LA-orthodox5b5b <min Leg-spin3b3b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p71.114.8% Reach deathp60.511.1% | |
| 17 | RHB | — | 5 | 109 | 67 | 162.7 | 21.8 | 15 | 4 | 29 Scout Score 29 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production16.928% Impact34.227% Versatility46.227% Shot quality2.68% Trajectory23.710% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.83×[36, 2, 1] | 16.9 Production 16.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.77× parp23.742.9% True Avg0.24× parp2.632.1% Balls / boundary8p23.725% | 2.6 Shot Quality 2.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation68.2% Control · Build0% Phase-weighted control62.5% | 34.2 Impact 34.2 = WPA percentile · total -1.7 WPA · Consolidation-1.2 WPA · Build-0.5 | 46.2 Versatility 46.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5044.4% vs LA-orthodox2b2b <min vs Leg-spin9b9b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp55.929.6% Off-spin4b4b <min LA-orthodox13bp55.9 Leg-spin9b9b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p18.414.8% Reach deathp42.111.1% | |
| 18 | RHB | — | 3 | 48 | 51 | 94.1 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 23.8 Scout Score 23.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production13.628% Impact18.427% Versatility20.227% Shot quality34.28% Trajectory68.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[5, 38, 5] | 13.6 Production 13.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.54× parp2.642.9% True Avg0.54× parp36.832.1% Balls / boundary38p2.625% | 34.2 Shot Quality 34.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation70.6% Control · Build81% Phase-weighted control76.3% | 18.4 Impact 18.4 = WPA percentile · total -7 WPA · Consolidation-17.7 WPA · Build+10.7 | 20.2 Versatility 20.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep5.644.4% vs LA-orthodox23bp5.6 vs Leg-spin8b8b <min vs Short ball1b1b <min Spin hittingp20.629.6% Off-spin1b1b <min LA-orthodox27bp20.6 Leg-spin8b8b <min Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p28.914.8% Reach deathp65.811.1% | |
| 19 | RHB | 19 | 7 | 48 | 49 | 98 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 19.6 Scout Score 19.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production10.928% Impact13.227% Versatility23.227% Shot quality60.58% Trajectory18.410% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.66×[11, 0, 2] | 10.9 Production 10.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.69× parp7.942.9% True Avg0.37× parp13.232.1% Balls / boundary10.33p13.225% | 60.5 Shot Quality 60.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation95% Control · Build54.5% Phase-weighted control80.6% | 13.2 Impact 13.2 = WPA percentile · total -9 WPA · Consolidation-0 WPA · Build-9 | 23.2 Versatility 23.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiancep11.244.4% vs LA-orthodox11bp16.7 vs Leg-spin15bp7.1 vs Short ball3b3b <min Spin hittingp10.529.6% Off-spin0b0b <min LA-orthodox20bp14.7 Leg-spin15bp5 Chinaman0b0b <min Hybrid0b0b <min vs Pace SR (mid)p76.314.8% Reach deathp34.211.1% |
| # | Player | Bat | Age | Inns | Runs | Balls | SR | Avg | 4s | 6s | Score | Prod | Shot Q | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHB | — | 4 | 101 | 72 | 140.3 | 25.2 | 10 | 4 | 78.7 Scout Score 78.7 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production85.840% Impact92.925% Versatility49.718% Shot quality694% Trajectory72.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.01×[23, 15, 50] | 85.8 Production 85.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.27× parp92.932.5% Balls / boundary2.75p97.620% Balls / six7.33p88.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 69 Shot Quality 69 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build76.2% Phase-weighted control80% | 92.9 Impact 92.9 = WPA percentile · total +12.8 WPA · Death+12.8 | 49.7 Versatility 49.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball9b9b <min vs Spin (death)p54.816.7% Reach buildp45.222.2% | |
| 2 | RHB | 36 | 4 | 67 | 40 | 167.5 | 22.3 | 5 | 6 | 68.8 Scout Score 68.8 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production87.640% Impact6925% Versatility55.818% Shot quality7.14% Trajectory47.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.96×[27, 0, 34] | 87.6 Production 87.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.45× parp97.632.5% Balls / boundary2.67p83.320% Balls / six3.2p97.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 7.1 Shot Quality 7.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation0% Control · Build100% Phase-weighted control50% | 69 Impact 69 = WPA percentile · total +2.3 WPA · Death+2.3 | 55.8 Versatility 55.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p78.616.7% Reach buildp54.822.2% | |
| 3 | LHB | 37 | 4 | 74 | 48 | 154.2 | 24.7 | 7 | 4 | 68.6 Scout Score 68.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production62.540% Impact83.325% Versatility64.318% Shot quality11.94% Trajectory82.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.05×[30, 27, 14] | 62.5 Production 62.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.39× parp83.332.5% Balls / boundary2.25p73.820% Balls / six9p40.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 11.9 Shot Quality 11.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation83.3% Control · Build54.5% Phase-weighted control59% | 83.3 Impact 83.3 = WPA percentile · total +6.2 WPA · Death+6.2 | 64.3 Versatility 64.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p97.616.7% Reach buildp78.622.2% | |
| 4 | LHB | 30 | 7 | 207 | 114 | 181.6 | 41.4 | 14 | 15 | 67.3 Scout Score 67.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production70.540% Impact88.125% Versatility56.618% Shot quality504% Trajectory37.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[0, 14, 63] | 70.5 Production 70.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.49× parp78.632.5% Balls / boundary3p59.520% Balls / six3p78.632.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 50 Shot Quality 50 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation94.4% Control · Build71% Phase-weighted control75.9% | 88.1 Impact 88.1 = WPA percentile · total +7 WPA · Death+7 | 56.6 Versatility 56.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p26.216.7% Reach buildp97.622.2% | |
| 5 | LHB | — | 6 | 124 | 83 | 149.4 | 62 | 10 | 5 | 62.4 Scout Score 62.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production36.840% Impact97.625% Versatility47.118% Shot quality694% Trajectory92.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.21×[17, 1, 31] | 36.8 Production 36.8 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.98× parp40.532.5% Balls / boundary4.3p6920% Balls / six14.33p7.132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 69 Shot Quality 69 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation57.1% Control · Build84.8% Phase-weighted control80% | 97.6 Impact 97.6 = WPA percentile · total +23.3 WPA · Death+23.3 | 47.1 Versatility 47.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball9b9b <min vs Spin (death)p7.116.7% Reach buildp6922.2% | |
| 6 | RHB | — | 6 | 65 | 52 | 125 | 21.7 | 2 | 4 | 59.9 Scout Score 59.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production4340% Impact78.625% Versatility49.718% Shot quality35.74% Trajectory97.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.65×[20, 1, 12] | 43 Production 43 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.93× parp3132.5% Balls / boundary7.67p7.120% Balls / six7.67p73.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 35.7 Shot Quality 35.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation57.1% Control · Build70.6% Phase-weighted control66.7% | 78.6 Impact 78.6 = WPA percentile · total +4 WPA · Death+4 | 49.7 Versatility 49.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball0b0b <min vs Spin (death)p73.816.7% Reach buildp3122.2% | |
| 7 | RHB | — | 1 | 67 | 46 | 145.7 | — | 4 | 5 | 58.9 Scout Score 58.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production69.640% Impact47.625% Versatility48.718% Shot quality97.64% Trajectory5013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)n/a[67] | 69.6 Production 69.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.23× parp73.832.5% Balls / boundary2.8p78.620% Balls / six7p6932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 97.6 Shot Quality 97.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation90% Control · Build90.9% Phase-weighted control90.6% | 47.6 Impact 47.6 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 48.7 Versatility 48.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p54.816.7% Reach buildp40.522.2% | |
| 8 | RHB | 22 | 7 | 151 | 91 | 165.9 | 37.8 | 14 | 7 | 57.4 Scout Score 57.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production56.140% Impact73.825% Versatility5518% Shot quality92.94% Trajectory22.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.88×[19, 1, 50] | 56.1 Production 56.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.11× parp64.332.5% Balls / boundary3.33p88.120% Balls / six10p3132.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 92.9 Shot Quality 92.9 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation77.8% Control · Build88.5% Phase-weighted control86.9% | 73.8 Impact 73.8 = WPA percentile · total +2.3 WPA · Death+2.3 | 55 Versatility 55 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball15bp50 vs Spin (death)p35.716.7% Reach buildp83.322.2% | |
| 9 | RHB | 24 | 6 | 70 | 41 | 170.7 | 17.5 | 8 | 3 | 53.1 Scout Score 53.1 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production75.640% Impact3125% Versatility59.518% Shot quality694% Trajectory12.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.74×[9, 14, 1] | 75.6 Production 75.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.34× parp88.132.5% Balls / boundary2.29p92.920% Balls / six8p64.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 69 Shot Quality 69 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build80% Phase-weighted control80% | 31 Impact 31 = WPA percentile · total -3.1 WPA · Death-3.1 | 59.5 Versatility 59.5 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p88.116.7% Reach buildp64.322.2% | |
| 10 | RHB | — | 6 | 142 | 101 | 140.6 | 23.7 | 17 | 5 | 51.4 Scout Score 51.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production48.140% Impact47.625% Versatility50.818% Shot quality59.54% Trajectory67.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.01×[2, 30, 60] | 48.1 Production 48.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.6× parp5032.5% Balls / boundary4p40.520% Balls / six4p5032.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 59.5 Shot Quality 59.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation88.9% Control · Build64.7% Phase-weighted control79.5% | 47.6 Impact 47.6 = WPA percentile · total +0 WPA · Death+0 | 50.8 Versatility 50.8 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p54.816.7% Reach buildp5022.2% | |
| 11 | RHB | 36 | 4 | 37 | 35 | 105.7 | 9.2 | 3 | 1 | 47 Scout Score 47 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production30.140% Impact54.825% Versatility36.618% Shot quality83.34% Trajectory87.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.09×[10, 1, 26] | 30.1 Production 30.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.83× parp35.732.5% Balls / boundary5p35.720% Balls / six20p11.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 83.3 Shot Quality 83.3 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation66.7% Control · Build86.4% Phase-weighted control84% | 54.8 Impact 54.8 = WPA percentile · total +0.1 WPA · Death+0.1 | 36.6 Versatility 36.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p14.316.7% Reach buildp16.722.2% | |
| 12 | RHB | 26 | 5 | 54 | 39 | 138.5 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 46.4 Scout Score 46.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production52.140% Impact35.725% Versatility56.118% Shot quality26.24% Trajectory42.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.94×[0, 34, 13] | 52.1 Production 52.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.97× parp54.832.5% Balls / boundary4p45.220% Balls / six8p54.832.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 26.2 Shot Quality 26.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build62.1% Phase-weighted control62.1% | 35.7 Impact 35.7 = WPA percentile · total -0.3 WPA · Death-0.3 | 56.1 Versatility 56.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p54.816.7% Reach buildp73.822.2% | |
| 13 | RHB | 36 | 8 | 104 | 78 | 133.3 | 20.8 | 6 | 6 | 45.4 Scout Score 45.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production26.740% Impact64.325% Versatility37.718% Shot quality45.24% Trajectory77.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1.04×[23, 0, 9] | 26.7 Production 26.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.96× parp21.432.5% Balls / boundary5.12p26.220% Balls / six10.25p21.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 45.2 Shot Quality 45.2 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build73.5% Phase-weighted control75.7% | 64.3 Impact 64.3 = WPA percentile · total +1.9 WPA · Death+1.9 | 37.7 Versatility 37.7 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker1b1b <min vs Slower ball7b7b <min vs Spin (death)p14.316.7% Reach buildp21.422.2% | |
| 14 | LHB | — | 3 | 42 | 31 | 135.5 | 42 | 2 | 3 | 44.6 Scout Score 44.6 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production25.440% Impact59.525% Versatility64.618% Shot quality2.44% Trajectory6013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[6, 16, 20] | 25.4 Production 25.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.79× parp2.432.5% Balls / boundary7p11.920% Balls / six9.33p45.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 2.4 Shot Quality 2.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build0% Phase-weighted control0% | 59.5 Impact 59.5 = WPA percentile · total +0.1 WPA · Death+0.1 | 64.6 Versatility 64.6 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p83.361.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball10bp83.3 vs Spin (death)p2.416.7% Reach buildp59.522.2% | |
| 15 | RHB | — | 6 | 55 | 45 | 122.2 | 13.8 | 2 | 5 | 42.5 Scout Score 42.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production64.940% Impact21.425% Versatility51.918% Shot quality21.44% Trajectory7.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.7×[11, 5, 7] | 64.9 Production 64.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp59.532.5% Balls / boundary4p54.820% Balls / six6p83.332.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 21.4 Shot Quality 21.4 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation60% Control · Build61.5% Phase-weighted control60.6% | 21.4 Impact 21.4 = WPA percentile · total -3.3 WPA · Death-3.3 | 51.9 Versatility 51.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p92.916.7% Reach buildp26.222.2% | |
| 16 | LHB | — | 5 | 109 | 60 | 181.7 | 36.3 | 11 | 4 | 41 Scout Score 41 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production54.440% Impact2.425% Versatility6418% Shot quality88.14% Trajectory27.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[18, 0, 7] | 54.4 Production 54.4 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR1.25× parp6932.5% Balls / boundary3.33p64.320% Balls / six10p35.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 88.1 Shot Quality 88.1 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation100% Control · Build82.1% Phase-weighted control86% | 2.4 Impact 2.4 = WPA percentile · total -5.1 WPA · Death-5.1 | 64 Versatility 64 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball3b3b <min vs Spin (death)p83.316.7% Reach buildp88.122.2% | |
| 17 | LHB | 31 | 7 | 105 | 75 | 140 | 17.5 | 6 | 6 | 39.9 Scout Score 39.9 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production51.540% Impact7.125% Versatility42.118% Shot quality78.64% Trajectory52.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.96×[14, 17, 0] | 51.5 Production 51.5 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.99× parp45.232.5% Balls / boundary4.5p5020% Balls / six9p59.532.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 78.6 Shot Quality 78.6 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build82.1% Phase-weighted control82.1% | 7.1 Impact 7.1 = WPA percentile · total -4.8 WPA · Death-4.8 | 42.1 Versatility 42.1 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker5b5b <min vs Slower ball4b4b <min vs Spin (death)p21.416.7% Reach buildp35.722.2% | |
| 18 | RHB | — | 2 | 52 | 29 | 179.3 | 52 | 3 | 4 | 39.4 Scout Score 39.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production21.140% Impact40.525% Versatility60.318% Shot quality54.84% Trajectory6013% form Δ (last 3 vs season)1×[51, 1] | 21.1 Production 21.1 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.84× parp26.232.5% Balls / boundary6p21.420% Balls / six24p2.432.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 54.8 Shot Quality 54.8 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation33.3% Control · Build85.7% Phase-weighted control76.5% | 40.5 Impact 40.5 = WPA percentile · total -0.1 WPA · Death-0.1 | 60.3 Versatility 60.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker2b2b <min vs Slower ball1b1b <min vs Spin (death)p54.816.7% Reach buildp92.922.2% | |
| 19 | RHB | — | 5 | 44 | 39 | 112.8 | 14.7 | 0 | 4 | 31.4 Scout Score 31.4 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production44.940% Impact26.225% Versatility16.918% Shot quality40.54% Trajectory17.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.82×[4, 9, 11] | 44.9 Production 44.9 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.84× parp11.932.5% Balls / boundary6.75p16.720% Balls / six6.75p92.932.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 40.5 Shot Quality 40.5 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidationn/a Control · Build75% Phase-weighted control75% | 26.2 Impact 26.2 = WPA percentile · total -3.1 WPA · Death-3.1 | 16.9 Versatility 16.9 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p16.761.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball16bp16.7 vs Spin (death)p3116.7% Reach buildp7.122.2% | |
| 20 | RHB | 27 | 5 | 37 | 43 | 86 | 7.4 | 5 | 1 | 26.5 Scout Score 26.5 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production27.640% Impact11.925% Versatility42.318% Shot quality16.74% Trajectory32.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.92×[0, 14, 5] | 27.6 Production 27.6 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.76× parp16.732.5% Balls / boundary5.5p3120% Balls / six11p26.232.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 16.7 Shot Quality 16.7 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation50% Control · Build60% Phase-weighted control59.1% | 11.9 Impact 11.9 = WPA percentile · total -4.4 WPA · Death-4.4 | 42.3 Versatility 42.3 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker0b0b <min vs Slower ball2b2b <min vs Spin (death)p54.816.7% Reach buildp11.922.2% | |
| 21 | RHB | — | 5 | 27 | 35 | 77.1 | 6.8 | 0 | 1 | 19.3 Scout Score 19.3 = Σ(component × weight) Componentscoreweight Production15.740% Impact16.725% Versatility40.218% Shot quality314% Trajectory2.513% form Δ (last 3 vs season)0.52×[1, 3, 4] | 15.7 Production 15.7 = Σ(percentile × share) KPIvaluepctshare True SR0.71× parp7.132.5% Balls / boundary16p2.420% Balls / six16p16.732.5% Early boundaryn/ap5015% | 31 Shot Quality 31 = control-% percentile Control · Consolidation80% Control · Build57.1% Phase-weighted control63.2% | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = WPA percentile · total -4.1 WPA · Death-4.1 | 40.2 Versatility 40.2 = Σ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending Matchup defiance (death)p5061.1% vs Yorker3b3b <min vs Slower ball5b5b <min vs Spin (death)p54.816.7% Reach buildp2.422.2% |
Rahul Radesh
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 23
92.2
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 260 · Balls 152 · SR 171.1 · Avg 32.5 · 4s 22 · 6s 16
92.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production97.428%27.3
Impact *97.427%26.3
Versatility83.427%22.5
Shot quality86.88%6.9
Trajectory92.110%9.2
Scout Score92.2
97.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR196.81.35×95bp97.442.9%
True Avg62.32.24×3wp97.432.1%
Balls / boundary3.3—95bp97.425%
97.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +64.9
WPA · Consolidation-2.1
WPA · Build+67.1
83.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p91.144.4%
vs Off-spin153 SR15bp90
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball310 SR10bp92.9
Spin hitting———p80.629.6%
Off-spin154 SR26bp62.5
LA-orthodox220 SR35bp94.1
Leg-spin178 SR9b9b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)188.6 SR1.2×44bp86.814.8%
Reach death165.8 SR0.99×38bp55.311.1%
86.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86%
Control · Build82.7%
Phase-weighted control84.2% → p86.8
92.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[10, 14, 28]
Innings9
Ganesh Gadugu
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
82.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 251 · Balls 145 · SR 173.1 · Avg 50.2 · 4s 14 · 6s 18
82.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production92.128%25.8
Impact *92.127%24.9
Versatility80.427%21.7
Shot quality65.88%5.3
Trajectory5010%5.0
Scout Score82.6
92.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1691.16×113bp92.142.9%
True Avg47.81.72×4wp92.132.1%
Balls / boundary4.9—113bp92.125%
92.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +41.1
WPA · Consolidation+46
WPA · Build-4.8
80.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p86.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox144 SR32bp94.4
vs Leg-spin170 SR20bp78.6
vs Short ball173 SR11bp78.6
Spin hitting———p66.229.6%
Off-spin185 SR13bp79.2
LA-orthodox142 SR33bp61.8
Leg-spin167 SR21bp65
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)183 SR1.17×47bp81.614.8%
Reach death278.9 SR1.66×19bp92.111.1%
65.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.3%
Control · Build79%
Phase-weighted control81.4% → p65.8
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[21, 12, 27]
Innings8
Rathan Teja
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB
78.7
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 101 · Balls 72 · SR 140.3 · Avg 25.2 · 4s 10 · 6s 4
78.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production85.840%34.3
Impact *92.925%23.2
Versatility49.718%8.9
Shot quality694%2.8
Trajectory72.513%9.4
Scout Score78.7
85.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR213.61.27×22bp92.932.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—22bp97.620%
Balls / six7.3—22bp88.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
92.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +12.8
WPA · Death+12.8
49.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball156 SR9b9b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp54.816.7%
Reach build121.4 SR0.79×42bp45.222.2%
69Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build76.2%
Phase-weighted control80% → p69
72.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.01×
Recent scores[23, 15, 50]
Innings4
Kodimela Himateja
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 24
78
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 461 · Balls 256 · SR 180.1 · Avg 92.2 · 4s 36 · 6s 31
78OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production8540%34.0
Impact *96.727%26.1
Versatility59.815%9.0
Shot quality706%4.2
Trajectory39.312%4.7
Scout Score78
85ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR184.11.14×69bp7035%
True Avg1273.58×1wp96.730%
Balls / boundary3—69bp83.317.5%
Balls / dismissal69—1wp96.717.5%
96.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +69.8
WPA · Powerplay+39.4
WPA · Consolidation+30.4
59.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR196.6 SR1.19×147bp76.726.7%
vs Spin SR157.8 SR1.1×109bp76.726.7%
Accel into Cons146.9 SR—64bp63.320%
Pressure entry140.7 SR0.87×54bp23.326.7%
70Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.4%
Control · Build77.4%
Phase-weighted control81.6% → p70
39.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.9×
Recent scores[45, 103, 31]
Innings8
Mickil Jaiswal
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 28
78
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 316 · Balls 179 · SR 176.5 · Avg 52.7 · 4s 14 · 6s 26
78OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production83.828%23.5
Impact *86.827%23.4
Versatility64.327%17.4
Shot quality76.38%6.1
Trajectory76.310%7.6
Scout Score78
83.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1551.06×129bp86.842.9%
True Avg401.44×5wp81.632.1%
Balls / boundary5.6—129bp81.625%
86.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +32.4
WPA · Consolidation-5.3
WPA · Build+37.8
64.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p55.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox115 SR39bp50
vs Leg-spin165 SR23bp64.3
vs Short ball170 SR10bp57.1
Spin hitting———p64.229.6%
Off-spin206 SR35bp87.5
LA-orthodox116 SR44bp38.2
Leg-spin170 SR30bp75
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)154.8 SR0.99×31bp65.814.8%
Reach death300 SR1.79×30bp97.411.1%
76.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.5%
Control · Build84.3%
Phase-weighted control83.7% → p76.3
76.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.02×
Recent scores[15, 76, 65]
Innings8
Aman Rao
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 22
72.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 297 · Balls 121 · SR 245.5 · Avg 42.4 · 4s 31 · 6s 23
72.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production76.740%30.7
Impact *9027%24.3
Versatility85.115%12.8
Shot quality306%1.8
Trajectory2512%3.0
Scout Score72.5
76.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR244.91.52×89bp96.735%
True Avg43.61.23×5wp76.730%
Balls / boundary2.2—89bp96.717.5%
Balls / dismissal17.8—5wp16.717.5%
90Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +58.6
WPA · Powerplay+53.1
WPA · Consolidation+5.5
85.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR217.6 SR1.32×91bp9026.7%
vs Spin SR330 SR2.31×30bp96.726.7%
Accel into Cons235.3 SR—17bp96.720%
Pressure entry——0bp6026.7%
30Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.5%
Control · Build73.3%
Phase-weighted control75.5% → p30
25Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.81×
Recent scores[45, 14, 31]
Innings7
Ishan Sharma
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 36
68.8
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 67 · Balls 40 · SR 167.5 · Avg 22.3 · 4s 5 · 6s 6
68.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production87.640%35.0
Impact *6925%17.2
Versatility55.818%10.0
Shot quality7.14%0.3
Trajectory47.513%6.2
Scout Score68.8
87.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR243.81.45×16bp97.632.5%
Balls / boundary2.7—16bp83.320%
Balls / six3.2—16bp97.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
69Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2.3
WPA · Death+2.3
55.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)300 SR1.89×2bp78.616.7%
Reach build100 SR0.65×1bp54.822.2%
7.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation0%
Control · Build100%
Phase-weighted control50% → p7.1
47.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.96×
Recent scores[27, 0, 34]
Innings4
Prateek Pawar
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 37
68.6
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 74 · Balls 48 · SR 154.2 · Avg 24.7 · 4s 7 · 6s 4
68.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production62.540%25.0
Impact *83.325%20.8
Versatility64.318%11.6
Shot quality11.94%0.5
Trajectory82.513%10.7
Scout Score68.6
62.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR233.31.39×9bp83.332.5%
Balls / boundary2.2—9bp73.820%
Balls / six9—9bp40.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
83.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +6.2
WPA · Death+6.2
64.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball150 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)285.7 SR1.8×7bp97.616.7%
Reach build157.6 SR1.03×33bp78.622.2%
11.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation83.3%
Control · Build54.5%
Phase-weighted control59% → p11.9
82.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.05×
Recent scores[30, 27, 14]
Innings4
Tanay Thyagarajan
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 30
67.3
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 207 · Balls 114 · SR 181.6 · Avg 41.4 · 4s 14 · 6s 15
67.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production70.540%28.2
Impact *88.125%22.0
Versatility56.618%10.2
Shot quality504%2.0
Trajectory37.513%4.9
Scout Score67.3
70.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2501.49×6bp78.632.5%
Balls / boundary3—6bp59.520%
Balls / six3—6bp78.632.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
88.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +7
WPA · Death+7
56.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)00×1bp26.216.7%
Reach build173.9 SR1.13×69bp97.622.2%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation94.4%
Control · Build71%
Phase-weighted control75.9% → p50
37.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[0, 14, 63]
Innings7
Aaron George
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 19
64.6
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 201 · Balls 117 · SR 171.8 · Avg 25.1 · 4s 27 · 6s 7
64.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production49.340%19.7
Impact *83.327%22.5
Versatility62.915%9.4
Shot quality23.36%1.4
Trajectory96.412%11.6
Scout Score64.6
49.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR185.71.15×70bp76.735%
True Avg260.73×5wp16.730%
Balls / boundary2.8—70bp9017.5%
Balls / dismissal14—5wp1017.5%
83.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +48.7
WPA · Powerplay+36.7
WPA · Consolidation+12
62.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR208.1 SR1.26×62bp83.326.7%
vs Spin SR130.9 SR0.92×55bp3026.7%
Accel into Cons170.4 SR—27bp83.320%
Pressure entry——0bp6026.7%
23.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.5%
Control · Build55.6%
Phase-weighted control75% → p23.3
96.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.25×
Recent scores[4, 91, 12]
Innings8
Tilak Varma
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 23
63.5
Scout Score
Inns 1 · Runs 136 · Balls 56 · SR 242.9 · Avg — · 4s 14 · 6s 8
63.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production72.240%28.9
Impact *43.327%11.7
Versatility79.815%12.0
Shot quality83.36%5.0
Trajectory5012%6.0
Scout Score63.5
72.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR233.31.45×18bp83.335%
True Avg——0wp6030%
Balls / boundary2.6—18bp7017.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp73.317.5%
43.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0.2
WPA · Powerplay-0.2
WPA · Consolidation+0.4
79.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR265.6 SR1.61×32bp96.726.7%
vs Spin SR212.5 SR1.49×24bp9026.7%
Accel into Cons187.5 SR—8bp7020%
Pressure entry——0bp6026.7%
83.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation87.5%
Control · Build76.5%
Phase-weighted control81.8% → p83.3
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)n/a
Recent scores[136]
Innings1
Shubham G Sharma
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB
62.4
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 124 · Balls 83 · SR 149.4 · Avg 62 · 4s 10 · 6s 5
62.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production36.840%14.7
Impact *97.625%24.4
Versatility47.118%8.5
Shot quality694%2.8
Trajectory92.513%12.0
Scout Score62.4
36.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR165.10.98×43bp40.532.5%
Balls / boundary4.3—43bp6920%
Balls / six14.3—43bp7.132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
97.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +23.3
WPA · Death+23.3
47.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker400 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball222 SR9b9b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.63×5bp7.116.7%
Reach build136.4 SR0.89×33bp6922.2%
69Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation57.1%
Control · Build84.8%
Phase-weighted control80% → p69
92.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.21×
Recent scores[17, 1, 31]
Innings6
Satwik Reddy
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 24
62.3
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 206 · Balls 124 · SR 166.1 · Avg 22.9 · 4s 18 · 6s 13
62.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production8140%32.4
Impact *7027%18.9
Versatility46.415%7.0
Shot quality3.36%0.2
Trajectory32.112%3.9
Scout Score62.3
81ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR191.81.19×98bp9035%
True Avg471.33×4wp83.330%
Balls / boundary3.3—98bp76.717.5%
Balls / dismissal24.5—4wp63.317.5%
70Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +18.3
WPA · Powerplay+55.6
WPA · Consolidation-37.4
46.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR180 SR1.09×75bp56.726.7%
vs Spin SR144.9 SR1.01×49bp5026.7%
Accel into Cons69.2 SR—26bp1020%
Pressure entry——0bp6026.7%
3.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation61.5%
Control · Buildn/a
Phase-weighted control61.5% → p3.3
32.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.87×
Recent scores[32, 15, 28]
Innings9
Harish Thakur
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB
59.9
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 65 · Balls 52 · SR 125 · Avg 21.7 · 4s 2 · 6s 4
59.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production4340%17.2
Impact *78.625%19.6
Versatility49.718%8.9
Shot quality35.74%1.4
Trajectory97.513%12.7
Scout Score59.9
43ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR156.50.93×23bp3132.5%
Balls / boundary7.7—23bp7.120%
Balls / six7.7—23bp73.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
78.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +4
WPA · Death+4
49.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker50 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball—0b0b <min
vs Spin (death)200 SR1.26×9bp73.816.7%
Reach build105.9 SR0.69×17bp3122.2%
35.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation57.1%
Control · Build70.6%
Phase-weighted control66.7% → p35.7
97.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.65×
Recent scores[20, 1, 12]
Innings6
Samhith Reddy
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB
58.9
Scout Score
Inns 1 · Runs 67 · Balls 46 · SR 145.7 · Avg — · 4s 4 · 6s 5
58.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production69.640%27.8
Impact *47.625%11.9
Versatility48.718%8.8
Shot quality97.64%3.9
Trajectory5013%6.5
Scout Score58.9
69.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR207.11.23×14bp73.832.5%
Balls / boundary2.8—14bp78.620%
Balls / six7—14bp6932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
47.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
48.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball325 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp54.816.7%
Reach build118.2 SR0.77×22bp40.522.2%
97.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation90%
Control · Build90.9%
Phase-weighted control90.6% → p97.6
50Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)n/a
Recent scores[67]
Innings1
Rishiket Sisodia
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 24
58.8
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 164 · Balls 106 · SR 154.7 · Avg 27.3 · 4s 11 · 6s 11
58.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production54.740%21.9
Impact *76.727%20.7
Versatility54.915%8.2
Shot quality96.76%5.8
Trajectory17.912%2.1
Scout Score58.8
54.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR184.41.14×32bp63.335%
True Avg29.50.83×2wp5030%
Balls / boundary3.6—32bp56.717.5%
Balls / dismissal16—2wp43.317.5%
76.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +26.9
WPA · Powerplay+17.3
WPA · Consolidation+9.6
54.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR148.1 SR0.9×52bp3026.7%
vs Spin SR161.1 SR1.13×54bp83.326.7%
Accel into Cons133.3 SR—36bp43.320%
Pressure entry——0bp6026.7%
96.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.9%
Control · Build84.2%
Phase-weighted control87.3% → p96.7
17.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.8×
Recent scores[38, 1, 8]
Innings7
Pranav Varma
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB · age 20
58.8
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 114 · Balls 92 · SR 123.9 · Avg 28.5 · 4s 9 · 6s 3
58.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production44.228%12.4
Impact *81.627%22.0
Versatility46.427%12.5
Shot quality92.18%7.4
Trajectory44.710%4.5
Scout Score58.8
44.2ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR127.10.87×70bp28.942.9%
True Avg44.51.6×2wp76.332.1%
Balls / boundary7.8—70bp28.925%
81.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +22.9
WPA · Consolidation-2.3
WPA · Build+25.1
46.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p57.144.4%
vs Off-spin86 SR7b7b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball170 SR10bp57.1
Spin hitting———p42.929.6%
Off-spin75 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox94 SR17bp26.5
Leg-spin130 SR23bp55
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)151.4 SR0.97×35bp5014.8%
Reach death113.6 SR0.68×22bp7.911.1%
92.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build83.8%
Phase-weighted control84.3% → p92.1
44.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.9×
Recent scores[3, 26, 19]
Innings7
Aelgani Varun Goud
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 26
57.7
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 97 · Balls 73 · SR 132.9 · Avg 24.2 · 4s 5 · 6s 4
57.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production45.528%12.7
Impact *76.327%20.6
Versatility33.827%9.1
Shot quality81.68%6.5
Trajectory86.810%8.7
Scout Score57.7
45.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR136.20.93×69bp44.742.9%
True Avg31.31.13×3wp55.332.1%
Balls / boundary7.7—69bp34.225%
76.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +13
WPA · Consolidation+0.3
WPA · Build+12.7
33.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p28.544.4%
vs LA-orthodox100 SR16bp33.3
vs Leg-spin82 SR11bp21.4
vs Short ball350 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p14.329.6%
Off-spin116 SR31bp4.2
LA-orthodox100 SR17bp32.4
Leg-spin82 SR11bp15
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)269.2 SR1.72×13bp92.114.8%
Reach death66.7 SR0.4×3bp28.911.1%
81.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation95.7%
Control · Build78.3%
Phase-weighted control84.1% → p81.6
86.8Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.03×
Recent scores[13, 5, 53]
Innings4
Nitin Sai Yadav
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 22
57.4
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 151 · Balls 91 · SR 165.9 · Avg 37.8 · 4s 14 · 6s 7
57.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production56.140%22.4
Impact *73.825%18.4
Versatility5518%9.9
Shot quality92.94%3.7
Trajectory22.513%2.9
Scout Score57.4
56.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR186.71.11×30bp64.332.5%
Balls / boundary3.3—30bp88.120%
Balls / six10—30bp3132.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
73.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +2.3
WPA · Death+2.3
55VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball193 SR15bp50
vs Spin (death)171.4 SR1.08×7bp35.716.7%
Reach build155.8 SR1.01×52bp83.322.2%
92.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation77.8%
Control · Build88.5%
Phase-weighted control86.9% → p92.9
22.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.88×
Recent scores[19, 1, 50]
Innings7
Vaishnav Reddy A
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 36
56
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 195 · Balls 116 · SR 168.1 · Avg — · 4s 8 · 6s 15
56OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production48.940%19.6
Impact *56.727%15.3
Versatility61.615%9.2
Shot quality76.76%4.6
Trajectory60.712%7.3
Scout Score56
48.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.62×5bp43.335%
True Avg——0wp6030%
Balls / boundary——5bp16.717.5%
Balls / dismissal——0wp73.317.5%
56.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +11.2
WPA · Powerplay-4.7
WPA · Consolidation+16
61.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR187.8 SR1.14×49bp7026.7%
vs Spin SR153.7 SR1.08×67bp63.326.7%
Accel into Cons144 SR—25bp5020%
Pressure entry——0bp6026.7%
76.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84%
Control · Build79.2%
Phase-weighted control81.6% → p76.7
60.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[21, 25, 41]
Innings6
Chandan Sahani
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 28
55.7
Scout Score
Inns 9 · Runs 246 · Balls 162 · SR 151.9 · Avg 30.8 · 4s 18 · 6s 14
55.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production71.628%20.0
Impact *65.827%17.8
Versatility46.627%12.6
Shot quality508%4.0
Trajectory13.210%1.3
Scout Score55.7
71.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR146.11×115bp71.142.9%
True Avg33.61.21×5wp60.532.1%
Balls / boundary5.5—115bp86.825%
65.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +8.9
WPA · Consolidation-2.3
WPA · Build+11.2
46.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p4044.4%
vs LA-orthodox100 SR18bp33.3
vs Leg-spin124 SR21bp50
vs Short ball167 SR21bp35.7
Spin hitting———p4329.6%
Off-spin173 SR33bp70.8
LA-orthodox82 SR28bp8.8
Leg-spin124 SR21bp45
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)152.3 SR0.97×44bp55.314.8%
Reach death190.3 SR1.13×31bp71.111.1%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78%
Control · Build79.7%
Phase-weighted control79.1% → p50
13.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.57×
Recent scores[16, 3, 7]
Innings9
Shanmukha Ashwin
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 36
54.2
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 87 · Balls 59 · SR 147.5 · Avg 17.4 · 4s 3 · 6s 7
54.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production54.528%15.3
Impact *60.527%16.3
Versatility49.627%13.4
Shot quality39.58%3.2
Trajectory60.510%6.0
Scout Score54.2
54.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR161.31.11×31bp76.342.9%
True Avg16.70.6×3wp28.932.1%
Balls / boundary6.2—31bp5025%
60.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +8.3
WPA · Consolidation+4.2
WPA · Build+4.1
49.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin280 SR5b5b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball67 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p79.429.6%
Off-spin280 SR5b5b <min
LA-orthodox157 SR14bp79.4
Leg-spin100 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)123.5 SR0.79×17bp23.714.8%
Reach death28.6 SR0.17×7bp2.611.1%
39.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82.6%
Control · Build62.5%
Phase-weighted control77.4% → p39.5
60.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[19, 1, 36]
Innings5
Arfaz Ahmed
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 24
53.1
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 70 · Balls 41 · SR 170.7 · Avg 17.5 · 4s 8 · 6s 3
53.1OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production75.640%30.2
Impact *3125%7.8
Versatility59.518%10.7
Shot quality694%2.8
Trajectory12.513%1.6
Scout Score53.1
75.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2251.34×16bp88.132.5%
Balls / boundary2.3—16bp92.920%
Balls / six8—16bp64.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
31Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.1
WPA · Death-3.1
59.5VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)222.2 SR1.4×9bp88.116.7%
Reach build136 SR0.89×25bp64.322.2%
69Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control80% → p69
12.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.74×
Recent scores[9, 14, 1]
Innings6
Shrunjith Reddy
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB
51.4
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 142 · Balls 101 · SR 140.6 · Avg 23.7 · 4s 17 · 6s 5
51.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production48.140%19.2
Impact *47.625%11.9
Versatility50.818%9.1
Shot quality59.54%2.4
Trajectory67.513%8.8
Scout Score51.4
48.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.6×2bp5032.5%
Balls / boundary——2bp40.520%
Balls / six——2bp5032.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
47.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0
WPA · Death+0
50.8VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp54.816.7%
Reach build123.5 SR0.8×17bp5022.2%
59.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation88.9%
Control · Build64.7%
Phase-weighted control79.5% → p59.5
67.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.01×
Recent scores[2, 30, 60]
Innings6
Rahul Buddhi
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 28
51.2
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 177 · Balls 124 · SR 142.7 · Avg 35.4 · 4s 13 · 6s 8
51.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production75.628%21.2
Impact *39.527%10.7
Versatility28.427%7.7
Shot quality97.48%7.8
Trajectory39.510%4.0
Scout Score51.2
75.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR156.41.07×94bp81.642.9%
True Avg36.81.32×4wp71.132.1%
Balls / boundary5.5—94bp71.125%
39.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -1.1
WPA · Consolidation+2.3
WPA · Build-3.4
28.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p1044.4%
vs Off-spin105 SR19bp10
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball178 SR9b9b <min
Spin hitting———p25.129.6%
Off-spin138 SR24bp37.5
LA-orthodox72 SR25bp2.9
Leg-spin115 SR26bp35
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)208.1 SR1.33×37bp97.414.8%
Reach death50 SR0.3×4bp18.411.1%
97.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86.5%
Control · Build84.2%
Phase-weighted control85.1% → p97.4
39.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.89×
Recent scores[12, 20, 11]
Innings7
Patkuri Nitish Reddy
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 25
50.3
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 217 · Balls 146 · SR 148.6 · Avg 31 · 4s 22 · 6s 11
50.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production73.740%29.5
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility36.215%5.4
Shot quality106%0.6
Trajectory10.712%1.3
Scout Score50.3
73.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR169.41.05×62bp56.735%
True Avg1052.96×1wp9030%
Balls / boundary3.9—62bp63.317.5%
Balls / dismissal62—1wp9017.5%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +5.9
WPA · Powerplay+17.9
WPA · Consolidation-12
36.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR160.3 SR0.97×73bp36.726.7%
vs Spin SR137 SR0.96×73bp36.726.7%
Accel into Cons91.7 SR—48bp3.320%
Pressure entry——0bp6026.7%
10Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build77.8%
Phase-weighted control69.7% → p10
10.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.79×
Recent scores[17, 21, 8]
Innings7
Sai Varun Yerram
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
49.7
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 147 · Balls 101 · SR 145.5 · Avg 24.5 · 4s 11 · 6s 7
49.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production42.528%11.9
Impact *55.327%14.9
Versatility68.627%18.5
Shot quality18.48%1.5
Trajectory28.910%2.9
Scout Score49.7
42.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR132.40.91×71bp39.542.9%
True Avg23.50.84×4wp44.732.1%
Balls / boundary7.1—71bp44.725%
55.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +3.9
WPA · Consolidation+0.5
WPA · Build+3.5
68.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p84.544.4%
vs LA-orthodox123 SR13bp72.2
vs Leg-spin195 SR19bp92.9
vs Short ball75 SR8b8b <min
Spin hitting———p69.829.6%
Off-spin131 SR13bp25
LA-orthodox156 SR27bp73.5
Leg-spin195 SR19bp95
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)103.7 SR0.66×27bp13.214.8%
Reach death200 SR1.19×25bp76.311.1%
18.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.3%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control71.8% → p18.4
28.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.83×
Recent scores[9, 44, 0]
Innings7
Aditya Javvaji
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB
49.4
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 303 · Balls 195 · SR 155.4 · Avg 43.3 · 4s 24 · 6s 19
49.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production61.728%17.3
Impact *7.927%2.1
Versatility58.627%15.8
Shot quality55.38%4.4
Trajectory97.410%9.7
Scout Score49.4
61.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1390.95×123bp5042.9%
True Avg34.21.23×5wp65.832.1%
Balls / boundary5.6—123bp76.325%
7.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -15.9
WPA · Consolidation+0.9
WPA · Build-16.8
58.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p4944.4%
vs LA-orthodox135 SR26bp83.3
vs Leg-spin84 SR38bp35.7
vs Short ball121 SR14bp21.4
Spin hitting———p61.329.6%
Off-spin216 SR32bp95.8
LA-orthodox147 SR43bp67.6
Leg-spin84 SR38bp25
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)153.3 SR0.98×30bp60.514.8%
Reach death330 SR1.97×10bp86.811.1%
55.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84.5%
Control · Build76.9%
Phase-weighted control80.5% → p55.3
97.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.08×
Recent scores[43, 77, 17]
Innings8
Prateek Reddy
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 25
48.5
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 157 · Balls 109 · SR 144 · Avg 19.6 · 4s 11 · 6s 7
48.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production53.628%15.0
Impact *71.127%19.2
Versatility26.927%7.3
Shot quality44.78%3.6
Trajectory34.210%3.4
Scout Score48.5
53.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR143.20.98×81bp55.342.9%
True Avg291.04×4wp5032.1%
Balls / boundary6.8—81bp55.325%
71.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +12.7
WPA · Consolidation+9.8
WPA · Build+3
26.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p22.244.4%
vs Off-spin112 SR25bp30
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball92 SR13bp7.1
Spin hitting———p47.229.6%
Off-spin126 SR31bp12.5
LA-orthodox220 SR10bp94.1
Leg-spin194 SR16bp85
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)96.4 SR0.62×28bp2.614.8%
Reach death100 SR0.6×7bp23.711.1%
44.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation78.6%
Control · Build77.4%
Phase-weighted control77.8% → p44.7
34.2Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.87×
Recent scores[32, 18, 15]
Innings8
Nimna Nimmagadda Surya Teja
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 36
47
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 37 · Balls 35 · SR 105.7 · Avg 9.2 · 4s 3 · 6s 1
47OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production30.140%12.0
Impact *54.825%13.7
Versatility36.618%6.6
Shot quality83.34%3.3
Trajectory87.513%11.4
Scout Score47
30.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1400.83×10bp35.732.5%
Balls / boundary5—10bp35.720%
Balls / six——10bp11.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
54.8Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0.1
WPA · Death+0.1
36.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball129 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.63×4bp14.316.7%
Reach build100 SR0.65×22bp16.722.2%
83.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation66.7%
Control · Build86.4%
Phase-weighted control84% → p83.3
87.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.09×
Recent scores[10, 1, 26]
Innings4
Ajay Dev Goud
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 26
46.4
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 54 · Balls 39 · SR 138.5 · Avg 18 · 4s 4 · 6s 4
46.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production52.140%20.8
Impact *35.725%8.9
Versatility56.118%10.1
Shot quality26.24%1.0
Trajectory42.513%5.5
Scout Score46.4
52.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR162.50.97×8bp54.832.5%
Balls / boundary4—8bp45.220%
Balls / six8—8bp54.832.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
35.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -0.3
WPA · Death-0.3
56.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball33 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp54.816.7%
Reach build141.4 SR0.92×29bp73.822.2%
26.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build62.1%
Phase-weighted control62.1% → p26.2
42.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.94×
Recent scores[0, 34, 13]
Innings5
Rohit Rayudu
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 31
45.7
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 131 · Balls 116 · SR 112.9 · Avg 32.8 · 4s 6 · 6s 5
45.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production40.428%11.3
Impact *5027%13.5
Versatility53.327%14.4
Shot quality71.18%5.7
Trajectory7.910%0.8
Scout Score45.7
40.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR120.70.83×58bp18.442.9%
True Avg702.52×1wp86.832.1%
Balls / boundary9.7—58bp18.425%
50Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +3.4
WPA · Consolidation+10.7
WPA · Build-7.2
53.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p7044.4%
vs Off-spin137 SR19bp70
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball71 SR7b7b <min
Spin hitting———p52.129.6%
Off-spin152 SR27bp54.2
LA-orthodox122 SR27bp50
Leg-spin67 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)78.9 SR0.5×19bp7.914.8%
Reach death160 SR0.95×15bp5011.1%
71.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation84%
Control · Build81.8%
Phase-weighted control82.8% → p71.1
7.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.51×
Recent scores[7, 4, 5]
Innings6
Mohd Shadab Ahmed
Middle order · pos 5 · LHB
45.5
Scout Score
Inns 4 · Runs 49 · Balls 37 · SR 132.4 · Avg 12.2 · 4s 7 · 6s 1
45.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production5028%14.0
Impact *23.727%6.4
Versatility55.627%15.0
Shot quality23.78%1.9
Trajectory81.610%8.2
Scout Score45.5
50ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR153.11.05×32bp60.542.9%
True Avg16.30.59×3wp23.732.1%
Balls / boundary4—32bp65.825%
23.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.7
WPA · Consolidation-3.7
WPA · Build+0
55.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin100 SR8b8b <min
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball400 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p85.329.6%
Off-spin100 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox200 SR12bp85.3
Leg-spin140 SR5b5b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)142.9 SR0.91×7bp44.714.8%
Reach death00×3bp13.211.1%
23.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation73.9%
Control · Build66.7%
Phase-weighted control71.9% → p23.7
81.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.02×
Recent scores[22, 0, 24]
Innings4
Tvs Narayana Teja
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB · age 36
45.4
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 104 · Balls 78 · SR 133.3 · Avg 20.8 · 4s 6 · 6s 6
45.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production26.740%10.7
Impact *64.325%16.1
Versatility37.718%6.8
Shot quality45.24%1.8
Trajectory77.513%10.1
Scout Score45.4
26.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1610.96×41bp21.432.5%
Balls / boundary5.1—41bp26.220%
Balls / six10.2—41bp21.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
64.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +1.9
WPA · Death+1.9
37.7VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR1b1b <min
vs Slower ball343 SR7b7b <min
vs Spin (death)100 SR0.63×4bp14.316.7%
Reach build108.8 SR0.71×34bp21.422.2%
45.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build73.5%
Phase-weighted control75.7% → p45.2
77.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.04×
Recent scores[23, 0, 9]
Innings8
Hrishikesh Simha
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
45.3
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 192 · Balls 138 · SR 139.1 · Avg 27.4 · 4s 16 · 6s 7
45.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production3440%13.6
Impact *36.727%9.9
Versatility37.615%5.6
Shot quality906%5.4
Trajectory89.312%10.7
Scout Score45.3
34ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR126.30.78×38bp23.335%
True Avg240.68×2wp43.330%
Balls / boundary5.4—38bp23.317.5%
Balls / dismissal19—2wp5017.5%
36.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -0.9
WPA · Powerplay-7.2
WPA · Consolidation+6.3
37.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR129.2 SR0.78×48bp1026.7%
vs Spin SR144.4 SR1.01×90bp43.326.7%
Accel into Cons130.2 SR—43bp36.720%
Pressure entry——0bp6026.7%
90Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation86%
Control · Build85.7%
Phase-weighted control85.9% → p90
89.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.06×
Recent scores[15, 50, 38]
Innings7
Ellala Vidya Nanda Reddy
Finisher · pos 8 · LHB
44.6
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 42 · Balls 31 · SR 135.5 · Avg 42 · 4s 2 · 6s 3
44.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production25.440%10.2
Impact *59.525%14.9
Versatility64.618%11.6
Shot quality2.44%0.1
Trajectory6013%7.8
Scout Score44.6
25.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR132.10.79×28bp2.432.5%
Balls / boundary7—28bp11.920%
Balls / six9.3—28bp45.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
59.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +0.1
WPA · Death+0.1
64.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p83.361.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball200 SR10bp83.3
vs Spin (death)118.2 SR0.74×11bp2.416.7%
Reach build166.7 SR1.09×3bp59.522.2%
2.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build0%
Phase-weighted control0% → p2.4
60Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[6, 16, 20]
Innings3
Adi Mani Kiran
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB
42.5
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 55 · Balls 45 · SR 122.2 · Avg 13.8 · 4s 2 · 6s 5
42.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production64.940%26.0
Impact *21.425%5.3
Versatility51.918%9.3
Shot quality21.44%0.9
Trajectory7.513%1.0
Scout Score42.5
64.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR166.70.99×12bp59.532.5%
Balls / boundary4—12bp54.820%
Balls / six6—12bp83.332.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
21.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.3
WPA · Death-3.3
51.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker0 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)350 SR2.21×4bp92.916.7%
Reach build92.3 SR0.6×13bp26.222.2%
21.4Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation60%
Control · Build61.5%
Phase-weighted control60.6% → p21.4
7.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.7×
Recent scores[11, 5, 7]
Innings6
Divesh Singh
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB
41
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 109 · Balls 60 · SR 181.7 · Avg 36.3 · 4s 11 · 6s 4
41OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production54.440%21.8
Impact *2.425%0.6
Versatility6418%11.5
Shot quality88.14%3.5
Trajectory27.513%3.6
Scout Score41
54.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR2101.25×10bp6932.5%
Balls / boundary3.3—10bp64.320%
Balls / six10—10bp35.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
2.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -5.1
WPA · Death-5.1
64VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR3b3b <min
vs Spin (death)266.7 SR1.68×3bp83.316.7%
Reach build179.5 SR1.17×39bp88.122.2%
88.1Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation100%
Control · Build82.1%
Phase-weighted control86% → p88.1
27.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[18, 0, 7]
Innings5
Vikram Naik Guguloth
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
40.5
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 252 · Balls 174 · SR 144.8 · Avg 42 · 4s 20 · 6s 14
40.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production61.840%24.7
Impact *1027%2.7
Versatility19.315%2.9
Shot quality63.36%3.8
Trajectory53.612%6.4
Scout Score40.5
61.8ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR144.80.9×29bp5035%
True Avg421.19×1wp7030%
Balls / boundary3.6—29bp5017.5%
Balls / dismissal29—1wp83.317.5%
10Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -17.7
WPA · Powerplay-6.2
WPA · Consolidation-11.5
19.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR166.3 SR1.01×95bp43.326.7%
vs Spin SR119 SR0.83×79bp3.326.7%
Accel into Cons130 SR—50bp3020%
Pressure entry114.3 SR0.71×49bp3.326.7%
63.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation82%
Control · Build80.3%
Phase-weighted control81.4% → p63.3
53.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[10, 48, 7]
Innings7
Mayank Gupta
Middle order · pos 4 · RHB
40.4
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 61 · Balls 47 · SR 129.8 · Avg 20.3 · 4s 9 · 6s 0
40.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production36.428%10.2
Impact *44.727%12.1
Versatility39.427%10.6
Shot quality7.98%0.6
Trajectory68.410%6.8
Scout Score40.4
36.4ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1200.82×25bp34.242.9%
True Avg150.54×2wp36.832.1%
Balls / boundary6.2—25bp39.525%
44.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +1
WPA · Consolidation+2.8
WPA · Build-1.8
39.4VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox—0b0b <min
vs Leg-spin100 SR8b8b <min
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p2529.6%
Off-spin131 SR13bp25
LA-orthodox—0b0b <min
Leg-spin100 SR8b8b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)116.7 SR0.74×6bp34.214.8%
Reach death——0bp42.111.1%
7.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation71.4%
Control · Build63.6%
Phase-weighted control68% → p7.9
68.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[54, 2, 5]
Innings3
Chama Milind
Finisher · pos 6 · LHB · age 31
39.9
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 105 · Balls 75 · SR 140 · Avg 17.5 · 4s 6 · 6s 6
39.9OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production51.540%20.6
Impact *7.125%1.8
Versatility42.118%7.6
Shot quality78.64%3.1
Trajectory52.513%6.8
Scout Score39.9
51.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR166.70.99×36bp45.232.5%
Balls / boundary4.5—36bp5020%
Balls / six9—36bp59.532.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
7.1Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.8
WPA · Death-4.8
42.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker100 SR5b5b <min
vs Slower ball300 SR4b4b <min
vs Spin (death)140 SR0.88×5bp21.416.7%
Reach build115.4 SR0.75×39bp35.722.2%
78.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build82.1%
Phase-weighted control82.1% → p78.6
52.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.96×
Recent scores[14, 17, 0]
Innings7
Pragnay Reddy
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 26
39.7
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 99 · Balls 72 · SR 137.5 · Avg 16.5 · 4s 8 · 6s 6
39.7OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production32.340%12.9
Impact *3027%8.1
Versatility38.915%5.8
Shot quality506%3.0
Trajectory82.112%9.9
Scout Score39.7
32.3ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR118.50.73×27bp3035%
True Avg160.45×2wp3030%
Balls / boundary4.5—27bp36.717.5%
Balls / dismissal13.5—2wp36.717.5%
30Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -8.5
WPA · Powerplay-13.1
WPA · Consolidation+4.5
38.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR160 SR0.97×30bp5026.7%
vs Spin SR121.4 SR0.85×42bp23.326.7%
Accel into Cons144.4 SR—27bp56.720%
Pressure entry147.5 SR0.91×40bp3026.7%
50Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation77.8%
Control · Build81.2%
Phase-weighted control78.6% → p50
82.1Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1.01×
Recent scores[1, 55, 4]
Innings6
S Venkat Karthik
Finisher · pos 6 · RHB
39.4
Scout Score
Inns 2 · Runs 52 · Balls 29 · SR 179.3 · Avg 52 · 4s 3 · 6s 4
39.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production21.140%8.4
Impact *40.525%10.1
Versatility60.318%10.9
Shot quality54.84%2.2
Trajectory6013%7.8
Scout Score39.4
21.1ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR141.70.84×12bp26.232.5%
Balls / boundary6—12bp21.420%
Balls / six——12bp2.432.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
40.5Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -0.1
WPA · Death-0.1
60.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker50 SR2b2b <min
vs Slower ball0 SR1b1b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp54.816.7%
Reach build242.9 SR1.58×14bp92.922.2%
54.8Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation33.3%
Control · Build85.7%
Phase-weighted control76.5% → p54.8
60Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[51, 1]
Innings2
Bhavesh Seth
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 28
34.3
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 115 · Balls 71 · SR 162 · Avg 23 · 4s 5 · 6s 8
34.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production13.528%3.8
Impact *28.927%7.8
Versatility55.127%14.9
Shot quality28.98%2.3
Trajectory55.310%5.5
Scout Score34.3
13.5ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR115.40.79×39bp13.242.9%
True Avg150.54×3wp18.432.1%
Balls / boundary13—39bp7.925%
28.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -1.9
WPA · Consolidation-5.3
WPA · Build+3.4
55.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p61.144.4%
vs LA-orthodox117 SR12bp61.1
vs Leg-spin83 SR6b6b <min
vs Short ball350 SR2b2b <min
Spin hitting———p44.129.6%
Off-spin100 SR8b8b <min
LA-orthodox117 SR12bp44.1
Leg-spin100 SR9b9b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)140 SR0.89×10bp39.514.8%
Reach death204.2 SR1.22×24bp81.611.1%
28.9Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75%
Control · Build74.1%
Phase-weighted control74.4% → p28.9
55.3Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[53, 6, 7]
Innings6
G Sai Krishna Reddy
Top order · pos 3 · RHB
34.2
Scout Score
Inns 8 · Runs 216 · Balls 150 · SR 144 · Avg 30.9 · 4s 15 · 6s 15
34.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production14.740%5.9
Impact *63.327%17.1
Versatility57.115%8.6
Shot quality36.76%2.2
Trajectory3.612%0.4
Scout Score34.2
14.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR123.60.77×72bp3.335%
True Avg22.20.63×4wp1030%
Balls / boundary5.1—72bp3017.5%
Balls / dismissal18—4wp3017.5%
63.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total +14.4
WPA · Powerplay-10.7
WPA · Consolidation+25.1
57.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR140.4 SR0.85×89bp3.326.7%
vs Spin SR149.2 SR1.04×61bp56.726.7%
Accel into Cons157.8 SR—45bp76.720%
Pressure entry172 SR1.07×25bp96.726.7%
36.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation75.6%
Control · Build76.9%
Phase-weighted control75.9% → p36.7
3.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.68×
Recent scores[0, 40, 4]
Innings8
Sahendra Mallu
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB
31.4
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 44 · Balls 39 · SR 112.8 · Avg 14.7 · 4s 0 · 6s 4
31.4OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production44.940%18.0
Impact *26.225%6.5
Versatility16.918%3.0
Shot quality40.54%1.6
Trajectory17.513%2.3
Scout Score31.4
44.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR140.70.84×27bp11.932.5%
Balls / boundary6.8—27bp16.720%
Balls / six6.8—27bp92.932.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
26.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -3.1
WPA · Death-3.1
16.9VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p16.761.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball156 SR16bp16.7
vs Spin (death)150 SR0.95×6bp3116.7%
Reach build50 SR0.33×12bp7.122.2%
40.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidationn/a
Control · Build75%
Phase-weighted control75% → p40.5
17.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.82×
Recent scores[4, 9, 11]
Innings5
Telukupalli Ravi Teja
Top order · pos 3 · LHB · age 31
29.8
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 140 · Balls 94 · SR 148.9 · Avg 20 · 4s 13 · 6s 7
29.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production18.740%7.5
Impact *23.327%6.3
Versatility47.315%7.1
Shot quality56.76%3.4
Trajectory46.412%5.6
Scout Score29.8
18.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR103.80.64×26bp16.735%
True Avg13.50.38×2wp23.330%
Balls / boundary8.7—26bp1017.5%
Balls / dismissal13—2wp23.317.5%
23.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -10.7
WPA · Powerplay-21.7
WPA · Consolidation+11
47.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR138.5 SR0.84×39bp23.326.7%
vs Spin SR156.4 SR1.09×55bp7026.7%
Accel into Cons176.7 SR—43bp9020%
Pressure entry139 SR0.86×41bp16.726.7%
56.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation81.4%
Control · Build72%
Phase-weighted control79.3% → p56.7
46.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.9×
Recent scores[37, 33, 0]
Innings7
Murugan Abhishek
Middle order · pos 4 · LHB · age 21
29.2
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 96 · Balls 57 · SR 168.4 · Avg 16 · 4s 6 · 6s 7
29.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production45.928%12.9
Impact *2.627%0.7
Versatility53.127%14.3
Shot quality13.28%1.1
Trajectory2.610%0.3
Scout Score29.2
45.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR155.21.06×29bp65.842.9%
True Avg11.20.4×4wp7.932.1%
Balls / boundary4.8—29bp60.525%
2.6Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -21.8
WPA · Consolidation-16.1
WPA · Build-5.7
53.1VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs Off-spin125 SR12bp50
vs Chinaman—0b0b <min
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p45.829.6%
Off-spin147 SR17bp45.8
LA-orthodox140 SR5b5b <min
Leg-spin233 SR3b3b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)200 SR1.28×7bp71.114.8%
Reach death186.7 SR1.11×15bp60.511.1%
13.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation65%
Control · Build77.8%
Phase-weighted control69% → p13.2
2.6Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.47×
Recent scores[1, 4, 10]
Innings6
Gnana Prakash Reddy
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
29
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 109 · Balls 67 · SR 162.7 · Avg 21.8 · 4s 15 · 6s 4
29OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production16.928%4.7
Impact *34.227%9.2
Versatility46.227%12.5
Shot quality2.68%0.2
Trajectory23.710%2.4
Scout Score29
16.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR112.50.77×24bp23.742.9%
True Avg6.80.24×4wp2.632.1%
Balls / boundary8—24bp23.725%
34.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -1.7
WPA · Consolidation-1.2
WPA · Build-0.5
46.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5044.4%
vs LA-orthodox0 SR2b2b <min
vs Leg-spin133 SR9b9b <min
vs Short ball200 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p55.929.6%
Off-spin200 SR4b4b <min
LA-orthodox131 SR13bp55.9
Leg-spin133 SR9b9b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)77.8 SR0.5×9bp18.414.8%
Reach death——0bp42.111.1%
2.6Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation68.2%
Control · Build0%
Phase-weighted control62.5% → p2.6
23.7Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.83×
Recent scores[36, 2, 1]
Innings5
Chv Anvith Reddy
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 20
27.3
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 158 · Balls 122 · SR 129.5 · Avg 26.3 · 4s 14 · 6s 4
27.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production2540%10.0
Impact *3.327%0.9
Versatility37.615%5.6
Shot quality43.36%2.6
Trajectory67.912%8.1
Scout Score27.3
25ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1100.68×40bp1035%
True Avg220.62×2wp36.730%
Balls / boundary8—40bp3.317.5%
Balls / dismissal20—2wp56.717.5%
3.3Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -26.9
WPA · Powerplay-27.1
WPA · Consolidation+0.2
37.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR137.9 SR0.84×66bp16.726.7%
vs Spin SR119.6 SR0.84×56bp16.726.7%
Accel into Cons126.3 SR—38bp23.320%
Pressure entry200 SR1.24×2bp9026.7%
43.3Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation76.3%
Control · Build80%
Phase-weighted control77.6% → p43.3
67.9Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.97×
Recent scores[4, 40, 16]
Innings7
Naman Agarwal
Top order · pos 3 · RHB · age 38
27.2
Scout Score
Inns 6 · Runs 120 · Balls 81 · SR 148.1 · Avg 20 · 4s 12 · 6s 7
27.2OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production2240%8.8
Impact *16.727%4.5
Versatility25.615%3.8
Shot quality16.76%1.0
Trajectory7512%9.0
Scout Score27.2
22ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR145.60.9×57bp36.735%
True Avg16.60.47×5wp3.330%
Balls / boundary4.1—57bp43.317.5%
Balls / dismissal11.4—5wp3.317.5%
16.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -13.3
WPA · Powerplay-8.2
WPA · Consolidation-5
25.6VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
vs Pace SR182.6 SR1.11×46bp63.326.7%
vs Spin SR102.9 SR0.72×35bp1026.7%
Accel into Cons80 SR—10bp16.720%
Pressure entry123.3 SR0.76×30bp1026.7%
16.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70%
Control · Build71.4%
Phase-weighted control70.6% → p16.7
75Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.99×
Recent scores[0, 18, 32]
Innings6
Mohammed Afreedi Ahmed
Finisher · pos 7 · RHB · age 27
26.5
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 37 · Balls 43 · SR 86 · Avg 7.4 · 4s 5 · 6s 1
26.5OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production27.640%11.0
Impact *11.925%3.0
Versatility42.318%7.6
Shot quality16.74%0.7
Trajectory32.513%4.2
Scout Score26.5
27.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR127.30.76×11bp16.732.5%
Balls / boundary5.5—11bp3120%
Balls / six11—11bp26.232.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
11.9Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.4
WPA · Death-4.4
42.3VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker—0b0b <min
vs Slower ball100 SR2b2b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp54.816.7%
Reach build90 SR0.59×20bp11.922.2%
16.7Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation50%
Control · Build60%
Phase-weighted control59.1% → p16.7
32.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.92×
Recent scores[0, 14, 5]
Innings5
Nanavath Rakesh
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB
23.8
Scout Score
Inns 3 · Runs 48 · Balls 51 · SR 94.1 · Avg 24 · 4s 4 · 6s 0
23.8OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production13.628%3.8
Impact *18.427%5.0
Versatility20.227%5.5
Shot quality34.28%2.7
Trajectory68.410%6.8
Scout Score23.8
13.6ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR78.90.54×38bp2.642.9%
True Avg150.54×2wp36.832.1%
Balls / boundary38—38bp2.625%
18.4Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -7
WPA · Consolidation-17.7
WPA · Build+10.7
20.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p5.644.4%
vs LA-orthodox78 SR23bp5.6
vs Leg-spin62 SR8b8b <min
vs Short ball0 SR1b1b <min
Spin hitting———p20.629.6%
Off-spin100 SR1b1b <min
LA-orthodox85 SR27bp20.6
Leg-spin62 SR8b8b <min
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)75 SR0.48×4bp28.914.8%
Reach death214.3 SR1.28×7bp65.811.1%
34.2Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation70.6%
Control · Build81%
Phase-weighted control76.3% → p34.2
68.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)1×
Recent scores[5, 38, 5]
Innings3
Alankrith Rapole
Middle order · pos 5 · RHB · age 19
19.6
Scout Score
Inns 7 · Runs 48 · Balls 49 · SR 98 · Avg 8 · 4s 4 · 6s 1
19.6OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production10.928%3.1
Impact *13.227%3.6
Versatility23.227%6.3
Shot quality60.58%4.8
Trajectory18.410%1.8
Scout Score19.6
10.9ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR1000.69×31bp7.942.9%
True Avg10.30.37×3wp13.232.1%
Balls / boundary10.3—31bp13.225%
13.2Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -9
WPA · Consolidation-0
WPA · Build-9
23.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance———p11.244.4%
vs LA-orthodox82 SR11bp16.7
vs Leg-spin60 SR15bp7.1
vs Short ball267 SR3b3b <min
Spin hitting———p10.529.6%
Off-spin—0b0b <min
LA-orthodox85 SR20bp14.7
Leg-spin60 SR15bp5
Chinaman—0b0b <min
Hybrid—0b0b <min
vs Pace SR (mid)260 SR1.66×5bp76.314.8%
Reach death100 SR0.6×3bp34.211.1%
60.5Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation95%
Control · Build54.5%
Phase-weighted control80.6% → p60.5
18.4Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.66×
Recent scores[11, 0, 2]
Innings7
Bunny Jagam
Finisher · pos 8 · RHB
19.3
Scout Score
Inns 5 · Runs 27 · Balls 35 · SR 77.1 · Avg 6.8 · 4s 0 · 6s 1
19.3OverallΣ(component × weight)
ComponentScoreWeightContribution
Production15.740%6.3
Impact *16.725%4.2
Versatility40.218%7.2
Shot quality314%1.2
Trajectory2.513%0.3
Scout Score19.3
15.7ProductionΣ(percentile × share)
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
True SR118.80.71×16bp7.132.5%
Balls / boundary16—16bp2.420%
Balls / six16—16bp16.732.5%
Early boundary———p5015%
16.7Impactv1 stub → WPAWPA percentile · total -4.1
WPA · Death-4.1
40.2VersatilityΣ(pct × share) · * owner cell pending
KPIstatvs parsmplpctshare
Matchup defiance (death)———p5061.1%
vs Yorker67 SR3b3b <min
vs Slower ball160 SR5b5b <min
vs Spin (death)——0bp54.816.7%
Reach build35.7 SR0.23×14bp2.422.2%
31Shot Qualitycontrol-% percentile
Control · Consolidation80%
Control · Build57.1%
Phase-weighted control63.2% → p31
2.5Trajectoryform Δ (last 3 vs season)
Form Δ (last 3 ÷ season SR)0.52×
Recent scores[1, 3, 4]
Innings5
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Score | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leg-spin | — | 33.0 | 15 | 267 | 8.09 | 88.5 Scout Score 88.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle88.597% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p890.88× | 92.4 Bowling Production 92.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle15w · 7.97 econp92.497% | 80.5 Quality 80.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle25%p80.5 | 96.1 Impact 96.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +25.9p96.197% | 70.3 Versatility 70.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep70.397% | |
| 2 | Leg-spin | — | 4.0 | 2 | 23 | 5.75 | 79.1 Scout Score 79.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle79.1100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50n/a | 86.1 Bowling Production 86.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 5.75 econp86.1100% | 61.7 Quality 61.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle25%p61.7 | 91.4 Impact 91.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +16.2p91.4100% | 77.3 Versatility 77.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep77.3100% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 28.0 | 8 | 232 | 8.29 | 75.2 Scout Score 75.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay83.250% Middle77.139.3% Death30.510.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p75.70.96× | 71.7 Bowling Production 71.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 8.57 econp78.850% Middle3w · 7.09 econp74.739.3% Death0w · 11.33 econp27.810.7% | 73.6 Quality 73.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay29%p79.3 False-shot · Middle24%p66.4 | 85.7 Impact 85.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +60p98.950% MiddleWPA +10.2p86.739.3% DeathWPA -10.4p20.210.7% | 68.1 Versatility 68.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp70.750% Middlep79.739.3% Deathp13.510.7% | |
| 4 | Leg-spin | 26 | 10.0 | 8 | 78 | 7.8 | 71.9 Scout Score 71.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle71.9100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p0.71.35× | 81.9 Bowling Production 81.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle8w · 7.8 econp81.9100% | 94.5 Quality 94.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle30%p94.5 | 72.7 Impact 72.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +4.4p72.7100% | 69.9 Versatility 69.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep69.9100% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 22 | 22.3 | 9 | 204 | 9.07 | 69.2 Scout Score 69.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay67.648.9% Middle8626.7% Death54.324.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p91.90.85× | 61.9 Bowling Production 61.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 9.27 econp59.348.9% Middle3w · 6.83 econp83.526.7% Death3w · 11.09 econp43.324.4% | 91 Quality 91 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay35%p94.6 False-shot · Middle31%p84.4 | 72.9 Impact 72.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -4.5p59.848.9% MiddleWPA +44.9p99.226.7% DeathWPA +1.2p70.224.4% | 51.9 Versatility 51.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp55.248.9% Middlep63.326.7% Deathp32.724.4% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | 31 | 12.0 | 3 | 102 | 8.5 | 68.3 Scout Score 68.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle68.391.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p94.90.84× | 64.4 Bowling Production 64.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 7.82 econp64.491.7% | 49.2 Quality 49.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p49.2 | 77.3 Impact 77.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +5.8p77.391.7% | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep63.391.7% | |
| 7 | Leg-spin | 26 | 33.3 | 12 | 250 | 7.46 | 66.9 Scout Score 66.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle66.574.6% Death68.422.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p30.11.01× | 86 Bowling Production 86 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle10w · 7.88 econp86.274.6% Death2w · 5.47 econp85.622.4% | 93 Quality 93 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle27%p93 | 33.9 Impact 33.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -12p27.374.6% DeathWPA -0.1p5622.4% | 74.4 Versatility 74.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep82.874.6% Deathp46.222.4% | |
| 8 | RA pace | 23 | 12.0 | 6 | 101 | 8.42 | 66.5 Scout Score 66.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay8958.3% Middle42.416.7% Death30.225% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 67.3 Bowling Production 67.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 5.14 econp91.258.3% Middle2w · 13.5 econp47.716.7% Death1w · 12.67 econp24.625% | 95.1 Quality 95.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay50%p98.9 False-shot · Middle42%p82 | 64.6 Impact 64.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +35p96.758.3% MiddleWPA -23.6p14.816.7% DeathWPA -9.6p22.625% | 67.3 Versatility 67.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp86.758.3% Middlep29.716.7% Deathp4725% | |
| 9 | RA pace | 35 | 12.0 | 5 | 109 | 9.08 | 66.3 Scout Score 66.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay73.850% Middle49.216.7% Death63.633.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 69.4 Bowling Production 69.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 8.67 econp81.650% Middle0w · 9 econp39.316.7% Death2w · 9.75 econp66.133.3% | 71.1 Quality 71.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p75 False-shot · Middle25%p59.4 | 70.9 Impact 70.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -1.3p72.850% MiddleWPA -0.3p61.716.7% DeathWPA +1.4p72.633.3% | 60.8 Versatility 60.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp71.150% Middlep4316.7% Deathp54.233.3% | |
| 10 | LA pace | — | 7.3 | 6 | 76 | 10.13 | 65.8 Scout Score 65.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay65.866.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 69.5 Bowling Production 69.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 9.4 econp69.566.7% | 81.5 Quality 81.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p81.5 | 57.6 Impact 57.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -4.6p57.666.7% | 68.7 Versatility 68.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp68.766.7% | |
| 11 | Off-spin | 36 | 34.0 | 10 | 274 | 8.06 | 65.3 Scout Score 65.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay56.123.5% Middle73.361.8% Death46.614.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p24.31.04× | 75.5 Bowling Production 75.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 7.88 econp62.223.5% Middle6w · 7.52 econp83.861.8% Death3w · 10.6 econp61.914.7% | 37.6 Quality 37.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p68.5 False-shot · Middle20%p25.8 | 76.5 Impact 76.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -5.6p53.323.5% MiddleWPA +26.3p97.761.8% DeathWPA -7.4p2514.7% | 74 Versatility 74 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp54.123.5% Middlep89.161.8% Deathp42.314.7% | |
| 12 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 9.0 | 2 | 66 | 7.33 | 64.2 Scout Score 64.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle64.2100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p66.90.99× | 64.4 Bowling Production 64.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 7.33 econp64.4100% | 24.2 Quality 24.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle18%p24.2 | 80.5 Impact 80.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +7p80.5100% | 77.3 Versatility 77.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep77.3100% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 27 | 15.4 | 3 | 127 | 8.11 | 63.8 Scout Score 63.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.119.1% Middle64.557.4% Death6623.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p71.30.99× | 48.5 Bowling Production 48.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 7 econp53.819.1% Middle1w · 7.56 econp43.757.4% Death2w · 10.36 econp5623.4% | 82.3 Quality 82.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p31.5 False-shot · Middle35%p99.2 | 74.6 Impact 74.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +1.8p79.319.1% MiddleWPA +1.5p6857.4% DeathWPA +10p86.923.4% | 66.6 Versatility 66.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp53.919.1% Middlep73.857.4% Deathp59.223.4% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | — | 14.0 | 4 | 144 | 10.29 | 63.1 Scout Score 63.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay22.721.4% Middle75.271.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p78.70.95× | 67.6 Bowling Production 67.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 19.67 econp11.821.4% Middle3w · 7 econp84.471.4% | 33.9 Quality 33.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay6%p8.7 False-shot · Middle20%p41.4 | 63.6 Impact 63.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -27.7p22.821.4% MiddleWPA +5.5p75.871.4% | 71.6 Versatility 71.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp2921.4% Middlep84.471.4% | |
| 15 | SLA orthodox | — | 34.1 | 11 | 267 | 7.81 | 62.2 Scout Score 62.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay63.646.8% Middle55.541% Death79.112.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p97.80.83× | 69.3 Bowling Production 69.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 7.88 econp73.646.8% Middle4w · 8.5 econp59.341% Death3w · 5.28 econp85.912.2% | 36.6 Quality 36.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay18%p12 False-shot · Middle24%p64.8 | 46.7 Impact 46.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -3.9p6246.8% MiddleWPA -13.6p25.841% DeathWPA -0.1p58.312.2% | 66.6 Versatility 66.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp73.346.8% Middlep58.241% Deathp69.212.2% | |
| 16 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 20.3 | 9 | 156 | 7.61 | 61.6 Scout Score 61.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay66.156.1% Middle57.134.1% Death51.29.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p5.11.27× | 76.2 Bowling Production 76.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 7.39 econp82.756.1% Middle2w · 7 econp72.934.1% Death3w · 11 econp50.59.8% | 53.3 Quality 53.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p42.4 False-shot · Middle26%p71.1 | 62.8 Impact 62.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -0.6p7556.1% MiddleWPA -5.1p41.434.1% DeathWPA +1.1p67.99.8% | 71.9 Versatility 71.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp75.456.1% Middlep65.634.1% Deathp73.19.8% | |
| 17 | LA pace | — | 22.0 | 5 | 218 | 9.91 | 60.9 Scout Score 60.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay7863.6% Middle41.513.6% Death24.622.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p99.30.78× | 54.5 Bowling Production 54.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 7.86 econp76.963.6% Middle0w · 9.33 econp32.413.6% Death1w · 16 econp4.822.7% | 42.8 Quality 42.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay23%p48.9 False-shot · Middle11%p14.1 | 64.5 Impact 64.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +11.5p90.263.6% MiddleWPA -4.2p46.113.6% DeathWPA -42.4p3.622.7% | 66.3 Versatility 66.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp71.563.6% Middlep46.913.6% Deathp63.522.7% | |
| 18 | RA pace | — | 7.0 | 2 | 49 | 7 | 60.6 Scout Score 60.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay62.257.1% Middle58.342.9% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 62.2 Bowling Production 62.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 6.75 econp63.357.1% Middle1w · 7.33 econp60.742.9% | 39.6 Quality 39.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p28.3 False-shot · Middle22%p54.7 | 76.2 Impact 76.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +3.9p85.957.1% MiddleWPA +0p63.342.9% | 57.8 Versatility 57.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp60.257.1% Middlep54.742.9% | |
| 19 | Off-spin | — | 9.1 | 2 | 70 | 7.64 | 60.6 Scout Score 60.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle60.687.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p74.30.96× | 53.2 Bowling Production 53.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 7.12 econp53.287.3% | 68 Quality 68 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle25%p68 | 55.5 Impact 55.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -1.3p55.587.3% | 74.2 Versatility 74.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep74.287.3% | |
| 20 | RA pace | 26 | 39.4 | 21 | 354 | 8.92 | 60.4 Scout Score 60.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay78.432.8% Middle54.117.6% Death50.749.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p25.71.03× | 79.4 Bowling Production 79.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay6w · 8.15 econp90.432.8% Middle2w · 8.43 econp55.517.6% Death13w · 9.61 econp80.649.6% | 64 Quality 64 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay27%p70.7 False-shot · Middle21%p51.6 | 45.4 Impact 45.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +3.1p83.732.8% MiddleWPA +0.3p64.817.6% DeathWPA -15.9p13.149.6% | 55.2 Versatility 55.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp82.232.8% Middlep53.917.6% Deathp37.749.6% | |
| 21 | RA pace | — | 24.1 | 10 | 230 | 9.52 | 60.1 Scout Score 60.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay65.170.3% Death48.429.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p641× | 70.2 Bowling Production 70.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay7w · 9 econp81.470.3% Death3w · 10.74 econp43.729.7% | 55.4 Quality 55.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p55.4 | 45.2 Impact 45.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -11.7p46.770.3% DeathWPA -2.7p41.729.7% | 66.6 Versatility 66.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp68.570.3% Deathp6229.7% | |
| 22 | SLA orthodox | — | 16.0 | 5 | 100 | 6.25 | 58.6 Scout Score 58.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay42.531.2% Middle60.750% Death79.818.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p9.61.13× | 64.9 Bowling Production 64.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9 econp53.431.2% Middle1w · 5.62 econp6150% Death3w · 3.33 econp94.418.8% | 20.7 Quality 20.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p25 False-shot · Middle17%p18 | 77.6 Impact 77.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -12.6p44.631.2% MiddleWPA +18p9350% DeathWPA +22.9p91.718.8% | 70.6 Versatility 70.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp55.231.2% Middlep88.750% Deathp48.118.8% | |
| 23 | LA pace | 31 | 26.1 | 10 | 238 | 9.1 | 56.7 Scout Score 56.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay44.257.3% Middle52.57.6% Death78.135% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p21.31.07× | 62.1 Bowling Production 62.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 10.47 econp45.757.3% Middle0w · 6 econp53.47.6% Death6w · 7.53 econp90.935% | 87.6 Quality 87.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p96.7 False-shot · Middle8%p19.5 | 51.7 Impact 51.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -28.7p20.757.3% MiddleWPA +6p78.97.6% DeathWPA +39.5p96.435% | 49.2 Versatility 49.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp45.957.3% Middlep61.77.6% Deathp5235% | |
| 24 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 0 | 21 | 5.25 | 56.6 Scout Score 56.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle56.675% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50n/a | 55.6 Bowling Production 55.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 5.67 econp55.675% | 8.6 Quality 8.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle6%p8.6 | 83.6 Impact 83.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +8.9p83.675% | 68.8 Versatility 68.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep68.875% | |
| 25 | Leg-spin | — | 7.0 | 2 | 63 | 9 | 56.1 Scout Score 56.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle56.1100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 49.3 Bowling Production 49.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 9 econp49.3100% | 91.4 Quality 91.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle31%p91.4 | 53.9 Impact 53.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -1.4p53.9100% | 45.3 Versatility 45.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep45.3100% | |
| 26 | RA pace | — | 9.0 | 5 | 105 | 11.67 | 55.8 Scout Score 55.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay47.244.4% Middle62.755.6% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 53.7 Bowling Production 53.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 14.75 econp41.244.4% Middle3w · 9.2 econp63.655.6% | 89 Quality 89 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay38%p88 False-shot · Middle33%p89.8 | 49.4 Impact 49.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13.7p35.944.4% MiddleWPA -0.4p60.255.6% | 42.1 Versatility 42.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp39.144.4% Middlep44.555.6% | |
| 27 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 39.0 | 12 | 281 | 7.21 | 55.4 Scout Score 55.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay66.423.1% Middle45.361.5% Death79.415.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p8.11.13× | 69.9 Bowling Production 69.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 5.33 econp75.123.1% Middle6w · 8.12 econp6261.5% Death4w · 6.33 econp93.715.4% | 35.9 Quality 35.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay20%p33.7 False-shot · Middle20%p36.7 | 56.7 Impact 56.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +17.2p92.423.1% MiddleWPA -9.1p35.261.5% DeathWPA +16.1p89.315.4% | 59.3 Versatility 59.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp70.423.1% Middlep55.561.5% Deathp57.715.4% | |
| 28 | SLA orthodox | — | 31.5 | 6 | 287 | 9.02 | 55.2 Scout Score 55.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.944% Middle66.640.8% Death77.815.2% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p96.30.83× | 48.2 Bowling Production 48.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10.14 econp38.344% Middle2w · 7.85 econp49.440.8% Death2w · 8.9 econp73.515.2% | 22.4 Quality 22.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay13%p1.1 False-shot · Middle20%p45.3 | 63.9 Impact 63.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -17.8p29.344% MiddleWPA +15.5p89.840.8% DeathWPA +30p9415.2% | 55.1 Versatility 55.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp46.544% Middlep74.240.8% Deathp28.815.2% | |
| 29 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 2 | 62 | 12.4 | 55.1 Scout Score 55.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle55.160% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 52.2 Bowling Production 52.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 10.67 econp52.260% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p31.2 | 88.3 Impact 88.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +14.6p88.360% | 32 Versatility 32 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep3260% | |
| 30 | RA pace | — | 16.3 | 6 | 164 | 9.94 | 55.1 Scout Score 55.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay55.854.5% Death54.345.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p141.11× | 59.4 Bowling Production 59.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 9.78 econp63.254.5% Death3w · 10.13 econp54.845.5% | 46.7 Quality 46.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p46.7 | 64.7 Impact 64.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -3.2p64.154.5% DeathWPA +0.3p65.545.5% | 63.2 Versatility 63.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp60.754.5% Deathp66.345.5% | |
| 31 | RA pace | 24 | 21.0 | 7 | 203 | 9.67 | 54 Scout Score 54 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay44.728.6% Middle53.133.3% Death61.838.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p69.90.99× | 52.3 Bowling Production 52.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 10 econp5128.6% Middle2w · 9.14 econp46.533.3% Death3w · 9.88 econp58.338.1% | 58.3 Quality 58.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay14%p14.1 False-shot · Middle33%p96.1 | 52.6 Impact 52.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13.6p3828.6% MiddleWPA -8.6p36.733.3% DeathWPA +2p77.438.1% | 46.1 Versatility 46.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp6028.6% Middlep40.633.3% Deathp40.638.1% | |
| 32 | Leg-spin | 36 | 20.3 | 9 | 167 | 8.15 | 53.5 Scout Score 53.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle53.592.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p3.71.28× | 83.9 Bowling Production 83.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle9w · 8.05 econp83.992.7% | 57 Quality 57 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle22%p57 | 16.4 Impact 16.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -19.1p16.492.7% | 71.9 Versatility 71.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep71.992.7% | |
| 33 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 25.0 | 9 | 230 | 9.2 | 51.5 Scout Score 51.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay73.148% Middle26.536% Death4316% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p22.81.05× | 53.9 Bowling Production 53.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 7.92 econp88.548% Middle1w · 10.11 econp12.136% Death3w · 11 econp44.216% | 44.8 Quality 44.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay19%p22.8 False-shot · Middle26%p74.2 | 58.5 Impact 58.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +24p94.648% MiddleWPA -14.8p21.136% DeathWPA -5.7p34.516% | 63.9 Versatility 63.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp82.548% Middlep26.636% Deathp92.316% | |
| 34 | Off-spin | 16 | 15.0 | 7 | 146 | 9.73 | 51.3 Scout Score 51.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle5386.7% Death40.413.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p72.80.97× | 59.5 Bowling Production 59.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle6w · 9.23 econp65.386.7% Death1w · 13 econp22.113.3% | 75.8 Quality 75.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle26%p75.8 | 23.8 Impact 23.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -16.2p1886.7% DeathWPA +0p61.913.3% | 43.2 Versatility 43.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep42.286.7% Deathp5013.3% | |
| 35 | RA pace | — | 20.0 | 7 | 214 | 10.7 | 50.5 Scout Score 50.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay20.320% Middle48.940% Death67.240% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p111.12× | 50.9 Bowling Production 50.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 14.25 econp1820% Middle3w · 9.88 econp46.540% Death4w · 9.75 econp71.840% | 61 Quality 61 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p28.3 False-shot · Middle27%p77.3 | 66 Impact 66 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -28.8p18.520% MiddleWPA -1p5740% DeathWPA +44.8p98.840% | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp30.820% Middlep35.940% Deathp44.940% | |
| 36 | RA pace | — | 20.3 | 5 | 197 | 9.61 | 50.3 Scout Score 50.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay23.843.9% Middle59.324.4% Death80.331.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p68.40.99× | 47.9 Bowling Production 47.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 12.33 econp14.243.9% Middle1w · 6.8 econp60.224.4% Death4w · 8 econp84.931.7% | 47.7 Quality 47.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p62 False-shot · Middle17%p21.9 | 45.2 Impact 45.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -38.2p3.343.9% MiddleWPA +3.3p69.524.4% DeathWPA +8.6p84.531.7% | 45.4 Versatility 45.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp13.343.9% Middlep74.224.4% Deathp67.731.7% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 25 | 21.0 | 5 | 207 | 9.86 | 49.8 Scout Score 49.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay30.833.3% Middle63.847.6% Death48.119% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p65.41× | 46.2 Bowling Production 46.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 12.14 econp1633.3% Middle3w · 8.2 econp65.647.6% Death2w · 10 econp50.619% | 74.4 Quality 74.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p90.2 False-shot · Middle23%p63.3 | 43.3 Impact 43.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -32.5p9.833.3% MiddleWPA +1p66.447.6% DeathWPA -2.3p4419% | 37.6 Versatility 37.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp2033.3% Middlep5247.6% Deathp32.719% | |
| 38 | RA pace | 36 | 26.0 | 9 | 272 | 10.46 | 49.4 Scout Score 49.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay17.126.9% Middle71.542.3% Death47.230.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p15.41.11× | 49.6 Bowling Production 49.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 13.71 econp826.9% Middle4w · 8.45 econp64.342.3% Death5w · 10.38 econp65.930.8% | 82.5 Quality 82.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p58.7 False-shot · Middle32%p97.7 | 46.8 Impact 46.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -33.2p7.626.9% MiddleWPA +22.6p94.542.3% DeathWPA -13.9p15.530.8% | 50.3 Versatility 50.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp17.226.9% Middlep60.242.3% Deathp65.830.8% | |
| 39 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 5.0 | 3 | 47 | 9.4 | 49.3 Scout Score 49.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle49.3100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 57.6 Bowling Production 57.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 9.4 econp57.6100% | 69.5 Quality 69.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle27%p69.5 | 28.9 Impact 28.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -11.6p28.9100% | 42.6 Versatility 42.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep42.6100% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 36 | 16.0 | 5 | 155 | 9.69 | 47.9 Scout Score 47.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle49.287.5% Death38.712.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p6.61.14× | 41.3 Bowling Production 41.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 9.36 econp42.987.5% Death1w · 12 econp29.812.5% | 43 Quality 43 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle20%p43 | 79.5 Impact 79.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA +8.3p8287.5% DeathWPA +0p61.912.5% | 45.1 Versatility 45.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep43.887.5% Deathp54.212.5% | |
| 41 | RA pace | — | 26.0 | 13 | 271 | 10.42 | 47.5 Scout Score 47.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay49.946.2% Middle37.715.4% Death48.738.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p12.51.12× | 61.6 Bowling Production 61.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 10.5 econp61.846.2% Middle2w · 11.25 econp4415.4% Death6w · 10 econp68.338.5% | 87.5 Quality 87.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay32%p92.4 False-shot · Middle29%p72.7 | 26.9 Impact 26.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -25.4p2546.2% MiddleWPA -14.9p19.515.4% DeathWPA -5.9p32.138.5% | 42.3 Versatility 42.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp4546.2% Middlep32.815.4% Deathp42.738.5% | |
| 42 | RA pace | — | 21.0 | 6 | 215 | 10.24 | 46.7 Scout Score 46.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay48.666.7% Middle5414.3% Death34.719% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p77.20.95× | 52.4 Bowling Production 52.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay5w · 9.93 econp65.866.7% Middle0w · 7.33 econp44.114.3% Death1w · 13.5 econp11.319% | 58.3 Quality 58.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay25%p64.1 False-shot · Middle17%p31.2 | 18.4 Impact 18.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -40.9p1.166.7% MiddleWPA +3.6p71.114.3% DeathWPA -3.6p39.319% | 61 Versatility 61 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp59.666.7% Middlep58.614.3% Deathp6819% | |
| 43 | Off-spin | — | 4.0 | 0 | 45 | 11.25 | 46.4 Scout Score 46.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle46.475% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p50n/a | 35.8 Bowling Production 35.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 9 econp35.875% | 54.7 Quality 54.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle22%p54.7 | 58.6 Impact 58.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -0.4p58.675% | 41.4 Versatility 41.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep41.475% | |
| 44 | Off-spin | 20 | 7.0 | 1 | 50 | 7.14 | 45.8 Scout Score 45.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle45.8100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p2.21.33× | 58.7 Bowling Production 58.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 7.14 econp58.7100% | 51.6 Quality 51.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p51.6 | 24.2 Impact 24.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -13.9p24.2100% | 78.5 Versatility 78.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep78.5100% | |
| 45 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 30.3 | 7 | 255 | 8.36 | 45.8 Scout Score 45.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay65.86.6% Middle39.177% Death69.216.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p93.40.84× | 56 Bowling Production 56 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 7 econp51.86.6% Middle5w · 8.43 econp51.977% Death2w · 8.6 econp76.916.4% | 7.3 Quality 7.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p66.3 False-shot · Middle15%p2.3 | 20.8 Impact 20.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +2.9p81.56.6% MiddleWPA -26.2p10.277% DeathWPA -1.2p46.416.4% | 57.4 Versatility 57.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp48.56.6% Middlep59.477% Deathp51.916.4% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 23 | 10.0 | 5 | 100 | 10 | 45.5 Scout Score 45.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay39.240% Death50.550% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 44.6 Bowling Production 44.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 10.25 econp28.240% Death4w · 10.6 econp57.750% | 44.6 Quality 44.6 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p44.6 | 48.9 Impact 48.9 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -10.9p48.940% DeathWPA -0.9p48.850% | 35.3 Versatility 35.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp38.540% Deathp32.750% | |
| 47 | RA pace | — | 10.2 | 0 | 105 | 10.16 | 44.6 Scout Score 44.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay46.967.7% Middle36.719.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 30.9 Bowling Production 30.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 9.71 econp32.367.7% Middle0w · 11.5 econp26.119.4% | 73.2 Quality 73.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay31%p77.2 False-shot · Middle25%p59.4 | 51.6 Impact 51.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -4.8p55.467.7% MiddleWPA -6.7p38.319.4% | 32.9 Versatility 32.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp33.767.7% Middlep30.119.4% | |
| 48 | RA pace | — | 10.0 | 4 | 117 | 11.7 | 44.6 Scout Score 44.6 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay59.830% Middle35.620% Death39.150% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 34.9 Bowling Production 34.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 12.67 econp52.730% Middle0w · 11 econp28.820% Death2w · 11.4 econp26.650% | 66.5 Quality 66.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay39%p84.8 False-shot · Middle17%p39.1 | 54.1 Impact 54.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.7p66.330% MiddleWPA -6.6p39.820% DeathWPA -0.4p52.450% | 45.5 Versatility 45.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp44.630% Middlep34.420% Deathp50.650% | |
| 49 | Off-spin | 16 | 7.1 | 2 | 67 | 9.35 | 44.4 Scout Score 44.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay57.827.9% Middle37.755.8% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 41.7 Bowling Production 41.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9 econp55.327.9% Middle0w · 8 econp34.955.8% | 8 Quality 8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay8%p16.3 False-shot · Middle4%p3.9 | 63.2 Impact 63.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +5.1p8827.9% MiddleWPA -3.1p50.855.8% | 55.4 Versatility 55.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp58.527.9% Middlep53.955.8% | |
| 50 | Off-spin | — | 6.0 | 2 | 69 | 11.5 | 44.4 Scout Score 44.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle39.450% Death51.833.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 42.2 Bowling Production 42.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 9 econp35.850% Death2w · 10.5 econp51.733.3% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p31.2 | 47.7 Impact 47.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -4.4p44.550% DeathWPA -0.4p52.433.3% | 49.3 Versatility 49.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep43.850% Deathp57.733.3% | |
| 51 | RA pace | 29 | 12.0 | 2 | 126 | 10.5 | 43.5 Scout Score 43.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay53.658.3% Middle32.325% Death24.916.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p28.71.01× | 36.7 Bowling Production 36.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 9 econp47.158.3% Middle0w · 10.67 econp23.325% Death1w · 15.5 econp20.216.7% | 50.5 Quality 50.5 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay24%p58.7 False-shot · Middle17%p31.2 | 56.4 Impact 56.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -2.6p68.558.3% MiddleWPA -3.8p47.725% DeathWPA -6.6p27.416.7% | 45.9 Versatility 45.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp5558.3% Middlep33.625% Deathp32.716.7% | |
| 52 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 1 | 87 | 14.5 | 41.9 Scout Score 41.9 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay51.350% Death27.833.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 21.5 Bowling Production 21.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 12.33 econp29.250% Death0w · 17.5 econp9.933.3% | 84.8 Quality 84.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay39%p84.8 | 57.2 Impact 57.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -1.4p70.750% DeathWPA -5.3p36.933.3% | 43.8 Versatility 43.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp36.850% Deathp54.233.3% | |
| 53 | Leg-spin | — | 10.0 | 3 | 94 | 9.4 | 41.5 Scout Score 41.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle41.5100% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p87.50.89× | 50.5 Bowling Production 50.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle3w · 9.4 econp50.5100% | 7 Quality 7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle13%p7 | 32 Impact 32 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -10.8p32100% | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep37.5100% | |
| 54 | RA pace | — | 11.5 | 2 | 142 | 12 | 39.3 Scout Score 39.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay34.450.7% Middle60.916.9% Death35.832.4% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p83.10.93× | 33.9 Bowling Production 33.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay2w · 14.83 econp28.950.7% Middle0w · 5.5 econp5416.9% Death0w · 10.96 econp31.332.4% | 48.1 Quality 48.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p51.1 False-shot · Middle17%p39.1 | 21.3 Impact 21.3 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -31.2p1250.7% MiddleWPA +4.7p74.216.9% DeathWPA -27.9p8.332.4% | 50.6 Versatility 50.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp41.750.7% Middlep63.316.9% Deathp57.732.4% | |
| 55 | RA pace | 23 | 21.0 | 7 | 194 | 9.24 | 38.4 Scout Score 38.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay5138.1% Middle3057.1% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p860.89× | 50 Bowling Production 50 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 9.38 econp65.638.1% Middle3w · 9.58 econp39.657.1% | 2.2 Quality 2.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay10%p4.3 False-shot · Middle12%p0.8 | 21.2 Impact 21.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13.6p40.238.1% MiddleWPA -30.8p8.657.1% | 44.5 Versatility 44.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp59.738.1% Middlep34.457.1% | |
| 56 | RA pace | — | 20.4 | 5 | 229 | 11.08 | 38.1 Scout Score 38.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay26.243.5% Middle35.424.2% Death56.332.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p84.60.9× | 37.4 Bowling Production 37.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 12 econp20.943.5% Middle1w · 11.4 econp23.324.2% Death3w · 9.6 econp70.232.3% | 40.8 Quality 40.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay18%p19.6 False-shot · Middle30%p78.9 | 13.8 Impact 13.8 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -29.8p16.343.5% MiddleWPA -23.6p13.324.2% DeathWPA -22.2p10.732.3% | 37.8 Versatility 37.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp2543.5% Middlep24.624.2% Deathp64.932.3% | |
| 57 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 0 | 62 | 12.4 | 37 Scout Score 37 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay32.640% Middle39.960% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 31.6 Bowling Production 31.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 18.5 econp18.640% Middle0w · 8.33 econp40.360% | 19.4 Quality 19.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay17%p40.2 False-shot · Middle0%p5.5 | 48.4 Impact 48.4 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -13.4p42.440% MiddleWPA -2.6p52.360% | 43 Versatility 43 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp33.240% Middlep49.660% | |
| 58 | RA pace | — | 22.0 | 3 | 257 | 11.68 | 36.5 Scout Score 36.5 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay2740.9% Middle32.136.4% Death60.522.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p80.10.95× | 18.1 Bowling Production 18.1 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 12.78 econp13.240.9% Middle0w · 11.62 econp4.836.4% Death2w · 9.8 econp4822.7% | 51.2 Quality 51.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay18%p19.6 False-shot · Middle29%p86.7 | 39.1 Impact 39.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -15.8p33.740.9% MiddleWPA -14.5p22.736.4% DeathWPA +1.7p7522.7% | 32.6 Versatility 32.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp19.640.9% Middlep29.736.4% Deathp60.622.7% | |
| 59 | Off-spin | — | 4.1 | 1 | 55 | 13.2 | 35.4 Scout Score 35.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle35.472% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 41.7 Bowling Production 41.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 11 econp41.772% | 14.1 Quality 14.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle11%p14.1 | 30.5 Impact 30.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -11.2p30.572% | 43 Versatility 43 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep4372% | |
| 60 | RA pace | — | 24.0 | 7 | 288 | 12 | 35.1 Scout Score 35.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay39.662.5% Middle53.812.5% Death14.525% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p18.41.07× | 31.2 Bowling Production 31.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay4w · 10.8 econp38.362.5% Middle2w · 10 econp55.312.5% Death1w · 16 econp1.625% | 35.1 Quality 35.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p35.9 False-shot · Middle17%p31.2 | 47 Impact 47 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -8.9p51.162.5% MiddleWPA +9.9p85.212.5% DeathWPA -11.1p17.925% | 42.2 Versatility 42.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp40.462.5% Middlep41.412.5% Deathp4725% | |
| 61 | Off-spin | — | 4.0 | 1 | 38 | 9.5 | 34.7 Scout Score 34.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle34.775% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 32.4 Bowling Production 32.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle0w · 9.33 econp32.475% | 14.1 Quality 14.1 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle11%p14.1 | 43 Impact 43 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -4.7p4375% | 39.8 Versatility 39.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep39.875% | |
| 62 | SLA orthodox | — | 7.0 | 2 | 91 | 13 | 34.2 Scout Score 34.2 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle34.285.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 35.3 Bowling Production 35.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 13.83 econp35.385.7% | 84.4 Quality 84.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle31%p84.4 | 5.5 Impact 5.5 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -39.5p5.585.7% | 17.2 Versatility 17.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep17.285.7% | |
| 63 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 2 | 100 | 16.67 | 34.1 Scout Score 34.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay36.950% Death3033.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 26.7 Bowling Production 26.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay1w · 16 econp27.950% Death1w · 15 econp2533.3% | 72.8 Quality 72.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay33%p72.8 | 28.2 Impact 28.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -23.4p27.250% DeathWPA -5.9p29.833.3% | 32.9 Versatility 32.9 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp3350% Deathp32.733.3% | |
| 64 | RA pace | 36 | 6.0 | 1 | 68 | 11.33 | 34 Scout Score 34 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle3483.3% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 27.3 Bowling Production 27.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 10.6 econp27.383.3% | 21.9 Quality 21.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p21.9 | 49.2 Impact 49.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -3.2p49.283.3% | 27.3 Versatility 27.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep27.383.3% | |
| 65 | Off-spin | — | 17.1 | 3 | 160 | 9.32 | 33.3 Scout Score 33.3 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay57.217.5% Middle27.875.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p16.91.11× | 41.5 Bowling Production 41.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 6 econp55.417.5% Middle3w · 9.38 econp38.375.7% | 46.8 Quality 46.8 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay22%p53.3 False-shot · Middle20%p45.3 | 15.1 Impact 15.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA +0.4p77.217.5% MiddleWPA -81.4p0.875.7% | 41.7 Versatility 41.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp56.317.5% Middlep38.375.7% | |
| 66 | RA pace | 31 | 23.0 | 7 | 276 | 12 | 32.7 Scout Score 32.7 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay41.334.8% Middle27.443.5% Death29.521.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p90.40.87× | 26.2 Bowling Production 26.2 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 10.88 econp54.634.8% Middle1w · 11.9 econp5.343.5% Death3w · 14 econp22.421.7% | 65.9 Quality 65.9 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay21%p38 False-shot · Middle28%p88.3 | 4.2 Impact 4.2 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -38p5.434.8% MiddleWPA -49.7p2.343.5% DeathWPA -28p621.7% | 33.4 Versatility 33.4 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp42.834.8% Middlep21.143.5% Deathp42.721.7% | |
| 67 | Off-spin | 21 | 16.0 | 5 | 194 | 12.12 | 29.8 Scout Score 29.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle24.881.2% Death62.712.5% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p81.60.93× | 37 Bowling Production 37 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle4w · 13 econp34.181.2% Death1w · 10.5 econp5612.5% | 10.2 Quality 10.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p10.2 | 16.7 Impact 16.7 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -32.8p781.2% DeathWPA +2.4p79.812.5% | 6.3 Versatility 6.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep3.181.2% Deathp26.912.5% | |
| 68 | RA pace | — | 9.2 | 5 | 117 | 12.54 | 28.1 Scout Score 28.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay28.185.7% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 39.6 Bowling Production 39.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay3w · 12.88 econp39.685.7% | 4.3 Quality 4.3 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay10%p4.3 | 14.1 Impact 14.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -30.7p14.185.7% | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp38.585.7% | |
| 69 | RA pace | — | 8.0 | 2 | 99 | 12.38 | 25.4 Scout Score 25.4 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle37.737.5% Death16.150% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p47.11× | 24.6 Bowling Production 24.6 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle1w · 10.33 econp42.837.5% Death1w · 16 econp10.950% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle17%p31.2 | 15.1 Impact 15.1 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -10.1p33.637.5% DeathWPA -89.9p1.250% | 31.8 Versatility 31.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep30.537.5% Deathp32.750% | |
| 70 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 1 | 96 | 16 | 22.1 Scout Score 22.1 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Powerplay24.150% Middle20.150% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p27.21.02× | 26.3 Bowling Production 26.3 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Powerplay0w · 14.33 econp23.350% Middle1w · 17.67 econp29.450% | 11.4 Quality 11.4 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Powerplay6%p8.7 False-shot · Middle11%p14.1 | 21.6 Impact 21.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy PowerplayWPA -16.4p31.550% MiddleWPA -25.9p11.750% | 18.5 Versatility 18.5 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Powerplayp27.650% Middlep9.450% | |
| 71 | Leg-spin | 25 | 20.0 | 5 | 229 | 11.45 | 20.8 Scout Score 20.8 = Σ(phase score × deployment) Phasescoredeploy Middle12.580% Death54.120% Trajectory (econ Δ, all phases)p19.91.07× | 13.7 Bowling Production 13.7 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaselineproddeploy Middle2w · 11.5 econp4.580% Death3w · 11.25 econp50.520% | 47.7 Quality 47.7 = false-shots induced (PP+Mid) False-shot · Middle21%p47.7 | 19.6 Impact 19.6 = Σ(WPA percentile × deployment) Phasewpapctdeploy MiddleWPA -49.2p3.980% DeathWPA +4p82.120% | 12.8 Versatility 12.8 = Σ(phase × deployment) Phaseversdeploy Middlep5.580% Deathp42.320% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RA pace | 23 | 7.0 | 3 | 36 | 5.14 | 91.2 Phase Production 91.2 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.512× parp96.736.8% Wicket rate0.43/ovp83.742.1% Boundary %7%p96.721.1% | 98.9 Quality 98.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %50% | 96.7 Impact 96.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+35 | 86.7 Versatility 86.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.730% Econ vs LHBp8830% Wkt vs RHBp69.620% Wkt vs LHBp8720% | |
| 2 | RA pace | 26 | 13.0 | 6 | 106 | 8.15 | 90.4 Phase Production 90.4 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.812× parp85.936.8% Wicket rate0.46/ovp98.942.1% Boundary %22%p81.521.1% | 70.7 Quality 70.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 83.7 Impact 83.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.1 | 82.2 Versatility 82.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8830% Econ vs LHBp72.830% Wkt vs RHBp72.820% Wkt vs LHBp96.720% | |
| 3 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 12.0 | 5 | 95 | 7.92 | 88.5 Phase Production 88.5 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.789× parp8836.8% Wicket rate0.41/ovp91.342.1% Boundary %21%p83.721.1% | 22.8 Quality 22.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %19% | 94.6 Impact 94.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+24 | 82.5 Versatility 82.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp81.530% Econ vs LHBp84.830% Wkt vs RHBp79.320% Wkt vs LHBp83.720% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 11.3 | 4 | 85 | 7.39 | 82.7 Phase Production 82.7 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.736× parp94.636.8% Wicket rate0.35/ovp68.542.1% Boundary %19%p90.221.1% | 42.4 Quality 42.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.6 | 75.4 Versatility 75.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp92.430% Econ vs LHBp92.430% Wkt vs RHBp96.720% Wkt vs LHBp3.320% | |
| 5 | RA pace | 35 | 6.0 | 3 | 52 | 8.67 | 81.6 Phase Production 81.6 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.863× parp70.736.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp8842.1% Boundary %17%p8821.1% | 75 Quality 75 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 72.8 Impact 72.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.3 | 71.1 Versatility 71.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp6230% Econ vs LHBp7530% Wkt vs RHBp51.120% Wkt vs LHBp98.920% | |
| 6 | RA pace | — | 17.0 | 7 | 153 | 9 | 81.4 Phase Production 81.4 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.897× parp7536.8% Wicket rate0.41/ovp94.642.1% Boundary %24%p66.321.1% | 55.4 Quality 55.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 46.7 Impact 46.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.7 | 68.5 Versatility 68.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp79.330% Econ vs LHBp48.930% Wkt vs RHBp92.420% Wkt vs LHBp57.620% | |
| 7 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 14.0 | 5 | 120 | 8.57 | 78.8 Phase Production 78.8 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.854× parp81.536.8% Wicket rate0.36/ovp78.342.1% Boundary %23%p7521.1% | 79.3 Quality 79.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 98.9 Impact 98.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+60 | 70.7 Versatility 70.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp68.530% Econ vs LHBp98.930% Wkt vs RHBp94.620% Wkt vs LHBp7.620% | |
| 8 | LA pace | — | 14.0 | 4 | 110 | 7.86 | 76.9 Phase Production 76.9 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.783× parp90.236.8% Wicket rate0.29/ovp57.642.1% Boundary %17%p92.421.1% | 48.9 Quality 48.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 90.2 Impact 90.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+11.5 | 71.5 Versatility 71.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.930% Econ vs LHBp90.230% Wkt vs RHBp77.220% Wkt vs LHBp16.320% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 9.0 | 2 | 48 | 5.33 | 75.1 Phase Production 75.1 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.531× parp98.936.8% Wicket rate0.22/ovp42.442.1% Boundary %9%p98.921.1% | 33.7 Quality 33.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 92.4 Impact 92.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+17.2 | 70.4 Versatility 70.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp98.930% Econ vs LHBp79.330% Wkt vs RHBp55.420% Wkt vs LHBp29.320% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | — | 16.0 | 4 | 126 | 7.88 | 73.6 Phase Production 73.6 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.785× parp92.436.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp46.742.1% Boundary %17%p94.621.1% | 12 Quality 12 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 62 Impact 62 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.9 | 73.3 Versatility 73.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp94.630% Econ vs LHBp94.630% Wkt vs RHBp81.520% Wkt vs LHBp1.120% | |
| 11 | LA pace | — | 5.0 | 3 | 47 | 9.4 | 69.5 Phase Production 69.5 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.936× parp57.636.8% Wicket rate0.60/ovp96.742.1% Boundary %30%p35.921.1% | 81.5 Quality 81.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 57.6 Impact 57.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.6 | 68.7 Versatility 68.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp55.430% Econ vs LHBp6230% Wkt vs RHBp7520% Wkt vs LHBp92.420% | |
| 12 | RA pace | — | 14.0 | 5 | 139 | 9.93 | 65.8 Phase Production 65.8 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.989× parp53.336.8% Wicket rate0.36/ovp78.342.1% Boundary %25%p6321.1% | 64.1 Quality 64.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 1.1 Impact 1.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-40.9 | 59.6 Versatility 59.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp44.630% Econ vs LHBp66.330% Wkt vs RHBp8820% Wkt vs LHBp43.520% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 23 | 8.0 | 3 | 75 | 9.38 | 65.6 Phase Production 65.6 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.934× parp6236.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp72.842.1% Boundary %25%p57.621.1% | 4.3 Quality 4.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %10% | 40.2 Impact 40.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.6 | 59.7 Versatility 59.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp31.530% Econ vs LHBp84.830% Wkt vs RHBp83.720% Wkt vs LHBp40.220% | |
| 14 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 1 | 27 | 6.75 | 63.3 Phase Production 63.3 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.672× parp79.336.8% Wicket rate0.25/ovp44.642.1% Boundary %17%p72.821.1% | 28.3 Quality 28.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 85.9 Impact 85.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.9 | 60.2 Versatility 60.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp83.730% Econ vs LHBp46.730% Wkt vs RHBp58.720% Wkt vs LHBp46.720% | |
| 15 | RA pace | — | 9.0 | 3 | 88 | 9.78 | 63.2 Phase Production 63.2 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.974× parp55.436.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp66.342.1% Boundary %22%p70.721.1% | 46.7 Quality 46.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 64.1 Impact 64.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.2 | 60.7 Versatility 60.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.330% Econ vs LHBp55.430% Wkt vs RHBp6220% Wkt vs LHBp78.320% | |
| 16 | Off-spin | 36 | 8.0 | 1 | 63 | 7.88 | 62.2 Phase Production 62.2 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.785× parp83.736.8% Wicket rate0.13/ovp31.542.1% Boundary %19%p85.921.1% | 68.5 Quality 68.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 53.3 Impact 53.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.6 | 54.1 Versatility 54.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp72.830% Econ vs LHBp77.230% Wkt vs RHBp22.820% Wkt vs LHBp22.820% | |
| 17 | RA pace | — | 12.0 | 5 | 126 | 10.5 | 61.8 Phase Production 61.8 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.046× parp3836.8% Wicket rate0.41/ovp91.342.1% Boundary %28%p44.621.1% | 92.4 Quality 92.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-25.4 | 45 Versatility 45 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp77.230% Econ vs LHBp3.330% Wkt vs RHBp98.920% Wkt vs LHBp5.420% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 22 | 11.0 | 3 | 102 | 9.27 | 59.3 Phase Production 59.3 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.924× parp68.536.8% Wicket rate0.27/ovp53.342.1% Boundary %26%p55.421.1% | 94.6 Quality 94.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 59.8 Impact 59.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.5 | 55.2 Versatility 55.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp90.230% Econ vs LHBp14.130% Wkt vs RHBp3820% Wkt vs LHBp81.520% | |
| 19 | Off-spin | — | 3.0 | 0 | 18 | 6 | 55.4 Phase Production 55.4 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.598× parp77.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2542.1% Boundary %11%p78.321.1% | 53.3 Quality 53.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 77.2 Impact 77.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.4 | 56.3 Versatility 56.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp64.130% Econ vs LHBp81.530% Wkt vs RHBp44.620% Wkt vs LHBp18.520% | |
| 20 | Off-spin | 16 | 2.0 | 1 | 18 | 9 | 55.3 Phase Production 55.3 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.897× parp48.936.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp64.142.1% Boundary %25%p48.921.1% | 16.3 Quality 16.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 88 Impact 88 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.1 | 58.5 Versatility 58.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp40.230% Econ vs LHBp64.130% Wkt vs RHBp48.920% Wkt vs LHBp8720% | |
| 21 | RA pace | 31 | 8.0 | 3 | 87 | 10.88 | 54.6 Phase Production 54.6 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.083× parp35.936.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp72.842.1% Boundary %27%p51.121.1% | 38 Quality 38 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 5.4 Impact 5.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-38 | 42.8 Versatility 42.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp33.730% Econ vs LHBp31.530% Wkt vs RHBp90.220% Wkt vs LHBp26.120% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 27 | 3.0 | 0 | 21 | 7 | 53.8 Phase Production 53.8 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.697× parp72.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2542.1% Boundary %11%p78.321.1% | 31.5 Quality 31.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 79.3 Impact 79.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.8 | 53.9 Versatility 53.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp66.330% Econ vs LHBp68.530% Wkt vs RHBp33.720% Wkt vs LHBp33.720% | |
| 23 | SLA orthodox | — | 5.0 | 1 | 45 | 9 | 53.4 Phase Production 53.4 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.897× parp59.836.8% Wicket rate0.20/ovp40.242.1% Boundary %20%p68.521.1% | 25 Quality 25 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 44.6 Impact 44.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12.6 | 55.2 Versatility 55.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp59.830% Econ vs LHBp59.830% Wkt vs RHBp18.520% Wkt vs LHBp78.320% | |
| 24 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 2 | 38 | 12.67 | 52.7 Phase Production 52.7 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.262× parp29.336.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp85.942.1% Boundary %39%p27.221.1% | 84.8 Quality 84.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %39% | 66.3 Impact 66.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.7 | 44.6 Versatility 44.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp42.430% Econ vs LHBp16.330% Wkt vs RHBp40.220% Wkt vs LHBp94.620% | |
| 25 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 2.0 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 51.8 Phase Production 51.8 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.697× parp64.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3742.1% Boundary %17%p59.821.1% | 66.3 Quality 66.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 81.5 Impact 81.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.9 | 48.5 Versatility 48.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp70.730% Econ vs LHBp33.730% Wkt vs RHBp35.920% Wkt vs LHBp5020% | |
| 26 | RA pace | 24 | 6.0 | 2 | 60 | 10 | 51 Phase Production 51 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.996× parp44.636.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp60.942.1% Boundary %28%p42.421.1% | 14.1 Quality 14.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %14% | 38 Impact 38 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.6 | 60 Versatility 60 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp18.530% Econ vs LHBp96.730% Wkt vs RHBp58.720% Wkt vs LHBp68.520% | |
| 27 | RA pace | 29 | 7.0 | 1 | 63 | 9 | 47.1 Phase Production 47.1 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.897× parp66.336.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp33.742.1% Boundary %29%p40.221.1% | 58.7 Quality 58.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 68.5 Impact 68.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.6 | 55 Versatility 55 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp57.630% Econ vs LHBp70.730% Wkt vs RHBp9.820% Wkt vs LHBp72.820% | |
| 28 | LA pace | 31 | 15.0 | 4 | 157 | 10.47 | 45.7 Phase Production 45.7 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.043× parp40.236.8% Wicket rate0.26/ovp5042.1% Boundary %28%p46.721.1% | 96.7 Quality 96.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 20.7 Impact 20.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-28.7 | 45.9 Versatility 45.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp35.930% Econ vs LHBp35.930% Wkt vs RHBp46.720% Wkt vs LHBp7520% | |
| 29 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 2 | 59 | 14.75 | 41.2 Phase Production 41.2 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.47× parp1236.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.542.1% Boundary %46%p1221.1% | 88 Quality 88 = false-shots induced False-shot %38% | 35.9 Impact 35.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.7 | 39.1 Versatility 39.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.130% Econ vs LHBp22.830% Wkt vs RHBp85.920% Wkt vs LHBp54.320% | |
| 30 | RA pace | — | 8.0 | 3 | 103 | 12.88 | 39.6 Phase Production 39.6 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.283× parp16.336.8% Wicket rate0.37/ovp72.842.1% Boundary %38%p14.121.1% | 4.3 Quality 4.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %10% | 14.1 Impact 14.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-30.7 | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2530% Econ vs LHBp7.630% Wkt vs RHBp53.320% Wkt vs LHBp90.220% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | — | 14.0 | 2 | 142 | 10.14 | 38.3 Phase Production 38.3 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.011× parp46.736.8% Wicket rate0.14/ovp18.542.1% Boundary %25%p6321.1% | 1.1 Quality 1.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 29.3 Impact 29.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-17.8 | 46.5 Versatility 46.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.730% Econ vs LHBp57.630% Wkt vs RHBp5.420% Wkt vs LHBp70.720% | |
| 32 | RA pace | — | 15.0 | 4 | 162 | 10.8 | 38.3 Phase Production 38.3 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.076× parp33.736.8% Wicket rate0.26/ovp5042.1% Boundary %32%p22.821.1% | 35.9 Quality 35.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 51.1 Impact 51.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.9 | 40.4 Versatility 40.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp51.130% Econ vs LHBp1230% Wkt vs RHBp64.120% Wkt vs LHBp43.520% | |
| 33 | RA pace | — | 7.0 | 0 | 68 | 9.71 | 32.3 Phase Production 32.3 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.968× parp51.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp5.442.1% Boundary %26%p53.321.1% | 77.2 Quality 77.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 55.4 Impact 55.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.8 | 33.7 Versatility 33.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7530% Econ vs LHBp18.530% Wkt vs RHBp7.620% Wkt vs LHBp20.720% | |
| 34 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 0 | 37 | 12.33 | 29.2 Phase Production 29.2 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.229× parp31.536.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2542.1% Boundary %33%p33.721.1% | 84.8 Quality 84.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %39% | 70.7 Impact 70.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.4 | 36.8 Versatility 36.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp27.230% Econ vs LHBp41.330% Wkt vs RHBp18.520% Wkt vs LHBp6320% | |
| 35 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 2 | 89 | 14.83 | 28.9 Phase Production 28.9 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.478× parp3.336.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp60.942.1% Boundary %42%p9.821.1% | 51.1 Quality 51.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 12 Impact 12 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-31.2 | 41.7 Versatility 41.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.330% Econ vs LHBp53.330% Wkt vs RHBp69.620% Wkt vs LHBp54.320% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 23 | 4.0 | 0 | 41 | 10.25 | 28.2 Phase Production 28.2 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.021× parp42.436.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp10.942.1% Boundary %29%p3821.1% | 44.6 Quality 44.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 48.9 Impact 48.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.9 | 38.5 Versatility 38.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3830% Econ vs LHBp51.130% Wkt vs RHBp2520% Wkt vs LHBp33.720% | |
| 37 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 1 | 48 | 16 | 27.9 Phase Production 27.9 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.594× parp9.836.8% Wicket rate0.34/ovp55.442.1% Boundary %56%p4.321.1% | 72.8 Quality 72.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 27.2 Impact 27.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-23.4 | 33 Versatility 33 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1230% Econ vs LHBp20.730% Wkt vs RHBp66.320% Wkt vs LHBp5020% | |
| 38 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 0 | 43 | 14.33 | 23.3 Phase Production 23.3 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.428× parp22.836.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2542.1% Boundary %44%p20.721.1% | 8.7 Quality 8.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %6% | 31.5 Impact 31.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16.4 | 27.6 Versatility 27.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp16.330% Econ vs LHBp29.330% Wkt vs RHBp31.520% Wkt vs LHBp3820% | |
| 39 | RA pace | — | 9.0 | 1 | 108 | 12 | 20.9 Phase Production 20.9 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.196× parp2536.8% Wicket rate0.11/ovp15.242.1% Boundary %33%p2521.1% | 19.6 Quality 19.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 16.3 Impact 16.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-29.8 | 25 Versatility 25 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp22.830% Econ vs LHBp2530% Wkt vs RHBp27.220% Wkt vs LHBp26.120% | |
| 40 | SLA orthodox | — | 2.0 | 0 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.6 Phase Production 18.6 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.843× parp7.636.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3742.1% Boundary %67%p1.121.1% | 40.2 Quality 40.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 42.4 Impact 42.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.4 | 33.2 Versatility 33.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp7.630% Econ vs LHBp41.330% Wkt vs RHBp29.320% Wkt vs LHBp6320% | |
| 41 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 0 | 57 | 14.25 | 18 Phase Production 18 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.42× parp18.536.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp10.942.1% Boundary %33%p31.521.1% | 28.3 Quality 28.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 18.5 Impact 18.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-28.8 | 30.8 Versatility 30.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9.830% Econ vs LHBp41.330% Wkt vs RHBp14.120% Wkt vs LHBp6320% | |
| 42 | RA pace | 25 | 7.0 | 0 | 85 | 12.14 | 16 Phase Production 16 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.21× parp27.236.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp5.442.1% Boundary %38%p17.421.1% | 90.2 Quality 90.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 9.8 Impact 9.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-32.5 | 20 Versatility 20 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp48.930% Econ vs LHBp1.130% Wkt vs RHBp1220% Wkt vs LHBp1320% | |
| 43 | RA pace | — | 9.0 | 0 | 111 | 12.33 | 14.2 Phase Production 14.2 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.229× parp20.736.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.142.1% Boundary %32%p29.321.1% | 62 Quality 62 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 3.3 Impact 3.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-38.2 | 13.3 Versatility 13.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp29.330% Econ vs LHBp5.430% Wkt vs RHBp1.120% Wkt vs LHBp1320% | |
| 44 | RA pace | — | 9.0 | 1 | 115 | 12.78 | 13.2 Phase Production 13.2 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.273× parp14.136.8% Wicket rate0.11/ovp15.242.1% Boundary %39%p7.621.1% | 19.6 Quality 19.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 33.7 Impact 33.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.8 | 19.6 Versatility 19.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp20.730% Econ vs LHBp9.830% Wkt vs RHBp42.420% Wkt vs LHBp9.820% | |
| 45 | SLA orthodox | — | 3.0 | 0 | 59 | 19.67 | 11.8 Phase Production 11.8 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.959× parp1.136.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp2542.1% Boundary %56%p4.321.1% | 8.7 Quality 8.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %6% | 22.8 Impact 22.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-27.7 | 29 Versatility 29 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1.130% Econ vs LHBp41.330% Wkt vs RHBp18.520% Wkt vs LHBp6320% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 36 | 7.0 | 0 | 96 | 13.71 | 8 Phase Production 8 vs all bowlers · n=46 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.366× parp5.436.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp5.442.1% Boundary %38%p17.421.1% | 58.7 Quality 58.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 7.6 Impact 7.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-33.2 | 17.2 Versatility 17.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5.430% Econ vs LHBp27.230% Wkt vs RHBp3.320% Wkt vs LHBp33.720% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leg-spin | — | 32.0 | 15 | 255 | 7.97 | 92.4 Phase Production 92.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.895× parp89.844.1% Wicket rate0.47/ovp97.744.1% Boundary %15%p8211.8% | 80.5 Quality 80.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 96.1 Impact 96.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+25.9 | 70.3 Versatility 70.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp91.450% Econ vs LHBp49.250% | |
| 2 | Leg-spin | 26 | 25.0 | 10 | 197 | 7.88 | 86.2 Phase Production 86.2 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.885× parp91.444.1% Wicket rate0.40/ovp88.344.1% Boundary %17%p58.611.8% | 93 Quality 93 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 27.3 Impact 27.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-12 | 82.8 Versatility 82.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp72.750% Econ vs LHBp9350% | |
| 3 | Leg-spin | — | 4.0 | 2 | 23 | 5.75 | 86.1 Phase Production 86.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.646× parp9344.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.244.1% Boundary %8%p78.911.8% | 61.7 Quality 61.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 91.4 Impact 91.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+16.2 | 77.3 Versatility 77.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp86.750% Econ vs LHBp6850% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | — | 10.0 | 3 | 70 | 7 | 84.4 Phase Production 84.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.786× parp94.544.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp71.144.1% Boundary %10%p96.111.8% | 41.4 Quality 41.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 75.8 Impact 75.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.5 | 84.4 Versatility 84.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8250% Econ vs LHBp86.750% | |
| 5 | Leg-spin | 36 | 19.0 | 9 | 153 | 8.05 | 83.9 Phase Production 83.9 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.904× parp72.744.1% Wicket rate0.47/ovp96.144.1% Boundary %14%p80.511.8% | 57 Quality 57 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 16.4 Impact 16.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-19.1 | 71.9 Versatility 71.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp83.650% Econ vs LHBp60.250% | |
| 6 | Off-spin | 36 | 21.0 | 6 | 158 | 7.52 | 83.8 Phase Production 83.8 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.845× parp97.744.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp6844.1% Boundary %13%p91.411.8% | 25.8 Quality 25.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 97.7 Impact 97.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+26.3 | 89.1 Versatility 89.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp80.550% Econ vs LHBp97.750% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 22 | 6.0 | 3 | 41 | 6.83 | 83.5 Phase Production 83.5 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.767× parp85.244.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp83.644.1% Boundary %11%p77.311.8% | 84.4 Quality 84.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 99.2 Impact 99.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+44.9 | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp96.150% Econ vs LHBp30.550% | |
| 8 | Leg-spin | 26 | 10.0 | 8 | 78 | 7.8 | 81.9 Phase Production 81.9 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.876× parp69.544.1% Wicket rate0.80/ovp99.244.1% Boundary %15%p63.311.8% | 94.5 Quality 94.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 72.7 Impact 72.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.4 | 69.9 Versatility 69.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp60.250% Econ vs LHBp79.750% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 11.0 | 3 | 78 | 7.09 | 74.7 Phase Production 74.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.796× parp96.144.1% Wicket rate0.27/ovp5044.1% Boundary %12%p86.711.8% | 66.4 Quality 66.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 86.7 Impact 86.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10.2 | 79.7 Versatility 79.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp88.350% Econ vs LHBp71.150% | |
| 10 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 7.0 | 2 | 49 | 7 | 72.9 Phase Production 72.9 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.786× parp86.744.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp54.744.1% Boundary %10%p89.111.8% | 71.1 Quality 71.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 41.4 Impact 41.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.1 | 65.6 Versatility 65.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp9350% Econ vs LHBp38.350% | |
| 11 | RA pace | 25 | 10.0 | 3 | 82 | 8.2 | 65.6 Phase Production 65.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.921× parp63.344.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp71.144.1% Boundary %17%p53.911.8% | 63.3 Quality 63.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %23% | 66.4 Impact 66.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1 | 52 Versatility 52 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp89.850% Econ vs LHBp14.150% | |
| 12 | Off-spin | 16 | 13.0 | 6 | 120 | 9.23 | 65.3 Phase Production 65.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.037× parp38.344.1% Wicket rate0.46/ovp94.544.1% Boundary %17%p5711.8% | 75.8 Quality 75.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 18 Impact 18 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-16.2 | 42.2 Versatility 42.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp74.250% Econ vs LHBp10.250% | |
| 13 | Off-spin | 31 | 11.0 | 3 | 86 | 7.82 | 64.4 Phase Production 64.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.878× parp71.144.1% Wicket rate0.27/ovp5044.1% Boundary %11%p9311.8% | 49.2 Quality 49.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 77.3 Impact 77.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+5.8 | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp27.350% Econ vs LHBp99.250% | |
| 14 | SLA orthodox | 28 | 9.0 | 2 | 66 | 7.33 | 64.4 Phase Production 64.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.824× parp83.644.1% Wicket rate0.22/ovp4344.1% Boundary %13%p72.711.8% | 24.2 Quality 24.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %18% | 80.5 Impact 80.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+7 | 77.3 Versatility 77.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp63.350% Econ vs LHBp91.450% | |
| 15 | RA pace | 36 | 11.0 | 4 | 93 | 8.45 | 64.3 Phase Production 64.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.949× parp5744.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp78.944.1% Boundary %20%p36.711.8% | 97.7 Quality 97.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %32% | 94.5 Impact 94.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+22.6 | 60.2 Versatility 60.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp46.150% Econ vs LHBp74.250% | |
| 16 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 3 | 46 | 9.2 | 63.6 Phase Production 63.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.033× parp4344.1% Wicket rate0.60/ovp90.644.1% Boundary %20%p39.811.8% | 89.8 Quality 89.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 60.2 Impact 60.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.4 | 44.5 Versatility 44.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp22.750% Econ vs LHBp66.450% | |
| 17 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 24.0 | 6 | 195 | 8.12 | 62 Phase Production 62 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.912× parp74.244.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp46.144.1% Boundary %15%p75.811.8% | 36.7 Quality 36.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 35.2 Impact 35.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.1 | 55.5 Versatility 55.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp99.250% Econ vs LHBp11.750% | |
| 18 | SLA orthodox | — | 8.0 | 1 | 45 | 5.62 | 61 Phase Production 61 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.632× parp99.244.1% Wicket rate0.13/ovp12.544.1% Boundary %4%p99.211.8% | 18 Quality 18 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 93 Impact 93 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+18 | 88.7 Versatility 88.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp97.750% Econ vs LHBp79.750% | |
| 19 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 1 | 22 | 7.33 | 60.7 Phase Production 60.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.824× parp60.944.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp64.144.1% Boundary %17%p46.911.8% | 54.7 Quality 54.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 63.3 Impact 63.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 54.7 Versatility 54.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp77.350% Econ vs LHBp3250% | |
| 20 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 1 | 34 | 6.8 | 60.2 Phase Production 60.2 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.764× parp78.944.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp39.844.1% Boundary %13%p66.411.8% | 21.9 Quality 21.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 69.5 Impact 69.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.3 | 74.2 Versatility 74.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp75.850% Econ vs LHBp72.750% | |
| 21 | SLA orthodox | — | 14.0 | 4 | 119 | 8.5 | 59.3 Phase Production 59.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.955× parp58.644.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp59.444.1% Boundary %16%p61.711.8% | 64.8 Quality 64.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %24% | 25.8 Impact 25.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.6 | 58.2 Versatility 58.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp53.950% Econ vs LHBp62.550% | |
| 22 | Off-spin | 20 | 7.0 | 1 | 50 | 7.14 | 58.7 Phase Production 58.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.802× parp8244.1% Wicket rate0.14/ovp27.344.1% Boundary %10%p89.111.8% | 51.6 Quality 51.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 24.2 Impact 24.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.9 | 78.5 Versatility 78.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp67.250% Econ vs LHBp89.850% | |
| 23 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 5.0 | 3 | 47 | 9.4 | 57.6 Phase Production 57.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.056× parp36.744.1% Wicket rate0.60/ovp90.644.1% Boundary %27%p11.711.8% | 69.5 Quality 69.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 28.9 Impact 28.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.6 | 42.6 Versatility 42.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp67.250% Econ vs LHBp1850% | |
| 24 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 0 | 17 | 5.67 | 55.6 Phase Production 55.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.636× parp80.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.344.1% Boundary %0%p94.511.8% | 8.6 Quality 8.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %6% | 83.6 Impact 83.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.9 | 68.8 Versatility 68.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp4350% Econ vs LHBp94.550% | |
| 25 | RA pace | 26 | 7.0 | 2 | 59 | 8.43 | 55.5 Phase Production 55.5 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.947× parp53.944.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp54.744.1% Boundary %14%p64.811.8% | 51.6 Quality 51.6 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 64.8 Impact 64.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.3 | 53.9 Versatility 53.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp19.550% Econ vs LHBp88.350% | |
| 26 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 2 | 30 | 10 | 55.3 Phase Production 55.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.123× parp30.544.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp85.944.1% Boundary %22%p33.611.8% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 85.2 Impact 85.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+9.9 | 41.4 Versatility 41.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp61.750% Econ vs LHBp21.150% | |
| 27 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 11 | 5.5 | 54 Phase Production 54 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.618× parp6844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3244.1% Boundary %0%p84.411.8% | 39.1 Quality 39.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 74.2 Impact 74.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4.7 | 63.3 Versatility 63.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp44.550% Econ vs LHBp8250% | |
| 28 | LA pace | 31 | 2.0 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 53.4 Phase Production 53.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.674× parp66.444.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3244.1% Boundary %0%p84.411.8% | 19.5 Quality 19.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %8% | 78.9 Impact 78.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+6 | 61.7 Versatility 61.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp58.650% Econ vs LHBp64.850% | |
| 29 | Off-spin | — | 8.0 | 1 | 57 | 7.12 | 53.2 Phase Production 53.2 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.8× parp88.344.1% Wicket rate0.13/ovp12.544.1% Boundary %12%p74.211.8% | 68 Quality 68 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 55.5 Impact 55.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.3 | 74.2 Versatility 74.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp52.350% Econ vs LHBp96.150% | |
| 30 | SLA orthodox | — | 3.0 | 2 | 32 | 10.67 | 52.2 Phase Production 52.2 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.198× parp23.444.1% Wicket rate0.67/ovp85.944.1% Boundary %22%p33.611.8% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 88.3 Impact 88.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+14.6 | 32 Versatility 32 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp1850% Econ vs LHBp46.150% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 23.3 | 5 | 198 | 8.43 | 51.9 Phase Production 51.9 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.946× parp64.844.1% Wicket rate0.21/ovp36.744.1% Boundary %16%p60.211.8% | 2.3 Quality 2.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %15% | 10.2 Impact 10.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-26.2 | 59.4 Versatility 59.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp94.550% Econ vs LHBp24.250% | |
| 32 | Leg-spin | — | 10.0 | 3 | 94 | 9.4 | 50.5 Phase Production 50.5 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.056× parp35.244.1% Wicket rate0.30/ovp71.144.1% Boundary %20%p30.511.8% | 7 Quality 7 = false-shots induced False-shot %13% | 32 Impact 32 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.8 | 37.5 Versatility 37.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp38.350% Econ vs LHBp36.750% | |
| 33 | SLA orthodox | — | 13.0 | 2 | 102 | 7.85 | 49.4 Phase Production 49.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.881× parp75.844.1% Wicket rate0.16/ovp10.244.1% Boundary %9%p97.711.8% | 45.3 Quality 45.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 89.8 Impact 89.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+15.5 | 74.2 Versatility 74.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp78.950% Econ vs LHBp69.550% | |
| 34 | Leg-spin | — | 7.0 | 2 | 63 | 9 | 49.3 Phase Production 49.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.011× parp50.844.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp54.744.1% Boundary %21%p23.411.8% | 91.4 Quality 91.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 53.9 Impact 53.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.4 | 45.3 Versatility 45.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp55.550% Econ vs LHBp35.250% | |
| 35 | RA pace | 23 | 2.0 | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 47.7 Phase Production 47.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.516× parp11.744.1% Wicket rate1.00/ovp9344.1% Boundary %33%p13.311.8% | 82 Quality 82 = false-shots induced False-shot %42% | 14.8 Impact 14.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-23.6 | 29.7 Versatility 29.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp750% Econ vs LHBp52.350% | |
| 36 | RA pace | 24 | 7.0 | 2 | 64 | 9.14 | 46.5 Phase Production 46.5 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.027× parp44.544.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp54.744.1% Boundary %21%p23.411.8% | 96.1 Quality 96.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %33% | 36.7 Impact 36.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-8.6 | 40.6 Versatility 40.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp47.750% Econ vs LHBp33.650% | |
| 37 | RA pace | — | 8.0 | 3 | 79 | 9.88 | 46.5 Phase Production 46.5 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.109× parp21.144.1% Wicket rate0.37/ovp77.344.1% Boundary %21%p25.811.8% | 77.3 Quality 77.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %27% | 57 Impact 57 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1 | 35.9 Versatility 35.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp64.850% Econ vs LHBp750% | |
| 38 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 0 | 22 | 7.33 | 44.1 Phase Production 44.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.824× parp60.944.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.344.1% Boundary %11%p70.311.8% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 71.1 Impact 71.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+3.6 | 58.6 Versatility 58.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp41.450% Econ vs LHBp75.850% | |
| 39 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 2 | 45 | 11.25 | 44 Phase Production 44 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.263× parp13.344.1% Wicket rate0.50/ovp81.244.1% Boundary %25%p19.511.8% | 72.7 Quality 72.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 19.5 Impact 19.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.9 | 32.8 Versatility 32.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5750% Econ vs LHBp8.650% | |
| 40 | RA pace | 27 | 9.0 | 1 | 68 | 7.56 | 43.7 Phase Production 43.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.848× parp77.344.1% Wicket rate0.11/ovp7.844.1% Boundary %17%p52.311.8% | 99.2 Quality 99.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %35% | 68 Impact 68 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.5 | 73.8 Versatility 73.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp85.250% Econ vs LHBp62.550% | |
| 41 | RA pace | 36 | 14.0 | 4 | 131 | 9.36 | 42.9 Phase Production 42.9 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.051× parp33.644.1% Wicket rate0.29/ovp59.444.1% Boundary %21%p16.411.8% | 43 Quality 43 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 82 Impact 82 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.3 | 43.8 Versatility 43.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp10.250% Econ vs LHBp77.350% | |
| 42 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 1 | 31 | 10.33 | 42.8 Phase Production 42.8 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.16× parp28.944.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp64.144.1% Boundary %28%p14.811.8% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 33.6 Impact 33.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.1 | 30.5 Versatility 30.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp21.150% Econ vs LHBp39.850% | |
| 43 | Off-spin | — | 3.0 | 1 | 33 | 11 | 41.7 Phase Production 41.7 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.235× parp1844.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp64.144.1% Boundary %17%p46.911.8% | 14.1 Quality 14.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 30.5 Impact 30.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.2 | 43 Versatility 43 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp69.550% Econ vs LHBp16.450% | |
| 44 | SLA orthodox | — | 3.0 | 0 | 25 | 8.33 | 40.3 Phase Production 40.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.936× parp52.344.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.344.1% Boundary %11%p70.311.8% | 5.5 Quality 5.5 = false-shots induced False-shot %0% | 52.3 Impact 52.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.6 | 49.6 Versatility 49.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp71.150% Econ vs LHBp28.150% | |
| 45 | RA pace | 23 | 12.0 | 3 | 115 | 9.58 | 39.6 Phase Production 39.6 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.076× parp27.344.1% Wicket rate0.25/ovp47.744.1% Boundary %17%p55.511.8% | 0.8 Quality 0.8 = false-shots induced False-shot %12% | 8.6 Impact 8.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-30.8 | 34.4 Versatility 34.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp49.250% Econ vs LHBp19.550% | |
| 46 | RA pace | 35 | 2.0 | 0 | 18 | 9 | 39.3 Phase Production 39.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.011× parp46.144.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3244.1% Boundary %17%p41.411.8% | 59.4 Quality 59.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 61.7 Impact 61.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.3 | 43 Versatility 43 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp39.850% Econ vs LHBp46.150% | |
| 47 | Off-spin | — | 13.0 | 3 | 122 | 9.38 | 38.3 Phase Production 38.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.054× parp3244.1% Wicket rate0.23/ovp44.544.1% Boundary %19%p38.311.8% | 45.3 Quality 45.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %20% | 0.8 Impact 0.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-81.4 | 38.3 Versatility 38.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp50.850% Econ vs LHBp25.850% | |
| 48 | Off-spin | — | 3.0 | 0 | 27 | 9 | 35.8 Phase Production 35.8 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.011× parp48.444.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.344.1% Boundary %17%p46.911.8% | 54.7 Quality 54.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %22% | 58.6 Impact 58.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.4 | 41.4 Versatility 41.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp36.750% Econ vs LHBp46.150% | |
| 49 | Off-spin | — | 3.0 | 0 | 27 | 9 | 35.8 Phase Production 35.8 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.011× parp48.444.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.344.1% Boundary %17%p46.911.8% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 44.5 Impact 44.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.4 | 43.8 Versatility 43.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp28.950% Econ vs LHBp58.650% | |
| 50 | SLA orthodox | — | 6.0 | 2 | 83 | 13.83 | 35.3 Phase Production 35.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.553× parp3.944.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp74.244.1% Boundary %31%p711.8% | 84.4 Quality 84.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %31% | 5.5 Impact 5.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-39.5 | 17.2 Versatility 17.2 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp33.650% Econ vs LHBp0.850% | |
| 51 | Off-spin | 16 | 4.0 | 0 | 32 | 8 | 34.9 Phase Production 34.9 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.898× parp55.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp5.544.1% Boundary %12%p6811.8% | 3.9 Quality 3.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %4% | 50.8 Impact 50.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.1 | 53.9 Versatility 53.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp24.250% Econ vs LHBp83.650% | |
| 52 | Off-spin | 21 | 13.0 | 4 | 169 | 13 | 34.1 Phase Production 34.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.46× parp0.844.1% Wicket rate0.31/ovp75.844.1% Boundary %32%p2.311.8% | 10.2 Quality 10.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 7 Impact 7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-32.8 | 3.1 Versatility 3.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3.950% Econ vs LHBp2.350% | |
| 53 | LA pace | — | 3.0 | 0 | 28 | 9.33 | 32.4 Phase Production 32.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.048× parp40.644.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.344.1% Boundary %17%p46.911.8% | 14.1 Quality 14.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 46.1 Impact 46.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.2 | 46.9 Versatility 46.9 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp8.650% Econ vs LHBp85.250% | |
| 54 | Off-spin | — | 3.0 | 0 | 28 | 9.33 | 32.4 Phase Production 32.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.048× parp40.644.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.344.1% Boundary %17%p46.911.8% | 14.1 Quality 14.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 43 Impact 43 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-4.7 | 39.8 Versatility 39.8 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp25.850% Econ vs LHBp53.950% | |
| 55 | RA pace | — | 3.0 | 1 | 53 | 17.67 | 29.4 Phase Production 29.4 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.984× parp2.344.1% Wicket rate0.34/ovp64.144.1% Boundary %56%p0.811.8% | 14.1 Quality 14.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %11% | 11.7 Impact 11.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-25.9 | 9.4 Versatility 9.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp14.850% Econ vs LHBp3.950% | |
| 56 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 22 | 11 | 28.8 Phase Production 28.8 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.235× parp25.844.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3244.1% Boundary %25%p28.111.8% | 39.1 Quality 39.1 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 39.8 Impact 39.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.6 | 34.4 Versatility 34.4 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp13.350% Econ vs LHBp55.550% | |
| 57 | RA pace | 36 | 5.0 | 1 | 53 | 10.6 | 27.3 Phase Production 27.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.19× parp16.444.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp39.844.1% Boundary %23%p21.111.8% | 21.9 Quality 21.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 49.2 Impact 49.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.2 | 27.3 Versatility 27.3 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp11.750% Econ vs LHBp4350% | |
| 58 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 23 | 11.5 | 26.1 Phase Production 26.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.291× parp19.544.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp3244.1% Boundary %25%p28.111.8% | 59.4 Quality 59.4 = false-shots induced False-shot %25% | 38.3 Impact 38.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.7 | 30.1 Versatility 30.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp3250% Econ vs LHBp28.150% | |
| 59 | RA pace | 29 | 3.0 | 0 | 32 | 10.67 | 23.3 Phase Production 23.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.198× parp23.444.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp20.344.1% Boundary %22%p33.611.8% | 31.2 Quality 31.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %17% | 47.7 Impact 47.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.8 | 33.6 Versatility 33.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp16.450% Econ vs LHBp50.850% | |
| 60 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 1 | 57 | 11.4 | 23.3 Phase Production 23.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.28× parp10.244.1% Wicket rate0.20/ovp39.844.1% Boundary %30%p10.211.8% | 78.9 Quality 78.9 = false-shots induced False-shot %30% | 13.3 Impact 13.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-23.6 | 24.6 Versatility 24.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp35.250% Econ vs LHBp14.150% | |
| 61 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 9.0 | 1 | 91 | 10.11 | 12.1 Phase Production 12.1 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.135× parp14.844.1% Wicket rate0.11/ovp7.844.1% Boundary %22%p1811.8% | 74.2 Quality 74.2 = false-shots induced False-shot %26% | 21.1 Impact 21.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.8 | 26.6 Versatility 26.6 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp30.550% Econ vs LHBp22.750% | |
| 62 | RA pace | 31 | 10.0 | 1 | 119 | 11.9 | 5.3 Phase Production 5.3 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.336× parp744.1% Wicket rate0.10/ovp3.944.1% Boundary %32%p3.911.8% | 88.3 Quality 88.3 = false-shots induced False-shot %28% | 2.3 Impact 2.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-49.7 | 21.1 Versatility 21.1 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp0.850% Econ vs LHBp41.450% | |
| 63 | RA pace | — | 8.0 | 0 | 93 | 11.62 | 4.8 Phase Production 4.8 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.305× parp8.644.1% Wicket rate0.00/ovp0.844.1% Boundary %29%p5.511.8% | 86.7 Quality 86.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %29% | 22.7 Impact 22.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-14.5 | 29.7 Versatility 29.7 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp2.350% Econ vs LHBp5750% | |
| 64 | Leg-spin | 25 | 16.0 | 2 | 184 | 11.5 | 4.5 Phase Production 4.5 vs all bowlers · n=64 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.291× parp5.544.1% Wicket rate0.13/ovp2.344.1% Boundary %25%p8.611.8% | 47.7 Quality 47.7 = false-shots induced False-shot %21% | 3.9 Impact 3.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-49.2 | 5.5 Versatility 5.5 = Σ(pct × share) Econ vs RHBp5.550% Econ vs LHBp5.550% |
| # | Bowler | Type | Age | Overs | Wkts | Runs | Econ | Prod | Qual | Impact | Vers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SLA orthodox | — | 3.0 | 3 | 10 | 3.33 | 94.4 Phase Production 94.4 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.317× parp9443.6% Boundary %0%p9441.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp96.414.5% | — | 91.7 Impact 91.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+22.9 | 48.1 Versatility 48.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep48.1100% | |
| 2 | SLA orthodox | 20 | 6.0 | 4 | 38 | 6.33 | 93.7 Phase Production 93.7 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.601× parp96.443.6% Boundary %6%p96.441.8% Wicket rate0.67/ovp77.414.5% | — | 89.3 Impact 89.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+16.1 | 57.7 Versatility 57.7 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep57.7100% | |
| 3 | LA pace | 31 | 9.1 | 6 | 69 | 7.53 | 90.9 Phase Production 90.9 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.715× parp91.750% Wicket rate0.65/ovp86.916.7% Boundary %14%p91.733.3% | — | 96.4 Impact 96.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+39.5 | 52 Versatility 52 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep26.840% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp94.626.7% | |
| 4 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.1 | 3 | 22 | 5.28 | 85.9 Phase Production 85.9 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.501× parp89.343.6% Boundary %12%p84.541.8% Wicket rate0.72/ovp79.814.5% | — | 58.3 Impact 58.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.1 | 69.2 Versatility 69.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep69.2100% | |
| 5 | Leg-spin | 26 | 7.3 | 2 | 41 | 5.47 | 85.6 Phase Production 85.6 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.519× parp98.843.6% Boundary %2%p98.841.8% Wicket rate0.26/ovp8.314.5% | — | 56 Impact 56 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.1 | 46.2 Versatility 46.2 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep46.2100% | |
| 6 | RA pace | — | 6.3 | 4 | 52 | 8 | 84.9 Phase Production 84.9 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.76× parp86.950% Wicket rate0.62/ovp70.216.7% Boundary %13%p89.333.3% | — | 84.5 Impact 84.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+8.6 | 67.7 Versatility 67.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep98.240% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 7 | RA pace | 26 | 19.4 | 13 | 189 | 9.61 | 80.6 Phase Production 80.6 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.913× parp84.550% Wicket rate0.66/ovp9416.7% Boundary %22%p67.933.3% | — | 13.1 Impact 13.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-15.9 | 37.7 Versatility 37.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep23.240% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 8 | SLA orthodox | 22 | 5.0 | 2 | 43 | 8.6 | 76.9 Phase Production 76.9 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.817× parp82.143.6% Boundary %13%p86.941.8% Wicket rate0.40/ovp32.114.5% | — | 46.4 Impact 46.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-1.2 | 51.9 Versatility 51.9 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep51.9100% | |
| 9 | SLA orthodox | — | 4.5 | 2 | 43 | 8.9 | 73.5 Phase Production 73.5 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.845× parp79.843.6% Boundary %17%p79.841.8% Wicket rate0.41/ovp36.914.5% | — | 94 Impact 94 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+30 | 28.8 Versatility 28.8 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep28.8100% | |
| 10 | RA pace | — | 8.0 | 4 | 78 | 9.75 | 71.8 Phase Production 71.8 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.926× parp7550% Wicket rate0.50/ovp41.716.7% Boundary %19%p82.133.3% | — | 98.8 Impact 98.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+44.8 | 44.9 Versatility 44.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep41.140% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 11 | RA pace | — | 6.4 | 3 | 64 | 9.6 | 70.2 Phase Production 70.2 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.912× parp77.450% Wicket rate0.45/ovp39.316.7% Boundary %20%p7533.3% | — | 10.7 Impact 10.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-22.2 | 64.9 Versatility 64.9 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep91.140% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 12 | RA pace | — | 10.0 | 6 | 100 | 10 | 68.3 Phase Production 68.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.95× parp70.250% Wicket rate0.60/ovp72.616.7% Boundary %22%p63.133.3% | — | 32.1 Impact 32.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.9 | 42.7 Versatility 42.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep35.740% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 13 | RA pace | 35 | 4.0 | 2 | 39 | 9.75 | 66.1 Phase Production 66.1 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.926× parp65.550% Wicket rate0.50/ovp45.216.7% Boundary %17%p77.433.3% | — | 72.6 Impact 72.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.4 | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep64.340% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 14 | RA pace | 36 | 8.0 | 5 | 83 | 10.38 | 65.9 Phase Production 65.9 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.985× parp58.350% Wicket rate0.62/ovp7516.7% Boundary %21%p72.633.3% | — | 15.5 Impact 15.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-13.9 | 65.8 Versatility 65.8 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep51.840% Slower ballp98.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 15 | Off-spin | 36 | 5.0 | 3 | 53 | 10.6 | 61.9 Phase Production 61.9 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.007× parp52.443.6% Boundary %20%p70.241.8% Wicket rate0.60/ovp66.714.5% | — | 25 Impact 25 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-7.4 | 42.3 Versatility 42.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep42.3100% | |
| 16 | RA pace | 24 | 8.0 | 3 | 79 | 9.88 | 58.3 Phase Production 58.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.938× parp72.650% Wicket rate0.37/ovp20.216.7% Boundary %23%p5633.3% | — | 77.4 Impact 77.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2 | 40.6 Versatility 40.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep30.440% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 17 | RA pace | 23 | 5.0 | 4 | 53 | 10.6 | 57.7 Phase Production 57.7 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.007× parp52.450% Wicket rate0.80/ovp91.716.7% Boundary %23%p48.833.3% | — | 48.8 Impact 48.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.9 | 32.7 Versatility 32.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep10.740% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 18 | RA pace | 27 | 3.4 | 2 | 38 | 10.36 | 56 Phase Production 56 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.984× parp5650% Wicket rate0.55/ovp60.716.7% Boundary %23%p53.633.3% | — | 86.9 Impact 86.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+10 | 59.2 Versatility 59.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep76.840% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 19 | Off-spin | 21 | 2.0 | 1 | 21 | 10.5 | 56 Phase Production 56 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.997× parp47.643.6% Boundary %17%p65.541.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp53.614.5% | — | 79.8 Impact 79.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+2.4 | 26.9 Versatility 26.9 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep26.9100% | |
| 20 | RA pace | — | 7.3 | 3 | 76 | 10.13 | 54.8 Phase Production 54.8 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.962× parp63.150% Wicket rate0.40/ovp22.616.7% Boundary %22%p58.333.3% | — | 65.5 Impact 65.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0.3 | 66.3 Versatility 66.3 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep94.640% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 21 | Off-spin | — | 2.0 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 51.7 Phase Production 51.7 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.997× parp47.643.6% Boundary %25%p42.941.8% Wicket rate1.00/ovp89.314.5% | — | 52.4 Impact 52.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.4 | 57.7 Versatility 57.7 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep57.7100% | |
| 22 | RA pace | 25 | 4.0 | 2 | 40 | 10 | 50.6 Phase Production 50.6 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.95× parp60.750% Wicket rate0.50/ovp45.216.7% Boundary %25%p38.133.3% | — | 44 Impact 44 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.3 | 32.7 Versatility 32.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep10.740% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 23 | SLA orthodox | 26 | 2.0 | 3 | 22 | 11 | 50.5 Phase Production 50.5 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.045× parp41.743.6% Boundary %25%p42.941.8% Wicket rate1.50/ovp98.814.5% | — | 67.9 Impact 67.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.1 | 73.1 Versatility 73.1 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep73.1100% | |
| 24 | Leg-spin | 25 | 4.0 | 3 | 45 | 11.25 | 50.5 Phase Production 50.5 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.068× parp29.843.6% Boundary %21%p60.741.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp83.314.5% | — | 82.1 Impact 82.1 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+4 | 42.3 Versatility 42.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep42.3100% | |
| 25 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 2 | 49 | 9.8 | 48 Phase Production 48 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy0.931× parp67.950% Wicket rate0.40/ovp32.116.7% Boundary %27%p26.233.3% | — | 75 Impact 75 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.7 | 60.6 Versatility 60.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep80.440% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 26 | SLA orthodox | 30 | 4.0 | 3 | 44 | 11 | 44.2 Phase Production 44.2 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.045× parp36.943.6% Boundary %25%p38.141.8% Wicket rate0.75/ovp83.314.5% | — | 34.5 Impact 34.5 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.7 | 92.3 Versatility 92.3 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep92.3100% | |
| 27 | RA pace | — | 7.1 | 3 | 77 | 10.74 | 43.7 Phase Production 43.7 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.02× parp4450% Wicket rate0.42/ovp27.416.7% Boundary %23%p51.233.3% | — | 41.7 Impact 41.7 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-2.7 | 62 Versatility 62 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep83.940% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 28 | RA pace | 22 | 5.3 | 3 | 61 | 11.09 | 43.3 Phase Production 43.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.053× parp34.550% Wicket rate0.55/ovp63.116.7% Boundary %24%p46.433.3% | — | 70.2 Impact 70.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+1.2 | 32.7 Versatility 32.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep10.740% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 29 | RA pace | — | 3.5 | 0 | 42 | 10.96 | 31.3 Phase Production 31.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.041× parp39.350% Wicket rate0.00/ovp1.216.7% Boundary %26%p34.533.3% | — | 8.3 Impact 8.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-27.9 | 57.7 Versatility 57.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep73.240% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 30 | RA pace | 36 | 2.0 | 1 | 24 | 12 | 29.8 Phase Production 29.8 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.14× parp27.450% Wicket rate0.50/ovp53.616.7% Boundary %33%p21.433.3% | — | 61.9 Impact 61.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep64.340% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 31 | SLA orthodox | 25 | 3.0 | 0 | 34 | 11.33 | 27.8 Phase Production 27.8 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.076× parp32.143.6% Boundary %28%p3141.8% Wicket rate0.00/ovp614.5% | — | 20.2 Impact 20.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-10.4 | 13.5 Versatility 13.5 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantagep13.5100% | |
| 32 | RA pace | — | 5.0 | 2 | 57 | 11.4 | 26.6 Phase Production 26.6 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.083× parp2550% Wicket rate0.40/ovp32.116.7% Boundary %27%p26.233.3% | — | 52.4 Impact 52.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-0.4 | 50.6 Versatility 50.6 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep55.440% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 33 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 1 | 30 | 15 | 25 Phase Production 25 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.425× parp17.950% Wicket rate0.50/ovp53.616.7% Boundary %33%p21.433.3% | — | 29.8 Impact 29.8 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.9 | 32.7 Versatility 32.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep10.740% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 34 | RA pace | 23 | 3.0 | 1 | 38 | 12.67 | 24.6 Phase Production 24.6 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.203× parp20.250% Wicket rate0.34/ovp2516.7% Boundary %28%p3133.3% | — | 22.6 Impact 22.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-9.6 | 47 Versatility 47 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep46.440% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 35 | RA pace | 31 | 5.0 | 3 | 70 | 14 | 22.4 Phase Production 22.4 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.33× parp10.750% Wicket rate0.60/ovp66.716.7% Boundary %30%p17.933.3% | — | 6 Impact 6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-28 | 42.7 Versatility 42.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep35.740% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 36 | Off-spin | 16 | 2.0 | 1 | 26 | 13 | 22.1 Phase Production 22.1 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.235× parp22.643.6% Boundary %42%p10.741.8% Wicket rate0.50/ovp53.614.5% | — | 61.9 Impact 61.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)+0 | 50 Versatility 50 = Σ(pct × share) Matchup advantage *p50100% | |
| 37 | RA pace | 29 | 2.0 | 1 | 31 | 15.5 | 20.2 Phase Production 20.2 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.472× parp15.550% Wicket rate0.50/ovp53.616.7% Boundary %42%p10.733.3% | — | 27.4 Impact 27.4 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-6.6 | 32.7 Versatility 32.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep10.740% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 38 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 1 | 54 | 13.5 | 11.3 Phase Production 11.3 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.282× parp13.150% Wicket rate0.25/ovp16.716.7% Boundary %38%p633.3% | — | 39.3 Impact 39.3 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-3.6 | 68 Versatility 68 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep64.340% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp98.226.7% | |
| 39 | RA pace | — | 4.0 | 1 | 64 | 16 | 10.9 Phase Production 10.9 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.52× parp650% Wicket rate0.25/ovp16.716.7% Boundary %33%p15.533.3% | — | 1.2 Impact 1.2 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-89.9 | 32.7 Versatility 32.7 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep10.740% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 40 | RA pace | — | 2.0 | 0 | 35 | 17.5 | 9.9 Phase Production 9.9 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.662× parp8.350% Wicket rate0.00/ovp13.116.7% Boundary %42%p10.733.3% | — | 36.9 Impact 36.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-5.3 | 54.2 Versatility 54.2 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep64.340% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 41 | LA pace | — | 5.0 | 1 | 80 | 16 | 4.8 Phase Production 4.8 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.52× parp3.650% Wicket rate0.20/ovp10.716.7% Boundary %40%p3.633.3% | — | 3.6 Impact 3.6 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-42.4 | 63.5 Versatility 63.5 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep87.540% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% | |
| 42 | RA pace | — | 6.0 | 1 | 96 | 16 | 1.6 Phase Production 1.6 vs all bowlers · n=42 KPIvaluepctshare True economy1.52× parp1.250% Wicket rate0.17/ovp3.616.7% Boundary %39%p1.233.3% | — | 17.9 Impact 17.9 = WPA percentile in phase WPA (this phase)-11.1 | 47 Versatility 47 = Σ(pct × share) Yorker ratep46.440% Slower ballp48.233.3% Slow bouncerp46.426.7% |
Ved Reddy Amisthapuram
Bowler · Leg-spin
88.5
Scout Score
Overs 33.0 · Wkts 15 · Runs 267 · Econ 8.09
88.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle88.597%85.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p890.88×
Scout Score88.5
88.5Middle97% of overs · 15w · 7.97 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp92.438%
Impactp96.125%
Qualityp80.515%
Versatilityp70.312%
Trajectoryp8910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.895× par192bp89.844.1%
Wicket rate0.47/ov192bp97.744.1%
Boundary %15%192bp8211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.871× par142bp91.450%
Econ vs LHB0.988× par50bp49.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +25.9 · induced false-shot 25%
Ashwad Rajiv
Bowler · Leg-spin
79.1
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 23 · Econ 5.75
79.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle79.1100%79.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50n/a
Scout Score79.1
79.1Middle100% of overs · 2w · 5.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp86.138%
Impactp91.425%
Qualityp61.715%
Versatilityp77.312%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.646× par24bp9344.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp81.244.1%
Boundary %8%24bp78.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.555× par14bp86.750%
Econ vs LHB0.741× par10bp6850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +16.2 · induced false-shot 25%
Aniketh Reddy
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 25
75.2
Scout Score
Overs 28.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 232 · Econ 8.29
75.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay83.250%41.6
Middle77.139.3%30.3
Death30.510.7%3.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p75.70.96×
Scout Score75.2
83.2Powerplay50% of overs · 5w · 8.57 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp78.838%
Impactp98.927%
Qualityp79.315%
Versatilityp70.710%
Trajectoryp75.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.854× par84bp81.536.8%
Wicket rate0.36/ov84bp78.342.1%
Boundary %23%84bp7521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.916× par64bp68.530%
Econ vs LHB0.625× par20bp98.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.47/ov64bp94.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov20bp7.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA +60 · induced false-shot 29%
77.1Middle39.3% of overs · 3w · 7.09 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp74.738%
Impactp86.725%
Qualityp66.415%
Versatilityp79.712%
Trajectoryp75.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.796× par66bp96.144.1%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp5044.1%
Boundary %12%66bp86.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.782× par47bp88.350%
Econ vs LHB0.845× par19bp71.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10.2 · induced false-shot 24%
30.5Death10.7% of overs · 0w · 11.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.855%
Impactp20.225%
Versatilityp13.58%
Trajectoryp75.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.076× par18bp32.143.6%
Boundary %28%18bp3141.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.9811bp13.5100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.4
Aelgani Varun Goud
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 26
71.9
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 8 · Runs 78 · Econ 7.8
71.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle71.9100%71.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p0.71.35×
Scout Score71.9
71.9Middle100% of overs · 8w · 7.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.938%
Impactp72.725%
Qualityp94.515%
Versatilityp69.912%
Trajectoryp0.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.876× par60bp69.544.1%
Wicket rate0.80/ov60bp99.244.1%
Boundary %15%60bp63.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.958× par45bp60.250%
Econ vs LHB0.7× par15bp79.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.4 · induced false-shot 30%
Nishanth Saranu
Bowler · RA pace · age 22
69.2
Scout Score
Overs 22.3 · Wkts 9 · Runs 204 · Econ 9.07
69.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay67.648.9%33.1
Middle8626.7%23.0
Death54.324.4%13.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p91.90.85×
Scout Score69.2
67.6Powerplay48.9% of overs · 3w · 9.27 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.338%
Impactp59.827%
Qualityp94.615%
Versatilityp55.210%
Trajectoryp91.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.924× par66bp68.536.8%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp53.342.1%
Boundary %26%66bp55.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.725× par38bp90.230%
Econ vs LHB1.228× par28bp14.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.16/ov38bp3820%
Wkt vs LHB0.43/ov28bp81.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.5 · induced false-shot 35%
86Middle26.7% of overs · 3w · 6.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.538%
Impactp99.225%
Qualityp84.415%
Versatilityp63.312%
Trajectoryp91.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.767× par36bp85.244.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp83.644.1%
Boundary %11%36bp77.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.53× par24bp96.150%
Econ vs LHB1.184× par12bp30.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +44.9 · induced false-shot 31%
54.3Death24.4% of overs · 3w · 11.09 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.348%
Impactp70.225%
Versatilityp32.715%
Trajectoryp91.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.053× par33bp34.550%
Wicket rate0.55/ov33bp63.116.7%
Boundary %24%33bp46.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%33bp10.740%
Slower ball033bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer033bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.2
Rohit Rayudu
Bowler · Off-spin · age 31
68.3
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 102 · Econ 8.5
68.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle68.391.7%62.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p94.90.84×
Scout Score68.3
68.3Middle91.7% of overs · 3w · 7.82 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.438%
Impactp77.325%
Qualityp49.215%
Versatilityp63.312%
Trajectoryp94.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.878× par66bp71.144.1%
Wicket rate0.27/ov66bp5044.1%
Boundary %11%66bp9311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.099× par36bp27.350%
Econ vs LHB0.618× par30bp99.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.8 · induced false-shot 21%
Ashish Srivastav
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 26
66.9
Scout Score
Overs 33.3 · Wkts 12 · Runs 250 · Econ 7.46
66.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle66.574.6%49.6
Death68.422.4%15.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p30.11.01×
Scout Score66.9
66.5Middle74.6% of overs · 10w · 7.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp86.238%
Impactp27.325%
Qualityp9315%
Versatilityp82.812%
Trajectoryp30.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.885× par150bp91.444.1%
Wicket rate0.40/ov150bp88.344.1%
Boundary %17%150bp58.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.955× par125bp72.750%
Econ vs LHB0.692× par25bp9350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12 · induced false-shot 27%
68.4Death22.4% of overs · 2w · 5.47 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp85.655%
Impactp5625%
Versatilityp46.28%
Trajectoryp30.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.519× par45bp98.843.6%
Boundary %2%45bp98.841.8%
Wicket rate0.26/ov45bp8.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.5435bp46.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.1
Bhuvanagiri Punnaiah
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
66.5
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 101 · Econ 8.42
66.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay8958.3%51.9
Middle42.416.7%7.1
Death30.225%7.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score66.5
89Powerplay58.3% of overs · 3w · 5.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp91.238%
Impactp96.727%
Qualityp98.915%
Versatilityp86.710%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.512× par42bp96.736.8%
Wicket rate0.43/ov42bp83.742.1%
Boundary %7%42bp96.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.515× par33bp96.730%
Econ vs LHB0.486× par9bp8830%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov33bp69.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.67/ov9bp8720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +35 · induced false-shot 50%
42.4Middle16.7% of overs · 2w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.738%
Impactp14.825%
Qualityp8215%
Versatilityp29.712%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.516× par12bp11.744.1%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp9344.1%
Boundary %33%12bp13.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.884× par9bp750%
Econ vs LHB0.618× par3bp52.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -23.6 · induced false-shot 42%
30.2Death25% of overs · 1w · 12.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp24.648%
Impactp22.625%
Versatilityp4715%
Trajectoryp47.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.203× par18bp20.250%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp2516.7%
Boundary %28%18bp3133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%18bp46.440%
Slower ball018bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer018bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.6
M Ravi Kiran
Bowler · RA pace · age 35
66.3
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 109 · Econ 9.08
66.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay73.850%36.9
Middle49.216.7%8.2
Death63.633.3%21.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score66.3
73.8Powerplay50% of overs · 3w · 8.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.638%
Impactp72.827%
Qualityp7515%
Versatilityp71.110%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.863× par36bp70.736.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov36bp8842.1%
Boundary %17%36bp8821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.927× par31bp6230%
Econ vs LHB0.375× par5bp7530%
Wkt vs RHB0.19/ov31bp51.120%
Wkt vs LHB2.40/ov5bp98.920%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.3 · induced false-shot 31%
49.2Middle16.7% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.338%
Impactp61.725%
Qualityp59.415%
Versatilityp4312%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.011× par12bp46.144.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp3244.1%
Boundary %17%12bp41.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.06× par12bp39.850%
Econ vs LHB—0bp46.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.3 · induced false-shot 25%
63.6Death33.3% of overs · 2w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp66.148%
Impactp72.625%
Versatilityp54.215%
Trajectoryp47.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.926× par24bp65.550%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp45.216.7%
Boundary %17%24bp77.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%24bp64.340%
Slower ball024bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer024bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.4
Mohammad Salman Khan
Bowler · LA pace
65.8
Scout Score
Overs 7.3 · Wkts 6 · Runs 76 · Econ 10.13
65.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay65.866.7%43.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score65.8
65.8Powerplay66.7% of overs · 3w · 9.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp69.538%
Impactp57.627%
Qualityp81.515%
Versatilityp68.710%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.936× par30bp57.636.8%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp96.742.1%
Boundary %30%30bp35.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.963× par28bp55.430%
Econ vs LHB0.312× par2bp6230%
Wkt vs RHB0.43/ov28bp7520%
Wkt vs LHB3.00/ov2bp92.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.6 · induced false-shot 33%
Shanmukha Ashwin
Bowler · Off-spin · age 36
65.3
Scout Score
Overs 34.0 · Wkts 10 · Runs 274 · Econ 8.06
65.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay56.123.5%13.2
Middle73.361.8%45.3
Death46.614.7%6.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p24.31.04×
Scout Score65.3
56.1Powerplay23.5% of overs · 1w · 7.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp62.238%
Impactp53.327%
Qualityp68.515%
Versatilityp54.110%
Trajectoryp24.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.785× par48bp83.736.8%
Wicket rate0.13/ov48bp31.542.1%
Boundary %19%48bp85.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.724× par17bp72.830%
Econ vs LHB0.847× par31bp77.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov17bp22.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.19/ov31bp22.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.6 · induced false-shot 27%
73.3Middle61.8% of overs · 6w · 7.52 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.838%
Impactp97.725%
Qualityp25.815%
Versatilityp89.112%
Trajectoryp24.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.845× par126bp97.744.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov126bp6844.1%
Boundary %13%126bp91.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.893× par72bp80.550%
Econ vs LHB0.766× par54bp97.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +26.3 · induced false-shot 20%
46.6Death14.7% of overs · 3w · 10.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.955%
Impactp2525%
Versatilityp42.38%
Trajectoryp24.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.007× par30bp52.443.6%
Boundary %20%30bp70.241.8%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp66.714.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.938bp42.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -7.4
Shaik Azhar
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 28
64.2
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 66 · Econ 7.33
64.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle64.2100%64.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p66.90.99×
Scout Score64.2
64.2Middle100% of overs · 2w · 7.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.438%
Impactp80.525%
Qualityp24.215%
Versatilityp77.312%
Trajectoryp66.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.824× par54bp83.644.1%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp4344.1%
Boundary %13%54bp72.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.953× par43bp63.350%
Econ vs LHB0.449× par11bp91.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA +7 · induced false-shot 18%
Mohammed Afreedi Ahmed
Bowler · RA pace · age 27
63.8
Scout Score
Overs 15.4 · Wkts 3 · Runs 127 · Econ 8.11
63.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.119.1%11.3
Middle64.557.4%37.0
Death6623.4%15.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p71.30.99×
Scout Score63.8
59.1Powerplay19.1% of overs · 0w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.838%
Impactp79.327%
Qualityp31.515%
Versatilityp53.910%
Trajectoryp71.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.697× par18bp72.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp2542.1%
Boundary %11%18bp78.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.645× par10bp66.330%
Econ vs LHB0.781× par8bp68.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov10bp33.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp33.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.8 · induced false-shot 17%
64.5Middle57.4% of overs · 1w · 7.56 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.738%
Impactp6825%
Qualityp99.215%
Versatilityp73.812%
Trajectoryp71.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.848× par54bp77.344.1%
Wicket rate0.11/ov54bp7.844.1%
Boundary %17%54bp52.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.777× par30bp85.250%
Econ vs LHB0.901× par24bp62.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.5 · induced false-shot 35%
66Death23.4% of overs · 2w · 10.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp5648%
Impactp86.925%
Versatilityp59.215%
Trajectoryp71.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.984× par22bp5650%
Wicket rate0.55/ov22bp60.716.7%
Boundary %23%22bp53.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate9%22bp76.840%
Slower ball022bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer022bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +10
Syed Ghazi Abbas Abedi
Bowler · SLA orthodox
63.1
Scout Score
Overs 14.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 144 · Econ 10.29
63.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay22.721.4%4.9
Middle75.271.4%53.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p78.70.95×
Scout Score63.1
22.7Powerplay21.4% of overs · 0w · 19.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp11.838%
Impactp22.827%
Qualityp8.715%
Versatilityp2910%
Trajectoryp78.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.959× par18bp1.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp2542.1%
Boundary %56%18bp4.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.922× par18bp1.130%
Econ vs LHB—0bp41.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov18bp18.520%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp6320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -27.7 · induced false-shot 6%
75.2Middle71.4% of overs · 3w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.438%
Impactp75.825%
Qualityp41.415%
Versatilityp84.412%
Trajectoryp78.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.786× par60bp94.544.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp71.144.1%
Boundary %10%60bp96.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.83× par40bp8250%
Econ vs LHB0.71× par20bp86.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.5 · induced false-shot 20%
Shubham G Sharma
Bowler · SLA orthodox
62.2
Scout Score
Overs 34.1 · Wkts 11 · Runs 267 · Econ 7.81
62.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay63.646.8%29.8
Middle55.541%22.8
Death79.112.2%9.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p97.80.83×
Scout Score62.2
63.6Powerplay46.8% of overs · 4w · 7.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.638%
Impactp6227%
Qualityp1215%
Versatilityp73.310%
Trajectoryp97.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.785× par96bp92.436.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov96bp46.742.1%
Boundary %17%96bp94.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.796× par67bp94.630%
Econ vs LHB0.754× par29bp94.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.36/ov67bp81.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov29bp1.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.9 · induced false-shot 18%
55.5Middle41% of overs · 4w · 8.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp59.338%
Impactp25.825%
Qualityp64.815%
Versatilityp58.212%
Trajectoryp97.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.955× par84bp58.644.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov84bp59.444.1%
Boundary %16%84bp61.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.989× par60bp53.950%
Econ vs LHB0.901× par24bp62.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.6 · induced false-shot 24%
79.1Death12.2% of overs · 3w · 5.28 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp85.955%
Impactp58.325%
Versatilityp69.28%
Trajectoryp97.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.501× par25bp89.343.6%
Boundary %12%25bp84.541.8%
Wicket rate0.72/ov25bp79.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.5223bp69.2100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.1
Rishab Baslas
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 26
61.6
Scout Score
Overs 20.3 · Wkts 9 · Runs 156 · Econ 7.61
61.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay66.156.1%37.1
Middle57.134.1%19.5
Death51.29.8%5.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p5.11.27×
Scout Score61.6
66.1Powerplay56.1% of overs · 4w · 7.39 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp82.738%
Impactp7527%
Qualityp42.415%
Versatilityp75.410%
Trajectoryp5.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.736× par69bp94.636.8%
Wicket rate0.35/ov69bp68.542.1%
Boundary %19%69bp90.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.729× par41bp92.430%
Econ vs LHB0.759× par28bp92.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.59/ov41bp96.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov28bp3.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.6 · induced false-shot 22%
57.1Middle34.1% of overs · 2w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp72.938%
Impactp41.425%
Qualityp71.115%
Versatilityp65.612%
Trajectoryp5.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.786× par42bp86.744.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp54.744.1%
Boundary %10%42bp89.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.661× par31bp9350%
Econ vs LHB1.123× par11bp38.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.1 · induced false-shot 26%
51.2Death9.8% of overs · 3w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.555%
Impactp67.925%
Versatilityp73.18%
Trajectoryp5.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.045× par12bp41.743.6%
Boundary %25%12bp42.941.8%
Wicket rate1.50/ov12bp98.814.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.666bp73.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.1
Dev Mehta
Bowler · LA pace
60.9
Scout Score
Overs 22.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 218 · Econ 9.91
60.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay7863.6%49.6
Middle41.513.6%5.6
Death24.622.7%5.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p99.30.78×
Scout Score60.9
78Powerplay63.6% of overs · 4w · 7.86 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.938%
Impactp90.227%
Qualityp48.915%
Versatilityp71.510%
Trajectoryp99.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.783× par84bp90.236.8%
Wicket rate0.29/ov84bp57.642.1%
Boundary %17%84bp92.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.782× par48bp85.930%
Econ vs LHB0.799× par36bp90.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov48bp77.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.17/ov36bp16.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +11.5 · induced false-shot 23%
41.5Middle13.6% of overs · 0w · 9.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.438%
Impactp46.125%
Qualityp14.115%
Versatilityp46.912%
Trajectoryp99.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.048× par18bp40.644.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp20.344.1%
Boundary %17%18bp46.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.606× par11bp8.650%
Econ vs LHB0.265× par7bp85.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.2 · induced false-shot 11%
24.6Death22.7% of overs · 1w · 16 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp4.848%
Impactp3.625%
Versatilityp63.515%
Trajectoryp99.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.52× par30bp3.650%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp10.716.7%
Boundary %40%30bp3.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate17%30bp87.540%
Slower ball030bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer030bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -42.4
Akhil Kumar Sankoju
Bowler · RA pace
60.6
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 49 · Econ 7
60.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay62.257.1%35.5
Middle58.342.9%25.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score60.6
62.2Powerplay57.1% of overs · 1w · 6.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.338%
Impactp85.927%
Qualityp28.315%
Versatilityp60.210%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.672× par24bp79.336.8%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp44.642.1%
Boundary %17%24bp72.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.586× par19bp83.730%
Econ vs LHB1× par5bp46.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.32/ov19bp58.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov5bp46.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.9 · induced false-shot 17%
58.3Middle42.9% of overs · 1w · 7.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.738%
Impactp63.325%
Qualityp54.715%
Versatilityp54.712%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.824× par18bp60.944.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp64.144.1%
Boundary %17%18bp46.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.656× par14bp77.350%
Econ vs LHB1.389× par4bp3250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0 · induced false-shot 22%
Nanavath Rakesh
Bowler · Off-spin
60.6
Scout Score
Overs 9.1 · Wkts 2 · Runs 70 · Econ 7.64
60.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle60.687.3%52.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p74.30.96×
Scout Score60.6
60.6Middle87.3% of overs · 1w · 7.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.238%
Impactp55.525%
Qualityp6815%
Versatilityp74.212%
Trajectoryp74.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.8× par48bp88.344.1%
Wicket rate0.13/ov48bp12.544.1%
Boundary %12%48bp74.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.975× par29bp52.350%
Econ vs LHB0.553× par19bp96.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.3 · induced false-shot 25%
Ajay Dev Goud
Bowler · RA pace · age 26
60.4
Scout Score
Overs 39.4 · Wkts 21 · Runs 354 · Econ 8.92
60.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay78.432.8%25.7
Middle54.117.6%9.5
Death50.749.6%25.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p25.71.03×
Scout Score60.4
78.4Powerplay32.8% of overs · 6w · 8.15 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp90.438%
Impactp83.727%
Qualityp70.715%
Versatilityp82.210%
Trajectoryp25.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.812× par78bp85.936.8%
Wicket rate0.46/ov78bp98.942.1%
Boundary %22%78bp81.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.8× par55bp8830%
Econ vs LHB0.842× par23bp72.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.33/ov55bp72.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.78/ov23bp96.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.1 · induced false-shot 27%
54.1Middle17.6% of overs · 2w · 8.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.538%
Impactp64.825%
Qualityp51.615%
Versatilityp53.912%
Trajectoryp25.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.947× par42bp53.944.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp54.744.1%
Boundary %14%42bp64.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.161× par28bp19.550%
Econ vs LHB0.573× par14bp88.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.3 · induced false-shot 21%
50.7Death49.6% of overs · 13w · 9.61 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp80.648%
Impactp13.125%
Versatilityp37.715%
Trajectoryp25.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.913× par118bp84.550%
Wicket rate0.66/ov118bp9416.7%
Boundary %22%118bp67.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%118bp23.240%
Slower ball0118bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer0118bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.9
Rathlavath Dinesh
Bowler · RA pace
60.1
Scout Score
Overs 24.1 · Wkts 10 · Runs 230 · Econ 9.52
60.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay65.170.3%45.8
Death48.429.7%14.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p641×
Scout Score60.1
65.1Powerplay70.3% of overs · 7w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp81.438%
Impactp46.727%
Qualityp55.415%
Versatilityp68.510%
Trajectoryp6410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.897× par102bp7536.8%
Wicket rate0.41/ov102bp94.642.1%
Boundary %24%102bp66.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.869× par83bp79.330%
Econ vs LHB0.987× par19bp48.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.43/ov83bp92.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.32/ov19bp57.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.7 · induced false-shot 24%
48.4Death29.7% of overs · 3w · 10.74 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp43.748%
Impactp41.725%
Versatilityp6215%
Trajectoryp6412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.02× par43bp4450%
Wicket rate0.42/ov43bp27.416.7%
Boundary %23%43bp51.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate12%43bp83.940%
Slower ball043bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer043bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.7
Vutkuri Yashveer Goud
Bowler · SLA orthodox
58.6
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 100 · Econ 6.25
58.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay42.531.2%13.3
Middle60.750%30.4
Death79.818.8%15.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p9.61.13×
Scout Score58.6
42.5Powerplay31.2% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.438%
Impactp44.627%
Qualityp2515%
Versatilityp55.210%
Trajectoryp9.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.897× par30bp59.836.8%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp40.242.1%
Boundary %20%30bp68.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.912× par18bp59.830%
Econ vs LHB0.885× par12bp59.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov18bp18.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.50/ov12bp78.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -12.6 · induced false-shot 17%
60.7Middle50% of overs · 1w · 5.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp6138%
Impactp9325%
Qualityp1815%
Versatilityp88.712%
Trajectoryp9.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.632× par48bp99.244.1%
Wicket rate0.13/ov48bp12.544.1%
Boundary %4%48bp99.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.6× par33bp97.750%
Econ vs LHB0.7× par15bp79.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +18 · induced false-shot 17%
79.8Death18.8% of overs · 3w · 3.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp94.455%
Impactp91.725%
Versatilityp48.18%
Trajectoryp9.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.317× par18bp9443.6%
Boundary %0%18bp9441.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov18bp96.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.438bp48.1100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +22.9
Chama Milind
Bowler · LA pace · age 31
56.7
Scout Score
Overs 26.1 · Wkts 10 · Runs 238 · Econ 9.1
56.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay44.257.3%25.3
Middle52.57.6%4.0
Death78.135%27.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p21.31.07×
Scout Score56.7
44.2Powerplay57.3% of overs · 4w · 10.47 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp45.738%
Impactp20.727%
Qualityp96.715%
Versatilityp45.910%
Trajectoryp21.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.043× par90bp40.236.8%
Wicket rate0.26/ov90bp5042.1%
Boundary %28%90bp46.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.057× par61bp35.930%
Econ vs LHB1.013× par29bp35.930%
Wkt vs RHB0.20/ov61bp46.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.41/ov29bp7520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -28.7 · induced false-shot 33%
52.5Middle7.6% of overs · 0w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp53.438%
Impactp78.925%
Qualityp19.515%
Versatilityp61.712%
Trajectoryp21.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.674× par12bp66.444.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp3244.1%
Boundary %0%12bp84.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.707× par6bp58.650%
Econ vs LHB0.618× par6bp64.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +6 · induced false-shot 8%
78.1Death35% of overs · 6w · 7.53 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp90.948%
Impactp96.425%
Versatilityp5215%
Trajectoryp21.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.715× par55bp91.750%
Wicket rate0.65/ov55bp86.916.7%
Boundary %14%55bp91.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%55bp26.840%
Slower ball055bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer5.45555bp94.626.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +39.5
Sashanth Budthi
Bowler · RA pace
56.6
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 21 · Econ 5.25
56.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle56.675%42.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50n/a
Scout Score56.6
56.6Middle75% of overs · 0w · 5.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.638%
Impactp83.625%
Qualityp8.615%
Versatilityp68.812%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.636× par18bp80.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp20.344.1%
Boundary %0%18bp94.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB—0bp4350%
Econ vs LHB0.583× par18bp94.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.9 · induced false-shot 6%
Arjun Gorrapalli
Bowler · Leg-spin
56.1
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 63 · Econ 9
56.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle56.1100%56.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score56.1
56.1Middle100% of overs · 2w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.338%
Impactp53.925%
Qualityp91.415%
Versatilityp45.312%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.011× par42bp50.844.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp54.744.1%
Boundary %21%42bp23.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.942× par27bp55.550%
Econ vs LHB1.112× par15bp35.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.4 · induced false-shot 31%
Kappaganti Sriniketh
Bowler · RA pace
55.8
Scout Score
Overs 9.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 105 · Econ 11.67
55.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay47.244.4%21.0
Middle62.755.6%34.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score55.8
47.2Powerplay44.4% of overs · 2w · 14.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.238%
Impactp35.927%
Qualityp8815%
Versatilityp39.110%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.47× par24bp1236.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp81.542.1%
Boundary %46%24bp1221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.396× par21bp14.130%
Econ vs LHB1.875× par3bp22.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.57/ov21bp85.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp54.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.7 · induced false-shot 38%
62.7Middle55.6% of overs · 3w · 9.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.638%
Impactp60.225%
Qualityp89.815%
Versatilityp44.512%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.033× par30bp4344.1%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp90.644.1%
Boundary %20%30bp39.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.236× par12bp22.750%
Econ vs LHB0.858× par18bp66.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.4 · induced false-shot 33%
Pranav Varma
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 20
55.4
Scout Score
Overs 39.0 · Wkts 12 · Runs 281 · Econ 7.21
55.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay66.423.1%15.3
Middle45.361.5%27.9
Death79.415.4%12.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p8.11.13×
Scout Score55.4
66.4Powerplay23.1% of overs · 2w · 5.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp75.138%
Impactp92.427%
Qualityp33.715%
Versatilityp70.410%
Trajectoryp8.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.531× par54bp98.936.8%
Wicket rate0.22/ov54bp42.442.1%
Boundary %9%54bp98.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.521× par45bp98.930%
Econ vs LHB0.556× par9bp79.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.26/ov45bp55.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov9bp29.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA +17.2 · induced false-shot 20%
45.3Middle61.5% of overs · 6w · 8.12 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp6238%
Impactp35.225%
Qualityp36.715%
Versatilityp55.512%
Trajectoryp8.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.912× par144bp74.244.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov144bp46.144.1%
Boundary %15%144bp75.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.771× par98bp99.250%
Econ vs LHB1.181× par46bp11.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -9.1 · induced false-shot 20%
79.4Death15.4% of overs · 4w · 6.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp93.755%
Impactp89.325%
Versatilityp57.78%
Trajectoryp8.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.601× par36bp96.443.6%
Boundary %6%36bp96.441.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov36bp77.414.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.5327bp57.7100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +16.1
Ellala Vidya Nanda Reddy
Bowler · SLA orthodox
55.2
Scout Score
Overs 31.5 · Wkts 6 · Runs 287 · Econ 9.02
55.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.944%16.2
Middle66.640.8%27.2
Death77.815.2%11.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p96.30.83×
Scout Score55.2
36.9Powerplay44% of overs · 2w · 10.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.338%
Impactp29.327%
Qualityp1.115%
Versatilityp46.510%
Trajectoryp96.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.011× par84bp46.736.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov84bp18.542.1%
Boundary %25%84bp6321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.014× par70bp46.730%
Econ vs LHB0.937× par14bp57.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.08/ov70bp5.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.43/ov14bp70.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -17.8 · induced false-shot 13%
66.6Middle40.8% of overs · 2w · 7.85 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp49.438%
Impactp89.825%
Qualityp45.315%
Versatilityp74.212%
Trajectoryp96.310%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.881× par78bp75.844.1%
Wicket rate0.16/ov78bp10.244.1%
Boundary %9%78bp97.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.865× par49bp78.950%
Econ vs LHB0.894× par29bp69.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA +15.5 · induced false-shot 20%
77.8Death15.2% of overs · 2w · 8.9 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp73.555%
Impactp9425%
Versatilityp28.88%
Trajectoryp96.312%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.845× par29bp79.843.6%
Boundary %17%29bp79.841.8%
Wicket rate0.41/ov29bp36.914.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.8721bp28.8100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +30
Asif Mansoori
Bowler · SLA orthodox
55.1
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 62 · Econ 12.4
55.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle55.160%33.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score55.1
55.1Middle60% of overs · 2w · 10.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.238%
Impactp88.325%
Qualityp31.215%
Versatilityp3212%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.198× par18bp23.444.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp85.944.1%
Boundary %22%18bp33.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.256× par18bp1850%
Econ vs LHB—0bp46.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +14.6 · induced false-shot 17%
Yelamanchili Harshith Rai
Bowler · RA pace
55.1
Scout Score
Overs 16.3 · Wkts 6 · Runs 164 · Econ 9.94
55.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay55.854.5%30.4
Death54.345.5%24.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p141.11×
Scout Score55.1
55.8Powerplay54.5% of overs · 3w · 9.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp63.238%
Impactp64.127%
Qualityp46.715%
Versatilityp60.710%
Trajectoryp1410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.974× par54bp55.436.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov54bp66.342.1%
Boundary %22%54bp70.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.977× par42bp53.330%
Econ vs LHB0.937× par12bp55.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.29/ov42bp6220%
Wkt vs LHB0.50/ov12bp78.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.2 · induced false-shot 22%
54.3Death45.5% of overs · 3w · 10.13 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.848%
Impactp65.525%
Versatilityp66.315%
Trajectoryp1412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.962× par45bp63.150%
Wicket rate0.40/ov45bp22.616.7%
Boundary %22%45bp58.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate22%45bp94.640%
Slower ball045bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer045bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.3
Arfaz Ahmed
Bowler · RA pace · age 24
54
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 203 · Econ 9.67
54OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay44.728.6%12.8
Middle53.133.3%17.7
Death61.838.1%23.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p69.90.99×
Scout Score54
44.7Powerplay28.6% of overs · 2w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp5138%
Impactp3827%
Qualityp14.115%
Versatilityp6010%
Trajectoryp69.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.996× par36bp44.636.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp60.942.1%
Boundary %28%36bp42.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.327× par19bp18.530%
Econ vs LHB0.625× par17bp96.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.32/ov19bp58.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.35/ov17bp68.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.6 · induced false-shot 14%
53.1Middle33.3% of overs · 2w · 9.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.538%
Impactp36.725%
Qualityp96.115%
Versatilityp40.612%
Trajectoryp69.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.027× par42bp44.544.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov42bp54.744.1%
Boundary %21%42bp23.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.994× par32bp47.750%
Econ vs LHB1.173× par10bp33.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.6 · induced false-shot 33%
61.8Death38.1% of overs · 3w · 9.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.348%
Impactp77.425%
Versatilityp40.615%
Trajectoryp69.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.938× par48bp72.650%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp20.216.7%
Boundary %23%48bp5633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate2%48bp30.440%
Slower ball048bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer048bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2
Tvs Narayana Teja
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 36
53.5
Scout Score
Overs 20.3 · Wkts 9 · Runs 167 · Econ 8.15
53.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle53.592.7%49.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p3.71.28×
Scout Score53.5
53.5Middle92.7% of overs · 9w · 8.05 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp83.938%
Impactp16.425%
Qualityp5715%
Versatilityp71.912%
Trajectoryp3.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.904× par114bp72.744.1%
Wicket rate0.47/ov114bp96.144.1%
Boundary %14%114bp80.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.89× par77bp83.650%
Econ vs LHB0.935× par37bp60.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -19.1 · induced false-shot 22%
Tanay Thyagarajan
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 30
51.5
Scout Score
Overs 25.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 230 · Econ 9.2
51.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay73.148%35.1
Middle26.536%9.5
Death4316%6.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p22.81.05×
Scout Score51.5
73.1Powerplay48% of overs · 5w · 7.92 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp88.538%
Impactp94.627%
Qualityp22.815%
Versatilityp82.510%
Trajectoryp22.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.789× par72bp8836.8%
Wicket rate0.41/ov72bp91.342.1%
Boundary %21%72bp83.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.79× par46bp81.530%
Econ vs LHB0.793× par26bp84.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.39/ov46bp79.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.46/ov26bp83.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +24 · induced false-shot 19%
26.5Middle36% of overs · 1w · 10.11 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp12.138%
Impactp21.125%
Qualityp74.215%
Versatilityp26.612%
Trajectoryp22.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.135× par54bp14.844.1%
Wicket rate0.11/ov54bp7.844.1%
Boundary %22%54bp1811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.082× par32bp30.550%
Econ vs LHB1.179× par22bp22.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.8 · induced false-shot 26%
43Death16% of overs · 3w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.255%
Impactp34.525%
Versatilityp92.38%
Trajectoryp22.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.045× par24bp36.943.6%
Boundary %25%24bp38.141.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp83.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.3616bp92.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.7
Wafi Kachchhi
Bowler · Off-spin · age 16
51.3
Scout Score
Overs 15.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 146 · Econ 9.73
51.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle5386.7%46.0
Death40.413.3%5.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p72.80.97×
Scout Score51.3
53Middle86.7% of overs · 6w · 9.23 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.338%
Impactp1825%
Qualityp75.815%
Versatilityp42.212%
Trajectoryp72.810%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.037× par78bp38.344.1%
Wicket rate0.46/ov78bp94.544.1%
Boundary %17%78bp5711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.916× par54bp74.250%
Econ vs LHB1.287× par24bp10.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16.2 · induced false-shot 26%
40.4Death13.3% of overs · 1w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.155%
Impactp61.925%
Versatilityp508%
Trajectoryp72.812%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.235× par12bp22.643.6%
Boundary %42%12bp10.741.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp53.614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage *—0bp50100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Sahendra Mallu
Bowler · RA pace
50.5
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 214 · Econ 10.7
50.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay20.320%4.1
Middle48.940%19.6
Death67.240%26.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p111.12×
Scout Score50.5
20.3Powerplay20% of overs · 0w · 14.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp1838%
Impactp18.527%
Qualityp28.315%
Versatilityp30.810%
Trajectoryp1110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.42× par24bp18.536.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp10.942.1%
Boundary %33%24bp31.521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.393× par24bp9.830%
Econ vs LHB—0bp41.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov24bp14.120%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp6320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -28.8 · induced false-shot 17%
48.9Middle40% of overs · 3w · 9.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp46.538%
Impactp5725%
Qualityp77.315%
Versatilityp35.912%
Trajectoryp1110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.109× par48bp21.144.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp77.344.1%
Boundary %21%48bp25.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.936× par37bp64.850%
Econ vs LHB1.684× par11bp750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1 · induced false-shot 27%
67.2Death40% of overs · 4w · 9.75 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp71.848%
Impactp98.825%
Versatilityp44.915%
Trajectoryp1112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.926× par48bp7550%
Wicket rate0.50/ov48bp41.716.7%
Boundary %19%48bp82.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate4%48bp41.140%
Slower ball048bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer048bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +44.8
Madhukar Manne
Bowler · RA pace
50.3
Scout Score
Overs 20.3 · Wkts 5 · Runs 197 · Econ 9.61
50.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay23.843.9%10.4
Middle59.324.4%14.5
Death80.331.7%25.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p68.40.99×
Scout Score50.3
23.8Powerplay43.9% of overs · 0w · 12.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp14.238%
Impactp3.327%
Qualityp6215%
Versatilityp13.310%
Trajectoryp68.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.229× par54bp20.736.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov54bp1.142.1%
Boundary %32%54bp29.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.113× par39bp29.330%
Econ vs LHB1.542× par15bp5.430%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov39bp1.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov15bp1320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -38.2 · induced false-shot 24%
59.3Middle24.4% of overs · 1w · 6.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp60.238%
Impactp69.525%
Qualityp21.915%
Versatilityp74.212%
Trajectoryp68.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.764× par30bp78.944.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp39.844.1%
Boundary %13%30bp66.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.785× par18bp75.850%
Econ vs LHB0.72× par12bp72.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.3 · induced false-shot 17%
80.3Death31.7% of overs · 4w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp84.948%
Impactp84.525%
Versatilityp67.715%
Trajectoryp68.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.76× par39bp86.950%
Wicket rate0.62/ov39bp70.216.7%
Boundary %13%39bp89.333.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate23%39bp98.240%
Slower ball039bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer039bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.6
Rakshan Readdi
Bowler · RA pace · age 25
49.8
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 207 · Econ 9.86
49.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay30.833.3%10.3
Middle63.847.6%30.4
Death48.119%9.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p65.41×
Scout Score49.8
30.8Powerplay33.3% of overs · 0w · 12.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp1638%
Impactp9.827%
Qualityp90.215%
Versatilityp2010%
Trajectoryp65.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.21× par42bp27.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov42bp5.442.1%
Boundary %38%42bp17.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.977× par27bp48.930%
Econ vs LHB1.667× par15bp1.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov27bp1220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov15bp1320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -32.5 · induced false-shot 33%
63.8Middle47.6% of overs · 3w · 8.2 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.638%
Impactp66.425%
Qualityp63.315%
Versatilityp5212%
Trajectoryp65.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.921× par60bp63.344.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp71.144.1%
Boundary %17%60bp53.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.755× par44bp89.850%
Econ vs LHB1.351× par16bp14.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1 · induced false-shot 23%
48.1Death19% of overs · 2w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.648%
Impactp4425%
Versatilityp32.715%
Trajectoryp65.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.95× par24bp60.750%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp45.216.7%
Boundary %25%24bp38.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%24bp10.740%
Slower ball024bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer024bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.3
Akhil Rathod
Bowler · RA pace · age 36
49.4
Scout Score
Overs 26.0 · Wkts 9 · Runs 272 · Econ 10.46
49.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay17.126.9%4.6
Middle71.542.3%30.2
Death47.230.8%14.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p15.41.11×
Scout Score49.4
17.1Powerplay26.9% of overs · 0w · 13.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp838%
Impactp7.627%
Qualityp58.715%
Versatilityp17.210%
Trajectoryp15.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.366× par42bp5.436.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov42bp5.442.1%
Boundary %38%42bp17.421.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.38× par34bp5.430%
Econ vs LHB1.25× par8bp27.230%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov34bp3.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp33.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -33.2 · induced false-shot 24%
71.5Middle42.3% of overs · 4w · 8.45 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp64.338%
Impactp94.525%
Qualityp97.715%
Versatilityp60.212%
Trajectoryp15.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.949× par66bp5744.1%
Wicket rate0.37/ov66bp78.944.1%
Boundary %20%66bp36.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.015× par39bp46.150%
Econ vs LHB0.846× par27bp74.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +22.6 · induced false-shot 32%
47.2Death30.8% of overs · 5w · 10.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.948%
Impactp15.525%
Versatilityp65.815%
Trajectoryp15.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.985× par48bp58.350%
Wicket rate0.62/ov48bp7516.7%
Boundary %21%48bp72.633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%48bp51.840%
Slower ball18.7548bp98.233.3%
Slow bouncer048bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.9
Hitesh Yadav
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 26
49.3
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 47 · Econ 9.4
49.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle49.3100%49.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score49.3
49.3Middle100% of overs · 3w · 9.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.638%
Impactp28.925%
Qualityp69.515%
Versatilityp42.612%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.056× par30bp36.744.1%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp90.644.1%
Boundary %27%30bp11.711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.883× par20bp67.250%
Econ vs LHB1.359× par10bp1850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.6 · induced false-shot 27%
B Satish Kumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 36
47.9
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 155 · Econ 9.69
47.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle49.287.5%43.0
Death38.712.5%4.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p6.61.14×
Scout Score47.9
49.2Middle87.5% of overs · 4w · 9.36 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.938%
Impactp8225%
Qualityp4315%
Versatilityp43.812%
Trajectoryp6.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.051× par84bp33.644.1%
Wicket rate0.29/ov84bp59.444.1%
Boundary %21%84bp16.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.178× par54bp10.250%
Econ vs LHB0.844× par30bp77.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA +8.3 · induced false-shot 20%
38.7Death12.5% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.848%
Impactp61.925%
Versatilityp54.215%
Trajectoryp6.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.14× par12bp27.450%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp53.616.7%
Boundary %33%12bp21.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%12bp64.340%
Slower ball012bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer012bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0
Aryan Cariappa
Bowler · RA pace
47.5
Scout Score
Overs 26.0 · Wkts 13 · Runs 271 · Econ 10.42
47.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay49.946.2%23.1
Middle37.715.4%5.8
Death48.738.5%18.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p12.51.12×
Scout Score47.5
49.9Powerplay46.2% of overs · 5w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp61.838%
Impactp2527%
Qualityp92.415%
Versatilityp4510%
Trajectoryp12.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.046× par72bp3836.8%
Wicket rate0.41/ov72bp91.342.1%
Boundary %28%72bp44.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.727× par25bp77.230%
Econ vs LHB1.263× par47bp3.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.96/ov25bp98.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.13/ov47bp5.420%
Impact · Quality — WPA -25.4 · induced false-shot 32%
37.7Middle15.4% of overs · 2w · 11.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp4438%
Impactp19.525%
Qualityp72.715%
Versatilityp32.812%
Trajectoryp12.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.263× par24bp13.344.1%
Wicket rate0.50/ov24bp81.244.1%
Boundary %25%24bp19.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.87× par13bp5750%
Econ vs LHB1.628× par11bp8.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.9 · induced false-shot 29%
48.7Death38.5% of overs · 6w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp68.348%
Impactp32.125%
Versatilityp42.715%
Trajectoryp12.512%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.95× par60bp70.250%
Wicket rate0.60/ov60bp72.616.7%
Boundary %22%60bp63.133.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%60bp35.740%
Slower ball060bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer060bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.9
Sai Varun Yerram
Bowler · RA pace
46.7
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 6 · Runs 215 · Econ 10.24
46.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay48.666.7%32.4
Middle5414.3%7.7
Death34.719%6.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p77.20.95×
Scout Score46.7
48.6Powerplay66.7% of overs · 5w · 9.93 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.838%
Impactp1.127%
Qualityp64.115%
Versatilityp59.610%
Trajectoryp77.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.989× par84bp53.336.8%
Wicket rate0.36/ov84bp78.342.1%
Boundary %25%84bp6321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.014× par59bp44.630%
Econ vs LHB0.925× par25bp66.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.41/ov59bp8820%
Wkt vs LHB0.24/ov25bp43.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -40.9 · induced false-shot 25%
54Middle14.3% of overs · 0w · 7.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp44.138%
Impactp71.125%
Qualityp31.215%
Versatilityp58.612%
Trajectoryp77.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.824× par18bp60.944.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp20.344.1%
Boundary %11%18bp70.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.06× par8bp41.450%
Econ vs LHB0.618× par10bp75.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA +3.6 · induced false-shot 17%
34.7Death19% of overs · 1w · 13.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp11.348%
Impactp39.325%
Versatilityp6815%
Trajectoryp77.212%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.282× par24bp13.150%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp16.716.7%
Boundary %38%24bp633.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%24bp64.340%
Slower ball024bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer20.83324bp98.226.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.6
Sunkari Dheeraj
Bowler · Off-spin
46.4
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 45 · Econ 11.25
46.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle46.475%34.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p50n/a
Scout Score46.4
46.4Middle75% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.838%
Impactp58.625%
Qualityp54.715%
Versatilityp41.412%
Trajectoryp5010%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.011× par18bp48.444.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp20.344.1%
Boundary %17%18bp46.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.06× par18bp36.750%
Econ vs LHB—0bp46.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.4 · induced false-shot 22%
Chv Anvith Reddy
Bowler · Off-spin · age 20
45.8
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 50 · Econ 7.14
45.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle45.8100%45.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p2.21.33×
Scout Score45.8
45.8Middle100% of overs · 1w · 7.14 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp58.738%
Impactp24.225%
Qualityp51.615%
Versatilityp78.512%
Trajectoryp2.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.802× par42bp8244.1%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp27.344.1%
Boundary %10%42bp89.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.883× par20bp67.250%
Econ vs LHB0.702× par22bp89.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.9 · induced false-shot 21%
Nitin Sai Yadav
Bowler · SLA orthodox · age 22
45.8
Scout Score
Overs 30.3 · Wkts 7 · Runs 255 · Econ 8.36
45.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay65.86.6%4.3
Middle39.177%30.1
Death69.216.4%11.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p93.40.84×
Scout Score45.8
65.8Powerplay6.6% of overs · 0w · 7 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.838%
Impactp81.527%
Qualityp66.315%
Versatilityp48.510%
Trajectoryp93.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.697× par12bp64.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp3742.1%
Boundary %17%12bp59.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.513× par8bp70.730%
Econ vs LHB1.094× par4bp33.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov8bp35.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp5020%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.9 · induced false-shot 33%
39.1Middle77% of overs · 5w · 8.43 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.938%
Impactp10.225%
Qualityp2.315%
Versatilityp59.412%
Trajectoryp93.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.946× par141bp64.844.1%
Wicket rate0.21/ov141bp36.744.1%
Boundary %16%141bp60.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.817× par83bp94.550%
Econ vs LHB1.086× par58bp24.250%
Impact · Quality — WPA -26.2 · induced false-shot 15%
69.2Death16.4% of overs · 2w · 8.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp76.955%
Impactp46.425%
Versatilityp51.98%
Trajectoryp93.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.817× par30bp82.143.6%
Boundary %13%30bp86.941.8%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp32.114.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.5221bp51.9100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.2
Saketh Dhatrak
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
45.5
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 100 · Econ 10
45.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay39.240%15.7
Death50.550%25.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score45.5
39.2Powerplay40% of overs · 0w · 10.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.238%
Impactp48.927%
Qualityp44.615%
Versatilityp38.510%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.021× par24bp42.436.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp10.942.1%
Boundary %29%24bp3821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.063× par16bp3830%
Econ vs LHB0.937× par8bp51.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov16bp2520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov8bp33.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.9 · induced false-shot 21%
50.5Death50% of overs · 4w · 10.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp57.748%
Impactp48.825%
Versatilityp32.715%
Trajectoryp47.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.007× par30bp52.450%
Wicket rate0.80/ov30bp91.716.7%
Boundary %23%30bp48.833.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%30bp10.740%
Slower ball030bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer030bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.9
Md Azheruddin
Bowler · RA pace
44.6
Scout Score
Overs 10.2 · Wkts 0 · Runs 105 · Econ 10.16
44.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay46.967.7%31.8
Middle36.719.4%7.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score44.6
46.9Powerplay67.7% of overs · 0w · 9.71 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.338%
Impactp55.427%
Qualityp77.215%
Versatilityp33.710%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.968× par42bp51.136.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov42bp5.442.1%
Boundary %26%42bp53.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.821× par30bp7530%
Econ vs LHB1.354× par12bp18.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov30bp7.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov12bp20.720%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.8 · induced false-shot 31%
36.7Middle19.4% of overs · 0w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.138%
Impactp38.325%
Qualityp59.415%
Versatilityp30.112%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.291× par12bp19.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp3244.1%
Boundary %25%12bp28.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.178× par9bp3250%
Econ vs LHB1.647× par3bp28.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.7 · induced false-shot 25%
Tanay Jaddu
Bowler · RA pace
44.6
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 4 · Runs 117 · Econ 11.7
44.6OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay59.830%17.9
Middle35.620%7.1
Death39.150%19.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score44.6
59.8Powerplay30% of overs · 2w · 12.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp52.738%
Impactp66.327%
Qualityp84.815%
Versatilityp44.610%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.262× par18bp29.336.8%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp85.942.1%
Boundary %39%18bp27.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.089× par7bp42.430%
Econ vs LHB1.42× par11bp16.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov7bp40.220%
Wkt vs LHB1.09/ov11bp94.620%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.7 · induced false-shot 39%
35.6Middle20% of overs · 0w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.838%
Impactp39.825%
Qualityp39.115%
Versatilityp34.412%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.235× par12bp25.844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp3244.1%
Boundary %25%12bp28.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.57× par9bp13.350%
Econ vs LHB0.412× par3bp55.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.6 · induced false-shot 17%
39.1Death50% of overs · 2w · 11.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp26.648%
Impactp52.425%
Versatilityp50.615%
Trajectoryp47.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.083× par30bp2550%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp32.116.7%
Boundary %27%30bp26.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate7%30bp55.440%
Slower ball030bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer030bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.4
Sacheit Binjrajka
Bowler · Off-spin · age 16
44.4
Scout Score
Overs 7.1 · Wkts 2 · Runs 67 · Econ 9.35
44.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay57.827.9%16.1
Middle37.755.8%21.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score44.4
57.8Powerplay27.9% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.338%
Impactp8827%
Qualityp16.315%
Versatilityp58.510%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.897× par12bp48.936.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp64.142.1%
Boundary %25%12bp48.921.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.173× par3bp40.230%
Econ vs LHB0.833× par9bp64.130%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov3bp48.920%
Wkt vs LHB0.67/ov9bp8720%
Impact · Quality — WPA +5.1 · induced false-shot 8%
37.7Middle55.8% of overs · 0w · 8 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.938%
Impactp50.825%
Qualityp3.915%
Versatilityp53.912%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.898× par24bp55.544.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov24bp5.544.1%
Boundary %12%24bp6811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.272× par10bp24.250%
Econ vs LHB0.618× par14bp83.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.1 · induced false-shot 4%
Vikram Naik Guguloth
Bowler · Off-spin
44.4
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 69 · Econ 11.5
44.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle39.450%19.7
Death51.833.3%17.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score44.4
39.4Middle50% of overs · 0w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.838%
Impactp44.525%
Qualityp31.215%
Versatilityp43.812%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.011× par18bp48.444.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp20.344.1%
Boundary %17%18bp46.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.295× par6bp28.950%
Econ vs LHB0.823× par12bp58.650%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.4 · induced false-shot 17%
51.8Death33.3% of overs · 2w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp51.755%
Impactp52.425%
Versatilityp57.78%
Trajectoryp47.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.997× par12bp47.643.6%
Boundary %25%12bp42.941.8%
Wicket rate1.00/ov12bp89.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage0.737bp57.7100%
Impact · Quality — WPA -0.4
Kartikeya Kak
Bowler · RA pace · age 29
43.5
Scout Score
Overs 12.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 126 · Econ 10.5
43.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay53.658.3%31.2
Middle32.325%8.1
Death24.916.7%4.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p28.71.01×
Scout Score43.5
53.6Powerplay58.3% of overs · 1w · 9 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp47.138%
Impactp68.527%
Qualityp58.715%
Versatilityp5510%
Trajectoryp28.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.897× par42bp66.336.8%
Wicket rate0.14/ov42bp33.742.1%
Boundary %29%42bp40.221.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.95× par29bp57.630%
Econ vs LHB0.769× par13bp70.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov29bp9.820%
Wkt vs LHB0.46/ov13bp72.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.6 · induced false-shot 24%
32.3Middle25% of overs · 0w · 10.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp23.338%
Impactp47.725%
Qualityp31.215%
Versatilityp33.612%
Trajectoryp28.710%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.198× par18bp23.444.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp20.344.1%
Boundary %22%18bp33.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.413× par12bp16.450%
Econ vs LHB0.823× par6bp50.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.8 · induced false-shot 17%
24.9Death16.7% of overs · 1w · 15.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.248%
Impactp27.425%
Versatilityp32.715%
Trajectoryp28.712%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.472× par12bp15.550%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp53.616.7%
Boundary %42%12bp10.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp10.740%
Slower ball012bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer012bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -6.6
Prithvi Reddy
Bowler · RA pace
41.9
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 87 · Econ 14.5
41.9OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay51.350%25.6
Death27.833.3%9.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score41.9
51.3Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 12.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.238%
Impactp70.727%
Qualityp84.815%
Versatilityp36.810%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.229× par18bp31.536.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp2542.1%
Boundary %33%18bp33.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.205× par18bp27.230%
Econ vs LHB—0bp41.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov18bp18.520%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp6320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -1.4 · induced false-shot 39%
27.8Death33.3% of overs · 0w · 17.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp9.948%
Impactp36.925%
Versatilityp54.215%
Trajectoryp47.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.662× par12bp8.350%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp13.116.7%
Boundary %42%12bp10.733.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate8%12bp64.340%
Slower ball012bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer012bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.3
Rathan Teja
Bowler · Leg-spin
41.5
Scout Score
Overs 10.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 94 · Econ 9.4
41.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle41.5100%41.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p87.50.89×
Scout Score41.5
41.5Middle100% of overs · 3w · 9.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.538%
Impactp3225%
Qualityp715%
Versatilityp37.512%
Trajectoryp87.510%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.056× par60bp35.244.1%
Wicket rate0.30/ov60bp71.144.1%
Boundary %20%60bp30.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.043× par42bp38.350%
Econ vs LHB1.098× par18bp36.750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.8 · induced false-shot 13%
Mahesh Vipparla
Bowler · RA pace
39.3
Scout Score
Overs 11.5 · Wkts 2 · Runs 142 · Econ 12
39.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay34.450.7%17.4
Middle60.916.9%10.3
Death35.832.4%11.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p83.10.93×
Scout Score39.3
34.4Powerplay50.7% of overs · 2w · 14.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp28.938%
Impactp1227%
Qualityp51.115%
Versatilityp41.710%
Trajectoryp83.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.478× par36bp3.336.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp60.942.1%
Boundary %42%36bp9.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.51× par33bp3.330%
Econ vs LHB0.833× par3bp53.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.37/ov33bp69.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov3bp54.320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -31.2 · induced false-shot 22%
60.9Middle16.9% of overs · 0w · 5.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp5438%
Impactp74.225%
Qualityp39.115%
Versatilityp63.312%
Trajectoryp83.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.618× par12bp6844.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp3244.1%
Boundary %0%12bp84.411.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.989× par5bp44.550%
Econ vs LHB0.353× par7bp8250%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4.7 · induced false-shot 17%
35.8Death32.4% of overs · 0w · 10.96 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp31.348%
Impactp8.325%
Versatilityp57.715%
Trajectoryp83.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.041× par23bp39.350%
Wicket rate0.00/ov23bp1.216.7%
Boundary %26%23bp34.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate9%23bp73.240%
Slower ball023bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer023bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -27.9
T Arun Kumar
Bowler · RA pace · age 23
38.4
Scout Score
Overs 21.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 194 · Econ 9.24
38.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay5138.1%19.4
Middle3057.1%17.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p860.89×
Scout Score38.4
51Powerplay38.1% of overs · 3w · 9.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp65.638%
Impactp40.227%
Qualityp4.315%
Versatilityp59.710%
Trajectoryp8610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.934× par48bp6236.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp72.842.1%
Boundary %25%48bp57.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.119× par22bp31.530%
Econ vs LHB0.793× par26bp84.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.55/ov22bp83.720%
Wkt vs LHB0.23/ov26bp40.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.6 · induced false-shot 10%
30Middle57.1% of overs · 3w · 9.58 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.638%
Impactp8.625%
Qualityp0.815%
Versatilityp34.412%
Trajectoryp8610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.076× par72bp27.344.1%
Wicket rate0.25/ov72bp47.744.1%
Boundary %17%72bp55.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.993× par42bp49.250%
Econ vs LHB1.153× par30bp19.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -30.8 · induced false-shot 12%
Mudassar Hussain
Bowler · RA pace
38.1
Scout Score
Overs 20.4 · Wkts 5 · Runs 229 · Econ 11.08
38.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay26.243.5%11.4
Middle35.424.2%8.6
Death56.332.3%18.2
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p84.60.9×
Scout Score38.1
26.2Powerplay43.5% of overs · 1w · 12 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp20.938%
Impactp16.327%
Qualityp19.615%
Versatilityp2510%
Trajectoryp84.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.196× par54bp2536.8%
Wicket rate0.11/ov54bp15.242.1%
Boundary %33%54bp2521.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.173× par44bp22.830%
Econ vs LHB1.25× par10bp2530%
Wkt vs RHB0.14/ov44bp27.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov10bp26.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -29.8 · induced false-shot 18%
35.4Middle24.2% of overs · 1w · 11.4 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp23.338%
Impactp13.325%
Qualityp78.915%
Versatilityp24.612%
Trajectoryp84.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.28× par30bp10.244.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp39.844.1%
Boundary %30%30bp10.211.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.11× par14bp35.250%
Econ vs LHB1.351× par16bp14.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -23.6 · induced false-shot 30%
56.3Death32.3% of overs · 3w · 9.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp70.248%
Impactp10.725%
Versatilityp64.915%
Trajectoryp84.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.912× par40bp77.450%
Wicket rate0.45/ov40bp39.316.7%
Boundary %20%40bp7533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate20%40bp91.140%
Slower ball040bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer040bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -22.2
Jamboju Pardhipan
Bowler · SLA orthodox
37
Scout Score
Overs 5.0 · Wkts 0 · Runs 62 · Econ 12.4
37OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay32.640%13.0
Middle39.960%23.9
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score37
32.6Powerplay40% of overs · 0w · 18.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp18.638%
Impactp42.427%
Qualityp40.215%
Versatilityp33.210%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.843× par12bp7.636.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov12bp3742.1%
Boundary %67%12bp1.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.808× par12bp7.630%
Econ vs LHB—0bp41.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov12bp29.320%
Wkt vs LHB—0bp6320%
Impact · Quality — WPA -13.4 · induced false-shot 17%
39.9Middle60% of overs · 0w · 8.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp40.338%
Impactp52.325%
Qualityp5.515%
Versatilityp49.612%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.936× par18bp52.344.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp20.344.1%
Boundary %11%18bp70.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.801× par15bp71.150%
Econ vs LHB1.647× par3bp28.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA -2.6 · induced false-shot 0%
Kranthi Pallepati
Bowler · RA pace
36.5
Scout Score
Overs 22.0 · Wkts 3 · Runs 257 · Econ 11.68
36.5OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay2740.9%11.0
Middle32.136.4%11.7
Death60.522.7%13.7
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p80.10.95×
Scout Score36.5
27Powerplay40.9% of overs · 1w · 12.78 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp13.238%
Impactp33.727%
Qualityp19.615%
Versatilityp19.610%
Trajectoryp80.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.273× par54bp14.136.8%
Wicket rate0.11/ov54bp15.242.1%
Boundary %39%54bp7.621.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.206× par35bp20.730%
Econ vs LHB1.414× par19bp9.830%
Wkt vs RHB0.17/ov35bp42.420%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov19bp9.820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -15.8 · induced false-shot 18%
32.1Middle36.4% of overs · 0w · 11.62 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp4.838%
Impactp22.725%
Qualityp86.715%
Versatilityp29.712%
Trajectoryp80.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.305× par48bp8.644.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov48bp0.844.1%
Boundary %29%48bp5.511.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.488× par38bp2.350%
Econ vs LHB0.803× par10bp5750%
Impact · Quality — WPA -14.5 · induced false-shot 29%
60.5Death22.7% of overs · 2w · 9.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp4848%
Impactp7525%
Versatilityp60.615%
Trajectoryp80.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.931× par30bp67.950%
Wicket rate0.40/ov30bp32.116.7%
Boundary %27%30bp26.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate10%30bp80.440%
Slower ball030bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer030bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA +1.7
Shrunjith Reddy
Bowler · Off-spin
35.4
Scout Score
Overs 4.1 · Wkts 1 · Runs 55 · Econ 13.2
35.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle35.472%25.5
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score35.4
35.4Middle72% of overs · 1w · 11 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp41.738%
Impactp30.525%
Qualityp14.115%
Versatilityp4312%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.235× par18bp1844.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp64.144.1%
Boundary %17%18bp46.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.589× par6bp69.550%
Econ vs LHB1.441× par12bp16.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.2 · induced false-shot 11%
Harish Thakur
Bowler · RA pace
35.1
Scout Score
Overs 24.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 288 · Econ 12
35.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay39.662.5%24.8
Middle53.812.5%6.7
Death14.525%3.6
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p18.41.07×
Scout Score35.1
39.6Powerplay62.5% of overs · 4w · 10.8 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.338%
Impactp51.127%
Qualityp35.915%
Versatilityp40.410%
Trajectoryp18.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.076× par90bp33.736.8%
Wicket rate0.26/ov90bp5042.1%
Boundary %32%90bp22.821.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.992× par65bp51.130%
Econ vs LHB1.3× par25bp1230%
Wkt vs RHB0.28/ov65bp64.120%
Wkt vs LHB0.24/ov25bp43.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA -8.9 · induced false-shot 21%
53.8Middle12.5% of overs · 2w · 10 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.338%
Impactp85.225%
Qualityp31.215%
Versatilityp41.412%
Trajectoryp18.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.123× par18bp30.544.1%
Wicket rate0.67/ov18bp85.944.1%
Boundary %22%18bp33.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.785× par9bp61.750%
Econ vs LHB1.372× par9bp21.150%
Impact · Quality — WPA +9.9 · induced false-shot 17%
14.5Death25% of overs · 1w · 16 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp1.648%
Impactp17.925%
Versatilityp4715%
Trajectoryp18.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.52× par36bp1.250%
Wicket rate0.17/ov36bp3.616.7%
Boundary %39%36bp1.233.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate6%36bp46.440%
Slower ball036bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer036bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -11.1
Adi Mani Kiran
Bowler · Off-spin
34.7
Scout Score
Overs 4.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 38 · Econ 9.5
34.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle34.775%26.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score34.7
34.7Middle75% of overs · 0w · 9.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp32.438%
Impactp4325%
Qualityp14.115%
Versatilityp39.812%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.048× par18bp40.644.1%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp20.344.1%
Boundary %17%18bp46.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.256× par9bp25.850%
Econ vs LHB0.823× par9bp53.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -4.7 · induced false-shot 11%
Ahwinan Ram Burgubavi
Bowler · SLA orthodox
34.2
Scout Score
Overs 7.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 91 · Econ 13
34.2OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle34.285.7%29.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score34.2
34.2Middle85.7% of overs · 2w · 13.83 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp35.338%
Impactp5.525%
Qualityp84.415%
Versatilityp17.212%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.553× par36bp3.944.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov36bp74.244.1%
Boundary %31%36bp711.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.089× par24bp33.650%
Econ vs LHB2.367× par12bp0.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -39.5 · induced false-shot 31%
Nishanth Sen Reddy CH
Bowler · RA pace
34.1
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 100 · Econ 16.67
34.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay36.950%18.4
Death3033.3%10.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score34.1
36.9Powerplay50% of overs · 1w · 16 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.938%
Impactp27.227%
Qualityp72.815%
Versatilityp3310%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.594× par18bp9.836.8%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp55.442.1%
Boundary %56%18bp4.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.55× par14bp1230%
Econ vs LHB1.719× par4bp20.730%
Wkt vs RHB0.43/ov14bp66.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov4bp5020%
Impact · Quality — WPA -23.4 · induced false-shot 33%
30Death33.3% of overs · 1w · 15 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp2548%
Impactp29.825%
Versatilityp32.715%
Trajectoryp47.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.425× par12bp17.950%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp53.616.7%
Boundary %33%12bp21.433.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%12bp10.740%
Slower ball012bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer012bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -5.9
Nimna Nimmagadda Surya Teja
Bowler · RA pace · age 36
34
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 68 · Econ 11.33
34OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle3483.3%28.3
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score34
34Middle83.3% of overs · 1w · 10.6 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp27.338%
Impactp49.225%
Qualityp21.915%
Versatilityp27.312%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.19× par30bp16.444.1%
Wicket rate0.20/ov30bp39.844.1%
Boundary %23%30bp21.111.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.256× par27bp11.750%
Econ vs LHB1.029× par3bp4350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -3.2 · induced false-shot 17%
Divesh Singh
Bowler · Off-spin
33.3
Scout Score
Overs 17.1 · Wkts 3 · Runs 160 · Econ 9.32
33.3OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay57.217.5%10.0
Middle27.875.7%21.0
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p16.91.11×
Scout Score33.3
57.2Powerplay17.5% of overs · 0w · 6 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp55.438%
Impactp77.227%
Qualityp53.315%
Versatilityp56.310%
Trajectoryp16.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.598× par18bp77.236.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp2542.1%
Boundary %11%18bp78.321.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.44× par4bp64.130%
Econ vs LHB0.67× par14bp81.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov4bp44.620%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov14bp18.520%
Impact · Quality — WPA +0.4 · induced false-shot 22%
27.8Middle75.7% of overs · 3w · 9.38 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp38.338%
Impactp0.825%
Qualityp45.315%
Versatilityp38.312%
Trajectoryp16.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.054× par78bp3244.1%
Wicket rate0.23/ov78bp44.544.1%
Boundary %19%78bp38.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB0.989× par45bp50.850%
Econ vs LHB1.104× par33bp25.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -81.4 · induced false-shot 20%
Telukupalli Ravi Teja
Bowler · RA pace · age 31
32.7
Scout Score
Overs 23.0 · Wkts 7 · Runs 276 · Econ 12
32.7OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay41.334.8%14.4
Middle27.443.5%11.9
Death29.521.7%6.4
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p90.40.87×
Scout Score32.7
41.3Powerplay34.8% of overs · 3w · 10.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp54.638%
Impactp5.427%
Qualityp3815%
Versatilityp42.810%
Trajectoryp90.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.083× par48bp35.936.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp72.842.1%
Boundary %27%48bp51.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.08× par38bp33.730%
Econ vs LHB1.062× par10bp31.530%
Wkt vs RHB0.47/ov38bp90.220%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov10bp26.120%
Impact · Quality — WPA -38 · induced false-shot 21%
27.4Middle43.5% of overs · 1w · 11.9 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp5.338%
Impactp2.325%
Qualityp88.315%
Versatilityp21.112%
Trajectoryp90.410%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.336× par60bp744.1%
Wicket rate0.10/ov60bp3.944.1%
Boundary %32%60bp3.911.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.522× par39bp0.850%
Econ vs LHB1.029× par21bp41.450%
Impact · Quality — WPA -49.7 · induced false-shot 28%
29.5Death21.7% of overs · 3w · 14 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp22.448%
Impactp625%
Versatilityp42.715%
Trajectoryp90.412%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.33× par30bp10.750%
Wicket rate0.60/ov30bp66.716.7%
Boundary %30%30bp17.933.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate3%30bp35.740%
Slower ball030bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer030bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -28
Murugan Abhishek
Bowler · Off-spin · age 21
29.8
Scout Score
Overs 16.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 194 · Econ 12.12
29.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle24.881.2%20.1
Death62.712.5%7.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p81.60.93×
Scout Score29.8
24.8Middle81.2% of overs · 4w · 13 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp34.138%
Impactp725%
Qualityp10.215%
Versatilityp3.112%
Trajectoryp81.610%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.46× par78bp0.844.1%
Wicket rate0.31/ov78bp75.844.1%
Boundary %32%78bp2.311.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.399× par50bp3.950%
Econ vs LHB1.544× par28bp2.350%
Impact · Quality — WPA -32.8 · induced false-shot 17%
62.7Death12.5% of overs · 1w · 10.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp5655%
Impactp79.825%
Versatilityp26.98%
Trajectoryp81.612%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy0.997× par12bp47.643.6%
Boundary %17%12bp65.541.8%
Wicket rate0.50/ov12bp53.614.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.0411bp26.9100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +2.4
Mohammed Abdul Malik
Bowler · RA pace
28.1
Scout Score
Overs 9.2 · Wkts 5 · Runs 117 · Econ 12.54
28.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay28.185.7%24.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score28.1
28.1Powerplay85.7% of overs · 3w · 12.88 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp39.638%
Impactp14.127%
Qualityp4.315%
Versatilityp38.510%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.283× par48bp16.336.8%
Wicket rate0.37/ov48bp72.842.1%
Boundary %38%48bp14.121.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.218× par26bp2530%
Econ vs LHB1.392× par22bp7.630%
Wkt vs RHB0.23/ov26bp53.320%
Wkt vs LHB0.55/ov22bp90.220%
Impact · Quality — WPA -30.7 · induced false-shot 10%
Ilyan Sathani
Bowler · RA pace
25.4
Scout Score
Overs 8.0 · Wkts 2 · Runs 99 · Econ 12.38
25.4OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle37.737.5%14.1
Death16.150%8.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p47.11×
Scout Score25.4
37.7Middle37.5% of overs · 1w · 10.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp42.838%
Impactp33.625%
Qualityp31.215%
Versatilityp30.512%
Trajectoryp47.110%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.16× par18bp28.944.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp64.144.1%
Boundary %28%18bp14.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.192× par16bp21.150%
Econ vs LHB1.235× par2bp39.850%
Impact · Quality — WPA -10.1 · induced false-shot 17%
16.1Death50% of overs · 1w · 16 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp10.948%
Impactp1.225%
Versatilityp32.715%
Trajectoryp47.112%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.52× par24bp650%
Wicket rate0.25/ov24bp16.716.7%
Boundary %33%24bp15.533.3%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Yorker rate0%24bp10.740%
Slower ball024bp48.233.3%
Slow bouncer024bp46.426.7%
Impact · Quality — WPA -89.9
Nipun Reddy Shavva
Bowler · RA pace
22.1
Scout Score
Overs 6.0 · Wkts 1 · Runs 96 · Econ 16
22.1OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Powerplay24.150%12.1
Middle20.150%10.1
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p27.21.02×
Scout Score22.1
24.1Powerplay50% of overs · 0w · 14.33 econ · vs all bowlers n=46
Componentpctweight
Productionp23.338%
Impactp31.527%
Qualityp8.715%
Versatilityp27.610%
Trajectoryp27.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.428× par18bp22.836.8%
Wicket rate0.00/ov18bp2542.1%
Boundary %44%18bp20.721.1%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.546× par11bp16.330%
Econ vs LHB1.25× par7bp29.330%
Wkt vs RHB0.00/ov11bp31.520%
Wkt vs LHB0.00/ov7bp3820%
Impact · Quality — WPA -16.4 · induced false-shot 6%
20.1Middle50% of overs · 1w · 17.67 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp29.438%
Impactp11.725%
Qualityp14.115%
Versatilityp9.412%
Trajectoryp27.210%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.984× par18bp2.344.1%
Wicket rate0.34/ov18bp64.144.1%
Boundary %56%18bp0.811.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.484× par10bp14.850%
Econ vs LHB2.47× par8bp3.950%
Impact · Quality — WPA -25.9 · induced false-shot 11%
Shaunak Kulkarni
Bowler · Leg-spin · age 25
20.8
Scout Score
Overs 20.0 · Wkts 5 · Runs 229 · Econ 11.45
20.8OverallΣ(phase score × deployment)
PhaseScoreDeployContribution
Middle12.580%10.0
Death54.120%10.8
Trajectory (econ Δ — baked into each phase)p19.91.07×
Scout Score20.8
12.5Middle80% of overs · 2w · 11.5 econ · vs all bowlers n=64
Componentpctweight
Productionp4.538%
Impactp3.925%
Qualityp47.715%
Versatilityp5.512%
Trajectoryp19.910%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.291× par96bp5.544.1%
Wicket rate0.13/ov96bp2.344.1%
Boundary %25%96bp8.611.8%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Econ vs RHB1.268× par68bp5.550%
Econ vs LHB1.367× par28bp5.550%
Impact · Quality — WPA -49.2 · induced false-shot 21%
54.1Death20% of overs · 3w · 11.25 econ · vs all bowlers n=42
Componentpctweight
Productionp50.555%
Impactp82.125%
Versatilityp42.38%
Trajectoryp19.912%
Production KPIvaluesmplpctshare
True economy1.068× par24bp29.843.6%
Boundary %21%24bp60.741.8%
Wicket rate0.75/ov24bp83.314.5%
Versatility KPIvaluesmplpctshare
Matchup advantage1.311bp42.3100%
Impact · Quality — WPA +4